THE DAILY WORLD NEWS

Zelaya's Honduras exit 'aborted'

2009-12-10T00:38:00.000-08:00

The de facto government of Honduras has said that plans for Manuel Zelaya, the country's deposed president, to leave the Honduran capital for Mexico have been put on hold.

Sources had said on Wednesday that Zelaya, who has sheltered at the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa since returning from exile in September, was due to head to Mexico within hours.

But Carlos Lopez, Honduras's foreign minister, told Honduran television that the plan had been "aborted under current circumstances".

Milton Mateo, a spokesman for the Honduran foreign ministry, had earlier said that Mexico had asked for a safe-conduct pass for Zelaya, and that the pass had been signed off.

Security forces alerted

Craig Mauro, an Al Jazeera correspondent who has reported on the politicial events in Honduras, said: "There was a lot of activity around the Brazilian embassy in Tegucigalpa where Zelaya has taken refuge for the last couple of months.

"There were reports that the number of security forces there have been doubled, and that Zelaya would be leaving to take asylum in Mexico," Mauro said from Buenos Aires, Argentina.

"Since then there have been conflicting reports. Honduran aviation officials [said] that a plane is on the way from Mexico, and there [were] some reports from Mexico, quoting unnamed sources, that he has been granted asylum.

"Zelaya has just spoken to a Venezuelan television network and he has neither confirmed nor denied that he would be seeking asylum."

The de facto government, which has held power since Zelaya was deposed on June 28, wants Zelaya to take political asylum in another country, which would restrict his political activities.

However, Zelaya seeks a status that would allow him to campaign fully for his return, Daniel Ortega, Nicaragua's president, said on Wednesday.

Political crisis

Zelaya has demanded his reinstatement since being ousted, but the country's congress voted against restoring him to power.

Fresh elections that were held last month saw Porfirio Lobo, a National Party politician, win the presidency.

Zelaya was forced into exile after the supreme court, congress and business leaders said he acted against the constitution and tried to illegally extend limits to his term in office.

He has repeatedly denied this and pointed out that it would have been impossible to change the constitution before his term in office was complete.

Divisions in the Central American nation remain wide even after the election, which Zelaya's supporters boycotted, and nations across the Americas are also at odds over whether to recognise the poll.

"The US has said that it recognised the elections but that it was only a step forward, and that it wanted to national reconciliation," Mauro said.

"Several countiries have followed the US' lead there, but there is also a bloc, led by Argentina, Brazil and Venezuela, that refuses to recognise the elections and which is demanding that Zelaya be restored to the presidency [to serve out the rest of his term], no matter what."

Lobo, who was defeated by Zelaya in the 2005 election, has pledged to form a unity government and seek dialogue.

He is due to take office on January 27, when Zelaya's term officially ends.

Source:

Al Jazeera and agencies

Iraq orders security shakeup after Baghdad blasts

2009-12-10T00:36:00.000-08:00

CHELSEA J. CARTER

Associated Press Writer= BAGHDAD (AP) â Iraq's Western-backed government â facing intense pressure to address security lapses after suicide bombings killed 127 people in the capital â ordered a shake-up Wednesday in the country's military leadership.

The angry mood that led Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to replace Baghdad's top military commander reveals a stark psychological shift among Iraqis who once accepted such violence as routine and are now demanding someone pay a political price.

Al-Maliki appealed for Iraqis to be patient as he signaled more changes might be ahead for security officials. The prime minister was expected to attend a special parliamentary session Thursday, where lawmakers demanded his security ministers answer for lapses that allowed for the attacks.

"I call on the Iraqi people for more patience and steadfastness," al-Maliki said in a televised address.

It was unclear whether the replacement of Lt. Gen. Abboud Qanbar would quiet outraged lawmakers, who are questioning how suicide bombers managed to launch multiple attacks Tuesday in heavily guarded central Baghdad. The blasts wounded more than 500.

Much of al-Maliki's appeal was aimed at calming anger that has united Iraq's ethnic and sectarian rivals â from Kurd to Arab, Shiite to Sunni â with their calls on Iraq's interior and defense ministers to resign.

"They have proved failures," said Saadi al-Barzanji, a Kurdish lawmaker.

Even the group that Iraq has accused of masterminding this week's bombings as well as two previous major attacks has called on security officials to step down.

"He who cannot ensure security for Iraqis should leave," Baath party spokesman Khudair al-Murshidi told Al-Jazeera in an interview from Syria. Al-Murshidi has denied that loyalists of Saddam Hussein's Baath party were behind any of the attacks.

Top security officials have twice failed to appear after being called before lawmakers. Those request followed suicide bombings against government buildings Aug. 19 and Oct. 25. More than 250 were killed in the earlier attacks.

Ayad al-Samarrie, the parliament speaker, on Tuesday again called on the ministers and others to appear before legislators, said Omar al-Mashhadani, the speaker's spokesman.

Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani said he would attend the session only if it was not held behind closed doors, according to a statement released by his office. It was not clear whether his demand was met or whether other officials would attend. Security matters have typically been discussed in parliament in closed session.

The political fallout provides a sharp contrast to what occurred following attacks that produced equal or greater devastation in previous years in Baghdad. At the height of the insurgency, tens of thousands died in street fighting and bombing attacks with virtually no calls for resignations.

During the address on state television, al-Maliki said Iraq's security strategies would be reviewed and possible personnel changes made. He stopped short of saying whether any of his ministers would be held responsible.

Al-Maliki appointed Lt. Gen. Ahmed Hashim Ouda late Wednesday to head Baghdad's military operations, according to state television.

Ouda has been a close political ally of al-Maliki and belongs to his Dawa party. He fought in the Iran-Iraq war, commanding an army division, and led an Iraqi army division during the 1991 Gulf War.

The prime minister previously has not asked any of his top security advisers to step down, but he now may have little choice. Al-Maliki has been running for re-election on a platform of improved security, and a lack of response could cost the prime minister and his party votes.

The U.S. has refrained from commenting publicly about the security lapses, instead warning of a possible rise in violence aimed at destabilizing the government ahead of the March 7 parliamentary elections. The top American commander in Iraq, Gen. Raymond Odierno, has said he will keep the bulk of the 120,000 U.S. troops in place until after the election.

There have been no claims of responsibility for the latest bombings, though the U.S. military has said high-profile vehicle bombs and simultaneous suicide bombings are the hallmarks of al-Qaida.

In his address, Al-Maliki called on neighbors to do more to stop to prevent insurgent attacks in Iraq â an apparent reference to Syria. Relations between the two countries soured after Baghdad accused Syria of harboring senior Baathists who masterminded the attacks in August and October. Syria denies it.

"I demand of the international community and all countries, including neighboring countries, who condemn the attacks to turn their words into actions and support the Iraqi people and the Iraqi government by confronting terrorism," al-Maliki said.

Sarkozy and Brown call for global market changes

2009-12-10T00:35:00.000-08:00

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy have issued a joint call for urgent global reform of financial markets.

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, they say a one-off tax on bank bonuses should be "considered a priority".

The two leaders say it is "simply not acceptable" for taxpayers to cover the cost of bank failures but not benefit from their successes.

The article comes as EU leaders prepare to meet for a summit in Brussels.

It also follows the announcement in a pre-Budget report by UK finance minister Alistair Darling of a one-off supertax on banker bonuses.

'Proper regulation'

The BBC's Jonny Dymond, in the Belgian capital, says the joint article at times reads like a call to arms.

In it, Mr Sarkozy and Mr Brown say the financial crisis has made them "recognise that we are now in an economy which is no longer national but global, so financial standards must also be global".

"We must ensure that through proper regulation, the financial sector operates on a level playing field globally."

They say there is an "urgent need for a new compact between global banks and the society they serve".

"A compact that ensures the benefits of good economic times flow not just to bankers but to the people they serve; that makes sure that the financial sector fosters economic growth."

Various proposals to reform the sector "deserve examination", they said, but a one-off tax on high bonuses paid to bankers "should be considered a priority".

"People rightly want a post-crisis banking system which puts their needs first. To achieve that, nothing less than a global change is required," the leaders wrote.

France and the UK have been at odds recently over European banking.

Mr Sarkozy appeared to boast that the appointment of Frenchman Michel Barnier to oversee European banking reform was a defeat for Britain.

Mr Sarkozy told Le Monde newspaper the British were "the big losers" in the share-out of EU jobs.

Mr Sarkozy and Mr Brown cancelled a meeting last week but are set to meet on Thursday on the sidelines of the EU summit.

On Wednesday, Mr Darling announced plans for a one-off supertax of 50% on banker bonuses, to be applied to payments over £25,000.

The new tax - which would be paid by banks and not individuals - is designed to discourage institutions from paying large bonuses to employees in the wake of the major taxpayer support they have received in the financial crisis.

