<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>UPS Global Trade News</title>
      <link>http://international.ups.com/</link>
      <description />
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:56 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/UPSGlobalTradeNews" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
         <title>A Lift for LAX Air Cargo Traffic</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Air cargo traffic at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX) reported its first year-over-year gain in freight traffic in nearly two years in September--a clear sign that the sector is entering a modest recovery.</p>

<p>The key gateway for trans-Pacific air cargo experienced a 2.5 percent increase in freight tonnage over September 2008, the first yearly growth for Los Angeles since November 2007.</p>

<p>The September tonnage also marked a 3.7 percent gain over August’s freight tonnage, the fifth straight month-to-month gain for the airport.</p>

<p>Air cargo carriers are seeing modest improvements in demand while some forwarders are reporting capacity shortages in Asia as carriers have idled aircraft.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/11/a_lift_for_lax_air_cargo_traff.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/11/a_lift_for_lax_air_cargo_traff.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:55:56 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Global Air Cargo Posts Positive Numbers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Global air cargo volumes are on the rise after a long decline that started in April 2008. </p>

<p>According to the International Air Transport Association (IATA), all of the world's regions reported higher demand in August compared to July, with Latin America and the Middle East showing the most improvement.</p>

<p>Compared to the low point of December 2008, seasonally adjusted freight demand has improved by 12 percent, but remains 16 percent below April 2008 levels when the fall in demand began, says IATA.</p>

<p>For 2010, IATA is forecasting an average international freight growth of 5.5 percent across the industry, compared to an expected full-year decline in 2009 of 14.5 percent.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/09/global_air_cargo_posts_positiv.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/09/global_air_cargo_posts_positiv.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:12:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>CBP Notice to Trade Regarding C-TPAT</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has updated its Web site with information regarding the Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) program’s enforcement and appeal process.</p>

<p>According to Customs, C-TPAT members may be suspended or removed from the program for several reasons to include, but not limited to, the following: narcotics seizures or other security related incidents such as human smuggling attempts, failed validations, non-response to required information, or an overall lack of commitment to the program.</p>

<p>Once an incident occurs, C-TPAT determines the appropriate next steps on a case-by-case basis. </p>

<p>To avoid suspension or removal from the program, C-TPAT members must ensure they are in full compliance with the minimum security criteria and be cognizant of and responsive to mandated timeframes. </p>

<p>For C-TPAT’s minimum security criteria, visit: <a href="http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/cargo_security/ctpat/">http://www.cbp.gov/xp/cgov/trade/cargo_security/ctpat/</a> . </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/09/cbp_notice_to_trade_regarding.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/09/cbp_notice_to_trade_regarding.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:53:01 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Social Security Number Eliminated as Identification in AES</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>An interim final rule was issued by the Census Bureau which will amend the Foreign Trade Regulations (15 CFR Part 30) to eliminate the option of reporting a Social Security Number ("SSN") as an identification number when registering to file and filing electronic export information in the Automated Export System ("AES") or AESDirect. Under the current FTR, the U.S. Principal Party in Interest ("USPPI") or U.S. authorized agent residing or having an office located in the U.S. may enter either (1) an Employer Identification Number ("EIN"), (2) a SSN, or (3) a Dun and Bradstreet Number ("DUNS") when reporting export transactions in AES or AESDirect. As a result of the rule, only an EIN or DUNS will be able to be used.</p>

<p>DUNS are available only to business entities, and EINs are available to both businesses and individuals. Upon implementation of the rule, if the USPPI or the U.S. authorized agent who resides or has an office located in the U.S. does not have an EIN, the USPPI or U.S. authorized agent must obtain an EIN through the Internal Revenue Service's ("IRS") website (<a href="http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98350,00.html">http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98350,00.html</a>). Former SSN filers who want to use a DUNS rather than an EIN for identification purposes must first obtain an EIN from the IRS and apply to Dun & Bradstreet for a DUNS.</p>

