The Social Organic

Build as we go

2014-05-07T18:10:00.000-07:00

The idea that we address problems as we build; amend a project
as needed while we build to address areas of opportunity.

Seeing and understanding time with light- Abstract and Experiment

2014-05-06T11:58:00.002-07:00

A note to the reader, I believe that light travels at varying rates based on the type of light. I believe that we are measuring the wrong speed and applying it broadly. Our understanding of time as observed is based on the human sense of sight, meaning our eyes are a limitation to understanding how time works. This is based on observation and our current understanding of light.

Here is a quick Note:

First; there is Space, Time, and Light. In Computing In The Light, I address some structure that can be observed as a product of assembly and have included that math below this article. Second observing the structure of light I have thus far concluded three elements which are [l] the length of the light, [t] the time it takes that light to travel, and [r] the first reflection.

Here are my observations of Time as it relates to being observed in the light

Jumping from star to star, I try to explain what one would see in time and space as we fly from surface to surface, faster than the known speed of light. Taking that understanding, I observe the age of the planets as they appear to grow older as we approach, and younger the farther away I get; this observation is made with the eyes of a human. These two stars exist in real time but appear older or younger to our eyes. As a measurement using Light and Years, we can see the history of our world with a telescope from a certain distance from our surface. This is because we are part of the light in that it is both reflected and emitted from the from our surface into the cosmos. Exploring the light, our lives down to the atom and below, are reflected into the cosmos. The speed of this light combined with its ability to carry information such as imagery and data in such a way that the reflection is of the passage of time carried by light reflected or emitted away from the surface. Like a movie played into the cosmos, if i shine a flashlight into the sky, that light though unseen, will continue to travel out into the cosmos even after the flashlight is off. Shining brightly for an instant to the first set of eyes that it finds.

Technically when we look at the stars at night, we are seeing them as they were in years, equal to the distance the light traveled in light years subtracted from the absolute age of the star. For example, the star is 2 billion years old, and we see it 500 light years away, we see it as 1,999,999,500 years old. From the surface, our planet is actual age, while the surface we are looking at appears 500 years younger. The opposite would be true for an observer on the other surface, separated only by space, time, and the light; Measured in light years. If we were to travel halfway to that star, and look back at earth, we would see our planet as 250 years younger than when we left.

On observation when we look at the stars from our surface, they are all in the past, all of them based on our human senses. When we look at the sky those stars in the past point out that we are living in the present, and bring about the notion that real time existing elsewhere is difficult to observe through the light with our own eyes, because the light shows us what was reflected in years past.

Meaning what is real time, is what we see close to us, and even then, the people around us remain only an echo of the present because of what we see and the time it takes light to reach our eyes from their surface.

As a example, When I look up at Proxima Centauri, I see the star and its planets as they were 4.3 years ago. From Proxima Centauri looking back at earth, I would see our star and earth as it was 4.3 years ago. We are measuring the space between them. Both planets exist in the same "time," meaning it is the same time in both places; yet as observed they appear younger or older relative to the point of observation. If we could instantly travel between the stars we are discussing, we would see the past from either vantage point while we exist in real time. As we leave our star and advance to the other star, our star would appear to grow younger behind us, and the star we approach would appear to grow older; while both stars remain exactly the same age. This would continue as we hop back and forth between the stars, growing younger behind us as we hop, and older as we approach; as observed the stars would change in age, relative to real time where it ticks forward at a common rate between to celestial objects.

Given that the stars appear older or younger, we can observe that the image of the planet or star is held within the light relative to our position as it was reflected or emitted. In this respect, time is recording directly into the light the history of these two stars and their planets, as it reflects their existence into the cosmos. Time flows like a video into the light, creating a reflection of time within the light that can be observed relative to our position between the stars we have chosen. At center between our celestial objects, we would observe both stars as approximately 2.15 years younger than they actually are or reduced in age by approximately one half.

While time tick forward for both objects simultaneously, we can draw a line for real time between the two stars, which is a directional constant, and another for observed time, between the two stars, then correlate between the two points the distance on observation and from which point a given age of the object could be observed from a certain distance. While the first line represent a constant called time, the second line is a constant set with a variable for our point as a place on the line between the two celestial objects, where observed age between the two is relative to position for the point on line two. As observed, time essentially keeps a record within the light, creating a reflection in time, which we observe as the past from our point on line two.

In this respect, we can triangulate through the light. For example, both stars tick forward at a common rate, and as observed, the light would reflect a time which has already ticked, between the stars. While time tick in one direction for both stars and their planets in our observation, the record of its passing is spread out into our cosmos at the speed of light. The time from one surface, overlaps and intertwines with another as observed from our vantage point near the reflecting objects, while we all tick forward at the same rate. Given light reflects out from a surface, a record of time is recorded like a video in the light. As applied to our planet, it is relative to the light dispersed into space as reflected from the surface of a celestial object.

We have drawn our two lines between the two stars. The age observed from point two, should spread spherically out from the surface of each star, and our point can now represent an intersect in time between two stars in 3 dimensional space, relative to our constant line one, actual time. Again the distance between these two points can be measured in addition to the observed age. Also, an observed symmetry within the space between our point on line two and either surface observed can be measured by observing the time reflected in the line to the point. Adding another element, placing a point P at center of our star, and adding a line that is as long as the required age of the observation back to the celestial object, through center, drawn between two points looking back at P. We would see P as the same age from either point as we observe the object at center, always younger the farther we move from the object, and always older as we move closer when we move fractions of light years. From two vantage points around the object, we can see the entire object in time, for example one light year out looking back at the object, with this method.

Also, on observation of a spinning object it would appear as though the light recorded into the cosmos would spin with the object, but this is incorrect. The light is reflected from a steady source, and acts in the same manner as reflected back to the source or out into the cosmos. It reflects as a solid flow into the cosmos like a video that can be observed from any direction. Just outside the earth's atmosphere, I can see the planet spin. Two hundred light years away, I can still see the planet spin, only a difference in time is observed because the light take two hundred years to reach this point.

For example, let's say I want to see America two hundred years ago; I could instantly travel to that point in the light where America is reflected, at that point I observe the rotation of the planet until America appears as it was two hundred years ago, two hundred light years away. Then, zoom in with my telescope and see America in the time I wanted to see; If my telescope were good enough, I could see the activity on the surface. Again, while time flow in one direction, through the light one can see our history from the right vantage on line two. One should keep in mind that instant travel is impossible, and the time taken to reach this point by any means real would take an amount of time to accomplish. Instant travel is used to demonstrate because it is known faster than light.

