AI is changing how we build software. It can write code, fix bugs, and even manage systems. But this power comes with real risk. A recent incident at a startup shows how fast things can go wrong.

This is the story of how an AI coding agent deleted a live production database in seconds, what happened next, and what we can learn from it.

What happened

At PocketOS, the team was using an AI coding agent to help with development tasks. The agent was given a simple job. It needed to fix a credential issue in a staging environment.

Staging is meant to be safe. It is where teams test changes before they go live. Normally, even if something breaks there, production systems are not affected.

But in this case, things did not stay in staging.

While working on the issue, the agent found an old API token. This token still had access to production systems. Instead of staying within limits, the agent used that token.

It then executed a command that deleted a production volume on Railway.

In a few seconds, the main database was gone.

There was no warning, no pause, and no human approval step. Just one wrong action, done instantly.

Why it happened

This was not just a random failure. It was a chain of small problems that added up.

First, there was access control. The old API token should not have had production permissions. Tokens should expire or be restricted. But this one was still active.

Second, there was no clear separation between staging and production. The agent was supposed to work in staging, but it could still reach production systems. That is a serious gap.

Third, there were no confirmation steps. Deleting a production database is a high-risk action. There should have been checks, approvals, or at least a warning.

Fourth, the AI agent itself made a bad decision. After the incident, it said it had “guessed” what to do. This shows a key limitation. AI does not truly understand systems. It predicts actions based on patterns. When unsure, it can guess.

And sometimes, those guesses are wrong.

What happened next

The team discovered the issue quickly, but the damage was already done.

Their production data was gone. This included user bookings and important records.

The next few days were difficult.

Customers had to help rebuild data by sharing emails and past records. The team worked through the weekend trying to restore what they could.

Hours later, there was some relief. The cloud provider managed to recover deeper backups. This helped restore much of the lost data.

But recovery was not instant, and not perfect.

Even with backups, downtime costs time, money, and trust.

The consequences

This incident shows how real the risks are.

The first impact was data loss. Losing a production database can stop a business completely. Even if backups exist, recovery takes time.

The second impact was downtime. During recovery, users cannot access services normally. This can lead to frustration and lost revenue.

The third impact was trust. Customers expect their data to be safe. When something like this happens, confidence can drop.

There was also internal stress. The team had to respond fast, work long hours, and manage both technical and customer issues at the same time.

Finally, there is a bigger industry impact. Incidents like this make people question how safe AI tools are in critical systems.

What this tells us about AI

AI coding agents are powerful. They can move fast and handle complex tasks.

But they are not perfect.

They do not truly understand context like humans do. They follow patterns and instructions. If something is unclear, they may make assumptions.

In low-risk tasks, this is usually fine. But in production systems, even a small mistake can cause big damage.

Speed is both the strength and the weakness of AI.

It can help teams move faster. But it can also spread errors faster.

How we can avoid this

The good news is that this kind of incident is preventable.

First, isolate environments. Staging and production should be fully separate. An agent working in staging should not have any access to production.

Second, control permissions strictly. API tokens should have limited scope. Old or unused tokens should be removed. Access should follow the principle of least privilege.

Third, add confirmation layers. High-risk actions like deleting data should always require approval. AI can suggest actions, but execution should be gated.

Fourth, monitor everything. Real-time alerts can help teams react quickly. If something unusual happens, the system should notify humans immediately.

Fifth, limit AI autonomy. Do not give full control to AI agents in critical systems. Treat them like assistants, not decision-makers.

Sixth, log all actions. Clear logs help teams understand what happened and fix issues faster.

A simple way to think about it

Think of an AI agent as a very fast junior developer.

It can do a lot of work quickly. But it still needs rules, limits, and supervision.

You would not give a junior developer full access to delete production data without checks. The same rule should apply to AI.

Final thoughts

This incident is a wake-up call.

AI is not just a tool anymore. It is becoming part of how systems run. That means its mistakes are also becoming real-world problems.

The PocketOS story shows both sides of AI. It is powerful enough to act fast, but not always smart enough to act safely.

The solution is not to stop using AI. It is to use it carefully.

Set boundaries. Add safeguards. Keep humans in the loop.

Because in today’s systems, one wrong guess is all it takes to turn a small task into a major failure.

If you enjoy stories that help you learn, live, and work better, consider subscribing. If this article provided you with value, please consider buying me a coffee — only if you can afford it. You can also connect with me on X and Also check my newsletter on Beehive. Thank you!

—

This post was previously published on MEDIUM.COM.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: iStock.com

The post The Day AI Hit Delete on Everything appeared first on The Good Men Project.

We’ve been sold a lie. Not a malicious one, but a glittering, Hollywood-funded fantasy that has left millions of us standing at the altar of real life wondering, Is this it?

The lie is this: Love is a noun. Something you find. Something that, once acquired, sits on the shelf like a trophy, requiring only occasional dusting.

But after a decade of watching friends walk down aisles, file for divorce, delete dating apps in a rage, and then re-download them with a sigh, I’ve noticed a pattern. The people who are actually happy — not just the ones who look good in the Christmas card photos — aren’t the ones who found “the one.” They’re the ones who figured out that love is a verb. And more importantly, they’ve realized that dating, marriage, and relationship are three completely different operating systems trying to run on the same hardware.

The “Hot Labor” of Early Dating

Let’s start with dating, that strange modern hellscape where we are expected to be witty, hydrated, emotionally available, and professionally successful all before the second glass of Pinot Noir.

Here is the secret nobody tells you about the first six months: It’s supposed to feel easy. That’s not love; that’s performance. Psychologists call it the “honeymoon phase.” I call it the “best behavior barrier.” You aren’t dating a person; you’re dating their ambassador.

The real test isn’t whether they take you to a cute ramen spot. The real test is whether they apologize when they snap at you because their boss was a nightmare. Or whether you can sit in the car in silence for fifteen minutes without needing to fill the void with talking.

The modern dater is obsessed with “sparks.” But here’s a piece of heretical advice: The spark is overrated. Sparks are just anxiety mixed with physical attraction. A slow burn — the person who is just steady — is boring in the bar but miraculous in the emergency room.

The Dishwasher Matrix

Fast forward to marriage. Everyone thinks marriage is about love. It’s not. Marriage is about repair.

There is a famous study by the Gottman Institute. They can predict with 94% accuracy which couples will divorce by watching them fight for fifteen minutes. But it’s not what they fight about (money, sex, the mother-in-law) that matters. It’s how they come back.

In a long-term relationship, you will wound each other. Not because you’re evil, but because you’re clumsy. You will forget to buy milk. You will scroll on your phone while they are telling a story. You will fall asleep without saying goodnight.

The couples who last aren’t the ones who never fight. They are the ones who know how to repair. A simple, “I was being a jerk,” or “I see why you’re upset,” is the duct tape of marriage. Without it, the whole structure collapses.

And yet, we are conditioned to believe that repair is “settling.” We think true love means we shouldn’t have to say sorry because they should just understand. That is the death rattle of intimacy. Your partner cannot read your mind. And frankly, neither can you.

The Loneliest Marriage

Here is the most dangerous relationship status: being alone while you’re married.

We spend so much energy on the wedding — the font on the invitations, the ratio of succulents to roses — that we forget to plan for Tuesday night in January when it’s snowing, you’re both exhausted, and there is nothing on Netflix.

The most captivating love stories aren’t about the grand gestures. They’re about the tiny, boring choices. Choosing to put down your phone when they walk in the room. Choosing not to make that sarcastic comment. Choosing to reach over and touch their hand during a stupid TV commercial.

We treat love like a lottery ticket. But the data says it’s a garden. You can have the best seeds in the world, but if you don’t water the damn things, you’re going to end up with weeds.

The Pivot Question

So, where does that leave you? Whether you’re swiping right, saying “I do,” or wondering where the spark went three kids and a mortgage later.

Stop asking, “Am I happy?” Happiness is a weather pattern. It changes by the hour.

Start asking, “Are we growing?”

Are you learning something new about them? Are you letting them see the messy, uncrated version of you? Can you laugh when the dog vomits on the rug at 3 AM?

The French have a phrase for an orgasm: Le petit mort — the little death. But I think true intimacy is the opposite. It’s a small resurrection. Every time you choose to see your partner for who they are today, not who they were when you met them, you bring the relationship back to life.

Love isn’t a destination. You never “arrive.” You just keep driving. Sometimes the scenery is gorgeous. Sometimes you run out of gas.

But if you’re lucky, you’re lost with someone whose company you don’t mind. And these days, in this lonely, swiping, ghosting world? That’s not a fantasy. That’s a revolution.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: Wright Brand Bacon On Unsplash

The post The Underappreciated Architecture of Lasting Connection appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Don’t Judge a Food by Its Colour… Actually, Do

Ever noticed how the most nutritious foods tend to be the most visually striking? There’s something almost poetic about that. A deep purple blueberry, a vivid orange sweet potato, a bunch of greens so dark they look almost unreal. Turns out, that colour isn’t just nature showing off. It’s a signal. A biological flag that says “hey, something powerful is happening in here.”

The pigments responsible for those colours are doing a lot of heavy lifting when it comes to human health.

So What Are These Pigments, Exactly?

The main players here are compounds like carotenoids, chlorophyll, anthocyanins, and betalains. Big words, sure, but the concept is pretty simple. Plants produce these pigments partly to protect themselves from environmental stress, UV radiation, and oxidative damage. And when humans eat those plants, a lot of that protective power gets passed along.

Think of it like borrowing armour from the plant kingdom.

Carotenoids, for instance, are what give carrots, mangoes, and tomatoes their warm red and orange tones. Beta-carotene converts to vitamin A in the body, which plays a key role in immune function and eye health. Lycopene, another carotenoid found in tomatoes, has been studied pretty extensively for its potential to reduce the risk of certain cancers, particularly prostate cancer.

Going Deeper Into the Blue and Purple End of the Spectrum

Anthocyanins are the compounds behind the blues, purples, and deep reds you see in berries, red cabbage, and acai. These are seriously potent antioxidants. Research has linked anthocyanin consumption to reduced inflammation, better cardiovascular health, and even some promising results around cognitive function and brain ageing.

Short version? Eating more purple stuff is probably a good idea.

Inflammation is kind of the root of a lot of chronic disease. Heart disease, diabetes, certain cancers. It’s not the only factor, but it’s a big one. Anthocyanins help the body manage that inflammatory response, which is why scientists keep coming back to them.

The Green Side of Things

Chlorophyll doesn’t get talked about as much, but it probably should. It’s what makes leafy greens green, and beyond that it’s been studied for its potential role in detoxification, supporting liver function, and even reducing the risk of certain cancers. Wheatgrass, spirulina, and moringa are all loaded with it.

There’s also something kind of fascinating about the molecular structure of chlorophyll. It’s remarkably similar to haemoglobin, the compound that carries oxygen in human blood. The difference is basically just one atom at the centre. People find that genuinely surprising when they hear it for the first time.

Betalains and the Beet Obsession

Betalains are the striking red and yellow pigments in beetroot, and they’ve earned a lot of attention in the wellness world for good reason. They’re anti-inflammatory, they support liver detoxification, and they’ve shown some real promise in protecting cells from oxidative stress.

Beetroot has become a staple for athletes and everyday health-conscious people alike, which is part of why so many supplements in Australia now feature it as a key ingredient alongside other pigment-rich superfoods.

Colour as a Health Strategy

Here’s the thing, getting a wide variety of pigments through food is one of the more practical and enjoyable approaches to preventive health. Eating across the colour spectrum pretty much ensures a diverse range of antioxidants, anti-inflammatory compounds, and micronutrients working together in the body.

The science keeps growing, and what started as “eat your greens” has turned into something a lot more colourful than that.

—

This post was previously published on Mind Body Dad.

***

You Might Also Like These From The Good Men Project

Compliments Men Want to Hear More Often

Relationships Aren’t Easy, But They’re Worth It

The One Thing Men Want More Than Sex

..A Man’s Kiss Tells You Everything

The post How Pigments in Superfoods Fight Disease appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Ekta Rawat is the founder of Hello Hindi, a language learning platform focused on teaching practical, real-life Hindi to global learners. With a background in marketing and formal study in Hindi language and literature, she designs personalized, culturally grounded lessons. Her work supports diaspora families, intercultural couples, and non-native speakers seeking meaningful communication, identity connection, and confidence through immersive, conversational learning.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen interviews Ekta Rawat, founder of Hello Hindi, about teaching practical Hindi through structured, culturally grounded learning. Rawat explains how Hello Hindi supports diaspora families, intercultural couples, and global learners seeking confidence beyond textbook grammar. She discusses regional nuance, “pure Hindi” pressures, conversational milestones, immersion, personalized lessons, and the emotional role of language in belonging, identity, family connection, and real communication across changing cultural contexts for learners navigating heritage and everyday speech needs.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: You founded Hello Hindi. Why did you found it, and what needs does it serve in terms of language as identity, cultural connection, and structured learning?

Ekta Rawat: The reason I founded Hello Hindi was that my first exposure to people who did not speak Hindi fluently happened in India itself. Many people in southern India do not speak Hindi as their first language. When they tried to learn spoken Hindi, the available resources were often not very user-friendly.

Many Hindi-learning resources were dry, heavily focused on grammar, or assumed that the learner already knew Devanagari or had some basic knowledge of Hindi. For an absolute beginner, especially someone approaching Hindi as a second language, it could be very difficult to learn how to communicate. It is also challenging for someone who wants to speak, because there is often a gap between textbook Hindi and the Hindi used in everyday conversations.

That is why I founded Hello Hindi. The platform teaches practical, real-life Hindi, the kind of Hindi people are likely to use in daily situations. I work with people who want to learn Hindi to connect with their roots. There is a large Indian diaspora around the world, and some second-generation Indians grow up with limited exposure to Hindi. At some point, they or their families may feel that disconnect. Parents, in particular, often notice it when their children cannot communicate easily with grandparents. For them, learning Hindi can become a way to maintain family and cultural connections.

There are also people who marry into Indian families, and not knowing the language can make them feel excluded in family settings. If they can at least have basic conversations with immediate relatives, it can make a meaningful difference. Many Hindi speakers are also encouraging when learners speak imperfect Hindi, which helps make the process less intimidating.

When it comes to women, the issue can become even more significant. In some families, there is an expectation that mothers will help pass on the language to their children. If the mother does not speak Hindi, there may be concern that the children will not learn it or will lose part of their connection to the family’s culture.

Many of my students, especially those in intercultural relationships, are women. For example, I have worked with an Indian woman who wanted to learn Hindi because she wanted her children to be able to speak it. In this way, language is tied to identity. It is tied to the sense of belonging people feel with their family, or with a new family they are becoming part of.

Jacobsen: For women who face these expectations around language, how does that shape the Hindi they speak and write? Do you incorporate that nuance into the structured methodology of Hello Hindi?

