<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Heart Beat</title>
	
	<link>http://heartcurrents.com</link>
	<description>Reliable Heart Information and Commentary by a Cardiac Psychologist/Heart Attack Survivor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:38:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheDailyHeartBeat" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="thedailyheartbeat" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">TheDailyHeartBeat</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Heartburn or a Heart Attack?</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/heartburn-heart-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/heartburn-heart-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acid reflux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolyn Thomas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[story]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=5008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important story to read: the misdiagnosis of (a woman&#8217;s) heart attack: Heartburn or a Heart Attack? When Carolyn Thomas went to the hospital for chest pain and nausea, doctors diagnosed acid reflux and sent her home &#8212; but she was really having a heart attack. Now this Canadian blogger is using her site to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong>An important story to read: the misdiagnosis of (a woman&#8217;s) heart attack:</strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_blank" href="http://www.lhj.com/lhj/printableStory.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/lhj/story/data/1325085967059.xml&#038;catref=cat680108" >Heartburn or a Heart Attack?</a></strong></p>
<p><em>When Carolyn Thomas went to the hospital for chest pain and nausea, doctors diagnosed acid reflux and sent her home &#8212; but she was really having a heart attack. Now this Canadian blogger is using her site to make sure every woman knows what it really feels like to have a heart attack.</em></p>
<p>By Amelia Harnish</p>
<p>Ladies&#8217; Home Journal: Doctors are more likely to delay heart attack care for women than men. What happened when you first went to the hospital? And when did you know something was really wrong?</p>
<p>Carolyn Thomas: Yes, my story, unfortunately, is not uncommon. When I was misdiagnosed three years ago when I was 58, it seemed like a very high-drama story, but I learned later that it happens all too often. Heart attacks are growing among younger women, and it&#8217;s even more likely that a woman under 55 will be sent home from the emergency room.</p>
<p>My symptoms started on my daily morning walk. It was so early that morning there was nobody on the streets. No dog walkers. No traffic. Nothing. Suddenly, out of the blue I felt crushing chest pains, nausea, sweating and a pain down my left arm. I was leaning against a tree, and I remember my first thought was, &#8220;This better not be a heart attack because I do not have time for this.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Pain down your left arm is not a symptom of indigestion.&#8221;</p>
<p>But then I was quite frightened, thinking, &#8220;Oh my God, I can&#8217;t move. What am I going to do?&#8221; I was hoping a dog walker would come by, but no one was out. What really startled me was the pain down my left arm because I had heard that&#8217;s a symptom of a heart attack. After about 20 minutes, my symptoms began to ease up, and I was able to start inching home.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.lhj.com/lhj/printableStory.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/lhj/story/data/1325085967059.xml&#038;catref=cat680108" >Full Story</a></p>
<p>http://www.lhj.com/lhj/printableStory.jsp?storyid=/templatedata/lhj/story/data/1325085967059.xml&#038;catref=cat680108</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/heartburn-heart-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stem Cells Can Repair Heart Attack Damage</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/stem-cells-repair-heart-attack-damage/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/stem-cells-repair-heart-attack-damage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cedars sinai medical center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[massive heart attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=5005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Studies: Stem cells reverse heart damage (CNN) &#8212; On a June day in 2009, a 39-year-old man named Ken Milles lay on an exam table at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. A month earlier, he&#8217;d suffered a massive heart attack that destroyed nearly a third of his heart. &#8220;The most difficult part was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/11/14/health/stem-cells-heart-damage-reverse/index.html" >Studies: Stem cells reverse heart damage</a></p>
<p>(CNN) &#8212; On a June day in 2009, a 39-year-old man named Ken Milles lay on an exam table at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles. A month earlier, he&#8217;d suffered a massive heart attack that destroyed nearly a third of his heart.</p>
<p>&#8220;The most difficult part was the uncertainty,&#8221; he recalls. &#8220;Your heart is 30% damaged, and they tell you this could affect you the rest of your life.&#8221; He was about to receive an infusion of stem cells, grown from cells taken from his own heart a few weeks earlier. No one had ever tried this before.</p>
<p>About three weeks later, in Kentucky, a patient named Mike Jones underwent a similar procedure at the University of Louisville&#8217;s Jewish Hospital. Jones suffered from advanced heart failure, the result of a heart attack years earlier. Like Milles, he received an infusion of stem cells, grown from his own heart tissue.</p>