<p>The purpose of the rule is to ensure the confidentiality of the USPPI's and the U.S. authorized agent's personal information and to comply with the Privacy Act of 1974 and Office of Management and Budget guidance. Census is amending relevant sections of the FTR (sections 30.1(c), 30.3(a), 30.3(e), 30.6(a) and 30.6(b)) to specify the requirements for the reporting of an EIN or DUNS in place of a SSN for identification purposes in the AES and AESDirect.</p>

<p>The Census Bureau is inviting the public to comment on the interim final rule. Comments are due by October 5, 2009.</p>

<p>According to Census, the interim final rule is effective September 4, 2009. However, Census will implement provisions of the rule on December 3, 2009.</p>

<p>For additional information, please refer to the Census interim final rule (published 8/5/09) available at <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-18728.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-18728.pdf</a>   <br />
  <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/social_security_number_elimina.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/social_security_number_elimina.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:09:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WTO Victory in U.S. Case Against China</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A ruling this week by the World Trade Organization (WTO) will make it easier for U.S. publishing and audio-visual industries to export and distribute copyrighted products such as CDs and DVDs in China—and possibly even to gain a foothold against the country’s massive counterfeit industry, reports BusinessWeek.</p>

<p>Specifically, the WTO found that import barriers on products like DVDs and reading materials violate WTO protocols, as do restrictions that prevent foreign suppliers from distributing their own products in China. To date, China has required U.S. creative works to be distributed through state-owned companies. </p>

<p>U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk called the findings "an important step toward ensuring market access for U.S. exporters and distributors of those products." </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/wto_victory_in_us_case_against.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/wto_victory_in_us_case_against.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:00:02 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ports of LA-LB Postpone Infrastructure Fee </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Ports of Los Angeles-Long Beach have postponed a $15 per TEU infrastructure fee indefinitely, and may even consider dropping the $35 per TEU 'clean trucks' fee two or three years sooner than planned if harbor truckers continue to introduce newer equipment to their fleets, according to a report in the <em>Journal of Commerce</em>.</p>

<p>The infrastructure fee was rolled out last year, but has been delayed twice, most recently until summer 2010, because the pace of expansion projects at the ports has slowed considerably.</p>

<p>The deputy executive director at the Port of Los Angeles explained that the infrastructure fee might be required eventually, although port executives believed it was counterproductive to keep setting deadlines for the fee and then canceling them.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/ports_of_lalb_postpone_infrast.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/08/ports_of_lalb_postpone_infrast.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 12:13:54 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>C-TPAT Partners to Receive Mitigated ISF Fines</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has decided to offer C-TPAT partners mitigated penalties for violations of the Importer Security Filing (ISF) rule, also known as 10+2, which is set to take full effect in January 2010. </p>

<p>The Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) is a voluntary government-business initiative to improve global supply chain and U.S. border security. </p>

<p>According to CBP's decision, certain C-TPAT partners will be eligible for mitigation of up to 50 percent of the normal mitigation amount for 10+2 violations. <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/ctpat_partners_to_receive_miti.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/ctpat_partners_to_receive_miti.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 09:06:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New Bridge to Facilitate U.S.-Mexico Trade</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A new international bridge linking Mission, Texas to Reynosa, Mexico, scheduled to open in October, will help facilitate trade between the U.S. and the Mexican state of Tamaulipas—a state known for its maquiladora manufacturing plants.</p>

<p>The $168 million Anzalduas International Bridge will be one of the newest and largest border crossings in the country. </p>

<p>Several global manufacturers have recently boosted their manufacturing activity in Mexico as rising transportation costs have made Asian manufacturing less attractive.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/new_bridge_to_facilitate_usmex.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/new_bridge_to_facilitate_usmex.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:28:53 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>New York/Newark Prioritizes C-TPAT Importers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>U.S. Customs and Border Protection's New York/Newark Area Port has issued an Informational Pipeline stating that it will give Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism importers the benefit of expeditious completion of CBP-mandated cargo examinations.</p>

