<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 06:44:03 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Ethics Policies</category><category>Poison Pills</category><category>CNS Spectrums</category><category>Massachusetts gift ban</category><category>Medical Meetings Magazine</category><category>Oregon</category><category>SmithKline Beecham</category><category>CECentral</category><category>Solvay</category><category>Lighthouse Learning</category><category>Kulongoski</category><category>Janssen</category><category>American Board of Medical Specialties</category><category>The Carlat Medical Report</category><category>Wilens</category><category>Policy and Medicine</category><category>Lizbeth Kowalszyk</category><category>Macy Foundation</category><category>vilazodone</category><category>Professional Medical Associations</category><category>greed</category><category>Dowden Health Media</category><category>Thacker</category><category>Deval Patrick</category><category>Viibryd</category><category>CME Zone</category><category>Colbert</category><category>Frontline</category><category>Center for Medicine in the Public Interest</category><category>CME</category><category>key opinion leaders</category><category>prescription data-mining</category><category>Paul Thacker</category><category>Hormone replacement therapy</category><category>Alan Schatzberg</category><category>University Diaries</category><category>Bremmer</category><category>Medical Societies</category><category>Massachusetts General Hospital</category><category>hired gun</category><category>psychologists</category><category>The Infinite Mind</category><category>Latuda</category><category>McAllen</category><category>Alison Bass</category><category>promotional speakers</category><category>GlaxoSmithKline</category><category>Dollars for Docs</category><category>Indianapolis Star</category><category>Merck</category><category>podcast</category><category>PV Updates</category><category>Jeffrey Flier</category><category>Free samples</category><category>DSM-V</category><category>William Carpenter</category><category>Anxiety disorders</category><category>Washington Post</category><category>Johns Hopkins</category><category>Drug-drug interactions</category><category>Clawsen</category><category>Dave Davies</category><category>Med Page Today</category><category>Symbyax</category><category>Governor Deval Patrick</category><category>British Medical Journal</category><category>Forest Laboratories</category><category>Fresh air</category><category>child psychiatry</category><category>Effexor</category><category>BMJ</category><category>Physician payments</category><category>Obama</category><category>drug reps</category><category>Melody Peterson</category><category>Royal College of Physicians</category><category>Manhattan Research</category><category>McGeeney</category><category>CVS Caremark</category><category>DuBuske</category><category>In Her Wake</category><category>Somaxon</category><category>Cephalon</category><category>data-mining</category><category>Antidote</category><category>Spielmans</category><category>Off-label promotion</category><category>Institute for Continuing Healthcare</category><category>Bristol-Myers Squibb</category><category>Schering-Plough</category><category>Gardiner Harris</category><category>i3 CME</category><category>Jazz Pharmaceuticals</category><category>ghostwriting</category><category>Boston Globe</category><category>Physician Payments Sunshine Act</category><category>Astra Zeneca</category><category>pharma marketing blog</category><category>American Medical Association</category><category>Carlat CME Institute</category><category>Functional neuroimaging</category><category>super PACs</category><category>AARP</category><category>Stowe</category><category>Direct to consumer ads</category><category>Billy Rubin's Blog</category><category>CEJA</category><category>Kickbacks</category><category>BBC</category><category>Furious Seasons</category><category>Oregon Academy of Family Physicians</category><category>Vyvanse</category><category>Mina Dulcan</category><category>Sunovion</category><category>Robert Freedman</category><category>Health care reform</category><category>Schwitzer</category><category>Dr. RW</category><category>JAMA</category><category>Biomarkers</category><category>Tim Kuklo</category><category>CAFE study</category><category>PhRMA code</category><category>Stephen Stahl</category><category>practice guidelines committee</category><category>Neuroscience education insttitute</category><category>drug companies</category><category>ACCME</category><category>Coalition for Healthcare Communication</category><category>Milwaukee Journal Sentinel</category><category>Current Psychiatry</category><category>Dallas Leipzig International Valve 2010</category><category>continuing medical education</category><category>John Russell</category><category>Eli Lilly</category><category>Conflicts of Interest</category><category>Radio