<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
	<channel>
				<title>Top 10 Most Tweeted JMIR Articles(In the Last Year)</title>
		<link>http://www.jmir.org/stats/feed</link>
		<description />
		                

	                                <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Top10Tw12" /><feedburner:info uri="top10tw12" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
                    <title>Can Tweets Predict Citations? Metrics of Social Impact Based on Twitter and Correlation with Traditional Metrics of Scientific Impact</title>
                    <description>Background: Citations in peer-reviewed articles and the impact factor are generally accepted measures of scientific impact. Web 2.0 tools such as Twitter, blogs or social bookmarking tools provide the possibility to construct innovative article-level or journal-level metrics to gauge impact and influence. However, the relationship of the these new metrics to traditional metrics such as citations is not known. Objective: (1) To explore the feasibility of measuring social impact of and public attention to scholarly articles by analyzing buzz in social media, (2) to explore the dynamics, content, and timing of tweets relative to the publication of a scholarly article, and (3) to explore whether these metrics are sensitive and specific enough to predict highly cited articles. Methods: Between July 2008 and November 2011, all tweets containing links to articles in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) were mined. For a subset of 1573 tweets about 55 articles published between issues 3/2009 and 2/2010, different metrics of social media impact were calculated and compared against subsequent citation data from Scopus and Google Scholar 17 to 29 months later. A heuristic to predict the top-cited articles in each issue through tweet metrics was validated. Results: A total of 4208 tweets cited 286 distinct JMIR articles. The distribution of tweets over the first 30 days after article publication followed a power law (Zipf, Bradford, or Pareto distribution), with most tweets sent on the day when an article was published (1458/3318, 43.94% of all tweets in a 60-day period) or on the following day (528/3318, 15.9%), followed by a rapid decay. The Pearson correlations between tweetations and citations were moderate and statistically significant, with correlation coefficients ranging from .42 to .72 for the log-transformed Google Scholar citations, but were less clear for Scopus citations and rank correlations. A linear multivariate model with time and tweets as significant predictors (P &amp;#60; .001) could explain 27% of the variation of citations. Highly tweeted articles were 11 times more likely to be highly cited than less-tweeted articles (9/12 or 75% of highly tweeted article were highly cited, while only 3/43 or 7% of less-tweeted articles were highly cited; rate ratio 0.75/0.07 = 10.75, 95% confidence interval, 3.4–33.6). Top-cited articles can be predicted from top-tweeted articles with 93% specificity and 75% sensitivity.  Conclusions: Tweets can predict highly cited articles within the first 3 days of article publication. Social media activity either increases citations or reflects the underlying qualities of the article that also predict citations, but the true use of these metrics is to measure the distinct concept of social impact. Social impact measures based on tweets are proposed to complement traditional citation metrics. The proposed twimpact factor may be a useful and timely metric to measure uptake of research findings and to filter research findings resonating with the public in real time. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 969 | Tweets Influence Factor: 1,704.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 536 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/1zQcZCd69Zs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/1zQcZCd69Zs/</link>
                    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 08:38:26 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e123/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>A 12-Week Commercial Web-Based Weight-Loss Program for Overweight and Obese Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Basic Versus Enhanced Features</title>
                    <description>Background: The development and use of Web-based programs for weight loss is increasing rapidly, yet they have rarely been evaluated using randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Interestingly, most people who attempt weight loss use commercially available programs, yet it is very uncommon for commercial programs to be evaluated independently or rigorously. Objective: To compare the efficacy of a standard commercial Web-based weight-loss program (basic) versus an enhanced version of this Web program that provided additional personalized e-feedback and contact from the provider (enhanced) versus a wait-list control group (control) on weight outcomes in overweight and obese adults. Methods: This purely Web-based trial using a closed online user group was an assessor-blinded RCT with participants randomly allocated to the basic or enhanced 12-week Web-based program, based on social cognitive theory, or the control, with body mass index (BMI) as the primary outcome. Results: We enrolled 309 adults (129/309, 41.8% male, BMI mean 32.3, SD 4 kg/m2) with 84.1% (260/309) retention at 12 weeks. