The Marc Chamot Report

It’s No 2008 Two Peat for Barack Obama; 2012 Electoral Votes Favoring Mitt Romney, Skyrocketing Favorability, Closing in on Women’s Gap & Majority Democratic Religious Faith, Support that McCain 2008 Never Had:

2012-06-04T11:28:00.001-05:00

It’s No 2008 Two Peat for Barack Obama; 2012 Electoral Votes Favoring Mitt Romney, Skyrocketing Favorability, Closing in on Women’s Gap & Majority Democratic Religious Faith, Support that McCain 2008 Never Had:

By Marc Chamot

President Barack Obama’s consistent attacks on Mitt Romney, instead of talking about his past four years accomplishments in a tanking jobs economy, or formulating plans for Americas’ future, Mitt Romney’s favorability is skyrocketing upwards, while Obama’s declining.

Is it going to be another electoral repeat of 2008 for Barack Obama? Not quite, Obama is being blown away at the polls. Key bloc of voters, who were for Obama, no more, presidential GOP candidate Mitt Romney’s popularity stock is rising. What was once 34% earlier in the year and it’s now at 48% favorability ratings according to polls.

Mitt Romney’s favorability rising; “Mitt Romney’s reputation with US voters appears to be on the rise. That’s the implication of a new CNN poll, anyway, which shows that Mr. Romney’s favorable rating has jumped from 34 percent in February to 48 percent today.

Forty two percent of respondents to the CNN/ORC International survey say they have an unfavorable view of the presumptive GOP nominee. And President Obama still leads Romney in this particular rating race – his favorability number is 56 percent.

But voters’ views of Romney are becoming more positive at a time when the Obama campaign is doing its best to define him in a negative light. Attacks on Romney’s record at Bain Capital filled the political blogosphere there for a few weeks. Now the Obama camp is hitting Romney’s record at Massachusetts governor. What’s going on? After all, this CNN poll isn’t alone – as we pointed out last week, a Gallup survey now has him at a 50 percent favorable rating.”

Obama is also losing two key voting groups that overwhelmed supported him in 2008. Besides women’s favorability gaps closing in for Mitt Romney, the casual church goers, and religious groups have abandoned Obama and Democrats in large numbers over gay marriage.

The huge advantage Obama once had with women voters has closed in; “Women are flocking to Mitt Romney, whose sudden popularity with the ladies is coming at the expense of President Obama — or at least that is what the headlines about recent presidential poll numbers would have you believe.

But before we pin a Romney campaign button on Gloria Steinem, let’s take a closer look at what’s going on.

It is true that Wednesday’s Washington Post/ABC News poll showed Romney enjoying a 13 percent boost in popularity among women, while the president’s favorability rating among women dipped by 7 percent.

Most of Romney’s gains were among unmarried women, a group he has struggled with.

But Romney, whose 40 percent overall favorability rating among women still lags behind Obama’s 51 percent, isn’t experiencing a sudden, unexpected influx in female support, and he’s certainly not picking off female Obama supporters. He’s benefiting from the expected.”

And regular Democratic religious voters, key voting bloc who helped propel Obama into the White House are leaving in droves. Democratic faith see waning support for Obama “In 2008, Barack Obama took aim at the "pew gap," the overwhelming Republican edge among voters who regularly attend church.

The Democratic presidential nominee came nowhere near closing it, but he didn't have to. He just needed an extra percentage point or two among traditional GOP constituents, and he got it.

The Democratic National Committee is promising a repeat performance in 2012. But some religious leaders and scholars who backed Obama in 2008 are skeptical. They say the Democrats have, through neglect and lack of focus, squandered the substantial gains they made with religious moderates and worry it will hurt Obama in a tight race against Republican Mitt Romney.

The DNC's faith outreach director, the Rev. Derrick Harkins, said the party has strong relationships with religious groups. But as evidence of their concerns, critics point to the public debate that followed Obama's endorsement of gay marriage, a decision the president said was based in part on his Christian faith.

No prominent clergyperson was sent out as a surrogate by the administration to explain the religious argument in favor of same-sex.”

Just five months before the presidential elections, Mitt Romney is having awesome poll numbers that John McCain would envy in 2008. John McCain did not have these kinds of tremendous electoral numbers against Obama going into the 2008 elections.

Mathematically, if the millions GOP/Republicans come out in full force this time to vote for Romney, those who did not turn out in 2008, and who stayed home instead, with current massive losses of white voters, and women voters gap closing and religious voters voting for Romney, it would be virtually impossible for Barack Obama to replicate those same electoral numbers he had in 2008 again.

Pollsters are talking about votes being closer in 2012; I’m talking about a landslide victory for Mitt Romney and a landslide defeat for Barack Hussein Obama, worse defeat for Obama than former 1978 presidential re-elections of Jimmy Carter against Republican Ronald Reagan.

Not only the economy is in the tank, worse than 1977 Jimmy Carter, it is a total disaster after four years of inept Obama, and lest not forget the Wisconsin’s Republican Scott Walker re-call election tomorrow, and U.S. Supreme Court’s coming out with two key decisions, rulings that could virtually put Obama against the wall, and completely destroy his re-election chances with the Obamacare initiative, and with the tough Arizona anti-illegal immigration’s policies that is due out later this month.

Obama’s Green Jobs Gamble Big Loser; Dow Tumbles 275 Points on Bleak Jobs Report; Failure to Deal with Illegal Immigrants & Manufacturing Jobs Going to China B.O.’s 2012 Waterloo:

2012-06-01T18:55:00.002-05:00

Obama’s Green Jobs Gamble Big Loser; Dow Tumbles 275 Points on Bleak Jobs Report; Failure to Deal with Illegal Immigrants & Manufacturing Jobs Going to China B.O.’s 2012 Waterloo:

By Marc Chamot

A Jimmy Carter repeat and wannabe, Barack Obama’s gamble with Green jobs over carbon emitting industries was a big loser in jobs creations.

The Department of Labor reported that employers had created only 69,000 jobs in May. Together, the news fueled fears that the economy is heading in the wrong direction under Obama's stewardship.

Romney Calls May Jobs Report 'Devastating News' “Romney moved quickly to take political advantage of the Labor Department's report that U.S. unemployment had moved up slightly to 8.2 percent in May from 8.1 percent, with the economy adding only 69,000 jobs for the month, far fewer than anticipated.”

“Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney called a disappointing U.S. jobs report for May "devastating news" on Friday and a sign that President Barack Obama's economic policies have failed.

"Today's weak jobs report is devastating news for American workers and American families," he said in a statement.

He called the May report "a harsh indictment of the President's handling of the economy."

"It is now clear to everyone that President Obama's policies have failed to achieve their goals and that the Obama economy is crushing America's middle class. The president's re-election slogan may be 'forward,' but it seems like we've been moving backward," he said.”

And Wall Street, upon hearing this disastrous jobs report the Dow Jones sank 275 points on bleak jobs report. The Dow Jones industrial average closed down 275 points at 12,118 today, its biggest decline since last November.

“I think that the president’s policies are failing the American people,” “explained Mr. West. “We have now hit 40 consecutive months of unemployment in the United States of America at or above 8 percent.”

GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney quickly labeled the jobs numbers “devastating news for American workers and American families,” while House Speaker John Boehner said it’s clear that Americans are in a “desperate spot.”

“It is now clear to everyone that President Obama’s policies have failed to achieve their goals and that the Obama economy is crushing America’s middle class,” Romney said.”

There are no jobs with Barack Obama’s current policies. President Obama’s flirtatious and fiascos’, with Green industries have turned out to be a big loser for his administration.

Therefore, by putting excessive taxes and fees on carbon related industries and chasing them out of the country and sending them to China was the death knell for jobs in America.

The Bottom line, Obama Green strategies for America jobs creations was a total failure and it may cost him the presidency in five months.

Barack Obama’s gravest errors of his presidency and what may kill it for Barack Obama 2012; is the wanton and out of control illegal immigrants he refuses to deal with, such as removing 11 million non-taxpaying and American jobs thieving illegal immigrants.

Illegal immigrants are stealing all of what used to be blue collar jobs, like roofing, carpentry, construction, painting and contracting jobs, they are out there contracting without any proof of licenses and contractor’s license bonds.

And Obama’s broken promise during the 2008 campaign, that he’d get tougher on China, his refusal to deal with Communist China, the main culprit where our carbon emanating industries, like the middle class working man, the blue collar’s private sector industry jobs, have all been going to China for years since the George Bush era and nothing was done about stemming the flows of escape.

It all slowly killed American jobs prospects forever here. If Barack Obama believes that he’ll get the Latino votes, he’s sadly mistaken, because according to Jennifer Korn of the Hispanic Leadership Network, says ”the news has been particularly devastating for the Hispanic community.”

“Hispanics are still experiencing an all-time high unemployment rate of 11.0 percent,” she said, asking Obama, “Mr. President where are the jobs?"

Ms. Korn, to your reply where are the jobs? Illegal immigrants and China has them all.

If GOP candidate Mitt Romney takes over as president, he’d better look into illegal immigrants and the millions of carbon emitting jobs that have gone to China, or China stole, by our Washington politicians looking the other way. Otherwise Romney will also be another one termer like Barack.

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Sees Public Pensions Fiscal Disasters Coming & Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has 7% Lead on Recall after taking on Costly & Greedy Public Employees & Unions:

2012-05-31T11:39:00.000-05:00

Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel Sees Public Pensions Fiscal Disasters Coming & Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has 7% Lead on Recall after taking on Costly & Greedy Public Employees & Unions:

By Marc Chamot

Money doesn’t grow on trees. The sad reality for public employees and their greedy unions have been outed among the general taxpaying public.

There’s no question that majority of Americans are fed-up of greedy public employees, unions and their costly salaries, medical and retirement plans.

A public employee pension’s reformer, and a Republican governor of Wisconsin Scott Walker is taking the brunt from state unions and employees, after taking action fiscal busting measures last year.

There is unionized effort to a recall Governor Walker after making severe cuts, on taxpayer funded and greedy public employees’ retirement benefits.

Uh, uh, majority of the taxpaying public are saying no, enough is enough with the greed, when taxpayers have to pay more to foot the bill.

Wisconsin’s Scott Walker has 7% lead as Wis. recall election nears: poll “Just ahead of Tuesday's recall election, a new Marquette University Law School poll shows Republican Gov. Scott Walker holding on to a 52 percent to 45 percent lead over Democratic challenger Tom Barrett among likely Wisconsin voters.

"If Walker wins next TuesdayObama is going to have a much tougher road in Wisconsin next fall," declared Preibus in a message designed to counter claims from national Democrats that the recall and the presidential vote have little in common.”

After this Tuesday’s Wisconsin gubernatorial elections, if incumbent Scott Walker wins, this will be a major electoral slaps in the face on government employees and their unions. You see, people and even Democratic taxpayers are finally waking up to the realities.

As to why are 60% to 70% of my tax dollars going towards state employee’s salaries, pensions and benefits? What do I get in return for all this? I don’t get squat! I don’t get anything on investments for my tax dollars, but benefiting a whole bunch of lazy and overpaid state employees.

So Chicago’s mayor and former Obama White House crony, Rahm Emanuel is quickly realizing that local greedy government employees in Chicago are breaking the bank. Rahm Emanuel sees bankruptcies’ looming in his city and wants to take, well Scott Walker type action in his city.

Even budget busting lucrative firefighters are not safe from Chicago budget cuts. Rahm Emanuel: Firefighters not ‘immune from ... change and reform’ “Chicago firefighters “do a great job,” but they’re not “immune from the change and reform” needed to solve the city’s financial crisis and deliver “greater value” to taxpayers, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said Wednesday. Tom Ryan, president of Chicago Firefighters Union Local 2, has characterized the cost-cutting contract concessions the mayor is seeking from firefighters when their contract expires June 30 as “horrendous,” “insulting” and “ridiculous.”

Emanuel did not respond in kind, nor would he discuss specifics of his proposal to target perks that, one union leader claimed, add $7,000 to the average firefighter’s annual paycheck.

The mayor simply said that “change” and “reform” is required everywhere and that no interest group gets a pass.

The mayor said he understands why Ryan has taken a hard line to protect the interests of his members.

But, he said, “I’ve got to make sure that the taxpayers and the residents are represented. That’s my role. … I respect what Tom has to do ….But I’ve got to make sure that we’re making the changes that are necessary for the future and we’re not just doing things that we used to do because we used to do ’em ….We’re not gonna do it just because we did it in the past.”

The Chicago Sun-Times reported Wednesday that Emanuel is seeking a laundry list of cost-cutting concessions from Chicago firefighters that take aim at such treasured union perks as holiday and duty availability pay; clothing allowance; pay grades; premium pay; the physical fitness incentive and the seven percent premium paid to cross-trained firefighter-paramedics.

“It looks almost like you’re looking at a 10 percent pay cut to me. That’s pretty drastic I think,” said Sposato, one of the big losers in the ward remap.

Ferguson has further estimated that the city could save $52 million-a-year by eliminating the duty availability pay that compensates both police officers and firefighters for being on 24-hour call. For firefighters, the perk costs the city nearly $14.3 million a year.

The inspector general pegged the annual uniform allowance at anywhere from $1,250 to $1,500 per firefighter, depending on the shift.

Chicago firefighters have been waiting for Emanuel to drop the other shoe ever since last fall.

That’s when the mayor made it clear he planned to take a hard line in contract talks — even though his own hero fire commissioner Robert Hoff was “deathly against” closing fire houses or reducing the minimum staffing requirement on fire apparatus.

The scary thing for firefighters is that the mayor’s proposed contract concessions come on top of his plan to solve the city’s pension crisis, which would take even more money out of firefighters’ paychecks.

Emanuel’s pension plan calls for a five percent increase in employee pension contributions; a 10-year freeze in cost-of-living increases for retirees; a five-year increase in the retirement age and a two-tiered pension system for new and old employees.”

Even a pro-union and pro-public employee liberal supporter like Rahm Emanuel understands that.

Where’s the money coming from? There is a limit to taxing, you know? You see folks; this is the mentality of unionized government employees.

While the private sector has suffered and have taken big economical hits, and tax revenues are down, greedy government employees do not understand that money doesn’t grow on trees, they want more, even if it puts us in the red. they don't care if we have to pay 80% of our income, for as long as they get their freeloading perks at our expense.

Too bad ultra-liberal California Governor Jerry Brown and other cities such as San Francisco, don’t realize this financial and money eating monster is within their midst, they don’t care, they want to tax people to death, enough for them to get the hell out of Dodge!

Some States Finding Alternative Ways for Money Other than Raising Taxes; they’re Aggressively Going after Tax Scofflaws, Cheats and Deadbeats:

2012-05-29T21:41:00.002-05:00

Some States Finding Alternative Ways for Money Other than Raising Taxes; they’re Aggressively Going after Tax Scofflaws, Cheats and Deadbeats:

By Marc Chamot

Some states are reluctant to raise taxes, but instead they are going after tax cheats and tax dodgers.

“You don’t want to raise taxes until you’re very sure the taxes that people are supposed to pay are being paid,” said Rep. Janet Ancel, chairwoman of Vermont’s House Ways and Means Committee. Bingo! Rep. Janet Ancel hit it right on the proverbial nail.

Finally, some states are collecting millions owed, rather than keep raising people’s taxes.

States like California like to tax people to death, while tax scofflaws are getting away without paying their fair shares of taxes.

Do you remember about those waves of immigrant own businesses in California? Those hundred thousands, who don’t accept checks, debit and credit cards in their thriving businesses?

Those immigrant owned businesses, who don’t give you receipts on purchases or don’t have rolls of receipts placed in their cash registers, those who tax you for local and state taxes on your purchases, but don’t pay the city and the state their fair shares or tax collected from purchases?

Like thousands of California Chinese and Mexican restaurants, bodegas to corner liquor stores, many who don’t accept checks or credit cards, and oh yeah, those that I have consistently written about in the past is popping up again.

You see, I see it this way; don’t raise people’s taxes if you don’t have efficient collections systems or refuse to go after wanton tax cheat businesses.

Taxpayers and people don’t have to carry the weight for deadbeat businesses, mainly immigrants who think they can get away without paying their fair shares of taxes, when governments like California gives them the wink, wink and look the other way from the problems.

I am not picking solely on immigrants, because there are many American owned businesses that are getting away without paying their taxes. But when I go out to local Chinese restaurants and Mexican Taquerias, it is always cash, no checks or debit cards with those people. This should raise red flags to politicians when they go out to eat.

Immigrant tax cheats are the people that the Feds IRS, state of California and the city of San Francisco have been ignoring for years.

We weren’t born yesterday, and we aren’t stupid, when we see no rolls of receipts in the cash register, I always wonder if my tax money they are collecting is really going to the city and state coffers. No, I don’t think so; we all know there is a whole lot of tax cheating is going on.

So states are hitting the pavement, mainly those who are Reluctant to raise taxes, some states push the tax man on tougher collection enforcement

“Dentist Frank Illuzzi was stunned when Vermont tax collectors began demanding a 6 percent sales tax on the value of toothbrushes and floss he hands out to patients.

Senior care facility operator Jay Grimes was similarly surprised to get a $350,000 bill slapping a 9 percent restaurant tax on the meals served to residents in the dining room. Landscaper Richard “Buckwheat” Lowe got $18,000 in bills taxing him for the first time ever on the mulch he sells.

Vermont is among a handful of cash-strapped states getting more aggressive about collecting every tax owed — hiring more collectors, hounding scofflaws and exploiting corners of their tax laws that haven’t been enforced in years. It’s an effort to avoid what politicians from both parties are dead set against: raising taxes.

Under adamant no-new-tax Democratic Gov. Peter Shumlin, Vermont has added about 10 new tax compliance auditors and has stepped up efforts to scour records in rural areas, and add greater scrutiny to businesses ranging from auctioneers to Internet-based cloud-computing services.