Boston</category><category>Contrave</category><category>Relman</category><category>depression</category><category>psychotherapy</category><category>Depression Central</category><category>American Society of Hypertension</category><category>Johnson and Johnson</category><category>Robert DeLeo</category><category>Califf</category><category>Heart Rhythm Society</category><category>Pfizer</category><category>Fugh-Berman</category><category>Physi</category><category>Appelbaum</category><category>Wired magazine</category><category>industry-free CME</category><category>Paul Simon</category><category>WebMD</category><category>Connors</category><category>Niravam</category><category>CS2day</category><category>M/C Communications</category><category>Vioxx</category><category>Vermont</category><category>SPECT</category><category>bipolar disorder</category><category>Seroquel</category><category>McCain</category><category>New York Times Magazine</category><category>Greater Boston</category><category>Chicago Tribune</category><category>Great Britain</category><category>Boston University</category><category>Pristiq</category><category>On Point</category><category>Bernard Carroll</category><category>Health Care Renewal</category><category>Brand(x)</category><category>Senate Finance Committee</category><category>Behrman</category><category>seeding trials</category><category>Rozerem</category><category>Mukherjee</category><category>gift ban</category><category>Lisa Cosgrove</category><category>Patent Extenders</category><category>Prescription project</category><category>Marketing tactics</category><category>Andrew Wilner</category><category>Aplenzin</category><category>Harvard Medical School</category><category>Pharmed Out</category><category>Stanford University</category><category>Shahram Ahari</category><category>Zimmerman</category><category>National Physician's Alliance</category><category>Pri-Med</category><category>Fauber</category><category>Shire</category><category>Sepracor</category><category>Blogging</category><category>Cymbalta</category><category>Mother Jones</category><category>Cervero</category><category>Pain TV</category><category>industry-funded CME</category><category>generics</category><category>Lexapro</category><category>Orexigen</category><category>Michael First</category><category>American College of Cardiology</category><category>Vox Medica</category><category>Goodwin</category><category>Silenor</category><category>Primedia Healthcare</category><category>AndroGel</category><category>John Kelsoe</category><category>Letters and Science</category><category>New Hampshire</category><category>University of Wisconsin</category><category>Anatomy of an Epidemic</category><category>Senator Herb Kohl</category><category>BlueSpark</category><category>PRMS</category><category>Psynomics</category><category>Parry</category><category>FDA</category><category>Marcia Angell</category><category>Liebowitz</category><category>AMA</category><category>ADHD</category><category>Luvox CR</category><category>LLC</category><category>CME Reform</category><category>QuantiaMD</category><category>Tom Sullivan</category><category>Goldberg</category><category>Angell</category><category>McMahon Publishing Group</category><category>Pharmaceutical marketing</category><category>testosterone</category><category>HealthGrades</category><category>DeVane</category><category>genetics</category><category>CME LLC</category><category>Tufts</category><category>Martin Samuels</category><category>APA</category><category>Placebo Journal Blog</category><category>Amen Clinics</category><category>legal consultation</category><category>Alliance for CME</category><category>iPhone</category><category>The Psychiatrist's Program</category><category>Meghna Chakrabarti</category><category>Mental Health American</category><category>SAPHRIS</category><category>antipsychotics</category><category>CME Rogue's Gallery</category><category>Goozner</category><category>Thought Broadcast</category><category>American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons</category><category>Institute of Medicine</category><category>Judith Graham</category><category>APA election</category><category>sanofi aventis</category><category>Doug Bremner</category><category>Corruption</category><category>Prempro</category><category>bifeprunox</category><category>Steve DiFillippo</category><category>Canadian Medical Association</category><category>prescriptive privileges</category><category>Health Affairs</category><category>Whitaker</category><category>Schwarz Pharma</category><category>EMSAM</category><category>Otsuka</category><category>Dr. Drug Rep</category><category>Vermont Psychiatric Association</category><category>Wood</category><category>bipolar depression</category><category>Asthma and Immunology</category><category>CME Outfitters</category><category>Minh Uong</category><category>Counter-detailing</category><category>Zyprexa</category><category>Steven