<p>&#8220;Once you reach this stage of heart disease, you don&#8217;t get better,&#8221; says Dr. Robert Bolli, who oversaw Jones&#8217; procedure, explaining what doctors have always believed and taught. &#8220;You can go down slowly, or go down quickly, but you&#8217;re going to go down.&#8221;</p>
<p>Conventional wisdom took a hit Monday, as Bolli&#8217;s group and a team from Cedars-Sinai each reported that stem cell therapies were able to reverse heart damage, without dangerous side effects, at least in a small group of patients.</p>
<p>In Bolli&#8217;s study, published in The Lancet, 16 patients with severe heart failure received a purified batch of cardiac stem cells. Within a year, their heart function markedly improved. The heart&#8217;s pumping ability can be quantified through the &#8220;Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction,&#8221; a measure of how much blood the heart pumps with each contraction. A patient with an LVEF of less than 40% is considered to suffer severe heart failure. When the study began, Bolli&#8217;s patients had an average LVEF of 30.3%. Four months after receiving stem cells, it was 38.5%. Among seven patients who were followed for a full year, it improved to an astounding 42.5%. A control group of seven patients, given nothing but standard maintenance medications, showed no improvement at all.</p>
<p>&#8220;We were surprised by the magnitude of improvement,&#8221; says Bolli, who says traditional therapies, such as placing a stent to physically widen the patient&#8217;s artery, typically make a smaller difference. Prior to treatment, Mike Jones couldn&#8217;t walk to the restroom without stopping for breath, says Bolli. &#8220;Now he can drive a tractor on his farm, even play basketball with his grandchildren. His life was transformed.&#8221;</p>
<p>At Cedars-Sinai, 17 patients, including Milles, were given stem cells approximately six weeks after suffering a moderate to major heart attack. All had lost enough tissue to put them &#8220;at big risk&#8221; of future heart failure, according to Dr. Eduardo Marban, the director of the Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute, who developed the stem cell procedure used there.</p>
<p>Cedars-Sinai: Helping the heart heal itself</p>
<p>The results were striking. Not only did scar tissue retreat &#8212; shrinking 40% in Ken Milles, and between 30% and 47% in other test subjects &#8212; but the patients actually generated new heart tissue. On average, the stem cell recipients grew the equivalent of 600 million new heart cells, according to Marban, who used MRI imaging to measure changes. By way of perspective, a major heart attack might kill off a billion cells.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is unprecedented, the first time anyone has grown living heart muscle,&#8221; says Marban. &#8220;No one else has demonstrated that. It&#8217;s very gratifying, especially when the conventional teaching has been that the damage is irreversible.&#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps even more important, no treated patient in either study suffered a significant health setback.</p>
<p>The twin findings are a boost to the notion that the heart contains the seeds of its own rebirth. For years, doctors believed that heart cells, once destroyed, were gone forever. But in a series of experiments, researchers including Bolli&#8217;s collaborator, Dr. Piero Anversa, found that the heart contains a type of stem cell that can develop into either heart muscle or blood vessel components &#8212; in essence, whatever the heart requires at a particular point in time. The problem for patients like Mike Jones or Ken Milles is that there simply aren&#8217;t enough of these repair cells waiting around. The experimental treatments involve removing stem cells through a biopsy, and making millions of copies in a laboratory.</p>
<p>The Bolli/Anversa group and Marban&#8217;s team both used cardiac stem cells, but Bolli and Anversa &#8220;purified&#8221; the CSCs, so that more than 90% of the infusion was actual stem cells. Marban, on the other hand, used a mixture of stem cells and other types of cells extracted from the patient&#8217;s heart. &#8220;We&#8217;ve found that the mixture is more potent than any subtype we&#8217;ve been able to isolate,&#8221; he says. He says the additional cells may help by providing a supportive environment for the stem cells to multiply.</p>
<p>Other scientists, including Dr. Douglas Losordo, have produced improvements in cardiac patients using stem cells derived from bone marrow. &#8220;The body contains cells that seem to be pre-programmed for repair,&#8221; explains Losordo. &#8220;The consistent thing about all these approaches is that they&#8217;re leveraging what seems to be the body&#8217;s own repair mechanism.&#8221;<br />
This is unprecedented, the first time anyone has grown living heart muscle.<br />
Dr. Eduardo Marban, Cedars-Sinai Heart Institute</p>
<p>Losordo praised the Lancet paper, and recalls the skepticism that met Anversa&#8217;s initial claims, a decade ago, that there were stem cells in the adult heart. &#8220;Some scientists are always resistant to that type of novelty. You know the saying: First they ignore you, then they attack you and finally they imitate you.&#8221;</p>
<p>Denis Buxton, who oversees stem cell research at the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health, calls the new studies &#8220;a paradigm shift, harnessing the heart&#8217;s own regenerative processes.&#8221; But he says he would like to see more head-to-head comparisons to determine which type of cells are most beneficial.</p>
