<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Rose Report</title>
	
	<link>http://rosereport.org</link>
	<description>The Rose Institute of State and Local Government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheRoseReport" /><feedburner:info uri="therosereport" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Open Primaries in California: The Future of Proposition 14</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/_szxA0XXuls/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100311/open-primaries-in-california-the-future-of-proposition-14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 03:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Wessels '10</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Primary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open primary system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposition 14]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In June 2010, California voters will have the chance to fundamentally alter the state’s primary election system. Currently, California operates under a modified closed primary system. Under this system, political parties nominate candidates for the November General Election through a June Primary Election. The primary is “closed” because voters may select only their own party’s candidates, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June 2010, California voters will have the chance to fundamentally alter the state’s primary election system. Currently, California operates under a <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_decline.htm">modified closed primary</a></span> system. Under this system, political parties nominate candidates for the November General Election through a June Primary Election. The primary is “closed” because voters may select only their own party’s candidates, and may not “cross over” to vote for candidates in other parties.  It is a “modified” closed primary because each party has the option of allowing independent voters (also known as “decline-to-state” voters) to participate in its primary. Currently, both the Democrat and Republican parties allow unaffiliated voters to participate in the primary election for their parties.<span id="more-2651"></span></p>
<p>If voters elect to pass <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://electionlawblog.org/archives/sca_4_bill_20090219_amended_sen.pdf">Proposition 14</a></span>, the state will switch to a “top two” candidate open primary system. This system differs from the current format in two ways. First, all voters, regardless of party registration, would have the option of voting for any candidate. Second, the primary’s top two candidates for each office, again regardless of political party, would advance to a runoff election in November. If two Democratic candidates each receive more votes than any Republican candidate for the office, the November election would feature a run-off between the two Democrats, or vice versa.</p>
<p>The <span style="color: #0000ff;"><a href="http://www.ppic.org/main/home.asp">Public Policy Institute of California</a> </span>(PPIC) recently issued a <a href="http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/atissue/AI_210EMAI.pdf">report</a> detailing the pros and cons of Proposition 14. Advocates of Proposition 14 argue that its passage would increase voter participation, enhance voter choice, and increase competition. They claim that this would ultimately result in the election of more moderate candidates and that elected candidates would be more representative of their constituents. Those who oppose Proposition 14 argue that it would open the door for party manipulation, could confuse voters, and would increase campaign costs. Finally, opponents contend that Proposition 14 would exclude smaller parties from the November Election and interfere with party members’ First Amendment right to free association by preventing them from nominating the candidates of their members’ choice.</p>
<p>The “Top Two Primaries Act” only applies to congressional and state elective offices, not to Presidential primaries.</p>
<p><strong>Washington State’s Initiative No. 872</strong></p>
<p>In November 2004, Washington State voters passed Initiative No. 872 – an initiative similar to California’s Proposition 14. <a href="http://www.cmta.net/bio.php?people_id=quinn_tony&amp;amp;popup=1">Tony Quinn</a>, a leading expert on California redistricting and election reform, notes that “in a practical manner, [Proposition 14] is exactly the same as the Washington law.” Although Washington’s <a href="http://initiatives.rosereport.org/"><span style="color: #0000ff;">initiative passed easily with over 60% of the vote</span></a>, it has been met with legal resistance. In 2005, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington held that the initiative violated the U.S. Constitution. By forcing political parties to allow outsiders to elect their candidates, the district court held, Initiative No. 872 violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments associational rights. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision.</p>
<p>In March 2008, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed, and held that the initiative is constitutional. Justice Thomas, writing the <a href="http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/06-713.pdf">opinion of the Court</a> in <em>Washington State Grange v. Washington State Republican Party,</em> 128 S.Ct. 184 (2008), held that the initiative “does not on its face severely burden respondents’ associational rights” and that it “is facially constitutional.”</p>
<p>However, the Court indicated that irregular election results could render the initiative unconstitutional <em>as applied</em> if it is found that voters believe candidates listed as members of a given party are the official nominees of that party.  This opening for an “as applied” challenge led opponents of Washington’s top-two system to challenge it again following the state’s August 2008 election, the first election to use the top-two open primary system.</p>
<p>The case is still pending. According to Tony Quinn, the challenge is unlikely to succeed: “There was no sign that anything was amiss. Voters understood the process, voted in a rational manner, and there was no great disruption.”</p>
<p><strong>The Future of Proposition 14</strong></p>
<p>In 2004, California voters had the opportunity to vote on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Proposition_62_(2004)">Proposition 62</a> – the Voter Choice Open Primary Act. In all practical purposes, this Act was identical to Proposition 14 – yet it failed to pass (54%-46%). Despite the identical consequences of these two propositions, there are several differences that may lead to a better fate for Proposition 14. Unlike Proposition 62, which qualified through the citizen signature process, Proposition 14 was put on the ballot by the legislature, which allowed its supporters to write their own, very favorable, title and ballot summary. In 2004, the Legislature intentionally distracted and confused the voters by putting on the ballot Proposition 60, which guaranteed parties the right to nominate their own candidates. Proposition 60, however, appeared earlier on the ballot than Proposition 62 and ultimately passed. So far, no such “poison pill” competing measure has been put on the 2010 ballot.</p>
<p>While in 2004 California voted to keep a closed primary, the political climate in California has since changed and early polls indicate that Proposition 14 will pass comfortably. A 2009 poll conducted by the Public Policy Institute of California shows that <a href="http://www.ppic.org/content/pubs/survey/S_909MBS.pdf">70% of Californians support a shift to an open primary system</a>. If Proposition 14 does pass, it may still be brought to court because of the controversial nature of the issue and the Supreme Court’s limited ruling in the Washington case. But based on its rulings so far in the Washington case, it is unlikely that the Court would invalidate Proposition 14.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/_szxA0XXuls" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100311/open-primaries-in-california-the-future-of-proposition-14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100311/open-primaries-in-california-the-future-of-proposition-14/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Redistricting Reform in Virginia?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/gSy-OGOv4os/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100310/redistricting-reform-in-virginia-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rose Report Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creigh Deeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redistricting reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virginia redistricting reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Virginia Democratic nominee for Governor, State Senator Creigh Deeds, has been very actively promoting a bill in the Virginia Senate that would reform the process for redistricting in Virginia.  The official summary of his bill (SB 173) reads:
Establishes a seven-member temporary commission to prepare redistricting plans in 2011 and each tenth year thereafter for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Virginia Democratic nominee for Governor, State Senator Creigh Deeds, has been very actively promoting a bill in the Virginia Senate that would reform the process for redistricting in Virginia.  The official summary of his bill (<a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+sum+SB173">SB 173</a>) reads:</p>
<blockquote><p>Establishes a seven-member temporary commission to prepare redistricting plans in 2011 and each tenth year thereafter for the House of Delegates, state Senate, and congressional districts. Appointments to the Commission shall be made one each by the four majority and minority party leaders of the House and Senate and by the state chairmen of the two major political parties. Those six appointees shall appoint the seventh member and chairman for the Commission. If they cannot agree, they shall submit the names of the two persons receiving the most votes to the Supreme Court for the Court to select the chairman. The Commission will prepare plans and submit them as bills to the General Assembly. The General Assembly shall then proceed to act on the bills in the usual manner. The bill provides for Commission comments on plans as they change in the legislative process. It also spells out the standards and process to be followed by the Commission in preparing plans, including limitations on the use of political data and opportunities for public comment on the plans.</p></blockquote>