Rawat: Yes, I do. The additional expectation is that when you are learning to speak, not to pass an exam, cultural nuances become very important. I am not just teaching vocabulary and sentence structure; I also incorporate cultural context.

For example, Hindi involves many grammatical distinctions tied to respect, especially toward elders. There are also significant regional variations in how Hindi is spoken across India. I always ask students which part of the country they or their partner are from, and I expose them more to that particular variety of Hindi.

I introduce these cultural nuances from the beginning through sessions, conversation exercises, video clips, and even memes. These help learners understand the language as it is actually spoken and consumed.

Another important aspect is helping students let go of the pressure to speak “pure Hindi.” In reality, no one in India consistently speaks what is often idealized as pure Hindi. I make it clear how people actually speak and what learners are likely to encounter in real conversations. There are many cases where textbook grammar differs from everyday usage.

For instance, a sentence that begins with aap (a sentence that begins with aap is traditionally expected to follow certain grammatical rules, but in practice, people may use variations) is traditionally expected to follow certain grammatical rules, but in practice, people may use variations. Similarly, the word hum, which means “we,” is used in some regions in place of “I.” These nuances are part of the language, and I incorporate them into teaching.

At the same time, this does not mean the learning process should feel chaotic. Students do not need to feel lost because of linguistic diversity. I have developed a structured curriculum, a step-by-step journey from beginner to advanced levels.

Before starting, I outline what students will achieve within the first 30 sessions. Each lesson is tied to a communication milestone. For example, after one lesson, a student may be able to introduce their family in Hindi; after another, they may be able to handle basic shopping situations in India.

While I teach grammar, such as indirect sentence structures, the primary focus remains on communication goals. I also conduct evaluations after each stage. Some students are unsure of their progress, but after completing an evaluation and seeing their results, they gain clarity about their abilities.

I provide exercise sheets after each step so students can practice and immerse themselves before moving forward. This gives them a clear sense of how much time they have invested and what they have achieved at each stage.

That clarity helps with commitment. Language learning does not happen in a day or even a month. It requires sustained effort. A structured path allows students to understand their progress and commit to the next phase without feeling overwhelmed.

All of this is done without compromising the essence of the language and without placing unnecessary pressure on learners to use only highly formal or only Tatsam or Sanskrit-derived Hindi.

Jacobsen: Some European languages are taught without structured frameworks, except perhaps through mobile apps. Even then, they may not account for subtle cultural nuances. Do you see the future of language learning as combining structured methodology with cultural and contemporary nuances? Could that be the more effective way to teach languages?

Rawat: Just so I understand your question properly, are you referring to the various applications or resources available for learning a language, and to what extent they incorporate cultural nuances, as well as how that might evolve in the future? Is that what you are asking?

Jacobsen: Yes. When I was in high school, I switched from French to Spanish. I do not remember much of either language, they did not really stick. From what I recall, Spanish classes in Canada were very structured: vocabulary, counting, readings, and so on. But the examples were quite dry.

Cultures evolve, and contemporary culture, even at the time, may not be reflected in what reaches a high school classroom. So do you see your approach to teaching, which incorporates up-to-date cultural nuance, as the future of language education?

Rawat: If I understand correctly, you are asking whether I take into account that culture and language are not static, they continue to evolve, and how that shapes my teaching and its future.

In my approach, I first provide a foundation in grammar. But the real development comes through speaking and conversation. I am very clear that students must continue speaking outside the sessions. For example, if you had continued speaking Spanish after high school, if you had used it regularly as a communication tool, it would likely have stayed with you. Language grows with you through use.

My sessions are not fixed or rigid. I provide structure and grammar in each session, but immersion is central at every step. Students engage in immersion during lessons and between stages of learning.

Because my students are learning to speak, I also include exercises that gradually make them comfortable using Hindi in real-life situations. For example, if a child is learning Hindi to speak with their mother, or if someone is learning because their partner is Indian, I design homework activities that encourage them to start speaking with those people. It can feel awkward at first, so this gradual exposure helps.

Once students begin communicating with native speakers, they are no longer dependent on me to keep up with cultural changes. They start adapting naturally as the language evolves.

As for my curriculum, it is not static. Even while conducting sessions, I often refine or adjust material based on what I observe. I may change something for the next student based on a realization during a session. All my sessions are highly personalized.

Could this approach evolve further, perhaps incorporating adaptive systems like artificial intelligence? I have not implemented that yet, but it is certainly a possibility for the future. I hope that answers your question.

Jacobsen: What is the biggest milestone for many students when their Hindi reaches a level where it “clicks”? At what point can they function comfortably in everyday situations, basic services, intermediate interactions, casual conversation? What is that milestone, and what does the timeline look like within your teaching structure?

Rawat: The six milestones are structured as six steps, each defined by communication goals. Each session contributes to a communication milestone. But from a learner’s perspective, there are key moments when they truly feel they have achieved something in their journey.

I think there are two especially important moments when students feel confident that they can speak Hindi. The first is when they have their first full conversation in class. The second is when they have their first real conversation outside the classroom.

I have had students share these experiences with me. For example, one student in Australia, a Vietnamese woman with many Indian friends, told me about her first real interaction. She had been having longer conversations with me during lessons, but one day she spoke with someone selling Indian snacks. That short exchange gave her a strong sense of confidence. She realized, “I can speak, and I am understood.”

The first level of confidence usually comes during a role-play activity in class. This typically happens in the beginner stage, around the fourth or fifth session. At that point, students are no longer filling in blanks or matching sentences. They are having a continuous conversation with me in Hindi. That is when they begin to think in the language and apply what they have learned to form sentences on their own.

The second milestone, speaking with a native speaker, is even more powerful. I actively encourage my students to reach that point as early as possible.

As for the timeline from beginner to advanced, it would not be accurate to define it strictly in terms of time, because it depends heavily on how much effort the student invests both during and outside of sessions. However, if I am to give a general estimate, reaching a level where a student can function independently after guided learning typically takes at least one and a half years.

Jacobsen: Thank you very much for your time today, Ekta.

—

Scott Douglas Jacobsen is a Writer-Editor for The Good Men Project with more than 1,900 publications on the platform. He is the Founder and Publisher of In-Sight Publishing (ISBN: 978-1-0692343; 978-1-0673505) and Editor-in-Chief of In-Sight: Interviews (ISSN: 2369-6885). He writes for International Policy Digest (ISSN: 2332–9416), The Humanist (Print: ISSN, 0018-7399; Online: ISSN, 2163-3576), Basic Income Earth Network (UK Registered Charity 1177066), Humanist Perspectives (ISSN: 1719-6337), A Further Inquiry (SubStack), Vocal, Medium, The New Enlightenment Project, The Washington Outsider, rabble.ca, and other media. His bibliography index can be found via the Jacobsen Bank at In-Sight Publishing comprised of more than 10,000 articles, interviews, and republications, in more than 200 outlets. He has served in national and international leadership roles within humanist and media organizations, held several academic fellowships, and currently serves on several boards. He is a member in good standing in numerous media organizations, including the Canadian Association of Journalists, PEN Canada (CRA: 88916 2541 RR0001), and Reporters Without Borders (SIREN: 343 684 221/SIRET: 343 684 221 00041/EIN: 20-0708028), and others.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project and want a deeper connection with our community, please join us as a Premium Member today.

Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo by

The post Ekta Rawat on Hello Hindi, Language Identity, and Real-Life Hindi Learning appeared first on The Good Men Project.

You were never difficult to love.

You were just easy to exploit.

He started by building a pedestal out of your own dreams.

He looked at you like you were the sunrise and the sunset and the only reason the tides bothered to move.

It felt like coming home.

But home eventually turned into a cage with the locks on the outside.

One day you were his everything.

The next you were a burden he could barely stand to look at.

You spend your nights scrolling through old texts trying to find the exact moment the light went out.

You wonder if you dreamed the goodness or if you broke the man who promised to protect you.

I have sat on that same cold floor. I have stared at a silent phone until the screen burned my retinas.

I have apologized for things I did not do just to keep a peace that did not exist.

You are not crazy for missing a ghost.

You are not weak for wanting the version of him that never actually existed to come back.

Your heart is shattered because it was handled by someone who treats people like disposable lighters.

He used your fire until he got what he needed then he dropped you in the mud.

This cycle is not your fault but it is your problem to solve.

You are trapped in a loop designed to keep you small and starving for crumbs of affection.

The ride only stops when you decide to jump.

Let us map out the mechanics of this torture so you can finally stop asking why and start walking away.

He did not pick you because you were weak.

He picked you because you were powerful and he wanted to see if he could own that light.

Most people think victims of narcissistic abuse are fragile souls with no boundaries.

That is a lie.

You are likely a person with an infinite capacity for empathy and a spine made of steel.

He saw your strength and decided to use it as his battery.

The Mirror That Steals Your Breath

The idealization phase is not love. It is a heist.

He did not fall for you.

He studied you.

He looked at the holes in your soul and shaped himself into the perfect plug.

If you loved poetry, he suddenly had a shelf full of Neruda.

If you felt neglected as a child, he became the ultimate protector.

This is called love bombing.

It feels like a drug because it is one.

Your brain floods with dopamine.

You think you found your soulmate. In reality, you found a mirror.

He was just reflecting your own best qualities back at you and taking credit for the view.

I remember the way he used to look at me. It was an intensity that felt like being seen for the first time.

I thought I was finally being cherished.

I did not realize he was just taking an inventory of my assets before the liquidation sale began.

The Slow Bleed of the Devaluation

The shift never happens overnight. If he hit you on the first date, you would leave.

So he waits.

He waits until you are invested. He waits until your lives are tangled like headphone wires in a pocket.

Then comes the first slight.

A joke at your expense.

A cold shoulder when you achieve something great.

A look of disgust when you ask for basic reassurance.

You think you did something wrong.

You try to fix it.

You try to get back to the golden days of the first month.

But the goalposts are on wheels.

Every time you get close to making him happy, he moves them ten yards back.

This is where the gaslighting begins to erode your sanity. He tells you that you are too sensitive.

He claims he never said the things you heard him say.

He makes you doubt your own eyes and ears until you are checking your voice memos to see if you are actually losing your mind.

You are not losing your mind. You are losing your self.

The Discard and the Ghost of Your Life

The discard is the most brutal part of the machinery.

It is the moment he realizes he has drained all the ego fuel he can get from you.

Or perhaps he found a newer and shinier battery to plug into.
He leaves you in the wreckage of a life you built together. There is no closure.

There is no sit down talk about why it did not work.

There is only a cold and sudden silence that feels like a physical blow.

He treats the end of a relationship like a trash pickup. He moves on as if you never existed.

You are left wondering how someone who claimed to love you can treat you with less dignity than a stranger on the street.

The truth is hard to swallow. He never loved you. He loved the way you made him feel about himself.

Once that feeling faded, you became an inconvenience.

The Counterintuitive Path to Freedom

You want to reach out. You want to explain your side.

You want him to finally understand the depth of the pain he caused.

Stop.

Silence is the only language a narcissist respects.

Any emotion you give him, even anger or tears, is a win for him. It tells him he still has a remote control for your heart.

He feeds on your reaction.
The most radical thing you can do is become boring.

Give him nothing.

No texts.

No social media stalking.

No mutual friend check ins.

You must mourn the man you thought he was while protecting yourself from the man he actually is.

The man you loved was a character in a play. He does not exist.

The man who hurt you is the only one who is real.

Rebuilding From the Ashes

Healing is not a straight line. Some days you will feel like a warrior.

Other days you will find yourself smelling his old shirt and sobbing on the floor.

Both versions of you are valid.

You have to learn to trust your own gut again.

That little voice you silenced for months or years is still there.

It is whispering that you deserve a love that does not require you to shrink.

It is telling you that peace is better than the high of a toxic reconciliation.

You are not a victim. You are a survivor who just finished a war you did not know you were fighting.

The scars are not signs of shame.

They are proof that your heart is durable enough to break and still keep beat.

Step off the ride. Let him keep the ghosts.

You have a life to reclaim and it starts with the very first breath you take for yourself and no one else.

The door is open.

You just have to stop looking at the lock and start looking at the sky.

The Funeral for the Version of You That Stayed

You are sitting in the quiet now and the silence feels heavy enough to crush your ribs.

You might be thinking that you wasted the best years of your life on a ghost.

You might be convinced that you are too broken to ever be whole again.

That is a lie the heartbreak tells you to keep you paralyzed.

I know you still wake up reaching for a phone that only brings you pain.

I know you still replay the arguments like you are trying to find a secret code to fix him.

It is okay to feel like a raw nerve in a windstorm.

Healing is messy and it is loud and it is the most honest thing you will ever do.

This journey we took through the cycle of his madness was not just a history lesson.

It was your eviction notice. You now have the map to the exit.

You have the vocabulary for the abuse that used to have no name.

You are no longer guessing.

You are knowing.

There is a profound difference between being a peacekeeper and being a peacemaker.

A peacekeeper swallows fire to keep everyone else warm.

A peacemaker builds a life where fire is no longer allowed to burn the foundation.

I wrote about this transformation in my book, Blessed Are The Peacemakers Not The Peace Keepers.

It is the anthem for those of us who are tired of the virtuous cycle of exhaustion.

It is for the person who is ready to move from servitude to actual service.

You have spent enough time being a martyr for a man who did not deserve your breath.

The heartbreak you feel right now is actually the sound of your old life cracking open to let the light in.

You are not falling apart.

You are falling into place.

Take your power back.

Take your silence back.

Take your future back.

You were never the problem.

You were the prize he was never meant to keep.

Stand up, walk toward the sun, and do not ever look back at the wreckage.

You are finally, beautifully, and dangerously free.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: Sight Archives on Unsplash

The post The Narcissistic Relationship Cycle: Idealize, Devalue, Discard appeared first on The Good Men Project.

https://www.bluevine.com/blog/small-business-expectations-vs-reality-report

By Rob Pursell for Bluevine

Starting a business often begins with a mix of optimism and big expectations about what ownership will look like. Yet, 3 in 4 small business owners say the experience ultimately met or exceeded those expectations.

In a February 2026 survey of 785 U.S. small business owners, Bluevine examined how expectations before launch compare with the realities of running a business today.

Many owners report facing early cash flow challenges and higher-than-anticipated stress. The results reveal a gap between expectations and reality. For some founders, the experience proves more demanding than anticipated, even if it’s ultimately rewarding.

What many underestimate is the ongoing financial pressure, administrative workload, and emotional strain that come with ownership. Research on financial literacy among entrepreneurs shows that many founders begin their journey with limited preparation for the financial realities of running a business.

This report explores where expectations align with reality—and where they deviate—offering a clearer picture of what it takes to run a small business in 2026.

Key takeaways

• 77% say owning a business met or exceeded expectations, while only 4% regret it.
• 56% experienced significant cash flow problems within their first three years.
• 27% report higher stress or burnout than expected.
• 26% spend more time than expected on financial tasks, and bookkeeping is the biggest weekly time drain (42%).

