<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>The Deal Magazine</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/" />
    
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2008-03-11:/newsweekly/34</id>
    <updated>2009-11-19T20:07:39Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.23-en</generator>

<link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheDealNewsweekly" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
    <title>Movers &amp; shakers: Nov. 20, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/pipeline/movers-shakers-baz-hiralal-112009.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-20T05:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-19T20:07:39Z</updated>
<summary>J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co. hired Jesper Koll to head its Japan equity research team.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealmakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Movers and Shakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Pipeline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/JesperKollMovers.png" class="mt-image-left" style="margin: 0pt 8px 8px 0pt; float: left;" width="70" height="90" /><b>J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co.</b> hired <b>Jesper Koll</b> (pictured) to head its Japan equity research team. Koll will step down as CEO of Tokyo's <b>TRJ Tantallon Research Japan</b>, a hedge fund he started in 2007. <br /></p><p>Koll was chief economist at J.P. Morgan between 1994 and 1998 and was also head of economic research at <b>Merrill Lynch &amp; Co.</b></p>

<hr>

<p><b>America's Growth Capital</b> hired <b>Andrew Kelley</b> as a partner in the firm's investment banking group, based in New York. He covers technology-enabled services, business services and software. Kelley has worked in investment banking at <b>UBS</b>, corporate development at <b>IBM Corp.</b> and equity research at <b>Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co.</b> For the past six years, he has focused on mergers and acquisitions for UBS, where most recently his focus was middle-market information technology and business services companies.</p>