<p><span id="more-2243"></span>Deeds&#8217; bill passed out of the Senate&#8217;s Privileges and Elections Committee February 9th on a 15-0 vote.  The bill then went to the floor where it <a href="http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?101+vot+SV0285SB0173+SB0173">passed</a> by a <strong>unanimous 40-0 </strong>on February 15th<strong>. </strong>While Deeds&#8217; bill passed the Virginia Senate with complete support, it was referred to the Committee on Privileges and Elections in the House of Delegates and was tabled by a subcommittee, which means the bill is currently stalled.  An earlier redistricting reform bill in the House of Delegates was defeated in Committee.  Governor Bob McDonnell has endorsed redistricting reform officially.  However, <a href="http://rosereport.org/20091105/redistricting-the-overlooked-impact-of-tuesday-night-in-virginia/">as we reported in November after McDonnell&#8217;s election</a>, under the current system of partisan redistricting, Republicans are in a very strong position to redraw Congressional lines as they want and may not have a very strong incentive to support redistricting reform.  Deeds has <a href="http://www2.timesdispatch.com/rtd/news/state_regional/state_regional_govtpolitics/article/DIST10_20100209-205607/323224/">said</a>, &#8220;I&#8217;ve got no illusions (about passing redistricting reform being easy).  (But) this is the right thing to do.&#8221;  While his bill is progress in getting redistricting reform passed in Virginia, and it is only a bipartisan &#8212; not an independent &#8212; commission that leaves the final control of district lines in the legislature, Deeds is correct that passing even such limited reform will not be easy.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/gSy-OGOv4os" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100310/redistricting-reform-in-virginia-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100310/redistricting-reform-in-virginia-2/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>New Movement for Redistricting Reform in Illinois</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/cKo_HOMPqos/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100308/new-movement-for-redistricting-reform-in-illinois/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demographic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois fair map]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illinois reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pat quinn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting Reforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rod blagoevich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Illinois League of Women Voters, in conjunction with Republican leadership in the state legislature, kicked off a new movement for redistricting reform in Illinois called the &#8220;Illinois Fair Map Amendment.&#8221; Proposed on February 18, the constitutional amendment will be simultaneously introduced as a bill in the Illinois General Assembly and as a petition for an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/illinois1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2602 alignleft" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/illinois1-300x193.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="193" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-family: Georgia">The <span class="MsoHyperlink">Illinois League of Women Voters</span>, in conjunction with Republican leadership in the state legislature, kicked off a new movement for redistricting reform in Illinois called the &#8220;<span class="MsoHyperlink">Illinois Fair Map Amendment</span>.&#8221; Proposed on February 18, the constitutional amendment will be simultaneously introduced as a bill in the Illinois General Assembly and as a petition for an initiative constitutional amendment that will be in effect for the 2011 redistricting cycle.<span style="font-family: Georgia, 'Times New Roman', 'Bitstream Charter', Times, serif"> </span></span></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">The amendment&#8217;s language calls for a nine-member independent redistricting commission, consisting of two members appointed by each of the four legislative leaders (majority and minority leaders of both houses). These appointees would as a group elect the ninth member and chair of the commission. The amendment would put strict limits on the eligibility for the commission, and would restrict commission members from running for office for at least a decade after redistricting. <span id="more-2596"></span>In addition, the proposed amendment offers a much more coherent set of standards for new maps, including requirements for</span><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black"> transparency and participation through  public meetings and increased public access to information.</span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
</div>
</div>
<p><!--StartFragment--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">The reform proposal stands in stark contrast to the existing redistricting process in Illinois, which was put in place in the state’s 1970 Constitution</span><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">.  Under this system, redistricting plans are enacted through a standard bill in the legislature, with a commission taking control if the legislature fails to pass a bill. The Commission has been necessary in every redistricting cycle since  1970. Under current rules, the redistricting commission consists of four Democrats, four Republicans, and a chairperson. The chairperson is selected by choosing a name out of a hat containing one Republican and one Democratic nominee. This process leaves redistricting control solely in the hands of one party, determined by a completely random “name-out-of-a-hat” process. It goes without saying that the current system is begging for change..<a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/il-regions1.png"><img class="alignright" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/il-regions1-588x1024.png" alt="" width="353" height="614" /></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-family: Georgia">Change, however, will be hard to come by. Even the groups sponsoring the Illinois Fair Map Amendment concede that there is no way that the Democratic-controlled legislature will approve the amendment. Therefore, they are concentrating their effort on submitting the amendment to voters as an initiative constitutional amendment on the November ballot.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">Illinois has a highly restrictive initiative process. Citizens may only adopt initiatives that relate to “structural and procedural subjects” contained in Article IV of the Illinois Constitution—the article that defines the legislature’s powers. Under a fair reading of this provision, citizens should be able to remove redistricting from the legislature and shift it to an independent commission, but this issue will likely be tested in court. In general, reformers have had little success invoking the initiative process in the state.  For example, in 1994, the Illinois Supreme Court invalidated a proposed initiative that would have imposed term limits on legislators. More generally, since the initiative process was instituted in in Illinois in 1970, only one citizen-initiated amendment has been ever been approved by the people: a 1980 measure reducing the number of representatives in the General Assembly<br />
</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">To reach the ballot, proponents of the initiative will need to collect signatures equaling 8% of the turnout for the last governor&#8217;s election sign a petition (the same threshold as California). In Illinois, this would amount to about 280,000 voters. The Fair Map Amendment movement has set its goal at 500,000 signatures. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.25pt;background: white"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;font-family: Georgia;color: black">Much of the language in the proposed redistricting amendment was written by members of the<span class="MsoHyperlink"> Illinois Reform Commission</span>, an independent advisory group created through executive order by <span class="MsoHyperlink">Gov. Pat Quinn</span> following the impeachment of former Gov. Rod Blagoevich. However, since the Illinois Reform Commission issued its report, the legislature has enacted virtually none of its recommendations . The redistricting reform movement represents a opportunity to at least one much-needed change in Illinois.</span></p>
<p><!--EndFragment--></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/cKo_HOMPqos" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100308/new-movement-for-redistricting-reform-in-illinois/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100308/new-movement-for-redistricting-reform-in-illinois/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands of Applicants for California Citizens Redistricting Panel</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/fcBDBXiEIQg/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100305/thousands-of-applicants-for-california-citizens-redistricting-panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:49:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brendan McDonald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Initiatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 11]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30,275 people applied for the 14 slots on the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC).  As the Rose Institute reported earlier, the application deadline was extended from February 12th to February 16th because of the intense interest.  The Citizens Redistricting Commission is entrusted with the task of redrawing California&#8217;s Legislative Districts in 2011, and is a result of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wedrawthelines.ca.gov/">30,275 people applied</a> for the 14 slots on the Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC).  <a href="http://rosereport.org/20100209/ca-redistricting-commission-application-deadline-extended/">As the Rose Institute reported earlier</a>, the application deadline was extended from February 12th to February 16th because of the intense interest.  The Citizens Redistricting Commission is entrusted with the task of redrawing California&#8217;s Legislative Districts in 2011, and is a result of ballot initiative Proposition 11.<span id="more-2443"></span></p>
<p>Now that applications for the CRC have closed, the State Auditor&#8217;s <a href="http://rosereport.org/20091129/prop-11-applicant-review-panel-announced/">Applicant Review Panel</a> will whittle the applicant pool down to 60 “of the most qualified applicants.” Those 60 will consist 20 from each of the two largest state parties and 20 who are unaffiliated with either of the largest two parties.  The President pro Tempore of the Senate, the Senate Minority Floor Leader, and the Speaker and Minority Floor Leader of the Assembly will each be able to strike up to two names from each group of 20, for a total of 24 taken from the list.</p>
<p>The State Auditor will then randomly choose the 8 members of the Citizens Redistricting Commission from the remaining names, until there are 3 members of the largest party, 3 members of the second largest party, and 3 members who do not associate with either of the two largest parties.  Those 8 Commissioners will select a final 6 applicants (2 from each pool) from the remaining names to form the final 14-member body.</p>
<p>The timeline for this process is <a href="http://www.wedrawthelines.ca.gov/application.html">here</a>.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/fcBDBXiEIQg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100305/thousands-of-applicants-for-california-citizens-redistricting-panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100305/thousands-of-applicants-for-california-citizens-redistricting-panel/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rose’s Florida Redistricting Report Featured across Blogosphere</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/fOgD_QpX9Jk/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100303/roses-florida-redistricting-report-featured-across-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Cotton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogroll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Institute Cited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flapolitics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[florida redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[swingstateproject]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rose Institute&#8217;s recently released report on Florida&#8217;s upcoming elections and redistricting has been featured in several major blogs over the last week. FLApolitics, one of the top political blogs in Florida, wrote an article pulling numerous quotes from our series and noted that it is the &#8220;perfect fix for a political junkie.&#8221; SwingStateProject.com also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rose Institute&#8217;s recently released <a href="http://rosereport.org/20100222/florida-redistricting-the-complete-analysis/">report on Florida&#8217;s upcoming elections and redistricting </a>has been featured in several major blogs over the last week. FLApolitics, one of the top political blogs in Florida, wrote <a href="http://flapolitics.com/diary/4440/the-rose-report-on-florida-redistricting">an article </a>pulling numerous quotes from our series and noted that it is the &#8220;perfect fix for a political junkie.