Stahl</category><category>Joseph Biederman</category><category>CME Peer Review</category><category>Placebo controlled trial</category><category>Reed Elsevier</category><category>David Polly</category><category>IMS</category><category>Ivan Goldberg</category><category>premarin</category><category>Takeda</category><category>Ridge Diagnostics</category><category>Thomas Sullivan</category><category>Comparative effectiveness research</category><category>disclosure</category><category>American Psychiatric Association</category><category>Gawande</category><category>Grassley</category><category>Abilify</category><category>neuroscienceCME</category><category>Tamar Hosansky</category><category>Physician disclosure</category><category>Alzheimer's disease</category><category>ACCME report</category><category>Schatzberg</category><category>Medscape</category><category>Commercial Support Free CME</category><category>Advertising</category><category>Neuroinvestment</category><category>Commercial Bias Inventory</category><category>Insel</category><category>Brigham and Woman's Hospital</category><category>David Kupfer</category><category>Remission</category><category>Novartis</category><category>Allen Frances</category><category>BIO 2008</category><category>Unbranded Doctor</category><category>Carl Elliott</category><category>Medbribe</category><category>William Heisel</category><category>Chantix</category><category>Delaware Media Group</category><category>Luvox SR</category><category>Natasha Singer</category><category>Viracept</category><category>Donna Norris</category><category>Oransky</category><category>Pathophilia</category><category>American Academy of Allergy</category><category>ACRE</category><category>DesignWrite</category><category>dirty thirty</category><category>Antidepressants</category><category>Bioethics</category><category>BusinessWeek</category><category>Memorial Sloan-Kettering</category><category>Wisconsin Medical Society</category><category>ProPublica</category><category>New York Times</category><category>Martha Rosenberg</category><category>book review</category><category>psychosis</category><category>Partners</category><category>commercial bias</category><category>Emory University</category><category>University of North Texas Health Science Center</category><category>Akathisia</category><category>Wall Street Journal Health Blog</category><category>Pies</category><category>University of Michigan</category><category>CNS News</category><category>Nuvigil</category><category>Haymarket Medical</category><category>IRINE</category><category>Primary Psychiatry</category><category>Patient Priming</category><category>SentinelSource</category><category>CATIE trial</category><category>Jerry Avorn</category><category>Medtronic</category><category>Wyeth Pharmaceuticals</category><category>Lurasidone</category><category>New York State Assembly</category><category>Sharfstein</category><category>Epocrates</category><category>Donna Beales</category><category>fibromyalgia</category><category>Strattera</category><category>Invega</category><category>American Journal of Psychiatry</category><category>Notes from RW</category><category>James Stein</category><category>Soltan</category><category>Spencer</category><category>Reporting on Health</category><category>Sternthal</category><category>Council of Medical Specialty Societies</category><category>Nissen</category><category>American Psychiatric News</category><category>Nancy Rappaport</category><category>Stossel</category><category>New Yorker</category><category>Tom Ashbrook</category><category>Senate Aging Committee</category><category>Journal of Clinical Psychiatry</category><category>Psychiatric Times</category><category>surveys</category><category>Nesi</category><category>Nemeroff</category><category>Medical Marketing and Media</category><category>Verispan</category><category>free speech</category><category>CE Measure</category><category>California Academy of Family Physicians</category><category>Product theaters</category><title>The Carlat Psychiatry Blog</title><description>Keeping Psychiatry Honest Since 2007</description><link>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>344</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog" /><feedburner:info uri="thecarlatpsychiatryblog" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-5464107527573758085</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-06T14:15:19.904-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">BMJ</category><title>BMJ's Ten Commandments for the Ideal Physician</title><atom:summary type="text">The British Medical Journal's great blogger Richard Lehman has published the following Ten Commandments for excellent clinical practice. These are great rules of thumb for any savvy health care practitioner--but they do require that wee bit of extra work to truly understand the statistics behind the medical literature. (Hat tip to Steve Balt, MD, for sending me the link). 
