<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Numismatic News » The Militarist</title> <link>http://www.numismaticnews.net</link> <description>Coin collecting news since 1952</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:39:47 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en-US</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheMilitarist" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="themilitarist" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Table vs. Non-portable Medals</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/table-vs-non-portable-medals-2</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/table-vs-non-portable-medals-2#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 21:00:03 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=28286</guid> <description><![CDATA[Table vs. Non-portable Medals Table medal is an old numismatic term used to describe a commemorative medal that is not an award and is not meant to be worn. A medal that is an award but not meant to be &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/table-vs-non-portable-medals-2">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<pre>Table vs. Non-portable Medals

 Table medal is an old numismatic term used to describe a commemorative medal that is not an award and is not meant to be worn.  A medal that is an award but not meant to be worn is a non-portable medal. The Hamburg Fire Medal of 1842 illustrated here is a good example of a table medal while the Firestone Company medals are non-portable awards for military service during the second world war.</pre>]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/table-vs-non-portable-medals-2/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Collecting by Initials</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27756</guid> <description><![CDATA[There are times that coin collecting, when compared military medal collecting looks down right easy. Most coins carry all the information one needs to catalog them. The what, where and when questions are all answered by the information spelled out &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a
href='/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2/attachment/batt-a-ngm' title='Batt A NGM'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Batt-A-NGM-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Batt A NGM" /></a> <a
href='/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2/attachment/batt-a-ngm-4' title='Batt A NGM'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Batt-A-NGM3-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Battery A NGM military medal" /></a><p>There are times that coin collecting, when compared military medal collecting looks down right easy. Most coins carry all the information one needs to catalog them. The what, where and when questions are all answered by the information spelled out on the coin. Military medals however may present some serious challenges to the collector. Often only a coat of arms or emblem identifies the issuer or purpose and the legends if any are reduced to only initials. Case in point is this medal issued in 1905. The obverse has an old cannon, flags and an eagle. The flags are the stars and stripes so the medal is obviously American. Above is the legend: Battery “A” and below are the initials N. G. M. The reverse has an engraved monogram and the date 1905. The monogram must be the initials of a member of Battery A which was a National Guard unit as evidenced by the N and G of the NGM. M would be the first letter of the state name and there are eight states with M names just to make things interesting. What makes this piece unusual is that the state name follows the words National Guard instead of preceding them. As far as I could find there was only one state that regularly used this name combination on their medals back at the turn of the century and that state was Missouri. With that in mind my research efforts turned up an article published by the Missouri Historical Society in 1903 with the title “A History Of Battery “A” Of St. Louis”. This extensive history went back as far as the War of 1812. So if you are going to collect military medals you will also become a historian and researcher.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials-2/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Collecting by Initials</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 23:21:24 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27761</guid> <description><![CDATA[There are times that coin collecting, when compared military medal collecting looks down right easy. Most coins carry all the information one needs to catalog them. The what, where and when questions are all answered by the information spelled out &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are times that coin collecting, when compared military medal collecting looks down right easy. Most coins carry all the information one needs to catalog them. The what, where and when questions are all answered by the information spelled out on the coin. Military medals however may present some serious challenges to the collector. Often only a coat of arms or emblem identifies the issuer or purpose and the legends if any are reduced to only initials. Case in point is this medal issued in 1905. The obverse has an old cannon, flags and an eagle. The flags are the stars and stripes so the medal is obviously American. Above is the legend: Battery “A” and below are the initials N. G. M. The reverse has an engraved monogram and the date 1905. The monogram must be the initials of a member of Battery A which was a National Guard unit as evidenced by the N and G of the NGM. M would be the first letter of the state name and there are eight states with M names just to make things interesting. What makes this piece unusual is that the state name follows the words National Guard instead of preceding them. As far as I could find there was only one state that regularly used this name combination on their medals back at the turn of the century and that state was Missouri. With that in mind my research efforts turned up an article published by the Missouri Historical Society in 1903 with the title “A History Of Battery “A” Of St. Louis”. This extensive history went back as far as the War of 1812. So if you are going to collect military medals you will also become a historian and researcher</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-by-initials/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Civil Defense Badges</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/article/civil-defense-badges</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/article/civil-defense-badges#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 22:17:57 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27575</guid> <description><![CDATA[Civil Defense really got it’s start during WWII with the system of local air raid wardens. As the nuclear age began American cities realized that they were not safe from attack in time of war. Evacuation and public shelter plans &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/article/civil-defense-badges">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a