&#8221; SwingStateProject.com also featured the Rose&#8217;s report in its <a href="http://www.swingstateproject.com/diary/6454/ssp-daily-digest-224">Daily Digest </a>on Feburaury 24.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/fOgD_QpX9Jk" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100303/roses-florida-redistricting-report-featured-across-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100303/roses-florida-redistricting-report-featured-across-blogosphere/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rose Institute-Kosmont Survey Results Featured on New Santa Ana</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/2RFDNewpuCw/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institute-kosmont-survey-results-featured-on-new-santa-ana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Cotton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kosmont-Rose Business Survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Institute Cited]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business license]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cost of doing business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kosmont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santa ana]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Rose Institute-Kosmont Cost of Doing Business Survey was recently featured in a post on New Santa Ana. The article discusses how the 2009 Kosmont Survey found that Santa Ana was the fourth most expensive city to do business in in Orange County. It argues that &#8220;some of the BEST cities in Orange County charge [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Rose Institute-Kosmont Cost of Doing Business Survey was recently featured in <a href="http://newsantaana.com/2010/02/25/santa-ana-is-the-fourth-most-expensive-city-in-the-o-c-to-do-business-in/">a post on <em>New Santa Ana</em></a>. The article discusses how the 2009 Kosmont Survey found that Santa Ana was the fourth most expensive city to do business in in Orange County. It argues that &#8220;some of the BEST cities in Orange County charge the LEAST for business licenses,&#8221; advocating lowering business license fees among other things.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/2RFDNewpuCw" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institute-kosmont-survey-results-featured-on-new-santa-ana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institute-kosmont-survey-results-featured-on-new-santa-ana/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rose Institute’s John Pitney Quoted in New York Times</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/vHjeRe2hfn4/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-john-pitney-quoted-in-new-york-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 18:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Cotton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Institute Friends and Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barbara boxer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck devore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john pitney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Professor John J. Pitney Jr. was recently quoted in a New York Times article on the upcoming California election for Barbara Boxer&#8217;s US Senate seat. GOP challengers are gearing up for what may be a fairly competitive race, according to the article. The NYT reports that Pitney &#8220;said [Senator Barbara] Boxer&#8217;s previous easy victories in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Professor John J. Pitney Jr. was recently quoted in a<em> <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/us/politics/02senate.html?hp">New York Times</a></em><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/us/politics/02senate.html?hp"> article </a>on the upcoming California election for Barbara Boxer&#8217;s US Senate seat. GOP challengers are gearing up for what may be a fairly competitive race, according to the article. The NYT reports that Pitney &#8220;said [Senator Barbara] Boxer&#8217;s previous easy victories in Senate races could be misleading, since they took place in what were more favorable political environments.&#8221; One of Boxer&#8217;s challengers, Chuck DeVore, is a graduate of Claremont McKenna College.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/vHjeRe2hfn4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-john-pitney-quoted-in-new-york-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-john-pitney-quoted-in-new-york-times/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rose Institute’s Doug Johnson on City Budget Woes</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/FpoCCyIGgvg/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-doug-johnson-on-city-budget-woes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:30:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Cotton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute Friends and Associates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doug Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rose Institute Fellow Douglas Johnson was quoted last week in an article by The Oakland Tribune on the possible financial crisis the city of Rialto may face in the next few years. The article reports that Johnson said: “city governments are grappling with similar decisions throughout the state as California&#8217;s budget woes and the national [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose Institute Fellow Douglas Johnson was quoted last week in <a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/california/ci_14445157">an article by The Oakland Tribune </a>on the possible financial crisis the city of Rialto may face in the next few years. The article reports that Johnson said: “city governments are grappling with similar decisions throughout the state as California&#8217;s budget woes and the national economy are striking at local coffers, while pension costs for city employees are spiking.” It also quotes him as saying that the consequences of a possible bankruptcy “could mean simply renegotiating contracts. It could mean a judge in charge of all city services, deciding who keeps their jobs, what services continue and what services are cut.&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/FpoCCyIGgvg" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-doug-johnson-on-city-budget-woes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100303/rose-institutes-doug-johnson-on-city-budget-woes/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Rose Fellow on CNN</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/xI3JRR44uPE/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100224/rose-fellow-on-cnn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Douglas M. Johnson, Consulting Fellow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Demographic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rose Institute Cited]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rose Institute Fellow Douglas Johnson was interviewed today about gerrymandering  for CNN&#8217;s &#8220;American Morning&#8221; show. The topic is redistricting. The piece &#8212; assuming it makes it past the editing room &#8212; will air Thursday, February 25th at 6am EST, and at various other times throughout the day.
The clip should be available online after it first [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rose Institute Fellow Douglas Johnson was interviewed today about gerrymandering  for CNN&#8217;s &#8220;American Morning&#8221; show. The topic is redistricting. The piece &#8212; assuming it makes it past the editing room &#8212; will air Thursday, February 25th at 6am EST, and at various other times throughout the day.</p>
<p>The clip should be available online after it first airs on TV at one or more of the following links: as part of CNN&#8217;s <a href="http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2010/broken.gov/">&#8220;Broken Government&#8221; Special Report</a>; by searching on reporter <a href="http://www.cnn.com/search/?query=Jason+Carroll&amp;x=25&amp;y=14&amp;primaryType=mixed">Jason Carrol</a>l; and/or on the<a href="http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/?iref=allsearch"> &#8220;AM Fix&#8221; blog</a>.</p>
<p>And keep a special eye out for the graphics, as they were created by Rose Research Assistants Ian Johnson and David Meyer.</p>
<p>UPDATE: The video is now online, available <a href="http://amfix.blogs.cnn.com/2010/02/25/broken-government-push-to-redraw-congressional-districts/">here</a> and embedded below.</p>
<p><object width="416" height="374" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" id="ep"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&#038;videoId=politics/2010/02/25/am.carroll.redraw.districts.cnn" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#000000" /><embed src="http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/.element/apps/cvp/3.0/swf/cnn_416x234_embed.swf?context=embed&#038;videoId=politics/2010/02/25/am.carroll.redraw.districts.cnn" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" bgcolor="#000000" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="416" wmode="transparent" height="374"></embed></object></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/xI3JRR44uPE" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100224/rose-fellow-on-cnn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100224/rose-fellow-on-cnn/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida Redistricting: The Complete Analysis</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~3/pgYonL4nP5E/</link>
		<comments>http://rosereport.org/20100222/florida-redistricting-the-complete-analysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chloe Cotton</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographic Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistricting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressional seats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairdistricts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rose institute]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rosereport.org/?p=2521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Florida redistricting after the 2010 census is likely to be a partisan struggle. The state is likely to gain an additional Congressional seat (for a total of 26). Despite having more registered Democrats than Republicans in Florida, the state government is dominated by Republicans. The state Senate has twenty-six Republicans to fourteen Democrats and the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/florida.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2522" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/florida.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="214" /></a>Florida redistricting after the 2010 census is likely to be a partisan struggle. The state is likely to gain an additional Congressional seat (for a total of 26). Despite having more registered Democrats than Republicans in Florida, the state government is dominated by Republicans. The state Senate has twenty-six Republicans to fourteen Democrats and the state House has seventy-six Republicans to forty-four Democrats. Additionally, the governor and one senator are also Republicans. This study will present a general overview of Florida redistricting followed by close examination of the more competitive, at risk or over-populated Congressional districts.</p>
<p>This study will also consider the potential impact of the “FairDistricts” measure headed for Florida’s ballot this November.</p>
