<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221</id><updated>2012-05-20T06:42:18.368-05:00</updated><title type="text">The Dupont</title><subtitle type="html">thoughts on the world, our country, and my life</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1119</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheDupont" /><feedburner:info uri="thedupont" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-7657469304275283913</id><published>2008-03-02T16:58:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-02T17:02:55.641-05:00</updated><title type="text">Iraq and Iran heart eachother, at least on camera</title><content type="html">In a continuing reminder of the failure of the Bush invasion and occupation of Iraq, we see that one side-effect is that we now have an Iraqi leadership increasingly friendly with the Saddam (and U.S.) enemy Iran.  How peachy are things between the two countries?  &lt;a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/180986.php"&gt;Quite peachy&lt;/a&gt;, in quite a contrast with our situation:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pomp and ceremony greeted Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on his arrival in Iraq on Sunday, the fanfare a stark contrast to the rushed and secretive visits of his bitter rival U.S. President George W. Bush. Ahmadinejad held hands with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani&lt;/strong&gt; as they walked down a red carpet to the tune of their countries' national anthems, his visit the first by an Iranian president since the two neighbours fought a ruinous war in the 1980s. His warm reception, in which he was hugged and kissed by Iraqi officials and presented with flowers by children, was Iraq's first full state welcome for any leader since the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am actually not so sure this is a bad thing, however.  If both the U.S. and Iran are allies with Iraq, that becomes a common denominator between our two countries, and might lead to a diplomatic detente with a new U.S. president. Maybe.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-7657469304275283913?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/7657469304275283913/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=7657469304275283913" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7657469304275283913" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7657469304275283913" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/03/iraq-and-iran-heart-eachother-at-least.html" title="Iraq and Iran heart eachother, at least on camera" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-4728808066079837280</id><published>2008-03-02T13:03:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-02T13:04:44.875-05:00</updated><title type="text">Wow Bill Maher's New Rules from the other night, brutal and hilarious</title><content type="html">Watch the whole thing.  This is, well, politically incorrect:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object width="340" height="294"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QNsHYL22yB0&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QNsHYL22yB0&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-4728808066079837280?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/4728808066079837280/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=4728808066079837280" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4728808066079837280" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4728808066079837280" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/03/wow-bill-mahers-new-rules-from-other.html" title="Wow Bill Maher's New Rules from the other night, brutal and hilarious" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-155580682301755877</id><published>2008-03-02T12:54:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-02T13:02:29.162-05:00</updated><title type="text">Hope in Kenya</title><content type="html">This is a few days old (Feb 29), but still worth writing on.  Kofi Annan got the job done, and many Kenyans were demanding reconciliation. From the &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/29/world/africa/29kenya.html?_r=1&amp;amp;scp=6&amp;amp;sq=kenya&amp;amp;st=nyt&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Kenya’s rival leaders broke their tense standoff on Thursday, agreeing to share power in a deal that may end the violence that has engulfed this nation but could be the beginning of a long and difficult political relationship. The country seemed to let out a collective cheer as &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a title="More articles about Mwai Kibaki" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/k/mwai_kibaki/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Mwai Kibaki&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;, the president, and &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a title="More articles about Raila Odinga." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/o/raila_odinga/index.html?inline=nyt-per"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Raila Odinga&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;, the top opposition leader, sat down at a desk in front of the president’s office, with a bank of television cameras rolling, and &lt;strong&gt;signed an agreement that creates a powerful prime minister position for Mr. Odinga and splits cabinet posts between the government and the opposition.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But wow a lot is going to have to happen to repair the economic, social, and human damage that has occurred over the past two months:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;There is also a deeply divided country to heal. &lt;strong&gt;More than 1,000 Kenyans have been killed and hundreds of thousands driven from their homes&lt;/strong&gt; in an uncharacteristic burst of violence set off by a deeply flawed election in December. Much of the fighting, like the voting, has been along ethnic lines.... The controversy spawned bloodletting across the country, with supporters of Mr. Odinga and Mr. Kibaki attacking one other in brutal battles. Few were spared. &lt;strong&gt;Entire villages were razed. Women and children were burned alive.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The international community needs to move in fast, efficiently, and constructively.  Let's go.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-155580682301755877?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/155580682301755877/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=155580682301755877" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/155580682301755877" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/155580682301755877" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/03/hope-in-kenya.html" title="Hope in Kenya" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-1982101253052357916</id><published>2008-03-02T12:50:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-03-02T12:54:07.231-05:00</updated><title type="text">Republican loon watch</title><content type="html">From TPMtv, Josh Marshall highlights the worst of the worst this week.  Hard to watch, but it serves to remind us how nuts some of these people really are.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object width="340" height="298"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_wavfn6_bE&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/C_wavfn6_bE&amp;color1=0x3a3a3a&amp;color2=0x999999&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-1982101253052357916?