Afghan violence will rise, says Petraeus

2009-12-10T00:31:00.000-08:00

By Phil Stewart and Susan Cornwell

Washington - Violence in Afghanistan will likely climb in the short-term, along with internal government turmoil, US General David Petraeus told Congress on Wednesday, urging lawmakers to reserve judgment for a full year on President Barack Obama's new war strategy.

Petraeus, who as head of US Central Command is in charge of drawing down forces in Iraq and overseeing a new surge of 30 000 US troops in Afghanistan, said he expected increased fighting in Afghanistan in the spring and the summer.

He also said the Afghan government's expected moves to combat corruption likely would result in "greater turmoil within the government as malign actors are identified and replaced".

"It will be important, therefore, to withhold judgment on the success or failure of the strategy in Afghanistan until next December, as the president has counselled," Petraeus said.

Petraeus, who in his previous role as the top Iraq commander oversaw a surge of forces in 2007 that was credited with helping pull that country back from the brink, cautioned that progress in Afghanistan would not be as quick as in Iraq.

"Achieving progress in Afghanistan will be hard and the progress there likely will be slower in developing than was the progress achieved in Iraq," Petraeus said.

The general, a favourite among Republicans who had a high public profile under former president George Bush, was the latest US official to go before Congress to defend Obama's new war strategy announced last week.

Petraeus expressed his full support for Obama's plan and called success in Afghanistan "necessary and attainable".

All of the additional 30 000 US forces are expected to be deployed by the summer or fall, aiming to reverse Taliban momentum and allow for a gradual withdrawal starting in July 2011, according to Obama's plan. The United States already has about 68 000 troops in Afghanistan. - Reuters

Report: Nigerian police killing civilians

2009-12-10T00:29:00.000-08:00

MICHELLE FAUL

Associated Press Writer= JOHANNESBURG (AP) â Beware of police roadblocks in Nigeria: If you cannot pay a bribe, you can land up dead, according to an Amnesty International report published Wednesday.

It highlights a new danger in a country regularly denounced as one of the most corrupt in the world, where bribe-taking long has been a way for poorly paid government workers to make ends meet.

Nigeria's police force is poorly paid and trained, and short of essential tools including bulletproof vests, fuel, even paper and pens, Amnesty said. But there appears to be no shortage of the bullets its officers use to kill people they are supposed to protect, the report said.

"In a country where bribes guarantee safety, those who cannot afford to pay are at risk of being shot or tortured to death by the police," it said.

Emmanuel Ojukwu, the national police spokesman, told The Associated Press that "extrajudicial killing is not approved in Nigeria."

He said officers who use unlawful force are arrested, prosecuted and sanctioned. But he could not say how many officers have been dismissed or jailed.

Amnesty International said its research, conducted over three years, indicates officers suspected of unlawful killings are "sent on training" or transferred to other areas. It said there are few prosecutions and it condemned a "culture of impunity."

No one can say how many people are summarily killed by Nigerian police, but the report put it at hundreds each year.

"Many unlawful killings happen during police operations. In other cases, the police shoot and kill drivers who fail to pay them bribes at checkpoints," the report said. "Some are killed in the street because, as the police later claim, they are 'armed robbers'; others are killed after arrest, allegedly for attempting to escape. Many disappear in police custody and are likely to have been extrajudicially executed."

Turkey mulls closure of Kurdish party

2009-12-09T03:21:00.000-08:00

ANKARA: Turkey’s highest court on Tuesday began hearing a case to shut down the main pro-Kurdish party on charges of backing PKK rebels, a verdict which could ruin government efforts to boost rights for minority Kurds.

There have been protests and shootings ahead of a ruling by the Constitutional Court, which could decide to disband the Democratic Society Party (DTP), the largest pro-Kurdish party in Turkey’s Parliament.

A verdict to close the party could undermine Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan’s AK Party’s drive to improve rights of Kurdish citizens, aimed at ending a long-running conflict with Kurdish separatists.

PKK guerrillas have fought for 25 years for a Kurdish homeland in southeastern Turkey. About 40,000 people have died in the violence.

Investors in Turkey, an EU-candidate country, worry the court ruling may raise political instability ahead of a general election set for 2011 and at a time when the economy has begun crawling back from a steep recession. “A verdict to close down DTP will lead to nothing but chaos,” wrote Okay Gonensin, a columnist in the liberal Radikal newspaper.

Several pro-Kurdish parties have been banned in the past.

The case to close down the DTP was brought by Turkey’s Chief Prosecutor Abdurrahman Yalcinkaya, who tried unsuccessfully to close down Erdogan’s party in 2008 on grounds it contravened the country’s secular constitution.

Judges among the 11-member court have told Reuters they want to reach a verdict in the next two weeks. The EU has criticized the lawsuit against the DTP, warning Turkey that banning the party would violate Kurdish rights, and analysts fear it would strengthen the hand of the militant Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) separatist group.

“If the party is closed down, the influence of the PKK in the Kurdish issue will increase. Nine Kurdish parties have been shut so far, but PKK activity in the area has always continued,” said Gonensin.

Leaked climate draft sparks anger

2009-12-09T03:20:00.000-08:00

Developing nations taking part in the United Nations climate change conference in Copenhagen have criticised a leaked document which proposes that more power be granted to rich nations.

The document, which was leaked on Tuesday by The Guardian, a British newspaper, also suggests that the UN's negotiating role should be sidelined and that the legally-binding Kyoto protocol be abandoned.

The Guardian reported that the text was drawn up by representatives of a small group of rich nations. The US, UK and Denmark are thought to be among those involved in the drafting of the proposals.

Developing countries have said that the text is part of a plan by rich nations to set unequal limits on carbon emissions in 2050, according to a confidential analysis of the proposals that The Guardian also obtained.

Alan Fisher, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Copenhagen, said leaks are made because people want to make certain positions public.

"There are two possible reasons for the leak. One is that Western nations were saying - this is our bottom line, these are the draconian measures we are prepared to take to safe-guard our interests," Fisher said.

"Or it could have been the developing nations saying - if you are even considering anything like this, there is going to be a revolt you have never seen the like of before.

"The Danes are not denying that the document exists, but they are saying it doesn't carry any official weight at all."

Unequal emissions target

The analysis says that the text worked on by rich nations is a strategy to get developing countries to agree to specific emission cuts, the newspaper reported.

The text seeks to set a limit on developing nations that would not allow them to emit more than 1.44 tonnes of carbon per person by 2050 - while developed nations will be allowed to discharge 2.67 tonnes per head.

The draft is also understood to call for handing control of climate change finance to the World Bank.

Waldon Bello, the director of "Focus on the Global South", a non-governmental organisation specialising in policy research, said that the text was evidence of a "betrayal" on the part of rich nations.

"This is a terrible document - the idea that there would be differential limits put on emissions to favour the north [and] the fact that there would be abandonment of the only legitimate framework, which is the Kyoto Protocol," he said.

"This is not what developing countries were expecting. They were expecting the north to make a serious offer and this is definitely not a serious offer at this point in time. This shows that there is just no 'give' when it comes to the north."

Funding gap

On the same day that the text was leaked, a senior Chinese negotiator told reporters in Copenhagen that the US's emissions target was not notable, that the EU's was not enough, and that Japan's came with impossible conditions.

He also criticised talk of developed nations contributing $10bn annually to poor countries to help them cope with climate change, saying that more money is needed.

Estimates of how much it would costs to enact a climate change plan vary widely.

Nicholas Stern, the British government adviser on climate change, says developing countries could use $130bn dollars per year.

The bulk of it, $75bn, would be spent on coping with the effects of climate change, with another $40bn going towards research and development of greener technologies and $15bn for forest conservation.

Those estimates are much lower than those given by the World Bank, which reports that poor countries would need $550bn dollars a year - including $400bn for technology development and $150bn to cope with the effects of climate change.

If global temperatures are to rise no more than two degrees Celsius by 2050, the International Energy Agency says $10 trillion of energy-related investments will have to be made over the next two decades.

Source:

Al Jazeera and agencies

AP sources: Dems reach deal to drop gov't-run plan

2009-12-09T03:19:00.000-08:00

DAVID ESPO

AP Special Correspondent= WASHINGTON (AP) â After days of secret talks, Senate Democrats tentatively agreed Tuesday night to drop a government-run insurance option from sweeping health care legislation, several officials said, a concession to party moderates whose votes are critical to passage of President Barack Obama's top domestic priority.

In its place, officials said Democrats had tentatively settled on a private insurance arrangement to be supervised by the federal agency that oversees the system through which lawmakers purchase coverage. Additionally, the emerging agreement calls for Medicare to be opened to uninsured Americans beginning at age 55, a significant expansion of the large government health care program that currently serves the 65-and-over population.

At a hastily called evening news conference in the Capitol, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., declined to provide details of what he described as a "broad agreement" between liberals and moderates on an issue that has plagued Democrats' efforts to pass health care legislation from the outset.

With it, he added, the end is in sight for passage of the legislation that Congress has labored over for months.

