The Cynical Christian

Out of the Darkness, A Teeny Ray of Sunshine

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:28:00 +0000

Birmingham's mayor Larry Langford was convicted on 60 counts of bribery and money laundering this week. It's never a good thing when someone has to go to jail, especially an elected official. It means the life of someone who most likely went into public service with the best of intentions has run off the tracks, the public trust has been violated, and the faith of the people in their leaders has gotten that much more ragged.

(And for crying out loud, hasn't Birmingham been through enough embarrassment already?)

But, in times like these, when so many politically connected operators seem to be doing whatever they please without even being brushed back by the fastball of justice, it's heartening to see somebody take one right off the melon.

Often, when the powerful are accused of wrongdoing, their defense is, "Dragging this allegation into the open would be bad for the people." This is, of course, complete, self-serving nonsense.

It is good for the people--good for the republic, good for democracy--to see proof that there is such a thing as justice and no one is beyond its reach.

Now, Birmingham has a big, big mess to clean up, but now there's at least a chance that the cleaning will be done by someone who is a little bit less of a crook.

Technorati Tags: birmingham, langford, scandal

Poker Face

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:15:00 +0000

Let's get the day started with a little Cartman, shall we?

Evengelical Atheists

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 26 Oct 2009 03:52:00 +0000

An atheist ad campaign hits New York. Man, I hope they don't use the same ad agency as the Mormons, 'cause those people are good:

The United Coalition of Reason says the New York ad campaign is intended to reach out to nontheists and let them know that they are not alone. At the same time, the organisation wants to break stereotypes and let the public know that atheists are good people too.
"We want everyone to know that people can be good without religious beliefs," said John Rafferty, a spokesperson for Big Apple Coalition of Reason, which is affiliated with the United coalition.

Wellll, maybe you can be good without religion, but you can't be good without God, a point made later in the article and by little ol' me in this post:

Let's stipulate, just for the sake of argument, that the world was created by a Creator. And let's assume that this Creator was God, just because that's the first creator I could think of. It would be safe to assume, I think, that anything created by God would carry his fingerprints. Just like you can tell the difference between a Picasso and a Monet by the style of the painting, if God is a distinct, independent intelligence, you should be able to see His style in His creation.

Style isn't something that you have to think about; it's a revelation of your personality. When I write something, I don't wonder, "What would Jason say about this?" I just write what comes to mind. When I buy clothes or furniture, I don't have to stop and think, "What would Jason like?" I just prefer some things over others. I think that those things are "good." But they're not good in an absolute sense; they're just good to me. Since other people might have different preferences, they wouldn't necessarily say my style is good, but they would say that it is indicative of my unique personality. Or, to say the same thing in a shorthand way, they'd say it's "very Jason."

If I created a universe, I would create one that was "very Jason." The things that I liked would be the things that were considered "good," and the beings that I created in my image would rejoice in those things like I do. And it would be that way not because I thought about it, but because it was a reflection of my nature as the creator. In my universe, 1 Corinthians 13 would say, "And now these three remain: peanut M&M's, Stevie Ray Vaughn, and Star Wars. But the greatest of these is Star Wars." Come to think of it, this universe is probably better than mine would be. But the point remains: The stuff that we see as good is the stuff God likes; the reason we see it as good is because He likes it. This universe is indicative of His preferences; it's "very God." It all boils down to this, my one-liner Philosophy of Goodness:

When we say "God is good," we're not describing what God is, we're describing what good is--good is God.

The atheist ad says, "A million New Yorkers are good without God." But that's not true. To the extent that they are good (and by "good" I don't just mean "slightly better than the shmuck next to them riding the subway with mirrors on his shoes"; I mean genuinely good), they're good because God is working through them, whether they know it or not. That's the only way they could be good.

Christians are going to have to deal with this and many other atheist misconceptions more and more frequently, I'm afraid. The evangelical strain of atheism is growing aggressively. For some tips on approaching atheists, check out the series on that subject I did with the extremely great Jen from the Conversion Diary blog.

