<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>The Undercover Economist</title>
	
	<link>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover</link>
	<description>"The Undercover Economist", about economics in everyday life, and "Dear Economist", in which readers' questions are answered, tongue-in-cheek, with the latest economic theory</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TheUndercoverEconomist" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
		<title>Dear Economist: Why don’t all waiters get their just desserts?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/PWSS7mfTomo/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-why-don%e2%80%99t-all-waiters-get-their-just-desserts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Economist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1901</guid>
		<description>Do waiters in mid-priced restaurants work less than those at high-end ones? If not, shouldn’t their tips be the same (in absolute terms)?
Manoj
Dear Manoj,
I can see where you’re coming from: a 10 per cent tip on a £20 meal is less than a 10 per cent tip on a £100 meal. If it’s the same [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pi5Bq0SJIH5OBTu-O1pYqJBJ6_Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pi5Bq0SJIH5OBTu-O1pYqJBJ6_Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pi5Bq0SJIH5OBTu-O1pYqJBJ6_Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pi5Bq0SJIH5OBTu-O1pYqJBJ6_Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/PWSS7mfTomo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-why-don%e2%80%99t-all-waiters-get-their-just-desserts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-why-don%e2%80%99t-all-waiters-get-their-just-desserts/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Why feedback can be just so much noise</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/DO900Wwh2Fk/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/why-feedback-can-be-just-so-much-noise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Undercover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1881</guid>
		<description>Should managers be giving more frequent performance appraisals? Do “customer feedback” questionnaires serve any useful purpose? The answers are not obvious. A feedback-free environment is not conducive to learning new skills, but then again, feedback itself can be confusing or demoralising.
I suffered from both too little and too much feedback in my last year of [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FOM2fwXKBpOjb5gmAYssnhTSYXc/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FOM2fwXKBpOjb5gmAYssnhTSYXc/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FOM2fwXKBpOjb5gmAYssnhTSYXc/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FOM2fwXKBpOjb5gmAYssnhTSYXc/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/DO900Wwh2Fk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/why-feedback-can-be-just-so-much-noise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/why-feedback-can-be-just-so-much-noise/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Cass Talks - me on Dear Undercover Economist</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/7s1fmVvlH1k/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/cass-talks-me-on-dear-undercover-economist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Economist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Tim elsewhere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1871</guid>
		<description>Alex Ritson of Cass Business School interviews me about Dear Undercover Economist.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ylymvj1-WGIuWgFny8LHNkli2Ms/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ylymvj1-WGIuWgFny8LHNkli2Ms/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ylymvj1-WGIuWgFny8LHNkli2Ms/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Ylymvj1-WGIuWgFny8LHNkli2Ms/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/7s1fmVvlH1k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/cass-talks-me-on-dear-undercover-economist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/cass-talks-me-on-dear-undercover-economist/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Big Questions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/Fu8YhHXEOnU/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-big-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 08:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1851</guid>
		<description>Steven Landsburg, author of the original pop-econ book, the wonderful &amp;#8220;The Armchair Economist&amp;#8221;, is blogging in support of a new book, &amp;#8220;The Big Questions: Tackling the problems of of philosophy with ideas from mathematics, economics and physics&amp;#8221;. I expect he will infuriate everyone because that&amp;#8217;s his style.
The blog is here. The first two posts are [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/67NATRlQgsKu2kM2DJDT8WH1r-o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/67NATRlQgsKu2kM2DJDT8WH1r-o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/67NATRlQgsKu2kM2DJDT8WH1r-o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/67NATRlQgsKu2kM2DJDT8WH1r-o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/Fu8YhHXEOnU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-big-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-big-questions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What I’ve been reading: Why Most Things Fail</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/krJSbBcPmbU/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/what-ive-been-reading-why-most-things-fail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1676</guid>
		<description>This is Paul Ormerod&amp;#8217;s offering from 2005. I&amp;#8217;m catching up. I enjoyed the book very much, although felt the last chapters were by far the best and most original. In them Ormerod studies patterns of biological extinctions and corporate bankruptcies, looks at the mathematical models that best explain them, and concludes that businesses appear to [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jTLLWJWW_8ZH-xx0adm5l4z8u8I/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jTLLWJWW_8ZH-xx0adm5l4z8u8I/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jTLLWJWW_8ZH-xx0adm5l4z8u8I/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jTLLWJWW_8ZH-xx0adm5l4z8u8I/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/krJSbBcPmbU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/what-ive-been-reading-why-most-things-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/what-ive-been-reading-why-most-things-fail/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Want to help? Then make life harder for the aid agencies</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/F1HPSL4R8U4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/want-to-help-then-make-life-harder-for-the-aid-agencies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Grown up economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Something different]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Undercover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1826</guid>
		<description>A club sandwich, a pair of trousers, a ticket to the movies – in a typical market transaction, I choose and pay for my own desires.