The New Therapeutics: </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/_JlTj8QPJtQ/bmjs-ten-commandments-for-ideal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-FTHANvinKY8/TwdH5ItaKVI/AAAAAAAABIs/w85s6KZ_rs8/s72-c/richard_lehman.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2012/01/bmjs-ten-commandments-for-ideal.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-4875403343991109014</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 14:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-07T15:39:20.906-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">super PACs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Colbert</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">industry-funded CME</category><title>On Stephen Colbert, Super PACs, and Industry-Supported CME</title><atom:summary type="text">
The current New York Times Magazine carries a fascinating and quite hilarious profile of Stephen Colbert, of the Colbert Report. Colbert is well known for his parody of a know-nothing rabidly conservative Republican commentator—but according to the article he has taken his comedy into the real world, involving himself directly in those shady instruments of electioneering known as “super PACs.”

</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/0xdgOLv-5v4/on-stephen-colbert-super-pacs-and.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-Rz7Bgg63ngQ/TwitYVmJ1QI/AAAAAAAABI0/sJAx2Z0VZ6o/s72-c/colbert.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2012/01/on-stephen-colbert-super-pacs-and.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-4706297783861668265</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-05T09:20:55.303-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">APA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">DSM-V</category><title>APA Threatens to Sue "dsm5watch" Website</title><atom:summary type="text">I just read Bernard Carroll's interesting post on the Health Care Renewal Blog about the latest DSM-5 brouhaha. It appears that the American Psychiatric Association has sent a "cease and desist" letter to a website critical of the DSM-5. The site was called "dsm5watch," but the APA argues that using DSM-5 in the blog title is an infringement of their trademark. The owner of the blog, Suzy Chapman</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/fvW4BwIfbi4/apa-threatens-to-sue-dsm5watch-website.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><thr:total>9</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2012/01/apa-threatens-to-sue-dsm5watch-website.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-4975513622081272609</guid><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:54:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2012-01-07T15:40:56.447-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Physician payments</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Physician Payments Sunshine Act</category><title>The Gig is Up: The Sunshine Act Will Include CME Payments to Doctors</title><atom:summary type="text">Those of us who have followed the progress of the implementation of the Physician Payment Sunshine Act have been acutely aware of one potential loophole: drug companies might try to hide payments to doctors for industry-supported CME activities. That’s because these payments are not "direct" payments to doctors, but rather indirect payments.
In a 2007 op/ed piece for the New York Times, I </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/s7-SxzB5lyo/gig-is-up-sunshine-act-will-include-cme.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/12/gig-is-up-sunshine-act-will-include-cme.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6767280952600034654</guid><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-12-12T16:35:18.201-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Affairs</category><title>Conflict of Interest--From a Patient's Perspective</title><atom:summary type="text">This month's issue of Health Affairs carries this fascinating article (free full text) written by a woman with MS who found out her neurologist made $300,000 in speaking and promotional activities in 3 years.