Because As We All Know, Communism Is Just Better

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 23 Oct 2009 04:27:00 +0000

In an early entry in what I'm sure will be a rapidly growing genre of "journalism"--history-revising communist apologetics--Newsweek tries to make the case that Russia was better off under communism. You know, because everybody had free government health care, and no one was bothered by troublesome things like opposing political parties and dissenting opinions. Reason.com gives that argument what for:

If we are to take these numbers at face value—I couldn't track down some of the stats, but will trust that Newsweek is being straight...with the notoriously unreliable figures produced by the Soviet dictatorship—what conclusions can we draw from a decrease in the number of hospitals? Is it that the criminal free market has skimped on health care in Russia, or is it that, during the Yeltsin years, the creaking health care bureaucracy created in post-Stalinist Russia was consolidated and made more efficient. As The Independent noted in 1990, health care in "the Soviet Union compares favourably only with parts of the Third World." And were those hospitals back "then" stocked with the latest technology? Were they fully equipped with prescription drugs and equipment? (The answer, obviously, is no).

Now, Where Was I?

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:56:00 +0000

After a long, internetless week, I'm finally back online (barring future complications). And what better way to celebrate than by blowing an anvil 200 feet in the air and watching it plummet back to earth?

They're awfully casual about getting clear of the blast zone. If I was doing this, there would probably be more running and diving under things.

Why Baseball Isn't Boring

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:26:00 +0000

A lot of people say they don't like baseball because it's so slow and boring. But once you know how the game works and what to look for when you're watching it, it's hard to believe that so much is going on during every pitch. As exhibit A, I give you this video of the battle of wits batween the catcher and the baserunner during one at bat of a Twins/Tigers game.

"Utterly Ridiculous"

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:47:00 +0000

I Am Second is a web site where people (some you've heard of, some you haven't) share their testimonies about the impact that Jesus has had in their lives. It's just people, sitting alone, talking directly into a camera about God, which, actually, makes for some pretty compelling viewing. It even includes Stevie B., and it is still enjoyably bizarre to me to watch the Christian testimony of a guy who got stabbed in the neck by Keyser Soze.

End Income Tax Withholding

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:59:00 +0000

If I was king for a day and could make only one change to make America better, it would be this:

Fold payroll taxes into the personal tax code, adjusting the rules so that everyone still pays the same total, but the tax bill shows up on the 1040. Doing so will tell everyone the truth: Their payroll taxes are being used to pay whatever bills the federal government brings upon itself, among which are the costs of Social Security and Medicare.
The finishing touch is to make sure that people understand how much they are paying, which is presently obscured by withholding at the workplace. End withholding, and require everybody to do what millions of Americans already do: write checks for estimated taxes four times a year.

That, I think, is all it would take: make everybody actually write a check for their taxes, and every wish of the conservatives would come true.

Some of the opposition to this idea comes from people who say, "Oh no, the average taxpayer isn't smart enough to put aside money for taxes by himself." Well, that might be so, but it would only happen once. Because when the average taxpayers got a bill and actually saw how much they pay in taxes, they would march on Washington and absolutely burn the place to the ground. After that, income taxes probably wouldn't be much of a problem for anybody.

"It’s good to know that at the most fundamental level, they have no idea what they’re talking about."

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:10:00 +0000

Jonah Goldberg on the defenders of Polanski:

It all boils down to the fact that Polanski is famous and talented and an Olympian artist, living above the world of mortals. Indeed, if he didn’t rape that girl — and he did — Polanski would still be considered a pig in most normal communities....

His defenders don’t care. They are above and beyond bourgeois notions of morality, even legality.

Equal, but Not Precious

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 04:24:00 +0000

By now, everybody's seen the videos of school children singing praise songs to America's Cool Black Friend. To all but the most sold-out hopeychange supporter, this has got to seem more than a little bit creepy. Whenever America borrows primary education ideas from North Korea, it gives one pause.

But something about this video bothered me a little more. Here's the description of one particularly egregious verse from NRO's Corner:

Obama/Jesus comparisons- "Red and yellow; black and white...they are equal in his sight." (Him being Obama). These lyrics may sound familiar to Sunday school alumni.

