The Debunking Directory Logic

Unpopular Wars: How To Win Friends And Influence People

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:53:00 +0000

The 9-11 attacks and the related misinformation/propaganda campaign were designed by the government to precipitate the lingering war in Iraq, so that we could get thousands of our men and women killed and thousands of Iraqi civilians killed to make the U.S. more popular and make the current administration more popular, which has worked like a charm.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

How To Get Stuff Done...

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:51:00 +0000

The government has a track record of blowing up its own buildings to push its own nefarious agenda, like they did in the Oklahoma City bombing and the 1993 WTC attack, because, you know, those attacks enabled the government to, you know,... do stuff, and stuff. So you can see this isn't a new idea for them.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Government Badge? You Are Evil!

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:46:00 +0000

Any information that comes from the government is suspect, because everybody knows that "the government" is one vast conspiracy utterly controlled by a small number of evil-doers, not made up of millions of honest, hard-working people, at all levels of bureaucracy, of all ages, of all parties, of all walks of life, each fighting in their own way for truth, justice, and the American way.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

"Now, Why Can't I Get Tenure Again?"

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:45:00 +0000

If I am on the faculty of a university, and I use the university's good name and my position in the university as a crutch to substantiate my claims of a 9-11 mega-conspiracy, expecting my learned colleagues to believe and support me, I will get a harsh dose of reality when I am slapped down to administrative leave as my continued employment at said university is reconsidered.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Goodbye NIST...Hello PowerPoint

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:44:00 +0000

Since verbose, difficult-to-read scientific reports contradict my claims of conspiracy, I'll use a different approach: Nothing says "Science" like lots of photos, drawings, and short captions in a PowerPoint or Flash animation backed by spooky "conspiracy music."

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

POV

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:42:00 +0000

Disagreement between government reports and eyewitness accounts do not mean that the individuals witnessed the same event; they only mean that the accounts that don't agree with my paranoid point of view are lies as part of the government cover-up, are mass hallucinations, or, just to be thorough, both.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

You say a few degrees I say more degrees...Let's call the whole thing off!

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:37:00 +0000

If there is disagreement on the approach angle and bank of the plane hitting the Pentagon in an official report and from online bloggers, then we can safely assume that the plane, in fact, did not exist.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

The Discovery Channel or Tom and Jerry?

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:35:00 +0000

Although a simple concrete barrier can sucker punch a dump truck to a dead stop and virtually atomize a fighter jet, we should expect the impact site of a passenger jet on the world's largest reinforced concrete building to be marked by a plane-shaped hole in the wall.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

RIP Edna Cintron

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:31:00 +0000

If a large plane crashes into a large skyscraper and starts a raging fire inside, then a woman later waves from the outside edge of a lower part of the huge jagged entry hole, then that's proof that the fire inside isn't actually all that hot.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

"Lying Government Shrewds!...and Blacksmiths!"

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:27:00 +0000

Steel supports must liquify at their melting point of 3000°F in order to weaken and fail, and everything that metalurgists and engineers have told us about heat of only about 700°F weakening steel is false, and for thousands of years, metal workers like blacksmiths and armorers have just had it all wrong, because they only needed large blast furnaces, spigots, and molds to form horseshoes, swords, and plowshares from liquid metal, and they didn't need a hammer and anvil, as you see in Hollywood movies' special effects.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Every Plane Must Be The Same

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:24:00 +0000

When pointing out how a B-25 flew into the Empire State Building in 1945, but the building easily survived and didn't collapse, we should disregard how much smaller the B-25 is than a 767, the amount of fuel that each contains, and that the ESB was constructed largely of concrete (like, say, the Pentagon).

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Explosions = Bombs. Always...I promise.