<p>Questions also remain about timing. Patients who suffer large heart attacks are prone to future damage, in part because the weakened heart tries to compensate by dilating &#8212; swelling &#8212; and by changing shape. In a vicious circle, the changes make the heart a less efficient pump, which leads to more overcompensation, and so on, until the end result is heart failure. Marban&#8217;s study aimed to treat patients before they could develop heart failure in the first place.</p>
<p>In a third study released Monday, researchers treated patients with severe heart failure with stem cells derived from bone marrow. In a group of 60 patients, those receiving the treatment had fewer heart problems over the course of a year, as well as improved heart function.</p>
<p>A fourth study also used cells derived from bone marrow, but injected them into patients two to three weeks after a heart attack. Previous studies, with the cells given just days afterward, found a modest improvement in heart function. But Monday, the lead researcher, Dr. Dan Simon of UH Case Medical Center, reported that with the three-week delay, patients did not see the same benefit.</p>
<p>With other methods, there may be a larger window of opportunity. At least in initial studies, Losordo&#8217;s bone marrow treatments helped some patients with long-standing heart problems. Bolli&#8217;s Lancet paper suggests that CSCs, too, might help patients with advanced disease. &#8220;These patients had had heart failure for several years. They were a wreck!&#8221; says Bolli. &#8220;But we found their stem cells were still very competent.&#8221; By that, he means the cells were still capable of multiplying and of turning into useful muscle and blood vessel walls.</p>
<p>Marban has an open mind on the timing issue. In fact, one patient from his control group e-mailed after the study was complete, saying he felt terrible and pleading for an infusion of stem cells. At Marban&#8217;s request, the FDA granted special approval to treat him. &#8220;He had a very nice response. That was 14 months after his heart attack. Of course that&#8217;s just one person, and we need bigger studies,&#8221; says Marban.</p>
<p>For Ken Milles, the procedure itself wasn&#8217;t painful, but it was unsettling. The biopsy to harvest the stem cells felt &#8220;weird,&#8221; he recalls, as he felt the doctor poking around inside his heart. The infusion, a few weeks later, was harder. The procedure &#8212; basically the same as an angioplasty &#8212; involved stopping blood flow through the damaged artery for three minutes, while the stem cells were infused. &#8220;It felt exacfly like I was having a heart attack again,&#8221; Milles remembers.</p>
<p>Milles had spent the first weeks after his heart attack just lying in bed re-watching his &#8220;Sopranos&#8221; DVDs, but within a week of the stem cell infusion, he says, &#8220;I was reinvigorated.&#8221; Today he&#8217;s back at work full time, as an accounting manager at a construction company. He&#8217;s cut out fast food and shed 50 pounds. His wife and two teenage sons are thrilled.</p>
<p>Denis Buxton says the new papers could prove a milestone. &#8220;We don&#8217;t have anything else to actually regenerate the heart. These stem cell therapies have the possibility of actually reversing damage.&#8221;</p>
<p>Bolli says he&#8217;ll have to temper his enthusiasm until he can duplicate the results in larger studies, definitive enough to get stem cell therapy approved as a standard treatment. &#8220;If a phase 3 study confirmed this, it would be the biggest advance in cardiology in my lifetime. We would possibly be curing heart failure. It would be a revolution.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/stem-cells-repair-heart-attack-damage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To Stent or Not to Stent:  Placing COURAGE in Context</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/stent-stent-placing-courage-context/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/stent-stent-placing-courage-context/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 07:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coronary artery disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myocardial infarction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=4999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Placing COURAGE in Context: Review of the Recent Literature on Managing Stable Artery Disease 1. Megan Coylewright, MD, MPH, 2. Roger S. Blumenthal, MD and 3. Wendy Post, MD, MS Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States, but prevention and intervention efforts are lowering mortality. This progress [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong> <a href="http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.com/content/83/7/799.full">Placing COURAGE in Context: Review of the Recent Literature on Managing Stable Artery Disease </a</strong>></p>
<p>   1. Megan Coylewright, MD, MPH,<br />
   2. Roger S. Blumenthal, MD and<br />
   3. Wendy Post, MD, MS</p>
<p><strong>Abstract</strong></p>