The writer, Maran Wolston, also happens to be a professor of medical ethics, so she renders her personal story in a particularly thoughtful way. When she first met her neurologist 5 years </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/56eZrzS6_-k/conflict-of-interest-from-patients.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-i-3js5NdUXU/TuZyMsyvDjI/AAAAAAAAA8k/NSg-F7rLNBA/s72-c/Health+Affairs+cover.gif" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/12/conflict-of-interest-from-patients.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-665502192828893876</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-11-14T10:15:22.959-05:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Cymbalta</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Medscape</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Eli Lilly</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pain TV</category><title>Eli Lilly's "Pain TV": Are they serious?</title><atom:summary type="text">Sometimes in the CME field you come across something that seems so embarrassing for everybody involved that you just have to shake your head and wonder what they were thinking. So here is the link to Medscape's ACCME Accredited Category 1 CME activity called "Pain TV", supported by an "unrestricted educational grant" from Eli Lilly, manufacturer of Cymbalta, which recently won the FDA indication </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/MxUGQByNYyM/eli-lillys-pain-tv-are-they-serious.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-IHSpXweYTJ0/TsEp02MEDuI/AAAAAAAAA8c/taNsz9Pgqt0/s72-c/Eli+Lilly+Pain+TV.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/11/eli-lillys-pain-tv-are-they-serious.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-5479003649937116847</guid><pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-27T14:43:12.451-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">FDA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Viibryd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">vilazodone</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Journal of Clinical Psychiatry</category><title>FDA Slams Viibryd: Better Sexual Profile Claim “Not Supported by the Data”</title><atom:summary type="text">The September 2011 issue of the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry created history in two ways.   
First, the journal published this article written by FDA staff critically reviewing the efficacy and safety data of Viibryd, a new antidepressant that the same FDA staff had just approved. 
Second, it was not just any journal that published the article, but the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. Why is </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/TRIDDH--2LM/fda-slams-viibryd-better-sexual-profile.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-3_Z50W5X-yA/TqfcJrSMKoI/AAAAAAAAA8U/ydDR0NtchOo/s72-c/Viibryd.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/10/fda-slams-viibryd-better-sexual-profile.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6141565061594142702</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-10-11T14:01:22.048-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biomarkers</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alzheimer's disease</category><title>New Study: Biomarkers are Cool, but Nearly Useless for Predicting  Alzheimer's</title><atom:summary type="text">Everybody would like to find a brain scan or a blood or spinal fluid test to predict Alzheimer's disease. Such objective tests seem inherently more reliable than the clinical interview.

Recently we've seen various studies identifying biomarkers for predicting who will develop Alzheimer's. The problem is that most of the studies are merely suggestive, though they are so complex that they create a</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/53a2Pcg2NPY/new-study-biomarkers-are-cool-but.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0KzivGeuAGQ/TpSCg7smQOI/AAAAAAAAA8M/SeVZwWKyNH0/s72-c/Alzheimers.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/10/new-study-biomarkers-are-cool-but.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-3385123202714001482</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-09-09T14:09:46.110-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CME Rogue's Gallery</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Carlat CME Institute</category><title>New Feature: CME Rogue's Gallery</title><atom:summary type="text">We've been beefing up the Carlat CME Institute, a website whose mission is to support excellence in non-industry-funded CME. Our latest feature is the "CME Rogue's Gallery" in which we keep a running list of the most blatantly promotional CME programs that cross our path. Currently we are spotlighting a program funded by Mylan Pharmaceuticals to increase prescription of the MAOI EMSAM, and a </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/_33vaW6YRTs/new-feature-cme-rogues-gallery.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-qauew3OCkv0/TmpQ9mJgoGI/AAAAAAAAA8I/kqKeSH-G-tk/s72-c/deal-with-devil-full.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/09/new-feature-cme-rogues-gallery.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-8628968169592667293</guid><pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-31T12:01:39.206-04:00</atom:updated><title>Dr. Stahl's Medical Writer Fights Back</title><atom:summary type="text">&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   ZH-TW   X-NONE                                                                                                         &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/WBczilJcthU/dr-stahls-medical-writer-fights-back.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/--zIgX4ZBQRI/Tl5aAQnsbbI/AAAAAAAAA8A/NVL4dEgW920/s72-c/Female+boxer.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>24</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/08/dr-stahls-medical-writer-fights-back.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6794548040286250802</guid><pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 21:11:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-27T17:59:51.194-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Stephen Stahl</category><title>Has Stephen Stahl Gone Off the Deep End? You Decide.</title><atom:summary type="text">A reader of my blog alerted me to this rambling blog post by Stephen Stahl on his NEI blog. I've pasted his article and my response below--or you can read the whole thing on his site. I’ll be curious to hear your thoughts. 
