<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Corpus Callosum</title>
      <link>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/</link>
      <description>The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:44:30 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.35</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <feedburner:emailServiceId>1184339</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://www.feedburner.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheCorpusCallosum" type="application/rss+xml" /><item>
         <title>New Premedical Curriculum?</title>
          <description>&lt;a href="http://hms.harvard.edu/hms/home.asp"&gt;Harvard
Medical School&lt;/a&gt; recently completed a review of their required
premedical curriculum, culminating with the development of recommended
changes. &amp;nbsp;The outcome of this process is reported in an
article in the recent issue of the &lt;i&gt;New England Journal of
Medicine&lt;/i&gt;. &amp;nbsp;It's one of their open-access articles:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a
 href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/3/221"&gt;Relevance
and Rigor in Premedical Education&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jules L. Dienstag, M.D.&lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
In recent decades, scientific knowledge has changed dramatically,
once-settled scientific principles have been replaced by more
sophisticated concepts and entirely new disciplines, and parallel
changes have occurred in medical practice and health care delivery. In
the face of these new realities, medical school curricula have had to
adapt. Yet despite these sweeping changes, including the permeation of
most areas of medicine by molecular and cellular biology and genetics,
requirements for admission to medical school have remained virtually
unchanged for many decades...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/new_premedical_curriculum.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/new_premedical_curriculum.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/343481635" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/343493491/new_premedical_curriculum.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/new_premedical_curriculum.php</guid>
         <category>Medicine</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:44:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/new_premedical_curriculum.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/343481635/new_premedical_curriculum.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>How Core Beliefs Influence Behavior</title>
          <description>Many years ago, I was browsing thought the Borders bookstore, one of
the earliers ones, on State Street in Ann Arbor, and encountered a book
about psychotherapy. &amp;nbsp;It claimed to be a sort of encyclopedia
of named styles of psychotherapy. &amp;nbsp;I can't recall the number
of them, but I think it was between 300 and 400. &amp;nbsp;That was 20
years ago. &amp;nbsp;I'm sure it is in the thousenads by now. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course most of these are merely variations of just a few themes.
&amp;nbsp;And most have not been validated systematically. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
One of these is called &lt;a
 href="http://www.corebeliefs.com/index.html"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Core
Belief Engineering&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;The basic principles
are sound. &amp;nbsp;The only quibble I have is that most psychotherapy
will involve changing core beliefs, so there seems to be little point
in splitting that off and giving it a separate name.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Probably the name serves to give the approach a certain degree of curb
appeal, and &lt;i&gt;prima facie&lt;/i&gt; validity. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Anyway, the idea is that people hold certain beliefs that tend to shape
their behavior in important, systematic ways. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For example, if a person finds that they keep dating other people who
turn out to be untrustworthy, it may be that they have a core belief
that no one is honorable in romantic contexts. &amp;nbsp;That belief
may shape their behavior, such that it becomes a self-fulfilling
prophesy. &amp;nbsp;By being suspicious, hypervigilant, and constantly
seeking reassurance, they drive people away. &amp;nbsp;This simply
reinforces the belief.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
That is only one example. &amp;nbsp;There are many ways that this plays
out.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Nowhere is this more evident that in politics.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/341468682" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/341478823/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php</guid>
         <category>Armchair Musings</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:29:59 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/341468682/how_core_beliefs_influence_beh.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>46% Swingers</title>
          <description>The Pew Research Center informs us that&lt;a
 href="http://pewresearch.org/databank/dailynumber/?NumberID=585"&gt;
today's number is 46%&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;That is the percentage of
independent voters who are undecided about their choice for President
in the November election in the USA. &amp;nbsp;This is "much higher"
than the same statistic four years ago. &amp;nbsp;It is likely that
this group will swing the election.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Of course, you could say the same about almost any group, if the
election is close. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I noticed this because I was on their site for something else, and
noticed the number in the sidebar, in a little box that said:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;big&gt;46%&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Nearly half of independents (46%) are undecided or may change their
