<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<atom:link href="https://feeds.libsyn.com/379022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
		<title>Employment &amp; Benefits Unpacked</title>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Libsyn WebEngine 2.0</generator>
		<link>https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/podcasts/overview/employment-benefits-unpacked</link>
		<language>en</language>
		<copyright>©2021 Mayer Brown</copyright>
		<docs>https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/insights/podcasts/overview/employment-benefits-unpacked</docs>
		<managingEditor>webedits@mayerbrown.com (webedits@mayerbrown.com)</managingEditor>
		<itunes:summary>A fortnightly Employment Law podcast placing a spotlight on recent cases and keeping you up to date with the very latest changes in the law. CPD available. This podcast is an overview of the cases and law.  How the law will apply in any particular case will depend on the individual circumstances. Listeners should seek legal advice if any of the matters discussed are relevant to a specific issue or concern. “These podcasts include excerpts from “The Corporate Machine” by Seastock and “Vivaldi - Motet for Soprano and Orchestra larghetto” by Advent Chamber Orchestra licensed under an Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 United States License”, to view the license visit &lt;a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/"&gt;http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/us/&lt;/a&gt;</itunes:summary>
		
		<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		
		<itunes:image href="http://www.mayerbrown.com/-/media/images/podcasts/1400x1400_ukemploymentlaw_podcast.jpg"/>
		<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
		
		<description>Welcome to Employment &amp; Benefits Unpacked, where we dive into the many employment, benefits, and mobility issues facing organizations across jurisdictions. Each episode is hosted by a different Mayer Brown lawyer from our global Employment &amp; Benefits group, offering fresh perspectives and insights for employers, HR professionals, and in-house counsel.</description>
		<itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
		



		<podcast:locked owner="webedits@mayerbrown.com">no</podcast:locked>
		
		<itunes:keywords>Employment,United,Kingdom,UK,Law</itunes:keywords><itunes:subtitle>UK Employment Law</itunes:subtitle><itunes:category text="Business"><itunes:category text="Business News"/></itunes:category><itunes:category text="News &amp; Politics"/><itunes:owner><itunes:email>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:email><itunes:name>Mayer Brown</itunes:name></itunes:owner><item>
			<title>Beyond Borders: Labor Law Strategies for Cross-Border Deals</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2026 14:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[e23496e4-42ea-441d-ad7a-918cea86ad22]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/beyond-borders-labor-law-strategies-for-cross-border-deals]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span style= "font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI',sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Aptos; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ligatures: standardcontextual; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"> In this episode of <em>Employment and Benefits Unpacked</em>, Mayer Brown employment lawyers Pauline Stadler (Frankfurt) and Marine Hamon (Paris) explore the critical labor law considerations that arise in cross-border transactions, drawing on their experience advising clients on carve-outs and asset deals spanning Germany and France. In this discussion, find out how works council consultation requirements, statutory timelines, employee transfer rules, and confidentiality obligations in each jurisdiction can directly impact your deals. Marine and Pauline highlight the importance of aligning messaging across jurisdictions given that employee representatives in different countries routinely compare notes and will push back on any inconsistencies. Key takeaways include the importance of establishing labor workstream milestones from day one, maintaining a consistent narrative for all stakeholders, and ensuring that transaction documents account for consultation timelines and employee objection rights.</span></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of <em>Employment and Benefits Unpacked</em>, Mayer Brown employment lawyers Pauline Stadler (Frankfurt) and Marine Hamon (Paris) explore the critical labor law considerations that arise in cross-border transactions, drawing on their experience advising clients on carve-outs and asset deals spanning Germany and France. In this discussion, find out how works council consultation requirements, statutory timelines, employee transfer rules, and confidentiality obligations in each jurisdiction can directly impact your deals. Marine and Pauline highlight the importance of aligning messaging across jurisdictions given that employee representatives in different countries routinely compare notes and will push back on any inconsistencies. Key takeaways include the importance of establishing labor workstream milestones from day one, maintaining a consistent narrative for all stakeholders, and ensuring that transaction documents account for consultation timelines and employee objection rights.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="472893540" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/employment_and_benefits_unpacked_-_episode_8_-_3.23.26_1080p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>22:35</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Mayer Brown employment lawyers Pauline Stadler (Frankfurt) and Marine Hamon (Paris) explore the critical labor law considerations that arise in cross-border transactions, drawing on their experience...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Mayer Brown employment lawyers Pauline Stadler (Frankfurt) and Marine Hamon (Paris) explore the critical labor law considerations that arise in cross-border transactions, drawing on their experience advising clients on carve-outs and asset deals spanning Germany and France. In this discussion, find out how works council consultation requirements, statutory timelines, employee transfer rules, and confidentiality obligations in each jurisdiction can directly impact your deals. Marine and Pauline highlight the importance of aligning messaging across jurisdictions given that employee representatives in different countries routinely compare notes and will push back on any inconsistencies. Key takeaways include the importance of establishing labor workstream milestones from day one, maintaining a consistent narrative for all stakeholders, and ensuring that transaction documents account for consultation timelines and employee objection rights.