There’s an interesting read on The Hechinger Report where Jackie Mader has written an article about game sites that avoid school web filters.

(The Hechinger Report, interestingly enough, releases articles under a Creative Commons license. That’s super cool of them, and one of the reasons they’re in my RSS feed reader.)

As is my trend for Blaugust, this isn’t a summary of that article, I’m using it as a jumping off point.

I have a love-hate relationship with games in my classroom.

Also internet filters.

Also, the internet.

Also, computers in general.

All for the same reason, in fact – these things that can be powerful tools for learning are also a student’s go-to for distraction. As someone with unmedicated ADHD, I know the struggle is real.

The difference is in the directions, as with most tools.

I don’t just toss my students at Luanti, I set up a modded server and direct students to complete a task, often one that requires teamwork.

I have students produce game review videos where OF COURSE they have to get some b-roll of them playing the game, but they also have to write up glows and grows (positive and constructive criticism, if we’re being fancy), script things out, record their audio, and overlay everything in post-production.

Many of the reviewed games are hosted on websites that do their best to avoid school filter blocks, which I allow so long as the content is not inappropriate for school. Students will ask what is and isn’t fair game, and I usually say “Imagine I’m showing your review to [Principal], because there’s a good chance I’m going to show it to [Principal] and your parents if you choose poorly.”

That’s usually enough guidance for a 6th grader to make the right call without going over the Student Code of Conduct in detail.

Heck, I’ve had students designing games for close to 20 years. The tools we use have changed, but the core concepts remain.

There’s plenty of reasons to block websites in school, and I’m glad it’s not my job to decide where the line is drawn, but I’ve found in my own little corner of education the easiest path forward is to take the distraction and turn it into a curriculum-based lesson.

I did the same thing with phones, back before my school banned them, but that’s another topic full of mixed feelings for a different post.

Over on DIY Photography, Alysa Gavilan as a good introduction to freelance photography as a career. It’s worth a read if that’s something you or someone you know is seriously thinking about that as a choice.

I’m not summarizing articles here, but I’ve known a few freelancers and photography business owners (Are you a freelancer if you have employees?) and because of that I offer some additional advice:

Get a business degree.

No, seriously. Some of the most talented artists I know don’t have formal degrees in their craft, because it’s already their passion. They live and breathe that stuff, and the knowledge follows experience and sharing with others in the communities that form around their chosen media.

A photographer might not start out strong, but they get that way through trial an error.

You know what field is prohibitively expensive if you try to learn through trial and error? Business.

A 2 year business degree from a community college will give you the basics for how to start a company, handle billing, pay employees (you should be an employee of your business, even if it’s just you), get proper permitting and paperwork, and a bunch of stuff I don’t know because I’m not a freelancer.

I’m not saying a photography degree is worthless, far from it. I would love it if every artist had the time and money to get a degree in the media that is their passion, but that’s not the world we live in right now.

If you only have the finances for one degree, get the one that helps you manage those finances.

Then use it to make your love of photography profitable.

I recently read an article with a similar name to this one that I’ll not link here, because it made me angry enough to draft a rebuttal.

This is not that rebuttal. This isn’t even a tribute.

Instead, this is my own list, different from the other one, and limited to five things simply to keep this post shorter than a novel. I could go on. I could nitpick. I would rather not invite that poison into my soul this morning.

(And yes, these are in a numbered order, but what that order should be has changed on a daily, sometimes hourly basis for me. I might adjust it after I’ve written all five. I might not.)

#5 We call it EdTech

TL;DR: I don’t like that it’s shoved over to be a separate thing when technology use should be in everyone’s domain.

There’s plenty of reasons to use labels, but doing so fits things into neat little boxes when the world is not so easy to organize.

I’ve been my school’s “EdTech” teacher for as long as it’s existed, and with that comes a concept held by too many people that I hold a fiefdom over all that has blinking lights and LCD screens.

We’ve moved away from that a bit in the past 6 years (I wonder why…) but the problem persists, with teachers using class Chromebooks for unsupervised “independent study” time because they’re not “techy” enough to do more.

In truth, any technology is a tool that makes life easier for those who are using it. (If it’s making life harder, someone’s doing something wrong.) The first of our ancestors that learned a pointy stick kept their food from running away was using technology. It should not be mystified just because now a lot of it has rocks we tricked into doing math.

There are plenty of people who make loving tech their whole personality and try to build walls up so anyone not on their level doesn’t get to be “in the know” and learn how to use the tools. Those who just want things to work don’t need to help build those walls.

#4 We Let Capitalism Lead It

TL;DR: Nothing in education should be a for-profit enterprise, because that shifts priorities to making money, not supporting students.

Schools, traditionally, are underfunded. Underfunded schools do not traditionally have a lot of money to spend on technology. Therefore, schools will frequently look for the free and/or cheap options.

This means the schools will have tons of open-source software running on refurbished hardware, right? Hahaha, my lab is an outlier and does not get counted.

No, a lot of the tools we use are “freemium” to get us hooked before charging for more features, or ad supported, or have data collection, or are provided at steep discounts so that students (and teachers) get locked into the “but I’ve always used [thing]” mentality.

Look at what Apple did in the 1990s. All of those Mac labs existed for a reason, and it helped keep them afloat for years.

