TRP Show!

Disgraceful Leftists & their continued woke crusade against Thomas Jefferson! (We trust the Left with paternity results like we do election results! 😂)

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 26 Sep 2026 04:11:06 +0000

While Dr. Richard Kurin’s September 2026 book, History by a Hair, has generated widespread media attention by stating unequivocally that Thomas Jefferson fathered children with Sally Hemings, several scientists, notable historians, and even key family descendants have raised notable disputes and structural concerns regarding his findings.

1. Rush to Sell by the 250th:

Published by Crown on September 22, 2026, the book was timed to coincide with major national discussions around the 250th anniversary (Semiquincentennial) of the United States' founding, driving strong interest and media promotion. The public release of the book sparked internal friction at the Smithsonian over how the findings were publicized. Reports indicated that event launches were moved or scaled back to avoid political backlash, which critics argue reflects an institutional rush to monetize or market popular history before fully navigating academic peer-review and community engagement.

2. Lack of Peer Review and Preempting Scientific Journals:

The primary academic criticism is that Dr. Kurin and the Smithsonian Institution bypassed standard scientific protocols.

The study’s formal scientific paper is still under review for publication in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). Despite not yet passing full academic peer review, the book was heavily marketed and published on a commercial calendar (sell by September 22, 2026).

Critics point out that outside scientists have not yet had the opportunity to look at the raw genomic data, test the methodology, or verify how a 200-year-old lock of hair was successfully sequenced without contamination.

3. Descendant Protest and DNA Withdrawal:

The study suffered a major internal blow right before publication from a primary source descendant.

Mary Brady-Atkins, the oldest living descendant of Sally Hemings at 98 years old, withdrew her DNA sample from the study on August 11, 2026.

Brady-Atkins publicly objected to the book being released before the study underwent rigorous peer review. Furthermore, she has publicly maintained long-standing doubts regarding the definitive genealogical link between Jefferson and Hemings. While the research team quickly reran the data without her sample and asserted the overall scientific conclusion "barely moved," her defection remains a prominent point of contention.

4. Evidentiary Precedent Concerns:

(The 1998 Nature Parallel) Skeptics have pointed out historical precedents where early genetic declarations regarding Jefferson had to be walked back.

In November 1998, the prominent scientific journal Nature published a study with a headline flatly stating that Thomas Jefferson fathered Sally Hemings' last child.

By January 1999, original researchers had to issue clarifications acknowledging that the headline was misleading. The Y-chromosome DNA matched the Jefferson male line, meaning the father could have technically been Thomas Jefferson's brother (Randolph) or one of Randolph's sons. Skeptics argue that Dr. Kurin’s genomic replication needs to clear a much higher bar to absolutely rule out other male Jefferson relatives, an issue that can only be validated once the peer-review data is fully transparent.

5. DNA Degradation & Hair Sample Limitations:

Skeptics of rootless hair genomic sequencing point out the technical difficulties of extracting reliable nuclear DNA from centuries-old hair fibers, which typically yield highly degraded or contaminated samples. Peer critics question whether low-coverage genomic reconstruction can offer absolute certainty or if it risks overstating statistical confidence intervals.

6. Chain of Custody & Provenance Integrity Unverifiable Artifact Origins:

The most critical weakness in artifact-based DNA analysis is chain of custody. Bibles, documents, and personal effects owned by 18th-century figures were handled, restored, re-bound, and inspected by dozens—if not hundreds—of curators, bookbinders, collectors, and family descendants over two centuries. Proving that a strand of hair found in a book actually belonged to Jefferson rather than a reader, restorer, or relative requires an almost impossible standard of custodial documentation.

7. Environmental Contamination:

Touch DNA and physical hair fragments in museum archives are highly susceptible to cross-contamination over long periods, making absolute scientific certainty about the source of the biological material difficult to establish without exhaustive secondary verification.

Spirit is selling these out all over the northeast...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 14:13:20 +0000

Always remember why Jim Carrey & Jenny McCarthy were canceled from the A-list...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:55:29 +0000

Larry King: Jim Carrey and Jenny McCarthy tried to warn us back in 2009.

