<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0">
    <title>Tim Abbott</title>
    
    <link rel="hub" href="http://hubbub.api.typepad.com/" />
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/" />
    <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:weblog-357499</id>
    <updated>2009-11-26T00:14:06+00:00</updated>
    <subtitle>on mission, culture, young people, schools and stuff</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.typepad.com/">TypePad</generator>
    <link rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TimAbbott" type="application/atom+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><entry>
        <title>The Bble in five lines</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/AbxSqEfJDB0/the-bble-in-five-lines.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/the-bble-in-five-lines.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-11-26T12:11:59+00:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a6da4f59970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-26T00:14:06+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-26T00:14:06+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Argghhh... I've been tagged with one of those meme things again. But as it's from Banksy (and before that the good Beaker Folk of Husborne Crawley) I thought I'd have a go. The rules are: Summarise the Bible in five statements, the first one word long, the second two, the third three, the fourth four and the last five words long. Or possibly you could do this in descending order. Tag five people. Here goes: Light A nation Exile and division The word made flesh Your kingdom come unto eternity Rather than tagging people I'm going to invite anyone reading this who wants to have a go to, well, have a go. Leave a comment so we know you took up the challenge and know where to look for your inspired theological brevity.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="bible" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="random" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Argghhh... I've been tagged with one of those meme things again.</p>

<p>But as it's from <a href="http://banksyboy.blogspot.com/2009/11/living-by-numbers.html" target="_blank">Banksy</a> (and before that the good <a href="http://cyber-coenobites.blogspot.com/2009/11/5-statements-of-beaker-belief.html" target="_blank">Beaker Folk of Husborne Crawley</a>) I thought I'd have a go. The rules are:</p><blockquote><p>Summarise the Bible in five statements, the first one word long, the second two, the third three, the fourth four and the last five words long. Or possibly you could do this in descending order. Tag five people.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>Here goes:</p>

<blockquote><p>Light<br />
A nation<br />
Exile and division<br />
The word made flesh<br />
Your kingdom come unto eternity</p></blockquote><p>Rather than tagging people I'm going to invite anyone reading this who wants to have a go to, well, have a go. Leave a comment so we know you took up the challenge and know where to look for your inspired theological brevity.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/the-bble-in-five-lines.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Do whatever is good... show true humility</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/xcV1Q1pZu58/do-whatever-is-good-show-true-humility.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/do-whatever-is-good-show-true-humility.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e2012875dae760970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-25T21:29:35+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-26T00:16:59+00:00</updated>
        <summary>This evening I gave a presentation to a group of Colchester Borough councillors about the work of Street Pastors in our town. Also there was Debbie speaking about the SOS Bus project she heads up with whom we have a great working partnership. Let me put on record... we love these guys and the work they do. We love it that we can work in partnership with them and that dozens of ordinary people volunteer to give up an evening to help others in the town centre. There is a genuine appreciation for the work of Street Pastors from the public and also from the councillors we met this evening. But there was one question that bugged me. One of the councillors asked me to comment on something someone had said to him - that Street Pastors somehow saw themselves as having a monopoly on the role of caring for people on the streets at night. We know this isn't something that's been said by any of our team, and it's certainly not the reaction we get from people we meet on a Friday or Saturday night who are generally really comfortable with the fact that we're Christians. What bugs me isn't that someone might suspect such exclusivist nonsense of us. It's the worrying realisation that they feel they have grounds for such suspicion in the first place. How has the church behaved all these years if, as soon as it steps out to care unconditionally for others, it is suspected of doing so to claim some moral superiority over other people? (We know some of these other people - they turn out on Friday and Saturday nights too, not in the name of the church, but to care nevertheless and to help people through the work of the SOS bus.) Of course, we weave for ourselves a mighty complex web if we attempt to answer all the shifting and unspoken assumptions of others. The world has its suspicions; sometimes it is right. By our actions, by loving the world as Christ did, we are perhaps earning again the right to be heard, even if some of our earnings are going to pay off a debt of suspicion. The councillor who raised the question (not a Christian) emphasised his enthusiastic endorsement of what Street Pastors do. We need to keep doing it. As Paul said to Titus: "Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good, to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and to show true humility toward all men."