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that both intervention groups reduced their BMI compared with the controls (basic: &amp;#8211;0.72, SD 1.1 kg/m2, enhanced: &amp;#8211;1.0, SD 1.4, control: 0.15, SD 0.82; P &amp;#60; .001) and lost significant weight (basic: &amp;#8211;2.1, SD 3.3 kg, enhanced: &amp;#8211;3.0, SD 4.1, control: 0.4, SD 2.3; P &amp;#60; .001) with changes in waist circumference (basic: &amp;#8211;2.0, SD 3.5 cm, enhanced: &amp;#8211;3.2, SD 4.7, control: 0.5, SD 3.0; P &amp;#60; .001) and waist-to-height ratio (basic: &amp;#8211;0.01, SD 0.02, enhanced: &amp;#8211;0.02, SD 0.03, control: 0.0, SD 0.02; P &amp;#60; .001), but no differences were observed between the basic and enhanced groups. The addition of personalized e-feedback and contact provided limited additional benefits compared with the basic program. Conclusions: A commercial Web-based weight-loss program can be efficacious across a range of weight-related outcomes and lifestyle behaviors and achieve clinically important weight loss. Although the provision of additional personalized feedback did not facilitate greater weight loss after 12 weeks, the impact of superior participant retention on longer-term outcomes requires further study. Further research is required to determine the optimal mix of program features that lead to the biggest treatment impact over time. Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): 12610000197033; http://www.anzctr.org.au/trial_view.aspx?id=335159 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/66Wq0Yb7U) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 255 | Tweets Influence Factor: 801.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 253 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/ro10JYjA4VY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/ro10JYjA4VY/</link>
                    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:50:12 EDT</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e57/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e57/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Primary Care Providers&amp;#8217; Perspectives on Online Weight-Loss Programs: A Big Wish List</title>
                    <description>Background: Integrating online weight-loss programs into the primary care setting could yield substantial public health benefit. Little is known about primary care providers&amp;#8217; perspectives on online weight-loss programs. Objective: To assess primary care providers&amp;#8217; perspectives on online weight-loss programs. Methods: We conducted focus group discussions with providers in family medicine, internal medicine, and combined internal medicine/pediatrics in Texas and Pennsylvania, USA. Open-ended questions addressed their experience with and attitudes toward online weight-loss programs; useful characteristics of existing online weight-loss programs; barriers to referring patients to online weight-loss programs; and preferred characteristics of an ideal online weight-loss program. Transcripts were analyzed with the grounded theory approach to identify major themes. Results: A total of 44 primary care providers participated in 9 focus groups. The mean age was 45 (SD 9) years. Providers had limited experience with structured online weight-loss programs and were uncertain about their safety and efficacy. They thought motivated, younger patients would be more likely than others to respond to an online weight-loss program. According to primary care providers, an ideal online weight-loss program would provide&amp;#8212;at no cost to the patient&amp;#8212;a structured curriculum addressing motivation, psychological issues, and problem solving; tools for tracking diet, exercise, and weight loss; and peer support monitored by experts. Primary care providers were interested in receiving reports about patients from the online weight-loss programs, but were concerned about the time required to review and act on the reports. Conclusions: Primary care providers have high expectations for how online weight-loss programs should deliver services to patients and fit into the clinical workflow. Efforts to integrate online weight-loss programs into the primary care setting should address efficacy and safety of online weight-loss programs in clinic-based populations; acceptable methods of sending reports to primary care providers about their patients&amp;#8217; progress; and elimination or reduction of costs to patients. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 213 | Tweets Influence Factor: 123.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 175 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/ZU6lfYWdGr0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/ZU6lfYWdGr0/</link>
                    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 10:54:18 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e16/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e16/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Use of Social Media by Western European Hospitals: Longitudinal Study</title>