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/1982101253052357916/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=1982101253052357916" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1982101253052357916" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1982101253052357916" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/03/republican-loon-watch.html" title="Republican loon watch" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-4945583473481650192</id><published>2008-02-23T15:31:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-23T15:33:16.260-05:00</updated><title type="text">Obama closing in on Hillary for a lead in superdelegates</title><content type="html">Another sign this thing is &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/obama_closing_the_gap_among_su.php"&gt;wrapping up for Obama&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;The Associated Press reports that &lt;strong&gt;Barack Obama has &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/2008/02/ap_survey_superdelegates_jump.php"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;picked up&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt; 25 super-delegate votes in the two and a half weeks since his narrow Super Tuesday win&lt;/strong&gt;, a sign that those in the party establishment are lining up behind the candidate expected to win the pledged-delegate vote. &lt;strong&gt;Only 60 supers are now separating them&lt;/strong&gt; by the AP's count, and Hillary has even lost a net two since Super Tuesday. It's the kind of news that should calm any fears — or dash any hopes, as the case may be — about super-delegates deciding the nomination over the popular will.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though 60 isn't negligible, there are still a lot of non-committed superdelegates out there.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-4945583473481650192?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/4945583473481650192/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=4945583473481650192" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4945583473481650192" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4945583473481650192" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-closing-in-on-hillary-for-lead-in.html" title="Obama closing in on Hillary for a lead in superdelegates" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-6127818389162846597</id><published>2008-02-21T14:12:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T14:20:54.345-05:00</updated><title type="text">Aww, Israel has them too! Right-wing nuts say earthquakes cause by homos</title><content type="html">Of course they are!  From &lt;a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/02/gays-and-earthq.html"&gt;Andrew Sullivan&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;An Israeli MP has blamed parliament's tolerance of gays for earthquakes that have rocked the Holy Land recently.  &lt;/span&gt;Shlomo Benizri, of the ultra-Orthodox Jewish Shas Party, said the tremors had been caused by lawmaking that gave "legitimacy to sodomy".[...]  He called on lawmakers to stop "passing legislation on how to encourage homosexual activity in the state of Israel, which anyway brings about earthquakes."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I mean, the guy's name is Shlomo.  Maybe he's still bitter about being made fun of as a kid: "Shlomo the homo!" &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Or maybe gays really do cause earthquakes.  If so I want to learn how.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-6127818389162846597?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/6127818389162846597/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=6127818389162846597" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/6127818389162846597" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/6127818389162846597" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/aww-israel-has-them-too-right-wing-nuts.html" title="Aww, Israel has them too! Right-wing nuts say earthquakes cause by homos" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-562407979568028990</id><published>2008-02-21T14:05:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T14:07:38.760-05:00</updated><title type="text">Dems' early voting in Texas primary 10 TIMES higher than in '04</title><content type="html">Wow... and &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/21/122936/619/504/461224"&gt;this is good&lt;/a&gt; for Obama.  And good for Dem chances in November (not that we *really* have a chance at Texas, but you never know):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Turnout on the first day of early voting was up all across Texas, according to initial numbers from the Secretary of State's office. But Houston and Dallas were off the charts — the numbers show a 10-fold increase over 2004. In Harris County four years ago, only 728 people showed up for the Democratic primary on the first day of early voting. Yesterday it was 9,243.  In Dallas, the first-day turnout jumped from 913 in 2004 to 8,615 yesterday. That would seem good news for Obama. Other urban counties such as Travis (Austin) and Bexar (San Antonio) showed six-fold increases. In El Paso, it tripled. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-562407979568028990?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/562407979568028990/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=562407979568028990" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/562407979568028990" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/562407979568028990" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/dems-early-voting-in-texas-primary-10.html" title="Dems' early voting in Texas primary 10 TIMES higher than in '04" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-4876820239916492958</id><published>2008-02-21T13:31:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T13:34:08.854-05:00</updated><title type="text">The Onion asks locals what they think of Bush's abstinence AIDS policy</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/amvo/bush_keep_abstinence_in_aids_plan?utm_source=slate_rss_1"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Bush: Keep Abstinence In AIDS Plan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    &lt;p style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;President Bush wants to keep a contested provision in his global AIDS package in which one-third of all prevention spending goes to abstinence education. What do &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; think?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;strong style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;"How much was allocated to dry-humping and finger-banging education?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong style="font-weight: normal; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;-Roger Davidson&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Health Inspector&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;      "This is fine as long as the other two-thirds is going towards funding cutting-edge abstinence research."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong style="font-weight: normal; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Amanda Troughton&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Apartment Manager&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;      "Exactly how much money does it cost to tell people not to have sex with each other?"&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong style="font-weight: normal; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Duncan Pertwee&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;, &lt;/span&gt;&lt;em style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Library Aide&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-4876820239916492958?