Tender Zone

Forcier Consulting Software Developer

2011-10-24T08:51:00.000-07:00

Forcier Consulting is a research firm based in South Sudan conducting research and capacity building for various UN agencies and NGOs working in South Sudan.

We conduct baseline & needs assessments, impact evaluations, mid-term project evaluations, and recommendations for program development, and capacity building and other short-term research projects.

As the demand for high – quality research in South Sudan increases, Forcier Consulting aims to increase its capacity through creating two custom software programs to enhance the quality of data collection and management.

Job Description

The Software Developer will report to the Managing Director and work on the development of three specific software programmes; one which will operate on Windows OS and two which will operate on Android OS.

The position does not require any travel outside the home location and it is expected that all communication will take place over the internet.

The ideal candidate will have the following qualifications:

B.A. in Computer Programming or related field.
Experience designing software for Windows and Android operating systems.
Knowledge of STATA or SPSS will be a significant advantage.

To be considered for this position, please send a letter of interest, CV, and daily rate requirements no later than 31 October to natalie@forcierconsulting.com.

Applications will be reviewed and hiring decisions made on a rolling basis.

Only short-listed candidates will be contacted.

Consultant: Call for Applications - Roster of Russian language editors

2011-10-24T08:48:00.000-07:00

The UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre periodically needs the services of editors to edit texts in Russian. The texts are typically translations from English and regard the following topics: democratic governance, poverty reduction, environment and energy, crisis prevention and recovery, gender, HIV/AIDS, capacity development. The Regional Centre currently aims to build a roster of Russian language editors from which it can draw to fulfill a variety of short-term, freelance assignments during the year. Assignments will be carried out remotely; work will be submitted through the internet.
Duties and Responsibilities
Selected editors shall report to the UNDP/RBEC task manager. Depending on the nature of the task, the scope of work could include the following: Editing manuscripts to ensure clarity, consistency and readability for the intended audience; Under the guidance of UNDP specialists, assembling all chapters/sections, suggesting re-writing as necessary, editing boxes of interest, tables and charts bringing the manuscript to full completion including editing all necessary components (table of contents, foreword, preface, introduction, bibliography, tables, annexes, boxes, etc. depending on the product); Pointing out factual inconsistencies, inconsistencies in arguments, political nuances, faulty logic, and awkward or unclear passages and suggest solutions; Ensuring all references are in order, requesting source information for tables and figures when such information is missing; If required, editing communications pieces associated with the primary texts or associated with other related knowledge products (e.g. policy briefs) in close cooperation with UNDP specialists; As appropriate, working closely with the consultant graphic designer to develop ideas for graphics and charts that creatively convey key messages/data in the manuscript; Proof-reading the final texts as laid out by the designer to ensure both text and associated graphics are error free and ready for printing.
Competencies
Excellent analytical and editing/writing skills in Russian; Strong knowledge of English; Excellent organizational skills; Ability to be flexible and respond to changes to the text as part of the review and feedback process; Strong interpersonal skills and the ability to communicate and work well in a multicultural environment; Demonstrated ability to meet deadlines, multitask and work under pressure.
Required Skills and Experience
Minimum 5-7 years experience as an editor producing/editing corporate publications and products; Substantive understanding of and/or background in one or more of the following areas of specialization: poverty reduction, democratic governance, environment and energy, capacity development, HIV and AIDS and gender equality and women’s empowerment; Copy-editing experience and excellent attention to detail; Knowledge of UN and UNDP terms, language and style is an advantage. Evaluation of Applicants: Applicants will be evaluated based upon experience, education, areas of expertise, and hourly fee. A written test will be administered to short-listed candidates. UNDP applies the ‘Best Value for Money’ Approach - final selection will be based on applicants’ qualifications, written test and financial proposal. Contracting Arrangements: Successful candidates will be placed on the Roster of Editors for a period of 3 years. Placement on the roster does not guarantee a contract. This will depend on UNDP’s future needs. When a request for services is made, UNDP will contract the consultant directly based on need. A Terms of Reference (ToR) outlining each assignment will be provided, and an Individual Contract (IC) will be issued detailing the time frame. Conditions of a particular assignment may be negotiable. Payments: Payments will be made upon UNDP confirmation of satisfactory performance. Application procedures: Qualified candidates are requested to apply online via this website. The application should contain: Cover letter (in English) stating qualifications, areas of expertise (for example, ‘environment and energy’). Please paste the letter into the "Resume and Motivation" section of the electronic application; Filled P11 form (blank form can be downloaded fromhttp://europeandcis.undp.org/files/hrforms/P11_modified_for_SCs_and_ICs.doc). Please upload the P11; CVs will not be accepted; Hourly fee in US dollars; Incomplete applications will not be considered. Please make sure you have provided all requested materials. Qualified women and members of minorities are encouraged to apply. Due to large number of applications we receive, we are able to inform only the successful candidates about the outcome or status of the selection process.

UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.

Consultant: Call for Applications - Roster of Russian language editors

International Expert on training program of Energy Efficient Building Design and Integrated Building Design Approach (IBDA)

2011-10-24T08:47:00.000-07:00

The objective of the UNDP-GEF full size project is to reverse the existing trends and reduce consumption of electrical and thermal energy and associated GHG emissions in new and reconstructed, primarily residential buildings in Armenia. As part of a broader development strategy to promote energy-efficient building design and technology in Armenia the project envisages delivery of a comprehensive training program for building professionals on IBDA and energy efficient products and technologies. Energy-efficient design is a critical building block for sustainable built environment and the central role in that is designated to the architects. The building construction industry is one of largest employers, employing a mix of technical specialists, skilled and unskilled personnel. The IBDA implementation is dependent also from the knowledge and skills of engineers and technicians specialized in mechanical and electrical engineering, HVAC, plumbing, glazing and insulation industry, etc. The ultimate goal of applying IBDA is to achieve high performance and multiple benefits at a lower cost than the total for all the components combined if these were considered separately. Professional education and training process needs to focus on aligning the curriculum content for students and practical training (with relevant training package) for practicing architects/designers in order to allow these professionals to be in line with current demand in the market and international standards and best practice. Architecture curriculum is developed and monitored by national organizations, however there is charter for architectural education (Union Internationale des Architects, 2005) used for developing curriculum for architectural studies and includes provisions for considering the knowledge building in sustainable and low energy design. Architectural education should also teach professional skills such as project management and coordination with consultants in order to improve the building delivery. The main objective of the task is to develop a comprehensive training program on energy efficient (EE) building design for i) students specializing in architecture, building design, civil engineering and heating, ventilation, air conditioning (HVAC) engineering; ii) practicing architects and building engineers in selected CIS countries; to iii) deliver training of trainers (ToT) on IBDA and energy efficient building design for respective university lecturers and to iv) deliver training on IBDA and energy efficiency building design for practicing architects.
Duties and Responsibilities
Training program development requested by UNDP from service provider must be conducted from combination of desk work and communication with project team and mission to the country for practical delivery of training. The proposed structure of the task implementation can follow the below order. I. Develop the questionnaire (to be provided to the local Project team) for evaluation of the existing needs in the corresponding target group (university students, lecturers and building design/construction professionals) covering following issues: Educational background The need for knowledge and skills on energy efficient building design, awareness about building code and energy policy. Openness for enhancement. Curriculum analysis with emphasis on EE and environmental design (for universities). II. Identification of relevant content to address the gap in the present architectural, HVAC and other relevant curricula for students and development of a training package on integrated building design approach for practicing architects and engineers. Key topics to be covered: IBDA EE and Renewable Energy (RE) technologies in buildings: HVAC Lighting Envelope Building energy audit and certification Buildings EE legal aspects Economics and financing of EE and Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) in buildings EE in buildings and climate change Case studies for different building types. III. Development of supporting teaching material within the existing curricula framework, as a starting point for the curricula enhancement program. IV. Selection of high quality reference materials for students with possibilities of specializing as a sustainable designer, energy efficiency policy expert, building science researcher, etc. V. Train the- trainer workshops in Yerevan for university lecturers wherein the reference materials and guides in the form of tutorials as aids for self-learning and teaching should be provided for the duration of 5 days. VI. Recommendations for infrastructure improvement (laboratories, software, networking, library) for acquisition of practical skills for understanding concepts of building performance by taking thermal performing analysis and computer simulation tools that can help in educating students about the environmental parameters and behavior of a building. VII. Conduct training workshops for practicing architects on energy efficient building design and IBDA. Deliverables: Deliverable 1. Sample questionnaires for evaluation of the existing needs-November 2011 Deliverable 2. Content, the supporting teaching and high quality reference materials of the curricula amendment-December 2011 Deliverable 3. Training package for ToT (based on the needs evaluation)-January 2012 Deliverable 4. Delivery of ToT training sessions for university lecturers and practicing architects; report on conducted training sessions and recommendations for infrastructure improvement-February 2012
Competencies
Experience in CIS and/or EU countries countries is an asset Knowledge of best international practice in the field of training/educational programs on energy efficient building design. Good understanding of educational/training needs for energy efficient building design and IBDA for universities and design organizations. Good communication, analytical and writing skills
Required Skills and Experience
Education: University degree in the field of engineering, architecture and/or energy. The availability of Scientific Degree is an advantage. Experience: Minimum 5 years of educational or scientific working experience in the field of elaboration and delivery of educational and training programs on energy efficient building design and IBDA. Languages: Proficiency in Russian language knowledge is an asset.

UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.

International Expert on training program of Energy Efficient Building Design and Integrated Building Design Approach (IBDA)

Consultant: Senior Partnership Strategy Consultant for Strengthening the Partnership Coordination and Management Capacity of the African Union Commiss

2011-10-24T08:46:00.000-07:00

The African Union is charged with spearheading Africa’s rapid integration and sustainable development by promoting unity, solidarity, cohesion and cooperation among African States as well as developing a new strategic partnership worldwide. In pursuant of its mandate the AU has established a number of multilateral, bilateral partnerships, as well as relationships with regional groupings and organisations. Several others are under consideration, and others are to be initiated.

In 2009 the AUC conducted a Global Review of Africa’s Strategic Partnerships (GRASP)^{^[1]} in an effort to get better clarity on the state of partnerships in the AU. The study identified the need for strengthening these partnerships and to this end the AUC intends to strengthen its capacity to deliver by, amongst others, effective management of Strategic Partnerships between Africa and the rest of the world. Further to this, a decision has been taken by the Executive Council of the AUC to establish a new Partnerships Unit.

UNDP has been a key partner of the AU for many years. Under the Regional Cooperation Framework (RCF), UNDP has been providing support to the AU notably through the Ten Year Capacity Building Programme (TYCBP) and regional programmes focusing ondemocratic and participatory governance in Africa,support for the implementation of the peace and security agenda of the Union, and strengthening institutional capacities of the AUC and selected regional economic communities. UNDP is also currently conducting a management and Technical review of its Regional Programmes to position itself more strategically to support the priorities of the AU.

The AU has requested the assistance of UNDP to strengthen the strategic partnership management and coordination function at the AUC. As a result of this request the UNDP has fielded two missions to the AUC. The first mission was a scoping exercise to provide an analysis of the current partnership management situation and to propose a set of long term and short term actions for the development and setting up the partnerships unit; the second mission was to conduct a capacity needs assessment for partnership management and coordination. The mission reports are annexed and constitute an integral part of this TOR.

The AUC now requires the services of a consultant to assist in the the development of a comprehensive framework for AU partnerships.

[1] Global Review of Africa’s Strategic Partnership with Other Parts of the World.

Duties and Responsibilities

Objective and Tasks

The objective of the consultancy is to support the AUC in developing a strategic policy framework to guide partner relationships. The consultant will formulate a policy framework and guiding principles to govern the implementation and coordination of existing partnerships, and to guide the development of future partnerships with a view to promote sound management of development assistance at continental and regional level in support of the AUC’s development objectives. To this end the consultant will perform the following tasks:

Review the report on the Global Review of Africa’s Strategic Partnerships (GRASP) which was conducted in 2009;
Undertake analyses of existing and newly developed partnerships to establish their relevance, scope, spirit, objectives, action plans, and monitoring mechanisms;
Assess consistency and value-addition of existing and developing partnership against AU vision, the 4 pillars of the AUC’s Strategic Plan (2009-2012), and guiding principles;
Conduct an internal and external survey of stakeholders on the state of partnerships in the AU, as well as the perceptions and expectation of staff and external partners on the AUC’s performance with respect to partnerships;
Undertake an assessment of opportunities for institutional partnerships between the AUC and non-governmental actors (CSOs, private sector, foundations)
On the basis of but not limited to the above, prepare a draft partnership strategy elaborating principles, setting forth a clear coherent and consistent framework for engagement with partners, criteria and guidance to manage existing, evolving and/or potential partnerships, and a partnership accountability framework;
Develop a monitoring and evaluation framework for the implementation of the partnership strategy;
Provide strategic guidance and support for partnership meetings that may be held during the period of the contract, including but not limited to the Africa-South America Summit, Senior Officials Meetings with China and Korea, meeting with Turkey, and the Africa-India Plan of Action.

