<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;CkQMRXoycCp7ImA9WxBQE0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258</id><updated>2010-01-13T02:13:04.498-06:00</updated><title>The Constitution, Conversations, &amp; Political Discourse</title><subtitle type="html">Welcome to Constitution Conversations.  I am J Albert.  Not that special, just tired of what is going on today.  I hope that my views will create a conversation, not only on this site, but in your home, at your work, around the dinner table, shopping….you get the idea.  If you don’t like what I have to say or the views that are expressed, good luck in finding a place to enjoy a good conversation.  Read my profile and get engaged to get the most out of this or any blog.  Welcome and enjoy!</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/" /><link rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>16</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse" /><feedburner:info uri="theconstitutionconversationandpoliticaldiscourse" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUCQXczeip7ImA9WxNRE00.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-3933245428014078308</id><published>2009-09-07T02:24:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-09-07T02:24:20.982-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-07T02:24:20.982-05:00</app:edited><title>How do we keep going from Dumb to Dumber? Ask the OBAMANATOR!</title><summary type="html">  You know, I have had a few days hospitalized wondering what would it have been like to have these needs when NObamaCare comes to be a reality, which believe you me, I pray every night and every time I think about these possibilities.  The testing, surgery's, and continuous poking and prodding will not be happening.  I have ALS and that means little or no support except things to manage the pain&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/2vjr3NhqRkU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/3933245428014078308/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/09/how-do-we-keep-going-from-dumb-to.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/3933245428014078308?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/3933245428014078308?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/2vjr3NhqRkU/how-do-we-keep-going-from-dumb-to.html" title="How do we keep going from Dumb to Dumber? Ask the OBAMANATOR!" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/09/how-do-we-keep-going-from-dumb-to.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A08NQn8_fip7ImA9WxNSEUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-5681739704488061602</id><published>2009-08-24T19:15:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-24T19:24:53.146-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-24T19:24:53.146-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Medicare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Employment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Petition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Independence" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Health" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Recall" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Liar" /><title>Is President Obama a Racist? Socialist? Anti-American? Anyone Up for a Good Old Fashioned Boycott?</title><summary type="html">From the Advertising Age website’s article “Political Talk Shows Talk Themselves Out of Ads”, which says:       GLENN BECK: The Fox News Channel talking head touched off a storm of controversy when he called President Barack Obama a 'racist' who has a 'deep-seated hatred for white people.'   Wal-Mart Stores, Berkshire Hathaway's Geico and Men's Wearhouse have already said they've taken steps to &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/ejqelvN6TXI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/5681739704488061602/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/is-president-obama-racist-socialist.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5681739704488061602?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5681739704488061602?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/ejqelvN6TXI/is-president-obama-racist-socialist.html" title="Is President Obama a Racist? Socialist? Anti-American? Anyone Up for a Good Old Fashioned Boycott?" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/is-president-obama-racist-socialist.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QER306eyp7ImA9WxNTGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-4055191931323236068</id><published>2009-08-21T02:37:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-21T22:21:46.313-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-21T22:21:46.313-05:00</app:edited><title>Mr. President, You Need to Read Up On Your 10 Commandments!</title><summary type="html">On the 19th, President Obama held a phone Town Hall Meeting with some of the Clergy.  In his statements, there was a reference to “some folks out there who are baring false witness, but I want everyone to know what health insurance reform is really about.”  Now, so I don’t get chewed on for taking it out of context, here is the entire portion of the Presidents “talk” in his Town Meeting &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/jH4n0oMeT4A" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/4055191931323236068/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/mr-president-you-need-to-read-up-on.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/4055191931323236068?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/4055191931323236068?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/jH4n0oMeT4A/mr-president-you-need-to-read-up-on.html" title="Mr. President, You Need to Read Up On Your 10 Commandments!" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/mr-president-you-need-to-read-up-on.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEMDRXw6fip7ImA9WxNTF04.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-8946465923319037302</id><published>2009-08-19T21:34:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-19T21:47:54.216-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-19T21:47:54.216-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Governor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Anchor Baby" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Medicare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Employment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Debra Medina" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Petition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Auto Makers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Washington DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Independence" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Recall" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Health" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sara Phelan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Liar" /><title>Executive Pay Limitations and Single Payer – These are not areas that Congress or the President belong in.</title><summary type="html">They seem to keep loosing sight of the Constitution in Washington.  