<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:08:09 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>2008</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Election 2008</category><category>John McCain</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>John McCain Campaign Strategy</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Media</category><category>Republicans</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>Joe Biden</category><category>GOP</category><category>Vice President</category><category>Justice and the Law</category><category>Republican</category><category>2009</category><category>Barack Obama Campaign Strategy</category><category>Campaign Strategy</category><category>Civil Liberties</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>Justice</category><category>Nuri al-Maliki</category><category>Race</category><category>SCOTUS</category><category>2010 Election</category><category>Campaign Tactics</category><category>Congress</category><category>Democratic Convention</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>Polls</category><category>Afghanistan</category><category>Bail Out Proposal</category><category>Foreign Policy Debate</category><category>Governing Strategy</category><category>Government</category><category>Ground Game</category><category>Pathetic</category><category>Status of Forces Agreement</category><category>War on Terror</category><category>politics</category><category>racism</category><category>Bailout</category><category>Corruption</category><category>Elections</category><category>Foreign Policy</category><category>Gay Marriage</category><category>Joe Lieberman</category><category>Law and Society</category><category>Stupid</category><category>Voter Turnout</category><category>Voting Behavior</category><category>Auto Industry</category><category>Bail Out</category><category>Conservatism</category><category>Criminal Justice</category><category>David Brooks</category><category>Electoral Strategy</category><category>Erick holder</category><category>Free Speech</category><category>Future</category><category>GOTV</category><category>Gitmo</category><category>International Criminal Court</category><category>Judicial Philosophy</category><category>Lies</category><category>Lobbyists</category><category>Pardons</category><category>President Obama</category><category>Presidential Debate</category><category>Senate</category><category>Social Injustice</category><category>Sotomayor</category><category>State Secrets</category><category>Technology</category><category>Ted Stevens</category><category>Torture</category><category>Torture Memos</category><category>Voter Registration</category><category>law and philosophy</category><category>2012</category><category>538</category><category>Abortion</category><category>Accountability</category><category>Appeal</category><category>Blackwater</category><category>Blogging</category><category>Bush</category><category>California</category><category>Charecter Attacks</category><category>Civil Rights</category><category>Confirmation</category><category>Constitution</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Darfur</category><category>Dick Cheney</category><category>Education</category><category>Election Strategy</category><category>Fail</category><category>Faith Based Organizations</category><category>Feminism</category><category>Finals</category><category>Financial Meltdown</category><category>Freedom of Expression</category><category>Georgia</category><category>Illegal Immigration</category><category>Internet</category><category>Jack Abramoff</category><category>Juan Cole</category><category>Judges</category><category>Judicial Activism</category><category>Law Suit</category><category>Legal Process</category><category>Liberal Judicial Philosophy</category><category>Mark Penn</category><category>Marty Lederman</category><category>Media Effects</category><category>Metaphor</category><category>Michael Steele</category><category>Military Commisions</category><category>Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act</category><category>Minority Representation</category><category>Mitt Romeny</category><category>Nation Building</category><category>Negative Attacks</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>Office of Legal Council</category><category>Real Solutions for Real Problems</category><category>Religion</category><category>Right Wing</category><category>Robocalls</category><category>School Choice</category><category>Segregation</category><category>Shiite</category><category>Small Town Voter</category><category>Social Movment</category><category>Spineless</category><category>Stimulus</category><category>Stimulus Package</category><category>Sunni</category><category>Terrorists</category><category>Vice Presidential Debate</category><category>Vote by Mail</category><category>Voter Mobilization</category><category>Voter Supression</category><category>Wire Tapping</category><category>Women</category><category>filibuster</category><category>five thirty eight</category><category>hate crimes</category><category>judiciary</category><category>nate silver</category><category>poblano</category><category>women in the judiciary</category><category>100 Days</category><category>14th</category><category>1st amendment</category><category>2010</category><category>30 Minute Ad</category><category>4th amendment</category><category>527s</category><category>ACORN</category><category>AP</category><category>AUMF</category><category>Accountablility Now</category><category>Adverse Possession</category><category>Advertising</category><category>Advocacy versus incitement</category><category>Africa</category><category>African Union</category><category>Age Gap</category><category>Air Force</category><category>Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb</category><category>Al Queda</category><category>Alan Grayson</category><category>Alaska</category><category>Algeria</category><category>America</category><category>American Prisons</category><category>Americans for Safe Access</category><category>Anti-Intellectualism</category><category>Anti-Voyeurism</category><category>Appellate