The officials who described the details of the closed-door negotiations did so on condition of anonymity, saying they were not authorized to discuss them publicly.

At its core, the legislation would expand health care to millions who lack it, ban insurance companies from denying coverage on the basis of pre-existing medical conditions and rein in the rise of health care spending nationally.

The developments followed a vote on the Senate floor earlier in the day in which abortion opponents failed to inject tougher restrictions into sweeping health care bill, and Democratic leaders labored to make sure fallout from the issue didn't hamper the drive to enact legislation. The vote was 54-45.

Taken together, the day's developments underscored the complexity that confronts the administration and Reid as they seek the 60 votes needed to overcome Republican opposition and pass a bill by Christmas. Despite their reluctance, some senators had talked openly and in detail earlier in the day about the progress of the negotiations.

The provision in the legislation to be dropped under the emerging agreement provides for a government-run insurance option to be available to consumers, with individual states permitted to drop out. Liberals have long sought such as arrangement, as a means of forcing competition on insurance companies.

One participant in the talks, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, told reporters he didn't like the deal, but he added, "I'm going to support it to the hilt" in hopes of securing passage of the health care bill.

Another senator involved, Sen. Russ Finegold, D-Wis., issued a statement saying, "I do not support proposals that would replace the public option in the bill with a purely private approach. We need to have some competition for the insurance industry to keep rates down and save taxpayer dollars." But he did not rule out voting for the measure.

In his comments to reporters, Reid said the emerging compromise "includes a public option and will help ensure the American people win in two ways: one, insurance companies will face more competition, and two, the American people will have more choices."

It wasn't clear what he meant by a "public option," the Medicare expansion or another as yet unknown element.

It was unclear, for example, what fallback steps would be included in case private insurance companies declined to participate in the nationwide plan envisioned to be overseen by the Office of Personnel Management. One possibility was for the agency to set up a government-run plan, either national in scope or on a state-by-state basis, but no confirmation was available.

Under the tentative agreement, liberals lost their bid to expand Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health care for the poor, elderly and disabled. But they prevailed on the Medicare expansion, and the negotiators appeared ready to maintain a separate health care program for children until 2013, two years longer than the bill currently calls for, according to officials familiar with the details.

Additionally, there was consensus support for a requirement long backed by Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., and other liberals for insurance companies to spend at least 90 percent of their premium income providing benefits, a step that supporters argue effectively limits their spending on advertising, salaries, promotional efforts and profits.

127 Iraqis killed in spate of deadly bombings in Baghdad

2009-12-09T03:18:00.002-08:00

Baghdad, December 09: Five powerful car bombs rocked Baghdad on Tuesday, killing at least 127 people, many of them students, and wounding 448 in the third co-ordinated massacre to devastate the capital since August.

The attacks came hours before the Iraqi presidency council fixed a new date for the country's crucial parliamentary elections on 6th March.

The first attack occurred at about 10:25 a.m. (0725GMT) when a car loaded with explosives went off at the park of the new seat of the Finance Ministry after a massive truck bombing on 19th August badly damaged its original building in Waziriya district.

Seconds later, another car bombing took place near an intersection close to the Interior Ministry in eastern Baghdad, while a third car bombing detonated in the park of a court near the Institution of Fine Arts in Baghdad's western district of Mansour.

The bombing at the court building apparently targeted the part of the building occupied by the federal court which moved recently from its original place in the building of the Justice Ministry in Salhiyah which was destroyed by a massive truck bombing on 25th October.

A minute later, a fourth car bombing carried out by a minibus loaded with explosives went off at the intersection of the Nidaa mosque, near the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs in the al-Qahira neighborhood in northeastern Baghdad.

The powerful blast destroyed dozens of civilian cars which were crowded at the intersection.

"I saw dozens of cars were charred and many bodies were scattered at the site and some parts of human bodies were thrown on the roofs of nearby buildings," Jamal al-Obiedi, a witness at the scene said.

Footage of the Iraqi local television al-Sharqiya showed the finance ministry bombing destroyed parts of its building and many old houses in the nearby impoverished neighborhood were damaged.

A total of 112 people were killed and 425 wounded by the four coordinated bombings in Baghdad, the Interior Ministry said in its latest toll reports.

Earlier in the day, a suicide bomber drove his explosive-laden car into a police patrol in Baghdad's southern district of Doura, killing 15 people, including three policemen, and wounding 23 people.

The latest wave of deadly bombings is the third of such attacks since 19th August when suicide truck bombings struck the ministries of foreign affairs and finance, and the attacks on 25th Oct when insurgents hit the buildings of Baghdad Provincial Council and the Justice Ministry.

The attacks came hours before the Iraqi Presidency Council announced that 6th March, 2010 is the date of holding the crucial parliamentary elections in the country.

The presidency decision came two days after Iraqi lawmakers unanimously agreed on controversial amendments on the electoral law that would govern the war-torn country's national elections.

Originally, the election was slated for 16th January, but months of debate among Iraqi politicians to pass the amendments needed to the law in an attempt to reform the elections process to make it more representative for Iraqis inside and outside the country.

Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki condemned Tuesday's bloody attacks, renewing his accusation to the remnants of Saddam Hussein's Baath party and the al-Qaida militants for committing such deadly attacks.

"The terrorist gangs backed by both remnants of Baath party outside Iraq and al-Qaida, committed another massacre carrying the same black fingerprints which have always plunged into the blood of innocents," Maliki said in a statement issued by his office in the afternoon.

Maliki also said that the attacks came after the Iraqi parliament succeeded in passing the last stumbling block toward the country's landmark elections, confirming that "Iraq's foes are only aimed at inciting chaos in the country and halting any progress in the political process."

The number of deaths by violence in the war-ravaged country had dropped to its lowest level in November since the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, when official monthly figures showed that 122 people had been killed in the country.

Jerusalem should be joint capital: European Union

2009-12-09T03:18:00.001-08:00

Brussels, December 09: European Union foreign ministers urged Israel and the Palestinians on Tuesday to make Jerusalem their shared capital, prompting a swift, angry reaction from Israel.

For their part Tuesday, the Palestinians announced a boycott of products made in Israeli settlements in the West Bank. Palestinian Economics Minister Hassan Abu Libdeh said the government has already confiscated $1 million worth of products, including foods, cosmetics and hardware, and that he hoped to remove all such goods from Palestinian store shelves next year.

In Brussels, EU foreign ministers reiterated that the 27-member bloc would not recognize Israel’s annexation of the eastern part of Jerusalem after it occupied it in the 1967 war. The ministers called for Israel to share Jerusalem as a capital with a future Palestinian state.

Although the EU has long opposed the annexation of east Jerusalem, the statement angered Israel and was sure to deepen Israel’s sense that the Europeans favor Palestinian positions. President Barack Obama has been trying, so far in vain, to nudge the sides toward renewed peace talks.

‘The EU will not recognize any changes to the pre-1967 borders including with regard to Jerusalem, other than those agreed by the parties,’ said the ministerial statement. It was referring to the Mideast war in which Israeli forces captured east Jerusalem from the Jordanian army.

‘If there is to be a genuine peace, a way must be found (through negotiations) to resolve the status of Jerusalem as the future capital of two states,’ it said.

The EU ministerial statement dropped an earlier Swedish draft resolution which explicitly stated that east Jerusalem — the disputed part of the holy city — should be the capital of a Palestinian state after Israel warned it would damage the bloc’s ability to take part in any resumed peace talks as a negotiator.

The Israeli Foreign Ministry reacted immediately. ‘We regret that the European Union chose to adopt the text,’ Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman Yigal Palmor said in a statement. He said the statement ‘does not contribute’ to promoting peace and ignores the Palestinians’ refusal to resume talks.

Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas refuses to resume peace talks, which broke down a year ago, unless Israel halts all settlement construction.

The Palestinian prime minister, Salam Fayyad, welcomed Tuesday’s EU statement. He said it gives Palestinians ‘a better sense of hope and possibility about tomorrow.’

The competing claims to east Jerusalem remain perhaps the most explosive issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

East Jerusalem is home to sensitive Jewish, Muslim and Christian holy sites. The most contentious is the disputed hilltop compound known to Jews as the Temple Mount and to Muslims as the Noble Sanctuary. Temple Mount, home to the biblical Jewish Temples, is the holiest site in Judaism. It also is the site of the Al Aqsa Mosque, the third-holiest site in Islam.

Palestinians have complained that Israel is trying to restrict their numbers in the eastern part of the city.

Some EU ministers supported the original Swedish proposal but others said it would risk undermining efforts to restart peace talks. Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said after the meeting: ‘We call on the Israeli government to cease all discriminatory treatment of the Palestinians in east Jerusalem.’

The ministers took ‘positive note’ of Israel’s recent decision to implement a temporary freeze on building new homes in West Bank settlements — a decision that angered the Palestinians by excluding east Jerusalem.

But they emphasized that the settlements and a separation barrier Israel has built are on occupied land and that Israel’s evictions and the demolition of Palestinian homes in east Jerusalem were illegal under international law.