There seems to be this long standing belief that they can just legislate on any subject, cause, rhyme, reason, or as simple bug up their shorts, and We the People sit back and just let it happen.  Where is your outrage?  The Constitution (which is the Constitution of the United States of America) provides the congress their &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/T-rFA-St6h8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/8946465923319037302/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/executive-pay-limitations-and-single.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8946465923319037302?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8946465923319037302?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/T-rFA-St6h8/executive-pay-limitations-and-single.html" title="Executive Pay Limitations and Single Payer – These are not areas that Congress or the President belong in." /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/executive-pay-limitations-and-single.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUUHSHY-fCp7ImA9WxNTFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-5990619109658453592</id><published>2009-08-19T04:27:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-19T05:20:39.854-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-19T05:20:39.854-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Governor" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Medicare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Employment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Debra Medina" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="John McCain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Petition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Washington DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Independence" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Recall" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Health" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sara Phelan" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Liar" /><title>Texas Has A Shooting Star Heading Your Way</title><summary type="html">Sit down folks, buckle up your seat belts or tie yourself down.  The Great State and Republic of Texas is about to have a Governor’s race and no, not because Rick Perry and Kay Bailey Hutchinson are running, or should I say that in spite of them running.  There is a new Sherriff coming to the Governors race and SHE is going to LIGHT up the completion, which is not that hard to do with the other &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/k1J8qQJrJQM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/5990619109658453592/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/texas-has-shooting-star-heading-your.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5990619109658453592?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5990619109658453592?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/k1J8qQJrJQM/texas-has-shooting-star-heading-your.html" title="Texas Has A Shooting Star Heading Your Way" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/texas-has-shooting-star-heading-your.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkYHRnw-cCp7ImA9WxNTFks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-359011946895470242</id><published>2009-08-19T02:00:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-19T02:48:57.258-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-19T02:48:57.258-05:00</app:edited><title>If President Lincoln Were Alive Today, Would He Write……..</title><summary type="html">Eleven Score and Thirteen Years Ago Our Fathers brought forth on this continent a New Nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men and women are created equal.   Now we are engaged in an ideological and internal war, testing whether this nation, or any nation, so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are the great battle-field of this war. We have come to &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/Jz4h8P01Auc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/359011946895470242/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/if-president-lincoln-were-alive-today.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/359011946895470242?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/359011946895470242?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/Jz4h8P01Auc/if-president-lincoln-were-alive-today.html" title="If President Lincoln Were Alive Today, Would He Write…….." /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/if-president-lincoln-were-alive-today.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;D0QHSX8zeSp7ImA9WxNTE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-4344231314917173820</id><published>2009-08-15T03:34:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-15T03:35:38.181-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-15T03:35:38.181-05:00</app:edited><title>Why I, J Albert, Support the Texas Nationalist Movement</title><summary type="html">The better question is Why don’t YOU support the Texas Nationalist Movement or any State’s Nationalist Movement?  Believe it or not, it is our RIGHT as citizens to pursue these options for our states and its people.         THE TEXAS CONSTITUTION  PREAMBLE    Humbly invoking the blessings of Almighty God, the people of the State of Texas, do ordain and establish this Constitution.  ARTICLE 1.  &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/3fozkgdxqQs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/4344231314917173820/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/why-i-j-albert-support-texas.html#comment-form" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/4344231314917173820?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/4344231314917173820?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/3fozkgdxqQs/why-i-j-albert-support-texas.html" title="Why I, J Albert, Support the Texas Nationalist Movement" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/why-i-j-albert-support-texas.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkAEQHk_fyp7ImA9WxNTE08.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-928178071979980786</id><published>2009-08-15T02:17:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-15T02:18:21.747-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-15T02:18:21.747-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Anchor Baby" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Employment" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Petition" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Auto Makers" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insurance" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Health" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Recall" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Liar" /><title>Who is the President of the United States of America?</title><summary type="html">Oh, I so love being politically incorrect.  This is a legitimate question that every American should be asking themselves and their governors of their respective states. In fact, why hasn’t the Supreme Court asked for the Long Form Birth Certificate of the acting President of the United States?  Good question?  Yeah, I know.  But do they know?  