Medical Schools, Hospitals, Pharmacies…ALL financed by the drug companies! pic.twitter.com/Kljj4is3QP
— 🗡️🛡️Sir Rickster🛡️🗡️ (@Rickster_75) March 4, 2024

Stopping out-of-control overreaching centralized government, elective despotism, & mobocracy!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 13:44:34 +0000

“There is no difference between communism and socialism, except in the means of achieving the same ultimate end: communism proposes to enslave men by force, socialism—by vote. It is merely the difference between murder and suicide.”

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 25 Sep 2026 12:37:19 +0000

Pictorial meant to help ed-u-ma-cate Leftists...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:51:02 +0000

Media Criminals...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 24 Sep 2026 02:11:33 +0000

🤔🤔

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:19:22 +0000

Dating Liberal Women 2026...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 22 Sep 2026 20:44:42 +0000

Liberal women in 2026 be like... pic.twitter.com/fi9iLyE9h2
— Matt (@the_matt) September 19, 2026

“Y’all are so pro life until it means everybody and not just little white kids”

-Liberal upset with MAGA because we don’t loudly support Palestine

Why are liberal women so easily manipulated? 😂✨🌈 pic.twitter.com/eaM1hB5Fi5
— Meme’nOnLibs (@MemeNonLibs) September 19, 2026

THIS IS LIBERAL FEMALES.... THEY MURDER CHILDREN.... THEY FEEL ENTITLED TO MURDER YOUR CHILDREN AND THEIR OWN..

AND FEEL NO GUILT ABOUT IT.. IN FACT THEY LAUGH AND CHEER ABOUT IT AND THEY CHEER EACH OTHER ON WHEN ONE MURDERS THEIR CHILDREN https://t.co/BRs4fCxjPL
— GO ICE 🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸❤️🇺🇸 (@TrumpGirl_67) September 15, 2026

Liberal feminism is now supporting child murder, even bringing their own children to celebrate. https://t.co/sq02iM1Fbv
— James Pyles (@jamespyles) September 19, 2026

These LIBERAL WOMEN ARE LUNATICS ….
First abortion is great
Then kill your baby up to term
Then kill your babies up to 30 days after birth
Then (Clancy Case ) kill your kids anytime your sad
NOW THEY ADVOCATE TO KILL ALL MEN

HOW ABOUT WE BRING BACK MENTAL INSTITUTIONS AND PUT… https://t.co/cdCg3zh5BB
— JUST BECAUSE (@SvAmerica24) September 17, 2026

I asked Tampa Riverwalkers who hurts women more, Sydney Sweeney or Lindsay Clancy.

What’s your take? pic.twitter.com/fqel7PQyg1
— Adam Francisco (@adamfrancisco_) September 21, 2026

Oops Leftist scum! The internet doesn't forget!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 22 Sep 2026 14:44:00 +0000

Obama, Yesterday: "I'm trying to think what would've happened if I had said, Fox News, you're out of here. It's unimaginable!"

Obama Admin 2009: Attempts to boot Fox News from pool coverage.

Obama: "If media (Fox News) is operating basically as a talk radio format, then that's… pic.twitter.com/5Ooim6khe1
— Americaforever (@onetexgal9) September 22, 2026

British financial banking impressment...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Mon, 21 Sep 2026 16:44:45 +0000

🔥 THIS IS A MUST WATCH 🔥
This is probably one of the most important videos you will watch, EVER — and a necessary watch going into the midterms.

We have been MISLED. On purpose. Flooded with noise so we fight each other and never look up at the real chessboard.

This video is… pic.twitter.com/3VV83IE0Jm
— Just Call Me Spicy! 🇺🇸💯❤💋 (@thespicypatriot) September 20, 2026

🤔🤔

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:24:37 +0000

🤔🤔

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 20 Sep 2026 10:09:28 +0000

About sums up these young Leftist social misfits...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sun, 20 Sep 2026 09:54:07 +0000

There was a brief period of time when I believed conservatives were evil. In 2020, I was completely engulfed in a leftist echo chamber online. I got out of it when I decided to actually talk to conservatives, and found them to be wonderful people, and all I had been led to…
— Christina Buttons (@buttonslives) September 11, 2025

Did they think DJT wasn't serious? 😂

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 19 Sep 2026 21:06:39 +0000

🚨 LMFAO! CNN has just been BLOCKED from entering the White House — and their reporter is MELTING DOWN live

Press pass SEIZED. Now she's on the sidewalk!