<p>Currently, Republicans hold fifteen of Florida’s twenty-five Congressional seats. The state is expected to gain one additional seat after the 2010 census. The Democrats’ ten seats are generally clustered around urban areas. Grouped around Miami, Fort Lauderdale and Palm Beach on the Southeastern coast of the state are 17<sup>th</sup>, 19<sup>th</sup>, 20<sup>th</sup>, 21<sup>st</sup> and 22<sup>nd</sup>. In West Tampa, is the 11<sup>th</sup> and near Orlando, Jacksonville, Gainesville and Orange, Seminole, Brevard and Volusia Counties. The 2<sup>nd</sup> in the Western part of the Panhandle includes Tallahassee and Panama City. According to 2007 data from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey, the average Democrat- held district is currently under-populated by about 3,700 people. The Republican-held seats, in contrast, are generally in more rural areas of the state. Their districts are over-populated by an average of almost 74,000 people. Five seats will be open in 2010: the 12<sup>th</sup>, 17<sup>th</sup>, 19<sup>th</sup>, 21<sup>st</sup> and 25<sup>th</sup>. The incumbents of the first two left office to run for other elected positions, the third to become president of non-profit, the fourth to retire and the fifth to run for the seat vacated by the fourth. As a result of the 2002 redistricting plan, Republicans initially held eighteen of the Congressional seats as a result of gaining two seats during the redistricting process, with new seats created specifically for Tom Feeney, then Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, and Mario Diaz-Balart, then chair of the state House’s redistricting committee. Over the course of the 2006 and 2008 elections, however, the Republicans have since lost three seats (the 8th, 22nd and 24th) resulting in the current balance of fifteen Republicans and ten Democrats.</p>
<p>Later parts of this report will go into more detail about how the 2010 election may change the composition of the Florida House delegation.<span id="more-2521"></span></p>
<div id="attachment_2523" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/seats-by-party.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2523" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/seats-by-party.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Seats by Party Control</p></div>
<p>The latest population estimate from the American Community Survey (ACS) puts the population of Florida at 18,182,321, up 13.8% from 15,982,813 in 2000. These numbers, however, are calculated based on 2006-2008 and so do not take into account the recent loss on population that the state has experienced. For the first time since 1946, Florida’s population declined in a given year, losing almost 60,000 residents in the year leading up to April 2009 as a result of the economic recession. The University of Florida has more recent data numbers that show the state at 18,748,925 in April 2009, down from 18,807,219 the year before. For purposes of this report, the ACS data will be used as they have released the most up-to-date estimates on population per congressional district. Assuming that Florida gains the seat it is expected to in the coming redistricting, the state will have twenty-six seats. Based on the ACS numbers, each district should have about 699, 320 people living within it in order to have equally sized districts.</p>
<p>Redistricting in Florida is done by the state legislature. They are expected to pass a joint resolution either during the regular session or a thirty day special session called by the governor. (If they fail finish an apportionment plan, the Supreme Court is to make one within sixty days). Once the legislature has passed a joint resolution, the Supreme Court determines its validity and it becomes law. If the plan is not approved by the Court, the legislature fixes any problems during a fifteen day session after which it goes back to the Supreme Court again. If the plan is not approved (again), or if the legislature is not able to reach a new joint resolution within the fifteen days, the Court has sixty days to make its own plan. The governor does not have veto power over the legislative or Supreme Court plan.</p>
<p>The Florida state legislature has been Republican since 1994, and it is highly unlikely that enough seats will be transferred to the Democrats during the upcoming 2010 elections to swing the balance of power. In the state senate, Republicans currently have twenty-six of forty seats, and in the state house, they have seventy-six out of one hundred and twenty.</p>
<p>An initiative called FairDistricts will be on the ballot in 2010 proposing a constitutional amendment to restrict gerrymandering. It would require the legislature to draw compact districts that conform to pre-existing political and geographic boundaries. Currently the only restrictions on redistricting in the state are that all districts must be contiguous and the map must follow federal law and the Voting Rights Act. A December 2009 poll found that 55% of likely voters supported the initiative although 35% remained unsure and said they did not know enough about the issue to decide. While the initiative is generally supported by most Democrats (though some African American elected leaders have expressed concerns about it) and attacked by Republicans, it is worth remembering that in 1991 Democrats divided districts to their political advantage just as Republicans did in 2001. The Democratic over-reach in 1991 made possible a swing to Republican control in the Republican sweep of 1994. If the Fair Districts initiative passes, it will leave control of redistricting in the Legislature’s hands but impose significant restrictions on how it can draw the lines. The degree of that control will almost certainly be the subject of multiple post-redistricting lawsuits.</p>
<p>According to the Census Bureau’s 2006-2008 American Community Survey figures, the state’s population was 60.3% white, 21.0% Hispanic, and 15.9% African-American. The state’s 2007 poverty rate was 12.1% and in 2000, 23.1% spoke a language other than English at home. The population is far older than the national average, with 17.4% of residents sixty-five years or older as of 2008, compared with 12.8% in the country as a whole. The state’s governor, Charlie Crist, is Republican but will be leaving office to run for Senate in 2010. His likely successor is the current State Attorney General, Republican Bill McCollum. Although state government is largely dominated by Republicans, Florida has been a swing state in the last few presidential elections. In 2008, Barack Obama won with 51% of the vote, and in 2004, George W. Bush won with 52%, after the state’s infamously close count in 2000 elected President Bush by less than six <strong>hundred votes.</strong></p>
<p>Along with the House races in November, Florida will have election for governor and senate as well. With Republicans currently polling well in both races, this could possibly increase voting turnout amongst the Republican population, thereby strengthening Republicans throughout the ballot.</p>
<p>For the purposes of this report, we have divided Florida into five regions: the Panhandle, Northern Florida, Central Florida, Southern Florida and Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Palm Beach. Each will be addressed individually</p>
<p>The Panhandle contains two very different districts: the more rural and conservative 1<sup>st</sup> and the more liberal and urban 2<sup>nd</sup>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2524" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 829px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1-2-map.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2524 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1-2-map.jpg" alt="" width="819" height="369" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Florida&#39;s 1st and 2nd congressional districts</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2525" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/jeff-miller.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2525" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/jeff-miller.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Jeff Miller</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 1<sup>st</sup> Congressional district is in the Western-most part of the state and has the most military veterans of any district in the country, making up 19.4% of its population. Culturally very southern, the district is 76.1% white and has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R +21. In the 2008 presidential election, the 1<sup>st</sup> gave John McCain 67% of its vote. The incumbent in the 1<sup>st</sup> is Republican Jeff Miller, first elected in a special election in October 2001 which followed the resignation of Joe Scarborough to become a talk-show host on MSNBC. The American Conservative Union gave Miller a 100% rating in 2008 and in his first election, Miller received 66% of the vote and has not fallen below that number in a general election since. He has raised over $140,000 in the campaign cycle so far; his next closest opponent just over $6,000. What could happen to this district? With a population of 694,028, the district is just barely below the estimated ideal population based on the ACS numbers and so will probably be slightly expanded to the west. This slight change, however, will not be enough to change the partisan balance and Miller’s seat seems safe.</p>
<div id="attachment_2526" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 250px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/allen-boyd1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2526" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/allen-boyd1.jpg" alt="" width="240" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Allen Boyd</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 2<sup>nd</sup> Congressional district is directly east of the 1<sup>st</sup> and is centered on the state’s capitol, Tallahassee. It extends west to Destin and east to the Sewanee River and is the part of the state with the highest percentage of native Floridians. There is a political divide between more-liberal Tallahassee in Leon County and the rest of the district. While Leon County has solidly supported Democrats in recent presidential elections, the district as a whole voted for McCain, giving him 54% of the vote and it has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R +6. The 2<sup>nd</sup> is 70.5% white and 22% African-American and 17.3% of its residents live below the poverty line. The incumbent is Blue Dog Democrat Allen Boyd, who was first elected in 1996. Boyd describes himself as a “moderate Democrat with a social conscience” and this is supported by his National Journal Rankings, which place him nearly squarely in the middle except on social issues where he leans more Democratic. Boyd has been easily reelected, running unopposed in 2006 and beating Republican Mark Mulligan by twenty-four points in 2008. Boyd has raised over $850,000 in the current campaign cycle, while his closest opponent, Democratic State Senator Alfred Lawson Jr., has raised almost $80,000. A poll from November 2009 showed Lawson to be leading Boyd by about 35-31, within the 4.6% margin of error. While national Republicans have yet to take a significant stand behind any of the several GOP candidates for this seat, it is one of the better chances in the state for the Republicans to gain a seat and so they will likely spend more time and money on the campaign once the primaries are done. Watch for this race to become competitive as the general election approaches, although it seems safe for the Democrats for now. The 2<sup>nd</sup> is about 5,000 people over the ideal population, not enough to significantly change the demographic make-up of the district. It seems likely that this 5,000 will simply be taken from the 2<sup>nd</sup>’s western border and added to the 1<sup>st</sup> district as it is about 5,000 people under the ideal population.</p>
<p>Northern Florida contains seven districts: the 3<sup>rd</sup>, 4<sup>th</sup>, 5<sup>th</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup>, 7<sup>th</sup>, 8<sup>th</sup> and 24<sup>th</sup>.  The 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th are currently held by Republicans and all but the 3rd are over the ideal population for a district.</p>