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:22:00 +0000

When some eyewitnesses at the WTC describe a really big noise as an "explosion," we should believe them, and not our own eyes that saw floors pancaking on each other, ejecting debris out the windows. And we should believe their assessment of the "explosions" because, you know, of their experience discriminating between the sounds of some of the tallest skyscrapers in the world collapsing and explosions 80 stories up.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Any, Many, Miny, Missile

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:22:00 +0000

Of all the types of aircraft described by witnesses at the WTC and Pentagon, we should choose to believe only the ones that fit our theories, not the ones that describe actual planes that are missing that contained actual passengers who are missing and whose body parts and DNA were found at the crash sites and whose planes were tracked to impact.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Darn Retrospect!

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:20:00 +0000

More information only muddles "the truth:" The most accurate and complete reports of any disaster are from selections of the first hurried reports, not from more complete, thoughtful analysis and more thorough eyewitness reports that come later.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

"Cheney! I knew we forgot something!!!"

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:19:00 +0000

The same nefarious conspirators that pulled off the single largest concerted suicide attack in history forgot to make a hole in the Pentagon to help fake the airliner impact site.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from 9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Inconvenient Passengers

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:19:00 +0000

Because the shape of the impact holes in the WTC towers and the Pentagon don't match what I think the shape of the planes should be, then it must have been some other type of craft that did the damage, in spite of all of the eyewitness reports and physical evidence to the contrary. Which means that, since the alleged hijacked aircraft are, indeed, missing, and the passengers on said aircraft are, indeed, missing, then the government must have landed those passenger jets in secret somewhere, removed the people, killed them, dismembered them, sprinkled their remains around the crash sites somehow, and destroyed/hid the aircraft somewhere else. Masterful. Much more convincing than just actually crashing the planes into the buildings in the first place.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

The Aeronautical Debris Easter Bunny?

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:17:00 +0000

If a large, thin-skinned aircraft impacts the side of a thick concrete building at 400mph, and only small pieces of the aircraft are found outside on the lawn, then it's obvious the pieces were planted there, and a plane didn't crash at all.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Protect the country I love or a raise? Hmm...

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:16:00 +0000

Our service men and women chose not to shoot down the planes or protect the Pentagon and WTC because they were part of the conspiracy, and they're not speaking out because they've been bought off. Better still, NORAD actually sent the remote-controlled aircraft into their targets.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Inexperienced Pilots or a NORAD RCA Remote?

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:14:00 +0000

The meandering directions of the hijacked aircrafts' flight paths were all part of well-planned routes, and not due to the terrorist pilots flying and navigating a large, real, multi-engine passenger jet for the first time.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

And The Award For 'Best Threat' Goes To...

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:14:00 +0000

Cries of "Death to America!" and "America is the Great Satan!" by Islamic extremists are all part of our government's plan for world domination. Left to themselves, the so-called "extremists" are actually quite pleasant, simple folk (but very good actors).

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

What Would Sherlock Do?

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:12:00 +0000

When you refer to the planes, say "alleged aircraft." When referring to the terrorists, say "alleged terrorists." Because not only can we not be sure they even existed, but also, "alleged" has such a nice, objective ring to it.
--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Hmm...Which Would Be Easiest?

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:09:00 +0000

Somehow orchestrating the hijacking of multiple airliners to have them crash at explosive-rigged sites was more effective than just setting off the explosives by themselves in the first place.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

"Hey. Did You Hear Something?"

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:07:00 +0000

The government planted explosives at the exact aircraft impact sites of the Pentagon and both WTC towers, the explosives and activity surrounding their placement went completely unnoticed, the rigging of the explosives was unharmed by the aircraft impacts and subsequent infernos, and they went off exactly when planned.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

Hani Hanjour Sighting?!?!

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:06:00 +0000

Several of the hijackers are still alive, and apparently are living well.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories

"Just A Few Men With Box Cutters!"

noreply@blogger.com (The Director) — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 00:04:00 +0000

Even though our civilian airliner pilots had been trained to cooperate with hijackers and not try to physically resist, and even though short knives and box cutters were allowed in carry-on luggage, we shouldn't believe the absurd claim that four or five strong and very determined men armed with knives and a fanatic eagerness to die killing Americans could take over an unlocked cockpit.

--From SawyerHome.net’s What I Learned from
9-11 Conspiracy Theories