                    <description>Background: Patients increasingly use social media to communicate. Their stories could support quality improvements in participatory health care and could support patient-centered care. Active use of social media by health care institutions could also speed up communication and information provision to patients and their families, thus increasing quality even more. Hospitals seem to be becoming aware of the benefits social media could offer. Data from the United States show that hospitals increasingly use social media, but it is unknown whether and how Western European hospitals use social media. Objective: To identify to what extent Western European hospitals use social media. Methods: In this longitudinal study, we explored the use of social media by hospitals in 12 Western European countries through an Internet search. We collected data for each country during the following three time periods: April to August 2009, August to December 2010, and April to July 2011. Results: We included 873 hospitals from 12 Western European countries, of which 732 were general hospitals and 141 were university hospitals. The number of included hospitals per country ranged from 6 in Luxembourg to 347 in Germany. We found hospitals using social media in all countries. The use of social media increased significantly over time, especially for YouTube (n = 19, 2% to n = 172, 19.7%), LinkedIn (n =179, 20.5% to n = 278, 31.8%), and Facebook (n = 85, 10% to n = 585, 67.0%). Differences in social media usage between the included countries were significant. Conclusions: Social media awareness in Western European hospitals is growing, as well as its use. Social media usage differs significantly between countries. Except for the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the group of hospitals that is using social media remains small. Usage of LinkedIn for recruitment shows the awareness of the potential of social media. Future research is needed to investigate how social media lead to improved health care. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 132 | Tweets Influence Factor: 332.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 108 | Twindex7: 95&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/ZDByCKYWpgM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/ZDByCKYWpgM/</link>
                    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 09:49:51 EDT</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/3/e61/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/3/e61/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Crowdsourced Health Research Studies: An Important Emerging Complement to Clinical Trials in the Public Health Research Ecosystem</title>
                    <description>Background: Crowdsourced health research studies are the nexus of three contemporary trends: 1) citizen science (non-professionally trained individuals conducting science-related activities); 2) crowdsourcing (use of web-based technologies to recruit project participants); and 3) medicine 2.0 / health 2.0 (active participation of individuals in their health care particularly using web 2.0 technologies). Crowdsourced health research studies have arisen as a natural extension of the activities of health social networks (online health interest communities), and can be researcher-organized or participant-organized. In the last few years, professional researchers have been crowdsourcing cohorts from health social networks for the conduct of traditional studies. Participants have also begun to organize their own research studies through health social networks and health collaboration communities created especially for the purpose of self-experimentation and the investigation of health-related concerns. Objective: The objective of this analysis is to undertake a comprehensive narrative review of crowdsourced health research studies. This review will assess the status, impact, and prospects of crowdsourced health research studies. Methods: Crowdsourced health research studies were identified through a search of literature published from 2000 to 2011 and informal interviews conducted 2008-2011. Keyword terms related to crowdsourcing were sought in Medline/PubMed. Papers that presented results from human health studies that included crowdsourced populations were selected for inclusion. Crowdsourced health research studies not published in the scientific literature were identified by attending industry conferences and events, interviewing attendees, and reviewing related websites. Results: Participatory health is a growing area with individuals using health social networks, crowdsourced studies, smartphone health applications, and personal health records to achieve positive outcomes for a variety of health conditions. PatientsLikeMe and 23andMe are the leading operators of researcher-organized, crowdsourced health research studies. These operators have published findings in the areas of disease research, drug response, user experience in crowdsourced studies, and genetic association. Quantified Self, Genomera, and DIYgenomics are communities of participant-organized health research studies where individuals conduct self-experimentation and group studies. Crowdsourced health research studies have a diversity of intended outcomes and levels of scientific rigor. Conclusions: Participatory health initiatives are becoming part of the public health ecosystem and their rapid growth is facilitated by Internet and social networking influences. Large-scale parameter-stratified cohorts have potential to facilitate a next-generation understanding of disease and drug response. Not only is the large size of crowdsourced cohorts an asset to medical discovery, too is the near-immediate speed at which medical findings might be tested and applied. Participatory health initiatives are expanding the scope of medicine from a traditional focus on disease cure to a personalized preventive approach. Crowdsourced health research studies are a promising complement and extension to traditional clinical trials as a model for the conduct of health research. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 111 | Tweets Influence Factor: 315.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 67 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/7uvy1cCpClc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/7uvy1cCpClc/</link>