To say that there is not another force which affects the common motion of time, would be presumptuous. However, having found a reflection of time in the light, we are only a step away from finding time itself.

Experiment

A basic experiment would include one projector and two screens, where the projected image pass through two screens. The light as it proceeds from one screen to the next is measured as the [l] or light, the [t] is takes to go from one screen to the next, and where the second screen is considered the first [r] reflection. Draw a line between the two screens, this first line represents real time as it tick independent of the light, and this would affect the aging of everything around our experiment. The second line is a line of observation between the two screens; meaning we set a point on this line in order to observe the light as it reaches this point as measured from the surface of the first screen.

For example, lets assign the distance between our screens as being proportionally equal to one year; meaning our line represents one light year between the two screens. If we move our point 25% along the line to the second screen, then what is observed looking back at the first screen would be 25% younger than what exists on the first screen. From this point, assuming we set another screen, we would observe the past as, or the history of the light as it exists for the first screen. Of course all we measure is the light between these two screens, the pint is it take time for the light to travel to a given point along our line, and on observation, the farther we move away from the point, the older the observation.

Our point on line two is set up like a sliding point between the two screens, where movement of the point equates to the an observation of an object in the past as determined by the position from which we make our observation. The point always sit between zero and one hundred percent of the length of light we are analyzing,

Use of these reserves, a short note with links to data

2014-04-29T12:34:00.004-07:00

I want to leave a short note about the reserves highlighted below and why I discovered them. I was concerned that America could not repay its debt without over taxing the population, which I believe would lead to a civil war. So I was trying to find the Oil, Gas, Gold, Silver and Platinum reserves for use to mint more coin and pay down our debt. I found them and I released the reserve data for America with brief description of how to find more. I left the rest for the world to find giving only a technique.

I hope this helps us pay down our debt without over taxing the peoples of our nation for federally incurred debts. The USGS and Army Core of Engineers could explore this amount of oil as a strategic asset for the United States that could perhaps pay down our deficit and fuel our fleet.

Visit these links to see the reserves. Scroll down to image 1 to start the series and understand what you see, these were the results of my experiment.

These are the southern deposits:

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2012/11/texas-oil-rush-mineral-deposit-maps-of.html
http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2013/05/oil-gas-deposits-in-southern-oklahoma.html
http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2013/05/new-mexico-oil-and-gas-reserves.html
http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2013/05/louisiana-oil-reserves-exposed.html

Also, take a look a look at the country of Mexico, southwest of Texas, its border is covered in oil patches that rival Texas.

Engineering Magnetic Polarity, The Other Magnetic Poles Visible - An Experiement

2014-04-26T06:08:00.003-07:00

******

* Note in this experiment I identify the the "other pole" of a magnet. That means the input and the output can * both be seen the the image below. I discovered this some time ago, and I have finally recognized what it is; * see the picture below. :) This is another contribution to the science of magnetism!

******

Perhaps a screen of this type can be used to "Engineer" Magnetic fields, use your old TV to understand how magnets work and build something new! For example, I have a few designs one could start with. This is the first step to achieving flight with magnets, and that is seeing the fields they produce! Good luck and build something that will fly!

Also, compared to basic magnets which we can see now, using this technique, we can improve quality and engineer magnetic fields with outputs as geometric shapes and patterns, based on particle assembly. The following is how to see a basic field from a common magnet. One should also note that using this technique, I found the other pole I was looking for. It spreads triangular out of either side of this magnet shown and is visible in the picture. It is not colored but defined by an outline inside the color rings.

Designing the Experiment

First we will need a magnet and old tube TV, set on a channel where static available; I used channel three. Turn the TV on its back and place the magnet on top of it. This is the first setup for observation.

Observations

After placing the magnet on the TV set, the Polarity of this magnetic can be seen in the rings produced. Notice the color variations are opposite on either side of the magnet. Notice that the color variations seem almost in sync, where the rings on either side or of opposite color. For example the ring is yellow on the outside and green on the other side, and it flips as it moves closer to the magnet.

On observation we can see that a magnet of any shape can be placed on a surface like this and the color variations observed for scientific purpose.

I have blown the following image up so you can see the difference in the fields: Use another screen and take a picture of it to see the second field with more clarity.

And for comparison I have drawn lines in the next

photograph outlining the pole I was searching for:

Note: On seeing this image, see the colorful field as a 3D field that wraps the magnet. Notice the tall pole in the north and south, almost invisible, but one can see the distortion up through either field. Notice how the field seems to be pushed away from north and south. Perhaps, given the direction of the distortion, this center might be an output or input of some sort.

******

Also, in addition to the poles on the north and south that seem to protrude with straight lines, note the plumes on the east and west of the magnet that seem to wrap the other field. One should consider that these are inputs and outputs of some sort to this shape of magnet. You must really look to see the shadowy outline of the other poles. The bright colors are the typically viewed portion of a magnet in my practice.

******

A worthy note of mention is that this setup can be used to "feel" out a magnet. Lift the bar magnet from the surface and see the field of the magnet as you move it closer and farther away from the screen. Notice how the screen can almost peel away the magnet field and show you the color of each ring as you move closer to the surface of the screen.

Also, note that the distortion around the magnet is visible as static, this is comparable the the field seen around matter within our sight, if you look closely at an object with your eyes, you will see a slight distortion around a matter object. Notice also that their is a defined block within the static that is the shape of the magnet.

Notice on the north side of this magnet, that there is a skewed box projecting from the top of the magnet through the rings. Note also that these fields look two dimensional, but they are indeed three dimensional.

I should note that this can damage the television used and should be used with caution. However, I want to state that this type of screen can be built in such a way that it does not damage the screen when the magnet is moved or held over its surface. This technique can be used to help us engineer magnetic fields in such a way that they are useful beyond the typical applications available with today's science.

We can use this information to design new shapes and magnetic assemblies; also a software could be built on this type of data to assist in modeling the fields as they appear on each shape.

Now, I need to figure out how the other pole works. :)

Michael

Computing in the Light - An Experiment

2014-04-25T17:06:00.003-07:00

This part of my OpenScience Initiative, I intend to continue to describe technology in such a way that it is inspirational to the appropriate audience in an effort to enhance creativity and the possibilities within their given science. I do this science online for people to watch as it develops.

