<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Bit Guru</title><link>http://thebitguru.com/blog/</link><description>thebitguru.com blog feed.</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 01:10:44 -0500</lastBuildDate><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheBitGuru" /><feedburner:info uri="thebitguru" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Play Button iTunes Patch now supports OS X Mountain Lion
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/j_OP012p-Ao/398-Play%20Button%20iTunes%20Patch%20now%20supports%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks to user48986 at &lt;a href="http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/64408/can-you-disable-a-code-signature-check"&gt;AskDifferent&lt;/a&gt;  I was able to update Play Button iTunes Patch to support OS X Mountain Lion.  Head over to the &lt;a href="/projects/iTunesPatch"&gt;project page&lt;/a&gt; for the updated download.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/398-Play%20Button%20iTunes%20Patch%20now%20supports%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=j_OP012p-Ao:Xvuj7lxBUak:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=j_OP012p-Ao:Xvuj7lxBUak:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=j_OP012p-Ao:Xvuj7lxBUak:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=j_OP012p-Ao:Xvuj7lxBUak:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=j_OP012p-Ao:Xvuj7lxBUak:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/j_OP012p-Ao" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 01:10:44 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/398-Play%20Button%20iTunes%20Patch%20now%20supports%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/398-Play%20Button%20iTunes%20Patch%20now%20supports%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Delete-from-disk updated to support Songbird 2.2.0
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/1WY3g50zpBo/396-Delete-from-disk%20updated%20to%20support%20Songbird%202.2.0</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class="caps"&gt;FYI&lt;/span&gt;, more info &lt;a href="http://www.thebitguru.com/projects/songbird"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/396-Delete-from-disk%20updated%20to%20support%20Songbird%202.2.0" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=1WY3g50zpBo:FsKNhZjHBX8:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=1WY3g50zpBo:FsKNhZjHBX8:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=1WY3g50zpBo:FsKNhZjHBX8:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=1WY3g50zpBo:FsKNhZjHBX8:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=1WY3g50zpBo:FsKNhZjHBX8:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/1WY3g50zpBo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:09:40 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/396-Delete-from-disk%20updated%20to%20support%20Songbird%202.2.0</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/396-Delete-from-disk%20updated%20to%20support%20Songbird%202.2.0</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>How to Quickly Recycle an IIS Application Pool
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/XQBU7uFE_y4/395-How%20to%20Quickly%20Recycle%20an%20IIS%20Application%20Pool</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of my projects involves changes to text files and quite often recycle of the application pool.  Generally this means going the long way of opening the &lt;span class="caps"&gt;IIS&lt;/span&gt; Manager, going to the application pool node, right clicking on the app pool and selecting recycle, but there is a quicker way.  You can create a shortcut in the quick launch area of the task bar that recycles a specific application pool.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;br /&gt;Continued...


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/395-How%20to%20Quickly%20Recycle%20an%20IIS%20Application%20Pool" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=XQBU7uFE_y4:pEpitUIqoC0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=XQBU7uFE_y4:pEpitUIqoC0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=XQBU7uFE_y4:pEpitUIqoC0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=XQBU7uFE_y4:pEpitUIqoC0:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=XQBU7uFE_y4:pEpitUIqoC0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/XQBU7uFE_y4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:37:45 -0600</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/395-How%20to%20Quickly%20Recycle%20an%20IIS%20Application%20Pool</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/395-How%20to%20Quickly%20Recycle%20an%20IIS%20Application%20Pool</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Random Slowdown of Browsers in OS X Mountain Lion
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/5KZZZQATZsw/394-Random%20Slowdown%20of%20Browsers%20in%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Recently I noticed a random slowdown of browsing speed.  I first thought that it was my browser, Google Chrome, that was the culprit.  So, I switch to Safari, but that behaved similarly.  I switched to Firefox, which, at first, seemed to be much faster, but after a bit of use it started slowing down randomly.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;br /&gt;Continued...