                    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 12:23:52 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e46/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e46/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Features of Mobile Diabetes Applications: Review of the Literature and Analysis of Current Applications Compared Against Evidence-Based Guidelines</title>
                    <description>Background: Interest in mobile health (mHealth) applications for self-management of diabetes is growing. In July 2009, we found 60 diabetes applications on iTunes for iPhone; by February 2011 the number had increased by more than 400% to 260. Other mobile platforms reflect a similar trend. Despite the growth, research on both the design and the use of diabetes mHealth applications is scarce. Furthermore, the potential influence of social media on diabetes mHealth applications is largely unexplored. Objective: Our objective was to study the salient features of mobile applications for diabetes care, in contrast to clinical guideline recommendations for diabetes self-management. These clinical guidelines are published by health authorities or associations such as the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the United Kingdom and the American Diabetes Association. Methods: We searched online vendor markets (online stores for Apple iPhone, Google Android, BlackBerry, and Nokia Symbian), journal databases, and gray literature related to diabetes mobile applications. We included applications that featured a component for self-monitoring of blood glucose and excluded applications without English-language user interfaces, as well as those intended exclusively for health care professionals. We surveyed the following features: (1) self-monitoring: (1.1) blood glucose, (1.2) weight, (1.3) physical activity, (1.4) diet, (1.5) insulin and medication, and (1.6) blood pressure, (2) education, (3) disease-related alerts and reminders, (4) integration of social media functions, (5) disease-related data export and communication, and (6) synchronization with personal health record (PHR) systems or patient portals. We then contrasted the prevalence of these features with guideline recommendations. Results: The search resulted in 973 matches, of which 137 met the selection criteria. The four most prevalent features of the applications available on the online markets (n = 101) were (1) insulin and medication recording, 63 (62%), (2) data export and communication, 61 (60%), (3) diet recording, 47 (47%), and (4) weight management, 43 (43%). From the literature search (n = 26), the most prevalent features were (1) PHR or Web server synchronization, 18 (69%), (2) insulin and medication recording, 17 (65%), (3) diet recording, 17 (65%), and (4) data export and communication, 16 (62%). Interestingly, although clinical guidelines widely refer to the importance of education, this is missing from the top functionalities in both cases. Conclusions: While a wide selection of mobile applications seems to be available for people with diabetes, this study shows there are obvious gaps between the evidence-based recommendations and the functionality used in study interventions or found in online markets. Current results confirm personalized education as an underrepresented feature in diabetes mobile applications. We found no studies evaluating social media concepts in diabetes self-management on mobile devices, and its potential remains largely unexplored. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 76 | Tweets Influence Factor: 179.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 43 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/antqPNLn2bM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/antqPNLn2bM/</link>
                    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:50:03 EDT</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2011/3/e65/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2011/3/e65/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>What Are Young Adults Saying About Mental Health? An Analysis of Internet Blogs</title>
                    <description>Background: Despite the high prevalence of mental health concerns, few young adults access treatment. While much research has focused on understanding the barriers to service access, few studies have explored unbiased accounts of the experiences of young adults with mental health concerns. It is through hearing these experiences and gaining an in-depth understanding of what is being said by young adults that improvements can be made to interventions focused on increasing access to care. Objective: To move beyond past research by using an innovative qualitative research method of analyzing the blogs of young adults (18&amp;#8211;25 years of age) with mental health concerns to understand their experiences. Methods: We used an enhanced Internet search vehicle, DEVONagent, to extract Internet blogs using primary keywords related to mental health. Blogs (N = 8) were selected based on age of authors (18&amp;#8211;25 years), gender, relevance to mental health, and recency of the entries. Blogs excerpts were analyzed using a combination of