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/4876820239916492958/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=4876820239916492958" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4876820239916492958" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4876820239916492958" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/onion-asks-locals-what-they-think-of.html" title="The Onion asks locals what they think of Bush's abstinence AIDS policy" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-4400167297109416318</id><published>2008-02-21T13:22:00.003-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-21T13:30:19.253-05:00</updated><title type="text">National news in a frenzy over McCain/Female Lobbyist story</title><content type="html">So if you are running as the up-standing, uncorrupt, anti-lobbyist and special interest candidate, this is not good.  From the story of record, which broke this last night, the &lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?hp"&gt;New York Times&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Early in Senator John McCain’s first run for the White House eight years ago, waves of anxiety swept through his small circle of advisers. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;A female lobbyist had been turning up with him at fund-raisers, visiting his offices and accompanying him on a client’s corporate jet.&lt;/span&gt; Convinced the relationship had become romantic, some of his top advisers intervened to protect the candidate from himself — instructing staff members to block the woman’s access, privately warning her away and repeatedly confronting him, several people involved in the campaign said on the condition of anonymity.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I'm pretty sure we don't know enough to understand the full extent of this relationship--just close friends and colleagues?  A bit more?  A lot more?  But regardless, being that close with a lobbyist while you are chair of the Senate Commerce Committee is not a good thing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mike Huckabee, who is still in the race against McCain, must be laughing that "miracles do happen" (when asked why he's in the race, that's his response...).  How crazy would it be for Huck to get this afterall?  And poor Mitt Romney; a day late and dollar short.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What a campaign............&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;PS:  Considering all of this, I suppose it could be worse.  In light of Mark Foley, Larry Craig, and the rest of the anti-gay gay Republicans, at least this lobbyist was a chick and not a dude!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-4400167297109416318?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/4400167297109416318/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=4400167297109416318" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4400167297109416318" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/4400167297109416318" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/national-news-in-frenzy-over.html" title="National news in a frenzy over McCain/Female Lobbyist story" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-2610638037531710619</id><published>2008-02-13T22:43:00.002-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-13T22:48:18.861-05:00</updated><title type="text">Two very different campaigns, shown by CNN cutting from Obama's speech to McCain's</title><content type="html">You can see it in the YouTube below. At about minute 3:05 CNN's gay Anderson Cooper interrupts Obama's inspiring, energetic, new speech to switch over to McCain's victory speech (both candidates won all three Potomac primaries last night: DC, MD, and VA). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And what a speech McCain's was.  He was speaking as if it were 1953 and the U.S. had just bowed to the imposing force of Red China and a nuclear USSR.  Such gems as--and these are direct quotes--we are fighting people who "despise our freedom," the Democrats will try to "placate implacable foes," and America is "the last best hope on Earth." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Heavy.  And I love the six old white men behind McCain compared to 17,000 people packed into an arena in University of Wisconsin.  I need to send Obama more money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/7CEjl-_1pHg&amp;rel=1"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/7CEjl-_1pHg&amp;rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-2610638037531710619?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/2610638037531710619/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=2610638037531710619" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2610638037531710619" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2610638037531710619" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/two-very-different-campaigns-shown-by.html" title="Two very different campaigns, shown by CNN cutting from Obama's speech to McCain's" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-5808986728254956376</id><published>2008-02-11T21:01:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-11T21:03:44.489-05:00</updated><title type="text">Pretty funny--McCain parody of Obama's Hope YouTube</title><content type="html">The &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY"&gt;inspiring Obama video&lt;/a&gt; was making its way around the internet last week, and you can watch it here. But this post is for laughing. &lt;a href="http://atrios.blogspot.com/2008_02_10_archive.html#2070148479110511662"&gt;At McCain&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object height="373" width="425"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3gwqEneBKUs&amp;amp;rel=1&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent"&gt;&lt;embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3gwqEneBKUs&amp;rel=1&amp;border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="373"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-5808986728254956376?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/5808986728254956376/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=5808986728254956376" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5808986728254956376" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5808986728254956376" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/pretty-funny-mccain-parody-of-obamas.html" title="Pretty funny--McCain parody of Obama's Hope YouTube" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-2096787546148865268</id><published>2008-02-10T11:31:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-10T11:45:08.310-05:00</updated><title type="text">Yesterday's primary results--Obama sweeps, Hillary weeps (not really), and Huck surges</title><content type="html">I don't these results are what most expected; I didn't. Obama just destroyed Hillary in Louisiana, Nebraska, and Washington State. Said another way, all over the damn country. On the Republican side, the media narrative has definitely changed from "McCain is the nominee and just has to unify the party" to "Huckabee is winning primaries still? Potentially in the north?