<hr>

<p>Check The Deal Pipeline for updates on these Movers &amp; shakers:<br /></p><p>-- Investment bank <b>Needham &amp; Co. LLC </b>hired <b>Jeff Liu</b> as a managing director and head of the software investment banking group<b></b>.</p><b><b>-- </b>Broadpoint Capital Inc.</b> tapped <b>Fred Engel</b>, <b>Philip Orenstein</b>, <b>Peter Carril</b> and <b>Jeffrey Byrne</b>.<br /><b><br /><b>-- </b></b><b>Morgan Joseph &amp; Co. </b>appointed<b> Bruce Jackson</b> as a senior vice president in the firm's equity research department.<b><br /></b><br />
<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Look for these and more in <a href="http://www.pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005356092">the full column</a> (subscription required).<br /></font><br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Confectioners: Cadbury, Hershey, more</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealwatch/confectioners-mars-wrigley-cad.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2008:/newsweekly//34.17027</id>
<published>2009-11-19T21:14:00Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-19T21:14:17Z</updated>
<summary>On Monday, Nov. 9, Kraft Foods Inc. formally made a hostile bid for Cadbury plc. Cadbury's management reacted by advising its shareholders to reject the offer.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealwatch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="cadburyschweppes" label="Cadbury Schweppes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hershey" label="Hershey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ma" label="M&amp;A" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="mars" label="Mars" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nelsonpeltz" label="Nelson Peltz" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nestle" label="Nestle" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="wrigley" label="Wrigley" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<img alt="cadburyschweppes%2C2.gif" src="http://dealscape.thedealblogs.com/images/cadburyschweppes%2C2.gif" style="margin: 5px; float: left;" height="30" width="115" />On Monday, Nov. 9, Kraft Foods Inc. formally made a hostile bid for Cadbury plc. A Kraft/Cadbury merger
would create a confectionery and snacks giant with over $50 billion in
annual sales, uniting Kraft's Philadelphia cheese and Oreo cookies with
Cadbury's Dairy Milk chocolate and Trident gum.<br /><br /><b>2009<br /><br /></b>Nov. 19: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/barbarians_at_the_gateau.php">Barbarians at the gateau?</a>: Private equity's big-eater Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co. reportedly
wants a bite of British chocolate cake and is considering joining
Hershey Co. and Italy's Ferrero International SA in a bid
for Birmingham, England-based chocolate maker Cadbury plc. - <i>Matthew Wurtzel</i><br /><br />Nov. 18: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005355855"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005355855">Hershey, Ferrero confirm Cadbury interest</span></a>: <span class="georgia12">Wayne, Pa.-based Hershey and Alba, Italy-based
Ferrero said in separate statements they were evaluating their options
regarding Cadbury, with Ferrero adding that its deliberations were
preliminary. The Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday that the
companies were considering a joint bid, though their short statements
gave no indication whether that was the case. - <i>Laura Board</i><br /><br /></span><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005355285">Nov. 17: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005355285">Ferrero emerges as possible Cadbury suitor</a></span>: <span class="georgiabold11grey"></span><span class="georgiaitalics10"><i></i></span><span class="georgia12">Media outlets reported Tuesday that Italy's
Ferrero SpA is considering a rival bid for the U.K. confectioner, which
has rejected a $16.8 billion unsolicited offer from <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a> - </b><i>Laura Board </i><b><br /><br /></b></span>Nov. 12: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/_hedge_fund_manager_johttp://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/_hedge_fund_manager_john.phphn.php">Paulson bets more on Kraft-Cadbury marriage</a>: Hedge fund manager John Paulson has <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/f8f59560-cf11-11de-8a4b-00144feabdc0.html">upped his stake</a>
in Cadbury plc (NYSE:CBY) for the second time this week, giving him a
2.54% stake in the British confectioner and making him the
fourth-largest shareholder. According to a regulatory filing, Paulson <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/paulson_betting_kraft_will_up.php">doubled his stake</a> in Cadbury to 2.1% on Monday. - <i>Sara Behunek</i><br /><br />Nov. 11: The European commission <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/11/kraft-cadbury_ec_approval_is_n.php">set a Dec. 14 deadline</a> to review Kraft's £9.8
billion ($16.3 billion) offer for Cadbury. It could opt to extend its
first-phase probe or open an in-depth phase-two probe. - <i>Baz Hiralal<br /><br /></i>Nov. 10: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/paulson_betting_kraft_will_up.php">Paulson betting Kraft will up offer?</a>: Kraft Foods Inc. may be holding strong at its <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005351696">original bid</a>
for Cadbury plc&nbsp; (much to the chagrin of the latter), but
hedge fund manager John Paulson seems to think the snack food giant
will eventually up its offer. According to a regulatory filing, Paulson
doubled his stake in Cadbury to 2.1% on Monday, scooping up an
additional 14.8 million shares. - <i>Sara Behunek<br /><br />Nov. 9: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005351696"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005351696">Kraft launches hostile bid for Cadbury</span></a>: <span class="georgia12"><b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a></b> on Monday launched a hostile bid for <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a></b>, aggressively priced with no sweetener to a $16.3 billion proposal. The target swiftly rejected the offer as derisory. - Laura Board</span><br />&nbsp;<br />Nov. 2: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005348034"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005348034">Cadbury awaits Kraft's next move</span></a>: <span class="georgia12">With less than two weeks to go before the deadline for <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a></b> to formalize a $16 billion-plus unsolicited bid for <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a></b> or walk away, observers predict the U.S. company may slightly sweeten -- but won't sugarcoat -- its offer. - Laura Board<br /><br /></span>Oct. 20: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/10/cadbury_third_quarter_earnings.php">Cadbury third-quarter earnings preview:</a> J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE:JPM) suggested that Cadbury's sales would be lower than 
  the company's target <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/kamal-ahmed/6359852/Robust-Cadbury-needs-to-plan-its-next-move.html">of 4 to 6 pence in revenue growth</a>. Analysts forecast that for the full year
show Cadbury's turnover is likely to be about £5.9 billion ($9.6
billion), up from £5.4 billion in 2008, according to <a href="http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/markets/article.html?in_article_id=492073&amp;in_page_id=3&amp;position=moretopstories">This is Money.</a> - </i> <i>Maria Woehr<br /><br />Oct. 9: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/10/is_cadburys_carr_regretting_kr.php">Cadbury's Carr regretting tough talking Kraft?</a>: According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5972XZ20091008?pageNumber=1&amp;virtualBrandChannel=0">Reuters</a>, Carr is facing pressure to "soften his stance" now that Kraft has until Nov. 9 to come up
with a formal bid. With hostile takeovers <a href="http://newstribune.com/articles/2009/10/06/business/086bus02hostiletakeovers09.txt">on the verge</a> of making a comeback and more <a href="http://www.linexlegal.com/content.php?content_id=118527">expected this fall</a>, this kind of begs the question: How is one supposed to act when approached with a hostile takeover? </i>
<i>- Maria Woehr<br />&nbsp;<br />Oct. 2: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/10/cadbury_downplays_shareholder.php">Cadbury downplays shareholder suit</a>: Cadbury plc&nbsp; said Friday it considered a <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/innovationNews/idUSTRE5904YT20091001">complaint</a> against its board filed by American shareholder Steward International Enhanced Value Index Fund as "entirely without merit." - </i><i>Jonathan Braude<br /><br />Oct. 1: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005334883"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005334883">Hershey kisses Cadbury goodbye?</span></a>: <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a></b>'s chances of consuming British confectioner <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a></b> looked rosier Thursday as smaller rival Hershey Co. appeared unable to muster the financing for a competitive bid. - </i><i>Jonathan Braude<span class="georgia12"></span><br /><br />Sept. 30: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005334157"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005334157">Kraft Foods given Cadbury bid deadline</span></a>: <span class="georgia12">The U.K. Takeover Panel on Wednesday gave <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a></b> almost six weeks to produce a firm offer for confectionery maker <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a></b>
or retreat.</span><span class="georgia12"> - Laura Board<br /><br />Sept. 30: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/kraft_reorg_gets_publicity_wit.php">Kraft fires Vegemite salvo in publicity war</a>:&nbsp;</span><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125426900142051099.html">An article published The Wall Street Journal</a> Wednesday touts the
success of Kraft's near-complete reorganization, which the company
calls Organizing for Growth, and as a totem of the new structure
highlights the launch of a new Vegemite brand. - </i><i>Sara Behunek<br /><br />Sept. 29: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/arbitrageurs_bet_kraft_will_sn.php">Report: Arbs bet Kraft will snag Cadbury</a>: Arbitrage investors, who speculate on companies involved in ongoing
deals, are betting that Kraft Foods Inc. will eventually
snag U.K. confectioner Cadbury plc&nbsp; -- and will do so without
much more of a fight, despite Cadbury CEO Todd Stitzer's recent
statement that he does <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/cadbury_exchanges_krafty_lexis.php">not believe Kraft's proposal makes strategic or financial sense for Cadbury</a>. - </i><i>Sara Behunek<br /><br />Sept. 28: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/kraft_ceo_makes_case_with_pres.php">Kraft CEO makes headlines in the U.K.</a>: Kraft Foods Inc. CEO Irene Rosenfeld worked the U.K. Sunday
papers this past weekend, giving interviews to archrivals The Sunday
Telegraph and The Sunday Times, as the company waits to hear whether
the Takeover Panel will issue it with a deadline to retreat or make a
firm offer for confectioner Cadbury plc.  </i><i>- Laura Board<br /><br />Sept. 28: <span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005332764"><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005332764">Cadbury defends its CEO</a>: </span>Embarrassed British confectioner <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a></b>
was forced to defend its CEO, Todd Stitzer, on Friday, following days
of adverse commentary and a reported threat of regulatory scrutiny. It issued an official statement clarifying his position on a possible £9.84 billion ($15.7 billion) takeover by U.S. suitor <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a></b>, claiming his remarks had been misconstrued and denying his opposition had softened<span class="georgia12"></span>. - </i><i>Jonathan Braude<br /><br />Sept. 25: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/cadbury_exchanges_krafty_lexis.php">Cadbury clears things up, somewhat</a>: After all the hubbub and possible interest from the U.K.'s Takeover
Panel over what Cadbury plc (NYSE:CBY) chief executive Todd Stitzer may
or may not have said, the British confectioner <a href="http://www.cadbury.com/media/press/Pages/CadburyPlc-Clarification.aspx">issued a statement</a> hoping to clear all doubts about Cadbury's feeling about a takeover by Kraft Foods Inc. (NYSE:KFT).:<br /><br /></i><i>For
the avoidance of doubt, Mr. Stitzer does not believe that Kraft's
proposal makes strategic or financial sense for Cadbury and his
comments should not be interpreted in any other way. Cadbury's position
in relation to Kraft's proposal remains precisely as set out in the
letter to Kraft issued on 12 September. - </i><i>Baz Hiralal<br /><br />Sept. 25: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury_cby_kraft_foods_kft_ta.php">Cadbury's sweet talk 'worries regulator'</a>:In appearing to name an acceptable price by specifying multiples of
recent food industry transactions and later downplaying the comments as
merely indicative, Stitzer and Cadbury may have created the uncertainty
the regulator reportedly fears. And by making the comments at a private
investor meeting -- they were later disseminated by Bank of America
Merrill Lynch sales specialist Simon Archer -- Stitzer has breached
Takeover Panel restrictions on selective disclosure, the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5c216498-a951-11de-9b7f-00144feabdc0.html">Financial Times reported</a>. - </i><i>Laura Board<br /><br />The Deal's Kenneth Klee <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/how_would_kraft_cadbury_re-org.php">looks at how a Cadbury-Kraft reorganization</a> would look: <br /><br />Sept 24: Prior to <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005324669">launching</a>
a $16.7 billion bid for Cadbury plc (NYSE:CBY) in early September, one
of CEO Irene Rosenfeld's biggest initiatives at Kraft Foods Inc.
(NYSE:KFT) has been an ambitious restructuring of the company calls
Organizing for Growth, launched in 2007 and now mostly complete.
Meanwhile, in 2008 Cadbury CEO Todd Stitzer began a corporate
realignment Cadbury calls Vision Into Action.<br /><br />Rosenfeld and other top Kraft execs discussed their reorg at some length in a recent <a href="http://www.strategy-business.com/article/09307?pg=all">article </a>in
Strategy + Business, and it makes interesting reading as we try to get
a bead on how the two companies would integrate. OFG, as it's
(inevitably) known, has a strong decentralization flavor, a result,
Rosenfeld says, of the pendulum having swung too far toward central
control. <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/how_would_kraft_cadbury_re-org.php">Read more here</a>. <br /><br />Sept. 23: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/kraft_to_walk_away_from_desper.php">Could Kraft tell Cadbury to keep its candy?</a>: Cadbury's Todd Stitzer and chairman Richard Carr could be <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury_baking_a_better_offer.php">playing</a> good cop/bad cop with Kraft Inc. (NYSE:KFT). Remember <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury.php">that letter</a>
Carr sent to Kraft CEO Irene Rosenfeld last week basically saying the
valuation was too low and the company wants to be independent? Well,
Stitzer now seems to be pushing for that higher bid.<br /><br />He told <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125356996259229125.html">The Wall Street Journal</a> he recognizes the synergies between the businesses saying, "If a
higher bid does not materialize, I think our shareowners will
have to decide whether or not the value of our plan or the value of
whatever offer's on the table is appropriate." - </i><i>- Maria Woehr<br /><br />Sept. 23:</i><i> <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/09/stitzer_wants_15x_ebitda_kraft.php">Stitzer wants 15 times Ebitda from Kraft?</a>: Cadbury
chief executive Todd Stitzer could be warming
up to the idea of a merger with Kraft Foods Inc. After recently
admitting there was some strategic sense to a deal, Stitzer may have <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFinancialServicesAndRealEstateNews/idUSLN50502920090923">named his price</a>
at £12.2 billion ($19.9 billion). Bank of America Merrill Lynch sales
specialist Simon Archer said in a note seen by Reuters, "On price, Todd
seemed to admit that a 15x Ebitda multiple would be a fair price."
That's about 20% higher than Kraft's unsolicited cash-and-stock bid of
$16.7 billion. - </i><i>Baz Hiralal<br /><br />Sept. 22: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005330786"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005330786">Cadbury seeks deadline for Kraft bid</span></a>: Cadbury plc has turned to the Takeover Panel in an attempt to force
unwanted suitor Kraft Foods Inc. to either step up with a sweetened
offer or leave the confectionery group in peace to continue its
restructuring program. The Uxbridge, England, company has requested the regulator issue Kraft
with a "put up or shut up" deadline. It would force Kraft to proceed
with a firm offer or walk away and be barred from bidding for six
months under most circumstances. - </i><i>Laura Board<br /><br />Sept. 18: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealmakers/deal-diary/deal-diary.php">Candymaker Cadbury won't trust strangers</a>: Picking up a defense mandate from a sophisticated, multibillion-dollar bid target like British confectionery maker Cadbury plc
is a lot tougher than taking candy from children. Sweet-talking won't
do the trick, and you won't get your hands on the prize if you have a
mellow, soft center. Under attack, a company wants trusted advisers who
can mount a quick and ruthless defense. - </i><i>Jonathan Braude<br /><br />Sept. 17: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury.php">Will Cadbury get a Hershey/Buffett bid?</a>: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2009/09/16/hershey-trust-trotts-out-buffetts-buddy-for-cadbury-advice/">The Wall Street Journal</a> is reporting that the Hershey Trust Co., which holds voting
control of candy maker Hershey Co. (NYSE:HSY), has hired Warren
Buffett's favorite banker, former Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co. (NYSE:GS) banker Byron
Trott, and boutique banking firm Watch Hill Partners LLC to advise on a possible bid for Cadbury plc (NYSE:CBY). There were <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury_baking_a_better_offer.php">earlier reports</a> that Hershey had hired J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co. (NYSE:JPM) to explore options as well. - </i><i>Maria Woehr<br /><br />Sept. 16: <em></em><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005328435"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005328435">Cadbury: Future is sweet</span></a>:
Cadbury plc CEO Todd Stitzer on Wednesday tried to fend
off unwanted suitor Kraft Foods Inc. by painting a bright picture of
his company's growth prospects beyond the current restructuring. The
Uxbridge, England, maker of Dairy Milk chocolate and Trident gum is
midway through a three-year cost-cutting drive dubbed Vision into
Action, which Stitzer trumpeted. He said he is confident that by 2011
Cadbury will have achieved its goal of "good mid-teens" profit margins.
- </i><i>Laura Board<br /><br />Sept. 15: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/cadbury_baking_a_better_offer.php">Cadbury baking a better offer?</a>: Just in case the executives over at Kraft Foods Inc. (NYSE:KFT) didn't
quite understand that the $16.7 billion offer to Cadbury plc (NYSE:CBY)
was rejected the first time around, Cadbury chairman Richard Carr went
ahead and wrote an <a href="http://www.cadburyinvestors.com/cadbury_ir/press_releases/2009press/2009-09-12/">open letter</a>
to Kraft CEO Irene Rosenfeld spelling out how unattractive the offer is
for the confectioner. The letter, however, instead left many wondering
if Cadbury is putting fire on the stove to get a tastier offer from
Kraft, or even rivals the Hershey Co. (NYSE:HSY) or Nestle SA. </i> <i>- Maria Woehr<br /><br />Sept. 9: <span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005325511"><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005325511">Kraft pushes Cadbury union as banks seek funds</a>: </span><span class="georgia12">Bankers for <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a> began to arrange financing for its takeover of <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a> as the suitor's CEO said her company would not need to make asset sales to fund the bid. Bloomberg News reported that <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1950365">Citigroup Inc.</a> and <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2005701">Deutsche Bank AG</a>, which form part of a <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1877596">Kraft</a> advisory team led by <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1942328">Lazard</a>, are trying to secure debt financing to cover about half of the stock-and-cash offer for Cadbury. - Laura Board</span><br /><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005325511"><br /></span><span class="georgia12"></span>Sept. 8: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005324793"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005324793">Kraft CEO sweet-talks Cadbury bid</span></a>:  <span class="georgia12"><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a> on Tuesday maintained confidence in its unwelcome pursuit of <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a>, flicking aside like a few stray crumbs any concerns about financing or shareholder support. </span>In a conference call, Kraft chairman and CEO
Irene Rosenfeld insisted she is comfortable about financing the
transaction and securing the support of her own shareholders. - <span class="georgiabold11grey">Laura Board and Jonathan Braude</span><span class="georgia12">  <br /><br /></span>Sept. 8: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/sweet_fees_for_advisors_in_pos.php">Tasty fees for bankers in Kraft, Cadbury</a>: According to <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/banksandfinance/6152160/Bankers-the-big-winners-in-Krafts-tilt-for-Cadbury.html">The Telegraph</a>, <a href="http://phx.corporate-ir.net/External.File?item=UGFyZW50SUQ9MTQ1ODZ8Q2hpbGRJRD0tMXxUeXBlPTM=&amp;t=1">the advisers</a><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601205&amp;sid=aP4b_.BTAJyk">$21 billion</a>. </i><i>- Maria Woehr<br /><br />Sept. 8: With Cadbury's board rejecting Kraft Foods Inc.'s £10.2 billion ($16.7 billion)
stock-and-cash offer for Cadbury plc as "fundamentally inadequate,"
competitors are busy studying whether throwing their hats into the ring
makes sense. But for their part, investors are betting on sweetened
offer as Cadbury's shares shot past the 745 pence mark, to close 38%
higher at 783 pence, and well above the 31% premium to Friday's closing
price Kraft first offered.<br /><br />The
Deal's George White parses words from other potential Cadbury suitors,
and speculates on possible motives to jump into the bidding war -- or
avoid it altogether:<br /><br /> advisers working
on a possible deal between Kraft Foods Inc. and Cadbury plc could get 0.7% to 1.25% of the total deal value. If Cadbury
had accepted the £10.2 billion ( $16.7 billion) bid from Kraft, then
commissions could have been over £250 million. But it didn't. So, if
the valuation increases, fees will be higher. According to analysts
Bloomberg interviewed, a deal to take over Cadbury could be as high as
 </i><ul><li><i>Nestlé's CEO Paul Bulcke said Monday his company had ruled out
major acquisitions in 2009 and 2010, though he declined to comment on
Cadbury specifically. </i></li><li><i>Hershey is smaller than Cadbury, and
with 90% of its sales in the U.S. it would not derive sufficient
synergies from acquiring a global brand.</i></li><li><i><span class="georgia12">Mars is busy digesting </span><span class="georgia12">Wm. Wrigley Junior Co. after buying it for $23 billion in April 2008. </span></i></li></ul><i>Sept. 7: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005324669"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005324669">Kraft bids $16.7B for Cadbury</span></a>: <span class="georgia12">U.S. food giant <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1907593">Kraft Foods Inc.</a>
shocked the London market out of its late-summer torpor Monday, Sept.
7, using the cover of a U.S. public holiday to announce its £10.2
billion ($16.7 billion) stock-and-cash pursuit of
chocolate-to-chewing-gum maker <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1988045">Cadbury plc</a>, one of Britain's best-loved brands.</span> <span class="georgiabold11grey">- Jonathan Braude and Laura Board</span><br /><br />April 20: Fujitsu, De la Rue, Cadbury and Thames are <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/deals/auction/View.dl?id=42438">collectively selling their combined 80% stake in Cadbury</a>.
Royal Mail, which holds the remaining 20% of Cadbury, has not joined
the collective that plans to sell. But any sole buyer of more than
29.9% would have to bid for its stake as well. The Financial Times
reports that the deal is reported to have been
valued at roughly £250 million ($363.475 million) to £350 million
($508.865 million). <br /><br />Jan. 27: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/01/hershey.php">Hershey uses ads to fight Mars-Wrigley, posts sweet quarter</a>: Hershey Co. made a<a href="http://www.thehersheycompany.com/news/release.asp?releaseID=1248605"> sweet profit</a> this quarter by posting higher-than-expected results amid more competition from the combined <a href="http://investor.wrigley.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=92701&amp;p=irol-irhome">Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co. and Mars Inc.</a>, a recession and a rise in cocoa costs. - </i><i>Maria Woehr<br /><br /><b>2008</b><br /><br />And what of that blockbuster Mars-Wrigley deal? David Marcus <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/exit-papers.php">serves up</a> an analysis. <br /><br />Meanwhile, Dec. 16: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1229013204519">Cadbury to sell Australian unit</a>:
British confectionery group Cadbury plc put its last remaining drinks
business on the block, announcing plans to sell its Australian
Beverages unit after establishing it as a standalone operation. -- </i><i>Jonathan Braude Dec. 24: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1229013213109">Cadbury sells the business</a> to Japanese beer group Asahi Breweries Ltd. for £550 million ($811 million). March 12: Japan's largest beer maker, which <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/deals/auction/View.dl?id=41433">will pay</a>  about A$1.185 billion ($769.5 million) for the unit.<br /><br />So who might buy it? The Deal's Kenneth Klee <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2008/12/who_will_buy_cadburys_australi.php">highlighted some ideas</a>.&nbsp;  </i><i><span class="georgia12"></span><br /><span class="georgia12"><p></p>  </span></i>]]>
        <![CDATA[Meanwhile, is Cadbury itself on Kraft Foods Inc.'s shopping list?
Speculation has abounded for months, and Citigroup Inc. in late
September downgraded the confectioner on the possibility it could <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/09/is_cadbury_on_krafts_menu.php">fall victim to a takeover</a>. <br /><br />Hershey Co. in late September was <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/09/nestle_may_swallow_part_of_her.php">reportedly working on a deal</a>
to sell a 25% stake in itself to Nestle SA, which would give Nestle an
option to buy the remainder within two years. According to a Daily
Telegraph report Sept. 23, Hershey has also been working with J.P.
Morgan since June as it explores strategic options. A deal would be the
latest among confectioners and would seem to signal a shift in
strategy, given earlier statements.<br /><br />After Mars Inc. unveiled April 28 a  <a href="http://investor.wrigley.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=92701&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1135540&amp;highlight=">$23 billion takeover</a>
of Chicago-based Wm. Wrigley Jr. Co., buzz abounded Cadbury, once
free from its U.S. drinks business, might look for a deal with Hershey
and that more M&amp;A among confectioners might follow. Cadbury's CEO
Todd Stitzer said on a conference call June 19 that the company didn't
think it needed to do a deal, according to a Reuters <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssFoodProcessing/idUSL1935039420080619">report</a>, while it was also looking like Hershey might <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2008/06/nestle_hershey_on_food_deals_t.php">not bite</a> any time soon and that a joint venture was another possibility. <br /><br />LeRoy Zimmerman, the chairman of Hershey's largest shareholder the Hershey Trust Co., maintained the company was <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2008/06/nestle_hershey_on_food_deals_t.php">not
for sale</a> in an op-ed piece in the Harrisburg, Pa., Patriot-News June
15. He also pointed to other "meaningful options," Klee noted, likely an international joint venture. (At the time, the Kraft-Cadbury speculation was also floating around. See <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealwatch/kraft-foods.php">Dealwatch: Kraft Foods</a> for more.)<br /><p>
<br />
Meanwhile, Klee noted, Nestle <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2008/06/nestle_hershey_on_food_deals_t.php">wasn't looking for a megadeal</a>: <br /></p><blockquote>
Nestle SA chairman Peter Brabeck says he doesn't expect to make any
acquisitions larger than $200 million to $300 million in the near term,
according to Dow Jones Newswires. That dampens speculation ... that the
$39 billion the company will get by <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1206369135211">selling Alcon</a>, its contact lens
unit, to Novartis AG in a two-stage deal could provide the wherewithal
for a larger deal.<br /></blockquote><p><b>ONE BIG BITE </b><br /></p><p>The Mars-Wrigley news came hours after reports surfaced in the Wall Street Journal
and the New York Times a deal was imminent. The gum maker has been controlled by they
Wrigley family since its founding in 1891. It seemed the deal could <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1207771447598">revive merger speculation</a> around Cadbury and Hershey, The Deal's Laura Board noted April 28. <br /></p><p>Cadbury shareholders approved the de-merger April 11, just days after
news surfaced that Robert Voweler, the CEO of the Hershey Trust, planned to retire in April 2009, as
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSL1078738920080413">Reuters pointed out April 13</a>.
Further, Reuters said, a tie-up between the confectioners makes sense,
given Cadbury's slight presence in the U.S. chocolate market and
Hershey's interest in expanding overseas. <br /></p><p><b>SPLITTING UP</b><br /></p><p>Cadbury on March 19 <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1205761089322">offered</a> details on the demerger of its U.S. drinks business and confectioner operations, little more than a week after <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1205222681927&amp;pagename=TheDeal%2FTDDArticle%2FTDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">moving</a>
to quash fears that a credit-related delay could push back the drinks
group's May 7 NYSE debut. Shareholders were to receive 64 shares in the
new confectioner business,
Cadbury plc, and 12 in Dr Pepper Snapple Group Inc. for every 100
shares they own in Cadbury Schweppes. Based on Cadbury's close
March 18, the offer values Dr Pepper at nearly $4 billion and Cadbury
plc at just under £10 billion ($19.8 billion). Cadbury listed in London
May 2. Dr
Pepper followed suit five days later.</p><p>Cadbury <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1205222681927&amp;pagename=TheDeal%2FTDDArticle%2FTDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">said</a>
March 11 the spinoff of was on track to close by May 7, hoping to curb
concern of a credit-related delay. The update came nearly a month after
Cadbury <a href="http://www.cadburyschweppes.com/EN/MediaCentre/PressReleases/CADBURY_SCHWEPPES_REPORTS_STRONG_PERFORMANCE_IN_2007.htm">served up</a> a mixed bag of news Feb. 19, revealing it would not
return cash to shareholders after the demerger of its drinks business;
disappointing 2007 profits; and the names of the chairmen-to-be for the
two companies to remain after the demerger.</p><p>Citing turbulent debt market conditions, Cadbury <a href="http://www.cadburyschweppes.com/EN/MediaCentre/PressReleases/CADBURY_SCHWEPPES_REPORTS_STRONG_PERFORMANCE_IN_2007.htm">said</a>
in the statement it would not return cash to shareholders upon the
demerger in the interest of preserving investment-grade ratings. The
company also said it would bump its 2007 dividend 11% to 15.5 pence.
Meanwhile, the company unveiled its North American beverages unit had a
sharp drop in profit margins for 2007, which won't recover until 2009,
Reuters <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNews/idUSL1970394520080219">noted</a>. Cadbury said its full-year pretax profit <a href="http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/consumer_goods/article3395155.ece">fell</a> 2% to £915 million ($1.8 billion). And the confectioner and beverage group  also <a href="http://www.cadburyschweppes.com/EN/MediaCentre/PressReleases/Cadbury_Schweppes_announces_appointment_of_new_Chairmen.htm">announced</a>
that deputy chairman Roger Carr would take over as chairman of Cadbury
plc, while Wayne Sanders, the former president and CEO of
Kimberly-Clark, would take the reins as chairman of <span class="brandName">Dr Pepper</span> Snapple Group Inc., following the demerger of the North American beverages unit.</p>
<p>The update came little more than two months after the company
disclosed activist investor Nelson Peltz had lifted his stake in
Cadbury Schweppes from 3.4% to 4.5%. Peltz's Trian Partners formed a
special-purpose vehicle with Qatar Investment Authority to do so, and
the two could seek to further increase the holding, according to a <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1028f780-a67f-11dc-b1f5-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1">Financial Times report</a>
citing sources familiar with the matter. The move looked as if it could
also usher in further change for the confection and drinks company,
which earlier in 2007 agreed to spin off its U.S. drinks business,
likely after some pressure from Peltz. (See more on the drinks sale
spinoff decision <a href="http://www.techconfidential.com/mt-static/html/editor-content.html?cs=utf-8#below">below</a>.)</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the Cadbury news came  a month after Hershey's controlling shareholder <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1193281683391&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1193281683391&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1">orchestrated a dramatic board overhaul</a>
that inspired the resignation of eight Hershey board members and left
only two in place. The sweeping changes led speculation a deal could
follow for Hershey and rumored prospective merger partner Cadbury on
one extreme, and that it was a move aimed at making the nation's top
candy maker a stronger standalone entity, on the other. </p>
<p>Hershey Trust, which is a charitable trust that funds the Milton Hershey
Academy and controls 78% of voting power in the company through a 31%
equity stake, publicly took issue with the company's performance Oct.
10, 2007. The news came nearly two weeks after Hershey announced the pending
departure of its chairman and CEO Richard Lenny and about a week ahead
of the company announcing a 66% decline in third-quarter profit, citing
restructuring charges and higher dairy costs. The company also faces
increasing competition from Mars Inc. and other rivals. The trust said
Oct. 10 it was <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119195852765653682.html" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119195852765653682.html">not satisfied with the Hershey's results</a> and that it was "actively engaged" in a process to resolve the company's challenges and to implement "new growth strategies." </p>
<p>Hershey Trust asked six directors to resign, and two others followed
suit on their own accord, the company said Nov. 11. In their place, the
trust unveiled planed to install: </p>
<ul><li>LeRoy S. Zimmerman, the chairman of the trust's board; 
  </li><li>Kenneth L. Wolfe, a former Hershey chairman and CEO; 
  </li><li>Charles A. Davis, a Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co. veteran; 
  </li><li>Edward J. Kelly III, a Carlyle Group managing director; 
  </li><li>Former Kellogg Co. chairman and chief executive Arnold G. Langbo; 
  </li><li>James E. Nevels, a Hershey Trust board member; 
  </li><li>Thomas J. Ridge, a former secretary of Homeland Security and former Pennsylvania governor; 
  </li><li>Charles B. Strauss, the former chairman and CEO of Unilever North America. </li></ul>
<p>Those who would remain on the board include David J. West, the
company's COO who was tapped to succeed Lenny and Robert F. Cavanaugh, a Hershey Trust board
member. Two additional new board members would be elected by
shareholders, the company said. </p>
<p>Hershey announced Lenny's resignation Oct. 1. A Wall Street Journal
report at the time said he had differences with the trust and was
frustrated with a lack of autonomy in running the business. The Journal
then said the trust had, without Lenny, met with U.K.-based
confectioner and drinkmaker Cadbury, which was spinning off its U.S.
drinks business, about a tie-up. But the trust has long maintained <a title="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSN0222346420070402" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSN0222346420070402">it isn't interested in relinquishing voting control of the company</a>. </p>
<p><a title="http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=mergersNews&amp;storyID=2007-11-12T094946Z_01_L12543690_RTRIDST_0_CADBURY-HERSHEY.XML" href="http://investing.reuters.co.uk/news/articleinvesting.aspx?type=mergersNews&amp;storyID=2007-11-12T094946Z_01_L12543690_RTRIDST_0_CADBURY-HERSHEY.XML">According to Reuters</a>,
Cadbury had no comment Nov. 12 on Hershey's board overhaul. But opinion
on whether the board shakeup will lead to a deal between the two sweets
makers is mixed. "Analysts said a Cadbury-Hershey combination would
make strategic sense, but questioned how a deal could be made to work
as the Trust would still want to retain control," Reuters said.
CNNMoney.com <a title="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-20919356.htm" href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/newstex/AFX-0013-20919356.htm">quoted Goldman Sachs</a>:
"We believe the shake-up reinforces the trust's strategy (at least
near-term) to pursue a route of fundamental improvement via internal
methods." </p>
<p><b>CADBURY'S CALLING </b></p>
<p><a href="http://www.techconfidential.com/mt-static/html/editor-content.html?cs=utf-8" name="below"></a>Meanwhile,
in an effort to distill Cadbury -- at the time the world's largest confection and
drinks maker -- down to a more profitable essence, the company in March
launched an auction for its Americas Beverages drinks business. Market
turmoil made a spinoff or an IPO more likely, and the company confirmed
Oct. 10 it would list the business on the New York Stock Exchange
rather than sell it to private equity investors. </p>
<p>Confirming a Financial Times report Sept. 14, a source told Board <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1188299441842&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;r=InFs&amp;p=M4YD5AR2" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1188299441842&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;r=InFs&amp;p=M4YD5AR2">the
company rebuffed an offer worth £6.4 billion to £6.9 billion ($12.8
billion to $13.8 billion) from one of the two PE groups bidding for the
unit</a>. Blackstone Group LP, Lion Capital and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts
&amp; Co.'s offer included the condition that Cadbury would be
responsible for a large piece of the financing. Both sides are,
however, still trying to come to terms. The other bid team consists of
Bain Capital LLC, Thomas H. Lee Partners LP and TPG. Both groups made
unsuccessful bids earlier in the summer. </p>
<p>The unit went on the block in March 2007, likely at the urging of
activist investor Nelson Peltz. But concern over the debt markets
forced the food and beverage group to postpone its deadline for final
bids for the unit, scheduled for the last week of July, to give bidders
more time to line up financing against a "more stable debt financing
market," <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1185385711818&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1185385711818&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1">the company said July 27</a>.
Days later, Cadbury said it would consider a demerger of the business
rather than abandon the auction entirely. Estimates that the unit could
command an £8 billion price tag had been curbed to £7 billion or less.
Still, the stall didn't short dealmaking for Cadbury's drinks
business; in fact, the company didn't even wait for the live Aug. 9
auction of bankrupt <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1186574723555" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1186574723555">Le-Nature's Inc. operations and warehouses in Latrobe, Pa., offering $19 million,</a> or $100,000 above the stalking-horse offer a day in advance. </p>
<p><b>CUTTING CALORIES </b></p>
<p>Regarding Cadbury's then-auction, Coca-Cola Co. had reportedly approached
several private equity teams in the bidding about buying the unit's
Snapple and Mott's brands to bolster its tea-based drinks business,
according to a Reuters interview with Coke CEO E. Neville Isdell. A
deal for the tea and juice units would have helped bolster Coke's position
against rival PepsiCo Inc., <a title="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118357239051857389.html?mod=home_whats_news_us" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB118357239051857389.html?mod=home_whats_news_us">the Wall Street Journal said July 5, 2007</a>, whose Lipton tea ranked No. 1 in the U.S. ready-to-drink category in
2006. Meanwhile, Indian conglomerate Tata Group plc was said to be
interested in the Snapple brand and was in talks with Blackstone and
Lion Capital about teaming with them on a deal, the Economic Times said
in late June. </p>
<p>While it didn't name a buyer, the company <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1181188636116&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1181188636116&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1">outlined a strategy</a>
on June 19, 2007 to look toward bolt-on acquisitions as opposed to a major
deal as some onlookers had suspected. Cadbury said June 5 it had
divested three small businesses it deemed noncore, part of a plan to
trim costs on the confection front and hone the London-based company's
focus once the drinks business is sold, <a title="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL0131888320070601" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL0131888320070601">according to a Reuters report</a>.
Plans to move out of Cadbury's expensive London digs, factory closures
and reductions in its "global sweets work force" were measures aimed at
that end, Reuters said. On the acquisitive front, <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1181188613188" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1181188613188">Cadbury said June 8 it had acquired 93.32% of Romania's No. 2 confectioner</a> Kandia-Excelent SA from Kandia NV, a day after it unveiled plans to buy Turkish gum business <a title="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSL0712290220070607" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSL0712290220070607">Intergum from the Amram family for $450 million</a>, further bolstering its gum division. And in its third small overseas deal in two weeks, Cadbury <a title="http://www.cadburyschweppes.com/EN/MediaCentre/PressReleases/CADBURY_SCHWEPPES_MAKES_RECOMMENDED_TENDER_OFFER_FOR_JAPANESE_FUNCTIONAL_CANDY_COMPANY.htm" href="http://www.cadburyschweppes.com/EN/MediaCentre/PressReleases/CADBURY_SCHWEPPES_MAKES_RECOMMENDED_TENDER_OFFER_FOR_JAPANESE_FUNCTIONAL_CANDY_COMPANY.htm">said</a> June 18 it would launch a friendly takeover of Japan's Sansei Foods. </p>