It is important that the forthcoming meetings with partners referred to in should be anchored in a ‘coherent and consistent framework of engagement’ as indicated in the list of tasks above. In this regard a partnership orientation paper shall be prepared for discussion with senior personnel of the AUC before the scheduled meetings. The paper shall set forth a framework for engagement with partners, key principles on partnerships, and elaborate criteria and guidance to manage partnerships.

Expected Deliverables and Timeframe

The assignment will be based at the AUC in Addis Ababa. It is expected to commence on November 2011 and end on 31 January 2012.

Deliverables expected from the assignment are indicated in the table below, with the respective due dates: The delivery dates will be reviewed in consideration of the actual date of assumption of assignment by the consultant.

Review of the GRASP report	30 Nov. 2011
Report on stakeholder survey of AU partnerships	30 Nov. 2011
Partnership orientation paper	15 Dec. 2011
Monitoring framework for the implementation of the AU Partnership Strategy	30 Dec. 2011
Final draft AU Partnership Strategy elaborating principles, setting forth a clear coherent and consistent framework for engagement with partners, criteria and guidance to manage existing, evolving and/or potential partnerships, and a partnership accountability framework	31 Jan. 2012

Institutional Arrangements

With regard to the specific deliverables, the consultant will report to the Chief of Staff at the Office of the Chairperson of the AU Commission, who will be responsible for day to day the management of the consultant. The AU Commission will provide the consultant with the necessary logistical support, including workspace, internet access, and secretarial assistance to enable the consultant to perform his official duties.

The UN Resident/Humanitarian Coordinator and UNDP Resident Representative (Ethiopia) is entrusted with supervision of the consultant. The latter will report on the progress of activities and other day-to-day implementation issues, and support needed where necessary, to the Resident Representative.

The UNDP Representation to the AU and Liaison Office with UNECA will facilitate and provide in-country administrative and logistical support to the consultant.

The overall management of the assignment and contract will be by the Project Manager of the Regional Project to Strengthen Institutional Capacities to Accelerate Pro-Poor Growth and Accountability in Sub-Saharan Africa, under which the consultant contract is issued. In this regard the Project Manager will have responsibility for monitoring and reporting on overall progress of implementation.

In addition, the UNDP Regional Service Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa, will provide technical support to the consultant to undertake the assignment, while the Partnership Bureau in New York will provide guidance on substantive partnership management issues.

Competencies

At least 10 years of work experience in the field of development management (with at least 5 years in Africa), strategic/policy advice and/or global geo-politics, donor coordination, and ODA management;
Extensive experience with African political institutions, including the Regional Economic Communities and continental institutions;
Familiarity with global aid standards such as the Paris Declaration, the Accra Agenda for Action and the Dili Declaration;
Strong analytical skills with emphasis on assessments;
Knowledge of multi-stakeholder engagement processes;
Ability to engage at a very high level;
Ability to work independently and creatively, with delegated authority.

Required Skills and Experience

The ideal candidate would have the following profile:

Post-graduate degree or equivalent in international relations, or related field with work experience related to partnership development.

Documents to be included when submitting the proposal

Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:

Proposal: (not more than 450 words) (i) explaining why they are the most suitable for the work and (ii) providing a brief methodology on how they will approach and conduct the work (if applicable);
Financial proposal: indicate monthly fee;
Personal CV including past experience in similar projects and at least 3 references.

UNDP is committed to achieving workforce diversity in terms of gender, nationality and culture. Individuals from minority groups, indigenous groups and persons with disabilities are equally encouraged to apply. All applications will be treated with the strictest confidence.

Consultant: Senior Partnership Strategy Consultant for Strengthening the Partnership Coordination and Management Capacity of the African Union Commission

consultant for Outcome Evaluation: By end 2011, at least one EGC is identified based on the national strategic framework

2011-10-24T08:45:00.000-07:00

In line with the five priorities of the UNDAF 2007-2011, developed after an extensive process of consultations with the Government and other stakeholders in the country, UNDP identified three interrelated key areas to be addressed during the Country Programme Document (CPD) period (2007-2011). They come under the umbrella of support for creating an enabling environment for achieving the MDGs as the Country Office (CO) continues to work in assisting the Government and people of Ethiopia to make progress in achieving their goals. The three areas are: reducing poverty and working towards achievement of the MDGs; deepening democratic governance; and addressing the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Working with the Government as well as other United Nations bodies, UNDP would support the development of at least one economic growth corridor with potential interventions related to diversification in agriculture, industry and services to increase the income of the poor. Support will be provided in the form of knowledge-building, increased labour productivity, and encouraging greater use of technology.

Following to the Country Programme Mid Term Evaluation (2009), UNDP Ethiopia programme went through a country programme re-profiling. The programme is currently framed around three strategic priorities: enhanced economic growth and poverty reduction; democratic governance and capacity development; and development of a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy (LCCR). Under programme component I: Enhanced Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction UNDP will support the Government’s efforts to accelerate pro-poor economic growth, with agricultural and small- and medium-scale enterprises as the key drivers, anchored in a value-chain approach. The focus will be on supporting policy and institutional capacity development at both the national and sub-national levels to build the knowledge, skills and systems that can enhance access to critical productive services, support efficiency of marketing systems, and leverage appropriate technology and practices to demonstrate sustainable options for boosting productivity and income in rural areas. UNDP will support policy and diagnostic work, knowledge networking, codification of knowledge, and testing of innovative practices that can facilitate solutions to practical bottlenecks in building effective value chains; and strengthen capacities of producer and private sector institutions to enhance access of the poor, especially women and youth, to better technologies, inputs, finance and markets.

Before the re-profiling of the UNDP programme, the outcome identified under the UNDP Country Programme Action Plan component relative to Enhanced Economic Growth and Poverty Reduction was the following: Knowledge about Economic Growth Corridors (EGCs) enhanced and private sector development promoted as an engine of Economic Growth. After the re-profiling the outcome statement became: By end 2011, at least one EGC is identified based on the national strategic framework and ready to be operational.Moreover, after the programme re-profiling a new outcome addressing private sector development was formulated:Private Sector Development promoted as a motor of Economic Growth.

Outcome indicators covering the cycle 2007-2011:

Number of EGS defined with sound investment plan based on national framework and gender responsive in-depth preparatory studies;
Extent of documented knowledge on economic growth corridors in Ethiopia;
Investment plan available and the number of new productive initiatives that promote pro-poor growth implemented within the EGC;
Number of new private domestic and FD investments as a result of improved investment climate (from 2010);
Level of competitiveness of private enterprise (2010).

UNDAF Outcome

By 2011, at national, regional, organizational and business levels, capacity strengthened and knowledge developed for increased incomes of the poor, through enhanced labor factor productivity and more intensive and widespread use of technology in at least one economic growth corridor, with potential interventions related to expansion and diversification in agriculture, industry and services.

National Goal

Accelerating Commercialization of agriculture and private sector development to have an accelerated and sustained economic growth for eradication of poverty and improve people's livelihood.

Purpose and Objective

The Purpose of the outcome evaluation is to enhance development effectiveness, to assist decision making, to assist policy making, to re-direct future UNDP assistance.

The overall objective of the outcome-level evaluation is to find out how UNDP has gone about supporting processes and building capacities that have, indeed, helped make a difference. In doing so, evaluation aims to identify which approaches have worked well and which have faced challenges, and to use lessons learned to improve future initiatives. This evaluation also serves the purpose of holding UNDP accountable for the resources invested in its work.

The outcome evaluation will be undertaken to learn lessons and good practices so that this knowledge can contribute to the next Programme Cycle 2012-2015. To learn lessons for next CP formulation by identifying the status of outcome and factors affecting it, relevance of outcome/outputs, strategic positioning of UNDP, production of outputs, partnership strategy, formulation and performance.

The specific objectives of the outcome evaluation include:

Assess progress towards the outcome;
Assess the factors affecting to the outcome;
Assess key UNDP contributions (outputs), including those produced through "soft" assistance, to outcome;
Assess the partnership strategy.

Evaluation Questions

Relevance: Is the outcome still relevant to UNDP’s mandate, to national priorities and to beneficiaries’ needs?
Effectiveness: Is the outcome achieved or has progress been made towards it? Has UNDP made significant contributions in terms of strategic outputs;
Effficiency: what is the extent of UNDP’s contribution to the outcome versus that of its partners?
Degree of change: What were the positive or negative, intended or unintended, changes brought about by UNDP’s interventions?
Sustainability: Will the positive change in the development situation endure/continue in future?

Outcome Analysis

Are the stated outcomes, indicators and targets relevant for the context, needs and priorities of Ethiopia and those of UNDP?
What is the current status and prospects for achieving the outcome with the indicated resources and within the time frame?
Are the outcome indicators chosen relevant and sufficient to measure the outcomes?
How have other partners contributed to the achievement of the outcome and how instrumental has UNDP been in rallying this contribution.
How has UNDP influenced policy, institutions, cultural factors and gender in addressing the outcome?

Output Analysis

What are the key outputs that have been or that will be most likely be produced by UNDP contribution to the outcome? Can causality linkages (results chain) be demonstrated between production of outputs and achievement of the outcome?
Are UNDP outputs relevant to the outcome?
Are the indicators appropriate to link outputs to the outcome

Output-Outcome Link

Can UNDP outputs or other interventions be credibly linked to the achievement of the outcome?
What are the key contributions that UNDP has made to the outcome
Given current interventions and in partnerships with other, actors and stakeholders will UNDP be able to achieve the outcome within the set time frame and resources?
In what way has UNDP been able to develop sustainable national capacity in this area
Has UNDP been able to respond to changing context and circumstances
What is the prospect for sustainability as a result of UNDP interventions related to the outcome?
Resources, Partnerships and Management Analysis
Were partners, stakeholders and/or beneficiaries involved in the design of the intervention relating to this outcome? If yes what was the nature of their involvement?
Are UNDP structures and working methods appropriate and supportive of the achievement of the outcome?
Does the project and institutional arrangements foster sustainability of benefits beyond the current UNDP support?

Methodology

Flexible blueprints

Overall guidance on outcome evaluations methodologies is provided in the UNDP Handbook on Monitoring and Evaluation for Results and the UNDP Guidelines for Outcome Evaluations. Reference should be made to these documents when addressing issues of methodology.

Based on these guiding documents, and in consultation with UNDP Ethiopia, the evaluators should develop a suitable methodology for this specific outcome evaluation.

During the evaluation, the evaluators are expected to apply the following approaches for data collection and analysis:

Desk review of relevant documents (see attached list, documents and weblink);
Discussions with UNDP Ethiopia senior management and programme staff;
Interviews with partners and stakeholders;
Interviews with relevant programme staff;
Interview with partners;
Interviews with beneficiaries, etc.

There is no official blueprint for how to conduct an outcome evaluation. Each must be tailored to the nature of the individual outcome under review as well as the realities of time and data limitations. Two main limitations related to the outcome evaluation have been identified and these are the following:

Under the outcome “By end 2011, at least one EGC is identified based on the national strategic framework and ready to be operational” there is only one project;
The outcome formulations have changed during the programme cycle 2077-2011;
Not all outcome indicators are in line to the outcome statement;
A new outcome was formulated in 2009, the project contributed to that outcome “Private Sector Development promoted as a motor of Economic Growth”, has nearly one year implementation.

Usually, an outcome evaluation begins with a review of change in the outcome itself, proceeds to an analysis of pertinent influencing factors, and then addresses the contribution of UNDP and its partners. It culminates in suggestions about how to improve the approach to results.

More in detail, the first step is for the evaluators to ascertain the status of the outcome. Evaluators should take the following steps: The role of an evaluator is to pass judgment based on his or her best professional opinion. Usually, an outcome evaluation begins with a review of change in the outcome itself, proceeds to an analysis of pertinent influencing factors, and then addresses the contribution of UNDP and its partners. It culminates in suggestions about how to improve the approach to results.