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/"&gt;The details&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Kansas, GOP (100% reporting)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Huckabee - 60%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;McCain - 24%&lt;br /&gt;Paul - 11%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Louisiana, DEM (100% reporting)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clinton - 36%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama - 57%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Louisiana, GOP (100% reporting)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Huckabee - 43%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;McCain - 42%&lt;br /&gt;Paul - 5%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Nebraska, DEM (99% reporting)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clinton - 32%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama - 68%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Washington State, DEM (96% reporting)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clinton - 31%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Obama - 68%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style="color:#003300;"&gt;Washington State, GOP (87% reporting, &lt;em&gt;too close to call&lt;/em&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Huckabee - 24%&lt;br /&gt;McCain - 26%&lt;br /&gt;Paul - 21%&lt;br /&gt;Romney - 16%&lt;br /&gt;Uncommitted - 13%&lt;/span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/177796.php"&gt;Josh Marshall says this say&lt;/a&gt; about the Republican WA State results, focusing on how this is not a good development for McCain:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;First thing you have to note is that &lt;strong&gt;74% of caucuses showed up to vote against their all-but-certain nominee&lt;/strong&gt;. Romney's showing a couple days after dropping out of the race is pretty impressive. And uncommitted even put in a respectable number. &lt;strong&gt;The truth is that beside Huckabee's feeble candidate, of the remaining three, one has officially dropped out, another has said he's shifting his focus to his congressional campaign and the third isn't even a person.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Indeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update&lt;/em&gt;:  I forgot to mention this, but it is &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/obama_campaign_tonights_sweep.php"&gt;big news too&lt;/a&gt;:  &lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Tonight Obama won 103 delegates to Hillary's 58, putting the current total at 1,012 for Obama and 940 for Hillary.&lt;/span&gt;  Now, that is just democratically elected delegates, not the Superdelegates that Hillary views as mana from heaven right now (see &lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/09/clinton-defends-role-of-super-delegates/"&gt;her pandering to them here. shocker.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-2096787546148865268?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/2096787546148865268/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=2096787546148865268" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2096787546148865268" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2096787546148865268" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/yesterdays-primary-results-obama-sweeps.html" title="Yesterday's primary results--Obama sweeps, Hillary weeps (not really), and Huck surges" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-8143313142676977503</id><published>2008-02-09T16:06:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-09T16:12:40.600-05:00</updated><title type="text">Um... what can you say about a headline like this</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4262036&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;Exclusive: Peace Corps, Fulbright Scholar Asked to 'Spy' on Cubans, Venezuelans&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With the sub-headline: &lt;em&gt;U.S. Embassy Official's 'Spy' Request Violated Long-Standing U.S. Policy&lt;/em&gt;. Indeed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whose bright idea was this?  &lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4262036&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;To ABC news&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;"&lt;strong&gt;I was told to provide the names, addresses and activities of any Venezuelan or Cuban doctors or field workers I come across&lt;/strong&gt; during my time here," Fulbright scholar John Alexander van Schaick told ABCNews.com in an interview in La Paz. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Van Schaick's account matches that of Peace Corps members and staff who claim that last July their entire group of new volunteers was instructed by the same U.S. Embassy official in Bolivia to report on Cuban and Venezuelan nationals. The State Department says any such request was "in error" and a violation of long-standing U.S. policy which prohibits the use of Peace Corps personnel or Fulbright scholars for intelligence purposes. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;"We take this very seriously and want to stress this is not in any way our policy," a senior State Department official told ABCNews.com.&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More Bush admin incompetency.  is it 2009 yet?  And by the way, this really hurts the global reputation of the Peace Corps, which has already been strained over the past five years due to the war in Iraq, and, um, Bush.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-8143313142676977503?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/8143313142676977503/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=8143313142676977503" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/8143313142676977503" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/8143313142676977503" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/um-what-can-you-say-about-headline-like.html" title="Um... what can you say about a headline like this" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-7252132627046204294</id><published>2008-02-09T15:53:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-09T16:06:02.551-05:00</updated><title type="text">Just finished Andrew Sullivan's "The Conservative Soul"</title><content type="html">And I strongly recommend it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/03/the_conservativ.html"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 280px" src="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/images/2007/03/24/tcscover.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am a big fan of Andrew Sullivan's blog, and actually expected this book to have a similar feel--insightful and often clever political analysis, commentary, and editorializing. Instead, this book goes into political philosophy of theoconservative fundamentalists who have extreme influence in today's Republican party and then explains his own views and philosophy (with much greater effect, of course). Very readable, the book also touched on important moment's in Sullivan's life and how we has grown over the years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is a representative paragraph, on nothing less than the U.S. Constitution:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;A constitution does something quite miraculous in human affairs, and few constitutions have been as miraculous as America's. What it does in the brutal world of competing human interest and opinions is to change the subject. Instead of focusing on what a polity is for, what meaning it is supposed to represent, which virtues it is supposed to inculcate, a constitution restricts itself to pure procedure. It doesn't tell us what purpose to give our own country or what purpose to give ourselves. It merely says what the state cannot do, and leaves the rest to us. It is a supremely negative piece of positive action. Instead of instructing us what we should do with our lives, it restricts itself to telling us &lt;em&gt;how&lt;/em&gt; we do it.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-7252132627046204294?