<p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States, but prevention and intervention efforts are lowering mortality. This progress is being undercut by rising rates of obesity and diabetes, and adherence to evidence-based prevention efforts is less than ideal. Many patients with CAD who are asymptomatic or have minimal symptoms undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) each year, even though PCI has not been demonstrated to improve survival for this group. Motivated by the recent controversy surrounding the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation (COURAGE) trial, we reviewed randomized clinical trials with follow-up published in the past decade comparing medical management with revascularization for stable CAD to provide a context for the COURAGE trial. We searched for relevant studies published from January 1, 1997, until the date of electronic publication of the COURAGE study results, March 26, 2007; references cited in the COURAGE publication were also reviewed. Evidence shows that PCI does not decrease mortality or risk of myocardial infarction over optimal medical or lifestyle therapy in patients with chronic stable CAD. In published studies, early benefits in angina control afforded by revascularization wane over time; this could change with modern interventional therapies. The final word is not that medical therapy is superior for all patients, but that optimizing medical and lifestyle therapy is appropriate as an initial management strategy for most patients who do not have unstable or disabling symptoms. It is essential that systems are set in place to make the medical management of patients with CAD second nature; this focus could be one of the most powerful results of the COURAGE trial. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/stent-stent-placing-courage-context/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Raises Questions About Niacin Use for Heart Disease….</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/study-raises-questions-niacin-heart-disease/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/study-raises-questions-niacin-heart-disease/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[good cholesterol levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high density lipoproteins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=4996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study Questions Treatment Used in Heart Disease New York Times By GARDINER HARRIS May 26, 2011 WASHINGTON — Lowering bad cholesterol levels reduces heart attack risks, and researchers have long hoped that raising good cholesterol would help, too. Surprising results from a large government study announced on Thursday suggest that this hope may be misplaced. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/27/health/policy/27heart.html"> Study Questions Treatment Used in Heart Disease<br />
 </a></p>
<p><em>New York Times</em><br />
By GARDINER HARRIS<br />
May 26, 2011 </p>
<p>WASHINGTON — Lowering bad cholesterol levels reduces heart attack risks, and researchers have long hoped that raising good cholesterol would help, too. Surprising results from a large government study announced on Thursday suggest that this hope may be misplaced.</p>
<p>The study could change the way doctors treat millions of patients with heart disease. Common wisdom has been that such patients should take a statin drug like Lipitor or Zocor to lower bad cholesterol and, in many cases, the vitamin niacin to raise their good cholesterol. But in the trial, niacin provided no benefit over simple statin therapy.</p>
<p>The results are part of a string of studies that suggest that what doctors thought they knew about cholesterol may be wrong. Studies that track patients over time have for decades shown that patients with higher levels of high-density lipoproteins (H.D.L., or good cholesterol) tend to live longer and have fewer heart problems than those with lower levels of this cholesterol.</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, doctors thought that if they could raise H.D.L. levels, their patients would benefit. So far, that assumption is not panning out. Nobody knows why.</p>
<p>In 2006, Pfizer halted development of a drug that raised good cholesterol levels after studies showed that the medicine increased the risks of death. And on Thursday, government scientists announced that Niaspan, an extended release form of niacin, not only did not provide any protection against heart attacks when taken with Zocor in patients with heart disease but also slightly increased their risk of stroke.</p>
<p>“We were stunned, to say the least,” said Dr. William E. Boden, a professor of medicine and preventive medicine at the University at Buffalo who was a trial investigator.</p>
<p>What is remarkable about the study is that niacin seemed to be working. Patients taking the medicine along with Zocor had higher levels of H.D.L. and lower levels of triglycerides, a fat in the blood. Despite these seeming improvements, the patients fared no better and may have done slightly worse than those taking Zocor alone. That is why the entire theory behind trying to increase H.D.L. levels in patients with heart disease may need rethinking.</p>
<p>The study results may be greeted as a mixed blessing by some patients. A drug many had hoped would help is now thought to be at best useless. But for many people, niacin is hard to take because it can cause flushing and headaches. Doctors have for years wheedled patients into tolerating these side effects in hopes that the medicine would save their lives. Now, they will not have to.</p>
<p>Dr. William M. Schreiber, a Louisville, Ky., internist, said he had stopped prescribing niacin because so many patients told him they could not abide its effects. “I’m delighted to hear that statins alone are just as good as statins and niacin,” he said.</p>
<p>The study is bad news for the maker of Niaspan, Abbott Laboratories, for the drug industry as a whole and even for the Food and Drug Administration. Abbott last year had $927 million in Niaspan sales, and the company spent $32 million on the study (the government spent $21 million) in the hope that it would increase sales. Instead, the results are bound to lower use of the drug.</p>