The state reaped about $57 million during the 12 months that ended in June, up from about $50 million five years earlier — a net gain of $7 million. That’s a tiny fraction of the state’s $1.3 billion general fund, but it has helped lawmakers close a budget gap that at the beginning of this year was projected to be $46 million.

Other states have had much more success.

Idaho hired 48 temporary auditors and collectors in fiscal 2011 as part of Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter’s effort to boost revenues without raising taxes and narrow the so-called “tax gap” — the amount of taxes in the state that are due but go unpaid, either by error or by intent.

The added staff brought in more than $26.3 million, more than double the original estimate of $11.5 million. All the positions were made permanent this fiscal year.

Idaho’s additional tax receipts are just a sliver of its roughly $2.7 billion budget, but they helped the state post a budget surplus for the first year since the Great Recession began in 2008, money that helped give state workers their first raises in five years.

Oklahoma added about 30 people to its tax collection staff since 2010 in an effort to help close a $900 million budget shortfall. The state collected nearly $35 million in delinquent taxes during the 12 months that ended in June, and overall sales tax revenues jumped by about $159 million from the first 10 months of fiscal 2011 to the same period in fiscal 2012.

States have a variety of strategies for following up when audits find tax scofflaws. One tactic in California is public shaming: The state publishes lists of individuals and businesses behind on income or sales taxes.

Others take a kinder approach. New York responded to the recent recession by stepping up its program to forgive parts of back payments due from taxpayers in economic distress.

Gale Garriott, executive director of the Federation of Tax Administrators, a Washington-based group that tracks state tax policy, said the handful of states that have taken a tough approach by hiring more auditors have generally been rewarded with more revenue.

“The return on investment is quite good. They bring in several times more than their salaries,” he said.”

Good. That’s the way to go. Aggressively collect money, rather than increase taxes. Hey, maybe the Feds can learn from this too. Well in the Feds case and the state of California they need more than collections, they need to cut runaway spending also mainly on government employees and their pensions.

It wouldn’t take much to add extra tax investigators and hit the streets of San Francisco to catch business tax cheats. But you see folks, in bleeding liberal California, it’s not right picking on poor immigrant businesses and even if they are tax cheats and tax dodgers, because you’re seen as a racist.

It’s better to pick on the rest of us instead, and raise our taxes, because it is a whole lot easier and it isn’t seen as being racist to tax dodging immigrants.

That’s why this country and California is falling apart. Don’t expect us to be paying taxes for freeloaders.

U.S. Vets Favoring Romney 58% to 34%; Obama's Preferential Tax Assistance to Illegals, Suing States Over Illegal Immigration, While Disabled Vets Waiting Years for Disability Pensions:

2012-05-29T13:22:00.000-05:00

U.S. Vets Favoring Romney 58% to 34%; Obama's Preferential Tax Assistance to Illegals, Suing States Over Illegal Immigration, While Disabled Vets Waiting Years for Disability Pensions:

By Marc Chamot

Why does Barack Obama fare so badly among military veterans when he came out in support for homeless vets? The problem, homeless veterans are in the minority.

The Obama administration has pledged to help homeless vets, that’s the problem, only 1 in 3 vets are homeless, but millions of service connected disabled veterans like me are still waiting for our VA financial disability benefits that haven’t arrived.

13 percent of American populations are military veterans, and according to Gallup Poll: Veterans Give Romney Double-Digit Lead over Obama “Gallup released a timely poll on Memorial Day which shows military veterans give former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney a double-digit lead over President Barack Obama. In fact, Gallup’s Frank Newport notes that vets are partially “responsible for Romney’s advantage among men overall.”

The poll shows military veterans support Romney over Obama by 58 to 34 percent. Non-veteran men give Romney a narrow lead with 46 to 45 percent. All men give Romney a 50 to 42 percent lead over Obama.

Women veterans support Obama over Romney with 47 to 42 percent. Non-veteran women support Obama by 49 to 42 percent. All women support Obama by the same margin.

Gallup notes that the proportion of adults with military service in their background increases dramatically among those men who are 60-years-old or older. 45 percent of those 60+ are veterans. Only 18 percent of those men aged 40-49 have a background in the services. 3 percent of women age 40-49 are veterans.”

I live in the San Francisco Bay Area, and last month the New York Times came out with an expose that the Oakland office of VA disability benefits and approvals of service connected pensions for disable military vets is the worst in the nation.

In Disability, California Veterans Wait Longer “Disabled veterans living in the Bay Area, seen at the Oakland Regional Office, wait an average of 313 days for the Dept of Veterans Affairs to adjudicate their claims. Of those claims, at least 1 in 4 needed a redo, according to Bay Citizen reporter Aaron Glatz.

According to Glatz, “nearly 60 VA offices around the country, the Oakland office are the slowest.

Representative Jackie Speier, of San Mateo, said the problems are so severe in Oakland that all new claims are sent to VA offices in Lincoln, Nebraska and Muskogee, Oklahoma for processing.

The California veterans affected wait almost 2 times longer than the national average of 180 days. Currently, the VA is working on converting the old paper files into electronic documents. The VA claims this will serve as the silver bullet for the claims backlog.

In a recent statement, VA said it is “taking steps” to meet VA Secretary Eric Shinseki’s goal of processing disability claims in less than 125 days with 98 percent accuracy.

After Glantz published his story in the New York Times, the VA announced plans to revamp processes at 12 regional offices around the country. The problematic Oakland Regional Office was not one of those on the list.

Tom Murphy, head of VA’s Disability Compensation program, stated Oakland was excluded because the delays were actually caused by “quality issues.” When this happens, the claims must all be re-examined prior to a determination.

Basically, disability claims need to be adjudicated twice, which explains the delay. However, the answer begs the question, why have the systemic failures have been allowed to persist? The director of the Oakland Regional Office is expected to answer this question and others shortly.”

Then why are U.S. Representative Jackie Speier, Nancy Pelosi and Barbara Lee on top of this fiasco, but not Barack Obama? Didn’t President Obama hire head of the VA Eric Ken Shinseki to take care of all veteran’s business?

And why is Barack Obama micromanaging the U.S. Attorney General’s Office of Eric Holder on lawsuits over illegal immigrations in states, while not doing squat for needy vets at the VA?

Why hasn’t President Obama ordered Mr. Eric Ken Shinseki, head of the Veteran Affairs Administration, get more people into the most inept office of Veterans’ affairs on disabilities in Oakland?

We’ve got thousands, upon thousands of service connected disabled veterans in Northern California, waiting for their disability pensions that never comes for months and even years.

We have been watching this president in action. It isn’t pretty, Obama has authorized billion dollars tax refunds to illegal immigrants, and he has made big efforts to block states from enacting their own legal illegal immigration policies.

While illegal immigrants and legal resident aliens are sucking up our tax dollars through IRS and Social Security handouts they don’t deserve, veterans who have served in the armed forces and fought and have disabilities, who fought for those immigrants’, most who don’t belong here, and who are sucking up our tax money reserved for U.S. citizens and veterans who served.

This is what happens when a president favors one group, illegals over others, while ignoring blocs of 25 million U.S. veterans, citizens and voters.

Veterans and American citizens who have contributed for the country with their lives and into the tax system are far more important and should have preferences on tax dollars, other disability safety nets than any immigrant, including illegals, who haven’t served in our military, or fought our wars for our freedoms, or died for our nation or put any money into our tax systems.

When government says to vets you can wait; “well hey, we have no more money for you, but for both legal and illegals’, we have lots of money available and with these kinds of mentalities makes us veterans very angry and we want action now.

Giving foreigners and illegals preferential treatments and welfare, over its citizens there will be a backlash among its voting citizens.

The reality of things; if Barack Obama made same efforts for American veterans and its citizens, rather than for illegal immigrants, he’d have far more support among veterans including me.

B. H. Obama White Support Evaporating; Romney Leads by 26 Points, 58% to 32% Among White Voters:

2012-05-27T15:51:00.001-05:00

B. H. Obama White Support Evaporating; Romney Leads by 26 Points, 58% to 32% Among White Voters:

By Marc Chamot

Sayonara Mr. El Presidente. Am I from the old school of I told you so, or what? According to Washington Post-ABC News Poll, whites are leaving Obama in droves.

Are the 2012 Obama re-election campaigns pinning whites against minorities, who still support Obama in large numbers? Absolutely!

President Barack Obama and his Democratic cronies still believe that minorities will pull through for him in 2012, regardless of the white vote. I have said that before and before and now.

Of course, we are all called racists by doing both, saying it and doing it. Well hey; I am of Jewish descents, which have lived through more racism around the world than anybody.

Oh no, another Jew? Have African Americans been murdered by the millions? Have African Americans lost over 6 million of their brethrens due to genocide? No. I don’t think so.

I am not racist and so aren’t the millions of whites, who no longer support Barack Obama. I can spot racism like a smelly toilet, and the direction of racial relations in this country that Barack Obama has taken us to, unh, unh, totally wrong. I don’t like it at all.

Who in America isn’t doing so well off? Nobody, not even African Americans, they’ve had suffered worst job losses in decades, and Latinos, who had their homes foreclosed on, they don’t care, but they will vote for Obama again.

Now, the Washington Post-ABC News poll is being nice tying in the white voters to the economy, which is also true. But in my opinion, I believe that racial relations have regressed under this president.

The poll shows, Romney holds key advantages among financially struggling white voters “In an election year in which the economy ranks as Americans’ top concern, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney holds significant advantages over President Obama among white voters who are struggling financially and buffeted by job loss, according to a new Washington Post-ABC News poll.

Asked which candidate would do more to advance their families’ economic interests, middle-class white voters who say they are struggling to maintain their financial positions chose Romney over Obama by a large margin — 58 percent to 32 percent.

The former Massachusetts governor has a similar advantage on this question among white voters who have lost a job in recent years, or who have seen a family member or close friend face unemployment.

Nonwhite voters, struggling or not, give Obama huge leads over Romney when it comes to looking after their families’ financial interests.

The results underscore a continuing challenge for Obama and the Democratic Party with white voters, and particularly those without college degrees — who, according, are significantly more likely to be unemployed than those with higher education.

Indeed, among whites who described themselves as struggling to maintain their economic footing — regardless of their current class — nearly seven in 10 lacked a college diploma. And although they lean more Republican than the population in general, it is a group that neither party can ignore. In the new poll, 31 percent of these voters described themselves as Republicans, 27 percent as Democrats.

In 2008, Obama lost whites without college degrees by a big margin, 58 percent to 40 percent, according to the national exit poll.

That performance among such voters was similar to John F. Kerry’s in 2004 and Al Gore’s in 2000.

“Democrats are very likely to lose those voters” again this year, said Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster. “The question is by how much.”

One factor that may help the president is that, in the 14 or fewer swing states likely to determine the outcome of the election, unemployment rates have dropped more sharply than they have for the nation as a whole.

But the extended economic hardship many Americans are facing — across racial and partisan lines — makes those who are vulnerable a particularly important target group for both campaigns.

In the poll, Americans overall reported widespread economic pain, with more than seven in 10 saying they have been affected directly or indirectly by unemployment in the past few years. Four in 10 reports struggling to maintain their socioeconomic status, with about one in five saying they are in the middle class and straining to stay there.

Fifty percent of all voters say Obama would do more to advance the interests of the middle class more generally, and 44 percent say so of Romney.

Among white voters trying to stay in the middle class, Romney is considered the better candidate for that group by a 20-point margin; Obama is preferred by better than 3 to 1 among middle-class nonwhite voters, regardless of their sense of security.

Whites and nonwhites — as well as voters across party lines — agree that Romney would do more than Obama to advocate for the economic interests of wealthy Americans.

By a 23-point margin, voters say it’s Romney, not Obama, who would do more to advance the interests of Wall Street.

The telephone poll was conducted May 17 to 20 among a random national sample of 1,004 adults. The margin of sampling error for the full poll is plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. The margin is four points for the sample of 874 registered voters.”

Like the old saying goes, “A Man's Got to Know his Limitations.” Clint Eastwood. Disastrous presidents with Obama records and sorry polls numbers usually don't run again. But this arrogant and narcissistic president does not recognize that.

Are Current Phony NBC News/Marist polls in the tank, No Matter What for Left-Winger Barack Obama? it Just doesn't add-up When 4 out of 10 Democrats in Primaries vote against the President:

2012-05-24T10:18:00.001-05:00

Are Current Phony NBC News/Marist polls in the tank, No Matter What for Left-Winger Barack Obama? Absolutely, it Just doesn't add-up When 4 out of 10 Democrats in Primaries vote against the President:

By Marc Chamot

Obama’s in deep trouble folks, even Democrats don’t want to vote for him in primaries.

How desperate are NBC News-Marist polls in the tank for Obama?

How far is NBC News willing to lie with their poll figures to convince us otherwise with more of their lies, and possibly lose even more credibility than they already have?

Just a day ago, Quinnipiac University Polling Institute poll released a survey that showed most voters in Florida disapprove of the way the president is doing his job. The poll showed Romney was leading Barack Hussein Obama 47-41 percent among Florida voters.

The survey also showed that it was up from a statistical dead heat two weeks ago and a Q-Poll conducted in back in March that showed the president with a 49-42 percent lead.

The independent poll also indicated that 63 percent of voters would not be more likely to vote against Obama based on the president's recent support for same-sex marriage, but 23 percent of likely voters say it would make them more inclined to vote for Romney.

So now, a day later, the oft liberal and left-leaning, and biased, often misleading network NBC News, come out with their poll numbers showing Obama leading Mitt Romney by four in Florida.

So who’s correct? Who’s to believe?

In NBC News/Marist Polls: Obama leads Romney in Florida, Ohio and Virginia “President Barack Obama leads Mitt Romney in Florida, Ohio and Virginia, according to new polls of the key 2012 swing states, although Obama's advantage has narrowed in recent months.

Obama has inched ahead of Romney 48 percent to 44 percent in both Florida and Virginia, according to three new NBC News/Marist polls. In Ohio, the president has a 6-point advantage over Romney, leading his Republican rival 48 percent to 42 percent among registered voters in the state. (The polls have a plus or minus 3 percent margin of error.)

Despite the good news, there are signs of danger for the Obama campaign. In March, the same polls found Obama with a 12-point lead over Romney in Ohio and a 17-point lead in Virginia. In January, the poll had Obama besting Romney by 8 points in Florida.”

But, which ones are to believe? Democratic primary electoral results, will give you the bigger picture, as to who is being dishonest or truthful about who’s actually leading Florida.

However, in NBC’s ignorant and twisted left-wing world, a world of make believes and far withdrawn from political realities, here are current Democratic primary results in recent primary elections, where Barack Hussein Obama inched a Democratic primary victories by small margins, over other Democratic opponents!

We’re talking about the current sitting American president here, who loads of Democrats won’t even vote for him; Obama carried only 58% of the vote in yesterday’s Kentucky, against 42% for "uncommitted" delegates to the national convention; "uncommitted" actually out-polled the president in 67 of Kentucky's 120 counties.

Obama also carried 58% in the Arkansas primary; little-known Tennessee lawyer and Occupy Wall Street supporter John Wolfe won 42% of the vote against the Democratic president in Arkansas.

Two weeks ago, a federal prisoner in Texas named Keith Judd racked up 41% of the vote against Obama in the West Virginia primary.”

Primary protest votes show displeasure with Obama “Some presidential primary voters in Kentucky and Arkansas are taking a swipe at President Barack Obama, denying the incumbent nearly 4 out of every 10 votes cast on the Democratic side.

In Kentucky's closed primary, about 42 percent of registered Democrats who voted selected "uncommitted."

In Arkansas' open primary, voters could select a ballot for either party. Early returns showed a Tennessee attorney, John Wolfe, drawing about 40 percent on the Democratic side.

The results in either state will not hamper Obama's effort to gain the party's nomination for a second term. Still, it's a bit embarrassing for the Democratic Party and highlights Obama's political weakness in Southern states.

Two weeks ago, a federal inmate in Texas earned 41 percent of the vote in West Virginia's Democratic primary.”

So, if 4 out of every 10 Democrats vote other than Barack Obama, I’m talking about 4 out of every 10 registered Democrats, not Republicans, and not independents, but Democrats voted against Barack Hussein Obama.

According to Democratic primary results in various states, statistically, with massive Democratic dislike for Barack Obama, would be virtually impossible for Barack Obama to be leading Romney in Florida, or any other state for that matter right?

The NBC and Marist polls are full of BS, this tells me that left-wingers are very desperate, and in the tank for leftist Barack Obama and are not credible.

NBC/WSJ Poll: Obama’s White Voter Support Eroding; Mitt Romney 52% to Obama’s 39%, Most White Voters Disgusted with Obama's & Supporters Racist Antics:

2012-05-22T23:37:00.001-05:00

NBC/WSJ Poll: Obama’s White Voter Support Eroding; Mitt Romney 52% to Obama’s 39%, Most White Voters Disgusted with Obama's & Supporters Racist Antics:

By Marc Chamot

As expected, according to recent polls, President Obama has eroded the white vote considerably.

However, I am not too surprised about this new poll; I expected this to happen in my past postings, but people ignored it.

It’s not surprising though, Obama’s last three years and a half has been more racially dividing this nation, rather than uniting it.

Nobody, no Medias want to talk about Obama’s massive losses of white voters. Barack Obama thinks minorities will pull for him in 2012, but I think he’s very mistaken; Obama’s misjudged the anger and wraths of majority white voters during Obama’s first term in office.

According to NBC/WSJ polls “Romney, meanwhile, holds the advantage with whites (52 percent to 39 percent), men (49 percent to 40 percent), suburban residents (47 percent to 41 percent), Midwest residents (48 percent to 43 percent), and high-interest voters (47 percent to 44 percent).”

This explains why Barack Hussein Obama wants minorities to make up for losses of the white vote in 2012. I believe Obama and his minions have misjudged the wrath of the white voters in America in the upcoming election.