Google’s doing the same thing with Chromebooks, and they don’t even need to deal with hardware or marketing to make it happen.

Sure, to be in my school system they have to promise to not collect any data on our students, but this is Google. If they have someone locked into their ecosystem by 3rd grade then as soon as that kid creates a non-student account the data collection and selling begins.

Adobe makes me the angriest, though, as even my own colleagues in the past have said their students needed Adobe Creative Suite to be successful. Why? It’s the industry standard. Why? Because everyone uses it. Why? Because it’s the industry standard.

There’s no such thing as a free lunch, I know. Using open source software in my lab requires me to do more work installing and maintaining things, but my students will still know WHEN to make the cut from one scene to another.

#3 We Lowered Our Standards

TL;DR: Some tools we use are garbage, but we still use them because they’re “educational.”

A long time ago I was really into a handful of Christian Rock bands. Alas, only a handful, because the rest were … developing their skills. Christian Rock was a small enough niche that a band could get their foot in the door and be on the local Christian Rock radio station with a level of quality one could not find on any pop, country, or oldies station because the bar for those was too high.

Most “educational” programs I’ve played with have either been heavy on the fun with a glaze of flash cards on top or heavy on the flash cards with showing a point total to make it “gamified.”

I’ve had far more success taking tools never meant to be limited to the classroom and having students make things with them. Kdenlive isn’t a video editor for kids, it’s a video editor. The lesson is in learning how to use it, and it doesn’t need a cartoon mascot for that.

(Although Tux Paint has a cartoon mascot and is super fun, so there’s always exceptions.)

#2 We Abandoned Old Successes

TL;DR: Things that work well don’t have to be dumped just because we found a new thing.

Remember when blogging and podcasting were big in education? No, not recently, I mean the first time, back in the ’00s, before some of my coworkers were born.

How about game based learning? Gamification? (You know those aren’t the same thing?)

Each of these was a trend that was popular for good reasons that just faded away to obscurity, not because it got worse but because the next new trend showed up and there was only so much time in a school day.

#1 We Jump on Bandwagons Because They’re Bandwagons

TL;DR: If not adopting AI will have me get left behind, then I will leave you to join the lemmings and be here when the bubble has burst with my cognitive skills intact.

I’ve seen a lot of fads come and go: ’80s hairstyles, Bitcoin, NFTs, and candy colored computers are just some of them. You can still find fragments left behind, but they are all shadows of their former selves.

AI is one of these trends, with companies relabeling rather tame algorithms as “AI” because that’s the buzzword of the day.

It disgusts me that so many EdTech “leaders,” some of whom I respected in the ’00s, have seen this as the next big thing and hitched their wagons to it.

Gotta make a buck somehow, if your income is public speaking and book sales, I guess.

Whenever I converse with an AI advocate, I get the same talking points:

• “You’re not teaching your kids what they need to know.”
  • My students know how to make movies. Yours know how to write a prompt and have a program steal other movies and mash them together to make something that looks the same as every other AI generated piece of slop. Our classes are not the same.
• “It gives you more time for the important work.”
  • Everything AI generates is subject to errors, and people are getting in trouble when those errors slip through. It takes me less time to make a thing than it does to double-check the output from a plagiarism engine.
• “It helps students learn.”
  • Citation needed. (I’m never provided any when I ask.)
  • Any time the work is done for my students, they don’t learn. My kindergarten students don’t learn their passwords in classes where the teacher types it for them, but in my class most of them have it down in two weeks. They learn by doing. If AI does the work from them, what are they learning?
  • I teach HTML coding. AI can write code, but AI written code is very hard to maintain. I can look at my hand-coded websites and edit them. My students can do the same. Yours can, what, ask the AI to do better this time?
• “It’s cheaper than paying an artist.”
  • Theft usually is. Knowing how to steal is not the flex you think it is. Telling an art teacher that kids should know how to steal from artists is certainly a choice.

One last thing about the AI bandwagon that is spreading like a cancer: The people making money in a gold rush are the ones who sell the shovels.

The established shovel makers aren’t building more factories. They see the bubble for what it is, and don’t expect it to last long enough for a new factory to pay for itself before the bubble bursts.

When that happens, I’ll be here – still teaching how to make cool things without typing prompts into a souped up spellchecker, while others have forgotten how to do anything without asking an AI for advice first.

The very first post I ever made on this blog was about the Artchive, a still-running site where you can find countless fine art images by famous artists. When I made that I was halfway through my first year as an elementary art teacher (after 4 years of teaching high school) and in the process of getting my graduate degree.

That post – this whole website, actually – was part of that degree, as we had to make web pages for one of my courses. Most went with static pages but not me, I had to be fancy!

The Artchive is still awesome, but Open Culture has found yet another resource to add to my tool belt: The Last Museum.

You should read the write-up Open Culture has, it’s not long and I don’t want to just rehash what someone else said. Instead, let’s talk about usage.

My students like making digital things, but those interests aren’t distributed evenly. If they have a video that needs some visuals, their first inclination is to head to Google and steal something. My job, in part, is to fix that so they don’t end up on the news for the wrong reasons.

Now I’ve shared a variety of sites with them to help out with that, but more is better, and The Last Museum is effectively a search engine for art.