minds.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It did not say what they were independent from, or what they might
change their minds about.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Personally, I find the number difficult to believe, so I have created
my own poll to check their results.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;!-- // Begin Snappoll.com Poll Code // --&gt;
&lt;link href="http://www.snappoll.com/main.css" type="text/css"
 rel="stylesheet"&gt;
&lt;table bgcolor="#000000" border="0" cellpadding="1"
 cellspacing="0" width="100"&gt;
  &lt;tbody&gt;
    &lt;tr&gt;
      &lt;td&gt;
      &lt;table class="pollcontent" border="0"
 cellpadding="5" cellspacing="0" width="180"&gt;
        &lt;form name="custompoll"
 action="http://www.snappoll.com/act_vote.php" method="post"
 target="_blank"&gt;&lt;input value="282125"
 name="poll_id" type="hidden"&gt;&lt;tbody&gt;
            &lt;tr bgcolor="#3399cc"&gt;
              &lt;td width="171"&gt;
              &lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;font color="#ffffff"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Today's
Political Question&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Are You Undecided?&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;/tr&gt;
            &lt;tr bgcolor="#3399cc"&gt;
              &lt;td&gt;&lt;font color="#ffffff"&gt;&lt;input
 checked="checked" value="1" name="chosenanswer"
 type="radio"&gt; Yes&lt;br&gt;
              &lt;input value="2" name="chosenanswer"
 type="radio"&gt; No&lt;br&gt;
              &lt;input value="3" name="chosenanswer"
 type="radio"&gt; I can't Decide&lt;br&gt;
              &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;/tr&gt;
            &lt;tr bgcolor="#3399cc"&gt;
              &lt;td&gt;
              &lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;input
 class="actionbutton" id="Vote" value="Vote!"
 name="Vote" type="submit"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
              &lt;a class="indipolllink"
 href="http://www.snappoll.com/view_results.php?poll_id=282125"
 target="_blank"&gt;&lt;font color="#ffffff"&gt;view
results&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
              &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;/tr&gt;
            &lt;tr bgcolor="#3399cc"&gt;
              &lt;td height="29"&gt;&lt;!--- This javascript is placed in banners/banner_pollinside.js
&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
function get_referrer(lk){var dc=document;if(dc.location==''){return true}var ru=escape(dc.location);var pu='';var du;if(lk!=null){if(lk.href!=null){du=lk.href;}else if(lk.form!=null &amp;&amp; lk.form.referrer_url!=null){lk.form.referrer_url.value=dc.location;return true}}else if(pu!=''){du=pu}else{return true}if(du==null){return true}if(du.match(/\?/)){du=du+'&amp;'}else{du=du+'?'}du=du+'referrer_url='+ru;if(lk!=null &amp;&amp; lk.href!=null){lk.href=du}else{window.location=du;return false}return true}
&lt;/script&gt; ---&gt;
              &lt;center&gt;
              &lt;script language="javascript"
 src="http://www.snappoll.com/banners/banner_pollinside.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;&lt;/center&gt;
              &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;/tr&gt;
          &lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/form&gt;
      &lt;/table&gt;
      &lt;/td&gt;
    &lt;/tr&gt;
  &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;!-- // End Snappoll.com Poll Code // --&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/46_swingers.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/340598864" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/340599213/46_swingers.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/46_swingers.php</guid>
         <category>Chatter</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 07:28:45 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/46_swingers.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/340598864/46_swingers.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Proposed Oil Legislation: Brilliant and Pointless</title>
          <description>The House is &lt;a href="http://www.theoildrum.com/node/4314"&gt;considering
legislation&lt;/a&gt; that would do two things: force oil companies to
give up unused leases, and ban the export of oil from Alaska.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It's brilliant because it highlights the &lt;i&gt;absurd&lt;/i&gt;
fallacy: that opening up more land for drilling would lower gas prices.
&amp;nbsp;The fact is, oil companies already have leases that they are
sitting on, not drilling on. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Opening up more land for oil leases will not cause them to drill more
oil. &amp;nbsp;It'd be like putting more gas in the tank of a
driverless car. &amp;nbsp;Putting more gas in the tank will not enable
the car to go farther. &amp;nbsp;The car will go nowhere, because no
one is driving it.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Bush's response was predicable. &amp;nbsp;It's one of those comments
that is either stupid, or a blatant lie:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/338941074" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/338949642/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php</guid>
         <category>Energy</category>
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 07:41:01 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/338941074/proposed_oil_legislation_brill.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Dick Cheney as a Wee Laddie</title>
          <description>&lt;img title="Click" alt="Click"
 src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/kerry_rifle_large.jpg"
 class="inset" height="600" width="383"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is a photo from a collection of images that were modified using &lt;a
 href="http://www.gimp.org/"&gt;&lt;b&gt;GIMP&lt;/b&gt; - The &lt;b&gt;G&lt;/b&gt;NU
&lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt;mage &lt;b&gt;M&lt;/b&gt;anipulation &lt;b&gt;P&lt;/b&gt;rogram&lt;/a&gt;.
