<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Think USC</title>
	
	<link>http://think.usc.edu</link>
	<description>Opinions and Ideas from the University of Southern California</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 22:08:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ThinkUsc" /><feedburner:info uri="thinkusc" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>An Ounce of Prevention Could Save Billions</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/tVl_VwLE1NE/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/an-ounce-of-prevention-could-save-billions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Doctors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goldman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schaeffer Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DANA GOLDMAN</a>, director of USC's  Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, talked to Gina Kolata about reining in healthcare costs by improving access to preventative care.
<br />
<br />
The Q&#38;A  originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/22/health/views/a-long-view-on-health-care-think-like-an-investor.html?_r=1">New York Times</a>.
<br />
<br />
<strong>How much are we spending on treating diseases that might be prevented?</strong>

The most consistent estimates, and most widely cited, seem to come out of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, lobbying groups like the Tobacco-Free Kids initiative, and the president’s prevention initiative. Instead of blanket measures, they focus more on diseases relating to “lifestyle” decisions like <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Obesity." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/symptoms/morbid-obesity/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">obesity</a> and <a title="In-depth reference and news articles about Smoking and smokeless tobacco." href="http://health.nytimes.com/health/guides/specialtopic/smoking-and-smokeless-tobacco/overview.html?inline=nyt-classifier">smoking</a>, and their estimates include costs for lost productivity in addition to medical expenses.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/an-ounce-of-prevention-could-save-billions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/an-ounce-of-prevention-could-save-billions/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Life at the Extremes — Not Really</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/i7KFSjPZFN8/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/life-at-the-extremes-not-really/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts and Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treuer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Dornsife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAVID TREUER</a>, professor of English, USC Dornsife.
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-treuer-indians-poverty-20120520,0,651965.story">Los Angeles Times.</a>
<br />
<br />
During the election cycle we tend to ask: What does America mean; where are we going? And then someone decides to check on the Indians to find out the answer, as though Indians represent America's soul hidden in the attic. And of course politicians have long stood next to their "souls" and posed for pictures on the campaign trail.

Within the last year, Diane Sawyer and "20/20" did a special on the sorry conditions at the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, and the New Yorker featured a grim photo essay on Pine Ridge too. The New York Times published a piece on brutal crime at the Wind River Reservation in Wyoming and another on the deep financial problems at Foxwoods, the Pequot-owned "world's largest" casino in Connecticut. Indians make the news, but the news ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/life-at-the-extremes-not-really/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/21/life-at-the-extremes-not-really/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Great California Exodus?</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/vbsHkY3AsoU/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/15/the-great-california-exodus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Myers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zocalo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DOWELL MYERS</a>, demographer and planning professor, USC Price School of Public Policy
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared at <a href="http://zocalopublicsquare.org/thepublicsquare/2012/05/13/we%E2%80%99re-still-here-still-golden/read/nexus/">Zocalo.</a>
<br />
<br />
California, you might think, is a terrible place that people are fleeing from. One reason you might think so is that a cottage industry of pundits, business lobbyists, and politicians has been dedicated to convincing the world that California is and will remain a failure until our prevailing cultural and political climate changes. In this game, demographics are treated like a football. But the people of California are the demographics, and they may not like being tossed about.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/15/the-great-california-exodus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/15/the-great-california-exodus/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What a Deal: Smarter Politicians, Less Time in Office</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/B4eUOnIFkF4/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/11/what-a-deal-smarter-politicians-less-time-in-office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 21:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[California Legislature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sacramento Bee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schnur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Dornsife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DAN SCHNUR</a>, director of USC's Jesse Unruh Institute of Politics.
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.sacbee.com/2012/05/11/4482363/proposition-enhances-reform-allows.html">Sacramento Bee</a>.
<br
<br />
When the original ballot initiative to impose term limits was put before California voters in 1990, I enthusiastically campaigned for its passage.

When career politicians tried to dramatically weaken the state's term limits law 10 years ago, I fought to defeat them.