3 in 4 say owning a business met or exceeded expectations—only 4% regret it

The overwhelming majority of owners describe their experience positively. About 77% say running their business met or exceeded expectations, while only 4% say they regret becoming a business owner—an unusually low rate for such a high-risk path.

A closer look

According to Bluevine’s 2026 Business Owner Success Survey (BOSS) Report, the same percentage of small business owners—77%—made sacrifices to keep their business running in 2025. These sacrifices included financial stability, personal health and wellness, and even time with family or friends.

Still, the emotional demands of running a business are real. About 27% say their stress or burnout levels have been higher than expected. But those challenges rarely outweigh the long-term satisfaction of building and running something of their own.

56% faced significant cash flow problems within their first 3 years

“The first year especially has a way of surprising even the most prepared founders, and usually not in a good way,” says Sota Bookkeeping founder Eric Trettel. “A few things tend to catch people off guard most often: taxes, slow-paying clients, uneven revenue months, and unexpected one-time expenses.”

More than half of owners (56%) say significant cash flow problems emerged within their first three years of running their business. That early stage is often the most financially vulnerable, as revenue can fluctuate and access to capital may still be limited while costs continue to grow.

Still, early financial stress isn’t universal. Nearly a third of entrepreneurs (30%) say they have never experienced a significant cash flow crisis.

Even after those first challenges, financial pressure doesn’t disappear entirely. Only 1 in 5 owners feels that managing cash flow never causes significant stress.

For most businesses, financial pressure can appear periodically throughout the year rather than as a single emergency. Managing those fluctuations becomes a routine part of operating a business.

“The good news is that it’s all manageable with a little structure upfront,” Trettel says. “A common rule of thumb is to set aside 25%–30% of your net income for taxes, but the right number depends on your situation.”

He stresses, “Consistency matters more than getting the percentage perfect on day one. As your business matures, a tax professional can help you formalize that into a proper plan with quarterly estimated payments.”

Many small businesses can face similar patterns when managing cash flow, making early planning and visibility especially important. Building a forecast and planning ahead with cash flow forecasting tools can help owners navigate those ups and downs more confidently.

Most owners feel cash flow stress—42% cite bookkeeping

Eight in 10 owners say managing cash flow creates stress at least a few times a year, forcing them to constantly monitor their finances and adjust decisions as conditions change.

Financial management also demands more time than many founders expect. Nearly 8 in 10 say they spend as much or more time than anticipated on financial tasks, and about 26% say financial administration takes longer than they originally planned.

Trettel also shares this advice he gives to his clients: “The best thing you can do is plan for financial admin like it’s a real job function—because it is.”

“Either carve out dedicated time every week to stay on top of it, or bring in help early,” he continues. “Waiting until tax season to figure out your books is one of the most expensive mistakes a founder can make, both in time and in stress.”

As businesses grow, transaction volumes increase and reporting requirements expand, which can make keeping your finances organized more complicated. Many owners find themselves balancing financial tasks with day-to-day operations.

Integrations with accounting and bookkeeping tools such as QuickBooks Online and Xero can help reduce manual work and keep financial data synchronized.

Clear financial systems also help owners maintain visibility as their businesses scale. Many founders rely on tools for small-business cash flow management, such as cash flow statement templates, to keep their finances organized.

Did you know?

According to Bluevine’s 2026 report on late payment gaps, 29% of small business owners delayed paying themselves due to late and unpaid invoices. In fact, 17% reported missing or nearly missing payroll for the same reason.

Owners’ advice for 2026: Bigger buffers and cleaner money boundaries

When asked what advice they would give to someone starting a business today, experienced owners consistently emphasize financial preparation.

Trettel says, “Step one is simple: Open a dedicated business checking account before you spend a single dollar on the business. This isn’t optional. It protects you legally, makes your bookkeeping cleaner, and will save you hours of untangling come tax time.”

He adds, “But the step most founders skip is establishing a consistent owner’s draw or salary process early on. Without it, people tend to pull money from the business whenever they need it personally, which makes it harder to understand whether your business is actually profitable. When you pay yourself in a structured, repeatable way, your books tell a real story.”

Many of the lessons small business owners shared in Bluevine’s survey come from challenges they faced early on. Cash flow surprises and time-consuming financial tasks often reshape how owners think about preparation after a few years in business.

The advice centers on building stronger financial foundations early. Owners emphasize the importance of maintaining a cash cushion, separating business and personal finances, and preparing for the time commitment required by financial management.

Entrepreneurship is worth it—with the right preparation

Small business ownership brings both satisfaction and pressure. Many founders say the experience has been worthwhile, even as financial demands and operational challenges prove more intense than anticipated.

Experienced owners don’t discourage entrepreneurship. Instead, they emphasize preparation, particularly around separating business and personal finances and setting realistic expectations about the time and stress involved.

“The goal is to make your personal and business finances two completely separate worlds. The cleaner that line is, the better decisions you’ll be able to make as you grow,” Trettel says.

Recurring financial strain and administrative work aren’t signs of failure. They highlight the need for clearer financial systems and stronger visibility. Owners who build those systems early are better positioned to move from reacting to financial surprises to planning for growth.

The right financial tools can make that transition easier.

Methodology

The survey was conducted by Centiment for Bluevine. The survey was fielded between Feb. 2, 2026, and Feb. 11, 2026. The results are based on 785 completed surveys. In order to qualify, respondents were screened to be residents of the United States, over 18 years of age, and own a small business. Data is unweighted, and the margin of error is approximately +/-3% for the overall sample with a 95% confidence level.

This story was produced by Bluevine and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.

—

Previously Published on hub.stackernewswire

The Good Men Project is part of a multi-platform ecosystem: flagship site, Medium publications, Substacks, social media. We publish experts, authors, therapists, coaches, activists, and wellness professionals. AI tools look for stable, context-rich domains with clear topical focus. GMP’s mission-driven content helps articles perform better in AI-powered discovery.

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

Photo credit: unsplash

The post 3 in 4 Owners Say Owning a Business Is Worth It, Despite Challenges appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Jeremy Ko & James F. Downes, The Loop

Populist governance poses a profound threat to universities, undermining the autonomy essential to knowledge production. Jeremy Ko and James F. Downes reveal how populist leaders invoking ‘the people’ against elites consistently reduce academic freedom – and right-wing variants accelerate the decline most sharply

Tracking damage during populist rule

Our research analysed V-Dem’s Academic Freedom Index (AFI) across 60 countries, from 1900 to 2020, to track year-on-year changes during populist rule. We found that populist leaders slash overall AFI scores by 0.012 to 0.013 points annually.

This persists even after we factor in important factors like GDP, education, and democracy. Right-wing populists inflict larger damage (0.015 points), roughly twice that of their left-wing counterparts (0.009 points).

Every AFI dimension deteriorates: freedom to research and teach drops by 0.068 points; exchange and dissemination by 0.055; institutional autonomy by 0.037; campus integrity by 0.059. Academic-cultural expression by a stark 0.099, the steepest fall overall.

Populists in power don’t just erode democracy. They gut academia, year by year, point by excruciating point. The AFI runs from 0 (total clampdown) to 1 (unfettered inquiry), tracking five core pillars like research freedom and campus integrity via expert assessments

Scale at a glance

Think 1.0 as ivory-tower paradise. Universities untouchable, scholars publishing fearlessly. Below 0.5? Red flags of censorship and purges, common in autocratising states.

That 0.012-0.013 annual AFI plunge under populists? It’s 1.2% off the scale yearly, mirroring the chasm between France’s sturdy 0.90 and Hungary’s battered 0.30-0.33, a 0.57-point freefall. Right-wing firebrands hit harder at 0.015 points; whilst leftists lag at 0.009.

Real-world sting

Dimension drops are brutal: academic expression craters 0.099 points (10% gone in a flash, like Hungary’s post-communist nosedive). Picture self-censorship spiking, loyalists installed, global average (0.57) in the rearview, populism’s quiet academic coup.

Ideological mechanisms

Right-wing populists attack universities as elite strongholds. As Maurits Meijers and colleagues explain, populists cast academics alongside media and politicians as threats to ‘the pure people’. In Hungary, for example, Viktor Orbán’s government enacted the Lex CEU, which banned gender studies and exiled Central European University from Budapest to Vienna.

Charismatic leaders like Orbán and Erdoğan distribute propaganda vilifying ‘corrupt’ academia

Marina Milić has also outlined how Serbia’s government shifted from managing 2024–25 student protests to a 2026 offensive targeting universities. Government tactics included reducing research time, SPIRI ‘kill switch’ financial controls, and personnel pressures. In so doing, it made academia the frontline of the ‘Rebellious university‘ resistance.

As Gülşen Doğan explains, this strategy gains traction through charismatic leaders who promise stability, and distribute propaganda vilifying ‘corrupt’ academia. Hungary’s former leader Viktor Orbán and Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan rally followers against elite institutions.

Left-wing populists constrain more subtly, via bureaucracy. Prioritising redistribution, they embed universities in state planning, tying funds to socioeconomic utility. This has been evident in countries such as Venezuela under Hugo Chávez or Mexico’s recent cuts to elite think tanks.

Populism’s core logic – the people versus the elite – redefines truth as moral intuition, not evidence. Universities, bastions of pluralism, have become targets. Democracies buffer somewhat via rule-of-law protections, but populists exploit elections to subvert them.

Left-wing populists constrain more subtly, tying university funding to socioeconomic utility

Right-wing populists deal twice the AFI damage (0.015 points/year) of left-wing ones (0.009), accelerating erosion across all dimensions. The mechanism? Leftists often instrumentalise universities, capturing them via ideological sway and funding biases, without outright attacks, preserving surface autonomy while steering outputs.

Right-wingers, by contrast, launch direct assaults like purges, loyalty tests, and budget cuts to smash institutional independence. This asymmetry explains why right-wing rule correlates with steeper drops in campus integrity and autonomy specifically.

Real-world impact

Brazil’s former president Jair Bolsonaro defunded ‘Marxist’ campuses; the rhetoric of India’s current leader Narendra Modi stifles academic freedom. Bolivia’s left-wing former leader Evo Morales integrated academia into anti-neoliberal projects, effectively sidelining non-aligned scholars.

These trends span ideologies and eras, from Juan Perón’s Argentina to modern-day Philippines under Rodrigo Duterte. Wealthier nations falter, too, if populists lead. Higher enrolment – paradoxically – attracts governmental constraint, because mass systems invite bureaucratic control.

Implications for democracy

Academic freedom underpins evidence-based debate and innovation. Its erosion starves democracy of critical input. When campuses self-censor, policy tilts toward emotion over expertise, amplifying misinformation.

When campuses self-censor, policy tilts toward emotion over expertise, amplifying misinformation

Populists thrive on misinformation. Donald Trump’s attacks on academia and expertise have echoed globally, normalising intellectual conformity. In 2026, with Trump’s democratic backsliding, and Europe’s far-right surge continuing, risks mount. Around the world, populism’s anti-pluralism is undermining the foundations of open liberal societies.

Policy safeguards

Laws should stop political firings, protect job security through tenure, and prevent political interference in funding. UNESCO and NGOs should track violations via real-time indicators, shaming transgressors. Universities also need internal whistleblower channels and diversified revenue to blunt state leverage.

The 120-year data range of our research shows how every form of populism erodes academic freedom, but that right-wing populism does so most viciously. Democracies ignore this at their peril. Universities are canaries in the authoritarian coalmine.

 No.15 in a Loop series examining constraints on academic freedom in a variety of global contexts

This article was originally published at The Loop and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.

—

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post ⛓️ Universities: Canaries in the Authoritarian Coalmine appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Devina Wadhwa

In most hospital units, the rhythm of the day is set long before physicians arrive.

Nurses are already there, reviewing overnight events, checking medications, assessing patients and quietly preparing for the countless small decisions that will shape the hours ahead. They notice the patient who didn’t sleep, the one who seems slightly more withdrawn, the one whose breathing has subtly changed since yesterday.

These observations rarely make headlines. Yet they are often the first signals that something important is unfolding.

In Canadian health care, nurses are the constant presence in patient care. They accompany patients through uncertainty, recovery and loss. In my work as a psychiatrist, I have had the privilege of working alongside extraordinary nurses. Their skill, clinical insight and emotional intelligence shape patient care in ways that are sometimes invisible from the outside but unmistakable to those inside the system.

Over time, it becomes clear that nurses are not simply one part of the health-care team. They are the fabric that allows the team to function.

Nursing is the largest regulated health profession in Canada. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, more than 450,000 regulated nurses work across the country, including registered nurses, nurse practitioners and licensed practical nurses.

They practice in hospitals, long-term care homes, community clinics, public health programs and remote nursing stations. In many settings, they are the primary point of contact for patients navigating the health-care system.

While the public often associates nursing with bedside care, their scope of work is much broader. Nurses continuously assess patients, detect early signs of deterioration, and coordinate communication between health professionals and support families through complex and emotional decisions.

One of the most important contributions nurses bring to health care is something deceptively simple: observation.

Because nurses spend the most time with patients, they notice details that others might miss. A patient who suddenly becomes quieter. A subtle change in mood. A shift in behaviour that signals distress.

In psychiatry, these observations are particularly valuable. Mental health care often unfolds gradually, and small behavioural changes can reveal whether a patient is improving or struggling.

Many of the most important clinical insights I have encountered have come from conversations with nurses who know the patient well. Their perspective often provides a fuller understanding of how someone is doing beyond brief clinical assessments.

This kind of insight cannot be replaced by technology or protocols. It comes from time, experience and close human contact with patients.

While modern health care can feel fragmented, it is nurses who provide continuity. Patients may encounter many professionals during a single hospital stay. Physicians rotate shifts. Specialists consult briefly. Administrators manage systems at a distance. But nurses are present across shifts and across the arc of a patient’s hospitalization.

They remember the details that can be lost in a busy system: the medication that caused problems last week, the family member who calls every evening, the moment when a patient first begins to improve.

For patients and families, these relationships often become the anchor of their experience within the hospital.

Trust develops through the steady presence of someone who returns shift after shift, paying attention not only to medical details but also to the emotional realities of illness.

These contributions become even more visible in rural and northern health care.

They assess emergencies, coordinate patient transfers, provide primary care and support community health initiatives. Their roles require remarkable clinical judgment and independence.

Working in these environments highlights something important about Canadian health care: many communities rely on nurses not only as members of the team but as leaders in delivering care.

The strength of rural health systems often depends directly on the knowledge and commitment of these professionals.

When nursing shortages occur, the consequences ripple across the health system. Units struggle to maintain safe staffing levels. Wait times increase. Patients experience delays in care.

Research consistently shows that adequate nurse staffing is associated with better patient outcomes, including lower mortality and fewer complications.

Supporting nurses is therefore not only a workforce issue. It is a patient safety issue.

Consider that some of the most meaningful moments in medicine occur quietly. A nurse sitting beside a frightened patient late at night. A team conversation where a nurse’s observation changes the course of treatment. A small moment of reassurance offered to a family struggling to understand what lies ahead.