The first step is for the evaluators to ascertain the status of the outcome. Evaluators should take the following steps:

Begin with the description of the intended outcome, the baseline for the outcome and the indicators and benchmarks used. Obtain information from the country office gathered through monitoring and reporting on the outcome. This will help inform evaluators of whether change has taken place or whether a deconstruction of the outcome statement has to be undertaken.
Obtain contextual information beyond what UNDP has tracked. Before organizing an outcome evaluation, the country office will have undertaken preliminary data collection (contextual data as well as evaluations, monitoring reports, etc.) and, depending upon the country office, possibly started to analyze the data. An outcome evaluation is not only designed to tap UNDP-specific information about the outcome but also to derive contextual information from other sources that detail trends in policy formulation, changes in human development indices over time and other changes.
Examine contextual information and baselines contained in project documents, the Country Programme Document (CPD) 2007-2011 and the Country Programme (for newer programmes), United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) and other sources. These documents speak to the outcome itself, as opposed to what UNDP is doing about it, and how it was envisaged at certain points in time preceding UNDP’s interventions. The situation analysis section of both the Country Programme and the project document, for example, could each provide useful information and hyperlinks to other sources of information.
Employ a means to validate information about the status of the outcome that is culled from contextual sources such as monitoring reports. To do this, evaluators may use interviews or questionnaires during the evaluation that seek key respondents’ perceptions on a number of issues, including their perception of whether an outcome has changed.
Probe the pre-selected outcome indicators, go beyond these to explore other possible outcome indicators, and determine whether the indicators have actually been continuously tracked. The one or two indicators provided are unlikely to yield sufficiently relevant evidence of change in the outcome. In time, it is expected that the monitoring process will lead to modification in the outcome indicators themselves.
Undertake a constructive critique of the outcome formulation itself (and the associated indicators). This is integral to the scope of outcome evaluation. Evaluators can and should make recommendations on how the outcome statement can be improved in terms of conceptual clarity, credibility of association with UNDP operations and prospects for gathering of evidence.

This will follow with the activities, such as a series of meetings with the key actors in public, private at national, regional and local levels. In this regard, field visits will be conducted in order to undertake several interviews to focused groups and beneficiaries. Data and information to be collected should be evidence-based, as well as qualitative and quantitative in nature. Where there is required, evidence-based data need to be presented with digital pictures. As much as possible, the assessment will follow a participatory approach.

The international consultant will be provided with all the relevant documents for their review, prior to their arrival in Ethiopia. Once the consultants join in their assignments, their tasks, in consultation with the Team Leader and M&E officer, will focus on: (a) field visits and meeting with key stakeholders, (b) data collection and analysis; (c) development of a draft evaluation report; and (d) presentation of findings, recommendation and the way forwards.

What are the main factors (positive and negative) impacting the achievement of the outcomes.

Duties and Responsibilities

Deliverables

The consultants are expected to produce an Outcome Evaluation Report that highlights the findings, lessons learnt and recommendations. This report should follow the Outcome Evaluation Report Template and include all sections recommended therein (see attached template). The evaluators are also expected to produce an inception report before they commence on the bulk of the evaluation work.

Once the draft evaluation report is developed by the consultants, it should be shared with all the key relevant stakeholders for their comments, views, suggestions and recommendations.

List of deliverables:

Inception report: (3 days after the commencement of the assignment): The consultants need to submit the overall methodological framework which should define: eventually the deconstruction of the outcome statement/indicator and how such would be assessed/evaluated, Data collection tools and instruments, data source, sampling approach, type of data analysis, reference indicators and benchmarks (if relevant)
First draft of the evaluation report: shared with M&E officer, Team Leader, stakeholders and comments incorporated where relevant.
Final Evaluation Report: High quality Evaluation Report with the implementable action plan /recommendations both in hard and softy copies. Moreover, disseminate findings among implementing partners. Dissemination kits (PowerPoint Presentation, reader-friendly summary version of report, etc.)

Timeframe

It is expected that the evaluation would be undertaken starting from October 2011. The consultancy will be 22 days, 10 days home-based work, 10 days on the site, as per the following timeframe:

	Main Activity	Working Days Assigned	Officers	Transportation
1	Desk Review of the relevant documents	4 (home-based)
2	Consultations with key stakeholders, including donors, at federal level	4 +2 days travel
	Ethiopian chamber of commerce, WB, ECX	1
	MOFED, MoI, MoT	1
	Consultation with UNDP relevant staff , Oromia BOFED, Ethiopian investment office	1
	Field visits to Eastern Industrial zones (Dukam, Fantalle)	1
4	Data analysis and compiling, and drafting the Evaluation Report	5
5	Arrangement for a one-day Stakeholder meeting. PPP	1
6	Finalization and submission of Evaluation Report, Recommendation, Action Plan.	5 (home-based)
	Total Days Required:	22 days

Team Composition and Required Competencies

Two high caliber professionals, one national and one international, will be recruited as a Team Leader/ for this evaluation exercise. The international consultant (Team Leader) and the national consultant will be recruited for 22 days.

International consultant:

October 2011. The consultancy will be 22 working days, 10 days home-based work, 10 days on the site.

Under the guidance of one international consultant and one national consultant/ M&E officer, the evaluation will be conducted in a timely manner. The two consultants will report to the Team Leader/ M&E officer. The consultants will work together as a team for achieving the deliverables of the evaluation with high standard that have to be accepted by UNDP.

This evaluation requires senior professionals, these are: one Team Leader (international consultant), one national consultant, UNDP Team leader, UNDP M&E officer. The qualifications and experiences of the international consultant are, as follows:

Administrative and Logistic Support:

The consultants will be recruited under the UNDP terms and conditions, applicable to the short-term IC contract holders, and undertake their assigned tasks and responsibilities under the direct supervision of the UNDP Team Leader, Governance Unit, and the M&E officer in collaboration with other UNDP Units, and other key stakeholders at federal, regional and local levels. During the evaluation period, the consultants will directly report to the UNDP Team Leader/ M&E officer.

All the payments of the Consultants will be borne by the Programme. For the field trips and meetings, UNDP will provide logistic and administration support to the Consultants. In this regard, the Consultants are required to plan their trips in advance.

Payments to Consultants: The national and international consultants shall receive their respective consultancy fees upon certification of the completed tasks satisfactorily, as per the following schedule:

Installment of Payment/ Period	Tasks to be completed by Consultants	Payment to be made by UNDP
1^st Installment:	Upon submission of the acceptable (1) draft Evaluation Report	40 % of the total consultancy fees
^2rd Installment:	Upon submission of the acceptable Final Evaluation Report	60% of the total consultancy fees

Competencies

Experience and Skills

At least ten years demonstrated experience in planning, implementation and management of the local development and /or economic development programmes at international level;
Extensive experience in assessment and evaluation of economic projects, at national and international levels;
Three to five years experience in providing high quality technical and advisory support to the governments at federal and local levels in local development policy, strategy and programme development;
Have excellent analytical skills and experience in developing high standard evaluation reports;
Working experience and familiarity with the development efforts of the international development partners, especially UN agencies and NGOs;
Sound understanding of the national and international development policies, strategies and programmes, and their implementation issues and challenges, especially in the area of development economics;
Exposure to or understanding of the Ethiopia’s socio-economic and geo-political contexts would be an asset;
Full proficiency in using computer software, such as Microsoft offices and internet.

Language:

Full proficiency in both spoken and written English.

Required Skills and Experience

Education

Master’s Degree in Development Economic, or development related fields, with the participation in several international training courses, relating to local or/ and economic development, or capacity development.

Documents to be submitted

Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications:

1. Proposal: (not more than 450 words)

(i) Explaining why they are the most suitable for the work

(ii) Provide a brief methodology on how they will approach and conduct the work (if applicable)

2. Financial proposal:

3. Personal CV including past experience in similar projects and at least 3 references

Payment Proposal

Proposed payment for the consultancy work on lump sum rate in a separate sheet

Evaluation

Individual consultants will be evaluated based on the following methodologies:

Cumulative analysis

The award of the contract shall be made to the individual consultant whose offer has been evaluated and determined as:

a) responsive/compliant/acceptable, and

b) Having received the highest score out of a pre-determined set of weighted technical and financial criteria specific to the solicitation.

* Technical Criteria weight; 70%

* Financial Criteria weight; 30%

Only candidates obtaining a minimum of 49 point and above would be considered for the Financial Evaluation

Criteria	Weight	Max. Point
Technical (based on CV, Proposal and Interview)
Minimum educational background and work experience (CV)	10%	10
Understanding of scope of work and methodology (From Proposal)	20%	20
Individual Competencies (Desk review or Interview)	40%	40

Financial	30%	30

consultant for Outcome Evaluation: By end 2011, at least one EGC is identified based on the national strategic framework

Technical Assistance Service Contract for the Implementation of the Project “Capacity Building of Civil Society in the IPA countries and Territories”

2011-10-23T08:46:00.001-07:00

Technical Assistance Service Contract for the Implementation of the Project “Capacity Building of Civil Society in the IPA countries and Territories”

EuropeAid/127427/C/SER/Multi – additional services

TERMS OF REFERENCE

Consultancy providing one CSO Capacity Building Expert with specific EU expertise for the TACSO project, phase 2 (TACSO 2).

Organisation The technical assistance service contract for the implementation of the project “Capacity Building of Civil Society in the IPA countries and Territories” (Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99, Montenegro, Serbia and Turkey), EuropeAid/127427/C/SER/Multi – additional services, TACSO project is lead by SIPU International AB on behalf of a consortium from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Poland, Romania and Turkey.

The Project The general objectives of the project are to strengthen the overall capacities and accountability of Civil Society Organisations (CSOs) within the IPA beneficiaries and to guarantee the quality of service of CSOs and a sustainable role of CSOs in the democratic process. The main purposes of the project are to increase and improve the capacity and actions of CSOs and to improve the democratic role of CSOs. More information can be found on the TACSO Web site.

The position The CSO Capacity Building Expert with specific EU expertise (CSO EU Expert) will have Sarajevo as the base of operation.

Responsibilities The CSO EU Expert will assist the project and the regional office with technical advice and support in all human and institutional capacity development activities conducted as part of the project work plans. General responsibilities will include the organisation and implementation of activities related directly to the EU institutions, serve as a linking pin between TACSO, the CSO environment and the EU institutions, prepare technical documents and reports, comment on draft reports, as well as support the further development and implementation of the regional and national capacity building programmes with direct EU perspective.

Specific responsibilities: • Project support on monitoring and guidance of CSOs implementing IPA funded projects for beneficiaries • Support to activities such as P2P activities, SEP Calls, PADOR registration and other EU supporting activities initiated by DG ELARG. • Organisation of matchmaking between CSOs in the region and potential EU partners • Representing TACSO during EU initiated dialogues and events. • Preparation and implementation of meetings, workshops and conferences.

The expert will report directly to the TACSO team leader.

Qualifications, experience and competences • The expert should have experience in working in the field of cooperation between the CSO environment and EU institutions. • The expert is expected to have an international background and a MBA or Masters in a field related to CSO development. • Furthermore, the expert should have a minimum of eight years of work experience related tasks and project implementation in an EU context.

Expected competences: • Strong leadership and interpersonal skills. • Experience in working with development of projects (preferably EU-funded) in the field of CSO capacity building or in informal adult education. • Experience in working with EU institutions. • Excellent analytical skills and ability to communicate in a pedagogical and convincing manner in writing. • Experience in the facilitation of international meetings. • Experience in the administration of projects. • Experience in working for international organsations. • Experience with the CSO environment in the Western Balkans and Turkey. • Full command of one of the languages spoken in the IPA region. • Excellent communication skills in English. • Excellent computer skills.

The Contract The position is open to Consultancies providing one STE for the position. The selected consultancy will be offered a 12 month x 15 day/month with option of extension of the contract and with a start on 1 December 2011. The fee level is foreseen to be modest and match the contracting period. The base of operation is Sarajevo.

Contact information. The application must include 1) a Motivation letter including remuneration expectations, 2) Profile document on the Consultancy, 3) Updated EU standard CV with photo on the STE and 4) information on 3 references.

The application must be sent in English by e-mail to TL@tacso.org no later than Monday, 28 October, 2011 at 10.00 am.

For more information, please contact the Team Leader, palle.westergaard@tacso.org

Only shortlisted applicants will be contacted.