I am Jewish; I am one of those Jews, who truly believe that Judaism is a race. Just as Arabs and other Middle Eastern people are. We Jews have had our fair shares of prejudices throughout our lifetimes, but we don’t go around crying or bitching about what people have done to us in the past.

Other liberal white folks who may be nuttier than squirrels with mouthfuls of peanuts, like those San Francisco snobbish and arrogant, quiche eating and white wine drinkers, who support Obama and race dividers.

The once Obama race uniter has become the race divider president, a president whose justice department, Eric holder, who likes to associate with race baiters, such as Al Sharpton does not give us a whole lot of confidence in this president’s fairness’s on racial relations.

Racist blacks have been known to be anti-white under the Obama administration’s carte blanche. The George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin escalated national racial issues to its worst in history, and we’ve seen racial conflicts, way worse under the Obama inept administration than any other.

Having the New Black Panthers put out “dead or alive” threats, without impunity or concern for violating laws on George Zimmerman’s well being and safety without any prosecutions for carrying death threats, and innocent white folks were being beaten, over the Trayvon Martin incident around the country has seriously soured a whole lot of white folks against Barack Hussein Obama 2012 presidency.

Racist teachers like Tanya Dixon-Neely; a maleficent, rude and nasty teacher attacking Mitt Romney as a high school bully, and who herself, attempted to bully and indoctrinate a white youth student through threats; into believing that Obama was so supreme and above criticism; it was wrong to criticize Barack Obama.

Tanya Dixon-Neely also claimed that they have arrested people who have criticized Obama in the past, regardless that Barack Hussein Obama, had openly admitted that he bullied a girl when he was younger.

You see my friends; most of those white liberals who support Obama are in the minority, and don’t care if this country is going down the tubes, as long as they have their money and it isn’t messed with.

And yet those very arrogant white liberals, I’m talking about, who’ll vote for Obama are those who have these high priced Mercedes Benzes, BMW’s, and Lexus’s, and those white liberals have a whole lot of money, but don’t give a darn about this country’s direction, or the rest of us for that matter.

And dumping Joe Biden in lieu of Hillary Clinton won’t help Obama’s 2012 chances either.

The racial damages by Obama has been done, and I don’t think Barack Obama will recover from massive loses of the white votes. On top of it, Obama’s got the worst economy in recent times going against him in this election.

California Disabled Con Artists with Sleazy Lawyers, Unite to use ADA, Americans Disabilities Act Regulations to Extort Money & Put Local Businesses out of Business for nonconformity:

2012-05-21T19:59:00.000-05:00

Government Mandated Con Job; California Disabled Con Artists with Sleazy Lawyers, Unite to use ADA, Americans Disabilities Act Regulations to Extort Money & Put Local Businesses out of Business for nonconformity:

By Marc Chamot

Why is California putting so many people out of work? It’s because, some unscrupulous lawyers with disabled con artists in tow, are going around suing businesses that haven’t conformed to ADA regulations.

The Americans with Disabilities Act was a law passed to help disabled folks to have easy access to places, mainly restrooms.

However, most California landlords and rented offices, business rental spaces are old, and do not conform to ADA regulations and are not obligated to be responsible to ADA regulations. In other words, the renter, the business owner is the one being sued, not the landlord.

These con artists are using ADA regulations on Foresthill businesses face ADA compliance lawsuits “The town of Foresthill is 17 miles off the interstate and many of the buildings date back to the Gold Rush; that's why business owners in town thought they wouldn't have to worry about lawsuits over disability access.

Business owners in the historic foothill community said they're under siege after they became the latest targets of a disabled attorney who claims the businesses lack proper access.

Quadriplegic attorney Scott Johnson has filed more than 1,000 lawsuits under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Business owners in Foresthill said Johnson spent several days in town in January; the letters and lawsuits soon followed.

Among the businesses facing lawsuits include The Red Dirt Saloon and Ore Cart Steakhouse, built in 1854.

"I'm sorry that he's in this position, but does that give him the right to terrorize the businesses of Foresthill and put us all out of business?" Red Dirt Saloon owner Joan Elliott said.

Other businesses include Worton's Market, the Over Easy Starlite Café and Foresthill Joe's coffee shop.

"This is the last thing that we need," Foresthill Joe's owner Sara Schnuck said.

Although the saloon and steakhouse are only a few years younger than the State of California, the owner said a major renovation 17 years ago brought it into ADA compliance.

But Johnson's lawsuit points to the ramp outside, which he claims is too steep.

Red Dirt Saloon regular Crawford Casto, who arrived at the business by wheelchair, thinks it's nonsense.

"I can't understand why somebody wants to be this petty, to come around and do something that's not necessary," Castco said.

Whether or not the claims are valid, the businesses are spending money to defend themselves.

The cafe is collecting cash in a jar.

Meanwhile, a grassroots movement aimed at stopping lawsuit abuse is hosting a public forum Tuesday at 3 p.m. on the south steps of the state Capitol.”

Ignorant Black & Racist, Hypocritical Bully, Rowan High School, Spencer North Carolina Teacher, Defends Barack Obama through Lies, Hypocrisies & Threats of Arrest in Classroom:

2012-05-21T16:51:00.001-05:00

Fact of the Day; Ignorant Black & Racist, Hypocritical Bully, Rowan High School, Spencer North Carolina Teacher, Defends Barack Obama through Lies, Hypocrisies & Threats of Arrest in Classroom:

By Marc Chamot

Do you want to know why American education’s going into the gutters? Listen to this video and you’ll be shocked.

It looks like North Carolina hires racist teachers like Tanya Dixon-Neely; Updated name of maleficent, rude and nasty teacher.

They indoctrinate students, and then if students don’t agree, they threaten them, with suspensions and arrest.

A Rowan High School racist teacher got into a shouting match, with one of her students over Barack Hussein Obama on her “fact of the Day” posting about Mitt Romney being a school bully.

Apparently, this teacher posted on her bulletin board, “fact of the Day,” Mitt Romney was a School Bully. Basically, this racist teacher was suppressing freedom of speech in her classroom, and threatened her white student of arrest, by criticizing Barack Hussein Obama.

This nameless teacher attacked one of her students because he was complaining to her about the double standards, of ignoring the real facts that Barack Obama once shoved a girl in school and actually, ignoring the facts that Obama was a bully too, a female bully at that.

This teacher, whom the North Carolina teachers unions and the state of North Carolina are scurrying to defend, and protect her from massive Media, and public backlashes over her blinded and ignorant love for Barack Hussein Obama.

The latest, this nameless teacher has been suspended over her ignorant actions.

What happened to public education, folks? The good news, this video is further proof that our kids, because of the Internet; radical teachers, and mainstream Medias have lost influence over the people and even on the younger ones.

You can hear some students murmuring and mocking the teacher over her misguided “fact of the day” fallacies, favoring Obama to the extremes, no matter what the facts are.

1.4 Million Jobs Lost, 16 States Benefited in Jobs & 11 States Have Lost Jobs under B. H. Obama & USA Today/Gallup polls Gives Mitt Romney 9 Point Lead, Independents Favoring Romney by 11 Points & Rising:

2012-05-18T14:53:00.002-05:00

State of the Disunion; 1.4 Million Jobs Lost, 16 States Benefited in Jobs & 11 States Have Lost Jobs under B. H. Obama & USA Today/Gallup polls Gives Mitt Romney 9 Point Lead, Independents Favoring Romney by 11 Points & Rising:

By Marc Chamot

Is It Obamageddon 2012 and curtains for Barack Hussein Obama? President Obama apparently, has no record on jobs to run on.

Not one, not one positive record to run on for his 2012 re-election. 1.4 million Jobs were lost since 2009, and possibly more under Obama. According to government labor reports, only 16 states have benefitted, somewhat under Obama, and the rest are suffering high unemployment.

Is Barack Obama trying to take credit for Texas jobs creations? Texas is leading the nation in jobs creations, then why is Barack Hussein Obama getting credit for Texas jobs creations?

No way! The credit goes to Republican Governor Rick Perry and his policies, for the number one jobs creation state in the nation. No, not radical left-wing and jobs killer Barack Obama should take credit for Texas jobs growths.

Recovery? Just 16 States Have Gained Jobs Under Obama “Just 16 states have seen job growth since President Obama took office, according to state employment data released Friday by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The remaining states have lost a combined 1.4 million jobs since January 2009.

Even 34 months after the recession officially ended in June 2009, there are still 11 states that have fewer people working now than at the start of the recovery.

Meanwhile, 20 states have unemployment rates at or above 8%, including nine with unemployment at 9% or higher, according to the BLS.

At the other end of the spectrum, Texas has been the leader in job creation under Obama, with 240,000 more people working there than when he took office. Since the recovery started in June 2009, Texas has added 474,000 jobs, which accounts for one in four of all the jobs created during the recovery.

North Dakota takes the prize for fastest job growth rate, with employment climbing 13% since Obama took office, due largely to the oil boom there.

The biggest job loser under Obama is California, which is down 285,000 jobs in April compared with January 2009, BLS data show.

The data underscore how the lackluster recovery has failed to come close to filling back the job losses from the recession, a poor performance that is sure to weigh on Obama's re-election prospects.

The latest IBD/TIPP poll, for example, finds just 35% give Obama a top grade for his handling of the economy, while 43% give him a D or F.

Obama has attempted to assuage such concerns by boasting about the "extraordinary progress that we've been able to make," including "4 million jobs created over the last two years."

The nation's workforce is still 5 million smaller than it was at the previous employment peak, set way back in January 2008, BLS data show. At 51 months, it's already the longest jobs recession since the Great Depression, with no end in sight.

By this point in the recovery from the 1981-82 recession — which saw unemployment shoot up to 10.8% — the labor force was 6.8 million larger than at the pre-recession jobs peak.

IBD also compared state job growth with measures of business friendliness. States that rank highest on this measure — which typically focuses on tax rates, regulations, tort reform and the size of the state government — have experienced faster job growth rates than those ranking lowest.

IBD examined state business friendliness rankings from Forbes, CNBC, the George Washington University's Mercatus Center, the Tax Foundation and Chief Executive Magazine.

States that ranked in the top 10 in two or more of those lists had nearly twice the job growth rate of those showing up in the bottom 10 in two or more rankings. Top-ranked states also had an unemployment rate almost a full percentage point below the least business friendly states.

"We can take lessons we learn from states and apply them nationally," said Jason Sorens, assistant professor of political science at the State University of New York, Buffalo, and co-author of the Mercatus 50-state ranking study. "If keeping taxes, spending and regulations low and reasonable promotes growth in states, we should expect that same relationship to hold nationally."

New Poll Show Romney's Favorability on the Rise “Mitt Romney has not only wrapped up the GOP presidential nomination, he is also started to win over more supporters. In a new Gallup Poll, Romney's favorability rating has jumped eleven points to his highest level yet.

Fifty percent of Americans now have a favorable opinion of presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, up from 39% in February and his highest by 10 percentage points. His current 41% unfavorable rating, though, leaves him with a net score of +9, after being at -8 in February. In roughly half of the 28 measurements Gallup has taken of Romney since 2006, more Americans have viewed him negatively than positively.

The spike in Romney's favorable rating in the May 10-13 USA Today/Gallup poll is predictable, given that he has become the presumptive Republican nominee. Presidential candidates typically get a spike in their favorable ratings in the wake of winning the nomination. Gallup's prior measurement of Romney, in February, came as Rick Santorum was surging in the polls after a series of primary and caucus wins that made him Romney's main challenger.

Republicans and independents are fueling the rise in Romney's favorable rating, with Democrats' views of him unchanged. Eighty-seven percent of Republicans now view him favorably, up from 65% in February. His favorable rating among independents is 11 points higher, and independents now view Romney more positively (48%) than negatively (43%).”

California Broke; $16 Billion in Deficits, $3.5 Billion shortfalls on Personal Annual Income Tax Returns & Yet Want to Provide Legal Work Documents to Illegals:

2012-05-14T21:41:00.002-05:00

California Broke; $16 Billion in Deficits, $3.5 Billion shortfalls on Personal Annual Income Tax Returns & Yet Want to Provide Legal Work Documents to Illegals:

By Marc Chamot

California, the "Sad Sack" state:

Car 54 Where are you? I was called anti-immigrant and I was called every name in the book. You see; the very last time I wrote on how I see about rampant California immigration's.

People of money are leaving the state in droves daily and the state’s tax base is dwindling in the billions annually. If changes aren’t done, it’ll be a matter of time, before the state will be laden with poor foreign immigrants, and with no tax base.

I had mentioned about the massive increases of poor Asian Immigrants and of rampant illegal immigrants, while money and state financial resources were leaving the state in droves and the only people who are left are millions of poor immigrants who don’t report or pay taxes.

There are billions of dollars in unfunded pension benefits for state employees, and billions of dollars in safety nets for people, mainly immigrants to those who have never contributed into the system.

And the state taxing businesses to death, and chasing them out of the state, is causing the state to spiral downwards financially.

I said this before folks! But do you think California liberals are listening? No! Do you think Sacramento is learning? No!

Too many good businesses and work have been chased and lost away, because of excessive taxes and fees to maintain California’s lavish lifestyles, fiscally escalating financial policies favoring state employees and their unions, and poor immigrants for their free educations and medical care that is destroying the state fiscally.

I have said this so many times before, but no liberal Democrat wants to accept responsibilities to these facts and realities that are bankrupting the state.

The sad facts of life are, the love to provide foreign immigrants free school and medical care and money to live on, money they never contributed into, and that money must come from somewhere? Taxing people to death, they move elsewhere and the poorest who need services remain in the state.

Revenue from personal income taxes falls $2 billion short “Personal income tax revenues fell about two Billion dollars short of projections during the most crucial month for the state budget – tax month.

Jason Sisney with the non-partisan Legislative Analyst’s Office says April’s shortfall continues a string of months with disappointing revenues.

California Governor Jerry Brown bet that a nascent financial recovery would lift the world’s ninth- largest economy enough to whittle down a $9.2 billion deficit. Instead, the gap has widened to $16 billion.”

Tax collections have run $3.5 billion below what he calculated four months ago. “Spending has grown $2 billion above projections. The federal government and court ruling blocked some savings he expected, while his fellow Democrats in the Legislature balked at others.

California, with an economy bigger than Russia’s, lost more than a million jobs in the recession that struck in 2007, costing the most populous U.S. state 24 percent of its revenue. The new deficit estimate increases the urgency of the governor’s plans to increase income taxes on some earners to the highest in the nation, and boost sales levies that are now more than any other state.”

This is another example of California idiocies. The state, with $16 billion dollars deficits want to create more economic killing policies.

The worst thing about all this; California chastised Arizona and Alabama for their strict anti-illegal immigrants policies; they claimed states had no right to enact its own immigration policies, now they are enacting their own pro-illegal immigrant policies. What hypocrites!

Do you see how cu-cu-for-cocoa-puffs are California politicians? They are definitely qualified for 5150’s, a term for mental wards.

State measure would let illegal immigrants work legally “A California Assemblyman is proposing a measure that would allow nearly a million people who are in the country illegally to work lawfully in the state without much fear of deportation, according to published reports.

While several states throughout the nation are cracking down on those in the country illegally, Assemblyman Felipe Fuentes, D-Sylmar, is spearheading the California Opportunity and Prosperity Act, which was filed Friday with the state attorney general's office, according to the agency's website.

GETTING AN INITIATIVE ON THE BALLOT

The number of voter signatures required for the initiative to be on the ballot must be equal or be at least 5 percent of the total votes cast for Governor at the last gubernatorial election.

The measure would have to qualify by 131 days before the election to appear on the next statewide election ballot.

Source: California Secretary of State Website

Fuentes called the measure a "moderate, common-sense approach" needed because of the federal government's inability to pass comprehensive immigration reform, The Sacramento Bee reported. It would apply to people who have lived in the state since at least January 2008, have no criminal record, and speak English or are trying to learn the language, among other qualifications.

Over the weekend, Barbara Coe with Huntington Beach-based California Coalition for Immigration Reform, e-mailed fellow anti-illegal-immigration activists, criticizing the measure and urging them to contact state legislators to stop the law.

"This is the most frightening news yet!" she wrote in an e-mail.

Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, R-Twin Peaks, told the Sacramento Bee that the initiative sidesteps immigration law.

"There's a proper process for coming to this country," he said about those who come to the country illegally. "Why don't you respect that?"

Those who support the measure said the state stands to make up to $325 million in new tax revenue from those who are working in the country illegally, the Sacramento Bee reported. The initiative needs 504,760 voter signatures to qualify for an upcoming ballot.

This is the latest state measure that has been friendly to people who are working in the country illegally.

Last month, Gov. Jerry Brown signed into law a bill that prohibits the state, cities, counties and special districts from requiring employers to use E-Verify, a free Internet-based system that checks if a new hire is allowed to legally work in the country. Some Orange County cities had to revisit clauses in city contracts that required employers they do business with to use the federal tool.”

Obama's Love for Illegals Revealed; Florida Voter Audits Show that 182,000 may Be Undocumented’s / Illegals Registered to Vote in State Elections:

2012-05-14T20:34:00.002-05:00

Why is Hussein Barack Obama Fighting Voter ID Laws? Now we know; Florida Voter Audits Show that 182,000 may Be Undocumented’s / Illegals Registered to Vote in State Elections:

By Marc Chamot

Well, what do you know? No wonder Barack Obama is fighting against Voter I.D. laws across the country?

It turns out that Florida voter audits are showing, 182,000 illegal aliens registered voters. The Obama-justice administrations said; “Oh, it would keep the poor African Americans and indigents’ from voting" in regards to state Voter ID Laws.”

Bull; baloney, it was all to protect corruptive illegal immigrants who vote for Hussein Barack Obama and his corruptible Democratic elections. It is groups like Lulac, La Raza and currently defunct ACORN, who went out to register these people en masse, in Latino/Hispanic heavy states to vote in fraudulent elections.

Nearly 200,000 Fla. voters may not be citizens “Florida officials are now saying that nearly 200,000 registered voters may not be U.S. citizens.

