US Patriots

Kamala Harris, the anti-Christianity, anti-American Choice

2020-08-13T10:42:00.002-04:00

By Douglas V. Gibbs —— Bio and Archives--August 13, 2020

Radical and unapologetic, hard left anti-Christian, anti-American Kamala Harris epitomizes exactly what the Democrat Party has become. She was the logical choice to be Biden's running mate

They used to try and hide who they really are. Now, the Democrat Party proudly throws around their anti-Christian, anti-Israel, anti-American, anti-Liberty, anti-Free Market, anti-Constitution attitude. They are deconstructionists who are dismantling American History and the American Culture in order to fundamentally transform America into a socialist nightmare. The most amazing part of it is how they have so many Americans buying into their overthrow of Americanism, without asking questions, without examining the facts. The whole thing is based on lies, projection, and tyrannical tactics that mirror the efforts of past bloody regimes run by murderous tyrants such as Adolf Hitler, Mao Tse Tung, Joseph Stalin, Vladimir Lenin, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez, and the Khmer Rouge. Yet, they don’t see it.

The Democrat Party’s history of racism is alive and well in the Joe Biden campaign

The Democrat Party’s history of racism is alive and well in the Joe Biden campaign, and has been in every past campaign in our lifetime. We have just not been able to see it as clearly as we do now. The totalitarian left is willing to poison the water supply to make sure you behave. They, largely through social media, are willing to do what they can to support communism’s attempt to seize control of our system. And there are Americans who are not only cheering this kind of authoritarian behavior, they are willing to run to the streets and burn down symbols of law and order and our history to help the cause. “Defund the police,” they scream, which actually means, “let the revolutionaries burn down the system.”

The authoritarians of the Democrat Party have politicized healthcare in this country to the point that they are currently controlling us in the name of a virus to the point that it is illegal to go to church, assemble with groups in your own home, or speak out against their idiotic, anti-science mandates. Meanwhile, they encourage the rioting in the streets of radical street thugs who do so not because they are honestly angry, but because it ushers in opportunities for a new socialist regime. They are no different than the brown shirts and black shirts of fascism during the last century.

Then, to put the cherry on top of the whole thing, the Democrat Party’s presidential candidate has happily picked Kamala Harris as his running mate, a character assassination expert who deployed her skills against Brett Kavanaugh, and who happily promoted a communist front group that put up bail for violent Marxist street thugs. She’s the same power hungry authoritarian who ruthlessly went after pro-life activist David Daleiden, who, if you remember, filmed numerous undercover videos exposing Planned Parenthood employees admitting they make huge profits from the sale of tissue from aborted fetuses, and that upset Harris so greatly that she sent a team of heavily armed agents to his home to seize all of his footage. The Real Kamala Harris then orchestrated an attack against Daleiden that left him nearly ruined, and facing jail time for exposing Planned Parenthood’s criminal activity.

Her radical pro-baby-slaughter stance is only the beginning of her Anti-Christian Bigotry

Her radical pro-baby-slaughter stance is only the beginning of her Anti-Christian Bigotry. Harris came out in favor of forcing Christians into violating their religious tenets by forcing them to pay for abortion. While attorney general of California she was furious when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in the Hobby Lobby case that Christian institutions did not have to pay for abortion and contraceptives in their employee healthcare packages. She believed Hobby Lobby should be forced to cover abortion-inducing drugs and devices. She wrote a brief urging the Supreme Court to take up the case and, when it did, joined with the attorney general of Massachusetts to write an amicus brief arguing that the court should force Hobby Lobby to cover abortifacients. This premise lurked at the foundation of her argument: When people start for-profit corporations, they must leave their “personal” religious beliefs behind. In her amicus, Harris suggested that the free exercise of religion is a right created by manmade statutes—not God—and is a “personal” thing that should be kept in an “inner sanctum.”

Kamala Harris, who is not black, by the way, she is half Indian, half Jamaican, according to Trump, is the kind of opponent any GOP candidate would dream of. She’s a radical, supporter of policies that are compromising the family, compromising law and order, and policies that are literally sending Democrat-ruled New York City straight down the tubes. She hates America, she hates our institutions, and she has even gone so far as to compare ICE to the KKK.

In short, radical and unapologetic, hard left anti-Christian, anti-American Kamala Harris epitomizes exactly what the Democrat Party has become. She was the logical choice to be Biden’s running mate.

God bless,

Johnny D

2019-11-19T09:43:00.005-05:00

LOOK AT THIS ELECTED OFFICIAL, IS HE IN NEED OF

PRESCRIPTION PSYCH MEDS OR AN EXORCISM, MAYBE BOTH.