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/7252132627046204294/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=7252132627046204294" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7252132627046204294" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7252132627046204294" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/just-finished-andrew-sullivans.html" title="Just finished Andrew Sullivan's &quot;The Conservative Soul&quot;" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-3837336636962815015</id><published>2008-02-08T11:15:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-08T11:18:02.633-05:00</updated><title type="text">Romney quits race after spending $35 million of his own money on failure</title><content type="html">For half a second I felt bad for him, and then I heard about what he said in &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-goprace8feb08,1,6814954.story"&gt;his departure speech&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);font-size:85%;" &gt;Groans erupted among members of the Conservative Political Action Conference gathered in a packed hotel ballroom as Romney announced his withdrawal. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);font-size:85%;" &gt;To stay in the race, he said, would make it easier for a Democrat to win, "and in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign be a part of aiding a surrender to terror."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What a douchebag.  Yes, a Democrat being elected will be "surrendering to terror".  Bush and the Republicans have done so well dealing with al Qaida and getting the world to hate us, they can really talk.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Mitt, feel proud that you lost to a man who your party hates.  Congrats!&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-3837336636962815015?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/3837336636962815015/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=3837336636962815015" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/3837336636962815015" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/3837336636962815015" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/romney-quits-race-after-spending-35.html" title="Romney quits race after spending $35 million of his own money on failure" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-9039672633687182821</id><published>2008-02-06T20:45:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T20:51:37.479-05:00</updated><title type="text">Obama beats Clinton in number of states won with 60+ percent of the vote, 8-1</title><content type="html">DailyKos brings up a good point in a long post about how &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/6/142357/5631/340/451210"&gt;Obama unequivocally won&lt;/a&gt; last night.  And then he cites this, which is impressive:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;States Obama won with (so far) more than 60% of the vote:&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Alaska (over 70%) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Colorado &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Georgia &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Idaho (over 70%) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Illinois &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Kansas (over 70%) &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Minnesota&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;North Dakota&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;States Clinton won with (so far) more than 60% of the vote:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;Arkansas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-9039672633687182821?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/9039672633687182821/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=9039672633687182821" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/9039672633687182821" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/9039672633687182821" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/obama-beats-clinton-in-number-of-states.html" title="Obama beats Clinton in number of states won with 60+ percent of the vote, 8-1" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-5406362488063073130</id><published>2008-02-06T13:28:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T13:43:07.392-05:00</updated><title type="text">Super Tuesday reaction:  The Dems</title><content type="html">Unlike the Republican side, there really wasn't a known Wednesday morning headline other than that it was going to be very, very close.  And it was--as illustrated in many ways but &lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/obama-clinton-separated-by-04-percent-on-super-tuesday/"&gt;among them that&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Of all the votes cast on Super Tuesday for the two candidates nationwide, &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;the two candidates are only separated by 0.4 of a percentage point.&lt;/span&gt; By midday Wednesday, 14,645,638 votes were reported cast for either Obama or Clinton on Tuesday. Clinton had won 7,295,400 of those votes (50.2 percent) while Obama captured 7,295,400 votes (49.8 percent).&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yeah, kind of insane. Add to this that &lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/02/06/democrats-shatter-turnout-primary-season-records/"&gt;most Dem races shattered records for turnout&lt;/a&gt;; in the North, South, Midwest, and West Coast.  We're pumped up. In terms of delegates secured (the Dems' delegates are given more or less proportionally to how well you did in the state), it looks like &lt;a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/6/85340/64547"&gt;Obama just eked out a win&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Based on a wide variety of sources, right now it's at Clinton 670, Obama 650, but still with 210 to be allocated from California, 47 from Illinois, and smaller amounts elsewhere.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Then, going state by state, &lt;a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/6/1147/79607"&gt;this is how it played out&lt;/a&gt; (New Mexico is still too close to call):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Obama:  Alabama, Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Delaware, Idaho, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Utah, North Dakota, and Missouri.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Clinton: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oklahoma, and Tennessee.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;What does it all mean?  Practically, we still have a long way to go. And it might come down to the decisions to be made by the hundreds of superdelegates who get to vote for whomever they want at the convention.  Ah, but I will say one thing:  For the first time in the campaign I think a Clinton-Obama ticket is actually possible.  We will see.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-5406362488063073130?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/5406362488063073130/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=5406362488063073130" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5406362488063073130" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5406362488063073130" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/super-tuesday-reaction-dems.html" title="Super Tuesday reaction:  The Dems" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-1691698220481720695</id><published>2008-02-06T12:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-06T13:28:06.172-05:00</updated><title type="text">Super Tuesday reaction:  The Repubs</title><content type="html">Going into yesterday, the conventional wisdom seemed to say that Super Tuesday would most likely entail McCain winning almost all Republican contests (the question being by how much), with the remaining going to Mitt Romney, and potentially one or two to Mike Huckabee.  