One of my favorite features about it is that you can select a specific range of years. Because copyright law is a hot mess in most places (it’s great to protect artists’ rights, it’s unfortunate that companies abuse it constantly), I’m more likely to find public domain art I can use if I move the higher end of that slider down to, say, 1930.

(It’s still worth checking each work, of course, as exceptions sometimes exist depending on each country’s laws.)

And the variety! There’s maps, woodcuts, paintings, prints, lots of architecture, and all kinds of cool things in there.

This isn’t going to replace the other sources I use, but it’s certainly going to supplement them.

Remember when you would buy a compact camera if you wanted something inexpensive?

Well, technically you still can (Looking at you, Camp Snap!), but the prices for higher quality compact cameras are surpassing the lower end DSLR and mirrorless models, even when you factor in the lenses.

Granted, you’re getting what you pay for. A $1k+ compact is going to outperform my current, aging DSLR (in the best lighting, at least…) while still being small enough to fit in a pocket. Still, I’m the kind of person who won’t pay the going rate for a new desktop computer when I’m replacing my phone, so my knee-jerk reaction is to not like it.

The Bad Times

I remember when it seemed like the small camera market was dying off. Flip video cameras were remarkable even without an optical zoom, but cell phones were on the rise, so they died away. Reporters were being handed iPhones so staff photographers could be laid off. (And that was earlier this year!)

The Better Times

Now we’ve got a resurgence of non-phone cameras and I love it, for so many reasons. Camera companies are loving it as well, as the ones that survived are raking it in. I won’t celebrate the rich getting richer, but without new hardware being made the hobby does get a bit more difficult.

First of all: Your average non-phone camera isn’t going to be packed with AI “features.” Oh, there might be something in there labeled as AI, in the same way that every spellchecker gets that label if someone in marketing thinks it’ll make a shareholder salivate, but cameras aren’t going to have the processors or storage space dedicated to the LLMs I complain about to everyone who will listen.

Second: Phones are constantly online. Cameras aren’t. You can get a camera with Wi-Fi features, but try turning those on and watch your battery drain in real time. The benefit here is that any portal onto the internet is also a doorway to distraction. When I’m taking photos I want to be in that moment, not immediately going through the process of evaluating and uploading content.

My students have always been in that mindset. It’ll take an hour to record 5 minutes because they need to stop and review after every shot, and while that’s happening oops here come the phones. This only got quashed last year because of a school-wide cell phone ban.

A Mild Complaint

The downside of this is that it’s getting harder to get cameras for my classroom. I started regularly trolling shopgoodwill.com back in 2020 looking for computers, and within a few years I had a class set of compact cameras as well. Granted, they were of … varying levels of quality, with some using cards not manufactured in quantity since before some of my students were born, but they worked, and they were cheap, because the demand was low.

Now, I still get cameras from Goodwill, but my eyes are on the bridge models – like the Nikon Coolpix ones that take four AA batteries, because I can get rechargeable lithium AAs for cheap(ish) prices and those things combined will last for years.

But the compact cameras? That’s a non-starter. I might get a DSLR for $50 and be happy even without it being new enough to record video, but the decent compacts are going for way, way, more.

(I’m fully aware that this may be incredibly dated within a year or two. Consider it a snapshot from a bygone era if that’s the case.)

A Selfish Complaint, Because It’s My Blog So I’m Allowed

I suppose my biggest complaint about it is entirely selfish. Until last year I had a perfectly serviceable compact that was waterproof, shockproof, had a flip-out screen, and all for @ $400. You can’t get that value for that price any more, and since the screen died it’s next to unusable.

The New Old Compact

My new compact, A Camp Snap Pro, is none of the things the old one was. It’s cheap, by both definitions of the word. There’s no flip-out screen, in fact there’s no screen at all. It doesn’t do video, and while I suspect it would survive a bounce or two thanks to a lack of moving parts, I dare not consider it to be waterproof.

Not everyone’s a fan.

I’d take a class set if I could manage it.

No screen to check your shots? Well it’s more work to do that, so you might as well take all of the ones you need for this assignment before stopping your shoot to do that. You DID plan your whole shot list, right? … right?

No built-in zoom? Use your feet like I told you to.

The photos all look too dark? Time to actually use the studio lights we have instead of relying solely on the fluorescent overheads.

It’s only slightly removed from teaching film photography, but without the chemicals.

I’m totally here for that aesthetic.

Russell T. Warne has an article over on Education Next about the Gifted (or as some districts call it, “Talented & Gifted,” or “TAG”) program and some of its flaws. This isn’t a summary of the article, I’m just using that as a jumping off point.

I’d like to think I know a bit about the Gifted program. In 5th grade I was labeled Gifted and later I became both a TAG teacher and coordinator. I’ve had the small desk, big desk, and run-around-the-building positions for TAG, something not everyone gets to say.

The Small Desk

My journey in TAG began after taking an IQ test, a method I consider to be outdated based on both Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences (I was taught Gardner in the ’90s, talking about “Intelligence” like it’s one monolithic thing should be reserved for history books and RPGs) and the more recent concept of Growth Mindset.

Regardless of the inherent inequalities in that system of identification, I benefited from it … mostly.

Some of the things we did stuck with me, even now, decades later. I remember playing a competitive stock market game and my team winning, out of mostly sheer luck. I remember working collectively on a model airplane that we never actually finished. I faked a UFO photo with papier-mâché and a Polaroid camera, fooling a significant percentage of my grade level.

