<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Geotechnical Data Hub</title>
	
	<link>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com</link>
	<description>The Geotechnical Data Hub</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:55:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheGeotechnicalDataHub" /><feedburner:info uri="thegeotechnicaldatahub" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Geotechnical Laboratory’s guide to AGS data – Part I</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/9MaeUQMnkTk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-laboratorys-guide-to-ags-data-part-i/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HayleyMaher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGS Data Format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The speed with which consultants are able to analyse and plot laboratory data is the main reason why AGS data is being requested more frequently in laboratories working on medium to large construction projects.    For a significant number of laboratories the production of AGS data is causing a number of problems but these can be [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/9MaeUQMnkTk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-laboratorys-guide-to-ags-data-part-i/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-laboratorys-guide-to-ags-data-part-i/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Geotechnical Knowledge Management – Have we been here before?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/F-5PwopBidw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-knowledge-management-have-we-been-here-before/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HayleyMaher</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGS Data Format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data Presentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GIS and mapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The more you know about a site and the surrounding area before you start a Site Investigation, the better you will be able to design the investigation. Technology has come to our aid here and these days we waste no time jumping on the internet to visit Bing Maps®, Google Earth®, or Google Street View® [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/F-5PwopBidw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-knowledge-management-have-we-been-here-before/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-knowledge-management-have-we-been-here-before/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Are you Aiming for a Paperless Geotechnical Laboratory</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/WvBV5ga96xQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/aiming-for-a-paperless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 12:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>keynetix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=80</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Whenever a company looks to improve the efficiency of their field work and laboratory testing, the subject of a paperless laboratory is never far away.  Previously the idea has been dismissed or parked as a result of either technology requirements or the practical problems of tracking a sample around the laboratory without the usual paper [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/WvBV5ga96xQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/aiming-for-a-paperless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/aiming-for-a-paperless/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this the coolest Geology App for your iPhone?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/MMPtLXl2UQE/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/igeologyappiphone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=75</guid>
		<description>iGeology is a new free iPhone App that lets you take the 1:50,000 geological map of Britain with you wherever you go. Simply navigate to the area you are interested in and tap the screen, wait a few seconds and the Superficial and Bedrock Geology information is displayed for that [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/MMPtLXl2UQE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/igeologyappiphone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/igeologyappiphone/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Location Naming Conventions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/4rylfNnW1Ds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/location-naming-conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=72</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;One of the most important data management principles you must have clearly agreed before you start a project is the location naming conventions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This seems the simplest of suggestions and I expect readers of this article to fall into one of two camps; either you have not experienced problems associated with naming conventions and you possibly [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/4rylfNnW1Ds" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/location-naming-conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/location-naming-conventions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>AGS Format Version 4 – An introduction to the new format</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/yLr41jFFvpo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-format-version-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGS Data Format]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description>With only weeks to go until the official launch of the latest version of the AGS format (AGS4), and having spent every spare minute over the last few weeks reviewing draft after draft of the document, I thought I would summarise some of the exciting new features that AGS4 has incorporated in my article this [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/yLr41jFFvpo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-format-version-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-format-version-4/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Site Investigation Data Management – is it a waste of time?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/Mt0QNO4vdZI/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/site-investigation-data-management-%e2%80%93-is-it-a-waste-of-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 10:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rothery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=59</guid>
		<description>Is Site Investigation Data Management a waste of time?  Mike Rothery looks to the American Carpet industry for inspiration and ideas on how, why and if we should be concerned about how we manage geotechnical [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/Mt0QNO4vdZI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/site-investigation-data-management-%e2%80%93-is-it-a-waste-of-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/site-investigation-data-management-%e2%80%93-is-it-a-waste-of-time/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>AGS Geology Codes – bones of contention to skeleton of the project</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/blOru9WAFD8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-geology-codes-%e2%80%93-bones-of-contention-to-skeleton-of-the-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phil Child</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGS Data Format]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=50</guid>
		<description>Although the AGS has become the industry standard way of transferring geotechnical and geo-environmental data, there remains a fairly large amount of confusion with regards to key aspects of the format.  A favourite bone of contention, particularly for the newcomer to the format perhaps, is that all too nefarious of fields, the Geology Code [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/blOru9WAFD8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-geology-codes-%e2%80%93-bones-of-contention-to-skeleton-of-the-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/ags-geology-codes-%e2%80%93-bones-of-contention-to-skeleton-of-the-project/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Borehole Drilling – What is the client paying for?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/ITKN9uUxzhQ/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/borehole-drilling-what-is-the-client-paying-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:28:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rothery</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since those heady days of software boom in the early 1990’s it has been an elusive dream to be able to offer the site investigation drilling industry a simple and robust method of logging boreholes electronically in the field. For us the obvious motivation is to bring an innovative product to market and reap [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/ITKN9uUxzhQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/borehole-drilling-what-is-the-client-paying-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/borehole-drilling-what-is-the-client-paying-for/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Take the data entry challenge</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~3/8GWHdo43uZ8/</link>
		<comments>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-data-entry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Chandler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AGS Data Format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Field Data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lab Data]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geotechnicaldatahub.com/?p=1</guid>
		<description>Many years ago I came up with the two golden rules of data entry at one of our user group meetings and these two rules are now widely quoted in data transfer presentations both by me and [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheGeotechnicalDataHub/~4/8GWHdo43uZ8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-data-entry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.geotechnicaldatahub.com/geotechnical-data-entry/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