Earlier in the week, state election officials announced they had identified more than 2,600 people who are in Florida legally but ineligible to vote.

The Department of State is asking county election officials to verify the information. Election supervisors are contacting voters and if someone is not a citizen, their name will be dropped from the voter rolls.

But an initial list drawn up by the state — and not widely released — shows that a comparison of voter lists and driver's license information turned up a list of nearly 182,000 people who may not be U.S. citizens.

State officials, however, note that some of those on list may have become citizens after first getting their driver's licenses. Still, the decision to screen the voter rolls for non-citizens could result in tens of thousands voters being dropped in the middle of a critical election year.

President Barack Obama won Florida four years ago, but recent polls have shown that he is neck-and-neck with likely GOP nominee Mitt Romney. The 2000 election between George W. Bush and Al Gore was decided by just 537 votes in the Sunshine State.

"The Department of State has a duty under both state and federal laws to ensure that the voter registration rolls are current and accurate," said Chris Cate, a department spokesman.

There are currently more than 11 million active registered voters in the state.

Florida law requires voters to be a U.S. citizen residing in the state. Florida also does not allow someone to vote if they are a convicted felon and have not had their civil rights restored.

State officials said they did not know yet if any of the people on the list voted illegally in past elections.

The state has been responsible for helping screen voters since 2006 when it launched a statewide voter registration database.

Prior to the launch of the database, Florida had come under fire for previous efforts to remove felons from the voting rolls, including a purge that happened right before the 2000 presidential election. An effort to remove felons back in 2004 was halted after it was discovered that the list drawn up by the state had problems.

The state database is supposed to check the names of registered voters against other databases, including ones that contain the names of people who have died and people who have been sent to prison.

Driver's license numbers had been used to verify the identity of someone who had registered to vote but apparently the state was not checking citizenship status prior to last year. The state does not give driver's licenses to illegal immigrants, but it does grant them to legal visitors.

Cate said the list of 182,000 people was drawn up by checking first and last names, date of birth and either a driver's license number, a Social Security number or an address. Most of the matches had identical driver's license numbers, names and birthdates. A state document shows that out of the nearly 182,000 identified that more than 172,000 were active voters, meaning they had cast ballots in recent elections or registered recently.

The state is taking the matches using other databases to try to confirm if the voter is not a U.S. citizen. Florida has asked for access to a federal database maintained by the Department of Homeland Security but so far the U.S. government has turned the state down.

The initial list of more than 2,600 voters given out by the state to supervisors shows the names of people who registered all the way from the late `50s to as recently as 2011. One Hillsborough County man on the list registered to vote in 1959.

Some have questioned the timing of the state's push to remove voters from the rolls. It comes while Florida is still in court over a 2011 law that curtailed early voting hours and tightened rules for groups registering voters. Legislators said the law was needed to protect the integrity of the state's elections, but the U.S. Department of Justice has questioned some of the changes.

"Of course Floridians are entitled to have confidence in the integrity of the voter rolls, and anyone not eligible should be removed and not permitted to vote," said Howard Simon, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida. "But the `potentials,' `possible,' `might-be that are the basis for this initiative by the Secretary of State don't yet add up to voter fraud. Based on Florida's regrettable experience with voter purges, it would be a mistake to rely on the accuracy of the state's data."

Republican Party of Florida chairman Lenny Curry defended the state push.

"To now learn that thousands of illegal votes could be cast across our state is chilling and threatens the confidence people need to have in our elections," Curry said in a statement." Any amount of fraud or illegality in this system is too much."

If the U.S. Supreme Court rules in favor of the Obama Administration and against Arizona on illegal immigration, it means the U.S. Supreme Court support illegal immigrants voting in American elections.

Make Room for Out of the Closet, Hollywood Hussein Barack Obama & Same Sex Marriages Good for Money, but not for Votes:

2012-05-10T16:06:00.002-05:00

Move over Hollywood Henderson, Make Room for Out of the Closet, Hollywood Hussein Barack Obama & Same Sex Marriages Good for Money, but not for Votes:

By Marc Chamot

Electoral tsunamis awaiting Obama 2012. Most battleground states Obama needs to win, are anti-same sex marriages.

Who noticed Barack Obama’s remark in a sit-down interview with ABC's Robin Roberts, who says our troops, Marines, Army, Air force and the Navy, those service people, soldiers are all fighting on his behalf, Obama said “on my behalf,” instead of our behalf?

Folks, did we elect some kind of a king, or royalty here? That is very arrogant and very conceded thing to say as president. Those troops, our prized soldiers are fighting and dying on our behalf, not for our self appointed and delusional grand master Hussein Barack Obama.

Do you all remember that big jerk and show-off, outside linebacker for the Dallas Cowboys in the seventies named Thomas Hollywood Henderson? Well, we’ve got a new king of Hollywood in Barack Hussein Obama.

Not only he’s the out of the closet gay Barack Obama, he’s Hollywood too.

"I've always been adamant that gay and lesbian Americans should be treated fairly and equally," Obama told Roberts, in an interview that will air in full on ABC's "Good Morning America" Thursday.

"I have to tell you that over the course of several years as I have talked to friends and family and neighbors when I think about members of my own staff who are in incredibly committed monogamous relationships, same-sex relationships, who are raising kids together, when I think about those soldiers or airmen or Marines or sailors who are out there fighting on my behalf and yet feel constrained, even now that Don't Ask Don't Tell is gone, because they are not able to commit themselves in a marriage, at a certain point I’ve just concluded that for me personally it is important for me to go ahead and affirm that I think same sex couples should be able to get married,"

President Obama also endorsed marriage between homosexuals on national TV, trashing our common traditions of marriages between man and woman. But no sooner Obama endorsed ‘gay marriage,’ money, and checks began pouring in from Hollywood! His chief fundraiser George Clooney got him millions!

Somehow a Texas jailbird got into West Virginia’s presidential primary. The inmate, Keith Judd, is serving time at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas, for making threats at the University of New Mexico in 1999. Obama received 59 percent of the vote to Judd's 41 percent.

Against Obama, even a jailbird gets some votes “Just how unpopular is President Barack Obama in some parts of the country? Enough that a man in prison in Texas got 4 out of 10 votes in West Virginia's Democratic presidential primary.

For some West Virginia Democrats, simply running against Obama is enough to get Judd votes. "I voted against Obama," said Ronnie Brown, a 43-year-old electrician from Cross Lanes who called himself a conservative Democrat. "I don't like him. He didn't carry the state before and I'm not going to let him carry it again."

When asked which presidential candidate he voted for, Brown said, "That guy out of Texas."

Judd got on the state ballot by paying a $2,500 fee and filing a form known as a notarized certification of announcement, said Jake Glance, a spokesman for the Secretary of State's office.

Attracting at least 15 percent of the vote would normally qualify a candidate for a delegate to the Democratic National Convention. But state Democratic Party Executive Director Derek Scarbro said no one has filed to be a delegate for Judd. The state party also believes that Judd has failed to file paperwork required of presidential candidates, but officials continue to research the matter, Scarbro said.

Voters in other conservative states showed their displeasure with Obama in Democratic primaries last March.

In Oklahoma, anti-abortion protester Randall Terry got 18 percent of the primary vote. A lawyer from Tennessee, John Wolfe, pulled nearly 18,000 votes in the Louisiana primary. In Alabama, 18 percent of Democratic voters chose "uncommitted" in the primary rather than vote for Obama.

Obama's energy policies and the Environmental Protection Agency's handling of mining-related permits have incurred the wrath of West Virginia's coal industry.

With the state the nations second-biggest producer of this fossil fuel, Gov. Earl Ray Tomblin and Sen. Joe Manchin —both Democrats have championed the industry — have declined to say whether they will support Obama in November. Each overcame low-profile opponents in Tuesday's primary. Manchin refused afterward to say whether he voted for Obama.

Hillary Rodham Clinton beat Obama handily in the state's 2008 primary and he lost the state to Republican John McCain in the general election.

The latest state-by-state Gallup poll, released in January, found Obama with a 32.7 percent approval rating in West Virginia. The president had a lower approval rating only in Utah, Idaho, Oklahoma and Wyoming.

"Keith Judd's performance is embarrassing for Obama and our great state," outgoing West Virginia GOP Chairman Mike Stuart said.

Brown, the Cross Lanes electrician, did not know of Judd's background when he voted. He went to the polls before his 22-year-old daughter, Emily. She planned to vote for Judd, too, until she found out where he has been living. "I'm not voting for somebody who's in prison," she said. She was certain about one thing: "I just want to vote against Barack Obama."

This shows how Obama far Obama has fallen electorally since 2008. 8 million differences in votes to McCain’s, I just don’t see How Barack Obama can make it into another term, with those horrific numbers? I still believe, Obama will be wiped off the map in 2012. Electoral backlashes, the waves are coming back, no, it’s going to be an electoral tsunami over Hussein Barack Obama in 2012.

On his same sex marriage approvals, what was Barack Obama thinking? Most of the states that Obama needs to win electoral votes are from battleground states, which staunchly don’t support nor approve of same sex marriages in high margins.

North Carolina-A political rule of thumb: You don’t want to be on the wrong side of an issue supported by 6-in-10 voters. But that’s where the president is in North Carolina, where a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage passed Tuesday by 61 percent to 39 percent. Just 7 of the state’s 100 counties opposed the ballot measure.

North Carolina is no ordinary state. In 2012, it occupies a central location in the political universe – it’s not only a key swing state, it’s the place that will host the Democratic National Convention this summer. Obama won it in 2008, arguably his biggest reach on Election Night, and hoped accepting his re-nomination there would keep it in his column.

Florida-One day, gay marriage might be enshrined in law across the map. But it won’t be until after the current generation of senior citizens passes away. Not only do they oppose it by lopsided margins, they also vote in disproportionately high percentages.

Consider this fact about Florida, a state with an unusually large population of seniors. Four years ago, Barack Obama and an anti-gay marriage constitutional amendment shared the Florida ballot. Obama won the state narrowly, the amendment won by a landslide.

And the amendment won 600,000 more votes than Obama.

The president can still win re-election without Florida’s treasure trove of electoral votes. But he’d prefer not to risk it, which could be the side effect of a public affirmation of support for gay marriage in a state as competitive as Florida.

Colorado-The new capital of evangelicalism? No, it’s not in the South. It’s Colorado Springs, according to Christianity Today magazine, which once described the city as having “more mega churches, mega seminaries, and mega-Christian activity than any other American city.”

After Denver, Colorado Springs is the largest city in the most important state in the Mountain West – the city is bigger than Cleveland or Pittsburgh. Gay marriage is an issue that resonates there among Christian conservatives and it’s the kind of issue that can get evangelical voters very enthusiastic about the prospect of voting for Mitt Romney.

The evidence of that came in 2006, when Colorado voters passed an amendment to outlaw gay marriage – a measure strongly supported by the Colorado Springs-based Focus on the Family. While the state voted in favor of the constitutional amendment, 55 percent to 45 percent, in Colorado Springs’ El Paso County the numbers were far greater — 66 percent voted for the measure. More pro-amendment votes were cast there than in any other county in the state.

Colorado is the kind of place that helps Team Obama sleep a little more soundly at night, because it’s a hedge in case Florida flips back Republican, or Ohio or Virginia drifts back to red. Any leg-up for Romney there would be bad news back in Chicago.

Nevada-Utah may be the LDS heartland, but Nevada ranks among the top 5 states in terms of percentage of Mormon population. And the LDS church opposes gay marriage.

While Mormons aren’t a significant Democratic constituency — and especially not with Romney in the race — it’s best not to antagonize any constituency in a swing state like Nevada, where the presidential outcome in 2000 and 2004 was decided by less than 25,000 votes.

“Overall in Nevada, it hurts. To what degree is hard to determine,” said Pete Ernaut, a former GOP state legislator and a confidant of Gov. Brian Sandoval. “The issue here is about a toss-up, with voters about evenly split. But that said, there are key constituencies affected by this, most notably Mormon voters – and specifically Democratic Mormon voters – and that is going to be a difficult issue for the president.”

Iowa-In 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court made history with its unanimous decision to allow same-sex marriage.

One year later, Iowa voters made history again by ousting three of the justices who handed down that ruling.

The backlash was as extreme as it sounds: their removal from the high court was the first time an Iowa Supreme Court justice wasn’t retained in nearly a half-century.

And the issue echoed through the 2010 governor’s race as well. Republican Terry Branstad argued that the court was wrong to strike down the state law banning same-sex marriage and advocated a constitutional amendment to re-institute the ban. His Democratic opponent, Gov. Chad Culver, disagreed on the idea of putting the court decision to a vote.

Culver lost his re-election bid, though not solely because of his position on same-sex marriage. Still, it didn’t help him, and that’s the risk Obama takes there. Obama and Iowa go way back — he’s president today because he dealt Hillary Clinton a third-place finish there in the 2008 caucuses — but it’s a state where just one percentage point divided the presidential nominees in 2000 and 2004.

Missouri-There are many Democrats who already concede Missouri is a lost cause for Obama in 2012, even though he only lost to John McCain there by a razor-close margin in 2008.

Wednesday’s announcement only makes the situation worse. In a state where there’s no room for error, the president has taken a position that places him at odds with 71 percent of the state – at least that’s the percentage that voted to ban gay marriage when it was on the ballot in 2004.

There’s a very good chance that number has eroded since then. But not enough for it to be an asset, in a state where Obama’s strength in St. Louis, Kansas City and some surrounding suburbs is counterbalanced by the parts of the state that sit squarely in the Bible Belt.

Ohio-It’s often said that the 2004 gay marriage initiative that passed in Ohio played a key role in lifting George W. Bush to victory over John Kerry. Whether that’s true or not – Bush strategist Matthew Dowd argued Wednesday that it’s not – it’s an issue that resonates outside of Democratic vote centers like Columbus and Cleveland.

In 2004, here’s how state GOP chairman Robert Bennett framed it to the New York Times. “I’d be naïve if I didn’t say it helped,” he said. “And it helped most in what we refer to as the Bible Belt area of southeastern and southwestern Ohio, where we had the largest percentage increase in support for the president.”

Recent polls continue to show that a majority in Ohio oppose gay marriage, compared to only about one-third of voters who support it. And, as POLITICO reported Wednesday, when Vice President Joe Biden privately argued for the president to refrain from expressing his support, he flagged two states where there could be a backlash — his native Pennsylvania and Ohio.

Mitt Romney 10% Lead with Independents & Climbing, Surpassing Barack Obama 49% to 44% in Current Polls & Administration Jobs Unemployment Figures Bogus, Unemployment Much Higher:

2012-05-08T16:01:00.001-05:00

Mitt Romney 10% Lead with Independents & Climbing, Surpassing Barack Obama 49% to 44% in Current Polls & Administration Jobs Unemployment Figures Bogus, Unemployment Much Higher:

By Marc Chamot

Has the fat lady sung on Barack Hussein Obama?

What’s this we stuff coming from President Obama? And Move Forward? Barack Obama, during his speeches, likes to pretend to be middleclass, when in reality he’s a multi-millionaire, way out of touch from most Americans.

Obviously, we’re not fooled by his phony speeches, because they are repeats of the ones he used during the 2008 presidential campaign, laden with failed promises and policies he never carried out.

We have seen Barack Obama in action for the past 3 ½ years, nothing accomplished, nothing but chaos, and continuations of George Bush chaotic presidency and Obama was a total failure for this country. He has become the illegal aliens' best friend.

In 2008, there was total pandemonium, and electricity in the air with angry voters from the Bush era, when Obama ran for president in 2008. That fire for Obama in 2008, has completely soured and turned into voter anger.

The handwriting’s on the wall; it’s all over for Obama, but the crime, for his second term. The good numbers are quickly fading away for Obama, and he’s got six months to turn it around, but there is not enough time to do it. Obama has lost millions of phony registered voters that corruptible ACORN, supposedly created for him in 2008.

His support is waning, Obama semi-officially launched his re-election campaign—“as opposed to the hundreds of “non-political” appearances he has made over the past three years--at a rally Saturday at Ohio State University. Some 14,000 supporters filled the arena--or rather, did not fill the arena.

Coverage of the event focused heavily on the 4,000 empty seats, and Obama’s senior campaign adviser David Axelrod was pressed by ABC’s Jake Tapper about whether the turnout demonstrated a lack of “enthusiasm” for the President.”

According to recent polls, Mitt Romney has captured 10% of independent voters and climbing. “The latest Battleground poll by George Washington University-Politico has Romney up by 10 points (48 to 38 percent) over Obama among independent voters. Overall, it’s a dead heat, with Romney garnering 48 percent; Obama 47 percent.”

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Tuesday “shows Mitt Romney earning 49% of the vote and President Obama attracting 44% support. Three percent (3%) would vote for a third party candidate, while another three percent (3%) are undecided.”

And with the Obama fake jobs report, unemployment is much bleaker than what the Obama Administration claims:

“Seasonal adjustment is not just what the guess is about the number of jobs from month to month. It also includes adjustment for the size of the labor force. And that’s how they’re able to play games with the labor force participation rate. So that might account for a big chunk of the difference here.

One-point-two million — and this is their number — from December to January, 1.2 million people left the workforce, just left it.

That’s the labor force participation rate, and they left. That’s half the number, or half the difference right there.

If you take the number 132.9 jobs in December, 130.4 million in January, that’s 2.5 million fewer jobs, 1.2 million, about half of that that they just threw out in a seasonal adjustment of people that left the workforce.”

You see folks; trick on the numbers, the Obama administration is not including the millions of unemployed, who have run out of unemployment benefits, and who are still unemployed, including those long terms unemployed like myself.

I had predicted in my past articles, just as Rush Limbaugh on his radio show, it’s going to be a catastrophic landslide loss for Barack Hussein Obama in 2012. Nobody believes it, but us, watch and see this nightmare unfolding for the Obama-Democrats coming this November.

