Comments for Thomas Christory's Blog http://blog.christory.net When Cisco, VMware and Linux are your everyday Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:30:43 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= Comment on Your ideal CCIE R&S rack ? by Jchttp://blog.christory.net/2010/06/12/your-ideal-ccie-rs-rack/comment-page-1/#comment-928 Jc Thu, 06 Jan 2011 11:30:43 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=57#comment-928 4X3750-POE + stack 6X6500 + Supervisor virtual chassis + 10g fiber 4X3750-POE + stack
6X6500 + Supervisor virtual chassis + 10g fiber

]]> Comment on Building an easy and scalable load-balanced high-availability web-hosting solution. Part One : The front by Thomas Christoryhttp://blog.christory.net/2009/09/15/building-an-easy-and-scalable-load-balanced-high-availability-web-hosting-solution-part-one-the-front/comment-page-1/#comment-502 Thomas Christory Mon, 21 Jun 2010 07:06:26 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=19#comment-502 Actually if you look at the schema, there are two load balancers, every server is a webserver -and- a load balancer, and for those two load balancers, there is a floating ip that moves if a server goes down. Actually if you look at the schema, there are two load balancers, every server is a webserver -and- a load balancer, and for those two load balancers, there is a floating ip that moves if a server goes down.

]]> Comment on Building an easy and scalable load-balanced high-availability web-hosting solution. Part One : The front by Nikola Majksnerhttp://blog.christory.net/2009/09/15/building-an-easy-and-scalable-load-balanced-high-availability-web-hosting-solution-part-one-the-front/comment-page-1/#comment-501 Nikola Majksner Sun, 20 Jun 2010 22:58:32 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=19#comment-501 Cool, but what if your load balancer is dead, your website will not be available, so you have to use two load balancers in case one of them is dead, second one will take care of requests. To be shorter, you need load balancer redundancy. Cool, but what if your load balancer is dead, your website will not be available, so you have to use two load balancers in case one of them is dead, second one will take care of requests. To be shorter, you need load balancer redundancy.

]]> Comment on Building an easy and scalable load-balanced high-availability web-hosting solution. Part One : The front by Thomas Christoryhttp://blog.christory.net/2009/09/15/building-an-easy-and-scalable-load-balanced-high-availability-web-hosting-solution-part-one-the-front/comment-page-1/#comment-500 Thomas Christory Sat, 19 Jun 2010 14:08:30 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=19#comment-500 we had 2 haproxy frontend, and a kind-of load balanced ip, if one fails, the ip goes up on the other server we had 2 haproxy frontend, and a kind-of load balanced ip, if one fails, the ip goes up on the other server

]]> Comment on Building an easy and scalable load-balanced high-availability web-hosting solution. Part One : The front by Markushttp://blog.christory.net/2009/09/15/building-an-easy-and-scalable-load-balanced-high-availability-web-hosting-solution-part-one-the-front/comment-page-1/#comment-497 Markus Fri, 18 Jun 2010 12:28:34 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=19#comment-497 How do you implement redundancy? How do you implement redundancy?

]]> Comment on Your ideal CCIE R&S rack ? by Thomas Christoryhttp://blog.christory.net/2010/06/12/your-ideal-ccie-rs-rack/comment-page-1/#comment-480 Thomas Christory Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:35:39 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=57#comment-480 Pas con l'idée de copier =)Ouais @ Cisco ;-) Pas con l’idée de copier =)

Ouais @ Cisco ;-)

]]> Comment on Your ideal CCIE R&S rack ? by Benhttp://blog.christory.net/2010/06/12/your-ideal-ccie-rs-rack/comment-page-1/#comment-479 Ben Sat, 12 Jun 2010 18:29:58 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=57#comment-479 Aucune idée, je ne me suis jamais penché sur le sujet ! Mais si tu à no limit sur le budget, pourquoi ne pas copier les meilleurs? ipexpert, ou INE : http://www.ine.com/rack-rentals.htm#RoutingSwitching En fait ton lab, tu va le monter chez cisco, avoue ;) Aucune idée, je ne me suis jamais penché sur le sujet !
Mais si tu à no limit sur le budget, pourquoi ne pas copier les meilleurs? ipexpert, ou INE :
http://www.ine.com/rack-rentals.htm#RoutingSwitching
En fait ton lab, tu va le monter chez cisco, avoue ;)

]]> Comment on Cisco Contest #1 by Macihhhttp://blog.christory.net/2010/02/10/cisco-contest-1/comment-page-1/#comment-439 Macihh Wed, 26 May 2010 21:27:01 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=48#comment-439 C'est ce qui m'a couté mon BCMSN ! C’est ce qui m’a couté mon BCMSN !

]]> Comment on Cisco Contest #1 by Thomas Christoryhttp://blog.christory.net/2010/02/10/cisco-contest-1/comment-page-1/#comment-435 Thomas Christory Sat, 22 May 2010 21:34:23 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=48#comment-435 ouep c'est ça :-) Bien ouej ! ouep c’est ça :-) Bien ouej !

]]> Comment on Cisco Contest #1 by rayboneshttp://blog.christory.net/2010/02/10/cisco-contest-1/comment-page-1/#comment-434 raybones Sat, 22 May 2010 21:04:59 +0000 http://blog.christory.net/?p=48#comment-434 le n-802.1q, il n'a pas été spécifié "encapsulation dot1q" sur l'une des extremité et cela a donc été négocié... d'ou la mention n-802.1q. le n-802.1q, il n’a pas été spécifié “encapsulation dot1q” sur l’une des extremité et cela a donc été négocié… d’ou la mention n-802.1q.

]]>