The storyline for Wednesday was pre-written as "McCain solidifies his front-runner status; nearing enough delegates to clinch the nomination."  Instead, lots of successful McCain stories, but always with a caveat, such was the Washington Post's  &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/06/AR2008020600763.html?hpid=topnews"&gt;McCain Wins Big States; Huckabee, Romney Live&lt;/a&gt;, or the New York Times' &lt;span style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/06/us/politics/06relect.html?ref=politics"&gt;Arizona Senator Surges; Huckabee Strong in the South&lt;/a&gt;.  Here are &lt;a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iXAwi3T9ZznlUSKMBNqOtXxtp4cQD8UKPJQ82"&gt;the results&lt;/a&gt; themselves (most states were winner take all on the Republican side):&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Mike Huckabee:&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Alabama&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Arkansas&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:country-region st="on"&gt;Georgia&lt;/st1:country-region&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Tennessee&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;West Virginia&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;John McCain:&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Arizona&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;California&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Connecticut&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Delaware&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Illinois&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Missouri&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;New Jersey&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:city st="on"&gt;New York&lt;/st1:city&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Oklahoma&lt;/st1:state&gt;&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;Mitt Romney:&lt;span style=""&gt;  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Alaska&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Colorado&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Massachusetts&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Minnesota&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;Montana&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;North Dakota&lt;/st1:state&gt;, &lt;st1:state st="on"&gt;&lt;st1:place st="on"&gt;Utah&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:state&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What strikes me as interesting is that there are some trends -- McCain wins the big states, Huckabee wins the South -- it also just seems kind of random, particularly on Romney's side (exceptions being Mormon Utah and his "home state" of Mass.)  But regardless, what this shows is a party truly divided.  McCain's inability to win big last night, though albeit with a win at the end of the day, illustrates this.  And then you have people like James Dobson of Focus on the [heterosexual, nuclear, preferably white] Family &lt;a href="http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2008/02/dobson-and-mcca.html"&gt;saying things like this&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;I'm deeply disappointed the Republican Party seems poised to select a nominee &lt;/span&gt;who did not support a Constitutional amendment to protect the institution of marriage, who voted for embryonic stem cell research to kill nascent human beings, who opposed tax cuts that ended the marriage penalty, and who has little regard for freedom of speech, who organized the Gang of 14 to preserve filibusters, and has a legendary temper and often uses foul and obscene language.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;I am convinced &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Sen. McCain is not a conservative, and in fact, has gone out of his way to stick his thumb in the eyes of those who are. &lt;/span&gt;He has at times sounded more like a member of the other party. McCain actually considered leaving the GOP in 2001, and approached John Kerry about being Kerry's running mate in 2004. McCain also said publicly that Hillary Clinton would make a good president. Given these and many other concerns, a spoonful of sugar does not make the medicine go down. &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;I cannot, and I will not vote for Sen. John McCain, as a matter of conscience.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Apparently he's not a fan of McCain.  This is not over yet; I'm hoping that the &lt;a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/02/05/641408.aspx"&gt;Huckabee-McCain detente&lt;/a&gt; will end soon as Huck tries to exploit the religious rights' apparent aversion to McCain, and McCain fights back calling out Huckabee for the cave man perspective he holds when it comes to social issues and tax policy. We'll see.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-1691698220481720695?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/1691698220481720695/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=1691698220481720695" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1691698220481720695" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1691698220481720695" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/super-tuesday-reaction-repubs.html" title="Super Tuesday reaction:  The Repubs" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-7028702409959979163</id><published>2008-02-05T15:00:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-05T15:07:46.468-05:00</updated><title type="text">Lima photo essay 2</title><content type="html">Click on the pictures for larger versions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;National Cathedral, Plaza de Armas, Lima.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387876_2891.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="width: 350px;" src="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387876_2891.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Peruvian houses, north of the river, Lima.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387982_8171.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="width: 350px;" src="http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387982_8171.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;City bus.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387983_8452.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="width: 350px;" src="http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387983_8452.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Graffiti, on the way to the beach.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387981_7860.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="width: 280px;" src="http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387981_7860.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Surfing at the pier, on the Pacific Ocean.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387988_9958.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="width: 350px;" src="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387988_9958.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-7028702409959979163?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/7028702409959979163/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=7028702409959979163" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7028702409959979163" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7028702409959979163" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/lima-photo-essay-2.html" title="Lima photo essay 2" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-2963480139082114994</id><published>2008-02-05T14:48:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-05T14:59:44.832-05:00</updated><title type="text">Super Tuesday is upon us</title><content type="html">East Coast polls close in the next four or five hours, and then polls throughout the country will close during the following hours as almost half the electorate votes on which candidate from which party will end up facing the other in November.  