The Sunday school song he refers to is "Jesus Loves the Little Children," and the original lyric goes like this:

Red and yellow
Black and white
They are precious in His sight.

Leave aside the substitution of Obama for Jesus (just add it to the ever-thickening "What if Someone Had Tried That Under Bush?" file). Note how the word "precious" in the hymn has been replaced with "equal." I think this speaks to a deeper problem than just the personality cult love-fest that is the Obama administration.

We've reached the point in our society where equality is the greatest moral good. That seems like a good idea on paper, until you realize that the easiest way for a government to make people equal is to make them all equally miserable. In fact, that's the way it usually goes, from the French Revolution to the "People's Republic" of China. Government efforts to unite the people in equality often end up uniting a whole bunch of them at room temperature, and the survivors never get the omelet that's supposed to come from all those broken eggs.

As for me, I'll take "precious" over "equal" any day, especially from my wife when she's comparing me to the UPS guy or that dude from Twilight. Anybody would rather be considered precious themselves, but in our interactions with others, we buy into the conventional wisdom of equality above all. And I think the popular fetishization of equality comes from the fact that we're starting to consider people less precious, not more.

If considering people precious makes you more like Jesus and considering them equal makes you more like Obama, I think I'll stick with the old messiah over the new one, thank you very much. Equal is easy--you can treat all your kids equally by sitting them in front of the TV and going about your business. There, equal. Precious is hard; it demands action, because if you say something is precious but don't act to make it distinct from everything else, then it's not precious. It's just average.

You can tell from Jesus' actions that He thinks we're precious. And I'll give the kids credit for accuracy: you can tell from Obama's actions that he thinks we're ... equal.

How Do We Know What the Bible Says?

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 11:52:00 +0000

I didn't think there could be many interesting or controversial thoughts on Bible translations (except when people don't use the King James Version, because we all know that's how Jesus talked!), but that just shows what I know. Bible translator Leland Ryken has written a whole book making the case for more literal translations:

In Understanding English Bible Translation: The Case for an Essentially Literal Approach, he points out that the more literal a version is, the more of the interpretive possibilities of the original are preserved. If the translator chooses a phrase that conveys what he considers to be the meaning of the original, while not remaining close to its form, he is actually foreclosing the reader’s options in understanding the text.

A good point, but I will still only read his book if it's translated into King James English.

Change...!

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Wed, 23 Sep 2009 03:22:00 +0000

Into one of these great new tshirts, comrade!

Still an Idiot

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:34:00 +0000

I wasn't going to say anything about Jimmy Carter's latest, because seriously, why bother? But then I realized it gave me a chance to pull out this picture again:

Who Wants Theirs Well-Done?

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:39:00 +0000

Before we let another summer go by without anyone getting 3rd degree burns over 70% of their body, here's how to properly light a grill with liquid oxygen:

Turnout

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:56:00 +0000

I'm glad so many people turned out for the 9/12 Tea Party protest and everything, but I can't help but wonder, where were you guys during the election? Y'know, a few months ago we had a chance to pick out who'd be making decisions in the government, and yet here we are. They're called elections, and they happen every couple of years, usually in November. Mark your calendars. Here's hoping you show up for the next one.

You Lie!

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Thu, 10 Sep 2009 02:56:00 +0000

Here's something our government could use more of: our elected representatives heckling each other. I'm not kidding--I'm sick of hearing "my honorable colleague" this, and "the distinguished gentleman" that, from people who obviously hate each other. Let's have some more honest interaction, like Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina, who yelled "You lie!" at America's Cool Black Friend during the speech on health care.

Priceless.

7 Quick Takes

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:43:00 +0000

1) Some guy, who writes for some magazine that used to be famous, is astonished--astonished, I say!--that people think there are communists in the Obama administration! I don't know whatever could have given them that impression. Aside from the government takeover of banks, and car makers, and their relentless efforts to take over the health care industry. And the fact that they have a "pay czar" who has authority over how much private business executives get paid. And the administration's affinity for communist dictators. Oh, and there's that guy who publicly proclaimed that he's a communist. Other than that, though, I don't know what people are thinking. Buncha' right-wing crazies.

