<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:blogger="http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2024 15:41:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><category>Indonesia</category><category>Atheisme Modern</category><category>George Gordon Noel Byron</category><category>Political and Social Philosophy</category><category>Karl Marx</category><category>The Philosophy of Jokes</category><category>Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HEGEL</category><category>There&#39;s GOD</category><category>Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche</category><category>George Berkeley</category><category>Philosophy of Love and Sex</category><category>Niccolò Machiavelli</category><category>René Descartes</category><category>David Hume</category><category>Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz</category><category>Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category>The History of Modern Philosophy</category><category>Baruch Spinoza</category><category>Habermas</category><category>Henri Bergson</category><category>John Dewey</category><category>Lain-Lain</category><category>Thomas Hobbes</category><category>Arthur Schopenhauer</category><category>Francis Bacon</category><category>Jean Jacques Rousseau</category><category>John Locke</category><category>Philosophy of  Dream</category><category>Philosophy of Technology</category><category>Sartre</category><category>William James</category><category>Aurelius Augustinus</category><category>Emmanuel Levinas</category><category>Feuerbach</category><category>Filsafat Politik-Sosial</category><category>Ibnu Rusyd</category><category>Immanuel Kant</category><category>Filsafat Islam</category><category>Freud</category><category>Albert Camus</category><category>Antropological Philosophy</category><category>Ethics</category><category>Filsafat Cinta</category><category>Filsafat Rasionalisme</category><category>Martin Heidegger</category><category>Math of Philosophy</category><category>Montesquieu</category><category>Philosophy of Death</category><category>West Philosophy</category><title>The Modern Philosophy</title><description></description><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>172</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-1716217020232787907</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-28T10:04:10.767+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Aurelius Augustinus</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Politik-Sosial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lain-Lain</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Keadilan Sebagai Pengada Mutlak  bagi Eksistensi Negara Sebuah Gugatan Aurelius Augustinus (354 – 430 M)  terhadap Eksistensi Negara (3)</title><atom:summary type="text">Tanggapan KritisA.	Kritik bagi Augustinus1.	Dalam menguraikan pandangan filosofisnya Augustinus lebih cenderung berperan sebagai seorang teolog Katolik. Ia lebih bergulat dengan kebenaran-kebenaran Kitab Suci dan Wahyu-Wahyu Allah dari pada bergulat dengan realitas-relitas sosio-politis.2.	Bagi Augustinus keadilan adalah relasi kasih antara manusia dan juga dengan Tuhan, dan tanpa keadilan ini </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/keadilan-sebagai-pengada-mutlak-bagi_17.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-760671091849228786</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:35:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-28T10:05:08.143+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Aurelius Augustinus</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Politik-Sosial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Keadilan Sebagai Pengada Mutlak  bagi Eksistensi Negara Sebuah Gugatan Aurelius Augustinus (354 – 430 M)  terhadap Eksistensi Negara (2)</title><atom:summary type="text">Ada Negara Niscaya Ada Keadilan – Tanpa Keadilan Niscaya Tidak Ada NegaraA.	Konsep Dasar Augustinus tentang Keadilan1.	Cicero:Menurut Cicero, dalam bukunya De Republica, negara merupakan hal rakyat yang dipahaminya sebagai sebuah komunitas manusia-manusia yang terikat satu sama lain melalui kesamaan hukum. Nah, kesamaan di hadapan hukum itulah yang disebutnya sebagai Keadilan. Tanpa keadilan </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/keadilan-sebagai-pengada-mutlak-bagi_902.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-3872446747350523246</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-22T18:31:13.427+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Aurelius Augustinus</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Politik-Sosial</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Keadilan Sebagai Pengada Mutlak  bagi Eksistensi Negara Sebuah Gugatan Aurelius Augustinus (354 – 430 M)  terhadap Eksistensi Negara (1)</title><atom:summary type="text">Letak Konsep  Keadilan Dalam Pemikiran Umum AugustinusA. Latar BelakangTema yang diangkat oleh penulis merupakan salah satu tema yang diuraikan oleh Augustinus dalam salah satu karyanya yang termasyur, yaitu buku “De Civitate Dei”. Karya Augustinus ini, yang dikerjakan pada 413-427 M. Terdiri dari 22 buku. Berisikan pembelaan terhadap ajaran Kristen yang sedang diserang oleh orang-orang kafir </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/keadilan-sebagai-pengada-mutlak-bagi.