<p>But back to the drinks. Two days after it was revealed <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1173311677908&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1173311677908&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">Peltz had taken nearly a 3% stake in the confection and drinks maker</a>, Cadbury <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1173922367928&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1173922367928&amp;pagename=hpa&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;p=M4YD5AR1">said it would consider spinning off its North American&nbsp;drinks unit</a>. According to reports from London's Daily Telegraph and Reuters May 18, <a title="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSL1810078520070518" href="http://www.reuters.com/article/consumerproducts-SP/idUSL1810078520070518">the company had received about a dozen offers</a>. </p>
<p><b>THE BRANDS</b> </p>
<p>A seasoned food company dealmaker, Peltz's ties run deep with some
of Cadbury's brands. In 2000, as then-chief executive of Triarc Cos.,
he <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1003865140443" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1003865140443">sold Snapple Beverage Group to the company</a>
for $1.5 billion. Peltz's stake in the world's largest confectionary
maker was revealed to be worth nearly $714 million. The company's brands included
everything from Cadbury Creme Eggs and Sour Patch Kids candy on the
confection side, to Hawaiian Punch and 7-Up on the drinks side. After
Peltz's stake was revealed, Cadbury shares traded nearly $5 above where
they began the week. </p>
<p>The London-based company long seemed due for a sugar jolt, having at the time weathered recent difficulties including a salmonella scare related to its chocolate in the
U.K. and accounting errors at a subsidiary in Nigeria. And as Reuters <a title="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusiness.aspx?type=consumerProducts&amp;storyid=nL19351079&amp;from=business" href="http://today.reuters.com/news/articlebusiness.aspx?type=consumerProducts&amp;storyid=nL19351079&amp;from=business">pointed out</a>, marketing around an arsenal of new products and high commodity costs for the company could be a tremendous drain<i>.</i> </p>

<p>A snapshot of some Cadbury dealmaking ahead of the drinks auction: </p>
<ul><li>Cadbury had widely been rumored a <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1171469685388" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1171469685388">prospective acquirer</a> for bankrupt juicemaker Le-Nature's bottling plant. 
  </li><li>In April 2006, Cadbury <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1145579539640" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1145579539640">said it would acquire</a> Carlyle Group's controlling stake in Dr Pepper/Seven Up Bottling Group for $353 million. 
  </li><li>In November 2005, Cadbury <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1132015894352" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1132015894352">said it would sell its European soft drinks division</a> to Lion Capital and Blackstone for $2.2 billion.
        <ul><li>The
next month, Cadbury said it would sell its Holland House cooking wines
to Mizkan Americas Inc. for $37 million and Grandma's Molasses to
B&amp;G Foods Inc. for $30 million. Both were cash deals. </li></ul>
  </li><li>And back in 2000, as then-CEO of Triarc, Peltz <a title="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1003865140443" href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1003865140443">sold</a> Snapple Beverage Group to Cadbury Schweppes for $1.5 billion after expanding Triarc largely through beverage acquisitions. </li></ul>
<p>Peltz is a longtime vocal investor in food companies and he has of
late lobbied for change at Wendy's International Inc. and H.J. Heinz
Co. For more on his Heinz involvement, see a related <a title="http://dealscape.thedealblogs.com/2006/08/dealwatch_heinz.php#more" href="http://dealscape.thedealblogs.com/2006/08/dealwatch_heinz.php#more">Dealwatch</a>.<i>&nbsp;</i> </p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>AOL</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealwatch/it-looks-like-time-warner.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2008:/newsweekly//34.18696</id>
<published>2009-11-19T20:00:00Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-19T20:00:41Z</updated>
<summary>It's official. Time Warner Inc. will finally spin off AOL LLC on Dec. 9, 2009. Since the landmark merger that brought Time Warner and AOL together in 2000, it's been a bumpy ride. </summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealwatch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="aol" label="AOL" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="carlicahn" label="Carl Icahn" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="dickparsons" label="Dick Parsons" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="google" label="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jeffbewkes" label="Jeff Bewkes" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="microsoft" label="Microsoft" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="timewarner" label="Time Warner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="yahoo" label="Yahoo!" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<img alt="aol.gif" src="http://dealscape.thedealblogs.com/images/aol.gif" style="margin: 5px; float: left;" height="100" width="120" />It's official. Time Warner Inc. will finally spin off AOL LLC on Dec. 9, 2009.<br /><br />From the <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/blogs/video/decade-of-the-deal/2000-video-aol-time-warner-mar.php">landmark merger</a> that brought Time Warner and AOL together (see video) in 2000, the kick-off to The Deal's "<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/deals-that-defined-an-era.php">Deals that defined an era</a>" cover story in March, it's been a bumpy ride. Read on.<br /><br /><b>2009</b><br /><br />Nov. 19: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/aol_to_employees_please_go_awa.php">AOL to employees: Please go away</a>: In a <a href="http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1468516/000119312509238010/d8k.htm">filing Thursday</a>
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, AOL said it has informed
its workforce that it wants to cut a third, or about 2,500, of
employees. The company is asking employees to step up to the chopping
block on their own (and presumably receive a buyout package), saying
the cuts will be "conducted on a voluntary and involuntary basis." - <i>- Olaf de Senerpont Domis<br /><br /></i>Nov. 17:<i> </i><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/cohttp://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/11/convergence_diary_aol_spin.phpnvergence_diary_aol_spin.php">Convergence diary: AOL spin</a>: With the Dec. 9 spin off of AOL Inc., Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX) will
officially cast a vote against the marriage of content production and
content distribution. - <i>Chris Nolter</i> <br /><i><br /></i>Nov. 10:<i> </i>AOL is laying off 100 of its 6,000 workers Tuesday, according to tech blogs <a href="http://valleywag.gawker.com/5400813/aol-layoffs-tomorrow-to-kick-off-depressing-holiday-season">Valleywag</a> and <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20091110/aol-small-layoff-today-a-voluntary-buyout-and-then-the-big-one/">BoomTown</a>. <br /><i><br /></i>Sept. 8: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/09/peanut_butter_manifesto_writer.php"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_29860">'Peanut butter manifesto' writer joins AOL</span></a>: <span class="georgia12">To head up <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1966654">AOL LLC</a>'s Internet and mobile communications,  CEO <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2002249">Tim Armstrong</a> <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/090908/p3#a090908p3">is tapping </a>Brad Garlinghouse, previously a <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1956476">Yahoo! Inc.</a> (<a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1868099">NASDAQ</a>:YHOO) executive best known for authoring a frank critique of his former employer that got leaked to the media.</span>&nbsp; <span class="georgia12">- <i>Mary Kathleen Flynn</i></span><br /><br />Aug. 28: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/08/aol_takes_tw_exec_on_road_to_i.php">New AOL CFO has spinoff, deal experience</a>: Mergers and acquisitions, financial planning and internal audit are some of the things Arthur Minson will be handling as <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2009/08/aol-names-arthur-minson-chief-financial-officer">the new</a>
EVP and chief financial officer of AOL LLC. What's more important to
AOL is Minson's past experience with AOL -- he held a corporate
development/finance role -- and the hand he had in Time Warner Cable
Inc.'s transition to a public company. At TW Cable, he was EVP and
deputy CFO. - <i>Baz Hiralal</i><br /><br />July 23: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2009/07/buffett_stewart_others_to_star.php">Buffett, Stewart to star in AOL cartoons</a>: What do dealmaker Warren Buffett, lifestyle media magnate Martha
Stewart, supermodel Gisele Bündchen and late astronomer Carl Sagan have
in common? Aside from being the leaders of their respective fields, the
four will be featured in their own online cartoons produced by Time
Warner Inc.'s (NYSE:TWX) AOL and A Squared Entertainment. <i>- Gerald Magpily</i><br /><br />June 11: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/06/aol_goes_local_with_dual_acqui.php">AOL goes local with dual acquisitions</a>: AOL LLC chief executive Tim Armstrong isn't letting his
company's spin off from parent Time Warner Inc. (NYSE:TWX) distract him
from doing deals. <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2009/06/aol-acquires-two-local-services-patch-and-going">AOL</a> on Thursday acquired Patch Media Corp and Going Inc. - <i>Suzanne Stevens</i><br /><br />June 4: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/06/news_corps_miller_poaching_aol.php">News Corp.'s Miller poaching AOL talent</a>: News Corp.'s (NYSE:NWS) chief digital officer Jonathan Miller continues
to stack the MySpace executive team with top talent. The latest hire,
according to <a href="http://www.paidcontent.org/entry/419-industry-moves-round-up-myspace-music-yahoo-comcast-sportsnet-chicago-a/">paidContent.org</a>,
is Sam Wick as senior vice president of strategy. Wick
previously was VP of strategy and corporate development for AOL LLC's
display advertising unit Platform A. You may remember that Miller was <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/17/AR2006111701847.html">famously fired</a> as AOL CEO in November 2006. <i>- Suzanne Stevens &nbsp;</i> <br /><br />May 27: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/05/time_warner_board_may_decide_a.php">Time Warner board may decide AOL's fate</a>: Time Warner.'s board will meet May 28, and there's
speculation it will finalize plans to spin off AOL. Time Warner has
hinted the <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/04/time_warner_aol_spinoffsale_cl.php">separation is coming</a> -- but has offered few details on when or how it will be accomplished. TechCrunch, citing sources close to AOL, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/05/27/time-warner-to-decide-on-aol-spinoff-at-thursday-board-meeting-its-a-done-deal/">is reporting</a> those details will be hammered out at the board meeting. - <i>Suzanne Stevens</i> - <br /> ]]>
        <![CDATA[April 30, 2009: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/04/aols_armstrong_lures_former_go.php">AOL's Armstrong lures former Google colleague</a>: Time Warner's AOL unit has lured another executive away from Google. AOL <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2009/04/jeff-levick-named-head-aol-global-advertising-and-strategy">announced Thursday</a>
it has hired Jeff Levick as president of global advertising and
strategy. <br /><br />There's
been much speculation about AOL's future. The unit has not performed
well for parent Time Warner. First-quarter ad revenue was off 18%, and
AOL announced a 10% workforce reduction in January. The option most
commonly discussed is a spinout of AOL, which some industry analyst
speculated might be fueling the recent management changes. - <i>Suzanne
Stevens</i><br /><br />April 17: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/04/time_warner_aol_spinoffsale_cl.php">Time Warner closer to AOL spinoff or sale</a>: Proponents of an AOL sale or spinoff got another sign that Time
Warner may do just that with the beleaguered Internet
unit. Clearing the way for such an event, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/time-warner-announces-successful-completion/story.aspx?guid=%7B3A6B7279-5A1A-439D-9130-F37DDF98EEE6%7D&amp;dist=msr_7">bondholders approved</a>
an amendment for outstanding debt of $12.3 billion. Each bondholder who
gave consent will receive $5 for each $1,000 principal amount of debt. -<i> Baz Hiralal</i><br /><br />March 13:<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/03/aol_hires_googles_armstrong_as.php">AOL hires Google's Armstrong as CEO</a> Time Warner shook the head of its AOL unit,
replacing chairman and CEO Randy Falco and president and COO Ron Grant
with <a href="http://corp.aol.com/press-releases/2009/03/tim-armstrong-named-chairman-and-ceo-aol">nine-year Google vet Tim Armstrong</a>. - <i>Baz Hiralal</i><br /><br />Feb. 23: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/02/aol_builds_on_its_social-media.php">AOL builds on its social media acquisitions</a>: Time Warner's AOL unit is playing catch-up in social media, using
acquisitions to chase Facebook Inc. and News Corp.'s MySpace. According
to <a href="http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090223/aol-socializes-even-more-with-new-lifestream/">reports </a>on Cnet and Boomtown, it's making progress. - <i>Kenneth Klee</i><br /><br />Feb. 4: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/02/google_to_tw_spin_off_aol_buy.php">Google to TW: Spin off AOL? Buy our stake? Do something!</a>: Time Warner, which reported a $16 billion quarterly <a href="http://www.thestreet.com/story/10461811/1/time-warner-posts-16-billion-loss-update.html?cm_ven=GOOGLEN">loss</a>, has to be frustrated with Internet media company AOL, which reported a 23% <a href="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/020409-aols-q4-revenue-plummets-drags.html">drop</a> in quarterly revenue and also announced <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/01/aol_cuts_jobs_will_it_cut_bebo.php">layoffs</a>. - <i>Baz Hiralal</i><br /><br />Jan. 28: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2009/01/aol_cuts_jobs_will_it_cut_bebo.php">AOL cuts jobs, will it cut Bebo?</a>: It was reported that Time Warner's <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/behind-the-money/blog/startup-depression/aol-cuts-700-employees-10-of-s.php">AOL is cutting 10%</a>
of its ranks, or about 700 people. AOL CEO Randy Falco provided "some
perspective" on that and other cost cutting decisions, while the
company tries to grow its publishing, advertising and social media
businesses. However, one in-depth report, citing several sources with
intimate knowledge, said AOL was thinking about <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/27/AR2009012701514.html">selling social networking site Bebo</a> -- which it acquired last year for $850 million -- for about $200 million as it hasn't met expectations. - <i>Baz Hiralal</i><br /><br />Nov. 20, 2008: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/technology/aol/with-more-pressing-responsibil.php">Yahoo!, AOL continue their two-step</a>: <a href="http://www.raydiance-inc.com/about-us/the-raydiance-team">Scott Davison</a>,
a former senior vice president with AOL, admits he's out of the
loop regarding a potential merger between the Time Warner Inc. Internet unit and Yahoo! Inc., a <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a.92qtG0uaV0">story</a> that refuses to go away. But he still sees plenty of value in AOL. - <i>David Shabelman</i><br /><br />Aug. 15: <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/technology/aol/looking-to-build-on-its.php">AOL aggregates Socialthing!</a>: Looking to build on its acquisition in March&nbsp;of social networking site Bebo Inc., AOL has snapped up <a href="http://socialthing.com/">Socialthing! Inc.</a>,&nbsp;a
social media aggregation tool that lets users track their online social
communities and broadcast updates to them. At least that's what this <a href="http://corp.aol.com/news/2008/08/aol-acquire-socialthing">blog post</a>
indicates. It also says the Socialthing! platform, which is currently
in beta, is integrated with 13 sites, including such well-known names as Facebook, Twitter, Digg and Flickr. - <em>David Shabelman</em><br /><br />Time Warner said Aug. 6 it would <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1217230021096">split the unit into two separate divisions</a>
-- separating its dial-up Internet access business from its content and
advertising operations -- which would make it easier to sell the
divisions, which continue to drag on the media conglomerate's earnings, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1217230021096">Shabelman wrote</a>. <br /><br />This was <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1202101573881">not a new plan</a>, but were the dial-up business to go on the block, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/news/will-earthlink-target-aols-dia.php">a possible buyer was EarthLink Inc.</a>,
which was thought to have held talks with AOL and whose CEO
told The Wall Street Journal such a deal was "worth aggressively
pursuing." Another is John Malone's Liberty Media Corp., though EarthLink is the more likely of the two, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/aol/the-headline-reads-liberty-med.php#comments">Shabelman argues</a>. Meanwhile, Google Inc. said Aug. 7 it might have to <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/aol/yahoo-inc-yhoo-can-thank.php">take a charge on the $1 billion</a>
it pumped into AOL in 2005. At the time, the deal valued AOL at $20
billion, a figure Time Warner would be "hard-pressed" to come by for
the two divisions today, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/aol/yahoo-inc-yhoo-can-thank.php">Shabelman argued</a>. The company <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1216687345422">unveiled some cost-cutting and reorganization measures</a> in late July, also fueling the deal rumor fire. <br /><br />And
over at Yahoo!, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/behind-the-money/blog/behind-the-money/will-jon-miller-save-yahoo.php">former AOL CEO Jon Miller</a> was seen as a likely board
addition for the company under fire from activist Carl Icahn, but a noncompete with Time Warner kept him
off the board. See <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealwatch/yahoomicrosoft.php">Dealwatch: Yahoo!</a>
for more on that saga. Meanwhile, rumors persisted that Yahoo! and
Microsoft Corp., unable to agree to a transaction of their own (so far),
have talked to AOL <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/techconfidential/money-out/blog/money-out/it-seems-as-though-whenever.php">about a possible deal</a>. Hiralal <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/corporatedealmaker/2008/08/whos_buyng_aol.php">noted</a>: "The Wall Street Journal
reports that discussions with Yahoo! Inc. are more advanced than those
with Microsoft Corp., and that analysts value the ad and content
business at $3 billion to $4 billion."<br /><br /><b>A PRIME TIME REWRITE</b> <br /><br />For Time Warner, a broader restructuring was underway. In early June 2008, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1212755507067">The Deal's Richard Morgan wrote</a>: <br /><br /><blockquote>The
shape of Time Warner Inc. under recently installed CEO Jeff Bewkes
gained focus Monday, June 9, with sale implications for AOL's access
business signaled as very likely, for AOL's advertising business as
somewhat likely and for lagging Time Inc. titles as too tough to call.<br /></blockquote>In early May, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/05/southern_progress_may_be_bewkes%27_next_focus.php">Morgan wrote</a>: <br /><br /><blockquote>While those inside Time Warner Inc. anxiously await what CEO Jeff
Bewkes will focus on next, having just shuttered or consolidated three
studios in the media conglomerate's filmed-entertainment division, many
on the outside believe he'll set his sights on Time Inc. And within
this publishing division, Southern Progress Corp. is being tipped as a
standalone unit that's ripe for an auction.<br /></blockquote>The last move was to unhook its cable business. Time Warner said April 30 it would <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1207771452099">spin off Time Warner Cable Inc.</a> as a separate company, and later gave some more details <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=OpenMarket/Xcelerate/Preview&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1210002290395&amp;t=TDStandardArticle">on its plan</a>
to transform through a so-called "digital transition," which centers on
its film business and extends to other areas like moving its magazine
business online, <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1210002291110">Morgan explained</a>. The Deal's Chris Nolter in late December 2007 dug into<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1197631234956"> the tall task for Bewkes</a>, ahead of his taking over as CEO for Richard Parsons at the beginning of the year. Again, he analyzed it <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1207771432969">in April</a>. <br /><br /><p><b>STRATEGIC ACQUIRER</b></p><p>Meanwhile, AOL was beefing up its ad and content business. <br /></p><ul><li>The company <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1207771428889">said April 15 it would acquire Sphere Source Inc.</a>, a venture-backed company that makes a search widget used by Web publishers. <br /></li><li>The deal followed its <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1207771428889">March acquisition of social networking site Bebo Inc.</a>, its February deal for widget maker <a href="http://blogger.goowy.com/goowy_media_blog/2008/02/goowy-acquired.html">Goowy Media Inc.</a> and two deals in November. <br /></li><li>AOL said Nov. 12 it had acquired Yedda Inc., which runs a Q&amp;A Web
site, for undisclosed terms, just days after unveiling plans to acquire
<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1193281676210">content-targeting online advertising company  Quigo Inc. for more than $340 million</a>.
Both have R&amp;D operations in Israel. <br /></li><li>The ramp-up came as AOL was angling to bolster its online advertising capabilities to offset declines in
subscription revenues and better compete with Google and Yahoo! And as GigaOm's Om Malik <a href="http://gigaom.com/2007/11/11/is-yedda-the-answer-for-aol/">pointed out</a>, with Yedda, AOL was betting on the startup's ability to give it "traction in the 'answers' game," where Yahoo! has prevailed.</li></ul><p>(See more on M&amp;A below.)</p><p>The deals came nearly two months after the company unveiled a
stronger relationship with Hewlett-Packard Co. and said it would flee
its Northern Virginia corporate headquarters for digs in Manhattan,
signaling a serious push for its ad network or, as some speculated,
that it was bringing the business close to its parent
to shape it up and prepare it for a sale. </p>
<p> As its transformation continued through 2007, AOL announced a
co-branding deal with HP to offer versions of its portal -- targeted
locally -- its toolbar and search functions on the manufacturer's
machines. Under the deal, default settings for HP laptops and PCs would include a
co-branded homepage, search and toolbar functions.</p>
<p> To focus on its advertising platform, AOL also said it would move
its headquarters to New York and integrate several recently acquired
companies. AOL's then-latest deal came July 24, with a deal for <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1185160253292&amp;pagename=TheDeal%2FTDDArticle%2FTDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">Tacoda Inc. and its online tracking technology to help target advertising</a>. Terms of the deal were not disclosed, but the news came little more than two months since it last beefed up in  the sector.</p>
<p>The company pushed in the mobile advertising direction May 16 with a
deal -- which The Wall Street Journal and peHUB's Dan
Primack pegged at $80 million and $110 million respectively -- for <a href="http://press.aol.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=1232">German ad-serving company Adtech AG</a>. The Adtech news came two months after AOL retreated from its <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1173922368819&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">$900 million planned takeover of Swedish online marketer TradeDoubler AB</a>, after <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1171939811875">extending the deadline for its offer</a>,
but still failing to gain 90% of the target's shareholder approval for
such a deal. The move would have enabled AOL to boost its online ad
presence in Europe, but after extending the deadline, it failed to
garner sufficient backing. The moves signaled a hot M&amp;A market for
online advertising companies and the push may are making in the mobile
ad sector. </p>
<p> <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1162525538487&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">Back
in 2006, the company said Nov. 8, it planned to acquire Relegence Corp.
to add technology for aggregating and delivering real-time Internet,
television and other content.</a> The news came about a month after the
company retreated from the Internet access business in Europe and amid
part of a broader restructuring. </p>
<p> Time Warner <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1160531898106&amp;pagename=TheDeal%2FTDDArticle%2FTDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">announced</a>
Oct. 11, 2006 the $464 million sale of its AOL UK Internet access unit
to Carphone Warehouse, the final divestiture to retreat from the access
business in Europe amid part of a broader restructuring. </p>
<p> The news came weeks after its Sept. 21, $365 million <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?cid=1158633795401&amp;pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;c=TDDArticle">sale</a>
of its AOL France business to Neuf Cegetel, which marked its second
European divestiture that week. The AOL France news came on the heels
of Telecom Italia SpA <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1157891914978">picking up</a> AOL Germany for $852.7 million, a buyer that had previously <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1151362806232">expressed</a> interest in taking all of AOL Europe. </p>
<p> The ultimate fate of the once-mighty titan of dial-up Internet may
say a lot about the future of a company struggling to shed its dinosaur
skin and survive in an ever-changing online world. </p>
<ul><li> In a September 2006 statement, Time Warner's then-chairman and
CEO Dick Parsons called the latest agreement "the second stage of our
current initiative to build a more competitive and profitable AOL
Europe -- a strategy that we're pursuing in all of our businesses." </li></ul>
<p> And quite a pursuit that was -- launching new products and
services, a strong push into Web 2.0, an e-mail campaign to AOL
customers with messages from management about changes to expect and
walking away from its subscription-based revenue model, providing
e-mail services to users free of charge. </p>
<ul><li> The possibility of AOL going free <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1151921128985">first surfaced</a>
in media reports in July 2006 and came to full light in August. Its
strategy called for AOL to continue offering e-mail and instant
messaging, but also augment its offerings with a suite of Web 2.0
technologies <i>--</i> abandoning as much as $2 billion in subscription
revenue, The Wall Street Journal said at the time, and turning its back
on its traditional business model. <ul><li> The shift came after the company's
subscription base began to slide and in response, AOL began to make
some of its Internet services offerings free. Alongside AOL's
acquisition of Advertising.com Inc., the move bolstered ad revenue
growth. </li><li> Among its suite of Web 2.0 offerings are
social networking (AIM Pages), video sharing (UnCut Video), Web log
search feature (Weblogs) and an RSS feed aggregator (My.AOL.com). </li></ul>
  </li></ul>
<p> <b>BELLS AND WHISTLES</b> </p>
<p> Earlier in September 2006, AOL <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1157891907763">launched</a>
a new instant messaging tool aimed at business users seeking tighter
security than traditional IM services offer. In March, AOL <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1141295391695">said</a> it would begin to sell programming on its Web site by the middle of the year, just weeks after <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1139003250375">announcing </a>alongside
competitor Yahoo! that it would offer a service through which companies
could choose to charge a small fee to ensure e-mail would reach the
intended recipient, an attempt to thwart spam. </p>
<p> Also in September, The Deal's Paul Bonanos <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1156910613753">pondered</a> the future of AOL and whether Web 2.0 could be its saving grace. </p>
<ul><li> Bonanos wrote: "AOL could save itself not so much by
developing new kinds of online features aimed at early adopters, but by
adapting emerging Web 2.0 technologies for mainstream users." </li></ul>
<p> <b>HIGHS AND LOWS</b> </p>