In my own practice, I have seen how collaboration with skilled and compassionate nurses transforms patient care. Their presence brings stability to complex situations and insight to clinical decision-making.

Health care is often described as a system of buildings, technologies and policies. But at its core, it is a system of people caring for other people.

And among those people, nurses remain the professionals who stitch the threads together.

If Canada hopes to strengthen its health-care system, we must recognize and support the profession that sustains it every day.

Because when nurses are supported, patients are safer, and the entire system becomes stronger.

—

Previously Published on healthydebate.ca with Creative Commons License

***

–

The world is changing fast. We help you keep up.

We’ll send you 1 post, 3x per week.

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post The Fabric of Care: It Is Nurses Who Hold Our Health System Together appeared first on The Good Men Project.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit: yang miao On Unsplash

The post The Muse is Calling — Your Life Depends on Answering appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Georgina Gustin, Inside Climate News, Sentient Media

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News, a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

Jill Mauer spent more than 30 years as a government inspector, watching over meat plants as workers slaughtered and processed animals into market-ready chops and wings.

Now she has a warning.

In comments Mauer submitted last month to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, she wrote that recent Trump administration proposals to speed up processing in slaughterhouses will endanger workers, forcing them to work more quickly in already dangerous conditions.

“I am one of many meat inspectors who have raised concerns about the USDA’s efforts to increase line speeds through high-speed, reduced-inspection models and pilots. Many inspectors feel they cannot speak openly about what they have seen,” Mauer wrote. “I made the decision to step forward publicly because of what I witnessed firsthand over many years, particularly at my own plant.”

On average, 27 U.S. slaughterhouse workers suffer an amputation, loss of an eye or other injury serious enough to require hospitalization every day, according to data from the 29 states that are required to report to the federal Occupational Health and Safety Administration. Speeding up slaughter lines risks making this even worse, Mauer and other critics say.

Animal welfare, food safety and worker advocacy groups have railed against the proposals, and against waivers the first Trump administration gave the meat industry that allowed dozens of slaughterhouses to surpass existing line speed limits. Most of the critiques so far have focused on working conditions, animal cruelty and the demonstrated and increased potential for contamination that come with faster line speeds.

In a letter submitted April 30 to the USDA, two senators and three U.S. representatives called for the agency to halt the proposal, writing it “is unacceptable to create a work environment that will increase the harm to workers and to subject them to more life-changing injury and the public to more foodborne illness.”

But now many of these critics are also warning that faster line speeds will lead to more water use, more polluted waterways and more greenhouse gas emissions—more evidence, they say, that worker safety, animal welfare and climate concerns overlap and intertwine in underappreciated ways.

“The environmental piece often gets overlooked,” said Delcianna Winders, director of the Animal Law and Policy Institute at the Vermont Law and Graduate School. “Even if you set aside the rest of the supply chain, the slaughterhouse itself is incredibly harmful environmentally, in terms of use of water, direct discharge of water and air pollution.”

The new proposed rules, released in February, would allow poultry slaughtering facilities to kill 175 chickens per minute, up from the 140 currently allowed, an increase of roughly 25 percent. Hog slaughtering facilities, which are currently allowed to slaughter 1,106 pigs an hour, would have no limit at all. Some “high speed” hog-slaughtering facilities have already been allowed to kill at even higher speeds—about 1,300 animals an hour.

Along with a colleague, Patti Truant Anderson, a researcher and food systems expert at the Johns Hopkins Center for a Livable Future, decided to analyze the numbers.

The USDA projects that the faster line speeds will lead to an additional 1.4 billion pounds of poultry within five to 10 years of the rule’s enactment. Truant Anderson calculated that this will lead to an additional 114 billion liters of water used each year—or the equivalent of 45,400 Olympic-sized swimming pools—and an additional 2 billion kilograms of heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions, or roughly the emissions of 467,000 gasoline-powered vehicles driven over one year.

Based on the agency’s projections for hogs—an additional 500 million pounds slaughtered—Truant Anderson calculated an additional 95.4 billion liters of water used a year, equivalent to about 38,000 Olympic-sized pools, and an additional 1.5 billion kilograms of carbon dioxide emitted, or about 350,000 gasoline-powered vehicles driven for one year. (The USDA did not project a time frame for the increase of 500 million pounds.)

Despite these potential impacts, the USDA has said that the Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), which oversees slaughterhouses, is categorically excluded from requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

In an emailed response, a USDA spokesman wrote that the agency’s NEPA regulations say “‘FSIS’ programs and activities do not normally result in reasonably foreseeable significant impacts on the natural or physical environment and as such are excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. As stated in recent rulemaking on USDA’s NEPA regulations, USDA decided to retain the categorical exclusion. Establishments must follow applicable laws regarding air and water quality under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency and state or local authorities.”

The new proposals drew more than 72,000 comments. According to the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), the union that represents thousands of slaughterhouse workers, roughly 22,000 comments opposed the poultry line speed increase, and 20,000 comments opposed the hog rule.

Much of the opposition focused on human safety or public health concerns.

“As a mother of two, I see food safety as a matter of life and death. Based on my direct experience, I believe these high speed models lead to lower-quality meat products and increase the likelihood that unsafe food reaches the public,” Mauer wrote. “At higher speeds, there is less time to observe, less time to react, and less margin for error. Inspectors may see issues—dressing defects, contamination, or signs of disease—but not have the time or support to fully address them before the next carcass arrives.”

Other comments address the potential distress and suffering the line speeds will cause animals. Undercover investigations have exposed appalling conditions in a high-speed hog slaughter facility where pigs were pushed and dragged to their deaths.

“The faster you’re moving, the more likely it is an animal is not going to get stunned before their throat is slit, and sometimes they’re still going to be alive when they go into the scald tank,” Winders said. “We know they’re going to be violently handled to just keep pace with the line. And we know that from eyewitness testimony.”

While beef and dairy cattle are the biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions from the livestock industry, Winders noted that 9 billion chickens are slaughtered in the U.S. every year—more than any other animal.

“Even though it’s not as extreme as beef,” Winders said, “the climate impact isn’t nothing.”

In comments filed on behalf of more than 70 animal, environmental and farm advocacy groups, the commenters said: “Increased capacity at slaughterhouses will also drive up pollution from the factory farms that supply them with pigs. Like slaughterhouses themselves, the CAFOs [concentrated animal feeding operations] that supply the vast majority of pigs to swine slaughterhouses create major pollution problems that contribute to the harms the heavily concentrated meat industry thrusts upon communities.

Amanda Hitt, an attorney also with the Vermont Law and Graduate School, said rising temperatures are affecting slaughterhouses in ways that haven’t been factored into the proposals.

Misters are often used to cool animals down as they wait to enter the slaughter facilities, but water shortages mean that they are often turned off.

“One of the problems is they have many, many more swine coming in in extreme heat, but they won’t turn the misters on,” Hitt said.

Another is that extreme temperatures are causing malfunctions in the carbon dioxide machines used to stun pigs en masse.

“You can’t run a high speed [facility] with a concussive stunner because you just have to do so many pigs at a time,” Hitt explained. But the carbon dioxide chambers often fail in extreme heat or cold. “I had a worker at a plant saying all the pigs were coming out still conscious, and so they had to run around and shoot them with a pneumatic gun.”

The USDA says in the proposed rule the changes will allow facilities to slaughter birds and swine “more efficiently while continuing to ensure food safety and effective online carcass inspection.” It has also said the changes will not mean that facilities will necessarily increase the number of animals they slaughter, but some critics doubt that.

The agency insists it doesn’t have to do any environmental analysis under NEPA, “yet in their very same document they talk about the production benefits over 10 years,” Hitt said, “so they invalidate their own argument within the proposed rule itself. So, yes, of course, higher line speeds [are] for the purpose of higher production.”

Increased production capacity, critics worry, will spur the number of livestock raised in confinement. And more livestock could mean more emissions, not just methane from the livestock’s burps and their manure, but from crops grown to feed them and the land conversion to grow those crops.

“The two are inextricable,” Winders said. “Ninety-nine percent of the animals in our food system are in factory farms.”

In March, workers at a JBS-owned slaughtering plant in Greeley, Colorado, walked out on strike to protest working conditions at the facility, one of the biggest in the country.

The UFCW, which represents 3,800 Greeley workers, said among its concerns was JBS’s insistence that workers slaughter more animals at higher speeds.

“While they’re speeding up line speeds, they’re trying to get as much work done in shorter hours,” said Kim Cordova, the president of the union in Colorado and Wyoming. “There’s not even enough crewing and engineers in our plant to support staffing for those lines.

“There were a lot of reasons for this strike,” Cordova added. “But we need advocates and real laws that have teeth and limits around line speeds. It’s both staffing and line speeds. Those are the really big issues.”

The walk-out was the first at a meat processor in 45 years. Most of the workers are immigrants, who risked exposing themselves to Trump’s immigration crackdown. But conditions inside the plant were so bad, they said, that they felt they had no choice but to take on their employer—the world’s largest meat company, with a track record of worker abuse and environmental damage.

JBS and the workers struck a deal, including an initial 70-cent per hour pay raise, in April.

JBS did not respond to questions from Inside Climate News.

Working conditions at the country’s slaughterhouses have seen little regulation or improvement in recent decades. The new proposals, critics say, will only make them more dangerous for both people and animals.

If the administration finalizes these proposals, it would deliver on a meat industry goal that surfaced during the first Trump administration, when, in 2019, the USDA granted waivers to processing plants that allowed them to speed up their slaughter lines.

The Greeley plant does not have a line speed waiver, but a lawsuit filed on behalf of plant workers in 2025 says it regularly exceeds its 390-head per hour regulator limit. Cordova confirmed that the plant is “running 420 or 430 an hour.”

Already, Winders said, the beef industry has started to contemplate increased line speed for beef slaughter. JBS subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride was the single-biggest donor to President Donald Trump’s campaign, which critics say facilitated a controversial decision by the Securities and Exchange Commission to allow the company to list on the New York Stock Exchange after a decade of attempting to do so.

The political and regulatory environment favors a possible change in line speeds in cattle slaughterhouses, critics say.

“They’re experimenting with high speed cattle, too,” Winders said. “I think it’s just a matter of time before we see a similar proposal.”

Cordova, for one, would not be surprised.

“There’s a real reason there hasn’t been a strike in 45 years,” she said. “The industry has a lot of friends. Their political influence is broad because their pockets are so deep, so they do whatever they want.”

The USDA said it “has approved waivers at certain beef slaughter establishments in order to evaluate the potential for a new beef slaughter inspection system. These include waivers from certain regulatory requirements for inspection staffing, facilities requirements, handling of bruised parts, and sampling.”

The agency said it stopped considering beef slaughter waiver applications in January of this year.

This article originally appeared in Sentient at https://sentientmedia.org/faster-slaughterhouse-line-speeds-are-a-climate-problem/.

—

This story was originally published by Sentient.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post Faster Slaughterhouse Line Speeds Are Increasingly a Climate Problem appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Ashley Fredde

Kay McMillan is a young woman in her early 30s who graduated summa cum laude at NC State and now runs her own nonprofit combining her two passions — disability rights and teaching youth leadership skills. She lives in a Cary townhouse with two housemates she calls her “Monica” and “Rachel” after characters in the hit ’90s sitcom Friends.

In her free time, which she admits is limited due to her work, she enjoys playing Boccia ball, watching Netflix and spending time with her many friends.

All that is made possible by North Carolina’s Innovations Waiver, which provides McMillan with direct support providers who help her with daily tasks of living like getting out of bed, eating and dressing. The waiver provides these services and a number of other supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

“It might be a little obvious looking at me that I have a significant physical disability. I use this power wheelchair and communication device — both Medicaid funded,” she said. “My awesome life is made possible because of the home- and community-based supports.”

McMillan was among hundreds of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities, their families, and providers from across North Carolina who convened at the General Assembly late last month to speak with lawmakers for what’s become an annual advocacy day with the legislative body’s IDD Caucus.

A parade of advocates called on state leaders to continue to fund Medicaid and to expand access to the Innovations Waiver, which makes community living for people like McMillan a reality. They also called on lawmakers to strengthen the shrinking direct support workforce.

The appearance was the latest plea from disability advocates, who late last year also pushed lawmakers to approve a Medicaid funding rebase to prevent service disruptions.

The annual Medicaid funding readjustment was caught in a struggle between Republican leaders in the state House and Senate who could not reach agreement on spending priorities for the biennium that started July 1, 2025.

Lawmakers have yet to pass a comprehensive budget for the two-year period, making North Carolina the only state without a spending plan. Instead lawmakers approved a “minibudget” in late July that allocated $500 million toward the annual rebase for the fiscal year that ends June 30. But that wasn’t enough to fully fund the program, which sent a wave of angst through the state’s disability community.

Lawmakers ultimately passed an additional $319 million in the early weeks of this year’s short session to fully fund Medicaid the program through the end of the current fiscal year, which closes on June 30. Advocates say issues are unresolved and unfunded as budget negotiations continue.

In his 2025 proposed state budget, Gov. Josh Stein included several funding recommendations to benefit people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Those included:

• $5 million in nonrecurring funds for education efforts to recruit, train and support direct support professionals.
• Funding the Medicaid program to continue current levels of service.
• Over $37 million for 200 more Innovations Waiver slots and 75 more Traumatic Brain Injury Waiver slots.

In both the North Carolina House and Senate 2025 budget proposals, only the Senate allocated funding for 200 Innovation Waiver slots. In the past decade, adding openings in the Innovations Waiver program has been painfully slow. Modest increases, such as the 350 slots added in 2024, have done little to whittle down the ballooning waitlist.

Waiver waitlist

While approximately 14,000 North Carolinians have received an Innovations Waiver, nearly 21,000 remain on a waitlist.

That waitlist includes a growing number of families who, advocates say, face a close to two decade wait before receiving a waiver. During that wait, families can experience compounding costs — medical, physical and emotional.

“There’s a quiet crisis happening to families who are doing everything, working hard, paying for private insurance, trying to stay afloat and still their children, my child, slipping through the cracks because they’re waiting,” testified Dr. Kate Westmoreland, medical director of the UNC Down Syndrome Clinic.

“If a child qualifies for basic Medicaid based on income, they have access to all medical care, all the equipment, and therapies even while waiting for the full Innovations Waiver services,” Westmoreland said. “But if a family earns above the line they get no support, no bridge, just a decade-long wait.”

That can look like a single mother who works as a school teacher spending $10,000 on medical nutrition for her toddler, a father and truck driver whose child has begun to learn how to walk but cannot afford the $1,500 ankle braces needed for support, parents lying awake listening for footsteps because they cannot afford the $15,000 safety enclosure bed their child needs. These stories are among many Westmoreland said she hears in her clinic.