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Pensions Playbook: Investing in the UK</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 16:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[22165b35-3dfc-42dc-9a6f-a628eedb3a3d]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/pensions-playbook-investing-in-the-uk]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span style= "font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI',sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Aptos; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ligatures: standardcontextual; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"> In this episode of Employment & Benefits Unpacked, Andrew Block and Gareth Davies of Mayer Brown’s UK Pensions group provide a comprehensive guide for investors navigating the UK pensions landscape, unpacking the full spectrum of pension arrangements ranging from defined contribution and collective defined contribution schemes to the complexities of defined benefit arrangements that can significantly impact deal dynamics. With many UK defined benefit schemes now in surplus, the hosts discuss the evolving opportunities managing pension liabilities and the key regulatory powers investors should understand. Whether you're an investor, HR professional, or in-house counsel, this episode offers practical insights to help you navigate UK transactions with confidence.</span></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In this episode of Employment & Benefits Unpacked, Andrew Block and Gareth Davies of Mayer Brown’s UK Pensions group provide a comprehensive guide for investors navigating the UK pensions landscape, unpacking the full spectrum of pension arrangements ranging from defined contribution and collective defined contribution schemes to the complexities of defined benefit arrangements that can significantly impact deal dynamics. With many UK defined benefit schemes now in surplus, the hosts discuss the evolving opportunities managing pension liabilities and the key regulatory powers investors should understand. Whether you're an investor, HR professional, or in-house counsel, this episode offers practical insights to help you navigate UK transactions with confidence.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="200172321" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/employment_and_benefits_unpacked_-_episode_7_-_2.18.26_720p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>19:49</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of Employment & Benefits Unpacked, Andrew Block and Gareth Davies of Mayer Brown’s UK Pensions group provide a comprehensive guide for investors navigating the UK pensions landscape, unpacking the full spectrum of pension...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>In this episode of Employment &amp; Benefits Unpacked, Andrew Block and Gareth Davies of Mayer Brown’s UK Pensions group provide a comprehensive guide for investors navigating the UK pensions landscape, unpacking the full spectrum of pension arrangements ranging from defined contribution and collective defined contribution schemes to the complexities of defined benefit arrangements that can significantly impact deal dynamics. With many UK defined benefit schemes now in surplus, the hosts discuss the evolving opportunities managing pension liabilities and the key regulatory powers investors should understand. Whether you're an investor, HR professional, or in-house counsel, this episode offers practical insights to help you navigate UK transactions with confidence.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>ERISA Litigation Targets Voluntary Benefits: What Employers Should Know</title>
			<itunes:title>ERISA Litigation Targets Voluntary Benefits: What Employers Should Know</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[89233f5b-94f5-4c4c-bf2b-52a57e79ebad]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/erisa-litigation-targets-voluntary-benefits-what-employers-should-know]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, hosts Reginald Goeke, Rick Nowak, and Stephanie Vasconcellos examine several recent ERISA class actions asserting novel challenges to employer voluntary benefit programs including accident, critical illness, and hospital indemnity coverage. The conversation delves into whether and when these programs are ERISA plans, the contours of the voluntary benefits safe harbor under 29 CFR § 2510.3-1(j), the plaintiffs’ theories of fiduciary liability against employers and their insurance brokers in these lawsuits, and the practical implications for employers—including anticipated legal arguments and the potential risk that employers may stop making voluntary benefit programs available to their employees.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, hosts Reginald Goeke, Rick Nowak, and Stephanie Vasconcellos examine several recent ERISA class actions asserting novel challenges to employer voluntary benefit programs including accident, critical illness, and hospital indemnity coverage. The conversation delves into whether and when these programs are ERISA plans, the contours of the voluntary benefits safe harbor under 29 CFR § 2510.3-1(j), the plaintiffs’ theories of fiduciary liability against employers and their insurance brokers in these lawsuits, and the practical implications for employers—including anticipated legal arguments and the potential risk that employers may stop making voluntary benefit programs available to their employees.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="210506070" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/employment_and_benefits_unpacked_podcast_-_1.14.26_video_version_720p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>20:37</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, hosts Reginald Goeke, Rick Nowak, and Stephanie Vasconcellos examine several recent ERISA class actions asserting novel challenges to employer voluntary benefit programs including accident, critical...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, hosts Reginald Goeke, Rick Nowak, and Stephanie Vasconcellos examine several recent ERISA class actions asserting novel challenges to employer voluntary benefit programs including accident, critical illness, and hospital indemnity coverage. The conversation delves into whether and when these programs are ERISA plans, the contours of the voluntary benefits safe harbor under 29 CFR § 2510.3-1(j), the plaintiffs’ theories of fiduciary liability against employers and their insurance brokers in these lawsuits, and the practical implications for employers—including anticipated legal arguments and the potential risk that employers may stop making voluntary benefit programs available to their employees.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>One Big Beautiful Bill Act Part 3 Executive Pay IRC 162 Changes Alternative Minimum Tax Considerations and the New Section 4960 Landscape</title>