When I returned to Sacramento to serve as chairman of the California Fair Political Practices Commission, I saw that term limits had dramatically succeeded in one important respect. The Legislature was far more diverse than at any other time in our state's history. Not only were there an unprecedented number of female, Latino and Asian Pacific Islander members, but we have also seen an extraordinary range of diversity in professional experience and background as well, as small-business owners and union members, doctors and nurses, teachers and farmers and law enforcement officers have all sought and gained election to the Legislature since term limits took effect.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/11/what-a-deal-smarter-politicians-less-time-in-office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/11/what-a-deal-smarter-politicians-less-time-in-office/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Ads Are Hazardous to Your Mental Health</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/uA_xoV8tx70/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/01/political-ads-are-hazardous-to-your-mental-health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 23:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kaplan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Annenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinkusc.com/?p=375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MARTY KAPLAN</a>, professor of entertainment, media and society, USC Annenberg
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared at the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marty-kaplan/warning-political-ads-mak_b_1116573.html">Huffington Post.</a>
<br />
<br />
This is the disclaimer that Britain's Public Interest Research Centre recently <a href="http://www.pirc.info/projects/advertising/" target="_hplink">proposed</a> for inclusion on billboards:
<blockquote><em>"This advertisement may influence you in ways of which you are not consciously aware. Buying consumer goods is unlikely to improve your wellbeing, and borrowing to buy consumer goods may be unwise; debt can enslave."</em></blockquote>
For this buy-buy-buy holiday season, those words are a spritz of pepper spray.

Imagine, then, that advertisers were required to admit that the underlying premise of ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/01/political-ads-are-hazardous-to-your-mental-health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/05/01/political-ads-are-hazardous-to-your-mental-health/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>In China, Blame the Murder Victims</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/EIZJKd5QTS0/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/26/in-china-blame-the-murder-victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 19:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts and Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Annenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MEI FONG</a>, lecturer, USC's Annenberg School of Communication and Journalism.
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-fong-chinese-student-killings-20120426,0,5617529.story">Los Angeles Times</a>.
<br />
<br />
After USC graduate students Ming Qu and Ying Wu were shot and killed earlier this month, the Chinese student community in America was saddened, shocked and frightened.

The reaction back home was very different. The killings, which happened while Qu and Wu were sitting and talking in a BMW, unleashed a torrent of Internet vitriol in <a id="PLGEO00000014" title="China" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/intl/china-PLGEO00000014.topic">China</a>, and it wasn't directed at the pair's attacker.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/26/in-china-blame-the-murder-victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/26/in-china-blame-the-murder-victims/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>What Brought L.A. Back From the 1992 Riots</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/AChIfD3Nt9o/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/25/what-brought-l-a-back-from-the-1992-riots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 21:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. Riots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pastor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Dornsife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MANUEL PASTOR</a>, director of USC's Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, and KAFI BLUMENFIELD, president and CEO Liberty Hill Foundation.
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-0425-pastorblumenfield-l.a.-riots-reform-20120425,0,5976851.story">Los Angeles Times</a>.
<br />
<br />
In 1992, the acquittal of four police officers accused of beating Rodney King was the match that ignited a city, setting off a wave of violence that left 53 dead, thousands injured and hundreds of businesses destroyed.

There was a lot of accumulated tinder to burn. Los Angeles was struggling with a faltering and de-industrialized economy that left too many without good jobs, a wave of demographic transition that caused ethnic and generational tensions, and a widening gap between rich and poor that was just beginning to emerge into public view — a bit like the U.S. today.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/25/what-brought-l-a-back-from-the-1992-riots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/25/what-brought-l-a-back-from-the-1992-riots/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Keeping L.A.’s 30/10 Transit Plan on Track</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/2e5Rx-o3ZFE/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/keeping-l-a-s-3010-transit-plan-on-track/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:48:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2012 presidential campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Schweitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Price]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LISA SCHWEITZER</a>, associate professor, USC Price School
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-schweitzer-3010-transit-plan-20120416,0,5520828.story">Los Angeles Times.</a>
<br />
<br />
Los Angeles Mayor <a id="PEPLT007500" title="Antonio Villaraigosa" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/antonio-villaraigosa-PEPLT007500.topic">Antonio Villaraigosa</a>'s 30/10 plan may be in trouble. The proposal calls for borrowing from the federal government over 10 years the total amount expected to be raised and repaid over 30 years from a half-cent sales tax authorized by L.A. County voters in 2008. With the money, the <a id="ORGOV000097" title="Metropolitan Transportation Authority" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/travel/commuting/metropolitan-transportation-authority-ORGOV000097.topic">Metropolitan Transportation Authority</a> could complete transit and highway projects in 10 years instead of 30.

However, on March 29, Congress extended federal transportation spending for only 90 days — the ninth such action since 2009 — to avoid a complete shutdown of Washington-funded highway work. Funds for the mayor's proposal were not part of the bill. The possibility of movement won't come until after the November elections, and even that may be a pipe dream.

The 30/10 financing model, widely heralded among transportation experts, thus appears to be another hostage to partisan acrimony in Washington. A two-year bill, which passed 72 to 22 in the <a id="ORGOV0000134" title="U.S. Senate" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/government/u.s.-senate-ORGOV0000134.topic">Senate</a>, included financing for the 30/10 plan, but <a id="ORGOV0000005" title="Democratic Party" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/democratic-party-ORGOV0000005.topic">Democrats</a> in the House could not force a vote on the legislation. Some <a id="ORGOV0000004" title="Republican Party" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/politics/parties-movements/republican-party-ORGOV0000004.topic">House Republicans</a> simply do not want to expand federal loan programs, which they believe encourage overbuilding and mismanagement.

