<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl" type="text/xsl" media="screen"?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css" type="text/css" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>The Stalwart</title>
    
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-137793</id>
    <updated>2008-10-09T17:37:28-04:00</updated>
    <subtitle>Markets, Business, The Economy</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheStalwart" type="application/atom+xml" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site, subject to copyright and fair use.</feedburner:browserFriendly><entry>
        <title>Have Pizza Shops Fallen Hard as Well?</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/416159553/have-pizza-shop.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/have-pizza-shop.html" thr:count="5" thr:updated="2008-10-10T12:54:44-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56783939</id>
        <published>2008-10-09T17:37:28-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-09T17:37:40-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Watching markets decline on and on, and watching extremely well established companies falling to arguably long-term historical lows on valuation, I decided it was time to get some pizza and a steak and cheese sub given that I am currently...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Vincent Fernando</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Watching markets decline on and on, and watching extremely well established companies falling to arguably long-term historical lows on valuation, I decided it was time to get some pizza and a steak and cheese sub given that I am currently in the US and haven't had the real thing in months. Whether its me trying to be overly-"folksy" (sort of the investors version of Sara Palin) or not, I like to think that the thinking and logic behind buying a company's stock should be such that it would also hold for someone looking to buy a local pizza shop from a business broker. Hopefully we can leave the debate as to whether I am merely trying to be folksy for another day...</p>

<p>What hit me today as I was eating a buffalo chicken pizza (a type of food you'll wonderfully only find in the U.S.A.) was that I wondered if the price of buying actual, well established, pizzerias was at a long term historical low, as with many well established companies in the stock market. Obviously the pizza shop is unlikely to have hidden financial landmines like some companies, but there are a lot of listed companies which are very unlikely to have anything of the sort either. Thing is, if I the price of some of my hometown's well established pizza companies had dropped by half in the last few months, I would be very interested to know, and one might suspect that it would be a great opportunity to buy it regardless of a coming recession or not. Now how does this exactly translate into the stock market opportunities of today? Not sure, clearly a lot of listed companies will have uncertainties far harder to understand that those of my local pizza haunt. But you would have to imagine that some battered down listed companies would be compelling in the same manner as my theoretical pizza-shop-at-half-price. At the very least this all makes me want call a local business broker for some pricing... I wonder if the cost of many small businesses has fallen substantially. Perhaps the best investments for all of us might be right around the corner.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/have-pizza-shop.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dryships, The Saga Continues</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/415742364/dryships-the-sa.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/dryships-the-sa.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56757189</id>
        <published>2008-10-09T08:34:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-09T08:34:42-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Apologies for those who find the subject of Dryships, well, rather dry. This is a follow on from the post "Never Enough Lessons on Forward PE". I basically added a comment on seeking alpha explaining what one starting point might...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Vincent Fernando</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Transportation" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Apologies for those who find the subject of Dryships, well, rather dry. This is a follow on from the post <a href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/never-enough-le.html">"Never Enough Lessons on Forward PE"</a>. I basically added a comment on seeking alpha explaining what one starting point might be for valuing a highly cyclical, asset-heavy company like Dryships, and wanted to include it here at The Stalwart.</p>

<blockquote>As for how might someone value dryships? Well let's think as if one were actually in the industry looking to expand your fleet. An industry player can either buy ships in the market or buy a company that owns ships. If you get far more ships for your buck buying DRYS than buying int he market, then I think that's a decent starting point, but we must be very careful since even dry bulk (and rig) asset prices can fluctuate quite substantially. Thinking from an industry buyer perspective would be simply thinking about the value of a dry bulk company as the actual players in the industry do. I promise you they don't forecast 1 year of earnings and then calculate a multiple. Wall street analysts frequently do, and companies put simple multiples in their investor presentations, but trust me actual shipping players don't make decisions like this. DRYS has rigs and bulk vessels, plus perhaps some additional value from its organization and customer relationships. But you would probably want to be getting DRYS at a price where you were getting its assets at a good discount to market prices, as this would give you some cushion. (these asset prices can fall, so good to have a margin of safety). Just don't forget that DRYS has a lot of debt, so you would want your adjusted NAV (adjusted to include a margin of safety vs. asset price declines) to be much higher than Enterprise Value (not market cap).</blockquote>

