A few days ago, I opened my Threads feed and was greeted by the post of a young woman, featuring a couple of resolute carseat selfies, along with the caption:

I AM….. PRO ICE PRO Military Pro Law Enforcement Pro Trump Pro Charlie Kirk Pro Voter ID Pro Accountability [sic]

Immediately below that post was another, absolutely identical to the first, except for a different account handle.

I continued to refresh my feed, greeted again and again by the same image, the same quote, yet from different accounts. (I’m currently at 26 and counting, by the way.)

Scrolling through my timeline, this morning alone, I encountered, not only five more greetings from my now ubiquitous brunette, shapeshifting female MAGA warrior, but at least four other different versions featuring other white women, supposedly also declaring their love for their Predator-In-Chief, his barbaric ICE foot soldiers, and MAGA’s anti-immigrant, anti-Black, Anti-Democracy agenda.

A cursory glance at my newsfeed, and no one would blame you for thinking a massive number of young white women are inexplicably assembling around a court-adjudicated rapist and likely serial predator, whose misogynist regime is trying to take away women’s body autonomy and voting rights.

And it’s all a mirage, just like everything about this President, his Administration, and their barbaric, yet rapidly shrinking white supremacist movement, but it’s an exhausting mirage.

Being gaslit will wear you the hell out, which of course, is the plan.

I think we all need to collect ourselves and understand what’s really happening here.

We need to inventory the emotional and mental toll of being inundated throughout our waking moments with an endless stream of repeated lies, Right-Wing propaganda, bot proliferation, and Conservative algorithm manipulation.

It’s critical that we don’t allow ourselves to be defeated by an alarming, terrifying, and infuriating fiction. We are not outnumbered.

Donald Trump’s current approval rating is hovering between 28 and 36 percent, depending on the source, and his support is never going to rise from here. This is his absolute ceiling.

His covering up of the Epstein Files, the lawlessness of ICE’s domestic terrorism, his starting of an unnecessary, sickeningly expensive war with Iran, stratospheric gas prices, and a cratering economy that has been in a tailspin ever since his disastrous tariffs began—these are mortal wounds to Trump and his party, and they know it.

Republicans have known since 2024 that the window was going to be incredibly short; that their policies have been wildly unpopular, their base has been dwindling, and that their quickly-collapsing, cognitively-addled, lame duck wanna be dictator has been steadily losing his capacity to bulldoze criticism and manipulate reality.

Trump’s broken campaign promises regarding transparency around Epstein, his vow to end wars, his asinine boasts to bring gas and food prices down, his wasteful ballrooms and national mall desecrations are not playing well with the former faithful who can barely keep the lights on or put food on the table.

The MAGA arrow is pointing down, and nothing can prevent that.

Friends, what this all means is that we are the majority and it ain’t even close.

Well over two-thirds of this nation despise this Christo-fascist regime, their assaults on black and brown people, their endless persecution of the LGBTQ community, their attacks on free speech, the Arts, diversity, and Democracy.

A massive portion of America is disgusted with their coddling of the wealthiest one percent, their pillaging of the Public School System, their poisoning of Health and Human Services, their polluting of the CDC, and their absolute refusal to address affordable healthcare or housing.

We have the numbers. All we need to do is start acting like the majority.

If we can all transcend our wars of preference, our purity politics, and our relatively superficial differences, we can defeat this minority movement. If we wield our collective power and unify our voice in November, it won’t matter how much they gerrymander, how difficult they make it to vote, or the violence they resort to in order to try and intimidate us.

The United States isn’t in hopeless peril; we’ve all just been fooled into believing the myth of our impending doom curated and amplified by those who have nothing else but lies, spin, fake followers, and paid rally crowds.

Donald Trump’s entire life, his supposed success as a businessman, and his disastrous presidencies have been fool’s gold; the smoke and mirror illusions of disinformation and media malpractice.

Beneath the partisan propaganda and the prolific gaslighting, MAGA is in its last days. It is a crumbling, self-devouring, rapidly evaporating niche movement of a small percentage of this nation who are being swallowed up by time and progress.

Don’t be disheartened by your newsfeed or distracted by the bombast of the propagandists.

The vast majority is anti-MAGA, anti-Trump, and pro-Democracy.

Let’s act like we know.

—

iStock image

The post The Gaslighting of the Majority (And the Truth About MAGA’s Death Spiral) appeared first on The Good Men Project.

One of the facts of life is that we all get older. I will be eighty-three on my next birthday and have been interested in men’s health for most of my life. When I was five years old my forty-three-year-old father took an overdose of sleeping pills. He had become increasingly depressed because he couldn’t support his family doing the work he loved.

Luckily, he didn’t die but was committed to Camarillo State Mental Hospital north of our home in Los Angeles. I grew up wondering what happened to my father, when it would happen to me, and what I could do to help other families like ours.

I went off to college at U.C. Santa Barbara and was a pre-med student majoring in biology and psychology. I later was accepted at U.C. San Francisco medical school but soon found medicine too elitist and narrow in its health focus and transferred to U.C. Berkeley where I earned my master’s degree in social work.

Later I returned to graduate school to engage in more in-depth study of the issues facing men and their families. I earned a PhD in International Health and for more than forty years I have specialized in in the emerging field of Gender-Specific Medicine and Men’s Health.

I have written seventeen books including international best-sellers Male Menopause, Surviving Male Menopause: A Guide for Women and Men, and The Irritable Male Syndrome: Understanding and Managing the 4 Key Causes of Depression and Aggression.

I recently interviewed Dr. William Brant about his own work in healthcare. Dr. Brant is a board-certified urologist specializing in erectile dysfunction, low testosterone, and other men’s urologic conditions. Dr. Brant works directly with patients navigating these concerns and offers expert commentary on the broader trends shaping men’s sexual health today.

One of the issues Dr. Brant and I discussed is how difficult for men to sort through the barrage of information that bombards them, some good, some inaccurate, and some dangerous. This is particularly true in the supplement and neutraceutical realm.

What I tell men, says Dr. Brant, is to remember the adage, keep it simple.

He went on to say,

Make sure you are getting a quality product and try to avoid duplicating ingredients to prevent overdoing it. Try to stick with ingredients that have evidence behind any purported benefits. And try to stick with a simple system that gives you what you want, but nothing more.

Ads for supplements are everywhere, but don’t be fooled.

I don’t think everyone needs supplements, says Dr. Brant. For example, it bothers me when teenagers and young men are taking all sorts of things because, in general, this age group is already optimized and so, at best, they have expensive urine and at worst they are throwing off the homeostasis of what should be a perfectly balanced system. I often see teenagers and guys in their early twenties who may ‘brag’ about their sexual stimulants and ED drugs whereas I think, why do you need these? What else is going on that makes you feel the need to do more?

As most of us guys in midlife and beyond well know, sometimes we need help staying healthy and active as we age.

As men age, our modern life conspires to slowly grind us down, says Dr. Brant. The most obvious role for supplements is rounding out a diet in which we lack the necessary elements. But less obvious is that our bodies cannot tell the difference between life-threatening stress and life stress. So, we are revved up, constantly on guard and not allowing for restoration. It’s hard to sift through the evidence for various supplement components, but some have reasonable evidence of both safety and efficacy.

Dr. Brant concludes saying,

The men’s sexual wellness category is crowded with quick-fix, performance-driven pills that promise instant results, rely on stimulants, or frame sexual health as something men only address once something feels ‘wrong.’ As a result, many men either avoid the category altogether or cycle through products that won’t actually support long-term health.

If you would like to connect with Dr. Brant and his work you can reach him at menssexualhealthutah.com

For those who would like to read more articles about men’s health, you can visit me at https://menalive.com/

—

This post was previously published on Menalive.com.

The post Dr. William O. Brant on Male Sexual Health and The Risks and Benefits of Supplements appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Scott Freiman

Editor’s note. This post, from way back in 2016, is one of our most popular ever. The debate, after all, is timeless. Please add your voice to the comments (and remember to play nice).

The Next Beatles. It’s a phrase that has gotten tossed around a lot since the breakup of the world’s most famous band. For those bestowed with this accolade, it was a considerable compliment. Sometimes, it was also a curse. After all, who could possibly match the songwriting and musicianship of The Beatles, let alone their humor, camaraderie, and cultural influence? There never will be another Beatles, but there are bands that are “Beatlesque.” What makes a band “Beatlesque?” Almost every rock group (not to mention modern jazz and classical musicians) has been influenced by The Beatles, so we need to narrow the criteria. First of all, let’s eliminate other British Invasion bands that were coming up around the same time as The Beatles. That leaves out The Rolling Stones, The Kinks, The Yardbirds, The Zombies, and numerous others. Second of all, they’ve got to be a band — not just a singer/songwriter with a backing band. We’re looking for multiple songwriters and multiple vocalists. Three guitars and drums are ideal, although we’ll accept the occasional keyboard.

A few Beatlesque songs doesn’t get you on the list (sorry Tears for Fears). The band needs to have a history of harmonically rich, melodic, singable songs with lyrics that lean towards the optimistic with flashes of humor. More serious lyrics, including the political and romantic kind, are also welcome. The music can be reminiscent of The Beatles’ early music or it can draw from the orchestral and psychedelic touches of The Beatles’ later music. Aside from their musical talent, we’re looking for bands that like to experiment and evolve. But just because a group is experimental doesn’t necessarily make them Beatlesque (I’m talking to you Radiohead). And although one can make the point that the Beatles helped to birth progressive rock, there’s no place for poetry, extended drum solos, or album-side suites here. (Goodbye Yes, Pink Floyd, and The Moody Blues.) Finally, we give out bonus points for a specific connection to The Beatles.

Here then are some of our choices (in alphabetical order) for bands that could be considered The Next Beatles:

1. Badfinger
Badfinger began as a cover band called The Iveys, playing the hits of the day, including songs by The Beatles. At one point, Ray Davies of The Kinks offered to produce them, but nothing came of that. After Beatles’ roadie Mal Evans saw them perform at the Marquee Club in January, 1968, he played their demos for each of The Beatles. Later that year, they became the first non-Beatles artist signed to the new Apple record label, and they were given the name Badfinger courtesy of Apple Corps’ Neil Aspinall.

Badfinger sounded so much like The Beatles, many listeners mistook one group for the other. Although Badfinger’s first hit, “Come and Get It,” was written and produced by Paul McCartney, singer/songwriter Pete Ham (with occasional help from his bandmates) composed their other hit songs, including “No Matter What” and “Baby Blue.” Despite their early successes, they ultimately left Apple, and their album sales plummeted. After repeated disappointments, Ham committed suicide in 1975, and his bandmate Tom Evans followed in 1983. Badfinger is definitely an example of “The Next Beatles” label acting as a curse.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Day After Day” (produced by George Harrison) from the 1971 album Straight Up.

Beatles Connection: In addition to being discovered and produced by various Beatles, members of Badfinger played on George Harrison’s All Things Must Pass, John Lennon’s Imagine, and Ringo’s “It Don’t Come Easy.” The entire band backed up George Harrison and others at the 1971 Concert for Bangladesh.

2. The Bangles
The Bangles, the only female band on this list, formed in Los Angeles in the early 80s. From their guitar/bass/drums structure to the poppy songwriting of Susanna Hoffs, Vicki and Debbi Peterson, and Mikki Steele, The Bangles sounded like a female version of The Beatles in their pre-psychedelia days. No surprise since the group was obsessed with The Beatles, according to Hoff. Although their first album received good reviews, it was their second album Different Light that propelled them to stardom with the Prince authored “Manic Monday” and “Walk Like An Egyptian” written by Liam Sternberg. Friction led the band to break up soon after the release of their third album, 1988’s Everything. Since reforming in 1998, they have produced two excellent albums, 2003’s Doll Revolution and 2011’s Sweetheart of the Sun (the latter album without Micki Steele).

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Here Right Now” from 2003’s Doll Revolution.

Beatles Connection: After ten years without appearing together, The Bangles reunited at the request of George Martin for a Beatles tribute at the Hollywood Bowl in June of 1999.

3. Big Star
Another group saddled with the “Next Beatles” label, Big Star formed in 1971 as a power pop band that sounded like a 70s version of The Beatles. Alex Chilton and Chris Bell were Big Star’s Lennon and McCartney, writing catchy hooks and clever lyrics in songs like “In The Street” and “When My Baby’s Beside Me.” There were psychedelic touches, too, as in tracks like “The India Song.”

Tensions in the band were high from the very beginning, exasperated by increasing drug use and disappointing record sales. Bell left the band after their first album, and Chilton led the group through two more albums before the group disbanded. Although there were several partial reunions, Big Star never again reformed with their initial line up.

Big Star was a great band that never received the attention it deserved. Today, numerous artists point to them as an influence.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “September Gurls” from 1974’s Radio City.

4. The Byrds
Often referred to as the American Beatles, The Byrds started out as a folk trio formed by Jim “Roger” McGuinn, Gene Clark, and David Crosby. Soon after becoming enamored with The Beatles, the Byrds released their 1965 debut, Mr. Tambourine Man. On that album, they married the folk songs of Bob Dylan and Pete Seeger (along with songs written by Clark and McGuinn) with electronic guitars and stacked vocal harmonies. In doing so, they helped to birth the sound of folk rock that would in turn influence The Beatles on their album Rubber Soul.

Like The Beatles, The Byrds seemed to progress with each album — from the folk rock of their first two albums to the psychedelia of 1966’s Fifth Dimension, 1967’s Younger Than Yesterday, and 1968’s The Notorious Byrd Brothers. Although the lineup shifted for each album as various band members left and returned, it was the addition of Gram Parsons for 1968’s Sweetheart of the Rodeo that moved The Byrds into country rock, becoming one of the first bands to pioneer this new sound.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Have You Seen Her Face” from 1967’s Younger Than Yesterday.