---------------------------------------

Quick Look:
We are using the number of rings to calculate,
We are using the size of the rings to calculate,
We are using the distance between them to calculate,
We are using the length of the light to calculate,
We are using a recognition camera to observe these in the reflections in a mirror,
We are using either a screen and a mirror, or two mirrors and a laser.
We can calculate with observations of odd or even number of reflections in each display,
We are building a means to calculate in the light.

What we have demonstrated is that there is structure within these assemblies and determining the method of calculation is of the utmost importance to me at the given moment. I want to be able to calculate in a processor that uses light, meaning, how do we get to a method where light can be calculated directly.

-------------------------------------

The Math:

A note on observation:

It would seem on proper analysis that one can observe structure within the light, and from such a deduction, I conclude that Light must be added to the historic notion of Space and Time; becoming Space, Time, and Light. I deduce this with the notion that both space and time have structure; while the structure of time is something I am still debating. The structure of light must be deduced before I can begin to calculate in the light.

The observations:

One [l] length of light equals [r] number of reflections and [t] amount of time. Where each reflection is changed by a (d) degree until the chain included in the [l] is complete.

Where [r] and [t] are measured as a product of [l], the length of the light applied.

[r] reflections are calculated with two mirrors, and the same odd or even designation can be said an attribute of [r] and [l] based on the number of reflections. If [r] were calculated as ODD as an observed product of two mirrors, then [l] can be said to be ODD as well.

[l] is a variable based on the speed of the light used to determine [r]; while [t] time remain the same constant between them. Where [l] can be said to have taken one second to produce [r] number of reflections and they both share the same attribute [t];

[l] is equal to a certain number of [r] and a certain amount of [t] time; the length of the light can be said to affect the number of [r] reflections andnthe associated amount of [t] time, while [l] remain the determining factor of both.

[t] is equal to a certain length of [l] and a certain amount of [t] time; the amount said to affect the of time be said to affect the length of the light and the number of [r] reflections awhile [l] remain the determining factor of both.

[r] is equal to a given [l] length of light and a certain amount of [t] time; the amount of reflections can be a basis for determining the [l] length of the light and the amount of [t] time; the amount of reflections can be said to affect [l] and [t] while being the sole determining factor of both.

While the [l] distance traveled from the pass through surface and the [t] time taken to produce one [r] reflection is equal to the length of the light.

The first length of this light increase proportionally to each reflection in both directions, while in relation directly to the first length.

Where the size of each reflection as it relates the [l] length of the light over a given period of [t] is changed proportionally within each successive reflection in both directions as it relates to the first [r].

Where the [l] length of the light in every successive set of reflections can be independently measured as an increase in length from the previous set.

Where the first length of light is measured from the first surface image to the first reflection; as measured through a cascading series of reflections and as a single unit of measurement from the first image to the last reflection.

Where light emitted at a certain [t] interval from the first surface will produce a given number of [r] between two surfaces as it relates to the [l] length of the light.

The equation thus far:

l = r = t

Distance, a number of reflections, and an amount of time are equal and assembled as one unit with three measurements. For example, an increase or decrease in this unit would affect all three measurements.

---------------------------------------

Calculating in our observations

A binary input from a conventional system would be a length of light, and carries additional data such as l, t, and r, while other data can be obtained on observation. Rather than feeding into a CPU directly, we feed the binary into the laser directly, and find the method to calculate within the light, feeding the result to an appropriate destination.

---------------------------------------

Purposed out of the box: A three state transistor than can carry data

In a binary system, a two mirror system could be be used with one recognition camera on top, where three states can be noted within, on, off or a combined state of both on. An intensity sensor can be used to test this concept, while a camera used to recognize additional data in a separate type of transistor.

---------------------------------------

Basic Experiments

These experiments describe roughly how a light computer would calculate using a mirror, a screen, and a camera, as well as a few other methods.

Light Experiment

Place an iPad in front of a mirror, with the forward facing camera on, and you will see a progressive series of screens appear in both the mirror and on your iPad.

Now place two mirrors facing each other and you will observe that the same type of cascaded imagery appear between them. Now compare the speed at which the two cascade within the assembly, and one can observe the speed at which light can calculate using imagery verses the typical electronic cycle.

Observe that light calculates faster than your iPad; when calculated as the number of perfect reflections reproduced. Perhaps we use this to build a computer instead of transistors.

The following pictures demonstrate the iPad approach; This would be how the App is built, based on this imagery using the camera as the feedback loop between the screen and the mirror.

Also, understand and observe the path of the light: from screen to mirror, mirror to camera, camera to screen. This cycle can also be used to calculate on each pass as it renders an additional screen within the previous. One method could be demonstrated using just the reflections within, in this case we do not have to adjust the mirror, it stays parallel to our monitor. We can use a monitor like the iPad screen and its camera to build a method for calculation based on a feedback loop through the camera included and the observed image as it propagates through the camera. Using an image on screen, we can pass an image through an observed reflection and what is progressed through a multiple of reflections cutting off the camera when the calculation is complete.

I propose a system like this can calculate using the number of reflections, the size of the reflections, the time it takes to produce them and the distance between them.

The use of mirrors are of course faster, but this is a basic concept when we explore the iPad method. I propose that on proper development, the cycle of the light can be used effectively to make a basic calculation.

Perhaps another method might work...

We could also build an experiment where we would be able to use a laser that propagates through a hole in one mirror, or a series of holes. We could then measure the [l] length of the light and [t] time with pulses, we can count the number of [r] reflections done during the length of the pulse. Using a camera, we can see the size of the spread in the reflections as they appear on each successive appearance. Using the length of the light on each reflection, the time it takes to propagate, and the number of reflectors to calculate more advanced mathematics. We turn the laser on and off to initiate a given calculation and measure it against another calculation.

We can also arrange an array of lasers in a single two mirror setup, calculated in base; like base 2, base 10, or base 16, 32, 64, etc. Where the calculations initiated simultaneously and a calculation made on observation.

Using a box with a series of parallel stacks and a few cameras we could calculate faster than a super computer at the speed of light, or technically, at the speed of our recognition processor and timing relays.

If we use a binary input binary from another circuit attached to the lasers, say 64 on one two mirror stack, using a circuit configuration where each laser represents one processor on this stack, or each laser could also be setup like a thread with the array acting in unison to solve a problem.

Note - We need the recognition processor to determine the size of the ring in each reflection, the timing of the laser, and the distance of the light transmitted. We can use a control like the distance between each reflection or the speed of the light chosen, timed with the light we are using as a measure as well.

