There are myriad translations of the Bible.

The one that I have used most frequently throughout my time at Resurrection has been Today’s New International Version (TNIV).

On September 1, 2009 it was announced that  TNIV would be discontinued. In its place the NIV will be updated by 2011. You can find more information at http://www.nivbible2011.com.

In addition, I recently ran across this website announcing a new translation to be produced the Common English Bible. You can find more information at http://www.commonenglish.com.

Considering that the TNIV will no longer be published, I will begin to phase it out of my regular usage. I will likely return to the NRSV which I used most frequently during seminary. However, I am open to suggestions or insights on the above to versions.

What are your thoughts, feelings or opinions about the 2011 NIV, TNIV or Common English Bible?

I find hope from this progress report…

Progress Report

Call to Action Steering Committee

November 2009

Background and Introduction

The Call to Action as adopted by the Council of Bishops in May 2009 challenged a Steering Committee “to guide our denominational response to the urgent opportunity for further alignment of the mission of the church and the four areas of focus, and to refashion and reposition the church for the 21^st century.” The Committee was charged with the task of bringing forward “…a plan of action that will lead to reordering the life of the church.” Central to that Call to Action was the resolve to be guided by the mission of the church (“to make disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world”) and the four areas of focus that have emerged as our way of living into that mission. The world-wide economic crisis formed the context and climate for such an undertaking.

Over the last six months the Steering Committee that was created following the spring meetings of the Council of Bishops and the Connectional Table has met in Chicago on three occasions, and shared numerous emails, reports, papers, and conversations. We have been very ably assisted through this process by a consultant, Peter Gerend from Duke Corporate Education, related to the Fuqua School of Business at Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. We gratefully acknowledge the funding support provided through the Connectional Table.

In addition to many Biblical images and metaphors that surfaced in the course of our conversations, we grounded ourselves and our work in Wesleyan heritage by reading once again “The United Methodist Way: Living the Christian Life in Covenant with Christ and One Another” (a paper that was prepared for the November 2007 Extended Cabinet Retreat) and “The Character of a Methodist” by John Wesley. In preparation for our study, we also read two books: A Sense of Urgency by John Kotter and A Failure of Nerve by Edwin Friedman. How the Mighty Fall by Jim Collins was also a resource for several of us.

The presenting critical question that has guided the work of the Steering Committee:

Will we passively accept the reality of the continued decline of United Methodism in the United States and Western Europe OR with urgency and passion choose to move toward achieving our common mission of making disciples of Jesus for the transformation of the world in creative, fresh, and bold new ways in all parts of the world?

In the course of our time together we created a vision of what the church of the future might be:

As United Methodists, we dream of a church…

• With more accountability to Gospel and less conformity to an outdated, bureaucratic system
• With more participation with young people and less rhetoric about good intentions
• With more ministry with the poor and less with the privileged
• With more expectation for growth and less acceptance of status quo
• With more engagement with the margins and less traditionalism
• With more work on the Four Focus Areas and less on sub-optimal tasks
• With more positive expression of our Methodist connection in ecumenical, interfaith families and less autonomy and parochial self-interest
• With more dreaming about what will be and less struggling to preserve what was
• With more giving to direct ministry and less to administration
• With more grace and freedom and fewer rules
• With more trust and less cynicism

Process

With the framing question and dream in mind, we engaged in several exercises that surfaced numerous interventions that could become system-changing actions. Out of those we reached consensus around several processes that, if implemented, would lead to “a holistic 21st century method for being and doing church around the world in radically new ways.”

1. Developing metrics for effectiveness and accountability across the church
2. Rebuilding our leadership development system, with special attention to young people
3. Eliminating the guaranteed appointment
4. Recasting the quadrennial General Conference
5. Reordering the life of the church
6. Establishing a “global office” or central organizing center for coordination and efficiency
7. Constructing a viable financial future

We have engaged in numerous conversations to gather information from a wide constituency. We have received electronic feedback from a cross-section of United Methodists in response to preliminary ideas and drafts of possibilities built around this list of interventions, and our original list was revised as a result of these responses.

These are significant issues with which we have been wrestling. In this process, we have confirmed often and in many ways, through many voices, that the UMC is a highly complex organization. To redesign and reorder the life of the church requires adaptive change, and that change requires hard work. To suggest a Biblical image, we have left Egypt and are making our way through the wilderness toward the “promised land.” We are not there yet, and there is even more hard work and disruption ahead as we design and develop a comprehensive new system that will, by God’s grace, empower us to achieve the mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world.

Easy answers may lead to quick fixes that garner popular support but may also lead to wrong choices that compromise our desire to move toward achieving the mission. We believe that what is demanded of us at this time, as a people of faith who worship and serve God through the UMC, is either to “convince the world of the reality of the Gospel or leave it unconvinced.”  (¶129, The Book of Discipline)

Recommendations

Item #1 It is imperative that clearly defined measurements, standards, and expectations be established and applied, thus providing a standard for accountability across the connection. It will be as local churches and annual conferences are held accountable for outcomes of faithful and fruitful ministry that our mission will be accomplished. We call upon the Council of Bishops to immediately begin a process of consultation, conferencing, and conversation with stakeholders and constituents that will lead to developing a comprehensive set of metrics to be applied at every level of the church: lay and clergy leaders, local churches, districts and annual conferences, and the general church.