It doesn't matter about the Obama unemployment figures and lies, Obama will feel the crushing anger of the those unemployed voters in 2012. Even left-wing Medias in the tank for Barack Obama, won't be able save him.

Voter ID Works Folks! Millions of Registered Hispanic Voters, Possibly Illegals, Black/White Ex-Cons, Dead People & Derelicts With no ID’s, Mysteriously Disappear from the Obama 2008 Elections:

2012-05-07T20:10:00.002-05:00

Voter ID Works Folks! Millions of Registered Hispanic Voters, Possibly Illegals, Black/White Ex-Cons, Dead People & Derelicts With no ID’s, Mysteriously Disappear from the Obama 2008 Elections:

By Marc Chamot

Did Barack Hussein Obama win by voter fraud in 2008? The good news is voter ID that President Obama fought so hard to overturn; has just bitten him in the proverbial butt.

Now with Acorn gone, was there massive elections fraud in 2008 for Obama? It seems like massive registrations that occurred in 2008 for Obama has dramatically declined. Millions of voters, mainly Hispanics within the Democratic Party have disappeared in thin air.

In other words my friends, Obama isn’t getting their votes his time, the millions of fraudulent votes of 2008 may not exist for the Obama 2012 re-election campaigns.

According to the Washington Post; “the number of black and Hispanic registered voters has fallen sharply since 2008, posing a serious challenge to the Obama campaign in an election that could turn on the participation of minority voters.

In the 2008 election, robust turnout among black and Latino voters is credited with putting Obama over the top in key swing states, including Virginia and New Mexico.

Voter rolls typically shrink in non-presidential election years and registrations among whites fell at roughly the same rate, but this is the first time in nearly four decades that the number of registered Hispanics has dropped significantly.

That figure fell 5 percent across the country, to about 11 million, according to the Census Bureau. But in some politically important swing states, the decline among Hispanics, who are considered critical in the 2012 presidential contest, is much higher: just over 28 percent in New Mexico, for example, and about 10 percent in Florida.

For blacks, whose registration numbers are down 7 percent nationwide, and Hispanics, the large decrease is attributed to the ailing economy, which forced many Americans to move in search of work or because of other financial upheaval.

“The only explanation out there is the massive job loss and home mortgage foreclosures, which disproportionately affected minorities,” said Antonio Gonzalez, president of the William C. Velasquez Institute, a nonpartisan policy group that focuses on Latinos. “When you move, you lose your registration.”

Political strategists and election experts are divided on whether registrations will rise to their previous levels. But the prospect of a tight race between President Obama and Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican nominee, has placed great importance on getting eligible Americans to register and vote.

The decline in minority registration “is obviously an area of concern,” said Democratic strategist Simon Rosenberg, president of NDN, a left-leaning think tank.

But he predicted the Obama campaign “will have enough money and enough focus to mitigate the problem. . . . They have five months to get the electorate looking the way they want.”

The GOP is also watching the shifting voter registration numbers, tracking active Republican voters in swing states and making sure they are still registered. In some places, the number of voters registered as Republicans is catching up with Democrats.

“We have really closed the gap in key battleground states,” said Republican National Committee spokeswoman Kirsten Kukowski, pointing to the relative parity Republicans has reached with Democrats in Iowa and Colorado.

The president’s reelection effort is focusing early this year on voter registration, which typically happens just before an election, between September and November. Last weekend, the campaign held a series of voter registration training sessions in a dozen states. In Florida, where the number of registered Hispanic voters has dropped by more than 140,000, the campaign trained hundreds of volunteers to sign up voters.

Those efforts, say campaign officials, have been complicated by laws approved by state legislatures since 2008, including some that place additional requirements on groups that register voters.

“It is disheartening to see voting becoming harder in states across the country,” said Katie Hogan, a spokeswoman for the Obama campaign. She said the campaign is “doing the challenging work of registering voters, even when Republican legislation is trying to make it more difficult.”

A dozen state legislatures passed rules last year requiring voters to present state-issued photo IDs when they arrive at the polls, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, although in four states the laws were vetoed by Democratic governors. The bills continue to be a hot topic in state houses. Pennsylvania’s governor signed a voter ID bill in March, and the Virginia General Assembly also recently sent a voter ID bill to the governor.

Florida and Ohio will cut nearly in half the number of days for early voting, and Florida lawmakers reversed rules that had made it easier for former felons to vote.

Florida also passed new rules governing groups that register voters, requiring them to turn in completed voter registration forms within 48 hours or risk fines. Groups previously had 10 days to file the forms. As a result, the League of Women Voters, the Boy Scouts and several other organizations that register voters halted efforts in Florida.

Opponents of the laws say Republican legislatures have attempted to tamp down turnout among minorities, who tend to vote for Democrats.

“We’re seeing the squeeze put on voters of color. They were hit by the economy, they have to re-register to vote, and now they are hit by new registration requirements,” said Judith Browne Dianis, a civil rights lawyer and co-director of the Advancement Project, which is challenging the laws in several states.

Supporters of the laws counter that they are aimed at preventing voter fraud.

“For decades we’ve dealt with fraud and irregularities, and those concerns have to be addressed as well,” said Ana Navarro, a Florida Republican activist who supports the changes to the state’s voting laws. “If you look at almost any election in Miami-Dade, there are always allegations of fraud.”

Together, the number of registered blacks and Hispanics across the country declined by 2 million from 2008 to late 2010, the most recent data available from the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey.

The number of registered blacks is just over 16 million. Among whites, registrations dropped 6 percent to 104 million.

The drop is attributed not only to Americans moving from their homes, but also the assumption — by one in four voters — that their registration is automatically updated when they move, according to a report by the Pew Center on the States.

Nationally, about one in eight Americans moved between 2008 and 2010, with higher numbers among members of the armed services, young people and those living in communities affected by the economic downturn.

Nevada, a swing state with one of the highest foreclosure rates in the nation, is a prime example. In Clark County — which is 22 percent Hispanic — election officials found that more than 20 percent of voters were no longer living at the addresses on file, said David Becker, director of election initiatives for the Pew Center. Such voters are purged from the voter rolls.

“Voters aren’t even thinking about it, and no one is trying to engage with them until 30 or 60 days before a presidential election,” Becker said.

Among Latinos, the decline has altered a trend of steady growth. Given that 12 million Latinos were registered to vote in 2008, some analysts had projected the number would grow to 13 million in 2010 and 14 million this election cycle. Instead, it fell in 2010 to 11 million.

“Everyone is saying the Latino vote is rocketing to the moon,” said Gonzalez of the Velasquez Institute. “It has been growing, but it stopped.”

Maria Teresa Kumar, executive director of Voto Latino — a nonpartisan group focused on registering young Hispanic voters — said the economy has made it “a lot harder to target individuals.”

But, she added, “if you just look at Latino youth, you will have 2.4 million [potential] new Latino voters. That’s three congressional districts.”

To get a jump-start, Kumar’s team is touring with Mana, a popular Mexican rock band, and collecting e-mail addresses to push voter engagement.

The NAACP will launch its voter registration campaign next week and will begin hiring field staff in a dozen states, including Florida, Georgia, Virginia and Pennsylvania. It will also mail voter registration forms to more than 1 million blacks who will turn 18 years old before the election.

“There have been a significant set of challenges that have been put before African American voters this election cycle, and us starting earlier serves to build momentum,” said Marvin Randolph, NAACP’s senior vice president for campaigns.”

Obama, who won by 8 million votes in 2008 over Senator John McCain, but these registered voters from 2008, could number in the upper 10 million voters in losses for Barack Hussein Obama 2012. The Obama camp has been frantically been trying to disprove those very damaging, Washington Post figures as being totally false.

Double Standards? New York Times & Blacks Crying Foul on Whites Who Won’t Vote For Obama Because of Race, While Ignoring that 95% of Blacks Voted Against White Presidential Candidates Because of Racism:

2012-05-07T18:40:00.000-05:00

Double Standards? New York Times & Blacks Crying Foul on Whites Who Won’t Vote For Obama Because of Race, While Ignoring that 95% of Blacks Voted Against White Presidential Candidates Because of Racism:

By Marc Chamot

I am getting sick and tired of liberal racial "double standards." Enough with it, and it's time to put a stop to it!

“The New York Times sent reporter Sabrina Tavernise to the battleground state of Ohio, to the blue-collar town of Steubenville in pursuit of a pet theory: Barack Obama may struggle to win because some whites are racist. Tavernise starts by suggesting this could be a problem with Democrats, but “ultraconservatives” quickly surface.”

New York Times are at it again folks, throwing the race card for Obama. They are trolling battleground states to find racism, regardless that 95% of blacks voted for Obama because of race, and they will again, regardless of his failed administration record so they want to find white racists.

I heard a radio show host the other day say, "every time black folks see Obama on TV, they say that's my man! Regardless of his inept policies. And black people have not fared well under Obama, but they'll vote for him anyway, because he's black. But they'll cry foul when whites do it.

So what do you call that? Double standards for white folks. So it's OK for blacks to play the race card on white presidential candidates? So when whites do it for their preferred candidates, they'll get crucified and called racists by liberals and the New York Times. That’s a crock and load of crap!

In other words folks, with these demented people, it is okay for blacks to be racists against white presidential candidates, but not for whites voting against Obama in favor of a white candidate. This country has turned lunatic!

Whites will be called out on racism towards Obama it if it occurs; NY Times Goes Hunting for Racist 'Ultraconservatives' in Ohio Who Won't Support Obama: “The locals were most quotable in the Times when made undocumented suggestions like “you had all these whites saying, ‘Oh, there’s another vote from some drug addict.’” They also associated the notion of racial discrimination in job interviews with anti-Obama sentiment:

Stephanie Montgomery, who is black and a graduate of Franciscan University in Steubenville, said her race came up so often in her job search in this area that she developed a technique for recognizing when it was happening. The sign: when warmth on the phone turns cool in person, and “they lose eye contact with you.”

“You almost need a corporate environment to get a fair shot,” she said while standing at a job fair in the Steubenville mall. She said that she did not vote for Mr. Obama in 2008 because she preferred Mr. McCain’s more conservative platform, but that Mr. Obama seemed to be a lightning rod for criticism, in part because of his race.

“He’s everything they hate,” she said, referring to ultraconservatives, “an affirmative-action baby, who got the Nobel Prize without deserving it.”

Franciscan University is a very traditional Catholic college (my son attended it for a year). It’s very pro-life, so it would make sense that Montgomery might not be your ideal Obama voter in 2008. But did she say “ultraconservatives,” or is the Times suddenly projecting?

Here was Tavernise’s methodology in her hunt for racism: "In 50 interviews in this county over three days last week, 5 people raised race directly as a reason they would not vote for Mr. Obama," Tavernise reports. She did not ask "specifically about race, but about their views on the candidates generally," so that "those who raised the issue did so of their own accord."

As James Taranto at The Wall Street Journal theorized, “If 45 of 50 interview subjects didn't mention race, one could just as easily take the position that the glass is 90% full rather than 10% empty.” But Tavernise, and the Times felt that even a small amount of what they perceive to be racism, could be crucial in a close election.

It’s also ridiculous for the Times to imply through its mining for quotes that the concept that Obama “got the Nobel Prize without deserving it” is racist. Obama felt he won the Nobel Prize without deserving it.

Tavernise sometimes didn't find the quotes that actually would match her thesis:

Many who raised race as a concern cast Mr. Obama as a flawed candidate carried to victory by blacks voting for the first time. Others expressed concerns indirectly, through suspicions about Mr. Obama’s background and questions about his faith.

Louis Tripodi, a baker in Steubenville who voted for Mr. Obama, blames talk radio and Republican rhetoric for encouraging such attitudes. “‘He’s a Muslim, he’s a socialist, he’s not born in this country,’ ” he said. “It’s got a lot to do with race.”

Anyone who reads these sentences can see it’s the liberal who brings up Obama’s background and faith, and assumes its "racist" for radio hosts to suggest Obama is selling socialistic ideas like nationalizing the auto companies and the health care system.

Felsoci was talking about blacks voting overwhelmingly for Obama. It might not be “black ignorance,” in that black voters are stupid, but it might be “black disinterest in the facts, voting blindly on race.”

See Samuel L. Jackson: "I voted for Barack because he was black. Because that's why other folks vote for other people -- because they look like them...That’s American politics, pure and simple. [Obama’s] message didn’t mean [bleep] to me.”

But the Times never noticed that comment.

When recent polls show black voters prefer Obama 90 percent to 4, why aren’t the Times sending one of their reporters into neighborhood bars to ask them if they’re racist. If as the Times suggest in its headline, that it's sad "Race Is Still an Issue for Some Voters,” why don’t they write about blacks?

That is why liberals and the New York Times cannot be trusted anymore they are sheer hypocrites!

Pandora’s Box Open; What France & Greek Elections Show, Taking Away Existing Unfunded Entitlements from People can be Political Killers, then Why Create More?

2012-05-07T17:08:00.002-05:00

Pandora’s Box Open; What France & Greek Elections Show, Taking Away Existing Unfunded Entitlements from People can be Political Killers, then Why Create More?

By Marc Chamot

Both, Republicans and Democrats should be ashamed of themselves, for creating entitlements that the government cannot afford to render.

My take on the European elections is simple; what happens when you take candy away from a child? He or she cries.

What European elections show that strict austerity measures directed on the public, but not government employees can be political killers!

People in general don’t like to have their benefits screwed around with, nor their retirement age. What France and Greek elections show, is that most people, those who are receiving entitlement benefits are the largest voter base.

What France and Greece have shown; it’s going to be virtually impossible for U.S. politicians to do drastic reforms on Social Security, Medicare and VA Medical Benefits.

So, my best advice to Washington congress and the president, if we don’t have the money to finance people’s entitlements, then stop creating new ones. Get it?

For example, former President George Bush’s Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, its most touted change is the introduction of an entitlement benefit for prescription drugs, through tax breaks and subsidies.

In the years since Medicare's creation in 1965, the role of prescription drugs in U.S. patient care has significantly increased.

As new and expensive drugs have come into use, patients, particularly senior citizens for whom Medicare was designed, have found prescriptions harder to afford. The MMA is meant to address this problem.

The benefit is funded in a complex way, reflecting the diverse priorities of the lobbyists and constituencies whose support was needed:

It provides a subsidy for large employers to discourage them from eliminating private prescription coverage to retired workers (a key AARP goal);

It prohibits the Federal government from negotiating discounts with drug companies; It prevents the government from establishing a formulary, though does not prevent private providers such as HMOs from doing so.”

And now; Obama’s healthcare initiative, and commonly known as Obamacare, which will cost us billions more in taxpayer dollars for this newly created entitlement, while Social Security and Medicare has run amok and may go bankrupt within a few years. This is stupid, just as is foolish!

Do you want more stupid? California is going broke; they virtually have no more money left. They have run out good businesses out of the state, through their un-elected environmentalists boards out of Sacramento.

They provided more funding for illegal immigrants medical healthcares, free schooling and including college educations.

Do you want to know why our Social Security and Medicare is going broke? Millions of foreign immigrants, green carders, legal residents, and mainly those from mainland China, and Latinos are allowed to collect on SSI, Social Security, and Medicare for life after only paying five years into the program.

That is exactly what's wrong with he system. Why should we all suffer when we put our money into it, and then it's being stolen by people, who didn't invest into Social Security and Medicare in their lifetimes? That is absolutely wrong.

What are the lessons we can learn from Greece and France? Stop creating new costly entitlements and not include immigrants, or people who don’t pay into the system, because it’s going to be bloody murder at election time for politicians to take them away later.

According to Brookings Inst., Obama Doesn't Need the White Vote this time, Minorities Will Decide the 2012 U.S. Election:

2012-05-04T17:03:00.003-05:00

According to Brookings Inst., Obama Doesn't Need the White Vote this time, Minorities Will Decide the 2012 U.S. Election:

By Marc Chamot

No wonder white folks are being treated like crap by Barack Hussein Obama, he doesn't need white votes.

According to Brookings Institution, Barack Hussein Obama doesn't need the white vote this time, he can win on his own with Latino votes. No wonder we've got an arrogant, and a conceded 'Boy Wonder' in the White House.

Oh, I realize! Brookings Institute is in the tank for this racist communist. Yep, Hussein Obama is a 'jackass' all right, or a horse's ass, I don't know which, but maybe he knows what he is exactly, because we all know he's a big imbecile!

Why Minorities Will Decide the 2012 U.S. Election

U.S. Politics, Elections, Race

William H. Frey, Senior Fellow, Metropolitan Policy Program

The Brookings Institution MAY 01, 2012 —

With Republican Mitt Romney now his party’s presumptive presidential nominee, both his campaign and President Obama’s re-election effort are barnstorming the nation for votes.

For former Massachusetts Gov. Romney, this means recapturing the enthusiasm of the 2010 midterm GOP rout, especially among white Republican leaning voting blocs concerned about taxes and excessive government spending.

For the Democratic president, it means tapping into the groundswell that got him elected in 2008, particularly when it comes to minority voters.

Obama and the Democrats believe demography is on their side. Census 2010 made abundantly clear that racial and ethnic minorities, especially Hispanics, are dominating national growth and will for decades to come. The Democratic agenda— favoring broader federal support for medical care, housing, and education seems designed to curry the favor of these groups, which played a huge role in tipping the balance in his favor in several key swing states.

But while demography is often destiny, it’s not necessarily a slam dunk that minorities can carry the day for Obama this time. The reasons have to do with the complications of translating pure demographics into votes and the outsized role that the nation’s still large white population can exert on national politics.

The 2010 midterm Republican surge is an example. With the economy in freefall and disenchantment with early Obama initiatives rising, even sympathetic white voting blocs—like college graduate women— fled the Democrats in what The National Journal’s Ron Brownstein termed a “white flight.”

Of course the president's public approval ratings have risen since then, and the economy has picked up some. The country is clearly not at the same place economically as it was in 2008 or 2010.

