<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Independent Insurance Claim Adjuster</title>
	
	<link>http://independent-adjuster.com</link>
	<description>Publishing Opinion and News for Independent Insurance Claim Adjusters, Insurance Claim Professionals, Contractors, and Insurance Attorneys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 19:47:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource" /><feedburner:info uri="theindependentinsuranceclaimadjusterresource" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Use of Claim Reporting Disclaimers:  Impartial, Disinterested, and Without Prejudice</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/5PUxLfkNx4w/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/use-of-claim-reporting-disclaimers-impartial-disinterested-and-without-prejudice/923/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 17:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Independent  Adjuster.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim adjusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim error]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim omission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclaimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[error and omission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impartial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prejudice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[without prejudice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=923</guid>
		<description>Use of disclaimers such as "impartial", "disinterested", and "without prejudice" can often be misconstrued or have no valid basis for use in claim service documentation and reporting.  This article shows where a fault in using those types of statements exist and what steps can be taken to resolve such a concern.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/5PUxLfkNx4w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/use-of-claim-reporting-disclaimers-impartial-disinterested-and-without-prejudice/923/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/use-of-claim-reporting-disclaimers-impartial-disinterested-and-without-prejudice/923/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Claim Investigation: For the Perspective Plaintiff</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/3vjFdNE9sCk/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-investigation-plaintiffs-perspective/918/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 19:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Crimaldi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adjuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cargo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim denial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim investigator for plaintiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consignee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indemnity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent claim service provider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance attorney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim professional]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[investigator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peak Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subject to damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveyor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=918</guid>
		<description>This article discusses the use of claim service professionals (investigators, surveyors, adjusters) at the juncture between denial of indemnity and litigation, and the cost saving benefits for parties who wish to proceed with recovery on denied indemnity.  This begs the question:  Do damaged parties who are denied indemnity have an unfair disadvantage against insurers who are able to collect "fresh" evidence close to the date of loss?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/3vjFdNE9sCk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-investigation-plaintiffs-perspective/918/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-investigation-plaintiffs-perspective/918/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Major Site Upgrade: February 2012</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/fQRub0EgmpU/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/major-site-upgrade-february-2012/875/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Independent  Adjuster.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[About]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Change Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[changes to site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Site Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[site upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=875</guid>
		<description>February 2012:  We made some pretty significant changes and additions to the site, including a new Wordpress theme, information and guidelines for publishing your articles, terms of service, privacy policy, DMCA Act Notice.  These changes officially open the doors to publishing your own article on our site!&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/fQRub0EgmpU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/major-site-upgrade-february-2012/875/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/major-site-upgrade-february-2012/875/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>An Empirical Basis for Post-Claim Analytics: Examining closed files</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/Bl0y0ujiTZQ/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/an-empirical-basis-for-post-claim-analytics-closed-files/700/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Independent  Adjuster.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Independent Insurance Adjusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claim data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[examining closed claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hail peril]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent adjuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance adjusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post claim activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind peril]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=700</guid>
		<description>The majority of independent adjusters, claim professionals and claim service vendors have little access to information about post-claim activity.  This article summarizes an empirical basis for providing independent claim professionals and other vendors with post-claim data under property coverages such as wind, hail, and other perils involving structures.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/Bl0y0ujiTZQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/an-empirical-basis-for-post-claim-analytics-closed-files/700/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/an-empirical-basis-for-post-claim-analytics-closed-files/700/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Claim Ethics Question – Deteriorating Trees &amp; Property Damage</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/SAzVdTttOi0/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-ethics-question-deteriorating-trees-property-damage/633/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2011 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Independent  Adjuster.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Independent Insurance Adjusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Claim Handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automobile damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dead tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deteriorating tree]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[negligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property owner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree damage claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree limb damages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree limbs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description>Claim Ethics Question - Deteriorating Trees &amp;#038; Property Damage - A deteriorating tree caused damage to an automobile.  The facts are laid out but as a claim representative, do you pay or deny?&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/SAzVdTttOi0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-ethics-question-deteriorating-trees-property-damage/633/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/claim-ethics-question-deteriorating-trees-property-damage/633/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>SugarLoaf Maine Ski Lift Failure – Insurance Claim &amp; Legal Info</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~3/Alfa13sDNbY/</link>
		<comments>http://independent-adjuster.com/maine-sugarloaf-ski-lift-failure-insurance-claim-legal-info/619/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 20:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Independent  Adjuster.com</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Independent Insurance Adjusting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance Claim Handling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal & Litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carrabasset valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incident]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injuries ski lift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance claim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ski chair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ski chair maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ski lift failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ski ride]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarloaf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarloaf investigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarloaf maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarloaf manager]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarloaf ski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://independent-adjuster.com/?p=619</guid>
		<description>An insurance investigation perspective on the ski lift failure at SugarLoaf Maine.  The mountain resort is likely to face strict liability for injuries to the parties affected by the fall.  Investigation tips and information about the responsible party.&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheIndependentInsuranceClaimAdjusterResource/~4/Alfa13sDNbY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://independent-adjuster.com/maine-sugarloaf-ski-lift-failure-insurance-claim-legal-info/619/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://independent-adjuster.com/maine-sugarloaf-ski-lift-failure-insurance-claim-legal-info/619/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