<p>In a statement, Dr. Eugene Sun, a vice president at Abbott, said, “Based on its long history of clinical evidence, Niaspan remains an important agent for patients with” blood lipid problems.</p>
<p>The study gives no comfort to other drug makers, many of which have been trying to come up with new drugs to raise levels of good cholesterol or otherwise lower heart attack risks. Statins and other drugs have proven so effective in treating heart disease that improvements are proving very tough to find.</p>
<p>The study is also bad news for the F.D.A., which heavily relies on laboratory results to decide whether to approve drugs.</p>
<p>“This study shows that approving drugs and allowing them to stay on the market on the basis of how they affect lipids and other biomarkers is not good policy,” said Dr. Steven Nissen, chairman of cardiovascular medicine at the Cleveland Clinic. “It’s time to have a new regulatory approach.”</p>
<p>In the trial, 3,414 participants with heart and vascular disease were given either Zocor and a placebo or Zocor and Niaspan and followed for 32 months. The trial ended 18 months early because it was found that there was almost no chance taking Niaspan would prove beneficial. Zocor and other medications did a good job of keeping patients’ bad cholesterol levels relatively low.</p>
<p>Researchers said patients should not stop taking Niaspan without talking to their doctors first.</p>
<p>“We have great evidence that lowering L.D.L. is beneficial,” said Dr. Bruce Psaty, a professor of medicine and epidemiology at the University of Washington. “We lack good evidence that changing H.D.L. or triglycerides does much.” </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/study-raises-questions-niacin-heart-disease/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using Text Messages and Social Media for Weight Loss…</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/text-messages-social-media-weight-loss/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/text-messages-social-media-weight-loss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author melissa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanci hellmich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=4994</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Text messages help with weight loss By Nanci Hellmich, USA TODAY College students who used cellphones to monitor calories and physical activity and received personalized feedback about how they were doing dropped significantly more weight than those who didn&#8217;t, new research shows. &#8220;Cellphones are a powerful intervention tool for weight loss,&#8221; says lead author Melissa [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><strong><a target="_blank" href=" http://yourlife.usatoday.com/fitness-food/diet-nutrition/story/2011-10-09/Text-messages-help-with-weight-loss/50713886/1?csp=obinsite" >Text messages help with weight loss</a></strong><br />
By Nanci Hellmich, USA TODAY</p>
<p>College students who used cellphones to monitor calories and physical activity and received personalized feedback about how they were doing dropped significantly more weight than those who didn&#8217;t, new research shows.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cellphones are a powerful intervention tool for weight loss,&#8221; says lead author Melissa Napolitano, a research scientist at the Center for Obesity Research and Education and an associate professor of kinesiology at Temple University in Philadelphia.</p>
<p>She and colleagues recruited 52 overweight college students, mostly women, who weighed an average of 190 pounds, and assigned them to one of three plans. Here&#8217;s a look at the plans and how much the dieters lost in eight weeks:</p>
<p>•A Facebook-only group where students received eating and exercise advice online on topics such as setting goals, monitoring food intake, portion control, liquid calories, physical activity and stress eating. Dieters were in a private Facebook group and could get support from other members. They also viewed podcasts.<br />
At a glance<br />
Results of an eight-week weight-loss plan:</p>
<p>Facebook-only group: Dieters got eating and exercise advice on Facebook.</p>
<p>Average loss:<strong> 1.4 pounds</strong></p>
<p>Facebook-plus group: Got advice on Facebook plus personalized feedback via text messages.</p>
<p>Average loss:<strong> 5.3 pounds.</strong></p>
<p>No advice group: No diet or exercise advice; on waiting list to participate</p>
<p>Average loss: <strong>Half a pound.</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;We tried to make the podcasts short — one or two minutes,&#8221; Napolitano says. &#8220;We related everything to college students.&#8221;</p>
<p>For instance, in one podcast, students were taught how to resist the pressure of eating pizza when they weren&#8217;t hungry. Average loss: 1.4 pounds.</p>
<p>•The Facebook-plus group got the same diet advice online, plus a book of calorie counts and extra help and encouragement via text messages on their cellphones. The dieters received a text message three times a week reminding them to send in their calorie intake and exercise information, then they got feedback on that information. On the other four days, participants received personalized tips and self-monitoring reminders via texts. Average loss: 5.3 pounds.</p>
<p>•A third group was put on a waiting list to participate and got no extra help. Average loss: half pound.</p>