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-3579851448497030321</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-17T12:28:30.772+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HEGEL</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The History of Modern Philosophy</category><title>Modern Philosophy | Konsep dan Relasi antara Kebebasan, Person  dan Kepemilikan  Menurut Hegel (2)</title><atom:summary type="text">Konsep dan Relasi Person dan Kehendak Bebas Ada aneka pandangan terhadap person ini. Dalam tataran sejarah perkembangan filsafat terutama dalam perspektif metafisik person diartikan sebagai kesatuan substansial dari tubuh dan jiwa, sebagai dimensi psiko-fisik, sebagai dimensi ontologisnya. Dalam hal ini tubuh dilihat sebagai ekspresi derajad kemanusiaan, berhargam dan bernilai, tidak pernah </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/modern-philosophy-konsep-dan-relasi_17.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-5700239356956404535</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 05:24:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-17T12:27:05.261+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HEGEL</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The History of Modern Philosophy</category><title>Modern Philosophy | Konsep dan Relasi antara Kebebasan, Person  dan Kepemilikan  Menurut Hegel (1)</title><atom:summary type="text">Pemikiran Hegel yang tertuang dalam karyanya Philosophy of Right merupakan pintu masuk ke dalam pemikirannya tentang filsafat politik. Di dalamnya Hegel membahas tema-tema pemikiran politiknya yang meliputi permasalahan tentang hukum, moralitas dan kesusilaan. Di dalam tema kesusilaan, ia membahas pula dialektika yang terjadi di dlaam keluarga, masyarakat dan negara. Berkaitan dengan ini, salah </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/modern-philosophy-konsep-dan-relasi.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-5502497517810945333</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-12T20:22:53.078+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">West Philosophy</category><title>Religion based on Logic</title><atom:summary type="text">Religion and Logic have been considered to be mutually exclusive. Logic being reality and science and religion being the world of make believe. Many people from the world of logic look at religion as a form of mental defect that undermines the principles of science. However pure Atheism doesn&#39;t tell us what right and wrong is or how we should live our lives as humans exploring reality. The </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/religion-based-on-logic.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-8345581194405592505</guid><pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:17:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-12T20:19:32.200+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Islam</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Rasionalisme</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>Filsafat Rasionalisme: Logika Menentang Agama</title><atom:summary type="text">Filsafat Rasionalisme satu aliran filsafat modern, yaitu empirisme. Kali ini saya akan menggali lebih dalam tentang aliran kontra empirisme, taitu Rasionalisme. Rasionalisme sangat bertentangan dengan empirisme. Rasionalisme mengatakan bahwa pengenalan yang sangat sejati berasal dari rasio, sehingga pengenalan inderawi merupakan suatu bentuk pengenalan yang kabur. Lebih detail, Rasionalisme </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/filsafat-rasionalisme-logika-menentang.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-8256217022925034150</guid><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-10T11:24:01.520+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Cinta</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Filsafat Islam</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ibnu Rusyd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lain-Lain</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philosophy of Love and Sex</category><title>Filosofi Cinta</title><atom:summary type="text">Cinta bisa jadi merupakan kata yang paling banyak dibicarakan manusia. Setiap orang memiliki rasa cinta yang bisa diaplikasikan pada banyak hal. Wanita, harta, anak, kendaraan, rumah dan berbagai kenikmatan dunia lainnya merupakan sasaran utama cinta dari kebanyakan manusia. Cinta yang paling tinggi dan mulia adalah cinta seorang hamba kepada Rabb-nya.Kita sering mendengar kata yang terdiri dari </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/filosofi-cinta.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-7637489946338317254</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-04T10:13:20.598+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>Logika Menentang Agama</title><atom:summary type="text">“Man tamanthaqa faqad fazandaqa”, demikian ungkapan terkenal dari tokoh besar di dunia Islam, Ibn Taimiyyah. Arti harfiahnya kira-kira adalah, “Barang siapa menggunakan logika maka ia telah kafir”. Apakah sikap seperti ini dapat dibenarkan? Ataukah memang mutlak salah? Apa implikasi jika sikap seperti ini dibenarkan? Dan apa pula konsekuensinya jika ia mutlak salah? Ataukah sikap seperti ini </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/logika-menentang-agama.