Here is Dr. Stahl’s post, dated August 23 2011: 
"Are future psychiatric treatments doomed? Be careful what you ask for...you just might get it."
Nobody likes drug companies </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/RS6pmkw9HAk/has-stephen-stahl-gone-off-deep-end-you.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-uOPBJHvdPhE/Tllc8oirgGI/AAAAAAAAA78/aq3ahD60l48/s72-c/Jump+off+cliff.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>39</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/08/has-stephen-stahl-gone-off-deep-end-you.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-9071410632931233682</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-18T12:29:03.927-04:00</atom:updated><title>Syracuse Restaurant Becomes "Pharmaceutical Dinner Facility"</title><atom:summary type="text">(Note to readers: This will be the last non-psychiatric post on this blog--from now on, all medical education-related articles will be posted on the new Carlat CME Blog.) 

In a rather embarrassing attempt to raise revenues, a restaurant in Syracuse, New York, is now explicitly marketing itself as a purveyor of drug company dinners. 

Francesca's Cucina, "Located in the heart of Syracuse's Little</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/mnsb37XLY0s/syracuse-restaurant-becomes.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NySMMCvpqHM/TkwRemIr9sI/AAAAAAAAA74/iSQ4Rc9Id9I/s72-c/pharm-dinner3.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/08/syracuse-restaurant-becomes.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-2911773752692490135</guid><pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-08-15T15:10:54.609-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ridge Diagnostics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Biomarkers</category><title>A Blood Test for Depression? Really?</title><atom:summary type="text">This month's Psychiatric Times has an interesting article (requires a subscription) about putative blood tests for diagnosing schizophrenia and depression. Because most of my patients have either depression or anxiety, I skipped to the section on a new depression blood test marketed by Ridge Diagnostics. Called the "MDDScore," the test measures 10 biomarkers, including cortisol, brain-derived </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/IgAd_nDKDL0/blood-test-for-depression-really.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-ij8OYvqZiaA/Tklu8wnMbeI/AAAAAAAAA7c/ztg8-BPZHwc/s72-c/Depression.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>26</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/08/blood-test-for-depression-really.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-485302447495203990</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 20:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-07-05T16:19:30.596-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CS2day</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Pfizer</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Chantix</category><title>The Biggest Chantix News: Pfizer's $12.3 Million Buys No News</title><atom:summary type="text">By now most of you have heard about this recent study linking the use of Pfizer's anti-smoking drug Chantix with a small increase in heart attacks and arrhythmias. The meta-analysis of 14 double-blind controlled trials indicates that in patients without a history of heart disease, Chantix increases the rate of serious cardiac events from 0.82% of those assigned to placebo to 1.06% of those on </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/IsYO7GyYXW4/biggest-chantix-news-pfizers-123.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-knKy8qkc3gA/ThNxiuwy7CI/AAAAAAAAA7Y/Tc4WMxi8w3g/s72-c/Chantix+side+effects.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/07/biggest-chantix-news-pfizers-123.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-2595896516355153176</guid><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-06-24T10:12:29.057-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Thomas Sullivan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Medical Marketing and Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CEJA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Policy and Medicine</category><title>Apres le Deluge: The CEJA Spin Cycle Begins</title><atom:summary type="text">&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   ZH-TW   X-NONE                                                         MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/gMpiYrIDNQ4/apres-le-deluge-ceja-spin-cycle-begins.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-a5yzjj9Uar0/TgSWTPRkuVI/AAAAAAAAA7M/fr2t7Li-C_Y/s72-c/spin+cycle.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>14</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/06/apres-le-deluge-ceja-spin-cycle-begins.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-4889573926914705068</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-06-21T17:51:01.464-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">CEJA</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">AMA</category><title>AMA Votes to Discourage Commercial Support of CME</title><atom:summary type="text">Something huge happened yesterday at the American Medical Association House of Delegates meeting in Chicago. Although the meaning of what happened will be spun throughout the blogosphere, twittersphere, and schmuckosphere, the bottom line is that the AMA just voted most commercial funding of CME out of existence. 