The resolution said such Israeli actions ‘constitute an obstacle to peace and threaten to make a two-state solution impossible.’

The Palestinians have dismissed the Israeli’s temporary building freeze as insincere because it excludes east Jerusalem and 3,000 homes already being built in the West Bank. Some 300,000 Israelis live in the West Bank, in addition to 180,000 Jewish Israelis in east Jerusalem.

Meanwhile Tuesday, the Palestinians’ economics minister, Abu Libdeh, defended the Western-backed government’s decision to remove settlement-built products from Palestinian stores. ‘Consuming settlements’ products is wrong, nationally, economically, politically, and must stop right away,’ he told a news conference.

Fully implementing the boycott will be a challenge since the Palestinian economy relies heavily on Israeli manufacturers for many basic goods.

Weather agency: Last decade warmest in modern era

2009-12-09T03:16:00.000-08:00

By Andrew C. Revkin and James Kanter, The New York Times
COPENHAGEN -- The decade of 2000 to 2009 appears to be the warmest one in the modern record, the World Meteorological Organization reported in a new analysis yesterday.
The announcement, likely to be viewed as a rejoinder to a renewed challenge from skeptics to the scientific evidence for global warming, came as international negotiators in Denmark sought to devise a global response to climate change.
The period from 2000 through 2009 has been "warmer than the 1990s, which were warmer than the 1980s, and so on," Michel Jarraud, secretary-general of the international weather agency, said at a Copenhagen news conference.
The unauthorized release last month of e-mail messages between climate scientists in Britain and the United States has provided new ammunition to global warming skeptics. Some of the messages seemed to suggest that some data be withheld from the public.
Mr. Jarraud said the release of the climate analysis was moved up from year's end to coincide with the international conference on climate change. He said it was simply part of an ever-more-voluminous body of evidence that the world is warming. The data also indicate that 2009 was also the fifth-warmest year on record, he said, but noted that the figures for the year were incomplete.
The international assessment on temperatures from 2000 to 2009 largely meshes with an interim analysis by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, which independently estimates global and regional temperature and other weather trends.
Yet it was the gulf between rich and poor nations, not the science of global warming, that dominated the Copenhagen conference talks yesterday, as delegates fretted about various pieces of draft wording for a new climate treaty circulating in the halls. A 13-page document that was said to have been drafted by Denmark, the conference's host country, included language calling for mechanisms opposed by poor countries for delivering aid to them to help deal with the impact of climate change.
The proposal includes more oversight by donor nations than the developing nations want. Danish officials said in a statement that the document was in no way a draft for a new accord, and that many such papers were circulating as parties informally traded ideas.
Another document was said to be framed by Brazil, South Africa, India and China. It made no mention of specific commitments on their part and rejected outside auditing of projects to reduce emissions financed by those countries on their own.
A negotiator for a large bloc of developing countries, meanwhile, challenged rich countries to make far deeper cuts in emissions than they have proposed so far. The negotiator, Sudan's Lumumba Stanislaus Di-Aping, said President Barack Obama should be willing to spend far more to limit climate dangers in the world's most vulnerable regions. "We have to ask him, when he provided trillions of dollars to save Wall Street, are the children of the world not deserving help to save their lives?" he said.
Mr. Di-Aping spoke on behalf of more than 130 developing countries in the so-called Group of 77, as well as China.
The European Commission, meanwhile, welcomed a decision by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to pave the way for imposing federal limits on emissions of carbon dioxide, saying it should give further weight to the negotiations here. The EPA's so-called endangerment finding was "an important signal by the Obama administration that they are serious about tackling climate change and are demonstrating leadership," a European Commission spokesman said.
Political leaders in Copenhagen welcomed the agency's ruling, but were quick to press the Obama administration to do more to sweeten its offer to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Andreas Carlgren, environment minister of Sweden, the country that now holds the European Union's rotating presidency, said in an e-mail message that the EPA ruling "shows that the United States can do more than they have put on the table."
So far, Mr. Obama has proposed a 17 percent cut in emissions by 2020 from 2005 levels and deeper cuts in later years. The White House has also indicated that the United States will contribute to a fund to tackle climate change.
A major reason that hopes have risen in recent weeks is the expectation that Mr. Obama, who plans to attend the conference's final day Dec. 18, will commit the United States to making cuts in greenhouse gases.
The United States declined to ratify the Kyoto Protocol, a 1997 pact on curbing greenhouse gases, because of strong opposition in the Senate and from the Bush administration. The refusal to ratify the protocol has left a lingering mistrust of the United States on environmental issues in parts of the world.
The EPA finding is expected to allow Mr. Obama to tell Copenhagen delegates that the United States is moving aggressively to address the problem, even as Congress remains stalled on its legislation to curb global warming.

Read more:http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09343/1019425-113.stm#ixzz0ZBnqy64d

Philippines police name 161 massacre suspects

2009-12-09T03:15:00.000-08:00

Among the wanted people are government militiamen and members of the powerful Ampatuan clan in Maguindanao province.

Police say clan leader and local mayor Andal Ampatuan Jr organised the attack and killed many of the victims himself.

The government has declared martial law in the province to quell what it said was a rebellion by the Ampatuan clan.

"We have to resolve this case peacefully," national police chief Jesus Verzosa was quoted as saying by the Associated Press news agency.

"We are urging them to surrender and then the normal processes of the law and prosecution should be held," he said.

"This is what we are trying to tell everybody - that we must be governed by laws and the rule of laws must be respected."

Among the 57 people who died in the attack on 23 November were members of a rival clan and 30 journalists.

Mr Versoza said witnesses had identified Mr Ampatuan Jr as the leader of the attack, said AP.

He is in police detention and has been charged with 25 counts of murder.

Prosecutors have issued subpoenas to other six members of the Ampatuan family, including Mr Ampatuan's father, to appear at a hearing on 18 December.

They deny any involvement in the attack on a political rival's convoy and have not yet been charged.

A state of martial law was declared in the province on Saturday after the government said it had intelligence that armed groups were plotting an offensive.

It is the first time martial law has been used in the country since the fall of autocrat Ferdinand Marcos in 1986.

G77 blasts the Danish draft, UN terms it informal paper

2009-12-09T03:14:00.002-08:00

The G-77 group of countries and China on Wednesday blasted a Danish draft proposal for an agreement on climate change, saying it "threatens the success" of the ongoing Copenhagen summit.

The draft text, which was leaked, is a "serious and unfortunate development. It is a major violation that threatens the success of the Copenhagen negotiating process," said Sudan's Lumumba Stanislas Dia Ping, who heads the G-77 group.

The G-77 and China called on the Prime Minister of Denmark, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, not to make any such further attempts and also affirmed that the group would not walk out of Copenhagen and work towards an equitable outcome till the last minutes of the conference.

UN climate change chief Yvo de Boer said this draft was on a decision paper put forward by Danish Prime Minister.

"This was an informal paper ahead of the conference given to a number of people for the purposes of consultations.

The only formal texts in the UN process are the ones tabled by the Chairs of this Copenhagen conference at the behest of the Parties," he added.

Iraqi leaders come under fire over blasts

2009-12-09T03:14:00.001-08:00

Iraqi leaders were set to come under fire, having failed to prevent a spate of attacks in Baghdad that killed 127 people on Tuesday.

The blasts undermined the government’s claims of improved security and MPs quickly demanded that Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki and the government’s security ministers answer for any failings that led to the attacks.

The United States, United Nations, Arab League and Britain, meanwhile, led international condemnation of Tuesday’s bombings, with UN chief Ban Ki-moon calling them “horrendous” and “unacceptable.”

Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani, whose department is responsible for police forces across Iraq, welcomed being questioned by lawmakers in the Council of Representatives over the attacks, which a senior security spokesman said bore “the touch of Al-Qaeda.”

“I am ready to go to parliament on the condition that the session be public,” Bolani told AFP.

The bombings all struck Baghdad within minutes of each other on Tuesday morning.

One suicide attacker detonated his payload at a finance ministry office, another struck at a tunnel leading to the labour ministry and a third drove a four-wheel-drive car into a courthouse.

A fourth suicide bomber in a car struck a police patrol in Dora in southern Baghdad, causing 15 deaths, 12 of them students at a nearby technical college, an interior ministry official said.

Another car bomb hit interior ministry offices in central Baghdad.

An interior ministry official said 127 people had been killed and 448 wounded in the bombings.

Maliki called Tuesday’s attacks a “cowardly” attempt “to cause chaos... and hinder the election,” and said they were deliberately timed to come after MPs on Sunday agreed on a new electoral law.

He blamed “foreign elements” who backed Al-Qaeda.

The courthouse bombing destroyed a large part of the building, with falling concrete killing several people, emergency workers said.

Mangled wrecks of cars, some flipped on their roofs, lined the street opposite the courthouse, and several parked vehicles were crushed by collapsed blast walls.

