<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:09:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Foreign Policy</category><category>Iraqi Elections</category><category>Truth</category><category>Christian Conservative</category><category>Faith Based Organizations</category><category>Cultural Heritage</category><category>Dress Code</category><category>Stinging the Cops</category><category>China</category><category>Resort Complex</category><category>Busing</category><category>Death Penalty</category><category>Confirmation</category><category>Catcher in the Rye</category><category>female justices</category><category>Negative Attacks</category><category>Sotomayor</category><category>2010 Election</category><category>John McCain Campaign Strategy</category><category>Identity</category><category>Accountablility Now</category><category>Obamacans</category><category>Smart</category><category>Tim Pawlenty</category><category>HOPE</category><category>30 Minute Ad</category><category>Foreign Policy Debate</category><category>Voter Mobilization</category><category>Troy Davis</category><category>Fail</category><category>Deficit</category><category>Energy</category><category>western civilization</category><category>entrapment by estoppel</category><category>Jack Abramoff</category><category>U.S. Supreme Court</category><category>Vote by Mail</category><category>Debate Strategy</category><category>GOTV</category><category>Terror Detainees</category><category>Dick Cheney</category><category>American Prisons</category><category>Bail Out</category><category>Embassy Bombings</category><category>Squating</category><category>United States</category><category>Stupid</category><category>Stimulus Negotiation</category><category>Private Contractor</category><category>Bias</category><category>Free Speech</category><category>Anti-Intellectualism</category><category>Hearings</category><category>Oral Argument</category><category>Oil</category><category>Sons of Iraq</category><category>CIA</category><category>Religious Freedom</category><category>Office of Legal Council</category><category>Appellate Process</category><category>Meet the Press</category><category>Monetary Industrial Complex</category><category>Judicial Activism</category><category>Sen. Ben Nelson</category><category>Gas Prices</category><category>Ink Stained Hands</category><category>Meta</category><category>EPA</category><category>Rachel Maddow</category><category>Thomas Lubanga Dyilo</category><category>Off-Shore Drilling</category><category>Shiite</category><category>Stimulus Package</category><category>Talking Points Memo</category><category>Marine Sgt. Jose Nazario</category><category>courage</category><category>nate silver</category><category>Insitutional Power</category><category>AUMF</category><category>Real Solutions for Real Problems</category><category>blog rec</category><category>527s</category><category>Ground Game</category><category>Jesperson</category><category>homeless</category><category>Judicial Temperament</category><category>Kevin Jon Heller</category><category>Leadership</category><category>DOMA</category><category>Clinton Campaign</category><category>Torture Memos</category><category>Language</category><category>Bong Water</category><category>law school</category><category>Information Quality Act</category><category>Credit Crisis</category><category>Turnout</category><category>colorblind</category><category>Attorney General</category><category>Americans for Safe Access</category><category>Right Wing</category><category>Cloture</category><category>Took our jobs</category><category>Socialism</category><category>100 Days</category><category>Gitmo</category><category>Human Rights</category><category>Student Votes</category><category>Oversight</category><category>Jobs</category><category>Political Rights</category><category>Civilian Contractors</category><category>David Brooks</category><category>Nisoor Square</category><category>Roberts</category><category>Vice President</category><category>Perchlorate</category><category>Chain Email</category><category>Biography</category><category>Jay Rockefeller</category><category>CITI Bank</category><category>Harold Ickes</category><category>hispanics</category><category>takedown</category><category>Vice Presidential Debate</category><category>social behavior</category><category>Shepard Fairey</category><category>Voter Turnout</category><category>Seperation</category><category>Corporate Interests</category><category>Personal</category><category>Sunni</category><category>Mike Huckabee</category><category>John Kerry</category><category>Charecter Attacks</category><category>Economics</category><category>Proposition 8</category><category>The Surge</category><category>Statutory Interpretation</category><category>Race</category><category>Blue Dogs</category><category>Metaphor</category><category>Democrats</category><category>Dr. Tiller</category><category>William Ayers</category><category>War on Drugs</category><category>Election 2008</category><category>North Korea</category><category>Clothing</category><category>Kenneth Rowles</category><category>Inequity</category><category>RNC</category><category>Election Challenges</category><category>Rome Statutes</category><category>Party Structure</category><category>Mixture</category><category>Africa</category><category>Faith</category><category>Kopbusters</category><category>Gaffe</category><category>Algeria</category><category>Nation Building</category><category>Election Fraud</category><category>Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb</category><category>Connecticut Supreme Court</category><category>Ethics</category><category>Constitution</category><category>Fair Use</category><category>Voter Supression</category><category>White House</category><category>racism</category><category>ACORN</category><category>Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act</category><category>blanche lincoln</category><category>Larry Lessig</category><category>Green Revolution</category><category>cal western</category><category>Soft Power</category><category>Jay Bybee</category><category>Bush</category><category>Jury Trial</category><category>Post Election</category><category>Mandate</category><category>John