<p>Containers consigned to a C-TPAT importer that are designated for drayage to a Centralized Examination Station (CES) for a CBP Enforcement, Trade, or Agriculture examination, will clearly be designated as "C-TPAT Priority," on the Permit to Transfer or CF3461 document faxed to the CES facility. The CES facility will in turn dray to their facility, and present for examination, the C-TPAT Priority cargo before non-C-TPAT designated containerized cargo.</p>

<p>In order to identify C-TPAT importers, and ensure priority treatment is afforded, it is strongly recommended that Customs brokers/filers file entries three to five days prior to vessel arrival. These procedures will facilitate the expectations of C-TPAT importers by ensuring the subject containers will be given priority consideration by CES facilities.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/new_yorknewark_prioritizes_ctp.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/new_yorknewark_prioritizes_ctp.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:00:46 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Importer Security Filing Progress Reports Now Available</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As an Importer Security Filing (ISF) agent, UPS Supply Chain Solutions, Inc. (UPS/SCS) will, from time to time, provide updates regarding important developments to the ISF program administered by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). This update provides information about ISF Performance Reports (also called "Progress Reports") that CBP will make available to ISF agents, such as UPS/SCS. At this time, the ISF Progress Report provides only aggregate-level information related to ISF-10 submissions. However, CBP continues to evaluate whether it will expand the report in the future to provide more detailed transactional ISF data and/or data for ISF-5 submissions.</p>

<p>CBP will generate a report for each importer that is based on the Importer of Record/tax identification number used when the ISF was submitted. If an importer uses multiple tax identification numbers, CBP will generate a separate ISF Progress Report in connection with each number.</p>

<p>Future reports will be distributed on a monthly basis by CBP to ISF agents, such as UPS/SCS. UPS/SCS will then provide a copy of the report to customers shortly thereafter. However, in order to receive these reports, you must make a request to your UPS/SCS account representative.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/importer_security_filing_progr.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/07/importer_security_filing_progr.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 13:57:21 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>UPS Chief Says Trade Key to Economic Recovery</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>UPS Chief Executive Scott Davis told attendees of the Detroit Economic Club's National Summit that global trade can pull the economy out of recession, but the fundamentals would need to change. </p>

<p>Specifically, Davis cited three imperatives for laying the groundwork: rebuilding transportation infrastructure, deploying technology to speed commerce, and creating a fair, rational system of trade. </p>

<p>"Trade is a major force for good, for growth and for jobs," Davis said, and as many as 57 million Americans work for companies engaged in global trade. </p>

<p>At the same time, Davis cautioned against rising protectionism. "We must argue that protectionism is the worst response at the worst time. We can't let political expediency cloud global reality," he said.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/ups_chief_says_trade_key_to_ec.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/ups_chief_says_trade_key_to_ec.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:24:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Mexico Back in Vogue for Low-Cost Manufacturing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A new study finds the manufacturing costs in Mexico are becoming more competitive with countries like China, which has dominated the industry in recent years.</p>

<p>Research firm AlixPartners found that in 2005, Chinese-made parts were 22 percent cheaper on average than American-made parts. By the end of 2008, however, the price gap had narrowed to 5.5 percent. Furthermore, while manufacturing in China was about 5 percent cheaper than in Mexico three years ago, manufacturing in China is now about 20 percent more expensive. Compared with the U.S., the savings in Mexico have widened to 25 percent, from 16 percent.</p>

