Most Tactical Asset Allocation (TAA) strategies trade once per month. Thats by design. Short-term market movement is mostly noise, and trying to time every zig and zag is a fools errand. A unique feature of our platform is the ability to follow these monthly strategies on any day of the month. Were not just executing the same signal on a different date were recalculating the signal

Turkish savers have argued about the same question for decades: keep the money in a lira time deposit and collect the interest, or convert it to dollars and hold. The dilemma is common enough to have a household name faiz mi, dolar m?, interest or dollars? Both answers have had long stretches of looking right, which is why the argument never ends. Figure 1 settles it the only way it

Financial markets process an enormous volume of corporate news every day. Earnings announcements, management changes, clinical trial results, insider transactions, partnerships, and regulatory developments can all affect a companys value. The challenge is not simply identifying whether a headline sounds positive or negative. Investors must understand its economic implications, anticipate how

Time-series momentum stands as one of the most reliable and heavily backtested anomalies in quantitative finance, serving as a foundational alpha source for modern managed futures and trend-following strategies. However, a recent academic paper by Matti Suominen and Erik Hjalmarsson, titled Boundaries of Time Series Momentum, uncovers a structural vulnerability that every practitioner must

In this episode of House of Quants, listeners will discover: Why quantitative trading is engineering: The episode challenges the myth of the lone trader searching for magical chart patterns and explains how institutional research operates as an industrial-scale system built around data, statistics, software, execution, and risk. How ideas become executable trading systems: Every strategy passes

Joel Greenblatt's Magic Formula ranks companies on two numbers and buys the ones that score well on both. One asks whether a business is cheap. The other asks whether it is any good. The claim in the book is that the pair works better than either number on its own. We tested that claim by running all three books over the same twenty one-year windows of the S&P 500, from 2006 to 2025.

The obvious rule is to buy what members of Congress buy and avoid, or short, what they sell. Across 17,859 investable common-stock disclosure events, that rule fails. One year after a disclosure became public, the typical purchase event trailed the S&P 500 by 5.36 percentage points and the typical sale event trailed by 6.39 points. Purchases did only 1.13 points better than sales on matched

Easley, O'Hara, Yang and Zhang take five textbook microstructure measures, compute them on Binance one-minute bars for BTC, ETH, XRP, SOL and ADA over January 2021 to July 2023, and ask a random forest to call the sign of tomorrow's change in the return distribution. Two numbers carry the paper. Crypto VPIN averages 0.47 against the 0.22 that the same authors found in E-mini and crude

Markowitz's 1952 paper deliberately begins after investors have formed beliefs about future returns. Portfolio choice is the second stage; estimating its inputs is the first. Rebuilding Robert Shiller's three-asset classroom example with two defensible US equity series moves the recommended equity weight from 38% to 26%, while estimated portfolio risk and return barely move. Repeating

A currency futures book built from other currency futures scores a Sharpe of 0.16. The same contracts, wired into a graph that also contains equities, bonds, and commodities, jump the FX sleeve to 0.66. That is Pu, Roberts, Dong, and Zohren, 64 futures, 2000 to 2022, volatility-targeted to 15%. Phylaktis and Yamani ran the pairwise version of the same instinct and got a harsher split: a

Form 4 looks unusually convenient for quantitative research. It is public, structured and tied to a regulatory deadline: in general, a reporting person must file by the end of the second business day after a reportable transaction. The SEC's Form 4 instructions state the rule and also show why a filing is more complicated than one insider, one trade. A filing can contain many

In July 2022 Wouter Keller published Bold Asset Allocation. This paper walks the aggressive variant, BAA-G4: hold the single strongest of QQQ, VWO, VEA and BND by relative momentum, or retreat into bonds and bills when a canary basket says so. We ran the published rules on the real tradable funds through seventeen registered one-year windows, 2009 through 2025. The crash switch is real: in 2022 it

The Sharpe Ratio1, one of the most commonly used measure of risk-adjusted performance2, is usually reported as a point estimate (Morningstar, Quantalys, etc.). Thanks to the work of Lo3, Opdyke4 and more recently5 de Prado et al.6, it is nevertheless well understood that such a point estimate [] does not convey information about statistical significance6, so that a more meaningful way to

A reader asked whether the birthplace lottery that decided equity outcomes also decided bond and gold outcomes. It did, and the shape of the answer is different from what the equity article found. The same measurement applied to bonds The construction matches the equity article. One unit of currency, invested at home in long government bonds, deflated by the home consumer price index, held from

Kelly, Malamud and Zhou opened their Journal of Finance paper by reporting out-of-sample market timing Sharpe ratio improvements "relative to market buy-and-hold" of roughly 0.47 per year, earned by a model with 12,000 predictors trained on 12 monthly observations. Daniel Buncic re-ran it on the same data with the same code and found the first problem in the first sentence. Buy-and-hold

