<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:blogger='http://schemas.google.com/blogger/2008' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256</id><updated>2024-03-07T19:16:25.997+00:00</updated><title type='text'>The Musings of Harry</title><subtitle type='html'>&lt;i&gt;A somewhat nonrandom collection of Harry&#39;s thoughts that in no way constitute a blog&lt;/i&gt;</subtitle><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default?alt=atom'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default?alt=atom&amp;start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>64</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112574137690494813</id><published>2005-09-03T10:46:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-09-03T10:56:16.910+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Eighth circuit upholds bad bnetd ruling</title><summary type="text">The 8th circuit court of appeals has upheld the district court&#39;s summary judgement in favour of Blizzard and Vivendi.This means that the original decision stands - and that the DMCA can be used to prevent third parties from improving software they have purchased legally. The core of the matter is that EULAs are, apparently, valid contracts - and that the appellants&#39; acceptance of the EULAs for </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112574137690494813/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112574137690494813' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112574137690494813'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112574137690494813'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/09/eighth-circuit-upholds-bad-bnetd.html' title='Eighth circuit upholds bad bnetd ruling'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112497247237517183</id><published>2005-08-25T13:04:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-25T13:21:12.383+01:00</updated><title type='text'>BBCode vulnerability discovered</title><summary type="text">An interesting vulnerability has been found in BBCode. Apparently, this problem affects most products that use BBCode - the de-facto standard for formatting posts in online forums.The problem exists with the [IMG] tag, which allows users to embed images in their posts. It generally works something like this: [IMG]http://server/folder/image.jpg[/IMG] The vulnerability works by creating a folder </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112497247237517183/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112497247237517183' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112497247237517183'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112497247237517183'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/bbcode-vulnerability-discovered.html' title='BBCode vulnerability discovered'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112463123415514060</id><published>2005-08-24T16:20:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-24T16:20:04.843+01:00</updated><title type='text'>More thoughts on de Menezes</title><summary type="text">A couple of things happened over the weekend, which I found interesting. First, I had to travel by tube. Upon entering the tube system, my first thought was &quot;I wonder if I&#39;ll get mistaken for a suicide bomber&quot;. It was not &quot;I wonder if I&#39;ll get blown up by a suicide bomber&quot;. Of course, I considered the likelihood of either to be pifflingly small, but nevertheless, that was the order of my thoughts</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112463123415514060/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112463123415514060' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112463123415514060'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112463123415514060'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/more-thoughts-on-de-menezes.html' title='More thoughts on de Menezes'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112472437297992459</id><published>2005-08-23T12:51:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-23T12:49:46.840+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Followup: response from Sir Ian Blair</title><summary type="text">A few weeks ago, I wrote about an interview with Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, and its implications on the shoot-to-kill policy. As well as writing that post, I contacted Scotland Yard to see if they would like to comment, and - after several follow-up phone calls - they have responded. Unfortunately, but understandably, they are waiting for the IPCC report on Jean Charles </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112472437297992459/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112472437297992459' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112472437297992459'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112472437297992459'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/followup-response-from-sir-ian-blair.html' title='Followup: response from Sir Ian Blair'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112436632958462121</id><published>2005-08-22T15:45:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-22T15:44:00.850+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Google supports &quot;fill in the blanks&quot; queries</title><summary type="text">This is so cool.Google blog describes the uses for wildcard searches:Sometimes one wants to use a search engine to find a very specific piece of information rather than to learn about a topic. If search engines were truly intelligent, you could just pose a question the same way you would ask a person. An alternative is to get the search engine to &#39;fill in the blank.&#39; So instead of asking [who </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112436632958462121/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112436632958462121' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436632958462121'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436632958462121'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/google-supports-fill-in-blanks-queries.html' title='Google supports &quot;fill in the blanks&quot; queries'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112463112602280915</id><published>2005-08-21T14:17:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-21T14:34:06.276+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Menezes was &quot;not a bomb threat&quot;</title><summary type="text">The Guardian reports that senior sources in the Metropolitan Police have told the Observer that de Menezes was not considered a bomb threat by the surveillence team who followed him to Stockwell tube station. Apparently, he was only considered a threat once the armed officers arrived.These officers are trained to deal with suicide bombers, and their training tells them that a bomber will likely </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112463112602280915/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112463112602280915' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112463112602280915'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112463112602280915'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/menezes-was-not-bomb-threat.html' title='Menezes was &quot;not a bomb threat&quot;'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112429507621924575</id><published>2005-08-20T16:56:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-20T16:56:38.900+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Speed cameras cause more accidents?