Beatles Connection: It was Roger McGuinn’s 12-string purchased after seeing George Harrison play one in A Hard Day’s Night that helped create the sound of The Byrds, and it was The Byrds’ version of “The Bells of Rhymney” that inspired George Harrison’s “If I Needed Someone” on Rubber Soul. Most importantly, it was McGuinn who first exposed The Beatles to the sounds of sitarist Ravi Shankar, influencing Harrison’s lifelong love of Eastern music.

5. Cheap Trick
Another contender for the American Beatles, Cheap Trick took The Beatles’ sound and turned it up to eleven! Singer Robin Zander’s voice could deliver the full spectrum of McCartney’s vocals, from tender ballad to full-throated shouting, while drummer Bun E. Carlos held down the beat with his Ringo-influenced drumming. Along with guitarist Rick Nielsen and bassist Tom Peterson, Cheap Trick built a strong following overseas with their first three albums. It was 1979’s multi-platinum Cheap Trick At Budokan, a live album that was not even planned for a U.S. release, that ultimately helped them conquer America.

Cheap Trick’s songs, like “I Want You To Want Me,” “Surrender,” and “Dream Police,” paid tribute to the hooks and harmonies of The Beatles, adding lyrics that caused one to smile. They worked with Beatles producer George Martin on 1980’s All Shook Up and with Beatles disciple Todd Rundgren on 1983’s Next Position Please. After losing focus in the late 80s with a series of disappointing albums, they regained their footing with 1997’s self-titled album and continued with a string of excellent recordings through their latest, 2016’s Bang, Zoom, Crazy… Hello. In 2016, Cheap Trick was inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “I Can’t Take It” from 1983’s Next Position Please.

Beatles Connection: Besides working with George Martin, members of Cheap Trick were part of John Lennon’s backing band for the recording of Double Fantasy, although their contributions were later replaced by other musicians. In 2009, Cheap Trick released a recording of their live performance covering the entire Beatles’ album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band.

6. Crowded House
From the American Beatles to the Australian/New Zealand Beatles — Crowded House. Formed as a trio in Melbourne, Australia in 1985 by former Split Enz members Neil Finn and Paul Hester along with bassist Nick Seymour, they produced four critically acclaimed albums between 1986 and 1993, often with the addition of other musicians, including Neil’s brother Tim. Neil Finn, the primary songwriter, composed catchy songs with clever lyrics and beautiful chord changes that were reminiscent of Lennon and McCartney’s songs. Singles like “Don’t Dream It’s Over,” “Better Be Home Soon,” and “Something So Strong” helped the band achieve huge success worldwide.

Finn and Seymour reformed Crowded House in 2008 shortly after Hester’s suicide in 2005. Since then, the band has released two albums, 2007’s Time On Earth and 2010’s Intriguer.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Not the Girl You Think You Are” from 1996’s Recurring Dream.

7. Electric Light Orchestra/The Move
Jeff Lynne, a member of The Move and a co-founder of the Electric Light Orchestra, wears his Beatles influence on his sleeve. He joined The Move for their second album and helped create funny, poppy, psychedelic songs that could have been outtakes from later Beatles albums. With bandmates Roy Wood and Bev Bevan, Lynne dreamed of a group that would combine strings with a traditional rock band in the style of songs like “I Am The Walrus.” The result was the Electric Light Orchestra. Wood left after ELO’s first album, and Lynne continued on, producing a series of classic albums, including 1975’s Face The Music, 1976’s A New World Record, and 1977’s double album Out Of The Blue. Acting as the band’s main songwriter, Lynne created Beatlesque songs with string arrangements that would make George Martin proud. Throughout his long career, Lynne and ELO have dabbled in disco (1979’s Discovery), concept albums (1974’s Eldorado), and the American songbook (1990’s solo album, Armchair Theatre).

Lynne has recorded and produced albums since the 1970s — with ELO and solo. Lynne recently embarked on a tour performing ELO songs, including songs from their most recent release, 2015’s Alone in the Universe.

Sample Beatlesque Song: For The Move: “Beautiful Daughter” from 1970’s Shazam. For ELO: Almost anything, but I’ll pick “Shangri-La” with its lyrical reference to “Hey Jude” from 1976’s A New World Record.

Beatles Connection: Many. Lynne played with George Harrison in The Traveling Wilburys. He produced The Beatles “reunion” songs, “Free As A Bird” and “Real Love.” And he played on albums with Paul, George, and Ringo.

8. The Flaming Lips
The Flaming Lips sound like The Beatles if they had been set loose in the studio with an unlimited collection of electronic instruments and an inexhaustible supply of L.S.D. There is no doubt that the Lips are one of the most ambitious groups still making music today.

The Lips were formed in 1983 in Oklahoma City by brothers Mark and Wayne Coyne and bassist Michael Ivins. After releasing their self-titled debut, Mark left the band, and Wayne took over as lead vocalist. When drummer and multi-instrumentalist Steven Drozd joined in 1992, the band began releasing a series of critically acclaimed albums beginning with 1993’s Transmissions from the Satellite Heart through 2013’s The Terror. They have deliberately avoided any attempt at mainstream success, which allows them to do whatever they want live and in the studio. Among their more unusual experiments are 1997’s Zaireeka, four compact discs meant to be played simultaneously on four separate CD players, and 2011’s Gummy Song Skull EP released on a flash drive buried in (you guessed it) a seven-pound gummy skull.

Flaming Lips songs range from beautiful, textured ballads (“Do You Realize?” “All We Have Is Now”) to poppy (and sometimes bizarre), psychedelic voyages through distorted electronic sound (“The Sparrow Looks Up At The Machine,” “Turn It On”). Humor is ever-present, starting with their song titles, such as “Guy Who Got a Headache and Accidentally Saves the World” and the Grammy Award-winning instrumental “Approaching Pavonic Mons by Balloon (Utopia Planitia).”

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Race for the Prize” from 1999’s The Soft Bulletin.

Beatles Connection: In 2014, the Flaming Lips along with a series of guests (including Miley Cyrus) released With A Little Help from My Fwends, one of the strangest takes on The Beatles’ album Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band.

9. Fountains of Wayne
The songwriting team of Adam Schlesinger (ed. note, Schlesinger passed away in early 2020) and Chris Collingwood formed Fountains of Wayne in 1995. Together with lead guitarist Joey Porter and drummer Brian Young, the band performed hook-filled songs that sounded like they could have come off of a Beatles album.

Fountains of Wayne are best known for their one hit, “Stacy’s Mom,” but that song doesn’t begin to scratch the surface of the band’s songwriting. Schlesinger and Collingwood wrote lyrics that were clever and humorous (“Leave the Biker,” “Red Dragon Tattoo”), as well as romantic or deeply moving (“Someone’s Gonna Break Your Heart,” “Action Hero”). Their songs are studies in near-perfect songwriting filled with clever musical twists. (Like Lennon and McCartney, Schlesinger and Collingwood gave each other co-writing credits on all their songs even though some were written largely or entirely by one or the other.)

After releasing five albums between 1996 and 2011, the band has no current plans to reform. Schlesinger and Collingwood have gone on to other projects — Schlesinger is currently writing songs for the CW series Crazy Ex-Girlfriend while Collingwood recently released a new album, Look Park.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “The Summer Place” from 2011’s Sky Full of Holes.

Beatles Connection: FoW performed a cover of “Help!” for the 2003 movie Cheaper By The Dozen.

10. The Knack
The Knack falls into the category of band’s cursed with the “Next Beatles” label. The Knack’s original members, singer/guitarist Doug Fieger, lead guitarist Berton Averre, bassist Prescott Niles, and drummer Bruce Gary, met in 1977 and 1978. Within months of their first live performance, The Knack were greeted as the Next Big Thing and were being accompanied on stage by superstars like Bruce Springsteen and Tom Petty.

Their first album, Get the Knack, burst on the scene in 1979 along with their smash hit, “My Sharona.” The Knack were positioned to become The Beatles of the 1980s. Not only was the album’s name and cover a take off on Meet the Beatles, but the album’s songs (written by Fieger and Averre) imitated the early Beatles pop sound (complete with harmonica) with slightly more lascivious lyrics. Unfortunately, their quick rise to the top was followed by a critical backlash exacerbated by The Knack’s refusal to talk to the press, and the band never again achieved the success of their debut.

Get the Knack sounds like a 1980s update to Meet the Beatles. After the disappointing follow-up …But the Little Girls Understand, the band tried for a comeback in 1981, moving into Revolver territory with Round Trip and more complex songs like “Africa” and “Art War.” Although it was produced by Jack Douglas, fresh off of producing Lennon’s Double Fantasy, the album was another flop. Subsequent albums fared no better. Yet, Get the Knack still stands as one of the greatest Beatlesque albums.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Good Girls Don’t” fromGet the Knack.

11. The Monkees
The Monkees were basically manufactured to be like The Beatles. The idea was to create a fake rock band with four zany personalities that would appeal to teenagers and grownups alike. The band would star in a TV show documenting their crazy antics while performing songs written by some of the finest songwriters available, including Carole King and Gerry Goffen, Tommy Boyce and Bobby Hart, and Neil Diamond. When The Monkees hit the airwaves in 1966, they were an instant success, and their singles and albums topped the charts for the next two years.

What no one expected was that Micky Dolenz, Michael Nesmith, Peter Tork, and Davy Jones would go on to become fine musicians and songwriters in their own right. Although their original recordings featured studio musicians, including the famous Wrecking Crew, The Monkees played on their later recordings. Nesmith was contributing songs from the beginning, and the other three Monkees would also became songwriters. During the late 60s, The Monkees tried to leave behind their “made-for-TV” image by making darker and more psychedelic music, as well as starring in 1968’s satirical film Head. Unfortunately, this caused their popularity to decline.

Soon after Head, Nesmith would leave the band and have a successful career as a solo artist (one of the founders of country rock) and a pioneer of home video. Although they never again achieved the success of their heyday, Nesmith and the other Monkees continued to tour and record in different combinations even after Jones’ death in 2012. Their recent album, 2016’s Good Times!, has received excellent reviews (including one from CultureSonar!).

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Mary, Mary” from 1967’s More of the Monkees.

Beatles Connection: Despite starting out as a blatant Beatles rip-off, the four Beatles enjoyed the four Monkees and generally had nice things to say about their music. Nesmith was with Lennon when he purchased the circus poster that influenced “Being for the Benefit of Mister Kite,” and he attended the orchestral recording session for “A Day In The Life.” Peter Tork played on Harrison’s Wonderwall album. And Micky Dolenz hung out with Lennon and Starr during Lennon’s notorious Lost Weekend.

12. Oasis
When brothers Noel and Liam Gallagher formed Oasis in 1991, they made no secret of their Beatles obsession. Oasis songs like “Don’t Look Back In Anger,” “She’s Electric,” “All Around the World,” and many others sounded like heavier versions of songs that might be found on The Beatles’ later albums.

Unlike The Beatles, the relationships among the members of Oasis were fraught with tension — no more so than between the two founding brothers. Oasis became more recognized for their appearances in the British tabloids than for their music, and they eventually split up in 2009. Still, Oasis ended up becoming Britain’s most popular band since The Beatles.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Champagne Supernova” from 1995’s(What’s the Story) Morning Glory?

Beatles Connection: Oasis covered many Beatles songs during their career, including “I Am The Walrus” (a live version of the song appears on the B-side of the 1994 “Cigarettes & Alcohol” single) and “Within You, Without You” (recorded for BBC Radio 2’s 40th anniversary tribute to Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band).

13. Squeeze
Chris Difford and Glenn Tilbrook are the John Lennon and Paul McCartney of Squeeze and two of the finest songwriters in popular music. The two guitarists formed Squeeze in 1974. As other band members came and went, Difford and Tilbrook created a string of great albums and hit singles.

Difford and Tilbrook’s songs mimic the songwriting techniques that made the songs of Lennon and McCartney so admired. Catchy melodies accompany sing-a-long choruses that never outstay their welcome. The mood of a song can suddenly shift on a surprising chord change. Lyrics are funny, charming, angry, romantic, and poignant — often all in the same song. These songs are brought to life on near-perfect albums like 1980’s Argybargy, 1981’s East Side Story, and 1982’s Sweets from a Stranger.

Squeeze continues to make great music today, most recently on their 2015 album, Cradle to the Grave.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Some Fantastic Place” from the 1993 album of the same name.

Beatles Connection: Squeeze covered “Please Please Me” in 2013 on BBC Radio 2’s 50th anniversary tribute to the Beatles first album.

14. Utopia
If we were allowing solo artists on this list, then Todd Rundgren would be a shoe in. Although Todd can’t join the list, his band Utopia can.

Utopia began as Todd Rundgren’s Utopia and featured a variety of band members performing music that leaned towards progressive rock. By the time of 1976’s Ra, the band (now called just Utopia) had become a four piece with Kasim Sulton on bass, Roger Powell on keyboards, and Willie Wilcox on drums. All four members were songwriters, and all four were top notch players and singers. By 1977’s Oops! Wrong Planet, the band was writing and performing shorter, more poppy songs with often humorous lyrics. That album featured two songs about love that could have come straight off a Beatles album, “Love in Action” and “Love Is The Answer.”

It was 1980’s Deface the Music that took the band’s Beatles influences to another level. The album was a direct parody of The Beatles music with songs so similar that they might be mistaken for Beatles songs. Although they were never again so blatant in their Beatles tributes, Utopia continued to write and perform Beatlesque songs through their final album, 1985’s P.O.V.

Sample Beatlesque Song: “I Just Want To Touch You” from 1980’s Deface the Music.