Specifically, the delegates voted to approve a report of the AMA ethics committee </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/dvUNB7Fa2GU/ama-votes-to-discourage-commercial.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-tcJj0evcE6U/TgD882lTiwI/AAAAAAAAA7I/hhzucDiwAVg/s72-c/champagne.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>9</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/06/ama-votes-to-discourage-commercial.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6523070533106727679</guid><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-06-21T13:59:42.917-04:00</atom:updated><title>Unhinged in The New York Review of Books</title><atom:summary type="text">The July 14, 2011 issue of The New York Review of Books includes the second of a two-part review of several new books on the topic of psychiatry, including my book Unhinged. Review author Marcia Angell, Senior Lecturer in Social Medicine at Harvard Medical School and former Editor in Chief of The New England Journal of Medicine, calls Unhinged “absorbing” in her article “The Illusions of </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/C2ai2pH96G0/unhinged-in-new-york-review-of-books.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><thr:total>6</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/06/unhinged-in-new-york-review-of-books.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-1199634076044555165</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-25T12:19:56.407-04:00</atom:updated><title>Horizant: The Second Coming of Gabapentin</title><atom:summary type="text">by Steve Balt

In keeping with the religious notion of reincarnation, apparently some drugs are destined to be reborn, redesigned, and re-packaged for brand new indications.  I've written about Contrave and Silenor for instance—two drugs with generic counterparts that have been re-tweaked and renamed for newer (and larger) markets.
In early April, the FDA granted its approval to yet another "new"</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/qP6a5hARYp4/horizant-second-coming-of-gabapentin.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-Pqv8fyuWUQ4/Td0MSl0DsSI/AAAAAAAAA6w/tWIqo-ihYuI/s72-c/gbp-horiz.jpeg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>36</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/05/horizant-second-coming-of-gabapentin.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6411793466675574295</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-16T16:01:43.781-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">QuantiaMD</category><title>A Review of QuantiaMD: Good Content, Murky Firewalls, and Hypo-Disclosure</title><atom:summary type="text">There are a number of new and rapidly growing physician social networking sites, and two of the largest are Sermo and QuantiaMD. They both offer tempting packages of free information to doctors, including CME. When stuff is free to you, someone else is paying for it. That "someone" has a stake in the content, and the art of operating an ethical educational website hinges on creating a good </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/eC9Q2Syeskc/review-of-quantiamd-good-content-murky.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-5-ZAqmCT12Q/Tc9mjs-jn2I/AAAAAAAAA6o/KP9aQsyEmoE/s72-c/Quantia+logo.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>10</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/05/review-of-quantiamd-good-content-murky.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-7940649544050168381</guid><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 21:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-13T22:23:09.260-04:00</atom:updated><title>APA Joins Vanda in Running Misleading Fanapt Ad</title><atom:summary type="text">Makers of atypical antipsychotics are desperately trying to  differentiate their products from their competitors. This explains the  deceptive insert from Vanda Pharmaceuticals that was bagged with the latest version of the APA's newspaper, Psychiatric News. 

