The Third Dimension.

Jones’ Malicious Intentions and Responsibilities of American Government.

2010-09-28T18:29:00.001+02:00

Jones’ Malicious Intentions and Responsibilities of American Government.

America, the land of immigrants, in these days witnessing a widening rift between its dominant Christian and minority Muslim population, which is neither good for the country nor is beneficial for the rest of the world. The construction of Cordoba House, a mosque and community center in New York City to promote interfaith understanding, has become a controversial project and is unlikely to be completed on its original site. On the other hand, Terry Jones, pastor at The Dove Outreach Center in Florida, has added fuel to fire by inviting Christians to burn Quran on September 11 to commemorate victims of 9/11 terror attacks.

Terry Jones - with 50 members in his church - has never been a popular figure and is notorious for his anti-Islamic and anti-gay rights rhetoric. He has authored a book titled "Islam is of the devil" and his church sells coffee mugs and shirts featuring this phrase. His church is hosting an event on September 11 to remember the 9/11 victims by burning the copies of Quran from 0600 p.m. to 0900 p.m. Previously he has been failed to get public attention but his latest move has attracted thousands of fans, along with critics, at Facebook and he has done interviews with more than 150 media outlets of the world. In addition to his website, he is using Youtube as well to spread his message across the world, which may provoke reactions and, in worst scenario, riots in many countries.

Jones' move to commemorate 9/11 victims is a nastiest case of using scare tactics and negativity bias to gain popularity and recognition in mass media. Some American politicians has been using the same tools of aversion to move their ratings up and lure conservative voters. Ron McNeil, a candidate for congress, told a group of students last week that Islam’s plan "is to destroy our way of life". Earlier this year, in March, In March, for example, Allen West, a retired Army officer running for Congress in, told a group of supporters that "Islam is not a religion" but rather "a vicious enemy" that was "infiltrating" the United States. (A campaign spokesman said last week that Mr. West meant to refer to radical Islam, not Islam generally.) Such campaigning may attract some voters but they also have a great potential to inspire some new terrorists.
Terrorists might have used - better to say misused - the name of Islam to launch their terror activities in the United States and Western world. It does not mean that, however, Islam encourages its followers to kill every infidel on the earth by the way of terrorism as it is represented by a handful of politicians and religious leaders. It will be anything but a worst instance of focalism and confirmatory bias if a Muslim declares that Christianity teaches massacre of Jews since most of the Nazis were Christians. It will be a grave mistake to consider holocaust, in which lots of Jews were ruthlessly killed, as a Christian terrorism. Why do we not take Islam in the same manner? Indeed, supposed terrorists of 9/11 were Muslims but it will be a great mistake to take it as Islamic terrorism. Unfortunately, American minds have established an association of Islam with terrorism. Individuals like Jones further empower this association by the misrepresentation of selected and out of context Quranic verses and Islamic teachings, for personal interests. Such malicious practices, in reality, equal strengthening the terrorists, with whom American government and NATO are at war.

Anti-Islamic rhetoric may win politicians and religious leaders instant popularity but they must be cautious that it may be taken as War on Islam outside the United States. As it is evident from the controversy and debate on construction of Cordoba House, many Americans take Islam as a violent and dangerous political ideology with the main objective of destroying Western way of life. Airing such beliefs may cause collision between Christianity and Islam; something which rests at the top of terrorists' wish list. It will make it easier for them to motivate people from inside America and Europe.

Nine years long multi-dimensional war on terror, lead by the United States, has weaken Al-Qaida and extremists organizations, which are becoming increasingly disliked among ordinary Muslims. Militant organizations are finding it hard to attract new recruits for carrying out operations on Western lands. Some reports even suggest that such organization are using internet and social media to lure those who are already living in Europe and America. Take the example of Nidal Malik Hasan, American born Muslim of Palestinian descent. He was serving as U.S. Army psychiatrist at a time when he killed 13 people and wounded 30 others in a shooting spree at Ford Hood Texas. Investigation before and after the shooting discovered email communication between Hasan and Anwar Al-Awlaki, senior Al-Qaeda recruiter and motivator. Al-Awlaki is also considered to inspire the Christmas 2009 airline bombing attempt and the Times Square bombing using internet. Labeling Islam as a terrorist ideology will not be of any help to dry up sources for inspiration to lure the youth from inside Europe and America.

Al-Qaida recruiters and motivators, like Anwar Al-Awlaki, are always in dire need of such events to lure their recruits. If copies of Quran are burnt in the United States then people like Al-Awlaki - no one must have any doubt - certainly will project it as an American war on Islam. His comrades in many mosques across Muslim World will project in such a way which will make listeners believe that Islam is under attack. Put simply, the act of burning the Quran will sow seeds of animosity, revenge and hate in many minds, which will not serve a noble purpose. If people like Al-Awlaki are considered terrorists because they motivate people for acts of terrorism then what should we call people like Jones who provides source of inspiration for people like Al-Awlaki?

It is the responsibility of Christians to denounce and condemn Jones for his malicious plan to burn copies of Quran on September 11 who has shown a great insensitivity towards those Christians who are living in countries where they are outnumbered by Muslims. This event, if happens, will certainly a great amount of spread rage and anger across Muslim world, which may endanger the lives and properties of millions of innocent Christians. This event also have the potential to provoke riots in the Christian world where Muslims live as a minority. Jones' invitation to burn Quran at his church ignores the feelings of more than a billion Muslims then it also insensitive of the troubles and difficulties for Christian population across the world.

In our world today, goods, services, people and ideas move at fastest speed than at any point in our entire human history. Revolution in communication and internet technologies has made the transmission of the news in real time across the globe. This calls for a more responsible and tolerant behavior from our politicians and religious leaders. Jones' invitation to burn copies of Quran on September in no way will help to promote interfaith understanding and coexistence of different communities. Rather it will lead towards the polarization and collision of different civilizations. We, as a citizens of the modern world, must never allow handful of religious fanatics and opportunists to promoted hatred. Rather, in a world equipped with nukes and weapons of mass destruction, our religious leaders and scholars must engage in a dialogue to promote interfaith understanding and making co-existence of different religions possible.

Let us hope that American government and people will understand their responsibilities and will stop this event from happening.

(Written on September 5, but published on a later date)

Indian Attrocities in Kashmir and Pakistan

2010-09-24T22:57:00.001+02:00

کشمیر میں بھارتی مظالم اور پاکستان کی مجرمانہ خاموشی

کشمیر کی سر سبز وادیوں میں جدوجہد آزادی کی آگ ایک بار پھر بھڑک اٹھی ہے ۔ اس آگ کی تپش سے نئی دہلی میں راجیہ سبھا کے ایوان لرز اٹھے ہیں مگر اسلام آباد میں بیٹھے ہوئے پالیسی سازوں کے پتھر دل نہیں پگھلے ۔

کشمیر میں تشدد کی حالیہ لہر میں جون سے لے کر اب تک 110 سے زائد افراد شہید ہو چکے ہیں ۔ کشمیر کے بچے ، عورتیں ، بوڑھے اور نوجوان بھارتی افواج پر پتھر پھینک رہے ہیں اور آزادی کے نعرے لگا رہے ہیں ۔ پاکستان کے وزیر اعظم یوسف رضا گیلانی نے پاکستانی میڈیا کو ، جو پہلے ہی کشمیر میں بھارتی مظالم پر آنکھیں بند کیے بیٹھا ہے ، محتاط رپورٹنگ کی ہدایت کی ہے ۔ محتاط رپورٹنگ کا مطلب اس کے سوا اور کیا ہو سکتا ہے کہ پاکستانی اخبارات اور ٹیلی وژن چینلز اپنے فرائض کی انجام دہی میں دانستہ غفلت کا مرتکب ہوں اور کشمیر سے لا تعلقی کا عملی اظہار کریں۔

وزیر اعظم پاکستان کو یہ نہیں بھولنا چاہیے کہ 32 ہزار سہاگنوں نے اپنے سہاگ پاکستان سے الحاق کے خواب کی تعبیر دینے کی کوشش میں گنوا دئیے۔ ایک لاکھ بچے محض اس لئے یتیم ہوئے کہ ان کے والدین نے اپنے بچوں کا مستقبل پاکستان کے ساتھ دیکھا تھا ۔ وزیر اعظم پاکستان کو یہ نہیں بھولنا چاہیے کہ قائد اعظم نے کشمیر کو پاکستان کی شہہ رگ قرار دیا تھا ۔

امید کی جانی چاہیے کہ حکومت پاکستان اور پاکستانی میڈیا کشمیریوں کی جدوجہد آزادی میں سفارتی اور اخلاقی امداد کے لیے کوئی کسر اٹھا نہیں رکھے گی۔

Silicon Valley, the Battlefield of World War-III.

2010-04-27T14:03:00.005+02:00

World War-III has just broken out. The battlefield, however, is neither Afghanistan nor Iraq. It is Silicon Valley. Facebook, the world's largest social network, and Google, are the adversaries. Google, the search engine giant, has ruled on the web as unchallenged king. The war may end with one gaining supremacy, or the web may emerge as a bipolar world.

At the long-awaited F8 conference, Facebook showed up with a series of products to help the company dominate the virtual world. These tools will help users to allow friends to follow in their footsteps. Put practically, it will further increase users' time on Facebook, and will introduce a new approach to surfing on the web. Indeed, "the web was at a turning point," said Mark Zuckerberg, founder of Facebook.