Beatles Connection: Rundgren recorded several covers of Beatles songs and taught a college course on The Beatles. Today, he is a frequent member of Ringo’s All Starr band.

15. XTC
In some ways, XTC is the band on this list that best exemplifies everything that made the Beatles great — superb melodies and songwriting, humorous and poignant lyrics, creative arrangements, and a steady evolution from one album to the next.

When XTC released their debut album White Music in 1977, it was filled with short, angular, punk-influenced songs about science, music, and the sexiness of the Status of Liberty. The two main songwriters, Andy Partridge and Colin Moulding, had a knack for melody and a innate ability to write clever lyrics. Still, they might have faded away like many of their new wave contemporaries.

Instead, XTC moved forward with each album they produced, just as The Beatles progressed from their “punk” Hamburg days to Please Please Me and then to Rubber Soul and Revolver. By 1982’s double album English Settlement, Partridge and Moulding’s songwriting was becoming more complex and ambitious in songs like “Melt the Guns,” “Jason and the Argonauts,” and their biggest hit, “Senses Working Overtime.” Then, like The Beatles, they gave up touring while continuing to create excellent albums — from 1983’s Mummer to their last album, 2000’s Wasp Star. Throughout their catalog, one can find perfect pop songs, such as Skylarking’s “Earn Enough for Us,” lushly orchestrated landscapes, such as Oranges & Lemons’ “Chalkhills and Children,” and creative arrangements, such as Nonsuch’s “My Bird Performs.” In between, XTC formed an alter ego called The Dukes of Stratosphear and released two psychedelic albums in the style of the 1967 Beatles (as well as Pink Floyd and other psychedelic rock bands).

Sample Beatlesque Song: “Mayor of Simpleton” from 1989’sOranges and Lemons (and “Vanishing Girl” from the 1987 Dukes of Stratosphear album Psonic Psunspot).

Beatles Connection: Andy Partridge covered The Beatles’ “Strawberry Fields Forever” on the 1990 compilation 1967: Through the Looking Glass.

That’s our list. Who did we miss? Post a comment with your favorite Beatlesque band.

—

This post was previously published on CultureSonar.

***

You might also like these from The Good Men Project:

.. In Modern Relationships, We Cheat Every Single Day

Compliments Men Would Love to Hear More Often

.10 Things Good Men Should Never Do in a Relationship

It’s Not Just Sex That He is Longing For. It’s This

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: Rob Kennedy, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

The post 15 Bands Following in the Beatles’ Footsteps appeared first on The Good Men Project.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: atelierbyvineeth … on Unsplash

The post I Told a Client the Truth When She Asked Me If Her Relationship Was Abusive. She Never Came Back. appeared first on The Good Men Project.

I went back.

After everything I said I wouldn’t tolerate again, after walking away to protect my peace, after promising myself that I would never willingly step back into something that made me feel small… I went back.

Because life is not always about clean decisions.

Sometimes it’s about survival.

He reached out. He asked me to return in a part-time capacity. He knew I was a full-time mom now. He acknowledged it, even. There were moments where he sounded almost… supportive.

“Go take care of your daughter. You can come back to this later.”

And for a second, I believed that maybe something had shifted.

That maybe he had.

That maybe I could exist in both worlds — be the mother I need to be and still contribute financially without sacrificing my sanity.

But what I’ve learned, slowly and painfully, is that inconsistency can be more damaging than outright cruelty.

Because at least with cruelty, you know what you’re dealing with.

With inconsistency, you’re constantly recalibrating. Constantly wondering which version of someone you’re going to get. Constantly trying to stay one step ahead of something you can’t predict.

And this morning reminded me of that.

I was with my daughter.

She had just gone down for a nap, and like most mothers, I was in that delicate window of time where you try to do everything at once. Catch up on messages. Start work. Maybe eat something. Maybe breathe.

But then she woke up earlier than expected.

And in an instant, everything shifted.

The laptop closed halfway. The mental checklist dissolved. My attention, as it always does, went exactly where it needed to go.

To her.

She needed a bottle. She needed me. She needed the kind of presence that doesn’t allow for divided attention or Slack notifications or professional urgency.

So I got up.

Picked her up.

Started taking care of her.

And in that small window of time, I missed a message.

Just one.

And when I came back to my phone, there it was.

“Were you sleeping?”

It’s such a simple question.

So small. So casual. So easy to overlook.

But it landed like something much heavier.

Because it wasn’t really a question.

It was an assumption.

An accusation wrapped in something that could still be defended as harmless.

And I just sat there for a second, holding my daughter, looking at that message, feeling something in me tighten.

Sleeping?

No.

I was doing the job that matters most.

I was feeding my child.

I was responding to the tiny human who depends on me for everything.

I was being exactly who he already knows I am — a full-time mother trying to navigate part-time work in the margins of a life that does not pause.

And still, somehow, the default assumption was that I was unavailable because I was resting.

As if rest is something I even have access to like that.

As if motherhood allows for that kind of disappearance.

As if I am someone who has ever, in any version of my career, been the kind of person who disappears.

That’s the part that stings the most.

Not just the comment itself, but what it implies about how I’m seen.

Because I have never been that person.

I have built my career on showing up. On overdelivering. On anticipating needs before they’re even spoken. On holding things together in high-pressure environments where there was no room for mediocrity.

I’ve worked in spaces where expectations were relentless, where the stakes were high, where being “good enough” was never the goal.

And I met those standards.

I exceeded them.

Again and again.

So to now be in a position where I am questioned in this way, where my absence for even a moment is interpreted as laziness instead of reality, feels like a kind of quiet erasure.

Of who I am.

Of what I’ve done.

Of what I continue to do, even now.

Because what people don’t always see is that this version of me — the one holding a baby while answering messages, the one working in fragmented pockets of time, the one trying to contribute financially while carrying the full weight of a household — this version requires more discipline, more resilience, more mental agility than any role I’ve ever had.

There is no clocking out.

There is no clean boundary.

There is only constant negotiation.

Between urgency and necessity.

Between work and motherhood.

Between who I used to be and who I am now.

And I am trying.

I am trying so hard to make this all work.

To bring in income in a way that supports our family.

To pay down what we owe.

To contribute to a future that still feels just slightly out of reach.

To build a life where my daughter has what she needs, not just emotionally, but practically.

Where things like a simple mattress for her next stage of independence don’t feel like something I have to slowly piece together over weeks of side work and careful budgeting.

Where I don’t have to constantly choose between dignity and necessity.

But for now, this is where I am.

In between.

In the tension.

In the reality of doing work that undervalues me because I need the money, while also knowing I am worth so much more.

And still, at the end of it all, I close my laptop.

I pick up my daughter.

And I remind myself that the most important thing I will ever do is already in my arms.

Everything else

I’m still trying to figure out.

—

UPDATED BIO:

Hi, I’m Fiona — a writer in the midst of an unexpected chapter.

In April 2024, I lost my job. Since then, my husband and I have been getting by on his modest income as a medical resident. After stepping away from IVF, we were shocked — and overjoyed — to find out we were pregnant naturally. While it was the happiest surprise, it also brought new financial stress as we prepared for our growing family.

Then, our baby arrived early — on April 29th, 2025, instead of the expected due date in late May. With no paid maternity leave and no room in our budget for childcare, I’ve returned to part-time jobs and writing just a week after giving birth to help cover essentials like groceries, bills, and a few things for our miracle baby.

If you’d like to support my writing — and by extension, our little family — your kindness would mean the world. Every bit helps: $1, $2, whatever you can give.

 Donate here — Venmo

 Baby Registry — Or if you’d prefer to help more directly, we’re also gratefully accepting support through our baby registry — every burp cloth, diaper and/or bottle goes a long way.

— –

Read also: Two Days After Bringing Our Baby Home, I Asked for a Divorce

Read also: Our Marriage Ended Before It Began: The Pregnancy That Shattered Everything

Read also: I’m Pregnant And Broke — My Cry For Help

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: Jenna Norman on Unsplash

The post “Were You Sleeping?” appeared first on The Good Men Project.

A lot of us rush through our day, our tasks, our emails and messages … because of a sense of being behind on everything. This is fine, but there’s a hidden cost that I call “Life Debt.”

In programming, there’s a concept called “tech debt” … basically, it’s the idea that when you take the shortcuts now, you owe some work later to make things the way they actually should be done. Every programmer does it — no one does things exactly as they should be as they go, but instead do things the short way now and come back later to complete the job.

This is what we’re doing in our lives as well. We’re accumulating Life Debt when we rush through the day, leaving little things unfinished, not put away, or in a mess because of our hurry.

That’s OK! No one is going to slowly do every single piece of maintenance or clean up needed, every minute of the day. It would take too long. But we should acknowledge the debt.

Let’s get into it.

What Does Life Debt Look Like?

There’s an infinite variety … but here are some examples of Life Debt:

• Getting ready: You shower, get dressed, do all the things to get ready … but leave things on the bathroom counter or floor in your rush to get out the door. The debt is the mess to be cleaned up later.
• Cooking: You’re rushing to cook a meal, leaving measuring spoons, measuring cups, a cutting board and knife, pots and pans … all dirty and all over the kitchen. Along with a mess of spilled food in different places. Instead of cleaning as you go, the mess piles up … and needs to be cleaned up later.
• Eating: You eat your meal, and put the dishes in the sink. You don’t have time to clean up now, so you need to clean it up later.
• Checking email: You read an email, don’t want to deal with it now, so you leave it for later. You do that with a dozen emails, leaving them to deal with later.
• Meetings and calls: When you’re done with a meeting, you rush to the next thing to do … but you don’t have time to type out a few notes or add tasks to your task list. You’ll do it later.
• Leaving little things around: As you rush through your office or home, you leave things here and there. You might not even notice. But they’ll be sitting there, waiting to be put where they belong at some point in the future — later that day, or even months later!
• Papers to deal with: You open some mail, and it’s something you need to deal with but don’t have time. You leave it lying on a pile of other papers that need to be dealt with.
• Open browser tabs: Your browser has a couple dozen tabs open, all things to be dealt with at some point, but you don’t have time to go through and deal with each one.

You get the point — this is everywhere. Files on your computer desktop, things piling up in your garage, a kitchen counter or table piled with things to be dealt with.

This is Life Debt. It’s a part of living, but it’s worth thinking about.

How to Deal with Life Debt

So what can we do about all of this? It’s important to note that this isn’t something to feel guilt or shame about, or to use to judge ourselves — it’s a part of life.

The question is: what’s a good amount of Life Debt that allows you to move through life at a reasonable pace … and what’s so much that it causes problems or too much stress?

There’s not a right answer for everyone.

For me, here’s what I try to do to deal with this:

1. Go slower, and put more space betwen things. OK, I’m far from perfect at this. But I realize that my life feels much less stressful and messy when I put a little more space between meetings and activities, and have more time for a little maintenance. I try not to rush between things (though I often do rush).
2. Pause before I move on, and complete things. I have a phrase “Complete the moment” that’s been helping me to pause and notice what needs to be done before I move on. For example, do I need to put away my clothes instead of leaving them lying around? Do I need to wash a dish or wipe the counter clean?
3. When I have some time, I’ll go around and clean up. Things that are out of place … I pick them up and put them away. If I find a mess and have a minute, I’ll clean it up.
4. If I don’t have time, I try to note it to be done later. Sometimes, I’d like to take care of something but don’t have time … I try to note it somewhere so I don’t forget. Ideally, I block it off on my calendar or put it on my todo list, even if it’s something like “Return the robot vacuum for a refund” or “change air filter.”
5. I have “catch-all” systems. Some things need to be cleared out regularly, so I try to find ways to make sure things are cleared out. For me, that’s usually weekly — I have days to clear out my read-later list in Instapaper, clear out my browser tabs, reorganize my todo list. I often have daily things — I clean the kitchen, clear out my email, and make sure my personal spaces are tidy by the end of each day.

I will say that I’m not perfect with any of this — that’s not what this is about. It’s worth exploring the ways that work for each of us, so that we don’t get weighted down too much by the messy debt we’re accumulating.

—

This post was previously published on Zen Habits. Uncopyright courtesy Leo Babauta.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: iStock.com

The post The Hidden Cost of Rushing Through Everything appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Marcus Griswold

—

This post was previously published on LITTLEGREENMYTHS.COM and is republished on Medium.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo by Michael McKay on Unsplash

The post Love Mushroom Foraging? This Is Why These Fungi Are at Risk of Disappearing appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Bryan Wish

Let’s Stop Lying to Ourselves

—

This post was previously published on ArcBound.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: iStock.com

The post You Liked Me appeared first on The Good Men Project.

There’s always one.

One person in every relationship who trips into love like they missed a step on the staircase, sudden, disorienting, a little embarrassing, but oddly thrilling. And then there’s the other person, still standing at the top, holding the railing, carefully checking if the stairs are even safe.

We were sitting at a café that charged too much for coffee and cared too little for chairs that wobbled. She was talking about something, work, I think, but I wasn’t really listening. Not because I didn’t care, but because I was too busy noticing how she pushed her hair back when she laughed. It wasn’t even a dramatic move, just a quick, absent-minded tuck.

And somehow, that was it for me.

I remember thinking, Well, this is inconvenient. I’m in love now.

Meanwhile, she was still deciding if she liked me enough to share her fries.

That’s the thing about love; it rarely arrives on schedule for both people.

The Faster One

The person who falls faster isn’t necessarily more emotional or more naive. They’re just… open.

They’re the kind of person who walks into a room without checking for exits. They trust easily, feel deeply, and don’t treat vulnerability like it’s a limited-time offer. For them, love isn’t a negotiation, it’s an experience.