</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="apologetics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="church" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Colchester" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="street pastors" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345219a769e20120a6d8fe30970b-popup" onclick="window.open( this.href, '_blank', 'width=640,height=480,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0' ); return false" style="float: left;"><img alt="DSC_0040" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8345219a769e20120a6d8fe30970b " src="http://timabbott.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345219a769e20120a6d8fe30970b-320wi" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px;" /></a> This evening I gave a presentation to a group of Colchester Borough councillors about the work of <a href="http://www.colchesterstreetpastors.org.uk/" target="_blank">Street Pastors</a> in our town. Also there was Debbie speaking about the <a href="http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/3796332.Colchester__SOS_bus_saves_a_life/" target="_blank">SOS Bus</a> project she heads up with whom we have a great working partnership. Let me put on record... we love these guys and the work they do. We love it that we can work in partnership with them and that dozens of ordinary people volunteer to give up an evening to help others in the town centre.</p><p>There is a genuine appreciation for the work of Street Pastors from the public and also from the councillors we met this evening. But there was one question that bugged me.</p><p>One of the councillors asked me to comment on something someone had said to him - that Street Pastors somehow saw themselves as having a monopoly on the role of caring for people on the streets at night. We know this isn't something that's been said by any of our team, and it's certainly not the reaction we get from people we meet on a Friday or Saturday night who are generally really comfortable with the fact that we're Christians.</p><p>What bugs me isn't that someone might suspect such exclusivist nonsense of us. It's the worrying realisation that they feel they have grounds for such suspicion in the first place. How has the church behaved all these years if, as soon as it steps out to care unconditionally for others, it is suspected of doing so to claim some moral superiority over other people? (We know some of these other people - they turn out on Friday and Saturday nights too, not in the name of the church, but to care nevertheless and to help people through the work of the SOS bus.)</p><p>Of course, we weave for ourselves a mighty complex web if we attempt to answer all the shifting and unspoken assumptions of others. The world has its suspicions; sometimes it is right. By our actions, by loving the world as Christ did, we are perhaps earning again the right to be heard, even if some of our earnings are going to pay off a debt of suspicion. The councillor who raised the question (not a Christian) emphasised his enthusiastic endorsement of what Street Pastors do. We need to keep doing it.</p><p>As Paul said to Titus:</p><blockquote><p><em>"Remind the people to be subject to rulers and authorities, to be obedient, to be ready to do whatever is good, to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and to show true humility toward all men."</em></p></blockquote></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/do-whatever-is-good-show-true-humility.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Wood panelling - my most viewed photo!</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/wVtCAyBIyW8/texture---wood-panelling.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/texture---wood-panelling.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a6d11391970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-24T20:39:27+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-24T20:44:39+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Texture - wood panelling, originally uploaded by timabbott. It is, to me, one of life's little mysteries that this is my most viewed photo by far on Flickr. About 2500 views. By comparison, the next highest picture has about 700. I know that compared to some giants of the Flickrverse 2500 views is peanuts. But for a picture of a wood panelled wall? It was taken as part of a vague theme to record a wide range of textures that might be of use as backgrounds. The CC licensing is an acknowledgement that this picture might be of some use to others and it really doesn't harm me to let them download it. Which must surely account for the number of views. I mean, you wouldn't click on this image just to take a closer look would you? Not unless you're a student of 21st Century wood panelling. So I'm guessing there are people out there who have this bit of interior wall for their computer desktop, Powerpoint / Keynote slide background or perhaps something else. I just never imagined it would be so popular.