grounded theory and consensual qualitative research methods. Results: Two core categories emerged from the qualitative analysis of the bloggers accounts: I am powerless (intrapersonal) and I am utterly alone (interpersonal). Overall, the young adult bloggers expressed significant feelings of powerlessness as a result of their mental health concerns and simultaneously felt a profound sense of loneliness, alienation, and lack of connection with others. Conclusions: The present study suggests that one reason young adults do not seek care might be that they view the mental health system negatively and feel disconnected from these services. To decrease young adults&amp;#8217; sense of powerlessness and isolation, efforts should focus on creating and developing resources and services that allow young adults to feel connected and empowered. Through an understanding of the experiences of young adults with mental health problems, and their experiences of and attitudes toward receiving care, we provide some recommendations for improving receptivity and knowledge of mental health care services. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 71 | Tweets Influence Factor: 199.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 38 | Twindex7: 95&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/JQYZRWwjpYY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/JQYZRWwjpYY/</link>
                    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:20:36 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e17/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e17/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Developing Health Promotion Interventions on Social Networking Sites: Recommendations from The FaceSpace Project</title>
                    <description>Online social networking sites offer a novel setting for the delivery of health promotion interventions due to their potential to reach a large population and the possibility for two-way engagement. However, few have attempted to host interventions on these sites, or to use the range of interactive functions available to enhance the delivery of health-related messages. This paper presents lessons learnt from &amp;#8220;The FaceSpace Project&amp;#8221;, a sexual health promotion intervention using social networking sites targeting two key at-risk groups. Based on our experience, we make recommendations for developing and implementing health promotion interventions on these sites. Elements crucial for developing interventions include establishing a multidisciplinary team, allowing adequate time for obtaining approvals, securing sufficient resources for building and maintaining an online presence, and developing an integrated process and impact evaluation framework. With two-way interaction an important and novel feature of health promotion interventions in this medium, we also present strategies trialled to generate interest and engagement in our intervention. Social networking sites are now an established part of the online environment; our experience in developing and implementing a health promotion intervention using this medium are of direct relevance and utility for all health organizations creating a presence in this new environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 68 | Tweets Influence Factor: 182.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 48 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/9FLFxiMl0nA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/9FLFxiMl0nA/</link>
                    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:40:33 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e30/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/1/e30/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Public Access and Use of Health Research: An Exploratory Study of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy Using Interviews and Surveys of Health Personnel</title>
                    <description>Background: In 2008, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Public Access Policy mandated open access for publications resulting from NIH funding (following a 12-month embargo). The large increase in access to research that will take place in the years to come has potential implications for evidence-based practice (EBP) and lifelong learning for health personnel. Objective: This study assesses health personnel&amp;#8217;s current use of research to establish whether grounds exist for expecting, preparing for, and further measuring the impact of the NIH Public Access Policy on health care quality and outcomes in light of time constraints and existing information resources. Methods: In all, 14 interviews and 90 surveys of health personnel were conducted at a community-based clinic and an independent teaching hospital in 2010. Health personnel were asked about the research sources they consulted and the frequency with which they consulted these sources, as well as motivation and search strategies used to locate articles, perceived level of access to research, and knowledge of the NIH Public Access Policy. Results: In terms of current access to health information, 65% (57/88) of the health personnel reported being satisfied, while 32% (28/88) reported feeling underserved. Among the sources health personnel reported that they relied upon and consulted weekly, 83% (73/88) reported turning to colleagues, 77% (67/87) reported using synthesized information resources (eg, UpToDate and Cochrane Systematic Reviews), while 32% (28/88) reported