</title><summary type="text">TheNewspaper.com reports that a study conducted by the Department for Transport, uncovered by a FOIA request, has shown that the presence of speed cameras increases the number of personal injury accidents - accidents in which someone is hurt.This doesn&#39;t surprise me at all. As is probably obvious to most, speed cameras do not reduce speeding overall -- they decrease speeding where the camera is. </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112429507621924575/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112429507621924575' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112429507621924575'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112429507621924575'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/speed-cameras-cause-more-accidents.html' title='Speed cameras cause more accidents?'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112436825856120194</id><published>2005-08-19T17:36:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-19T17:35:16.700+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Documents relating to de Menezes shooting leaked</title><summary type="text">I don&#39;t wish to jump to conclusions before the publication of the inquiry into the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes, but documents  have been leaked from the IPCC which cast a grave shadow over the whole affair.It seems very likely that the following is true:De Menezes was not wearing loose clothing or a heavy jacketHe did not run from officers or vault the ticket barrierHe had been restrained</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112436825856120194/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112436825856120194' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436825856120194'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436825856120194'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/documents-relating-to-de-menezes.html' title='Documents relating to de Menezes shooting leaked'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112436475306214170</id><published>2005-08-18T12:27:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-18T12:32:33.073+01:00</updated><title type='text'>TSA finally gives way to common sense</title><summary type="text">Via Schneier on Security: The US Transportation Security Agency is considering lifting its ban on small pointy objects. It&#39;s also deciding whether or not to give screeners the discretion not to conduct pat-down searches, and not to require passengers to remove their shoes.Well... it&#39;s about time. This policy was always completely stupid. I&#39;m glad that someone in charge has finally realised that.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112436475306214170/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112436475306214170' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436475306214170'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112436475306214170'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/tsa-finally-gives-way-to-common-sense.html' title='TSA finally gives way to common sense'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112428886716660539</id><published>2005-08-17T15:11:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-17T15:27:47.173+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Bush administration opposes .xxx TLD</title><summary type="text">Apologies for the recent lack of posts. I&#39;ve been on holiday.News.com reports that the Bush administration has asked ICANN to delay the creation of a .xxx top-level domain name, so that the suffix can receive &quot;further scrutiny&quot;.The Bush administration appears to be reacting to approximately 6000 letters and emails from concerned citizens. They don&#39;t seem to have objected to the concept on </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112428886716660539/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112428886716660539' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112428886716660539'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112428886716660539'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/bush-administration-opposes-xxx-tld.html' title='Bush administration opposes .xxx TLD'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112354183893541731</id><published>2005-08-09T15:31:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-09T15:32:51.816+01:00</updated><title type='text'>RFID</title><summary type="text">I recently wrote about a pilot scheme in the US to require visitors to carry RFID-enabled cards at border crossings, in an attempt to acheieve better border control (I assume).Well, yesterday I read at Schneier on Security that the record for reading a passive RFID device was set at 69 feet! Just goes to show. The US government has said that they won&#39;t read the cards except at borders, but who </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112354183893541731/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112354183893541731' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112354183893541731'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112354183893541731'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/rfid.html' title='RFID'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112353917612735619</id><published>2005-08-08T23:13:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-09T11:26:39.926+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Email header injection in PHP</title><summary type="text">Be careful with your &#39;contact&#39; forms in PHP.It&#39;s very easy for a cracker to hijack your contact form to send spams or anonymous emails if you don&#39;t validate your input very carefully. Consider the following example:&amp;lt;!