<p>"A couple of years ago, outsourcing to China was a no-brainer," remarked the managing director for AlixPartners, but that’s no longer the case, he said</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/mexico_back_in_vogue_for_lowco.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/mexico_back_in_vogue_for_lowco.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 08:23:44 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Prior Notice of Imported Food Final Rule In Effect</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently issued a revised Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) on its enforcement of the requirements for submitting prior notice (PN) for food imported or offered for import into the United States (21 C.F.R. &sect;&sect; 1.276-1.285). Prior notice of imported food is required pursuant to the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism Act). The FDA's final rule regarding prior notice went into effect on May 6, 2009.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
Although the CPG does not establish legally enforceable responsibilities or bind the FDA or the public, it serves as a description of the FDA's current thinking on the prior notice requirement. The purpose of the CPG is to provide guidance to FDA and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) staff on enforcing the final rule, which requires the submission of PN to FDA electronically via CBP's automated system(s) or FDA's Prior Notice System Interface (PNSI). Food imported or offered for import without adequate PN is subject to refusal.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
According to the FDA, the new CPG supersedes previously issued versions of the guide. There are numerous changes to the CPG. For example, the May 2009 guide adds new areas of enforcement discretion for foreign-to-foreign mail and courier shipments, U.S. federal government shipments, and seeds imported for cultivation. It also eliminates enforcement discretion if an alternative facility is provided when the actual manufacturer and registration number are not known. Now a site-specific manufacturer registration number or full address must be provided.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
In addition, certain provisions on the submission of PN and express carrier tracking numbers appear in the final rule instead of the CPG. Under the final rule, the PN submission may be submitted no more than 15 days prior to arrival for PNSI and no more than 30 days prior to arrival for ABI/ACS. In addition, in some instances, the express consignment operator or carrier tracking number may be submitted in lieu of (1) anticipated arrival information, (2) the bill of lading or airway bill number, or (3) the flight number.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
The following is a partial list of items to which the PN requirements do not apply: <br /></p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>&quot;personal use&quot; food brought by travelers; </li><br />
    <li>home-made food sent by the individual who made it as a personal gift; </li><br />
    <li>food that is imported then exported without leaving the port of arrival until export; </li><br />
    <li>meat, poultry or egg products under exclusive USDA jurisdiction at the time of importation; and </li><br />
    <li>food shipped as baggage or cargo constituting the diplomatic pouch. <br /><br />
    </li><br />
  </ul><br />
<p><br />
The following section, excerpted from the CPG, provides guidance to FDA and CBP staff when they encounter the situations described below. FDA and CBP staff may take different or additional actions if they believe particular circumstances warrant them.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
Regulatory action should not be considered by FDA and CBP when there is no prior notice in the following scenarios, or for certain gift packs, when the PN identifies the packer rather than the manufacturer(s): <br /></p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>Non-commercial imports by non-commercial shippers, irrespective of the type of carrier, including food in household goods, including military and civilian transfers; food purchased and shipped home by U.S.-based travelers (and not by a commercial establishment); and gifts purchased at commercial establishments but shipped by the purchaser, not the establishment; </li><br />
    <li>Imports for quality assurance, research or analysis purposes only, not for human or animal consumption or resale, in quantities consistent with such ends, but not including samples for test marketing, such as tasting at trade-shows or product promotional tasting events; </li><br />
    <li>Imports for &quot;in vivo&quot; testing in non-food producing laboratory animals; </li><br />
    <li>Foreign-to-foreign mail when the article is not consigned for delivery to a U.S. party/address; </li><br />
    <li>Courier shipments when the carrier is an express consignment operator or carrier and the importer, owner, or recipient/consignee is not located in the United States; </li><br />
    <li>Official U.S. federal government shipments, provided that a Federal Government agency is the importer of record; </li><br />
    <li>Imported food arriving from and exiting to the same country, if certain conditions are met; </li><br />
    <li>Seed imported or offered for import for cultivation, generally when no more than a small portion of the seed is likely to be diverted from cultivation to animal feed or other food use. </li><br />