“End the waitlist for children on the Innovations Waiver. Or, at a very minimum, extend basic Medicaid coverage to every child once they are accepted on the waiver waitlist — give families a bridge, give children a chance,” Westmoreland told lawmakers.

While some services are available to waitlisted families, such as community living supports and respite hours, that access can be affected by the growing shortage of direct support professionals.

Meredith Mulford’s 11-year-old daughter, Eloise, has been on the Innovations Waiver waitlist for seven years. In the past five years, Eloise has received only one out of every 25 direct service hours she was allotted. The family’s service provider, Easterseals, attributed the gap to a workforce shortage.

“I can’t see a future where I re-enter the workforce in any full time capacity,” Mulford said. “At 46, as someone who loves to work, that feels devastating. I’m burned out, I’m tired, I’m frustrated more than I should be. It has shaped and changed every aspect of my relationship with both my husband, who works full time to support us and keep insurance, and my older daughter.”

ISO direct support providers

North Carolina would need 20,000 more direct support professionals to meet the need by 2028, according to a North Carolina DHHS report. The persisting challenges to growing the direct support workforce are low wages, limited career development and high turnover rates, the report stated.

The shortage spreads thin the workforce that already exists. An additional projected shortage of 12,500 to 17,500 registered nurses in the state by 2033 further complicates access. Even individuals or families that have been granted the Innovations Waiver, or other services such as skilled home nursing care, have difficulty filling their hours.

“I have funding. I have the hours, I don’t have nurses,” Jeff Olander told lawmakers. “For years, on paper, I’m relying on 84 hours a week of nursing care. In reality, I can staff about half. So the rest I pay for out of pocket. I fill it with aides, who are no substitute for skilled care.”

Olander and his brother were diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy. After his father died, the two brothers and their mother attempted to use the system as best they could.

“Nurses cannot be found. My mom is in her 70s, and she can’t provide physical care. So when shifts go unfilled, there’s no one to step in,” Olander said. “Weeks after his 31st birthday, my brother died at home with just me and my mom.

“This is what system failure looks like in real life. Home care isn’t just like other work. It’s not just a shift. It’s providing personal care right in someone’s daily life,” he said.

Medicaid uncertainty

Stein’s 2026 budget proposal included over $26 million for 200 new Innovations Waiver slots, as well as $25 million for Transitions to Community Living, a program that offers supportive housing, tenancy assistance and wraparound mental health services for people transitioning from or at risk of entering institutional care.

The North Carolina House and Senate have not yet released budget proposals for the 2026-27 period.

“I do fear that more cuts are coming from the federal government, and more than a billion dollars will be needed next year to fund Medicaid,” McMillan told lawmakers.

“Here is the truth. The Medicaid system is already broken, and if there are any cuts to Medicaid, it will collapse,” she said. “Because of Medicaid, I have a life, not just an existence.”

McMillan has lived independently since she was 18 because she’s had access to direct support professionals.

”Thanks to the Medicaid Innovations Waiver, direct support professionals help me with daily needs, getting out of bed, eating, dressing and even my job,” McMillan said.

At the current wages — which average between $14.80 and $16.62 per hour — there’s a lack of direct support professionals willing to work the hours needed for people like McMillan.

“My 64-year-old mom is my backup support and lives an hour and a half away. Last week, my mom made that drive not once, or twice, but three times to cover open DSP shifts. I’m worried because my parents cannot be my backup forever, and here is what keeps me up at night.”

She pointed out that home- and community-based supports are optional under federal rules.

”My right to get out of bed in the morning is ‘optional.’ That means when budgets get tight, our homes, our lives are on the chopping block first,” McMillan said. “If you cut Medicaid, you are not saving money. You are sentencing people to nursing homes, a life of isolation where no one can reach their full potential.”

“I am so scared that if these cuts happen, I will end up in an institution,” she told lawmakers. “So I am asking you from my chair, with my device, with my whole heart, protect Medicaid funding.”

This article first appeared on North Carolina Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

—

North Carolina Health News is an independent, non-partisan, not-for-profit, statewide news organization dedicated to covering all things health care in North Carolina. Visit NCHN at northcarolinahealthnews.org with Creative Commons License

***

Photo Credit: Angela Graves, who grew up in Merrimack, has received preliminary support from the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services for a pilot program using mushrooms to help clean up forever chemicals at the site of the former Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics plant. (Photo by Molly Rains/New Hampshire Bulletin)

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.  Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post ‘There’s a Quiet Crisis’: NC Families, Advocates Plead for Greater Disability Services Investment appeared first on The Good Men Project.

I think one of the loneliest feelings in the world is realizing that nobody notices you are struggling because you became too good at hiding it.

People see you functioning normally.

They see you replying to messages.

Going outside.

Working.

Laughing sometimes.

Posting online.

Trying to stay active.

And honestly, from outside, your life probably looks completely normal.

But internally, your mind feels heavy almost every single day.

Not physically heavy.

Emotionally heavy.

The kind of heaviness that quietly follows you everywhere.

You wake up with it.

You carry it through conversations.

You carry it into crowded rooms.

You carry it into nights that already feel too quiet.

And eventually, pretending you are okay becomes so automatic that even the people closest to you stop noticing how exhausted you truly feel inside.

I know this feeling because I lived inside it for a long time.

I know what it feels like to smile around people while secretly feeling emotionally disconnected from everything around you.

I know what it feels like to become so mentally tired that even explaining your emotions feels exhausting.

And honestly, I think many people are silently living this way right now.

At First, I Thought I Was Just “Going Through a Phase”

In the beginning, I kept convincing myself that things would improve automatically.

Maybe I just needed rest.

Maybe I was overthinking.

Maybe I was simply emotionally tired for a few days.

So I ignored the signs.

I ignored:

• the constant overthinking
• the emotional numbness
• the loneliness
• the pressure
• the exhaustion I carried every night

I kept forcing myself to continue normally because I thought slowing down meant weakness.

And honestly, modern life teaches people to ignore their emotional pain until it becomes impossible to carry anymore.

People praise productivity constantly.

They praise people who keep working despite exhaustion.

They praise people who stay strong publicly.

But very few people teach us how to emotionally take care of ourselves honestly.

So instead, many people silently break themselves while trying to appear fine.

I think I became one of those people.

Nights Were Always the Hardest for Me

I think nights reveal emotions people spend the entire day trying to avoid.

During the day, distractions exist.

Noise exists.

Responsibilities exist.

People exist.

But nights are different.

Nights are honest.

And honestly, some nights felt unbearably heavy.

I would lie awake replaying thoughts repeatedly.

Thinking about my future.

Thinking about mistakes.

Thinking about whether I was falling behind in life.

Wondering why my mind felt emotionally exhausted all the time even when I was trying my best.

And slowly, overthinking became part of my routine.

My body would feel tired.

But my brain would continue racing endlessly.

I think emotionally exhausted people understand this feeling deeply.

The feeling where your mind refuses to rest even when your heart desperately wants peace.

And honestly, some nights I felt so emotionally overwhelmed that even crying felt exhausting.

So I stayed silent instead.

Social Media Quietly Made Everything Worse

One thing I rarely admitted was how deeply comparison affected my mental state.

Every day online, I saw people:

• looking happy
• becoming successful
• building careers
• traveling
• achieving goals
• appearing confident about life

And slowly, I started feeling emotionally behind.

Even when I tried not to compare myself.

Comparison still entered my mind quietly.

I started questioning my own life constantly.

Why did everyone else seem happier?

Why did everyone else seem more certain about their future?

Why did my mind feel so emotionally tired while everyone else looked fine?

And honestly, social media creates emotional pressure people barely notice anymore.

You constantly feel like:

• you should already be more successful
• you should already have life figured out
• you should already feel confident
• you should already feel mentally stronger

And slowly, your own progress stops feeling valuable because your brain only notices how far away you still feel from everyone else.

I think many emotionally exhausted people are carrying both pain and comparison at the same time.

And that combination becomes mentally overwhelming.

I Became Emotionally Distant From Myself

This was one of the hardest things to explain.

At some point, I stopped feeling emotionally connected to myself.

Things that once made me happy started feeling emotionally empty.

Music sounded different.

Conversations felt draining.

Even peaceful moments felt temporary because my mind was constantly focused on pressure and overthinking.

And honestly, emotional exhaustion changes people quietly.

Not dramatically.

Quietly.

Until one day you realize you have been surviving emotionally for so long that you forgot what genuine peace even feels like.

I think that realization scared me more than anything else.

Because I did not want to become emotionally numb.

I did not want life to feel empty.

But I also did not know how to stop carrying the pressure inside my mind.

I Thought Being Strong Meant Staying Silent

For a long time, I believed emotional strength meant handling everything alone.

Not complaining.

Not showing weakness.

Not telling people how mentally exhausted I truly felt.

So every time someone asked:

“Are you okay?”

I automatically said:

“Yeah, I’m fine.”

Even during moments where internally I felt completely broken.

And honestly, I became so good at pretending that eventually nobody questioned it anymore.

That is the dangerous thing about silent suffering.

The more quietly you carry pain, the more invisible it becomes to everyone around you.

But internally, the pressure keeps growing.

And eventually, emotional exhaustion starts affecting everything:

• your confidence
  your sleep
• your peace
• your motivation
• your ability to enjoy life

I think many people are silently carrying invisible emotional battles while pretending they are completely okay because they are afraid nobody would fully understand anyway.

You Are Probably Harder on Yourself Than Anyone Else

One painful realization changed the way I viewed myself.

I realized most of my emotional exhaustion was connected to the way I treated myself internally.

I constantly pressured myself.

Constantly criticized myself.

Constantly felt guilty for not doing enough.

And honestly, I rarely allowed myself to simply breathe emotionally.

Rest felt guilty.

Slow progress felt like failure.

Struggling emotionally felt embarrassing.

I kept asking myself:

“Why can’t I just fix myself?”

But healing does not happen through self-hatred.

A tired mind does not become peaceful through punishment.

And honestly, maybe many emotionally exhausted people are not weak at all.

Maybe they have simply been carrying too much emotionally for too long without allowing themselves compassion.

The Breaking Point Happened Quietly

I used to think emotional breakdowns happened dramatically.

But honestly, mine happened quietly.

I simply became tired.

Tired of pretending.

Tired of carrying invisible pressure every day.

Tired of acting emotionally okay while internally struggling constantly.

And one night, I finally admitted something honestly to myself:

“I’m exhausted.”

Not lazy.

Not weak.

Exhausted.

And strangely, admitting that felt relieving.

Because for the first time in a long time, I stopped fighting my own emotions.

I stopped pretending everything felt manageable.

I stopped acting like I needed to carry everything perfectly alone.

And honestly, I think healing begins the moment people finally become emotionally honest with themselves.

Healing Did Not Happen Instantly

I wish I could say everything changed immediately after that realization.

It didn’t.

Healing felt slow.

Some mornings still felt heavy.

Some nights still felt overwhelming.

Some memories still hurt unexpectedly.

But slowly, my relationship with myself started changing.

I became kinder to myself internally.

I stopped expecting myself to have life completely figured out immediately.

I stopped believing emotional struggle automatically meant failure.

And honestly, that mindset changed my mental state more than fake positivity ever did.

Because real healing is not about becoming happy every second.

It is about learning how to stop emotionally fighting yourself constantly.

You Do Not Need to Earn the Right to Feel Peace

One of the saddest things modern life teaches people is that they only deserve peace after becoming successful enough.

So people continue emotionally exhausting themselves trying to:

• prove their worth
• become successful
• fix their future
• become “enough”

But your worth as a human being is not measured only through achievement.

You do not need to constantly suffer to deserve kindness from yourself.

You do not need to become perfect before allowing yourself peace.

And honestly, I think many emotionally tired people desperately need to hear that.

Because some people are carrying invisible emotional battles every day while still trying their best to survive.

And that already requires enormous strength.

Maybe Healing Begins With Self-Compassion

I think many people are waiting for life to suddenly become easier before allowing themselves emotional peace.

But honestly, healing often begins much smaller than that.

Sometimes healing begins when:

you stop insulting yourself internally
you allow yourself to rest without guilt
you admit you are emotionally tired
you stop comparing your life constantly
you become gentler with your own mind

Because a person cannot emotionally heal while constantly fighting themselves internally every day.

And honestly, maybe you deserve more compassion from yourself than you currently allow.

Final Thoughts

If nobody has told you this recently, I want you to remember something honestly.

You are not weak because your mind feels heavy sometimes.

You are not broken because healing feels slow.

You are not failing at life simply because you feel emotionally exhausted.

Some people are carrying invisible battles every single day while still trying to survive quietly.

And honestly, that already requires incredible strength.

Even now, there are still days where my mind feels heavy.

Days where overthinking returns.

Days where the future feels emotionally overwhelming again.

But now I understand something I wish I had realized earlier.

Being human is not weakness.

Struggling emotionally does not make someone unworthy of love, peace, or healing.

And maybe healing truly begins the moment we stop pretending we are okay just to make everyone else comfortable and finally start treating ourselves with the same kindness we keep giving everyone else.

—

This post was previously published on medium.com.

Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.

Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.

Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!

***

–

Photo credit:  Jack B on Unsplash

The post I Know You’re Tired of Pretending You’re Okay appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Taylor Sisk

DELBARTON, W.Va. — A half-dozen cars had been in the queue for nearly four hours by the time the House of Hope mobile food pantry line began to move. Seventy or so more idled behind them by 11:30 a.m., when the food distribution began.

The plan was to begin handing out boxes of groceries at 11, but the Facing Hunger Foodbank truck delivering the food blew a tire en route. No one complained.

Perry Hall was among those waiting. His wife, Lilly Hall, volunteers with the distribution team. Perry has been dealing with a form of cancer called multiple myeloma. The Halls get by on around $1,500 a month from his Social Security benefits, plus assistance from the federal Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP. But because of her age, Lilly, 59, recently became subject to new SNAP work requirements and at risk of losing her benefits.

As part of the federal One Big Beautiful Bill Act, all “able-bodied adults” 64 or younger who don’t have dependents and don’t work, volunteer, or participate in job training at least 80 hours a month are now restricted to three months of benefits every three years from SNAP, formerly known as food stamps. Previously, the federal requirement applied to those 54 or younger. The new rule, which went into effect in November, also applies to parents of children 14 or older. And it removed exemptions for veterans, people experiencing homelessness, and young adults who’ve aged out of foster care.

Proponents of work requirements argue that they incentivize people who are “work-ready” to seek and keep jobs, reducing dependence on government assistance and upholding the “dignity of work.”

Rhonda Rogombé serves as health and safety net policy analyst for the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. She and her colleagues have studied the effects of SNAP work rules and found that requiring recipients to work does not lower an area’s unemployment rate.

Previous work requirements were suspended nationwide during the covid pandemic and reinstated in fall 2023. The researchers found that the average number of people employed in Mingo County each month actually went down after the requirement was reimposed.

A 2018 federal research project that examined several data sources, including SNAP data from nine states, found that work requirements “have no impact on labor force participation and the number of hours worked.”