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-573271003189455984</guid><pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-12-04T10:10:46.503+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>Antara Cinta, Iman dan Akal</title><atom:summary type="text">Al-‘aqliyyuun yakin bahwa esensi manusia adalah “keberpikirannya”. Bagi mereka semakin sempurna seorang manusia, semakin sempurna pula pemikirannya. Karena itu insan kamil (manusia sempurna) menurut pandangan ini adalah orang yang paling sempurna nalarnya, dalam arti telah menyingkap rahasia wujud (keberadaan) sebagaimana kenyataannya. Tafakkur, -dalam pengertian rasionalnya-, merupakan satu </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/12/antara-cinta-iman-dan-akal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-3050827362827191330</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-27T00:17:15.999+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Lain-Lain</category><title>What is Carlisle Medical Journal?</title><atom:summary type="text">Carlisle Medical Journal is a very unique, compact, and user friendly medical journal that can be used to assist anyone in organizing and recording their own medical history. The journal is divided into 9 customized sections. Each multi-colored tab contains the title for each section. The contents of the book fits into a three ring customized binder approximately 9&quot; x 6&quot;. Simply fill in the </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/09/what-is-carlisle-medical-journal.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-6675033996151718671</guid><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:38:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-17T12:37:19.312+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Martin Heidegger</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philosophy of Technology</category><title>Martin Heidegger: About Technology&#39;s Age</title><atom:summary type="text">Nietzsche is the intersection of postmodern philosophers and Martin Heidegger, in which meditations on art and technology, they are always quoted and commented it. Heidegger&#39;s contribution to the sense of de-realization of the set of key phrases like: &quot;everywhere we are underway amid beings, and yet we no longer know how it stands with being&quot;, and &quot;precisely nowhere does man today any longer </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/09/martin-heidegger-about-technologys-age.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiVQdpq-uujaQFnjlFKKW4Mh-ZjxNiP4dUjrAVQoSY-T6DPyrNerCWOpPHbuPBeAZy7iaD70hExG1hvFm_eSwWTgdvxlK2cjKnR04ZbEFo2HRtTDRMHwHrsOHP5oPvnNMQzHt0995W8sljU/s72-c/Martin+Heidegger.jpeg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-2265398561055165353</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:42:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-13T09:47:09.346+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Albert Camus</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sartre</category><title>Sartre vs. Camus</title><atom:summary type="text">As we learn from Camus and Sartre: The Story of a Friendship and the Quarrel that Ended It, a fascinating and intermittently astute book by Ronald Aronson,1 the two men met in Nazi-occupied Paris at the height of World War II. The occasion was the June 1943 opening of Sartre’s play, The Flies, a recasting of the Orestes revenge story with overtones of Resistance heroism.By this time, both men </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/07/sartre-vs-camus.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-139581534213961825</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-09T21:39:05.257+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Feuerbach</category><title>Ludwig Andreas Feuerbach</title><atom:summary type="text">Ludwig Feuerbach (1804—1872) was a famous German philospher and atheist. The founder of psychoanalysis Freud heavily borrowed from his book Essence of Christianity to create The Future of an Illusion. What are often thought of as &quot;Freudian&quot; terms are in fact Feuerbachian. Such borrowings can be seen in the words and passages of Essence of Christianity: &quot;wish-fulfillment&quot;; &quot;What man misses—whether</atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/07/ludwig-andreas-feuerbach.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjUpgXOdH9KkntRNASaIRYBglx7SyL60lTn-hNPZEVmvYzhxdOA_TzfUoFK0tyOsE78a3jO_An86cDwUa1ByXM_uzEFOEPQ-zyaAQJGTADYRF_k77pNu9yhI7-itljsstTYLjeSG6sLhvRt/s72-c/feurbach.