    <li>Gift packs imported by individuals for non-business purposes (not for sale or commercial use), for which a single prior notice is filed with the identity of the facility that packed the gift pack, rather than the identity of all the manufacturers of each article of food in the gift pack. <br /><br />
    </li><br />
  </ul><br />
</p><br />
<p>The following are acceptable reasons for not providing a manufacturers' registration number: <br /></p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>facility out of business; </li><br />
    <li>private residences; </li><br />
    <li>restaurants exempted under 21 CFR 1.226(d); </li><br />
    <li>retail food establishments exempted under 21 CFR 1.226(c); </li><br />
    <li>non-processing fishing vessels exempted under 21 CFR 1.226(f); </li><br />
    <li>non-bottled drinking water establishments per 21 CFR 1.227(b)(2); </li><br />
    <li>farms exempted under 21 CFR 1.226(b); </li><br />
    <li>the submitter is unable to determine the registration number, but submits the full address. <br /><br />
    </li><br />
  </ul><br />
</p><br />
<p><br />
FDA intends to reject prior notice submissions unless the prior notice includes a valid registration number or an appropriate reason selected from among those listed above. The requirement that FDA provide confirmation of receipt of Prior Notice does not apply to rejected submissions.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
FDA staff should verify the validity of any circumstance where a reason is provided in lieu of a registration number.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
If the reason provided is that the submitter is unable to determine the registration number of the manufacturer, FDA should nonetheless verify the identity of the manufacturing facility and its registration status. Without the registration number, it will be more difficult and/or may take more time for FDA to verify the identity of the manufacturing facility and its registration status and to determine whether the article of food is subject to being held under section 801(l) of the act. As a result, if an article of food is imported or offered for import and the registration number is not provided, and if FDA has concerns that the food may pose a serious health threat, then physical movement of the food shipment beyond the arrival port may be delayed until the verification is completed.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
If the registration number of the facility that manufactured the food is not submitted as part of prior notice, FDA may also consider this in determining whether and where to examine the article of food.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
FDA and CBP's enforcement strategy for violations is to take into account the severity of the violations, whether they are flagrant, and whether the person has had previous violations, particularly if they were similar types of violations.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
When it is consistent with FDA's public protection responsibilities and depending on the nature of the violation, individuals and firms may be given an opportunity to take voluntary and prompt corrective action before the agency initiates enforcement actions. For instance, FDA may elect to refuse PNs, or may send Compliance letters to give warning to the responsible parties, prior to pursuing other regulatory actions.<br /><br />
<br /><br />
The regulatory actions for violations include: <br /></p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>Refusal for no prior notice, inaccurate prior notice, or untimely prior notice; </li><br />
    <li>Hold on importing, or offering for import, food from a foreign facility that is not registered; </li><br />
    <li>Injunction; </li><br />
    <li>Prosecution; </li><br />
    <li>Debarment; </li><br />
    <li>CBP seizure and assessment of civil monetary penalties for violations of any laws enforced by CBP, including but not limited to 19 USC 1595a. Civil monetary penalties may be assessed against any person who directs, assists, financially or otherwise, or is in any way concerned in the importation of any merchandise contrary to law. <br /><br />
    </li><br />
  </ul><br />
</p><br />
<p><br />
For more information on FDA's announcement in the Federal Register regarding the revised CPG, please access the following site: <U><a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-10556.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2009/pdf/E9-10556.pdf</a></U><br /><br />
<br /><br />
The FDA Compliance Policy Guide, entitled &quot;Sec. 110.310 Prior Notice of Imported Food Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002&quot; (dated May 2009) is available at <U><a href="http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~pn/cpgpn8.html">http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~pn/cpgpn8.html</a></U></p></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/prior_notice_of_imported_food.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/06/prior_notice_of_imported_food.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 14:38:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Global Airfreight Market Could be Stabilizing</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The director general of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), Giovanni Bisignani, said the global airfreight market appears to be stabilizing. </p>