WaSH Evaluation Consultant

2011-10-23T08:45:00.000-07:00

Australian Red Cross is seeking a consultant to lead an Evaluation of the Water and Sanitation and Health Improvement (WaSH) project in Vanuatu.

Australian Red Cross has been actively supporting Vanuatu Red Cross in this project since July 2010. Attached is the Terms of Reference for the consultancy which provides some background information.

The duration of this review is envisioned to be a maximum of 20 days, including up to 14 days in-country, and up to six days in Australia (preparation, report writing, travel and briefing/debriefing meetings with Australian Red Cross).

Australian Red Cross expects that the successful consultant will have the following skills and experience.

Essential

· An understanding of gender and development issues.

· Extensive experience in monitoring and evaluating programs, and be able to provide independent testimonials of their work.

· Experience implementing and/or evaluating community based public health programs in remote communities.

· Experience implementing and/or evaluating community based water and sanitation programs.

· Experience using participatory and beneficiary focussed approaches.

· Experience facilitating discussions across broad stakeholder groups.

· Excellent report writing skills.

Desirable

· A good understanding of the Red Cross Red Crescent Movement.

· Experience working in Vanuatu or the Pacific region.

If this project interests you, and you have the suitable background, and you are available for deployment in January 2012, we encourage you to submit an expression of interest to Petra Mackay pmackay@redcross.org.au. Your expression of interest must include a one-page cover letter and updated CV, an example of a professional report you have been commissioned to submit and details of your daily consultancy fees.

If you have any questions about the position please contact Kezia Brett kbrett@redcross.org.au.

Expressions of interest must be submitted by 5pm 24th October 2011.

Consultancy - Market Survey for Livelihood Projects

2011-10-23T08:44:00.002-07:00

Terms of Reference

BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT

Danish Refugee Council (DRC) is a private independent, non-profit organization (NGO), founded on the basis of humanitarian principles, and human rights in general, to securing the protection of refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs), and to promoting long term solutions to the problems of forced displacement. DRC started working in Somalia since 1997 supporting Ethiopian Refugees, Somalis Returnees and Internally Displace Persons. Currently, DRC programs focuses on people uprooted by conflict and natural disasters including IDPs populations, and host communities. Our core programming areas includes; Food Security and Livelihoods, WASH and Infrastructure, Protection and Advocacy, Community Development, as well as Emergency Response.

For nearly two decades, Somalia has been in a state of political turmoil. Since it was instated, the Transitional Federal Government (TFG) has not been able to create a functioning government with broad based support. Currently the TFG holds a very limited authority over much of south-central Somalia with various Islamic groups controlling the majority of the region. With the creation of semi-autonomous regions including Somaliland, Puntland and Jubaland, Somalia still remains divided on many fronts.

OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECTS

The objectives of the projects under which this market survey will be conducted include:

a) To protect and support primary livelihood mechanisms in selected locations of Mogadishu and Somaliland (OFDA)

b) Strengthening of conflict management and critical livelihood capacities for vulnerable youth in Somaliland (Turning the Tide)

OBJECTIVES OF THE MARKET SURVEY

The overall objective of the proposed market survey is to provide information on small scale businesses that have got market potential within the targeted areas and how they contribute to improving the lives of beneficiaries as well as stimulate local economies. To realize this objective, the market survey exercise will focus on a number of specific things to include:

• Determining what types of small businesses (production or services) would best generate income for women, men, youth or other vulnerable groups in the targeted communities or IDP camps.

• The consultant should then conduct market surveys for these business opportunities detailing the followings:

The current level of availability of the identified service / product in the local marketplace
The average price for which the service / product is being sold
The types, quantities and price of the inputs needed to begin production / the service. (Identify costs for establishing profitable small businesses highlighted in the survey findings).
Demand for the product / service and whether there is a need for it in the marketplace
Potential consumers of the product / service, location of the consumers, and their estimated purchasing power
Means for transporting the product to the potential consumers and associated transportation costs
The level of interest among youth or women in launching the specified type of business
Identify major sources of supplies for local markets
Identify/suggest with reasons, the appropriate mode of supporting such ventures (one time payments versus installments or for example revolving funds, loan, grants. Etc.)

EXPECTED OUTPUTS

To ensure achievement of the above, the Consultant / firm will undertake the following key tasks:

• Develop an Inception Report detailing among other things; the process and methodologies to be employed to achieve the objective of this consultancy as stated above. It should include the interview schedules, and important time schedules for this exercise, and present to DRC Program Team for review and further inputs.

• Undertake desk review of the relevant project documents and any other relevant documents.

• Review key and relevant DRC Horn of Africa Programme Strategy (2012 – 2014) documents in view of the project focus, development targets in relation to the project’s intervention areas.

• Design data collection methodology, taking into consideration relevant gender analysis framework(s).

• Design, develop, critique (with DRC team) and refine data collection tools, including translation to the local Somali language, where necessary.

• Conduct a comprehensive field based survey [using both quantitative and qualitative data collection methods] and collect data on targets– based on indicators as documented in the project proposal.

• Write up the Market Survey Report. The format of the report will be as follows:

Title page
Executive Summary (short, succinct summary of the report not more than 2 pages)
Introduction and brief summary of the livelihood projects being implemented
Methodologies used for the survey
Description of findings (qualitative and quantitative)
Conclusions
Recommendations
Annexes (sample data collection tools, Photos & any documents related to the survey)

• Present the draft report to DRC program team for first review before producing a second draft.

• Submit a Final Market Survey Report to DRC as stated in the Consultancy Contract.

DURATION

The consultancy will commence with the consultant developing a work plan for the entire period of the consultancy

The assignment will take EIGHTEEN (18) chargeable days beginning on a date to be mutually agreed with the selected consultant

The report must be submitted on an agreed date which is not later than two weeks after the completion of the field work.

LIAISON AND COMMUNICATIONS

The assessment will be coordinated by the Livelihoods Coordinator and Area managers of the Somaliland and Mogadishu.

RESPONSIBILITIES OF DRC

• Provide transport to and from the field.

• Provide travel insurance to the consultant

• Provide accommodation to consultant

• Pay consultancy fees at a mutually agreed rate

RESPONSIBILITIES OF CONSULTANT

• The consultant should provide a personal computer and will be expected to make a quality report.

• Actively engage with the group & community members and other stakeholders to generate adequate information to make informed decision.

KEY DELIVERABLES

• Four (4) bound hard copies of the Report.

• Soft copy of the Report in two (2) CDs.

• The consultant will also be required to submit to DRC all study materials including: 1. Soft copies of all data sets both quantitative and qualitative

All filled quantitative data collection tools and qualitative data recording materials.
Any other non-consumable documents/items that will be used in the course of the planned consultancy

QUALIFICATIONS

• Bachelor’s degree on Commerce, Business, Community Development or related field;

• Proven experience conducting market assessments, feasibility studies and setting up small businesses

COMMITMENTS DRC has a Humanitarian Accountability Framework, outlining its global accountability commitments. All staff are required to contribute to the achievement of this framework (http://www.drc.dk/HAF.4265.0.html)

APPLICATION PROCESS Applicants should send a 1-page cover letter that clearly explains their motivation for applying, as well as why they are particularly suited to achieve the job responsibilities, together with their CV (not longer than 4 pages) to: drcjobs@drchoa.org. Please indicate “Market Survey” as the subject heading.

The deadline for applications is 31. October, 2011.

Evaluation Consultant for ACF Cash Transfer Programme Ivory Coast

2011-10-23T08:44:00.001-07:00

Start Date: 22nd November End Date: 31st December Application Deadline: 31st October

Language of report: French Working Language: French Location: Abidjan, Ivory Coast

Fee: £100-500/day

ACF-UK is looking for an experienced consultant for the evaluation of ACFs programme “Transfert Monétaire par téléphone mobile (programme en partenariat avec le PAM et MTN)”. The start date of the evaluation is intended for the 22nd November and will last for 25 days. All expenses will be covered and accommodation and travel will be provided by ACF for the duration of the stay in country. Please find the ToR attached. If you are interested please apply through the ACF-UK website with an expression of interest (including your daily rate) and an up-to-date CV. The deadline for applications will be the 31st October. Contact: Ben Allen, Evaluations Learning and Accountability Officer (b.allen@actionagainsthunger.org.uk)

Evaluation of Raising Poor and Marginalised Women's Voices in Liberia Project

2011-10-23T08:43:00.000-07:00

‘Raising Poor and Marginalised Women Voices in Liberia’ is a project that was developed as an intergral part of the global governance and transparency programme funded by DfID on ‘ Raising Her Voice.’ The programme aims at promoting rights and developing the capacity of grassroots women to engage effectively in governance.

As part of a larger organisational undertaking to better capture and communicate the effectiveness of its work, Oxfam GB desires to assess the effectiveness to date of the ‘Raising Poor and Marginalised Women Voices in Liberia’ project that aims at promoting the rights and develop capacity of grassroots women to engage effectively in governance.

This evaluation will use a predefined qualitative research protocol, Process Tracing, to assess the extent to which: a) the changes around engagement of poor and marginalised women in governance issues in Liberia that the ‘Raising Her Voice’ project is seeking have taken place; and b) we can evidence that the project contributed to these changes. Guidelines outlining the core evaluation protocol have been prepared, and Oxfam GB is seeking an experienced external evaluator to lead on the implementation of this methodology. The evaluation will be overseen and supported by one of OGB’s Global Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning advisors.

Tender should be sent to PPAT@oxfam.org.uk and received no later than 5pm GMT, Monday, November 7.

Short-listed candidates will be contacted on or before November 15, and invited to interview the following week.

Final Evaluation Consultant of a Harm Reduction Project in Ukraine

2011-10-23T08:42:00.001-07:00

The final evaluation concerns the project “HIV/AIDS and drug use in Ukraine” programme implemented by the Ukrainian Red Cross with the technical support of the French Red Cross. It is a thirty six-month program from April 2007 to December 2011 funded by “Agence française de développement”, the Italian Red Cross, the French Red Cross and American Red Cross. The main purpose of this evaluation is to provide through a study on the impact of the project in terms of harm reduction and home base care. The second purpose is to provide lessons to draft the policy and strategy of the future programme for the next years. The evaluation is scheduled in to take place in November 2011

CONTEXT

With 47.5 millions inhabitants, Ukraine is currently facing the combined difficulties of injecting drugs use and HIV/AIDS epidemic. According to the latest UNAIDS figures, 3.6% of Ukrainian adult population are infected with the HIV; moreover, “the rate of treatment of active injecting drug users remains limited (according to 2009 data, only 7.5% of the total number of those receiving antiretroviral therapy - ART) because of insufficient availability of substitution maintenance therapy, and hence problems with forming adherence to ART.” An estimated 36% of HIV infections in Ukraine are linked to the use of injecting drugs.

Today, Ukraine remains the country with the highest HIV prevalence rate in Europe. However, public authorities continue to hamper harm reduction programmes by hardening the laws regarding drug use.

Relations with the national society

The Ukrainian Red Cross society continues its collaboration with the French Red Cross on the Harm Reduction project, especially by putting its nurses at disposal for the Home Based Care component.

The general objective of the “HIV/AIDS and drug use in Ukraine” programme is to prevent and reduce HIV and hepatitis transmission risks at the Injective Drug Users (IDU) level, and to improve the global assistance provided to this population in four cities: Kiev, Zaporizhzhiya, Melitopol and Chernivtsy.

The program started from the evaluation of HIV/AIDS situation in Kiev and Zaporizhzha regions in September 2006. Since 2007 the program worked in cities of Keiv and Zaporizhzha and since 2008 cities of Chernivtsi and Melitopol have joined the program. The duration of the current phase of the program is 41 months from 1st July 2008 – 30th November of 2011.

OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION

To assess the practical suitability of the operation to the needs identified at the programme inception.
To provide a clear view on the degree to which the objectives have been achieved.
To analyse the impact of the operation, the concrete impact/incidence of activities in the field of a harm reduction.
To assess the local impact of the project on the community beneficiaries IDU and the Ukrainian RC
To evaluate the coordination mechanisms used with the national authorities, local and international organisations and all relevant actors in Harm reduction.
To develop practical recommendations to improve further similar project to the future.