Kyl</category><category>moderation</category><category>Bi-Partisanship</category><category>Malaysia</category><category>Elections</category><category>Transfer</category><category>Mitt Romeny</category><category>Financial Meltdown</category><category>Foreclosure</category><category>Ted Stevens</category><category>Joe Biden</category><category>Justice</category><category>John McCain</category><category>Youth Vote</category><category>secret treaty</category><category>Guantanamo</category><category>Political Science</category><category>Matt Taibbi</category><category>Magic Negro</category><category>David H. Petraeus</category><category>Governing Strategy</category><category>social issues</category><category>Education</category><category>Alaska</category><category>UAW</category><category>Civil Unions</category><category>KBR</category><category>Uncle Tom</category><category>Cyber Civil Rights</category><category>law and philosophy</category><category>exclusionary rule</category><category>Technology</category><category>Liar</category><category>Pathetic</category><category>david paterson</category><category>Pardons</category><category>Juan Cole</category><category>Massey Coal</category><category>Habeas Corpus</category><category>Citizen Kang</category><category>Souter</category><category>America</category><category>equal protection</category><category>Spineless</category><category>Government</category><category>Media Shield</category><category>2012</category><category>Humanitarian Intervention</category><category>Political Theatre</category><category>hate speech</category><category>Congress</category><category>Shock doctrine</category><category>five thirty eight</category><category>Proposition 4</category><category>Auto Industry</category><category>Electoral Strategy</category><category>United States of Africa</category><category>Clean Water</category><category>Michael Brillon</category><category>Culture War</category><category>Term Limits</category><category>Snark</category><category>Empathy</category><category>General James Jones</category><category>Bill Clinton</category><category>4th amendment</category><category>Finals</category><category>Stimulus</category><category>Internet</category><category>Seattle Schools Cases</category><category>Air Force</category><category>Lesbian</category><category>California</category><category>Public Opinion</category><category>Law and Order</category><category>Democrat</category><category>Freedom of the Press</category><category>2010</category><category>Drudge Report</category><category>Mahathir Mohamad</category><category>Terrorists</category><category>Bush Doctrine</category><category>Effectiveness</category><category>Scooter Libby</category><category>Blogging</category><category>Liberals</category><category>Nuri al-Maliki</category><category>Clarence Thomas</category><category>Social Injustice</category><category>Mardy Lederman</category><category>Harry Reid</category><category>Electric Cars</category><category>Michael Steele</category><category>Signing Statements</category><category>Lochner II</category><category>Legislative Strategy</category><category>Public Defender</category><category>President Obama</category><category>Senate</category><category>Textualism</category><category>State Secrets</category><category>merger</category><category>Panetta</category><category>impeachment</category><category>poblano</category><category>Predidiction for 2008 Election</category><category>African Union</category><category>Minority Representation</category><category>Bob Gates</category><category>2009</category><category>Mark Penn</category><category>Susan Rice</category><category>International Criminal Court</category><category>Women</category><category>Democratic Party</category><category>Double Secret Strategy</category><category>Power</category><category>Saudi Arabia</category><category>Police State</category><category>filibuster</category><category>Somalia</category><category>Gay</category><category>King County</category><category>SOFA</category><category>Kern County</category><category>Medical Marijuana</category><category>Deadly Force</category><category>Henry Paulson</category><category>War Crimes</category><category>LGBT</category><category>Ralph Nader</category><category>Police</category><category>2008</category><category>Financial Crisis</category><category>Nebraskas Abandonment Law</category><category>Rod Blagojevich</category><category>Soup Lines</category><category>Benevolent Dictator</category><category>Secret Service</category><category>Budget</category><category>Steve Schmidt</category><category>Organizing</category><category>Social Movment</category><category>Republican</category><category>Immigrant Experiece</category><category>Advocacy versus incitement</category><category>Torture</category><category>Nuclear Weapons</category><category>Joe Lieberman</category><category>Boring</category><category>hate crimes</category><category>Pay Off</category><category>Georgia</category><category>Feminism</category><category>Delusional</category><category>Strategy</category><category>long island</category><category>Darfur</category><category>Revisionist</category><category>Homles</category><category>Sex Abuse Taskforce</category><category>Tarp</category><category>Howard Wolfson</category><category>Osbourne</category><category>Herring v United States</category><category>john yoo</category><category>Politico</category><category>third party</category><category>Judicial Philosophy</category><category>Jerry Nadler</category><category>OLC</category><category>Legal Process</category><category>Islam in America</category><category>Law Suit</category><category>Presidential Debate</category><category>1st amendment</category><category>Cell Phones</category><category>Anti-Voyeurism</category><category>Corruption</category><category>Obama Long Ad</category><category>northeast republicans</category><category>Depression</category><category>J.D. Salinger</category><category>Media Effects</category><category>Funding</category><category>George W</category><category>Troop Increase</category><category>US News and World Report Rankings</category><category>Democratic Convention</category><category>Political Cartoon</category><category>National Security</category><category>GOP</category><category>Gay Marriage</category><category>Foriegn Policy</category><category>Fable</category><category>Collective Action</category><category>Platform</category><category>Public