Regime calls are a steering wheel, not a brake. We walked two strategies through the same registered one-year windows on the nine original Select Sector SPDRs. One holds all nine, equal weight, quarterly rebalance, always fully invested. The other holds three at a time, routed between a risk-on book of technology, discretionary and financials, a cyclical book of industrials, materials and energy,

A critical decision in wealth management is the allocation of capital across asset classes and cash. Theory and empirical evidence suggest that out- and underperformance of broad asset classes depends on the macroeconomic environment. Consequently, the systematic, low-frequency adjustment of portfolio weights in response to macro factors can produce material excess returns. It is a practical and

Recently we kicked off the momentum mini-portfolio series. The first article was a TSX market dual-factor momentum system with a hybrid trend following type exit. The system turned out to be pretty robust after being run through a vast set of robustness tests. We also took a deep dive into minimum system allocation, as I felt that topic is not as well explored online. If you missed that one you

The other I threw away, and the only thing that told them apart was a control group that most people building trading systems never bother to build. Heres what the control saw that my eyes couldnt. Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. What a control group is, and why trading skips it In a drug trial you dont just give people the drug and check

Hernndez-Romo and co-authors ran four population-based optimizers 31 times each, 1000 generations per run, population of 50, tuning an eight-parameter moving-average strategy on five-minute BTC/USDC bars from January 2020 to March 2025. Differential Evolution won on average annualized return with 107.36%, against 92.05% for the Whale Optimization Algorithm, 73.47% for Particle Swarm and 61.80%

Johann Christian Lotter opens his workshop deck with four lines that do more work than most methodology chapters. A model is not the reality. The reality is unknown. The same reality can be described with many different models. The best model must be selected by experiment. Every argument in Pillar 1 reduces to those four lines, and the deck states them in under thirty words before showing a

We document a persistent intramonth momentum cycle in U.S. sector ETFs that yields meaningful risk-adjusted returns when properly sequenced. Using the nine original Select Sector SPDR ETFs and SPY as the market benchmark from December 1998 through June 2026, we show that trailing 252-day sector momentum generates a positive spread on the first trading day of the monthand then sharply reverses

In May I published a case study on running alpha research through a team of LLM agents: four roles, instrumented handoffs, and roughly a 2 lift in hypotheses tested per week. The post was careful about what it measured. It was silent about a risk I had not thought to price. Here is the risk. If your research agent and your competitors research agent are the same base model, then whatever that

Take two stocks that both end the month flat. The first bled lower for two weeks, then clawed all the way back. The second ran up for two weeks, then gave it all back. Same start, same finish, same zero return. Sort every stock in the market by past return and these two land in the identical bucket, because return only sees the endpoints. Gulen and Woeppel show that the shape between the endpoints

An 8-week dual-momentum switch between GLD and IBIT returns 79.91% a year at a Sharpe of 1.64. Vojtko and Dujava report that number on a Quantpedia note covering 31 December 2018 through April 2026, weekly rebalance at Wednesday's close, cash when both lookbacks print negative. Hold the other column: maximum drawdown is still -43.94%. They tested ten lookbacks and published the peak. The

In September 2017, Alpha Architect published VIX and Trend-Following, the Killer Combo?, an empirical examination of whether volatility information could improve a traditional trend-following allocation model. The central idea was intuitive: market volatility may contain useful information about how quickly an investor should measure momentum. A shorter momentum window may react more effectively

Factor timing is the seductive idea that you can do better than holding a basket of factors: lean into value when value looks cheap, load momentum when momentum is running, cut a factor when its volatility spikes. Every one of those moves has a tidy formula and a plausible story. And when you run them out of sample on a clean universe, almost all of them lose to the dumbest thing you could have

I recently came across Lpez de Prado et al.'s (2026) treatment of the Sharpe ratio estimator: Normal, with the true as its mean, and a variance (see the Normal section of the image below) conditioned on sample size, the return series' autocorrelation, its skewness, its kurtosis, and the level of itself. It's an elegant correction but stubbornly a bell curve underneath.

Markets have been behaving unusually lately. In May, equity indices rose while volatility and skew also increased, a relatively rare occurrence historically. Since last week, the same phenomenon has emerged again, with the spot/volatility correlation turning positive. Is this still a rare occurrence? We dont know. But one thing is clear: regime detection is becoming increasingly important in

Three papers crossed my desk this month. One detects market manipulation with graph neural networks and reports 98.7% accuracy at 8.3 milliseconds per decision. A second, same author cluster, detects anomalies in high-frequency trading and reports a 15% accuracy improvement with an F1 of 0.915. A third uses XGBoost on Bitcoin technical indicators and reports 92.40% accuracy with a ROC AUC of

You lock in gains, you stop giving winners back, and, the part everyone repeats, your win rate goes up. I tested it on 3,966 of my own trades. Two of those three claims are false, and the third one cost me a fortune. The setup I run an automated futures system with a fixed exit: each strategy takes its full target or its full stop. No partials, no breakeven moves; the trade rides to one of two