Process</category><category>Ashley Todd</category><category>Associated Press</category><category>Attorney General</category><category>Bagram</category><category>Benevolent Dictator</category><category>Bi-Partisanship</category><category>Bias</category><category>Bigotry</category><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>Bill of Rights</category><category>Biography</category><category>Black Politics</category><category>Blow Back Effect</category><category>Blue Dogs</category><category>Bob Gates</category><category>Bong Water</category><category>Boring</category><category>Brandenburg v Ohio</category><category>Budget</category><category>Bush Doctrine</category><category>Busing</category><category>Butte County</category><category>CIA</category><category>CITI Bank</category><category>Cabinet</category><category>Campaign Coverage</category><category>Catcher in the Rye</category><category>Cell Phones</category><category>Chain Email</category><category>Chicken Little</category><category>China</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>Christian Conservative</category><category>Citizen Kang</category><category>Civil Unions</category><category>Civilian Contractors</category><category>Clarence Thomas</category><category>Clean Water</category><category>Clinton Campaign</category><category>Clothing</category><category>Cloture</category><category>Colin Powell</category><category>Collective Action</category><category>Congressional Intent</category><category>Connecticut Supreme Court</category><category>Convicted Felons in the Senate</category><category>Conviction</category><category>Corporate Interests</category><category>Counter Insurgency</category><category>Crazy</category><category>Credit Crisis</category><category>Criminal Liability</category><category>Cuba</category><category>Cultural Heritage</category><category>Culture War</category><category>Cyber Civil Rights</category><category>DOMA</category><category>David D. McKiernan</category><category>David Gregory</category><category>David H. Petraeus</category><category>Deadly Force</category><category>Death Penalty</category><category>Debate Strategy</category><category>Deficit</category><category>Delusional</category><category>Democrat</category><category>Democratic Primary</category><category>Depression</category><category>Diane Feinstein</category><category>Diplomacy</category><category>Double Secret Strategy</category><category>Dr. Tiller</category><category>Dress Code</category><category>Drudge Report</category><category>EPA</category><category>Economic Crisis</category><category>Economics</category><category>Economy</category><category>Effectiveness</category><category>Election Challenges</category><category>Election Fraud</category><category>Electric Cars</category><category>Elitist</category><category>Embassy Bombings</category><category>Empathy</category><category>Energy</category><category>Ethics</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>FISA</category><category>Fable</category><category>Fair Use</category><category>Faith</category><category>Fazul Abdullah Mohammed</category><category>Federal Crimes</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Feedom of Speech</category><category>Financial Crisis</category><category>Foreclosure</category><category>Foriegn Policy</category><category>Free Money</category><category>Freedom of the Press</category><category>Funding</category><category>Gaffe</category><category>Gas Prices</category><category>Gay</category><category>Gender Politics</category><category>Gendered Judging</category><category>General James Jones</category><category>George W</category><category>Glenn Greenwald</category><category>Green Revolution</category><category>Guantanamo</category><category>Guantanamo Bay</category><category>HOPE</category><category>Habeas Corpus</category><category>Hal Turner</category><category>Hard Power</category><category>Harold Ickes</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>Health Care</category><category>Health Care Reform</category><category>Hearings</category><category>Henry Paulson</category><category>Herring v United States</category><category>History</category><category>Homles</category><category>Housing Crisis</category><category>Howard Dean</category><category>Howard Wolfson</category><category>Human Rights</category><category>Humanitarian Intervention</category><category>ICC</category><category>Identity</category><category>Image Rehab</category><category>Immigrant Experiece</category><category>Independent Voters</category><category>Inequity</category><category>Influence</category><category>Information Quality Act</category><category>Ink Stained Hands</category><category>Insitutional Power</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iranian Elections</category><category>Iraqi Elections</category><category>Islam in America</category><category>J.D. Salinger</category><category>Jane Hamsher</category><category>Jay Bybee</category><category>Jay Rockefeller</category><category>Jeff Ooi</category><category>Jerry Nadler</category><category>Jesperson</category><category>Jobs</category><category>Joe the Plumber</category><category>John Edwards</category><category>John Kerry</category><category>John Kyl</category><category>Judicial Temperament</category><category>Jury Trial</category><category>KBR</category><category>KIeth Olbermann</category><category>Kenneth Rowles</category><category>Kenya</category><category>Kern County</category><category>Kevin Jon Heller</category><category>King County</category><category>Kopbusters</category><category>Kos</category><category>LAT</category><category>LGBT</category><category>Language</category><category>Larry Lessig</category><category>Law Blog</category><category>Law and Order</category><category>Lawyers</category><category>Leadership</category><category>Legislative History</category><category>Legislative Strategy</category><category>Lesbian</category><category>Liar</category><category>Liberalism</category><category>Liberals</category><category>Lochner II</category><category>MTP</category><category>Magic Negro</category><category>Mahathir Mohamad</category><category>Malaysia</category><category>Mandate</category><category>Marc