Really, I'm glad that the word "communist" is still considered an insult. We'll see how long that lasts.

2) Next month, I'm going on a mission trip with my church. Our team of six will be spending a week in a remote mountain village in Ecuador. Not only is it my first trip to South America, it's my first ever serious camping trip. Except for the missions aspect (God wants us to spread his love around the world and junk like that), nothing about about the trip interests me. The more I study up on camping, the more I know I'm going to hate it. Why? Because I have a house. And a bed. And central air. Why would anyone reject all that to sleep outside on the ground and poop in the woods?

Friends have asked me to go on camping trips before, and I said, "Won't you get cold at night?" They replied, "It's no problem. I've got a zero degree sleeping bag." And I said, "Well, I've got a 72 degree bedroom. You enjoy yours and I'll enjoy mine."

3) When I was growing up, Steve Martin was a goofy guy in a white suit with an arrow through his head, and very few people knew that he was a flat-out great banjo player. Now I think more people know him for banjo playing than for stand-up. That, my friends, is a renaissance man.

4) Every year since she was a kid, my wife has been interviewed by someone from the Department of Labor for the purpose of gathering statistics. Seriously, someone from the DoL actually came to her house and interviewed her. This will be the first interview since we've been married, so I will do my best to observe and report back what actually goes on, and if I possibly can, screw up the survey results. "Department of Labor statistics report that 30% of Alabama households consume more than 9 pounds of bacon a day, and have working nuclear reactors in their basements."

5) Punctuality. Let me pause here to give a shout out to Bobo Pest Control, a representative from which is currently inspecting my house. I've had the guys from Bobo come by several times, and not only do they get here when they say they will, they're usually early. It's so unheard of, I don't know how to deal with it.

Bobo: Ok, we'll be there at 9:00.

Me: You mean, sometime between 9 and 5?

Bobo: No. At 9.

Me: You mean, sometime on the 9th? Sometime in the 24 hour period that makes up the 9th of the month.

Bobo: No. 9.

Me: You mean sometime during the year 2009?

If they offered cable TV or plumbing services, I'd hire them to do that too.

6) We don't have termites, by the way. We were just renewing the termite bond, in case there's anybody out there who maybe, possibly, somehow, could conceivably be interesting buying my house.

7) And finally, we could always use a little dramatic chipmunk:

Prithee, What Price Victory?

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 04 Sep 2009 01:04:00 +0000

ESPN's Bill Simmons, in pointing out the lameness of the WNBA, once encouraged readers to try this experiment: Go up to an average sports fan in a WNBA city and ask him which of these things he would rather happen: his WNBA team wins the world championship, or he finds a $5 bill on the ground.

I would bet most sports fans wouldn't pass up an easy fin to get a WNBA title. However, this hypothetical got me to thinking: I wounder what response you'd get from asking the same question to fans about their favorite college football team. In fact, knowing what I know about college football fans, what I really wonder is how much cash it would take to get the fan to choose found money over the national championship.$100? $500? Here in Alabama, my guess is that the average number would have to be well north of $1000.

So how 'bout it, all you hard-core boosters? If I gave you a choice between finding [blank] dollars, and your team winning the national championship, how much money would have to go in the [blank] for you to take it?

Why We Don't Need Socialized Health Care

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 04:16:00 +0000

The whole argument for socialized, government-run health care (and lots of other government-run things) seems pretty simple to me: Either people are smart enough to make decisions in their own best interests, or they're not. If they are, they should be left alone to manage their own health, find their own doctors, and buy their own insurance. If they're not, then why are they even allowed to vote? People who are too dumb to take care of themselves certainly have no business picking our leaders.

But of course, there are all different kinds of dumb. This video was originally a pro-Obamacare video and extremely dumb, but it's been corrected by someone who actually knows how the world works.

Playstation 3 - Good News Edition

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:32:00 +0000

If you've been holding off on buying a Playstation 3 because it doesn't include a Polish Bible, here's the bundle you've been waiting for!