There are a number of possible explanations, Rogombé said, “but when people are hungry, they’re not able to support themselves. When people are hungry, it’s harder to focus at work. It’s harder to engage in work activity, and we think that that’s part of it.”

Jobs are scarce in this southern West Virginia county. Lilly Hall found work at a Delbarton restaurant. But it’s unpaid until a waitress position opens — enough to preserve her benefits, but far from ideal.

On that mild Wednesday in late March, House of Hope provided chicken, eggs, bread, potatoes, fresh fruit and vegetables, and milk.

Among those in line were older residents and “some young people that have lost their way and they can’t get work and they just need help,” said Timothy Treleven, who operates the pantry with his wife, Christine, and Gail Lendearo.

House of Hope’s scheduled distribution day is the last Saturday of each month — supplemented by occasional weekday Facing Hunger visits — as money from monthly checks begins to run out and cupboards go bare.

On a typical Saturday, pantry staff and volunteers hand out up to 400 boxes of food.

“It’s an honor to do this,” Lendearo said. “It’s a blessing.”

Perry Hall’s cancer is now in remission, but for a while his treatment required that he and Lilly travel back and forth, 4½ hours each way, to Morgantown. The couple’s van couldn’t make the trip, so they paid a friend for rides.

Mingo’s population is just under 22,000, down from around 27,000 in 2010. It once flourished, fueled by coal. Williamson, the county seat, was home to an opera house and businesses operated by immigrants from Italy, Russia, and Syria. The region is still referred to as “the coalfields,” but little is mined here these days. A quarter of residents live in poverty.

Rogombé and her colleagues found that Mingo County residents face significant barriers to securing what few jobs are available. These include unreported physical and mental impairments, housing insecurity, and a lack of high school diplomas and identification documents.

Filing the paperwork to receive benefits or to confirm compliance is difficult for many residents. The West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy’s research found that about 1 in 4 lack reliable internet access.

Additional changes lie ahead for the SNAP program. Currently, the federal government and the states share administrative costs equally, but in October states will assume 75% of those costs. And beginning in October 2027, they’ll be required to pay additional costs based on error rates.

Kentucky, like West Virginia, is among the poorer states that will be most affected by the new requirements and costs. The Kentucky Center for Economic Policy estimates that up to 114,000 residents risk losing SNAP benefits with the expanded work requirements.

Jessica Klein, a researcher with the center, worries about the consequences. “We know SNAP has an impact on health, and not just because it decreases food insecurity,” she said. It worsens blood pressure rates, obesity, medication adherence, and more.

With the additional financial burden placed on states, “I think what we’ll see is some states changing rules that impact participation in order to have a smaller, more affordable program,” Klein said. “My fear is that some states will choose not to operate SNAP at all.”

In Mingo County, folks are stepping up. At least eight food pantries offer groceries to those in need.

Janet Gibson runs the Blessing Barn pantry in the Ben Creek community. “I can go from one end of the creek to the other” and tell you everyone’s name and a little something about them, she said. She takes pride in feeding her people.

Gibson said it can be hard to find even volunteer opportunities in the county, largely because of transportation challenges. A look at a local map can be misleading: A couple of dozen miles into a holler or up a ridge could take an hour or more.

“Whether you’re working full-time or not, you’re still spinning out gas to get to work,” Gibson said, “and gas ain’t cheap now.”

A single mother of three, Trista Shankle of Paducah, Kentucky, isn’t subject to the new SNAP requirements, but she worries about the fragility of the social safety net. She overcame challenges, is earning a master’s degree in social work, and works for an organization that connects community college students with Temporary Assistance for Needy Families benefits. Her family receives SNAP, Medicaid, housing support, and assistance from the USDA’s Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children. If any one of those is cut, she said, she may have to drop out of school.

Shankle is certain she wouldn’t have advanced to where she is today without the benefits she and her family have received: “They bring a sense of calm and comfort. I know that my kids aren’t going to go hungry.”

The first week in April, Lilly Hall reported for work at Black Bear Trails Restaurant. She’s grateful for the opportunity. And when a waitress slot opens, “I’ll snag that position so quick it’ll make your head flip.”

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

—

Previously Published on kffhealthnews.org

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

On Substack? Connect with us there.
—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post Food Stamp Work Rules Don’t Increase Employment, Researchers Say appeared first on The Good Men Project.

—

Money arguments are rarely about money. They’re about safety, autonomy, fairness, identity, and trust. A $50 purchase can trigger a conflict not because of the amount, but because it activates a deeper question: “Are we building the same life?”

In healthy relationships, financial conversations don’t disappear—they become more skillful. The goal isn’t to “win” a budgeting debate. It’s to create shared clarity: what matters, what’s non-negotiable, and how you’ll make decisions when life changes.

This article offers a practical, expert-informed approach to talking about money without turning it into a fight. It’s designed for couples at any stage—dating, living together, married, or co-parenting—especially in a world where payments, subscriptions, and investments can be digital, fast, and emotionally loaded.

Why money conversations trigger conflict so easily

Money has three qualities that make it conflict-prone:

• It’s emotional: it represents security and freedom.
• It’s moralized: people attach “good/bad” judgments to spending and saving.
• It’s measurable: numbers can be used as proof, criticism, or control.

Expert comment: Financial conflict is often a values conflict

In relationship counseling, it’s common to see the “spender vs saver” dynamic framed as irresponsibility vs rigidity. In reality, both sides are often trying to protect something important—joy and spontaneity on one side, stability and preparedness on the other.

Start with the right mindset: clarity over control

The fastest way to escalate a money conversation is to approach it as a courtroom: evidence, prosecution, defense, verdict. A better frame is collaboration:

• “We’re solving a shared problem.”
• “We want a system that feels fair to both of us.”
• “We can adjust as we learn.”

A useful rule: discuss systems, not incidents

Arguing about individual purchases (“Why did you buy that?”) is high-friction and low-learning. Discussing the system (“What’s our fun budget?” “What needs approval?”) reduces shame and increases predictability.

Choose the right time and setup (it matters more than you think)

Money talks fail when they happen in the worst possible conditions: late at night, during a stressful week, in the middle of a conflict, or right after a bill arrives.

Create “low-stakes” conditions

• Schedule the conversation (30–60 minutes).
• Meet at a neutral time—weekend morning often works.
• Keep phones away or on airplane mode.
• Agree on a stop signal if emotions spike.

Expert tip: use a shared document as a third object

When you both look at a shared note or spreadsheet, you reduce “you vs me” and increase “us vs the problem.” This simple move can de-escalate blame and defensiveness.

The three conversations every couple needs (before the numbers)

1) The “meaning” conversation: what money represents

Ask each other:

• What did money feel like in your childhood—scarce, abundant, unpredictable?
• What’s your biggest financial fear?
• What’s one thing money gives you emotionally (freedom, safety, status, generosity)?

This is not therapy language—it’s practical. When you understand your partner’s money story, their behavior becomes less personal and more understandable.

2) The “values” conversation: what you’re optimizing for

Some couples optimize for:

• security (high savings, low risk)
• experiences (travel, events, shared memories)
• growth (education, business, investing)
• family support (helping parents, childcare)

You don’t need identical priorities. You need to know what each person refuses to sacrifice.

3) The “rules of engagement” conversation: how you will disagree

Before money gets tense, agree on how to handle disagreements:

• No insults, no name-calling (“irresponsible,” “cheap”).
• No surprise audits (demanding receipts during fights).
• Use pauses when needed; resume within 24–48 hours.

Get practical: build a money system that prevents repeat fights

Once you’ve aligned on meaning and values, the numbers become easier. The goal is a system that answers everyday questions quickly.

Step 1: Define account structure (shared vs separate)

Common models:

• Fully merged: one shared pool (simple, but requires high alignment).
• Yours/Mine/Ours: shared account for joint bills + separate personal accounts.
• Proportional split: shared bills paid based on income percentage.

Expert comment: “fair” is not always “equal”

If one partner earns significantly more, equal splitting can create resentment and instability. Proportional contributions often feel more equitable and protect dignity for both people.

Step 2: Decide on three budgets: essentials, future, and freedom

A simple system many couples can maintain:

• Essentials: rent, utilities, groceries, transportation
• Future: debt payoff, emergency fund, savings goals
• Freedom: guilt-free spending for each person

The freedom category is underrated. It prevents “permission dynamics” where one adult must justify every personal purchase to another adult.

Step 3: Create an “approval threshold”

Agree on a number above which you consult each other first (for example: $200, $500, or any recurring subscription).

This reduces surprises and turns conflict into a predictable process: “This is above the threshold, so we talk.”

Digital money adds new friction—address it directly

In 2026, financial life includes apps, subscriptions, and sometimes digital assets. These can create conflict because they move fast and feel abstract.

Subscriptions and micro-spending

Small monthly charges can quietly grow into a significant line item. Agree on:

• how many subscriptions you can maintain,
• which ones are “shared value,”
• which ones fall under personal freedom spending.

Digital assets and stablecoins (if relevant)

Some couples use stablecoins for practical reasons—sending money internationally, separating a portion of savings, or keeping a “travel buffer.” If you do, treat it like any other financial tool:

• define how much (if any) of your household money goes into it,
• define custody rules (who controls access),
• define documentation (so nothing feels secret).

If one partner prefers to keep a small, clearly defined amount in a stablecoin for convenience, using a dedicated usdt wallet setup can simply be part of that documentation and separation—like having a labeled savings envelope—so both people understand what it is and what it is not.

Expert warning: secrecy is the accelerant

Hidden accounts or undisclosed crypto holdings often hurt relationships less because of the asset itself and more because secrecy breaks trust. Transparency about existence and purpose matters more than the particular tool used.

How to talk about debt without shame

Debt is a common trigger because it can feel like a moral failing. But debt is often a life event: education, medical costs, family emergencies, or simply surviving a high-cost period.

Use facts and compassion together

• List each debt: balance, interest rate, minimum payment.
• Ask: “What do you want this debt to mean in our story?”
• Choose a plan: snowball (smallest first) or avalanche (highest interest first).

Expert comment: debt conversations fail when they become identity attacks

“You’re bad with money” is not useful. “This interest rate is hurting us—how do we fix it together?” is.

Conflict-proof language: phrases that keep the conversation safe

Replace accusations with observations

• Instead of “You always overspend,” say “We exceeded the freedom budget three times this month.”
• Instead of “You don’t care about our future,” say “I feel anxious when savings don’t move.”

Use “I” statements with a goal

• “I’m worried about cash flow this month. Can we look at bills together?”
• “I want us to feel safe. What would help you feel safe too?”

Ask better questions

• “What do you think is fair here?”
• “What’s the smallest change that would reduce stress?”
• “What are we protecting with this purchase—or this saving plan?”

Money meeting cadence: the habit that prevents big blowups

Most couples don’t need daily money talk. They do need predictable check-ins.

A simple cadence

• Weekly (15 minutes): upcoming bills, schedule, any surprises
• Monthly (45 minutes): review spending categories, adjust budgets
• Quarterly (60 minutes): goals, savings rate, larger purchases, travel plans

Expert tip: end with appreciation

Close the meeting with a positive reflection (“Thanks for staying with this,” “I appreciate your planning”). It sounds small, but it rewires money talk from conflict to teamwork.

When money fights signal deeper relationship issues

Sometimes the money argument is a proxy for something else:

• power and control
• unequal labor (one person managing everything)
• fear of commitment
• lack of shared goals

Red flags to take seriously

• one partner monitoring or restricting the other’s spending as punishment
• secret accounts used to hide behavior, not to create safety
• threats, intimidation, or coercion around money

If these patterns exist, consider professional support (financial counseling, couples therapy) and, where safety is involved, local resources.

Conclusion: money talk is a skill—and skills can be learned

Talking about money without fighting is not about having the “right” spreadsheet. It’s about building a shared system that protects both partners’ needs: safety, autonomy, fairness, and meaning. Start with the human layer—money stories and values—then design simple rules: account structure, three budgets, and an approval threshold. Add a routine so problems get handled early, before they become emotional explosions.

When couples treat money as a shared project rather than a scoreboard, the conversation changes. The goal is not zero conflict. The goal is a relationship where conflict leads to clarity—and clarity leads to trust.

Disclaimer: This article is for educational purposes and is not financial or legal advice.

—

This content is brought to you by Evelina Brown.

iStockPhoto

The post How to Talk About Money in a Relationship (Without Turning It Into a Fight) appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Kristi Girdharry, Babson College

—

Previously Published on theconversation.com with Creative Commons License

***

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view  A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post A Writing Professor’s New Task in the Age of AI: Teaching Students When to Struggle appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Royal Forestry Society

A survey of over 500 professionals reveals that stress is a “constant backdrop” in forestry and arboriculture

The Royal Forestry Society (RFS), working with a coalition of leading forestry organisations, today published the Breaking Points survey report which shows the forestry and arboriculture sector is experiencing a mental health crisis.

Nick Adams, a forestry contractor and a Policy Committee Vice-Chair at the Forestry Contracting Association, describes the mental health strain of his job as “unsustainable”.

“I’d always thought I could just push through,” he said. “There was a moment I realised the job was going to kill me if I didn’t change something. There is only so much someone can take before they pack it in and leave the industry or worse. Unfortunately, the problems are not new; they’re decades old.”

Nick’s experience reflects a wider pattern uncovered by the Breaking Points survey, which shows stress is now a “constant backdrop” across the forestry and arboriculture workforce.

Official data show suicides have risen over the last 15 years and that men, particularly those in middle age, are at heightened risk of poor mental health. The Breaking Points survey warns this is especially relevant to forestry, where many workers fall into this demographic and experience the compounding stressors of lone working and the transient nature of job roles.

The Forestry Commission-funded report paints a picture of a sector under immense strain. Financial instability, physical risk and rural isolation are heightening the risk of poor mental health among those who manage the nation’s trees and woodlands.

The Breaking Points survey gathered data from over 500 professionals in 2025, including forestry contractors, arborists, manual forestry workers and forest managers. The report notes that while the industry has successfully improved physical safety records over the last two decades, mental health has not received the same attention.

Key Findings

The Breaking Points survey shows a workforce struggling under multiple pressures. 76% of all respondents cited financial issues as their top stressor and only 43% have regular (weekly) access to someone they trust to talk to. 44% reported explicit mental health struggles and 35% reported chronic burnout.

The report also showed that stress was felt differently across roles.

• Self-employed workers: Nearly all (94%) experience financial stress and 63% struggle with isolation and loneliness.
• Arborists: An overwhelming 92% report safety risks as a primary stressor and 56%, the highest of any role group, report emotional or mental health struggles.
• Machine Operators: 85% are stressed by safety risks, and 59% report significant isolation.
• Managers and Supervisors: Over half (57%) are stressed by policy and bureaucratic “red tape”.

The report finds that stress in the sector is often “cyclical and self-reinforcing,” where financial pressure leads to poor safety decisions and chronic burnout. A lack of spaces to talk and a cultural resistance to vulnerability means problems go unaddressed.