<p>The Facebook-plus group lost the most, which &#8220;was relatively modest but it was without any face-to-face contact,&#8221; says Napolitano, who reported the findings last week at a meeting of the Obesity Society. &#8220;We really wanted to mimic a face-to-face treatment with text messaging.&#8221;</p>
<p>Gary Foster, director of Temple&#8217;s obesity research center, says dieters often say they need to be held accountable. What text messaging does is &#8220;tries to replicate the interaction with a health care professional. There is someone on the other end.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/text-messages-social-media-weight-loss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Modifying Genes by Eating Vegetables</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/modifying-genes-eating-vegetables/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/modifying-genes-eating-vegetables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 04:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Heart Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mcgill universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vegetables and fruits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=4990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fruits and Vegetables Could Modify Gene Linked to Heart Disease By KIM CAROLLO Oct. 11, 2011 Eating a healthy amount of greens could have an effect on genes linked to heart disease, according to a new study. Researchers from Canada&#8217;s McMaster and McGill universities found that eating fruits and vegetables may actually change a gene [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a href="http://heartcurrents.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/veggies-heartcurrents.jpg" ><img src="http://heartcurrents.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/veggies-heartcurrents.jpg" alt="veggies heartcurrents Modifying genes by eating vegetables" title="veggies-heartcurrents" width="600" height="400" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-4991" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/fruits-vegetables-change-gene-linked-heart-disease/story?id=14713782"><strong> Fruits and Vegetables Could Modify Gene Linked to Heart Disease</strong><br />
</a></p>
<p>By KIM CAROLLO<br />
Oct. 11, 2011</p>
<p> Eating a healthy amount of greens could have an effect on genes linked to heart disease, according to a new study.</p>
<p>Researchers from Canada&#8217;s McMaster and McGill universities found that eating fruits and vegetables may actually change a gene variant, called 9p21, that is one of the strongest predictors for heart disease.</p>
<p>&#8220;We found that in people with this high-risk gene who consumed a diet rich in vegetables and fruits, their risk came down to that of people who don&#8217;t have that gene,&#8221; said Dr. Sonia Anand, a lead author and professor of medicine and epidemiology at the Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine at McMaster University.</p>
<p>The researchers analyzed the diets of more than 27,000 people from different parts of the world who were already enrolled in two separate studies looking at heart disease.</p>
<p>&#8220;Despite having a high genetic risk for heart disease, a healthy lifestyle can actually turn off the gene,&#8221; said Anand. She also said it&#8217;s not yet clear exactly how diet affects the gene.</p>
<p>The study participants who lowered their risk through their diet ate at least two servings of fruits and vegetables a day. Raw fruits and vegetables played the biggest role in lowering risk, Anand said.</p>
<p>Experts not involved in the Canadian research say the research provides more evidence that there is a strong gene-environment interaction involved in heart disease and other conditions.</p>
<p>&#8220;This may be true for other issues. There may be genetic factors that make a patient more sensitive to salt and develop hypertension, whereas another person can eat large amounts of salt and maintain normal pressure,&#8221; said Dr. Carl &#8220;Chip&#8221; Lavie, medical director of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention at the John Ochsner Heart and Vascular Institute at Ochsner Health System in New Orleans.</p>
<p>&#8220;Other studies have also shown that those who eat healthier diets tend to offset the risk that same chromosome places on them,&#8221; said Dr. Phil Ragno, director of cardiovascular health and wellness at Winthrop University Hospital in Mineola, N.Y.</p>
<p><strong>Motivation for Lifestyle Change?</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;We know that despite public health recommendations to eat five or more servings of fruits and vegetables a day, only a minority of people take the advice seriously,&#8221; said Anand. &#8220;Genetic information may be a motivation to help people take the public health recommendation seriously.&#8221;</p>
<p>But she added that this research doesn&#8217;t mean that people should go out and get genetically screened for the presence of 9p21 variants. Screening is costly and not routinely done.</p>
<p>The role of genetics is an expanding area of medical research, and experts believe the next few years will bring new health recommendations based on people&#8217;s genetic makeup.</p>
<p>&#8220;This points the way toward the future and where we&#8217;re going in terms of understanding the genetics of heart disease,&#8221; said Dr. William O&#8217;Neill, cardiology professor and executive dean of clinical affairs at the University of Miami&#8217;s Miller School of Medicine. &#8220;Maybe in the next few years, we may be able to do specific gene scans on individual patients and if we find the patients who have genetic high risk, we really want to concentrate on modifying risk by targeting smoking, cholesterol adn diet.&#8221;</p>