Rich</category><category>Mardy Lederman</category><category>Marine Sgt. Jose Nazario</category><category>Mark Begich</category><category>Massey Coal</category><category>Matt Taibbi</category><category>Matt Yglesias</category><category>McCain Doctrine</category><category>Media Shield</category><category>Medical Marijuana</category><category>Meet the Press</category><category>Meta</category><category>Michael Brillon</category><category>Mike Huckabee</category><category>Misogynistic</category><category>Mixture</category><category>Modern Civilization</category><category>Monetary Industrial Complex</category><category>Muammar el-Qaddafi</category><category>Musings on Life</category><category>NSA</category><category>National Security</category><category>Nebraskas Abandonment Law</category><category>New York Time</category><category>New York Times</category><category>Nisoor Square</category><category>North Korea</category><category>Notification</category><category>Nuclear Weapons</category><category>OLC</category><category>Obama Long Ad</category><category>Obamacans</category><category>Obstructionism</category><category>Off-Shore Drilling</category><category>Ohio</category><category>Oil</category><category>Omar al-Bashir</category><category>Oral Argument</category><category>Organizing</category><category>Originalist</category><category>Osbourne</category><category>Oversight</category><category>Panetta</category><category>Party Structure</category><category>Pay Off</category><category>Perchlorate</category><category>Personal</category><category>Phony</category><category>Platform</category><category>Police</category><category>Police State</category><category>Political Cartoon</category><category>Political Participation</category><category>Political Rights</category><category>Political Science</category><category>Political Theatre</category><category>Politico</category><category>Post Election</category><category>Power</category><category>Predidiction for 2008 Election</category><category>Presidency</category><category>Presidential Powers</category><category>Primary Challenge</category><category>Private Contractor</category><category>Proposition 4</category><category>Proposition 8</category><category>Public Defender</category><category>Public Opinion</category><category>Public Shaming</category><category>RNC</category><category>Rachel Maddow</category><category>Ralph Nader</category><category>Regulation</category><category>Religious Freedom</category><category>Report</category><category>Resort Complex</category><category>Restraint</category><category>Revisionist</category><category>Ricci</category><category>Rick Warren</category><category>Roberts</category><category>Rod Blagojevich</category><category>Rome Statutes</category><category>SOFA</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>Scooter Libby</category><category>Scowcroft</category><category>Sean Quinn</category><category>Seattle Schools Cases</category><category>Secret Service</category><category>Sectarian Killing</category><category>Sen. Ben Nelson</category><category>Seperation</category><category>Seperation of Church and State</category><category>Sex Abuse Taskforce</category><category>Shepard Fairey</category><category>Shock doctrine</category><category>Signing Statements</category><category>Simpsons</category><category>Sleaze</category><category>Smart</category><category>Snark</category><category>Socialism</category><category>Soft Power</category><category>Somalia</category><category>Sons of Iraq</category><category>Soup Lines</category><category>Souter</category><category>South Korea</category><category>Spartacus</category><category>Squating</category><category>Statutory Interpretation</category><category>Steve Pappas</category><category>Steve Schmidt</category><category>Stimulus Negotiation</category><category>Stinging the Cops</category><category>Strategy</category><category>Student Votes</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>Susan Rice</category><category>Talking Points Memo</category><category>Tarp</category><category>Teachers</category><category>Term Limits</category><category>Terror Detainees</category><category>Textualism</category><category>The Surge</category><category>Theft</category><category>Thomas Lubanga Dyilo</category><category>Three Day Rule</category><category>Tim Pawlenty</category><category>Timimi</category><category>Took our jobs</category><category>Tragedy</category><category>Transfer</category><category>Troop Increase</category><category>Troopergate</category><category>Troy Davis</category><category>Truth</category><category>Turnout</category><category>U.S. Supreme Court</category><category>UAW</category><category>US News and World Report Rankings</category><category>USA</category><category>Uncle Tom</category><category>Unisured</category><category>United States</category><category>United States of Africa</category><category>Upskirt Laws</category><category>Vacation</category><category>Walt Monegan</category><category>War Crimes</category><category>War on Drugs</category><category>Warner Music</category><category>White House</category><category>William Ayers</category><category>Women in Congress</category><category>Yard Signs</category><category>Youth Vote</category><category>blanche lincoln</category><category>blog rec</category><category>cal western</category><category>colorblind</category><category>communication</category><category>courage</category><category>david paterson</category><category>disaster victims</category><category>entrapment by estoppel</category><category>equal protection</category><category>exclusionary rule</category><category>female justices</category><category>female vs male justices</category><category>first amendment</category><category>hate speech</category><category>hispanics</category><category>homeless</category><category>impeachment</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>john yoo</category><category>law school</category><category>long island</category><category>merger</category><category>moderation</category><category>northeast republicans</category><category>piracy</category><category>punishment</category><category>secret treaty</category><category>social behavior</category><category>social issues</category><category>takedown</category><category>tents</category><category>theory of representation</category><category>third party</category><category>ucsd</category><category>usd</category><category>western civilization</category><title>The Gaucho Politico</title><description>Politics, Law, and Government.