<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Republic of T.</title>
	
	<link>http://www.republicoft.com</link>
	<description>Black. Gay. Father. Vegetarian. Buddhist. Liberal.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheRepublicOfTComments" type="application/rss+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>Comment on You Can’t Win by jimbo</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/HehP6DzyGWA/</link>
		<dc:creator>jimbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/07/01/you-cant-win/#comment-193611</guid>
		<description>Ha ha...I'm having one of those weeks as well.  Somebody get me off of this scarecrow pole!

I loved The Wiz!  Diana is brilliant in "Brand New Day."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha&#8230;I&#8217;m having one of those weeks as well.  Somebody get me off of this scarecrow pole!</p>
<p>I loved The Wiz!  Diana is brilliant in &#8220;Brand New Day.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/07/01/you-cant-win/comment-page-1/#comment-193611</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Michael Jackson by Nikhi</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/88b6WBcLBvE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikhi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3896#comment-193415</guid>
		<description>The world has lost a legend, an inspiration to many and the great innovator of his time, and so far - of all time. Rest in peace Michael, we love you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world has lost a legend, an inspiration to many and the great innovator of his time, and so far - of all time. Rest in peace Michael, we love you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/26/for-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-193415</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Michael Jackson by Norris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/PserVBgy3sE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3896#comment-193410</guid>
		<description>Well said! We will miss you Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said! We will miss you Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/26/for-michael-jackson/comment-page-1/#comment-193410</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cure Health Disparities With Real Reform by Healthcare debate: 100 years later, still the same — US Health Crisis</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/sUCTTw_GdJo/</link>
		<dc:creator>Healthcare debate: 100 years later, still the same — US Health Crisis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/26/cure-health-disparities-with-real-reform/#comment-193293</guid>
		<description>[...] owners, the middle class, people suffering from chronic illness and their caretakers. There is a fundamental social inequity built into the structure of health insurance and health delivery systems that cannot be solved by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] owners, the middle class, people suffering from chronic illness and their caretakers. There is a fundamental social inequity built into the structure of health insurance and health delivery systems that cannot be solved by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/26/cure-health-disparities-with-real-reform/comment-page-1/#comment-193293</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Don’t Cry For Mark Sanford Argentina by Norris</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/G79A5FUxKgE/</link>
		<dc:creator>Norris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3871#comment-193240</guid>
		<description>This is your best writings to date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is your best writings to date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/24/dont-cry-for-mark-sanford-argentina/comment-page-1/#comment-193240</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Conscience &amp; Dr. Tiller, Pt. 1 by links for 2009-06-21 « Embololalia</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/TeiyqX4p01c/</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-06-21 « Embololalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/15/conscience-dr-tiller-pt-1/#comment-192920</guid>
		<description>[...] The Republic of T. » Conscience &amp; Dr. Tiller, Pt. 1 If Dr. Tiller’s murder has become the issue, instead of the service he provided to women (and for which he as murdered), the opponents of legal abortion have only themselves to blame for making or allowing others in their movement to go on making service providers like Dr. Tiller the focus. Maybe that makes it easier to ignore the rest of the story — of both Dr. Tiller and the women who found themselves in need of his services — and over simplify both his reason for providing the service and women’s reasons for seeking it. (tags: georgetiller abortion usa medicine) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Republic of T. » Conscience &amp; Dr. Tiller, Pt. 1 If Dr. Tiller’s murder has become the issue, instead of the service he provided to women (and for which he as murdered), the opponents of legal abortion have only themselves to blame for making or allowing others in their movement to go on making service providers like Dr. Tiller the focus. Maybe that makes it easier to ignore the rest of the story — of both Dr. Tiller and the women who found themselves in need of his services — and over simplify both his reason for providing the service and women’s reasons for seeking it. (tags: georgetiller abortion usa medicine) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/15/conscience-dr-tiller-pt-1/comment-page-1/#comment-192920</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter Updates for 2009-06-20 by joan</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/wSBcA-EDNcc/</link>
		<dc:creator>joan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-06-20/#comment-192881</guid>
		<description>OK, I realized everyone wants to hate her but I can totally understand what's going on there.  I assume they are sitting there while they wait to go live to interviews for whatever show that was.  The kids are bored and Maddy is complaining.  Maddy is always complaining.  (just my observation having watched the show a handful of times) If she gives Maddy a drink, not only is she playing into Maddy's whining 'pay attention to ME' game, suddenly *everyone* will want a drink!  The pile of mostly orderly kids sitting and playing will become a crazy swarm of whining, fighting, pushing, crying kids grabbing at one water bottle and probably spilling it everywhere...Just in time for the live shot to start!