At the F8 conference Mr.Zuckerberg unveiled a variety of products which will put users and their friends at the "centre of the web," and revolutionize the way businesses use the web to gauge consumers' preferences. Just take the so-called "like" button. One will simply click the "like" button, and it will help the company to know who liked what. Friends will also come to know what people liked on the web. With the passage of time, the "like" button will introduce a new approach to searching.

People might find it easier to follow the footsteps of others instead of making their own search. Thus, Facebook, in possession of hard-to-resist business intelligence, will find itself among businesses, advertisers, publishers, marketers and users. It will not only let the company know who liked it, but will also enable the company to send future updates to them. In addition, it will help their friends know what they liked, and some of them would definitely like this product page again.

The new range of Facebook products has lots of up-sides for business. It also means that companies will have more powers, while tailoring the products for users, and they will be in a better position to target their advertisements. Probably one day we will be unable to resist products simply because companies will design them according to our tastes!

Google is not unaware of the threat. Google Buzz was an effort to imitate Facebook and to draw users back from the "king of social networking." Google Buzz was rolled into Gmail to take advantage of a large email users base. However, it seems that its destiny will be similar to that of Orkut, Google's social networking site, and in the area of social networking, Facebook will continue to rule unchallenged.

Google has a history of changing traditional business models and crushing whatever stands in its way. Facebook is set to repeat history, but will it be able to outsmart Google? Whoever you are with, in this WW-III, will decide the victor.

A blog by Qasir M. Chaudhry
http://www.qasir.co.nr/

What Could Be The Right Name For NWFP; Khyber-Pakhtoonkhwa or Hazara-Pakhtoonkhwa?

2010-04-21T17:25:00.001+02:00

The Islamic Republic of Pakistan, kept hostage by plunderers, looters and burglars, in the disguise of Bhuttos, Zardaris, Sharifs, Chaudhris, Pirs, Feudal lords, and Shahs, finds a new challenge added to its long list of problems and impediments. If we remember Z. A. Bhutto because he gave the nation an agreed-upon constitution, and then immediately raped this chaste constitution, then his son-in-law will be remembered for creating new provinces within Pakistan. When the ruling party is headed by Asif Ali Zardari, and the main opposition party is chaired by Nawaz Sharif, catastrophies fall into the category of "likely-to-happen." What worries me is not the number of provinces at the end of the Zardari-Raj, but if my country would still be Pakistan?

The other day, violent demonstrations and protests in Abottabad over the issue of renaming N.W.F.P as Khyber-Pakhtoonkhawa, left nine people dead, and more than a hundred sustained injuries during the draconion baton charging and use of tear gas by police. Previously it was simply the matter of renaming the province, and the real challenge was to suggest a suitable name for the territory, but now it is a different kettle of fish. Now the people of Hazara are demanding a separate province of their own as Hazara province. Mian Nawaz Sharif, the civil dictator of PML-N, has justified this by saying "The demand of a separate province by Hazara people is not out of place." May one hope that Mr. Sharif would have come up with the same response if someone from Central and Southern Punjab had demanded a separate province?

There is nothing wrong with renaming the province, but the choice of name must be based on a solid reason and principle. If we allow the renaming of the province on the lingual and ethnic basis then it will be the beginning of an unending process. From North to South, Pakistan is brimming over with many ethnicities, and many languages are spoken. How many provinces can a country riddled with the corruption of politicians and generals afford?

The demands for the renaming of the province are neither new nor baseless. The current name of the province, North West Frontier Province, is not a name itself, rather it is a description of the region's location. It must be given a name, a name which is in accordance with the history and culture of the region. Pakhtoonkhawa has already been discussed and the leadership is well aware of the sentiments of the people. Therefore, they must either come up with a new and agreed-upon name, or simply postpone this issue until a suitable name surfaces. Our good-for-nothing politicians have opted for the other approach. They have let the genie out of the bottle.

Already in ICU, the government finds itself stuck in a difficult situation as it cannot take the decision back. If it does, then the supporters of Pakhtoonkhawa will be on the roads, and if it creates another province as Hazara province, then soon there will be demands for new provinces all across Pakistan. Can we sustain such demands? If the government is sincere about the well-being and political stability of the country, then there is no option other than to review the name of N.W.F.P. As blame- game and political point scoring is hot in the air, Ch. Shujaat Hussain, head of PML-Q, has come up with a new suggestion. According to him, since Khyber-Pakhtoonkhawa ignores the identity of the Hazara people, a new name with little change, Hazara-Pakhtoonkhawa can be acceptable to all parties, but there are some people in the N.W.F.P government who insist they will not review their decision to rename the province.

To review the decision of renaming N.W.F.P would be easier, and in the best interest of the nation, than to create a new province Hazara, which would give logical and moral support to those who are demanding provinces on ethnic and lingual grounds. Apparently the issue in question is simply about renaming a province, but the reality is otherwise. We are about to set standards which will decide how territorial changes would be made in the future.

Since the bill is still in the senate and has not been passed yet, it is easy at the moment to come up with satisfactory changes to it, but the current government, along with its friendly opposition, has a history of raising troubles then ridiculously trying to solve them. Therefore, it seems to be against all hope that the current bunch of zombies will show up with a satisfactory solution!

Would Sania-Shoaib union bring their countries closer or widen the rift?

2010-04-06T19:12:00.000+02:00

Had Fatima Bhutto, the granddaughter of former President, Prime Minister and Chief Martial Law Administrator or Pakistan, enough like-minded people on both sides of the borders the relations of the two countries were on the smooth trajectory. But, unfortunately it is not the case. The marriage between Shoaib Malik and Sania Mirza has ceased to be a personal matter. Some Indians are trying to make it as a matter of shame of the so called democracy!

Vice president of BJP, an extremist Hindu organization which played a major role in the demolition of Babri Mosque, has advised, or warned, Sania Mirza to review his decision to marry Shoaib Malik, a cricket hero from Pakistan, according to BBC. To marry is a basic human right, but it is not easy for Hindu politicians to grant this right to a woman only because she wants to marry with a Pakistan man.

Such is a state of hostility between the two countries that even after six decades of independence, both countries are failed to normalize their relations. While the rest of the world is planning to overtake the global stage, these two countries, home to a big slice of the global population, are waiting for the day when they will be able to use their nukes to annihilate each other.

Reaction from leaders of Muslim community are also not very different hence the motives are. According to BBC, Qalab Sadaq, the vice president of Indian Personal Muslim Law Board, opposed the marriage fearing that it will leave an impact that the hearts of Indian Muslims beat for Pakistan. Does it not make it clear that Indian Muslims are forced not to call a spade a spade but to say something against Pakistan and Pakistani people to certify their patriotism. Does it not put the true face of Indian democracy into light ?

“People to people contact can build bridges between India and Pakistan”, believes Fatima Bhutto, according to Outlook India. However, in case of these two neighboring countries, it can even widen the rift. To remove differences and become friendly, people of both countries, specially Indians, will need to change their attitudes.

The marriage between Sania and Shoaib, if it happens amid all of legal problems and political rhetoric, will also uncover the degree Indian people believe in the values of democracy. There must be an increased level of people-to-people interaction between the two countries but even universal laws have a tendency to be proved wrong when one talks about Pak-India relations. For the moment, the marriage is an acid test of the democratic India. Let us wait for the results!

The Third Eye تیسری آنکھ: Pak-Us Strategic Dialogue and The Beginning of The New Era in Pak-Us relations!

2010-03-28T18:00:00.000+02:00

امریکہ اور پاکستان کے درمیان تعلقات کا نیا دور ۔ پاکستان کے لئے امریکہ بہادر کا تازہ ترین لولی پوپ
The Third Eye تیسری آنکھ: Pak-Us Strategic Dialogue and The Beginning of The New Era in Pak-Us relations!

DAWN.COM | International | The mysterious case of the grey lady of Bagram

2010-03-20T15:22:00.000+01:00

DAWN.COM | International | The mysterious case of the grey lady of Bagram

Jury Butchers The Justice To Death In New York

2010-02-05T17:45:00.001+01:00

A Jury of 12 members, comprised of 8 women and 4 men, held the arms and legs of ‘the justice’ in a court room of New York while honorable judge ran the cold steel machete on the throat of ‘the victim’, which was already weakened and attenuated by the inhuman tortures of the watchdogs of the partially blind law, during apprehension. In the history of law the decision will be remembered as a dark of iniquity!

MIT trained Neuroscientist Aafia Siddiqui was vanished, or kidnapped according to some, from her home town Karachi in 2003, with her children. No one knew her whereabouts until the evening of July 17, 2008 when members of Afghan police arrested her, along with a young boy, as a potential suicide bomber. When searched, the police found that she was carrying written instructions for creating ‘weapons involving biological materials’, description of U.S. military assets, and numerous unnamed chemicals. Her arrest took place before a crowd of witnesses near Ghazni’s main mosque in Afghanistan and later she was handed over to the American interrogation center, where she tried to kill soldiers of American Army. Later she was brought in New York to be tried in the court. Based on lots of assumptions and fabricated with imaginary details, the case became very controversial and an acid test for the U.S. judicial system.

Petra Bartosiewicz, New York based free lance writer and journalist, painstakingly investigated the story and her findings appeared in the Harper’s magazine of November 2009 under the title of ‘The Intelligence Factory; How America Makes Its Enemies Disappear’. She put the truth in nutshell, ‘when I first read the U.S. government’s complaint against Aafia Siddiqui, who is awaiting trial in a Brooklyn detention center on charges of attempting to murder a group of U.S. Army Officers and FBI Agents in Afghanistan, the case it described was so impossibly convoluted-and yet so absurdly incriminating-that I simply assumed she was innocent’. However, surprisingly, the jury found 100 pound and five feet woman convicted for all of seven counts. The decision has put the black stain on the face of American judiciary!