<div id="attachment_2527" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 967px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/northern-map.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2527" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/northern-map.jpg" alt="" width="957" height="601" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Florida&#39;s 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 24th congressional districts</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2528" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 205px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/corrine-brown1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2528" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/corrine-brown1.jpg" alt="" width="195" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Corrine Brown</p></div>
<p>The 3<sup>rd</sup> lies in the center of the area. It was drawn in 1992 to be North Florida’s black-majority seat and Democrats were been shifted from the surrounding districts to make the surrounding districts more Republican. It currently stretches from Jacksonville’s downtown in the north to Orlando’s in the south, and stretches east and west to include other largely minority and Democratic areas such as Gainesville, Sanford and Eatonville. As a result of this gerrymandering, the district is strongly Democratic with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D +18 and gave Obama 73% of its vote in the 2008 election. It is 50.9% black and 35.4% white. The 3<sup>rd</sup> District’s incumbent is Democrat Corrine Brown who has been in office since 1992. Liberal on most issues, Brown is outspoken, a trait which has gotten her into controversy in the past, but she has run unopposed in the last three elections. Although she currently has six challengers for the 2010 election, she has no primary competition as yet. The 3<sup>rd</sup> district is currently the most under populated district in Northern Florida, with about 40,000 people less than the ideal size. The 3rd District is at the center of the debate over the potential impact of the FairDistricts initiative. Due to its shape, the 3<sup>rd</sup> is one of several districts that violate restrictions in the initiative which require compact districts that conform to geographical and political boundaries. On the other hand, the 3<sup>rd</sup> District is protected by the Voting Rights Act and a non-compact shape may be necessary to ensure it remains an effective African-American seat.</p>
<div id="attachment_2529" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ander-crenshaw2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2529" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ander-crenshaw2.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Ander Crenshaw</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 4<sup>th</sup> congressional district is in the northeast corner of the state and includes most of Jacksonville (except the African-American neighborhoods which are in the 3<sup>rd</sup>). It also includes the far less populous northern counties which run west to Tallahassee. Jacksonville in particular has a strong military presence with the Mayport Naval Station and the Naval Air Station. The 4<sup>th</sup> is solidly Republican with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R +17. It supported McCain with 62% of the vote in 2008 and Bush with 69% in 2004. Republican incumbent Ander Crenshaw has been in office since his 2000 election and has won fairly easily each year. An investment banker until 2000, Crenshaw is a solid conservative and member of the House Appropriations Committee. He currently has no general election opponent and only one primary opponent, Troy Stanley, whom he has outraised by over $230,000. The 4<sup>th</sup> should remain a Republican seat after the 2010 election. The district is currently just 14,000 over the ideal population The Republicans will likely continue their strategy of transferring more liberal areas to the 3<sup>rd</sup>. If necessary, given the solid conservative nature of the 4<sup>th</sup> District, some of its more Republican neighborhoods may move to strengthen weaker Republican districts nearby like the 2<sup>nd</sup>, 6<sup>th</sup> or 7<sup>th</sup>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2530" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ginny-brown-waite1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2530" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ginny-brown-waite1.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Ginny Brown-Waite</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 5<sup>th</sup> is a quickly growing region north and east of St. Petersburg and Tampa. A favorite area of retirees, almost a quarter of its population is over sixty-five. Thirty-nine percent of residents receive Social Security, the highest of any district in the country. The majority of the population is inland in towns like Citrus Springs and Brooksville. The 5<sup>th</sup> leans to the right, thanks in part to the 2002 redistricting process. McCain won with 56% of the vote in 2008 and Bush won with 58% in 2004. The incumbent is Republican Ginny Brown-Waite, who was on the state Senate congressional redistricting committee in 2001 and helped to create the district that she won later that year with 48% of the vote, beating Democratic incumbent Karen Thurman. The election result that year highlight the importance of redistricting as Thurman won the old parts of the district 52%-43% and Brown-Waite won the new parts 53%-41%. Since then, she has won at least 60% of the vote. Brown-Waite has at least three Democratic opponents, however none has raised over $20,000. Representative Brown-Waite has raised close to $400,000. She appears safe for the 2010 elections. The 5<sup>th</sup> is the most populous congressional district in Florida. With over 880,000 residents, it is more than twenty-five percent over the ideal population level. About 180,000 people will need to be moved to another district. Out of the six districts that border the 5<sup>th</sup>, two – the 2<sup>nd</sup> and the 8<sup>th </sup>- are currently held by Democrats. The 8<sup>th</sup> in particular is a possible win for the Republicans in 2010 and they may try to further strengthen it by moving some conservative voters into it from the 5<sup>th</sup>. Similarly, the 2<sup>nd</sup> is generally conservative but represented by a Democrat. Again, Republicans may try to tilt the balance a little more in their favor by adding some conservative voters into that district. Due to its large population, the 5<sup>th</sup> is a district that will necessarily look very different after 2012.</p>
<div id="attachment_2531" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cliff-stearns1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2531" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/cliff-stearns1.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="199" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Cliff Stearns</p></div>
<p>The 6<sup>th</sup> congressional district is located just to the north of the 5<sup>th</sup> and stretches from Jacksonville in the north to Ocala, Lady Lake and Leesburg in the south. Between are lightly populated counties except for Gainesville, the home of the University of Florida. While virtually all of the very Democratic Alachua County is in the 6<sup>th</sup>, its most liberal precincts were put into the 3<sup>rd</sup> during the 2002 redistricting process. On the whole, the district is solidly Republican, giving John McCain 57% of its votes in the 2008 election. Incumbent Cliff Stearns has been in office since 1988, winning 61-39 over Democrat Tim Cunha in 2008. While Cunha is running again, Stearns seems to be safe this year, with almost $400,000 raised so far. Fundraising information is not available for Cunha. The 6<sup>th</sup> is currently the 5<sup>th</sup> most over-populated district in the state, at 12% over the ideal population. Republican legislators will likely continue their method of moving the more liberal voters into the already solidly liberal 3<sup>rd</sup> in order to strengthen their power in the 6<sup>th</sup>. As one of the more sprawling districts in the state, however, the 6<sup>th</sup> will probably see some major changes if the FairDistricts initiative is passed by the voters of Florida this November.</p>
<div id="attachment_2533" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/john-mica2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2533" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/john-mica2.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="201" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman John Mica</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 7<sup>th</sup> congressional district includes close to 100 miles of coast on the Atlantic Ocean, from Ponte Vedra Beach to Daytona Beach. Inland population centers include Deltona and the wealthy Seminole County suburbs outside of Orlando. The 7<sup>th</sup> leans conservative, with 53% voting for McCain in 2008. Republican John Mica has represented the 7<sup>th</sup> since 1992 and received 62% of the vote in 2008. He looks likely to hold onto his seat in the coming election as well, having raised over $440,000 to his next closest opponent’s $40,000. Like most of the other Republican districts in north Florida, the 7<sup>th</sup> is over-populated at more than 12% over the ideal population. As the 7<sup>th</sup> is not as strongly Republican as some of the other districts nearby, some of its liberal voters will probably be shuffled around, likely to the already Democratic 3<sup>rd</sup>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2534" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alan-grayson2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2534" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alan-grayson2.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Alan Grayson</p></div>
<p>The 8<sup>th</sup> congressional district is likely to host one of the most competitive house races in the state in 2010. Home to Walt Disney World, the 8<sup>th</sup> includes parts of Orlando and Orange County in the south and Lake and Marion Counties in the north. While traditionally conservative, the 8<sup>th</sup> has become more liberal in recent years, as evidenced by its 52% support of Obama in 2008. Its Cook Partisan Voting Index is R+2. The 2002 redistricting changed the 8<sup>th</sup> district considerably, taking away much of Orange County and putting it in the newly created 24<sup>th</sup>. Republican Congressman Ric Keller held office from 2000 to 2008, when he lost  to Democrat Alan Grayson. Grayson won with fifty-two percent of the vote. In his short time in office, Grayson earned a reputation as an outspoken supporter of President Obama and as a harsh critic of Congressional Republicans’ approach to health care. National GOP party members hope to use this to portray Grayson as an extreme liberal who is out of touch with the fairly moderate district. While Grayson currently has no primary opponents, eight Republicans have entered the race. Grayson has them all beat in fundraising, however, with over $1.5 million raised so far. Grayson raised more in the last three months than any other candidate for the House in the entire country. In Grayson’s race, Republican Armando Gutierrez Jr. has raised the most with about $310,000. Grayson will have a tough race and many are predicting that Republicans will win back this seat, especially in light of the general unhappiness with the Democratic Party at this point. The 8<sup>th</sup> District is overpopulated by about 11% and Republican legislators will likely work hard to shed more liberal voters around Orlando in order to strengthen their position in the district. If the FairDistricts initiative passes, however, the 8<sup>th</sup> is likely to see big changes due to its current ‘wrap-around’ irregular shape.</p>