Near the finance ministry, several houses were completely destroyed and a two-metre (6.5-foot) deep crater marked the site of the explosion.

Although no group has yet claimed responsibility, the timing of the blasts and the fact that three targeted government buildings suggested an Al-Qaeda operation.

“This has the touch of Al-Qaeda and the Baathists,” Major General Qassim Atta, spokesman for security operations in Baghdad, told AFP, referring to the outlawed Baath party of now executed dictator Saddam.

Both groups were blamed for bloody attacks — including truck bombings of the finance, foreign and justice ministries — in Baghdad in August and October that killed more than 250 and punctured confidence in Iraq’s security forces.

“Such attacks are war crimes,” London-based rights group Amnesty International said in a statement.

Those caught up in the devastation described scenes of horror.

“I heard the sound of the explosion, I fainted, then I found myself on this bed covered with blood,” Um Saeed, who was wounded in the face and arms by the courthouse blast, told AFP at a local hospital.

Jamal Amin, who works at a restaurant near the finance ministry, said: “I was standing in front of the restaurant. People started to shout, ‘suicide bomber, suicide bomber!’

“I saw a mini-bus, and then the explosion happened and I lost consciousness. I woke up in the hospital.”

An official at Medical City hospital said many of the 39 bodies they had received “had been blown apart.”

Violence across Iraq dropped dramatically last month, with the fewest number of deaths in attacks recorded since the invasion in 2003. Official figures showed a total of 122 people were killed in November.

Both the Baghdad government and the US military have warned of a rise in attacks in the run-up to the election.

Presidential chief-of-staff Nasser al-Ani told Iraqi state television on Tuesday the election will be on March 7, after the presidency council said earlier that March 6 had been chosen as the date for the vote.

Despite Tuesday’s attacks US forces remain on track to begin withdrawing from Iraq in large numbers next year, the top US military officer said.

Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that while the withdrawal of US forces in Iraq was “on a balance” with the buildup in Afghanistan, nothing that has happened so far would upset plans.

90 killed in spate of Baghdad explosions

2009-12-08T19:17:00.000-08:00

An official at Iraq’s Interior Ministry says at least 90 people have been killed and more than 115 wounded in a series of coordinated blasts around Baghdad.

Three bomb-rigged cars exploded in quick succession on Tuesday, striking the Labor Ministry, a court complex and the new site of Iraq’s Finance Ministry — whose previous building was destroyed in an August blast.

Earlier, a suicide bomber struck a police patrol in southern Baghdad.

The Interior Ministry official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to media.

These were the latest high-profile blasts apparently aimed at sensitive Iraqi government buildings, police said.

The explosions rattled buildings across the capital, and undermined a fragile sense of security ahead of an auction of oilfield contracts this weekend, when executives from top oil firms will fly into town, and before an election next year.

Three people died and five were wounded in a first blast in a southern Baghdad suburb, police said.

Others were killed and wounded in at least three successive explosions in the city centre half an hour later, police said.

Smoke billows following an explosion in the Iraqi capital Baghdad on December 8, 2009. Central Baghdad was rocked by three massive explosions in quick succession, causing large plumes of smoke to rise into the air, an AFP correspondent witnessed. – AFP

“Civilians and security personnel have definitely been kiled. We all announce more details as we have them,” Baghdad security spokesman Major General Qassim al-Moussawi told Reuters.

Some police sources said there had been five explosions, two near judicial buildings, one near a university, another near in a central Baghdad commercial district and the earlier one in the south. Smoke billowed from at least two sites.

The blasts are the first large, high-profile explosions in Baghdad since Oct. 25, when two massive truck bombs killed 155 people at the justice ministry and Baghdad governorate headquarters.

A smaller blast, which some police officials said might have involved the accidental explosion of a hidden stockpile of munitions, killed seven children at a school in the Shi’ite slum of Sadr City on Monday.

The major bomb attacks in the heart of the Iraqi capital in October and a similar earlier attack in August marked a change of tactics for Iraq’s stubborn insurgency.

Rather than stage frequent smaller-scale attacks against soft targets like marketplaces or mosques, insurgent groups like al Qaeda now appear to be aiming for spectacular and less frequent strikes against heavily defended government targets.

Overall violence triggered by the 2003 U.S.-led invasion has fallen dramatically. The health ministry in November reported the lowest monthly death toll of Iraqi civilians in 6-1/2 years.

12 killed in twin blasts in ISI office in Pak

2009-12-08T19:16:00.000-08:00

At least 12 people were killed and 11 others injured when two blasts ripped through an office of the ISI within Multan cantonment in Pakistan's Punjab province today, the latest in a string of attacks targeting security facilities across the country.

The first blast occurred shortly before noon and was followed soon by a more powerful explosion, witnesses said.

Military police cordoned off the area and prevented people and the media from approaching the site.

Officials of a state-run rescue service said a dozen people were killed in the attack. Eleven injured people, including four children and two women, were taken to a nearby hospital.

Zafar Ahir, an editor of Jang newspaper who witnessed the blasts, said the target of the attack was an ISI office.

"More than half of the ISI office has been destroyed.

I saw the building blow up," he told Geo News channel.

Geo News aired mobile phone footage shot by passers-by which showed the facade of one building was completely destroyed by the blasts. Several nearby buildings were also damaged.

The footage also showed a plume of smoke rising from the site of the blast.

Some witnesses said the blasts were preceded by firing.

Officials said rescue workers were sifting through the rubble of the damaged building for survivors.

Another President Hanging from a Cross of Iron

2009-12-08T19:15:00.000-08:00

Article by WorldNews.com Correspondent Dallas Darling.

In 1953, eight years before his farewell address and in front of the American Society of Newspaper Editors, President Dwight Eisenhower cautioned his listeners about a "cross of iron."(1) He believed the potential for a just and peaceful post World War Two society was being squandered by the Cold War and Arms Race. President Eisenhower claimed, "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."(2) He also warned nations about maintaining powerful militaries and producing enormous weapons systems. He alleged they were "spending the sweat of their laborers, the genius of their scientists, and the hopes of their children." President Eisenhower then said, "This is not a way of life at all...it is humanity hanging from a cross of iron."(3)

Last week, President Barack Obama announced plans to send 34,000 more troops to Afghanistan. This act will immediately cost American taxpayers over thirty billion dollars. In the long-run, how many more human lives and resources will it expend? U.S. Secretary of Defense Robert Gates has already announced the 2011 deadline to begin withdrawing U.S. troops from Afghanistan was "just an estimate." Other military-minded strategists are heralding an "elongated" pullout taking several years. Armed escalation and perpetual use of force and violence to subdue Afghanistan will only bring more deaths and destruction. It is obvious President Obama heeded the advice of his military generals. It is clear too he succumbed to the Pentagon and military-industrial complex. Sadly, will Obama's legacy be another president hanging from a cross of iron?

When President John F. Kennedy refused to provide air support for the failed 1961 Cuban Bay of Pigs Invasion, he made many enemies within the military establishment. Although he appeared to be tough on Communism-forcing the Soviet Union to back down during the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, an agreement to remove nuclear weapons from Turkey (pointing at Russia) angered many reactionaries. When President Kennedy signed a treaty to never again attack Cuba, U.S. corporations and ultra-conservatives in Florida became incensed. When Cold War Warriors and CIA militants (who wanted to halt Kennedy's moves towards detente) found out he was going to meet with Joint Chief of Staff General Earle Wheeler and Secretary of the Army Cyrus Vance to discuss troop withdrawal from Vietnam,(4) President Kennedy never returned from Dallas, Texas, alive.

President Kennedy's predecessor, Lyndon B. Johnson, was also impaled on a cross of iron by the national security state and military establishment. President Johnson was ill-advised concerning the Gulf of Tonkin incident. Even though the U.S. provoked the first attack on August 2, 1964, and even though the second attack on August 4 never occurred, a group of admirals, generals, and Pentagon officials kept Commander Herrick's "revised" report from reaching President Johnson.(5) The report stated no attack ever occurred by North Vietnamese PT boats. Regrettably, and once he was cornered, President Johnson misled Congress and the American people by claiming two American destroyers were attacked. President Johnson also requested "any means necessary" to fight a brutal and prolonged war costing millions of lives. He ordered massive retaliatory bombing campaigns too.

Much like President Johnson, who was always concerned of being portrayed as too soft on Communism by the military-industrial complex and its mass communications network, Jimmy Carter was manipulated and used by military elitists and war-minded policy makers. Not only did ultra-conservatives and CIA militants withhold vital intelligence reports about the seriousness of Iran's Islamic Revolution, but right-wing ideologues transferred jurisdiction of covert operations from Secretary of State Cyrus Vance-who prioritized diplomacy over war and wanted to reduce nuclear armaments-towards the conservative anti-Soviet Team B's agenda. President Carter's Administration had little knowledge of the secret wars in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iran.(6) Instead of being suspended on a cross of iron, other presidents, like Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, George H. W. Bush, and George W. Bush, went about crucifying humanity on crosses of iron.