Shaming</category><category>Cuba</category><category>Executive Pay</category><category>Obstructionism</category><category>Musings on Life</category><category>Democratic Primary</category><category>Crazy</category><category>Joe the Plumber</category><category>Teachers</category><category>14th</category><category>Campaign Tactics</category><category>Lies</category><category>David Gregory</category><category>Abortion</category><category>Restraint</category><category>Steve Pappas</category><category>Rick Warren</category><category>usd</category><category>Segregation</category><category>Sleaze</category><category>Omar al-Bashir</category><category>SCOTUS</category><category>Copyright</category><category>Theft</category><category>Appeal</category><category>disaster victims</category><category>Kenya</category><category>Judges</category><category>Legislative History</category><category>Spartacus</category><category>Erick holder</category><category>Economy</category><category>punishment</category><category>Blackwater</category><category>Alan Grayson</category><category>Hillary Clinton</category><category>women in the judiciary</category><category>Hal Turner</category><category>Image Rehab</category><category>Presidential Powers</category><category>Barack Obama Campaign Strategy</category><category>Chicken Little</category><category>Gender Politics</category><category>McCain Doctrine</category><category>Warner Music</category><category>Notification</category><category>Walt Monegan</category><category>Wire Tapping</category><category>Black Politics</category><category>Marty Lederman</category><category>Howard Dean</category><category>Ricci</category><category>Bagram</category><category>Military Commisions</category><category>Tragedy</category><category>Scowcroft</category><category>Independent Voters</category><category>AP</category><category>ICC</category><category>judiciary</category><category>Afghanistan</category><category>Phony</category><category>Criminal Liability</category><category>School Choice</category><category>Advertising</category><category>Civil Rights</category><category>Mark Begich</category><category>Health Care Reform</category><category>Justice and the Law</category><category>Political Participation</category><category>Misogynistic</category><category>Jane Hamsher</category><category>Status of Forces Agreement</category><category>Newsweek</category><category>Yard Signs</category><category>Kos</category><category>Guantanamo Bay</category><category>History</category><category>Sean Quinn</category><category>Sectarian Killing</category><category>Elitist</category><category>Bill of Rights</category><category>Brandenburg v Ohio</category><category>Campaign Coverage</category><category>Troopergate</category><category>Timimi</category><category>Butte County</category><category>Campaign Strategy</category><category>Freedom of Expression</category><category>New York Time</category><category>Lawyers</category><category>South Korea</category><category>Free Money</category><category>Robocalls</category><category>Federal Crimes</category><category>Housing Crisis</category><category>Ohio</category><category>Associated Press</category><category>Vacation</category><category>Accountability</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><category>Bail Out Proposal</category><category>Chris Dodd</category><category>Law and Society</category><category>Republicans</category><category>Modern Civilization</category><category>theory of representation</category><category>New York Times</category><category>John Edwards</category><category>Originalist</category><category>Hard Power</category><category>Barack Obama</category><category>Election Strategy</category><category>Civil Liberties</category><category>Polls</category><category>Fazul Abdullah Mohammed</category><category>Media</category><category>Iraq</category><category>Colin Powell</category><category>Conservatism</category><category>Three Day Rule</category><category>tents</category><category>Small Town Voter</category><category>piracy</category><category>female vs male justices</category><category>Illegal Immigration</category><category>538</category><category>Report</category><category>Future</category><category>Congressional Intent</category><category>Voter Registration</category><category>Jeff Ooi</category><category>USA</category><category>Law Blog</category><category>first amendment</category><category>Bailout</category><category>Marc Rich</category><category>Gendered Judging</category><category>LAT</category><category>Conviction</category><category>Diplomacy</category><category>Regulation</category><category>David D. McKiernan</category><category>Unisured</category><category>Presidency</category><category>Cabinet</category><category>Diane Feinstein</category><category>Religion</category><category>Feedom of Speech</category><category>ucsd</category><category>Voting Behavior</category><category>Liberalism</category><category>Age Gap</category><category>Lobbyists</category><category>NSA</category><category>Counter Insurgency</category><category>Muammar el-Qaddafi</category><category>George W. Bush</category><category>Bigotry</category><category>politics</category><category>Blow Back Effect</category><category>communication</category><category>Upskirt Laws</category><category>Glenn Greenwald</category><category>Liberal Judicial Philosophy</category><category>Simpsons</category><category>Supreme Court</category><category>War on Terror</category><category>Health Care</category><category>Iran</category><category>Iranian Elections</category><category>Ashley Todd</category><category>Adverse Possession</category><category>Al Queda</category><category>intellectual property</category><category>Criminal Justice</category><category>Seperation of Church and State</category><category>Economic Crisis</category><category>Influence</category><category>Convicted Felons in the Senate</category><category>Matt Yglesias</category><category>Women in Congress</category><category>Primary Challenge</category><category>FISA</category><category>MTP</category><category>Sarah Palin</category><category>KIeth Olbermann</category><title>The Gaucho Politico</title><description>Politics, Law, and Government.