&amp;nbsp;There is a small collection of such photos at &lt;a
 href="http://www.junauza.com/2008/07/25-best-gimped-images.html"&gt;Tech
Source From Bohol&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;This &lt;a
 href="http://209.234.77.62/gallery/kerry_rifle_large.html"&gt;particular
image&lt;/a&gt; is at a &lt;a
 href="http://209.234.77.62/stovepipe.html"&gt;less refined site&lt;/a&gt;,
that Tech Source linked to.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I made up the name. The original caption on the photo is "Innocence."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/dick_cheney_as_a_wee_laddie.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/337070215" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/337071686/dick_cheney_as_a_wee_laddie.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/dick_cheney_as_a_wee_laddie.php</guid>
         <category>Photos of Interest</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:20:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/dick_cheney_as_a_wee_laddie.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/337070215/dick_cheney_as_a_wee_laddie.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Group Therapy For RLS</title>
          <description>&lt;a
 href="http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/restless_legs/restless_legs.htm"&gt;Restless
Legs Syndrome&lt;/a&gt; has been more in the public eye lately.
&amp;nbsp;I understand this is because of aggressive direct-to-consumer
advertising. &amp;nbsp;I'm not much of a consumer, so I haven't seen
the ads, but people tell me about them. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Whatever you think of DTC advertising, RLS is real, and it is a
significant problem for some people. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Years ago, it was discovered that RLS can be alleviated for some people
with carbidopa/levodopa. &amp;nbsp;But that was an off-patent medicine.
&amp;nbsp;When patented medicines [Requip (ropinirole) and Mirapex
(pramipexole)] became available, RLS became an opportunity, hence, the
ads.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Not all patients required medication. &amp;nbsp;Sometimes, it was
possible to try an underlying cause. &amp;nbsp;Iron deficiency is one
example, easily corrected. &amp;nbsp;Others could benefit from
lifestyle changes. &amp;nbsp;Quiting caffeine and/or alcohol helped
some people. &amp;nbsp;Others benefited from sleep hygiene.
&amp;nbsp;But some, particularly those with severe symptoms, do require
medication.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It seems that the focus for most people has been on interventions
involving medication. &amp;nbsp;But if lifestyle and nutritional
interventions don't solve the problem, is there any other
nonpharmacological intervention that is worthwhile?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/group_therapy_for_rls.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/group_therapy_for_rls.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/336003208" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/336003531/group_therapy_for_rls.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/group_therapy_for_rls.php</guid>
         <category>Medicine</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 07:26:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/group_therapy_for_rls.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/336003208/group_therapy_for_rls.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Happy Meals</title>
          <description>I got twenty dollars out of the bank today.  What should I get: two shares of Fannie Mae stock, or four Happy Meals?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/happy_meals.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/335360952" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/335364087/happy_meals.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/happy_meals.php</guid>
         <category>Armchair Musings</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:18:50 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/happy_meals.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/335360952/happy_meals.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Mental Health Parity</title>
          <description>This post is not about mental health parity. &amp;nbsp;Although it is a
very important topic, there is no reason for me to write about it.
&amp;nbsp;If you are interesting in the topic, just go read the (open
access) Perspectives column in the current NEJM: &lt;i&gt;&lt;a
 href="http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/359/2/113"&gt;Shuffling
toward Parity -- Bringing Mental Health Care under the Umbrella&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The column is short enough that there would not be any point in trying
to distill it any further. &amp;nbsp;But I do want to make a couple of points, including a
mild-to-moderate quibble with one of the points mentioned:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Insurers who offer relatively generous coverage for
mental health care will disproportionately attract people with mental
disorders -- people who have been shown to incur higher costs for health
care and mental health care than most other enrollees. Being the best
mental health plan in a competitive health insurance market is a losing
financial proposition, so insurers may compete to narrow their benefits
and avoid enrolling people with mental illness.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These assertions are made with no references to empirical data.