<p>Again, I have never owned Dryships nor have been long or short the stock in any manner.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/dryships-the-sa.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Liveblog!!</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/414256708/liveblog.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/liveblog.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2008-10-07T20:50:30-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56689829</id>
        <published>2008-10-07T19:31:07-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T19:31:16-04:00</updated>
        <summary>We're doing it again! We'll be starting around 8:45.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Politics" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We're doing it again! We'll be starting around 8:45.<br />
<iframe src="http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=17890ace89/height=550/width=470" scrolling="no" height="550px" width="470px" frameBorder="0" /><br />
</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/liveblog.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>A Truly Touching Union Of Red And Blue State Politicians</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/414211220/a-truly-touchin.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/a-truly-touchin.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56687247</id>
        <published>2008-10-07T18:13:34-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T18:13:57-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Bloomberg has the good word: Alabama Governor Bob Riley sought out New York Governor David Paterson to help broker a solution to a sewer debt crisis that has pushed the state's most populous county to the brink of bankruptcy. Riley,...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=ao5qj37kD_.A&amp;refer=home"&gt;Bloomberg&lt;/a&gt; has the good word:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Alabama Governor Bob Riley sought out New York Governor David Paterson to help broker a solution to a sewer debt crisis that has pushed the state's most populous county to the brink of bankruptcy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Riley, a Republican, called Paterson, a Democrat, because New York regulates bond insurers who guarantee $2.8 billion of the county's $3.2 billion of sewer debt, said New York State Insurance Superintendent Eric Dinallo. After a series of meetings set up by New York insurance regulators, banks and bond insures agreed to contribute $1 billion to a refinancing plan.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/a-truly-touchin.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Never Enough Lessons on Forward PE</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/414209322/never-enough-le.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/never-enough-le.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56687159</id>
        <published>2008-10-07T18:10:26-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T18:12:39-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Never enough lessons on forward PE, especially for cyclicals. Today dry bulk shipper Dryships hit an all-time low of US$21.8, down from a peak of US$120, and down from the US$64 back when Barron's called the Buy on the stock....</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Vincent Fernando</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Transportation" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Never enough lessons on forward PE, especially for <em>cyclicals</em>. Today dry bulk shipper Dryships hit an all-time low of US$21.8, down from a peak of US$120, and down from the US$64 back when Barron's called the Buy on the stock. Everyone is wrong at times, and being wrong for decent reasons is fine. But in a previous post in April, we outlined that we mostly took issue with Barron's completely missing some of the most important issues with dry bulk commodities transportation stocks such as DRYS and worst of all arguing for the stock given a very low forward PE, which was completely ridiculous given that the bulk shipping industry is prone to earnings swings of +/-80% within short, unforeseeable periods of time. The below was <a href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/04/arbitraging-bar.html#comments">our previous excerpt</a> from Barron's:</p>

<blockquote>Global trade might slow this year, but it will come back eventually, and DryShips' profits -- and shares -- should move up over the long term, even if 2008 growth turns out to be lower than Wall Street expects. At its recent quote of 64, DryShips stock was trading at a price/earnings ratio of 3.5 times consensus analyst earnings estimates of $18.18 a share this year and about 5 times the $12.22 forecast for 2009. DryShips also trades at a more than 50% discount to its peers, although rivals generally seek long-term contracts, which are less volatile. </blockquote>

<p>And then our <a href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/04/watch-those-for.html">following criticism</a>.</p>

<blockquote>This article fails to mention that dry bulk spot rates are extremely volatile and forecasting where they will go is subject to massive room for estimation error, even for industry veterans. Thus forward PE can be very deceptive and is a silly way to look at the companies. Last year Clarksons research surveyed a large collection of readers to forecast where rates would go in 2007 and EVERYONE was wrong by a large margin. (they spiked massively) They can also spike massively downward in the same fashion... If forward earnings ends up being 80% lower, which historically isn't a crazy notion at all if you look at a rate chart, your PE will be 5x what you thought it was. Thus using forward PE is pretty silly given its forecast error range is so wide as to be near meaningless.</blockquote>