-- HTML contact form here (just pretend) --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;?phpif($_REQUEST[&#39;Message&#39;]){ $Valid[&#39;Email&#39;] = ValidateEmailAddress($_REQUEST[&#39;Email&#39;]); $Valid[&#39;Name&#39;] = $_REQUEST[&#39;Name&#39;] $</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112353917612735619/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112353917612735619' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112353917612735619'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112353917612735619'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/email-header-injection-in-php.html' title='Email header injection in PHP'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112334325911421580</id><published>2005-08-06T16:36:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-06T16:47:39.120+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Sir Ian Blair</title><summary type="text">Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner, has always seemed to me to be quite a reasonable man. I&#39;ve seen him speak on TV several times in the aftermath of the London bombings. The first time I saw him was on Question Time, in which he defended the Police&#39;s shoot-to-kill policy for suicide bombers. Today, I watched another interview with him, in which he said the following with respect</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112334325911421580/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112334325911421580' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112334325911421580'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112334325911421580'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/sir-ian-blair.html' title='Sir Ian Blair'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112324756470981054</id><published>2005-08-05T13:55:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-05T14:12:44.716+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Shoot-to-kill policies are short-sighted</title><summary type="text">I&#39;ve been thinking a lot about the Police&#39;s shoot-to-kill policy for suspected suicide bombers. It&#39;s been stuck in my mind mostly because it just feels wrong. Unfortunately, I couldn&#39;t quite put my finger on a good reason why.Well, Bruce Schneier - as regularly seems to be the case - has done exactly that. In fact, it&#39;s a reasonably simply critisism, and I&#39;m a bit annoyed that it didn&#39;t occur to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112324756470981054/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112324756470981054' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112324756470981054'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112324756470981054'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/shoot-to-kill-policies-are-short.html' title='Shoot-to-kill policies are short-sighted'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112307077831433913</id><published>2005-08-03T12:57:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-03T13:06:18.320+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Microsoft shamelessly copy Google</title><summary type="text">Not that there&#39;s anything wrong with copying a good idea, but when it&#39;s Microsoft copying Google, you&#39;ve got to ask: why don&#39;t Microsoft come up with their own ideas?They&#39;ve already copied Google Maps in the form of Virtual Earth, and now they&#39;ve ripped off Google&#39;s start page too, in the form of Start.com.I must say though: start.com is nice. Nicer than Google&#39;s original. I think Virtual Earth </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112307077831433913/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112307077831433913' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112307077831433913'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112307077831433913'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/microsoft-shamelessly-copy-google.html' title='Microsoft shamelessly copy Google'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112291224242079257</id><published>2005-08-02T14:32:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-02T14:31:53.343+01:00</updated><title type='text'>No more cheeky wifi?</title><summary type="text">A West London man, Gregory Straszkiewicz, has been found guilty of &quot;dishonestly obtaining an electronic communications service&quot; for accessing an unsecured wireless network without permission.One really has to ask if this is reasonable. Obviously if he had committed a crime on someone else&#39;s network, that would be a different matter, but that doesn&#39;t seem to be the case.I sometimes hear arguments </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112291224242079257/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112291224242079257' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112291224242079257'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112291224242079257'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/no-more-cheeky-wifi.html' title='No more cheeky wifi?'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112290069657944514</id><published>2005-08-01T13:33:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-01T14:10:56.673+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Looks like I&#39;m never going back to the states...</title><summary type="text">...which makes me unhappy. I have some good friends there.Boingboing reports that the US is piloting a scheme where visitors to the country will be required to carry an RFID card containing their biometrics and personal information.This, in addition to photographing and fingerprinting all visitors to the States, is a step too far. Why is it necessary to gather biometric information on all </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112290069657944514/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112290069657944514' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112290069657944514'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112290069657944514'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/looks-like-im-never-going-back-to.html' title='Looks like I&#39;m never going back to the states...'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112290181305653172</id><published>2005-08-01T13:20:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-08-01T14:11:22.883+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Salami</title><summary type="text">I can&#39;t remember where I heard this analogy, but it&#39;s really good.This analogy explains a big part of the problem with government or commercial initiatives that accomplish something at the cost of reducing our liberties and/or freedoms just a little bit.In isolation, these programmes seem ok: they accomplish something (perhaps), and don&#39;t cost that much in return. We are led to believe that the </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112290181305653172/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112290181305653172' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112290181305653172'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112290181305653172'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/08/salami.html' title='Salami'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112165435738442896</id><published>2005-07-27T09:30:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-27T09:29:23.676+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Project Gotham Racing</title><summary type="text">Stunning new screenshots for Project Gotham Racing have been released. They really do look photo-realistic. I wonder how good they&#39;ll look at 150Mph, but still - impressive.