Recently released Census Bureau Current Population Survey data from January 2012 permit a simulation of this year’s election under different white and minority voting scenarios.

They show that Obama’s reelection is even more dependent on minority support than in 2008—and not just in the most racially diverse states.

Two factors are key to translating minority population into votes in 2012: eligibility and turnout.

The minority/eligible voter disconnect. The minority representation in the total population overstates its presence among eligible voters because our fastest growing minorities are either too young to vote or are less likely to be citizens, even when here legally. For every 100 Hispanic residents in the United States, only 44 are eligible voters aged 18 and over and U.S. citizens. In contrast, 78 of every 100 white residents are able to vote. In this respect, Asians are more like Hispanics and blacks are more like whites. So even though minorities are growing faster than whites overall, the latter are more heavily represented among eligible voters (71 percent) than in the total population (63 percent; Figure 1).

This disparity is even larger in many fast growing “new minority” states. In Nevada, whites comprise 51 percent of the population but fully 61 percent of eligible voters. Other states where minority voters are strongly underrepresented include Arizona, California, Texas, and Florida (Table 1).

Further diminishing minority electoral clout is lower voter turnout. In each of the last two elections, the share of eligible minority voters who voted was 15 to 20 percent less than for whites. Turnout rates were smallest for the fast growing Hispanic and Asian populations. As a consequence, the white share of actual voters will be even larger than it is among eligible voters (estimated to be about 75 percent of voters in November).

Why minorities mattered in 2008. Minorities mattered in 2008 for three reasons: first, their relative sizes compared with whites increased in each state; second, their enthusiasm for the Democratic candidate was greater than in 2004; and third, white support for the Republican candidate (John McCain) waned in comparison to the previous election.

The uptick in minority enthusiasm for the first black presidential candidate resulted in higher turnout rates, and larger Democratic vote margins nationally than in 2004 (Figures 2a and 2b). This was the case in most but not all states, including Nevada and Florida, where Hispanics, blacks, and other minorities turned the tide toward the Democrats.

Often overlooked, but just as important, was weaker white Republican support in terms of both turnout and margin. Although whites dominated the electorate in states like Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Indiana, their tepid support for McCain opened the door for those states’ much smaller minority populations to tip the balance to Obama. In more diverse states like North Carolina and Virginia, minorities would not have made the difference were it not for sharply lower white Republican support than in 2004.

Minorities and the 2012 election. As we approach November, minorities will account for a slightly larger share of eligible voters than in 2008. At the same time, white support for the Republican candidate may be greater than in 2008. Which dynamic will prevail?

Three simulations—based on January 2012 eligible voter populations in every state (Table 2), but with different assumptions about white and minority turnout and voting—provide clues as to November’s possible results Each simulation assesses how many states and Electoral College votes Obama and Romney would win, and for which states minorities are responsible for the win (states where whites voted for the losing candidate).

Scenario A, the best case for Democrats, assumes that the 2008 turnout and voting patterns again apply to new population. If that occurs, Obama wins with 29 states and 358 electoral votes (Map). These are the same states he took in 2008—changing racial demographics did not put any new states in his column. As with the 2008 win, 10 state victories (representing 39 percent of his electoral votes) can be attributed to minority voters. These states put him over the winning 270 electoral vote threshold.

Scenario B, the best-case for Republicans, applies 2004 turnout and voting patterns to the 2012 population. This time, Romney beats Obama with 286 electoral votes in 30 states. The stronger white support for Republicans here, compared with Scenario A, is evident even in big states taken by Democrats, like California, New York and Illinois where whites voted Republican and minorities were responsible for the wins.

Scenario C signals something closer to what this year’s election promises—strong partisan participation for both whites and minorities. Whites in each state are assumed to mimic their 2004 turnout and voting patterns, reflecting higher levels of enthusiasm for the Republican nominee than in 2008. Minorities are presumed to follow their strong 2008 turnout and voting margins. The results favor an Obama win—but barely.

Obama squeaks by with 292 electoral votes spread among 24 states. Of these votes, 230 are attributable to 14 states where the minorities were responsible for his victory (including eight where whites voted for Obama in 2008). In essence, about four-fifths of Obama’s electoral votes are attributable to states won by minorities. Among the new states where Obama depends on minorities under this scenario are California, New York, Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin. Among the 14 states, Obama’s victories in Florida, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Oregon (66 electoral votes total) would be particularly close.

This scenario awards Romney five states that Obama won in 2008: Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana and Colorado. The 27 states (and 246 electoral votes) that Romney gains under this scenario are not all decisive wins either. While whites vote Republican in each, overall margins are very close in Ohio and Missouri, large states with substantial minority populations.

Whatever scenario comes to pass, minorities are going to matter in November. The new demography of the electorate guarantees it. Their significance lies not just in racially diverse battleground states on the coasts, Southeast, and Mountain West. If the white Republican base turns out in full force, the votes of African Americans and growing Hispanic populations will be necessary for Democratic wins in a slew of interior states with largely white electorates. The 2012 election will most assuredly be a battle of turnout and its outcome will greatly depend on the enthusiasm of minority voting blocs.

Osama Bin Laden Endorses MSNBC as Most Fair & Balanced & Keith Olbermann His Favorite Anchor! 3 ICE Agents Wounded, Going after MS-13’s Norteños on Anti-gang Sweeps Raises Some Questions?

2012-05-04T12:41:00.003-05:00

Osama Bin Laden Endorses MSNBC as Most Fair & Balanced & Keith Olbermann His Favorite Anchor! 3 ICE Agents Wounded, Going after MS-13’s Norteños on Anti-gang Sweeps Raises Some Questions?

By Marc Chamot

Is this country infested with illegal Hispanic/Latinos criminal illegal elements, enough to shoot 3 ICE agents?

Yes, illegal alien thugs with guns, imagine that? So why weren't any of these criminal thugs killed under gunfire? That's the mystery question?

But first; Do American Left-Wing nutcases inspire terrorism? I think it does, because Osama Bin Laden’s recovered memoires’ says so.

What does it tell you, about American leftist liberals, or liberals in general, when Osama Bin Laden endorses their Network?

No kidding. Osama Bin Laden thought that radical and left-wing MSNBC was the most fair and balanced.

His favorite clown on the Network was that ultra-nutcase, Keith Olbermann; Osama’s written work says, he was very disappointed at MSNBC for firing him.

And these leftist nutcases are saying that Republican conservatives are the radicals. Wow! Here’s the proof folks, obviously from Osama comments on MSNBC and Olbermann that anti-Americanism from the left inspires terrorism, there’s no butt’s about it my friends.

3 federal ICE agents were shot and wounded going after criminal illegal alien thugs and gangsters in Petaluma California.

This was prompted by a 2010 triple killing in South San Francisco California, where Feds and local authorities took part in a crime sweep across the Bay Area and arrested 13 gangsters; most were part of the viscous murderous Hispanic MS-13’s Norteño gangsters.

When federal agents came busting through the garage door, shots were fired from inside the home and injured three ICE agents. What I’m wondering? With such a force; why weren’t any of those criminals illegal alien gangsters killed on the spot?

Is President Obama restricting our federal agents from returning fire to shoot and kill, on Latino dangerous criminal illegal gangsters like the MS-13?

Is President Obama putting our agents at risk, just for Latino support? Folks, I find it very incredulous that a federal SWAT team, when three Fed members get shot, but gangsters like MS-13, the perpetrators, who started the gunfire survive to live another day?

Support Waning for San Francisco, Bay Area’s Pro-Illegal Immigration's & Occupy Movement for Workers Rights in May Day Marches:

2012-05-04T11:07:00.000-05:00

Support Waning for San Francisco, Bay Area’s Pro-Illegal Immigration's & Occupy Movement for Workers Rights in May Day Marches:

By Marc Chamot & Photo Source: Zimbio.Com

Even in liberal California, folks are getting tired of illegals.

May Day’s massive disruptions of the Bay Area and San Francisco came and gone, without a whimper.

The crowd was so small, that people were wondering if the rapture has come about without their knowing.

The May 1^st, in the May Day marches support in most parts such as San Francisco, and Bay Area fizzled into thin air. The customary May 1^st pro-illegal immigration marches and the Occupy movements are collapsing.

What’s most interesting, illegal immigrant outlook for the Bay Area wasn’t that good either. In the past May Day marches and demonstrations were huge, laden with Hispanics/Latinos, among other races, whites and blacks, who went out in masses for illegal immigrants’ and workers rights, but not this time!

People saw through their façade, major local unions and their government employees, got the royal proverbial finger from the populace.

People have concluded that these organizations are made up of not only leftist and liberals, but it’s made up of greedy government employees and their unions. It is also made up of violent communist anarchists and pro-open borders and pro-illegal immigration backers, of which most sane thinking folks are finally realizing that this is not their cause.

Actually, it’s the economy stupid and some liberals are finally waking up to what these people are all about.

Most people have come to the conclusion that these people and these marches don’t benefit them one bit. Those May Day protestors are way out of whack from the majority’s core beliefs, people in the Bay Area are also realizing that these people are only in it for themselves, not for the rest.

Chief Executive Magazine's Poll of CEO’s; California Absolute Worst in Nation to do Business, While Texas is Number One!

2012-05-03T13:55:00.000-05:00

Chief Executive Magazine's Poll of CEO’s; California Absolute Worst in Nation to do Business, While Texas is Number One!

By Marc Chamot

Mama, don’t let your states grow up to be California; Chief executives from major companies throughout the land, handpicked California as the worst place in the nation to do business.

Liberal policies and agendas are destroying California. California is going totally broke folks.

So what California liberals are hoping for, is a Democratic takeover of the U.S. House and Senate and presidency, so that they can get more of those deficits killing bailouts that liberals love, taxing to finance the poor and keeping radical environment policies over business and jobs interests.

With endless migrations of poor Asian Chinese from Asia that have to be sustained and maintained through California charities and welfares systems. A state that protects close to 5 million illegal aliens, it is not too hard to see that the state is going downwards, bankrupt.

Numerous California cities have already filed for bankruptcies.

You drive through most San Francisco neighborhoods, chief city for immigrants of all California combined with Asians and Latinos, including illegal aliens’ and immigrant neighborhoods throughout the city are decaying beyond recognition.

Filth and trash scattered all over, and houses are not properly maintained and streets are in shambles, resembling the surface of the moon with so many pot holes.

You see my friends; San Francisco public employees are stealing taxpayer moneys in salaries out of greed, while many foreign immigrants aren’t contributing fair shares of taxes, but are straining the city’s and the state’s welfare systems.

The liberal multi-cultural policies of the wealthy supporting the state’s immigrant poor is not sustainable, because when wealth abandons the state due to excessive taxations, regulations and fees and there is no more money available.

Taking more than what they give. In other words, good taxpaying companies and corporations are being chased out; leaving the state in droves, while leaving poor immigrants behind, to populate the state, which the state has to provide taxpayer financed support for those immigrants.

Supporting millions of immigrants who have never contributed financially, nor paid any taxes to the state or federal government in their lives!

So, business executives have named California the absolutely worst state for business for the eighth year in a row, says Chief Executive Magazine.

“The publication surveyed 650 chief executives about states based on such factors as business taxation and regulation, workforce quality and living environment. CEOs gave the Golden State four out of five stars for living environment, three stars for workforce quality but one star for taxation and regulation.

CEOs' opinions matter because they play roles in determining where a company will locate, expand or add jobs and increasingly, the competition is with other states more than foreign countries.

"California's enduring place of perpetual decline continues in this year's ranking," the publication states. "Once the most attractive business environment, the Golden State appears to slip deeper into the ninth circle of business hell.

"It's little wonder that most Silicon Valley CEOs say they won't expand in California because of high taxes and burdensome regulation," Chief Executive continues, "Intel long ago moved its plants to Nevada, and Cisco, Google and others have located their server farms to places like Utah, Arizona and Oregon."

The publication cites California's 10.9% unemployment rate, third highest in the U.S., its status as home to a third of the nation's welfare recipients. "Each year, the evidence that businesses are leaving California or avoid locating there because of the high cost of doing business due to excessive state taxes and stringent regulations, grows."

At the other end of the spectrum, Texas ranks first on the CEOs' list of best states for business for the 8th consecutive year. It has been the receiving state for Allstate Insurance's $12 million customer center in SanAntonio, Caterpillar's new plants in Seguin and Victoria; eBay/Pay Pal hiring 1,000 people for its Austin facility.

Just this week, Apple Inc. Agreed to add 3,600 more jobs in Austin where it already employs 3,100 people. The company is receiving approximately $35 million in tax rebates and Austin and Texas economic development grants.

CEOs were brutal in their assessment of California. Among the quotes from unnamed CEOs that Chief Executive cites:

"California - the government is the worst in every possible way."

"California has a great draw from a weather and location view point, but the state is so business unfriendly."

"California, New York and Michigan...have bloated governments, are union-controlled and run significant annual budget deficits."

"State politicians feel business and commerce are 'necessary evils' that provide the funds to enable pursuit of their misguided agendas."

"California... has too much government who has nothing better to do than to harass businesses in the state. They need to cut the size of their regulatory bodies in half,"

And "California regulations, taxes and costs will leave only tech, life sciences and entertainment as viable."

"California has different overtime policies for its own employees vs. private sector."

"California's taxes and ongoing changes for regulations are devastating. One never knows from day to day what new interpretation or an existing regulation or new regulation will befall your small business."

Some states are making significant changes that are impacting their ranking on this annual list. Indiana ranks 5th on the 2012 list, compared to 16th just two years ago. During the recession, Indiana has cut taxes and in 2011 became the 23rd right-to-work state.

More impressive is Louisiana, which ranked 47th in 2006 is now 13th on Chief Executive's list of best states for business. "In Louisiana there is an active government push to reduce taxes and regulation and to encourage new industry to relocate to the state," one business executive said.

On the other hand, Oregon dropped 9 spots to rank 42nd on the 2012 list. Chief Executive cites fights over health insurance exchanges, tax and regulatory fee increases.

Click here to see the 10 best states for business.

Click here to see the 10 worst states for business.”

What’s more interesting about this study; every blue state such as California, New York, Oregon, Hawaii, Connecticut, Michigan, Massachusetts and Illinois were rated the worst to do business, only four of the top five top best are Republican run states.

Top 10 best, Texas, Georgia, South Carolina, Virginia, Indiana, Tennessee, North Carolina, Arizona, Utah, and Florida are tops!

Obama Orders IRS to refund 'Illegal Aliens' $4.2 billion, While Asking the Rich to Pony-Up More Tax Dollars!

2012-05-03T04:03:00.000-05:00

Obama Orders IRS to refund 'Illegal Aliens' $4.2 billion, While Asking the Rich to Pony-Up More Tax Dollars!

By Marc Chamot

The dismantling of an incompetent administration, and one scandal after the nest, with this complete'jackass' in the White House!

President Barack Hussein Obama wants to tax the rich, the wealthiest just because government is going broke, what does this imbecile do?

Obama is allowing the IRS to refund illegal aliens tax money, and child tax credits, even though they are not residing in the U.S.!

Not only that folks. Mexico's GDP is twice of that of the United States, and this incompetent fool allows billions of U.S. dollars sneak out the country! And that's incomprehensible folks!

According to NBC and the Examiner.com. "This bombshell dropped on Monday in Washington, D.C., causing outrage throughout the halls of Congress, and now beyond, to the "genuine" taxpayers who have been robbed all across America.

Investigative television reporter Bob Segall of Indianapolis NBC affiliate WTHR TV Channel 13, was contacted by a long-time central Indiana tax preparer, who blew the whistle on a multi-billion dollar tax fraud about which the IRS has done nothing, according to the TV news show video segment that aired on Monday.

"There is not a doubt in my mind there's huge fraud taking place here," he said, slowly flipping through the pages of a [heavily redacted] tax return.

"We're talking about a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme here that's taking place and no one is talking about it," he said.

The scheme involves illegal immigrants that are filing tax returns, claiming child credits for multiple dependents under their support in "their" U.S. household, and collecting enormous cash refunds--such as one persons tax return that showed income of over $14,000, who collected a cash refund of over $10,300.

n 1996 during the Clinton Administration, the Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN) was created in order for both resident and non-resident aliens, regardless of immigration status, to fulfill their tax filing and payment obligations under IRS regulations--even though an ITIN does not confer the right to work and receive income in the United States.

This year tax preparation offices across the country were flooded by an estimated 2 million illegal immigrants, who in growing numbers have been taking advantage of a tax loophole called the Additional Child Tax Credit--a fully-refundable credit of up to $1000 per child--meant to ease the income tax burden on working families who have childrenliving at home.

However, Segall's investigation and reporting found many illegal immigrants who were claiming these tax credits, but for kids who live in Mexico–even listing nieces and nephews.

"We've seen sometimes 10 or 12 dependents, most times nieces and nephews, on these tax forms," the whistleblower told Eyewitness News. "The more you put on there, the more you get back."

After Segall reviewed many of the heavily redacted tax returns, it was still clear that the tax filers had received large tax refunds after claiming child tax credits for many dependents.

"Here's a return right here: we've got a $10,3000 refund for nine nieces and nephews," he said, pointing to the words "niece" and "nephew" listed on the tax forms nine separate times.

"We're getting an $11,000 refund on this tax return. There's seven nieces and nephews," he said, pointing to another set of documents. "I can bring out stacks and stacks. It's just so easy it's ridiculous."

Under agreement not to reveal their identity or filming them face on, Segall of WTHR was able to speak with several of the illegal immigrants who, using Segall's translator--confirmed it is easy.

One of the workers, who was interviewed at his [appeared to be a 2 bedroom mobile home] in southern Indiana, admitted that four other illegal immigrants used his address to file tax returns--even though they don't even live there.

These four workers claimed that not only they, but a total of 20 children between them--about 30 people--lived in the residence.

As a result, the IRS sent the illegal immigrants tax refunds totaling $29,608.Upon Segall questioning the man regarding that incredible residency claim, he replied ... "They don't live here ... the other kids are in their country of origin, which is Mexico," later saying that none of the 20 children have ever visited the United States–let alone lived here.