href="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Civil-Defense4.jpg?29045e"><img
class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-27583" title="Civil Defense" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Civil-Defense4-150x150.jpg?29045e" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Civil Defense really got it’s start during WWII with the system of local air raid wardens. As the nuclear age began American cities realized that they were not safe from attack in time of war. Evacuation and public shelter plans had to be made just in case the worst would happen. Nearly all plans called for trained local volunteers to carry out the emergency plans which would also come in handy in times of natural disasters. The volunteers were organized as auxiliaries of local and county law enforcement and fire fighting agencies. Volunteers usually didn’t have uniforms so badges became an essential way to recognize authorized personnel in times of emergency. Over the years Civil Defense programs have faded away but the badges remain. These are the badges with the letters “C D “ in a triangle that most collectors run into at shows. Some have enameled centers while others are just bare metal. Nearly every one has the name of the local issuer and they make for fascinating collecting. Illustrated here are only two examples of the many varieties that exist. As far as I know there are no books about these badges and collector interest in them is very limited so if you are tired of the high prices in other fields this may be a good time to jump in on the ground level.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/article/civil-defense-badges/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Army and Navy Union</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/army-and-navy-union</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/army-and-navy-union#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 02:31:26 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27374</guid> <description><![CDATA[My wife recently found this photo in an antique mall! It is of a veteran wearing the generic uniform of the 1930’s which nearly all veterans seem to wear in the photos I have seen. Each has a Sam Brown &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/army-and-navy-union">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
id="attachment_27375" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 160px"><a
href="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Copy-of-Army-Navy-Union.jpg?29045e"><img
class="size-thumbnail wp-image-27375" title="Copy of Army Navy Union" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Copy-of-Army-Navy-Union-150x150.jpg?29045e" alt="Army and Navy Union veteran's photo with unknown decoration being worn." width="150" height="150" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">Army and Navy Union veteran&#39;s photo with unknown decoration being worn.</p></div><p>My wife recently found this photo in an antique mall! It is of a veteran wearing the generic uniform of the 1930’s which nearly all veterans seem to wear in the photos I have seen. Each has a Sam Brown type belt and the proper organizational insignia sewn on. In this case the man was a member and commander in the Army and Navy Union based on the medals he is wearing. The medals are an Army and Navy Union membership medal with a four star brooch, a Marine Corps Good Conduct Medal and below these is a pin back cross with a skull in the center much like a German Frei Korps or White Russian award. I assume it is also an Army and Navy Union award since it has the initials “A &amp; N U “ on the arms of the cross. The Cross looks like it is enameled. Can anyone here tell us more about this unusual cross?</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/army-and-navy-union/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>The Order of Lincoln</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/the-order-of-lincoln</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/the-order-of-lincoln#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:54:47 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27262</guid> <description><![CDATA[A few months ago I presented an example of an Order of Lincoln Regents Breast Badge. Since then I saw an example of the Order&#8217;s Laureate Neck badge and Lapel Ribbon in the latest FJP Auction which made me wonder &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/the-order-of-lincoln">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago I presented an example of an Order of Lincoln Regents Breast Badge. Since then I saw an example of the Order&#8217;s Laureate Neck badge and Lapel Ribbon in the latest FJP Auction which made me wonder exactly how many versions of the O of L insignia exist.   Based on their web site this is what I found:</p><p>Order of Lincoln</p><p>Sash, red ribbon with green edged purple center stripe, 5 arm cross with green wreath above,</p><p>Obverse Lincoln portrait.</p><p>For Officers, regents for life, regents and general trustees.</p><p>　</p><p>Officer’s Breast Badge</p><p>5 Arm cross, pin back, Illinois arms on obv.</p><p>For officers, regents and regents for life</p><p>　</p><p>Student Laureate</p><p>5 arm neck badge with green wreath above, plain red neck ribbon.</p><p>Obverse Lincoln portrait.</p><p>　</p><p>Laureate Order of Lincoln</p><p>5 arm neck badge with green wreath above.