She's not telling them they can't have any water, in fact, she's asking the staff if they could please arrange for everyone to get a drink after the next segment.  They probably have a cooler of sippy cups nearby, there just isn't time for a family water break in the 30 seconds before they had to be on the air.  I can understand that, maybe it's just a different perspective as another mother of a mob, but I totally see what's going on and I don't fault her a bit!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I realized everyone wants to hate her but I can totally understand what&#8217;s going on there.  I assume they are sitting there while they wait to go live to interviews for whatever show that was.  The kids are bored and Maddy is complaining.  Maddy is always complaining.  (just my observation having watched the show a handful of times) If she gives Maddy a drink, not only is she playing into Maddy&#8217;s whining &#8216;pay attention to ME&#8217; game, suddenly *everyone* will want a drink!  The pile of mostly orderly kids sitting and playing will become a crazy swarm of whining, fighting, pushing, crying kids grabbing at one water bottle and probably spilling it everywhere&#8230;Just in time for the live shot to start!</p>
<p>She&#8217;s not telling them they can&#8217;t have any water, in fact, she&#8217;s asking the staff if they could please arrange for everyone to get a drink after the next segment.  They probably have a cooler of sippy cups nearby, there just isn&#8217;t time for a family water break in the 30 seconds before they had to be on the air.  I can understand that, maybe it&#8217;s just a different perspective as another mother of a mob, but I totally see what&#8217;s going on and I don&#8217;t fault her a bit!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/20/twitter-updates-for-2009-06-20/comment-page-1/#comment-192881</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poisonous Parenting: Making Babies vs. Raising Children by J. Frey</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/5Q_HbJbzdFQ/</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Frey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3731#comment-192630</guid>
		<description>Um.  I've read your Poisonous Parenting series and first, let me state that I completely agree with your overall message that despite right-wing fears, being a gay parent does not in any way equate to being an abusive straight parent.  I'm not commenting to try and refute that.

But I have noticed on several different occasions that along with the cases of parents who have beaten and neglected their own children, you list cases of parents leaving their kids in cars.  

It's horrible.  But it's not intentional.  The knee-jerk reaction is always hatred at the parents.  It would have to be deliberate, people say.  How could anyone leave their kid in the car in the hot sun?  And there are some few cases where it is deliberate.  I'm not arguing that.

Sometimes, though, it isn't.  The article I'm linking to explains it better than I could.  It's all too possible to go into "autopilot", and if the child is quiet, to assume that they've already been taken care of.  Even hypervigilance can only be maintained for so long.  The human brain just isn't designed for it.  