<p>Cargo demand was fairly steady in March, "although at the shockingly low level of -21.4 percent," he said. <br />
"Air cargo demand has moved sideways in the -21 percent to -24 percent range since its plunge from -7.9 percent to -23.2 percent between October last year and January 2009," according to a statement issued by IATA. </p>

<p>"It's not the end of the recession, but we may have found the floor," Bisignani noted. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/05/global_airfreight_market_could.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/05/global_airfreight_market_could.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 10:33:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Notice of APHIS Requirements for Animal Product Imports</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (&quot;USDA&quot;) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (&quot;APHIS&quot;) regulates the importation into the United States of animals and animal-derived materials to ensure that certain animal and poultry diseases are not introduced into the United States. This notice summarizes certain APHIS requirements concerning the importation of animal-derived materials. This notice covers only animal-derived materials regulated by APHIS; other items regulated by APHIS (e.g., live animals, plants and plant products) and the regulations of other U.S. government agencies are not covered by this notice.<br /></p>

<p><strong>Import Restrictions</strong><br /><br />
Generally, a USDA Veterinary Services (&quot;VS&quot;) permit is needed for materials derived from animals or exposed to animal-source material. Other animal materials that require an import permit include meat and dairy products from countries with livestock diseases exotic to the United States. Meat, meat products, and meat or animal by-products may require a certificate from the exporting country. Some products may be exempt from certification, depending on the nature of the product, the country or region of production or export, the manner of preparation, and the animal species. In some cases, importation may be prohibited. Restrictions can affect not only products that will be entered for consumption in the United States, but also products that will transit the United States for export.<br /></p>

<p>Products subject to regulation include not only fresh meat, but also processed food products containing meat. Examples of animal-derived materials that may require an import certificate or permit include: </p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>Fresh (chilled or frozen), cured, or dried meat (poultry, ruminant, swine, equine) </li><br />
    <li>Milk and milk products </li><br />
    <li>Eggs and egg products </li><br />
    <li>Meat products (e.g., meat pies, prepared foods, hydrated and dehydrated soups, stocks, extracts, and canned meat) </li><br />
    <li>Hides, skins, capes, and hair </li><br />
    <li>Bones, gelatin, and gelatin capsules </li><br />
    <li>Casings </li><br />
    <li>Organs and glands </li><br />
    <li>Blood </li><br />
    <li>Live animals </li><br />
    <li>Animal embryos, semen, and ova</li><br />
  </ul></p>

<p>Information about certification and permit requirements for these products is available in APHIS's Animal Product Manual, at <U><a href="http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/apm.shtml">http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/apm.shtml</a></U>.<br /></p>

<p>Additional information about specified diseases and regions of concern is available at <U><a href="http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animal_disease_status.shtml">http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animal_disease_status.shtml</a></U> . Information about applying for a VS import permit can be found at <U><a href="http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/permits/">http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/permits/</a></U>. Certain animal products do not require a USDA import permit. These products are: <br /></p>

<p>  <ul><br />
    <li>Human pharmaceuticals and human vaccines containing animal components </li><br />
    <li>Human and non-human primate material (excluding cell cultures) </li><br />
    <li>Feline and canine material </li><br />
    <li>Live laboratory mammals and their material (for research purposes) </li><br />
    <li>Amphibians, fish, reptiles, shellfish, and aquatic species (includes venom) </li><br />
    <li>Chemically synthesized materials </li><br />
    <li>Microbially produced materials </li><br />
    <li>Recombinant microbes and their products </li><br />
    <li>Non-pathogenic microorganisms </li><br />
    <li>Cell cultures/lines, recombinant cell cultures/lines, and their products (for in vitro use) </li><br />
    <li>Test kits </li><br />
    <li>Animal feeds, feed supplements, and pre-mixes</li><br />
</ul></p>

<p>Nonetheless, all of these products are subject to USDA inspection at the port of arrival in the United States. Some products may still require a certification or declaration, and in some cases, USDA recommends that certain documentation, e.g., from the foreign shipper/producer, accompany the shipment to facilitate importation. More information about the products that do not require a USDA import permit is available at <U><a href="http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animal_import/animal_imports_nopermit.shtml">http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/animals/animal_import/animal_imports_nopermit.shtml</a></U> .<br /></p>

<p>The Food Safety and Inspection Service of the USDA also regulates the importation of meat, poultry and egg products. Animal products also may be regulated by other government agencies, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and these agencies have their own restrictions on imports and their own requirements for permits, certificates, and licenses.<br /></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://international.ups.com/2009/04/notice_of_aphis_requirements_f.html</link>
         <guid>http://international.ups.com/2009/04/notice_of_aphis_requirements_f.html</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">News</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:46:57 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