</description><link>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>313</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheGauchoPolitico" /><feedburner:info uri="thegauchopolitico" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/</creativeCommons:license><feedburner:emailServiceId>TheGauchoPolitico</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://add.my.yahoo.com/rss?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://us.i1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/i/us/my/addtomyyahoo4.gif">Subscribe with My Yahoo!</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.newsgator.com/ngs/subscriber/subext.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://www.newsgator.com/images/ngsub1.gif">Subscribe with NewsGator</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://feeds.my.aol.com/add.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://o.aolcdn.com/favorites.my.aol.com/webmaster/ffclient/webroot/locale/en-US/images/myAOLButtonSmall.gif">Subscribe with My AOL</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.bloglines.com/sub/http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheGauchoPolitico" src="http://www.bloglines.com/images/sub_modern11.gif">Subscribe with Bloglines</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.netvibes.com/subscribe.php?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://www.netvibes.com/img/add2netvibes.gif">Subscribe with Netvibes</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://fusion.google.com/add?feedurl=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://buttons.googlesyndication.com/fusion/add.gif">Subscribe with Google</feedburner:feedFlare><feedburner:feedFlare href="http://www.pageflakes.com/subscribe.aspx?url=http%3A%2F%2Ffeeds.feedburner.com%2FTheGauchoPolitico" src="http://www.pageflakes.com/ImageFile.ashx?instanceId=Static_4&amp;fileName=ATP_blu_91x17.gif">Subscribe with Pageflakes</feedburner:feedFlare><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1516415873820768309</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:53:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-30T16:16:20.055-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ucsd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law school</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">merger</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">usd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">cal western</category><title>UCSD School of Law?</title><atom:summary>The rumors of a merger between ucsd and cal western are not new. This has been talked about literally for decades. The story has surfaced again here.The University of California San Diego has revived a decades-old plan to establish a law school through a partnership with California Western School of Law.Discussions are preliminary, but the arrangement could range from a strengthened affiliation </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/9eOcWaReGvY/ucsd-school-of-law.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/9eOcWaReGvY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2010/01/ucsd-school-of-law.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-5161943820232833003</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2010-01-09T00:00:39.498-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bagram</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Liberties</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">National Security</category><title>Perennial War Warps Our Country.</title><atom:summary>I know its a shocking concept but our country has "been at war with terror" since the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001. Been at war is in quotes if only because the type of war the US has engaged in is not at all the traditional idea of war. The home front has remained mostly in a state of normality. Certainly there have been some changes like the security theater employed at airports but for the </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/1p4BeVaNfTg/perennial-war-warps-our-country.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/1p4BeVaNfTg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2010/01/perennial-war-warps-our-country.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1475428537382719754</guid><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-14T14:45:54.416-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Legislative Strategy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Matt Taibbi</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><title>Obama's Fault Or Not?</title><atom:summary>Matt Taibbi's polemic article about the selection of economic advisors and the general economic policy that has come about has spawned a large debate in the blogosphere. The core of the attacks against Taibi are not the factual charges which seem to be largely a distraction. Instead the substantive critique is that the executive branch advisors arent the problem and that removing them and </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/lmAxbD0ybsA/obamas-fault-or-not.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/lmAxbD0ybsA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/12/obamas-fault-or-not.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1343811116542617745</guid><pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-30T23:43:17.049-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Budget</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Deficit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Afghanistan</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Troop Increase</category><title>Getting Out of Afghanistan and The Defense Problem</title><atom:summary>With our President prepared to send 40,000 more soldiers into Afghanistan a serious discussion has arisen about the future of our commitment there. I have written before about the time and material required for nation building. Back then i was much more willing to devote what was needed to the long struggle of fixing Afghanistan. The nature of the mission has changed and so has my support for </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/VdGt4bNvCdc/getting-out-of-afghanistan-and-defense.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/VdGt4bNvCdc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/getting-out-of-afghanistan-and-defense.