</description><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>313</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1516415873820768309</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-30T16:16:20.055-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cal western</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law school</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">merger</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ucsd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">usd</category><title>UCSD School of Law?</title><atom:summary type="text">The rumors of a merger between ucsd and cal western are not new. This has been talked about literally for decades. The story has surfaced again here.The University of California San Diego has revived a decades-old plan to establish a law school through a partnership with California Western School of Law.Discussions are preliminary, but the arrangement could range from a strengthened affiliation </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2010/01/ucsd-school-of-law.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-5161943820232833003</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-09T00:00:39.498-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bagram</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Liberties</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">National Security</category><title>Perennial War Warps Our Country.</title><atom:summary type="text">I know its a shocking concept but our country has &quot;been at war with terror&quot; since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Been at war is in quotes if only because the type of war the US has engaged in is not at all the traditional idea of war. The home front has remained mostly in a state of normality. Certainly there have been some changes like the security theater employed at airports but for the </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2010/01/perennial-war-warps-our-country.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1475428537382719754</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-14T14:45:54.416-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Legislative Strategy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Matt Taibbi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><title>Obama&#39;s Fault Or Not?</title><atom:summary type="text">Matt Taibbi&#39;s polemic article about the selection of economic advisors and the general economic policy that has come about has spawned a large debate in the blogosphere. The core of the attacks against Taibi are not the factual charges which seem to be largely a distraction. Instead the substantive critique is that the executive branch advisors arent the problem and that removing them and </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/12/obamas-fault-or-not.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1343811116542617745</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-30T23:43:17.049-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Afghanistan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Deficit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Troop Increase</category><title>Getting Out of Afghanistan and The Defense Problem</title><atom:summary type="text">With our President prepared to send 40,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan a serious discussion has arisen about the future of our commitment there. I have written before about the time and material required for nation building. Back then i was much more willing to devote what was needed to the long struggle of fixing Afghanistan. The nature of the mission has changed and so has my support for </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/getting-out-of-afghanistan-and-defense.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-8510278306790020646</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-25T01:26:33.609-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">filibuster</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Insitutional Power</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Power</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Presidency</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Seperation</category><title>Institutional Power and Congressional Sheep</title><atom:summary type="text">As a general rule members of Congress wish to be reelected. That is not too shocking of a proposition because being a member of Congress is a prestigious job with good benefits. As a result of this interest congress people, senators especially, like to do things that will keep them in office. One of the things that helps keep someone in Congress is taking credit while avoiding responsibility. By </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/institutional-power-and-congressional.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3042505433706622812</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T13:45:58.295-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">blanche lincoln</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">courage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Democrats</category><title>Going Down Fighting</title><atom:summary type="text">Some times political incumbents lose. Admittedly it doesnt happen often. When it does happen though you generally get a good picture ahead of time. The best evidence is Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas. She is, in all likelihood, going to lose.  