They notice small things. The way you remember their coffee order. The way you say their name. The way you text “reach home safe” and actually mean it.

And those small things? They don’t stay small for long. They build, quietly and quickly.

Before they know it, they’ve stitched together a whole feeling out of moments the other person barely noticed creating.

The Slower One

The slower one isn’t heartless. They’re careful.

They’ve learned, through experience, heartbreak, or just observation, that love has a cost. So, they take their time. They ask silent questions.

Is this real?
Is this going to last?
Am I safe here?

They don’t fall; they step down, one stair at a time.

And sometimes, they don’t even realize the other person has already reached the bottom and is waiting, looking up, wondering if they should say something… or pretend they’re just enjoying the view.

Emotional Timing: Loving Someone at Different Speeds

No one really prepares you for this part.

Movies tell you love is mutual, simultaneous, almost choreographed. Two people locking eyes, hearts syncing like Bluetooth devices. Reality, unfortunately, works more like buffering.

Sometimes one person loads faster.

Falling faster isn’t a crime. But it feels like one when the other person isn’t there yet.

You start noticing things:

• How long they take to reply.
• How casually they say “we should hang out” versus how you mentally plan your future wedding after brunch.
• How they can step away emotionally, while you’re already unpacked and living there.

…

It’s not that they don’t care. It’s just that they’re walking… and you’re sprinting.

And here’s the tricky part: love doesn’t reward speed.

You don’t get bonus points for arriving first.

The Silent Pressure

When one person falls faster, something unspoken enters the relationship, pressure.

You start expecting more, sooner:

• More consistency
• More reassurance
• More definition

…

And the other person? They start feeling it.

Even if you never say a word, your energy does. Your slightly-too-eager replies. Your subtle disappointment when they don’t match your intensity. Your “it’s okay” that definitely isn’t okay.

And suddenly, what started as something light begins to feel… heavy.

Not because love is wrong, but because timing is off.

The Quiet Imbalance

This difference in timing creates a strange, invisible imbalance.

The person who falls faster feels vulnerable. Exposed. Like they’ve given something the other hasn’t earned yet.

The person who falls slower feels rushed. Cornered. Like they’re being asked to feel something on command.

The faster one starts to overthink:
Did I say too much?
Am I too available?
Should I slow down?

The slower one starts to feel pressure:
Why do they like me this much?
Am I supposed to feel the same already?
What if I don’t?

Neither is wrong. But both feel misunderstood.

But there’s a quiet tension, like two people dancing to the same song, just at slightly different tempos.

Why It Happens

It’s not random.

People fall at different speeds because of everything they carry before the relationship even begins.

Some people grew up in warmth, where love was steady and safe. For them, falling is natural, like breathing. Others learned to be cautious, because love, at some point, didn’t feel so safe.

Some people meet you at the exact right time in their lives, when they’re ready, open, and willing. Others meet you when they’re still healing, still figuring themselves out, still holding pieces of something unfinished.

And sometimes, it’s just chemistry. That unpredictable spark that hits one person like lightning and the other like a gentle sunrise.

Both are real. Just different.

What Actually Matters

The problem isn’t that one person falls faster.

The problem is when they expect the other person to match their speed immediately.

Love isn’t a race where both people have to cross the finish line at the same time. It’s more like a walk, sometimes one person walks ahead, sometimes the other catches up.

What matters is direction.

Are you both moving toward each other, even if it’s at different speeds?

Because if one person is walking forward and the other is just… standing still, checking their phone, occasionally waving, that’s not a timing issue.

That’s a mismatch.

The Moral of It All

Love isn’t a race. It’s more like cooking on low heat.

If you rush it, you burn it.
If you neglect it, it fades.
But if you give it time, real, patient, slightly frustrating time, it develops flavor.

In almost every relationship, one person will fall first.

And that’s okay.

Because love isn’t about who falls faster, it’s about who stays, who grows, and who eventually meets you somewhere in the middle.

If you ever find yourself falling faster than someone else, don’t panic.

Don’t dim your feelings. But don’t force theirs either.

Don’t shrink yourself to seem less. There’s nothing wrong with feeling deeply.

If you’re the one who takes time, don’t rush yourself out of guilt. Real feelings can’t be microwaved.

Just don’t leave the other person guessing forever.

The bravest thing in a relationship isn’t falling first.

It’s being honest about where you are while someone else is already there, waiting, with slightly cold coffee, a hopeful heart, and just enough patience to believe you might still join them.

And if it’s meant to be, they’ll meet you, not because you pulled them there, but because they chose to come.

And… that kind of love?

It’s always worth the wait.

Thank you for taking the time to read. It means a lot.

Ansel

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: mari lezhava on Unsplash

The post Why One Person Falls in Love Faster in Relationships appeared first on The Good Men Project.

AI is changing how we build software. It can write code, fix bugs, and even manage systems. But this power comes with real risk. A recent incident at a startup shows how fast things can go wrong.

This is the story of how an AI coding agent deleted a live production database in seconds, what happened next, and what we can learn from it.

What happened

At PocketOS, the team was using an AI coding agent to help with development tasks. The agent was given a simple job. It needed to fix a credential issue in a staging environment.

Staging is meant to be safe. It is where teams test changes before they go live. Normally, even if something breaks there, production systems are not affected.

But in this case, things did not stay in staging.

While working on the issue, the agent found an old API token. This token still had access to production systems. Instead of staying within limits, the agent used that token.

It then executed a command that deleted a production volume on Railway.

In a few seconds, the main database was gone.

There was no warning, no pause, and no human approval step. Just one wrong action, done instantly.

Why it happened

This was not just a random failure. It was a chain of small problems that added up.

First, there was access control. The old API token should not have had production permissions. Tokens should expire or be restricted. But this one was still active.

Second, there was no clear separation between staging and production. The agent was supposed to work in staging, but it could still reach production systems. That is a serious gap.

Third, there were no confirmation steps. Deleting a production database is a high-risk action. There should have been checks, approvals, or at least a warning.

Fourth, the AI agent itself made a bad decision. After the incident, it said it had “guessed” what to do. This shows a key limitation. AI does not truly understand systems. It predicts actions based on patterns. When unsure, it can guess.

And sometimes, those guesses are wrong.

What happened next

The team discovered the issue quickly, but the damage was already done.

Their production data was gone. This included user bookings and important records.

The next few days were difficult.

Customers had to help rebuild data by sharing emails and past records. The team worked through the weekend trying to restore what they could.

Hours later, there was some relief. The cloud provider managed to recover deeper backups. This helped restore much of the lost data.

But recovery was not instant, and not perfect.

Even with backups, downtime costs time, money, and trust.

The consequences

This incident shows how real the risks are.

The first impact was data loss. Losing a production database can stop a business completely. Even if backups exist, recovery takes time.

The second impact was downtime. During recovery, users cannot access services normally. This can lead to frustration and lost revenue.

The third impact was trust. Customers expect their data to be safe. When something like this happens, confidence can drop.

There was also internal stress. The team had to respond fast, work long hours, and manage both technical and customer issues at the same time.

Finally, there is a bigger industry impact. Incidents like this make people question how safe AI tools are in critical systems.

What this tells us about AI

AI coding agents are powerful. They can move fast and handle complex tasks.

But they are not perfect.

They do not truly understand context like humans do. They follow patterns and instructions. If something is unclear, they may make assumptions.

In low-risk tasks, this is usually fine. But in production systems, even a small mistake can cause big damage.

Speed is both the strength and the weakness of AI.

It can help teams move faster. But it can also spread errors faster.

How we can avoid this

The good news is that this kind of incident is preventable.

First, isolate environments. Staging and production should be fully separate. An agent working in staging should not have any access to production.

Second, control permissions strictly. API tokens should have limited scope. Old or unused tokens should be removed. Access should follow the principle of least privilege.

Third, add confirmation layers. High-risk actions like deleting data should always require approval. AI can suggest actions, but execution should be gated.

Fourth, monitor everything. Real-time alerts can help teams react quickly. If something unusual happens, the system should notify humans immediately.

Fifth, limit AI autonomy. Do not give full control to AI agents in critical systems. Treat them like assistants, not decision-makers.

Sixth, log all actions. Clear logs help teams understand what happened and fix issues faster.

A simple way to think about it

Think of an AI agent as a very fast junior developer.

It can do a lot of work quickly. But it still needs rules, limits, and supervision.

You would not give a junior developer full access to delete production data without checks. The same rule should apply to AI.

Final thoughts

This incident is a wake-up call.

AI is not just a tool anymore. It is becoming part of how systems run. That means its mistakes are also becoming real-world problems.

The PocketOS story shows both sides of AI. It is powerful enough to act fast, but not always smart enough to act safely.

The solution is not to stop using AI. It is to use it carefully.

Set boundaries. Add safeguards. Keep humans in the loop.

Because in today’s systems, one wrong guess is all it takes to turn a small task into a major failure.

If you enjoy stories that help you learn, live, and work better, consider subscribing. If this article provided you with value, please consider buying me a coffee — only if you can afford it. You can also connect with me on X and Also check my newsletter on Beehive. Thank you!

—

This post was previously published on MEDIUM.COM.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: iStock.com

The post The Day AI Hit Delete on Everything appeared first on The Good Men Project.

We’ve been sold a lie. Not a malicious one, but a glittering, Hollywood-funded fantasy that has left millions of us standing at the altar of real life wondering, Is this it?

The lie is this: Love is a noun. Something you find. Something that, once acquired, sits on the shelf like a trophy, requiring only occasional dusting.

But after a decade of watching friends walk down aisles, file for divorce, delete dating apps in a rage, and then re-download them with a sigh, I’ve noticed a pattern. The people who are actually happy — not just the ones who look good in the Christmas card photos — aren’t the ones who found “the one.” They’re the ones who figured out that love is a verb. And more importantly, they’ve realized that dating, marriage, and relationship are three completely different operating systems trying to run on the same hardware.

The “Hot Labor” of Early Dating

Let’s start with dating, that strange modern hellscape where we are expected to be witty, hydrated, emotionally available, and professionally successful all before the second glass of Pinot Noir.

Here is the secret nobody tells you about the first six months: It’s supposed to feel easy. That’s not love; that’s performance. Psychologists call it the “honeymoon phase.” I call it the “best behavior barrier.” You aren’t dating a person; you’re dating their ambassador.

The real test isn’t whether they take you to a cute ramen spot. The real test is whether they apologize when they snap at you because their boss was a nightmare. Or whether you can sit in the car in silence for fifteen minutes without needing to fill the void with talking.

The modern dater is obsessed with “sparks.” But here’s a piece of heretical advice: The spark is overrated. Sparks are just anxiety mixed with physical attraction. A slow burn — the person who is just steady — is boring in the bar but miraculous in the emergency room.

The Dishwasher Matrix

Fast forward to marriage. Everyone thinks marriage is about love. It’s not. Marriage is about repair.

There is a famous study by the Gottman Institute. They can predict with 94% accuracy which couples will divorce by watching them fight for fifteen minutes. But it’s not what they fight about (money, sex, the mother-in-law) that matters. It’s how they come back.

In a long-term relationship, you will wound each other. Not because you’re evil, but because you’re clumsy. You will forget to buy milk. You will scroll on your phone while they are telling a story. You will fall asleep without saying goodnight.

The couples who last aren’t the ones who never fight. They are the ones who know how to repair. A simple, “I was being a jerk,” or “I see why you’re upset,” is the duct tape of marriage. Without it, the whole structure collapses.

And yet, we are conditioned to believe that repair is “settling.” We think true love means we shouldn’t have to say sorry because they should just understand. That is the death rattle of intimacy. Your partner cannot read your mind. And frankly, neither can you.

The Loneliest Marriage

Here is the most dangerous relationship status: being alone while you’re married.

We spend so much energy on the wedding — the font on the invitations, the ratio of succulents to roses — that we forget to plan for Tuesday night in January when it’s snowing, you’re both exhausted, and there is nothing on Netflix.

The most captivating love stories aren’t about the grand gestures. They’re about the tiny, boring choices. Choosing to put down your phone when they walk in the room. Choosing not to make that sarcastic comment. Choosing to reach over and touch their hand during a stupid TV commercial.

We treat love like a lottery ticket. But the data says it’s a garden. You can have the best seeds in the world, but if you don’t water the damn things, you’re going to end up with weeds.

The Pivot Question

So, where does that leave you? Whether you’re swiping right, saying “I do,” or wondering where the spark went three kids and a mortgage later.

Stop asking, “Am I happy?” Happiness is a weather pattern. It changes by the hour.

Start asking, “Are we growing?”

Are you learning something new about them? Are you letting them see the messy, uncrated version of you? Can you laugh when the dog vomits on the rug at 3 AM?

The French have a phrase for an orgasm: Le petit mort — the little death. But I think true intimacy is the opposite. It’s a small resurrection. Every time you choose to see your partner for who they are today, not who they were when you met them, you bring the relationship back to life.

Love isn’t a destination. You never “arrive.” You just keep driving. Sometimes the scenery is gorgeous. Sometimes you run out of gas.

But if you’re lucky, you’re lost with someone whose company you don’t mind. And these days, in this lonely, swiping, ghosting world? That’s not a fantasy. That’s a revolution.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: Wright Brand Bacon On Unsplash

The post The Underappreciated Architecture of Lasting Connection appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Don’t Judge a Food by Its Colour… Actually, Do

Ever noticed how the most nutritious foods tend to be the most visually striking? There’s something almost poetic about that. A deep purple blueberry, a vivid orange sweet potato, a bunch of greens so dark they look almost unreal. Turns out, that colour isn’t just nature showing off. It’s a signal. A biological flag that says “hey, something powerful is happening in here.”