Item #2 Our Steering Committee surfaced the need to “redesign the leadership development system” and quickly saw this in the context of and in relation to one of the Four Areas of Focus (“developing principled Christian leaders”). We urge the Vision Pathway Team of the Council of Bishops, and others working on this Area of Focus, to approach this task with urgency. We will be forwarding to those groups the papers and notes of our conversations around leadership development and formation.

We urge the Council of Bishops and the Connectional Table to lead the church in prioritizing the leadership and participation of youth and young adults in all areas and at all levels of the church’s ministry, inviting youth and young adults to join in shaping the mission, worship, education, fellowship and outreach of the church.  We recognize that youth and young adults are not the “future” of the church but instead are persons with gifts and passions that can help all of us understand and relate the gospel to the cultures of today.

Item #3 Closely linked to redesigning our leadership development system is the recognition of a need to reconsider our system of deploying clergy across the church. The phrase, “eliminating the guaranteed appointment,” was a way to capture our sense that deployment and fruitfulness are linked. We know that the Ministry Study Committee is addressing the same concern and therefore refer this item to them, along with our encouragement to diligently address the many angles of this question.

Item #4 We affirm the invitation in the original Call to Action “to collaborate with the General Commission on the General Conference and the General Council on Finance and Administration to redesign the plan and operation of the 2012 General Conference.”  We call upon the Council of Bishops, the General Commission on the General Conference, and the Rules Committee to pursue this task immediately. After our deliberations over these last months, we believe that conversation must be expanded to include a total revamping of General Conference, including frequency and format.

Items #5, #6, and #7

The final three items in our list of interventions are intricately connected. Above all we believe that any reordering or reshaping of the general church absolutely must be done as a means of achieving the mission of “making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world” and as a vehicle for more effectively integrating the Four Areas of Focus into the connection and the fabric of the denomination, starting at the local church level. The reordering at the general church must be accomplished not as a top-down initiative, but as a way of repositioning, modeling, equipping, and resourcing the whole church for the twenty-first century.

The Steering Committee believes that this reordering includes some scenario involving a reduced number of general agencies, coupled with the creation of an executive, coordinating office for the denomination in order that our mission and ministries around the world will be strengthened. We do not believe that we can, or should, create a “central office” (whatever title it may ultimately given) as another layer of bureaucracy, simply added to what already exists.

We explored several scenarios and identified principles to guide the development of a plan that will provide flexibility, rapid response, collaboration, and energy for accomplishing the mission of making disciples of Jesus Christ for the transformation of the world. Those principles include at least:

• Starting with no preconceived ideas of what will continue, be changed, or be ended
• Becoming nimble, lean, minimal and aligned and effective
• Aligning all facets of the church with the mission, lived out through the Four Areas of Focus
• Becoming more financially sustainable in order to assure the future
• Analyzing all Disciplinary mandates to glean only what is essential to achieve the mission

We know that alignment is essential! However, before designing the specifics of any future scenario or system-wide reordering of the denomination, we must evaluate the whole system. In order to achieve the best alignment we are convinced of the necessity of performing an operational assessment of the structures and relationships with the current system, including general agencies, the Council of Bishops, and the Annual Conferences. To achieve this complex task, we will recommend that we contract with an outside, independent group that can lead us through this process.

We know that data regarding our current and future financial obligations at all levels of the connection must be gathered before drafting a means of assuring a viable financial future for the UMC and as part of our operational assessment. We call on the Connectional Table to work with urgency to assemble the data and give direction for the church. (¶904, The Book of Discipline, 2008)

Next Steps Going Forward

We must receive feedback and insights from a large number and a wide range of United Methodist voices, identified leaders of the denomination as well as those faithful ones who sit in our pews and who serve Jesus daily in the world. We recommend working with an organization that can design an internet-based survey instrument and can receive, analyze, and summarize the results.

We call upon the Council of Bishops and the Connectional Table to create and fund a team that will lead the next phase of this journey. This team will receive and review the data gathered and generate a response based on the results of the assessments. The scenarios the current Steering Committee has developed may be incorporated as starting points for the work of this new team.

In order to move the process forward and design the reordering the life of the church, the Steering Committee recommends the following steps as the next phase of this critical work.

The creation of a new Steering Team composed of twelve (12) persons, including no more than five (5) of the current committee members. We recommend that Bishop Gregory Palmer be named the chair and convener of this Steering Team. Members of this new Steering Team will be named by the current committee, with attention given to expertise and diversity, and to passion and vision.

The creation of a four-person Project Team, led by a Project Manager with whom we will contract for oversight of the work. The Project Team will function as the day-to-day work team, interfacing with the various constituencies and with the Operational Assessment group to be selected. The Steering Team will give direction and will receive updated reports from the on-going work of the Project Team.