"I put my stuff through security, then I tap my badge...Cameras WATCHED me walk in...and it BEEPS, turns RED! It didn't… pic.twitter.com/tf23NcXypA
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 19, 2026

Please RT to expose Fake News @CNN! https://t.co/zEeVMtxdQD
— LeoTerrell (@TheLeoTerrell) September 19, 2026

🤔🤔

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 19 Sep 2026 16:05:06 +0000

DJT the Man of Action...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Sat, 19 Sep 2026 01:21:59 +0000

BREAKING NEWS: I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has entered into an Agreement with The Kingdom of Denmark, and Greenland, that gives the United States permanent control over security, and all other needs, in Greenland, completely addressing ALL of our…
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 19, 2026

Stay strong gentlemen— the productive middle-class supports your valiant efforts!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 18 Sep 2026 13:28:19 +0000

I can now confirm that I am representing the courageous and heroic lone holdout juror from the Lindsay Clancy Trial. He is an American Hero and Champion of Justice.

Please pray for him and help us protect him.

This American Hero and Champion of Justice loves the United States…
— Edward Andrew Paltzik, Attorney (@EdPaltzik) September 17, 2026

🤯🤯 Citizens of the sovereign States reprobate all secrets & corruption in your governments— but most importantly the national government!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Fri, 18 Sep 2026 12:41:41 +0000

EXCLUSIVE: Judge Boasberg was a 9-time host for a CCP-founded program run by a Chinese spy front flagged for its efforts to compromise Americans.

SIX were during his FISA term—with access to top secret intelligence. 🧵 pic.twitter.com/phgdrwCto1
— Natalie Winters (@nataliegwinters) September 17, 2026

🚨 WOW! Ex-Deep State CIA Director John Brennan just panicked that he will be forced to testify in a "GRAND CONSPIRACY" case in Florida — and even worries that Barack Hussein OBAMA might be scrutinized

"The subpoena is to give testimony in Florida next month on this grand… pic.twitter.com/pHBclRPQRV
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 17, 2026

So he had a stroke. A pretty aggressive one too which is why he is presently incoherent. This is beyond cruelty. This is absolutely disgusting behavior by his staff and his party. Let the turtle go home and eat his lettuce in peace. https://t.co/E3EmeBRCoW
— Frowny Happy Face (@FrownyHappyFace) September 17, 2026

NEW: A House Judiciary report just dropped screenshots of ActBlue's internal Slack messages.

They show staff knowingly waved through foreign donations—using "verification" methods you won't believe.

Thread 🧵👇
— Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 16, 2026

"McConnell would never be allowed to drive a car, babysit young children, or file his own taxes. Why, then, should a cognitively incapacitated 82-year-old retain one of the most important positions of power within the national government," per PublicNotice
— unusual_whales (@unusual_whales) September 17, 2026

With Julian Assange coming back…

Remember when Hillary Clinton wanted to “just drone” him because he was telling the world the truth about the Clintons and the Obama Admin corruption?

While having no dirt on Trump.

There was 0 outrage.

The Media and DC literally didn’t care. pic.twitter.com/of6UuZRQbX
— C3 (@C_3C_3) September 17, 2026

Nick Shirley uncovers an adult day care in Flushing, Queens with 7,000 phantom members.

Nick: “This public document says you have 7,899 members.”

Employee: “No, we don’t have 7,000 members.”

Nick: “So you’re overbilling then? You’re getting paid $1,600 per patient — that’s how… pic.twitter.com/O8SidXcCYU
— Deep Leaks (@DeepLeaksHQ) September 18, 2026

I knew Barr was a rat bastard. He was part of the swamp. Trump erred in appointing a career swamp creature. https://t.co/QOWQNRcovX
— David A. Clarke, Jr. (@SheriffClarke) September 18, 2026

The Case Against The Fed, by Murray Rothbard

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 17 Sep 2026 18:58:19 +0000

The Case Against The Fed, by Murray Rothbard

(04/01/1995)

•Mises Review• David Gordon

The Bankers’ Cartel

Mises Review 1, No. 1 (Spring 1995)

THE CASE AGAINST THE FED

Murray N. Rothbard

Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1994, 158 pgs.