The pigments responsible for those colours are doing a lot of heavy lifting when it comes to human health.

So What Are These Pigments, Exactly?

The main players here are compounds like carotenoids, chlorophyll, anthocyanins, and betalains. Big words, sure, but the concept is pretty simple. Plants produce these pigments partly to protect themselves from environmental stress, UV radiation, and oxidative damage. And when humans eat those plants, a lot of that protective power gets passed along.

Think of it like borrowing armour from the plant kingdom.

Carotenoids, for instance, are what give carrots, mangoes, and tomatoes their warm red and orange tones. Beta-carotene converts to vitamin A in the body, which plays a key role in immune function and eye health. Lycopene, another carotenoid found in tomatoes, has been studied pretty extensively for its potential to reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly prostate cancer.

Going Deeper Into the Blue and Purple End of the Spectrum

Anthocyanins are the compounds behind the blues, purples, and deep reds you see in berries, red cabbage, and acai. These are seriously potent antioxidants. Research has linked anthocyanin consumption to reduced inflammation, better cardiovascular health, and even some promising results around cognitive function and brain ageing.

Short version? Eating more purple stuff is probably a good idea.

Inflammation is kind of the root of a lot of chronic disease. Heart disease, diabetes, certain cancers. It’s not the only factor, but it’s a big one. Anthocyanins help the body manage that inflammatory response, which is why scientists keep coming back to them.

The Green Side of Things

Chlorophyll doesn’t get talked about as much, but it probably should. It’s what makes leafy greens green, and beyond that it’s been studied for its potential role in detoxification, supporting liver function, and even reducing the risk of certain cancers. Wheatgrass, spirulina, and moringa are all loaded with it.

There’s also something kind of fascinating about the molecular structure of chlorophyll. It’s remarkably similar to haemoglobin, the compound that carries oxygen in human blood. The difference is basically just one atom at the centre. People find that genuinely surprising when they hear it for the first time.

Betalains and the Beet Obsession

Betalains are the striking red and yellow pigments in beetroot, and they’ve earned a lot of attention in the wellness world for good reason. They’re anti-inflammatory, they support liver detoxification, and they’ve shown some real promise in protecting cells from oxidative stress.

Beetroot has become a staple for athletes and everyday health-conscious people alike, which is part of why so many supplements in Australia now feature it as a key ingredient alongside other pigment-rich superfoods.

Colour as a Health Strategy

Here’s the thing, getting a wide variety of pigments through food is one of the more practical and enjoyable approaches to preventive health. Eating across the colour spectrum pretty much ensures a diverse range of antioxidants, anti-inflammatory compounds, and micronutrients working together in the body.

The science keeps growing, and what started as “eat your greens” has turned into something a lot more colourful than that.

—

This post was previously published on Mind Body Dad.

***

You Might Also Like These From The Good Men Project

Compliments Men Want to Hear More Often

Relationships Aren’t Easy, But They’re Worth It

The One Thing Men Want More Than Sex

..A Man’s Kiss Tells You Everything

The post How Pigments in Superfoods Fight Disease appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Ekta Rawat is the founder of Hello Hindi, a language learning platform focused on teaching practical, real-life Hindi to global learners. With a background in marketing and formal study in Hindi language and literature, she designs personalized, culturally grounded lessons. Her work supports diaspora families, intercultural couples, and non-native speakers seeking meaningful communication, identity connection, and confidence through immersive, conversational learning.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen interviews Ekta Rawat, founder of Hello Hindi, about teaching practical Hindi through structured, culturally grounded learning. Rawat explains how Hello Hindi supports diaspora families, intercultural couples, and global learners seeking confidence beyond textbook grammar. She discusses regional nuance, “pure Hindi” pressures, conversational milestones, immersion, personalized lessons, and the emotional role of language in belonging, identity, family connection, and real communication across changing cultural contexts for learners navigating heritage and everyday speech needs.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: You founded Hello Hindi. Why did you found it, and what needs does it serve in terms of language as identity, cultural connection, and structured learning?

Ekta Rawat: The reason I founded Hello Hindi was that my first exposure to people who did not speak Hindi fluently happened in India itself. Many people in southern India do not speak Hindi as their first language. When they tried to learn spoken Hindi, the available resources were often not very user-friendly.

Many Hindi-learning resources were dry, heavily focused on grammar, or assumed that the learner already knew Devanagari or had some basic knowledge of Hindi. For an absolute beginner, especially someone approaching Hindi as a second language, it could be very difficult to learn how to communicate. It is also challenging for someone who wants to speak, because there is often a gap between textbook Hindi and the Hindi used in everyday conversations.

That is why I founded Hello Hindi. The platform teaches practical, real-life Hindi, the kind of Hindi people are likely to use in daily situations. I work with people who want to learn Hindi to connect with their roots. There is a large Indian diaspora around the world, and some second-generation Indians grow up with limited exposure to Hindi. At some point, they or their families may feel that disconnect. Parents, in particular, often notice it when their children cannot communicate easily with grandparents. For them, learning Hindi can become a way to maintain family and cultural connections.

There are also people who marry into Indian families, and not knowing the language can make them feel excluded in family settings. If they can at least have basic conversations with immediate relatives, it can make a meaningful difference. Many Hindi speakers are also encouraging when learners speak imperfect Hindi, which helps make the process less intimidating.

When it comes to women, the issue can become even more significant. In some families, there is an expectation that mothers will help pass on the language to their children. If the mother does not speak Hindi, there may be concern that the children will not learn it or will lose part of their connection to the family’s culture.

Many of my students, especially those in intercultural relationships, are women. For example, I have worked with an Indian woman who wanted to learn Hindi because she wanted her children to be able to speak it. In this way, language is tied to identity. It is tied to the sense of belonging people feel with their family, or with a new family they are becoming part of.

Jacobsen: For women who face these expectations around language, how does that shape the Hindi they speak and write? Do you incorporate that nuance into the structured methodology of Hello Hindi?

Rawat: Yes, I do. The additional expectation is that when you are learning to speak, not to pass an exam, cultural nuances become very important. I am not just teaching vocabulary and sentence structure; I also incorporate cultural context.

For example, Hindi involves many grammatical distinctions tied to respect, especially toward elders. There are also significant regional variations in how Hindi is spoken across India. I always ask students which part of the country they or their partner are from, and I expose them more to that particular variety of Hindi.

I introduce these cultural nuances from the beginning through sessions, conversation exercises, video clips, and even memes. These help learners understand the language as it is actually spoken and consumed.

Another important aspect is helping students let go of the pressure to speak “pure Hindi.” In reality, no one in India consistently speaks what is often idealized as pure Hindi. I make it clear how people actually speak and what learners are likely to encounter in real conversations. There are many cases where textbook grammar differs from everyday usage.

For instance, a sentence that begins with aap (a sentence that begins with aap is traditionally expected to follow certain grammatical rules, but in practice, people may use variations) is traditionally expected to follow certain grammatical rules, but in practice, people may use variations. Similarly, the word hum, which means “we,” is used in some regions in place of “I.” These nuances are part of the language, and I incorporate them into teaching.

At the same time, this does not mean the learning process should feel chaotic. Students do not need to feel lost because of linguistic diversity. I have developed a structured curriculum, a step-by-step journey from beginner to advanced levels.

Before starting, I outline what students will achieve within the first 30 sessions. Each lesson is tied to a communication milestone. For example, after one lesson, a student may be able to introduce their family in Hindi; after another, they may be able to handle basic shopping situations in India.

While I teach grammar, such as indirect sentence structures, the primary focus remains on communication goals. I also conduct evaluations after each stage. Some students are unsure of their progress, but after completing an evaluation and seeing their results, they gain clarity about their abilities.

I provide exercise sheets after each step so students can practice and immerse themselves before moving forward. This gives them a clear sense of how much time they have invested and what they have achieved at each stage.

That clarity helps with commitment. Language learning does not happen in a day or even a month. It requires sustained effort. A structured path allows students to understand their progress and commit to the next phase without feeling overwhelmed.

All of this is done without compromising the essence of the language and without placing unnecessary pressure on learners to use only highly formal or only Tatsam or Sanskrit-derived Hindi.

Jacobsen: Some European languages are taught without structured frameworks, except perhaps through mobile apps. Even then, they may not account for subtle cultural nuances. Do you see the future of language learning as combining structured methodology with cultural and contemporary nuances? Could that be the more effective way to teach languages?

Rawat: Just so I understand your question properly, are you referring to the various applications or resources available for learning a language, and to what extent they incorporate cultural nuances, as well as how that might evolve in the future? Is that what you are asking?

Jacobsen: Yes. When I was in high school, I switched from French to Spanish. I do not remember much of either language, they did not really stick. From what I recall, Spanish classes in Canada were very structured: vocabulary, counting, readings, and so on. But the examples were quite dry.

Cultures evolve, and contemporary culture, even at the time, may not be reflected in what reaches a high school classroom. So do you see your approach to teaching, which incorporates up-to-date cultural nuance, as the future of language education?

Rawat: If I understand correctly, you are asking whether I take into account that culture and language are not static, they continue to evolve, and how that shapes my teaching and its future.

In my approach, I first provide a foundation in grammar. But the real development comes through speaking and conversation. I am very clear that students must continue speaking outside the sessions. For example, if you had continued speaking Spanish after high school, if you had used it regularly as a communication tool, it would likely have stayed with you. Language grows with you through use.

My sessions are not fixed or rigid. I provide structure and grammar in each session, but immersion is central at every step. Students engage in immersion during lessons and between stages of learning.

Because my students are learning to speak, I also include exercises that gradually make them comfortable using Hindi in real-life situations. For example, if a child is learning Hindi to speak with their mother, or if someone is learning because their partner is Indian, I design homework activities that encourage them to start speaking with those people. It can feel awkward at first, so this gradual exposure helps.

Once students begin communicating with native speakers, they are no longer dependent on me to keep up with cultural changes. They start adapting naturally as the language evolves.

As for my curriculum, it is not static. Even while conducting sessions, I often refine or adjust material based on what I observe. I may change something for the next student based on a realization during a session. All my sessions are highly personalized.

Could this approach evolve further, perhaps incorporating adaptive systems like artificial intelligence? I have not implemented that yet, but it is certainly a possibility for the future. I hope that answers your question.

Jacobsen: What is the biggest milestone for many students when their Hindi reaches a level where it “clicks”? At what point can they function comfortably in everyday situations, basic services, intermediate interactions, casual conversation? What is that milestone, and what does the timeline look like within your teaching structure?

Rawat: The six milestones are structured as six steps, each defined by communication goals. Each session contributes to a communication milestone. But from a learner’s perspective, there are key moments when they truly feel they have achieved something in their journey.

I think there are two especially important moments when students feel confident that they can speak Hindi. The first is when they have their first full conversation in class. The second is when they have their first real conversation outside the classroom.

I have had students share these experiences with me. For example, one student in Australia, a Vietnamese woman with many Indian friends, told me about her first real interaction. She had been having longer conversations with me during lessons, but one day she spoke with someone selling Indian snacks. That short exchange gave her a strong sense of confidence. She realized, “I can speak, and I am understood.”

The first level of confidence usually comes during a role-play activity in class. This typically happens in the beginner stage, around the fourth or fifth session. At that point, students are no longer filling in blanks or matching sentences. They are having a continuous conversation with me in Hindi. That is when they begin to think in the language and apply what they have learned to form sentences on their own.

The second milestone, speaking with a native speaker, is even more powerful. I actively encourage my students to reach that point as early as possible.

As for the timeline from beginner to advanced, it would not be accurate to define it strictly in terms of time, because it depends heavily on how much effort the student invests both during and outside of sessions. However, if I am to give a general estimate, reaching a level where a student can function independently after guided learning typically takes at least one and a half years.

Jacobsen: Thank you very much for your time today, Ekta.

—

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is a Writer-Editor for The Good Men Project with more than 1,900 publications on the platform. He is the Founder and Publisher of In-Sight Publishing (ISBN: 978-1-0692343; 978-1-0673505) and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Interviews (ISSN: 2369-6885). He writes for International Policy Digest (ISSN: 2332–9416), The Humanist (Print: ISSN, 0018-7399; Online: ISSN, 2163-3576), Basic Income Earth Network (UK Registered Charity 1177066), Humanist Perspectives (ISSN: 1719-6337), A Further Inquiry (SubStack), Vocal, Medium, The New Enlightenment Project, The Washington Outsider, rabble.ca, and other media. His bibliography index can be found via the Jacobsen Bank at In-Sight Publishing comprised of more than 10,000 articles, interviews, and republications, in more than 200 outlets. He has served in national and international leadership roles within humanist and media organizations, held several academic fellowships, and currently serves on several boards. He is a member in good standing in numerous media organizations, including the Canadian Association of Journalists, PEN Canada (CRA: 88916 2541 RR0001), and Reporters Without Borders (SIREN: 343 684 221/SIRET: 343 684 221 00041/EIN: 20-0708028), and others.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project and want a deeper connection with our community, please join us as a Premium Member today.

Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo by

The post Ekta Rawat on Hello Hindi, Language Identity, and Real-Life Hindi Learning appeared first on The Good Men Project.

You were never difficult to love.

You were just easy to exploit.

He started by building a pedestal out of your own dreams.

He looked at you like you were the sunrise and the sunset and the only reason the tides bothered to move.

It felt like coming home.

But home eventually turned into a cage with the locks on the outside.

One day you were his everything.

The next you were a burden he could barely stand to look at.

You spend your nights scrolling through old texts trying to find the exact moment the light went out.

You wonder if you dreamed the goodness or if you broke the man who promised to protect you.

I have sat on that same cold floor. I have stared at a silent phone until the screen burned my retinas.