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="photos" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="random" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><div class="flickr-frame">	<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/theabbott/2739993330/" title="photo sharing"><img alt="" class="flickr-photo " src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3210/2739993330_5dbd36205b.jpg" /></a><br />	<span class="flickr-caption"><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/theabbott/2739993330/">Texture - wood panelling</a>, originally uploaded by <a href="http://www.flickr.com/people/theabbott/">timabbott</a>.</span></div>				<p class="flickr-yourcomment">	It is, to me, one of life's little mysteries that this is my most viewed photo by far on Flickr. About 2500 views. By comparison, the next highest picture has about 700.<br /><br />I know that compared to some giants of the Flickrverse 2500 views is peanuts. But for a picture of a wood panelled wall?<br /><br />It was taken as part of a vague theme to record a wide range of textures that might be of use as backgrounds. The CC licensing is an acknowledgement that this picture might be of some use to others and it really doesn't harm me to let them download it. Which must surely account for the number of views. I mean, you wouldn't click on this image just to take a closer look would you? Not unless you're a student of 21st Century wood panelling. So I'm guessing there are people out there who have this bit of interior wall for their computer desktop, Powerpoint / Keynote slide background or perhaps something else.<br /><br />I just never imagined it would be so popular.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/texture---wood-panelling.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Never Underestimate the Power of a Good Story</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/nIvA3aqc4bM/never-underestimate-the-power-of-a-good-story.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/never-underestimate-the-power-of-a-good-story.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e2012875a5ce63970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-16T00:32:35+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-16T00:32:35+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Brilliant! h/t: Phil Cooke</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="random" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Web/Tech" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Brilliant!</p><p align="center" class="asset asset-video" style="margin: 0pt auto; display: block;"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/6FhTecwPz-E&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/6FhTecwPz-E&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" /></object></p><br /><br />h/t: <a href="http://www.philcooke.com/Canal_commercial" target="_blank">Phil Cooke</a></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/never-underestimate-the-power-of-a-good-story.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>What you think vs The Truth</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/kudH30qKEX0/what-you-think-vs-the-truth.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/what-you-think-vs-the-truth.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a6a34ddc970b</id>
        <published>2009-11-15T23:24:11+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-15T23:24:11+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Seth Godin's post, When data and decisions collide, inspired Generous Husband's post on the difference between what we think is true, and what is true. In short, what we perceive to be the truth becomes reality for us and we respond according to that reality. If I believe someone is being dishonest with me, I will treat them with extreme caution or scepticism, even if they're actually being totally honest.. If I believe someone doesn't want to talk to me, it will affect how I relate to them, even if my perception is entirely false. We can't go round challenging ourselves on every last thing we believe about people or situations, but perhaps it would help to check our sense of reality when we find ourselves believing things about others that may not be true and for which we have little real evidence. In my humble experience the truth we tell ourselves can often turn out to be false.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>Seth Godin's post,<a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/11/when-data-and-decisions-collide.html" target="_blank"> When data and decisions collide</a>, inspired Generous Husband's post on <a href="http://www.the-generous-husband.com/2009/11/15/what-you-think-vs-the-truth/" target="_blank">the difference between what we think is true, and what is true.</a></p><p>In short, what we perceive to be the truth becomes reality for us and we respond according to that reality. If I believe someone is being dishonest with me, I will treat them with extreme caution or scepticism, even if they're actually being totally honest.. If I believe someone doesn't want to talk to me, it will affect how I relate to them, even if my perception is entirely false.</p><p>We can't go round challenging ourselves on every last thing we believe about people or situations, but perhaps it would help to check our sense of reality when we find ourselves believing things about others that may not be true and for which we have little real evidence. In my humble experience the truth we tell ourselves can often turn out to be false.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/what-you-think-vs-the-truth.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Crash</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/pxEIKfcow0w/crash.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/crash.