Murray Rothbard begins this outstanding book by calling attention to a paradox. The Federal Reserve System enjoys virtual immunity from Congressional investigation. The few who propose to subject the Fed to even minimal scrutiny, such as Henry Gonzales of Texas, at once find a consensus arrayed against them (Pp. 1 ff.). They threaten the stability of the market; since, it is alleged, only the Fed’s independence blocks the onset of uncontrollable inflation.

Here lies the paradox. Inflation results from the infusion of new money into the economy, and it is the Fed that is responsible for its creation. “The culprit solely responsible for inflation, the Federal Reserve, is continually engaged in raising a hue-and- cry about \`inflation’ for which virtually everyone else in society seems to be responsible” (p. 11). How did this odd situation come about?

As one would expect from a top flight economist, Rothbard responds by tracing the problem to its roots. He briefly and clearly explains how money originated in a barter economy. Some commodities are much easier to market than others, and “[o]nce any particular commodity starts to be used as a medium, this very process has a spiraling or snowballing effect” (p. 13). Soon one or two commodities emerge into general use as a medium of exchange. And this, precisely, is money. Gold and silver have almost always been the commodities that win the competition for marketability. “Accordingly, every modern currency unit originated as a unit of weight of gold or silver” (p. 17).

Why has Rothbard gone to such pains to describe a historical process that seems very remote from the Fed? By beginning with a simple case he can elucidate the basic mechanism that underlies the Fed’s operation. To explain a complex event by starting with a simple method and gradually complicating it is a basic procedure of modern science. Galileo termed this “resoluto-compositive” method and Descartes described it at length. Once one grasps how money has emerged, the key to understanding the mysteries of the Fed lies at hand.

We already can answer the following question; what is the optimum quantity of money? If one has understood the explanation of money’s genesis, the answer is apparent. An increase in the supply of money does not increase real wealth, since money is used only in exchange. (The exception owing to non-monetary uses of gold and silver can for our purposes be ignored) “Any quantity of money in society is \`optimal’ “(p. 20). And, to add one complication, the answer remains the same when paper money has been introduced.

A problem now arises for the analysis so far presented. If an increase in the supply of money does not increase real wealth, why have governments continually resorted to inflation? Rothbard’s response involves another fundamental insight of Austrian economics. Inflation does not affect everyone equally; quite the contrary, those who first obtain new money gain a great advantage, since they can purchase goods and services before most people become aware that the purchasing power of money has fallen. Inflation in is thus a form of counterfeiting (pp. 27-29).

But it is not the only form; another type of counterfeiting arose out of deposit banking. Because of the inconvenience of carrying gold and silver, people often deposited the metals in banks, obtaining in return a receipt. These receipts, since they are promises to pay gold or silver, soon began to circulate as money substitutes. But a temptation presented itself to the bankers. The receipts normally did not specify particular gold or silver coins to be returned to the depositor; they were rather entitlements to specified amounts of the money commodity. (Rothbard notes that the great nineteenth-century economist W. S. Jevons warned against these “general deposit warrants” [p. 37]). Since they need only return the amount of money specified in the receipt, bankers might give out more receipts than they had gold or silver on hand, trusting that not all depositors would demand redemption at the same time. For those willing to assume this risk, the prospect of vast profits called appealingly.

But is not this practice a blatant instance of fraud? So it would appear, and so Rothbard firmly avers that it is. Unfortunately, several nineteenth century British legal decisions held otherwise, and these verdicts were adopted by the American courts as well. Rothbard describes the legal situation with the sure hand of a master historian (pp. 42-44).

Our banker-counterfeiter, one might assume, can now proceed happily on his way to illicit fortune. But an obstacle confronts him; should he issue more receipts than he can redeem, the clients of other banks may ruin him through demands for payment that he cannot make good. The solution is obvious; by unifying the banks in a centralized system, this check to fraudulent wealth creation would be ended. Hence the movement for a central banking system, whose history in Britain and the United States Rothbard deftly summarizes.