Every bishop will host a series of conversations in her or his area. These conversations will focus on responses and suggestions for reordering the life of the church, and for establishing metrics for use in evaluation and accountability. (See Item #1 above)

In order to adequately fund the next steps in this undertaking, we request funding support through the Connectional Table. The distribution of these funds will be for the purpose of securing contracts with an organization that will perform the Operational Assessment, including on-line surveys with analysis, and with a Project Manager who will devote full time and attention to the process. In addition, the funds will be used for the expenses of the Teams, including travel and meeting time. In consultation with those who work with such processes and assessments, we believe an amount not to exceed $500,000 will be needed.

Finally, that a progress report and an accounting will be given at the spring 2010 meetings of the Council of Bishops and Connectional Table, with final recommendations made to the COB and CT in the fall of 2010.

MEMBERS OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE

Bishops

• Gregory Palmer, Chair
• Larry Goodpaster, Project Manager
• Grant Hagiya
• John Hopkins
• Joel Martinez
• Sharon Rader
• Mary Ann Swenson
• Rosemarie Wenner
• John Yambasu

General Secretaries

• Neil Alexander
• Barbara Boigegrain
• Karen Greenwaldt
• Erin Hawkins
• Larry Hollon
• Moses Kumar

Connectional Table

• Benjamin Boruff
• Jay Brim
• Deborah McLeod

Support Staff

• Diane Degnan, Communications
• Mary Figueredo,  GBOPHB, Recording Secretary

Consultant

• Pete Gerend, Duke Corporate Education

6 Questions for The United Methodist Church could have been improved greatly by clearer named and expected outcomes. It was not sufficient to simply seek to “change the conversation” within the denomination. The project would have had much clearer outcomes from the beginning, if I were to do it over.

6 Questions for The United Methodist Church was an exercise in social media for me. My hope was to use social media to spread the word about the opportunity throughout the denomination. It didn’t quite live up to the lofty expectations as far as numerical participation, but I did learn some keys about social media:

• Initial buzz and word of mouth is an excellent catalyst for growth. In a campaign that lasted 98 days, over half the participants had joined in the first 6 days.
• Sustaining traffic over a long period of time is difficult. If I had it to do over again, I would have ended the project after two weeks.
• While participants at http://bit.ly/6qumc grew slowly. There was not much interaction on the Facebook Page, but fans continued to grow steadily throughout the entire project. I have no idea why.

Will you please share your thoughts, feelings or opinions about social media initiatives?

My apologies for a lack of regularity in blogging. I have been in the midst of ending my role in Congregational Care and beginning my new role as Internet Campus Pastor at The United Methodist Church of the Resurrection. I am excited about the possibilities of building a Christian community online where non religious and nominally religious people are becoming deeply committed Christians. You can worship with us at http://live.cor.org – a site which will be continue to be updated in the months ahead.

Will you please send me an email at andrew.conard@cor.org with “Resurrection Internet Campus” in the subject line if you have ideas to share about  shaping the future of church online within The United Methodist Church?

I hope to hear from you soon.

I learned the value of focus from 6 Questions for The United Methodist Church.There were a large number of topics which diluted the focus and made it more confusing to participate. For a similar project in the future, I would change the topics to less than seven.

I could have learned this lesson from Simple Life and Deliberate Simplicity – two books which I have read recently. Simple is most often better.

Earlier this year, you were invited to join in a conversation which sought to raise questions for The United Methodist Church. This effort was called 6 Questions for The United Methodist Church (6qumc). 6qumc officially closed on September 30.

I am working on compiling the top 6 questions in each category into a book which will be available for print or download from lulu.com. I hope that these questions will be distributed as widely as possible throughout The United Methodist Church to help shape the conversation within our denomination.

Will you consider being a part of the spread of this conversation?

Check back here a week from Friday to access the final product

Simple Life: Time, Relationships, Money, God by Thom S. and Art Rainer is a follow up to Simple Church: Returning to God’s Process for Making Disciples with the focus shifting from church to one’s personal life. Rainer and Rainer suggest moving through action steps of clarity, movement, alignment and focus in the areas of time, relationships, money and connecting with God. Common sense principles are mixed in with interview from individuals who were experiencing stress in these areas.

I appreciate the idea of simplifying one’s life. Simple Life offers practical steps to moving forward. However, I experienced the content as a bit fluffy. The meat of the content could have been produced in a book half the length. This book would have been more effective if the authors would have taken on the challenge of editing to a more concise length.

The connection to the successful book, Simple Church, seems contrived and a mechanism to market a nominally effective book. I recommend http://unclutterer.com over Simple Life for simplifying one’s life.

I believe that it would be valuable for United Methodist annual conferences to mandate any new church construction be LEED certified. While this may lead to increased building cost, over time it yields positive benefits in energy and cost savings. This is a benefit for the denomination’s witness in the world and a positive benefit in the area of climate change.

I am taking a blogging hiatus for the rest of the week.

I will be traveling to a Kansas West residency event in the first part of the week and to visit Nicole’s family of origin in North Carolina in the latter part of the week.

In the meantime, I am looking for your guidance.

What would be most helpful for you in future blog posts?

Email me at andrew dot conard at cor dot org with “Blog Idea” in the subject line or leave your comments below. I am ready to hear from you.