<p>Well this post came under some fire from commenters on Seeking Alpha for either a) being written by an author looking to push the stock down (we wish we had that level of influence on The Stalwart) or b) not understanding that without earnings forecasts and resulting forward PE's, then there wasn't a way to make an investment case:</p>

<blockquote>If you think "... using forward PE is pretty silly given its forecast error range is so wide as to be near meaningless" then you must think there is no meaningful way for an analyst that follows DRYS to do his job (to forecast earnings). THAT'S silly.</blockquote>

<p>There are many tools for analyzing a company beyond just forecasting its next year's income. And for highly cyclical ones with little visibility forward earnings barely deserves to ever a tool, and is usually much more dangerous than useful. </p>

<p>DRYS is now at US$24, down massively due to, well, the fact that the Baltic Dry Index, which is an index for bulk shipping rates, has fallen from a peak of 11,500 just earlier this year to below 3,000 currently, for a 74% decline in just a few months. The rates for DRYS bulk ships have fallen in a roughly similar fashion. This dramatically changes the earnings forecasts of analysts across the board for 2009 and onward, though even these new earnings forecasts remain rubbish given the fact that rates are so volatile and for the most part"unforecastable" for dry bulk shipping. They could cut their earnings drastically, only to see a surprise rate rally in 2H09. Dryships 2009 earnings forecasts have dropped 25% already, though this to me looks timid given the drop in rates seen. DRYS is now at a 2009 PE of 2x, but again, if the current rate situation were fully reflected in analyst numbers would have to come down substantially further, as much as to say make the PE 15x or worse.</p>

<p>Now maybe DRYS is decent here, I haven't done a full analysis of the company's assets (at US$24 maybe the scrap value of its fleet could be enough to argue for value, potentially), nor intend to in this space. But the point is more about using forward earnings as a justification rather than whether buying DRYS at $64 was correct or not. At the very least, the Dryships debacle is another great example of forward PE's being undependable for this industry and many cycical industries. What's even more shocking is that some top-tier transport analysts use forward PE's when arguing for these types of stocks and some fund managers don't bat an eyelid upon hearing such justifications. Highly cyclical companies with low earnings visibility = companies where forward (forecast) PE is essentially meaningless.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/never-enough-le.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Instead of Shooting the Messenger, Maybe We Should Listen to Him</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/414085250/instead-of-shoo.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/instead-of-shoo.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56675201</id>
        <published>2008-10-07T15:28:21-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T15:30:51-04:00</updated>
        <summary>Short sale bans have been implemented across the world, yet oddly most stocks across the world have continued to fall... strange. We suspect that perhaps stocks fall because they aren't worth as much as they used to. Or at least...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Vincent Fernando</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Internet" />
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Short sale bans have been implemented across the world, yet oddly most stocks across the world have continued to fall... strange. We suspect that perhaps stocks fall because they aren't worth as much as they used to. Or at least that there is serious risk/uncertainty that they won't be. Thus maybe rather than ban short sellers, perhaps we should be asking them for more detail on WHY they are selling various companies short... we might learn something from these evil market participants.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Pershing Square manager, and professional short-seller, William Ackman makes this point below, having this to say about the SEC banning short sales:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;One regulator, which Ackman believes has not done the right thing, is the SEC. He criticized its temporary ban on the short selling of financial stocks and a handful of other troubled companies, saying it did "more to destroy investor confidence than any other action taken by the SEC in the past five months." He called the move a "market manipulation at the behest of the SEC." He went even further to say that the SEC would be best to ask the short sellers which companies they are targeting to help sound the alarms on shaky companies. 