&amp;nbsp;Perhaps the references exist, but were not mentioned for the
sake of brevity. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
My concern, though, is that the assertions are of the sort that seem so
obviously true, that it might not seem as though they need any actual
data to back them up.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/mental_health_parity.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/mental_health_parity.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/331672894" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/331676917/mental_health_parity.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/mental_health_parity.php</guid>
         <category>Psychiatry</category>
         
         <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:47:13 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/mental_health_parity.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/331672894/mental_health_parity.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Climate Change Delusion</title>
          <description>Joshua Wolf and Robert Salo of Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital
reported, in the &lt;a
 href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title%7Edb=all%7Econtent=t768481832%7Etab=issueslist"&gt;Australian
and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry&lt;/a&gt;, on a case of a person
with delusional beliefs regarding climate change.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There is no openly-accessible abstract, (the link to the paywall page
is &lt;a
 href="http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content%7Econtent=a791365692%7Edb=all%7Eorder=page"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;)
so we have to make do with &lt;a
 href="http://www.anorak.co.uk/global-warming/185486.html"&gt;a
news report&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;We describe a patient with climate change delusion, a
previously unreported phenomenon. A 17-year-old man was referred to the
inpatient psychiatric unit at Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne with
an 8 month history of depressed mood... He also ...had visions of
apocalyptic events...&lt;br&gt;
  &lt;br&gt;
The patient had also developed the belief that, due to climate change,
his own water consumption could lead within days to the deaths of
'millions of people' through exhaustion of water supplies. He quoted
'internet research' to substantiate this. The patient described that 'I
feel guilty about it', had attempted to stop drinking... He was unable to
acknowledge that the belief was unreasonable when challenged.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This was taken quickly as fodder for &lt;a
 href="http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/melbourne_boy_first_victim_of_climate_change_delusion/"&gt;thoughtless
commentary&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/climate_change_delusion.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/climate_change_delusion.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/330720707" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/330723444/climate_change_delusion.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/climate_change_delusion.php</guid>
         <category>Psychiatry</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:31:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/climate_change_delusion.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/330720707/climate_change_delusion.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Neuroscience of Oil Addiction</title>
          <description>There is an interesting and thought-provoking essay at The Oil Drum.
&amp;nbsp;It was written by &lt;a
 href="http://www.uvm.edu/giee/?Page=about/students/Nathan_Hagens.html&amp;amp;amp;SM=about/about_menu.html"&gt;Nathan
Hagens&lt;/a&gt;, a student at the Gund Institute, University of
Vermont. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img alt="drugs_n_energy.png"
 src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/drugs_n_energy.png"
 height="375" width="500"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
He makes some errors in the science, and engages in some armchair
hypothesizing (see graph above), but the overall conclusions are not
affected. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/328818035" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/328819613/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php</guid>
         <category>Energy</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:33:30 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/328818035/neuroscience_of_oil_addiction.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Compiling Firefox 3 From Source on Kubuntu</title>
          <description>Responding
to the innate human desire to have the faster browser possible, I am
almost happy with Firefox 3. &amp;nbsp;But not quite. &amp;nbsp;Thus,
the
experiment: compile from source. &amp;nbsp;This is accomplished as
follows:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
0.
Kubuntu does not come with the packages necessary to build from source,
by default. &amp;nbsp;You must install a bunch of stuff first.
&amp;nbsp;Fortunately, this is easy. &amp;nbsp;To install the
prerequisites
necessary to build Firefox from source, open a terminal and type:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;code&gt;apt-get build-dep firefox&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Download the Firefox source code &lt;a
 href="ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/3.0/linux-i686/en-US/"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
2. &amp;nbsp;Extract to a suitable place, likely a subdirectory in your
home folder.&lt;br&gt;
3. Open a terminal and go to the subdirectory. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
4. &amp;nbsp;Run the configure script:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;code&gt;./configure --enable-optimize --disable-tests&amp;nbsp;
--enable-gnomevfs --enable-application=browser&lt;/code&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Note
that the option to enable gnomefvs is optional. &amp;nbsp;It allows
Firefox
to populate the Applications tab in the Preferences dialog box.