<div id="attachment_2536" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 231px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/suzanne-kosmas2.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2536" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/suzanne-kosmas2.jpg" alt="" width="221" height="334" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Suzanne Kosmas</p></div>
<p>The 24<sup>th</sup> is one of two districts created in 2002 and designed specifically for a certain Republican politician, then-State Speaker of the House, Republican Tom Feeney. Like the 8<sup>th</sup>, the 24<sup>th</sup> will be an extremely competitive race in November. About half of the population lives around Orlando and the other half on the Atlantic coast, which includes the northern half of Brevard County and the southern half of Volusia County. The district leans slightly to the right, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R +4 and it voted for McCain by a 2% margin in 2008. While Feeney won in 2002 and held onto his seat during the next two elections, he lost to Democratic challenger Suzanne Kosmas in 2008 amid corruption allegations involving an international trip paid for by convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Kosmas received 57% of the vote. She now, however, faces a host of opponents who view her as vulnerable because she is a freshman representative in a swing district. She has outraised everyone so far, with over $1 million dollars, but national Republicans are sure to pour money into the general election, seeing this as another good chance to gain a seat. The 24<sup>th</sup> is slightly overpopulated with about 8% more than the ideal population. In 2011, Republicans will likely try to strengthen themselves in this district by moving some of the more liberal precincts into the already Democratic 3<sup>rd</sup>.</p>
<p>In conclusion, northern Florida hosts two of the most competitive 2010 races in the country. It also encompasses some of the most overpopulated districts in the state and a single district which has been specifically created to hold the liberal parts of the region, allowing the other districts to be more safely Republican. Together, these factors will make Northern Florida an interesting area to watch both in the 2010 election and the 2012 redistricting. It is also a potential place for the new district to be added, due to its large population.</p>
<p>Central Florida includes the 9<sup>th</sup>, 10<sup>th</sup>, 11<sup>th</sup>, 12<sup>th</sup>, and 15<sup>th</sup> districts. It is centered on Tampa and St. Petersburg in the west, though some districts stretch across inland Florida to the Space Coast along the Atlantic.</p>
<div id="attachment_2537" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 717px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/9-10-11-map.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2537" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/9-10-11-map.jpg" alt="" width="707" height="601" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Florida&#39;s 9th, 10th and 11th congressional districts</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2538" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 240px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/gus-bilirakis1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2538 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/gus-bilirakis1.jpg" alt="" width="230" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Gus Bilirakis</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 9<sup>th</sup> congressional district includes the area north of St. Petersburg and north and east of Tampa. It is also the home of Clearwater, the spiritual headquarters of the Church of Scientology. Strangely shaped, it runs along the Gulf Coast before circling inland around the 11<sup>th</sup> and then cutting into the 12<sup>th</sup> the south east. The 9<sup>th</sup> leans Republican, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R +6. Its incumbent, Republican Gus Bilirakis, was elected in 2006 when his father Michael Bilirakis, who had held the seat since 1982, decided not to run again. The incumbent has raised well over half a million dollars and looks well positioned to win his seat again in the 2010 election. Due to its odd shape, the 9<sup>th</sup> may face significant changes if the FairDistricts initiative passes. If Fair Districts does not pass, Republican legislators are expected to maintain this as a safe Republican seat. The 9<sup>th</sup> is only slightly over the ideal population level, with about 45,000 residents more than it should ideally have. Its more liberal areas may probably be moved into the slightly under-populated Democratic 11<sup>th</sup> district and some conservative precincts may move into the 10<sup>th</sup>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2539" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 248px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/bill-young1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2539" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/bill-young1-238x300.jpg" alt="" width="238" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Bill Young</p></div>
<p>The 10<sup>th</sup> congressional district is the only district in the state which is contained entirely within a single county: Pinellas County. It includes parts of St. Petersburg except for the most liberal (and primarily African American) parts in the south of the city which were moved into the already liberal 11<sup>th</sup> in 2002. It also includes island communities along the Gulf coast. The 10<sup>th</sup> is a swing district, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+1. It supported Obama by a four point margin in 2008. The incumbent is Republican Bill Young who has been in office since 1970, making him the longest serving current Republican member of Congress. Young’s victory margins have been growing gradually smaller, although he won 61% of the vote in 2008. While Young is the subject of many retirement rumors, he has said he will run in 2010. So far, however, he has been out-raised by Democratic challenger Charlie Justice, who has raised over $212,000 to Young’s $62,000. This is a potential gain for Democrats although Young’s status as a forty-year incumbent who has brought a lot of money to the area will make him a tough opponent. The 10<sup>th</sup> is almost 10% under the ideal population level and will likely be given some conservative precincts from the 9<sup>th</sup>.</p>
<div id="attachment_2540" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 206px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/kathy-castor1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2540 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/kathy-castor1.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Kathy Castor</p></div>
<p>The 11<sup>th</sup> congressional district is based in Tampa and includes most of the city and its suburbs. It extends south along the coast through Manatee County to include various working-class communities. Across the Tampa Bay, it also includes the southern and heavily African-American parts of St. Petersburg, which are connected to the rest of the district by the four-mile Sunshine Skyway Bridge. Twenty seven percent African American and 24% Hispanic, the district is one of the most heavily minority in the state. With a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+11, the district is strongly Democratic, a strategic move by Republicans to strengthen the surrounding conservative districts. Incumbent Kathy Castor is a Democrat first elected in 2006 with 70% of the vote, powered by over a million dollars raised for the Democratic primary. While she faces several Republican candidates, none has raised any significant amount, while she has raised over $350,000 so far. Castor looks to be a safe hold for the Democrats. If the FairDistricts initiative passes, the 11<sup>th</sup>, with two sections unconnected to each other by a land mass, may change considerably. If the initiative fails, however, the district is only 5% below the ideal population level and will likely retain its irregular shape. Presumably, liberal voters from the over-populated and conservative 9<sup>th</sup>, 12<sup>th</sup> and 13<sup>th</sup> will be added to the district, continuing the Republican strategy of concentrating Democrats in a single district to strengthen their own districts.</p>
<div id="attachment_2541" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 206px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/adam-putnam1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2541 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/adam-putnam1.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Adam Putnam</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 12<sup>th</sup> congressional district is located in the middle of Central Florida and includes almost all of Polk County. The district is increasingly conservative, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+6. It gave McCain a slim margin in 2008, 50-49. Republican Congressman Adam Putnam has been in office since 2000 and has announced that  in 2010 he plans to run for state agriculture commissioner. Republican Dennis Ross, a former state legislator, leads the fundraising race to follow Putnam, with over $450,000 raised so far. The Democratic front-runner is Polk County Elections Supervisor Lori Edwards, who has raised just over $175,000 and has significant name recognition. None of the other candidates have raised more than $7,000. The 12<sup>th</sup> is a possible gain for Democrats in 2010 although Ross is looking like a solid candidate so far. The district is about 11% over the ideal population, and the more liberal part of which will probably be moved into the neighboring (and liberal) 11<sup>th</sup>. Depending on where the new 26<sup>th</sup> district is placed, some of the 12<sup>th</sup> residents might be moved into it.</p>
<div id="attachment_2542" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 231px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/bill-posey1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2542 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/bill-posey1.jpg" alt="" width="221" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Bill Posey</p></div>
<p>The 15<sup>th</sup> congressional district lies along the Eastern coast of Central Florida. It includes most of Brevard County and all of Indian River. The fastest-growing part of the district is in the west and centered on Kissimmee and St. Cloud. The 15<sup>th</sup> supported McCain by a 3% margin in 2008 and Bush by 14% in 2004. Its Cook Partisan Voting Index is R+6. The incumbent is first-term Republican Bill Posey who won received 53% of the vote in 2006. Posey has raised almost $600,000 in his reelection bid and currently faces no strong opponents. Democrats Shannon Roberts and John Bull are running but no fundraising information is available for either and neither has a website up at this point. Despite being a possible weak spot for Republicans, Democrats have not yet mounted a serious opposition and Posey looks safe, at least for now. The 15<sup>th</sup> is over 11% above the ideal population level. Its excess population will likely be moved north and south into the less overpopulated 24<sup>th</sup> and 16<sup>th</sup>. Again, depending on where the 26<sup>th</sup> district is positioned, some conservative residents of the 15<sup>th</sup> might be moved into that district.</p>
<p>Western Central Florida is likely to be very interesting during the 2011 redistricting process, whereas middle and eastern Central Florida will probably see more excitement in the 2010 election cycle. On the whole, the area could potentially look very different.</p>
<p>Our southern Florida region contains five districts: 13<sup>th</sup>, 14<sup>th</sup>, 16<sup>th</sup>, 23<sup>rd</sup> and 25<sup>th</sup>. Four seats are held by Republicans and over-populated while the 23<sup>rd</sup> is held by a Democrat and relatively under-populated.</p>