Although the jury convicted Dr. Aafia Siddiqui for the alleged charges however it did not make it clear where she had been for the five years between 2003 and 2008. She was vanished from Karachi and how she was able to get in Ghazni? If she had been working with Al-Qaida, then why we are not told that when and where she had been working for the terrorist organization. Where are her two missing children? Can we hope that 12 years old Mariam and 7 years old Suleiman are alive? Or have they been killed during detention by U.S. forces?

One also wonders if Aafia Sidiqui is simply used as a scapegoat to dictate Pakistani establishment, as she has become a symbol of independence and matter of honor in Pakistan among Pakistani masses. Since the tensions and differences between Pak-U.S. diplomatic relations are now open secret, has Aafia been punished for the mistakes and errors of Pakistani government?

Whatever the case is, one thing is above any doubt that the so called jury was influenced to issue such an unfair and unjust decision and to butcher the justice in the court room. Bible says; ‘whoever shuts his ears to the cry of the poor will also cry himself and not be heard. It is the joy for the just to do justice, but destruction will come to the workers of iniquity’.

Although, the cries of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui went unheard in the court room but surely they will not in the court of Lord.

What keeps politicians away from Waziristan ?

2009-10-26T19:32:00.002+01:00

General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, COAS of Pakistan Army, today visited South Waziristan where armed forces are carrying on an operation against Pakistani brethern of Afghan militants which have not been successfully controlled and completely eliminated, yet, by NATO and American forces together. During his visit, he asserted that success of war against terror hinges on Waziristan operation. He met the troops and commanding officers and praised their morale. However, I am waiting for the time when any senior member of political administration will visit the Wazirstan and will spend some of his "preciously useless" moments with the tigers of our armed forces.

Only history will decide that whether we are fighting a war of Pakistan or a foreign war has been imposed on us. However, armchair generals of our political brass must realize that now we are left only one way and that is to eliminate every germ of extremism. We, as a nation, don't have any other choice except a complete victory of Pak forces over internationally aided Talibans.

The operation against Talibans in Waziristan was an agreed upon decision of our civil and political leadership. Since, the decision has been made, all political parties must join their hands on this issues and envisage a comprehensive strategy to gain public support for the cause. Although, it is military which actually fights against enemy in the battle field, however it is also the fact that no army can not be successfull untill it is supported by its nation. In our particular case, bombs are exploding in every corner of the country and yet we could not decide whether Talibans are a strategic threat or strategic depth for the security of Pakistan? It seems likely to be true that there are some foreign elements in the disguise of Taliban who are fighting against Pak forces. Even if it is true then would any one tell the nation that whose responsibility it is to identify such elements and to deter the completion of their damned agenda?

Why is civil administration is not owning the operation? Indeed, Pakistan Army has a long and notorious history of military take overs and martial laws. But, it is not a suitable time to let army be alone! All leaders of political parties must visit the area, see the army officers and troops, meet the displaced residents and organize camps to solve out their problem. However, before owning army operation, our fattening politicians must also keep it in mind that by owning operation against Taliban they can angry those who own Talibans. Who owns Taliban? Every one knows the answer of this question except those for whom it really matters!

A blog by Qasir Chaudhry
(www.qasir.co.nr)

Nuditiy as the best policy against overwhelming terrorism in Pakistan.

2009-10-25T20:25:00.001+01:00

When the bomb of so called Talibans backfired on its nurturers in General Headquarters, Rawalpindi, I wondered what is going to be the immediate response of the civil administration except banning the ride of two persons on motorbike? Frankly, I could not come up with a satisfying answer!

After a couple of days, I read in the newspapers that ban is in practise and no one is allowed to drop his younger brother to his school before heading to his own office. Indeed, the civil administration was sure that now terrorists would not be able to continue their damning activities. It could have been an effective measure to forestall suicide attacks. However, suicide bombers don’t use motorcycles. They simply butt in and explode themselves. So, the administration must not be blamed and the terrorists should be requested to ride motorcycles so that our police can find them out.

Terrorist have used, better to say misued, motorcycles many times to commit terror activities. But, at the same time it is also true that motorbikes are not the only vehicle used by them. Infact, thanks to large sums recieved from world’s largest democracy, now they use cars and advanced telecommunication technologies. They have become expert in disguise. A person in Pakistan Army’s uniform may be Talib, or a lorry driver can be a suicide bomber, having his lorry filled with explosives and heading towards a pre-decided public building to wreck it with himself. Every thing is hidden in the layers of smoke and blood. Nudity, is the only way to remove all of these screens and to make every thing clear.

Pakistan is an islamic republic, though only in papers, and Islam prohibits nudity in public places. ostensibly, it will not be easier for the government to ban clothing on the citizens. However, it is the easiest step which our government can do to curb terrorism in its buds. Since, no one would be allowed to dress up, security agencies will easily spot the person wearing a suicide jacket. If in the new legislation, nudity is accompanied by a complete ban on any kind of vehicle, then, any terror activity will simply be impossible. On the other hand, after being the first islamic country to develope nuclear devices, Pakistan will be the first country practising “complete naturalism”. After a successfull implementation, there will be a considerable reduction in carbon emissions and the world will be forced to accept Pakistan as a leader in fight against excessive CO2. Indeed, this law is a key to the new hieghts and horizons.

This law may not be welcomed in all quarters. In the beginning, inflation-hit fragment of the population may extremly oppose the law. But, this will not be a problem for the government as niether the anger of populace has ever been a problem for the government nor their wills and wishes have been respected by the leadership. On the other side, elite class have long been trying to be out of clothes under the excuse of fashion. So, briefly speaking, to give a decisive blow to the Talibans and to prove the superiority of “bloody civilians” over generals our political administration is only one step away!

(A blog by Qasir Chaudhry)

Army GHQ under attack and ban on Double Swari

2009-10-12T19:51:00.008+02:00

Right from the moment when wandering sould of Musharraf found a room in the body of Son-in-Law of the east, people of Pakistan forgot that the word, "optimism" still exists in the dictionary. It has been made criminal for the common man to hope even for the hope of the good. If no one, except political saints and feudal pundits, hoped for the good he also did not imagine some self-declared Mujahidin-e-Islam nurtured and prought up by ISI, would ever dare to attack on the eyes and ears of Pak military, General Head Quarter, located in Saddar, Rawalpindi. But, unfortunately it happened and 6 men of special services group had to embrace martyrdom to clean the premesis from the terrorists. Do my nation have to psychologically and consciously ready to accept the happenening of impossiblities?

Indeed, it is important for the military brass, statesmen and the political leadership to know who dared to challenge the Pak Army. But, for me it is more important to know why these terrorists have been allowed to be successfull to attack on military's headquarters? Why this event were not stopped before happening? It was neither an easy job nor it was possible without inhouse leakouts! Had the eyes of those responsible for the security of the country been sleeping or they were assigned to spot the dark stains on political costume of the politicians? Punjab police says it had communicated with responsible state institutions about the alleged possibility of attack on GHQ. Did it mean any thing else except the complete failure of the agency which propped out IJI as its proud-production? Is some one out to ask Rehman Malik, federal minister for interior, does accusation of Indian involvement absolve you of not performing your duties successfully. India is our enemy and she did what she was supposed to. What have you done Mr. Interior Minister and do you have any idea of what to do next ? As far as Mr. Zardari is concerned, it is enough that he was in the country at the time of this tragic event.

If any one deserves appreciation, homage and praise then he is the officer incharge of the operation Janbaz to clear the security buidling and indeed the commandos of Special Services Group who operated quite effectively and successfully. These guys proved their mettle and professional excellence by completing operation in less than 24 hours. Thus, the master minds of this terroristic attack have not been able to blackmail the political and military leadership. It is worthy to remember it took almost 72 hours to Indian forces to clear the buildings off from terrorists in Mombay last year.

After the operation in Swat, the peformance of Pak Army has disappointed some quarters in the world. Some international powerplayers saw Pak Army professional weaker and operationally ineffective as it has a long history of being dragged in the mud of Pakistani politics. But, I hope now world is made to believe that when a Pakistani Army Chief says that we have the ability to tackle every danger, then he really means it.

Probably, this is the decisive moment for the future of terrorism. The defenders of ideological and geographical borders have made the nation believe that this land is being protected by iron-hand. But, I am wondering if in these moment would Zardari-Led government be able to do some thing else excepting banning "Double-swari"?

For the urdu translation of this blog, please visit,
http://qasir-chaudhry.blogspot.com/2009/10/attack-on-ghq-and-ban-on-doubling-on.html

Get updates

Attack on Pak Army Headquarters!

2009-10-10T20:46:00.003+02:00

It is the beginning of a new change indeed. Before the recent attack on General Headquarters (G.H.Q) of Pakistan Army, it has always been the G.H.Q. invading the Prime Minister House in Islamabad. It was probably because of the bad luck of Pakistani nation that G.H.Q.'s every move on Islamabad embraced success and certainly it is because of the lucky stars of Zardari-led, flour-searching nation that the militants were halted, fought and killed by the lions of the nation.

Alomst 6 to 10 militants ( as news reports vary on the exact number of attackers ) attacked Pakistan's military head quarter in Rawalpindi. Terrorist, dressed up in Army uniforms, attacked on the compound and started firing. However, unlike to such event in Mombay last year, the troops of Pak Army quickly came into action. Four militants were killed in the initial attack while the rest were made to be on defensive. The situation became, to some extent, under-control in one hour's time.