On the Dem side, it promises to be a very close race through and through.  And with proportional award of electors (usually by whichever candidate wins each congressional district) it is unlikely that either Hillary or Obama will have enough to clinch the nomination.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On the Republican side, most state contests are winner take all, and McCain looks very strong (though I wouldn't discount Romney getting just enough votes to stay in this thing).  Already, the conservative coalition is cracking, with many fundamentalist (and some mainstream) conservatives saying no way to McCain.  One of the kings of the gay/abortion choice/science/etc. hatred, James Dobson, had &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/dobson_i_will_never_support_mc.php"&gt;this to say&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;With John McCain on the verge of winning the Republican nomination, the once-complacent anti-McCain forces on the right are getting louder than ever. This morning, James Dobson &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);" href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGY2YzViYjE2ZWZkZTFiZDdhMjE0OWUxMzYzNDVmYWM="&gt;released a statement&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt; to Laura Ingraham's radio show, declaring that &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;under no circumstances would he support McCain in the general election&lt;/span&gt; — a potential blow to the Arizona senator, since it could discourage turnout among some evangelical voters.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, &lt;a href="http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/mccain-attacks-senate-gop-critics-2008-02-05.html"&gt;John McCain decided to answer&lt;/a&gt; a number of articles that have been circulating about how many Republican colleagues in the Senate are not particularly fond of him:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) took a swipe Tuesday at GOP senators who have criticized him during the presidential campaign, saying they “&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;are not the most respected members of the United States Senate.&lt;/span&gt;” &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;  &lt;p style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);" class="MsoNoSpacing"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;McCain, who is the front-runner for the Republican presidential nomination heading into the Super Tuesday primaries, was referring to comments made by five-term Mississippi Sen. Thad Cochran and former Sen. Rick Santorum (Pa.). &lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine,”&lt;/span&gt; Cochran had told &lt;em&gt;The Boston Globe&lt;/em&gt; after his endorsement of McCain’s main rival, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. “He is erratic. He is hotheaded. He loses his temper and he worries me.”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;This is going to be fun to watch.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-2963480139082114994?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/2963480139082114994/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=2963480139082114994" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2963480139082114994" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/2963480139082114994" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/super-tuesday-is-upon-us.html" title="Super Tuesday is upon us" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-7774389579511909359</id><published>2008-02-03T19:17:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T19:20:18.101-05:00</updated><title type="text">Thank you Al Gore, for supporting marriage equality</title><content type="html">The former vice president, Nobel Peace Prize winner, Oscar winner, and leader Al Gore recently posted a video on Huffington Post where he eloquently states that he supports marriage equality today:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" width="400" height="400"&gt;&lt;param name="movie" value="http://current.com/e/88817757" /&gt;&lt;param name="wmode" value="transparent" /&gt;&lt;embed src="http://current.com/e/88817757" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="400" height="400" wmode="transparent"/&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-7774389579511909359?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/7774389579511909359/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=7774389579511909359" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7774389579511909359" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/7774389579511909359" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/thank-you-al-gore-for-supporting.html" title="Thank you Al Gore, for supporting marriage equality" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-5515234424006234494</id><published>2008-02-03T13:33:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T13:44:29.385-05:00</updated><title type="text">Lima photo essay 1</title><content type="html">I was in Lima for a week for work, but had time to do some photography.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The view from my hotel window.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387880_4222.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 350px" style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; MARGIN: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" src="http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387880_4222.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Miraflores municipal center at night.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387885_5957.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 350px" style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; MARGIN: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" src="http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387885_5957.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Paragliders flying along the Lima coastline.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387887_6541.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 350px" style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; MARGIN: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" src="http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387887_6541.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Steeple and statue in the Plaze de Armas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387878_3441.jpg"&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 280px" style="BORDER-RIGHT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-TOP: #000000 1px solid; MARGIN: 2px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 1px solid; BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid" src="http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v194/114/20/591518880/n591518880_387878_3441.jpg" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-5515234424006234494?