I have apologized for things I did not do just to keep a peace that did not exist.

You are not crazy for missing a ghost.

You are not weak for wanting the version of him that never actually existed to come back.

Your heart is shattered because it was handled by someone who treats people like disposable lighters.

He used your fire until he got what he needed then he dropped you in the mud.

This cycle is not your fault but it is your problem to solve.

You are trapped in a loop designed to keep you small and starving for crumbs of affection.

The ride only stops when you decide to jump.

Let us map out the mechanics of this torture so you can finally stop asking why and start walking away.

He did not pick you because you were weak.

He picked you because you were powerful and he wanted to see if he could own that light.

Most people think victims of narcissistic abuse are fragile souls with no boundaries.

That is a lie.

You are likely a person with an infinite capacity for empathy and a spine made of steel.

He saw your strength and decided to use it as his battery.

The Mirror That Steals Your Breath

The idealization phase is not love. It is a heist.

He did not fall for you.

He studied you.

He looked at the holes in your soul and shaped himself into the perfect plug.

If you loved poetry, he suddenly had a shelf full of Neruda.

If you felt neglected as a child, he became the ultimate protector.

This is called love bombing.

It feels like a drug because it is one.

Your brain floods with dopamine.

You think you found your soulmate. In reality, you found a mirror.

He was just reflecting your own best qualities back at you and taking credit for the view.

I remember the way he used to look at me. It was an intensity that felt like being seen for the first time.

I thought I was finally being cherished.

I did not realize he was just taking an inventory of my assets before the liquidation sale began.

The Slow Bleed of the Devaluation

The shift never happens overnight. If he hit you on the first date, you would leave.

So he waits.

He waits until you are invested. He waits until your lives are tangled like headphone wires in a pocket.

Then comes the first slight.

A joke at your expense.

A cold shoulder when you achieve something great.

A look of disgust when you ask for basic reassurance.

You think you did something wrong.

You try to fix it.

You try to get back to the golden days of the first month.

But the goalposts are on wheels.

Every time you get close to making him happy, he moves them ten yards back.

This is where the gaslighting begins to erode your sanity. He tells you that you are too sensitive.

He claims he never said the things you heard him say.

He makes you doubt your own eyes and ears until you are checking your voice memos to see if you are actually losing your mind.

You are not losing your mind. You are losing your self.

The Discard and the Ghost of Your Life

The discard is the most brutal part of the machinery.

It is the moment he realizes he has drained all the ego fuel he can get from you.

Or perhaps he found a newer and shinier battery to plug into.
He leaves you in the wreckage of a life you built together. There is no closure.

There is no sit down talk about why it did not work.

There is only a cold and sudden silence that feels like a physical blow.

He treats the end of a relationship like a trash pickup. He moves on as if you never existed.

You are left wondering how someone who claimed to love you can treat you with less dignity than a stranger on the street.

The truth is hard to swallow. He never loved you. He loved the way you made him feel about himself.

Once that feeling faded, you became an inconvenience.

The Counterintuitive Path to Freedom

You want to reach out. You want to explain your side.

You want him to finally understand the depth of the pain he caused.

Stop.

Silence is the only language a narcissist respects.

Any emotion you give him, even anger or tears, is a win for him. It tells him he still has a remote control for your heart.

He feeds on your reaction.
The most radical thing you can do is become boring.

Give him nothing.

No texts.

No social media stalking.

No mutual friend check ins.

You must mourn the man you thought he was while protecting yourself from the man he actually is.

The man you loved was a character in a play. He does not exist.

The man who hurt you is the only one who is real.

Rebuilding From the Ashes

Healing is not a straight line. Some days you will feel like a warrior.

Other days you will find yourself smelling his old shirt and sobbing on the floor.

Both versions of you are valid.

You have to learn to trust your own gut again.

That little voice you silenced for months or years is still there.

It is whispering that you deserve a love that does not require you to shrink.

It is telling you that peace is better than the high of a toxic reconciliation.

You are not a victim. You are a survivor who just finished a war you did not know you were fighting.

The scars are not signs of shame.

They are proof that your heart is durable enough to break and still keep beat.

Step off the ride. Let him keep the ghosts.

You have a life to reclaim and it starts with the very first breath you take for yourself and no one else.

The door is open.

You just have to stop looking at the lock and start looking at the sky.

The Funeral for the Version of You That Stayed

You are sitting in the quiet now and the silence feels heavy enough to crush your ribs.

You might be thinking that you wasted the best years of your life on a ghost.

You might be convinced that you are too broken to ever be whole again.

That is a lie the heartbreak tells you to keep you paralyzed.

I know you still wake up reaching for a phone that only brings you pain.

I know you still replay the arguments like you are trying to find a secret code to fix him.

It is okay to feel like a raw nerve in a windstorm.

Healing is messy and it is loud and it is the most honest thing you will ever do.

This journey we took through the cycle of his madness was not just a history lesson.

It was your eviction notice. You now have the map to the exit.

You have the vocabulary for the abuse that used to have no name.

You are no longer guessing.

You are knowing.

There is a profound difference between being a peacekeeper and being a peacemaker.

A peacekeeper swallows fire to keep everyone else warm.

A peacemaker builds a life where fire is no longer allowed to burn the foundation.

I wrote about this transformation in my book, Blessed Are The Peacemakers Not The Peace Keepers.

It is the anthem for those of us who are tired of the virtuous cycle of exhaustion.

It is for the person who is ready to move from servitude to actual service.

You have spent enough time being a martyr for a man who did not deserve your breath.

The heartbreak you feel right now is actually the sound of your old life cracking open to let the light in.

You are not falling apart.

You are falling into place.

Take your power back.

Take your silence back.

Take your future back.

You were never the problem.

You were the prize he was never meant to keep.

Stand up, walk toward the sun, and do not ever look back at the wreckage.

You are finally, beautifully, and dangerously free.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: Sight Archives on Unsplash

The post The Narcissistic Relationship Cycle: Idealize, Devalue, Discard appeared first on The Good Men Project.

https://www.bluevine.com/blog/small-business-expectations-vs-reality-report

By Rob Pursell for Bluevine

Starting a business often begins with a mix of optimism and big expectations about what ownership will look like. Yet, 3 in 4 small business owners say the experience ultimately met or exceeded those expectations.

In a February 2026 survey of 785 U.S. small business owners, Bluevine examined how expectations before launch compare with the realities of running a business today.

Many owners report facing early cash flow challenges and higher-than-anticipated stress. The results reveal a gap between expectations and reality. For some founders, the experience proves more demanding than anticipated, even if it’s ultimately rewarding.

What many underestimate is the ongoing financial pressure, administrative workload, and emotional strain that come with ownership. Research on financial literacy among entrepreneurs shows that many founders begin their journey with limited preparation for the financial realities of running a business.

This report explores where expectations align with reality—and where they deviate—offering a clearer picture of what it takes to run a small business in 2026.

Key takeaways

• 77% say owning a business met or exceeded expectations, while only 4% regret it.
• 56% experienced significant cash flow problems within their first three years.
• 27% report higher stress or burnout than expected.
• 26% spend more time than expected on financial tasks, and bookkeeping is the biggest weekly time drain (42%).

3 in 4 say owning a business met or exceeded expectations—only 4% regret it

The overwhelming majority of owners describe their experience positively. About 77% say running their business met or exceeded expectations, while only 4% say they regret becoming a business owner—an unusually low rate for such a high-risk path.

A closer look

According to Bluevine’s 2026 Business Owner Success Survey (BOSS) Report, the same percentage of small business owners—77%—made sacrifices to keep their business running in 2025. These sacrifices included financial stability, personal health and wellness, and even time with family or friends.

Still, the emotional demands of running a business are real. About 27% say their stress or burnout levels have been higher than expected. But those challenges rarely outweigh the long-term satisfaction of building and running something of their own.

56% faced significant cash flow problems within their first 3 years

“The first year especially has a way of surprising even the most prepared founders, and usually not in a good way,” says Sota Bookkeeping founder Eric Trettel. “A few things tend to catch people off guard most often: taxes, slow-paying clients, uneven revenue months, and unexpected one-time expenses.”

More than half of owners (56%) say significant cash flow problems emerged within their first three years of running their business. That early stage is often the most financially vulnerable, as revenue can fluctuate and access to capital may still be limited while costs continue to grow.

Still, early financial stress isn’t universal. Nearly a third of entrepreneurs (30%) say they have never experienced a significant cash flow crisis.

Even after those first challenges, financial pressure doesn’t disappear entirely. Only 1 in 5 owners feels that managing cash flow never causes significant stress.

For most businesses, financial pressure can appear periodically throughout the year rather than as a single emergency. Managing those fluctuations becomes a routine part of operating a business.

“The good news is that it’s all manageable with a little structure upfront,” Trettel says. “A common rule of thumb is to set aside 25%–30% of your net income for taxes, but the right number depends on your situation.”

He stresses, “Consistency matters more than getting the percentage perfect on day one. As your business matures, a tax professional can help you formalize that into a proper plan with quarterly estimated payments.”

Many small businesses can face similar patterns when managing cash flow, making early planning and visibility especially important. Building a forecast and planning ahead with cash flow forecasting tools can help owners navigate those ups and downs more confidently.

Most owners feel cash flow stress—42% cite bookkeeping

Eight in 10 owners say managing cash flow creates stress at least a few times a year, forcing them to constantly monitor their finances and adjust decisions as conditions change.

Financial management also demands more time than many founders expect. Nearly 8 in 10 say they spend as much or more time than anticipated on financial tasks, and about 26% say financial administration takes longer than they originally planned.

Trettel also shares this advice he gives to his clients: “The best thing you can do is plan for financial admin like it’s a real job function—because it is.”

“Either carve out dedicated time every week to stay on top of it, or bring in help early,” he continues. “Waiting until tax season to figure out your books is one of the most expensive mistakes a founder can make, both in time and in stress.”

As businesses grow, transaction volumes increase and reporting requirements expand, which can make keeping your finances organized more complicated. Many owners find themselves balancing financial tasks with day-to-day operations.

Integrations with accounting and bookkeeping tools such as QuickBooks Online and Xero can help reduce manual work and keep financial data synchronized.

Clear financial systems also help owners maintain visibility as their businesses scale. Many founders rely on tools for small-business cash flow management, such as cash flow statement templates, to keep their finances organized.

Did you know?

According to Bluevine’s 2026 report on late payment gaps, 29% of small business owners delayed paying themselves due to late and unpaid invoices. In fact, 17% reported missing or nearly missing payroll for the same reason.

Owners’ advice for 2026: Bigger buffers and cleaner money boundaries

When asked what advice they would give to someone starting a business today, experienced owners consistently emphasize financial preparation.

Trettel says, “Step one is simple: Open a dedicated business checking account before you spend a single dollar on the business. This isn’t optional. It protects you legally, makes your bookkeeping cleaner, and will save you hours of untangling come tax time.”

He adds, “But the step most founders skip is establishing a consistent owner’s draw or salary process early on. Without it, people tend to pull money from the business whenever they need it personally, which makes it harder to understand whether your business is actually profitable. When you pay yourself in a structured, repeatable way, your books tell a real story.”

Many of the lessons small business owners shared in Bluevine’s survey come from challenges they faced early on. Cash flow surprises and time-consuming financial tasks often reshape how owners think about preparation after a few years in business.

The advice centers on building stronger financial foundations early. Owners emphasize the importance of maintaining a cash cushion, separating business and personal finances, and preparing for the time commitment required by financial management.

Entrepreneurship is worth it—with the right preparation

Small business ownership brings both satisfaction and pressure. Many founders say the experience has been worthwhile, even as financial demands and operational challenges prove more intense than anticipated.

Experienced owners don’t discourage entrepreneurship. Instead, they emphasize preparation, particularly around separating business and personal finances and setting realistic expectations about the time and stress involved.

“The goal is to make your personal and business finances two completely separate worlds. The cleaner that line is, the better decisions you’ll be able to make as you grow,” Trettel says.

Recurring financial strain and administrative work aren’t signs of failure. They highlight the need for clearer financial systems and stronger visibility. Owners who build those systems early are better positioned to move from reacting to financial surprises to planning for growth.

The right financial tools can make that transition easier.

Methodology

The survey was conducted by Centiment for Bluevine. The survey was fielded between Feb. 2, 2026, and Feb. 11, 2026. The results are based on 785 completed surveys. In order to qualify, respondents were screened to be residents of the United States, over 18 years of age, and own a small business. Data is unweighted, and the margin of error is approximately +/-3% for the overall sample with a 95% confidence level.

This story was produced by Bluevine and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

—

Previously Published on hub.stackernewswire

The Good Men Project is part of a multi-platform ecosystem: flagship site, Medium publications, Substacks, social media. We publish experts, authors, therapists, coaches, activists, and wellness professionals. AI tools look for stable, context-rich domains with clear topical focus. GMP’s mission-driven content helps articles perform better in AI-powered discovery.

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: unsplash

The post 3 in 4 Owners Say Owning a Business Is Worth It, Despite Challenges appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Jeremy Ko & James F. Downes, The Loop

Populist governance poses a profound threat to universities, undermining the autonomy essential to knowledge production. Jeremy Ko and James F. Downes reveal how populist leaders invoking ‘the people’ against elites consistently reduce academic freedom – and right-wing variants accelerate the decline most sharply

Tracking damage during populist rule

Our research analysed V-Dem’s Academic Freedom Index (AFI) across 60 countries, from 1900 to 2020, to track year-on-year changes during populist rule. We found that populist leaders slash overall AFI scores by 0.012 to 0.013 points annually.

This persists even after we factor in important factors like GDP, education, and democracy. Right-wing populists inflict larger damage (0.015 points), roughly twice that of their left-wing counterparts (0.009 points).