<div id="attachment_2545" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 786px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/southern-florida-map1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2545" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/southern-florida-map1.jpg" alt="" width="776" height="601" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Florida&#39;s 13th, 14th, 16th, 23rd and 25th congressional districts</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2546" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 206px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vern-buchanan1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2546 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vern-buchanan1.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Vern Buchanan</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 13<sup>th</sup> congressional district stretches along the Gulf Coast from just below Tampa Bay to Charlotte harbor. It includes all of Sarasota, DeSoto and Hardee Counties and most of Manatee County. Twenty-six percent of the 13<sup>th</sup>’s population is over 65 and it has leaned to the right with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+6. The incumbent is second-term Republican Vern Buchanan. He replaced Kathleen Harris when she ran for Senate in 2006. His 2006 campaign was the most expensive House race in the country, with Buchanan spending over $8 million, $5.5 of which was his own money. Buchanan is continuing his large fundraising numbers, having raised over $1.3 million so far. His only opponent is Democrat James Golden who has raised just over $60,000. Buchanan could potentially be vulnerable but without a strong Democratic challenger, he looks safe to hold his seat in November. The 13<sup>th</sup> is slightly overpopulated with just under 40,000 residents more than the ideal. In redistricting, Democratic precincts could be moved from the 13th into the 11<sup>th</sup> in the northwest and others could moved east towards the under-populated Miami area. The 13<sup>th</sup> is one of the most regularly shaped districts in Florida, although if the FairDistricts initiative passes, all of Florida may look extremely different after 2012.</p>
<div id="attachment_2547" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 231px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/connie-mack1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2547 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/connie-mack1.jpg" alt="" width="221" height="270" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Connie Mack</p></div>
<p>The 14<sup>th</sup> district is just south of the 13<sup>th</sup> and runs along the Gulf Coast. Retirees account for more than one in four residents. The district includes all of Lee County and parts of Charlotte and Collier Counties. It also includes various islands along the coast. The district is solidly conservative with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+11. The incumbent is Republican Connie Mack. Mack was first elected in 2004 and has been a staunch conservative on most issues, although he is more moderate on environmental issues. Mack has raised close to $400,000 so far and none of his opponents have come anywhere close to that. He looks to be the strong favorite in the election. The 14<sup>th</sup> is almost 18% over the ideal population level. Some of its conservative precincts will likely be moved east towards Miami and parts may be incorporated into a new district or shifted north if the new district is closer to Central Florida.</p>
<div id="attachment_2548" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tom-rooney1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2548" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/tom-rooney1.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Tom Rooney</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 16<sup>th</sup> congressional district is the only district in the state that borders both the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf Coast, making it one of the most strangely drawn districts in the country. In the east it includes most of Martin and St. Lucie Counties. A thin line connects this area with the lightly populated rural sections in the central and west part of the district which contain huge citrus, tomato and other vegetable farms. The district is conservative, giving McCain its vote with a 5% margin in 2008 and receiving a Cook Partisan Voting Index score of R+5. The incumbent is first-term Republican Tom Rooney. He won in 2008 when his opponent, Democrat Tim Mahoney, admitted to having engaged in “multiple affairs” while in office. Mahoney won the seat in 2006 after then-incumbent Mark Foley resigned after a scandal involving him sending explicit messages to Congressional Pages. Rooney has raised over $730,000 so far; his Democratic challenger, Chris Craft, has just broken $100,000. Due to both the conservative nature of the district and Rooney’s fundraising advantage, he looks solid to retain his seat despite his status as a freshman legislator. The 16<sup>th</sup> is overpopulated by almost 10% of the ideal district population. Liberal precincts will likely be moved west into the under-populated and liberal Miami area and some conservative precincts may be moved in the direction of a new, conservative 26<sup>th</sup> district.</p>
<div id="attachment_2549" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 238px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alcee-hastings1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2549" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alcee-hastings1.jpg" alt="" width="228" height="278" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Alcee Hastings</p></div>
<p>The 23<sup>rd</sup> congressional district has most of its land mass in the Everglades in the central part of Southern Florida. It includes four tentacles stretching eastwards towards the Atlantic Ocean. The first goes into St. Lucie County to include African-American neighborhoods in Fort Pierce, the second into West Palm Beach and Delray Beach, the third into African-American areas in Lauderhill, Fort Lauderdale, Deerfield Beach and Pompano Beach, and the last into Miramar and Pembroke Pines. The district is geographically strange but most of it is demographically consistent as it has been formed to hold encompass most of the heavily African-American areas in Southern Florida. The district is 54.5% African American, one of the highest percentages in the country. The 23<sup>rd</sup> is also heavily democratic, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+28. Democratic incumbent Alcee Hastings has been in office since 1992 and won 82% of the vote in the last general election. His current opponent is Republican Bernard Sansaricq, a Haitian-American who was previously President of the Haitian Senate. Hastings, however, has raised over $350,000 and looks safe to hold onto his seat for another term. The 23<sup>rd</sup> is about 5% under the ideal population level for a district, but it is likely to remain heavily African American after the 2012 redistricting. Even if the FairDistricts initiative passes, the 23<sup>rd</sup> is a Voting Rights Act minority-held district and so protected to some extent by federal law.</p>
<div id="attachment_2550" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 206px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mario-diaz-balart1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2550 " src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/mario-diaz-balart1.jpg" alt="" width="196" height="240" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Mario Diaz-Balart</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 25<sup>th</sup> district is located at the very southern tip of the state. Created during the 2002 redistricting process, the district sprawls across the Everglades and includes parts of Collier and Monroe Counties in the west and the south west parts of Miami in the east, where most of the district’s population resides. In the eastern part of the district, the people are heavily Cuban and Latino. The district also includes the fastest growing town in the state, Homestead, which was destroyed by a hurricane in 1992 but has since been redeveloped. The district leans conservative, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+5, and voted for McCain by a margin of one point in 2008. The incumbent in the 25<sup>th</sup> is Republican Mario Diaz-Balart, who as chair of the state House Redistricting committee in 2002 tailored the seat for himself. However, last week, Diaz-Balart announced that he would not run again and would instead run for the newly open 21<sup>st</sup> district to the east of the 25<sup>th</sup>. This announcement came minutes after the statement by the current representative from the 21<sup>st</sup>, Diaz-Balart’s brother Lincoln Diaz-Balart, that he would not be running for reelection in November. This sudden opening will surely be filled by many candidates in the coming weeks. At the moment, there is no clear frontrunner. State representative and current candidate for state Senate David Rivera has been mentioned as a possible Republican nominee as has his opponent in that senate race, Anitere Flores. On the democratic side, the opening could convince Joe Garcia, Diaz-Balart’s 2008 opponent, to try again. While he is currently working in Washington, Garcia came within six points of winning two years ago and would be a strong challenger for the seat. Additionally, Democrat Luis Rivera was already in the race. This is definitely a possible win for either party and likely to prove one of the more exciting races in the state. The 25<sup>th</sup> is the third most populous district in the state, at almost 15% over the population ideal. In the 2011 redistricting, more Democratic precincts will probably be moved into the already Democratic 23<sup>rd</sup>, with other precincts moving towards the under-populated Miami-Dade area.</p>
<p>Excluding the 23<sup>rd</sup>, Southern Florida is made up of some of the most over-populated districts in the state. Southern Florida could be a major site for change in the 2012 redistricting, with the new district possibly being located in or near it. Additionally, the news of Mario Diaz-Balart’s decision not to run again in the 21<sup>st</sup> has left an exciting race open with a change of party hands possible.</p>
<p>The Miami-Fort Lauderdale- Palm Beach area includes the 17<sup>th</sup>, 18<sup>th</sup>, 19<sup>th</sup>, 20<sup>th</sup>, 21<sup>st</sup>, and 22<sup>nd</sup> districts. The more southern 18<sup>th</sup> and 21<sup>st</sup> are held by Republicans while the rest are held by Democrats. All, however, are below the ideal population level, some by a considerable amount.</p>
<div id="attachment_2551" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 420px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/miami-map1.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2551" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/miami-map1.jpg" alt="" width="410" height="343" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Florida&#39;s 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, 21st and 22nd congressional districts</p></div>