SPECIFIC EVALUATION OBJECTIVES

Analysis of the impact of the project.
Analysis of the effectiveness of the activities “home base care, exchange of syringes, psychosocial support for patients on substitution therapy” in quantitative and qualitative terms on the different sites (Kiev, Zaporizhzha, Melitopol)
Analysis of the local project ownerships by the Ukrainian Red Cross which includes involvement and participation, capacity, empowerment and accountability.
A drawing up of “lessons learned” on the project implementation, on FRC and URC operational capacities.
A drawing-up of operational recommendations for possible continuation or exit strategy.
Analysis of the visibility of the operation.
Analysis of the efficiency of the project. The analysis should cover: planning of activities, implication of beneficiaries in the implementation, and elements such as: logistics, selection of recipients, etc.
Examination on coordination and coherence of the actions carried out with local authorities, local and international organizations.
Analysis of the relevance of the project objectives, suitability of the aid provided in the context of local practices, of the choice of beneficiaries, and of the strategy, in relation to Harm reduction.

This evaluation will use and complete the results of the preview evaluation done on September 2010.

WORK PLAN AND METHOLODOGY

The evaluation will be carried out during 4 weeks including drafting of the final report.

The consultant will have to carry out field visits in Kiev, Zaporizhzha, Melitopol.

A briefing will be held at the French Red Cross Headquarter or at the French Red Cross Delegation in Ukraine for 2 days during which the information and documents necessary for the mission will be provided.
Review of data and briefing - FRC/URC

Discussions with the FRC project coordinator in Ukraine and with the project team
Discussions with the Secretary General of the URC and URC staff
Analysis of the documents relative to the program: Review of the project documents (narrative and financial proposal, logical framework, work plan, intermediary reports and preliminary final report, as well as other documents relative to the running of the program).
Preparation of the evaluation tools and of the action plan for the field visits in Kiev, Zaporizhzha, Melitopol.

Field visits

Collection of all required information:

Interviews with the key actors of the project (technical and administrative team) and other institutional actors
Interviews with direct project beneficiaries and use of participatory tools (maps, diagrams, matrices etc.)
Direct observation, visit of different sites and different communities and participation to activities of the project
Review of documents of the French Red Cross
Review of documents of other institutions working in the same field

Preliminary analysis of the data collected.

Preliminary presentation of the results of the evaluation to the team of the project and to the key partners in country.

Report submission and discussion

The report will be drafted in English
The draft report will be submitted to the head of mission and to the Headquarters at the latest 10 days after the end of the field evaluation
If possible, a debriefing with the Heath Desk at the Headquarters in Paris will take place upon reception of this first version to clarify misunderstandings and inaccuracies. If not, written comments will be sent by the FRC to the consultant.
Once the necessary amendments to the draft report have been incorporated, the revised text will be resubmitted to the FRC.
The consultant will have 2 weeks maximum to submit a final report in a computer format.

The total duration of the consultancy should not exceed 30 days including the field visits and the drafting of the final report.

EVALUATION REPORT

The report will have the folowing format:

Cover Page
Table of contents
Executive Summary
Main report (about 20 pages): the main body of the report should start with the method used and should be structured in accordance with the specific objectives formulated under point 3 above.

The recommendations will be divided as follows:

Consolidated recommendations applying to the whole project
Specific recommendations/issued regarding the Zaporizhzha and Melitopol activities
Specific recommendations/issues regarding the Kiev activities
Some Annexes if needed

The consultant will be responsible of the coherence of the report, both in terms of content and presentation.

WORKPLACE

CONSULTANT PROFILE

This evaluation should be carried out by a consultant with:

Academic background
Knowledge of the Red Cross Movement.
Experience in HIV/Aids with focus on harm reduction.
Experience in project evaluation in the field of international humanitarian
Knowledge of harm reduction activities in Eastern Europe

The project is looking for experience from the regional level to make extensive use of methodologies, tools, materials, and approaches developed within the eastern region.

Language: English mandatory, French or Russian if possible
Profile : responsible, result-oriented, good analytical and writing skills

EXPRESSION OF INTEREST If you are interested in carrying out this evaluation, please send a Curriculum Vitae and a tender including the following elements: 1. CV 2. Cover Letter 3. References 4. Evaluation proposal (2 pages maximum) including the methodology proposed to comply with the requirements of the evaluation 5. Budget presenting the costs for the evaluation: consultant allowance, transport and communications costs, etc.

CONTACT David Annequin candidatures.alce.crf@gmail.com

Consultant pour la reformulation de la Politique nationale des enseignants

2011-10-23T08:41:00.004-07:00

CONTEXTE Après une longue période de conflit armé, la République démocratique du Congo entre dans une phase de reconstruction de tous les secteurs de la vie nationale, particulièrement dans le secteur de l’éducation. La refondation du système éducatif se fait notamment à travers l’élaboration et l’opérationnalisation des stratégies sous-sectorielles et globales. Dans tous ces cas, l’accès à une éducation de qualité constitue un des piliers essentiels des stratégies conçues éducatives et du développement du pays, comme souligné dans le Document de stratégie de croissance et de réduction de la pauvreté (DSCRP) 2006-2010

La grande attention portée sur l’éducation comme un pilier de développement se justifie aussi au regard des dégâts que des années de conflit et de mauvaise gouvernance ont fait subir à ce secteur. Depuis plus d’une décennie, en effet, le système éducatif congolais connaît une crise aiguë dont une des manifestations demeure la baisse de la qualité de l’enseignement dispensé.

Les résultats à l’examen de fin d’études primaires - TENAFEP - indiquent que 35%-43% des élèves en 6ème année primaire ne maîtrisent pas les apprentissages fondamentaux. Les tests d’évaluation des acquis scolaires réalisés par la Direction des Etudes et de la Planification de l’Enseignement Primaire, Secondaire et Professionnelle (EPSP) de 2006 confirment ces faibles résultats. En effet, sur 25 items, les performances moyennes des écoles congolaises sont classées au-dessous de 12 réponses justes sur 25 soit : 8,4 en français ; 8,9 en calcul et 11,8 en culture générale. L’analyse par discipline des résultats des Tests d’évaluation des acquis scolaires et des Tests de fin d’études primaires révèle que les plus grandes difficultés rencontrées par les élèves se trouvent dans l’apprentissage du français où 75 % des élèves interrogés n’ont pas dépassé la performance en dessous de la moyenne (11 sur 25) alors que la pédagogie de maîtrise situe la performance minimale entre 50 % et 70 %. Il semble ainsi que l’atteinte des objectifs de l’Education Pour Tous (EPT) et ceux du Développement du Millénaire (OMD) nécessite, dans le contexte de la RDC, l’accroissement et/ou le renforcement des capacités pédagogiques et administratives des acteurs du secteur de l’éducation, qui doivent assurer et garantir la qualité de l’éducation et la performance du système éducatif.

Des efforts ont été entrepris dans le passé avec le concours de l’UNESCO et d’autres partenaires au développement pour renforcer les capacités des enseignants. En particulier, l’UNESCO a appuyé l’élaboration d’une « Politique de formation des formateurs». L’objectif que celle-ci s’était assignée consistait alors à « former des formateurs du système éducatif congolais en vue de pallier à la carence du personnel enseignant et d’améliorer l’offre d’enseignement à tous les niveaux du système ». A l’heure actuelle, tenant compte des nouveaux défis que posent à la fois la question de la qualité de l’éducation dans une société en pleine reconstruction et le développement récent des techniques et des outils relatifs à la question enseignante (Toolkit de l’UNESCO), une revisitation de cette Politique s’impose et cette revisitation devra partir d’un diagnostic profond de la situation de l’enseignant, dans une approche holistique de la problématique.

En effet, dans le cadre de l’Initiative TTISSA, l’UNESCO et ses principaux partenaires ont identifié le développement des politiques sur la question enseignante comme une des principales priorités pour la réalisation des objectifs de l’Education pour Tous en Afrique. Pour atteindre cet objectif, la RDC devra procéder à un diagnostic approfondi sur la question enseignante, en mettant à profit le guide pour la réalisation d’un diagnostic holistique sur la question enseignante élaboré par TTISSA. Dans le cadre de la réalisation de ce diagnostic, on renforcera les capacités de Ministères en charge de l’éducation afin qu’ils puissent assurer la mise en œuvre d’une politique enseignante viable et pérenne.

Sur la base des résultats du diagnostic, les Ministères en charge de l’Education réexamineront leur Document de politique de la formation des formateurs qui sera élargie au statut, les conditions de travail, l’administration, la gestion et la formation/développement professionnel, et sera soumis à l’approbation des secteurs compétents et à une validation de l’ensemble des partenaires de l’Education.

Le nouveau Document de politique élaboré sera complété par une Stratégie et un Plan de mise en œuvre par le Gouvernement, avec l’appui des partenaires de la coopération bilatérale et- multilatérale.

OBJECTIFS DE LA CONSULTATION Les objectifs immédiats de la consultation sont les suivants  Identifier dans une approche participative les besoins en matière d’enseignants en RDC à travers un diagnostic complet de la question enseignante  Reformuler la politique nationale sur les enseignants, prenant en compte à la fois les questions du statut, les conditions de travail, l’administration, la gestion et la formation/développement professionnel et de rémunération  Elaborer un plan de mise en œuvre de la politique reformulée ;

RESULTATS ATTENDUS 1. Le diagnostic sur la question enseignante sur la base du Toolkit élaboré par l’UNESCO (tenant compte du statut, les conditions de travail, l’administration, la gestion et la formation/développement professionnel) est réalisé. 2. La nouvelle Politique sur la question est élaborée sur la base du Toolkit de l’UNESCO ; 3. Le Plan opérationnel de la politique sur les enseignants élaboré.

FONCTIONS ET RESPONSABILITES DU CONSULTANT

Les présents termes de référence s’inscrivent dan le cadre des actions de l’UNESCO en RDC au titre du Programme TTISSA .

Sous l’autorité directe de la Représentante et Cheffe de Bureau de l’UNESCO en RDC et la supervision du Spécialiste du programme Education à Kinshasa, le (la) Consultant(e) apportera son appui à la mise en œuvre du projet. Plus précisément, il (elle) sera chargé(e) des tâches suivantes :

• Mener une étude sur l’état des lieux de la question enseignante en RDC, utilisant le Toolkit de l’UNESCO ; • Organiser le dialogue social et des consultations avec les parties prenantes (syndicats, associations parents d’élèves etc.) ; et • Animer un atelier de présentation et de validation des résultats de l’étude diagnostique.

PROFIL DU CONSULTANT Le (la) candidat(e) à ce poste de Consultant devra remplir les conditions suivantes : • Diplôme supérieur en sciences de l’éducation ou en sciences sociales, • Une expérience professionnelle en matière de formulation des politiques éducatives d’au moins 5 ans, • Bonne connaissance du système éducatif congolais, en particulier de son système de formation des enseignants ; • Excellente aptitude à communiquer oralement, à dynamiser et faciliter le dialogue, • Grande capacité d’analyse et de synthèse • Excellente qualité d’écriture

DUREE DE LA CONSULTATION Deux mois : novembre-décembre 2011.

Date limite de soumission : 11 novembre 2011.

Les candidatures à ce poste de consultant doivent être destinées à : Madame la Représentante de l’UNESCO en RDC kinshasa@unesco.org L'UNESCO est un espace ''non fumeurs''

Consultancy Opportunities

2011-10-23T08:41:00.003-07:00

PILPG is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that operates as a global pro bono law firm providing free assistance to developing states and governments involved in violent conflicts. To facilitate the utilization of this legal assistance, PILPG also provides policy formulation advice and training on matters related to conflict resolution. To date, PILPG has advised over twenty states and governments on the legal aspects of peace negotiations and post-conflict constitution drafting, and over two dozen states and War Crimes Tribunals in Europe, Asia and Africa concerning the protection of human rights, self-determination, and transitional justice.

PILPG maintains a consultant database of qualified applicants with the skills and expertise to implement our projects. PILPG utilizes this database to contact qualified individuals regarding new career and consulting opportunities both with PILPG and our strategic partners. PILPG generally requires that professionals have at least five years of experience, strong program management skills, and an expertise in their field.

If you are interested in submitting your materials for review and entry into PILPG’s database, please email your resume to recruitment@pilpg.org. Your information will not be considered an application for an open position. We may contact you to follow up on your submissions, so please include contact information. PILPG is an equal opportunity employer.