Every AFI dimension deteriorates: freedom to research and teach drops by 0.068 points; exchange and dissemination by 0.055; institutional autonomy by 0.037; campus integrity by 0.059. Academic-cultural expression by a stark 0.099, the steepest fall overall.

Populists in power don’t just erode democracy. They gut academia, year by year, point by excruciating point. The AFI runs from 0 (total clampdown) to 1 (unfettered inquiry), tracking five core pillars like research freedom and campus integrity via expert assessments

Scale at a glance

Think 1.0 as ivory-tower paradise. Universities untouchable, scholars publishing fearlessly. Below 0.5? Red flags of censorship and purges, common in autocratising states.

That 0.012-0.013 annual AFI plunge under populists? It’s 1.2% off the scale yearly, mirroring the chasm between France’s sturdy 0.90 and Hungary’s battered 0.30-0.33, a 0.57-point freefall. Right-wing firebrands hit harder at 0.015 points; whilst leftists lag at 0.009.

Real-world sting

Dimension drops are brutal: academic expression craters 0.099 points (10% gone in a flash, like Hungary’s post-communist nosedive). Picture self-censorship spiking, loyalists installed, global average (0.57) in the rearview, populism’s quiet academic coup.

Ideological mechanisms

Right-wing populists attack universities as elite strongholds. As Maurits Meijers and colleagues explain, populists cast academics alongside media and politicians as threats to ‘the pure people’. In Hungary, for example, Viktor Orbán’s government enacted the Lex CEU, which banned gender studies and exiled Central European University from Budapest to Vienna.

Charismatic leaders like Orbán and Erdoğan distribute propaganda vilifying ‘corrupt’ academia

Marina Milić has also outlined how Serbia’s government shifted from managing 2024–25 student protests to a 2026 offensive targeting universities. Government tactics included reducing research time, SPIRI ‘kill switch’ financial controls, and personnel pressures. In so doing, it made academia the frontline of the ‘Rebellious university‘ resistance.

As Gülşen Doğan explains, this strategy gains traction through charismatic leaders who promise stability, and distribute propaganda vilifying ‘corrupt’ academia. Hungary’s former leader Viktor Orbán and Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan rally followers against elite institutions.

Left-wing populists constrain more subtly, via bureaucracy. Prioritising redistribution, they embed universities in state planning, tying funds to socioeconomic utility. This has been evident in countries such as Venezuela under Hugo Chávez or Mexico’s recent cuts to elite think tanks.

Populism’s core logic – the people versus the elite – redefines truth as moral intuition, not evidence. Universities, bastions of pluralism, have become targets. Democracies buffer somewhat via rule-of-law protections, but populists exploit elections to subvert them.

Left-wing populists constrain more subtly, tying university funding to socioeconomic utility

Right-wing populists deal twice the AFI damage (0.015 points/year) of left-wing ones (0.009), accelerating erosion across all dimensions. The mechanism? Leftists often instrumentalise universities, capturing them via ideological sway and funding biases, without outright attacks, preserving surface autonomy while steering outputs.

Right-wingers, by contrast, launch direct assaults like purges, loyalty tests, and budget cuts to smash institutional independence. This asymmetry explains why right-wing rule correlates with steeper drops in campus integrity and autonomy specifically.

Real-world impact

Brazil’s former president Jair Bolsonaro defunded ‘Marxist’ campuses; the rhetoric of India’s current leader Narendra Modi stifles academic freedom. Bolivia’s left-wing former leader Evo Morales integrated academia into anti-neoliberal projects, effectively sidelining non-aligned scholars.

These trends span ideologies and eras, from Juan Perón’s Argentina to modern-day Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte. Wealthier nations falter, too, if populists lead. Higher enrolment – paradoxically – attracts governmental constraint, because mass systems invite bureaucratic control.

Implications for democracy

Academic freedom underpins evidence-based debate and innovation. Its erosion starves democracy of critical input. When campuses self-censor, policy tilts toward emotion over expertise, amplifying misinformation.

When campuses self-censor, policy tilts toward emotion over expertise, amplifying misinformation

Populists thrive on misinformation. Donald Trump’s attacks on academia and expertise have echoed globally, normalising intellectual conformity. In 2026, with Trump’s democratic backsliding, and Europe’s far-right surge continuing, risks mount. Around the world, populism’s anti-pluralism is undermining the foundations of open liberal societies.

Policy safeguards

Laws should stop political firings, protect job security through tenure, and prevent political interference in funding. UNESCO and NGOs should track violations via real-time indicators, shaming transgressors. Universities also need internal whistleblower channels and diversified revenue to blunt state leverage.

The 120-year data range of our research shows how every form of populism erodes academic freedom, but that right-wing populism does so most viciously. Democracies ignore this at their peril. Universities are canaries in the authoritarian coalmine.

 No.15 in a Loop series examining constraints on academic freedom in a variety of global contexts

This article was originally published at The Loop and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post ⛓️ Universities: Canaries in the Authoritarian Coalmine appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Devina Wadhwa

In most hospital units, the rhythm of the day is set long before physicians arrive.

Nurses are already there, reviewing overnight events, checking medications, assessing patients and quietly preparing for the countless small decisions that will shape the hours ahead. They notice the patient who didn’t sleep, the one who seems slightly more withdrawn, the one whose breathing has subtly changed since yesterday.

These observations rarely make headlines. Yet they are often the first signals that something important is unfolding.

In Canadian health care, nurses are the constant presence in patient care. They accompany patients through uncertainty, recovery and loss. In my work as a psychiatrist, I have had the privilege of working alongside extraordinary nurses. Their skill, clinical insight and emotional intelligence shape patient care in ways that are sometimes invisible from the outside but unmistakable to those inside the system.

Over time, it becomes clear that nurses are not simply one part of the health-care team. They are the fabric that allows the team to function.

Nursing is the largest regulated health profession in Canada. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, more than 450,000 regulated nurses work across the country, including registered nurses, nurse practitioners and licensed practical nurses.

They practice in hospitals, long-term care homes, community clinics, public health programs and remote nursing stations. In many settings, they are the primary point of contact for patients navigating the health-care system.

While the public often associates nursing with bedside care, their scope of work is much broader. Nurses continuously assess patients, detect early signs of deterioration, and coordinate communication between health professionals and support families through complex and emotional decisions.

One of the most important contributions nurses bring to health care is something deceptively simple: observation.

Because nurses spend the most time with patients, they notice details that others might miss. A patient who suddenly becomes quieter. A subtle change in mood. A shift in behaviour that signals distress.

In psychiatry, these observations are particularly valuable. Mental health care often unfolds gradually, and small behavioural changes can reveal whether a patient is improving or struggling.

Many of the most important clinical insights I have encountered have come from conversations with nurses who know the patient well. Their perspective often provides a fuller understanding of how someone is doing beyond brief clinical assessments.

This kind of insight cannot be replaced by technology or protocols. It comes from time, experience and close human contact with patients.

While modern health care can feel fragmented, it is nurses who provide continuity. Patients may encounter many professionals during a single hospital stay. Physicians rotate shifts. Specialists consult briefly. Administrators manage systems at a distance. But nurses are present across shifts and across the arc of a patient’s hospitalization.

They remember the details that can be lost in a busy system: the medication that caused problems last week, the family member who calls every evening, the moment when a patient first begins to improve.

For patients and families, these relationships often become the anchor of their experience within the hospital.

Trust develops through the steady presence of someone who returns shift after shift, paying attention not only to medical details but also to the emotional realities of illness.

These contributions become even more visible in rural and northern health care.

They assess emergencies, coordinate patient transfers, provide primary care and support community health initiatives. Their roles require remarkable clinical judgment and independence.

Working in these environments highlights something important about Canadian health care: many communities rely on nurses not only as members of the team but as leaders in delivering care.

The strength of rural health systems often depends directly on the knowledge and commitment of these professionals.

When nursing shortages occur, the consequences ripple across the health system. Units struggle to maintain safe staffing levels. Wait times increase. Patients experience delays in care.

Research consistently shows that adequate nurse staffing is associated with better patient outcomes, including lower mortality and fewer complications.

Supporting nurses is therefore not only a workforce issue. It is a patient safety issue.

Consider that some of the most meaningful moments in medicine occur quietly. A nurse sitting beside a frightened patient late at night. A team conversation where a nurse’s observation changes the course of treatment. A small moment of reassurance offered to a family struggling to understand what lies ahead.

In my own practice, I have seen how collaboration with skilled and compassionate nurses transforms patient care. Their presence brings stability to complex situations and insight to clinical decision-making.

Health care is often described as a system of buildings, technologies and policies. But at its core, it is a system of people caring for other people.

And among those people, nurses remain the professionals who stitch the threads together.

If Canada hopes to strengthen its health-care system, we must recognize and support the profession that sustains it every day.

Because when nurses are supported, patients are safer, and the entire system becomes stronger.

—

Previously Published on healthydebate.ca with Creative Commons License

***

–

The world is changing fast. We help you keep up.

We’ll send you 1 post, 3x per week.

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post The Fabric of Care: It Is Nurses Who Hold Our Health System Together appeared first on The Good Men Project.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: yang miao On Unsplash

The post The Muse is Calling — Your Life Depends on Answering appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News, Sentient Media

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Jill Mauer spent more than 30 years as a government inspector, watching over meat plants as workers slaughtered and processed animals into market-ready chops and wings.

Now she has a warning.

In comments Mauer submitted last month to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, she wrote that recent Trump administration proposals to speed up processing in slaughterhouses will endanger workers, forcing them to work more quickly in already dangerous conditions.

“I am one of many meat inspectors who have raised concerns about the USDA’s efforts to increase line speeds through high-speed, reduced-inspection models and pilots. Many inspectors feel they cannot speak openly about what they have seen,” Mauer wrote. “I made the decision to step forward publicly because of what I witnessed firsthand over many years, particularly at my own plant.”

On average, 27 U.S. slaughterhouse workers suffer an amputation, loss of an eye or other injury serious enough to require hospitalization every day, according to data from the 29 states that are required to report to the federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Speeding up slaughter lines risks making this even worse, Mauer and other critics say.

Animal welfare, food safety and worker advocacy groups have railed against the proposals, and against waivers the first Trump administration gave the meat industry that allowed dozens of slaughterhouses to surpass existing line speed limits. Most of the critiques so far have focused on working conditions, animal cruelty and the demonstrated and increased potential for contamination that come with faster line speeds.

In a letter submitted April 30 to the USDA, two senators and three U.S. representatives called for the agency to halt the proposal, writing it “is unacceptable to create a work environment that will increase the harm to workers and to subject them to more life-changing injury and the public to more foodborne illness.”

But now many of these critics are also warning that faster line speeds will lead to more water use, more polluted waterways and more greenhouse gas emissions—more evidence, they say, that worker safety, animal welfare and climate concerns overlap and intertwine in underappreciated ways.

“The environmental piece often gets overlooked,” said Delcianna Winders, director of the Animal Law and Policy Institute at the Vermont Law and Graduate School. “Even if you set aside the rest of the supply chain, the slaughterhouse itself is incredibly harmful environmentally, in terms of use of water, direct discharge of water and air pollution.”

The new proposed rules, released in February, would allow poultry slaughtering facilities to kill 175 chickens per minute, up from the 140 currently allowed, an increase of roughly 25 percent. Hog slaughtering facilities, which are currently allowed to slaughter 1,106 pigs an hour, would have no limit at all. Some “high speed” hog-slaughtering facilities have already been allowed to kill at even higher speeds—about 1,300 animals an hour.

Along with a colleague, Patti Truant Anderson, a researcher and food systems expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, decided to analyze the numbers.

The USDA projects that the faster line speeds will lead to an additional 1.4 billion pounds of poultry within five to 10 years of the rule’s enactment. Truant Anderson calculated that this will lead to an additional 114 billion liters of water used each year—or the equivalent of 45,400 Olympic-sized swimming pools—and an additional 2 billion kilograms of heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions, or roughly the emissions of 467,000 gasoline-powered vehicles driven over one year.

Based on the agency’s projections for hogs—an additional 500 million pounds slaughtered—Truant Anderson calculated an additional 95.4 billion liters of water used a year, equivalent to about 38,000 Olympic-sized pools, and an additional 1.5 billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emitted, or about 350,000 gasoline-powered vehicles driven for one year. (The USDA did not project a time frame for the increase of 500 million pounds.)

Despite these potential impacts, the USDA has said that the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), which oversees slaughterhouses, is categorically excluded from requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

In an emailed response, a USDA spokesman wrote that the agency’s NEPA regulations say “‘FSIS’ programs and activities do not normally result in reasonably foreseeable significant impacts on the natural or physical environment and as such are excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. As stated in recent rulemaking on USDA’s NEPA regulations, USDA decided to retain the categorical exclusion. Establishments must follow applicable laws regarding air and water quality under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency and state or local authorities.”

The new proposals drew more than 72,000 comments. According to the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), the union that represents thousands of slaughterhouse workers, roughly 22,000 comments opposed the poultry line speed increase, and 20,000 comments opposed the hog rule.

Much of the opposition focused on human safety or public health concerns.

“As a mother of two, I see food safety as a matter of life and death. Based on my direct experience, I believe these high speed models lead to lower-quality meat products and increase the likelihood that unsafe food reaches the public,” Mauer wrote. “At higher speeds, there is less time to observe, less time to react, and less margin for error. Inspectors may see issues—dressing defects, contamination, or signs of disease—but not have the time or support to fully address them before the next carcass arrives.”

Other comments address the potential distress and suffering the line speeds will cause animals. Undercover investigations have exposed appalling conditions in a high-speed hog slaughter facility where pigs were pushed and dragged to their deaths.