</p><p>Red ribbon with green edged purple center stripe</p><p>Obverse Illinois State Arms</p><p>　</p><p>　</p><p>Lapel Ribbon</p><p>Miniature 5 arm cross on red ribbon with green edged purple center stripe. Lincoln portrait on obverse.</p><p>　</p><p>Lapel Pin</p><p>Miniature 5 arm cross pin back with Lincoln portrait.</p><p>This order is awarded for primarily civilian non-military recognition to persons with any kind of link to the State of Illinois. As such it is currently a scarce award but as time goes on I expect this to become a more easy to obtain award for collectors.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/the-order-of-lincoln/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>WWI German Wound Badges</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/wwi-german-wound-badges</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/wwi-german-wound-badges#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=27126</guid> <description><![CDATA[I just got back from a vacation road trip which included stops at a few antique malls. In one of the malls there was a black WWI German army wound badge. The black finish had been worn off of the &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/wwi-german-wound-badges">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got back from a vacation road trip which included stops at a few antique malls. In one of the malls there was a black WWI German army wound badge. The black finish had been worn off of the high parts of the design exposing the brass metal that the badge was stamped from. The vender described the badge as “early WWI”. I am not sure what the vender meant by early; early issue of WWI or just a pre-nazi issue? In any event it reminded me of an observation that I have been making for decades that no one else seems to mention. The army and navy wound badges were first issued in March and June of 1918. At that time Germany was “on the ropes” and was suffering from serious shortages of food and metal resources. Therefore the wound badges issued during the first world war were all made of iron. Brass badges were privately made after the war ended to replace the original rusting iron badges. In my opinion a nice condition iron wound badge is much more scarce and valuable than the brass version. If the finish is not worn off on the high points of the badge use a magnet to separate the iron from the brass versions.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/wwi-german-wound-badges/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Collecting Economics</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-economics</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-economics#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 02:03:44 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=26928</guid> <description><![CDATA[In today’s tough economy every collector has to deal with the economic facts of life whether they realize it or not. First all of us should keep records of what we pay for our collectibles. I am a compulsive record &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-economics">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In today’s tough economy every collector has to deal with the economic facts of life whether they realize it or not. First all of us should keep records of what we pay for our collectibles. I am a compulsive record keeper because I know that the time will come when I will sell the item and I have to know “what I’ve got in it”. When a collection gets sold a lot of money will change hands and that could become a tax problem if you do not know what the cost of the sold items was. Tax people assume that the entire sales amount is taxable income unless you can prove otherwise. With good records only the profit is taxable. How is cost determined? I define total cost as the total amount of money I have to spend to legally pick up and take an item home. That includes the price paid plus the sales tax and the postage and handling charges. If there is an auction buyers fee that is also included in my cost. There are other costs which are not applicable for tax purposes to a collector. These are the expenses of going to shows etc. which only a dealer can deduct. Even so these expenses are just as real for a collector and must be considered when planning a trip to a convention. This week, in my case, I was thinking about going to the ANA convention by Chicago’s O’Hare Airport. Since I couldn’t make this part of a multi-purpose trip I had to figure out what my expenses would be if I went just for the show. First of all the hotel for one night would cost a minimum of 132.00 plus the many state and local room taxes which would add at least another 20.00 bringing the total to 152.00. Now add the parking fees which would be another minimum of 30.00 raising the total to 182.00. I have to use the toll way both ways so add another 10.00 plus the gas for my car, another 80.00 pushing up the total to 272.00. I enjoy going to coin shows, but I am not a high roller type. I have gone to a fair number of ANA and many other large coin shows. I do collect coins but seldom find any that I need or am willing to pay full dealer prices for. I rarely sell to dealers at shows since I don’t have many duplicates and looking for a buyer usually takes more time than it is worth. My main reason for going to coin shows is the hunt for military medals and other interesting exonumia items. With that said I have rarely spent more than 1000.00 at any coin show and while pleased with my purchases I did have to pay fair prices. Now having figured that it is going to cost me about 275.00 just to go to the show I must ask myself based on my history of show purchases, am I likely to find anything at the show that I would be happy to spend an additional 275.00 on. The answer is no and that is why I will not go the show. I will just spend that 275.00 on the internet from the comfort of my home without the hassles of Chicago-O’Hare traffic. I will however, miss seeing my old friends and the good times I used to have at the shows back when I didn‘t have to pay all the expenses myself.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/collecting-economics/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>European Royalty</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/european-royalty</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/european-royalty#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 05:25:51 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=26788</guid> <description><![CDATA[Back in the days before the First World War most of Europe was ruled by Crowned Royalty. The various royal families were so intermarried that their family trees looked more like the rhizome root systems of a bamboo forest. At &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/european-royalty">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<div