Segall then asked why 'undocumented workers' should receive tax credits for children living in a foreign country, which is a violation of IRS tax rules?

"If the opportunity is there and they can give it to me, why not take advantage of it?"

Segall then met with Russell George, the U.S. Treasury Department's Inspector General for Tax Administration, who stated ... "The magnitude of the problem has grown exponentially," but that the IRS has known about the problem for years.

Mr. George said his department has repeatedly warned the IRS that additional child tax credits are being abused by undocumented workers--in 2009 alone, their annual audit report showed that ITIN tax filers received about $1 billion in additional child tax credits.

The same audit report from 2010 showed it cost the American tax payers more than $4.2 billion.

"Keep in mind, we're talking $4 billion per year." George continued by saying "It's very troubling" that the IRS has not taken any action on the matter--despite these multiple warnings from their own inspector general.

"Millions of people are seeking this tax credit who, we believe, are not entitled to it," said the inspector general. "We have made recommendations to [IRS] as to how they could address this, and they have [still] not taken sufficient action in our view to solve the problem."

Segall's investigation revealed that claims for additional child tax credits by ITIN filers have skyrocketed during the past decade--from $161 million in 2001 to $4.2 billion in tax year 2010.

He also found that illegal immigrants filed 3.02 million tax returns in 2010, with 72% of those returns (2.18 million)claiming the additional child tax credit.

Segall's attempts to speak with any of the 100,000 employees of the IRS were rebuffed; instead they emailed this statement...

"The law has been clear for over a decade that eligibility for these credits does not depend on work authorization status or the type of taxpayer identification number used. Any suggestion that the IRS shouldn't be paying out these credits under current law to ITIN holders is simply incorrect. The IRS administers the law impartially and applies it as it is written," the statement said.

George disagrees with that position and believes the IRS should be doing more to prevent undocumented workers from getting billions in US tax dollars.

"The IRS is not doing something as simple as requesting sufficient documentation from people seeking this credit," he said. "Once the money goes out the door, it's nearly impossible for the IRS to get it back."

Segall says that the IRS says it can't change the system unless it gets permission from Congress; and closing this loophole requires lawmakers to pass a new law specifically excluding illegal immigrants from claiming additional child tax credits.

However, the IRS "Ten Facts About Child Tax Credit," does not concur, as illegal immigrants, by definition, fail the citizenship qualification test.

Let's remember, this is an election year, Barack Obama is CEO, Harry Reid can block any legislation in the Senate, andTreasury Secretary Tim Geithner, who is George Russell's boss, is still claiming that Obamacare will reduce healthcare costs.

Tomorrow in my follow on article, learn how Congressmen are reacting to this incredible tax fraud--and what they intend to do about it"

CNN Loses 50% of Viewership, Likely for Refusing to Take On Barack Hussein Obama, over his Signing of National Defense Authorization Act 2012, Indefinite Detention of Americans Without Due Process:

2012-05-02T16:07:00.004-05:00

Backlash Coming? CNN Loses 50% of Viewership, Likely for Refusing to Take On Barack Hussein Obama, over his Signing of National Defense Authorization Act 2012, Indefinite Detention of Americans Without Due Process:

By Marc Chamot

Well hello; is there massive electorate’s backlashes on Barack Obama and U.S. congress coming from the left and everyone else in the works? I think so.

CNN, the Barack Hussein Obama Network has lost 50% of their viewership, according to recent national viewership audit!

This bodes very bad news for the president's re-election opportunities, and possibly a whole lot of members of U.S. congress and the house who voted for this bill, may be removed.

In Obama’s case, it seems that he lost his base over the signing into law the NDAA, a national authorization act, which includes the permanent incarceration of Americans without due processes of court hearings, on any constitutionally protected civil acts that the president deems terrorist.

The main culprit, political killer, maybe Obama signing the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 “The most controversial provisions to receive wide attention are contained in Title X, Subtitle D, entitled "Counter-Terrorism." In particular, sub-sections 1021 and 1022, which deal with detention of persons the government suspects of involvement in terrorism, have generated controversy as to their legal meaning and their potential implications for abuse of Presidential authority.

Although the White House[9] and Senate sponsors[10] maintain that the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) already grants presidential authority for indefinite detention, the Act states that Congress "affirms" this authority and makes specific provisions as to the exercise of that authority.

[11][12] The detention provisions of the Act have received critical attention by, among others, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, and some media sources which are concerned about the scope of the President's authority, including contentions that those whom they claim may be held indefinitely could include U.S. citizens arrested on American soil, including arrests by members of the Armed Forces.[13][14][15][16][17]”

President Obama signed the NDAA into law, to make it easier for him to declare Martial Law and suspend habeas corpus on U.S. citizens. Had President Obama vetoed the bill, he would have virtually had a second term guaranteed.

Republicans and Democrats in the U.S. Senate and House, better worry too, because they are in big trouble for passing such rights intrusive bill that is violating the U.S. constitution, and people’s freedoms with suspensions of habeas corpus are at stake.

“Habeas corpus is a writ, or legal action, through which a prisoner can be released from unlawful detention, that is, detention lacking sufficient cause or evidence.

The remedy can be sought by the prisoner or by another person coming to their aid. Habeas corpus originated in the English legal system to assist wealthy landowners, but it is now available in many nations.

It has historically been an important legal instrument safeguarding individual freedom of certain individuals against arbitrary state action. It is a writ requiring a person to be brought before a judge.”

But of course, CNN bore the brunt of the downward trend the news networks experienced this month and for much of the first quarter, when compared to the busy first few months of 2011.

Wait, Did CNN Just Lose HALF Of Its Viewers? “For the month of March, CNN was down -50% in total viewers and down -60% in A25-54 viewers (Total Day). The net was down -21% in Total Viewers and down -26% in A25-54 viewers (Primetime) compared to March 2011."

The viewer exodus is not limited to CNN, though. Roger Ailes' aging heavyweight champion FOX News "was not immune to a loss in viewership for the month of March and for the first quarter of 2012. And For the month, Fox News is down -17%," according to another post by Ariens.

Perhaps, if I may be so bold, this is what happens to you when you continue to report stories that no longer resemble -- even remotely -- what your own viewers see outside their windows and apartments.

CNN has barely covered the rapidly growing Occupy and Tea Party protests around the country, and as the clip from Current TV's Cenk Uygur below points out, CNN gave zero prime-time coverage to the NDAA's indefinite detention provisions, arguably one of the most devastating rollbacks of Americans' civil rights ever.

Perhaps viewers are sick and tired of the same half-assed recycled stories about Kim Kardashian, the same shiny Piers Morgan celebrity interviews, and perhaps a war weary public is also not so quick to slurp up CNN's incoherent Iran warmongering.

Perhaps viewers are disgusted with CNN's packaging of the 2012 election year -- a critical time regardless of where you stand politically -- into a crass sports event, heavy on special effects and "analysis," and quite thin on actual reporting.

Now, I don't think CNN's viewers have suddenly decided not to consume news any more. I just think they are going online to do it.

Maybe your viewers no longer need you. Cenk Uygur explores CNN's massive failure to cover the NDAA:”
What’s happening to CNN is what’s happening to all traditional Medias around, including the New York Times. The Times once blasted President George Bush, over anti-constitutional rights’ intrusive Patriot Act, but were merely silent on Obama’s Patriot act, on the jailing of Americans without due processes.

People are finally waking up; people are now realizing that traditional Medias are tools of corruptive politicians, they distract people with gibberish and nonsense news, while American politicians are destroying this nation and ripping the constitution apart.

People are now turning to the Internet to get their facts! They know they’ve been deceived for all these years.

Not so Fast Rush Limbaugh; Why Blame Democrats for Growing national Debts? FACT: Under GOP Presidents Reagan, Bush, With Some Republican Senate Control Created Most of the National Debt:

2012-05-02T14:51:00.003-05:00

Not so Fast Rush Limbaugh; Why Blame Democrats for Growing national Debts? FACT: Under GOP Presidents Reagan, Bush, With Some Republican Senate Control Created Most of the National Debt:

By Marc Chamot

The blame game; when I hear conservatives talk about former President Ronald Reagan, about his tax cuts, and creating a thriving jobs market and economy, they tend to ignore the truths about the growing debt.

The truths of the matter; when President Reagan instituted his massive tax cuts, the big loss of money had to come from somewhere, right? Welcome national debt!

I am conservative, and I am one of those that have never been a big fan of former President Ronald Reagan. Yes, President Reagan did initiate big tax cuts, created jobs, and a thriving economy, but Ronald Reagan also created nightmares, of escalating national debts that conservatives want to ignore today.

Playing loose with the facts; anybody, anyone can Google and get economic chart reports on "national debts" and get the montages of real facts.

In conservative Radio show host, Rush Limbaugh was totally wrong, when he claimed that during the Ronald Reagan years and George Bush’s years, Democrats were at fault for the national debt, because they controlled both houses, the Senate and the House of Representatives.

According to facts that Limbaugh, chose to ignore; in the first six years of the Reagan’s presidency (1981-87) The Republicans controlled the U.S. Senate and the Democrats the House of Representatives until 1986.

GOP/Republicans like Rush Limbaugh, pride themselves about President Reagan cutting 70% to 28% tax rates on the wealthy.

What President Reagan forgot; with the tax cuts, you’ve got to cut down on the size of government and expenditures’, but that never happened, but instead, we began to borrow to pay the bills because we lost the revenues from these massive tax cuts.

According to these charts, even congress under Republican control national debt was still rising, without skipping a beat.

Making the U.S. Supreme Court Liberal; Assassinations' on Conservative Members at the Supreme Court Probable; if Obamacare & Arizona SB 1070 are overturned; My Worst Fear? An Obama Second Term:

2012-04-30T16:18:00.000-05:00

Making the U.S. Supreme Court Liberal; Assassinations' on Conservative Members at the Supreme Court Probable; if Obamacare & Arizona SB 1070 are overturned; My Worst Fear? An Obama Second Term:

By Marc Chamot

Assassinations’ concerns can reverberate the other way too. It is all about who’s got the power.

Some public opinionated minorities have been talking about their worst fears; a possible black man’s and possible American president’s assassination on Barack Hussein Obama, if he wins a second term. That’s been the talk among the African American communities and liberals ever since 2008.

The Secret Service has been taking those threats against the president seriously and has arrested many people over it.

Going on into his 2012 re-election campaigns, I am hearing that talk all over again from the same people; if Obama wins a second term he’d be assassinated. But that’s bull, no folks; they’ve got it all wrong, this will never happen.

However; President Hussein Obama has showed his scorns towards our conservative members of the U.S. Supreme Court many times. Me personally, I wouldn’t put passed this president, and his powerful cronies to do something harmful towards our conservative members at the Supreme Court.

No! It’s not the self proclaimed dictator and left-wing radical Barack Hussein Obama’s assassination we have to worry about folks, we’d better worry about our conservative Supreme Court justices’ state of health.

My biggest fear is an assassination or attempt assassinations on a conservative member of the U.S. Supreme Court. All it takes is one, replacing one conservative member, to make it five to four in favor of liberals.

The five conservatives at the U.S. Supreme Court are standing in the way of Obama’s radicalizations, of left-wing agendas that’s destroying America; justices John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United States, Antonin Scalia, Associate Justice, Anthony M. Kennedy, Associate Justice, Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, and Samuel Anthony Alito, Jr., Associate Justice, they’d all better watch their backs as long as Barack Hussein Obama is president.

It’s obvious, what stands in the way of Obama passing his far left-radical ideologies on American, like Obamacare and legalizing statuses for illegal aliens, that possibly five conservative members of the U.S. Supreme Court will negate, and make Obama’s three and a half years a total waste of time and money.

Well hey liberal; you radical racists worry about Barack Hussein Obama’s health and future?

Well, I do worry about my U.S. Supreme Court conservative justices’ welfare, as liberals worry about Obama's. This left-wing political ploy about Obama's safety, works both ways you know?

Leader Needed, Not a Celebrity President; Enough with those Extravagant Parties & Vacations, Obama’s living it off at Taxpayer’s Expense while Entire Nation has gone amuck & Going Broke:

2012-04-28T20:00:00.000-05:00

Leader Needed, Not a Celebrity President; Enough with those Extravagant Parties & Vacations, Obama’s living it off at Taxpayer’s Expense while Entire Nation has gone Amuck & Going Broke:

By Marc Chamot

The Anti-Obama ad wars have begun. The hits are coming, because President Obama does not have a record to run on. The economy and unemployment are in worse shape, than what it was when he took office three and a half years ago.

A 30 second ad mocking the president as a ‘celebrity president’ produced by Karl Rove’s American Crossroads group, this powerful ad shows how he and Michelle Obama are living it off with wealthy Hollywood actors and actresses, singers, and artists, while millions of Americans are unemployed.

Most striving to survive with little they’ve got. “Americans are watching the Obama’s summer break on Martha's Vineyard has already been branded a PR disaster after the couple arrived four hours apart on separate government jets.

But according to new reports, this is the least of their extravagances. Branding her 'disgusting' and 'a vacation junkie', they say the 47-year-old mother-of-two has been indulging in five-star hotels, where she splashes out on expensive massages and alcohol.”

"The First Lady is believed to have taken 42 days of holiday in thepast year; the vacations are totally Michelle's idea. ... The exact cost is unclear as Mrs. Obama and her 40 friends footed many personal expenses White House sources today claimed that the First Lady has spent $10million of U.S. taxpayers' money on vacations alone in the past year."

GIRLS' TRIP TO SPAIN: AUGUST 2010

The exact cost is unclear as Mrs Obama and her 40 friends footed many personal expenses, such as hotels and meals themselves.

But the U.S. taxpayer would have paid for the First Lady's 68-strong security detail, personal staff, and use of presidential jet Air Force Two.

Per diems for the secret service team runs at around $281 each - nearly $98,000 for the length of the summer break.

Use of Air Force Two, the Air Force version of a 757, comes in at $149,900 for the round trip. This does not include time on the ground.

Mrs Obama's personal staff, of which there are an unknown amount and might cost considerably more per day, should also be taken into account.

CHRISTMAS BREAK IN HAWAII: DECEMBER 2010

According to the Hawaii Reporter, the bill for the $1.5m trip included:

· $63,000 on an early flight bringing Mrs Obama and the children to Hawaii ahead of the President.

· $1,000,000 on Mr Obama’s return trip from Washington on Air Force One.

· $38,000 for the ‘Winter White House’ beach property rental.

· $16,000 to rent nearby homes for Secret Service and Navy Seals.

· $134,000 for 24 White House staff to stay at the Moana Hotel.

· $251,000 in police overtime.

· $10,000 for an ambulance to be on hand at all times

SKI TRIP TO VAIL: FEBRUARY 2011

Mrs Obama and her daughters stayed at the Sebastian hotel on Vail Mountain, where rooms cost more than $2,400 for multi-bedroom suites.

The family appear to have flown there on Air Force Two.

They were escorted to the resort by a motorcade of about a dozen vehicles, including 15 state and local law enforcement officers

SUMMER HOLIDAY ON MARTHA'S VINEYARD: AUGUST 2011

The Blue Heron Farm estate, where the Obama family are currently staying, rents for about $50,000 a week.

According to U.S. News and World Report, the Coast Guard is required to keep ships floating near the property, the presidential helicopter and jet remain at the ready and security agents will be on 24-hour duty.

There are no jobs for American college graduates, but he still insists on legalizing illegal immigrants with the DREAM ACT, for illegal immigrant students who have never paid any taxes, that will burst wide open our fragile welfare system, including Social Security that’s going broke.

Ideas like those, is damaging his reputation. We're watching all these fancy and rich lifestyles that only billionaires can afford, developing right in front of our eyes. We're not so stupid.

Obama is trying to capitalize on Osama Bin Laden’s killing; he thinks he can run on, making it a major accomplishment and achievement during his presidency. He’s got old former President Bill Clinton doing a 90 second ad, showing the people that he was the president that got Bin Laden.

Americans don’t give a hoot about the killing of Bin Laden now. Americans care more about their pocketbooks, jobs, healthcare that has gone amuck, and are more worried about the state of Social Security and Medicare, if it’s going to be around for them later.

Americans are more concerned about the $15 trillion deficits and rising costs of food, gas and so on. Americans just don’t give a darn about Osama Bin Laden killing right now. We don’t want or need a celebrity president. We need a leader!

That's why I support Mitt Romney for president. We cannot afford another four disastrous years with Barack Hussein Obama.

Oh, by the way. Even The White House has read the Marc Chamot Report in the past and I don't think President Obama has learned anything yet:

Google’s New Dynamic Views, Very Unique & Wonderful! & A Sad Farewell to all My Friends at Entrecard:

2012-04-28T16:16:00.002-05:00

Google’s New Dynamic Views, Very Unique & Wonderful! & A Sad Farewell to all My Friends at Entrecard:

By Marc Chamot

Is Google Dynamic Views, the best thing ever since slice bread? Absolutely folks! I like it!

To my Dear friends at Entrecard; sadly to announce that new Google ‘Dynamic Views’ for bloggers won’t accept any widgets at this time.

I love Entrecard, and Entrecard has been very good to me for the past three years of blogging.

I have made lots of good friends through Entrecard and I appreciate very much what they did for me, I will surely miss everybody.

There is no way to place any widgets on Dynamic View’s side bars. The only way to keep the blog active is by posting, pictures, videos, or anything that I want recorded forever on the Net, but not through sidebars unfortunately. Hopefully, in the near future, I'll attempt to place Entrecard back on my blog when possible.

Apparently Google automatically created a few widgets on a sidebar that I could keep. However, there is no way for you to card me back anymore at through Google’s Dynamic Views.

I will certainly miss all of you good folks at Entrecard; however, this is time to move on, but please keep checking me out if you can, I will too.

Google Dynamic Views has allowed my blog buddies links, that’s the good news.