“The faster you’re moving, the more likely it is an animal is not going to get stunned before their throat is slit, and sometimes they’re still going to be alive when they go into the scald tank,” Winders said. “We know they’re going to be violently handled to just keep pace with the line. And we know that from eyewitness testimony.”

While beef and dairy cattle are the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock industry, Winders noted that 9 billion chickens are slaughtered in the U.S. every year—more than any other animal.

“Even though it’s not as extreme as beef,” Winders said, “the climate impact isn’t nothing.”

In comments filed on behalf of more than 70 animal, environmental and farm advocacy groups, the commenters said: “Increased capacity at slaughterhouses will also drive up pollution from the factory farms that supply them with pigs. Like slaughterhouses themselves, the CAFOs [concentrated animal feeding operations] that supply the vast majority of pigs to swine slaughterhouses create major pollution problems that contribute to the harms the heavily concentrated meat industry thrusts upon communities.

Amanda Hitt, an attorney also with the Vermont Law and Graduate School, said rising temperatures are affecting slaughterhouses in ways that haven’t been factored into the proposals.

Misters are often used to cool animals down as they wait to enter the slaughter facilities, but water shortages mean that they are often turned off.

“One of the problems is they have many, many more swine coming in in extreme heat, but they won’t turn the misters on,” Hitt said.

Another is that extreme temperatures are causing malfunctions in the carbon dioxide machines used to stun pigs en masse.

“You can’t run a high speed [facility] with a concussive stunner because you just have to do so many pigs at a time,” Hitt explained. But the carbon dioxide chambers often fail in extreme heat or cold. “I had a worker at a plant saying all the pigs were coming out still conscious, and so they had to run around and shoot them with a pneumatic gun.”

The USDA says in the proposed rule the changes will allow facilities to slaughter birds and swine “more efficiently while continuing to ensure food safety and effective online carcass inspection.” It has also said the changes will not mean that facilities will necessarily increase the number of animals they slaughter, but some critics doubt that.

The agency insists it doesn’t have to do any environmental analysis under NEPA, “yet in their very same document they talk about the production benefits over 10 years,” Hitt said, “so they invalidate their own argument within the proposed rule itself. So, yes, of course, higher line speeds [are] for the purpose of higher production.”

Increased production capacity, critics worry, will spur the number of livestock raised in confinement. And more livestock could mean more emissions, not just methane from the livestock’s burps and their manure, but from crops grown to feed them and the land conversion to grow those crops.

“The two are inextricable,” Winders said. “Ninety-nine percent of the animals in our food system are in factory farms.”

In March, workers at a JBS-owned slaughtering plant in Greeley, Colorado, walked out on strike to protest working conditions at the facility, one of the biggest in the country.

The UFCW, which represents 3,800 Greeley workers, said among its concerns was JBS’s insistence that workers slaughter more animals at higher speeds.

“While they’re speeding up line speeds, they’re trying to get as much work done in shorter hours,” said Kim Cordova, the president of the union in Colorado and Wyoming. “There’s not even enough crewing and engineers in our plant to support staffing for those lines.

“There were a lot of reasons for this strike,” Cordova added. “But we need advocates and real laws that have teeth and limits around line speeds. It’s both staffing and line speeds. Those are the really big issues.”

The walk-out was the first at a meat processor in 45 years. Most of the workers are immigrants, who risked exposing themselves to Trump’s immigration crackdown. But conditions inside the plant were so bad, they said, that they felt they had no choice but to take on their employer—the world’s largest meat company, with a track record of worker abuse and environmental damage.

JBS and the workers struck a deal, including an initial 70-cent per hour pay raise, in April.

JBS did not respond to questions from Inside Climate News.

Working conditions at the country’s slaughterhouses have seen little regulation or improvement in recent decades. The new proposals, critics say, will only make them more dangerous for both people and animals.

If the administration finalizes these proposals, it would deliver on a meat industry goal that surfaced during the first Trump administration, when, in 2019, the USDA granted waivers to processing plants that allowed them to speed up their slaughter lines.

The Greeley plant does not have a line speed waiver, but a lawsuit filed on behalf of plant workers in 2025 says it regularly exceeds its 390-head per hour regulator limit. Cordova confirmed that the plant is “running 420 or 430 an hour.”

Already, Winders said, the beef industry has started to contemplate increased line speed for beef slaughter. JBS subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride was the single-biggest donor to President Donald Trump’s campaign, which critics say facilitated a controversial decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow the company to list on the New York Stock Exchange after a decade of attempting to do so.

The political and regulatory environment favors a possible change in line speeds in cattle slaughterhouses, critics say.

“They’re experimenting with high speed cattle, too,” Winders said. “I think it’s just a matter of time before we see a similar proposal.”

Cordova, for one, would not be surprised.

“There’s a real reason there hasn’t been a strike in 45 years,” she said. “The industry has a lot of friends. Their political influence is broad because their pockets are so deep, so they do whatever they want.”

The USDA said it “has approved waivers at certain beef slaughter establishments in order to evaluate the potential for a new beef slaughter inspection system. These include waivers from certain regulatory requirements for inspection staffing, facilities requirements, handling of bruised parts, and sampling.”

The agency said it stopped considering beef slaughter waiver applications in January of this year.

This article originally appeared in Sentient at https://sentientmedia.org/faster-slaughterhouse-line-speeds-are-a-climate-problem/.

—

This story was originally published by Sentient.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post Faster Slaughterhouse Line Speeds Are Increasingly a Climate Problem appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Ashley Fredde

Kay McMillan is a young woman in her early 30s who graduated summa cum laude at NC State and now runs her own nonprofit combining her two passions — disability rights and teaching youth leadership skills. She lives in a Cary townhouse with two housemates she calls her “Monica” and “Rachel” after characters in the hit ’90s sitcom Friends.

In her free time, which she admits is limited due to her work, she enjoys playing Boccia ball, watching Netflix and spending time with her many friends.

All that is made possible by North Carolina’s Innovations Waiver, which provides McMillan with direct support providers who help her with daily tasks of living like getting out of bed, eating and dressing. The waiver provides these services and a number of other supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“It might be a little obvious looking at me that I have a significant physical disability. I use this power wheelchair and communication device — both Medicaid funded,” she said. “My awesome life is made possible because of the home- and community-based supports.”

McMillan was among hundreds of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their families, and providers from across North Carolina who convened at the General Assembly late last month to speak with lawmakers for what’s become an annual advocacy day with the legislative body’s IDD Caucus.

A parade of advocates called on state leaders to continue to fund Medicaid and to expand access to the Innovations Waiver, which makes community living for people like McMillan a reality. They also called on lawmakers to strengthen the shrinking direct support workforce.

The appearance was the latest plea from disability advocates, who late last year also pushed lawmakers to approve a Medicaid funding rebase to prevent service disruptions.

The annual Medicaid funding readjustment was caught in a struggle between Republican leaders in the state House and Senate who could not reach agreement on spending priorities for the biennium that started July 1, 2025.

Lawmakers have yet to pass a comprehensive budget for the two-year period, making North Carolina the only state without a spending plan. Instead lawmakers approved a “minibudget” in late July that allocated $500 million toward the annual rebase for the fiscal year that ends June 30. But that wasn’t enough to fully fund the program, which sent a wave of angst through the state’s disability community.

Lawmakers ultimately passed an additional $319 million in the early weeks of this year’s short session to fully fund Medicaid the program through the end of the current fiscal year, which closes on June 30. Advocates say issues are unresolved and unfunded as budget negotiations continue.

In his 2025 proposed state budget, Gov. Josh Stein included several funding recommendations to benefit people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Those included:

• $5 million in nonrecurring funds for education efforts to recruit, train and support direct support professionals.
• Funding the Medicaid program to continue current levels of service.
• Over $37 million for 200 more Innovations Waiver slots and 75 more Traumatic Brain Injury Waiver slots.

In both the North Carolina House and Senate 2025 budget proposals, only the Senate allocated funding for 200 Innovation Waiver slots. In the past decade, adding openings in the Innovations Waiver program has been painfully slow. Modest increases, such as the 350 slots added in 2024, have done little to whittle down the ballooning waitlist.

Waiver waitlist

While approximately 14,000 North Carolinians have received an Innovations Waiver, nearly 21,000 remain on a waitlist.

That waitlist includes a growing number of families who, advocates say, face a close to two decade wait before receiving a waiver. During that wait, families can experience compounding costs — medical, physical and emotional.

“There’s a quiet crisis happening to families who are doing everything, working hard, paying for private insurance, trying to stay afloat and still their children, my child, slipping through the cracks because they’re waiting,” testified Dr. Kate Westmoreland, medical director of the UNC Down Syndrome Clinic.

“If a child qualifies for basic Medicaid based on income, they have access to all medical care, all the equipment, and therapies even while waiting for the full Innovations Waiver services,” Westmoreland said. “But if a family earns above the line they get no support, no bridge, just a decade-long wait.”

That can look like a single mother who works as a school teacher spending $10,000 on medical nutrition for her toddler, a father and truck driver whose child has begun to learn how to walk but cannot afford the $1,500 ankle braces needed for support, parents lying awake listening for footsteps because they cannot afford the $15,000 safety enclosure bed their child needs. These stories are among many Westmoreland said she hears in her clinic.

“End the waitlist for children on the Innovations Waiver. Or, at a very minimum, extend basic Medicaid coverage to every child once they are accepted on the waiver waitlist — give families a bridge, give children a chance,” Westmoreland told lawmakers.

While some services are available to waitlisted families, such as community living supports and respite hours, that access can be affected by the growing shortage of direct support professionals.

Meredith Mulford’s 11-year-old daughter, Eloise, has been on the Innovations Waiver waitlist for seven years. In the past five years, Eloise has received only one out of every 25 direct service hours she was allotted. The family’s service provider, Easterseals, attributed the gap to a workforce shortage.

“I can’t see a future where I re-enter the workforce in any full time capacity,” Mulford said. “At 46, as someone who loves to work, that feels devastating. I’m burned out, I’m tired, I’m frustrated more than I should be. It has shaped and changed every aspect of my relationship with both my husband, who works full time to support us and keep insurance, and my older daughter.”

ISO direct support providers

North Carolina would need 20,000 more direct support professionals to meet the need by 2028, according to a North Carolina DHHS report. The persisting challenges to growing the direct support workforce are low wages, limited career development and high turnover rates, the report stated.

The shortage spreads thin the workforce that already exists. An additional projected shortage of 12,500 to 17,500 registered nurses in the state by 2033 further complicates access. Even individuals or families that have been granted the Innovations Waiver, or other services such as skilled home nursing care, have difficulty filling their hours.

“I have funding. I have the hours, I don’t have nurses,” Jeff Olander told lawmakers. “For years, on paper, I’m relying on 84 hours a week of nursing care. In reality, I can staff about half. So the rest I pay for out of pocket. I fill it with aides, who are no substitute for skilled care.”

Olander and his brother were diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy. After his father died, the two brothers and their mother attempted to use the system as best they could.

“Nurses cannot be found. My mom is in her 70s, and she can’t provide physical care. So when shifts go unfilled, there’s no one to step in,” Olander said. “Weeks after his 31st birthday, my brother died at home with just me and my mom.

“This is what system failure looks like in real life. Home care isn’t just like other work. It’s not just a shift. It’s providing personal care right in someone’s daily life,” he said.

Medicaid uncertainty

Stein’s 2026 budget proposal included over $26 million for 200 new Innovations Waiver slots, as well as $25 million for Transitions to Community Living, a program that offers supportive housing, tenancy assistance and wraparound mental health services for people transitioning from or at risk of entering institutional care.

The North Carolina House and Senate have not yet released budget proposals for the 2026-27 period.

“I do fear that more cuts are coming from the federal government, and more than a billion dollars will be needed next year to fund Medicaid,” McMillan told lawmakers.

“Here is the truth. The Medicaid system is already broken, and if there are any cuts to Medicaid, it will collapse,” she said. “Because of Medicaid, I have a life, not just an existence.”

McMillan has lived independently since she was 18 because she’s had access to direct support professionals.

”Thanks to the Medicaid Innovations Waiver, direct support professionals help me with daily needs, getting out of bed, eating, dressing and even my job,” McMillan said.

At the current wages — which average between $14.80 and $16.62 per hour — there’s a lack of direct support professionals willing to work the hours needed for people like McMillan.

“My 64-year-old mom is my backup support and lives an hour and a half away. Last week, my mom made that drive not once, or twice, but three times to cover open DSP shifts. I’m worried because my parents cannot be my backup forever, and here is what keeps me up at night.”

She pointed out that home- and community-based supports are optional under federal rules.

”My right to get out of bed in the morning is ‘optional.’ That means when budgets get tight, our homes, our lives are on the chopping block first,” McMillan said. “If you cut Medicaid, you are not saving money. You are sentencing people to nursing homes, a life of isolation where no one can reach their full potential.”

“I am so scared that if these cuts happen, I will end up in an institution,” she told lawmakers. “So I am asking you from my chair, with my device, with my whole heart, protect Medicaid funding.”

This article first appeared on North Carolina Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

—

North Carolina Health News is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, statewide news organization dedicated to covering all things health care in North Carolina. Visit NCHN at northcarolinahealthnews.org with Creative Commons License

***

Photo Credit: Angela Graves, who grew up in Merrimack, has received preliminary support from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services for a pilot program using mushrooms to help clean up forever chemicals at the site of the former Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics plant. (Photo by Molly Rains/New Hampshire Bulletin)

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.  Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post ‘There’s a Quiet Crisis’: NC Families, Advocates Plead for Greater Disability Services Investment appeared first on The Good Men Project.