Where this came from. A reader replied to Autopsy 001 with a Morningstar page showing NANC ahead of the index and a fair question: what am I missing? They were not missing anything. The fund really has outperformed. This is the answer to what that outperformance is made of. Unlike our other case files this is not a pre-registered test of our own hypothesis. It is a descriptive analysis of

Over the past few years, the liquid alternatives space has moved decisively into a new ETF era. What was once a narrow category now stretches from CTA to hedge-fund replication strategies, sometimes pairing those return streams directly with core stocks and bonds exposures. And thanks to their low-cost, daily liquidity and ease of access, these vehicles are attracting progressively more inflows.

The pitch One screenshot: $6k into weekly calls, $1.2M out. The logic sounds like physics options have capped downside and uncapped upside, so keep buying cheap lottery tickets and one asymmetric win pays for everything. The post-2021 refinement adds a mechanism: find the gamma squeeze, ride the dealers' forced hedging, be the flywheel instead of the fuel. The test Twenty years of S&P

A well-known finance paper showed that an AI model could read a news headline about a company and say, better than chance, which way the stock would move. The same paper predicted the effect would fade as more traders started using the same tools. Thanks for reading! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. We tested that prediction with 2026 data, a different AI model, and

Run pairwise Granger tests over a basket of thirty instruments and you get a causal network that looks like a plate of spaghetti. AUD/USD drives copper, copper drives the Aussie back, oil leads the loonie, the loonie leads oil, and somewhere in the mess a small-cap ETF appears to Granger-cause the ten-year yield. Most of those arrows are fake. They come from three things markets are drowning in:

The dividend discount model (DDM) says that a stocks current price ought to reflect the discounted value of its expected future dividend stream (1) begin{equation*}mathrm{Price} = sum_{t=1}^{infty} frac{mathbb{E}[mathrm{Div}_{t}]}{(1{+}r)^t}end{equation*} mathbb{E}[mathrm{Div}_t] is the companys expected dividend in t years, and r > 0% is the firms discount rate. The Gordon

Every investor who holds only their home market has made the same decision. Over the last century and a half that decision paid an Australian seven percent a year in real terms and a Portuguese investor less than one. Nobody chose which of those they were born into. The number everyone quotes Equities return about seven percent a year after inflation. That figure comes from one country, measured

You backtest a strategy, subtract "a spread" for costs, and move on. Where did that number come from? If you typed in a guess, or pulled a single quoted spread from a vendor, you are almost certainly wrong, and wrong in the one direction that flatters your worst assets. The effective spread you actually pay is unobservable without trade-and-quote data, and quote data for anything outside

This article presents methods for adjusting the duration of major countries in global bond indices using point-in-time measures of local economic conditions. The macro factors include inflation, credit conditions, real estate price growth, yield-curve valuations, and economic surprises. Each has clear theoretical implications for interest-rate markets. An equally weighted composite score of these

How a single-value performance metric can distort the ranking of trading strategies and how to avoid falling for it and gain deeper insight into strategy comparison. Diagram comparing probability distributions of trading strategies A and B, showing why a single higher performance value (V_B) doesn't mean strategy B is truly better than A Picture two trading strategies, A and B. You run

Behavioral finance research has established that investors dislike negative skewness because it exposes them to rare but severe losses, while they embrace positive skewness because it offers the chance of occasional outsized gains the lottery-like appeal that persists even when expected payoffs are modest. In behavioral models, this preference for positively skewed assets bids up their prices,

This is an independent test of a novel strategy from David Varadi: Inflation Compass. It builds on his earlier Growth and Inflation strategy by adding a direct market-based measure of expected inflation. Were testing two versions of his new strategy: Original and Enhanced (more on this later). Backtested results from 1990 follow. Results are net of transaction costs see backtest

A time series is mean-reverting if it tends to return to a stable long-run level after being displaced from it. In pure form, that means the process has a well-defined unconditional mean and a variance that does not grow without bound; shocks decay rather than accumulate. This is the opposite of a random walk, where each innovation is permanently absorbed into the level and variance grows linearly

You already ran the models. The old article "From One Tree to Forests to Boosting" walked you from a single decision tree to XGBoost, "How a Decision Tree Engineers a New Alpha" showed a tree carving conditional edges out of order-book features, and "Ridge Above 1h, XGBoost Below 5min" handed you a timeframe rule for which model to point at which horizon. None of

What Is the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process? The OrnsteinUhlenbeck (OU) process is the simplest continuous-time model of a mean-reverting random process. It was introduced in 1930 by Leonard Ornstein and George Uhlenbeck as a physical model of the velocity of a Brownian particle experiencing friction (Uhlenbeck & Ornstein, 1930), and it has since become one of the most widely used stochastic