There are reports that Punjab Police informed all the concerned departments and agencies about this event on 15th July 2009. Although, the army troops fought bravely and they did not let terrorist successfull in their damned intentions, however, one wonders if there were reports about this attack what important national service our proud intelligence agencies have been performing as they could not stop this attack before happening? After this attack, does military establishment really wish the nation believe that political cell of ISI has been closed.

It is said that this attack is a response to the alleged preprations of Army offensive against Taliban and Al-Qayda remains in South Wazirstan. In the light of current wave of such activities in Pakistan, in next days we might face more deadly happenings. Our security agencies must keep their eyes open. On the other side, it is the dire need of the time to take a targeted operation against sick-headed militants hiding in Waziristan. No one be allowed the challenge the sovereignty of our nation!

For Urdu blogs, please visit http://www.qasir-chaudhry.blogspot.com/

Palestinians, Tamil Tigers and European animals are equal ?

2009-09-27T18:01:00.002+02:00

Would EU dare to punish Israel for the war crimes as she did to a Sri Lanka, a poor country of South Asia, for human rights violations during a war against Tamil Tigers?

EU decided to withdraw GSP Plus status when a report criticised the conduct of war and human rights abuses by Sri Lankan military during an operation against Tamil Tigers. Withdrawl of this status would remove tax-free access of Sri Lankan product in EU market. Now, we have to see what kind of measure EU will take when almost same allegations are surfaced against Israel in 3 weeks attack on Gaza, in which more than one thousand people were killed.

In a recent report issued by UN Human Rights Council, Israel is found guilty of war crimes in three weeks armed attack on Gaza which ended in the second week of this year. "Israel attacked to punish, humiliate and terrorize the civilian population, radically diminishing its local economic capacity, both to work and to provide for itself, and to force upon it an ever increasing sense of dependency and vulnerability" says the 575 page report.

During this war, Israel imposed blockade around Gaza to constitute collective punishment which was not limited to the Hamas fighters but was also extended to the children, women and elders. The brave Israeli military deliberately targeted factories, wells, schools, police stations, and other public buildings. There are numerous instances of deliberate attacks on unarmed civilians. Even hospitals were not spared leaving no safe place for the¨Palestinians people on their own land. The panel, lead by a South African Judge Richard Goldstone, also found the evidences of the use of white phosphorous, heavy metal weapons and flechettes - short, pointed and metal darts that are inappropriate in highly populated arias.

This report clearly explains that the Hamas was not the only target of the Israel. Rather, under the cover of operations against the Hamas fighters, the Israeli military destryed the infrastructure to make their lives as difficult as possible. Although, the world super powers of the world are used to ignore such shamefull acts of the state of Israel but probably it would also be hard for these super powers to allow Israel for a complete genocide of the muslim population of Gaza otherwise Israel might have done it.

It is very evident that untill Palestine issue is resolved, the dream to pacify the middle east can not be materialized. A couple of days ago, Barak Obama declared that we have talked too much to solve the Palestine issue now it is time to do some thing practical. Obama is not the first US leader who expressed his determination to resolve this issue peacefully. His predecessors Clinton and Bush had also expressed the same resolution in the different words. One wonders, if US really wants to resolve this issue then who else is there to stop? However, Obama is different from his predecessors in at least one way; he is not a white American!

I am not an expert on geopolitics, international realtions and conflict resolution. However, I do understand that it is not possible for the global rulers to put aside their double standards and treat the different fractions of the world population on equal basis and in the same way, but I would like to ask them only one question:
"May Palestinians enjoy those rights and freedoms which are excercised by Western European Animals "?

A blog by Qasir Chaudhry

Get updates

Can't you prefer national interests please?

2009-02-27T19:33:00.000+01:00

Supreme Court's decsion ends up the political-romance between the leadership of two major political parties in Pakistan. Indeed, the seperation of the 'couple' is as natural as it is in the case of partners lacking so called chemistry. However, the timing of seperation suggests that personal interests are not easier to surpass the national interests and necessary lessons are not learnt from the mistakes of the past. The hope we are not going to back in 90s seems against hope!

Although it is the Supreme Court of Pakistan which banned Sharif brothers from their elected offices but every one knows, as Nawaz Sharif accuses rightly, that courts in Pakistan have a history of being influenced by the governments. So, it is quite natural if most of the people take it as Zardari-influenced decision. One wonders that how could Mr. Zardari forget that the judicial-murder of Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and brutal assassination of his own wife Benazir Bhutto could not stop his never-thought-election as a President of Pakistan than how a simple court decision may put Sharifs out of the ring?

Seperations may provide a sigh of relief but not the sense of happiness and so is the case with the both parties. If Mr. Sharif complaints that he was disappointed with the promises unfulfilled then on the other side predictable political turmoil in the upcoming future certainly is not a good news for accidently-made President of Pakistan, Asif Ali Zardari. However, it is certainly not a bad news for all stake holders. The court's decision has injected a power dose into the veins of the lawyers' movement which is aimed at to restore the judges sacked by Musharraf and put the PML-Q back in political stream light. So, the country has been pregnant with political turmoil, horse-trading and social unrest in the times when US officials are formulating new strategy to curb terrorists and extremists in Afhanistan and federally administered tribal areas of Pakistan.

The distinct geographical location of Pakistan was our great strength but our greatest politician made it otherwise. Since, US is in do-or-die position in Afganistan, she is about to take final step to safeguard her interests. And, one must also remember that US is not the only stake holder in this area. So, if the political and social situation get worsenned and uncontrollable for the political leadership, then every stake holder would move forward in pursuance of his/her interests. I just have one question to each of our brilliant and talented politicians, can't you please prefer the national interests over personal interests for a while?