<p>And that could be reassuring for many people with genetic susceptibility to certain conditions.</p>
<p>&#8220;We often think of genetic factors as being unmodifiable factors,&#8221; said Anand. &#8220;But lifestyle factors can actually change the genes.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/modifying-genes-eating-vegetables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Effect of Lack of Sleep on the Body</title>
		<link>http://heartcurrents.com/effect-lack-sleep-body/</link>
		<comments>http://heartcurrents.com/effect-lack-sleep-body/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Stephen Parker (Article selection and Commentary)</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sleep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heart disease and diabetes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obesity epidemic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heartcurrents.com/?p=4980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists Finding Out What Losing Sleep Does to a Body Rob Stein Washington Post Staff Writer October 9, 2005> With a good night&#8217;s rest increasingly losing out to the Internet, e-mail, late-night cable and other distractions of modern life, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that too little or erratic sleep may be taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/08/AR2005100801405_pf.html" >Scientists Finding Out What Losing Sleep Does to a Body</a><br/><br />
 Rob Stein<br />
Washington Post Staff Writer<br />
October 9, 2005><br/></p>
<p>With a good night&#8217;s rest increasingly losing out to the Internet, e-mail, late-night cable and other distractions of modern life, a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that too little or erratic sleep may be taking an unappreciated toll on Americans&#8217; health.</p>
<p>Beyond leaving people bleary-eyed, clutching a Starbucks cup and dozing off at afternoon meetings, failing to get enough sleep or sleeping at odd hours heightens the risk for a variety of major illnesses, including cancer, heart disease, diabetes and obesity, recent studies indicate.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re shifting to a 24-hour-a-day, seven-day-a-week society, and as a result we&#8217;re increasingly not sleeping like we used to,&#8221; said Najib T. Ayas of the University of British Columbia. &#8220;We&#8217;re really only now starting to understand how that is affecting health, and it appears to be significant.&#8221;</p>
<p>A large, new study, for example, provides the latest in a flurry of evidence suggesting that the nation&#8217;s obesity epidemic is being driven, at least in part, by a corresponding decrease in the average number of hours that Americans are sleeping, possibly by disrupting hormones that regulate appetite. The analysis of a nationally representative sample of nearly 10,000 adults found that those between the ages of 32 and 49 who sleep less than seven hours a night are significantly more likely to be obese.</p>
<p>The study follows a series of others that have found similar associations with other illnesses, including several reports from the Harvard-run Nurses&#8217; Health Study that has linked insufficient or irregular sleep to increased risk for colon cancer, breast cancer, heart disease and diabetes. Other research groups scattered around the country have subsequently found clues that might explain the associations, indications that sleep disruption affects crucial hormones and proteins that play roles in these diseases.</p>
<p>&#8220;There has been an avalanche of studies in this area. It&#8217;s moving very rapidly,&#8221; said Emmanuel Mignot of Stanford University, who wrote an editorial accompanying the new obesity study in the October issue of the journal Sleep. &#8220;People are starting to believe that there is an important relationship between short sleep and all sorts of health problems.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not everyone agrees, with some experts arguing that any link between sleep patterns and health problems appears weak at best and could easily be explained by other factors.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are Chicken Little people running around saying that the sky is falling because people are not sleeping enough,&#8221; said Daniel F. Kripke of the University of California at San Diego. &#8220;But everyone knows that people are getting healthier. Life expectancy has been increasing, and people are healthier today than they were generations ago.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other researchers acknowledge that much more research is needed to prove that the apparent associations are real, and to fully understand how sleep disturbances may affect health. But they argue that the case is rapidly getting stronger that sleep is an important factor in many of the biggest killers.</p>
<p>&#8220;We have in our society this idea that you can just get by without sleep or manipulate when you sleep without any consequences,&#8221; said Lawrence Epstein, president of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. &#8220;What we&#8217;re finding is that&#8217;s just not true.&#8221;</p>
<p>While many aspects of sleep remain a mystery &#8212; including exactly why we sleep &#8212; the picture that appears to be emerging is that not sleeping enough or being awake in the wee hours runs counter to the body&#8217;s internal clock, throwing a host of basic bodily functions out of sync.</p>