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-11-14T22:38:46+00:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20128758f4de0970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-12T22:22:38+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-12T22:22:38+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Last night I was part of a simple but profound encounter. Eight people, some of them Christian, gathered round a meal to discuss faith, doubt and the possibility, or otherwise, of God. “Crash” is the brainchild of my friend Joe who says, “It is called ‘Crash’ because so often in life two opposing views come crashing together and we try to salvage answers from among the wreckage. Crash seeks to be different and looks to enable different views to come together in such a way that enriches us all rather than tearing us apart.” Wisely, Joe established a few simple rules to ensure the playing field was reasonably level. Everyone is encouraged to get involved in the discussion and conversations. No-one is allowed to dominate the evening and conversations. And because the evening encourages various belief systems and world views to engage with each other there should be no aggression. After a short introductory talk around the subject of the incarnation and the point of Christ and Christmas to provide fuel for potential discussion, dinner was served and conversation began. Predictably, to start with we chatted about all sorts of things. But quite soon conversation gravitated towards our respective beliefs and doubts in a natural flow of speaking and listening that included everyone and judged no one. Our discussions around the meal permitted a degree of honesty and reality about faith and doubt that I have not experienced in any other context. It was painful to hear how damaging some people in churches have been to some of those present. Is it any wonder that people give up on God when God’s people behave like pharisees? But there was also a confident hope expressed in Christ in a way that was confessional and gentle, respecting the beliefs and feelings of all in keeping with Joe’s vision for the evening. In some ways, Crash seems pretty obvious. There may well be similar things happening all over the country. It left me wondering. There are lots of people who, faithwise, live in something of a cloud of unknowing. I wonder where they go to discuss their ideas, to hear stories of the Christian life, to chat about life’s big issues without feeling, rightly or wrongly, ‘evangelised’? Where do people go who have been hurt by church to stay connected to some expression of Christian community? ‘Crash’ is simple and, as an unpressured place to talk about eternal matters, very effective. Big thanks to Joe &amp; Sarah for hosting and to everyone else who took part.We’ll probably do it again in January.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="apologetics" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="church" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="mission" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="spirituality" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Last night I was part of a simple but profound encounter. Eight people, some of them Christian, gathered round a meal to discuss faith, doubt and the possibility, or otherwise, of God. “Crash” is the brainchild of my friend <a href="http://evangelistchanging.blogspot.com/2009/11/crash.html" target="_blank">Joe</a> who says,<br /><br />“It is called ‘Crash’ because so often in life two opposing views come crashing together and we try to salvage answers from among the wreckage.  Crash seeks to be different and looks to enable different views to come together in such a way that enriches us all rather than tearing us apart.”<br /><br />Wisely, Joe established a few simple rules to ensure the playing field was reasonably level. Everyone is encouraged to get involved in the discussion and conversations. No-one is allowed to dominate the evening and conversations. And because the evening encourages various belief systems and world views to engage with each other there should be no aggression.<br /><br />After a short introductory talk around the subject of the incarnation and the point of Christ and Christmas to provide fuel for potential discussion, dinner was served and conversation began. Predictably, to start with we chatted about all sorts of things. But quite soon conversation gravitated towards our respective beliefs and doubts in a natural flow of speaking and listening that included everyone and judged no one. Our discussions around the meal permitted a degree of honesty and reality about faith and doubt that I have not experienced in any other context. It was painful to hear how damaging some people in churches have been to some of those present. Is it any wonder that people give up on God when God’s people behave like pharisees? But there was also a confident hope expressed in Christ in a way that was confessional and gentle, respecting the beliefs and feelings of all in keeping with Joe’s vision for the evening.<br /><br />In some ways, Crash seems pretty obvious. There may well be similar things happening all over the country. It left me wondering. There are lots of people who, faithwise, live in something of a cloud of unknowing. I wonder where they go to discuss their ideas, to hear stories of the Christian life, to chat about life’s big issues without feeling, rightly or wrongly, ‘evangelised’? Where do people go who have been hurt by church to stay connected to some expression of Christian community?<br /><br /><p>‘Crash’ is simple and, as an unpressured place to talk about eternal matters, very effective.</p><p>Big thanks to Joe &amp; Sarah for hosting and to everyone else who took part.</p>We’ll probably do it again in January.</div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/crash.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Girls and body image</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/IPRiXu4IBRA/girls-and-body-image.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/girls-and-body-image.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2009-11-15T23:32:29+00:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a6a39311970c</id>