It's an awful way for a child to die.  But to be a parent who knows that this is not a nice death and it's your own fault that your child died that way because of one stupid mistake you made, and there's nothing you can do to make it right again, and carry that knowledge with you for the rest of your life... I can't even begin to imagine how hellish that must be.  It's not the same as being an abusive parent - those may shed crocodile tears, sure, but it's very different.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/27/AR2009022701549.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um.  I&#8217;ve read your Poisonous Parenting series and first, let me state that I completely agree with your overall message that despite right-wing fears, being a gay parent does not in any way equate to being an abusive straight parent.  I&#8217;m not commenting to try and refute that.</p>
<p>But I have noticed on several different occasions that along with the cases of parents who have beaten and neglected their own children, you list cases of parents leaving their kids in cars.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s horrible.  But it&#8217;s not intentional.  The knee-jerk reaction is always hatred at the parents.  It would have to be deliberate, people say.  How could anyone leave their kid in the car in the hot sun?  And there are some few cases where it is deliberate.  I&#8217;m not arguing that.</p>
<p>Sometimes, though, it isn&#8217;t.  The article I&#8217;m linking to explains it better than I could.  It&#8217;s all too possible to go into &#8220;autopilot&#8221;, and if the child is quiet, to assume that they&#8217;ve already been taken care of.  Even hypervigilance can only be maintained for so long.  The human brain just isn&#8217;t designed for it.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s an awful way for a child to die.  But to be a parent who knows that this is not a nice death and it&#8217;s your own fault that your child died that way because of one stupid mistake you made, and there&#8217;s nothing you can do to make it right again, and carry that knowledge with you for the rest of your life&#8230; I can&#8217;t even begin to imagine how hellish that must be.  It&#8217;s not the same as being an abusive parent - those may shed crocodile tears, sure, but it&#8217;s very different.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/27/AR2009022701549.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/27/AR2009022701549.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/04/poisonous-parenting-making-babies-vs-raising-children/comment-page-1/#comment-192630</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Liberated by AYW</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/FoGq479AQuk/</link>
		<dc:creator>AYW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/2009/05/22/liberated/#comment-192528</guid>
		<description>Speaking of George W. Bush: Bush is the worst thing that ever happened to America.
_______________
SCANDAL! SCANDAL! SCANDAL!

EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!

George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.

“In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).

“One of those ‘very leasts’ [was] George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003. Determining the exact whereabouts and contacts of [then] president-elect George Bush on September 21 thru 22, 2003, should be entirely lacking in difficulty” (Leola McConnell—Nevada Progressive Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010).

Leola McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder where it culminated in her death.

BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.

Bush is getting away with his murder of Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.

Bush’s method of murdering Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.

Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.

(There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)
_______________
Andrew Wang
(a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
Messiah College, Grantham, PA
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of George W. Bush: Bush is the worst thing that ever happened to America.<br />
_______________<br />
SCANDAL! SCANDAL! SCANDAL!</p>
<p>EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!</p>
<p>George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her.</p>
<p>“In her suit, Margie Schoedinger states that George W. Bush committed sexual crimes against her, organized harassment and moral pressure on her, her family members and close relatives and friends. As Schoedinger said, she was strongly recommended to keep her mouth shut. . . . Furthermore, she alleges that George Bush ordered to show pressure on her to the point, when she commits suicide” (blog of drizzten).</p>
<p>“One of those ‘very leasts’ [was] George Bush’s personal complicity in the death (murder to be precise) of my friend Margie Schoedinger in September of 2003. Determining the exact whereabouts and contacts of [then] president-elect George Bush on September 21 thru 22, 2003, should be entirely lacking in difficulty” (Leola McConnell—Nevada Progressive Democratic Candidate for U.S. Senate in 2010).</p>
<p>Leola McConnell is correct: Bush applying pressure (continuously criminally stalking Margie Schoedinger) purposefully to force Schoedinger to commit suicide does in fact constitute murder where it culminated in her death.</p>
<p>BEWARE: If the president of the United States hates one—for whatever reasons—he can continuously criminally stalk one to the point that one cannot get away from it, and one ultimately commits suicide in desperation to escape. He can murder people in this way.</p>
<p>Bush is getting away with his murder of Schoedinger—with no sheriff, prosecutor, or court willing to uphold the rule of law.</p>
<p>Bush’s method of murdering Schoedinger cannot exist in a vacuum: he must have murdered other people in the same way.</p>
<p>Bush should confess, come out with the names of all of the people whom he murdered in the disgusting way he murdered Schoedinger, undergo execution, and accordingly find himself at the intersection where he would be free.</p>
<p>(There are thousands of copies of the information above on the Internet. It exists very extensively in all major search engines. Please feel free to go to any major search engine, type “George W. Bush continuously criminally stalked Margie Schoedinger to the point that she could not get away from it, and she committed suicide in desperation to escape: he murdered her,” hit “Enter,” and find innumerable results.)<br />
_______________<br />
Andrew Wang<br />
(a.k.a. “THE DISSEMINATING MACHINE”)<br />
B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996<br />
Messiah College, Grantham, PA<br />
Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/05/22/liberated/comment-page-1/#comment-192528</feedburner:origLink></item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Ultimate List - Time Travel by Katrina</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRepublicOfTComments/~3/bKrnuP8THJ8/</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 10:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.republicoft.com/?p=3770#comment-192495</guid>
		<description>I'd like to see:
1.Gil Scott Heron in his mid twenties.
2. Paul Robeson singing.
3. Spain when it was still covered in ancient forests.
4. Viet Nam before any European colonisation
5. Madagascar with dodos
6. Pre-human New Zealand with moas and kiwis and kakapos waddling around.
7. Australia before the arrival of any humans, when the megafauna (giant wombats! mega kangaroos!) was still alive.
8. Viet Nam before Chinese colonisation (although I don't think China existed as a nation when that happened)
9. The poles when they were hot enough to have plant life but still had six months a year of hardly any light.