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-8510278306790020646</guid><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-25T01:26:33.609-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congress</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Seperation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">filibuster</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Insitutional Power</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Health Care Reform</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Presidency</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Power</category><title>Institutional Power and Congressional Sheep</title><atom:summary>As a general rule members of Congress wish to be reelected. That is not too shocking of a proposition because being a member of Congress is a prestigious job with good benefits. As a result of this interest congress people, senators especially, like to do things that will keep them in office. One of the things that helps keep someone in Congress is taking credit while avoiding responsibility. By </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/KXH73VGA8jo/institutional-power-and-congressional.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/KXH73VGA8jo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/institutional-power-and-congressional.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3042505433706622812</guid><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-09T13:45:58.295-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">courage</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">blanche lincoln</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Democrats</category><title>Going Down Fighting</title><atom:summary>Some times political incumbents lose. Admittedly it doesnt happen often. When it does happen though you generally get a good picture ahead of time. The best evidence is Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas. She is, in all likelihood, going to lose.  What then is she supposed to do on big votes like health care insurance reform? Her actions represent a general failing on behalf of losing politicians to do </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/0-MRbnrN218/going-down-fighting.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/0-MRbnrN218" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/going-down-fighting.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4971222759686643025</guid><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-05T01:25:34.386-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">piracy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">President Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">intellectual property</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">secret treaty</category><title>Secret Intellectual Property Treaty is Very Bad</title><atom:summary>You probably are not aware of the intellectual property treaty being negotiated in Seoul South Korea. Its called the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement. The reason that you may not have heard of it is that its supposed to be secret. Why? National Security concerns of course. Thats right, a treaty that affects millions is being negotiated in secret apparently without the input of views that might</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/yXZo4_cCRjs/secret-intellectual-property-treaty-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/yXZo4_cCRjs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/secret-intellectual-property-treaty-is.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-7397534822549211100</guid><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-04T01:06:24.800-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Gitmo</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Rights</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law Suit</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Wire Tapping</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Civil Liberties</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Military Commisions</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><title>Obama Coming Up Short on Civil Liberties</title><atom:summary>Is he delivering or not? That seems to be a dividing line right now among democrats and liberals. Is President Obama delivering on the change promised during the campaign? The answer to that depends in part on what you thought he meant by change. Other contributing factors to your view probably include the time frame he has had to operate in, the conditions of the media, the general lameness of </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/dq0f_0sy9tg/obama-coming-up-short-on-civil.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/dq0f_0sy9tg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/obama-coming-up-short-on-civil.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-6747529071759795707</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 01:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-02T17:43:58.962-08:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Society</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media Shield</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media</category><title>Media Shield Law on the Horizon</title><atom:summary>The NYT is reporting on the development of the media shield law designed to protect reporters from disclosing their sources. The law is required in order to give cover to sources who provide information vital to the public knowledge. The type of law that the NYT is reporting on seems like it might be sufficient protection but much hangs on any potential litigation in the court system.As reported </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/KoUCn2h0FCw/media-shield-law-on-horizon.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/KoUCn2h0FCw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/11/media-shield-law-on-horizon.