        <published>2009-11-03T10:36:00+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-03T10:36:00+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Half of secondary school girls considering cosmetic surgery, Guides study finds. This new study for Girl Guides found that 46 per cent of girls aged 11 to 16, and 50 per cent of girls aged 16 to 21 would consider cosmetic surgery to make themselves thinner or prettier. And 42 per cent of girls aged 11 to 16 were controlling to excess what they eat to stay slim. What was particularly concerning was that the impact of negative body image seemed to be happening even before puberty. While 60 per cent of 7 to 9-year-old girls said that they were very happy with their appearance, the figure dropped to 27 per cent for 10 and 11-year-old girls. Which suggests that by the time we first meet them in secondary school at Year 7, about three quarters of girls are already uncomfortable about the way they look. Just to explain the apparent mild fixation with body image on this blog, we're working on a new project for schools that addresses this area. More news soon.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="culture" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="health" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="young people" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/life_and_style/health/article6900116.ece" target="_blank">Half of secondary school girls considering cosmetic surgery, Guides study finds.</a><p>This new study for Girl Guides found that 46 per cent of girls aged 11 to 16, and 50 per cent of girls aged 16 to 21 would consider cosmetic surgery to make themselves thinner or prettier. And 42 per cent of girls aged 11 to 16 were controlling to excess what they eat to stay slim.</p><p>What was particularly concerning was that the impact of negative body image seemed to be happening even before puberty. While 60 per cent of 7 to 9-year-old girls said that they were very happy with their appearance, the figure dropped to 27 per cent for 10 and 11-year-old girls. Which suggests that by the time we first meet them in secondary school at Year 7, about three quarters of girls are already uncomfortable about the way they look.</p><p>Just to explain the apparent mild fixation with body image on this blog, we're working on a new project for schools that addresses this area. More news soon.</p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/11/girls-and-body-image.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>5 Deeply De-Christian Doctrines Meme</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/Zq0tXbeNfaE/5-deeply-dechristian-doctrines-meme.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/5-deeply-dechristian-doctrines-meme.html" thr:count="2" thr:updated="2009-11-12T16:55:22+00:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a63d53ae970b</id>
        <published>2009-10-30T13:45:13+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-30T13:45:13+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Joe tagged me with this so I thought I ought to play ball and join in. List 5 doctrines that are taught within the Christian church that you believe to be deeply de-Christian. I will interpret 'taught' in it's broad sense. Some of these things may not be preached from the pulpit, but are often taught by what we do. Also, I'm pretty much on the same page as Joe with the five things he listed so the pressure is on to find another five. 1. The longer / louder your prayer the more likely it is that God will hear it. 2. When Jesus said 'make disciples'; he had in mind a teaching series delivered by an expert 3. That holiness is more about what I do than what God does 4.The body of Christ looks like a (our?) church rather than the church (with all her faults, diversity and character) 5. That running a business is less spiritual than running a church / Christian organisation Most of the people I might have tagged seem to be on a blog holiday however, should they wish to join in, for perhaps a more youth work tinted view I tag Ian, Sarah and Alice.</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="church" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="Religion" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="theology" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="worship" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><a href="http://evangelistchanging.blogspot.com/2009/10/5-deeply-de-christian-doctrines-meme.html" target="_blank">Joe</a> tagged me with this so I thought I ought to play ball and join in.</p><p><em><strong>List 5 doctrines that are taught within the Christian church that you believe to be deeply de-Christian.</strong></em></p><p>I will interpret 'taught' in it's broad sense. Some of these things may not be preached from the pulpit, but are often taught by what we do. Also, I'm pretty much on the same page as Joe with the five things he listed so the pressure is on to find another five.</p><p>1. The longer / louder your prayer the more likely it is that God will hear it.