I got “enrichment” experiences that I would not have otherwise had, thanks to a poorly designed test that said I met the minimum requirements. They left me more rounded, with a better understanding of what I would and would not like to try later in life.

The Big Desk

For a time, I was my current school’s TAG teacher for grades 4-5. It was a lot of fun, with the program revolving around students identifying problems and inventing creative solutions. Keep in mind that for 4th graders, sometimes a problem might be “I don’t have a cardboard robot costume.”

I was 100% for this. We were a pull-out program, so students missed instructional time elsewhere to attend my class once a week (where I also missed planning time) but hey, they were “gifted,” they could make that up, right?

Then 2020 happened and a lot of changes took place. There were multiple ways to handle distance learning but I ended up not enjoying the changes that were made. As I was teaching TAG for the fun of it and not for the stipend, I asked to not be the TAG teacher and my principal took no issue with that.

TAG Coordinator

My last few years as a TAG teacher I did double duty as my school’s Coordinator. I won’t lay out all of the duties here but my primary responsibility was to be one of the front-line people identifying who was eligible for TAG based on my school system’s requirements. (Oh, hey, Russell T. Warne talks about that in the article I linked!)

My school system had (and I assume still has, but I’m not a Coordinator now) a much more lenient method of accepting students into TAG. Again, I’m not going over all the bullet points here, but nowhere in the multiple factors we examined did we ever consider IQ. Being Coordinator was a thankless job, but I’m glad I got to learn how things work. I wouldn’t touch it with a 10 foot pole unless I was still teaching TAG, though. Most schools, the TAG Coordinator is office staff or an administrator.

The Problem With TAG

Alright, now that you have my life story, here’s the part I’d be able to fit into a post on Mastodon:

In my experience, the parts of TAG that benefit students in the program could benefit ALL students if we just opened it to everyone. The parts of TAG that make learning more engaging are perhaps needed even more by students who are not achieving enough to qualify.

There’s no magic switch that makes the TAG program better if you have a label, and nothing that makes it cease to be good if you lack it. We could teach the core concepts to everyone, but we don’t.

At least, not officially.

There’s lots of reasons why, and I’m not about to take a position outside the classroom in order to address them, but I suspect it boils down to resource allocation. TAG costs money and time, both of which are in short supply in most schools.

(There’s also the non-zero possibility that someone thinks that if all classes are TAG then there’s nothing that makes the TAG classes stand out, but that’s idle speculation based on nothing I’ve seen or heard in regards to my district’s TAG department.)

But here’s the thing: If you’re blessed with a curriculum that allows for flexibility, you can just … have students do TAG lessons anyway. I know not every teacher has that option, some admin expect everyone to be on the same lesson in the curriculum on the same day.

But I do have that freedom, and so do many arts teachers.

So that’s what I do.

Importantly: They’re much cheaper and more convenient than most lights that would serve the same purpose.I don’t even need to buy one, since I’ve made due with a sheet of paper and even a blank wall on occasion.

But there’s still a trick to getting it right, so I’m glad that SLR Lounge has written up a guide to Reflector use.

Eight years later and a lot has changed. Yes, all the big things that have already come to your mind, but also, I’m doing a lot of stuff differently.

(Except for standardized testing. Standardized testing never changes.)

The rest of this post’s going to be something of a ramble. I might take parts of what’s in here and turn them into separate posts later, or I might come back years later and share another ramble.

My computer lab is all Linux. Heck, my home computers are all Linux at this point. It’s not that I love it, it’s that every other OS I’ve been fond of in the past 20 years has turned to garbage.

AI is a plague, and many of the great educators I once admired are now touting it as the revolution that will help everyone more easily steal from artists while enabling cognitive decline and hastening the destruction of our environment. None of these things really matter to them, but hey, they got it to make a graphic with too many colors so that lets them hand-wave away all the negatives.

A lot of the sites I’ve convinced others to use have gone the same route as my once respected peers. Code.org rebranded to CodeAI just this year. I’m still expected to use their curriculum for my web design course, but it’s one overhaul away from being useless to my students. (They’re all artists. Am I to tell them the future will be built upon their works, with no credit given? Am I to tell them the future requires them to steal for the corporations so that they may be laid off when they’re no longer needed? What skills will it provide to help them after the AI bubble bursts?)

I’m having a lot of fun playing TTRPGs, though, and most years I sponsor an after school TTRPG club for my students. We’ve abandoned Dungeons & Dragons (another product whose owner has made thoroughly bad choices, but this is the wrong blog for that) in favor of Lasers & Feelings, Cypher System, and Tales of the Valiant.

My social media presence has eroded to near nothing. I deleted my Twitter accounts (I’d stopped using them years earlier), and no longer publish videos to YouTube. I’m on Mastodon and PeerTube, though the former is followers-only by default and the latter focuses on TTRPGs. I might make a PeerTube for my education musings, if I gather enough thoughts to make that worth it. You can find the accounts I use on my other website.

Just last month we passed the 10 year anniversary of my wife’s death. It still hurts. I still miss her every day.

I want to be optimistic about things. There are a lot of reasons out there for me to be pessimistic and call it realism. You have to hunt for the things that make you happy, or make them yourself.