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-345779359194028326</guid><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-23T02:32:29.042-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Mixture</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">War on Drugs</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Social Injustice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Bong Water</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Textualism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Criminal Justice</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Order</category><title>Bong Water is the New Gateway Drug</title><atom:summary>How much prison time is two and a half table spoons of bong water worth? In Minnesota the answer is 86 months of prison time. Thats just over seven years of prison time for possessing some bong water. In a -ridiculous, abhorrent- decision handed down by the Minnesota Supreme Court Bong Water with traces of meth was found to be a substance that qualified as a felony drug possession charge. In </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/LFAPCQdOp2Y/bong-water-is-new-gateway-drug.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/LFAPCQdOp2Y" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/bong-water-is-new-gateway-drug.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-207551113971749883</guid><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:31:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-08T20:32:28.659-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">politics</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Media</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Voting Behavior</category><title>No Idea What They Are Talking About</title><atom:summary>When i read most articles about voters, their motivations, rationales, etc i want to smash my head against a brick wall. Today featured a string of blog posts by respected bloggers steve benen, digby, matt yglesias about exactly who and what independent voters are. These bloggers have gotten where they are today because they tend to write intelligently about things that they know and what they </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/eUOUrU7z0gQ/no-idea-what-they-are-talking-about.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/eUOUrU7z0gQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/no-idea-what-they-are-talking-about.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4904746100628103028</guid><pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 05:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-04T22:50:04.093-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Statutory Interpretation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Congressional Intent</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Alan Grayson</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">ACORN</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Legislative History</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Smart</category><title>Why Grayson's Use of Legislative History is Brilliant</title><atom:summary>Dday has a post up about the rising liberal lion Alan Grayson and his myriad efforts to protect the American people. As Grayson rockets to legislative stardom i wanted to take a minute to explore just how good he is at his job. The technical thing i have been most impressed with is his use of legislative history and understanding of the legal system in fighting fraud and abuse by government </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/oXkPB3sE22w/why-graysons-use-of-legislative-history.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/oXkPB3sE22w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-graysons-use-of-legislative-history.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-874580188483419065</guid><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 04:13:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-23T21:14:43.690-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Crazy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Republican</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Socialism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Language</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Right Wing</category><title>Everything is socialists now</title><atom:summary>I am some what fascinated by the right wings ability to kill words. The cottage industry they built up to manipulate the electorate through dog whistle and fear is as impressive at is scary. The relentless message discipline combined with an utter carelessness for the actual meaning of words has allowed them to turn what used to be words of art, words with actual definitions, into meaningless </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/rgX5nrGHnzw/everything-is-socialists-now.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/rgX5nrGHnzw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/everything-is-socialists-now.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-9050497855605728152</guid><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-21T18:28:50.267-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">david paterson</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Barack Obama</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><title>Is Obama paying back David Paterson?</title><atom:summary>There has been a minor dust up regarding President Obama urging Gov Paterson of NY not to seek reelection. We saw Michael Steele make the assertion that it was "curious" on why the White House would ask New York Gov. David Paterson (D) not to run for reelection in 2010."I found that to be stunning, that the White House would send word to one of only two black governors in the country not to run </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/9-5XPKx8Ssk/is-obama-paying-back-david-paterson.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/9-5XPKx8Ssk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/is-obama-paying-back-david-paterson.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-8012140054299510907</guid><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-08T19:04:22.545-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">equal protection</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">colorblind</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">racism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Education</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">14th</category><title>Race and Colorblindness</title><atom:summary>I have been extremely busy but David has a link and post up on racial views of children that have implications for the way we treat race in society and i wanted to discuss it. It is a very good piece, particularly because it explodes a lot of myths. One is that diverse schools are not a panacea that will lead to cross-racial friendship and understanding. Apparently not: students in integrated </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/bJBnzTDBdqk/race-and-colorblindness.