Consultancy to Develop a Best Practices casebook on Sustainable Urban Energy

2011-10-23T08:41:00.001-07:00

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT Issued on: 13 Oct. 11 ORGANIZATIONAL LOCATION: UN-HABITAT DUTY STATION:
FUNCTIONAL TITLE: Consultancy to Develop a Best Practices casebook on Sustainable Urban Energy DURATION: 10 months CLOSING DATE: 25 October 2011

BACKGROUND Under the framework of the agency's Medium-Term Strategic and Institutional Plan, UN-HABITAT has identified entry points that will allow it to help clients and partners cope more effectively with the rapid pace of urbanization and also maximize the benefits that come with it. The overarching goal of the programme is to increase UN-HABITAT's capacity to effectively support member states in achieving sustainable urbanization. This programme focuses on the areas of urban planning; urban mobility; urban energy; urban governance and legislation; and urban economy and finance. The selection of these areas as strategic entry points is based on experiences from UN-HABITAT field projects and results from global research on sustainable urban development. Furthermore, the demand for these areas has been identified in several country and city participatory prioritization activities, including Urban Profiles developed through city and national consultations in more than 60 cities in Africa, the Caribbean, the Pacific, and the Arab states. The same areas have also been prioritized in the Habitat Country Programme Documents, developed jointly by national and local authorities in 32 countries. It is UN-HABITAT’s contention that if the growth of cities is planned at scale, in advance, and in phases to address projected growth over the next 20 to 30 years, fast-growing cities in developing countries will succeed in assuming their role as engines of the national economy – and in the process prevent new slums from being formed. Cities, being home to more than half of the world’s population, consume 60 to 80 percent of the world’s energy resources and produce 70 percent of the world’s anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Hence, cities must play a major role in improving energy efficiency, using resources more carefully, transforming urban energy systems, enhancing energy security and national prosperity - while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. A good understanding of current and projected energy consumption patterns in urban areas as well as their renewable energy generation potentials will provide useful information for urban energy planning. Planning 'low-carbon' cities implies using renewable energy options, as well as using non-renewable energy more efficiently. Some cities and urban communities in the north are aiming to be climate stabilising in energy terms by 2050 or even earlier. The cities of both the USA and the European Union have promoted platforms unifying their energy commitments in order to assist in setting and meeting ambitious targets. Most other regions, however, have untapped renewable energy potential (wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, waste, biomass, etc.) as well as large potential for saving energy. While there is no goal specifically on energy, access to energy services is a prerequisite for the achievement of all the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), while a move to sustainable energy practice support virtually all MDGs. Within this programme, the objective of the focus area on urban energy is to promote approaches, methods, and instruments for promoting sustainable urban energy planning, improving energy efficiency, increasing the use of renewable energy technologies, and improving access to clean, reliable, and sustainable energy services in urban areas.

RESPONSIBILITIES  The objective of this consultancy is to develop a Best practices casebook on Sustainable Urban Energy projects. This document will be used by UN-HABITAT and partners to initiate sustainable urban energy planning based on successful practices.  Under the supervision of the Chief of the Urban Energy Section and in consultation with other UN-HABITAT colleagues, the consultant will be responsible for the development of the casebook with urban energy practices from all over the world and with emphasis on developing countries. This will include: • Desktop review of existing practices on urban energy taking into account regional balance and particular attention on developing countries; • Prepare a template for documenting practices with a good analytical structure; • Collect practices and liaise with people involved in the practices to have updated or missing information. • Develop a first draft Casebook for review; • Compile a number of case studies (with a maximum of 10 per thematic areas or type of urban energy technology/services). • The best practices will include: renewable energy technologies, energy efficiency, energy access, energy services, legislation and ordinances on energy use (such as the Solar ordinance in Europe). • Contribute to the organization of an expert group meeting and present the draft casebook for comment and inputs; • Finalize the draft taking into consideration comments/inputs received during the expert group meeting or any other document review. • The consultant will also liaise with other UN-HABITAT departments and section for additional inputs.

COMPETENCIES  Ability to work independently with a high degree of responsibility, in a flexible manner and under pressure.  Strong writing, inter-personal communication and networking skills, as well as research skills.

EDUCATION • Advanced university degree, relevant to sustainable urban energy planning, human settlements planning/design and architecture in developing countries. A post graduate university degree in combination with qualifying work experience may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree in a related field. •
WORK EXPERIENCE • Excellent knowledge of principles, concepts, policies and strategic orientations of sustainable urban energy and clean energy. • At least five years of working experience, research and development in the field of renewable energy in urban areas and formulation of energy policies/regulation; • Good understanding of low-carbon cities planning, smart cities and smart grid.

LANGUAGE SKILLS  Fluency in English (written and oral), and knowledge of any other UN will be an asset.

OTHER SKILLS  Computer literacy in standard office applications (MS Works package: MS Word, MS PowerPoint, MS Excel and MS Access) and electronic communications.

REMUNERATION Payments will be based on deliverables over the consultancy period. There are set remuneration rates for consultancies. The rate is determined by functions performed and experience of the consultant. The fees will be paid as per agreement.

Applications should include: • Cover memo (maximum 1 page) • Summary CV (maximum 2 pages), indicating the following information: 1. Educational Background (incl. dates) 2. Professional Experience (assignments, tasks, achievements, duration by years/ months) 3. Other Experience and Expertise (e.g. Internships/ voluntary work, etc.) 4. Expertise and preferences regarding location of potential assignments 5. Expectations regarding remuneration

All applications should be submitted to: Mr. Vincent Kitio UN-HABITAT P.O. Box 30030, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Email: Vincent.kitio@unhabitat.org, cc: Sebastian.lange@unhabitat.org

Fax: + 254 20 762 4343

Please be advised that since April 15th 2010, applicants for consultancies must be part of the UN-HABITAT e-Roster in order for their application to be considered. You can reach the e-Roster through the following link: http://e-roster.unhabitat.org

Deadline for applications: 25 October 2011

UN-HABITAT does not charge a fee at any stage of the recruitment process. If you have any questions concerning persons or companies claiming to be recruiting on behalf of these offices and requesting the payment of a fee, please contact: recruitment@unon.org

Consultancy to Develop a UN-HABITAT’s Strategy on Sustainable Urban Corridors with particular emphasis on low-carbon cities

2011-10-23T08:40:00.002-07:00

VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT Issued on: 13 Oct. 11 ORGANIZATIONAL LOCATION: UN-HABITAT DUTY STATION: - FUNCTIONAL TITLE: Consultancy to Develop a UN-HABITAT’s Strategy on Sustainable Urban Corridors with particular emphasis on low-carbon cities DURATION: 5 months CLOSING DATE: 25 October 2011

UN-Habitat plans to develop the concept of sustainable urban corridors as a means for promoting sustainable urbanization, green growth and socio-economic development through creating more access to affordable and reliable basic services and economic opportunities.

The planned sustainable urban corridors will take advantage of existing infrastructures – road corridors, power transmission lines, oil and gas pipelines, railways, airports etc. – to create new urban centers with dedicated areas for: industries; business centers; public offices, social services, residential areas etc..

The urban corridors will create a conductive environment for the establishment of industrial hubs that provide manufacturers, commercial and business investors with environmentally sound infrastructure and services, and an economic location from which to produce and add value to national resources (minerals, agriculture products etc) for both domestic consumption and export.

Renewable energy parks that generate additional energy from locally available resources will be created along the corridor. In countries endowed with oil reserves, refineries for domestic market could also be developed along the corridor to generate additional job opportunities.

Development of urban corridors is seen here as a concrete and emerging mainstream urban development strategy for developing countries. Existing transport (railways; highways, airport, ports, waterways) and energy corridors (high voltage lines, oil/gas pipelines etc) have under-utilized economic potential and unexploited business opportunities.

RESPONSIBILITIES  The objective of this consultancy is to develop a Sustainable Urban Corridor Strategy for UN-HABITAT. This document will be used by UN-HABITAT and partners to initiate urban development intervention along existing unplanned urban corridors.  The aim of this consultancy is therefore to develop a blueprint document on sustainable urban corridor.  Under the supervision of the Chief of the Urban Energy Section and in consultation with other UN-HABITAT colleagues, the consultant will be responsible for the development of the Strategy Document. This will include: • Desktop review of existing development corridors in the world with particular attention on developing countries; • Analysis of urban corridors in Africa: assess their characteristics (SWOT). • Identify 2 urban corridors in West Africa, assess them and suggest urban development steps with simulation and spatial planning. • Develop a first draft Strategy Document for review; • Compile a number of case studies (maximum 2 by region) – including best practices - to be used as references in the strategic document. • Contribute to the organization of an expert group meeting and present the draft strategy for comment and inputs; • Finalize the draft taking into consideration comments/inputs received during the expert group meeting or any other document review.

EDUCATION

Advanced university degree, relevant to spatial and urban planning, human settlements planning and architecture in developing countries. A post graduate university degree in combination with qualifying work experience may be accepted in lieu of the advanced degree in a related field.

WORK EXPERIENCE • Excellent knowledge of principles, concepts, policies and strategic orientations of sustainable urban energy and spatial planning. • At least ten years of working experience, research and development in the field of urban planning and design, physical planning of commercial/industrial areas; • Experiences in the formulation of policy documents and strategic plans on sustainable urban planning, basic urban infrastructure and services, and good understanding of their implementation under changing circumstances. • Good understanding of low-carbon cities planning and development.

LANGUAGE SKILLS  Fluency in English (written and oral), and knowledge of any other UN will be an asset.

OTHER SKILLS  Computer literacy in standard office applications (MS Works package: MS Word, MS PowerPoint, MS Excel and MS Access) and electronic communications.

All applications should be submitted to: Mr. Vincent Kitio UN-HABITAT P.O. Box 30030, 00100 Nairobi, Kenya Email: Vincent.kitio@unhabitat.org, cc: Sebastian.lange@unhabitat.org

Fax: + 254 20 762 4343

Deadline for applications: 25 October 2011

NUTRITION SURVEILLANCE MODELS KARAMOJA & EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROCESS AND CONTENT

2011-10-23T08:40:00.001-07:00

Programme Area: Health and Nutrition/ Alive Program
Duty Station: Kampala with field travel to Karamoja Region
Duration of Contract: 25 working days
Level: P4

Background: Currently, a range of nutrition- related surveillance models is being tested in Uganda’s north-eastern region of Karamoja, providing periodic data on the nutrition and health status of the communities. The functioning of the models and data dissemination and use is monitored and guided by the national Technical Working Group (TWG) on nutrition Information Systems/ M&E formed from representatives of MoH and international partners. The Group reports to the Nutrition Cluster of the MoH of Uganda. Technical and financial support for the surveillance models is ensured by UNICEF Uganda and WFP (in the case of annual surveys). The importance of the models and their value is ever high given the recent deterioration of health and nutrition status of population in the Horn of Africa and its negative effects on Northern region and which dictates the need for continued and reliable monitoring of status in order to timely and effectively inform decision-makers of the impeding deteriorations and programming needs.

There is consensus among national and international stakeholders that critical analysis is needed on the value and comparative advantages of the currently tested models in Karamoja and aiming at streamlining of the activities. The intent is in line with the MoH Operational Framework for Nutrition (2009) and which states that monitoring and evaluation of the activities planned under the Framework must be systematic and a functioning nutrition information system needs to “...ensure the availability and utilization of accurate, timely and comprehensive nutrition information for improved advocacy, planning and design, implementation, coordination, monitoring and evaluation of nutrition programs and also for early warning”.

UNICEF will help in securing and guiding a technical Assessment mission and also ensuring intense consultations and feedback from the TWG on M&E under the MoH /Nutrition Division. This proposed consultancy will consist of one international professional with expertise in management and analysis of nutrition surveillance models. The consultant will work in close collaboration with MoH/Nutrition unit focal person on Nutrition Information systems.

Scope of work To respond to stakeholders needs, the following objectives will be pursued under the current assignment:

1.Critical comparative analysis of the objectives under each of the models, the components and operation of each model, including comparative assessment of the target population groups under surveillance, periods of data collection, what information/ indicators are collected, who provides the surveillance information, how is the information transferred, stored, and disseminated. Additionally, to establish validity of the data the analysis will provide insight into how the estimates produced by different models compare to each other, and whether trends are similar.

2.Indicate the level of usefulness of the information from each of the models to stakeholders and the decision-making process by describing actions taken as a result of the data from each of the surveillance models. Characterize the entities that have used the data to make decisions and take actions. List other anticipated uses of the data.

3.Evaluate the three models and synthetize their value for each of the following attributes: Simplicity, flexibility, costs and resources used to operate the model (direct costs), as well as the sustainability of each model.