			<itunes:title>One Big Beautiful Bill Act Part 3 Executive Pay IRC 162 Changes Alternative Minimum Tax Considerations and the New Section 4960 Landscape</itunes:title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 16:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[0d5b867b-cada-477b-bfdd-785d1f2c6ac2]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-part-3-executive-pay-irc-162-changes-alternative-minimum-tax-considerations-and-the-new-section-4960-landscape]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Ryan Liebl, Hillary August, and Stephanie Vasconcellos who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 3 spotlights updates in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act impacting executive compensation, including a summary of the further expansion of the application of the limitation deduction in Code Section 162(m) for certain companies, the further expansion of the application of the excise tax on nonprofits for executive compensation paid to certain covered employees, and the changes in alternative minimum tax and the importance of the alternative minimum tax to employers who grant incentive stock options. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Ryan Liebl, Hillary August, and Stephanie Vasconcellos who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 3 spotlights updates in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act impacting executive compensation, including a summary of the further expansion of the application of the limitation deduction in Code Section 162(m) for certain companies, the further expansion of the application of the excise tax on nonprofits for executive compensation paid to certain covered employees, and the changes in alternative minimum tax and the importance of the alternative minimum tax to employers who grant incentive stock options. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="526376286" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/eb_unpacked_-_episode_5_-_12.17.25_1080p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>18:37</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Ryan Liebl, Hillary August, and Stephanie Vasconcellos who provide insight into the benefits and...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Ryan Liebl, Hillary August, and Stephanie Vasconcellos who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 3 spotlights updates in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act impacting executive compensation, including a summary of the further expansion of the application of the limitation deduction in Code Section 162(m) for certain companies, the further expansion of the application of the excise tax on nonprofits for executive compensation paid to certain covered employees, and the changes in alternative minimum tax and the importance of the alternative minimum tax to employers who grant incentive stock options. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Part 2: Leveraging “Trump Accounts” for Financial Wellness, Benefit Plan Design, and Health Savings Plan Specifics</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 20:21:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[10bcb13b-0b22-46ba-959e-c69527053c3f]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-part-2-leveraging-trump-accounts-for-financial-wellness-benefit-plan-design-and-health-savings-plan-specifics]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span style= "font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI',sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Aptos; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; mso-ligatures: standardcontextual; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"> Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 2 spotlights the new Trump accounts and how you can leverage them to kick start long term financial wellness. We dive into dependent care benefits, added flexibility for health savings accounts, and practical takeaways for plan design, compliance, and employee engagement. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</span></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 2 spotlights the new Trump accounts and how you can leverage them to kick start long term financial wellness. We dive into dependent care benefits, added flexibility for health savings accounts, and practical takeaways for plan design, compliance, and employee engagement. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="287441138" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/eb_unpacked_-_episode_4_-_12.10.25_720p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>26:35</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 2 spotlights the new Trump accounts and how you can leverage them to kick start long term financial wellness. We dive into dependent care benefits, added flexibility for health savings accounts, and practical takeaways for plan design, compliance, and employee engagement. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>One Big Beautiful Bill Act, Part 1: Deductions for Tipped Wages, Overtime Breaks, and the New Fringe Benefits Playbook</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 22:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[371fffac-1b3e-45d0-b831-36ebd220691c]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-part-1-deductions-for-tipped-wages-overtime-breaks-and-the-new-fringe-benefits-playbook]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span style= "font-size: 10.0pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI',sans-serif;">Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 1 spotlights new, tax breaks for tipped and overtime pay, updated employer reporting expectations, and a reset on fringe perks. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</span></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 1 spotlights new, tax breaks for tipped and overtime pay, updated employer reporting expectations, and a reset on fringe perks. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="407276813" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/employment_benefits_unpacked_podcast_-_episode_3_-_part_1_-_11.19.25_720p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>27:30</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>Join us for this three-part series covering how the One Big Beautiful Bill Act reshapes the workplace benefits conversation. This series features Hillary August, Stephanie Vasconcellos, and Ryan Liebl who provide insight into the benefits and compensation specifics of this new legislation. Part 1 spotlights new, tax breaks for tipped and overtime pay, updated employer reporting expectations, and a reset on fringe perks. Tune in for clear and actionable takeaways you can use with your leadership team, your HR team, and your workforce.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Navigating Employment Investigations: What Are the Key Steps?</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2025 17:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[c2e850ac-1d7f-4204-bbb1-626c77d6507d]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/navigating-employment-investigations-what-are-the-key-steps-0]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Chris Fisher, head of Mayer Brown’s UK Employment and Benefits Group, and Hagen Köckeritz, head of the Employment and Benefits Group in Germany, share a practical playbook for internal employment investigations amid rising complaints and regulatory scrutiny. They discuss when to take a formal or informal approach, how to preserve evidence and maintain confidentiality, and how to select an impartial investigator while navigating privilege pitfalls across jurisdictions. The conversation also covers scoping, interviews, data privacy and cross border constraints, and how to document findings and decide next steps. Listen for concise, actionable guidance that helps employers, HR and in house teams run credible, defensible employment investigations.