The Federal Reserve System, as Rothbard makes crystal clear, was the culmination of efforts that continued throughout the nineteenth century to centralize banking. “By the 1890s, the leading Wall Street bankers were becoming disgruntled with their own creation, the National Banking System. . . .while the banking system was partially centralized under their leadership, it was not centralized enough” (p. 79). As he describes the movement to cartelize banking, Rothbard introduces a dominant theme in his interpretation of twentieth-century American history; the struggle of competing groups of bankers for power. “From the 1890s until World War II, much of American political history. . .can be interpreted not so much as \`Democrat’ versus \`Republican’ but as the interaction or conflict between the Morgans and their allies on the one hand, and the Rockefeller-Harriman-Kuhn, Loeb alliance on the other” (p. 92).

In the agitation to establish the Fed, the House of Morgan was in the ascendant; and Rothbard stresses the importance of the conference held at Jekyll Island, Georgia, in November, 1910, under Morgan control (pp. 114 ff). The entire section of the book (pp. 79-118) that deals with the origin of the Fed shows Rothbard’s incredibly detailed historical knowledge. Though he was too modest to do so, he could had he wished have echoed the boast of Fustel de Coulanges: “It is not I who speak, but history who speaks through me.” Rothbard brings the historical section of the book to a close with a discussion of the Fed’s early years in which the Governor of the New York Fed, Benjamin Strong, guaranteed Morgan control (pp. 124-129). Only with the coming of the New Deal were the Morgan interests relegated to a lesser role, as the Rockefellers assumed leadership of the Eastern Establishment. Rothbard draws attention to the research of Thomas Ferguson, who has interpreted the New Deal as an anti-Morgan coup (p. 131, n. 40).

“Philosophers have only interpreted the world; the point however is to change it.” For once, Rothbard agreed with his ideological antipodes, Karl Marx; and the present work is not only an academic study but a plan for action. And the plan in question is a radical one. If Rothbard is correct, the entire basis of modern deposit banking, the fractional reserve system, is a type of counterfeiting that must be abolished. Under present arrangements, “the Fed has the well-nigh absolute power to determine the money supply if it so wishes” (p. 144). In response, the Federal Reserve System must be liquidated and the gold standard restored “at one stroke” (p. 146).

Again and again, the reader will be struck by the way in which Rothbard’s grasp of fundamental economic principles enables him to overturn conventional thinking. A brilliant example of this is his unmasking of the fallacy involved in deposit insurance (pp. 134- 137). Wittgenstein says in the Tractatus, “Whatever can be said, can be said clearly;” but few have been able to live up to his exacting dictum. Murray Rothbard’s writing always displayed the clarity of a first-rate mind. Those who wish to see this mind in action, as well as learn from someone in total control of the literature of American economic history, should immediately secure of The Case Against the Fed.

CITE THIS ARTICLE

Gordon, David. “The Bankers’ Cartel,” Review of The Case Against The Fed, by Murray Rothbard. The Mises Review 1, No. 1 (Spring 1995).

Food for thought...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Thu, 17 Sep 2026 14:08:01 +0000

👏👏👏

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 21:27:59 +0000

🚨 LMFAO...Director Kash Patel just embarrassed the CRAP out of clueless Sen. Mazie Hirono (D)

HIRONO: When will you respond to our letter?

PATEL: I gave a full analysis and response.

HIRONO: When will you respond?

PATEL: I already responded. The letter is public.

HIRONO: I… pic.twitter.com/BZGbJCun5L
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 15, 2026

Sydney Sweeney Tries To Gain Support Of Liberal Women By Murdering Multiple Children https://t.co/3vkEsV3QB3
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) September 15, 2026

Weekend at the Swamp...

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 17:16:09 +0000

🤔🤔

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Wed, 16 Sep 2026 14:47:48 +0000

Amen James!

noreply@blogger.com (Unknown) — Tue, 15 Sep 2026 17:39:40 +0000

Everyone is arguing over who to blame.

The rich.
Corporations.
Capitalism.
Socialism.

I think they’re arguing about the symptoms instead of the cause.

If you don’t understand how money and credit are created, you’re missing the biggest wealth transfer in modern history.

👇 My… pic.twitter.com/eRx7tGTOre
— James Polidori (@JPolidori) July 16, 2026