Welcome of the year 2009 at Chams Elysees

2009-01-31T13:57:00.004+01:00

یہ پیرس ہے ، دنیا کا خوبصورت ترین شہر اور انسانوں کا پرستان ِ بچپن میں پرستان کی کہانیا ں تو ہم سبھی سنتے ہیں لیکن مجھے آج تک کسی ایسے آدمی سے ملنے کا اعزاز حاصل نہیں ہوا جس نے کہانی کو حقیقت بنتے دیکھا ہو ِ کسی شخص کا یہ دعوی سامنے نہیں آیا کہ اس نے پرستان میں گھومتی پھرتی پریوں کے درشن کیے ہیں ِ چنانچہ ہوتا یہ ہے کہ پرستان کی فضاؤں میں اڑتی ہوئی پریوں کی تمنا عمر میں اضافے کے ساتھ ساتھ دم توڑتی جاتی ہے ِ پرستان کو تو میں نے بھی نہیں دیکھا لیکن پیرستان کو ضرور دیکھا ہے اور پیرستان کو دیکھنے کے بعد یہ کہنے کو جی کرتا ہے کہ اگر پرستان حسین ہو گا، مگر پیرستان سے زیادہ نہ ہو گا ِ پرستان کی فضائیں اگر پریوں کی خوشبو سے مہکتی ہیں تو پیرستان کی ہوا کے جھونکے گوریوں کی پوشاک کی پرفیوم چرانے سے باز نہیں آتیں ِ پرستان کی فضاؤں میں اگر پریاں اڑتی ہیں تو پیرستان کی گلیوں میں گوریاں اور کالیاں اس طرح ٹھمک ٹھمک کر چلتی ہیں کہ یہ پنجابی گیت یاد آ جاتا ہے
جتی چم دی مروڑا نیہوں چلدی، ٹور پنجابن دی
مطلب یہ کہ پنجابن کی چال ایسی ہے کہ چمڑے کی جوتی بھی پنجابن کی چال کا بل نہیں سہہ سکتی ِ پیرس کی جوتا ساز کمپنیاں گوریوں کی چال کے حساب سے جوتے بناتی ہیں اس لئے آج تک ہمارے پنجابی گیت کی طرح کوئی فرنچ گانا سامنے نہیں آیا ِ
ہمارے ہاں کہتے ہیں کہ جس نے لاہور نہیں دیکھا وہ پیدا ہی نہیں ہوا ِ طالب علمی کے زمانے کی بات ہے کہ میرا ایک اٹھارہ سالہ دوست صرف پیدا ہونے کے لئے لاہور گیا تھا ِ شکر کی بات ہے کہ کہنے والے نے پیدا ہونے کے لئے پیرس دیکھنے کی شرط نہیں لگائی ِ ورنہ ، کہنے والے کا تو کچھ نہ جاتا مگر ہماری اچھی خاصی آبادی پیدا ہونے سے محروم رہ جاتی ِ ہاں ، یہ اور بات ہے کہ پیرس قابل دید شہر ہے ِ یہاں ہر گلی میں تاریخ بکھری پڑی ہے ِ چپہ چپہ ماضی سے وابستہ ہے ِ لیکن صاحبو، پیرس میں نئے سال کو خوش آمدید کہنے کا اپنا ہی مزہ ہے ِ آپس کی بات ہے کہ آج یہ خاکسار اس رات کا رنگ چرانے اور مزے لوٹنے والا ہے ِ
سال 2008 کا سورج اپنی آخری ہچکی لے چکا ہے ِ ٹھیک 110 منٹ کے بعد 2008 ماضی کا حصہ بن جائے گا اور 2009 جنم لے گا ِ اس وقت جبکہ پیرستان کی گوریاں اور کالیاں نئے سال کو خوش آمدید کہنے کے لئے تیاریوں اور اپنے حسن کو تڑکا لگانے میں مصروف ہیں میں یہ سوچ سوچ کر ہلکان ہو جا رہا ہوں کہ نئے سال کا استقبال کرتی ہوئی پریوں کا نظارہ آئفل ٹاور سے کیا جائے یا شانزے لیزے کی شاہراہ پر ِ حال یہ ہے کہ شانزے لیزے کا دیو مالائی حسن اپنی طرف کھینچتا ہے تو آئفل ٹاور کا جادو اپنی طرف ِ لیکن یہ الجھن کسی حسینہ کی زلف کے پیچ کی طرح سلجھنے کا نام ہی نہیں لے رہی ِ آخر جیب سے ایک یورو کا سکہ نکالا ، ہوا میں اچھالا ، اور اس کے واپس میری ہتھیلی میں آنے کے ساتھ ہی فیصلہ ہو گیا ِ جی ہاں ، میں شانزے لیزے جا رہا ہوں ِ میں یہ بھی دیکھ رہا ہوں کہ عالم ارواح سے گستاو آئفل ٹاور کی گھورتی ہوئی آنکھیں یہ کہہ رہی ہیں کہ تم نے میری تخلیق آئفل ٹاور کو نظر انداز کر کے اچھا نہیں کیا ، اب میں بھی تمہارا سفرنامہ نہیں پڑھوں گا ِ مسٹر آئفل سے تو جو کہا سو کہا، لیکن آپ سے یہ کہنا چاہوں گا کہ آئفل ٹاور نہ جانے پہ پریشان نہ ہوں کیونکہ میں ہوں نا
اگر آپ نے پیرس کے اندر ہی سفر کرنا ہے تو پیسے اور وقت کی بچت کے لحاظ سے میٹرو یعنی زیر زمین ٹرین سروس، لا جواب ہے ِ اگرچہ زیادہ تر یہ زمین کے نیچے نیچے ہی رہتی ہے لیکن کبھی کبھار یہ زمین سے اوپر بھی آ جاتی ہے ِ پیرس میں میٹرو کے علاوہ ٹرام، بس سروس اور لو کل ٹرین کا اچھا خاصا نیٹ ورک ہے، جس پر پھر کبھی بات ہو گی ِ تو میں عرض کر رہا تھا کہ شانزے لیزے جانے کے لیے مجھے ایک نمبر میٹرو پکڑنی ہے ِ میں اس وقت جہاں کھڑا ہوں ، وہاں سے میٹرو کا نزدیک ترین شتلے لے ہال ہے ِ یہ دنیا کا سب سے بڑا زیر زمین ٹرین سٹیشن مانا جاتا ہے ِ اس ٹرین سٹیشن کو روزانہ ساڑھے سات لاکھ افراد استعمال کرتے ہیں اور یہاں سے میٹرو کی پانچ جبکہ علاقائی ٹرین کی 3 لائنیں گذرتی ہیں آسان لفظوں میں یوں کہہ لیں کہ زمین کے نیچے ہی نیچے آٹھ ٹرینوں کے لیے دو طرفہ پلیٹ فارم ہیں ِ یہاں زمین کے اندر ایک اور ہی دنیا آباد ہے ِ میں اسٹیشن میں داخل ہو کر میٹرو نمبر ایک کے سٹیشن کی طرف جا رہا ہوں جو یہاں سے کچھ فاصلے پر ہے ِ جوں جوں میں پلیٹ فارم کے قریب ہوتا جا رہا ہوں عوام کی تعداد بڑھتی جا رہی ہے ِ یعنی عوام جوق در جوق شانزے لیزے کی طرف جا رہے ہیں ِ اتنے سارے لوگوں کو دیکھ کر پہلے تو خیال آیا کہ کہیں نئے سال کے موقع پر مفت لنگر کا اہتمام بھی نہ ہو ِ لیکن اب آپ سے کیا پردہ ِ پیرس تو کیا پورے فرانس میں داتا کی نگری ہے نہ بری امام کا دربار ِ ان کی حکومت ہی ان کے لیے سب کچھ ہے ِ پیدائش سے موت تک ، تعلیم سے روزگار تک ، روزگار سے بے روزگاری تک، اور شادی سے رہائش تک آپ جب چاہیں حکومت کے دروازے پر دستک دے سکتے ہیں ِ بہرحال، پلیٹ فارم کے بالکل پاس تو یہ حال ہے کہ لوگوں سے کھچا کچھ بھرا ہوا ہے اور صحیح معنوں میں تل دھرنے کی جگہ نہیں ہے، پاؤں دھرنا تو بہت دور کی بات ہے ِ خیر، ابھی ایک ٹرین آئی ہے، لوگ اس میں سوار ہو رہے ہیں اور اب جا کر پلیٹ فارم پر جانے کا موقع ملا ہے ِ دو منٹ کے بعد ایک اور ٹرین صاحبہ تشریف لا رہی ہیں جن کا پیٹ انسانوں سے اتنا بھرا ہوا ہے کہ اس میں سوار ہونا جنرل مشرف کی وردی اتروانے سے آسان نہیں لگ رہا ِ ٹرین کے آٹو میٹک دروازے کھلنے کی دیر ہے کہ عوام الناس یوں لپکی ہے جیسے یورپ میں ہمارے پاکستانی بھائی مفت کی شراب پر لپکتے ہیں ِ اس لمحے جب سب لوگ ٹرین میں سوار ہونے کی کوشش کر رہے ہیں مجھے فرانس کے مہذب شہریوں اور اپنے ہم وطنوں کے درمیاں کوئی فرق نہیں محسوس ہوا ِ بلکہ، میں تو سوچتا ہوں کہ اگر فرانس کی آبادی پاکستان میں منتقل کر دی جائے تو فرانسیسیوں کو پاکستانیوں کے طور طریقے اپنانے میں کپڑے بدلنے سے زیادہ دیر نہیں لگے گی ِ یہ تبدیلی کیوں آئے گی ? آپ اس کا جواب سوچیے، میں آپ کو یہ بتاتا ہوں کہ وہی ٹرین جس میں تھوڑی دیر پہلے تل دھرنے کی بھی جگہ نہیں تھی اب مزید سواریوں کو لئے جا رہی تھی ِ اگرچہ اپنے سے پیچھے والے لوگوں کی مہربانی سے میں ٹرین میں کھڑا ہونے کی جگہ تو مل گئی ہے لیکن بالکل آگے کھڑی سواری کو زحمت دئیے بنا سانس نہیں لی جا سکتی ِ عرض کرنے کا مقصد یہ ہے کہ جب ہم سانس اندر کھینچتے ہیں تو ہمارا سینہ اور پیٹ پھولتا ہے ِ یہاں، اس میٹرو میں ، جب میں سانس لیتا ہوں ، اور سینہ پھولتا ہے تو آگے کھڑی فرانسیسی حسینہ کی زلفوں کو چومتا ہے اور جذبات کے پٹرول کو دیا سلائی دکھاتا ہے ِ صاحبو، اس حال میں سفر کرنا بہت دل گردے کا کام ہےقربتوں کا یہ عالم کہ ٹمپریچر کی طرح فاصلے بھی کم ہوتے ہوتے منفی ہو چکے ہیں ِ مطلب اگر آپ مجھ سے یہ پوچھیں گے کہ بتاؤ، تمہاری دائیں طرف کھڑی حسینہ تم سے کتنے فاصلے پر ہے تو میرا جواب ہو گا، منفی 2 انچ جناب ِ نزدیکیاں اس قدر ہیں کہ کوئی جسمانی راز راز نہیں رہا ِ ایسی معلومات جنہیں حاصل کرنے کے لئے عشاق کو انتظار اور مشقت کے اچھے خاصے پاپڑ بیلنے پڑتے ہیں ، معرفت کی ان گھڑیوں میں اس خاکسار کو بلا آرزو دستیاب ہیں ِ مجھے پورا یقین ہے کہ اگر اس وقت مستنصر حسین تارڑ میری جگہ ہوتے تو دائیں یا بائیں ، آگے یا پیچھے سے کم از کم ایک آدھ حسینہ ان کی مردانہ وجاہت کا تیر کھا کر پھڑک چکی ہوتی

جاری ہے ِ ِ

Salman Rushdie urges west to be hard on Pakistan

2009-01-03T16:08:00.004+01:00

اپنی متنازعہ تحریروں سے جانے والے اور مغرب کے لاڈلے سلمان رشدی نے مغربی ممالک سے کہا ہے کہ انتہا پسندی کو کنٹرول کرنے کے لئے وہ پاکستان سے سختی سے نمٹیں ِ خود ساختہ جیمز بانڈ صاحب کا فرمانا یہ بھی ہے کہ اس میں کوئی شک نہیں کہ ممبئی میں ہونے والے دھماکوں میں پاکستان کا ہاتھ ہے ِ یعنی جو بات ابھی تک امریکی اور بھارتی جاسوسی ایجنسیاں یقین کے ساتھ نہیں کہہ سکتیں، سلمان رشدی پورے یقین کے ساتھ کہہ رہا ہے

ِ پنجابی کی ایک کہاوت اس بات کو بڑی خوبصورتی سے بیان کرتی ہے، کہ

چور نالوں پنڈ کالی

مطلب یہ کہ چور سے زیادہ جلدی سامان کی گٹھری کو ہے ِ

اب چونکہ سلمان رشدی کی رسائی خفیہ معلومات کے خزانے سے لبریز علی بابا کی غار تک ہو ہی گئی ہے تو امید کی جا سکتی ہے کہ اب وہ اپنے مغربی آقاؤں کی خدمت میں یہ عرض کرنا بھی پسند کریں گے کہ پاکستان میں انتہا پسندی کا پودا لگانے اور اسے پاکستانیوں کے خون سے پروان چڑھانے والا اصل مالی کون ہے ِ ہم یہ بھی امید کرتے ہیں پاکستان میں ہونے والی دہشت گردی کی کاروائیوں میں شہید ہونے والے ہزاروں انسانوں کے اصل قاتلوں کو سزا دلوانے کے لئے بھی وہ مغرب سے کہیں گے ِ لیکن اگر وہ ایسا نہیں کر سکتے تو کیا یہ اچھا نہیں ہو گا کہ وہ اپنی زبان بند رکھیں ، غیر ضروری باتوں پہ توجہ نہ دیں، اپنے اگلے ناول کی تیاری کریں اور یہ سوچیں کہ اپنے ناول کو بیسٹ سیلر بنانے کے لئے وہ سلمانوں کے جزبات کو کیسے استعمال کر سکتے ہیں

A blog by Qasir M. Chaudhry

NO PEACE IN SUBCONTINENT WITH KASHMIR ISSUE UNRESOLVED

2009-01-02T21:31:00.002+01:00

Some days ago, the most important question in the media was that if India and Pakistan are going to war? The forces of the both countries were red alert at the borders. Although, for the time being there is no immediate threat for war now, thanks for the diplomatic efforts of the world, but one is still bound to think what would happen if such event happen in the future?