Resembling the Pax Roman's cross and crucifixion, America's ominous military-industrial complex (cross of iron) is filled with systematic and redemptive acts of violence. It is America's ultimate national weapon. It dispenses of those the imperial authorities brand as rebels, traitors and the enemies of so-called democracy. Others who have internalized the ideologies of this system have become passive and obedient. Like Roman soldiers on crucifixion detail who became numb to the violence against the rebellious that they nailed up their victims in different postures as a grim joke,(7) some are thrilled by the cross of iron's humiliation and tortuous deaths displayed on foreign hills and along foreign roads, U.S. embassies, electronic coliseums, and yes, grassy knolls. For others who try and resist a managed reality and its psychological and physical warfare, including a system where the labor and dedication of the Many are supported by the arrogance of the Few(8), they have tragically become recipients of unspeakable pain and horror.

In 1953, President Eisenhower's speech was directed at the Soviet Union. He wanted the world to declare a new kind of war, where monuments would be "roads and schools, hospitals and homes, and food and health."(9) (Perhaps President Obama should have walked among these sites before making his decision!) By 1961, he was admonishing the U.S. of "an immense military establishment and a large arms industry."(10) President Eisenhower pleaded with Americans to understand its "grave implications and to guard against the acquisition of the military-industrial-complex's unwarranted influence-whether sought or unsought," and "warned of the potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power."(11) When President Eisenhower said, "Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery for defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together"(12), he could have added "presidents" alongside citizenry.

President Obama contextually misconstrued President Eisenhower's farewell speech by saying, "Each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: the need to maintain balance in and among national programs"(13), and then speaking of only Afghanistan. He failed to inform Americans how President Eisenhower quickly ended the Korean War and passed one of the largest public works programs in history. Neither did President Obama mention the 1 trillion-dollar-a-year military-industrial complex's price tag, that could have funded universal health care and bettered the lives of millions. Nor did he remind people (as Eisenhower did) how an "immense military establishment and large arms industry is felt politically, economically, even spiritually," and that "in holding scientific research and discovery in respect...we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific technological elite."(14) The total influence of the Cross of Iron is experienced in "every city, every state house, every office of the federal government,"(15) and every church! God is replaced with deadly Strykers, cluster bombs, and the Beast of Kandahar.

But the Cross of Iron is much larger than Afghanistan. It consists of almost 1,000 armed bases around the world, including 7,000 in the U.S. It consumes more in expenditures than the top 25 nations do combined. This is why President Obama can say "right makes might,"(16) and why he does not have to worry about the next military raid (or does he?), drone assassination, or violent white phosphorous attack. Afghanistan is symptomatic of a much deeper malaise. Who will undermine the power of collectivized public executions in foreign nations? Who will super-cede the Pentagon and military-industrial complex that permeates every aspect of life? Who will resist the iron law of empire and transform the Beast of Kandahar? Who will rise against this Imperial Ideology? Until that day, another president hangs from a cross of iron, and so does another nation and humanity.

Dallas Darling - darling@wn.com

101 killed, 182 wounded in Baghdad explosions

2009-12-08T19:14:00.000-08:00

BAGHDAD—Five powerful car bombs rocked Baghdad on Tuesday, killing at least 101 people, many of them students, wounding 182 and shattering a month of calm in the capital ahead of a general election.

Two car bombs exploded near the labor and interior ministries and a suicide attacker driving a car struck a police patrol in Dora, in southern Baghdad, causing 15 of the deaths, an interior ministry official said.

The first explosion in central Baghdad was heard at 10:25a.m. (0725 GMT) with a second blast within seconds and a third one minute later.

Sporadic gunfire then sounded and the sirens of emergency vehicles were also heard, with helicopters taking to the skies soon afterwards.

The interior ministry official said 12 of those killed by the suicide attacker in Dora were students at a nearby technical college. The remaining three victims were policemen working at the checkpoint.

The two remaining car bombs targeted a criminal court building in Mansour, western Baghdad, and a market in Shorjah, in the centre of the city.

Violence across Iraq dropped dramatically last month, with the fewest deaths in attacks since the US-led invasion of 2003. Official figures showed a total of 122 people were killed in November.

However, the Baghdad government and the US military have warned of a rise in attacks in the run up to the election, which is expected to take place in February.

The threat of political violence linked to the poll is a major concern after bloody attacks in Baghdad in August and October that killed more than 250 people.

The attacks, including truck bombings outside the finance, foreign and justice ministries, punctured confidence in the Iraqi security forces.

"We believe that there will be an attempt to conduct more attacks between now and the election," General Ray Odierno, the top US commander in Iraq, said in November.

Tuesday's bombings came two days after the war-torn country's parliament passed a law governing the election, which will be the second national ballot since the 2003 US-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein from power.

The United Nations on Monday urged Iraq to announce "as soon as possible" the date for the vote after more than two months of delays.

The presidency council, made up of President Jalal Talabani and his two deputies, now has to announce a date for the ballot.

The United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) in a statement said that February 27 was "feasible" and it stood ready to give all possible help to bring this about.

US diplomats, most notably Christopher Hill, Washington's ambassador to Baghdad, had pushed MPs to pass the law, seeking to avoid delays to the planned pullout of tens of thousands of American troops in 2010.

The United States has 115,000 soldiers in Iraq, but that figure will drop to 50,000 next year as all of its combat troops are pulled out before a complete withdrawal by the end of 2011.

Pakistan President has assets ‘beyond his means’ of $1.5 billion

2009-12-08T19:13:00.000-08:00

The President of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari, has assets of $1.5 billion (£920 million) around the world, according to the country’s main anti-corruption body.

A report by the National Accountability Bureau said that the wealth accumulated by Mr Zardari was “beyond his means”. It said Mr Zardari allegedly owned properties and bank accounts in several countries, including Britain, the US and Spain. In 1996 he allegedly bought a $4 million, 355-acre estate in Surrey.

Investigators said that most of Mr Zardari’s fortune was made during his wife Benazir Bhutto’s two terms in office as Prime Minister in the 1990s. They alleged that the money had come from kickbacks and commissions on government deals.

The report was given to the Supreme Court as it deliberated over a proposed amnesty for the country’s leaders.

Mr Zardari had faced six cases of kickbacks and misuse of power that were terminated under an agreement known as the National Reconciliation Ordinance in October 2007.

The amnesty, brokered by the US and Britain, was introduced by former President Pervez Musharraf under a deal that paved the way for Ms Bhutto to return home from self-imposed exile. Ms Bhutto was assassinated just over two months later, leaving Mr Zardari to lead her party to victory in general elections in February 2008 and then become President after General Musharraf resigned in August.

Mr Zardari’s aides dismissed the allegations as politically motivated. Farhatullah Babar, the chief spokesman for the President, said: “Reports of $1.5 billion dollars of national and foreign assets allegedly belonging to President Zardari are no more than regurgitation of a decade old unproven politically motivated allegations.”

Blasts in crowded Pak market leave 34 dead, 100 injured

2009-12-08T04:49:00.001-08:00

Two bombs ripped through a crowded market in Lahore on Monday, killing at least 34 people, authorities said. TV footage showed cars and shops on fire in the Moon Market area of the city after the blasts. Earlier in the day a suicide bomber blew himself in Peshawar killing 10.

Lahore police officer Chaudry Shafiq confirmed 34 people were killed. Another officer said around 100 people wounded. Punjab Law Minister Rana Sanaullah said the bombs were apparently remote-controlled devices.

The bombings followed an attack by a suicide bomber who blew himself up outside a crowded court complex in Peshawar on Monday, killing 10 people and injuring nearly 50.

The bomber, who came to the court complex on a rickshaw, tried to flee when he was challenged by police, said North West Frontier Province Senior Minister Bashir Bilour. He blew himself up when police fired at him, the minister added. The injured people were taken to nearby hospitals. Doctors said six of them were in a serious condition.

everal policemen, lawyers and passers-by were among the injured. Bilour said there would have been more casualties if the bomber had managed to enter the sessions court complex on Jail Road.

To a question about claims that India and the US were behind such attacks, he said, “no Americans or RAW agents are carrying out these blasts”.

The blast sparked a fire that destroyed the vehicle used by the bomber. An official of the bomb disposal squad said investigators had found body parts of the bomber and parts of the suicide jacket. Militants have carried out scores of bombings in Pakistan as the Army presses an offensive in Waziristan in the northwest close to the Afghan border.

EU expects US to put more on table at climate summit

2009-12-08T04:48:00.000-08:00

FRANK McDONALD, Environment Editor in Copenhagen

THE EU delegation at the Copenhagen climate summit, which opened yesterday, has said it would be “astonished” if US President Barack Obama did not put more on the table when he arrives here at the end of next week.