What then is she supposed to do on big votes like health care insurance reform? Her actions represent a general failing on behalf of losing politicians to do </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/going-down-fighting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4971222759686643025</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-05T01:25:34.386-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intellectual property</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">piracy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">secret treaty</category><title>Secret Intellectual Property Treaty is Very Bad</title><atom:summary type="text">You probably are not aware of the intellectual property treaty being negotiated in Seoul South Korea. Its called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The reason that you may not have heard of it is that its supposed to be secret. Why? National Security concerns of course. Thats right, a treaty that affects millions is being negotiated in secret apparently without the input of views that might</atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/secret-intellectual-property-treaty-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-7397534822549211100</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-04T01:06:24.800-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Liberties</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gitmo</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law Suit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Military Commisions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wire Tapping</category><title>Obama Coming Up Short on Civil Liberties</title><atom:summary type="text">Is he delivering or not? That seems to be a dividing line right now among democrats and liberals. Is President Obama delivering on the change promised during the campaign? The answer to that depends in part on what you thought he meant by change. Other contributing factors to your view probably include the time frame he has had to operate in, the conditions of the media, the general lameness of </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/obama-coming-up-short-on-civil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-6747529071759795707</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-02T17:43:58.962-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Society</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Shield</category><title>Media Shield Law on the Horizon</title><atom:summary type="text">The NYT is reporting on the development of the media shield law designed to protect reporters from disclosing their sources. The law is required in order to give cover to sources who provide information vital to the public knowledge. The type of law that the NYT is reporting on seems like it might be sufficient protection but much hangs on any potential litigation in the court system.As reported </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/media-shield-law-on-horizon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-345779359194028326</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-23T02:32:29.042-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bong Water</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Criminal Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Order</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mixture</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Social Injustice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Textualism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">War on Drugs</category><title>Bong Water is the New Gateway Drug</title><atom:summary type="text">How much prison time is two and a half table spoons of bong water worth? In Minnesota the answer is 86 months of prison time. Thats just over seven years of prison time for possessing some bong water. In a -ridiculous, abhorrent- decision handed down by the Minnesota Supreme Court Bong Water with traces of meth was found to be a substance that qualified as a felony drug possession charge. In </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/bong-water-is-new-gateway-drug.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-207551113971749883</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-08T20:32:28.659-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">politics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Voting Behavior</category><title>No Idea What They Are Talking About</title><atom:summary type="text">When i read most articles about voters, their motivations, rationales, etc i want to smash my head against a brick wall. Today featured a string of blog posts by respected bloggers steve benen, digby, matt yglesias about exactly who and what independent voters are. These bloggers have gotten where they are today because they tend to write intelligently about things that they know and what they </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/no-idea-what-they-are-talking-about.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4904746100628103028</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-04T22:50:04.093-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ACORN</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alan Grayson</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congressional Intent</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Legislative History</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Smart</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Statutory Interpretation</category><title>Why Grayson&#39;s Use of Legislative History is Brilliant</title><atom:summary type="text">Dday has a post up about the rising liberal lion Alan Grayson and his myriad efforts to protect the American people. As Grayson rockets to legislative stardom i wanted to take a minute to explore just how good he is at his job. The technical thing i have been most impressed with is his use of legislative history and understanding of the legal system in fighting fraud and abuse by government </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-graysons-use-of-legislative-history.