*** A positive benefit is energy efficient processing power, because their is not heat in the light we are using.

How should we calculate?

I suggest using the number of reflections as a calculating method, for basic math, and then successive rings as they appear, as a multiplier or other mathematical operator that works in multiples.

Timing the camera on and off can be used to complete an operation is we are using a screen and a mirror.
camera combination. Also the observed distance between reflective observations can be used to calculate. An app could be developed to quickly begin counting, then possibly ported over to the real means as an actual light processor.

---------------------------------------

Notes to be added or deleted from this article...

One length of light creates, for example, only fourteen reflections. The size of that light through these reflections will change in a predictable way from one to fourteen. For example, in a basic setup we could could use the light to convey a short message such as length of the reflection chain. In the previous example would be 14 reflections timed by a pulse that would equal fourteen reflections.

Oil Gas deposits in Southern Oklahoma Exposed

2013-05-28T19:13:00.004-07:00

The reserves remaining in Oklahoma are demonstrated Below; The Reserves are proven. Minerals exploration 5%. Demonstrated here is a capacity. These reserves are seldom tapped and are not a part of the US strategic Reserves.

Trillions in assets right under Oklahoma. Read below to learn how to Identify the Reserves in your area.

This first mineral deposit map demonstrates deposits. The next map shows in dark red existing wells in Texas.

Note the Yellow to red areas on the bottom of the State Map, you will find that these are reserves attached to those in Texas. Apply a simple existing oil well topography to the top of this, or a state map and get your bearings. Those spots are Oil and Gas. The reserve highlighted on the left abruptly begins laying wells in Texas.

Questions or comments contact mmarley79@icloud.com. I can provide the data for the entire world, however, we will go one state at a time. This data can enlarged for further investigation. Note the fields demonstrated here match those in texas with hundreds of wells already in place.

New Mexico Oil and Gas Reserves Exposed

2013-05-28T10:42:00.001-07:00

Here are the reserves located in New Mexico, the big blotches have wells placed on them in places, and between , Shale and gas, etc. The reserves remaining in New Mexico are demonstrated Below; The Reserves are not precisely proven and demonstrate a technique for further investigation. Minerals. Demonstrated here is enough capacity to match Texas oil, shale and gas output annually. These reserves are seldom tapped and are not a part of the US strategic Reserves.

Trillions in assets right under New Mexico. Read below to learn how to Identify the Reserves in your area.

This first mineral deposit map demonstrates deposits. The next map shows in dark red existing wells in Texas.

The big patches are as follows: Bottom right in New Mexico, Oil and Gas Reserves.

Just the NW of the patch we just discussed you will find natural Gas. and specifically to the north you will find even more. New Mexico can now match Texas output for oil and gas.

Please contact me using a message below with further questions. If you would like more detailed data, I can give you exact coordinates. If your an Oil Company, I have the rest of the world waiting to be released.

Michael J. Marley
mmarley79@icloud.com

Louisiana Oil Reserves Exposed

2013-05-28T10:36:00.002-07:00

The reserves remaining in Louisiana are demonstrated Below; The Reserves are proven. Minerals exploration 5%. Demonstrated here is enough capacity to match Texas oil, shale and gas output annually. These reserves are seldom tapped and are not a part of the US strategic Reserves.

Trillions in assets right under Louisiana. Read below to learn how to Identify the Reserves in your area.

The top map demonstrates the reserves and minerdeposits. The bottom, though slightly off, demonstrates the wells in Texas stop at the border. Now match the colors.

Lips divine

2013-05-17T16:45:00.001-07:00

It was of I, and now of you
Tell me what am I to do, this night
two souls entwined, taking their first flight
One on one, her soul and mine
A rhythmic movement along fluid lines
her lips divine, so divine
Tell me what am I to do
As she smile back
It was of I, and now of you

Oh, oh, so not so

For I think it's your turn, not mine to go

She leaned for a kiss, with such splendid grace

The world became an ocean,

and this beach was our place.

Michael J Marley

A moments doubt

2013-05-14T08:42:00.001-07:00

Oh ye to the wisdom of those old and wise
Who see so much more than these younger eyes
Not quick to get to mouthing about
Or jumping to conclusions without a moments doubt
But years of wisdom to dish about,
To be found within those words
oh ye the wisdom of a moments doubt

Michael J Marley

Layered cosmic magnetic Fields

2013-05-12T13:27:00.001-07:00

4/25/2014 - This is actually possible at lower levels, but given the disorganization of the visual universe, I am unsure if this can be taken up as far as I have proposed in the following document.

Content
The study of magnets suggests that magnetic fields are layered one within the other in our universe. One field within the other all the way up, constantly moving one within the other, creating spin from atoms up to stars. For example earth lay within the solar field, The solar field lay within the galactic field, and The galactic field within the next all the way up to to next highest order of magnitude. Perhaps magnetism is the universal constant we seek. Perhaps magnetism is a dark energy with enough power to energize matter and remain invisible to our telescopes.

A constant implies that it affects everything. I believe magnetism is present in everything from atoms to stars, even galaxies. Some would argue gravity is also a consta When determining the superior force that binds, I am sure one can use magnetism to negate the effects of gravity.

Magnetism vs Gravity

2013-05-06T18:41:00.001-07:00

4/25/2014 - Updated Content

If you look at my article on

Engineering Magnetic Polarity, The Other Magnetic Poles Visible

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2014/04/seeing-magnetic-polarity-and-fields.html

One would note that the shape of the magnetic field this experiment was visualized around a sphere and applied to a surface as a means to see how gravity would work. My conclusion was that magnetism from our planet has an effect on a mass at the atomic level that resembles gravity. On further investigation in this experiment, previously noted, I discovered what seems to be another force tied directly to magnetism as revealed by the photo in the experiment. How this force tie into gravity or exist as part of our planet is still a mystery and deserves further investigation.

Original Content:

Magnetism vs Gravity (Their is another unseen force)

New relativity is a form of modeling that can be applied quickly to magnetics. ~~the universe around us.~~ The Theory is further modeled using magnetic models rather than spheres. From here we can infer not only the shape of the field, but the locations of its polar and symmetric opposites or equals using the magnetic field to infer this data in a perfect relativity assembly.