Andrew Roach is doing some amazing things. He’s not a teacher in the traditional sense, but he’s a problem solver. He’s using old tech to make video and fancy tech to make toys. He has a zine that’s half manifesto and half instruction manual on how to make your own TV station.

Russ Sharek went and made a new license for releasing work, that’s similar to CC-BY but with carve-outs preventing AI and corporate use.

Old things are becoming popular again, and I only feel like turning to dust a little bit when I remember them as new things. Primitive digital cameras that don’t connect to the internet or use AI to “fix” things are on the rise, and my students like them a lot. It’s made it harder for me to buy used cameras because of supply and demand, but when I brought my Camp Snap 8 to school, all of my younger students wanted to use it.

There are reasons to be optimistic. Maybe that’s what I’ll post more of here, to make myself feel better about the future.

Or maybe I’ll just yell at cloud computing and AI.

Or both. Both is good.

Rather than give long and difficult to type URLS for my presentations, I thought I’d share them here. (Yes, I am aware that “academicaesthetic” is not universally easy to type, but it’s easier than, say, “o03Eil5s,” and people can get here from AaronBSmith.com … hm, maybe that’s the link I’ll share.)

Keep in mind that these Google Slides are primarily my visual aids, as opposed to the talks themselves, and I’ll probably be changing slides around up to and including 5 minutes before my session starts. If all goes well I’ll have recordings of the actual presentations that I can post on this website as a follow-up.

• Student Directed Learning With Google Forms & Classroom
• Dungeons & Dragons: The Original Game Based Learning Tool

Let’s talk about assessment.

…

OK, now that I’ve scared off any random students who’ve managed to find my website, let’s have an honest talk about assessment.

Grades in one form or another have been a staple of education for a very long time indeed. With the push to quantify school quality through standardized testing and the overall inertia that we normally encounter in academia in general, they don’t look like they’ll be going away any time soon.

So naturally, they’re a perfect thing for progressive ed reformers to rally against. Kids hate them (unless they have an A), teachers hate assessing which grades to give (unless it’s self-grading), and parents hate having to come in for parent/teacher conferences to discuss them, so let’s trash them, right?

Not so fast.

Grades, like paper in an art room, still serve more than one essential need in the classroom. Unlike slide rules and filmstrip projectors, we still use grades because we haven’t come up with a better alternative for them. They work.

Let’s start with the point that Mr. Robinson brings up in his initial rebuttal: Feedback.

Grades on individual assignments let students know the skill with which they completed the assigned task. Those grades can (and should be) itemized in such a way that students also know how well they accomplished various subcategories of the skills being assessed. Their cumulative grade (which if done well should be accessible at any time, not just when Progress Reports or Report Cards are sent home) helps students know how well they’re doing in the course overall. Ideally they should have some idea about how much each assignment weighs against the other tasks they are given throughout the course.

Yes, I can give feedback just through constructive and positive criticism, but while those things are crucially important parts of my curriculum, the ability to boil something down to a number or letter can help the student better understand their growth than me just saying “Hey, that was reasonably better than last time!”

Next up: Grades do the same thing for me that they do for the students.

For the past eight years, my grade book has been a Google Sheet with more annotations, comments, and conditional formatting than is healthy for any web-based system. It is packed full of additional information that explains or clarifies various scores and why they are what they are.

This is incredibly useful information that I’ve gone back to on many occasions throughout the year, but it doesn’t beat being able to highlight the row a child’s scores are in and scroll across to see trends in the data. I can do that with numbered (or lettered) grades far faster than I’d ever be able to do that without them.

I’ve often complained that education is a dinosaur that needs to do some serious evolving if it’s to continue to be meaningful and helpful to our students, but when it comes to getting rid of grades? That’s throwing the baby out with the bath water.

There are a few kinds of assessment that I could do without (Die, standardized testing, DIE!), but let’s keep grades around for a while. They haven’t failed us yet.

Pun intended.

Well never fear, because scholar.social has stepped in to fill the void!

As the name implies, scholar.social is not JUST for teachers, but anyone involved in academics. The tag line they use is  “The Mastodon profile that you’re not embarrassed to put on the last slide of a presentation at a conference,” which is a little wordy I’ll admit, but I think it’s  a great ideal to live by.

It’s a small instance at the time I’m writing this, but as someone who has debated making an instance just for myself I don’t see this as a bad thing. Something I enjoy on Mastodon is when I can look at the Local Timeline and not have it scroll past me faster than I can read. I was getting that on mastodon.cloud and mastodon.social, but not on elekk.xyz. I’ll admit, being able to see what others were saying on my instance kind of spoiled me, so I’m glad my new home lets me enjoy that again.

I’m not going to say this will replace Twitter. Twitter didn’t replace Tumblr for me, and Tumblr didn’t replace this blog. I will say that so far I’m enjoying Mastodon, scholar.social specifically, and think that if you like reading what I put on this site you might enjoy it yourself.

So if you’re a teacher, why not give it a try? When you do, say hello. All the cool kids are doing it.

And so am I.

For years, now, Mr. Savage has been giving a  short talk at the annual Maker Faire. They are full of inspiration, encouragement, and awesomeness. This year’s talk is no different.

The giant ant he rides in on is a bit of a bonus.