&amp;nbsp;That actually was one thing that led to me wanting to do this
in the first place. &amp;nbsp;Enabling optimization is obviously part
of the goal of the
project. &amp;nbsp;Disabling tests speeds up the compilation time.
Enabling
the browser application is required.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
5. make&lt;br&gt;
6. make install&lt;br&gt;
7. Find and run the executable. &amp;nbsp;It will be in a subdirectory
named /mozilla/browser/app. &amp;nbsp;Assuming that works, then...&lt;br&gt;
8.&amp;nbsp;Flash will not work. &amp;nbsp;To install it, download the
tarball from &lt;a
 href="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br&gt;
9.
Close your browser, extract the files from the tarball, and run the
install script. &amp;nbsp;Do this as a non-root user. &amp;nbsp;It will
install
it in you home folder. &amp;nbsp;You do not get to choose where it
installs, but that is OK. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Note that the new program will
call itself "Minefield". &amp;nbsp;It will use the same profile that
you
were using for Firefox. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is it faster? &amp;nbsp;Seems to open faster. &amp;nbsp;Does it really
make a difference? &amp;nbsp;No. &amp;nbsp;Probably that is why Kubuntu
doesn't include all the stuff to compile things. &amp;nbsp;Unless you
want something more exotic, or have some particular data-intensive
need, it does not really make enough difference to be worth it.
&amp;nbsp;If there is some customization that you really need, then it
may be that compiling from source is the only way to do it.
&amp;nbsp;But often that will entail a lot of trial-and-error.
&amp;nbsp;You have to really want it, in order for it to be worthwhile.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
As far as web browsing goes, most of the delays are due to the network,
not your local machine.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
OpenOffice, perhaps, might, possibly benefit. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Also, the difference might be more noticeable on a slower computer.
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/compiling_firefox_3_from_sourc.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/328488940" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/328489305/compiling_firefox_3_from_sourc.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/compiling_firefox_3_from_sourc.php</guid>
         <category>Computing</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 21:36:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/compiling_firefox_3_from_sourc.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/328488940/compiling_firefox_3_from_sourc.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>Artichoke Blossom, Cynara cardunculus</title>
          <description>&lt;img alt="artichoke_blossom.jpg"
 src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/artichoke_blossom.jpg"
  height="500" width="375"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We decided to let one artichoke blossom, just to see what it looks
like. &amp;nbsp;It turns out that it looks sort of like a thistle.
&amp;nbsp;That's because it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a kind of thistle.
&amp;nbsp;I hadn't known that. &amp;nbsp;The thistle is the national
flower of Scotland.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/artichoke_blossom_cynara_cardu.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/328199995" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/328203958/artichoke_blossom_cynara_cardu.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/artichoke_blossom_cynara_cardu.php</guid>
         <category>Photos of Interest</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 13:37:48 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/artichoke_blossom_cynara_cardu.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/328199995/artichoke_blossom_cynara_cardu.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>iScream</title>
          <description>Seems like everything is being made so you can attach an iPod.
&amp;nbsp; Shown below is the &lt;a
 href="http://www.buy.com/retail/product.asp?sku=204553512&amp;amp;adid=17070&amp;amp;dcaid=17070"&gt;George
Foreman iPod Grill&lt;/a&gt;. &amp;nbsp;With
10-watt speaker.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p class="center"&gt;
&lt;img alt="ipod_grill.jpg"
 src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/ipod_grill.jpg"
 class="inset" height="400" width="400"&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How patriotic is that? &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And what are we to make of one of the reviews posted at Buy.com?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;I love George Foreman's products! I own all of the
grills, and I use them when I have small get togethers. They are great,
indoors and out. I usually only use one at a time, since my friends
don't really come to my parties. I don't know what that is about. I
used the George Foreman iPod Grill just this past weekend. I was
outdoors, listening to some Celine Dion and grilling one hotdog. Celine
is great with barbecue foods. I also had a small can of baked beans.