<p>&#8220;Lack of sleep disrupts every physiologic function in the body,&#8221; said Eve Van Cauter of the University of Chicago. &#8220;We have nothing in our biology that allows us to adapt to this behavior.&#8221;</p>
<p>The amount of necessary sleep varies from person to person, with some breezing through their days on just a few hours&#8217; slumber and others barely functioning without a full 10 hours, experts say. But most people apparently need between about seven and nine hours, with studies indicating that an increased risk for disease starts to kick in when people get less than six or seven, experts say.</p>
<p>Scientists have long known that sleep disorders, such as sleep apnea, narcolepsy and chronic insomnia, can lead to serious health problems, and that difficulty sleeping may be a red flag for a serious illness. But the first clues that otherwise healthy people who do not get enough sleep or who shift their sleep schedules because of work, family or lifestyle may be endangering their health emerged from large epidemiological studies that found people who slept the least appeared to be significantly more likely to die.</p>
<p>&#8220;The strongest evidence out there right now is for the risk of overall mortality, but we also see the association for a number of specific causes,&#8221; said Sanjay R. Patel of Harvard Medical School, who led one of the studies, involving more than 82,000 nurses, that found an increased risk of death among those who slept less than six hours a night. &#8220;Now we&#8217;re starting to get insights into what&#8217;s happening in the body when you don&#8217;t get enough sleep.&#8221;</p>
<p>Physiologic studies suggest that a sleep deficit may put the body into a state of high alert, increasing the production of stress hormones and driving up blood pressure, a major risk factor for heart attacks and strokes. Moreover, people who are sleep-deprived have elevated levels of substances in the blood that indicate a heightened state of inflammation in the body, which has also recently emerged as a major risk factor for heart disease, stroke, cancer and diabetes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Based on our findings, we believe that if you lose sleep that your body needs, then you produce these inflammatory markers that on a chronic basis can create low-grade inflammation and predispose you to cardiovascular events and a shorter life span,&#8221; said Alexandros N. Vgontzas of Pennsylvania State University, who recently presented data at a scientific meeting indicating that naps can help counter harmful effects of sleep loss.</p>
<p>Other studies have found that sleep influences the functioning of the lining inside blood vessels, which could explain why people are most prone to heart attacks and strokes during early morning hours.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve really only scratched the surface when it comes to understanding what&#8217;s going on regarding sleep and heart disease,&#8221; said Virend Somers of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn. &#8220;I suspect as we understand more about this relationship, we&#8217;ll realize how important it really is.&#8221;</p>
<p>After several studies found that people who work at night appear unusually prone to breast and colon cancer, researchers investigating the possible explanation for this association found exposure to light at night reduces levels of the hormone melatonin. Melatonin is believed to protect against cancer by affecting levels of other hormones, such as estrogen.</p>
<p>&#8220;Melatonin can prevent tumor cells from growing &#8212; it&#8217;s cancer-protective,&#8221; said Eva S. Schernhammer of Harvard Medical School, who has conducted a series of studies on volunteers in sleep laboratories. &#8220;The theory is, if you are exposed to light at night, on average you will produce less melatonin, increasing your cancer risk.&#8221;</p>
<p>Other researchers are exploring a possible link to other malignancies, including prostate cancer.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s absolutely no reason it should be limited to breast cancer, and it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily be restricted to people who work night shifts. People with disrupted sleep or people who are up late at night or get up frequently in the night could potentially have the same sort of effect,&#8221; said Scott Davis of the University of Washington.</p>
<p>The newest study on obesity, from Columbia University, is just the latest to find that adults who sleep the least appear to be the most likely to gain weight and to become obese.</p>
<p>Other researchers have found that even mild sleep deprivation quickly disrupts normal levels of the recently discovered hormones ghrelin and leptin, which regulate appetite. That fits with the theory that humans may be genetically wired to be awake at night only when they need to be searching for food or fending off danger &#8212; circumstances when they would need to eat to have enough energy.</p>
<p>&#8220;The modern equivalence to that situation today may unfortunately be often just a few steps to the refrigerator next door,&#8221; Mignot wrote in his editorial.</p>
<p>In addition, studies show sleep-deprived people tend to develop problems regulating their blood sugar, which may put them at increased risk for diabetes.</p>
<p>&#8220;The research in this area is really just in its infancy,&#8221; Van Cauter said. &#8220;This is really just the tip of the iceberg that has just begun to emerge.&#8221; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://heartcurrents.com/effect-lack-sleep-body/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)

Served from: heartcurrents.com @ 2012-02-26 13:59:43 -->