</p><p>2. When Jesus said 'make disciples'; he had in mind a teaching series delivered by an expert</p><p>3. That holiness is more about what I do than what God does</p><p>4.The body of Christ looks like <strong>a</strong> (our?) church rather than <strong>the</strong> church (with all her faults, diversity and character)</p><p>5. That running a business is less spiritual than running a church / Christian organisation</p><p /><p>Most of the people I might have tagged seem to be on a blog holiday however, should they wish to join in, for perhaps a more youth work tinted view I tag <a href="http://www.youthblog.org/" target="_blank">Ian</a>, <a href="http://easyasfallingoffablog.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Sarah</a> and <a href="http://alisssmith.typepad.com/alice_smith/" target="_blank">Alice</a>.</p><p /><p /></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/5-deeply-dechristian-doctrines-meme.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Dunbar's number, or The Monkeysphere</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/2Vigg5nL0EM/dunbars-number-or-the-monkeysphere.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/dunbars-number-or-the-monkeysphere.html" thr:count="0" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a678abd7970c</id>
        <published>2009-10-26T19:29:56+00:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-26T19:29:56+00:00</updated>
        <summary>Seth Godin on Dunbar's number. There's a limit to the number of people with whom we can effectively maintain a relationship and that number is a maximum of about 150. Interesting that the gathering of Jesus' followers after his ascension numbered about 120. There's a brilliant exposition of this theory by David Wong, What is the monkeysphere? (some-rude-words alert) which roots it in everyday life, even if you don't entirely agree with all of David's conclusions. Something happens when we get more than 150 people together - we lose touch. Think about the churches you know. What do the ones with up to about 120 people feel like compared with the ones that have 180 or more? Interesting!</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="culture" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="random" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/10/the-penalty-for-violating-dunbars-law.html" target="_blank">Seth Godin on Dunbar's number.</a><br /><br />There's a limit to the number of people with whom we can effectively maintain a relationship and that number is a maximum of about 150. Interesting that the <a href="http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+1&amp;version=NIVUK" target="_blank">gathering of Jesus' followers</a> after his ascension numbered about 120.<br /><br />There's a brilliant exposition of this theory by David Wong, <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_14990_what-monkeysphere.html" target="_blank">What is the monkeysphere?</a> (some-rude-words alert) which roots it in everyday life, even if you don't entirely agree with all of David's conclusions.<br /><br />Something happens when we get more than 150 people together - we lose touch. Think about the churches you know. What do the ones with up to about 120 people feel like compared with the ones that have 180 or more? Interesting!<br /><br /><br /><br /></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/dunbars-number-or-the-monkeysphere.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
    <entry>
        <title>Creativity and Creeds</title>
        <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TimAbbott/~3/6VmEau1w9Ys/creativity-and-creeds.html" />
        <link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/creativity-and-creeds.html" thr:count="1" thr:updated="2009-10-29T09:40:35+00:00" />
        <id>tag:typepad.com,2003:post-6a00d8345219a769e20120a66e61fc970c</id>
        <published>2009-10-23T12:03:14+01:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-23T12:03:14+01:00</updated>
        <summary>"The Christian movement which ditches the creeds and covenants in favor of total experimentation finds itself looking less and less Christian. The movement which favors creeds at the expense of innovation finds itself theologically correct yet culturally irrelevant. However movements which are able to find the perfect point of tension between creativity and creeds have the ability to become something truly special." Creativity and Creeds by Mark Sayers</summary>
        <author>
            <name>Tim Abbott</name>
        </author>
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="church" />
        <category scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" term="culture" />
        
        
<content type="xhtml" xml:lang="en-GB" xml:base="http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14px; color: #333333; "><em><span style="color: #007f40; ">"The Christian movement which ditches the creeds and covenants in favor of total experimentation finds itself looking less and less Christian. The movement which favors creeds at the expense of innovation finds itself theologically correct yet culturally irrelevant. However movements which are able to find the perfect point of tension between creativity and creeds have the ability to become something truly special."</span></em></span><p><font color="#333333" size="3"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 14px;"><a href="http://originsproject.org/?p=739" target="_blank">Creativity and Creeds by Mark Sayers</a></span></font></p></div>
</content>


    <feedburner:origLink>http://timabbott.typepad.com/timabbott/2009/10/creativity-and-creeds.html</feedburner:origLink></entry>
 
</feed><!-- ph=1 --><!-- nhm:dynamic-ssi -->