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/394-Random%20Slowdown%20of%20Browsers%20in%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=5KZZZQATZsw:UK61oN3UYMc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=5KZZZQATZsw:UK61oN3UYMc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=5KZZZQATZsw:UK61oN3UYMc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=5KZZZQATZsw:UK61oN3UYMc:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=5KZZZQATZsw:UK61oN3UYMc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/5KZZZQATZsw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 15:39:38 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/394-Random%20Slowdown%20of%20Browsers%20in%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/394-Random%20Slowdown%20of%20Browsers%20in%20OS%20X%20Mountain%20Lion</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>One place where Apple is blowing Google/Android out of the water
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/L_T9hkGG4UQ/Android%20out%20of%20the%20water</link><description>&lt;p&gt;With the recent iPhone 5 release we are seeing quite a few comparisons between Apple and Google, Samsung, Nokia among others.  All the technical specs aside, there is one thing where Apple is &lt;em&gt;literally&lt;/em&gt; blowing all the other competition out of the water.  And that is, with &lt;strong&gt;their control over the cellphone providers&lt;/strong&gt; (AT&amp;T, Verizon, etc.).  Let me explain what I mean.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;br /&gt;Continued...


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/392-One%20place%20where%20Apple%20is%20blowing%20Google/Android%20out%20of%20the%20water" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=L_T9hkGG4UQ:rd-q1fLl4qc:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=L_T9hkGG4UQ:rd-q1fLl4qc:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=L_T9hkGG4UQ:rd-q1fLl4qc:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=L_T9hkGG4UQ:rd-q1fLl4qc:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=L_T9hkGG4UQ:rd-q1fLl4qc:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/L_T9hkGG4UQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 08:01:05 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/392-One%20place%20where%20Apple%20is%20blowing%20Google/Android%20out%20of%20the%20water</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/392-One%20place%20where%20Apple%20is%20blowing%20Google/Android%20out%20of%20the%20water</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Nice, cellphone manufacturers are finally starting to pay attention to battery
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/0D7ebhkFeXs/391-Nice,%20cellphone%20manufacturers%20are%20finally%20starting%20to%20pay%20attention%20to%20battery</link><description>&lt;div class="attachment_float_right"&gt;&lt;a href="/site_media/uploads/attachments/279_Untitled.png" rel="lightbox" title="Droid Razr Maxx"&gt;&lt;img src="/site_media/uploads/attachments/resized/279_Untitled--200x200.jpg" alt="Droid Razr Maxx" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I just read that Tech Crunch had a post showing the &lt;a href="http://techcrunch.com/2012/08/20/leaked-tutorial-videos-show-clearest-image-of-motorola-droid-razr-hd-to-date/"&gt;Motorola Droid Razr HD&lt;/a&gt; pictures.  Most of the specs aren&amp;#8217;t something that we haven&amp;#8217;t seen already, but what did catch my eye was the battery size.  The rumor is that it will have a 3,300mAh battery!  Compare that to the 2,100mAh battery that the current &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S_III"&gt;Samsung Galaxy S3&lt;/a&gt; has.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.pcauthority.com.au/News/302430,samsung-galaxy-s3-has-twice-the-battery-life-of-the-htc-one-x.aspx"&gt;this post&lt;/a&gt; if the S3 with it&amp;#8217;s screen set to 50% brightness lasts about 8h:26m then this phone should last about 13h:15m (3300/2100 * 8.43 = 13.25).  That&amp;#8217;s generally the most that I can get out of my S2 (1,650mAh batterY) with it&amp;#8217;s screen off!&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I hate the fact that whenever I use my phone to it&amp;#8217;s fullest (e.g. using &lt;span class="caps"&gt;GPS&lt;/span&gt;) my first concern ends up being the battery life.  So, I am very happy to see that manufacturers are finally starting to pay attention to the battery life.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/391-Nice,%20cellphone%20manufacturers%20are%20finally%20starting%20to%20pay%20attention%20to%20battery" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=0D7ebhkFeXs:gJAlzwgy3z0:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=0D7ebhkFeXs:gJAlzwgy3z0:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=0D7ebhkFeXs:gJAlzwgy3z0:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=0D7ebhkFeXs:gJAlzwgy3z0:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=0D7ebhkFeXs:gJAlzwgy3z0:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/0D7ebhkFeXs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:48:21 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/391-Nice,%20cellphone%20manufacturers%20are%20finally%20starting%20to%20pay%20attention%20to%20battery</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/391-Nice,%20cellphone%20manufacturers%20are%20finally%20starting%20to%20pay%20attention%20to%20battery</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Differences between buying from Amazon Wireless and Verizon direct
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/WRnncj670BQ/389-Differences%20between%20buying%20from%20Amazon%20Wireless%20and%20Verizon%20direct</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been looking into switching my cellphone services providers from Sprint to Verizon because 1) Sprint has really slow data service in my area, and 2) Verizon has 4G &lt;span class="caps"&gt;LTE&lt;/span&gt; coverage.  Anyways, as I started looking around for options I noticed that &lt;a href="http://wireless.amazon.com/"&gt;Amazon Wireless&lt;/a&gt; had pretty good prices for phones with 2-year contracts (who can beat $0.01 for &lt;a href="http://wireless.amazon.com/Samsung-Galaxy-Nexus-Android-Wireless/dp/B0061R2A1S/ref=sh_br_ph_1?ie=UTF8&amp;#38;transaction=FAMILY_NEW&amp;#38;sr=1-1-entd&amp;#38;qid=1344487325502"&gt;Galaxy Nexus&lt;/a&gt; ?).  I knew there had to be a catch, but I wasn&amp;#8217;t able to find much about the differences online.&lt;/p&gt;