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Chris Fisher, head of Mayer Brown’s UK Employment and Benefits Group, and Hagen Köckeritz, head of the Employment and Benefits Group in Germany, share a practical playbook for internal employment investigations amid rising complaints and regulatory scrutiny. They discuss when to take a formal or informal approach, how to preserve evidence and maintain confidentiality, and how to select an impartial investigator while navigating privilege pitfalls across jurisdictions. The conversation also covers scoping, interviews, data privacy and cross border constraints, and how to document findings and decide next steps. Listen for concise, actionable guidance that helps employers, HR and in house teams run credible, defensible employment investigations.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="496339141" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/eb_unpacked_podcast_-_episode_2_-_10.13.25_finalv1_1080p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>21:54</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Chris Fisher, head of Mayer Brown’s UK Employment and Benefits Group, and Hagen Köckeritz, head of the Employment and Benefits Group in Germany, share a practical playbook for internal employment...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>In this episode of Employment and Benefits Unpacked, Chris Fisher, head of Mayer Brown’s UK Employment and Benefits Group, and Hagen Köckeritz, head of the Employment and Benefits Group in Germany, share a practical playbook for internal employment investigations amid rising complaints and regulatory scrutiny. They discuss when to take a formal or informal approach, how to preserve evidence and maintain confidentiality, and how to select an impartial investigator while navigating privilege pitfalls across jurisdictions. The conversation also covers scoping, interviews, data privacy and cross border constraints, and how to document findings and decide next steps. Listen for concise, actionable guidance that helps employers, HR and in house teams run credible, defensible employment investigations.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>International Travel to the US Today</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[a9cc9f00-9e01-462d-a5ed-057748d5ac23]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/international-travel-to-the-us-today]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p><span style= "font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Segoe UI',sans-serif; mso-fareast-font-family: Aptos; mso-fareast-theme-font: minor-latin; color: #111111; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA;"> In our first episode, Mayer Brown partners Grace Shie and Morgan Bailey unpack the recent Presidential Proclamation suspending travel to the United States for citizens of certain countries. Grace and Morgan discuss what this "travel ban" means for international travelers, including the impact to employers and their mobile workforce.</span></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In our first episode, Mayer Brown partners Grace Shie and Morgan Bailey unpack the recent Presidential Proclamation suspending travel to the United States for citizens of certain countries. Grace and Morgan discuss what this "travel ban" means for international travelers, including the impact to employers and their mobile workforce.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="449397239" type="video/mp4" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/employment_benefits_unpacked_podcast_-_episode_1_1080p.mp4?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>19:37</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In our first episode, Mayer Brown partners Grace Shie and Morgan Bailey unpack the recent Presidential Proclamation suspending travel to the United States for citizens of certain countries. Grace and Morgan discuss what this "travel ban" means for...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author><itunes:summary>In our first episode, Mayer Brown partners Grace Shie and Morgan Bailey unpack the recent Presidential Proclamation suspending travel to the United States for citizens of certain countries. Grace and Morgan discuss what this "travel ban" means for international travelers, including the impact to employers and their mobile workforce.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Claiming legal privilege over a grievance investigation report</title>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2022 08:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[fee11acd-2d76-4931-82a9-19eb2245e195]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/claiming-legal-privilege-over-a-grievance-investigation-report]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the Mayer Brown employment podcast, head of the London Employment Group, Chris Fisher, looks at a case where a client was unable to claim legal privilege over the original version of an investigation report, despite having sent it to their external lawyers for advice before it was issued to the employee: the case of <strong><em>University of Dundee v. Chakraborty</em></strong>.</p> <p> </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the Mayer Brown employment podcast, head of the London Employment Group, Chris Fisher, looks at a case where a client was unable to claim legal privilege over the original version of an investigation report, despite having sent it to their external lawyers for advice before it was issued to the employee: the case of <em>University of Dundee v. Chakraborty</em>.</p> <p> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="9025131" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/uk-employment-10-6-22-claiming-legal-privilege.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>09:25</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of the Mayer Brown employment podcast, head of the London Employment Group, Chris Fisher, looks at a case where a client was unable to claim legal privilege over the original version of an investigation report, despite having sent it...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>18</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode of the Mayer Brown employment podcast, head of the London Employment Group, Chris Fisher, looks at a case where a client was unable to claim legal privilege over the original version of an investigation report, despite having sent it to their external lawyers for advice before it was issued to the employee: the case of University of Dundee v. Chakraborty.  </itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Enforcing Non-compete Clauses: the Importance of Delay and the Balance of Convenience</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 12:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[cae44750-b7a6-451a-965a-9cc2f4c9a660]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/enforcing-non-compete-clauses-the-importance-of-delay-and-the-balance-of-convenience]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in <em>Planon v Gilligan</em> where the employer was refused an injunction to enforce a non compete clause because of the loss of income that the employee would have suffered and the two month delay before the employer issued its proceedings. </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in <em>Planon v Gilligan</em> where the employer was refused an injunction to enforce a non compete clause because of the loss of income that the employee would have suffered and the two month delay before the employer issued its proceedings. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="11462079" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/UK-employment-6-8-22-enforcing-non-compete-clauses.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>11:57</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in Planon v Gilligan where the employer was refused an injunction to enforce a non compete clause because of the loss of income that the employee would have suffered and the...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>16</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent Court of Appeal decision in Planon v Gilligan where the employer was refused an injunction to enforce a non compete clause because of the loss of income that the employee would have suffered and the two month delay before the employer issued its proceedings. </itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Special DE&amp;I Podcast - Equal Pay Settlement for US Women's National Soccer Team</title>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2022 14:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6a77fc7e-a8fb-462e-9ed4-56b1e9c99ca8]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/special-podcast-equal-pay-settlement-for-us-womens-national-soccer-team-players]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In our special DE&I podcast series we deal with topics in the area of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I). Each episode will focus on a particular DE&I initiative or issue.</p> <p>In this episode, host Chris Fisher interviews Mayer Brown partners Nicole Saharsky and Marcia Goodman who represented the US women’s national soccer team in their recent landmark equal pay claim.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In our special DE&I podcast series we deal with topics in the area of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I). Each episode will focus on a particular DE&I initiative or issue.</p> <p>In this episode, host Chris Fisher interviews Mayer Brown partners Nicole Saharsky and Marcia Goodman who represented the US women’s national soccer team in their recent landmark equal pay claim.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="16951680" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/UK-Employment-5-3-22-Equal-Pay-Settlement-for-US-Womens-National-Soccer-Team-Players.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>17:40</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In our special DE&I podcast series we deal with topics in the area of Diversity, Equity & Inclusion (DE&I). Each episode will focus on a particular DE&I initiative or issue. In this episode, host Chris Fisher interviews Mayer Brown...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>15</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webededits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In our special DE&amp;I podcast series we deal with topics in the area of Diversity, Equity &amp; Inclusion (DE&amp;I). Each episode will focus on a particular DE&amp;I initiative or issue. In this episode, host Chris Fisher interviews Mayer Brown partners Nicole Saharsky and Marcia Goodman who represented the US women’s national soccer team in their recent landmark equal pay claim.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Enforcing a 12 month non-compete, resignations turning into dismissals and agency workers' rights to vacant roles</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2022 13:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[b84016f2-1b19-494c-967c-894a16ef5fdd]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/enforcing-a-12-month-non-compete-resignations-turning-into-dismissals-and-agency-workers-rights-to-vacant-roles]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at three recent cases, on whether a 12 month non-compete covenant could be enforced against a solicitor, when a resignation might become a dismissal if the employer exercises a payment in lieu clause and whether agency workers have the right to apply for vacant roles in the client organisation.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at three recent cases, on whether a 12 month non-compete covenant could be enforced against a solicitor, when a resignation might become a dismissal if the employer exercises a payment in lieu clause and whether agency workers have the right to apply for vacant roles in the client organisation.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="16534656" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Employment_Podcast_-_3.24.22.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>17:14</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at three recent cases, on whether a 12 month non-compete covenant could be enforced against a solicitor, when a resignation might become a dismissal if the employer exercises a payment in lieu clause...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>14</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at three recent cases, on whether a 12 month non-compete covenant could be enforced against a solicitor, when a resignation might become a dismissal if the employer exercises a payment in lieu clause and whether agency workers have the right to apply for vacant roles in the client organisation.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Special Global Podcast Part 3: The Evolution of Work: Managing the Challenges from a Global Perspective</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[6b94e00f-430d-4cfa-b858-6c8753dfebc2]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/special-global-podcast-part-3-the-evolution-of-work-managing-the-challenges-from-a-global-perspective]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 3 focuses on the future of work.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on <strong>November 15, 2021</strong>. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in <strong>Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021</strong>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 3 focuses on the future of work.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="10069632" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Employment-11-22-21-Future-of-Work.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>10:30</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>13</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 3 focuses on the future of work. Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Special Global Podcast Part 2: The Evolution of Work: Managing the Challenges from a Global Perspective</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[3ced7c99-ec1c-497f-9926-92ac7d339679]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/special-global-podcast-part-2-the-evolution-of-work-managing-the-challenges-from-a-global-perspective]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 2 focuses on remote and hybrid working.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on <strong>November 15, 2021</strong>. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in <strong>Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021</strong>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 2 focuses on remote and hybrid working.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="23376384" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Employment-11-22-21-Remote-Working.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>24:22</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>12</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 2 focuses on remote and hybrid working. Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Special Global Podcast Part 1: The Evolution of Work: Managing the Challenges from a Global Perspective</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2021 17:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[bce2a615-1a3d-4165-a20a-b865369dec21]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://ukemploymentlaw.libsyn.com/special-global-podcast-part-1-the-evolution-of-work-managing-the-challenges-from-a-global-perspective]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 1 focuses on vaccinations and the workforce.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on <strong>November 15, 2021</strong>. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in <strong>Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021</strong>.</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 1 focuses on vaccinations and the workforce.</p> <p>Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="22431744" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Employment-11-22-21-Vaccinations-and-Testing.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>23:22</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords/>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The...]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>11</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>webedits@mayerbrown.com</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this podcast episode, we explore the impact of the post-Covid workforce and the challenges facing employers in multiple jurisdictions. We consider the employment and mobility issues arising in the UK, France, Germany, Hong Kong, US and Brazil. The episode is divided into three parts: Part 1 focuses on vaccinations and the workforce. Please note this episode was recorded on November 15, 2021. Given the fast-moving nature of the topics covered, please check our ongoing commentary for the latest developments/regulations in all jurisdictions. For example, in Germany, strict Workplace Access rules were implemented as of November 24, 2021.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Do employers have to offer a right of appeal on redundancy?	</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_24th_September_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_24th_September_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the Court of Appeal case of Gwynedd Council v Barratt and the question of whether (or when) an employer should offer a right of appeal on a redundancy dismissal in order to avoid a claim of unfair dismissal.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/mf_hE5QHIko" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the Court of Appeal case of Gwynedd Council v Barratt and the question of whether (or when) an employer should offer a right of appeal on a redundancy dismissal in order to avoid a claim of unfair dismissal.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="7117629" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_24th_September_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>07:21</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the Court of Appeal case of Gwynedd Council v Barratt and the question of whether (or when) an employer should offer a right of appeal on a redundancy dismissal in order to avoid a claim of unfair dismissal. ]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>10</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the Court of Appeal case of Gwynedd Council v Barratt and the question of whether (or when) an employer should offer a right of appeal on a redundancy dismissal in order to avoid a claim of unfair dismissal.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Whistle-blower manipulation – limiting the Jhuti principle?</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_22nd_September_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_22nd_September_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent EAT case of Kong v Gulf International Bank, where a whistleblower claimed that their dismissal was unfair because it had been manipulated by a manager who was not involved in the dismissal process.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/DKIp--KEDZg" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent EAT case of Kong v Gulf International Bank, where a whistleblower claimed that their dismissal was unfair because it had been manipulated by a manager who was not involved in the dismissal process.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="10481385" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_22nd_September_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>10:51</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent EAT case of Kong v Gulf International Bank, where a whistleblower claimed that their dismissal was unfair because it had been manipulated by a manager who was not involved in the dismissal process.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>9</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at the recent EAT case of Kong v Gulf International Bank, where a whistleblower claimed that their dismissal was unfair because it had been manipulated by a manager who was not involved in the dismissal process.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Discrimination Update – interim relief and gender critical beliefs</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_July_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_July_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two recent discrimination cases dealing with two important issues – will interim relief remedies be introduced for discrimination claims and will gender-critical beliefs be protected as philosophical beliefs.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/gHefGFKux_A" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two recent discrimination cases dealing with two important issues – will interim relief remedies be introduced for discrimination claims and will gender-critical beliefs be protected as philosophical beliefs.