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/bJBnzTDBdqk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/09/race-and-colorblindness.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-164319037581253655</guid><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-16T23:05:43.649-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Brandenburg v Ohio</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">1st amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Freedom of Expression</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Hal Turner</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">first amendment</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Advocacy versus incitement</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Free Speech</category><title>Hal Turner and the Limits of Free Speech</title><atom:summary>When you state that someone deserves to die and that their death would replenish the tree of liberty as well as assure the freedom of millions, is your speech protected? That is the central question in the case of right wing radical and white supremacist associate hal turner. Turner's blog entry of June 2 and his subsequent arrest set off a rather large wave of discussion across the Internet. </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/-O5HD1cOIrI/hal-turner-and-limits-of-free-speech.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/-O5HD1cOIrI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/hal-turner-and-limits-of-free-speech.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3002151558902095635</guid><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 05:09:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-13T22:36:10.454-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">women in the judiciary</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Minority Representation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><title>The Next Justice</title><atom:summary>With the recent confirmation of Sonia Sotomayor President Obama managed to add two axis of diversity to the Court. So whats next? Given the temperament of both obama and justice sotomayor i dont envision obama nominating someone radically different in judicial philosophy or style. When you have nailed down the type of person that president obama is likely to nominate the next logical question is </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/ICTcPEgZloQ/next-justice.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/ICTcPEgZloQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/next-justice.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3216752109931196776</guid><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:07:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-11T15:11:29.148-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Took our jobs</category><title>They took our healthcare!</title><atom:summary>I havent written very much this summer mostly because i have been busy. Also im not a healthcare wonk and thats been the main conversation. The townhall disruptions do remind me of this.The entire idea behind the townhall disruptions is to intimidate, bully, and oppress. When conservatives cant win on the merits of an intellectual argument they resort to violence and fear as the primary tool.</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/ScbBAGR_X0Q/they-took-our-healthcare.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/ScbBAGR_X0Q" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/08/they-took-our-healthcare.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-3359534657970915481</guid><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-25T01:07:22.171-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sotomayor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">law and philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Law and Society</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Confirmation</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><title>Sotomayor and the Lack of A Liberal Philosophy</title><atom:summary>Its hard to blame Judge Sotomayor for not giving a long drawn out lecture on the nature of the American Appellate system to the Senators who asked her questions. She after all really wants to be on the Court. It is clear that at this point in time simply keeping your mouth shut and letting the Senators talk about themselves and their views is the easiest way to be confirmed. You can search around</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/Gmxcj2Kai0g/sotomayor-and-lack-of-liberal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/Gmxcj2Kai0g" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/sotomayor-and-lack-of-liberal.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1662340777873739553</guid><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-15T23:33:34.954-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sotomayor</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Hearings</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political Theatre</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Boring</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Confirmation</category><title>Sotomayor Comfirmation Hearing is Pretty Boring</title><atom:summary>Im trying hard to get worked up about the sotomayor confirmation hearing. I really am. Sadly though i just cant. Dont get me wrong im very excited to see a latina woman appointed to the court and even though id like to see more liberalism from her she isnt the worst choice ever. My problem is with this entire confirmation hearing process. Does it really serve any point? Are we learning a </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/PeDx4gSozgA/sotomayor-comfirmation-hearing-is.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/PeDx4gSozgA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/sotomayor-comfirmation-hearing-is.