For those of you who would argue gravity is the ruling force in the universe I ask, politely, how can something pull an object to a world and not a man just outside its atmosphere. Surely gravity is not the force of binding on this circumstance; I would ask why just outside our atmosphere we float when gravity would surely pull us to the ground. Perhaps the path of the field affects why the same object can weigh a standard on the same scale in differing degrees of accuracy around the world. Gravity is an inward force, that should be uniform while magnetism seems an outward attractive force. Yet when we see variations in the weigh of a pound worldwide, then variability of magnetic readings within the vicinity must be analyzed.

I am proposing that all organic and inorganic materials possess electrically bonded atoms, all in constant motion, and that what we infer as gravity is the effect magnetism has in some way on the mass of an atomic body as it is affected by the field.

~~I am proposing that magnetism can exist without gravity, but gravity cannot exist without magnetism.~~

New: The previous statement is retracted until I determine what the input and output mechanism and structure exist for the common magnet.

New Relavity (updated)

2013-05-06T16:31:00.000-07:00

New Relativity

by Michael J Marley

Key Quotes

"New Relativity: Hold an Orange in your hand, now imagine what the other side of the orange looks like; It's that simple. Two points of perspective from one vantage point. Visual mathematics. Measurable perceptual equalities in tandem points of observations at center."

Symmetry in the new theory of relativity using tandem pairs; Px1 and Px2 are an example of symmetry in this model as they are a tandem and mathematically relative pair with P stationary at center for this example. P is a Three Dimensional Point like an electron."

- Michael J. Marley
___________________________

Symmetry in the new theory of relativity. Px1 and Px2 or an example of symmetry in this model as they are a tandem pair.

Practical applications:

1. Perhaps I am looking at a ball of fire called a star. From my position in space Px1, I can say beyond a reasonable doubt that another position of equal distance directly opposite the star being observed at P, would observe the same space, rotation, color and shape within space time, as the opposite px2. Hence I can relatively identify the shape and characteristics of that star, even infer the position of rings and revolutionary track of its moons and or satellites.

2. Looking at nano architecture, one can assert the existence of and even conceptualize the paths of energy around an atomic mass or the structural components of nano building blocks for medical applications an so called nano power plants. Pictured below is an atom. Each position has a perspective of the same event. We can mathematically model the second perspective. Keep in mind that space and time between Px1 and Px2 are opposite observations of each other, but mathematically equal where space, time, and velocity are concerned.

3. For applications in artificial intelligence, the computer system can " visualize" mathematically the other side of a human or toaster, with a degree of relativity. The system sees one side of a three dimensional figure and calculates it's perspective opposite seeing a human figure or toaster in three dimensional space. The details of course with be that this is a three dimensional figure and for the system to take this into account before action is taken.

4. Wrap this model around Einstein's Theory of Relativity and you'll find this model brings symmetry in Three Dimensional space with New Relativity.

While the equations for Einsteins theory remain relevant, adding a tandem embankment brings this equation to life. The same dimensions of time and space in Einsteins representation remain relevant. However, another perspective yields the same results, only the opposite is witnessed with one train moving faster than the other in the shape of a triangle, the shape of which I describe time. By switching perspectives, time and space become a measurable addition to this visual representation.

5. Render the difference in space between lightening strikes and when Einstein receives the information in the form of light separated by space and time and you'll find the space time separation between trains as they are hit by lightening and the space time separation to new relativity are precisely of some degree opposite or inverse enough to infer the space between trains when the lightening struck.

Space time differences would remain proportion to each point Px1 or Px2 and equal when measuring the space between strikes lightening strikes as they reach each embankment at Px1 or Px2 . This means we can verify the time and space difference between strikes by measuring from another position the difference relative to another observation on the same line.

6. Observational characteristics pertaining to the shape of time as a triangle out from either point of observation would be observed as having the exact opposite of the first point of observation from that of the second point of observation; Px1 or Px2. Meaning the trains closer to each point will be observed as moving just as fast as the other, while the distant train just a slow as the other; when in reality all points are equal and a complete picture is given of the event.

7. We can have trillions of tandem points of observations all with the same degree of opposite proportions in space and time of a single point. At some points, these tandem pairs for observation will yield data from observation that is exactly equal. These are of a relative position where visual observations yield equality. For example, this would be the case if my point of observation were at the center point P, or perhaps my embankment were looking down on the events taking place. i would see the lightening in this example simultaneously.

8. In all cases, Px1 when observing P will observe the trains moving one closer than the other with one lighten strike before the other. Px2 observing the same data that correlates directly to Px1, will see the same data of a proportion that completes a line, inverse or otherwise, about the trains movement and lightening strikes with direct observational proportionality and vice verso.

---

Now lets get down to business...

My theory of relativity is explained below. Please keep in mind that I believe the universe has as a guiding force magnetism and those energies associated with it. So when I see a point P at the center of my drawing, I also see the field created by P simultaneously. From this view I can say what is true on the bottom is true on the top, and take that model of symmetry up to the universe and see that perhaps a star can be observed the same way. Knowing the magnetic effects of a star type, one can infer not only what the other side of that star or nano structure may look like, but we can also complete the magnetic field around the object in three dimensional space. This is my personal belief, please keep in mind I have included it only to help your further visual a three dimensional Theory of Relativity. Ultimately it's about where we are in space and time and how two perspectives meet.

---

What is pictured here is a SPHERE, please use your imagination. The following is how to perceive said sphere. Theoretically this would be represented with one line between Px1 and Px2 with point P at center crossing a Sphere on center. Pairs are always directly opposite one another and move in tandem. This line can be moved to any position around the sphere and observe that all things are equal with this sphere. If I were looking at a single electron, then what is seen from Px1 would be seen from Px2 if the electron were at point P. Having only one point of observation with the perspective from the embankment, then we can perceive the other side of the electron from the embankment at px2. With this observation, we can predict the other side of an electron from only one point of observation. Px2 would be a relative position in tandem with Px1 that can be inferred by the observer.

Px1 is the "perceived" opposite of Px2. Lights travels spherically into our universe, as does the light from either lightening strike. Those lights reach Px1 and Px2 at differing times while point P is at center. With the data from Px1, when infer a lot about the perspective Px2 has of P while both observe point P or the lightening strikes.