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-886015862420039352</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-07-09T10:46:35.221+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Baruch Spinoza</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">David Hume</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Feuerbach</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Georg Wilhelm Friedrich HEGEL</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Karl Marx</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Niccolò Machiavelli</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">René Descartes</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Sartre</category><title>Atheism, Agnosticism, and Skepticism</title><atom:summary type="text">While it might seem odd at first to include atheism,  agnosticism, and skepticism in a series on religion,  these three systems of thought should be addressed here. Religion is sometimes defined as whatever about which a man is deeply concerned,1 and it is to such concerns that we now turn. Everyone, even the nontheist,  attempts to make sense of and explain the reality around him While those who</atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/07/atheism-agnosticism-and-skepticism.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-7644190283692804028</guid><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-24T16:28:03.150+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Math of Philosophy</category><title>Difference and Equation of Philosophy, Science Philosophy and Science</title><atom:summary type="text">Difference and equation of philosophy, science philosophy and science; Four Philosophy Science question: characteristic, procedure, condition of, cognate status; Four dot look into science philosophy: consistent, presentation (exposition), discipline, criteriolog order second; Constructivist; Basis for erudite research: deductive and inductive; Logic: formal (material and shape) </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/06/difference-and-equation-of-philosophy.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjfJTbNPEgfKnGjx-3C3k2YCE6xQL1pOiaVphYYfBFe-U9VlDavVEseQ9dpGk0wdQQLfk8w5yhkJIjCKxSUGghpY3Z5y4nyUbtUW0QrNA4r8txCPxWzx53s_ViVuBxT7pC9lkOqX_OhEhcf/s72-c/pendidikan.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-8169773092450783097</guid><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:40:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-18T12:48:16.829+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Antropological Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philosophy of Technology</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">The History of Modern Philosophy</category><title>Filsafat Manusia: Teknologi Mendeterminasikan Manusia sebagai Penciptanya sendiri</title><atom:summary type="text">TESIS POKOK FILSAFAT MANUSIA:Proses teknologi menciptakan kebutuhan yang hanya dapat dipuaskan oleh teknologi. Teknologi mengubah masyarakat sehingga masyarakat tersebut harus menyesuaikan dirinya secara terbalik dengan perkembangan teknologi.Di satu pihak teknologi membawa nilai-nilai manusia, di lain pihak teknologi menciptakan determinasi baru dalam kehidupan.Pada konteks filsafat manusia, </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/06/filsafat-manusia-teknologi.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-6674235677540453105</guid><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-17T11:26:04.809+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ibnu Rusyd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>Proyek Harmonisasi Korelasi Iman (Wahyu) dan Rasio (Akal)</title><atom:summary type="text">Dalam usaha untuk mencari kaitan atau korelasi antara agama (syari’at) dengan filsafat, Ibn Rusyd kemudian menghasilkan tiga karya besar, antara lain: Hubungan antara Filsafat dan Syari’at (Fals al-Mafa fi ma bain-a I’Hikmah wa’l syari’ah mina-‘l- Ittishal); Penyingkapan tentang metode penalaran dalam Doktrin Agama (al-Khasyf ‘an Manhij al-‘Adilah fi’ ‘Aqa-id al-Millah l, serta Kerancuan dalam </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/06/proyek-harmonisasi-korelasi-iman-wahyu.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-6422030815187400072</guid><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-21T17:51:56.927+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Ibnu Rusyd</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Islam&#39;s Philosophy</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>Biografi dan Karya</title><atom:summary type="text">Persoalan korelasi antara wahyu dan akal merupakan persoalan yang tidak gampang terpecahkan. Debat mengenai hubungan antara kedua selalu menemui jalan buntu. Hal itu dialami oleh setiap orang yang hendak mengadakan proyek harmonisasi terhadap keduanya. Ada dua hal yang perlu di catat: Pertama, orang akan berbenturan dengan sikap penghayatan religiusitas yang cukup mendalam dan dibentuk oleh </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/biografi-dan-karya.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEg2abB5CaNNd0MhKS6oyyL0qbw3eYmGoX7j5XipNJFcAwa-emcSxFm-o5zk9petbLuV4AocHgHSdVTknDqaSWZcRstrJo4ffznRkT8FvcPPP3eYt6bFirPUUqLC2OmM4DfqnP_3cI4jN1X2/s72-c/Averroes.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-8643004714356511231</guid><pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-16T21:03:45.001+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Ada 4 Tokoh Eksistensialist</title><atom:summary type="text">Ada 4 tokoh eksistensialist yang akan dijadikan acuan:A. KierkegaardBaginya Eksistensi adalah suatu kesatuan, kumpulan fakta-fakta, yang tak dapat begitu saja disamakan dengan sejumlah sistem rekonstruksi pemikiran rasional. Artinya eksistensi mencakup berbagai macam hal dalam sebuah keberadaan, bukan hanya yang temporal, tetapi juga yang kekal. Bukan hanya yang teratur tetapi juga yang tak </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/ada-4-tokoh-eksistensialist.