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112165435738442896/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112165435738442896' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112165435738442896'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112165435738442896'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/project-gotham-racing.html' title='Project Gotham Racing'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112237662118696595</id><published>2005-07-26T12:12:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-26T12:17:01.193+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Will it never end?</title><summary type="text">The US House of Representatives has overwhelmingly voted -- 355 to 21 -- for a federal inestigation into GTA San Andreas&#39;s sex scenes.I&#39;ve already posted about the ridiculousness of this whole &#39;scandal&#39;, but this takes the biscuit. One would think that the US Congress has better things to do than investigate cartoon sex. Apparently not. I&#39;m beginning to think that everyone inolved has been </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112237662118696595/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112237662118696595' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112237662118696595'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112237662118696595'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/will-it-never-end.html' title='Will it never end?'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112161609742344605</id><published>2005-07-25T16:51:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-25T16:51:34.156+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Good web advertising</title><summary type="text">I thought I&#39;d post about this -- I think it&#39;s a really good example of how to advertise on the internet.More often than I like, I go to a website to read an article, and a stupid floating &amp;lt;div&amp;gt; with some garish animation pops up right on top of the thing I&#39;m trying to read. It&#39;s immeasurably irritating. The newer ones even make you wait a few seconds before presenting you with a way to </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112161609742344605/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112161609742344605' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112161609742344605'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112161609742344605'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/good-web-advertising.html' title='Good web advertising'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112205133498390319</id><published>2005-07-24T15:47:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-24T15:47:03.086+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Real life Mr Hanky!</title><summary type="text">Canada has a real-life Mr Hanky!The seven-foot turd is the mascott of the People Opposed to Outfall Pollution , or -- you guessed it -- POOP. He has a song and everything! The organisation is campaigning for proper sewage treatment for their city, which -- somewhat surprisingly -- dumps 120 million litres of raw sewage into the sea every year. Isn&#39;t sewage treatment a pretty basic need? Even in </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112205133498390319/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112205133498390319' title='2 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112205133498390319'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112205133498390319'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/real-life-mr-hanky.html' title='Real life Mr Hanky!'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>2</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112213002340006422</id><published>2005-07-23T15:33:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-23T16:12:45.453+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Software patents are bad because...</title><summary type="text">... companies like Microsoft use them to protect such &#39;innovations&#39; as the smilie. Yes. The smilie. The humble emoticon.ZdNet reports that Microsoft have filed for a patent covering &quot;selecting pixels to create an emoticon image, assigning a character sequence to these pixels and reconstructing the emoticon after transmission&quot;. If you&#39;re interested, you can read the patent yourself.The FFII has </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112213002340006422/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112213002340006422' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112213002340006422'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112213002340006422'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/software-patents-are-bad-because.html' title='Software patents are bad because...'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112208354903657463</id><published>2005-07-23T02:50:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-23T03:08:56.503+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Excellent article about profiling</title><summary type="text">Not really much to say here -- Bruce Schneier has posted an excerpt from his book (Beyond Fear) about profiling, along with some extra points.This is well worth reading -- an excellent critique of the strengths and weaknesses of profiling as a security measure.</summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112208354903657463/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112208354903657463' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112208354903657463'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112208354903657463'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/excellent-article-about-profiling.html' title='Excellent article about profiling'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13665256.post-112205023267063109</id><published>2005-07-22T16:52:00.000+01:00</published><updated>2005-07-22T17:48:03.100+01:00</updated><title type='text'>Here we go again...</title><summary type="text">According to Wired,   a whoooole bunch of stupid nonsense is arriving in the aftermath of the Hot Coffee &#39;scandal&#39;.Take Two has announced that it is &quot;exploring its legal options as it relates to companies that profited from creating and distributing tools for altering the content&quot;.  Datel Design &amp; Development, the company that makes the &#39;Action Replay&#39; system that allows Playstation users to use </summary><link rel='replies' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/feeds/112205023267063109/comments/default' title='Post Comments'/><link rel='replies' type='text/html' href='http://www.blogger.com/comment/fullpage/post/13665256/112205023267063109' title='0 Comments'/><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112205023267063109'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/13665256/posts/default/112205023267063109'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://musingsofharry.blogspot.com/2005/07/here-we-go-again.html' title='Here we go again...'/><author><name>Harry Metcalfe</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/02351218926148250125</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='https://img1.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:total>0</thr:total></entry></feed>