Picture a line through a sphere attached by a straight line through center between Px1, P at center and Px2 opposite Px1 where both points are of equal distance apart and point P at center of our point of observation between Px1 and Px2. Cross point P at the Center of Observation with more tandem lines with P at center to get creative. The more one has, the more complete the image of P. Each lightening strike to each train, assuming it were night time, would appear spherically outwards to our points of observation. Now pick a point like Px1 and move the point without breaking your point at center. Use this to represent Einsteins position in his Theory of Relativity. Place the tracks at center a make your observations. This is New Relativity as described by Michael J Marley.

The shape of our perception can be observed by this depiction as well. We observe objects in a triangular fashion at a distance from our point of observation. This is always the case. Our Perception would be a triangular vie out. And all of Einstein's observations would remain true. Spinning the model we will eventually see that an infinite number of perspectives could independently observe the same event at the same time, all with varying degrees of mathematical equality associated with tandem pairs having P at center. We would also observe that exist a mathematical equality between our points Px1 and Px2 as they independently observe point P.

Now lets explore the other side of this visual equation.

After hearing the train come by my home, I realize that light, sound, and perhaps a few others wave lengths could be correlated in the respect that it would appear to follow the same rules of observations of distance and proximity. This reminded me of Einstein and well, led me to a the New Relativity model.

Opposite is reverse of Center Point (P) at Nano Architectural layers. No matter how many circles in 3D you draw around the scenes, if you follow the line around the sphere all the information remains proportional, and Px1 and Px2 with opposite proportionality with P at center. Look at Einsteins story with measurable perspectives.

Lets build the model. Lets draw a sphere with a point at center. Imagine this as point P. Now lets place point Px1 on one side of point P and place another directly opposite Px1 name Px2. Now P is at center of our sphere. This point is a proton at center and is assumed stationary and equal. We can make an inference about Px1 based solely on the data from Px1 about point P.

Place Einsteins tracks on either side of that proton at center. Our observations can infer, that all things equal, including the trains, we can infer the opposite side of a train for equality.

However, as observed, time; distance traveled and velocity all reduce proportionately as measured against increasingly distant objects as we observe the trains go by. Velocity and distance traveled appear to increase when measured against increasingly closer objects as seen from Px1 looking at Px2; or vice verso. Granted that all measurements remain equal at each point as they are observed moving to another point on their line. i.e. a1 - a2, b1 - b2.

The same observations of Einsteins equations could be made by placing his tracks at center. However, from a nano architectural perspective up to Einsteins theory of relativity, we can infer a lot from his embankment at Px1 in our equation and what Px2 would see if he were looking back at Einstein.

Keep in mind that any number of points and perceptions can be simultaneous calculated for an accurate observational model of P. In Artificial intelligence, this model allows us to build a constructive consciousness having a simulated Artificial Intelligence by infer data about the opposite observation of the data at point P being observed. Meaning my computer knows what this side of a basketball looks like, it can now activity infer the other side of that basketball before it can see it. I am inferring it is mathematically possible to deduce an observation from Px2, which could be opposite Px1 at any point around a sphere. The same observations of velocity and space would be mathematically possible to validate a direct relationship between Px1 and Px2 as they observe P at Center; with observed data about Einsteins model remaining correct. I have added another point of observation and expanded the model to include three dimensional space encompassing the object, or in Einsteins case, objects, being observed.

What we observe is that time is independent of, but directly affects all events.

Whats true on the bottom is true on the top!

Conversationally, if we look at the same two points inside a sphere. Where lightening strikes both trains and expands radially out to our points. Given two separate simultaneous strikes of lightening would correlate the data from the opposite point. Any number of points through P can be made so long as it maintains two additional points on either side of a straight line; for this example.

Px1 and Px2 would see the person from the other side respective to the observations made by either Px1 or Px2. We can infer data about P from one point of observation about the opposite observation. This part of my New Relativity model.

No matter how many circles in 3D you draw around the scenes, if you follow a straight line around the sphere all the information remains proportional. This is a variable look at Einsteins story with measurable perspectives.

One could mathematically deduce what was being observed from every point on a path along a circle in 3D around Einsteins theory, if one considered Einsteins embankment as any point Px on that 3D line.

Px1 and Px2 moves around a sphere in three dimensions with point P at center and Px1 and Px2 directly opposite the other. Their is a line from Px1 through P to Px2. These points stay connected opposite each other as they are moved. We see the symmetry of the equation in perspectives that are measurably able to be calculated without a direct observation of its opposite, especially at levels where one proton or neutron where observed from each the points on our sphere around the object. I call this new relativity because it takes the einsteinium drawing and looks at it from the perspective of what he would see if he could sit anywhere. On meditation, I realized Einstein's equations could be expanded dramatically if the symmetry I describe in time and space were existent in this model. Three dimensional space is where the event he witnessed occurred, and in three dimensional space I have described them with a visual equations.

Possible Applications

I believe that artificial intelligence is derived from the ability to associate. Using the 3D model proposed for New Relativity allows us to construct in real time the event within logic processors. This gives the system a predictive measure for what is perceived for associated data.
Seeing the other side of stars.
Predicting the other side of a nano architecture from one perspective.
A means of developing a predictive AI.

Check out some more information about this event and some other interesting information here:

The National Geographic article can be found here:

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/03/120322-new-supernova-sn2012aw-stars-explode-space-science/

About the Supernova

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/11/death-by-supernova.html

A Magnetic Cosmos in Pictures

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/2012/11/hubble-telescope-magnetic-cosmos.html#!/2012/11/hubble-telescope-magnetic-cosmos.html

Magnetic Fields in the Clouds

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/10/perhaps-this-is-how-time-travel-works.html

The Universe Spins

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/10/understand-cosmos-with-one-picture.html

Special Relativity in 3D

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/10/3d-special-relativity.html

Twinkle, Twinkle, Little Star

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/10/twinkle-twinkle-little-star-seeing.html

See Gravity in Our Universe

http://socialorganic.blogspot.com/#!/2012/09/here-is-how-you-see-gravity.html

I Call this New Relativity.

Within what space do our dreams collide

2013-05-06T10:42:00.001-07:00

When we dream, our brains build a world within a world that seems to incorporate space in such a way that it is dimensional in the respect that it can be measured and activity recorded. More importantly, the dream has actual dimensional space and boundaries with parallels to that of our lives. I am proposing that a dream is another form of dimensional space that is readily accessible by all of us. In fact space and time, though relative, can also exist within a dream.

The enigma of dreams being a form of dimensional space lay in that we can all dream something different, see something different, and actively participate in the realities of the space within each of our own dreams. The constant is that all these dreams exist within the same dimensional space, accessible by all of us; even our flock. The question remains: what dimension of space do our dreams reside within.