MAY GOD HELP US IF HE IS A REFLECTION OF THE PEOPLE

WHO ELECTED HIM.

God bless,

JohnnyD

Socialism Fails Every Time

2018-10-17T12:52:00.002-04:00

by -John Stossel - October 9, 2018

God bless,
JohnnyD

Save the Democrats: Crush Them at the Polls

2018-10-16T11:46:00.001-04:00

Help them reverse their unicorn ride into hell.

From: National Review

By Deroy Murdock - October 12, 2018

The screams from the U.S. Senate gallery during the ayes and noes on Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation were the Democratic party’s cries for help. Voters should arrange the major intervention that Democrats sorely need, so they might regain their mental health.

What should have been a solemn occasion last Saturday afternoon — the then-nominee’s supporters and opponents quietly and gracefully waiting to see if he had enough votes to reach the nation’s highest court — instead sounded like chilling shrieks from a psychiatric hospital.

And, frankly, today’s Democratic Left resembles an insane asylum.

• Leftist mobs have screamed at Senator Ted Cruz (R., Texas), Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen, and other Republicans and hounded them out of restaurants.

• These thugs screamed at Maine’s Susan Collins, Arizona’s Jeff Flake, and Utah’s Orrin Hatch in Capitol Hill elevators and hallways last week.

• Leftists screamed at GOP senators Bob Corker of Tennessee, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and David Perdue of Georgia at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

• Screaming agitators repeatedly interrupted Kavanaugh’s confirmation proceedings and had to be dragged from the Senate Judiciary Committee’s (SJC) hearing room.

Rather than beg these unhinged hooligans to cease and desist, Democratic leaders encouraged their eruptions.

• Senate Democratic whip Dick Durbin of Illinois blessed the outbursts at Kavanaugh’s hearing. Durbin said: “What we heard is the noise of democracy.”

• Representative Maxine Waters (D., Calif.) welcomed the anti-GOP dining disruptions. “If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd,” she urged fellow Democrats in June. “And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere.”

• “Go to the Hill today,” Senator Cory “Spartacus” Booker (D., N.J.) implored fellow Leftists in late July. “Please, get up in the face [sic] of some congresspeople.”

• “You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for,” Hillary Clinton told CNN Tuesday. “That’s why I believe, if we are fortunate enough to win back the House and or the Senate, that’s when civility can start again. But until then, the only thing that the Republicans seem to recognize and respect is strength.”

• Eric Holder, Obama’s attorney general, abandoned all legal niceties in a speech Sunday: “When they go low, we kick them,” Holder said to cheers in Georgia. “That’s what this new Democratic party is about.”

Meanwhile, Jackson Cosko, 27, is in serious legal jeopardy after he was arrested during the Kavapocalypse for posting online the private addresses of Republican SJC members. The supposed “intern” for Representative Sheila Jackson Lee (D., Texas) allegedly snuck into the Senate offices of New Hampshire Democrat Maggie Hassan and used the computer system to purloin these privileged data. When a Hassan staffer caught him, police say that Cosko sent that employee a chilling note: “If you tell anyone I will leak it all. Emails signal conversations gmails. Senators children’s health information and socials” or Social Security numbers (emphasis added).

Cosko faces major charges: unlawful entry, identity theft, threats, witness tampering, and illegally posting public officials’ private information.

Meanwhile, Julie Gunlock at American Greatness reports that Cosko is not merely an overexcited undergrad with an unpaid internship. In fact, he is a paid “fellow” with a third-party organization. As such, his job may be to commit just the sort of wrongdoing of which he is accused.

President Trump surveyed these dangers and told voters in Council Bluffs, Iowa, Tuesday: “You don’t hand matches to an arsonist, and you don’t give power to an angry left-wing mob. And that’s what the Democrats are becoming.”

So, with Kavanaugh now a Supreme Court associate justice, what Republicans and independents must do is give the Democrats the only thing that finally will force them into self-reflection and self-correction: a therapeutic electoral shellacking.

Only a massive, crushing defeat on November 6 finally might make the Left heel.

If Democrats win either house, they will go berserk. Impeachment of President Trump, Kavanaugh, and even Vice President Pence (as some leftists demand) will top their To Do list. Medicare for All, scrapping ICE, and Democratic Socialism soon will follow.

To these leftist words, Antifa will add the music of mob rule: riots, property destruction, physical intimidation, street violence, death threats, and possibly even more severe mayhem — all in the name of Resistance.

If Democrats barely lose (say, the GOP keeps a three-seat House majority), they will blame Russia, voter suppression, patriarchy, white-nationalist lead poisoning, global warming, sexism, Islamophobia, homophobia, high gas prices, income inequality, and racism, racism, racism.

