<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Blog: The Photovoltaics Solar Energy Advocate</title>
	
	<link>http://davebuemi.com</link>
	<description>Commenting on the Photovoltaic Solar Energy Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 15:06:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ThePvAdvocate" /><feedburner:info uri="thepvadvocate" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>PV Module Form Factor Evolution – Enter SolarClover</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/vC9FpJ919sE/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2012/03/14/pv-module-form-factor-evolution-%e2%80%93-enter-solarclover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 13:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoD Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1056</guid>
		<description>The standard PV panel design is essentially a 30+ year old packaging scheme, whether you are talking about crystalline technology or thin-film (glass on glass). It is a form factor that has served the industry well up to this point, but as my readers know, I believe it is keeping the pace of PV adoption [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/vC9FpJ919sE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2012/03/14/pv-module-form-factor-evolution-%e2%80%93-enter-solarclover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2012/03/14/pv-module-form-factor-evolution-%e2%80%93-enter-solarclover/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Buy American Act Compliant PV Modules – How to Know?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/qWNYLUexneU/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2012/02/20/buy-american-act-compliant-pv-modules-%e2%80%93-how-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoD Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Protectionism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1042</guid>
		<description>The US PV industry as a whole is grappling with the solar import tariff petition by Solarworld which presents an interesting set of American made, American protectionist, and wider global trade issues. A great recap with citations of this complex situation which may result in substantial tariffs on solar PV modules that contain crystalline solar [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/qWNYLUexneU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2012/02/20/buy-american-act-compliant-pv-modules-%e2%80%93-how-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2012/02/20/buy-american-act-compliant-pv-modules-%e2%80%93-how-to-know/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality Check for DoD Energy – And Its Big!</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/BxMJ5V3yUO4/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/13/reality-check-for-dod-energy-and-its-big/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 22:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoD Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1039</guid>
		<description>While there has been much excitement about the sheer size of the Pentagon’s plans for deploying renewable energy, a recent study from DoD’s Office of Installations and Environment on solar applicability on bases in the California, Colorado and Nevada bases offers both optimism and caution for deploying solar in DoD agencies. Of specific interest, 7000 [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/BxMJ5V3yUO4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/13/reality-check-for-dod-energy-and-its-big/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/13/reality-check-for-dod-energy-and-its-big/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>All the Best in New Year</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/DvDtakB7Gzs/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/01/all-the-best-in-new-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoD Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market Protectionism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV & Earth Sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Bankability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Grid Parity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1028</guid>
		<description>&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/DvDtakB7Gzs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/01/all-the-best-in-new-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2012/01/01/all-the-best-in-new-year/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Industry M&amp;A – Really?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/P8gDU_K1Hgg/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2011/12/27/solar-industry-ma-madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PV Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thin Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1019</guid>
		<description>With the collapse of publicly traded solar stocks in the last 4 months, the general business press has been buzzing with speculation about mergers and acquisitions. But these articles have missed some basic industry drivers and circumstances that may point to minimal M&amp;#38;A activity. A good example includes a recent Bloomberg article about how First [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/P8gDU_K1Hgg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2011/12/27/solar-industry-ma-madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2011/12/27/solar-industry-ma-madness/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Operational Energy – The Marines Embrace Renewables</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/BKLx6uD9vlY/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/14/operational-energy-%e2%80%93-the-marines-embrace-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DoD Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PV Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1004</guid>
		<description>US Department of Defense agencies are leading the nation on the renewable energy front. With plans to have 25% renewable energy use by 2025 and spending $15.2B on DoD energy in 2010, this is a significant and growing market place for the solar energy industry. DoD energy is segmented into basing power (mostly electricity), operational [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/BKLx6uD9vlY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/14/operational-energy-%e2%80%93-the-marines-embrace-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/14/operational-energy-%e2%80%93-the-marines-embrace-renewables/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Understanding Photovoltaic Cell and Module Level Efficiency</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/_eg7yx_iBHg/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/02/understanding-photovoltaic-cell-and-module-level-efficiency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 12:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PV Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solar Manufacturing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=1000</guid>
		<description>After a recent presentation during a government renewable energy conference, I received a number of questions regarding why there was such a large difference between crystalline solar cell efficiency and a fully packaged and weatherized module. For instance, a 19% efficient crystalline photovoltaic (PV) cell, when packaged into a module with 60 cells results in [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/_eg7yx_iBHg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/02/understanding-photovoltaic-cell-and-module-level-efficiency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2011/11/02/understanding-photovoltaic-cell-and-module-level-efficiency/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Where did global warming go?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~3/303f8b5DddA/</link>
		<comments>http://davebuemi.com/2011/10/17/the-world-is-moving-on-without-the-united-states/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Buemi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PV & Earth Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davebuemi.com/?p=990</guid>
		<description>A good piece in the New York times today answers the question by starting with &amp;#8220;. . . . now that nearly every other nation accepts climate change as a pressing problem, America has turned agnostic on the issue.&amp;#8221; Every other nation in the world is experiencing significant climate change effects, recognize the urgency of [...]&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ThePvAdvocate/~4/303f8b5DddA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://davebuemi.com/2011/10/17/the-world-is-moving-on-without-the-united-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://davebuemi.com/2011/10/17/the-world-is-moving-on-without-the-united-states/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