There are options that do not depend on Washington pulling itself together. But Villaraigosa must first decide what is truly important about his plan: fast-tracking the money or developing a model for the federal government to do so. That's a debate worth having because there are three options for fast-tracking money into Southern California to pay for our needed transportation projects.

The first is the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, which has been around since 1994. Because California's economy is bigger than that of most countries, it can finance much of its own infrastructure. The bank has an <a id="AUTOORNPR000013" title="AAA" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/travel/commuting/aaa-AUTOORNPR000013.topic">AAA</a> credit rating and thus can offer competitive rates. It has helped fund some large projects, including the <a id="PLTRA0000103" title="Chesapeake Bay Bridge" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/travel/commuting/chesapeake-bay-bridge-PLTRA0000103.topic">Bay Bridge</a>'s deck replacement. Given its modest size, the bank probably wouldn't bankroll more than a handful of projects at once, so Los Angeles would need to prioritize its projects. But then, nobody really expected the feds to finance the entire 30/10 wish list either.

Villaraigosa also could look overseas for some fast money. The European Investment Bank has lent money to 78 countries to build highways and transit projects, the bulk of it to member states of the <a id="ORGOV000067" title="European Union" href="http://www.latimes.com/topic/economy-business-finance/economy/european-union-ORGOV000067.topic">European Union</a>. Although the bank has not financed a project in the United States, its mission is to foster infrastructure projects that support EU goals, among them slowing global warming. The 30/10 plan has multiple transit projects — the Westside subway and the Green Line/LAX extension — that dovetail nicely with this environmental goal. Villaraigosa could make an unprecedented proposal to the European bank. What's the worst that could happen? It says no and mocks our soccer teams ?
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/keeping-l-a-s-3010-transit-plan-on-track/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/keeping-l-a-s-3010-transit-plan-on-track/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>The Missile Mishap That Nobody Predicted</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/XVuqsqVkGXE/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/the-missile-mishap-that-nobody-predicted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:31:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[International Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hymans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Dornsife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[JACQUES E.C. HYMANS</a>, associate professor of international relations, USC Dornsife.
<br />
<br />
This op-ed originally appeared in <a href="http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/137408/jacques-e-c-hymans/north-koreas-lessons-for-not-building-an-atomic-bomb">Foreign Affairs</a>.
<br />
<br />
The dismal failure of North Korea's April 13 long-range missile test -- it broke into pieces after <a href="http://security.blogs.cnn.com/2012/04/13/north-koreas-rocket-gone-in-81-seconds/" target="_blank">81 seconds</a> of flight time -- has also exposed the poverty of standard proliferation analyses. In the days leading up to the test, most commentators apparently took Pyongyang's technological forward march for granted. Even the <a href="http://blog.sfgate.com/pyun/2012/04/11/the-8-things-you-should-know-about-the-north-korea-missile-launch/" target="_blank">more sober voices</a> evinced little doubt that this test would go at least as well as the country's 2009 effort, which managed to put a rocket into flight for about fifteen minutes before it malfunctioned. Meanwhile, other technical experts regaled readers with tales of the <a href="http://38north.org/2012/04/jpollack041012/" target="_blank">"emerging"</a> bona fide North Korean <a ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/the-missile-mishap-that-nobody-predicted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/16/the-missile-mishap-that-nobody-predicted/</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Natural Metaphysical Poet</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ThinkUsc/~3/GujvU6_ovGc/</link>
		<comments>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/15/a-natural-metaphysical-poet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>USC Admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts and Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[los angeles times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muske-Dukes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USC Dornsife]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://think.usc.edu/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CAROL MUSKE-DUKES</a>, professor of English, USC Dornsife.
<br />
<br />
This commentary originally appeared in the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-ca-carol-muske-dukes-20120415,0,2898630.story">Los Angeles Times.</a>
<br />
<br />
It was a freezing night in March 1978 — and the small, determined woman climbing next to me up the icy incline to the Bedford Hills Correctional Facility for women leaned on a cane. I wanted to take her arm, but because she was famously fiercely independent, I hesitated. Later, I thought that I was right to hold back: Adrienne Rich was that kind of standard-bearer, accustomed to her own "climb," accustomed to a righteous loneliness in her ascent.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/15/a-natural-metaphysical-poet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://think.usc.edu/2012/04/15/a-natural-metaphysical-poet/</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>