What’s really incredible? Since I made the switch yesterday, Google organizes their ads on every post when opened, while I get more traffic generated unto my blog through Google and their feeds. Google says, through their Dynamic Views, your blog gets more exposure and traffic, through their unique algorithm, they generate more traffic.

Since I made the switch yesterday, my blog traffic had averaged between 250-300 viewers a day and now, in just one day it shot up to 700 viewers as you see here!

It was a big sacrifice, but written contents are far more important than junking up one’s sidebar like I have been doing. What made me decide to go with ‘Dynamic Views’ was, what’s even more incredible, according to Google, readers can locate every article written, and quicker right in front of the their eyes! There are no clouds or tags ever needed for any blogs! Google does it automatically for you!

Million dollar blog looks and feel; Dynamic Views, even makes a simple blogger like me look professional!

According to Google; Get a Bird's Eye on people's blogs, you can channel through blogs easier and friendlier, without confusions.

All about Dynamic Views for Readers:

Blogger now offers seven new ways to experience your favorite blogs.

Classic: A modern twist on a traditional template
Flipcard: Photos tiled across the page
Magazine: A clean, elegant editorial style layout
Mosaic: A mosaic mix of different sized images and text
Sidebar: An email inbox-like view with a reading page for quick scrolling and browsing
Snapshot: An interactive pinboard of your posts
Timeslide: A horizontal view of your posts by time period

Dynamic Views make it easier to read your favorite blogs. Better yet, they make it easy to discover posts written long ago that you may not have read.

Blog authors can now configure their blog to display Dynamic Views, and select a default view that best displays the type of posts on their blog. To experience a blog in view other than the default, you can simply select another view style from the toolbar, which, in some views, collapses into a thin line as you scroll. For the toolbar to reappear, simply hover your mouse over the line.

If the blog you’re reading has Pages enabled, the options will appear in a drop-down menu like the one in the image below.

Marc Chamot's Complete Bio & The Marc Chamot Report, Very Highly Recommended American Political Blog & Has Won Numerous Awards:

2012-04-28T15:37:00.000-05:00

Marc Chamot's Complete Bio & The Marc Chamot Report, Very Highly Recommended American Political Blog & Has Won Numerous Awards:

By Marc Chamot

DISCLAIMER: “Where I have NO SHAME to tell it like it is! It’s GUARANTEED that you might not like SOME of what I write, and you’re bound to get ticked off, one way or another.”

"Dr. Rossiter says the liberal agenda preys on weakness and feelings of inferiority in the population; by creating and reinforcing perceptions of victimization; satisfying infantile claims to entitlement, indulgence and compensation; augmenting primitive feelings of envy; rejecting the sovereignty of the individual, subordinating him to the will of the government."

As to why I despise Liberals, and why I became a political blogger: "There are two major developments, she says, that are new this year and insufficiently noted, but they're going to shape election outcomes in 2010 and beyond. First, Washington is being revealed in a new way.

The American people now know, "with real sophistication," everything that happens in the capital. "I find a much more knowledgeable electorate, and it is a real-time response," Ms. Blackburn says. "We hear about it even as the vote is taking place."

Voters come to rallies carrying research—"things they pulled off the Internet, forwarded emails," copies of bills, roll-call votes. The Internet isn't just a tool for organization and fund-raising. It has given citizens access to information they never had before. "The more they know," Ms. Blackburn observes, "the less they like Washington."-Tennessee Representative Marsha Blackburn

I am a Fair Bi-Partisan Independent/Conservative Libertarian views on American Politics. Exposing News Stories/Truths that the Mainstream Media Chooses to Ignore! I do stories on current events that shake-up America. Published articles and essays are from other sources and by Marc Chamot on current events and American political scene. On Illegal Immigration, Economic issues and so forth that affects us all… Welcome!

I Power Blogger! Always Fighting for Justice & What's RIGHT from WRONG!

I am very politically incorrect;

WHAT I AM ABOUT:

What I will say about my BLOG is that I can’t stand monopolies, mainly daily newspaper monopolies that control and like to control our local LIBERAL, and RIGHT WING media contents, of agenda driven propagandas, and I am against GREEDY American Corporations that wantonly use illegal aliens.

I don't support illegal immigrants or illegal aliens. I want the Mexican borders secured and I want states to be allowed to enact their OWN illegal immigration laws, if the United States Federal government isn't doing enough to enforce OUR immigration LAWS.

I believe is self deportations, Alabama's new anti-illegal immigrants law prove that it does work. I also want congress to REDUCE legal immigration, especially with the way the economy is. The unemployed Americans; our citizens are entitled to American JOBS, over any foreigner.

I can’t stand U.S. companies that move jobs abroad to circumvent the hiring of Americans and not providing decent wages, for the rest of us to afford to live here and support our families.

I can’t stand lying and thieving politicians from both parties. I am for the American workingman and labor, the middle class, and I am for “private sector unions” unless they are sold out to Illegal Aliens.

I DO NOT SUPPORT greedy public/government employees, costly/generous benefits and their

unions. I grasp some from Democrats. I also grasp from Republicans, Less Government and Less Taxes, Anti-Illegal Aliens, Pro-Life and Pro-Gun and that’s about it.

I don’t like corporate welfare and the only welfare is to the American people. I want influential and powerful U.S. corporations OUT of American politics, just as I want to see“Labor Unions” OUT of American politics too.

I don’t believe in FREE-TRADES, and globalization, I don’t like our JOBS going to China, I can’t stand China for what they are doing to my country. I am a HARD-CORE protectionist, GOD comes First, America and then the rest of the world!

I want to see higher tariffs on imported Chinese goods, that's flooding our nation.

I will only support and VOTE for the person that meets my criteria. If they don’t want to, or just want to KEEP ignoring my ISSUES and me, they’ll be shredded apart and revealed for what phonies they really are, on this BLOG and the NET…

Don't Tread on Me!

I'M ONE PROUD CONSERVATIVE U.S. MILITARY VETERAN!!

A PROUD FORMER UNITED STATES NAVY SEAMAN:

THIS PROUD CHRISTIAN & ISRAELI-AMERICAN BLOGGER STANDS WITH ISRAEL:

A VERY ANGRY AMERICAN!

HELP SAVE AMERICAN JOBS, AND AMERICAN INDUSTRIES! ONLY;

THANKS EVERYBODY! ACHIEVEMENTS I CAN BE PROUD OF;

The Marc Chamot Report Reaches Milestones in Internet Referrals and Recommendations from Blogging Peers:

FROM CHER DUNCOMBE, BLOGGER, ASKCHERLOC

“Marc Chamot is one of the most sought-after writers I know. Not only is he erudite, but everything he writes is thoroughly researched.

Marc has been quoted by some of the most popular news media and has an avid following.

I admire Marc's tenacity and his determination to produce nothing but quality in all his ventures. It is my privilege to recommend him.” April 3, 2010http://askcherlock.com/

TAXTIPSFORDEMOCRATS SAYS ABOUT MARC CHAMOT:

In: Four Blogs Making America Better, You Must Read Them!

Next, a blog of a completely different ilk, often leaning non-partisan but always ready to hit hard with facts and figures. The Marc Chamot Report comes to you from the Left Coast, where Marc must stick out like a wolf in the hen house as he is far from the stereotypical surfer dude. He’s pro-America, Pro-Israel and perhaps one of the sharpest writers on the Internet.

His own story is almost as interesting as what he chooses to write about:

The Marc Chamot Report “News, Opinions, and Commentaries on National and World Events Stories on current events that shake-up America. Published articles and essays from other sources, and by Marc Chamot on current events and the American political scene. Immigration and Economic issues and so forth that affects us all… Welcome!”

Formerly a newspaperman and an American and world political expert!

Stop by and get to know him, and if you feel like it, tell him he is sorely needed by full-time journalism, now more than ever.

WHAT DAILY KOS SAYS, ABOUT THE "MARC CHAMOT REPORT" "This is a great progressive blog about free trade and outsourcing"

THE MARC CHAMOT REPORT WINS BEST BLOG AWARDS AGAIN: ANOTHER GREAT BLOG AWARD FROM THE BOBO FILES! THANK YOU!

I'm proudly displaying my blog awards from one of my favorite bloggers, the Bobo Files.

MARC CHAMOT RECIPIENT OF LOVES YOUR BLOG AWARD: Thank you Politicus!

ANOTHER BLOG AWARD! From Lilyslicorice-Thank you! Please check her blog out.

WHO SAYS WHAT ON LINKREFERRAL ABOUT MARC CHAMOT NEWS &OPINIONS:

T-H-E B-O-M-B!!! Your site is beautiful, holding clear images which gives a fresh feel that is off the hook. Wish you the best... .

http://www.rocqueyashi.com/service

While I don't agree with your premise at times, I love your strength of mind and your willingness to speak out! I will be reading for some time to come!.

http://www.freshthoughtz.com

i like your blog, very good posts on america's current political scenario and i am glad that you are promoting freedom of expression.

http://www.pcfunia.com

"One of the best damned sites on the web! A real AMERICAN!"
http://patriotickle.blogspot.com/

Top Notch Marc! Nice site with good content!.

http://liberallystupid.blogspot.com/

You sound like your really ultra right wing. Your writing itself very expressive and very entertainment..
http://societyfordaintydamsels.wordpress...

This site has a lot of info and articles, it may have a little too much on the opening page if you have a slower connection but still worth it. The articles are well researched with many quotes that you can fact check. I am adding this site to my regular following. .

http://www.prepology.blogspot.com "A relatively good American Conservative Blog site, with: fairly diverse content, regularly frequent postings, and a well-written style of personal reporting. All in all, an excellent blog from a Modern Conservative perspective.."

http://www.real-american-truth.blogspot....

"Very nice site. A pleasure to read. Keep up the good work."
http://www.lakeshoreexp.com

"Agree with his point of view or not, Marc Chamot produces great content. He considers the information and weighs in on what the "experts" have to say. He doesn't miss an issue!."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.taxtipsfordemocrats.com

"nice design n easy view :)"
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.cabetina.blogspot.com

"nice design, good content, nice colors, good info, overall a good website, keep it up, all the best, please visit my website"
http://www.click2help.co.cc/.

"This is one of the very best Independent blogs on the web. Marc's article are always well researched and well written.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://freedomfromthepress.net

"This one is as good as your other one. Great work. I really like your banner, very original. I added this one to my blogroll also. Great content. Keep up the good work and best of luck.."http://paulthepoliticalpundit.blogspot.c.../

"Great site. Refreshing viewpoint..Very solid blog. Interesting articles.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.zazzle.com/preventsocialism

"Wow, great layout. I really like it. You have a lot of stuff, but it doesn't look to busy. Great job. The content is well thought out. Keep up the great work.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://paulthepoliticalpundit.blogspot.com/

"Some interesting commentary and interesting stories. Some lesser known stories that aren't shown as much in the news media. Good job.."Jeremy
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.comics-on-cd.comlu.com/

"Marc Chamot, actually I'm not sure what side of the fence you are on or if your sitting on the fence. I like your blogs because you always state all the facts in your post without making up lies and false statements and never conveniently leave out facts that might go against your point of view like most Republican blogs I've seen."
http://www.bobgold08.blogspot.com/

"Just updating my review of this site. There are always informative posts and the discussions are well thought out. This is not a "recycler" blogger where the same old news of the day is recycled and regurgitated. Excellent job.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://thebobofiles.com

"Nice job! I love that you stay rational and stick to facts. The most important for a political blogger to have.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://theaugurswell.com/

"The site is easy to navigate and works well... More importantly, it is jam-packed with info. I consider it the mark of an excellent blog when I can go down the page and learn a number of new things, not just read about someone's daily ramblings. Nice job!." Leslie athttp://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://theaugurswell.com/

"Good site, good content and nice cartoons to boot. Nice job.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.standbyliberty.com

"I liked your blog, but I really liked your profile statements. It's making me think twice about my own political position. Keep up the good work. Thanks!."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://4crossrider.mybisi.com

"Nice site with good content. The scroll is very very very long. Nice graphics and photos. And Al Davis does need to go. Nice job.."
ttp://www.standbyliberty.com/

"There's some pretty interesting stuff here. Your site is full of things that would make people want to click on every one of the tabs to see what else is there. I know I did. Good stuff ! If you want to make more traffic and more money online visit my site i'm offering a gigantic bonus 12 gb of products with resell wrights FREE If You Get Best Google Software Ever Seen Google Shadow . ."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.google-shadow.webs.com

"Excellent site. Original layout. Navigates and loads well. Lots of content. I will follow.."
http://www.blogger.com/dirget.pl?url=http://seeingthroughthelenses.blogspot.com

"Thank you for posting this blog! And you are right, the mainstream does not let everyone see the "real" stories that is happening in the world today - but you are doing something great by informing the public. Keep updating your blog as much as possible and get more subscribers and visitors. We also have a community of members who would be more than happy to invest in your blog. We share the same views as you do. Drop by and include your blog to our growing list. Good luck to you!."
http://www.pyrabang.com/go/signup

"great blog with good topics .. keep updating your blog with more content on a consistent basis .. more people should be viewing your discussed issues .. we have a community of members who invest in blogs such as yours .. nice job!."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.pyrabang.com/go/signup

"Hi Marc, We need 200,000,000 Americans like you to bring these socialists to the bar of justice for treason and organized crime. Will you be the one to start the ball rolling??."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://nbaabenefits.com/davebobst.asp

"Marc, We need people like you to write articles about topics the media choose to ignore. Now that their Lord and Savior Barak Hussein is in office they will never report the negative about him, but they will still bash Bush, even after he's gone. Have you ever thought of having your commentary or articles featured on a different site. I am looking for writers. I just don't have the time. God Bless! Keep it Up.."
http://www.slunged.com

"I like visiting your site regularly. You know your stuff. The pages load quickly. If I'm not mistaken, you maintain two or three. I don't blame you for not endorsing candidates. I haven't picked any to support this year either. I'm sure by Election Day, I'll be rooting for one or the other even if I vote for a third-party candidate.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://politics2000.today.com

"I love the layout of your blog. It's easy to navigate and not too busy. I thoroughly enjoyed reading the political articles you have posted. It's nice to find a blog that doesn't resort to rumor and bashing to make a point.."http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://sophiecls.etsy.com

"Originally found this site through EC. I'm glad to see you on this referral site as well. I have enjoyed reading your articles since I first came across this place. I can appreciate the way that you provide opinion in a bi-partisan fair manner. As you know, I pretty much beat up on all the candidates - you at least provide the up side as well. Great job!."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://thebobofiles.com

"Very interesting blog with well written articles up to date articles. Not sure about joining the Libertarians though. I like having a choice in the primaries."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.christianpoliticalview.com

"As a political blogger, I know how difficult it is to express your political views without endorsing a party or politician. Your blog is the first conservative blog that dosen't support a conservative party. Great job!."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.michael-cc.blogspot.com

"This is the kind of a site you can appreciate, unless you happen to be a loyalist to the present band of thugz. Marc criticizes based on issues, not party labels, and his criticisms are right on the money. You'll appreciate his style. I like the "newspaper" feel of the site as well.." http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://reconstitution.us/rcnew

"Great!! I can see you do your research on the issues.I will bookmark this one.."
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://www.slunged.com

"good site, will be back..... "
http://www.linkreferral.com/dirget.pl?url=http://linkreferral.blogspot.com

"good web site, what do you think of fox news, is it fair and balanced?"
http://qimansworld.today.com/

"Nice blog. Your articles are well written and well researched. I enjoyed reading them very much.."
http://www.blogger.com/dirget.pl?url=http://the-one-about.blogspot.com/

Clean look. Crazy content. Birtherism, and some right-wing crazy. Less spelling errors these days, too!.Additional comments: Alexa blog rankings don't impress me, thankfully. But you are destroying America!

http://thefrustratedteacher.blogspot.com

Fair Use Policy for the Marc Chamot Report & Last Will & Testament Regarding Chamot's Internet Fingerprints on Record:

2012-04-28T15:16:00.002-05:00

Fair Use Policy for the Marc Chamot Report & Last Will Testament Regarding Chamot's Internet Fingerprints on Record:

By Marc Chamot

The Marc Chamot Report Fair Use Policy:

Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted materials, with use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.

I am making these materials available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc.

I am also using such materials to rebut and dispute arguments, when they ARE not based on FACTS.

I'm here to offer my own argument, opinions and judgments on the subject matters, which MAY interfere with my constitutional rights, towards receiving, fair political representations from my federal, state and local representatives.

I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes.

When I post photos, I may have inadvertently posted one without prior knowledge of actual ownerships.

If you feel I may have violated some of YOUR copyright of some sorts, you HAVE the right to email or post a comment, requesting my removal of such material(s), such as photos and full postings of articles, however I reserve the right to keep the main idea, snippets of your article on my blog, protected under the FAIR USE ACT.

LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT REGARDING DIGITAL FINGERPRINTS:

“I am J.M.L. Chamot, I am of sound mind, and I am declaring my Digital Fingerprints on Google Blogger, Facebook and Twitter.

Disowned Family Members of Marc Chamot; have NO authority to represent me on my behalf, upon my death, mother Tehila Wetterauer, step mother, Anna Uhl Chamot, half-Brothers, Gregory Wetterauer, Robert Wetterauer, Alain Chamot, who goes by G Alain Chamot and Former Wife, Teresa Liliana Vitteri Sirini, none have have the authority or any legal rights to access Google Blogger, Facebook and Twitter, including surviving daughter, Helene Annette Chamot.

No one in my family will have the authority, whether legally, or illegally to access or REMOVE any contents from Blogger, Facebook and twitter upon my death.

It's expressively forbidden for any former family member to declare themselves as family member representing me on my behalf, whereas they claim to have the authority for any legal requests on my behalf, making requests on my behalf to Google Blogger’s The Marc Chamot Report, Facebook and Twitter for removals of contents, shall be DENIED and be forbidden. This is my final wish”