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/5515234424006234494/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=5515234424006234494" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5515234424006234494" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/5515234424006234494" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/lima-photo-essay-1.html" title="Lima photo essay 1" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-1806905692158010255</id><published>2008-02-03T13:10:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T13:30:23.221-05:00</updated><title type="text">Sometimes a principled arch-conservative is better than you'd expect</title><content type="html">In this case, I'm talking about Senator Tom Colburn of Oklahoma, who, among other things as I recall was worried that it was dangerous to use a girls restroom in Oklahoma due to "rampant lesbianism in our public schools" and believes both evolution and global warming are complete farces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Anyway, then he goes and does something like this, calling upon his Majority Leader, the loser Mitch McConnel of Kentucky, to &lt;a href="http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/2007/12/coburn_pushes_for_investigatio.php"&gt;investigate some major sketchy behavior&lt;/a&gt; by the less-than-ethical Republican Representative Don Young from Alaska:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;We may finally get some answers about &lt;strong&gt;how Rep. Don Young (R-AK) managed to change the text of a bill after it was passed by Congress in order to benefit a major campaign contributor.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) today, &lt;strong&gt;Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK) called for the creation of a select committee comprised of both representatives and senators to investigate the miraculous change to the 2005 transportation bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;color:#663366;"&gt;To review the circumstances of Young's extra-Constitutional wizardry: Young, then the chairman of the House transportation committee, inserted a $10 million earmark to widen I-75 in Florida's Collier and Lee Counties in the 2005 bill. The project was supported by local officials. That was the version passed by Congress. But because of Young's unique position, he was able to make a crucial change: the bill later signed by the President had different language, directing the $10 million to an I-75 interchange at Coconut Road. That project had been opposed by local officials, but aggressively backed by real estate mogul Daniel Aronoff, who'd thrown a $40,000 fundraiser for Young that year.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yeah, sketchy.  Coburn also hates government spending--justified or unjustified.  Hence going after this on principle that the taxpayers' money should not be wasted. Amen.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-1806905692158010255?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/1806905692158010255/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=1806905692158010255" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1806905692158010255" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1806905692158010255" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/sometimes-principled-arch-conservative.html" title="Sometimes a principled arch-conservative is better than you'd expect" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-1205231552021111844</id><published>2008-02-03T12:43:00.000-05:00</published><updated>2008-02-03T12:52:05.754-05:00</updated><title type="text">Two days to Super Tuesday</title><content type="html">And things are interesting.  I found &lt;a href="http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html"&gt;a blog that is tracking presidential convention committed delegates&lt;/a&gt;--both the caucus/primary chosens ones and the superdelegates who get to pick who they choose.  The current standings have Clinton ahead overall with 243 to Obama's 169. But without counting superdelegates, Obama is ahead 63 to 48.  But you need 2025 delegates to win the nomination, and so we have a long way to go.  But then again, &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/"&gt;Super Tuesday&lt;/a&gt; is coming up.  I need to send &lt;a href="http://www.barackobama.com/index.php"&gt;Obama&lt;/a&gt; some money.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-1205231552021111844?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/1205231552021111844/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=1205231552021111844" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1205231552021111844" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/1205231552021111844" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/02/two-days-to-super-tuesday.html" title="Two days to Super Tuesday" /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-10352221.post-96536387276718887</id><published>2008-01-23T21:25:00.001-05:00</published><updated>2008-01-23T21:34:18.075-05:00</updated><title type="text">Hillary campaign really does play the worst kind of politics...</title><content type="html">...which finally helps me understand the true hatred the right has for the Clintons.  It is a hatred that runs deeper than just disagreement--I think it is of jealousy.  Clinton campaigns &lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;work&lt;/span&gt;.  But they work by going after the least common denominators, their ability to take supreme advantage of the news cycle and the all-too-predictable reaction of the idiot main-stream press, and their choice to use their opponents' advantages against them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They have used this well so far against Obama, and the most obvious success is that over the past week Obama has been off his game.  Defending himself against the Bill/Hillary attacks, getting off his message of hope through progressive policy and honest politics (for the most part). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And here is the latest from the Clintons.  A radio ad so stupid that it shouldn't pass the laugh test.  But these people know Americans, and they know &lt;a href="http://tpmelectioncentral.com/2008/01/new_negative_hillary_ad_in_south_carolina_hits_obama_for_calling_gop_party_of_ideas.php"&gt;this will sadly work&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;&lt;span style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;VOICE-OVER: “Listen to Barack Obama last week talking about Republicans.    &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;BARACK OBAMA: “The Republicans were the party of ideas for a pretty long chunk of time there over the last 10, 15 years.”  &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;  &lt;p style="color: rgb(102, 51, 102);"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:85%;"&gt;VO: “Really? Aren’t those the ideas that got us into the economic mess we’re in today? Ideas like special tax breaks for Wall Street. Running up a $9 trillion debt. Refusing to raise the minimum wage or deal with the housing crisis. Are those the ideas Barack Obama’s talking about?”&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;Yes, right.  Obama is basically Reagan conservative... am I missing something??&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.barackobama.com/"&gt;Barack Obama 2008&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/10352221-96536387276718887?l=thedupont.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/feeds/96536387276718887/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=10352221&amp;postID=96536387276718887" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/96536387276718887" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/10352221/posts/default/96536387276718887" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://thedupont.blogspot.com/2008/01/hillary-campaign-really-does-play-worst.html" title="Hillary campaign really does play the worst kind of politics..." /><author><name>Hi, I'm Jonathan--</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/00459936100444153393</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>