<p> AOL parent Time Warner, has long drawn criticism from dissident
shareholder Carl Icahn who has criticized the company for botching its
integration strategy for the unit. AOL certainly had much to contend with. </p>
<p> In August 2006, the company's chief technologist resigned after
research underlings orchestrated a data breach that made available
search histories of more than 650,000 of its users that could
potentially reveal their identity. </p>
<ul><li>
    <div align="left"> The company <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1155049693407">drew</a>
a stern response from Capitol Hill lawmakers who said stricter laws
about the kind of information Internet companies collect are in order. <ul><li> But the breach also <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1155049727108">highlighted</a> the need for data security and startups to tackle it in innovative ways.
              <div align="left"> </div>
          </li></ul>
    </div>
  </li></ul>
<p> Earlier in the month, AOL <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1155049701516">grabbed</a>
community network software company Totekasche Holdings Inc. for
undisclosed terms, its third buy of the year. Others included online
marketing software maker Lightingcast Inc. in May and video search
company Truveo Inc. in <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/StandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1136501218194">January 2006</a>. </p>
<ul><li>
    <div align="left"> In late June 2006, along with Venezuelan media company Cisneros Group, Time Warner <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TDStandardArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1151921125152">divvied</a>
up America Online Latin America Inc. and its three bankrupt affiliates.
The Fort Lauderdale, Fla. company was formed as a joint venture in
1998, hit its peak in 2002, but failed to provide service in target
markets and saw its customer base drop. </div>
  </li><li>
    <div align="left"> In April, AOL <a href="http://www.thedeal.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=TheDeal/TDDArticle/TechArticle&amp;bn=NULL&amp;c=TDDArticle&amp;cid=1144308956240">announced</a>
a partnership with China's No. 2 media group, Shanghai Media Group, to
provide content for a Chinese language version of AOL, aimed at
catering to Chinese speakers in the U.S. </div>
  </li></ul>

]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Managing your shareholder base</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/community/managing-your-shareholder-base.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-19T18:12:06Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-19T18:12:56Z</updated>
<summary>Growth companies and their PE sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that arise when they layer on tiers of preferred stock.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Community" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Industry Insight" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bradfordpweirick" label="Bradford P. Weirick" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gibsondunn" label="Gibson Dunn" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="joellekhoury" label="Joelle Khoury" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="section3a10" label="Section 3(a)(10)" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="securitiesandexchangecommission" label="Securities and Exchange Commission" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Growth companies often play it too fast and loose with share issuances. The difficulty of raising money in the early stages often leads entrepreneurs to tap "friends and family" for early-stage capital. Successful early-stage companies will often layer on tiers of preferred stock as the business grows and matures. Growth companies and their private equity sponsors should be wary of the pitfalls that may follow. Although these share issuances may comply with federal and state securities laws, the sheer number of shareholders (often impacted by employee option exercises and share transfers) may later complicate an exit. </p>

<p>As time passes on a growth company's path to an exit event, stock issuances add up. Friends and family investors may grow impatient for liquidity and may transfer shares. Employees may exercise options, and if there are no constraints imposed by the option plan and/or shareholder agreements, employees may sell shares. Shareholders who were accredited investors when they purchased their shares may no longer meet accredited investor requirements. In today's market, the path to liquidity for venture capital-backed companies is fairly long (seven to 10 years on average). Over that period of time, venture capital-backed companies can often find that their shareholder base has grown substantially and that many of their shareholders are nonaccredited.</p>

<p>In a potential sale of a venture capital-backed company to a strategic acquirer, the buyer may favor using its capital stock as acquisition currency. (In today's economic climate in particular, with tight credit and share prices having rebounded, strategic buyers may be more inclined to favor stock versus cash.) A buyer (whether privately held or publicly traded) will wish to consummate the acquisition quickly and cheaply, which, in a stock-for-stock merger, means that the buyer will likely propose issuing its shares pursuant to a private placement exemption rather than in a Securities and Exchange Commission registration.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is the point where a venture capital-backed company's management (or lack of management) of its shareholder base can become critically important. The shares to be issued by the acquirer in a stock-for-stock acquisition will only qualify for a private placement exemption if the number and nature of the target's stockholders make the private placement available -- which for most transactions will require (under Rule 506) that there be no more than 35 nonaccredited target shareholders. In the event that the target company has not closely monitored its shareholder base, and if, at the time of the transaction, more than 35 of the target company's shareholders are nonaccredited investors, the acquirer's desired acquisition structure may be frustrated. This is the so-called widely held private target problem. A public company acquirer might elect to move forward with the transaction nonetheless by registering the shares to be issued in the transaction, although the added time and cost may be an annoyance to both parties. A private company buyer, however, will not likely proceed with an acquisition that requires it to register shares -- because the registration process for a company that is not yet public is typically too burdensome and time consuming, and few private companies would choose to "go public" in that manner. If the privately held buyer does not have sufficient liquidity to allow it to pay cash and is not able to identify a suitable alternative transaction structure, the transaction may be dead on arrival. In a deal climate where any exit may be hard to come by, obviously, any such potential impediment to a transaction should be avoided.</p>

<p>There are ways to structure around the widely held private target problem. The acquirer and target may agree that only target shareholders who are accredited will receive stock in the acquisition and all others will receive cash. Corporate laws generally do not favor treating shareholders differently within the same class of stock, and the California corporations code expressly prohibits it, so that solution may not be feasible. Alternatively, the transaction could be structured so that target common stock is cashed out in the transaction and only preferred stock of the target (typically held by institutional investors) will receive acquirer stock. That approach may solve the securities law problem, but it may not be satisfactory in light of the acquirer's liquidity constraints, and it might not be consistent with the acquirer's desire to avoid cashing out the target management team.</p>

<p>Another structural option for the acquirer in a stock-for-stock merger may be the "fairness hearing" process under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act. Section 3(a)(10) exempts transactions in which securities are issued in a transaction where the terms and conditions have been approved in a fairness hearing by any court, federal official or agency expressly authorized by law to grant such approval. The fairness hearing is available in a few states (including in California, where the use of the Section 3(a)(10) fairness hearing exemption has become fairly common). Unlike shares issued in a Regulation D private placement, shares issued in reliance upon a Section 3(a)(10) exemption are generally freely tradable upon closing, and the process is less expensive and time consuming than an SEC registration. Nonetheless, fairness hearings take much longer than a private placement (generally 40 to 60 days), are more costly and require acquirers to prepare and file a formal disclosure document describing the transaction. Also, the fairness hearing is open to everyone to whom securities are proposed to be issued, which increases the risk that a disgruntled shareholder may impede the sale process.</p>

<p>There is no magic solution that will enable all growth companies to avoid the widely held private target problem. Even with the best planning and advice, certain things are outside of a company's control, and financing needs and other considerations often override these issues. Nonetheless, there are a few pointers that growth companies and their private equity sponsors should keep in mind as they develop their capital-raising and equity incentive strategies. </p>

<p><b>Issue securities only to accredited investors.</b> Growth companies should try to avoid issuing securities to any unaccredited investors. This is patently obvious, but the number of times in practice that this is ignored (out of ignorance or otherwise) by growth companies is staggering.</p>

<p><b>Restrict the transferability of equity in shareholder agreements.</b> Growth companies should closely manage their shareholder agreement provisions that restrict the transfer of shares (for example, by providing that investors cannot transfer shares except in compliance with applicable securities laws). Growth companies can significantly impede the expansion of their shareholder bases by including mandatory notice requirements in such provisions, and by closely monitoring all transfers to ensure they are made in compliance with securities laws. These stock transfer provisions are sometimes ignored by private companies (particularly those without a general counsel). As typically drafted, these provisions give a private company some leeway in determining whether a proposed transfer is being made pursuant to a valid exemption and may provide a company with a legitimate basis to discourage transfers to unsophisticated (or nonaccredited) investors. </p>

<p><b>Adopt a well-crafted option plan and manage it closely. </b>To limit the risk that option exercises by departing employees will swell the ranks of unaccredited investors, growth companies should include in their equity plan documents a right to cash out options or shares held by employees within a specified period of time following the termination of employment.</p>

<p>The exercise of options in advance of a sale can also dramatically increase a company's nonaccredited shareholder base. Equity incentive plans should include a mechanism that allows the board of directors, at its election, to provide for the conversion of options into options to purchase acquirer stock or to cash out options upon a change of control. </p>

<p><b>Impose a company right of first refusal on all shares held by employees.</b> As a part of the implementation of any equity incentive plan, growth companies should include in the equity incentive plan or a shareholder agreement a provision granting the company a right of first refusal to purchase any shares proposed to be transferred by employees.</p>

<p></p>

<p><i>Bradford P. Weirick is co-chairman of Gibson, Dunn &amp; Crutcher LLP's emerging technologies practice group, focusing his practice on mergers and acquisitions, private equity investment transactions, and public and private securities offerings. Joelle Khoury is a corporate associate with Gibson Dunn.</i></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Movers &amp; shakers: Nov. 19, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/pipeline/movers-shakers-baz-hiralal-111909.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31820</id>
<published>2009-11-19T05:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-19T00:32:48Z</updated>
<summary>DLA Piper named David Mendelsohn chair of the firm's corporate and finance practice for the Chicago office.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealmakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Movers and Shakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Pipeline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[ <b>Deutsche Bank AG</b> made eight additions to its technology and operations group for global prime finance.
<b>Larry Pecker </b>joined as a director and head of prime brokerage information technology. Pecker joined from <b>J.P. Morgan Chase &amp; Co.</b> and previously worked in prime brokerage technology at <b>Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co.</b> <br /><br /><b>John Napoli</b>, a director, was named chief operating officer of global prime finance information technology. He was global program management officer for the Deutsche's global equity derivatives business. Pecker and Napoli are in New York and report to Sanjay Chojar, managing director and head of global prime finance IT. In addition, the bank added six vice presidents with technical expertise.<br /><hr><b>Peter White</b> joined <b>TD Bank</b> as head of sponsor finance. He will establish and lead a group that finances transactions for private equity firms from Maine to Florida. White has 30 years of banking and leveraged finance experience having been a managing director at BankBoston Corp., FleetBoston Financial Corp., <b>GE Capital </b>and <b>CIT Group Inc.</b><br /><hr><p><img alt="DavidMendelsohnMovers.png" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/DavidMendelsohnMovers.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="70" height="90" />Check The Deal Pipeline for updates on these Movers &amp; shakers:<br /></p><p>-- <b>BTIG Australia Ltd.</b> hired <b>Darin Lester</b>, <b>David McConnell</b>, <b>Dustin Westblade </b>and <b>Trevor Harrison</b>.</p><b><b>-- </b>DLA Piper</b> named <b>David Mendelsohn</b> (pictured) chair of the firm's corporate and finance practice for the Chicago office.<br /><b><br /><b>-- </b>Winston &amp; Strawn LLP</b> opened offices in Beijing and Shanghai. .<b><br /></b><br />
<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Look for these and more in <a href="http://www.pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005356020">the full column</a> (subscription required).<br /></font><br /><br />
]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Movers &amp; shakers: Nov. 18, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/pipeline/movers-shakers-baz-hiralal-111809.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-18T05:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-17T21:48:57Z</updated>
<summary>Lazard named Kenneth Jacobs, who joined the firm in 1988, chairman of the board and CEO.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealmakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Movers and Shakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Pipeline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/KennethJacobsMovers.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="70" height="90" /><b>Lazard</b> named <b>Kenneth Jacobs</b> (pictured) chairman of the board and CEO. Jacobs, chief executive of Lazard North America, succeeds former Lazard chairman and CEO<b> Bruce Wasserstein</b>, who died Oct. 14. (Wasserstein founded and chaired The Deal LLC.) </p>

<p>The board unanimously selected Jacobs to fill the role. Jacobs joined Lazard in 1988, was named a partner in 1991 and has been a deputy chairman since January 2002. In his role as head of North America, he added new practices, such as restructuring, strategic capital structure advice and private fund advisory. He has also expanded the firm's financial advisory business in the middle market through the acquisition of Goldsmith Agio Helms &amp; Lynner LLC, and opened offices in Boston, Houston and Washington, among others. Most recently, Jacobs helped advise <b>IMS Health Inc.</b> on its $5.2 billion sale to <b>TPG Capital</b> and <b>CPP Investment Board</b>. </p>

<p>Also this year, he advised <b>GlaxoSmithKline plc</b> on its up to $3.6 billion acquisition of skincare company Stiefel Laboratories Inc., and Rohm and Haas Co. on its $18.8 billion sale to <b>Dow Chemical Co.</b></p>

<p><b></b><b>Steven Golub</b>, who served as interim CEO for the past several weeks, will continue as vice chairman of Lazard and chairman of its financial advisory group.</p>

<p>Lazard will appoint <b>Ashish Bhutani</b> and <b>Gary Parr </b>to its board and as vice chairmen of the firm, effective Jan. 4. Bhutani will continue as chief executive of Lazard Asset Management. <b>Steven Heyer</b>, a director since Lazard's initial public offering in 2005, was named as lead director, a new board position. Also, <b>Antonio Weiss</b> was appointed global head of investment banking.</p>

<hr>

<p>Check The Deal Pipeline for updates on these Movers &amp; shakers:<br /></p><p>-- <b>Alvaro de Molina</b> resigned as chief executive of auto lender <b>GMAC Financial Services </b>and was replaced by<b> </b><b> Michael Carpenter</b>.</p><b><b>-- </b></b><b>Credit Suisse Group</b> hired <b>Charles Donald</b> as a managing director in its U.K. investment banking group.<br /><b><br /><b>-- </b></b><b>Alternative Investment Management LLC</b> appointed <b>Susan Harrison</b> as a director of investor relations.<b><br /></b><br />
<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Look for these and more in <a href="http://www.pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005355462">the full column</a> (subscription required).<br /></font><br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Easing the stress of distressed M&amp;A</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/community/easing-the-stress-of-distressed-m&amp;a.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-17T20:27:06Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-17T20:28:19Z</updated>
<summary>Corporate buyers face numerous complexities when trying to identify the right moment to purchase a distressed asset.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Community" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Industry Insight" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bankofamericacorp" label="Bank of America Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="barclaysplc" label="Barclays plc" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="derekwatson" label="Derek Watson" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ibmcorp" label="IBM Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kpmg" label="KPMG" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="lordtaylorllc" label="Lord &amp; Taylor LLC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="luiscustodio" label="Luis Custodio" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="merrilllynchco" label="Merrill Lynch &amp; Co." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="nrdcequitypartnersllc" label="NRDC Equity Partners LLC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tengzhongheavyindustrialmachinerycoltd" label="Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. Ltd." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Timing is everything, and bargain-hunting investors are indicating that now could be a good time to acquire troubled assets. </p>

<p>Certainly, the mergers and acquisitions market is uncrowded right now. U.S. deal volume in the third quarter was the slowest period by dollar value since the third quarter of 2004, according to The Wall Street Journal. Meanwhile, there is no shortage of potential acquisition targets. With large declines in the global markets, stock prices are at below-average levels, based on a 10-year price-to-earnings average. And the number of troubled assets available for sale continues to rise. Opportunistic companies with healthy balance sheets and access to cheap sources of financing may be in a good position to execute on long-term growth strategies. </p>

<p>Timing the market is a notoriously difficult task, however, especially in today's volatile environment. Corporate buyers face additional complexities when trying to identify the right moment to purchase a distressed asset. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[First, there is the basic question of timing for maximum value. During the bankruptcy process, a company's value might fluctuate based on how it and its liabilities are transformed. While shedding liabilities might increase the value of its operating assets, the company may also be losing valuable employees and customers. 