This is their RESPONSIBILITY to ensure the integrity&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/A_jXUwN74C8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/928178071979980786/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/who-is-president-of-united-states-of.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/928178071979980786?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/928178071979980786?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/A_jXUwN74C8/who-is-president-of-united-states-of.html" title="Who is the President of the United States of America?" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/who-is-president-of-united-states-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;Ak8GQHY-eip7ImA9WxNTEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-8778671366602963613</id><published>2009-08-12T04:00:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-12T04:20:21.852-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-12T04:20:21.852-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Medicare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Washington DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>Dear Nancy……(An Open Letter to the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi)</title><summary type="html">Dear Representative Nancy Pelosi;  I would have started this with Honorable, but that word does not become you.  I also have a hard time with calling you a Representative since you have long forgotten what representing means.  And yes, I am just another Un-American Texan that has no idea what the words Truth, Honor, Respect and Dignity Mean, but I do know a snake oil salesman when I see them, you&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/cLJWmV68Mnw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/8778671366602963613/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/dear-nancyan-open-letter-to-speaker-of.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8778671366602963613?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8778671366602963613?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/cLJWmV68Mnw/dear-nancyan-open-letter-to-speaker-of.html" title="Dear Nancy……(An Open Letter to the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi)" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/dear-nancyan-open-letter-to-speaker-of.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DEEMRXozcSp7ImA9WxJaEU4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-5011728652801254541</id><published>2009-08-01T05:42:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-08-01T09:24:44.489-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-01T09:24:44.489-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="States Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>Wondering if this will get me on the Watch List? Oh well</title><summary type="html">Tonight,  I have gladly joined the site, The Texas Nationalist Movement,  for the simple reason,  I support the Constitution of the United States of America.    I believe that we each have been given the right under that constitution to speak and believe as we choose, freely, openly , and with out fear of reprisal as long as it is not in done in such a way as to cause harm to others and diminish &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/SNUT5hzRCaA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/5011728652801254541/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/wondering-if-this-will-get-me-on-watch.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5011728652801254541?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/5011728652801254541?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/SNUT5hzRCaA/wondering-if-this-will-get-me-on-watch.html" title="Wondering if this will get me on the Watch List? Oh well" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/08/wondering-if-this-will-get-me-on-watch.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkEDQ306fip7ImA9WxJbF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-8517775305048837963</id><published>2009-07-28T03:44:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-28T03:44:32.316-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-28T03:44:32.316-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Medicare" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Constitutional rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="John McCain" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="CBO" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Insiders" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Washington DC" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Bill of Rights" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Sara Phelan" /><title>Would the Congressional Budget Fudge the Numbers, Just A WEEEEEEEE BIG BIT?</title><summary type="html">If  you have taken any time to look over the documents made available to the public In reference to H.R. 3200, the America’s Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009 (were there any of these in other years?), you just might go, WHAT IN THE SAM HILL ARE YOU BOYS GETTING INTO?  Director Elmendorf of the CBO (god, don’t you just hate all these three letter acronyms) sent a letter to the (Catch &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/rqKZWjdaCYs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/8517775305048837963/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/would-congressional-budget-fudge.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8517775305048837963?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/8517775305048837963?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/rqKZWjdaCYs/would-congressional-budget-fudge.html" title="Would the Congressional Budget Fudge the Numbers, Just A WEEEEEEEE BIG BIT?" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/would-congressional-budget-fudge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QCR3Y-cSp7ImA9WxJbFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-2335984272876343327</id><published>2009-07-26T15:35:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:09:26.859-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-27T00:09:26.859-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>Here is My Answer to Why Americans Are Not Obeying Obama, Where is Yours?</title><summary type="html">In the article/blog “Why Aren't Americans Obeying Obama?” by Austin Hill he asked a great question that every American needs to be ready to answer. My Answer is below. I hope you will read some of the blogs on Austin Hill’s Townhall blog. After reading a few of the replies, I wanted to chime in on Austin Hill’s Blog/Article.Some feel that President Obama is still running for office. Clearly, he &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/o_1ZmaKWnOQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/2335984272876343327/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/here-is-my-answer-to-why-americans-are.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/2335984272876343327?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/2335984272876343327?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/o_1ZmaKWnOQ/here-is-my-answer-to-why-americans-are.html" title="Here is My Answer to Why Americans Are Not Obeying Obama, Where is Yours?" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/here-is-my-answer-to-why-americans-are.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0IBRHw9fyp7ImA9WxJbFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-225950706603487010</id><published>2009-07-25T03:20:00.004-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:12:35.267-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-27T00:12:35.267-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>If the Health Care Bill Goes Through, it will kill me!</title><summary type="html">Just another day of little sleep and pain to the level I did not know possible, and in those moments when I took some of my medications to help with the pain, I realized, I am not blogging on this topic just because I am conservative. Being conservative might be way down on the list. I felt ashamed for feeling these emotions when I realized, I have the right given to me by the Constitution to be &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/3CPtzwL_UqQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/225950706603487010/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/if-health-care-bill-goes-through-it.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/225950706603487010?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/225950706603487010?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/3CPtzwL_UqQ/if-health-care-bill-goes-through-it.html" title="If the Health Care Bill Goes Through, it will kill me!" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/if-health-care-bill-goes-through-it.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cEQ30yeyp7ImA9WxJbFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-2821346795112951657</id><published>2009-07-21T00:10:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:03:22.393-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-27T00:03:22.393-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><title>Passing a Bill in the House before they have finished writing it? Give me a break!</title><summary type="html">OK. Now answer this question. Would YOU vote to approve anything that had not been read front to back by either yourself or someone that you trust had read it and given you the key highlights of the “bill”? If you answer with anything but no, then you are a Democrat. To believe that our representatives would actually vote and pass a bill that was not even written yet is not just grounds for &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/cQOdIZnWiW8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/2821346795112951657/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/passing-bill-in-house-before-they-have.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/2821346795112951657?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/2821346795112951657?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/cQOdIZnWiW8/passing-bill-in-house-before-they-have.html" title="Passing a Bill in the House before they have finished writing it? Give me a break!" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/passing-bill-in-house-before-they-have.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QARnY9fip7ImA9WxJbFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-1456757839031975106</id><published>2009-07-20T19:20:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:09:07.866-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-27T00:09:07.866-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>We The People……….</title><summary type="html">We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. Wow. Every time I read these lines my heart beats a little faster and &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/8fnMXiqWal0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/1456757839031975106/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/we-people.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/1456757839031975106?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/1456757839031975106?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/8fnMXiqWal0/we-people.html" title="We The People………." /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/we-people.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0INSH07fSp7ImA9WxJbFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4689613869044997258.post-110706821887174825</id><published>2009-07-20T03:27:00.006-05:00</published><updated>2009-07-27T00:13:19.305-05:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-07-27T00:13:19.305-05:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="political" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="blog" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="president" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="constitution" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="news" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="conservative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="republican" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="democrat" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="house bill" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="representative" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="senator" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="liberal" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Obama" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="independent" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="congress" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Supreme Court" /><title>I Am Going to Start With Questions for YOU!</title><summary type="html">After a week of writing and re-writing, trying to ensure that my questions to start off my blog are clear as well as focused on what my blog is about, Freedom to Conserve the Constitution. Freedom that the Constitution gives me to be conservative in my beliefs and others liberal. Freedom to live and worship as we choose. To believe in a God or not to believe. Yet no where does it give away our &lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~4/BVriP9SUV_Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</summary><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/feeds/110706821887174825/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/i-am-going-to-start-with-questions-for.html#comment-form" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/110706821887174825?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/4689613869044997258/posts/default/110706821887174825?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheConstitutionConversationAndPoliticalDiscourse/~3/BVriP9SUV_Q/i-am-going-to-start-with-questions-for.html" title="I Am Going to Start With Questions for YOU!" /><author><name>J. Albert</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/07786147684755943341</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:extendedProperty name="OpenSocialUserId" value="11857234266076854168" /></author><thr:total xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0">0</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://www.constitutionconversations.com/2009/07/i-am-going-to-start-with-questions-for.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>