&lt;p&gt;"People that identified problems should be heralded or at least listened to," he added.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The activist investor also divulged his new long investments, Wachovia Corp. and American International Group Inc. He noted that the two embattled company's are his first financial sector long investments in five years. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree, short sellers like Ackman probably have a lot of things to say about what problems might arise next. Perhaps we shouldn't take away their incentive to spot landmines. Some short-selling on US housing prices (let's just imagine) three years ago might have reduced the extent of the bubble and the damage it caused. It's better to learn of problems bit by bit before everything explodes, rather than get sudden huge surprises from banks once they can no longer hide the damage. Banning short sales in the belief that it will cure market malaise is similar to banning doctors who provide negative diagnoses to their patients and thinking that somehow this will cure cancer or at least lessen the damaging effects of disease. We can run wild with similes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Article link &lt;a href="http://www.thedeal.com/dealscape/2008/10/ackman_wants_to_be_heralded_fo.php"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; but requires subscription to TheDeal.com.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/instead-of-shoo.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Tonight's Town Hall Debate</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/413868731/tonights-town-h.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/tonights-town-h.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2008-10-08T20:25:02-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56661677</id>
        <published>2008-10-07T10:44:47-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T10:47:56-04:00</updated>
        <summary>We plan to liveblog tonight's "town hall" debate, cause we had such a fun time doing it last week. I won't hazard a guess on who will win the debate, but I can predict who'll lose -- the audience/the American...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Politics" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>We plan to liveblog tonight's "town hall" debate, cause we had such a fun time <a href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/veep-debate-liv.html">doing it last week</a>. I won't hazard a guess on who will win the debate, but I can predict who'll lose -- the audience/the American people. </p>

<p>Nothing is more embarrassing than these "undecideds" asking "earnest" questions of the candidates. The naivety, the populism, the belief that their hopes and dreams somehow lie in who gets elected to political office. (see: The YouTube debates)</p>

<p>In the end, the audience will help enforce the worst insult you can make about Americans: that they deserve the politicians they get.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/tonights-town-h.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Internet Blogger Guy: Dow To "Test" 8,000</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/413236499/internet-blogge.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/internet-blogge.html" thr:count="5" thr:updated="2008-10-11T02:23:05-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56636087</id>
        <published>2008-10-06T19:16:35-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-06T19:20:21-04:00</updated>
        <summary>After a day of doing absolutely zilch, I spent some time clicking around tech blogs, and was amused to find a post from Robert Scoble artfully titled We’re in a death spiral, referring to the crumbling economy. (If you don't...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="html" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thestalwart.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2008/10/06/scobleizer_2.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href, '_blank', 'width=130,height=84,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"&gt;&lt;img alt="Scobleizer_2" title="Scobleizer_2" src="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/images/2008/10/06/scobleizer_2.jpg" width="130" height="84" border="0" style="float: right; margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;After a day of doing absolutely zilch, I spent some time clicking around tech blogs, and was amused to find a post from Robert Scoble artfully titled &lt;a title="Scobleizer — Tech geek blogger  » Blog Archive  We’re in a death spiral «" href="http://scobleizer.com/2008/10/06/were-in-a-death-spiral/"&gt;We’re in a death spiral&lt;/a&gt;, referring to the crumbling economy. (If you don't already know who Scoble is, then lucky you). Anyway, this was the part that caught my eye:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote cite="http://scobleizer.com/2008/10/06/were-in-a-death-spiral/"&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where do you see the market hitting bottom? I think we’ll test 8,000 by end of the year (some people say probably by the end of the week if it keeps going down line this).&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Nope, I don't care that some yacker on the internet is predicting Dow 8,000. But what strikes me is the use of the word "test". That's pure CNBC-speak and in this case it's just meaningless gibberish. Unless you're actually referring to a meaningful technical level or a period (example: testing the 2003 lows), it's a ridiculous word to use.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Now I'm not making a semantic argument, but a larger observation: It's said that in a bull market, everyone fashions themselves a market expert. I think we're seeing the same in this scary dive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/internet-blogge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Why You Should Give McCain Some Credit On Healthcare</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/412032019/why-you-should.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/why-you-should.html" thr:count="9" thr:updated="2008-10-07T00:21:13-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56576011</id>
        <published>2008-10-05T13:14:05-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-05T13:40:36-04:00</updated>
        <summary>If you're an entrepreneur, freelance whatever, writer, blogger, young, whateverer, you should take a minute to consider the appeal of McCain's healthcare proposal. McCain wants to eliminate tax deductions for worker-sponsored health insurance, and then offer a tax break for...</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>If you're an entrepreneur, freelance whatever, writer, blogger, young, whateverer, you should take a minute to consider the appeal of McCain's healthcare proposal. McCain wants to eliminate tax deductions for worker-sponsored health insurance, and then offer a tax break for one's own health care expenditures. Obama has called that a tax hike, and it seems that slamming McCain's health insurance plan will be a <a href="http://marcambinder.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/the_deadly_final_attack.php">key part of his closing argument</a>.</p>