Also included: a special version of Grand Theft Auto in which, instead of beating up bums and hookers, you witness to them and give them soup.

Art / Not Art

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 03:14:00 +0000

Now that we're fully in the post-modern period where words like "skill" and "talent" don't really mean anything anymore, how do you tell "great art" from "smears on a paper?"

John Stossel asks that very question, and provides a simple test to see if you can tell yourself. If you can't, well then you're just like most of the working artists who took the same test.

I think that we call a lot of stuff "art"--and I mean painting, literature, film, the whole bag--just because it is first called "art" by people who we think are smart and ought to know. The question is, who are these people and how do they get this kind of authority? Based on their preferences, they're a pretty sad and depressing lot, and have a hard time relating to people.

From the "What if This Had Happened Under the Bush Administration" File

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Sun, 30 Aug 2009 04:35:00 +0000

Item one: new legislation proposes granting the government the power to take over private computer networks (read: the Internet) during "emergencies."

CNET News has obtained a copy of the 55-page draft of S.773 (excerpt), which still appears to permit the president to seize temporary control of private-sector networks during a so-called cybersecurity emergency.
The new version would allow the president to "declare a cybersecurity emergency" relating to "non-governmental" computer networks and do what's necessary to respond to the threat. Other sections of the proposal include a federal certification program for "cybersecurity professionals," and a requirement that certain computer systems and networks in the private sector be managed by people who have been awarded that license.
"I think the redraft, while improved, remains troubling due to its vagueness," said Larry Clinton, president of the Internet Security Alliance.

Granting the government vague but sweeping powers seems to be all the rage in D.C. nowadays. I've read opinions saying that this interpretation of the bill is blowing things out of proportion, but really, how loud would the screaming be if we'd come anywhere close to this idea under Bush?

And item two: The National Endowment for the Arts has asked artists, the beneficiaries of their largesse, to use their art to promote Obama's agenda:

I was invited by the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to take part in a conference call that invited a group of rising artist and art community luminaries “to help lay a new foundation for growth, focusing on core areas of the recovery agenda - health care, energy and environment, safety and security, education, community renewal.”

...

And if you think that my fear regarding the arts becoming a tool of the state is still unfounded, I leave you with a few statements made by the NEA to the art community participants on the conference call. “This is just the beginning. This is the first telephone call of a brand new conversation. We are just now learning how to really bring this community together to speak with the government. What that looks like legally?…bare with us as we learn the language so that we can speak to each other safely… “

Again, try to imagine a headline like, "NEA Encourages Artists to Use Their Work to Support Bush's Social Security Reform." You can't imagine it; it's like trying to imagine a round square, or an exciting soccer game. But it's just par for the course here.

7 Quick Takes Friday

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:19:00 +0000

1) Blogging (and writing in general) always seems like a good idea, but it is an easy habit to get out of. I’m glad there are low impact options like Twitter and this “7 Quick Takes” idea from Jen to give me a reason to get back on the horse.

2) Speaking of Jen, in her 7 Quick Takes today she mentions this article from The Wall Street Journal on the “third man phenomenon”—apparently, in times of stress or danger, some people will imagine that there is another, unseen presence with them. The sensation is so strong that they will take the presence into account when they’re dividing up food rations. I kept waiting for the author to mention, even in passing or jokingly, the idea of guardian angels. But he never did. Hmmm…

3) And speaking of blogging, last night the wife and I went to see Julie & Julia. (Three-second review: The part about Julie was pretty standard Nora Ephron fare, but the part about Julia Child was really good. Made me hungry.) It’s the first movie I’ve ever seen that centers around someone writing a blog. Movies about blogging. Welcome to new media.

4) I had a terrible stomach virus last week (my Twitter quote from P.J. O’Rourke is all you need to know about that). And with all the fluids flying out of my body, I managed to gain five pounds. Can anyone explain to me how that works? I’ve been doing CrossFit for about 3 months, plus the recent involuntary fluid loss, and I’m getting fatter. Is this a side effect of marriage or something?