<p>For example, when <b>Bank of America Corp.</b> agreed to purchase Merrill Lynch &amp; Co. over a weekend in September 2008, the company paid a 70% premium. In an interview in Fortune magazine, Bank of America CEO Kenneth Lewis said that he didn't want to wait until Monday morning when Merrill might have faced bankruptcy, since it would have put Merrill's coveted brokerage business at risk. But other buyers have found that waiting for a bankruptcy filing seemed to pay off. <b>Barclays plc</b> was initially interested in purchasing Lehman Brothers Inc., but walked away when the Federal Reserve wouldn't backstop Lehman's risky mortgage-backed securities, according to The Wall Street Journal. </p>

<p>However, one week after Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy, Barclays was able to purchase Lehman's North American investment bank -- which was still relatively intact -- and headquarters for just $1.7 billion. Similarly, <b>NRDC Equity Partners LLC</b>, the investment group that owns the retailer <b>Lord &amp; Taylor LLC</b>, was considering making a bid for the jewelry retailer Fortunoff Holdings LLC in January. NRDC ultimately decided to make its bid several weeks later, after Fortunoff filed for bankruptcy.</p>

<p>Corporate buyers examining troubled targets need to consider several issues that might counterbalance the lower price paid during or immediately after a bankruptcy proceeding. First, an acquirer will need to give up a substantial amount of control during the bankruptcy process. In addition to negotiating with the target itself, acquirers typically have to engage with numerous other parties, including creditors, must have the purchase approved by the bankruptcy court and have to deal with the uncertainty of "topping bids."</p>

<p>But companies with expensive union contracts, exorbitant debt or other unfavorable contracts may be more attractive to buyers since these contracts and debt agreements may be renegotiated. For example, General Motors Corp. filed for bankruptcy court protection on June 1; just one day later it announced that it was in advanced talks to sell its Hummer brand to Chinese industrial company <b>Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. Ltd.</b></p>

<p>Acquirers have several other timing issues to consider, including the target's cash-burn rate. For instance, a young software or biotechnology company that often relies on outside capital to fund research and development for product commercialization may need to put itself up for sale because it is running out of cash and having trouble obtaining new financing in the current environment. Buyers need to make sure that the target has enough cash on hand to make it through a closing so that it can, in effect, survive the acquisition.</p>

<p>Luis Custodio, vice president of corporate development at <b>IBM Corp.</b>, said: "It is critically important to triangulate the target's balance sheet, cash burn rate and deal timeline to ensure cash sufficiency and avoid preclosing surprises. But, it is also prudent to include protective terms in the definitive agreements that allow both parties to reasonably deal with a cash shortfall event."</p>

<p>Very often a company has valuable intellectual property that makes it an appealing acquisition, including personnel critical to future product development. But a financially troubled company -- or even one that is adequately financed but sees its stock price drop significantly -- may have difficulty retaining key employees, especially during a merger negotiation. It is therefore usually beneficial to consider an expedited due diligence and closing process. Even in this market, as part of their acquisition and integration strategies, buyers must have processes in place that will give key employees incentives to stay.</p>

<p>Another issue for buyers of troubled companies to consider is the status of customer and supplier relationships. It is not uncommon for troubled targets to stretch vendor payments beyond acceptable levels, for service to suffer and for customer relationships to be negatively affected.</p>

<p>The potential cost of mending these damaged relationships, including the need for immediate access to working capital, needs consideration in valuing the company. </p>

<p>The cost of an acquisition is often more than its price tag alone, though good planning and due diligence can help estimate this as accurately as possible. The risk of bankruptcy in a deal process can often change the dynamics of negotiation and the anticipated timing, though buyers should be aware of the added complexity of an already risky process. </p>

<p>Today's market contains many buying opportunities for companies that have healthy balance sheets, access to capital and profitable strategies. In today's market, however, buyers need to consider how timing their purchase will affect the value of the acquisition. There are both benefits and disadvantages to purchasing assets or companies in Chapter 11. And even in situations where targets have not filed for bankruptcy, acquirers must understand the added risks of losing customers and employees if they wait too long to make an acquisition. </p>

<p></p>

<p><i>Derek Watson is a principal in the transaction services practice of KPMG LLP.</i></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Restaurants in the hot seat</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/dealwatch/restaurants-on-the-hot-seat.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2008:/newsweekly//34.21076</id>
<published>2009-11-17T20:08:00Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-17T20:08:51Z</updated>
<summary>Many casual-restaurant chains are weighing strategic options, and some are feeling the bankruptcy heat. Here's a look at some on the block, others that have filed and some that are the subject of speculation. </summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealwatch" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="bennigans" label="Bennigan's" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="chevysfresh" label="Chevys Fresh" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="churchschicken" label="Church's Chicken" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="dominospizza" label="Domino's Pizza" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="fatburger" label="Fatburger" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="metromediasteakhouses" label="Metromedia Steakhouses" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="perkinsmariecalenders" label="Perkins &amp; Marie Calender's" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pizzahut" label="Pizza Hut" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="roadhousegrill" label="Roadhouse Grill" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="rubytuesday" label="Ruby Tuesday" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sarestaurantcorp" label="S&amp;A Restaurant Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="southeastwaffles" label="SouthEast Waffles" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="steakale" label="Steak &amp; Ale" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tgifridays" label="TGI Friday's" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="unorestaurant" label="Uno Restaurant" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="viacquisitioncorp" label="VI Acquisition Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[ <p>Many casual-restaurant chains  are  weighing strategic options, and some are feeling the bankruptcy heat. Here's a look at some  on the block, others that have filed and some that are the subject of speculation.</p><p>Nov. 16: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005355051"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005355051">Charlesbank puts Papa Murphy's on the block</span></a>: Boston private equity firm <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1960090">Charlesbank Capital Partners LLC</a></b> said Monday it has hired North Point Advisors to shop pizza chain <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2019679">Papa Murphy's International Inc.</a> </b>- <i><span class="georgiabold11grey">Demitri Diakantonis</span></i> <span class="georgia12"></span></p><p>Oct. 30<span class="georgia12">: </span><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005348024">Rubio's Restaurants rejects takeover offer</a>: Mexican-themed casual dining chain <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1983373">Rubio's Restaurants Inc.</a></b> said late Thursday, Oct. 29, it rejected an $80 million buyout offer from shareholder Alex Meruelo and private equity firm <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2015825">Levine Leichtman Capital Partners</a></b>.<span class="georgia12">    <p>As a result, the chain hired <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1995712">Cowen and Co. LLC</a></b> to explore strategic alternatives, including a review of expressions of interest that it had already received. <span class="georgia12"><span class="georgia12">- </span><i><span class="georgiabold11grey">Demitri Diakantonis</span></i></span></p></span><span class="georgia12"><span class="georgia12"></span><i><span class="georgiabold11grey"></span></i></span></p><p><span class="georgia12"><p>Oct. 15: <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005341432"><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005341432">Private equity circles Rubio's Restaurants, again</span></a>: Carlsbad, Calif., Mexican-themed dining chain <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1983373">Rubio's Restaurants Inc.</a></b> has received its second buyout offer in as many years. <span class="georgia12">The
company announced late Wednesday that it had received a proposal valued
at $8 per share, or about $80 million, from shareholder Alex Meruelo
and private equity firm <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2015825">Levine Leichtman Capital Partners</a></b>
IV LP. The bidders sent Rubio's a letter that as of Thursday morning
had not yet been disclosed in Securities and Exchange Commission
filings. - </span><i><span class="georgiabold11grey">Demitri Diakantonis</span><br /></i></p><p>Oct. 14: <span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005341057"><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005341057">Bunker Hill puts Papa Gino's on the block</a>: </span><span class="georgia12"><span class="georgia12">Boston private equity firm <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1945980">Bunker Hill Capital</a></b> has hired <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2004281">Houlihan, Lokey, Howard &amp; Zukin Inc.</a></b> to explore a sale of restaurant chain operator Papa Gino's Holdings Corp., according to industry sources.<span class="georgia12"> <span class="georgia12">Calls to Bunker Hill, which acquired the chain in 2005 for undisclosed terms from <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1986096">BancBoston Capital Inc.</a></b>, and <b><a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2007727">Houlihan Lokey</a></b> were not immediately returned.</span></span> Sources
said dealbooks for the $20 million Ebitda company went out in the past
two to three weeks. Papa Gino's could fetch 6 times its Ebitda, or
around $120 million, they said. <span class="georgia12"><span class="georgia12">- </span><i><span class="georgiabold11grey">Demitri Diakantonis</span></i></span></span></span><span class="georgiabold18" id="t_hl_10005341057">&nbsp;</span>  <span class="georgia12">    <p><br /><span class="georgia12"><i><span class="georgiabold11grey"></span></i></span></p></span> <i></i> </p>  <p></p></span> </p><p><b>Fired Up, Inc. </b><br /></p><p><span class="georgia12">San Francisco private equity firm <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1865289">Rosewood Capital</a> has hired <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=1990157">Piper Jaffray &amp; Co.</a> to explore a sale of Fired Up Inc., the operator of Italian casual dining chain <a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewCompany.dl?id=2015158,1984844">Carino's Italian Grill</a>, according to sources.</span> (<a href="http://pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005333990">More here</a>.) - <i>Demitri Diakantonis</i></p><p><b>Uno Restaurant Holdings Corp. </b><br /></p><p>The pizza restaurant
chain's owner, Los Angeles private equity firm Centre Partners
Management LLC, has hired Jefferies &amp; Co. to work on a debt
restructuring or a debt-for-equity swap for the chain, sources said. - <i>Demitri Diakantonis</i><br /></p><p><b>Lobster Shack Inc. </b><br /></p><p>Redwood
City, Calif.-based Lobster Shack, a seafood restaurant, has filed for
Chapter 7 liquidation with $13,520 in assets and $300,523 in
liabilities. <br /></p><p><b>Good Times Restaurants, Inc. <br /></b></p><p>Denver,
Colo. fast food restaurant operator Good Times Restaurants Inc. said
Aug. 14 that it retained Austin, Tex. strategic advisory firm Mastodon
Ventures Inc. to help it evaluate strategic alternatives. - <i>Demitri Diakantonis</i></p><p><b>Golden Restaurants Inc.</b><br /></p><p>Houston-based
Golden Restaurants, a franchisee of Golden Corral Corp. brand
restaurants, filed for bankruptcy on the eve of Guillermo
Perales--owner of numerous franchisees in the restaurant business,
including Golden--having to give testimony in litigation regarding a
civil judgment brought by a former employee that was raped in a
restaurant belonging to a Golden affiliate. The debtor listed $1
million to $10 million in assets and $10 million to $50 million in
liabilities in its petition. Five affiliates also submitted separate
petitions.</p><p><b>Ruby Tuesday Inc.</b><br /></p><p>Casual dining chain
operator Ruby Tuesday Inc. announced July 20 that it will offer 10
million shares of common stock. The Maryville, Tenn., company expects
to receive up to $84.4 million in proceeds, according to Securities and
Exchange Commission filings. Ruby Tuesday had been reviewing options to
restructure its debt since October. - <i>Demitri Diakantonis</i></p><b>Alset Owners LLC<br /></b><br />A
portion of the stable of Checker's and Rally's restaurants owned by
Alset Owners LLC is set to be served up to suitors in August. According
to papers filed Wednesday, July 8, with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the District of Delaware in Wilmington, Judge Brendan L. Shannon has
approved bidding procedures that put at least 28 of Alset's 78 Rally's
and Checker's restaurants up for sale.<b> </b><i>- Ben Fidler<br /></i><i><br /></i><b>Real Mex Restaurants Inc.</b><br /><br />Boasting
the largest casual-dining Mexican chain in the U.S., Real Mex it has
completed an offering of senior secured notes with $117 million in
proceeds, giving it more breathing room amid the economic weakness. The
Cypress, Calif., operator, formerly controlled by Boca Raton,
Fla.-based Sun Capital Partners Inc. and now owned by a group led by
New York private equity firm Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co., said in
a June 10 regulatory filing that it planned to use the proceeds to
refinance its senior secured notes due April 1, 2010, and for general
corporate purposes. <span class="georgiabold11grey"> -<i> Vyvyan Tenorio</i></span><p>&nbsp;</p><br />]]>
        <![CDATA[<span class="georgiabold11grey"><i></i></span><br /><br /><b><br /><br /></b><br />]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Movers &amp; shakers: Nov. 17, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/pipeline/movers-shakers-baz-hiralal-111709.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-17T05:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-16T21:09:17Z</updated>
<summary>HSBC Bank Australia Ltd. appointed Tony Cripps as head of global banking and markets in Australia.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealmakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Movers and Shakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Pipeline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Tokyo's <b>Nikko Asset Management Co. </b>tapped <b>Michael Herring</b> as chief financial officer and chief operating officer of its U.S. operations. Herring arrived at the New York office from <b>Bay Harbour Management LLC</b>, where he was CFO and head of risk management.<b></b></p>

<hr>

<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/TonyCrippsMovers.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="70" height="90" /><b>HSBC Bank Australia Ltd.</b> appointed <b>Tony Cripps</b> (pictured) as head of global banking and markets in Australia.</p>

<p>The combined global banking and markets business now encompasses sales and trading, balance sheet management, debt finance and advisory, institutional wealth management, as well as HSBC Securities Services and relationship management of the bank's global corporate and institutional clients.</p>

<p>Cripps, who joined HSBC in 1986, was previously head of global markets for HSBC Bank Australia. Before that, he was a managing director and global head of e-commerce, corporate investment banking and markets in London from 2004 to 2006.<b></b></p>
<hr>

<p>Check The Deal Pipeline for updates on these Movers &amp; shakers:<br /></p><p>-- <b>BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research</b> said<b> David Beker </b>will rejoin the firm as head of Latin America economics and fixed income strategy.</p><b><b>-- </b></b><b>Ticonderoga Securities LLC </b>hired analyst <b>Jay Vleeschhouwer</b> to lead the firm's research in the software technology sector.<br /><b><br /><b>-- </b></b><b>Close Brothers Corporate Finance</b> appointed <b>Tod Kersten</b> as a managing director to head its new Warsaw office.<b><br /></b><br />
<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Look for these and more in <a href="http://www.pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005354831">the full column</a> (subscription required).<br /></font><br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Movers &amp; shakers: Nov. 16, 2009</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/pipeline/movers-shakers-baz-hiralal-111609.php" />
    <id>tag:http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/34:null</id>
<published>2009-11-16T05:00:01Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-13T21:49:45Z</updated>
<summary>Miles Redfield, formerly of Tristone Capital LP, joins Bank of Montreal as a managing director and head of the A&amp;D advisory group.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Dealmakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Movers and Shakers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Pipeline" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/MilesRedfieldMovers.png" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="70" height="90" /><b>Bank of Montreal</b> expanded its energy practice into acquisitions and divestitures, which extends its services beyond corporate mergers and acquisitions to those involving energy asset transactions. Seven people will join over the next several weeks in Houston.</p>



<p><b>Miles Redfield</b> (pictured), formerly of <b>Tristone Capital LP</b>, joins as a managing director and head of the A&amp;D advisory group, reporting to <b>Tod Benton</b> and <b>Shane Fildes</b>. Earlier, Redfield founded and co-managed <b>Wells Fargo Energy Advisors</b>. Redfield also spent three years with <b>GE Capital</b> and, from 1990 to 1998, was a senior member of BP Amoco's acquisition and divestment group.</p>

<p>The team also includes managing directors <b>Bruce Cox </b>and <b>Doug Perley</b>, director <b>Kevin McNichol</b>, vice president <b>Doug Rogers</b> and associates <b>Stephanie Tucker</b> and <b>Erin Fox</b>.<b></b></p>

<hr>

<p><b>Stephen Aulsebrook</b>, currently chief executive of both the Close Brothers Corporate Finance European business and of the firm's U.K. business, is now exclusively CEO of the European business.</p>

<p><b>Richard Madden</b>, managing director and head of the media sector team, was named chief executive of the U.K. business. Madden joined <b>Close Brothers Corporate Finance Ltd.</b> in 2005 from Bear, Stearns &amp; Co., where he was a senior managing director and head of its European media practice.</p>

<hr>

<p>Check The Deal Pipeline for updates on these Movers &amp; shakers:<br /></p><p>-- <b>Jefferies &amp; Co.</b> appointed <b>Verena Mladek</b> as a senior vice president for emerging markets sales.</p><b><b>-- </b></b><b>PureTech Ventures</b> said <b>John LaMattina</b>, former president of <b>Pfizer Inc.</b>'s global R&amp;D unit, joined the firm as a senior partner.<br /><b><br /><b>-- </b></b><b>Willkie Farr &amp; Gallagher LLP</b> said <b>Matthew Feldman</b>
rejoined the firm after serving as the chief legal adviser to the Obama
administration's presidential task force on the auto industry.<b><br /></b><br />
<font style="font-size: 1.25em;">Look for these and more in <a href="http://www.pipeline.thedeal.com/tdd/ViewArticle.dl?id=10005354308">the full column</a> (subscription required).<br /><br /></font>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The kids are all right</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/cover-stories/the-kids-are-all-right.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31669</id>
<published>2009-11-13T20:00:58Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-20T19:16:31Z</updated>
<summary>For the first time ever, the emerging markets of Brazil, India and China are expected to lead rather than follow a global recovery. But can these countries sustain their fast-paced growth long term?</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Cover Stories" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Deal International" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Nov. 16, 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Private capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="brazil" label="Brazil" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="brics" label="BRICs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="china" label="China" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="economicgrowth" label="economic growth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="economicrecovery" label="economic recovery" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="g20" label="G-20" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="g7" label="G-7" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="gdpgrowth" label="GDP growth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="india" label="India" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="russia" label="Russia" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="worldbank" label="World Bank" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/111609%20chinindbraz.gif" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" height="200" width="300" />While the United States and Europe grapple with how much longer it takes to recover from last year's near-death experience and get gingerly back on economic track, China and India have already returned to a sprint. Brazil is coming on fast. It's a stunning recovery for three of the world's largest emerging markets.</p>

<p>These markets "didn't suffer the same fate as their G-7 counterparts," says Nick Chamie, who heads emerging markets research for<b> RBC Capital Markets</b> in Toronto. For Brazil, India and China, "this turned out to be more a cyclical recession than a multigenerational crisis." </p>