Separate from this is a trend known as POSSE, or Publish (on your) Own Site, Syndicate Elsewhere.

Like it implies, following a POSSE strategy doesn’t forego having and using the free social media sites that are so hip with the kids these days, particularly the ones who don’t describe neato things with the word “hip” (or “neato,” for that matter…). Instead, you put your meaningful content on a site you host yourself, then link to it on those networks.

I like this plan. Here’s why.

Here today, gone tomorrow.

A sizable portion of the things I have made were uploaded to services that no longer exist. Remember Geocities? Mac.com web hosting? Tumblr is still around, but I apparently went so long without using it that an older account of mine was deactivated and resurrected by someone spamming ads for real estate.

We assume when we create an account on a free service that it will stay online forever, or at least until we’ve lost interest. Those of us with more gray hairs know that this is simply not the case. A lot of people today are mourning the loss of Vine, but it’s far from the first to go and certainly won’t be the last.

(Side note: My wife did all her blogging on a Tumblr account. I’m going to have to find a way to preserve that somehow.)

You’re the product.

I’ve heard “If you’re getting a service for free, you’re not the customer, you’re the product” so often that it almost loses meaning now. Unfortunately, it is frequently true.

Google doesn’t make money hand over fist because they’re selling physical items or search results, they’re making money because so many people see the stuff they do that buying ads from them is cost effective. (I say this knowing full well that some pages on this website include ads  from Google. I didn’t say all advertising is bad.) The same is true for Facebook. Twitter is … working on it, but they have a problem still with bots and harassers so their store of products seems a bit tainted to prospective buyers.

I pay a company for server space. Because that’s their product and keeping me happy is the best way to keep me sending them money, they work hard to do so. On a free service that is mostly depending on ad revenue and/or data collection, the people they want to make happy are the ones sending them money.

This happened recently on YouTube, where advertisers got particularly annoyed when their ads started showing up in front of incredibly offensive content. As a result, YouTube has seriously cut back on which videos can be monetized. So far, so good, right? Yes, except the algorithm isn’t as fine-tuned as it could be, and now non-bigoted people (I’m assuming, but I like to assume the best when possible) who depend on YouTube ad revenue to pay their rent are a bit concerned about their drop in income.

I like YouTube. It’s where I post all of my tutorials as well as my more recent conference presentations and vlogs, but I wouldn’t depend on it for my income even if my channel subscriptions went through the roof because I’d be relying wholly on a company NOT designed or motivated to keep me happy meeting my needs. (I’d also be squeamish about forcing my students to watch tutorials that make me money. The channel I use to host my tutorials is currently not set up for monetization. If you see ads, the revenue isn’t going to me.)

Self-hosted content is (more) mobile.

I said before that I like my web host. I do, but if I somehow change my mind it would take only a little bit of work to back up this entire site with YEARS of content and move it to another host. There are a few other companies that do that, but it isn’t universal and it isn’t always easy.

Google is one of the few, which is part of the reason I was able to move from Blogger to WordPress without copy/pasting blog posts by hand.

Flickr theoretically has an option for downloading all your photos, but the last several times I tried it didn’t work. If I had been uploading all my photos to a self-hosted site instead of Flickr, I wouldn’t be so concerned about this.

Twitter allows you to request an archive of all of your tweets.

I haven’t seen anything on Facebook or their subsidiaries (Instagram, etc.) allowing you to download all of your content from them.

Vine offered this, but they’re gone now.

You don’t need to leave, but a permanent home would be good.

This entire post was inspired by Doug Belshaw’s post about why he’s “leaving” Twitter. I use quotes because he’s not abandoning Twitter like I abandoned my old nameless-to-not-support-a-spammer Tumblr account. Instead, he’s switching strategies.

To Mr. Belshaw, the Twitter of yesteryear was a place where he had conversations. Now, it will be a place where he uses a bullhorn to tell followers about the cool stuff he’s doing elsewhere. It’s a viable use for the medium, and many people use Twitter for mostly that anyway.

“But blogs are for long form content, not rapid-fire ephemeral but public communication,” you might counter. “Surely he’ll continue to use Twitter for that.”

Eh, Twitter’s not the only option for that, either.

(I’m on Mastodon as well, if you want to follow me. UPDATE: I found an academics themed instance and I’m giving that one a try.)

(Also, if you want to try self-hosting and help support this blog at the same time, try Dreamhost. If you don’t like clicking affiliate links, here’s one to Dreamhost that doesn’t support me at all.)

1. Take 100 unique shots of the same item and/or in the same location. (The first 50 or so will likely not be so good. After that, students will be forced to think.)
2. Photograph something being made (Lego sculpture, a meal, a painting, etc.) with the camera in a different location in regards to the subject in each photo.
3. Document an outside (not in a car) journey from the point of view of your feet. Capture as many landmarks/areas of interest as possible.
4. Create a series of images where the subject is only seen in reflections (mirrors, windows, still water, etc.), bonus points if it is interacting or lining up with the non-reflected parts of the composition.
5. Watch the video below for inspiration.

As I write this, a lot of final exams are being given and/or graded. Mine are actually due today, and internet use isn’t an option, it’s a requirement.