4.State whether the models are meeting their objectives, and present recommendations on possible continuation, modification and/or streamlining of the surveillance models in order to ensure best value for resources utilized and the needs for timely and rapid information. Provide recommendations on how the specific gaps should be overcome under each model in the short and long-term to produce reliable and sufficiently informative data on nutrition status and interventions in Uganda (including through potential integration/ combination of one or more models and/or interrupting of a specific model if such might be reasonable while also advising whether any or part of the models can be integrated with existing systems, such as the health management information system which produces administrative data on health and nutrition status of the population).

5.Advise how the output from the surveillance models can be best collected and stored at local and national levels using existing mechanisms, such as a nutrition repository currently under development or other possible mechanisms and which should ensure easy access to public and partners to the data for purposes of continuous validation and utilization of data.

6.To build awareness among national and international stakeholders on the internationally accepted principles and practices concerned with nutrition information activities and use of data for improved early action in relation to nutrition crises in general.

Tasks: Following the objectives, a combination of activities will be pursued as described below and which may be enlarged given the needs that may become evident through the course of the assignment:

1.Review of relevant reports and the functioning/implementation of each model as tested in Karamoja and Acholi, including through field visits; 2.Consultation with nutrition information/surveillance stakeholders’ participating in the analyses of information produced by the surveillance models and defining the gaps and needs for an improved/ streamlined nutrition surveillance system (interviews with a variety of stakeholders from line ministries, UN agencies and partners to get a an in-depth understanding of the status of each surveillance module);
3.Visits to northern region 1-2 selected districts to observe and collect information on actual gaps, potential and resources needed for an effective streamlining and running of the models; 4.Facilitation of two working meetings under the auspices of the TWG on M&E for nutrition to present, discuss, prioritize and consent on the progress, findings and recommendations of the assessment; 5.Based on the above, write up of the Assessment and Recommendations and submit it to UNICEF Uganda/ MoH Uganda.
6.Taking note of any added issues discovered in the course of the Assessment and bring to the attention of the TWG on M&E for nutrition/ Focal point and UNICEF team for action.

EXPECTED/KEY DELIVERABLES: The aforementioned objectives shall be achieved by the following outputs:

1.Desk review of methodology, reports from each model, including assessment of web-based CVS stored data and related resource packages (schedule of implementation, budgets, implementation reports, etc) – maximum of 15 pages report produced; 2.Outline of semi-structured questionnaire on consultations/ individual meetings held with stakeholders and short reports (max. 1 page) of each, including from northern region visits done; 3.Agenda and handouts for the two working meetings with stakeholders : (1) to inform on purpose and seek guidance / inputs into refining of the assessment completed; 4.An assessment final report - maximum 30 pages with 2 page executive summary which:
a.Summarizes usefulness of each of the surveillance model by reviewing objectives of each and the dependence of policy decisions and control measures on each of the models. Depending on the objectives of a particular surveillance system, the model is considered useful if it satisfactorily addresses at least one of the following : Detecting trends and signalling changes in the occurrence of disease or condition, Provide estimates of the magnitude of morbidity related to the nutrition problem under surveillance; Identify risk factors associated with disease occurrence and permit assessment of the effects of control measures b.Summarize comparative advantages, local capacity for implementation, conceptual and institutional set-up of each model as well models’ capacity to effectively influence action at local and national levels; c.Summarizes gaps and needs/ recommendations for improved data analysis , demand and use by main stakeholders under each model; Discusses and concludes on the options for streamlining, including through integration, of the models of nutrition data and information collection as well as their ensuring of effective inputs into existing national and local early warning, food security, and health data collection mechanisms;

Qualifications or specialized knowledge/experience required for the assignment: •Advanced university degree in public health, nutrition and/or biostatistics/epidemiology; •Up to 10 years of experience, including minimum 5 internationally, in designing, managing or monitoring of nutrition information-related activities and models; •Proven knowledge and skills on best available nutrition surveillance models and nutrition information and surveillance activities at international, regional and local levels as relevant; •Excellent and proven communication and facilitation skills; •Excellent and proven analytical and report-writing skills; •Fluency in English; •Knowledge of Uganda and regional context will be an asset; •Familiarity with UN/UNICEF programmes and activities will be an asset;

Interested candidates should send letter of interest, P11 form, CV and any relevant sample work (links or attachments) to ugderecruit@unicef.org.

Applications must be received by 24th October 2011

Consultant for Basline Livelihoods Assessment in West Darfur

2011-10-23T08:39:00.000-07:00

HelpAge wishes to engage a consultant to conduct a baseline livelihoods assessment in Habilla Locality (Habilla town and two surrounding villages of Gobi and Tawang). The consultant will:

• Access and review the literature related to livelihoods, food security and local economy (examining reports, project proposal and budget and visiting other institutions working in the area) • Develop suitable detailed field data collection tools (qualitative and quantitative) • Develop an inception report, detailing the methodology, indicators, tools, work plan schedule and budget to carry out the assignment. This will be developed and finalized in consultation with HelpAge team. • Lead the baseline livelihoods assessment team. • Facilitate training of field staff and pre‐testing of data collection tools in collaboration with the HelpAge team. • Co‐ordinate collection of data, and supervise data entry and analysis. • Analyze and interpret the findings, working closely with the HelpAge assessment team. • Compile and submit the draft report, make a presentation to HelpAge, incorporate comments and submit a final report. • Prepare the final report and submit to the Livelihoods Coordinator and Darfur Programme Manager.

Interested consultants are invited to send technical and financial proposal by email to the following address baseline@helpagesudan.org. Please use Baseline Livelihoods Assessment Consultancy as the subject of your email.

Deadline for submission: 27th October 2011.

expert in the area vocational training in midwifery, family planning and reproductive health

2011-10-23T08:38:00.000-07:00

Health Focus GmbH

www.health-focus.de

Within the G8-Muskoka-initiative, we are currently looking for

an international expert

in the area vocational training in midwifery, family planning and reproductive health as part of the “Advice to Health- / AIDS-programme” of the German bilateral cooperation. The expert will also be the deputy team leader. Project location will be in Bafoussam, Ngaoundere or Maroua, Cameroon.

Estimated contract period: two and a half years starting February 2012

consultants for reconstruction projects

2011-10-23T08:37:00.001-07:00

Swiss Solidarity (www.bonheur.ch), Switzerland’s major fundraising platform, is looking for a team of 2 experienced consultants to visit a selection of reconstruction projects on two occasions in Pakistan.

A year after the 2010 floods which affected approximately 18 million people in Pakistan, more than half of the collected sum of CHF 42,1 million has been allocated.

An external evaluation shall provide an independent assessment regarding the quality, appropriateness and sustainability of the projects, as well as identify good practices and share the findings with the concerned organizations for learning purposes.

The mandate foresees 2 project visits. The visits will tentatively take place at the beginning (January-February) and in autumn (September) 2012.

For this purpose, Swiss Solidarity is looking for a team of 2 experienced consultants with a wide experience in post-disaster reconstruction and rehabilitation projects. Please find attached the Terms of reference with the consultant’s required profiles.

Application deadline: candidates shall send their curriculum vitae until November 11th 2011 to Manolo Caviezel (caviezel@bonheur.ch).

Appendix : Terms of reference.

team leader with consulting expertise in the area of reproductive health and health care management

2011-10-23T08:36:00.001-07:00

Health Focus GmbH

www.health-focus.de

Within the G8-Muskoka-initiative, we are currently looking for

an international expert as team leader

with consulting expertise in the area of reproductive health and health care management as part of the “Advice to Health- / AIDS-programme” of the German bilateral cooperation. Project location will be Bafoussam or Ngaoundere/Maroua, Cameroon.

Estimated contract period: two and a half years starting at the beginning of 2012

Download DOC (33 KB)

Download DOC (38.5 KB)

Download DOCX (73.85 KB)

TERMS OF REFERENCE-ACTIONAID INTERNATIONAL KENYA BOARD REVIEW

2011-10-23T08:35:00.002-07:00

CALL FOR PROPOSALS

Annual Board Review and Development

Terms of Reference

The assignment consists of planning and conducting a Board review for ActionAid International Kenya (AAIK) and facilitating work on a Board development plan.

Download PDF (117.88 KB)

Asset Building Group Assessment Consultancy, Maryland, South Sudan and Ethiopia

2011-10-23T08:35:00.001-07:00

Asset Building Group Assessment Consultancy (Silver Spring, MD , South Sudan and Ethiopia)

CHF International’s mission is to be a catalyst for long-lasting positive change in low- and moderate-income communities around the world, helping them to improve their social, economic and environmental conditions.

CHF International is seeking an experienced consultant to conduct an evaluation of our Asset Building Group methodology in South Sudan and Ethiopia.

Assignment Summary: Since 2004, CHF has been working on an Asset Building Group (ABG) model to mobilize groups of poor, largely female, community members to improve their savings and lending and income-generating activities. The goal of this assessment is to understand, in a more texturized, qualitative context, how those Asset Based Groups are currently functioning in Ethiopia and South Sudan. The information derived from this survey will inform CHF whether the methodology currently being used to implement these Asset Based Groups is sound, to assess and understand changes which could be made and ultimately whether it could become an institutionalized tool. In September of 2011, CHF worked with a consulting firm in Ethiopia and local staff in South Sudan to establish the working context for this assessment by surveying the members of CHF ABG groups, both functioning and disbanded, providing the basic characteristics and locations for ABGs in South Sudan and Ethiopia. The consultant will, in conjunction with CHF staff, analyze the results of the initial data and design a qualitative based assessment to gauge the experiences of groups and evaluate the process of applying the ABG methodology, its appropriateness in each setting and the viability of the ABG model in facilitating cooperative livelihood development.

ABG Functionality and Impact Assessment •Determine the viability of this methodology in aiding recovery of sustainable livelihoods. •Assess impact of ABG membership in terms of savings, access to finance, assets and income; •Determine the presence and significance of other economic or social benefits ; •Gauge activity and self-sustainability of ABGs; •Define a spectrum of impact ranging from “disbanded” to “highly impactful” and the various levels of functionality in between pertaining to ABGs’ effect on households and communities; •Define variables and/or elements of the methodology which contribute to or reduce effectiveness; •Define range of potential short and long term impacts that ABGs can bring about. •Consolidate institutional lessons learned regarding the factors of success and failure for ABG groups, shaping future application of this programmatic approach in a variety of recovery-oriented contexts. (Sudan and Ethiopia)

Deliverables: •Facilitation of data analysis and collaboration with CHF International staff on data collection priorities at CHF International HQ in Washington, DC. •Design of Stage 2 assessment tool and focus group survey.
•Implementation of Stage 2 including the provision any necessary training for local staff in South Sudan and Ethiopia, implementation of survey and focus groups and corollary data collection and data recording; •Analysis of Stage 2 data resulting in an Assessment report of ABGs in South Sudan and Ethiopia; to include a record of every ABG initiated by CHF, including data on group composition, governance activities, participation levels, functional activities, profits, market links, and other features; --Comparative analysis showing how demographics, geography, and other factors that distinguish ABGs impacts their success; --Document key success factors for functioning ABGs, levels of impact, and main reasons for disbandment and reduced impact amongst these groups; --Summary of lessons learned and recommendations for future implementation; •Packaging of data for handover to CHF; •Written narrative of findings and recommendations to strengthen the ABG methodology to acheive the most resilent and sustainable livelihoods. •Presentation and debrief at CHF HQ

Timeframe: The consultant should be available to mobilize during the month of November 2011. The consultant should be available for data analysis and tool design at CHF headquarters in Silver Spring, MD. Subsequently, the consultant should be available to mobilize to both CHF field offices in South Sudan and Ethiopia to further develop the tool, train local staff and consultants and implement the tool. Data analysis, compilation and written assessment to be finalized by mid December, 2011.
 Analysis of Initial Survey Results; Design of Qualitative Survey (Est. 5 days)  Conduct Qualitative Data Collection (Est. 13 days)  Synthesis and Analysis of all data (Est. 10 days)  Finalization of Deliverables and Presentation at CHF HQ (Est. 2 days)

Qualifications: •Significant contextual understanding of the regions, the people, cultures and economic environments in the Horn of Africa, specifically, Ethiopia and South Sudan; •Experience working with international NGOs in Ethiopia and South Sudan, preferably a history of working with CHF International; •Contextual understanding of community development theory and methodologies such as those implemented by CHF International. •At least 10 years experience with field survey design, impact assessment and evaluation, focus group design capturing both quantitative and qualitative dynamics. A PhD in survey design and techniques preferred; •Demonstrated experience as lead researcher, having trained and managed teams of at least 15 enumerators. This project will have limited oversight and require substantial self direction; •Experience with rigorous quantitative and qualitative research methods, tools, techniques and sampling methods; •Excellent knowledge of advanced statistics and research methodology, including skills in sampling techniques and methodologies, professional use of computer software for statistical and other relevant applications (such as SPSS, STATA or SASS); •Ability to summarize quantitative and qualitative data succinctly and comprehensively in final analysis stages; •Understanding of GPS technology to incorporate into a GIS database.