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-874580188483419065</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-23T21:14:43.690-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Crazy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Language</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Republican</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Right Wing</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Socialism</category><title>Everything is socialists now</title><atom:summary type="text">I am some what fascinated by the right wings ability to kill words. The cottage industry they built up to manipulate the electorate through dog whistle and fear is as impressive at is scary. The relentless message discipline combined with an utter carelessness for the actual meaning of words has allowed them to turn what used to be words of art, words with actual definitions, into meaningless </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/everything-is-socialists-now.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-9050497855605728152</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-21T18:28:50.267-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">david paterson</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><title>Is Obama paying back David Paterson?</title><atom:summary type="text">There has been a minor dust up regarding President Obama urging Gov Paterson of NY not to seek reelection. We saw Michael Steele make the assertion that it was &quot;curious&quot; on why the White House would ask New York Gov. David Paterson (D) not to run for reelection in 2010.&quot;I found that to be stunning, that the White House would send word to one of only two black governors in the country not to run </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-obama-paying-back-david-paterson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-8012140054299510907</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-08T19:04:22.545-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">14th</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">colorblind</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Education</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">equal protection</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">racism</category><title>Race and Colorblindness</title><atom:summary type="text">I have been extremely busy but David has a link and post up on racial views of children that have implications for the way we treat race in society and i wanted to discuss it. It is a very good piece, particularly because it explodes a lot of myths. One is that diverse schools are not a panacea that will lead to cross-racial friendship and understanding. Apparently not: students in integrated </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/race-and-colorblindness.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-164319037581253655</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-16T23:05:43.649-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">1st amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Advocacy versus incitement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brandenburg v Ohio</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">first amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Free Speech</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Freedom of Expression</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Hal Turner</category><title>Hal Turner and the Limits of Free Speech</title><atom:summary type="text">When you state that someone deserves to die and that their death would replenish the tree of liberty as well as assure the freedom of millions, is your speech protected? That is the central question in the case of right wing radical and white supremacist associate hal turner. Turner&#39;s blog entry of June 2 and his subsequent arrest set off a rather large wave of discussion across the Internet. </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/hal-turner-and-limits-of-free-speech.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3002151558902095635</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-13T22:36:10.454-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Minority Representation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">women in the judiciary</category><title>The Next Justice</title><atom:summary type="text">With the recent confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor President Obama managed to add two axis of diversity to the Court. So whats next? Given the temperament of both obama and justice sotomayor i dont envision obama nominating someone radically different in judicial philosophy or style. When you have nailed down the type of person that president obama is likely to nominate the next logical question is </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/next-justice.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3216752109931196776</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-11T15:11:29.148-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Took our jobs</category><title>They took our healthcare!</title><atom:summary type="text">I havent written very much this summer mostly because i have been busy. Also im not a healthcare wonk and thats been the main conversation. The townhall disruptions do remind me of this.The entire idea behind the townhall disruptions is to intimidate, bully, and oppress. When conservatives cant win on the merits of an intellectual argument they resort to violence and fear as the primary tool.</atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/they-took-our-healthcare.