Swedish environment minister Andreas Carlgren, who heads the EU’s negotiators, was referring to the recent US offer to cut American greenhouse gas emissions by 17 per cent by 2020, relative to 2005. This equates to a cut of only 5 per cent, based on 1990 levels.

The EU has unilaterally pledged to cut its emissions by 20 per cent, relative to what they were in 1990, by 2020 and by up to 30 per cent if other developed and major developing countries were to adopt more ambitious targets aimed at tackling the threat of global warming.

Asked at a press briefing if the EU would go for the higher figure to seal a deal in Copenhagen, Mr Carlgren made it clear that this would only arise “during the end-game” and intended to use the 30 per cent figure as a lever to put pressure on other parties to offer more.

“The EU wants to go to 30 per cent, that is very clear,” he said. “The question is whether other parties will go as far, as part of the global effort to limit the rise in temperatures to two degrees. And from our perspective, the US and China are not there yet.”

Mr Carlgren made it clear that both the US and China “know what we expect of them”. The US offer was a “promising leaning of the curve” but still too low, while China’s emissions would still rise significantly despite a recent pledge to cut the “carbon intensity” of its economy.

US chief negotiator Jonathan Pershing insisted the Obama administration still wanted “the strongest possible deal” to be reached in Copenhagen.

Its offer of a 17 per cent cut “puts us on the path to achieve a reduction of 30 per cent by 2025 and 42 per cent by 2030”.

He said the US was bringing “an unprecedented level of effort” to the negotiating table and the highest-level delegation to attend a UN climate conference, and he foresaw Copenhagen producing a “political arrangement to be followed by a legal arrangement”.

Asked about the impact of “Climategate” – the embarrassing e-mails hacked from the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit’s computer system – Dr Pershing said it would amount to “a small blip in the history of this process” and would have “virtually no effect at all”.

As lead author of one of the chapters in the fourth assessment report of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), he said it was “shameful” its scientists were now being “pilloried”, given the “enormous multitude” of evidence they had presented in 2007.

Dr Rajendra Pachauri, chairman of the IPCC, earlier defended its work in his address to the opening plenary session of the conference. He said some sceptics who found it “inconvenient to accept the inevitability” of climate change were now “resorting to illegal acts”.

Wearing a green tie and matching pocket handkerchief, he said the IPCC was proud of its record of independent research by tens of thousands of scientists throughout the world, all of which had been “peer-reviewed” repeatedly by 2,500 scientists in the process.

Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, said there was “unprecedented political momentum” for a deal in Copenhagen. But he said it would only be a success “if it delivers immediate action that begins the day the conference ends”.

The “Christmas cake” he envisaged Danish prime minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen lighting the candles on would have three layers: fast funding for developing countries, ambitious commitments to cut emissions, and a long-term shared vision on a low-carbon future.

Opening the conference, Mr Rasmussen told delegates that 110 heads of state or government would be arriving in Copenhagen for the final “high-level segment” at the end of next week, and this reflected “an unprecedented determination to deal with climate change”.

Nepal unrest blame on Delhi

2009-12-08T04:47:00.000-08:00

Kathmandu, Dec. 7: The key element of the escalating internal turmoil in Nepal remains external — it’s India’s deep distrust of Maoist intentions and the consequent outflanking of this country’s most influential political force from the power structure.

Novelist and commentator Manjushree Thapa puts the reason for Nepal’s cynical reversal into chaos succinctly: “Peace won’t come until the Maoists have a central role in power, and that won’t happen until India begins to trust them.”

At the moment, the odds on neither happening are high. The drift, in fact, has a contrary bias — the longer the Maoists stay out of power, the more belligerent they get, the more belligerent they get, the more averse New Delhi gets.

“Who blinks first is not a game between Prachanda and (Prime Minister) Madhav Nepal, it is between the Maoists and New Delhi,” says a top Kathmandu mediator, “for now, India seems happy to just deny them any which way, even if it is at the expense of the peace agreement of which India is a controlling stakeholder. That’s a tricky line to follow, but that is what it is.”

Indians themselves use more blunt language. “We cannot just hand over the state to the Maoists,” a senior diplomat at the Indian embassy told The Telegraph. “They still have an army, they have a militia and the YCL (Young Communist League) which is packed with trained army commanders in civilian clothes, they could just capture the state and that would deeply hurt our strategic interests.”

Hyperbolic? Too alarmist? Not in the Indian understanding, constructed though it may be as a ruse to keep the Maoists from power. “We are not convinced, and the other Nepali parties are not convinced that coercive capture of the state is not on the Maoists’ agenda,” the diplomat went on, “How can that be allowed to happen?”

The implications of the Maoists being left to protest on the streets are not lost on anyone, least of all the Indians — the peace agreement, already on the bayonet, will get shredded, the new Constitution will not get written by the May-end deadline, and a constitutional impasse will be imposed on the eddying political crisis.

Who runs Nepal after the life of the Constituent Assembly expires in May? Will it get an extension, which is only provided for in a state of emergency? Will President Ram Baran Yadav, a political lightweight who was pitched into ceremonial office by dint of compromise and consensus, assume power in the vacuum with the backing of the army, effectively the new raja of the republic, effectively negating all the gains of the three-year-old peace process?

Kathmandu is stewing with all manner of speculation, fanciful and frightening. “Don’t rule anything out,” cautions a senior analyst whose cynicism has matured through Nepal’s ramshackle roller-coaster over the past decade, “not even the possibility of a coup or an insurrection. There is a visible build-up to confrontation, something will have to give.”

Indian policy players are hoping — against widely held perceptions — that it will eventually be the Maoists who’ll give in. The basis of that hope is that differences between Maoist moderates (read Baburam Bhattrai) and hardliners (read Mohan Vaidya “Kiran”) will sharpen and the moderate elements, Prachanda included, will sooner than later “see reason” and split away from the militant elements.

This may well be a wishful and lazy analysis of the future Maoist trajectory, but there is enough to suggest the Indians are already employing it as central strategy — break the Maoists, weaken them numerically and ideologically, then bring them on board.

Part of the same strategy of wedging and weakening the Maoists is the India-inspired intransigence of the Nepali Army on the crucial of integrating ranks of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), currently in UN-monitored barracks. Integration is part of the peace accord but the word increasingly in vogue with the Nepali Army and the Indian embassy is disbanding.

“They are politically indoctrinated soldiers,” raves one Indian officer, “how can they just become part of the national army, what if there is an attempt at takeover? Integration may happen, but into society, into other wings of the security forces, not the army.”

Maoist hardliners are unlikely to accept that formulation, and if that makes them and the PLA increasingly restive, the Indians don’t mind.

As one Indian diplomat puts it, grandly: “We are not against the Maoists, it is only that they are too strong and doctrinaire for comfort, if their numbers are more controllable, if they talk and behave like social democrats who will respect multi-party democracy, we have no problem, it’s their country after all.”

In short, Maoists are a horse India is willing to back in Nepal, but it must be a horse in harness.

There clearly are divisions within the Maoists on what line to pursue — negotiation or confrontation — but those who know Maoists closely argue that they aren’t going to fritter away the fruits of their long and hard struggle by playing into divide-and-rule schemes.

Says a sympathiser and an independent member of the Constituent Assembly who tries little to conceal his disdain for the Indian mission in Kathmandu: “What have the Maoists got to lose, they are the only ones gaining on the ground every hour, they have time and tide on their hands. Indian diplomats will learn, earn and return, the Maoists will still be here, this is their country and that’s a good and simple fact for all to remember.”

Obama envoy in N Korea for rare direct talks

2009-12-08T04:46:00.000-08:00

Seoul: President Barack Obama's envoy began a rare trip to North Korea on Tuesday for the highest-level talks with the Communist nation in more than a year as a senior US official warned of strong sanctions against Pyongyang unless it rejoins international nuclear talks.

Envoy Stephen Bosworth's mission is to find out whether North Korea will return to the stalled international talks on ending its nuclear programs after carrying out an atomic test blast in May and quitting the six-nation negotiations.

Bosworth's delegation flew to Pyongyang from a US military base near Seoul, the US Embassy in Seoul said. North Korea's official Korean Central News Agency later said in a one-sentence dispatch that the delegation arrived in Pyongyang.

In Washington, a senior US official said Bosworth was carrying no new incentives for the North.

"We don't intend to reward North Korea simply for going back to doing something that it had previously committed to do," the official told reporters, speaking on condition of anonymity during the background briefing. "There are no inducements or incentives other than the fact that should they resume the talks, then they would be in a position to pursue some of the things that were possible should they proceed with denuclearization."

The official noted that there have been suggestions and indications that Pyongyang may be ready to rejoin the talks involving China, Japan, the two Koreas, the US and Russia. But he added, "You never know what the answer is until you ask and get the question answered."

The official warned that the North faces strong UN sanctions if it does not agree to return to negotiations.