For more information or to apply, please visit our website at http://www.chfinternational.org/jobs

Consultant, Equity Stocktake of WASH in Emergencies

2011-10-23T08:34:00.001-07:00

Terms of Reference Equity Stocktake of WASH in Emergencies

Background

Recognising that disasters tend to have greatest impact on the most vulnerable in society, UNICEF’s WASH humanitarian focus on provision of basic services, protection and restoration of dignity amongst affectees is largely orientated toward the most disadvantaged and marginalised. The WASH sector has, over the years, produced various guidance documents, handbooks and is currently guided by the WASH Strategy 2006-2015. WASH in Emergencies (WiE) has also contributed to many other emergency related documents generated and led by other sectors or cross-cutting areas.

The reorientation of UNICEF’s thrust along equity lines offers an opportunity to take stock of both the response practices and the documentation available to guide programme staff and UNICEF’s implementing partners. Given the inclusion of WASH in many sectoral and cross-cutting documents and guidance, it is necessary to review a wide array of materials to ensure that equity is adequately reflected in WASH inclusions.

Equity is not the only cross-cutting area that has gained prominence within UNICEF in recent years. Whilst reviewing the materials and practices, it would be pragmatic to simultaneously determine if existing WASH guidance documents require updating and strengthening in regard to key cross-cutting areas including (but not limited to): gender; accountability to beneficiaries and community participation; disabilities; HIV/AIDS; environment and Climate Change; DRR; Child Protection; Adolescent Development and Participation and others.

The degree to which these gaps are notable in field level WiE activities is possible to divine from emergency proposals, reports, evaluations and associated documents when compared to the guidance notes and policies derived by respective sections / divisions. A review of these will allow the consultant to identify correlation with gaps noted above in policy and guidance material, further honing the recommendations for action.

Objective

The main objective of this consultancy is the identification of gaps within UNICEF WiE documents, guidelines and contributions to other sectoral / thematic documents (with a specific focus on compliance with the current equity agenda) and to make recommendations to address these.

Duty Station

The consultant can be based in any location having good internet access. The consultant will be expected to make two visits to UNICEF NYHQ country offices during the course of the consultancy for short periods. The first of around 4 days at the outset to collect materials and interact with WASH and non-WASH colleagues, with a second shorter visit of two days to present findings and recommendations, or may be possible to achieve via video conferencing facilities.

Methodology

a. Review of and familiarisation with existing WASH reference materials and emergency reports (donor / internal sitreps and evaluations) b. Collection of official and draft guidance and policy documents from other sectors and colleagues responsible for cross-cutting issues and preparedness (Early Warning – Early Action). c. Cross referencing of cross-sectoral / cross-cutting materials to identify gaps with a specific focus on equity d. Review a range of WiE documentation including proposals / donor reports / sitreps / evaluations / job descriptions and so forth to determine which of the gaps identified require the highest priority for action e. Make written recommendation on the gaps identified and the action proposed to rectify these on a priority basis f. Present the findings to the PD-WASH section

Activities and Outputs

Outputs/deliverables Estimated Duration (person days) Deadline Compilation and tabulation of existing WASH, non-WASH and a cross-section of recent emergency documentation (guidance/technical notes/policies/strategies/training modules/proposals/sitreps/reports etc..) (Excel format) 10 15th January 2012 Analysis and tabulation of gaps identified between documents including emergency documentation (Excel format) 5 15th February 2012 Identification of priority gaps and recommended action to address the same (Word format) 4 30th January 2012 Presentation of findings and recommendations to PD-WASH and other stakeholders 1 30th March 2012

TOTAL person days & amount payable 20

Travel

Date Destination Purpose Length (days) December 2011 / January 2012 exact date t.b.d. NYHQ Collect materials and research through interaction with WASH and non-WASH colleagues 6 March 2012 NYHQ Presentation of findings to PD-WASH (this may be possible via video conferencing facilities) 3

Duration:
The consultancy will take place between 1st December and 31st March 2012.
Key skills and experience required:

The consultant should have the following skills and qualifications:- • Higher degree (PhD or Masters) in a field related to water, sanitation and/or public health • Minimum 10 years’ experience related to water/sanitation/health programmes in developing countries. • Extensive (greater than 5 years) experience of country-level humanitarian action in WASH • Computer literate, particularly in excel • Excellent communication and writing skills • Prior experience within UNICEF, preferably at NYHQ level both highly desirable

How to Apply:

Qualified candidates are requested to submit a cover letter with subject line “Consultant, Equity stocktake of WASH in Emergency materials”, CV and P 11 form (which can be downloaded from our website at http://www.unicef.org/about/employ/index_53129.html) to pdconsultants@unicef.org by 28 October, 2011. Please indicate your ability, and daily/monthly rate and availability to undertake the terms of reference above. Applications submitted without a daily rate will not be considered.

Consultant - Anti-corruption public complaints and reporting mechanisms

2011-10-23T08:33:00.002-07:00

Project name: EGYX49: Supporting Measures to Combat Corruption and Money Laundering, and to Foster Asset Recovery, in Egypt

Period of assignment/services (if applicable): 45 working days within the span of twelve months from December 2011 until November 2012

Proposal should be submitted by email with the title in the subject line to fo.egypt@unodc.org with a copy to Caitlin.chittenden@unodc.org no later than COB 8 November 2011. Any request for clarification must be sent in writing, or by standard electronic communication to the address or e-mail indicated above. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime will respond in writing or by standard electronic mail and will send written copies of the response, including an explanation of the query without identifying the source of inquiry, to all consultants.

SCOPE OF WORK, RESPONSIBILITIES AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ANALYTICAL WORK:

One of the project's key outcomes is Outcome 3 Institutional capacity to combat corruption and money laundering and to recover stolen assets enhanced and its corresponding output Output 3.2 Reporting and/or complaints mechanisms on corruption strengthened. Thus, UNODC is engaging an International Consultant under this output to support national authorities to strengthen the reporting and complaints mechanisms against corruption in Egypt. The International Consultant will utilize his/her specialist expertise and experience to assess the effectiveness of existing anti-corruption public complaints and reporting mechanisms and provide recommendations to increase public awareness of these mechanisms as well as to support existing structures to implement assessment recommendations (this may include restructuring the reporting/complaints mechanisms themselves). The International Consultant will also support on-site training to responsible entities on receiving, managing and processing complaints. Specifically, the International Consultant is responsible for carrying out the following activities under Output 3.2: • Assess the effectiveness of existing anti-corruption public complaints and reporting mechanisms and provide recommendations to increase public awareness of these mechanisms. (Activity 3.2.1) • Support existing structures to implement assessment recommendations (this may include restructuring the reporting/complaints mechanisms themselves). (Activity 3.2.2) • Provide on-site training to responsible entities on receiving, managing and processing complaints. (Activity 3.2.3) • Support the efforts of individual criminal justice agencies in establishing reporting and/or complaints mechanisms (for example at the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Justice or the Ministry of Interior) (Activity 3.2.4)

REQUIREMENTS FOR EXPERIENCE AND QUALIFICATIONS:

I. Academic Qualifications: • Advanced university degree in law or a related field. A combination of a first level university degree and a qualifying number of relevant years of experience might be considered in lieu of the advanced degree.

II. Years of experience: • Five years (7 years in case of a first level university degree) of relevant professional experience in the field of anti-corruption, including in assessing and strengthening anti-corruption public complaints and reporting mechanisms.

III. Competencies:

• Superior skills and experience in assessing and providing recommendations to strengthen anti-corruption public reporting and complaints mechanisms essential. • Sound experience providing technical assistance to overseas governments and organizations in an international setting in this field essential. • Solid practical experience advising upon and implementing best practices in the field of anti-corruption required. • Practical operational experience working in an anti-corruption agency, or an international organization or NGO in this field an advantage. • Good interpersonal skills and ability to establish and maintain effective partnerships and working relationships in a multicultural environment. • Up-to-date knowledge and practical experience of UN programmes, policies, guidelines and procedures is an asset. • Excellent written, editorial and oral communication skills in English. • Knowledge of Arabic is an advantage. • Computer literacy.

Interested individual consultants must submit the following documents/information to demonstrate their qualifications: 1. Proposal/Letter of interest: (i) Explaining why they are the most suitable for the work (ii) Provide a brief methodology on how they will approach and conduct the work 2. Financial proposal The financial must include the total requested lump sum amount for the assignment and a breakdown of the costs associated with this lump sum (professional fees and insurances). All travel costs for the International Consultant to complete the task (economy class plane tickets to/from Cairo and per diem (DSA)) will be arranged and paid for by UNODC. 3. Personal CV including past experience in similar projects and at least 3 references 4. A completed P11 form

The selected candidate will be expected to start the assignment upon contract’s signature, expected to be in December 2011.

Evaluators for Final Evaluation of Early Recovery Programme in Pakistan

2011-10-23T08:33:00.001-07:00

Following the widespread flooding and devastation caused by the heavy monsoon rains in Pakistan in 2010, six International NGOs – Action Against Hunger (ACF), CARE International, Concern Worldwide, International Rescue Committee (IRC), Oxfam GB and Save the Children – formed a consortium to undertake a large scale early recovery programme. This £20 million Emergency Food Security and Livelihoods (EFSL) programme, funded by the UK Department for International Development (DFID), provided basic income support and income generation opportunities to help the most vulnerable households begin restoring their livelihoods and communities. In order to promote greater quality, efficiency and coordination through collaborative working, and to demonstrate the capacity of NGOs to deliver rapid, effective and accountable interventions at scale in complex environments, a new type of consortium model was formed to implement the programme. This programme is near completion and a final evaluation is planned to look at both the success of the programme and the consortium approach employed to deliver it.

Requirements: Save the Children, as Monitoring and Evaluation lead for the consortium, is seeking two consultants to conduct an independent evaluation of the early recovery programme and consortium approach employed. The two-part evaluation will look at: 1. Effectiveness of programme implementation and impact 2. Benefits, constraints and effectiveness of collaborative working through a consortium model The consultants will be responsible for the production of their respective specialised parts of the evaluation. The Save the Children Monitoring and Evaluation team will work in close consultation with the consultants to provide support and advice as required. To facilitate the data gathering across a wide geographical area with limited access for international staff, it is proposed that a local consultancy firm be contracted to conduct interviews with field staff and beneficiaries. The duration of the evaluation will be no longer than 6 weeks.

Specific Objectives:

Programme Evaluation – the EFSL programme evaluator will primarily focus on a field level assessment of the programme and its results. More specifically they will be required to: • Develop field research plan, sample size and sampling methodology • Develop data collection tools (for both qualitative and quantitative inquiry) • Conduct analysis of data collected from the field • Collect data and conduct interviews at a country office level • Write the evaluation report Consortium Evaluation – the consortium evaluator will primarily focus on a country office level assessment of the characteristics, benefits and effectiveness of the consortium model employed. More specifically they will be required to: • Review and analyse consortium governance and coordination structures, and assess against other similar collaborative working models • Collect data and conduct in-depth interviews at a country office level with all key stakeholders • Gather and summarise lessons learned for future collaborative interventions • Write the evaluation report The highest standards of humanitarian evaluation practice are expected. The evaluation should be rigorous, with data sources triangulated to ensure accuracy, and comprehensive, using both quantitative and qualitative data. Finding and conclusions should be presented clear and concisely. The evaluation should reference international standards and benchmarks of good practice in the areas of intervention.

Key considerations in short listing the consultants would be as follows: • Qualification of individual consultants • Previous experience of leading large scale evaluations • Previous experience of evaluating EFSL projects • Previous experience of evaluating alliance or consortium projects • International experience is required. Experience of working in Pakistan or the region is desirable.

A detailed Terms of Reference is available upon request by sending an email to muhammad.alamgir@savethechildren.org with the consultancy title in subject line.

All expressions of interest are requested to be electronically submitted by 27th October 2011. Expressions of interest should consist of a CV, examples of relevant previous work, and a cover letter outlining how your particular skills and experience are relevant and appropriate for the particular part of the evaluation (ie. the EFSL programme or the consortium approach).