<div id="attachment_2552" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 230px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/kendrick-meek.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2552" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/kendrick-meek.jpg" alt="" width="220" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Kendrick Meek</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 17<sup>th</sup> congressional district is located at the historical center of Miami’s black population, in the north-east of Miami-Dade County. 56% of the district’s residents are African-American and 25% are Hispanic. The 17<sup>th</sup> is one of the most liberal in the country; it has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+34 and voted 87% for Obama in 2008. The incumbent is Democrat Kendrick Meek, first elected in 2002, who replaced his mother when she retired from representing the district. As Meek is running for Senate in 2010, the seat is left open, in a race that will almost certainly be decided by the Democratic primary. Almost a dozen Democrats are running, some already racking up fundraising numbers over $100,000. Leading the pack so far is Rudolph Moise with $213,245. The 17<sup>th</sup> currently has the third smallest population of any district in Florida at about 6% below the population ideal. As the most liberal district in the area, the 17<sup>th</sup> will likely become even more Democratic in redistricting as Republicans strengthen their hold on neighboring districts by transferring Democratic precincts to the 17th. Of all the Miami-Dade area districts, the 17<sup>th</sup> is one of the most geographically logical and so stands to stay fairly close to its current state, unless the FairDistricts initiative causes the entire map to be redrawn from scratch.</p>
<div id="attachment_2553" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ileana-ros-lehtinen.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-2553" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ileana-ros-lehtinen.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="301" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Ileana Ros-Lehtinen</p></div>
<p>The 18<sup>th</sup> congressional district contains most of the city of Miami, stretching from Calle Ocho to West Miami and Westchester, and parts of Miami Beach. It also includes some of the wealthiest parts of the city such as Coral Gables, Cocoplum and Key Biscayne. South of Miami. The district stretches south to Key West and includes the entire Florida Keys. While the district was drawn to be Republican and still leans to the right, there is a sharp political divide between the conservative Hispanics (largely Cuban) centered in the Miami-Dade area and the liberal gay communities in Miami Beach and Key West. The 18<sup>th</sup> has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of R+3 but voted for Obama by a two point margin in 2008. The incumbent is Republican Ileana Ros-Lehtinen who was first elected in a special election in 1989. Ros-Lehtinen had her closest race since her first in 2008, when Democrat Annette Taddeo ran against her, although she still won 58% of the vote. Infamously, then President-Elect Obama called Ros-Lehtinen after the election to congratulate her and she hung up on him, thinking it was a prank caller. Ros-Lehtinen looks safe this year, despite the swing nature of the district, as she has raised over $700,000 and has no challengers as of now. The 18<sup>th</sup> is the second least populated district in Florida, at almost ten percent below the ideal population level. It is likely that Republicans in redistricting will move conservative precincts from the over-populated 25<sup>th</sup> into the district.</p>
<div id="attachment_2554" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 205px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/robert-wexler.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2554" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/robert-wexler-195x300.jpg" alt="" width="195" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Robert Wexler</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 19<sup>th</sup> congressional district is made up of Palm Beach and Broward Counties and entirely inland. It reaches from Fort Lauderdale to West Palm Beach and includes Margate, Mission Bay, and most of Boca Raton. The district was drawn by Republicans to pack in Democratic precincts, resulting in its irregular shape. It is one the most heavily Jewish districts in the country and is solidly liberal, with a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+15. The 19<sup>th</sup>’s incumbent was Democrat Robert Wexler until he resigned last month to become the president of the Center for Middle East Peace and Economic Cooperation. Wexler had been in office since 1996 and a special election will be held to replace him in April. The primary for this election was held the first week of February and the two victors were Democrat Ted Deutch and Republican Edward Lynch. Deutch leads the fundraising race with over $920,000 to Lynch’s almost $50,000 and Deutch is the strong favorite to win the election, retaining the seat for the Democrats. The 19<sup>th</sup> is slightly above the ideal population level for the state, with about 18,000 more people than it ought to have. Republican legislators will surely continue to use the 19<sup>th</sup> as a packing-ground for liberal precincts and move some of its more conservative precincts into more competitive districts such as the 22<sup>nd</sup>. The 19<sup>th</sup>, with its heavily gerrymandered shape, is a likely target of the FairDistricts initiative if it is successful.</p>
<div id="attachment_2555" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/debbie-wasserman-schultz.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2555" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/debbie-wasserman-schultz-300x195.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="195" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz</p></div>
<p>The 20<sup>th</sup> congressional district is another oddly shaped one, including parts of Broward and Miami-Dade Counties. It is largely inland but also includes Fort Lauderdale, Hollywood, and Dania Beach on the coast. The district is fairly wealthy and has an average median income of over $54,000. Drawn to be solidly liberal, the 20<sup>th</sup> has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+13 and voted for Obama with a twenty-seven point margin in 2008. Democratic Incumbent Debbie Wasserman Schultz was first elected in 2004 after serving twelve years in the state House. She has raised over $660,000 so far in the current campaign cycle and her next closest opponent, Republican Robert Lowey, has raised $26,000. Wasserman Schultz looks solid to hold onto her seat in November. The 20<sup>th</sup> is about three percent underneath the ideal population level. Republicans will likely continue their practice of stacking it with liberal precincts in order to strengthen themselves elsewhere, so the district is almost certain to remain Democratic. As with most of the other Miami area districts, the 20<sup>th</sup> stands to change considerably if the FairDistricts initiative passes.</p>
<div id="attachment_2556" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/lincoln-diaz-balart.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2556" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/lincoln-diaz-balart-300x196.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="196" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Lincoln Diaz-Balart</p></div>
<p>Florida’s 21<sup>st</sup> congressional district is in Miami-Dade County and southern Broward County, and it is an irregular rectangle that stretches about twenty miles north to south but is only six miles across at its very widest. Home to Miami International Airport, the 21<sup>st</sup> is seventy-three percent Hispanic. The Cook Partisan Voting Index of the district is R+5 and the district voted for McCain by a two point margin in 2008. The 21<sup>st</sup>’s incumbent is Republican Lincoln Diaz-Balart who has been in office since 1992. He is the brother of Representative Mario Diaz-Balart of the 25th. Lincoln Diaz-Balart announced last week that he would not be running for reelection in November; within minutes of this announcement, Mario Diaz-Balart stated that he would run for the seat in the 21<sup>st</sup>. It remains to be seen how this move by Mario Diaz-Balart will be received by the voters of the 21<sup>st</sup>, but the seat is more solidly Republican that his current 25<sup>th</sup>. Also in the race is Republican William Sanchez. While no Democrats have announced plans to run as yet, in light of the recent developments, it seems highly probable that this race will become much more competitive. The district is just slightly under-populated, with almost 4% less than the ideal population level. In redistricting, Republicans will likely try to move more Republican precincts into the district in order to strengthen it politically.</p>
<div id="attachment_2557" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 209px"><a href="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ron-klein.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2557" src="http://rosereport.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/ron-klein-199x300.jpg" alt="" width="199" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Congressman Ron Klein</p></div>
<p>The 22<sup>nd</sup> congressional district runs along the Atlantic Coast, from Jupiter in Palm Beach County in the north to Fort Lauderdale in Broward County in the south. While it generally sticks to the coast, it stretches inwards at a few points. The 22<sup>nd</sup> has a Cook Partisan Voting Index of D+1 although it has been more conservative historically. The district was redrawn in 2002 in an attempt to strengthen then-Incumbent Republican Clay Shaw by creating a demographic that is elderly and wealthy for the most part. However, in 2006, the district continued moving to the left and ousted Shaw in favor of Democrat Ron Klein. Klein won 51-47 in one of the most expensive House races in the country that year and received 55% of the vote in 2008 while running against Republican Allen West. This election cycle, Klein has raised over $1.4 million so far and West, who is running again, has raised over $1.2 million. While Klein won by about ten points last time around and is looking solid this year, this race could be a possible gain for Republicans. The 22<sup>nd</sup> is about three percent below the ideal population level. Because it is such a swing district, it is likely that Republicans will add conservative precincts to it in order to better their chances in the next election.</p>
<p>As a region, the Miami-Fort Lauderdale- Palm Beach is one of the most under-populated parts of Florida and will likely see a lot of changes as a result of this during the 2012 redistricting. If the FairDistricts initiative is passed the changes are almost certain to be even more extensive, though the Voting Rights Act implications of the Latino- and African American-held seats will limit Fair Districts-driven changes.</p>
<p>On the whole, Florida’s election season and redistricting season are each likely to be very interesting to political observers. There are several competitive seats which may change hands between the parties in 2010, although it seems extremely unlikely that the Republican tilt of the state’s delegation will change. Additionally, Florida’s huge growth will almost certainly lead to the gain of a 26<sup>th</sup> congressional seat for the state. Due to their control of the legislature, Republicans will likely be able to draw the districts so as to make this new seat conservative and at the same time strengthen their holdings in other districts. Of course, if the FairDistricts initiative is passed, all this may change. Due to the strange shape of many districts, it is not impossible that all of Florida’s districts will be significantly redrawn to abide by the new regulations. The success or failure of an initiative such as this will be an interesting test of many proposals across the country which purport to make the redistricting process more reasonable and less partisan.</p>
<p><em>Florida</em><em> welcome sign picture courtesy of Valerie Renee. Congressional pictures from each member’s official House site, from blogs.browardpalmbeach.com, from the House Republican Conference or from gpoacess.gov</em><em> </em></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheRoseReport/~4/pgYonL4nP5E" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://rosereport.org/20100222/florida-redistricting-the-complete-analysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://rosereport.org/20100222/florida-redistricting-the-complete-analysis/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