The findings fit into a wider discussion about mental health in rural communities. In recent years, mental health in farming has rightly gained national attention as an urgent issue. The Breaking Points survey shows that the forestry workforce faces equally severe pressures but with fewer specialised support structures in place.

It also finds that forestry workers feel undervalued and misunderstood by the public, often facing hostility for their work. The report encourages members of the public to be curious next time they see forestry work taking place locally. Rather than assuming the worst, the report urges the public to ask foresters and arborists about their work and what they are aiming to achieve. In the vast majority of cases, their work will be beneficial to people and the environment.

RFS Chief Executive and Chair of the Wellbeing in Forestry Group, Christopher Williams said: “This report outlines the scale of the challenges for those working in forestry and identifies opportunities to better support them and strengthen their resilience. I hope it provides the evidence and momentum needed to improve mental wellbeing across our sector.”

The Breaking Points report is part a larger “Wellbeing in Forestry” programme. The working group, includes the Confederation of Forest Industries (Confor), Forestry Commission, Forestry Contracting Association (FCA), Forest Industry Safety Accord (FISA), Institute of Chartered Foresters (ICF), the Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution (RABI), the Royal Scottish Forestry Society (RSFS), the Small Woods Association and private sector consultants and contractors.

The group is urging landowners, agents and policymakers to adopt better practices regarding pay and communication. In the coming months, the group will introduce practical tools, peer support initiatives and public engagement campaigns to address the specific issues that contribute to the mental health challenges felt across the forestry and arboriculture sector.

-Ends-

For media enquiries contact:

Joe Roberts, Communications & Advocacy Manager, Royal Forestry Society

07551604050

Joe.roberts@rfs.org.uk

Notes to editors:

About the Report: The Breaking Points survey was conducted between July and August 2025, reaching workers across forest management, contracting, arboriculture, and traditional skills.

About the Working Group: The project is led by the Royal Forestry Society (RFS) in collaboration with the Forestry Commission, Confederation of Forest Industries (Confor), Forestry Contracting Association (FCA), Institute of Chartered Foresters (ICF), Forest Industry Safety Accord (FISA), Royal Agricultural Benevolent Institution, Royal Scottish Forestry Society and Small Woods Association.

About the Royal Forestry Society: The Royal Forestry Society (RFS) was founded 140 years ago and has dedicated itself to sharing knowledge on the art and science of woodland management so that the accumulated wisdom and experience of landowners, foresters, arborists and others is transferred from one generation to another.

Press release distributed by Pressat on behalf of Royal Forestry Society, on Wednesday 6 May, 2026. For more information subscribe and follow https://pressat.co.uk/

https://rfs.org.uk/news-list/breaking-points-new-report-mental-health-crisis-forestry/

—

Previously Published on pressat.co.uk with Creative Commons License

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.  A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post Workers Reach Breaking Point as New Report Reveals Quiet Mental Health Crisis in Forestry appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Anika Jane Beamer, Inside Climate News, Sentient Media

This article originally appeared on Inside Climate News (hyperlink to the original story), a nonprofit, non-partisan news organization that covers climate, energy and the environment. Sign up for their newsletter here.

DES MOINES, Iowa—In a press conference at the state capitol on Friday, Gov. Kim Reynolds announced a “comprehensive legislative package” that will boost funding for utilities struggling to meet federal drinking water standards and combat high nitrate pollution from agriculture.

The plan would have the state spend more than $100 million on water treatment infrastructure over the next decade, including a one-time $25 million investment to expand the Central Iowa Water Works nitrate removal facility, which serves more than 600,000 residents in the state’s largest metropolitan area.

The state-of-the-art removal facility has operated for more than 100 days in 2026 so far, as the Des Moines and Raccoon rivers reach near-record levels of nitrates that exceed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s legal limit of 10 milligrams per liter. Research has linked long-term exposure to nitrates in drinking water, even at low levels, to various cancers and serious health risks for infants.

And while nitrate contamination of surface water is not limited to central Iowa, many of the state’s smaller communities lack the infrastructure to remove the pollution.

Since the start of 2024, public water supplies for at least seven communities have exceeded the EPA’s maximum contaminant level, according to documents maintained by the Iowa Department of Natural Resources.

The water package announced by Reynolds, a Republican, allocates $76 million to grant and loan programs to help Iowa’s rural communities upgrade their water treatment facilities.

The investments in water treatment systems “shift money to the most urgent needs and most effective programs,” Reynolds said. “Water quality isn’t a farm issue, it isn’t a city issue, and it isn’t a political issue, but it absolutely is non-negotiable.”

Critics say that Reynolds’ plan does little to address the sources of pollution in waterways.

The Central Iowa Source Water Resource Assessment, a two-year-long scientific study released last summer, attributed 80 percent of the nitrogen in central Iowa’s watersheds to agricultural activity.

Large amounts of synthetic fertilizer and hog and poultry manure are applied to Iowa cropland to fuel corn and soybean growth, and any phosphorus and nitrogen not taken up by crops can leach out of the soil and into waterways to fuel algal and bacterial blooms or yield dangerously high nitrate levels.

Reynolds’ water quality proposal “ignores the root causes of pollution” and is “too little too late,” said Jennifer Breon, a senior organizer in Iowa for Food & Water Action, in a statement released by the political and lobbying arm of the environmental watchdog group Food & Water Watch.

The state will boost funding for water conservation efforts on farms in the Des Moines watershed, Iowa Agriculture Secretary Mike Naig announced at Friday’s press conference. The Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship will receive an additional $52 million to expand the adoption of cover crops, no-till and strip-till farming and nitrate-reducing wetlands in the region.

But all of that is voluntary.

“Binding regulations are the only way to ensure water quality improvements, and they are extremely popular,” said Breon, referencing polling led by Food & Water Action in February, which reported that 79 percent of Iowa voters support mandatory requirements for industrial agriculture to reduce pollution.

Advocates also argued that Reynolds’ decision to exclude the Iowa Water Quality Information System from the funding proposal undermines critical water monitoring efforts. The network of more than 60 continuous water quality monitors, operated by the University of Iowa, lost state funding in 2023.

Citizens and environmental organizations have lobbied the Legislature to reinstate permanent funding for the network this year, stressing that it plays a crucial role in providing Iowans with real-time water quality information.

Reynolds’ plan instead allocates an additional $500,000 each year to the state Department of Natural Resources’ ambient water quality monitoring program. That program conducts sampling once a month at 60 stream sites across the state.

The DNR program cannot provide minute-to-minute data in the way that the University of Iowa sensor network does, Colleen Fowle, director of the Iowa Environmental Council’s water program, told Iowa Farmers Union members in March.

Since 2023, the network has relied on grant funding that is set to expire at the end of July. The loss of the network would be a massive blow to a state struggling to provide its residents with clean water, said Fowle.

In a statement released by the Iowa Environmental Council, which describes Reynolds’ package as a “small first step,” Fowle also noted that the proposal emphasizes funding for central Iowa, while many of the communities facing the highest year-round nitrate levels fall outside that region.

“Nitrate contamination is a statewide crisis,” Fowle said. “And a statewide crisis demands a statewide solution.”

This article originally appeared in Sentient at https://sentientmedia.org/fertilizer-pollution-on-the-rise-iowa-will-invest-in-water-treatment/.

—

This story was originally published by Sentient.

***

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post With Fertilizer Pollution on the Rise, Iowa Will Invest $100 Million in Water Treatment appeared first on The Good Men Project.

By Stephen Martin

Kim McGuire had already spent nearly two weeks at St. Anthony Hospital in Oklahoma City when a hospital case manager delivered the news: her insurance would not cover a transfer to a rehabilitation facility.

She still needed wound care. She still needed physical therapy. But there was nowhere for her to go.

Then, someone mentioned a small hospital in Stroud.

“I mean, it really sounded too good to be true,” her husband, Mike McGuire, said.

By Tuesday, Kim McGuire had been transferred.

Fifty days into her hospitalization, the couple says they found something they didn’t expect in a rural hospital: time, attention and a level of care they say goes beyond what they had experienced elsewhere.

“It’s phenomenal, the way we’ve been treated here,” Mike McGuire said.

Cases like McGuire’s highlight a growing gap in the healthcare system — one that rural hospitals are increasingly stepping in to fill. Patients who no longer need acute hospital care but aren’t ready to go home often struggle to find placement in traditional rehabilitation facilities.

At some rural hospitals, that gap has become an opportunity and, in some cases, a lifeline.

Reinventing the rural hospital

At the hospital in Stroud, operated by Rural Wellness, Inc., that role is central to the business model.

Administrator Angelia Sylsberry describes a category of patients who fall between levels of care: too sick for home, not appropriate for long-term nursing facilities, and not eligible for higher-level rehabilitation programs.

“They’re in limbo,” she said.

The solution is a program known as “swing bed,” which allows hospitals to use inpatient beds for post-acute care. Patients typically stay longer than traditional hospital admissions, receiving therapy, wound care and medical oversight as they recover.

At Stroud, that model has become dominant. Most patients are in swing bed care, with stays averaging around three weeks.

The hospital draws patients from across the region — Oklahoma City, Tulsa and surrounding communities — effectively serving as a step-down facility for larger hospitals.

It’s a different kind of rural hospital: not just a place for emergency care, but part of a broader system managing patient flow.

But Sylsberry is clear that this didn’t happen overnight.

To support that model, the hospital has added services over time as a deliberate, long-term strategy to increase both the complexity of patients it can treat and the number of people it can serve.

Today, about 90% of the hospital’s 25 beds are used for swing-bed patients, reflecting a fundamental shift in how the facility operates.

The approach has also become central to its financial survival.

“When you only have two or three patients in the hospital, your overhead is still high — you’re losing money,” Sylsberry said. “As your census grows and those service lines grow, then you start gaining.”

Without those services, she said, the hospital would likely revert to what it was a decade ago when it was a small facility with limited patients, reduced staff and fewer resources.

More broadly, she sees the model as part of a necessary shift for rural healthcare.

“If a community loses their hospital, there goes their community,” Sylsberry said. “Industry won’t come in without a hospital. You just see that decline.”

Looking ahead, she said rural hospitals will need to continue expanding services — whether through swing-bed programs, outpatient care or visiting specialists — to remain viable in a system where funding pressures and staffing shortages are likely to intensify.

“It’s a strategic long-term plan,” she said, requiring investment in staff, equipment and training before the hospital could take on more complex cases.

Not one model, but many

While the hospital in Stroud has leaned heavily into post-acute care, other rural hospitals are adapting in different ways.

Just 10 miles south of the Oklahoma border, Ochiltree General Hospital in Perryton, Texas, has expanded its swing-bed program and added services such as rehabilitation and visiting specialists, drawing patients from across a broader region, including Oklahoma.

Community outreach director Amie Marrufo said those additions do more than expand care — they change how residents think about the hospital.

“If they’re going to drive past your hospital, that’s not helpful,” she said. “If they think you don’t do something, they won’t come back.”

The hospital also brings in specialists from larger cities on a rotating basis, allowing patients to receive surgery and follow-up care locally instead of traveling.

In Sulphur, a different approach has taken hold.

There, the hospital has focused on core services — emergency care, primary care and basic diagnostics — supported by its designation as a critical access hospital, which provides cost-based reimbursement through Medicare.

Jared Chanski, chief executive officer of Preferred Management Corp., which provides administrative and management support to the Arbuckle Memorial Hospital in Sulphur and several rural hospitals in Texas, said the biggest challenge for rural facilities is simple: volume.

“Rural areas just don’t have the volume to generate income the way urban systems do,” he said.

Instead, survival depends on controlling costs, focusing on essential services and, increasingly, working with outside partners to handle administrative and financial functions.

For some systems, the solution is scale.

Ozarks Community Hospital in Arkansas operates a network of clinics across rural Missouri and Arkansas, feeding patients into its hospital for specialized care while also receiving transfers from larger hospitals for swing bed rehabilitation. Until recently it also operated a clinic in Jay, Oklahoma.

But even with that network, administrator Scott Taylor said the math remains difficult.

The system recorded its highest revenue year recently, he said, but still operated at a loss.

The financial squeeze

Even as some rural hospitals are finding ways to adapt, the financial pressures driving those changes are intensifying.

Hospitals across Oklahoma are bracing for significant reductions in Medicaid funding, a program that plays an outsized role in rural health care. Oklahoma hospitals are projected to lose about $6.7 billion in Medicaid reimbursements over the next decade due to federal policy changes, according to the Oklahoma Hospital Association, with rural hospitals expected to be among the hardest hit.

That matters because rural hospitals rely more heavily on Medicaid and Medicare than their urban counterparts. Many are already operating with negative margins and depend on supplemental payments to stay afloat, said Rich Rasmussen, president of the Oklahoma Hospital Association.

“Today is the high-water mark,” Rasmussen said, warning that the financial strain will deepen as cuts take effect.

At the same time, administrators say the growing use of Medicare Advantage plans has introduced additional challenges, including delays, denials and lower reimbursement rates, further complicating an already fragile funding model.

Rural hospitals face a structural disadvantage: they serve smaller populations but carry many of the same fixed costs as larger facilities. When reimbursements fall, Rasmussen said, those hospitals have fewer options to absorb the losses, often forcing difficult decisions about which services to maintain and which to cut.

Some are already reducing or eliminating high-cost departments such as obstetrics or inpatient care. Others are shifting toward outpatient services, telehealth and regional partnerships as they attempt to adjust.

More than half of Oklahoma’s rural hospitals are considered at risk of closure, according to health care analysts, and nationally, hundreds of rural facilities face similar threats.

Health care leaders say the result is a fundamental shift in how rural hospitals must operate.

“They will have to redefine what their mission is,” Rasmussen said.

Beyond access to care, the consequences extend into the broader economy. Rural hospitals are often among the largest employers in their communities, supporting local jobs and serving as anchors for economic activity. Cuts to Medicaid funding could lead to job losses, reduced economic output and further population decline in already vulnerable areas.

Lawmakers have created a $50 billion rural health fund aimed at supporting new care delivery models, including technology and workforce innovations. But hospital leaders say those efforts are unlikely to offset the scale of the financial pressures.

“It does not stabilize hospitals. Not at all,” Rasmussen said.

Even where adaptation is possible, administrators say it comes with limits.

Rural hospitals must contend not only with reimbursement pressures but also with structural challenges in volume, said Chanski. Many reimbursement models assume patient volumes that simply do not exist in smaller communities.

In that environment, he said, standing still is not an option.

“For those that stagnate, they will struggle,” Chanski said.

At Newman Memorial Hospital in Shattuck, Chief Executive Officer Tom Vasko said those pressures are already reshaping how care is delivered.

“The financial pressures tied to Medicaid and Medicare aren’t incremental,” Vasko said. “They’re structural.”

His hospital has responded by expanding services — adding surgical capabilities, specialty care and a broader clinic network — in an effort to keep care local and sustain operations. But even that approach has limits.