<p>Investment flows reflect this rush. Stock markets have come roaring back, propelled by offshore investors. Initial public offerings are gaining momentum. Acquisitions, strategic investments and outbound investments are following fast. Private equity shows renewed vigor.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[
<p>"If the tone of capital markets is to be believed, the crisis in emerging markets is already a distant memory," <b>Standard &amp; Poor's</b> managing director Diane Vazza wrote in a recent research paper. </p>
<p>For developed nations, all this activity represents more than just interest from afar. Economists and investors alike are now convinced that this time, emerging markets for the first time ever will lead a global recovery, not follow it as in the past. What happens in Asian and Latin American powerhouses is vital. </p>
<p>"These economies have real dynamism and momentum today compared to some misfiring economies in the West," said Michael Geoghegan, <b>HSBC Holdings plc</b> group chief executive, in a statement last month. HSBC economists predict emerging markets growth in 2010 will reach 6%, while developed economies will register an anemic 1.8%.</p>
<p>Expect investment flows to be outsized as well. "When we look at our dealflow between the first half of the year and now, there's been a massive uptick in term sheets," says Akil Hirani, managing partner of Mumbai's <b>Majmudar &amp; Co.</b></p>
<p>This year, China's GDP growth should top 8%. India's could reach 6.5%. Brazil will register a 1% growth rate, although the second half of this year should come in at 3.5% growth, the Brazilian government predicts.</p>
<p></p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="465">
  <tbody>
    <tr bgcolor="#000000">
      <td colspan="6" valign="top"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Roaring back</font></b></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="6" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Foreign direct investment flows ($mill.)</font></b></td>
    </tr>
    <tr bgcolor="#000000">
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Country</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">FDI flows ($mill.)</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2005</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2006</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2007</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2008</font></b></font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td rowspan="2" valign="middle"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">China</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Inward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$72,406</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$72,715</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$83,521</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$108,312</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Outward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">12,261</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">21,160</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">22,469</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">52,150</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td rowspan="2" valign="middle"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">India</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Inward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">7,606</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">20,336</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">25,127</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">41,554</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Outward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2,978</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">14,344</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">17,281</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">17,685</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td rowspan="2" valign="middle"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Brazil</font></b></font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Inward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">15,066</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">18,822</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">34,585</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">45,058</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Outward</font></b></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2,517</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">28,202</font></div></td>
      <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">7,067</font></div></td>
      <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">20,457</font></div></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td colspan="6" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
          <div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2"><b>Source: <a href="http://www.unctad.org/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">World Investment Report 2009</font></a></b></font></div></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>
<p><br />
</p>
<p>Dealflow patterns in these three countries also are worth examining for lessons learned -- or not -- from last year's financial collapse. While upbeat once more, investors are generally more cautious. That's reflected in both deal size and acquisition price multiples. While megadeals haven't disappeared completely, they have diminished in number. Small and middle-market transactions, always more numerous than their larger counterparts, are rising in importance, as are distressed deals. Bank financing has returned, but strategic investors continue to weigh carefully cash reserves.</p>
<p>In M&amp;A terms, Western investors are approaching these markets more tentatively than investors in the countries themselves. "In an uncertain market, a lot of those [multinationals], whose own parents have pulled back, find it much more difficult," says Lawrence Chia, <b>Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu</b>'s managing partner for financial advisory services in China and Asia-Pacific. But "domestic M&amp;A, that is, China buying China, has always been robust and far, far greater than [foreign direct investment]." Domestic deals are getting done. "Valuations seem to be more acceptable" for domestic acquirers than for foreign competitors, he says. </p>
<p>Investment decisions also reflect bets on how economies are developing and changing. These, too, have worldwide implications. "People have started looking at the next growth story," says Sebastien Chatel, <b>Bank of America Merrill Lynch</b>'s co-head of Latin American equity capital markets. "Clearly, it's the emerging-markets consumer."</p>
<p>This anticipates the long-term transformation of various emerging markets, notably China, in which domestic consumption -- not just exports -- fuel the economy. For India and Brazil, already relatively dependent on domestic markets, it's accepted wisdom that a growing middle class will be able to afford to buy up and buy more.</p>
<p>With collapsed demand in developed economies, the recent crisis offered ample proof that this change in emerging markets is necessary. While Chinese exporters felt the pinch, "Chinese companies that didn't export didn't feel the downturn at all," says Benjamin Ye, a Shanghai partner with <b>PricewaterhouseCoopers</b>.</p>
<p>Some high-stakes transactions both illustrate this new territorial imperative and demonstrate the emerging markets' recovery. Take wireless telephones, where millions of users are being added every month in China, India and Brazil. France's <b>Vivendi SA</b> earlier this year offered $2.9 billion for Brazilian mobile operator <b>GVT Holding SA</b>. Spain's <b>Telefónica SA</b>, which already owns Brazil's Telecomunicações de São Paulo SA, countered Vivendi by offering $3.7 billion for GVT, and on Nov. 4 topped up its initial offer with a further $200 million.</p>
<p>"It's a great surprise to see a bidding war," says Marcello Hallake, a New York-based partner with law firm <b>Thompson &amp; Knight LLP</b>. In recent times, he says, "Brazil's wireless industry has been depressed and M&amp;A has been distressed."</p>
<p>Investors in these emerging markets are sniffing around what might best be called consumer-related infrastructure. Brazilian supermarket chains are exploring deals, Hallake says. Private equity firms are investing in Indian retail distributors. The latest involved Britain's <b>Henderson Equity Partners Ltd.</b>, which late last month completed an investment in a New Delhi-based luxury fashion designer retailer called <b>Genesis Colors Pvt. Ltd.</b>, joining previous investors <b>Sequoia Capital</b> and <b>Mayfield Fund</b>.</p>
<p>In October, South Korean department store giant <b>Lotte Shopping Co. Ltd.</b> bid up to $625 million for <b>Times Ltd.</b>, a hypermarket chain in Eastern China. Lotte beat out an offer by Chinese retail chain <b>WuMart Stores Inc.</b>, which in August gained a $120 million investment from private equity firm <b>TPG Capital</b> through a private investment in public equity. </p>
<p>"It's China as a market, rather than China as a manufacturing base," explains Ye. "That trend will continue."</p>
<p>By no means is every emerging market firing on all cylinders. Russia -- the "R" in Bric, short for Brazil, Russia, India, China -- remains mired in the collapse of its oil-based economy and debt-fueled spending spree on the part of its business oligarchs. Many other Central European countries will register steep declines this year, with even weaker fundamentals than their brethren further west. Mexico is shaky as well, dependent as it is on tapped-out American consumers.</p>
<p>Even the ability of the emerging markets' Big Three to sustain recovery long-term isn't universally accepted. Debates continue to swirl around China's muscular economic performance. "I'm not sure this is quality growth," says Daniel Rosen, speaking of China. Rosen, a principal in New York research firm <b>Rhodium Group LLC</b>, isn't alone in questioning the soundness and the impact of the $600 billion or so in loans with which the Chinese government flooded the market after last year's crisis. Some of these loans are bound to turn sour.</p>
<p>All three equities markets exude heat. Public companies' multiples can skew acquisition multiples, some fear. At the same time, a steep correction will cause some corporate investors a rethink as well. The breathless pace of recovery has some investors and advisers alike wondering whether these markets got ahead of themselves and whether hot money will leave as quickly as it's arrived. </p>
<p>"Emerging market equity fund flows setting records again makes me nervous," says Brad Durham, a managing director for <b>EPFR Global</b>, which estimated more than $45 billion flowed into emerging capital markets through mid-October.</p>
<p>Brazil's government imposed a tax on foreign purchases of Brazilian shares, but the money keeps coming. In November, the World Bank warned of the danger of a speculative bubble, especially in China. "The recovery [in China] happened almost too quickly," says Laure Wang, co-founder of Asia Alternatives Advisor Hong Kong Ltd. But even the more skeptical acknowledge that investors in these markets have steadied themselves from the tremors that shook capital globally. They're back doing deals. "There is liquidity in the system. Bankers are interested in cutting deals," says Majmudar's<b> </b>Hirani. "Everyone is reasonably positive about the India story."</p>
<p>He could just as well be talking about China or Brazil.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<h4>BRAZIL</h4>
<p></p>
<p>Latin America's biggest economy was hit hard when global commodities prices collapsed. Brazil's stock market, which offshore investors had buoyed, fell precipitously after last year's global meltdown. As a result of these capital outflows and the "flight to safety," the Brazilian currency, the real, depreciated within days by more than 30%. Yet this country of almost 200 million people escaped relatively unscathed. "Brazil never went into a deep crisis," says Martin Sanchez, who heads Latin America M&amp;A for Bank of America Merrill Lynch.</p>
<p>Now, optimism, the economy, the real and investors have all returned. "The economy turned the corner pretty quickly," says Douglas Smith, who heads Latin America research for <b>Standard Chartered Bank plc</b>. Smith anticipates "a significant pipeline of deals coming in the first quarter of 2010," as well as a good number of IPOs.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="465">
  <tbody><tr>
    <td colspan="7" bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Brazil IPOs</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr valign="top">
    <td rowspan="2" bgcolor="#000000"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Month</font></b></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" bgcolor="#000000"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2007</font></b></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" bgcolor="#000000"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2008</font></b></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" bgcolor="#000000"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2009</font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Deal value (reais mill.)</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">No.of deals</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Deal value (reais mill.)</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">No.of deals</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Deal value (reais mill.)</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">No.of deals</font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Jan. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$2,138</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Feb. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1,885</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">21</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">March </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2,504</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">April </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3,960</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">10</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5,274</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">May </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">June </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5,294</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">10</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">6,970</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">595</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">July </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">7,908</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">14</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">19,434</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">6,308</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Aug. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Sept. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">272</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">792</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Oct. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4,827</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">9</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">448</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5,794</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">7</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Nov. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">777</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff"></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Dec. </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3,632</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff"></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2"> Total</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$33,197</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">59</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$32,148</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">9</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#333333" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$13,489</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">12</font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="7" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
        <div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2"><b>Source: <a href="http://www.bcb.gov.br/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">Banco Central do Brasil</font></a></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the past year, the Brazilian stock market has more than doubled. The real is almost back to pre-crisis levels. Rio de Janeiro won the right to host the Olympics in 2016, and that means a huge increase in infrastructure spending. RBC predicts Brazil's economy will average 5% growth annually for five years. "That's remarkable," Chamie says.</p>
<p>Brazil's M&amp;A activity fell in the aftermath of the market crash but is staging a recovery, dominated by domestic consolidation plays. Government banks, notably the country's development bank, Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social, or BNDES, is pumping tens of billions of dollars into the Brazilian economy and playing a prominent role in backing deals, says Thompson &amp; Knight's Hallake. The idea is to promote larger Brazilian companies better able to compete globally.</p>
<p>In May, for example, Brazil's largest food processor, Perdigao SA, took over smaller rival Sadia SA in a share swap valued at $5.3 billion. The new <b>BRF Brasil Foods SA</b> boasts revenue exceeding $7.5 billion and global distribution. The deal sent other companies scrambling. In September, beef producer <b>JBS SA</b> agreed to pay $800 million for a 64% stake in bankrupt American chicken and turkey processor <b>Pilgrim's Pride Corp.</b> In September, meatpacker <b>Marfrig Alimentos SA</b> said it will pay $900 million for chicken processor Seara Alimentos Ltda., <b>Cargill Inc.</b>'s Brazilian subsidiary. That followed Marfrig's July deal for a French-owned turkey operation.</p>
<p>Consolidation is roping in the country's ethanol and sugarcane industries as well. They experienced a boom pre-crisis but overextended. The biggest deal to date involves France's <b>Louis Dreyfus Commodities BV</b>, which last month acquired control of Santelisa Vale for $460 million plus debt and created a joint venture, LDC-SEV. That will be the country's second-largest ethanol producer. <b>Goldman, Sachs &amp; Co.</b> and BNDES together own 13% of the venture.</p>
<p>The IPO market is just now gearing up. In June, Visanet SA, the Brazilian operations of credit card company <b>Visa International</b>, raised the equivalent of $4.3 billion. It was Brazil's biggest-ever IPO until early last month when the Brazilian unit of Spain's <b>Banco Santander SA</b> raised just more than $8 billion. </p>
<p>Late last month, an IPO for clearinghouse <b>Cetip SA</b> raised just over the equivalent of $500 million, which BofA Merrill's Chatel says is about the minimum IPO. "I expect to see much more activity next year," he says.</p>
<p>Outbound investment has noticeably lagged, however. "It's not as much as you'd think," Smith says. Some of the biggest names in Brazil are too busy doing deals domestically but could well soon turn their sights to regional expansion.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<h4>INDIA</h4>
<p></p>
<p>For the first three months of this year, India's IPO market was closed. M&amp;A activity had pretty much shut down. In April, the markets showed signs of life after it became apparent all Indian banks had survived last year's meltdown relatively unscathed. Then came May, the national elections and a resounding victory by the ruling Congress (I) Party. "An amazing result," says James Winterbotham, a London partner at <b>India Advisory Partners</b>. </p>
<p>In one day, the stock market jumped 17%. The deal pipeline began to flow once more. </p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="465">
  <tbody><tr>
    <td colspan="9" bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Outbound M&amp;A by Indian companies</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Year</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2002</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2003</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2004</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2005</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2006</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2007</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2008</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1st half 2009</font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">No. of M&amp;A deals</font></b></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">28</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">49</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">60</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">100</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">137</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">223</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">111</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">36</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value M&amp;A deals ($bill.)</font></b></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$1.8</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$1.7</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$2.4</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$17.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$33.4</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$10.1</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0.6</font></div></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="465">
  <tbody><tr>
    <td colspan="11" valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="11" bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Inbound corporate finance deals in India</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Year</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2000</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2001</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2002</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2003</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2004</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2005</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2006</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2007</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2008</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1st half 2009</font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">No. of deals</font></b></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">532</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">387</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">683</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">574</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">353</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">625</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">697</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">869</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">704</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">223</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">PE deals ($bill.)</font></b></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$1.8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0.7</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$0.1</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$1.7</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$2.0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$7.4</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$10.0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$10.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$3.0</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Strategic investments ($bill.)</font></b></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">6.7</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4.8</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">7.8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3.9</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3.4</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">13.8</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">11.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">23.9</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">22.1</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">6.5</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="11" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
        <div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2"><b>Source: <a href="http://www.iapib.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">IAP Indata </font></a></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Since the March lows, the stock market more than doubled before easing back somewhat amid concerns of a bubble. From June until the end of October, 15 companies launched IPOs, according to data compiled by <b>Meghraj Capital Advisors Pvt. Ltd.</b>, a Mumbai-based investment bank. At least 30 more have filed prospectuses for listing. </p>
<p>"We're definitely seeing a resurgence of IPOs," says Parag Saxena, New York-based chief executive of <b>New Silk Route Partners LLC</b>, a growth-capital firm. "It's a mixed blessing," adds Hirani. "Some [IPOs] are trading below issue price."</p>
<p>Those listing for the first time include India's second-largest state-run oil and gas exploration firm <b>Oil India Ltd.</b> and power generator <b>Indiabulls Power Ltd.</b>, which together were able to raise almost $1 billion.</p>
<p>While direct investments have also returned, deals post-crisis tend to be smaller. "When we look at 10 to 20 million-dollar transactions, we see a huge amount of interest. When we see 75 to 100 million, there's very limited interest," Saxena says.</p>
<p>In June 2008, Japan's <b>Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd.</b> paid $4.6 billion for Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd., India's largest generic-drugs manufacturer. At the time, the consensus was that the Japanese overpaid, a belief reinforced after Ranbaxy got into hot water with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for falsifying information and 30 of its drugs were banned. In January, Daiichi Sankyo took a $3.8 billion charge on the acquisition.</p>
<p>In today's environment, more typical are two deals in August involving distressed Indian drugmaker <b>Wockhardt Ltd.</b> In one, Wockhardt agreed to sell its nutrition business to <b>Abbott Laboratories</b> for $130 million. The same month, Wockhardt sold 10 hospitals from its Wockhardt Hospitals Ltd. subsidiary to Indian hospital network <b>Fortis Healthcare Ltd.</b> for 9.09 billion rupees ($195.78 million). Earlier this year, banks forced Wockhardt, which piled on debt to finance deals in France, Germany and the U.S., to restructure and sell assets. </p>
<p>Gone especially are the days when private equity firms such as <b>Apollo Management LP</b>, <b>Warburg Pincus</b> and <b>Morgan Stanley</b> -- not to mention Lehman Brothers Inc. and <b>American International Group Inc.</b> -- invested hundreds of millions of dollars in Indian real estate. The capital overkill bloated land values to New York and London levels and caused construction costs to skyrocket. </p>
<p>In the aftermath of the financial crisis, property values plummeted. Sales stopped cold. Projects were abandoned.Had property markets not begun to firm in recent months, "many of these companies would have been insolvent in another six months," says Vijay Sathye, a Meghraj Capital managing director.</p>
<p>Indian corporations went on an overseas buying spree in the year or so before the financial crisis. <b>Tata Group</b> led the charge first with the $11 billion acquisition of European steel company Corus Group plc, then with the $2.3 billion purchase of Land Rover-Jaguar. Those kind of trophy properties have lost their appeal, say investment bankers. </p>
<p>"You haven't seen Indian companies looking to buy, say, Opel. They're more cautious," Winterbotham says.</p>
<p>Sathye agrees that the number of India-related megadeals will remain low, but he doesn't think they'll disappear entirely. He points to <b>Bharti Airtel Ltd.</b>, which sought to acquire for $24 billion South Africa's biggest wireless carrier, <b>MTN Group Ltd.</b> The deal fell through when the Indian and South African governments wouldn't compromise on listing requirements. "Larger Indian companies keep growing globally," he says. "Transactions will start to happen."</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<h4>CHINA</h4>
<p></p>
<p>Earlier this month, China launched ChiNext, a Nasdaq-type stock exchange based in Shenzhen. ChiNext promises high-growth issues with fewer restrictions and easier listing requirements than its main boards, where it can take years to go public. </p>
<p>In a wave of speculative frenzy that first day, investors drove up the prices of the initial 28 companies by as much as 200%, with price-earnings ratios reaching stratospheric levels. ChiNext instantly gained the reputation of more casino than capital market.

</p><table align="right" width="440">
<tbody><tr>
<td><object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="viddler" height="370" width="437"><param name="movie" value="http://www.viddler.com/player/ca39cc09/" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://www.viddler.com/player/ca39cc09/" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" name="viddler" height="370" width="437"></object>
</td>
</tr></tbody></table>

<p>Like many others, Deloitte's Chia is dubious of the long-term viability of ChiNext, pointing out that similar markets elsewhere have declined after an initial burst of enthusiasm. But Chia also sees ChiNext as a welcome addition to China's capital markets. "This second board market is going to be attractive to a lot of companies. They're looking for an exit," Chia says, as are their venture capital and private equity investors. "There's pent-up demand for companies that want to get listed." (For more on private equity in China, see "<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/the-search-for-auspiciousness.php">The search for auspiciousness</a>.")</p>
<p>Aided by the government's stimulus program, China's economy decelerated but never declined. Dealflow, however, fell very sharply. "Through the first quarter of '09, it was really quite slow," says Wang. "There was so much uncertainty in the environment."</p>
<p>The government imposed a nine-month moratorium on IPOs that ended only in June. According to Rhodium Group's Rosen, inbound foreign investment during the first half of this year was down a modest 18%. Outbound investment, however, fell by a massive 52%. Fear, not lack of capital, kept Chinese investors back.</p>
<p>"The uncertainty of Chinese investors was overwhelming for firms with very little experience investing abroad," says Rosen. "They had very little stomach for what could have been the buying opportunity of the century."</p>
<p>Investment is now opening up on all fronts, including private equity. "There's been a recovery of M&amp;A activity across the board," says PwC's Ye.</p><p>The most dramatic deals involve acquisitions overseas by large
Chinese companies, many of which are state-owned, as well as the
country's sovereign wealth fund. Last month the Australian government
gave <b>Yanzhou Coal Mining Co. Ltd.</b> the clearance to buy Brisbane-based coal-mining concern <b>Felix Resources Ltd.</b> for $3.26 billion. It's China's biggest investment in Australia to date.</p>
<p>To gain approval, Yanzhou, of Zoucheng, China, promised to move
Australian assets into an Australian company, list that company on a
local stock market by 2012 and reduce ownership to less than 70%.
Yanzhou is also listed on the New York Stock Exchange.</p>
<table align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1" width="635">
  <tbody><tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td colspan="15" valign="top"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Down, but not out</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="15" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Total deal value of strategic and financial M&amp;A in China</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td rowspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Sector</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1Q08</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2Q08*</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3Q08</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4Q08</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1Q09</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2Q09</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td colspan="2" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3Q09</font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Volume</font></font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#000000" valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Value ($bill.)</font></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Domestic</font></b></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">613</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$22.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">862</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$69.3</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">763</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$19.0</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">900</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$31.1</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">520</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$15.3</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">710</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$26.7</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1,011.0</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">$32.1</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Foreign</font></b></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">167</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3.9</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">170</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5.8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">166</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">5.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">156</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">4</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">97</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">2.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">103</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">97</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">3.5</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Total</font></b></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">780</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">26.1</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1,032</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">75.1</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">929</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">24.5</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1,056</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">36.2</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">617</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">17.8</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">813</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">28.3</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">1,108</font></b></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><b><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">35.6</font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Domestic percentage</font></b></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">79%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">85%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">84%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">92%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">82%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">78%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">85%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">89%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">84%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">86%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">87%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">94%</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">91%</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">90%</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><b><font color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">Foreign percentage</font></b></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">21</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">15</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">16</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">18</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">22</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">15</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">11</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">16</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">14</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">13</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">9</font></div></td>
    <td bgcolor="#666666" valign="top"><div align="right"><font color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">10</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="15" bgcolor="#cccccc" valign="top"><hr noshade="noshade" size="1">
        <font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2">*Excluding two telecom deals for $15.9 billion</font>
        <p align="right"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="-2"><b>Source: <a href="http://www.thomsonreuters.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">ThomsonReuters</font></a>, <a href="http://www.pwc.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">PricewaterhouseCoopers</font></a></b></font></p></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table><br /><p>Yanzhou's willingness to meet Australia's ownership demands illustrates the lengths China will go to acquire through investments and outright takeovers natural resources concerns. This is an undisguised effort to ensure raw materials supplies for its industries. "Most outbound [foreign direct investment], $50 to $70 billion a year, will be in natural resources for some time to come," Rosen predicts.</p>
<p>That kind of unbridled hunger can induce pushback. Most notably, <b>Rio Tinto plc</b> nixed in June a deal that would have had <b>Aluminum Corp. of China</b>, known as Chinalco, China's largest mining company, invest $19.5 billion for an additional 9% stake in the Anglo-Australian resource giant.</p>
<p>Those kinds of investments represent a huge outlay of cash but also reflect China's need to recycle the more than $2 trillion in foreign exchange reserves it has accumulated. (Most are now in Treasury bills.) <b>China Investment Corp.</b>, the country's $200 billion sovereign wealth fund, is the government's designated exporter of capital abroad. </p>
<p>In one week in late October, CIC invested a total of about $1.2 billion in two separate Mongolian mining ventures. A month earlier, CIC spent almost $1 billion on an 11% stake in Kazakhstan oil and gas venture <b>KazMunaiGas Exploration Production JSC</b>.</p>
<p>Rosen and others see shifts in economic patterns that will have monumental impact on investments. One is the need to move up the value chain. So it's not just raw materials that Chinese companies have in their sights, but distribution, marketing and sales networks.</p>
<p>Those looking at China-related transactions say most deals are small -- less than $50 million -- and fly well under the radar. Only occasionally do they attract attention, such as <b>Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery Co. Ltd.</b>'s deal last month to buy the Hummer brand from <b>General Motors Co.</b></p>
<p>An even bigger shift will involve the Chinese market itself, that mother lode of 1.3 billion people clamoring for ever-more goods and services. "Once [the Chinese] start adjusting away from heavy industry to a new era of consumption-led growth, there will be hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, gargantuan investment opportunities in consumer-oriented infrastructure," Rosen says.</p>
<p>Some deals give an inkling of what this could mean. This summer <b>Bain Capital LLC</b> invested $233 million in <b>Gome Electrical Appliances Holding Ltd.</b>, China's equivalent to <b>Best Buy Co.</b> Bain wanted to invest more, but Gome's founder thwarted that through participation in a rights offering in August while, improbably, imprisoned.</p>
<p>"The world definitely wants to keep investing," Rosen concludes. "That's where the growth is. That's where the money is." </p>
]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The search for auspiciousness</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/the-search-for-auspiciousness.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31670</id>
<published>2009-11-13T20:00:09Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-13T16:21:23Z</updated>
<summary>Private equity firms scout for quality, reliability and smooth regulatory sailing in their China investments.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Deal International" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Nov. 16, 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Private capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="arsenalcapitalpartners" label="Arsenal Capital Partners" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="blackstonegrouplp" label="Blackstone Group LP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="brics" label="BRICs" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="carlylegroup" label="Carlyle Group" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="china" label="China" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="hopuinvestmentmanagementcoltd" label="Hopu Investment Management Co. Ltd." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="johnbreckenridge" label="John Breckenridge" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kohlbergkravisrobertsco" label="Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="maanshanmodernfarmingcoltd" label="Ma Anshan Modern Farming Co. Ltd." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="novolytetechnologiesinc" label="Novolyte Technologies Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="privateequity" label="private equity" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="solarfunpowerholdingscoltd" label="Solarfun Power Holdings Co. Ltd." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="suncapitalpartnersinc" label="Sun Capital Partners Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="John Breckenridge" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/111609%20chinside%20Breckenridge.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="300" height="200" />The low cost of doing business in China and the potential for growth continue to attract private equity investors. Its economy and local enterprises have expanded so quickly that sponsors can often achieve high returns without any leverage. But they have been forced to get comfortable with risks and regulatory hurdles of investing in the evolving market there.</p>