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="14031194" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_15th_July_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>14:33</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two recent discrimination cases dealing with two important issues – will interim relief remedies be introduced for discrimination claims and will gender-critical beliefs be protected as philosophical beliefs.]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two recent discrimination cases dealing with two important issues – will interim relief remedies be introduced for discrimination claims and will gender-critical beliefs be protected as philosophical beliefs.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Friction, upset, fire and re-hire: Return to work red flags for employers</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_2nd_June_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_2nd_June_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases relevant to employers looking to bring employees back to work. The first is Sinclair v Trackwork, regarding an employee dismissed because of ‘upset and friction’ caused by the way in which he was carrying out his health and safety responsibilities and whether that dismissal was automatically unfair because of the special protections around health and safety dismissals in the Employment Rights Act. And the second is Khatun v Winn Solicitors, a ‘fire and re-hire’ case about when an employer can fairly dismiss an employee who refuses to agree Covid-related changes to their employment contract.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/fIq5xy4AvH8" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases relevant to employers looking to bring employees back to work. The first is Sinclair v Trackwork, regarding an employee dismissed because of ‘upset and friction’ caused by the way in which he was carrying out his health and safety responsibilities and whether that dismissal was automatically unfair because of the special protections around health and safety dismissals in the Employment Rights Act. And the second is Khatun v Winn Solicitors, a ‘fire and re-hire’ case about when an employer can fairly dismiss an employee who refuses to agree Covid-related changes to their employment contract.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="13288639" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_2nd_June_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>13:46</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases relevant to employers looking to bring employees back to work. The first is Sinclair v Trackwork, regarding an employee dismissed because of ‘upset and friction’ caused by the way in which he was carryi]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>7</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases relevant to employers looking to bring employees back to work. The first is Sinclair v Trackwork, regarding an employee dismissed because of ‘upset and friction’ caused by the way in which he was carrying out his health and safety responsibilities and whether that dismissal was automatically unfair because of the special protections around health and safety dismissals in the Employment Rights Act. And the second is Khatun v Winn Solicitors, a ‘fire and re-hire’ case about when an employer can fairly dismiss an employee who refuses to agree Covid-related changes to their employment contract.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Returning to work from lockdown - two recent cases</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_10th_May_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_10th_May_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode of the podcast, Chris looks at an unfair dismissal case about an employee who refused to return to work due to Covid-related safety concerns, and a case about mandatory vaccination policies and whether they can amount to a breach of human rights.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/ZTOhZNKJpRo" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode of the podcast, Chris looks at an unfair dismissal case about an employee who refused to return to work due to Covid-related safety concerns, and a case about mandatory vaccination policies and whether they can amount to a breach of human rights.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="13450892" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_10th_May_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>13:56</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode of the podcast, Chris looks at an unfair dismissal case about an employee who refused to return to work due to Covid-related safety concerns, and a case about mandatory vaccination policies and whether they can amount to a breach of human ]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>6</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode of the podcast, Chris looks at an unfair dismissal case about an employee who refused to return to work due to Covid-related safety concerns, and a case about mandatory vaccination policies and whether they can amount to a breach of human rights.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Splitting employment contracts on a TUPE transfer and disciplinary action against an employee for refusing to wear a face mask</title>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_16th_March_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_16th_March_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the recent cases of McTear v Amey on when an employee’s contract can be split in two on a TUPE transfer and Kubilius v Kent Foods, the first Tribunal decision regarding an employee’s refusal to wear a face mask.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/sC7SjqQYYN4" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the recent cases of McTear v Amey on when an employee’s contract can be split in two on a TUPE transfer and Kubilius v Kent Foods, the first Tribunal decision regarding an employee’s refusal to wear a face mask.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="16715345" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_16th_March_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>17:21</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the recent cases of McTear v Amey on when an employee’s contract can be split in two on a TUPE transfer and Kubilius v Kent Foods, the first Tribunal decision regarding an employee’s refusal to we]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>5</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the recent cases of McTear v Amey on when an employee’s contract can be split in two on a TUPE transfer and Kubilius v Kent Foods, the first Tribunal decision regarding an employee’s refusal to wear a face mask.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Disclosure of employee phones in litigation and covert surveillance by employees in the workplace</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_1st_March_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_1st_March_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the Phones 4U v EE and Northbay v Anderson cases which consider the disclosure of employees’ personal phones in litigation and when covert surveillance by an employee in the workplace will amount to grounds for dismissal.