According to India, all of the terrorists involved in a series of attacks on the financial capital of India belong to Pakistan. On the other hand, the Pakistani government demands for the proofs of those persons who were involve in these bloody attacks. India thinks that Pakistan is not taking necessary measures against the terrorist while Pakistan says that India has not provide sufficient proofs to act against terrorists. So, in this situation, to war is the best way to fight against terrorists or to collaborate with each other to stop such happenings in the future?

On September 20, 2008 in a suicide attack on Marriot hotel Islamabad left 54 persons dead and 266 injured. The responsibles of these attacks are still unknown although most of the people believe in the foreign hands for these attacks. It was quite easy for the Pakistani Government to blame Indian government to blame for such attacks but Pakistani government did not do so! The question is that did Pakistani government take the right step or Indian government is going in the right direction? It has been very common for the Indian leaders to blame Pakistan for such unpleasant happenings that some times I think if India continues like this, then one day she would blame Pakistan even for earthquake!

It is also the easiest and the best way for the Indian leaders to mask their incapabilities under the cover of Pakistani involvement. For example, there has been 10 coordinated attacks in the city. All the planned attacks have been success-full which means complete intelligence failure. In addition to this, NSG commandos took 10 hours to reach the terrorists, the lack of coordination between the commandos and the police force. The operation against the terrorists continued for almost 72 hours, which means that the terrorists were fully prepared and they had every information about the methodology of the operation by the Indian security forces. Such plannings normally require lots of information and time. The question, which Indian government should also take into consideration, is what the hell their intelligence agencies were doing and why they could not avoid this event from happening?

Well, India believes that Laskar-e-Tayyeba, an organisation aimed at liberation of Kashmir by force, has been responsible for these attacks and she had given such names to the Pakistani officials too. On the Pakistani side, government has banned this organisation from working in Pakistan and some leaders are arrested too. But, why we all forget that by arresting or killing people we just kill their bodies, not their ideas and views.

Such happenings, regardless of their locations, are always condemnable and they should be stopped. Indeed, it is important to find out the real culprits of attacks on Mombai, but one should not forget that it is also important to stop such events in the future. If the both countries are looking for a peaceful and friendly relations, then, they have to solve the Kashmir problem. Otherwise, there can be good relations between the governments of the two countries, but there would always be such elements who not let the people live in peace!

World War III

2007-09-23T19:17:00.002+02:00

The first half of the last century witnessed two world wars and a sacrifice of 112 million human lives. In first world war more than 40 million while in second world war more than 72 million people died due to war, directly or indirectly. Let us think if our name would be included in the list of those who lost their lives in world war III. Some people believe that the count down to world war III has been started. Do you also think in the same way?

Before talking about world war three, we need to see whether wars are the results of deliberate plans or wars broke out without any prior planning. I am not expert on this topic but I believe that if these war broke out accidently then we don't leaders any more and if these events were planned then we should find out those who are really responsible for the massacre of millions innocent people.

I believe that neither of the previous world wars was happened suddenly or without any prior planning. If the preceding wars were pre-planned then how is it possible that third world war is not planned yet? It has been planned. It has to happen. But, who is the master mind? What are his objectives? These are such a question which would probably never been answered to the general public!

I want to believe that there is no one behind the scene. But, it is not easy to believe. Even Franklin D. Roosevelt, the thirty-second president of the U.S. did not believe it. Once he said, "In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens, it was planned that way." Unfortunately, he did not say who plans it. It is also possible that he could not say it! Likewise, the father of an American president once said, "Fifty men have run America and that's a high figure." Should we believe that he did not know the names?

We were talking about the third world war. It does not matter if one believes or does not believe that first two wars were planned or not but with every passing day, it is becoming clear and clear that the third world is not so far now. The attacks on twin towers was organized to catalyze the speed of the events. Some people even think that the third world war has been started, and it was started when US and its allies attacked on Iraq on March 20, 2003. Now, situation is going in that direction in which it was planned to go!

Keeping in mind current military conflicts, even if we believe the WW-III is not planned, it seems that our children will experience the mass and rapid destruction of the latest weapons if it does not happen in our life time. But, some times it seems that now time is not very far. It can happen at any time, who knows!

But, what should we do? Should we close our eyes and wait for the time when nuclear weapons will be exploding here and there? Or, we must start our efforts to save the earth for our children and posterity?

Stop wasting money every day !

2007-08-23T20:20:00.000+02:00

I have two news for you. The first one is a bad news but the second one is a good news. At the end of this blog, one news will be for you. Actually, you will select it yourself.

Bad news: Time flies!
Good News: You are the pilot!

Almost all of us try to fly at the same hieght as of Bill Gate but only a few manage to cath up with his competitors. Earning money is something between art and science. It is also said and believed by many of us that to be rich or poor is not independent of fate. This is our fate which decides the ways of our life. We can try to be rich but we can not if it is not so in our fate. However, there are many people who believe that it element of fate has nothing to do with our financial status. These are our skills and behavioural patterns which make us rich and poor. I believe that both of the opinions are partly true.

Please do not read this blog anymore if you are expect me to tell you a formula to be a billionaire in only a short period of time because you are going to lose your money. Don not be surprised over it, I really mean it. If I knew how to be included in the richest persons of the world in a short span of the time, then you might have been reading my interview in fortune magazine rather reading my blog over internet. However, I can tell you some ways which can help you to save that money which you are used to lose every day. Almost all of you will think that, 'you are a liar, we dont lose our money'. But the fact is, most of you lose it and lose it every day.

If you are happened to have studied Economics then probably you will be aware of the concept of 'opportunity cost'. In very simple words, it is The cost of doing an activity instead of doing something else. For example you can decide whether to go to a movie or to do some work. But the important thing is that movie is at the cost of work and vice versa. Please re-read the previous lines and make it sure it will remain in your mind for next some time. I am not sure whether this concept will help you to catch up Mr. Gates or not but I am sure of one thing that there will be a positive change in terms of productivity. Productivity, is some thing which has many things to do with your financial success in life.

There is one more thing. Always remember that time is money. For example, a certain amount of time is needed to accomplish any kind of task. For example, to write an article I may need 5 hours. I write article in three basic steps. First, I collect data, second I think and analyze this data, and thirdly I compose it. I nead to sit in library or in front of computer when I am to write or do research. For the second step is not necessary to sit in front of the computer. The point is, this is such a task which I can do while walking, waiting for my bus etc. and almost most of us have some tasks which they can do while they are not directly engaged in a physical activity. Please keep it in your mind as well.

It may be intresting to you to know that how I came on this conclusion that we lose money every day. First of all, be sure about one thing that when I say that we lose money every day I mean that we lose time and our energies every day. Since time and energy is required to earn money so we can say that to lose our energy and time automatically means that we lose money. If you analyse your life, you will come to realize how much money do you waste every day, and you are losing it without any sense of realization.

When we get up in morning, some of us sits before television station. Children may like to see cartoons, young people may like to see a music video and some of them may like to have a look over the world by the means of news. Did you ever think that television stations earn money because we see their programs. They start earning money when we start watching their shows. We think, probably believe that these programs are free. But, think out of the box and you will find out the reality. If television channels earn money because we watch their programs, then it also means that we lose money. Win-win situation does not exist every where in the world.

The same is true with internet. We lost most of our time on the internet. It apparently seems free to visit different websites, but it costs our time. I never ever mean that we should not watch television or use internet. We must, in fact. But we should be only limited to our purpose. We need to be very selective. We should be able to decide what we need to see. We should not others decide what we should see. Thanks to the research in psychology and customers´ choices, marketing people are very clever. They play with our instincts. It may be, actually it is very difficult for general people to resist their compaigns. So, what we need to do then??

We need to organize our life. We should decide our priorities and should be limited to them. If some thing is on the other side of our priorities, then we should simply keep ourself away from it. Just remember that time if flying and we are the pilots. If we let the time to go it own, then we will be exactly in the same position of a pilot who does not have control on his aircraft. You can imagine what happens, when an aircraft gets on his own way! The same is true with our lives. If we can not control time, then all of our plans will always remain in our minds. We probably will never accomplish them. We have to decide now that we have to command the time or let the time to command us?

What is your decision??

If there is no Bush....!