However, if Republicans romp, boost their Senate majority by three to eight seats (ideally securing a filibuster-proof, 60-seat majority) and score an additional dozen-plus House districts, vanquished Democrats might cry together on November 7 and conclude:

“We blew it.

“It’s not Trump. It’s not Russia. It’s not collusion. It’s not whitey. It’s not toxic masculinity. It’s us.

“We blew it in 2016, too.

“Our flawed nominee campaigned on an elitist platform against millions of ‘deplorables’ and offered no positive vision. Lazily, Hillary skipped Wisconsin entirely and spent too little time in Michigan. As NBC News concluded a week after the election: ‘Trump Out-Campaigned Clinton by 50 Percent in Key Battleground States in Final Stretch.’ Trump beat her, fair and square.

“We have no constructive program to make people’s lives better. We’re bullies. We’re cruel. We want control for control’s sake. We just want to bark orders at people. Socialism sucks — overseas and at home.

“So, we need to occupy some hard chairs, learn what we did wrong, and what promising, non-hateful message we can offer the American people. Maybe then we can emerge from this hole in which Republicans have relegated us.”

Atop Trump’s 2016 defeat of Hillary, a second, even harsher drubbing in 2018, might be the knockout blow that makes Democrats reverse their unicorn ride into hell and, instead, reinspire America with a program for growth and prosperity. Only then might Democrats stop their madness.

It now is the solemn duty of every voter, volunteer, activist, advocate, donor, operative, and candidate on the center-right to assure that the Democrats experience this desperately needed, self-cleansing, paradigm-shifting wipeout.

God bless,
JohnnyD

The Democrats & Their Ties To Communists & Socialists In America

2018-09-29T10:14:00.000-04:00

From: Freedom Outpost

by - Leon Puissegur — September 28, 2018

I have written a number of articles about the Democrats and just touched the surface of what the Democrats have become over decades of time. Today, the Democrats are aligned with the Socialists and Communists in our nation that wish to get rid of our Constitution and replace it with something more aligned to a Communist ideology. We can clearly make this statement based upon facts few will ever see or even recognize.

The first person I will show briefly is the man who directs all the Democratic movement in the US Senate. This man hates the United States and is none other than Chuck Schumer. Below I show his ties to the Communist Party, along with Socialism.

Charles Schumer via Discover the Networks:

“In 1998 Schumer was elected to the U.S. Senate. His candidacy was backed by the Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism, a Communist Party USA splinter group. In subsequent years, Schumer also received support from the Working Families Party.

* In 1997 Schumer co-sponsored Congressman Matthew Martinez's Job Creation and Infrastructure Restoration Act, which proposed to use $250 billion in federal funds for the establishment of union-wage jobs rebuilding infrastructure (e.g., schools, hospitals, libraries, public transportation, highways, and parks). Martinez had previously introduced this bill in 1995 at the request of the Los Angeles Labor Coalition for Public Works Jobs, whose leaders were all supporters or members of the Communist Party USA.

* On March 26, 2000, Schumer attended the New York Working Families Party's (WFP) national convention. In 2004 the WFP attracted 150,000 votes on its line for Senator Schumer.”

Just click on the links to see what these groups are all about. If the Socialist and Communist Parties have a friend in the Senate like Schumer, we are not watching our backs. We should never have any person writing our laws with Socialist and Communist ideologies. This is the “New” Democratic Party that is slowly showing that the old Democratic Party is near death and it has become a party representing these ideologies.

Now, let’s move to the top Democrat in the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi.

Nancy Pelosi via Discover the Networks
TIES TO THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALISTS OF AMERICA

On November 11 1995, Pelosi and fellow Democratic Congressman Ron Dellums were the keynote speakers at a public hearing on jobs and economic insecurity in San Francisco. The event was co-sponsored by the San Francisco Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the Full Employment Coalition.