5) I am now convinced that, when my house finally sells, it will be at the very, farthest, deepest, Marianas Trench of the housing market. Which will be followed by my having to buy a house after the most miraculous one-week turnaround skyrocket of housing prices in the history of real estate. Also, a quadrupling of interest rates. But if you want to know when the bottom is, wait until my house sells. That’s the bottom.

6) Hey, that Ted Kennedy sure was a heck of a guy, huh?

7) I leave you with these three words: Tactical Canned Bacon!

If You're Only Going to Watch One Video of a Violinist Playing the National Anthem on a Baseball Bat Today...

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:13:00 +0000

... watch this one.

So Long, John, and Thanks for All the Quotes

noreply@blogger.com (Jason) — Sat, 08 Aug 2009 23:47:00 +0000

The world is a little bit sadder now--filmmaking great John Hughes passed away at the age of 59. He hadn't done a lot lately, so I'm afraid people may have forgotten just how significant this guy and his movies were. Website Big Hollywood calls him "The Frank Capra of Gen X," and that sounds just about right.

A couple of years ago, some jerk from Slate decided he needed to tear Hughes down a bit, and I felt the need to write a response, which I repost in full below:

An article in Slate examines the political leanings of movie maker John Hughes in that gratingly snooty, over-educated way that you can only get from Slate or Alex Trebek. Some samples:

Hughes was also the first Balzac of homeroom, arguing that what stratified public education as much as looks, popularity, or natural herd instincts was net worth. Even those dismayed by the cheap sentimentality and wafer-thin plotlines of his films could at least appreciate seeing class presented as not something you skipped but were defined by. Hughes, though, was never quite the antagonist of the status quo he made himself out to be. He was actually a political conservative, and his portrayals of down-and-out youth rebellion had more to do with celebrating the moral victory of the underdog than with championing the underprivileged. In Hughes' hormonal vale of tears, snobs and elitists were the ones who ruined wealth for everybody else.

Whu-huh? Here we have a textbook example of "over-analysis." Can you clarify the difference between "celebrating the moral victory of the underdog" and "championing the underprivileged"? Which one was Anthony Michael Hall?

I may be reading too much into this, but it seems like the writer is angry at Hughes. It sounds like he was a big fan until he put two and two together and realized that this teen icon may actually be (gasp!) a grown-up. More examples:

It's true that Hughes remained mute on his partisanship just as he was being hailed as the reigning auteur of angst, but a 1988 Premiere profile brushed up against his convictions by calling him the "sort of guy Norman Rockwell might have been if he'd lived in Hollywood."

Yeah, he's just like that bastard Rockwell... All those paintings and not one of them shows an image of Jesus in a Bo-Peep outfit covered in camel dung. You call that talent?

It should have come as no surprise, then, that a faint smirk of family-values-friendly subversion stamped itself on all of late Hughes, which is to say his even more establishment period as a filmmaker. From The Great Outdoors (in-laws sure are difficult) to Home Alone (towheaded McMansion latchkey kid foils robbery, saves Christmas) to Dennis the Menace (overall-wearing scamp of the manicured lawns sling-shoots his way straight into your heart)?these were comedies for the Dan Quayle in all of us.

Ah, reaching back to Dan Quayle for a punch line, are we? No, that's cute, and only about 15 years stale too.

Any semi-conscious viewer could tell that Hughes was a very pro-family movie maker from the beginning. One constant theme of his stories are the problems that stem from fractured or broken families. His whole career was spent demonstrating the difference between Ferris and Cameron. The kid with loving (but gullible) parents was well-adjusted and successful; the kid with distant, distracted parents was a loser.

And by the way, it is unconscionable that any analysis of Hughes' work go on this long without mentioning his opus, Uncle Buck. The salvation of every character in that movie grew from the realization, by Buck and his teenaged niece Tia, that family was more important than rebellion.

Now, to Slate's Michael Weiss, here's a quarter. Why don't you go downtown and have a rat gnaw that esoteric film school claptrap off your face?

I don't know what Hughes' political affiliation was, and I don't much care. What was obvious from his work was that he was extremely funny and talented, and that he had a pretty keen understanding of what was important in life. Rest in peace.