"At a minimum, I think it will reinforce the intention of the international community to continue a very strong enforcement" of UN sanctions resolutions adopted to punish the North for its nuclear test and other provocations, the official said.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters Monday that she hopes Bosworth is successful in persuading the North Koreans to return to the nuclear talks, and that the North will work for "a new set of relationships with us and with our partners."

This week's talks — the first direct US-North Korean talks since Obama took office in January — come after a year of threatening rhetoric and rising tensions on the Korean peninsula. Earlier this year, Pyongyang expelled UN nuclear inspectors, restarted its atomic facilities, test-fired a long-range rocket and a series of ballistic missiles, quit six-party talks and conducted the nuclear test.

Pyongyang says it needs nuclear bombs to counter the strong US military presence in South Korea. The impoverished country has also used the atomic threat to win aid and other concessions from regional powers wary of the unpredictable neighbour.

But in recent months, the North has tried to reach out to the US and South Korea in an abrupt about-face that analysts and officials say shows the impoverished regime is feeling the pain of UN sanctions. Since August, the North has freed detained US and South Korean citizens and taken other conciliatory steps, including inviting Bosworth for direct talks.

Neither side has said which North Korean officials Bosworth will meet in Pyongyang during his three-day trip, though he is widely expected to sit down with Kang Sok Ju, the first vice foreign minister, who is considered the chief foreign policy strategist for reclusive leader Kim Jong Il.

North Korea has no choice but to rejoin the disarmament process since Washington has made it a condition of bilateral contact, said Koh Yu-hwan of Seoul's Dongguk University.

He said North Korea likely will push for a US commitment on a peace treaty, but State Department spokesman Kelly said the issue of a peace treaty is "not on our agenda" and the issue should be discussed at the six-party talks.

Analyst Paik Hak-soon of the private Sejong Institute think tank said it was too early to expect a major breakthrough.

"It'll be a preparatory step ahead of full-fledged negotiations. They'll disclose their positions and listen to each other, find and understand what their common interests are and what differences they have," he said.

Bosworth was accompanied to the North by Sung Kim, US special envoy for the North Korean nuclear talks, and by nuclear and Asia specialists from the Defence Department and the White House.

The delegation is to return to Seoul on Thursday before continuing onto Beijing, Tokyo and Moscow to brief other parties in the international talks before returning to Washington.

Bureau Report

Gates to Afghans: US 'in this thing to win'

2009-12-08T04:45:00.000-08:00

Associated Press Writer= KABUL (AP) â Defense Secretary Robert Gates arrived late Monday in Afghanistan with plans to assure officials and American troops there that the United States is committed to winning the war despite plans to begin pulling forces out in 2011.

"We are in this thing to win," Gates told reporters while traveling to Kabul, where he plans to meet privately with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and later with troops bearing the brunt of combat.

The secretary's trip to Afghanistan is the first by a Cabinet member since President Barack Obama's announcement last week that he will deploy 30,000 more troops with the intention of starting to bring them home in July 2011.

As Gates took his message abroad, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the overall military commander in Afghanistan, will try Tuesday to convince a skeptical Congress that more troops are needed to fight a growing enemy insurgency. More than 920 U.S. troops have died in the 8-year-old war.

McChrystal's appearance before the House Armed Services Committee starts the first of three days of congressional Afghanistan hearings that are expected to draw hard questions from both anti-war Democrats and conservative Republicans about Obama's stated intention to begin paring down the U.S. role in July 2011.

Gates and other administration officials have described the 2011 date as just the beginning, with the process likely take at least two or three years to complete.

Gates, in a mid-air briefing en route to Kabul, said he believes the U.S. mistakenly abandoned Afghanistan in 1989 as it fought the Soviets and understands Afghan concerns that they will be left alone against the Taliban.

Gates says he will try to assure Karzai and his advisers "that we are not going to repeat the situation in 1989" and that "we intend to be their partner for a long time to come."

He also says he will press Karzai and Afghanistan Defense Minister Gen. Abdul Rahim Wardak on efforts to recruit and train more Afghan soldiers and police officers. McChrystal has set the goal of building the Afghan security force to 400,000 by 2013. There are roughly 94,000 Afghan police officers and 97,000 soldiers today.

Gates' trip came as the Pentagon issued deployment orders for more than 16,000 troops to Afghanistan, the first major installment of the 30,000 reinforcements expected to be in place by next fall.

An infantry battalion of 1,500 Marines from Camp Lejeune will be among the first to arrive later this month, followed by another 6,200 Marines from the North Carolina base and 800 Marines from Camp Pendleton, Calif., deployed next spring.

A 3,400-soldier brigade combat team from Fort Drum, N.Y., will also deploy in early spring. Most of the troops will head toward southern Afghanistan, where anti-U.S. forces have a stronghold and fighting has been heaviest.

On Monday, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen bluntly told troops at Ft. Campbell, Ky. â including some bound for Afghanistan â that "we are not winning, which means we are losing and as we are losing, the message traffic out there to (insurgency) recruits keeps getting better and better and more keep coming."

The infusion will bring to 100,000 the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan, the largest expansion of the war since it began.

Obama's plan envisions a burst of soldiers and Marines sent in to tamp down violence, then hand off the mission to the Afghans.

Gates said the U.S. and Afghanistan are trying to address the problem of low recruitment and high attrition among Afghan forces by increasing pay and other incentives. Gates said the biggest challenge is that in many cases, Taliban fighters earn more money than Afghan police officers.

Gates also said the U.S. is prepared to work more closely with Pakistan as soon as the government there expresses a willingness to do so.

"The more they get attacked internally . . . the more open they may be from additional help from us. But we are prepared to expand that relationship at any pace they are prepared to accept," he said.

The drawdown of U.S. forces in Iraq is supposed to liberate billions of dollars of equipment and thousands of troops.

Gates said there is about $3 billion worth of equipment in Iraq, and that $2 billion of it will be transferred or given to the Iraqis by September 2010. In some cases, he said, it will be less expensive for the U.S. to buy new equipment for troops in Afghanistan than to try to move it from Iraq.

Doctors' massacre highlights medical crisis in Somalia

2009-12-08T04:43:00.000-08:00

By Daniel Howden, Africa Correspondent

Dr Maslah was still writing a message of congratulations to his best friend when news reached him of the bombing. The young surgeon was starting another gruelling shift at Galkayo hospital and was happy that a few hundred miles south in Mogadishu his friends at medical school were celebrating their graduation. A year earlier he had been the one collecting his degree as one of the first class of university graduates in Somalia since 1991. He was looking forward to getting some reinforcements.

The graduation was a welcome bright spot in a city consumed by internecine war and government ministers packed into the Shamo Hotel, along with families, lecturers and students.

But this year's class would not be so fortunate. The doctor's friend, with whom he'd studied at Benadir University for six years, was ripped apart by a massive blast along with half his class and three ministers.

A young man had sneaked into the celebration disguised in women's clothing and a veil. He made his way to the front and triggered the explosive vest he was wearing.

A witness describes what happened next. "Suddenly, the hall shook," he said. "Dozens of people were on the ground under a huge cloud of smoke. The ceremony hall became very dark, and seemed like a slaughterhouse, for the blood flowing on the ground. A young man rushed to pick up his older brother, who had graduated that day, but he was already dead. The young man cried and cried."

In a country seemingly inured to the atrocities of war, the slaughter of a class of young doctors has been greeted with unprecedented anger. Yesterday, hundreds of Somalis marched from the bomb site to Benadir University in the first ever public demonstration against the Islamist militia Al-Shabaab.

No one has claimed responsibility for the bombing, and Al-Shabaab has denied it.

For Dr Maslah there is more grief than anger. "I knew most of them ... I'm very sorry," he said, repeating the phrase four times. The lost class of 2009 could not be more sorely needed. Dr Maslah, based in Galkayo, north of the capital, is one of only a dozen surgeons in the entire country. His hospital has seen 34,000 patients in the past year. He himself performs an average of 40 operations a month.

Merely resolving to stay in the country takes uncommon courage. "They have a passion for their people," says Karin Fischer Liddle from Doctors Without Borders (MSF). "They're extremely brave to have taken the decision to stay in Somalia."

Dr Maslah thought of leaving the country but says his brother convinced him to stay. The young surgeon explains that he often feared for his life just getting to school. Some patients cannot be saved as there are no bloodbanks and people often travel for days just to reach a hospital. Recently the patients that arrive are often starving. The hospital is receiving more malnourished patients than ever before, according to MSF. Its feeding centre is packed with 1,300 people.

"I am not considering fleeing the country," Dr Maslah says despite his grief. "Sometimes I feel fear but I find reasons to stay. I'm in the place where I can be of most use."

Somalia: An escalating tragedy

34,000

The number of patients seen by Galkayo hospital in the past year.

1,300

The number of hungry people crammed into the hospital's feeding centre, many having arrived in a state of starvation

3.6 million

The number of Somalis in need of aid – nearly half the population

100,000

Approximate size of exodus of professionals from Somalia in the past year