that they consulted primary research literature. The dominant resources health personnel consulted when actively searching for health information were Google and Wikipedia, while 27% (24/89) reported using PubMed weekly. The most prevalent reason given for accessing research on a weekly basis, reported by 35% (31/88) of survey respondents, was to help a specific patient, while 31% (26/84) were motivated by general interest in research. Conclusions: The results provide grounds for expecting the NIH Public Access Policy to have a positive impact on EBP and health care more generally given that between a quarter and a third of participants in this study (1) frequently accessed research literature, (2) expressed an interest in having greater access, and (3) were aware of the policy and expect it to have an impact on their accessing research literature in the future. Results also indicate the value of promoting a greater awareness of the NIH policy, providing training and education in the location and use of the literature, and continuing improvements in the organization of biomedical research for health personnel use. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 68 | Tweets Influence Factor: 129.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 52 | Twindex7: 100&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/0CV94bL6QmQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/0CV94bL6QmQ/</link>
                    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:36:14 EST</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e97/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2011/4/e97/</feedburner:origLink></item>
                                        <item>
                    <title>Design of an mHealth App for the Self-management of Adolescent Type 1 Diabetes: A Pilot Study</title>
                    <description>Background: The use of mHealth apps has shown improved health outcomes in adult populations with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, this has not been shown in the adolescent type 1 population, despite their predisposition to the use of technology. We hypothesized that a more tailored approach and a strong adherence mechanism is needed for this group. Objective: To design, develop, and pilot an mHealth intervention for the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents. Methods: We interviewed adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their family caregivers. Design principles were derived from a thematic analysis of the interviews. User-centered design was then used to develop the mobile app bant. In the 12-week evaluation phase, a pilot group of 20 adolescents aged 12&amp;#8211;16 years, with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of between 8% and 10% was sampled. Each participant was supplied with the bant app running on an iPhone or iPod Touch and a LifeScan glucometer with a Bluetooth adapter for automated transfers to the app. The outcome measure was the average daily frequency of blood glucose measurement during the pilot compared with the preceding 12 weeks. Results: Thematic analysis findings were the role of data collecting rather than decision making; the need for fast, discrete transactions; overcoming decision inertia; and the need for ad hoc information sharing. Design aspects of the resultant app emerged through the user-centered design process, including simple, automated transfer of glucometer readings; the use of a social community; and the concept of gamification, whereby routine behaviors and actions are rewarded in the form of iTunes music and apps. Blood glucose trend analysis was provided with immediate prompting of the participant to suggest both the cause and remedy of the adverse trend. The pilot evaluation showed that the daily average frequency of blood glucose measurement increased 50% (from 2.4 to 3.6 per day, P = .006, n = 12). A total of 161 rewards (average of 8 rewards each) were distributed to participants. Satisfaction was high, with 88% (14/16 participants) stating that they would continue to use the system. Demonstrating improvements in HbA1c will require a properly powered study of sufficient duration. Conclusions: This mHealth diabetes app with the use of gamification incentives showed an improvement in the frequency of blood glucose monitoring in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Extending this to improved health outcomes will require the incentives to be tied not only to frequency of blood glucose monitoring but also to patient actions and decision making based on those readings such that glycemic control can be improved. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;				
																					Tweets: 64 | Tweets Influence Factor: 105.00 | Twimpact Factor (tw7): 50 | Twindex7: 90&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~4/5M6NvF-uDas" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
                    
                                                                                                                                                                                                <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Top10Tw12/~3/5M6NvF-uDas/</link>
                    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 09:05:11 EDT</pubDate>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jmir.org/2012/3/e70/</guid>
                                <feedburner:origLink>http://www.jmir.org/2012/3/e70/</feedburner:origLink></item>
            	</channel>
</rss>