• There’s a programming cheat sheet.  This helps.
• There’s also a more detailed manual online,  if you want to know everything.  (This might not be the best starting point, though.)
• YouTube Video tutorials abound, though the language in some is not safe for school. I will likely make my own tutorials once I feel I have enough skill to do so.
• Pressing F9 to save 8 seconds of an animated GIF to your desktop is a really neat feature that I will probably be using more than I should. (The images aren’t large by default. The GIF in the corner here is shown full size.
• This is definitely something my students are not going to understand fully on the first day.
• This is something several of my students are going to love.
• I got caught up in the sprite editor at first. I shouldn’t have. You can do all kinds of cool things without sprites at all. Start there.  The sprites are nothing without the code. The code can do plenty without the sprites.
• I have 10% of an idea of what I’m doing, and I love it. This is my kind of learning – I am outside my comfort zone, but not by such a large margin that I’m afraid to see what changing a parameter does.
• The “Undo” shortcut of Ctrl-Z works, and it is a lifesaver. Also:  Copy & Paste work as intended.
• Programming is an algebra teacher’s answer to the age-old question of “When are we going to need to know this?” Only in this case, you’re telling PICO-8 to plot X and Y and oh, wait, now change those numbers to this and keep changing them and use  those numbers as the modifiers for changing themselves and no, you’re not plotting a line graph, I want a new image each time.
• This is fun.

More updates as I do more.

Taking a short break from long blog posts to give you this little tidbit I’m fond of saying.

Note that this doesn’t specify who’s doing it wrong. Sure, it MIGHT be you, but it might be a student, administrator, or even the person who designed that bit of technology in the first place.

Come to think of it, that last scenario has occurred more times than I’m willing to talk about.

In any case, it has a kitty in the background.

Binge Watching Isn’t So Bad.

I started by taking all of the homework videos submitted over the previous week and throwing them in a folder in Google Drive. My district uses G Suite (formerly GAFE, or Google Apps For Education),  so I’m one of those lucky ducks with unlimited storage space.

In the past I’d tried tossing them all into a playlist and showing them in class on my LCD projector, but with a 1:1 ratio in my lab there was nothing stopping me from letting students watch and critique these videos at their own pace.

For convenience I also renamed all the videos following a specific naming convention. If John Doe submitted a 2 minute 11 second video for the 3rd video in his series, I named it 3_JD_2-11.mp4. This was a marked improvement over the previous names, which ranged from “My Edited Video” to “12345.mov” … I wasn’t grading students on how they named their files, so long as they uploaded the right ones.

With all the videos in a folder that I could share through Google Classroom, I was almost ready to go.

Will This Be Graded?

It doesn’t matter how enjoyable an activity you design, there will invariably be someone who asks if it’s going to show up in your grade book. I personally have an aversion to assigning “busy work”  because  I end up making myself busier as I grade something that was meant to be filler, but  there’s still that student, as dependable as death and taxes, that will ask if THIS time I’m giving them work that doesn’t matter.

Nope, it’s not enough to do things out of the goodness of your heart, you need numbers to go with it. Numbers I am happy to provide, in fact, so long as you give me a few in exchange.

I took all of the renamed videos and put them in a Google Form. I made it a “Dropdown” question, since otherwise my students would be scrolling for days.

(Pro Tip: If you don’t want to type everything in, you can’t select text in Google Drive’s web interface but you CAN  tell your browser to print the page. When the preview shows up, DON’T press the print button – the text in the preview page  can be selected, copied, and pasted into a Google Form. You’ll get some extra lines you’ll need to delete, but that’s easier than typing everything by hand.)

Then I added four “Linear Scale” questions that my students would use to rate the videos they watched. We’d already talked in class about these categories, so they were familiar with   them and didn’t need much in the way of explanation.

I capped it off with “Short Answer”  questions that allowed students to offer some criticism.

After the critique is over I  find the average for each category and then add the four categories up to get a score out of a possible twenty points. Critics get a score as well, earning one point for every three minutes of video graded.

Testing Boundaries

Of course this  has not always gone smoothly. There have been students that thought single word critiques, or pasting in the same sentence for each critique, were acceptable. One day when I was absent half the class invented time travel and managed to critique all the videos in  a tenth of the time it took to watch them.

I caught those students, because timestamps are a thing and I refused to treat this like something meant to save ME time and energy.

I’ll say that again: Letting students grade and critique student videos IS NOT faster than grading them myself.  I still have to watch the student videos  (why wouldn’t I?) and if anything I spend more time grading critiques than I did grading videos. I’m sure as I keep doing this I’ll find ways to streamline the process, but that doesn’t mean I’ll have more time for video games afterwards.

Keeping What Works

The goal was to get more students to start submitting their homework videos, and it’s working. My kids, with some exceptions, like writing comments when they know their classmates will read them. They like making movies when they know their classmates will write comments.

But what about the grades, you might ask? Won’t the students just give each other 5/5 on everything? There are a few that give incredibly high scores regardless, but with anonymous grading (on the student end – I see everything) and a class my size, it mostly averages out. Even if they did collude to give each other high marks, my homework grades are mandated by my district to count significantly less than my assessment or classwork grades.

Overall the scores are SLIGHTLY higher than what I’d give using the same rubric, but well made   videos still score higher than lower quality ones.

And they’re   getting better.