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-6897769032108902438</guid><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-14T22:36:33.493+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Atheisme Modern</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Karl Marx</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Karl Marx: Religion Detach Self Human being</title><atom:summary type="text">Marx alone believe that capitalistic society it is true offer the happening of human being itself realization, but that thing is only happened to some people and non for all society. Marx later offer what referred as with communist society that in communist society each individual will enjoy active life, rich, and have a meaning of; even that thing are barbed coexisted, however itself realization</atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/karl-marx-religion-detach-self-human.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-5932343475010429859</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-11T13:45:53.423+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Philosophy of Love and Sex</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">There&#39;s GOD</category><title>The Nature of Love: Physical, emotional, spiritual</title><atom:summary type="text">Some may hold that love is physical, i.e., that love is nothing but a physical response to another whom the agent feels physically attractedto. Accordingly, the action of loving encompasses a broad range of behaviour including caring, listening, attending to, preferring to others, and so on. (This would be proposed by behaviourists). Others (physicalists, geneticists) reduce all examinations of </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/nature-of-love-physical-emotional.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjtDbX9xBB7HbqSILPEPGnsKViY-YqH3IpB8sUNs0HH7EvqqW797JIXBG5zNYywxj2C-Bg36-fkec3Wc_b1knzr8OdxvYhOWwQCyJAgbfLMAv4W922yzU18gDIi1tvXciT7IYJYXMFRsdbh/s72-c/Nature+of+love.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-1267198849906926453</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-09T11:19:31.253+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Habermas</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Democracy in Democracy of Deliberative</title><atom:summary type="text">Idea of Habermas about this deliberative democracy in fact will be abysmal of concept democratize in classic body politic. In democracy very emphasized by citizen participation, even that way constitution and state have to be imminent, for the sake of preventing the happening of mass tyranny. But, access communications opened and control to the government run. Communicative power of civil society</atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/democracy-in-democracy-of-deliberative.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-2457739646125810132</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 04:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-09T11:06:53.600+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Habermas</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Biography</title><atom:summary type="text">Jurgen Habermas was born on 18 June 1229 in Rheinland-Westfalen Germany West, and become big in Gummersbach, a middle-weight town. Contrast among family atmosphere which is borjois-Protestan with society environment which is Roman makes sensitive Habermas to stress in society. From such atmosphere of Habermas produce fruit so much idea of sociologies.Habermas starting from critical theory of Marx</atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/biography.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><media:thumbnail xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" url="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiM-pF6wKU3Mv6m7Zh96Goy3YaZMHn91WT49p2rwa9sqO7ZACmUpsurSVtIjAyMzWsUFmpkOcWR6Aap8wang1h41aQgVI_nlSWavOrmZhP4S8YlKJNDEs380Vb3KDjJVuHpccQkbDRNSYd-/s72-c/Habermas.jpg" height="72" width="72"/><thr:total>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2096536625258867732.post-1994639318371159410</guid><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 01:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-05-09T10:54:54.654+07:00</atom:updated><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Habermas</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Indonesia</category><category domain="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#">Political and Social Philosophy</category><title>Demokrasi Deliberatif</title><atom:summary type="text">Deliberatif (latin: deliberatio)=menimbang-nimbang atau konsultasi. Demokrasi bersifat deliberatif jika “proses pemberian suatu alasan atas suatu kandidat  kebijakan publik  diuji lebih dahulu lewat konsultasi publik  atau lewat diskursus publik.” (F. Budi Hardiman, “Demokrasi Deliberatif: Model untuk Indonesia Pasca-Soeharto?”, dalam Basis, no. 11-12, Nov-Des 2004, hl. 18). Jadi, demokrasi </atom:summary><link>http://themodernphilosophy.blogspot.com/2009/05/demokrasi-deliberatif.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (The Modern Philosophy)</author><thr:total>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>