<p>Even in the global financial slump, "the Chinese market has well outperformed the rest of the world," says Terrence Mullen, a managing director with New York private equity firm <b>Arsenal Capital Partners</b>. In the third quarter, China's government said gross domestic product expanded nearly 9%, compared with 3.5% in the U.S. and 0.5% in Europe. </p>

<p>There is a wide variety of private equity shops operating in China, from<b> Blackstone Group LP</b> -- which recently launched its first renminbi-denominated private equity fund -- to midmarket shops looking for low-cost manufacturing for their portfolio companies. They employ a variety of strategies. Arsenal does not seek standalone deals, but half the investments of its current fund, the $500 million Arsenal Capital Partners II LP, have meaningful operations in China. One of its U.S.-based holdings, <b>Novolyte Technologies Inc.</b>, is looking to make an add-on acquisition in China, Mullen says. The Independence, Ohio, electrolyte materials maker, which Arsenal bought for $60 million last year, has production plants in Baton Rouge, La., and Suzhou, China. Arsenal is relying on its Shanghai office to help guide Novolyte's effort. "To be really successful, you need to be out there searching for good companies," says Mullen, as navigating the risks on the ground is imperative from quality and regulatory standpoints. </p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[
<p><b>Sun Capital Partners Inc.</b>, a midmarket private equity firm in Boca Raton, Fla., doesn't directly invest in China either, but it has "sourcing" offices in Shenzhen and Shanghai to help improve -- and protect -- the profitability of its portfolio. The only way to weed out "the good and the ugly" of manufacturing in China is to visit the facilities, says David Stokoe, Sun Capital's head of sourcing.  Slick catalogs and well-designed Web sites can be deceiving: He recalls arriving at one factory, where "you could literally see they fastened the sign on the wall 20 minutes before I got there." </p>

<p>Once inside, the red flags continued to rise. The person claiming to be the owner didn't seem to know his way around, he says, getting lost on the way to the restroom. </p>

<p>On-site due diligence may also prevent a serious run-in with the law. While touring a Chinese factory, one private equity investor discovered that at the end of its production line hand tools were being stamped "Made in Vietnam." The violation, known as trans-shipping, was an attempt to avoid paying stiff tariffs imposed by the U.S.</p>

<p>Once solid production facilities have been identified, big payoffs can ensue. In October, Sun Capital made 15 times its money in the sale of Japanese fruit-flavored jelly product maker <b>Tarami K.K.</b> </p>

<p>In some cases, sponsors have found opportunity despite problems. Faced with product safety concerns in the Chinese dairy industry -- six infants died and 300,000 were sickened last year from melamine-tainted milk -- the Chinese government has been pushing to modernize the country's fragmented sector. Private equity has become a welcome part of that effort, with a string of deals in recent months.</p>

<p>In June, <b>Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co. </b>said it completed a series of investments in Chinese dairy farm company <b>Ma Anshan Modern Farming Co. Ltd.  </b>According to a source close to the deal, the New York buyout house sank $150 million in the company, known as Modern Dairy, to help it build 20 to 30 large-scale dairy farms and back acquisitions over the next few years. </p>

<p>The following month, the dairy sector realized this year's largest private equity deal in China, according to research firm Dealogic.  <b>China National Cereal, Oils &amp; Foodstuffs Import &amp; Export Corp. </b>teamed with homegrown private equity firm <b>Hopu Investment Management Co. Ltd. </b>to buy a roughly 20% stake in China Mengniu Dairy Co. Ltd. for a combined $790.7 million in July.</p>

<p>In September, <b>Carlyle Group </b>said it bought a 17.3% stake in <b>Guangdong Yas</b><b>hili Group Co. Ltd.</b>, one of China's biggest makers of infant formula. It said it planned to appoint a new head of quality control at the company. </p>

<p>While Beijing has been promoting private capital to improve its economy, it's not always easy to obtain regulatory approvals for deals. In 2005, Washington-based Carlyle tried to buy a majority stake in Chinese machinery maker <b>Xugong Group Construction Machinery Co. Ltd.</b> for $375 million, in what would have been one of the largest foreign investments in the province of Jiangsu. But the government is wary of foreign takeovers of state-owned companies and the deal faced considerable resistance. Carlyle sweetened terms and offered to buy a minority stake, to no avail. The firm's patience ran out in 2008, and it scrapped the effort after three years in regulatory limbo. </p>

<p>But with plenty of opportunities to invest in privately held businesses, the regulatory environment is no longer the biggest impediment to doing deals in China, argues John Breckenridge, a managing director at <b>Good Energies Inc.</b> (pictured above), a renewable energy-focused private equity shop. Instead, cultural differences regarding how people think about selling their businesses have become the greatest challenge. For Chinese entrepreneurs, the "ultimate sign of success" often lies in filling a long-term position of chairman and CEO, whereas in the U.S. it is signaled by turning a "great profit." </p>

<p>Based in New York, Breckenridge travels to China at least once a month, and is responsible for Good Energies' largest Chinese investment: a 35% stake in the Nasdaq-listed <b>Solarfun Power Holdings Co. Ltd.</b>, a Qidong-based photovoltaic module maker. </p>

<p>"The Chinese PV industry has grown with astounding speed," he says, arguing it will become one of the top three or four players in the world for solar installations over the next several years.</p>

<p>Private equity's interest in China remains evident despite the global downturn in private equity fundraising. So far this year, 12 pools solely targeting China have raised about $3.5 billion, according to industry data tracker <b>Preqin Ltd.</b>, while a further 54 funds are on the road, looking to amass a combined $24.56 billion of capital. Many of them are homegrown.</p>

<p>"There's been an absolute explosion in wealthy Chinese," Breckenridge says. This has helped give rise to dozens of local private equity funds.</p>

<p>New York-based Blackstone unveiled in August its Rmb5 billion ($734 million) Blackstone Zhonghua Development Investment Fund, which will concentrate on investment in the Shanghai region. Blackstone has invested in China in the past, buying a 20% stake in chemical producer <b>China National BlueStar (Group) Co. Ltd.</b> for $600 million in September 2008. </p>

<p>Investing with a renminbi fund, however, could carry certain regulatory advantages, including, for instance, helping to get around Chinese accounting rules that make it difficult to take money out of the country. It's a "complicated and arduous" process to take capital back to the U.S., says Frank Marinaro, an attorney with <b>Loeb &amp; Loeb LLP</b>. There's a lot of interest among sponsors to set up renminbi funds, he adds. </p>

<p>Arsenal Capital is one of them. "We don't need to do it now," says Mullen, but "it's something we'd consider." </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Be true to your school</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/be-true-to-your-school.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31675</id>
<published>2009-11-13T19:59:58Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-16T19:21:01Z</updated>
<summary>As the economy swoons, for-profit education sizzles. There has been a string of deals in post-secondary education. Expect consolidation to continue.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Middle market" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Nov. 16, 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Private capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="apollogroupinc" label="Apollo Group Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="archipelagolearninginc" label="Archipelago Learning Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="bridgepointeducationinc" label="Bridgepoint Education Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="chancelloruniversity" label="Chancellor University" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="corinthiancollegesinc" label="Corinthian Colleges Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="devryinc" label="DeVry Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="education" label="education" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="educationmanagementcorp" label="Education Management Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="itteducationalservicesinc" label="ITT Educational Services Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="jordanedmistongroup" label="Jordan Edmiston Group" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="leedsequitypartnersllc" label="Leeds Equity Partners LLC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="princetonreviewinc" label="Princeton Review Inc." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tapartners" label="TA Partners" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/111609%20edu.gif" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="300" height="200" />In most parts of the economy, the phrase "jobless recovery" may seem an oxymoron, or even a cruel euphemism. For the education business, however, there is another name for a 10.2% unemployment rate: It's called a "tailwind." Hard times are good times in education, particularly for companies that teach skills that qualify students for new jobs or help them advance in existing positions. </p>

<p>Education has been a resilient part of the M&amp;A market. The thesis is that education is resistant to recession because workers will seek retraining when competition for jobs increases, often with federal financial aid. Advances in video and other online technologies that help with distance learning have also made the sector attractive, although the potential for an eventual job market rebound has held valuations in check recently. Among all media sectors, only education and content created for mobile phones realized an increase in transactions through the third quarter of 2009, according to media investment bank <b>Jordan, Edmiston Group Inc.</b> </p>

<p>Post-secondary education has had a string of deals. Test prep publisher <b>Princeton Review Inc.</b> is buying professional distance learning company <b>Penn Foster Holdings LLC</b>. <b>Corinthian Colleges Inc.</b> ended a five-year hiatus from acquisitions by agreeing to purchase the parent of Heald College. Private equity firm <b>TA Associates Inc.</b> is re-entering the education business with its buyout of Midwestern trade school operator <b>Vatterott College</b>.</p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[
<p>There have also been initial public offerings of for-profit, or "proprietary," post-secondary educators such as <b>Bridgepoint Education Inc.</b> and <b>Education Management Corp.</b> Online education company <b>Archipelago Learning Inc.</b>, which has filed for an IPO, focuses on kindergarten through 12th grade but has recently begun to retool its digital learning aids for the postsecondary market. Over the summer, Jack Welch lent his name and some of his funds to the hybrid online-on-campus M.B.A. program at <b>Chancellor University</b>.</p>

<p>Now comes the question of how many higher-ed companies the market will support. The industry is fragmented, and many competitors have overlapping disciplines and models. In addition to large institutions such as <b>Apollo Group Inc.</b>, <b>DeVry Inc.</b> and <b>ITT Educational Services Inc.</b>, several small and midsized privately held companies teach trades or offer more general degrees.</p>

<p>"The market is still very, very fragmented, and that is the rationale for additional consolidation," <b>Stifel, Nicolaus &amp; Co.</b> analyst Jerry Herman says, adding that while organic growth remains strong, companies may not feel the pressure to sell. </p>

<p>Many, however, have been hoarding cash and desire to enter new geographical markets and offer new programs. That desire could drive acquisitions.</p>

<p><b>Jefferies &amp; Co.</b> banker Alex Lehmann compares for-profit secondary education with "the software sector 10 or 12 years ago, before Oracle and others began rolling it up."</p>

<p>Apollo Group is a candidate to consolidate the industry. It is the largest of the for-profit, post-secondary educators, and owns a number of institutions, the best known of which is the University of Phoenix. Apollo's flagship owns the naming rights to the University of Phoenix Stadium, home of the National Football League's Arizona Cardinals. The total enrollment of Apollo's schools, which exceeds 360,000, could fill the stadium several times over.</p>

<p>"I'm not sure if Apollo is inclined to do it," Lehmann says. "It has the access to capital, the brand name, a good trade model and is probably the right guy to do a rollup. Or maybe some of the smaller guys would combine."</p>

<p>While it has clout to buy up its U.S. peers, Apollo's most recent acquisitions have been overseas through a partnership with private equity firm <b>Carlyle Group</b>. In June, Apollo Global Inc.<b></b> said it would buy U.K. legal and financial educational company <b>BPP Holdings plc</b> for about $540 million. The international venture also acquired Chilean arts and communications school Universidad de Artes, Ciencias y Comunicación for up to $50 million. </p>

<p>Apollo's prior deal was in online advertising, rather than education. In 2007, the company bought Internet advertising network Aptimus Inc. in a move that Apollo said would improve its ability to oversee its marketing.</p>

<p>Ariel Sokol of <b>Wedbush Morgan Securities Inc.</b> agrees that there will be additional acquisitions but does not expect the field to dwindle to a few large educators. "I don't think you're going to see leaders actively try to consolidate the domestic market," the analyst says. There are a number of mom and pops that can be rolled up, but for the large companies, expanding internationally may be more compelling.</p>

<p>"The domestic market is more cyclical," he says. "In the international market there is just such a large demand."</p>

<p>DeVry is another large career-education company that could acquire its rivals. Like Apollo, however, the Oakbrook Terrace, Ill., company's most recent acquisition was outside of the country. DeVry bought an 82.3% stake in Brazilian business, law and engineering educator Faculdades Nordeste SA, or Fanor, in April for $40.4 million. Last year, the company made a domestic buyout. DeVry paid $290 million for U.S. Education Corp., a Mission Viejo, Calif., company that offers certificate programs and associate degrees in nursing, ultrasound technology, dental hygiene and related fields.</p>

<p>DeVry's birth supports the idea that education and retraining are useful amid economic stress. The company began in 1930s Chicago. Bell and Howell Education Group purchased the school in 1966. The modern DeVry materialized in 1987, when Bell and Howell merged the school with Keller Graduate School of Management.</p>

<p>"We believe industry consolidation will likely continue, driven by the solid capital structures of the industry's largest operators and the overwhelming demand for education in this country and around the world," a DeVry spokesman says. "And while our main priority is meeting the needs of our students, we continue to look at opportunities that further broaden our program reach and help us to diversify."</p>

<p>DeVry says future acquisitions would have to improve the quality of its programs and diversify its programs or its geographic reach. As with the purchase of U.S. Education, it will target schools in "high-demand fields" such as healthcare, business and technology.</p>

<p>Some companies are even older than DeVry: <b>Strayer Education Inc.</b>, Heald and Penn Foster were formed in the 19th century. But the rapid growth of online programs is new to the industry. The Sloan Consortium, a group of institutions trying to increase higher education's acceptance of online programs, reports that the number of students taking Internet courses at post-secondary, degree-granting schools more than doubled from 2002 to 2007. </p>

<p>The increase from 1.6 million to 3.9 million students taking at least one online course represents a 19.7% compound annual growth rate. The growth rate of total higher education enrollment was 1.6% per year.</p>

<p>Experiments in online education that began in the 1990s have become more productive. "In the last decade, there has been a major step forward in the ability of the provider to audit what is going on and audit the quality of the service," says Scott Steffey of education industry consulting firm <b>Symposium Ventures LLC</b>. Institutions can track how much time teachers spend online, in direct contact with students. "My own experience is that online broadens the market, as opposed to cannibalizing the market," he says.</p>

<p>Steffey is a former vice chancellor of the State University of New York, and chief operating officer at Strayer Education. Before entering the education sector in the mid-1990s, he was an executive at <b>American Express Co.</b> and Nynex Corp., now part of <b>Verizon Communications Inc.</b> </p>

<p>Steffey has worked with <b>New Mountain Capital LLC</b> and <b>Lee Equity Partners LLC</b>, and advised TA Associates on its purchase of Vatterott in September.</p>

<p>Vatterott has about 8,000 students in skilled trades, such as air-conditioning repair, building maintenance, paralegal studies, court reporting, cosmetology and diesel mechanics. </p>

<p>"We visited probably 100 of these companies over the past two years," TA Associates managing director Jeffrey Barber says, and settled on Vatterott because of its management team and the quality of its programs. It is not TA's first investment in education: The firm bought <b>Florida Career College</b> in 2004, and sold the school to <b>Greenhill Capital Partners LLC</b> and <b>Abrams Capital LLC</b> in 2007. </p>

<p>Barber has been following the education industry since arriving at TA nine years ago. "I've always viewed it as a retail or consumer service," he says, like the <b>Gap</b> or <b>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</b>. "The product itself is education." </p>

<p>A decade ago, information technology was a hot field. Health and other fields that are difficult to export have become more prominent. "The basic model, especially for good operators, hasn't changed all that much," Barber says.</p>

<p>Vatterott might open a campus or make an acquisition, he says, but the plan is not necessarily to acquire other schools. "If there are markets where there is a need, and we can handle it within the operating framework, we would consider that," Barber says.</p>

<p>There are other for-profit, secondary educators with the resources to acquire other educators. </p>

<p>One is the newly public Education Management. The Pittsburgh company owns the Art Institutes and has made a number of purchases in its 40 years. Former CEO Robert Knutson led it on a rollup of art schools starting in the 1970s.</p>

<p>Education Management expanded its curricula during the last recession and recovery. In 2001, it merged with Argosy Education Group Inc., which offers programs in business, health, psychology, education and other subjects. </p>

<p>That year it also acquired Halifax, Nova Scotia, business school ITI Education Corp. </p>

<p>In 2003, Education Management bought career degree providers American Education Centers and South University, of Savannah, Ga. The company also absorbed the Dubrulle International Culinary &amp; Hotel Institute of Canada in Vancouver, British Columbia.</p>

<p><b>Providence Equity Partners</b> <b>Inc</b>., <b>Goldman Sachs Capital Partners</b> and <b>Leeds Equity Partners LLC</b> acquired Education Management for $3.4 billion in 2006. The firms took the company public in October but maintain a stake.</p>

<p>An Education Management spokeswoman did not return calls about the company's outlook on acquisitions.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, Corinthian Colleges ended a five-year hiatus from mergers and acquisitions in October, when it agreed to buy the private equity-backed owner of Heald College for $395 million. </p>

<p>San Francisco's Heald offers associate degrees in healthcare, business and other professional fields.  It has recently started a program in construction management and touts the opportunities that the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, known commonly as the stimulus bill, will create in the field.</p>

<p>Corinthian says it was attracted by Heald's campuses throughout Northern California and its brand, which dates to 1863. The Santa Ana, Calif., company would look for other acquisitions of regionally accredited programs that would allow it to enter new markets or would expand its presence in existing markets. Targets should also have attractive programs and be accretive to earnings in the first year.</p>