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3359534657970915481</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-25T01:07:22.171-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Confirmation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law and philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Society</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sotomayor</category><title>Sotomayor and the Lack of A Liberal Philosophy</title><atom:summary type="text">Its hard to blame Judge Sotomayor for not giving a long drawn out lecture on the nature of the American Appellate system to the Senators who asked her questions. She after all really wants to be on the Court. It is clear that at this point in time simply keeping your mouth shut and letting the Senators talk about themselves and their views is the easiest way to be confirmed. You can search around</atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/sotomayor-and-lack-of-liberal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1662340777873739553</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-15T23:33:34.954-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Boring</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Confirmation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Hearings</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political Theatre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sotomayor</category><title>Sotomayor Comfirmation Hearing is Pretty Boring</title><atom:summary type="text">Im trying hard to get worked up about the sotomayor confirmation hearing. I really am. Sadly though i just cant. Dont get me wrong im very excited to see a latina woman appointed to the court and even though id like to see more liberalism from her she isnt the worst choice ever. My problem is with this entire confirmation hearing process. Does it really serve any point? Are we learning a </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/sotomayor-comfirmation-hearing-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-6704561146750710636</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-02T01:44:05.806-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">racism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ricci</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><title>Ricci and the Courts Race Neutral Desires</title><atom:summary type="text">By now im sure those who read this are well aware that the SCOTUS reversed the lower courts decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. The Ricci decision couldnt have been all that surprising given the result of the Seattle Schools Cases. Its clear that at this point in time a majority of the court is of the belief that racism has been largely solved in this country, at least as it pertains to overt acts of</atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/ricci-and-courts-race-neutral-desires.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-5844613898700823136</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-23T00:01:33.885-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lochner II</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Massey Coal</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Osbourne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Seattle Schools Cases</category><title>Roberts Court as the Second Lochner Era</title><atom:summary type="text">In examining some of the recent decisions handed down by the SCOTUS i have to feel like we might be witnessing history. I dont mean the positive jackie robinson breaking the color barrier history but the bad tanks rolling into Hungary kind. The Roberts court has issued and will continue to issue a number of important 5-4 decisions that will gut or otherwise roll back the rights and protections </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/roberts-court-as-second-lochner-era.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4089471374378912110</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-15T23:25:25.987-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Foreign Policy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Foreign Policy Debate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Green Revolution</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Iran</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Iranian Elections</category><title>Letting Iranians Lead</title><atom:summary type="text">The situation in iran is a potential watershed moment in the way America handles the growth of Democracy and freedom on the world stage. An examination of the situation clearly reveals that the right path and correct attitude is the one currently on display by President Obama. American adventures in democratic intervention do not have a strong history of success. The reason for this is that our </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/letting-iranians-lead.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-2950474494998171220</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-09T12:14:00.342-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judges</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judicial Activism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judicial Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">judiciary</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Restraint</category><title>Are the Courts Too Deferential?</title><atom:summary type="text">Given the constant talk about the Court, the proper judicial philosophy etc. i came upon this oped in the WSJ that makes an interesting point and one that i happen not to have a terrible problem with -- that the courts are too deferential to congress. Its a rather interesting argument and one not heard too often and because of this it should be considered. The idea of &quot;activist judges&quot; has become</atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/are-courts-too-deferential.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1407338906461833061</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-08T21:34:39.036-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blogging</category><title>On Pseudonymous Blogging</title><atom:summary type="text">A long comment posted by me on donlephant in regards to the use of a nom de plume to blog.Justin,I read through the comments on the last post but didnt see a response to the central assertion i made. Namely that the cost in losing the good work done by pseudonymous bloggers will outweigh the benefit pushing them off the Internet. With the anonymity you have the ability to get the insight and </atom:summary><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/on-pseudonymous-blogging.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>