	&lt;br /&gt;Continued...


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/389-Differences%20between%20buying%20from%20Amazon%20Wireless%20and%20Verizon%20direct" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=WRnncj670BQ:otC6j8C186M:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=WRnncj670BQ:otC6j8C186M:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=WRnncj670BQ:otC6j8C186M:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=WRnncj670BQ:otC6j8C186M:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=WRnncj670BQ:otC6j8C186M:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/WRnncj670BQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 18 Aug 2012 02:26:33 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/389-Differences%20between%20buying%20from%20Amazon%20Wireless%20and%20Verizon%20direct</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/389-Differences%20between%20buying%20from%20Amazon%20Wireless%20and%20Verizon%20direct</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Shady T-Mobile Comparison
</title><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~3/LHhI12yN_HQ/390-Shady%20T-Mobile%20Comparison</link><description>&lt;div class="attachment_float_right"&gt;&lt;a href="/site_media/uploads/attachments/278_Untitled.png" rel="lightbox" title="T-Mobile comparing Galaxy S3, on a 4G connection, to Verizon iPhone, a 3G device."&gt;&lt;img src="/site_media/uploads/attachments/resized/278_Untitled--200x200.jpg" alt="T-Mobile comparing Galaxy S3, on a 4G connection, to Verizon iPhone, a 3G device." /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;This is just not cool.  &lt;a href="http://explore.t-mobile.com/verizon-att-sprint/"&gt;T-Mobile is comparing&lt;/a&gt; a Samsung Galaxy S3 on a &lt;strong&gt;4G&lt;/strong&gt; connection to a Verizon iPhone, which only supports &lt;strong&gt;3G&lt;/strong&gt;.  What&amp;#8217;s even worst is that they classify this as a &lt;strong&gt;4G&lt;/strong&gt; connection comparison.  Seriously, T-mobile, you are being shady to the &lt;em&gt;extreme&lt;/em&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;I am currently on Sprint, and I am in the market for a better service provider (slow data speeds).  I was looking at T-Mobile for a bit, but such shady marketing practices just screams trouble down the road.&lt;/p&gt;

	&lt;p&gt;Honestly, I am sad at the current state of carriers in the US.  I was pretty much settled on Verizon, but their recent practice of locking the boot loader on the S3 really disappointed me.&lt;/p&gt;


&lt;script src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~s/TheBitGuru?i=/blog/view/390-Shady%20T-Mobile%20Comparison" type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=LHhI12yN_HQ:Kh5EjqxUY24:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=LHhI12yN_HQ:Kh5EjqxUY24:F7zBnMyn0Lo"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=LHhI12yN_HQ:Kh5EjqxUY24:F7zBnMyn0Lo" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?a=LHhI12yN_HQ:Kh5EjqxUY24:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/TheBitGuru?i=LHhI12yN_HQ:Kh5EjqxUY24:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheBitGuru/~4/LHhI12yN_HQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Farhan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:00:20 -0500</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/390-Shady%20T-Mobile%20Comparison</guid><feedburner:origLink>http://thebitguru.com/blog/view/390-Shady%20T-Mobile%20Comparison</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