<p>But you should stop and think what this is all about: It's about unmooring healthcare and stable employment. For a lot of folks, employee-sponsored health insurance is a key aspect of career choices. Because it's so difficult to buy health care on the open market, a steady boring job at a large firm is a necessity -- you might want to drop out of that, do a startup, be a filmmaker, an artist, travel for 6 months, etc., but if having healthcare is critical (for me it's pretty important), then you really don't have that luxury or flexibility.</p>

<p>There's really no reason that health insurance and employment need to go together, either. The whole notion (I believe) was started in WWII, when there were price controls. Large employers wanted a way to pay their employees more, so government offered them a loophole (surprise!): Save on taxes by making part of their compensation be health insurance. Also not surprisingly, that wrinkle in the tax law stuck around. Over time, the effect has been to crowd out the health insurance open market for individuals.</p>

<p>Now for a quick econ lesson: If your employer stops offering you health insurance, <a href="http://rossdouthat.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/10/the_missing_7000.php">it won't reduce the value of your total compensation</a>. It just means that the (say) $6000/year that goes to health insurance will go to your actual salary. Another perspective: If you're an employer, you don't really care what mix you compensate employees in, you just know that you'll allocate, say, $85,000 per year in some mix of cash, insurance, payroll taxes, 401(k) contributions etc.</p>

<p>Again, I'd suggest that for a lot of people who might be peers of mine, this type of scheme (and the job flexibility this allows) should be appealing to them. And overall, if you think (like I do) that promoting entrepreneurship and worker mobility is vital for the economy, this is a key part of making that happen.</p>

<p><b>Of course</b>: Obama supporters will wish this away, and say Obama is promoting some form of universal health care coverage, making this irrelevant. Perhaps. But realistically, this isn't likely to go through, especially with our current budget difficulties. And even if you do think Obama's vision is realistic, it's still not very helpful to frame McCain's proposal as a tax increase. It's a good idea, as he's hit upon a key structural flaw in our healthcare system</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/why-you-should.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>WaPo On The "Fiscal" Crisis</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheStalwart/~3/411895440/wapo-on-the-fis.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/wapo-on-the-fis.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2008-10-06T17:21:32-04:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-56569747</id>
        <published>2008-10-05T09:28:18-04:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-05T09:28:32-04:00</updated>
        <summary>John McCain deserves a pass for insisting that we face a "fiscal" crisis, since even our fine newspapers don't know the difference. U.S. Fiscal Crisis Seems to Have Altered Political Map: McCain's Challenge Is Underscored by Pullout From Mich.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Joseph Weisenthal</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Economy" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" xml:base="http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>John McCain deserves a pass for insisting that we face a "fiscal" crisis, since even our  <a title="U.S. Fiscal Crisis Seems to Have Altered Political Map - washingtonpost.com" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/04/AR2008100402135.html">fine newspapers</a> don't know the difference.<br />
<blockquote><strong>U.S. Fiscal Crisis Seems to Have Altered Political Map</strong>:<br />
McCain's Challenge Is Underscored by Pullout From Mich.</blockquote><br />
</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://www.thestalwart.com/the_stalwart/2008/10/wapo-on-the-fis.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed>