As a member of their audience, my students can take me or leave me. I’m far too old and out of touch with today’s youth for my opinion to mean much. But their peers? Those are opinions that mean something, and I’ve given my students enough training for them to point out what areas of technique need improvement.

So there you go. Your mileage may vary, but this setup seems to be working for me. All it costs is one class per week for critique and a significant portion of my planning time to organize and grade the  commentary, but the end result is students getting better at something they actually like to do.

That works for me.

If you don’t want something done, call it “Homework.”

It all started with my homework. All year, my Media Arts students have been tasked with creating one video per week in addition to any in-class projects I assign. I try to create assignments with enough creative freedom for students to bend them to their will.

Each homework assignment needed to be a   short (1-3 minute) video with a “hook” that they all needed to have in common. “This video should have an argument.” “I want this video to have two different settings, each designated with an establishing shot.” The goal was to give a mote of detail (frequently a cinematic technique I wanted them to practice)  around which the student could condense their  plot, making it less likely for anyone to be able to say “I couldn’t think of where to start.”

But this was still homework.

And middle school students, as I’m sure you know, have an aversion to homework.

It’s not all their fault, mind you. Teachers in most classes give a significant amount of homework every night in the name of “rigor.” Imagine, if you will, that a student has 5 classes per day, and that each class on average assigns an hour’s worth of homework per night.

I don’t know about you, but my school doesn’t finish dismissing students until after 4pm. Assuming that they live close to school (which many of my kids don’t, since it’s a magnet school), they won’t be done with their homework until 9pm, assuming they work through supper. This barely gives them any time to be kids, rather than students.

Unless they prioritize, and skip some of their homework.

I don’t think it’s that students disliked my homework. I think that they didn’t like it enough to  prioritize it over assignments from other subjects that may have been more important for their grades.

In the past I simply bypassed all of this by not assigning any homework at all, but the overall quality of student work went down as a result. My students don’t need my homework to boost their grades, they need it to boost their skill level through practice and repetition. Telling them this doesn’t always get results, because that 4 page paper for another class is worth a lot more than my work. I can’t bump up how much my homework is worth in a bizarre teacher versus teacher arms race, either (even if I wanted to), because my grading percentages are mandated on the district level.

If you want something done, make it something that would’ve been done anyway.

My first step was to play up student interests. I already knew, through conversation, surveys, the audition process, and looking over students’ shoulders when they were supposed to be working on something else, that the majority of my Media Arts majors are obsessed with YouTube.

(My class has a focus on video and is intense enough to require an audition. If they didn’t like YouTube, I’d be worried.)

At the start of 3rd Quarter, I made a change to the homework. The weekly “hooks” were gone. Instead, students had to format their remaining 18 videos as if they were all part of a YouTube channel’s series. They needed an opening segment and a theme that they would pick and keep with for the rest of the year.

Some students picked a video game theme, of course. One of them is doing DIY craft videos. Another is doing weekly challenge videos, guest starring various family members. One young lady is doing weekly book reviews.

Due to their age I did not require them to make these videos into actual YouTube channels, but several of them actually got their parents’ permission and did just that.

And you know what? It really helped. I had students who were hit and miss in regards to completing homework start handing it in every week. Overall the quality of classwork assignments went up as students began to master the video editing software of their choice.

It was working, but not well enough for my standards.

We were missing something crucial that every aspiring YouTuber craves.

An audience.

In my next post, I’ll explain how I added one.

In addition to everything else I teach, part of my curriculum involves criticism. We as a culture of consumers frequently elevate critique itself into an art form – one so high that we generalize its practitioners into a league of toga-clad experts, giving thumbs up or down as various creative works battle it out in their arena. (The critics loved it! The critics panned it! The critics said it wouldn’t do well but look at the box office numbers, so what do they know?!)

You might think that things are different now that there are services that crowd-source ratings, and you’d be right. Rotten Tomatoes and Yelp are the first that come to mind, but Amazon’s reviews and YouTube’s Like and Dislike buttons also come in to play here.

Unfortunately, not all crowd-sourced criticisms are created equal. The goal of my upcoming lesson will be to improve how well my students articulate themselves when critiquing things they like or dislike.

The main example I intend to show will be a little gem from this very blog’s spam filter:

Seems like a nice bit of commentary. I mean, they’ve told me I have room for improvement, but they lead with something nice to say so the comment seems thoughtful and well-rounded.

What’s my point?

Guess which post they were commenting on.

This comment could more or less be attached to any of my posts where I explain something and still have it mostly make sense in context. There’s nothing in here to show that the person who wrote it actually read anything on my blog other than the tag line, and that we can only guess because their name and web address (which I censored since I’m not giving their college loan site free advertising) have something to do with education. OK, it was probably a bot that posted, but technically the bot still reads key words.

This is a common attribute for spam, but this is not something I expect from students.

I’ve recently ramped up the amount of time spent doing peer critiques in my Media Arts classes. The main setup is the subject of a blog post for another day, but one of the hurdles we have to navigate involves generic criticism.

It’s all well and good to say that you liked a video. It’s also OK if you say you didn’t like it, since not everyone has the same tastes.

But neither of those opinions works well in a critique setting if you don’t say WHY. The more my students dig down into their reasoning, the less likely they are to give criticism that would get caught in a spam filter.

That’s the goal, anyway.

We’ll see how well it works.