2007-08-17T17:58:00.000+02:00

Contrast is not only important but it also causes intrest and beauty. There is an arabic saying which says that every thing is known due to its oppsite one. For example, if there is no night, then the day will have no value. These are thorns who give us the sense of beauty in the flowers. Same is the case with man and woman. We can also say that if there is no female then there will be no male. But, can we say that if there is no Bush then we will have no Usama on the earth..? Can we say that..?

I am not sure that if there is no Bush then there will be no Usama. However, I am well aware of that their presence has made it difficult for us to live on the earth. These guys are really skilled enough to lead the world to their planned destination with their mutual cooperation. Probably both of them know they are vital for the existence of each other.

Afghanistan and then Iraq, the both countries became the laboratory to test the latest American bombs and missiles. Thousands of the people were killed in Afghanistan by the name of Bin Laden. What is intresting to me is that, thanks to its satellites, US is able to read the 12x8 inches number plates of the vehicles but can not minitor the movement of a 6 feet tall person. He moves in different places, uses latest technology, but can not be traced out. Amazing, isn't it?

There is one thing more which is not less intresting. Mr. Bush believes and don´t be surprised if he believes that milk is black because he is the president of the only superpower and if you don´t believe he can make you believe it. So he believes that Bin Laden is security threat for US citizens. He has got the skills and technology to change US into a graveyard. So, it was important to kill innocent children, hungry mothers, and old fathers with their young offsprings. We can hope that beloved ones of these brutally martyred people will be true friend of US. But, I can not understand that how deaths of innocent civilians will make Bin Laden to quit fighting?

Sometimes I think that I have discovered a new theory which says, if there is no Bush, there is no Usama. Bush is the president of the US and supreme chief of US forces. So, when Bush wanted to invade Afghanistan he declared that Usama is in Afghanistan, so it is necessary to attack on. So the poor country was attacked. Then suddenly Bush found that there are some elements of Al-Qaeda, so called organization of Bin Laden, in Iraq along with weapons of mass destruction. So, a happy Iraq became the history and now it also seems that Iraq itself will be found only in history books after its division into two or three countries. But neither Al-Qaeda nor deadly weapons could be found in Iraq. So, the brilliant Bush now thinks that Usama may be in Pakistan. But, Usama is very clever. Who knows after US attack on Pakistan he may go to Iran, then, he can also go to Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia his homeland and who can stop him to go there.

But, problem is that if there is no Bush then there is no Usama! So we see Bush still in his office and we also see Usama or his number two in the television and listen there revolutionery messages over internet. Although all of us have to die but Bin Laden will not die by Americans. How a friend can kill his reall friend. But, frankly, I am not sure about US that how they treat their friends. However, one thing is for sure that Bin Laden can't die by the US unless they find his replacement. Is Iran going to be Bin Laden's replacement?

Bin Laden had been very good for Bush to achieve his bloody objectives. But, if one thing is good for Bush, then it is not necessarily good for all of us. The fact is that the world has not been a better place after the Bush-Bin Laden joint venture. These two guys have made people to live under the constant threat. We are not sure about future. We can not say that we safe because we live in far Asia or in very safe state of European Union or United States. If things go like this then this world will not be a secure place to live by a few more years.

Good news is that the 2nd term of Bush is going to end in 2008. Let us hope but can we hope that ¨Bush¨ will not sit in oval office after 2008???

Love

2007-08-10T20:45:00.000+02:00

Almost every writer tries to write some thing about love. If we take this word out of the poetry probably there will only be white papers with some scratches in the libraries. Anyway, there are many definitions and interpretations of love. Here is a translation of a poem about love,

LOVE

If you love someone,

and he does not love you,

and you still love him

this is real love

and if you love some body

and he also loves you

it is just a business

love for love

like goods for money

or goods for goods

it is not love

Rather, it is a business

and every one can do it.

By the way, if we keep the above definition in mind then there will be only a few lovers in the world. But, unluckily, I am not with those who promote the business of hate. So I have to appreciate love naturally.

What is love? Once I was questioned by some one. I answered, ´what is not love!´. Some times it feels to me that this is the secret of the continuity of life on the earth. Just take the love out from the hearts of the living things and there will be nothing. Love is very constructive emotion although it may have some negative effects as well, but some times.

Normally, when the word love is used in our day to day life, then most of the times it means an emotion between a male and a female. Indeed, it is also a farm of love but it is not a complete version of love, I am afraid. It is just an aspect of love. However, it is intresting that love between a male and female has different meanings in eastern and western societies. In addition to this, there are different words for the various stages of love. However, in English, as far as I know the only one word is used differently for different stages.

Love is universal. As it is said earlier, the love between a male and female is just an aspect of love. However, if in one soceity of a group of people love is only limited to between a male and a female then it also indicates that these people are really materialistic and selfish. Love is not limited only to emotions about the opposite sex. It is also not the other name of attraction. It is an approach, it is a philosophy, it is a pattern of thinking, it is a thinking style!

It may be defined like en emotion of deep affection. It is a strong feeling about some thing and feelings are very important in our life. The point is that, the feeling of love should be based on some reason? Should this emotion be for a hope of some return? Here is another poem, this one is written by me, and I hope this will clear my point of view to some extent. Its English translation is as under;

I DON´T KNOW

I know and know very well,

I love you

I can´t deny it

But, why do I love you,

Simply I dont know

I tried to know

But I could not reach on a conclusion,

I could not find the reason

But sometimes I think

If I find the reason of my love,

If I come to know why I love you

Then, can I say anymore that

I love you

The theme of the poem is so simple. If I love some one because he or she is beautifull then there is a reason for my love. My love is for the beauty. As far as my beloved is beautifull, I will keep on loving and when my beloved will not be beautifull I will not love any more. So, if there is a reason in love then this love is not for ever. But, if we can not find any reason behind our love, we try to find the reason but we could not find. We just only know that we are in love. Then we can say that this is pure love and it is true love.

Love without reason is although true love but we can not say that if we can find no reason for love today then same will be the case forever. It is quite possible that after some period of the time, after little more intellectual growth we may find the exact reason. So, it means, that we need to move little more ahead and to find a basis which is unchanged.

Simply speaking, if there is some reason then certainly there will be some kind of expectation whether consciously or unconsciously. At this point of our discussion, we can say that whenever there is an expectation behind the love it is not a true love. This love is not going to last forever, whether it is limited to the opposite sex or the other objects of the life. So, the love which is universal in its application is always free from expectations.

At this point of our discussion, we can say that love is a positive emotion which is free from any kind of expectation. This is the true love and only love. We do not love other people just because of some hidden interests we love because it is our nature. Love is sudden and without our deliberate decision to love some one. We do not take a SWOT analysis to love some one. Rather we just love. This love is not only positive and constructive but also is universal in its application.

There is nothing except love. Let us paint this world with the beautifull colours of love!

Should we believe in God..?

2007-08-09T17:13:00.000+02:00

The question of the day is, Should we believe in God?

My answer would be; Yes, we should believe in God and this is the only best and simple way for the ultimate success!

There are some people who say if there is a God, why can't we see Him, why can't we feel Him. Lots of other people think religion is nonsense. They find the welfare of humanity in the science and man made laws. Hence, God is not the subject of the science and it does not provide exact location and where abouts of the God so they simply deny the God. So, the world is simply divided between two groups, who believe in God and who consciously don't believe in God. But, the good news is that God, unlike a dictator, does not make us to believe him. We have choices and we are responsible for our decisions.

When I say that some people do not consciously believe in God then I mean that all of us believe in God. The reason is that God is an absolute reality and we can not deny the reality. Actually, when one says that there is no God, he is admitting that God is beyond his perception. In fact he is indirectly negating the human concept of the God. The people who believe in God have some kind of perceptions and understandings about God. So, when one denies God, actually he is denying the perceptions and understandings of the other believers. But, it does not necessary means that there is no God.

Let us think in an other way. If we come across a reality then we have two options basically. We accept it or we do not. But, reality comes first than our acceptance or negation. It is necessary that some thing must be in existence for our discussion. If something simply does not exist then how can we discuss it? How can we argue over this? For the purpose of acceptance or denial, the existence of some thing is necessary. If God does not exist then we would simply have not discussed it. It would have not been in question. But, it is in question and it shows that He exists. His existence is the reason for acceptance or denial. So, we can never negate his existence because our denial is also a logic of his existence.

If we dont believe in Him just because we can not perceive him then should we not think is it logical? How can we understand Him who is beyond five senses? We can hear the sound of a specific frequency. If some thing is beyond or less than this frequency, we can not hear it. Likewise, the other senses are also limited. Let me give you one exercise which will help you to find out the power of you imagingation. Think about a thing which is colourless which has no specific shape and no mass. Then, if you are sucessfull in thinking, describe to make some one else understand it and believe me you will come to know how powerfull your imagination is? You will come to know that we can not think about such a thing exactly. It is almost impossible. If we can not perceive a thing which is colourless, not in specific shape, and have no mass then how can we successfully think about God and perceive him? I think, the best definition about the God may be that He is beyond the definition. We can not define Him exactly and completely.

As I said earlier that the best and simple way is to believe in God. Why? The reason is that in this case you will be safe in both ways. Be carefull, we have only one life. the time which is passed is passed forever and it will never come back. When span of our life will be over than we will have no option to come back. If you do not believe in God, then, just assume that there is God. Also assume that now you are died. After your death you come to know that God exists. The God, which you denied all of your life, now is before you. Just imagine how would you feel at this time? Will you be able to consider yourself as a successfull person? Would you be in position to say sorry and change your past life? The answer is no. But, on the other hand, if you believe in God then, assuming that God does not exist, there will be simply no problem for you after the death. So, it means that the safer way is to believe in God.