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/vfIlqyD6-U8" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the Phones 4U v EE and Northbay v Anderson cases which consider the disclosure of employees’ personal phones in litigation and when covert surveillance by an employee in the workplace will amount to grounds for dismissal.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="12672392" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_1st_March_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>13:08</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the Phones 4U v EE and Northbay v Anderson cases which consider the disclosure of employees’ personal phones in litigation and when covert surveillance by an employee in the workplace will amount to]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher and Miriam Bruce look at the Phones 4U v EE and Northbay v Anderson cases which consider the disclosure of employees’ personal phones in litigation and when covert surveillance by an employee in the workplace will amount to grounds for dismissal.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Discrimination claims: when is a ‘protected act’ protected and how often should employers conduct harassment training</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_February_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_February_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two discrimination decisions from the EAT: Chalmers v Airpoint on when a complaint about discrimination will amount to a protected act for victimisation purposes, and Allay (UK) v Gehlen which looks at how often an employer should run bullying and harassment training.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/7BKC8ymNfT0" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two discrimination decisions from the EAT: Chalmers v Airpoint on when a complaint about discrimination will amount to a protected act for victimisation purposes, and Allay (UK) v Gehlen which looks at how often an employer should run bullying and harassment training.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="12315926" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_15th_February_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>12:46</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two discrimination decisions from the EAT: Chalmers v Airpoint on when a complaint about discrimination will amount to a protected act for victimisation purposes, and Allay (UK) v Gehlen which looks at how often an employer]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris looks at two discrimination decisions from the EAT: Chalmers v Airpoint on when a complaint about discrimination will amount to a protected act for victimisation purposes, and Allay (UK) v Gehlen which looks at how often an employer should run bullying and harassment training.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Employment tribunal disclosure orders against non-UK parties and extending time to submit tribunal claims</title>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_29th_January_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_29th_January_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two recent Court of Appeal cases. Sarnoff v YZ, where disclosure was ordered in a UK discrimination claim against a board director living in the US, and Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham, where an extension of time for a discrimination claim was refused despite being only three days late.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/rGifcv-XMv4" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two recent Court of Appeal cases. Sarnoff v YZ, where disclosure was ordered in a UK discrimination claim against a board director living in the US, and Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham, where an extension of time for a discrimination claim was refused despite being only three days late.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="16818317" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_29th_January_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>17:28</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris looks at two recent Court of Appeal cases. Sarnoff v YZ, where disclosure was ordered in a UK discrimination claim against a board director living in the US, and Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham, where an extension of time ]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris looks at two recent Court of Appeal cases. Sarnoff v YZ, where disclosure was ordered in a UK discrimination claim against a board director living in the US, and Adedeji v University Hospitals Birmingham, where an extension of time for a discrimination claim was refused despite being only three days late.</itunes:summary></item>
		<item>
			<title>Interim relief in discrimination cases and covert surveillance in the workplace</title>
			<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
			<guid isPermaLink="false"><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_January_2021.mp3]]></guid>
			<link><![CDATA[http://web.2.c3.audiovideoweb.com/il80web20029/PODCASTS/Podcast_15th_January_2021.mp3]]></link>
			<description><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases: the landmark case of Steer v Stormsure which may lead to interim relief becoming available in discrimination cases, and Gerrard v ENRC which relates to whether covert surveillance can ever amount to harassment.<img src= "http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/UKEmploymentLawTheViewFromMayerBrown/~4/G2zuIJ4g8fE" height="1" width="1" alt="" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases: the landmark case of Steer v Stormsure which may lead to interim relief becoming available in discrimination cases, and Gerrard v ENRC which relates to whether covert surveillance can ever amount to harassment.]]></content:encoded>
			<enclosure length="23900486" type="audio/mpeg" url="https://traffic.libsyn.com/secure/ukemploymentlaw/Podcast_15th_January_2021.mp3?dest-id=3115412"/>
			<itunes:duration>24:50</itunes:duration>
			<itunes:explicit>false</itunes:explicit>
			<itunes:keywords>UK,law,employment,Kingdom,United</itunes:keywords>
			<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases: the landmark case of Steer v Stormsure which may lead to interim relief becoming available in discrimination cases, and Gerrard v ENRC which relates to whether covert surveillance can ever amount to harass]]></itunes:subtitle>
			<itunes:episode>1</itunes:episode>
			<itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
			<itunes:author>Mayer Brown</itunes:author>
		<author>webedits@mayerbrown.com (Mayer Brown)</author><itunes:summary>In this episode, Chris Fisher looks at two cases: the landmark case of Steer v Stormsure which may lead to interim relief becoming available in discrimination cases, and Gerrard v ENRC which relates to whether covert surveillance can ever amount to harassment.</itunes:summary></item>

	</channel>
</rss>