Dreams are indeed dimensional space; the space within a dream has dimensions that can be measured as the mind visibly creates a dimensional space within which all events occur. The question I find myself poised with is in which dimension does a dream exist. The space within a dream is three dimensional, but not in the context that we would consider a space of three dimensions to exist; much like the three dimensional space we see with our eyes.

Conscientiously speaking about the dimension, I would consider it an intellectual extension of the third dimension as dreams are within a perceived three dimensional space, with barriers limited by those experienced that have been observed within the same dimension by the dreamer, within the realm of their personal observations and beliefs. However, dimensionally saying which dimension dreams belong to is of significant importance to my studies.

A mention of connectedness between the three dimensional space within our heads during a dream, and that space we see with our eyes or cameras is indeed connected in the respect that one can dream with foresight or hind sight and completely model the event within our own brain while we are a sleep and recall the event while we are awake. This suggests two distinct forms of consciousness, both actively accessible; consciousness while we are awake, and conscious activity while at rest.

If not for the ability of every mind to dream something completely unique in three dimensions without even a dream crossing paths leads me to believe that the dimensional space is unique to the individual and disconnected from our current perception of dimensional or three dimensional space.

Using my New Relativity model, one can visualize that we dream in three dimensional space. The exact dimension is still unknown; but for a biological mass to completely rebuild a "reality" within dimensional space leads me to believe that the space within our minds is indeed part of dimensional space and at some point, our dreams all interact within the same dimension in collectively in personal way.

Say for example A man and a women live at 320 Park Place and both dreams the same dream consecutively, would they be able to interact without their flesh actually interacting? This possesses an interesting dilemma because that space is shared, but may or may not be projected. Can we dream actively as a collective organically if we all dream in the same consciousness or wave configuration?

Within what space do our dreams collide in the space we live in? Perhaps in the future I could dream of Rome and find a dreamer to escort me around. An interesting analogy to collective dreamers.

Online public Notice of Patent: The Ring Within A Ring

2013-05-05T14:51:00.001-07:00

4/25/2014 - This is absolutely the most dangerous, however productive, product of technology on this planet.

Online Public Notice of Patent

I declare the device known as the "ring within a ring" is hereby publicly posted as a patent for Michael J. Marley.

One ring of circular or other shape, magnetically suspended with or without a flange attachment for either the inner or outer ring, within another magnetically charged ring designed to encase the ring. Attachment to another means, within another hollow ring for suspension is included. Metals encompassing all known and unknown for the manufacture of the inner ring or external hollow ring are including but not limited to light-weigh or hi temperature alloys and exotic minerals. Plastics and otherwise exotic non metallic means are also included in covered materials of manufacture. The magnet enclosure is deemed "the ring within a ring." Once assembled.

I hereby claim the following:

Claim 0. One ring of any shape suspended magnetically and accelerated within a casing designed so that their is no mechanical means of contact with the casing when no flanges or rotary accessories are attach.

Claim 1. magnetically suspended inner ring of any shape within a hollow space where the piece levitates. This ring is the ring within a ring.

Claim 2. Where The means to accelerate said "ring within a ring" using solenoid is also included.

Claim 3. Where the device is used at speed to coalesce plasma around the core.

Claim 4. This design includes any means of attachment for levitation of spheres and discs, where this design is used to incorporate radio frequency encapsulation, a wobble, or crystal diversion.

Claim 5. Where the minimum number of pieces required is 3, any number of pieces could used to assemble the ring within a ring for varying capacities and or functions.

Claim 6. Any variation thereof for assembly of the ring within a ring is also covered if the end result is a ring within a ring used for any purpose named or undiscovered if the end device incorporates or contains a device of similar design.

Claim 7. Where by any means to suspend such inner ring is including any variation or design their of to achieve the same means already stated.

Claim 8. Where the device is used to produce power or motive forces, the suppression of vibration, or reduction in friction for parts in motion.

Description

Hollow out a large ring, magnetize the outer ring. Magnetize the inner ring. Assemble so that the inner ring floats. Attach solenoid winding around outer magnetized ring. Ring will produce plasma at speeds over 800 meters per second.

Declaration

I am patenting this as a public notice that this design or derivative thereof belongs solely to Michael j Marley. I hereby swear that Michael j Marley is indeed the rightful owner of this patent.

Economic Boom

2013-05-04T15:05:00.001-07:00

Perhaps the economy is about too boom. It has been shown that when oil prices rise, the economy slows down. After revealing the energy reserves in America, I am suggesting just the opposite will occur. I predict an economic boom as a result of the release of the data. Oil prices should decline and the economy should Start moving again. Meaning the upward trend in the economy is directly affected by the price of energy. As energy prices rise, the economies slow down. As energy prices decrease, the economy speeds up. This the road for the fiscal cure from the bottom up. I chose to release the energy locations to speed up the economy.

Cheap fuel equates to decreased costs associated with shipping any good from point "a" to point "b". This means prices go down for the consumer, who incidentally now has more money to spend. By spending this money, or saving it, we can stimulate the economy with trillions in savings from fuel prices. Taxes on that money fund government, and therefor bring prosperity to our local and national government. Bottom line: consumers have more money to spend once energy prices drop.

You can find the energy reserve data and property locations on my blog for Texas, Louisiana, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.

Sincerely,
Michael j Marley

Space can exist without light, light cannot exist without space.

2013-05-02T18:41:00.001-07:00

Say for example we see an electron at the center of our New relativity model. The light reaches us from the same event separated only by space and time. If the event were seen in three dimensional space, then the event could theoretically happen once and an unlimited number of times simultaneously depending on the space the embankments sit from which our class observes the light from the event. Unless of course that observation happens from point P, the smallest point at which space can be. In this case the event would happen only once at this point. As long as light is emitted from this event, then the multitude of direct observations, meaning the event that has happened appears to happen again to trillions for observers for the first time. Their observations separated only by time,
Light and space.

Space can exist without light, but light cannot exist without space.

While this statement is true, one could argue that dreams take up no space and we perceive those dreams as full of light. I would argue that a dream is a part of dimensional space. Hence it would still have space in order for light to exist.

Michael J Marley

Space within Time ( evolving text )

2013-05-02T16:57:00.001-07:00

Perhaps if a point in space were separated in such a way that time were separated by these two selected points; Lets call this a tear in time. Space would not cease to exist between this tear in the space we have defined. If one could tear time, then perhaps einsteinium theories that time was separate from space are correct. Perhaps time can exist without space, and space can exist without time. More likely, perhaps, one cannot exist without the other. What are your thoughts?