Sometimes, however, I might buy something for someone else, and here trouble begins. If I am buying something – a goat, an HIV prevention course, a bit of paved road [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z0xvYtMKiEkGHWMudEpnZsmJTwM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z0xvYtMKiEkGHWMudEpnZsmJTwM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z0xvYtMKiEkGHWMudEpnZsmJTwM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/z0xvYtMKiEkGHWMudEpnZsmJTwM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/F1HPSL4R8U4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/want-to-help-then-make-life-harder-for-the-aid-agencies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/want-to-help-then-make-life-harder-for-the-aid-agencies/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear Economist: Loving and losing – is the cost too high?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/upTeK_G0O1o/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-loving-and-losing-%e2%80%93-is-the-cost-too-high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 00:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dear Economist]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Everyday economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Grown up economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Logic of Life]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1801</guid>
		<description>With the imminent passing of my pet rat I am faced with a lot of grief; he has been a great pet and so I will be more saddened by his passing than if he had been a bad one. My question is: is it possible for the cost (the grief from losing a friend/pet/family [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Xm5-_MLxNhd8gK1y8NMrvv5vOo8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Xm5-_MLxNhd8gK1y8NMrvv5vOo8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Xm5-_MLxNhd8gK1y8NMrvv5vOo8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Xm5-_MLxNhd8gK1y8NMrvv5vOo8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/upTeK_G0O1o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-loving-and-losing-%e2%80%93-is-the-cost-too-high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/dear-economist-loving-and-losing-%e2%80%93-is-the-cost-too-high/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The joy of small numbers</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/s530w9dqlso/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-joy-of-small-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 05:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Something different]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1791</guid>
		<description>Michael Blastland, co-founder of More or Less, has a way with numbers:
The language of politics is billions. Billions up, billions down, billions more, billions cut. Feeling dizzy about the state of the public finances when one telephone number of pounds succeeds another?
Here&amp;#8217;s a simple alternative, a language politicians seldom use, perhaps because it would be [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpV0_2RAAfwlQTiJbWLuA-jKFK8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpV0_2RAAfwlQTiJbWLuA-jKFK8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpV0_2RAAfwlQTiJbWLuA-jKFK8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/LpV0_2RAAfwlQTiJbWLuA-jKFK8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/s530w9dqlso" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-joy-of-small-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/the-joy-of-small-numbers/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>On my bookshelf (but not read yet)</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/OCny4wi6xKM/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/on-my-bookshelf-but-not-read-yet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1766</guid>
		<description>Mia de Kuijper, Profit Power Economics. Read more about it in the Times.
William Higham, The Next Big Thing. A book about trend marketing. I am sceptical on principle but perhaps the book is good.
Yoram Bauman, The Cartoon Introduction to Economics. I saw some early drafts and it looked very promising.
Brian W. Arthur, The Nature of [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yQrvqLPDpCDu4FQrzwPxZLOdY70/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yQrvqLPDpCDu4FQrzwPxZLOdY70/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yQrvqLPDpCDu4FQrzwPxZLOdY70/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/yQrvqLPDpCDu4FQrzwPxZLOdY70/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/OCny4wi6xKM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/on-my-bookshelf-but-not-read-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/on-my-bookshelf-but-not-read-yet/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Levitt in controversial claim shock…</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~3/nJ9vyUhisr8/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/steven-levitt-in-controversial-claim-shock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim Harford</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/?p=1756</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I was naive in my reading of Superfreakonomics, but it didn&amp;#8217;t occur to me that the chapter on geoengineering would stir up such a storm. I liked the book, but worried about the chapter. I wrote:
As for the final chapter on global warming, it is a striking discussion of geo-engineering, surveying various schemes for [...]
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tYwOS2S1RIsBQziDhjlAuMu-NRU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tYwOS2S1RIsBQziDhjlAuMu-NRU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tYwOS2S1RIsBQziDhjlAuMu-NRU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/tYwOS2S1RIsBQziDhjlAuMu-NRU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheUndercoverEconomist/~4/nJ9vyUhisr8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/steven-levitt-in-controversial-claim-shock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://blogs.ft.com/undercover/2009/10/steven-levitt-in-controversial-claim-shock/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