id="attachment_26791" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a
href="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Saxe-Weimar-medal1.jpg?29045e"><img
class="size-thumbnail wp-image-26791" title="Saxe Weimar medal" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Saxe-Weimar-medal1-150x150.jpg?29045e" alt="Saxe Weimar medal" width="150" height="150" /></a><p
class="wp-caption-text">Saxe Weimar medal</p></div><p><a
href="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Saxe-Weimar-medal-rev.jpg?29045e"><img
class="aligncenter size-thumbnail wp-image-26792" title="Saxe Weimar medal rev" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/Saxe-Weimar-medal-rev-150x150.jpg?29045e" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Back in the days before the First World War most of Europe was ruled by Crowned Royalty. The various royal families were so intermarried that their family trees looked more like the rhizome root systems of a bamboo forest. At the time it was hoped that all the related rulers would not be going to war against each other. Kaiser Wilhelm II after all was the grand son of British Queen Victoria who in turn descended from the Royal House of Hannover and married Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. Czar Nicholas of Russia was married to a German Grand Duchess from Hesse-Darmstadt and several of the German royals married Russians. The royals were proud of themselves and whom they married as illustrated by this medal from the German State of Saxe-Weimar. It is the Medal of Merit for Women awarded for all kinds.of humanitarian activities. The medal was established by Grand Duke Karl Friedrich in honor of his mother whose name appears in the legend as Maria Pawlowna Grand Duchess of Saxony and Grand Princess of Russia. All this changed when WWI broke out and many foreign born royals found themselves and their loyalty under suspicion. That is when the British Royal Family changed their name to Windsor and the British branch of the Battenberg family became Mountbattens thus ending a very colorful historic era.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/european-royalty/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>Aluminum Medals</title><link>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/aluminum-medals</link> <comments>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/aluminum-medals#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 20:41:07 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Fred Borgmann</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[The Militarist]]></category><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.numismaticnews.net/?p=26663</guid> <description><![CDATA[Aluminum wasn’t always the most common metal around. Back in the early 1800’s when the process was first discovered that enabled the manufacture of aluminum in metal form aluminum was considered to be very rare and valuable. It was a &#8230; <a
href="http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/aluminum-medals">Continue reading <span
class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[
<a
href='/militarist/aluminum-medals/attachment/dupel-alsen-cross' title='Dupel Alsen cross'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dupel-Alsen-cross-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Dupel Alsen cross" /></a> <a
href='/militarist/aluminum-medals/attachment/dupel-alsen-cross-rev' title='Dupel Alsen cross rev'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dupel-Alsen-cross-rev-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Dupel Alsen cross rev" /></a> <a
href='/militarist/aluminum-medals/attachment/dupel-alsen-cross-2' title='Dupel Alsen cross'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dupel-Alsen-cross1-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Dupel Alsen cross" /></a> <a
href='/militarist/aluminum-medals/attachment/dupel-alsen-cross-rev-2' title='Dupel Alsen cross rev'><img
width="150" height="150" src="http://d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Dupel-Alsen-cross-rev1-150x150.jpg?29045e" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Dupel Alsen cross rev" /></a><p>Aluminum wasn’t always the most common metal around. Back in the early 1800’s when the process was first discovered that enabled the manufacture of aluminum in metal form aluminum was considered to be very rare and valuable. It was a modern miracle back then and valued higher than gold. As time went on our ability to produce aluminum continually improved so that by the mid 1890’s aluminum was no longer very rare or valuable but it still commanded respect. It was a good looking durable metal that resisted corrosion and was easy to stamp or engrave. During the First World War it became a cheap coinage metal and much better for that purpose than the zinc alternative. Today’s collector tends to view aluminum coins and medals as cheap and not very collectible but as collectors we must view these old medals through the eyes of those who issued and wore them. To those people aluminum medals were usually in the form of veterans medals and historical commemoratives. The medals were good looking, light weight, new technology and economical. Best of all the medals like this rare 50 year commemoration cross for the battles of Dupel and Alsen were proudly worn.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.numismaticnews.net/militarist/aluminum-medals/feed</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss><!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 1559/1698 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d3jsg6v4h2swe0.cloudfront.net

 Served from: www.numismaticnews.net @ 2013-05-20 22:13:19 by W3 Total Cache -->