“Grant-based and short-term funding mechanisms are not a substitute for sustainable reimbursement,” Vasko said.

Taken together, hospital leaders say the changes reflect a system under strain and one where adaptation is necessary but not always sufficient.

Rural hospitals as part of larger systems

Some rural hospitals have been absorbed into larger, urban-based health systems, becoming part of networks that aim to keep routine care local while shifting more complex cases to regional hubs.

At Integris Health, that approach is built around treating rural hospitals as community anchors, said Aaron Steffens, the system’s chief strategy officer. The goal is to preserve local access and identity while providing resources that standalone facilities often cannot sustain.

“A rural hospital inside a larger system can offer things a standalone facility simply can’t,” Steffens said, citing shared technology, clinical resources, administrative support and access to specialists.

Under that model, routine and urgent care — including emergency services, primary care, imaging and basic surgery — remains local, while higher-complexity cases such as cardiac procedures, neurosurgery and advanced cancer treatment are referred to larger facilities in Oklahoma City.

“The principle is simple: right care, right place,” Steffens said.

Patient flow between those facilities is coordinated through a centralized transfer system, with an emphasis on continuity of care. After receiving specialized treatment in urban hospitals, patients are often transferred back to their home communities for follow-up care.

“It’s not a hand-off so much as a handshake,” Steffens said, describing the coordination between rural and urban teams.

Post-acute services such as swing beds and rehabilitation also play a key role in that system, allowing patients to recover closer to home while easing pressure on larger hospitals.

Even large systems face the same pressures affecting rural healthcare more broadly. Steffens pointed to tight margins, workforce shortages and the fixed costs of maintaining services such as emergency care in low-volume areas.

Looking ahead, he said rural hospitals may increasingly function as community-based health centers focused on primary care, chronic disease management and prevention, supported by telehealth and centralized resources.

But those networks are also under increasing financial strain. Integris Health officials have said the system expects an annual revenue loss of roughly $130 million tied to reductions in

Medicaid and Medicare funding, prompting clinic closures, service line cuts and workforce reductions across the state. In a statement, the organization said the changes are necessary to remain a “forever” health system — a reflection of the difficult tradeoffs large providers now face in maintaining access while adjusting to shrinking revenue.

Closures and their consequences

Not every rural hospital has been able to adapt before financial pressures forced a shutdown.

In Clinton, the city’s hospital closed at the end of 2022 after its private operator withdrew following years of shrinking services. It later reopened under public control with fewer services and a reduced footprint.

In Pauls Valley, the hospital closed again in early 2025, less than four years after it reopened. The facility struggled with ongoing financial losses, and a decades-old decision not to convert to critical access status limited its reimbursement options.

In Stilwell, where the hospital shut down in 2025, residents remain without nearby emergency care, traveling roughly 30 miles to reach the nearest facilities.

“It’s terrible that we don’t have a hospital,” Mayor Jean Ann Wright said.

Local officials in several communities have explored converting facilities to rural emergency hospital models, which focus on emergency and outpatient services while relying on larger systems for inpatient care.

A system in transition

Taken together, the changes point to a broader shift in rural healthcare.

Hospitals are no longer trying to be all things to all patients. Instead, they are redefining their roles — as rehabilitation centers, outpatient hubs, regional partners or integrated systems of clinics and specialty care.

Some are finding ways to adapt.

Others have already closed.

And even those that are expanding say the underlying financial pressures remain unresolved.

Rural hospitals, administrators say, are not just evolving — they are racing to keep up with a system that is changing around them.

This article first appeared on Oklahoma Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

—

“Oklahoma Watch, at oklahomawatch.org, is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that covers public-policy issues facing the state.” with Creative Commons License

***

Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.  A complete list of benefits is here.

—

Photo credit: Mike McGuire talks with his wife, Kim McGuire, during her stay at Rural Wellness Stroud hospital in Stroud on April 21, 2026. It’s one of several rural hospitals finding ways to adapt and avoid closure. (Brent Fuchs/Oklahoma Watch)

The post Facing Financial Pressure, Rural Hospitals Adapt to Survive appeared first on The Good Men Project.

—

I spent a long time on the sidelines when it came to online dating. After my divorce at 58, the idea of putting myself out there on some website was terrifying and a little intimidating. A friend kept mentioning MeetMyAge, saying it was built specifically for people our age. I brushed it off, but eventually, after about a year of “I’ll think about it,” I signed up. Partly out of curiosity, partly out of loneliness.

My biggest concern wasn’t whether I’d meet someone great. It was simpler than that. I wanted to know whether the platform was truly safe. Broadly speaking, is dating app safe for someone like me who doesn’t live on his phone and doesn’t know all the red flags to watch for?

After using MeetMyAge for some time, I’m ready to talk about my experience.

Is Online Dating Safe for Adults 50+ in 2026?

This is the question I searched for the most before creating my profile. Based on what I found, it depends on the platform.

Online dating safety has genuinely improved over the past few years. Most reputable platforms now use ID checks, photo verification, and behavioral monitoring to weed out dishonest users. Still, certain risks exist. Scammers, fake profiles, and people who aren’t who they claim to be are a real part of the landscape.

For adults over 50, the concern tends to feel sharper. We didn’t grow up with this stuff. We’re sometimes less familiar with how romance scams work, and statistically, older adults are targeted more often. Fortunately, modern dating platforms take security seriously. The question is whether the app you’re using is doing its job. Some platforms rely almost entirely on user reports. Others have dedicated moderation teams, automated fraud detection, and fast response systems working around the clock.

Dating platform safety isn’t something you should just assume. It’s something worth checking before you share your photo, your name, or start a conversation with a stranger. I did that research. Here’s what I found about MeetMyAge specifically.

Is MeetMyAge Safe to Use?

In short, it is safer than I expected. When I started poking around and reading up on how MeetMyAge handles safety, I was genuinely surprised. The platform doesn’t slap a “verified” badge on profiles and calls it a day. The dating platform safety infrastructure is properly layered.

• Active profile moderation. I read that in 2025, MeetMyAge blocked 400,000 profilesfor policy violations. Plus, in just the first quarter of 2026, they’d already caught 176,000 more. Those are big numbers, and they suggest the system is running effectively.
• Meticulous photo review. It is mind-blowing statistics, but over the past year, the platform moderated 2 million photos. Of those, 480,000 were removed. They only allow real, verified photos of actual people. I believe this is a well-justified policy. I don’t want to waste time on users who aren’t ready to be honest with me from the first time. Mature adults deserve the truth when it comes to relationships.
• Top-notch fraud detection. Another fact that amazed me is that in 2026 alone, anti-fraud systems flagged 280,000 accounts,and 200,000 were banned. The remaining 80,000 were reviewed and confirmed as legitimate. I appreciate that they’re not just banning everyone who raises a flag. They take a closer look at doubtful data and properly analyze it.
• Users can report suspicious profiles directly. I actually tried reporting a profile once. There was a woman who seemed way too pleasing and rather quickly asked for my phone number. I wasn’t sure anything would come of it, but the MeetMyAge team reviewed it and got back to me quicker than I expected. It is so good to know that someone on the other side pays attention.

So, are dating sites safe? There is no universal answer. On MeetMyAge, safety is the core of the dating environment, and I say that based on my experience.

How Does MeetMyAge Verify Users?

You have a few options. The easiest route is connecting through Google or Facebook. If you go that way, your account gets verified automatically, and the platform can pull in basic profile info like your age and existing photos directly from those accounts. It’s very quick. If you sign up with email instead, MeetMyAge still runs you through internal verification steps. It takes a bit longer.

Beyond the signup process, the platform keeps watching. If the system picks up on suspicious behavior, e.g., mismatched ages in photos or multiple accounts linked to the same person, the moderation team reaches out and asks for ID confirmation. That’s a meaningful extra step. My friends used other platforms and said nothing similar ever happened there.

And every photo that gets uploaded goes through a review. MeetMyAge only accepts photos of real people. If you upload a stock image, a cartoon, or something that doesn’t check out, it gets removed. This matters more than people realize, as fake profile photos are one of the most common entry points for scammers on dating apps. I’m so glad that MeetMyAge actively screens them.

How Does MeetMyAge Fight Catfishing and Fake Profiles?

Catfishing worries many mature adults. It worried me too. The idea of spending weeks talking to someone who turns out to be completely fake, or worse, someone running a financial scam, is a well-understood fear.

MeetMyAge dating platform tackles this on multiple levels. For starters, there’s automated monitoring running in the background the whole time. The system picks up on sketchy behavior before most users even notice it.

Then there’s you. If a profile gives you a weird feeling, you can report it. The photo screening is another helpful feature. You can’t just pull a random picture off Google and build a fake profile around it. Those get caught during the review process, which kills a lot of catfishing attempts before they even get started.

If someone is confirmed as a fake, they’re gone for good. I like such an approach because a short ban means nothing to someone running a scam. A permanent one does.

What Happens When You Report a Suspicious Profile?

My mate tried many dating apps and told me that reporting someone there is like shouting into a void. You hit the button, get an automated “thanks for letting us know,” and never hear another word. You don’t know if anything happened and if the person is still out there talking to other users.

MeetMyAge does it differently. When you report a profile, the team reviews it, and they communicate the outcome back to you. You find out what happened. This is especially important for modern elders who may be less confident in their reading of a situation. When you’re 58 and not sure if someone is being genuinely friendly or running a script, knowing that a report is taken seriously gives you the confidence to act on your instincts.

It also means the platform builds trust over time. When users know their reports lead to real outcomes, they’re more likely to flag problems early. Thus, the whole community becomes safer.

How Fast Does MeetMyAge Respond to Complaints?

MeetMyAge’s numbers here are genuinely strong. The average response time to a reported profile is 6 minutes. The median is under 3 minutes. Half of all reports are reviewed in less than three minutes. Based on my experience, it really works this way.

I didn’t receive an automated email confirmation. They truly checked my query and sent me a custom answer tackling my problem. So, when anyone asks me now, “How safe are dating apps?”, I respond that I can vouch only for MeetMyAge, because I’ve used it and know how security features work here.

Smart Habits Every User Should Build on Dating Apps

Even on a well-moderated platform, your own habits matter. Here’s what I’d tell any friend over 50 who’s thinking about online dating:

• Don’t share personal contact info too fast. A phone number, home address, or workplace shouldn’t come up in the first few conversations. If someone pushes for it early, that’s worth paying attention to.
• Use a video call before meeting in person. It doesn’t have to be long or formal. Even a five-minute call confirms the person looks like their photos and is who they say they are. This one step eliminates huge risks.
• Be skeptical of any money conversation. No matter how personal and sincere the connection seems, if someone you haven’t met in person starts asking for financial help, for any reason, treat it as a red flag. This is the most common pattern in romance scams targeting adults over 50.
• Trust your gut. If something feels scripted, rushed, or too good to be true, slow down. Ask more questions. Step back. You’re allowed to be cautious.
• Report anything that seems strange. On MeetMyAge, especially, those reports actually go to human moderators. You’re not just protecting yourself, but also safeguarding the next person that profile may contact.
• Meet in a public place first. You can choose your favorite café, a park, or just a place with people around. Let someone you trust know where you’re going, who you’re meeting, and when you expect to be back. It takes two minutes,and it matters.

After a few months on MeetMyAge, my overall read is this. No dating platform is risk-free, but this one works at full tilt to protect the 50+ community. The verification process is profound, and the moderation process is transparent. Moreover, the response time to complaints is genuinely fast.

For anyone over 50 wondering whether to take the leap into online dating, this platform can be a great option. With a little common sense and the right habits, it’s a genuinely safe place to start looking for connection again.

And yes, I did meet someone. That’s a story for another time.

—

This content is brought to you by Evelina Brown

Photos provided by Evelina Brown.

The post Is the MeetMyAge Dating Platform Safe? appeared first on The Good Men Project.

Managers lead. Leaders manage. But they have different horizons. Management leans into the present. Leadership into the future.

Leadership asks, “Where?” Management asks, “How?”

Managers succeed when they fulfill five responsibilities.

5 Daily Responsibilities of Managers

The responsibilities of managers center on people.

#1. Define and focus on what matters now.

The delivery of value requires the elimination of irrelevant behaviors. Distraction isn’t a nuisance. It’s an enemy that crushes organizations.

Never dance with distraction – defeat it with focus.

#2. Develop and maximize talent through coaching.

Management delivers results through people.

Coaching enables ownership, fulfillment, energy, and learning.

Read: Seven Ways Coaching-Managers Get Things Done

#3. Get out of the way while staying connected.

1. Connect with top performers.
2. Connect with under-utilized contributors.
3. Avoid urgent trivialities.
4. Help people tweak their own work. Don’t meddle.
5. Honor behaviors that align with values.
6. Walk around.
7. Say thank you everywhere.

#4. Smooth the path to achievement.

Managers minimize friction.

1. Eliminate duplication of effort.
2. Minimize paperwork.
3. Create systems that strengthen camaraderie.

Make hard work as effective and efficient as possible. First, do what matters most. Second, improve the way you do it.

#5. Lift people out of the weeds.

Busy people always drift into the weeds.

1. Connect team members to stakeholders.
2. Explain the big picture.
3. Narrow scope.
4. Focus on solutions.
5. Ask, “What matters now?”

Bonus: Deal with issues others avoid. Others are waiting for you to call out the elephant in the room.

Management succeeds when people know what matters, why it matters, and how to succeed.

Clarity turns effort into achievement.

What’s on your list of daily responsibilities of managers?

Top 7 Frustrations of Middle Managers

What Are the Duties and Responsibilities of a Manager?

—

Previously Published on leadershipfreak with Creative Commons License

***

At The Good Men Project, we are glad to share selected work from Leadership Freak, a publication focused on leadership, workplace relationships, communication, and the everyday habits that shape how people work together. We do not believe the workplace is a separate sphere from the rest of life. The way people lead, listen, praise, correct, and share power at work affects families, mental health, dignity, and the wider culture people carry home with them at the end of the day.

That is one reason this kind of writing matters to us. Reimagining masculinity also means reimagining work: what we reward, what we normalize, what we ask people to sacrifice, and whether leadership is measured by control or by care. We are interested in workplaces where people are treated equitably, where leadership is more humane and less performative, and where success does not automatically require giving away your health, your relationships, or your sense of security. Advice on leadership may seem small compared with those larger goals, but culture often changes through repeated daily behavior. How people treat one another in ordinary moments matters. It matters a lot.

If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member today.

All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.

Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.

There are many ways to support The Good Men Project’s mission. You can join us on Substack, become a Premium Member, and follow our broader conversations about work, relationships, leadership, identity, and how to build a more humane culture. We also work with authors, agencies, brands, and sponsors through our author amplification and paid guest post programs. For more information, email info@goodmenproject.com.

—

Photo credit: unsplash

The post 5 Daily Responsibilities of Managers appeared first on The Good Men Project.