<p>Operators in other niches could also buy into the post-secondary market. Testing company Princeton Review agreed to pay private equity firm <b>Wicks Group of Cos. LLC</b> $170 million for online trade school Penn Foster Education Group Inc. in October. </p>

<p>The target, formerly the International Career School, has 223,000 students in 150 countries. <b>Bain Capital Venture Partners</b> and <b>Falcon Investment Advisors LLC</b> financed the transaction for Princeton Review.</p>

<p>Buyers will have to consider the affect a stronger job market would have on their growth. Corinthian COO Peter Waller said during a November earnings call that the company does not expect unemployment to remain "as much as a catalyst as it was in fiscal year 2009."</p>

<p>Education valuations have tightened over the concern that the tailwind that has propelled enrollment could well become a headwind if the job market improves substantially. "We are on the wrong side of the curve with respect to the cycle," Sokol says. </p>

<p>There is also the prospect of regulatory scrutiny. The Securities and Exchange Commission made an inquiry into Apollo's methods for recognizing revenue, raising concerns that practices at other companies could be subject to critique. The Department of Education is also reviewing rules governing financial aid, which can support a majority of enrollments at some institutions.</p>

<p>TA's Barber suggests that shifts in the job market or in regulations are minor challenges for institutions that successfully teach skills and place students.</p>

<p>"You read all of the articles about the recovery, but you're hearing about a jobless recovery," he says.  "As a backdrop, you've got to think about the transformation the U.S. has gone through, from a manufacturing-based economy to an information-based economy." </p>

<p>Education and training are part of that transformation, Barber says. "Education as a class has been growing at a pretty rapid pace," he says. "You need it to survive." </p>

<p>If employment rebounds and the growth rates fall, it would give proprietary educators even greater motivation to combine. Overseas acquisitions rather than domestic ones may tempt some of the large for-profit educator. </p>

<p>Still, the industry is unlikely to remain as crowded. </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Waiting to exhale</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/waiting-to-exhale.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31703</id>
<published>2009-11-13T19:58:59Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-13T21:35:27Z</updated>
<summary>Middle-market M&amp;A has come back from the abyss, but any sustained rebound depends on the banks.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Middle market" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Nov. 16, 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Private capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Special Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="healthcare" label="healthcare" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="middlemarket" label="middle market" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="middlemarketlending" label="middle market lending" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midmarket" label="midmarket" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midmarketma" label="midmarket M&amp;A" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midmarketpe" label="midmarket PE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="technology" label="technology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[
<p></p>
<table width="320" align="right" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
  <tbody><tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Downtime</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><b><font size="-2" color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Deals $500 mill. and under with U.S. targets, Jan. 1 - Nov. 2</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced buyouts (excluding add-ons)</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Value ($bill.) </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">No. deals </font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2005 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$30.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">330</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2006 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">30.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">409</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2007 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">29.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">247</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2008 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">20.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">247</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2009 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">252</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced secondary buyouts</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Value ($bill.) </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">No. deals </font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2005 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$10.8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">54</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2006 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">6.4</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">33</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2007 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">40</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2008 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">3.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">20</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2009 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">0.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">5</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><hr size="1" noshade="noshade">
        <div align="right"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Source: </b></font> <b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.dealogic.com/" target="_blank"><font style="text-decoration: none;" size="-2" color="#cc0000">Dealogic</font></a></font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top" bgcolor="#ffffff"><h4 align="center"><font face="sans-serif">Related features</font></h4>
        <div align="center">
          <p><font face="sans-serif"><h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/waiting-to-exhale.php">•&nbsp;Waiting to exhale</a></h7><br />
                <h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/what-the-sponsors-saw.php">•&nbsp;What the sponsors saw</a></h7><br />
                <h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/where-have-all-the-lenders-gone.php">•&nbsp;Where have all the lenders gone?</a></h7><br />
                <h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/back-channels.php">•&nbsp;Back channels</a></h7></font></p>
      </div></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table>
<p>The economic recession coupled with the credit crisis has taken a predictable toll on middle-market dealflow. But after hitting rock bottom at the start of the year, M&amp;A has slowly begun to pick up. Dealmakers are cautiously optimistic but fear the continuing paucity of credit could derail any middle-market rebound before it gets properly started.</p>
<p>"We're not in a free fall," says Mary Lou Malanoski, head of investment banking at New York-based <b>Morgan Joseph &amp; Co.</b> "We hit the bottom, but it's now a question of how quickly we can go back up."</p>
<p>That is a substantial improvement from even six months ago. Howard Lanser, director of mergers and acquisitions for<b> Robert W. Baird &amp; Co.</b>, calls the fourth quarter of 2008 and first half of 2009 "the most difficult we experienced in M&amp;A."</p>
<p>According to Baird, the number of global middle-market deals is off about 25% from last year -- which was not a particularly good year, either (see chart). In fact, 2009 is on track to be the worst-ever year for middle-market M&amp;A in the 10 years since Baird began tracking it.</p><p>"People don't appreciate what a serious shutdown of the marketplace
took place," says Hector Cuellar, president of Los Angeles investment
bank <b>McGladrey Capital Markets LLC</b>.</p>

<p>From November 2008 to March 2009, as a troubled banking sector
deleveraged, virtually no credit was available to finance midmarket
M&amp;A. The transactions that did happen were largely small add-ons,
normally financed with cash on hand, or so-called event-driven M&amp;A,
including divestitures of noncore assets. <br /></p><p>"This time last year, folks were in a bit of disarray," says John Neuner, managing director at Richmond, Va.-based <b>Harris Williams &amp; Co.</b> Middle-market deals had been "chugging along until September." Then came the government takeover of <b>Fannie Mae</b> and <b>Freddie Mac</b>, the near failure of <b>American International Group Inc.</b>, the implosion of <b>Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.</b> and a deep recession. Many deals were postponed or canceled altogether. </p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><br /></p><p></p><table width="465" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
  <tbody><tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td colspan="6" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Global middle-market M&amp;A activity</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="6" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><b><font size="-2" color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Number of transactions, 1999-2009</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Year</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$500 mill. - $1 bill.</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$100 mill. - $499 mill.</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">&gt;$100 mill.</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Total</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Deal value  ($bill.)</font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1999</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">341</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,504</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">7,494</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9,339</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$716 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2000</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">352</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,642</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9,900</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11,894</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">792 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2001</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">210</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,155</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">8,382</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9,747</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">528 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2002</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">194</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,080</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">7,733</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9,007</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">499 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2003</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">204</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,212</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">7,526</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">8,942</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">539 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2004</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">292</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,538</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">8,374</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">10,204</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">702 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2005</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">319</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,851</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9,749</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11,919</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">820 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2006</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">456</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2,151</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">10,429</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">13,036</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,006 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2007</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">548</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2,395</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11,434</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">14,377</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,146 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2008</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">311</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,695</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11,214</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">13,220</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">781 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9/08 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">274</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">1,435</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">8,605</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">10, 314</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">658 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9/09 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">145</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">831</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="center"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">6,735</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">7,711</font></b></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">385 </font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="6" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><hr size="1" noshade="noshade"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Middle-market transactions defined as those with a disclosed transaction value of less than $1 billion. Figures exclude transactions involving minority stakes, stock repurchases, and spin-offs.</font>
      <br />
      <font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">YTD as of September 30.</font>
    <p align="right"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Source: <a href="http://www.dealogic.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">Dealogic</font></a> <font color="#cc0000">and</font> <a href="http://www.rwbaird.com/" target="_blank"><font color="#cc0000">Robert W. Baird &amp; Co. Inc.</font></a> <font color="#cc0000">M&amp;A Market Analysis</font></b></font></p></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table><br />

<p>"A lot of things didn't get done," adds Neuner. "Everyone was trying to manage their balance sheets at the end of the year." </p>

<p>The problem persisted into 2009. "People didn't have a good feel for the new norm. At the end of the first quarter, fear was out there, and it kept buyers at the sidelines," he says.</p>

<p>But the picture has slowly started to change, says Landon Smith, managing partner at <b>Riveron Consulting LP</b>, a Dallas firm whose primary clients are private equity shops in the lower-middle market. Smith says he has seen a substantial uptick in deal-related work since Labor Day. While dealmaking often increases in the fourth quarter, Smith says he can identify a few issues that point to more secular growth.</p>

<p>Chief among these, he says, is "price rationalization between buyers and sellers." Especially in the lower end of the middle market, sellers have held out about as long as they can and now need a transaction. Some buyers, meanwhile, have backed off from making fire-sale-or-nothing offers. A few are even willing to pay market rate or above -- depending on the business, of course. </p>

<p>"Most buyers are back now," adds Brent Gledhill, head of global corporate finance for <b>William Blair &amp; Co. LLC</b>.</p>

<p>But much of the activity remains in backlogged deals, including those in the works before Lehman Brothers failed. Bargain-basement shopping is still the norm. And middle-market M&amp;A remains largely a cash market. For the deals announced since Labor Day, Riveron's Smith sees larger equity checks being cut than in 2008. </p>

<p>As recently as a year ago, debt could represent up to 80% of a deal's capital structure. Now, according to Joel Magerman, managing director at New York middle-market investment bank <b>Bryant Park Capital Inc.</b>,<b> </b>the debt-capital ratio is hovering in the 40% to 50% range. "You have to put up more equity to generate the same returns, resulting in a lower purchase multiple," he says </p>

<p>Indeed, bank lending remains the paramount issue for middle-market M&amp;A. "There is less activity on the bank side in terms of lending on new transactions," Malanoski says. A flight to quality has taken many banks upmarket to large-cap transactions and left the middle-market without one of its primary sources of financing, particularly for M&amp;A (see related story "<a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/where-have-all-the-lenders-gone.php">Where have all the lenders gone</a>"). The issue, then, is not buyers and sellers agreeing to make deals but finding ways to finance them.</p>

<p>The Nov. 2 bankruptcy filing of <b>CIT Group Inc.</b> has certainly not helped matters. But it hasn't made them hopeless, either. "It's never a good thing to lose a market participant, says Baird's Lanser. "But it's not going to break or make M&amp;A. My expectation is the gap will be filled from other lenders out there. Other lenders will step up. A new source of capital will form." </p>

<p>Meanwhile, active lenders are choosing to err on the side of caution. "It's better to say no to a deal that is not a clear winner and not make a mistake than to say yes and sort of risk making a mistake, even a small one, and being taken to task for that by an LP in the future," Magerman says.</p>

<p>As a result, strategic buyers who have capital have an advantage over financial buyers who can't get financing, says Morgan Joseph's Malanoski. Private equity firms, therefore, have largely contented themselves with "tending to their flock," explains Smith. Add-ons, which have made up a higher percentage of middle-market PE deals, are normally financed through existing lenders or through sell-side financing. "Seller notes are more typically involved these days to provide the debt piece," says Smith. </p>

<p>As a result of the nonavailability of credit, Magerman sees the market bifurcating: "Pristine deals are getting a high level of interest at above-market multiples. However, anything that has a little hair is being more severely punished than in the past on valuation multiples," he says. "Investors want to feel they're being handsomely rewarded for taking any risk."</p>

<p>And even when everything does work out, it takes significantly longer to close deals than it did pre-Lehman Brothers. Deals that used to take an average of four to five months from the time they went on the market to close are now taking six to seven months, says William Blair's Gledhill. Financings are also taking months to complete. Magerman recalls a $50 million debt financing his firm closed in August. "A 45-day closing period turned to 120 days," he says. </p>

<p></p>

<p>The financing conundrum exists at some level in virtually every sector of the economy -- and globally. "I thought there might be something unique to cause one region or country to [hit trouble], but we're seeing a lot of these things impacted almost universally," Magerman says.</p>

<p>The worst-hit sectors are financial services and consumer industries. Aerospace deals have been sliding due to delays in platforms, but should improve by next year, says Cuellar. Healthcare and technology have seen less of a negative impact, especially in biotech. Malanoski sees activity picking up in the industrial sector.</p>

<p>For Smith, it is not a company's sector per se but the nature of a company's leadership that determines its readiness to deal. "Things holding up the most are entrepreneurial businesses," he says. "Small business owners and entrepreneurs tend to find a way to make things work." Smith has identified many growth situations where "a business needs capital and needs to make a move."</p>

<p>For the rest of the middle market, it all comes down to the banks. "Where the banks go is probably issue No. 1," says Smith. "When and to what degree do they come back to lending? When does that credit free up? There's obviously a lot of issues that flow into that equation, but right now there's a lot of uncertainty around inflation, tax rates, regulation, commercial real estate fallout -- a lot of uncertainty with banking in general. Hopefully, if those issues start to firm up, they'll be able to get back to the business of lending."</p>

<p>For some, the question of whether banks will re-enter the middle market is not a matter of if, but when. "The last 90 to 120 days, people went to saying the doors were closed to saying they were open and they're looking at things," says Magerman. "When will they start doing business at a more reasonable level?"</p>

<p>Perhaps as soon as the first quarter, he estimates. By then it will be about two years since the credit slump onset and 18 months from the start of the recession.</p>

<p>Smith, for one, is "cautiously optimistic deal activity is going to improve," though "with a high degree of certainty that things will not kick up to 2007 levels for some time down the road, if ever." </p>

<p>That should be clear to everybody. </p>

<p><i>Demitri Diakantonis contributed to this report.</i><br /></p><h4 align="center">Related features</h4>
<div align="center">
<p><h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/waiting-to-exhale.php">•&nbsp;Waiting to exhale</a></h7><br />






<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/what-the-sponsors-saw.php">•&nbsp;What the sponsors saw</a></h7><br />






<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/where-have-all-the-lenders-gone.php">•&nbsp;Where have all the lenders gone?</a></h7><br />




<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/back-channels.php">•&nbsp;Back channels</a></h7></p>

</div><p> </p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>What the sponsors saw</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/what-the-sponsors-saw.php" />
    <id>tag:www.thedeal.com,2009:/newsweekly//34.31702</id>
<published>2009-11-13T19:58:58Z</published>
<updated>2009-11-13T21:29:21Z</updated>
<summary>PE investors had to get creative during the worst of the credit crunch, but take-privates and IPOs have picked up.</summary>
<author>

</author>

<category term="Features" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Middle market" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Nov. 16, 2009" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Private capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
<category term="Special Reports" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="adventinternationalcorp" label="Advent International Corp." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="aquilinecapitalpartnersllc" label="Aquiline Capital Partners LLC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="ipo" label="IPO" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kkr" label="KKR" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="kohlbergkravisrobertsco" label="Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co." scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midmarket" label="midmarket" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midmarketpe" label="midmarket PE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="newmountaincapitalllc" label="New Mountain Capital LLC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="pipe" label="PIPE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="takeprivates" label="take-privates" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="tpgcapital" label="TPG Capital" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/img/111609%20SRequity%20draper.jpg" class="mt-image-right" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 8px 8px; float: right;" width="300" height="200" />For midmarket private equity investors, the absence of leverage wasn't nearly as pronounced as in the megabuyout sector. Until last September, when <b>Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.</b> collapsed, the middle market enjoyed some runway before feeling the deleterious effects of the crisis, in part because smaller deals generally involve more modest debt multiples. But when volumes did drop in the first quarter of this year, they dropped precipitously (<a href="#bottom">See table, below</a>).</p>

<p>Difficult economic conditions forced many sponsor-backed businesses with heavy debt loads into restructurings or defaults. "We're reaping the harvest from the good times," says Tom Draper, an attorney with <b>Ropes &amp; Gray LLP</b>. </p>

<p>Private equity shops with dry powder struggled, and sometimes managed, to put capital to work. But without access to debt, sponsors typically paid for all-equity deals and worked all the angles.   </p>
]]>
        <![CDATA[
<p></p><table width="465" align="center" border="0" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1">
  <tbody><tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Downtime</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><b><font size="-2" color="#cc0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Deals $500 mill.  and under with U.S. targets,  Jan. 1 - Nov. 2</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced buyouts (excluding add-ons)</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Value ($bill.) </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">No. deals </font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2005 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$30.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">330</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2006 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">30.2</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">409</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2007 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">29.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">247</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2008 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">20.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">247</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2009 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">11.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">252</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top">&nbsp;</td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced secondary buyouts</font></b></td>
  </tr>
  
  <tr bgcolor="#000000">
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Announced </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Value ($bill.) </font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#ffffff"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">No. deals </font></b></font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2005 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">$10.8</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">54</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2006 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">6.4</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">33</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2007 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">9.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">40</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2008 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">3.5</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">20</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font color="#cc0000"><b><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">2009 YTD</font></b></font></div></td>
    <td valign="top" bgcolor="#666666"><div align="right"><font size="-2" color="#ffffff" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">0.6</font></div></td>
    <td valign="top"><div align="center"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">5</font></div></td>
  </tr>
  <tr>
    <td colspan="3" valign="top" bgcolor="#cccccc"><hr size="1" noshade="noshade">
      <div align="right"><font size="-2" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><b>Source: </b></font> <b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><a href="http://www.dealogic.com/" target="_blank"><font style="text-decoration: none;" size="-2" color="#cc0000">Dealogic</font></a></font></b></div></td>
  </tr>
</tbody></table><p>Some dabbled in private investments in public equities, developing structured PIPEs as a way of gaining bigger stakes in companies while financing markets remained virtually shut and valuations were unstable. In April, for example, New York buyout firm <b>New Mountain Capital LLC</b> supported a $60 million rights offering by software company<b> Deltek Inc. </b>The investor already owned 57% of the Herndon, Va.'s company's common shares, but by investing more money, it could boost its stake to 71% if no other stockholders participated in the offering. </p>

<p>Even buyout giant <b>Kohlberg Kravis Roberts &amp; Co. </b>had its own interesting, if more complex, take on PIPEs. In September, it closed a $288 million investment in <b>Eastman Kodak Co.</b> through secured, nonconvertible notes for which KKR is getting a 10.5% interest rate. KKR's warrants, coming at a nice discount to the stock the day it closed, entitle KKR to an 11% stake in Kodak.  </p>

<p>Investing in financial institutions, healthy or otherwise, has generated more noise than actual transactions to date, given the considerable regulatory uncertainties such deals face. One recent transaction may serve as a template of sorts for investors. Last month, <b>Aquiline Capital Partners LLC</b>, New Mountain and <b>TPG Capital</b> said they are swapping their stock in <b>Tygris Commercial Finance Group Inc.</b>, a commercial finance and leasing company, with <b>EverBank Financial Corp.</b>, a Jacksonville, Fla., thrift and mortgage lender. The $535 million stock-and-cash deal will give the sponsors a 37% stake in EverBank without a single investor owning more than 10%. Whether it passes regulatory muster remains to be seen.</p>

<p>As credit markets have eased in recent months, take-privates have gradually returned but are still few and far between. In October, <b>Advent International Corp.</b> closed a $380 million take-private of <b>Charlotte Russe Holding Inc.</b>, about a year after the women's apparel retailer rejected an offer from <b>KarpReilly Capital Partners LP</b> and <b>H.I.G. Capital LLC</b>. H.I.G. is undertaking its own take-private, buying pharmacy services company <b>Allion Healthcare Inc. </b>for about $278 million, following an auction. </p>

<p>With improvements in leveraged-financing markets and the recent opening of the window for initial public offerings, sponsors might even begin to arbitrage exits between secondary buyouts versus IPOs. For now, the more attractive, healthier companies have managed successful listings, though values remain volatile and the size of the capital raised tends to be modest, with a few exceptions. Proceeds have generally been earmarked for debt repayments, but sponsors have been able to sell shares in the IPO for -- in not a few cases -- significant gains. <br /></p><h4 align="center">Related features</h4>
<div align="center">
<p><h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/waiting-to-exhale.php">•&nbsp;Waiting to exhale</a></h7><br />






<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/what-the-sponsors-saw.php">•&nbsp;What the sponsors saw</a></h7><br />






<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/where-have-all-the-lenders-gone.php">•&nbsp;Where have all the lenders gone?</a></h7><br />




<h7><a href="http://www.thedeal.com/newsweekly/features/special-reports/back-channels.php">•&nbsp;Back channels</a></h7></p>

</div>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