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-6704561146750710636</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 06:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-02T01:44:05.806-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ricci</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Race</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">racism</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice and the Law</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><title>Ricci and the Courts Race Neutral Desires</title><atom:summary>By now im sure those who read this are well aware that the SCOTUS reversed the lower courts decision in Ricci v. DeStefano. The Ricci decision couldnt have been all that surprising given the result of the Seattle Schools Cases. Its clear that at this point in time a majority of the court is of the belief that racism has been largely solved in this country, at least as it pertains to overt acts of</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/BbjpDNIIqyo/ricci-and-courts-race-neutral-desires.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/BbjpDNIIqyo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/07/ricci-and-courts-race-neutral-desires.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-5844613898700823136</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-23T00:01:33.885-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">SCOTUS</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lochner II</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Massey Coal</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Seattle Schools Cases</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Roberts</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Osbourne</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Justice</category><title>Roberts Court as the Second Lochner Era</title><atom:summary>In examining some of the recent decisions handed down by the SCOTUS i have to feel like we might be witnessing history. I dont mean the positive jackie robinson breaking the color barrier history but the bad tanks rolling into Hungary kind. The Roberts court has issued and will continue to issue a number of important 5-4 decisions that will gut or otherwise roll back the rights and protections </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/Fx6MnGJj-3o/roberts-court-as-second-lochner-era.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/Fx6MnGJj-3o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/roberts-court-as-second-lochner-era.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-4089471374378912110</guid><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:18:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-15T23:25:25.987-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Iran</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Foreign Policy Debate</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Iranian Elections</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Green Revolution</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Foreign Policy</category><title>Letting Iranians Lead</title><atom:summary>The situation in iran is a potential watershed moment in the way America handles the growth of Democracy and freedom on the world stage. An examination of the situation clearly reveals that the right path and correct attitude is the one currently on display by President Obama. American adventures in democratic intervention do not have a strong history of success. The reason for this is that our </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/wEG1ISvx4qc/letting-iranians-lead.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/wEG1ISvx4qc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/letting-iranians-lead.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-2950474494998171220</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-09T12:14:00.342-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judges</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judicial Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Restraint</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">judiciary</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Judicial Activism</category><title>Are the Courts Too Deferential?</title><atom:summary>Given the constant talk about the Court, the proper judicial philosophy etc. i came upon this oped in the WSJ that makes an interesting point and one that i happen not to have a terrible problem with -- that the courts are too deferential to congress. Its a rather interesting argument and one not heard too often and because of this it should be considered. The idea of "activist judges" has become</atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/WLKAan-jomc/are-courts-too-deferential.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/WLKAan-jomc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/are-courts-too-deferential.html</feedburner:origLink></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1241765733735468686.post-1407338906461833061</guid><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 04:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-08T21:34:39.036-07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Blogging</category><title>On Pseudonymous Blogging</title><atom:summary>A long comment posted by me on donlephant in regards to the use of a nom de plume to blog.Justin,I read through the comments on the last post but didnt see a response to the central assertion i made. Namely that the cost in losing the good work done by pseudonymous bloggers will outweigh the benefit pushing them off the Internet. With the anonymity you have the ability to get the insight and </atom:summary><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~3/5teZdGk0QzE/on-pseudonymous-blogging.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Gaucho Politico)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total><description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGauchoPolitico/~4/5teZdGk0QzE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><feedburner:origLink>http://thegauchopolitico.blogspot.com/2009/06/on-pseudonymous-blogging.html</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>