I would not like to see:
Greece when Spartans held Helots as slaves and culled them regularly
The Spanish Inquisition
The then Belgian Congo
Pre-sewerage London

 

and now I've run out.

I'd like to see just about everywhere on earth as it was before humans became really numerous and sedentary, when they just criss-crossed lands according to the seasons and didn't change anything very much. There would have been so many more species of other animals, and they would have been much less shy. 
There wouldn't have been any feral cats in Europe, but at one stage there would have been lions (going by the cave drawings near the Cro Magnon cliffs). In some places you would have been able to walk under trees hundreds of years old for hundreds of miles, and there wouldn't have been much undergrowth because they wouldn't have left sufficient light get in. I find it hard to imagine how different it would have been. I can never get anyone else interested in this vision of things; they always look at me blankly and/or say: " but this is a forest", referring to the Eucalyptus and pine plantations nearby.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to see:<br />
1.Gil Scott Heron in his mid twenties.<br />
2. Paul Robeson singing.<br />
3. Spain when it was still covered in ancient forests.<br />
4. Viet Nam before any European colonisation<br />
5. Madagascar with dodos<br />
6. Pre-human New Zealand with moas and kiwis and kakapos waddling around.<br />
7. Australia before the arrival of any humans, when the megafauna (giant wombats! mega kangaroos!) was still alive.<br />
8. Viet Nam before Chinese colonisation (although I don&#8217;t think China existed as a nation when that happened)<br />
9. The poles when they were hot enough to have plant life but still had six months a year of hardly any light.</p>
<p>I would not like to see:<br />
Greece when Spartans held Helots as slaves and culled them regularly<br />
The Spanish Inquisition<br />
The then Belgian Congo<br />
Pre-sewerage London</p>
<p>and now I&#8217;ve run out.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to see just about everywhere on earth as it was before humans became really numerous and sedentary, when they just criss-crossed lands according to the seasons and didn&#8217;t change anything very much. There would have been so many more species of other animals, and they would have been much less shy.<br />
There wouldn&#8217;t have been any feral cats in Europe, but at one stage there would have been lions (going by the cave drawings near the Cro Magnon cliffs). In some places you would have been able to walk under trees hundreds of years old for hundreds of miles, and there wouldn&#8217;t have been much undergrowth because they wouldn&#8217;t have left sufficient light get in. I find it hard to imagine how different it would have been. I can never get anyone else interested in this vision of things; they always look at me blankly and/or say: &#8221; but this is a forest&#8221;, referring to the Eucalyptus and pine plantations nearby.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	<feedburner:origLink>http://www.republicoft.com/2009/06/12/the-ultimate-list-time-travel/comment-page-1/#comment-192495</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel>
</rss>