Michael J Marley

The shape of our Perception

2013-05-02T16:23:00.001-07:00

The shape of our perception can be observed by this depiction as well. We observe objects in a triangular fashion at a distance from our point of observation. With the base of the triangle having a Euclidian line at its base and p at center. This is always the case. Perception would be a triangular vie out to combine the inverse of time and spin our perception within these sphere within a sphere and you with see that the movements of our perception creation one ball within the other. This is the shape of our perception. imagine the perception of point P to be %50 of Line Px1, P, Px2 with the line perpendicular to and centered on P; make Px1 and Px2 be observed from P simultaneously making a triangle back to either point, and one will find the shape I describe.

The shape of perception would be of a eucleadian based cone with the point p as our embankment along the track. Spin this randomly in your simulations and 2 bubbles will appear; Only some of which we see. However, the shape of time is what we observe because objects in the distance move slower than that of the closest. That triangle represents time in the respect that what is observed from point px1 moves faster than that of point p and slower past point p in the New Relativity model. Meaning the farther the observation is from his point on the embankment, the slower it moves and the smaller it appears; even when all things are equal in his equation. Also, the light spherically out would mean both tracks and trains were not equal other wise both trains would have to be on the same track at the same point in time for light to reach his embankment to be equality in his equation. Einstein observed the closer object and activity at a closer point in space that affected his reality of time in space.

Taking into account all objects are of equal length and equal velocity, then our perception would from px1 at point P; lets assume point P to be one electron. We can infer from our perspective the other side of the two trains that Einstein observed as both lightening strikes took place. Perhaps those strikes were equal. He would have seen the same event two separate times, so not all is equal in his equation. However, his perception is viewed as a triangle with a spherical background, and time a measurement of his perception out like a triangle to a point, this is the shape of time.

Equality within the New Relativity model by Michael J Marley:

Place Einstein at point P, the very center of this equation where we have placed an electron, and einsteinium would see two events simultaneously. Meaning in order for all things to be equal in einsteinium thought, he would have to be at point P in my perceptual equation.

Please refer to my Theory of New Relativity or Special relativity in 3d for advice on computer modeling for robotic AI Systems.

Michael J Marley

Three dimensional time ( evolving text )

2013-05-02T16:08:00.001-07:00

Time is Three Dimensional by Michael J. Marley

Time can not exist without space. Space can exist with out time. Movement across two points cannot exist without time and space. This is suggests that time and space are interwoven in such a way that one would be hard to separate the two events. The shape of our perception gives rise to the shape of time. Objects closer to me are bigger and faster than those farther, given all things equal. In my theory of relativity, this is true for tandem points of observation if New Relativity is explored.

However, it is difficult to imagine, for some people, that time exists in a dimension beyond that of a two dimensional plane on which we see it displayed. For example, that analog or digital display is for most not more than a number they calculate their lives by. I propose the concept of three dimensional time. Meaning time and space exist together, not separate. Where Einstein explored those things that are not relative, I intend to define relative space.

For example, a super nova explosion happened 37,000,000 million years prior to our curious observation. 37,000,000 million years later we observe in three dimensions the event as it occurred, just as it did 37 illion years prior. Only Energy, Space, Debris, Light and Time are the variables of this event. This event depicts that perhaps time exists within a three dimensional space as our points of perception could be from an infinite number of embankments in the Theory of New Relativity. "Relatively" speaking I believe the point of px2 would experience the same time frames and parameters opposite px1.

This leads me to three dimensional time. Suppose 100 worlds, of varying degrees around a sphere, all witness this event simultaneously 37 million years later. This would suggest that time radiates like light in three dimensions. How else would we all perceive the same event so many years after the death of a star?

In my New Relativity model, time differences can be calculated between any pf the embankments about any series of events that occurs within the model. Like space within the model, time fills this space as well. Time, Space, and dimensional relativism are all in three dimensional space within the given sphere.

Time is three dimensional.

Michael j Marley

The man at home (prose)

2013-04-28T13:46:00.001-07:00

The stench of resin from an old frayed hat
We're he set a basin, Among the litter of an old furry cat
Everyday the same he said, another day has gone
Another day at home writing another song

He dozed off Lonely in an antique shack
Thinking of the colors from her new porcelain stack
Littered among lilies his wife would say
About the Crüe corset she wore at the play
Night time indeed was Time for them
To sit side by side stretched out through the day.

The Space Between Us (Prose)

2013-04-27T16:18:00.002-07:00

Ah, the space between us,

that ethereal space where all can see

a perfect depiction of you and me

the stars up in heaven,

their copies unleavened

for us both in a piece we call home

Through space through time,

through a space undefined

draw us heartily into our space

with arms open wide,

sometimes down at our side

hand in hand across an ocean blue

up over mountains cross rivers and snow

we left our sweat in the desert afterglow

to remember those scenes

with images of us to see

That the world we created,

became evermore rated

in the space between you and me

Antarctica

2013-02-26T17:19:00.000-08:00

I am making a claim to this portion of unclaimed territory in Antarctica.

I would like to acquire this from Argentina and Chile.

I would like to acquire this from Australia.

I would like to Acquire this from France.

I would like to acquire this from Norway.

I would like to Acquire this from New Zealand.

The Organic Cure

2013-02-20T18:37:00.002-08:00

We have cancer and aids; Two diseases killing our people. Those of us interested in the cure spend our time doing research of published research and working toward a goal in a relatively isolated way. This means when we work in lab our research is relatively isolated. If were to take all of the labs, each of which is searching for the same cure, and decide to put all the researchers names on the cure, then perhaps humanity can put its stamp on the universal cure. For example AIDS and cancer researchers could collectively work together and in the process, we find one complete cure by combining all of our research and learning from hundreds of cutting edge facilities almost simultaneously to advance the cure or find a solution for a problem using organic problem solving; A brain or synapse assembly if you will. Collective problem solving solving is achieved in real time, meaning coordination is done on a single platform where direct work, via camera or lab equipment, hologram, or other direct means of constant communication is established between the facilities.

We can all put our names on the cure and save more of our people.

This is the organic means for problem solving.

Techno Genesis

2013-02-19T15:23:00.002-08:00

Techno Genesis - Introducing Technology in such a way that it inspires the world to build.