I would also like to say that we should not accept or reject some thing only because that most of the people in our society are doing this. If we don't have knowledge about some thing then we should not give our opinion about this. Normally, we do it in our day to day life but when it comes to God we deny it without any kind or research or knowledge. If one person takes the God as a first priority and tries his best to find Him and he could not find it then he is in position to give his opinion otherwise it is not nice to do so.

This is very obvious reality that life is only once. We will never come again. What we have to do is to do in this life only. So, in this life, we should be really carefull about the God. This is very important. You will agree with me that this topic is worth of some thinking and research.

So, are you ready to take the God as a first priority?

Freedom ... an illusion..?

2007-08-03T21:01:00.000+02:00

The question, whether the man in this world is free or not, is probably as old as human history itself. Discussion is still going on. There is no agreed upon decision on this topic. Still some think that the man is free and some think otherwise. How do you think?

Freedom, if we define briefly, is the ability to act without any restraint. So, when there is a restriction, there is no freedom. To ensure freedom, it is necessary to ensure absence of restriction. So, when we assert that we are free, we are claiming that in other words, that we can do what we want to do without any restriction.

But, unfortunately, we have restrictions. We have restrictions right from our birth to aur death. We were not asked permission for our arrival in this world. We dont know, and we really dont know why we are here. Who sent us and for what? Do you consider it freedom, if one person is asked to do some thing, and he has to act on it. We had to come in this world and we came. In addition to this, we had no choice to select our parents, we could not have the right to select our country of birth. We had really no power to decide our creed, color or nation. All of these things were decided by some one else. Almost every thing about ourself was decided and some where else. But, when we come in this world, we try to assert that we are free. We are free to do what we want to. Is it logical? Is it a rational act to take the responsibility of the actions, which were taken by some one else?

We can very easily and simply say that, ok, these decision were taken before the growth of conscious and memory. This is right indeed, but problem is that it does not end our problem. This thinking does not help us to prove that we are free and we can do what we like to do. For example, we breath and we breath every day, every hour and every minute and probably once in every six seconds. This process is going on itself. We can not control of process of breathing, put aside the stop breathing. Some day try to have control on your breathing system. Take in and exhale oxygen with your own will. You will see that you will be tired very soon. Actually, if we breath with our own will we cant take for a long time and it gets out of our control and goes at its own.

Another example may be the chemical reactions which are being taken place in every cell of our body. Let control on these action be aside, we even dont know about these exactly. These chemical reactions are going on their own. We never ever order our heart to pump the blood. Lungs do not absorb oxygen under our deliberate guaidance. Indeed, body belongs to us, but every part in it goes its own way. We can only try to kill ourselves but we can not have control over them.

We can not stope eating, we can not stop drinking. We can decrease the amount, although, but we cant stop it. Freedom, as we defined earlier, is to do what we want to and to do without any restriction. But, we see that, we cant do, what we want to do. There are restrictions. There are limits which we can not cross.

We discussed earlier, the case of our birth in this world. Now focus on death. After coming in this world, it is our common observation, that we do not like to go from this world. We want to live here permanently. Although, we know that one day we have to die but we did not really admit it in our mind. We have a hope, very deep in our mind, that by some chance that we may not die. There may be some advancement in medical science which may help to give us some more years in this world. The point is, that , although we dont not like to die but we die.

Take this case from the other side. Once a person is died, we cant make him alive again. We can provide all the things, which are necessary for the life but we cant give him life again. After death, oxygen, water, nutrients all things becomes useless. Why? I cant understand. For example, if one person is died because of heart problem. His heart was not able to work properly to pump the blood to different parts of the body and he was died. Logically, if we change his malfunctional heart with a healthy heart, then he must be alive again. But, it does not happen. Once who is died, is died for ever. We can not bring him life again.

These are very simple and basic facts. We see that, there are restrictions at every foot step. We cant get rid of the restrictions. We have to face them. We have to accept them. By the way, dont you think that life is the name of the restrictions. For example, there is no restriction on a dead body. There is no law which can be imposed on the dead. Sometimes, I think that, evern there are restriction on our thinking as well. What we know is that we receive ideas, we accept different thoughts. But, from where, we dont know. It seems, as said earlier, that the life is the name of restrictions. I dont want to accept you as it is. I just want you to really think about you, about your ownslef. If there are really some restrictions, and some limits, then should we not try to learn who imposed such limits and why?

A life before this life.

2007-07-28T18:44:00.003+02:00

Life is a such a question that only some people try to answer it and only a few people find its answer. Did you every try to find its answer? dont worry, if you did not. We try to do it, now. So, what is this life?

It is not so easy to give an agreed definition of the life. But, it is not our task to define the life, we are just trying to understand the period which starts from the birth and ends with death. We can also say that the life is a period between pre-life period and post-life period. Here, I just want to raise the question about the times when we were not born and we will not be alive any more. Here two more question arises. Where have we been before taking birth in this world and where would we go after our death?

There are two simple and possible ways to make up our mind. The first one is that we dont recognise the pre and post life periods. We can say that we did not exist anyware before our birth and we will not exist after our death. The second one is to see this life in accordance with the pre and post life periods collectively. We can say that we existed somewhere before our birth, although we did not much know about this and we will be present some where even though we dont know exactly how would our presence be. But, we will exist.

Now we discuss the first approach which negates our existance before our birth. It is universally known fact that there is a relationship between different events. An event is a consequence of another event. We need to see that the reunion of male and female is a process of creation or just is an assistance to bring the child into the world. If we say that it is a process of creation, then, it means that as a couple, male and female have complete control on this process. If they really create, then, they must be able to create as like they like. They should be able to determine sex, and facial structure themselves. But, we see that they simply dont. They just take part in action. After that, every thing happens automatically, without any conscious effort. On the other hand, if we assume that it is just a process of bringing the child into the world, then, it is not necessary for themselves to control each and every action involved in creating the baby in the womb. There is some force, who is responsible for it and taking care of every thing. It seems absolutely logical, put aside other orguments, that reunion of the male and female is just a process to bring the child into the world.

If we believe that parents are just bringing the child into the world, then, we need also to believe that there must be one world or zone where children live before coming to our world. Where is that world of babies, and how they live there, is not our topic of today. Certainly we will talk on it but later. But, for now, we just need to understand that we had been living some where before arriving in this world. Life is not only limited to the present form of the life. Life may have many forms. We can discover, probably, if we like to know and explore ourselves.

It is not easy, indeed, to believe that we existed some where before our birth in this world. If we had been there, if we assume, then we should have been able to remember those times. But we cant simply remember. Does that mean, it is wrong? May be! But, question is that, did we ever tried to remember our past? No, most of you will say. ¨So, we need to try, try to remember our own past, try to have knowledge abour our ownselves. In our daily life, when we try to remember a forgotten information, we consciously or uncoscioulsy follow a method. We need to be carefull, while remembering our past, that its method may be some what different. What is the true method then? We will discuss on it. For now, just try to think, did we exist or not?

Get updates

Looking for happiness...?

2007-07-15T21:04:00.000+02:00

It is not uncommon in our common world to find out the people who are not happy. Why?

´I have a good job, beautiful wife, a lovely daughter, but I dont have peace of mind!´ These were the words of a man, who seems to be very successfull in his life. My original thought was that he must be very happy person. But he was not like many others who seems that they are happy but they are not.

She was about 60 years old lady, married twice, living in Sweden. She had a very beautiful house, just in front of the deep waters of the sea. She was an artist and was living in an ideal neighbourhood. But, she was planning to move to any Asian country. Why? You may be surprised to know that, in search of happiness!

He was a youngman of 29, doing a very nice job in a modern city and enjoying his life with his beautiful girl friend. Smile on his lips was a permanent part of his personality. One day, he tried to cut his throat, he tried to commit suicide. But, thanks to his lucky stars, he survived. Why he committed suicide? Again, he was not happy! He was not sattisfied from his life!

Now, I would like to talk about myself. I dont say whether I am happy or not but I would say that I could not and can not understand why we dont find happiness in the life? What is the secret of the happiness? In the search of happiness, I would like you to go with me because I want to see the true smiles on your lips. So, we have to find out the secret of happiness, which is ultimate goal of our all efforts. Do you also like to do this?

Happiness is a state of mind. It is our internal feeling. But, what we do? We try to find it out in external objects. We try to buy it with money. We see it in the beautiful face of our soulmate. We try to find it in the faces of our children and what is the result? Are we happy?

The easiest method to be happy is to happy with your circumstances. If we want to embrace real happiness, then, we need to get rid of unnecessary wants and desires. You might have observed that, if not, then you can observe that if you compare what you have with what others have, you can never be happy. You will always try to be like the other one. You will get in the race and you will have every thing except happiness.

Some times we feel that we are not enjoying a happy relationship or we are not happy from our children. The reason is so simple. Our soulmate is our partner in the life. But we start to own them. We think, that our partner of life is our only ours. He or she is our property. His or her rights are exclusively for us. We forget that our life partners or friends are not our property. They are with just for some time, for a certain period of the time. What should we do. We must try to enjoy every single moment of their company. We should think new ideas to make this relationship happier and give a higher rank in list of our priorities.

It is very easy to observe that those people who are not happy... they are not happy with their circumstances...We can change our circumstances but to a certain level. So, what we can not change, we should learn to accept and live with it. If we embrace our fate with a smiling face, then, believe me, we will be happier. If we mentally ready to disown other people and materialistic objects, and if we can get rid of expectations, then, certainly we will be more happier. Do you think is it difficult to do?

Should I hope that next time when you will be reading my blog, there will be a true smile on your lips. Should I hope?