Anyway, the speaker was way too loud. My neighbors (I live next to a
sorority house) called the cops on me. Again. I don't know what that is
about. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/iscream.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/327408245" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/327409466/iscream.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/iscream.php</guid>
         <category>Chatter</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 10:29:22 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/iscream.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/327408245/iscream.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>LCV Dirty Half-Dozen</title>
          <description>The &lt;a href="http://www.lcv.org/" rel="tag"&gt;League
of Conservation Voters&lt;/a&gt; is half-way through the process of
selecting the dozen worst environmental offenders in elected office.
&amp;nbsp;Each election year, they select &amp;nbsp;approximately 12
politicians to target for their campaign, in an effort to unseat, or
deny seats to, the politicians with the worst voting records on
environmental issues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Last time (2006), the "dozen" (actually 15) &lt;a
 href="http://lcv.org/newsroom/press-releases/2006-dirty-dozen.html"&gt;included&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;Senators&lt;/u&gt; &lt;br&gt;
George Allen (R-VA)&lt;br&gt;
Rick Santorum (R-PA)&lt;br&gt;
Jim Talent (R-MO)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;u&gt;Representatives&lt;/u&gt; &lt;br&gt;
Bob Beauprez (R-CO)&lt;br&gt;
Katherine Harris (R-FL)&lt;br&gt;
J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ)&lt;br&gt;
Richard Pombo (R-CA&lt;br&gt;
Charles Taylor (R-NC)&lt;br&gt;
Conrad Burns (R-MT)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
All of those listed above were defeated. &amp;nbsp;Rep. Heather Wilson
(R-NM), Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX), Rep. Dan Boren (D-OK), &lt;font
 face="Arial"&gt;&amp;nbsp;Rep. Deborah Pryce&lt;/font&gt;
(D-OH). Rep. Charles Taylor (R-NC) were targeted, but won their
elections. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Tom Delay (R-TX) and Bob Ney (R-OH) were named as well. &amp;nbsp;They
were not defeated; what happened to them is better: they resigned in
disgrace. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For 2008, they have named, so far, six politicians: &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Five are in office; one is a former Representative who is angling to
get back in. &amp;nbsp;&lt;a
 href="http://lcv.org/campaigns/dirty-dozen/"&gt;They are&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Senator Jim Inhofe (R-OK)&lt;br&gt;
Representative Joe Knollenberg (R - MI)&lt;br&gt;
former U.S. Rep. Bob Schaffer (R-CO)&lt;br&gt;
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)&lt;br&gt;
Representative Stevan Pearce (R-NM)&lt;br&gt;
Mary Landrieu (D-LA)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This is a reminder that the stake are as high as ever in November. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/lcv_dirty_halfdozen.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/327317567" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/327317568/lcv_dirty_halfdozen.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/lcv_dirty_halfdozen.php</guid>
         <category>Politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 07:20:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/lcv_dirty_halfdozen.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/327317567/lcv_dirty_halfdozen.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
            <item>
         <title>US Government Decides To Try Honesty</title>
          <description>&lt;img title="AG Michael Mukasky" alt="AG Michael Mukasky"
 src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/images/Michael_Mukasey%2C_official_AG_photo_portrait%2C_2007.jpg"
 class="inset" align="left" height="188"
 width="150"&gt;At last, they are being honest with us: &lt;i&gt;you
have no rights&lt;/i&gt;.
&amp;nbsp;Attorney General said so. &amp;nbsp;He admitted it.
&amp;nbsp;So, at least he's honest. &amp;nbsp;See his picture to the
right? &amp;nbsp;Doesn't he look like an honest gentleman? &amp;nbsp;He
is. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In a recent &lt;a
 href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hngKSYm06_-CQxF9Afx1X9j1urdQD91LS2V00"&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt;
with reporters, Mukasey &amp;nbsp;stated that it is "necessary to put
in place regulations that will allow the FBI to transform itself as it
is transforming itself into an intelligence gathering organization."
&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, the AP is reporting some details of that transformation. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a
 href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g07mkwmsp4l_Q5H-YBiHq6phbimgD91LUBOO0"&gt;Race
profiling eyed for terror probes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;br&gt;
By LARA JAKES JORDAN&lt;br&gt;
2 July 2008&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
 &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/325741142" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheCorpusCallosum/~3/325747226/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php</guid>
         <category>Politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:57:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2008/07/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php</feedburner:origLink><feedburner:origLink>http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~3/325741142/us_government_decides_to_try_h.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