The insert is a 5 X 8 inch 4 page booklet. The front cover is below:



Evidently appealing to the scratch-ticket set among psychiatrists,</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/F-7XNyIks00/apa-joins-vanda-in-running-misleading.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-X1K87ZSnYSo/Tc2d0UDzbaI/AAAAAAAAA6Y/N914g3jFTMI/s72-c/Fanapt+ad_Page_1.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/05/apa-joins-vanda-in-running-misleading.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-7457108214210712521</guid><pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-06T10:59:23.833-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Heart Rhythm Society</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ProPublica</category><title>Lub-dub, Lub-dub, Lub-dub...KA-CHING!</title><atom:summary type="text">In a fascinating series of articles released yesterday, ProPublica details how a heretofore obscure medical organization, the Heart Rhythm Society, pulls drug and device company cash in hand over fist. You'll find the main article here, along with links to several companion pieces, my favorite being this devilishly fun interactive piece in which you can click on graphics of cardiologists </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/fQXjkvL0jf8/lub-dub-lub-lub-lub-dubka-ching.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KjX9JFxJj-U/TcQLUMvqCGI/AAAAAAAAA6E/nB7CfJxvnS4/s72-c/Heart+cash.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/05/lub-dub-lub-lub-lub-dubka-ching.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6855105845713305571</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 17:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-05-04T13:13:05.952-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ACCME</category><title>ACCME Seeks to Hide Drug Company Disclosures in the Fine Print</title><atom:summary type="text">In an absolutely perplexing move, Dr. Murray Kopelow and the ACCME are proposing a revision to their Standards for Commercial Support that will undermine those standards. Currently, when an education company solicits money from industry to underwrite a course for doctors, they must disclose this inherent conflict of interest, and they often do so by printing the company's logo somewhere. 

As an </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/CvNRLmZWpIo/accme-seeks-to-hide-drug-company.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-iq2VseuvhK0/TcF_SCsRFkI/AAAAAAAAA6A/xCOwnjv8_x4/s72-c/medscape.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/05/accme-seeks-to-hide-drug-company.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-4906825494403592295</guid><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-27T15:43:24.682-04:00</atom:updated><title>House Votes to Repeal "Physician’s Oyster and Wine Takeaway" (POWT)</title><atom:summary type="text">&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Your User Name   12.00   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;     Normal   0               false   false   false      EN-US   ZH-TW   X-NONE                                                         MicrosoftInternetExplorer4                                                   &lt;![endif]--&gt;&lt;!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/YJLHP72TP7U/house-votes-to-repeal-physicians-oyster.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-89B98fVjioo/TbhxrcZ4mWI/AAAAAAAAA58/NggjnheXbAY/s72-c/pouting+doctor.jpg" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>4</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/04/house-votes-to-repeal-physicians-oyster.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-61169408311435084</guid><pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 14:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-17T10:53:36.995-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Medscape</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Eli Lilly</category><title>"Performance Improvement" CME, Brought To You By Medscape and Eli Lilly</title><atom:summary type="text">Performance Improvement CME has become all the rage in the world of continuing medical education. Otherwise known as PI CME, it is being touted by the AMA as the next big thing in medical education. You can read an AMA white paper about it here.

Not all medical specialty organizations actually require that physicians complete PI CME, but they are moving toward this. The American Board of </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/RaxN_Txc-bs/performance-improvement-cme-brought-to.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-zgXD-1dZS6Y/Tar6P09n3cI/AAAAAAAAA54/qBiGd6xh7sQ/s72-c/Medscape+Lilly+PI.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>7</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/04/performance-improvement-cme-brought-to.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1562387750337311798.post-6951764012963414144</guid><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2011-04-11T16:47:51.672-04:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alan Schatzberg</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Nemeroff</category><title>A New Smoking Gun in the APA Textbook Fiasco</title><atom:summary type="text">A new piece of evidence has been unearthed by Phyllis Vine of MIWatch that the Nemeroff/Schatzberg textbook was indeed ghostwritten by STI, Scientific Therapeutics Information. Somehow, Vine was able to unearth STI's "portfolio" of publications, even though the company has since removed the incriminating pages. 

I suppose APA might still hold to its guns, presumably by arguing that STI did no </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCarlatPsychiatryBlog/~3/oKgyzTah2XY/new-smoking-gun-in-apa-textbook-fiasco.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Daniel Carlat, M.D.)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-ANhRhgV5IRc/TaNhApid0pI/AAAAAAAAA5w/gh6Hokbuksk/s72-c/STI.PNG" height="72" width="72" /><thr:total>5</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://carlatpsychiatry.blogspot.com/2011/04/new-smoking-gun-in-apa-textbook-fiasco.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