PUBLIC PRAISE FOR HARDLINE COMMUNISTS

In 2001, on the hundredth anniversary of the birth of the late Harry Bridges (1901-90)—a former leader of the International Longshoremen's and Warehousemen's Union who was later (in 1992) exposed as having been a longtime member of the Communist Party USA's Central Committee—Pelosi honored Bridges as a man who was “beloved by the workers of this Nation, and recognized as one of the most important labor leaders in the world.” Bridges' International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen's Union, Pelosi added, was “the most progressive union of the time.” As scholar Joshua Muavichik explains, Bridges had been directly approved for his Central Committee post by the Kremlin: “This means, plain and simple, that he had devoted his life to the service of the Soviet Union and its ruler, Joseph Stalin, one of the three greatest mass murderers of all time.” Pelosi’s praise of Bridges, Muravchik adds, does not mean that Pelosi was ever a Communist, but it did illustrate “Pelosi’s wretched record in judging who are history’s good guys and who are its bad.”In 2001 as well, Pelosi also praised another prominent Bay Area socialist, Vivian Hallinan—whose husband, Vincent Hallinan, had co-founded the National Lawyers Guild's San Francisco chapter and had run for U.S. president in 1952 on the Progressive Party (which was a Communist Party front) ticket—as “a role model for many of us” and a “pioneer” in “a wide range of progressive causes.” In Pelosi’s view, “Vivian was devoted intellectually and passionately to many causes, well before they became popularly embraced.” Accuracy In Media's Cliff Kincaid notes that “these causes included support for communists in Central America during the 1980s, when Soviet- and Cuban-backed forces were subverting Central America through violence and terrorism and fighting for control of the region.” Indeed, Pelosi's tribute specifically lauded Mrs. Hallinan for having: (a) “opposed U.S. policy in Central America” under President Reagan; (b) “befriended Daniel Ortega, Nicaragua’s [Communist] Sandinista leader”; and (c) met with Cuban dictator Fidel Castro. The Hallinan family, it should be noted, was at one time under scrutiny by the California Senate Fact-finding Subcommittee on Un-American Activities for its efforts in promoting pro-Soviet propaganda.

GUEST SPEAKER AT “TAKE BACK AMERICA” CONFERENCES

In 2004 and 2006, Pelosi was a guest speaker at the annual “Take Back America” conferences which were organized by the Campaign for America's Future and the Institute for Policy Studies.

PELOSI APPOINTS A SENIOR POLICY ANALYST OF GEORGE SOROS

On February 8, 2007, Pelosi appointed Joseph Onek, a senior policy analyst for George Soros's Open Society Institute, to be her senior counsel.

All of the above show direct links to both the Socialist Party and the Communist Party. Once again, we should never allow anyone with connections like this to our enemies to be in any position within our government.

However, take a look at the last item that shows her direct link to the man who is an enemy of the United States, George Soros.

Take a look at this history from Discover the Networks.

Jeffrey Lord, a contributing editor to The American Spectator and a former aide to Jack Kemp and Ronald Reagan, has chronicled the following vital facts about the Democratic Party of 1800 through the 1960s:

Seven Democrat presidents owned slaves between 1800 and 1861.
Between 1840 and 1860, there were six Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery.
From 1868-1948, there were 20 Democratic Party platforms that either openly supported segregation or were silent on the subject.
The infamously racist "Jim Crow laws" of the post-Civil War era -- mandating segregation in virtually all public settings throughout the South -- were passed enthusiastically by Democrats.
In the post-Civil War era, the Democratic Party and the Ku Klux Klan had a very close relationship. Columbia University historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan became "a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party." And according to University of North Carolina historian Allen Trelease, the Klan served as the "terrorist arm of the Democratic Party."
Democrats opposed the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution. The 13th banned slavery. The 14th effectively overturned the 1857 Dred Scott decision (made by Democratic pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. And the 15th gave black Americans the right to vote.
Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which was passed by a Republican Congress over the veto of President Andrew Johnson, who had been a Democrat before joining Abraham Lincoln's Republican ticket in 1864. The law gave blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, file lawsuits, and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding.
Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1875, which was passed by a Republican Congress and signed into law by Republican President Ulysses S. Grant. The law prohibited racial discrimination in public places and public accommodations.
The Democratic Party's 1904 platform used the term "Sectional and Racial Agitation" to condemn the Republican Party's protests against segregation and against the denial of voting rights to blacks. This "agitation," said the Democratic platform, sought to "revive the dead and hateful race and sectional animosities in any part of our common country," which in turn would bring "confusion, distraction of business, and the reopening of wounds now happily healed."
Between 1908 and 1920, there were 4 Democratic platforms that were silent on the issues of blacks, segregation, lynching, and voting rights. By contrast, the Republican platforms of those years specifically addressed "Rights of the Negro" (1908), opposed lynching (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928), and (with the advent of the New Deal) the dangers of turning blacks into "wards of the state."
At the direction of Democratic President Woodrow Wilson in 1913, Democrats segregated the federal government.
The Democratic Convention of 1924, held in New York's Madison Square Garden, has been dubbed by historians as the "Klanbake." Hundreds of the delegates present were members of the Ku Klux Klan, which was so powerful that a plank condemning Klan violence was unwaveringly rejected. To celebrate, some 10,000 hooded Klansmen staged a massive rally complete with burning crosses and calls for violence against blacks and Catholics.
Democrats created the Federal Reserve Board, passed labor and child welfare laws, and created Social Security with Woodrow Wilson's New Freedom and FDR's New Deal. But these programs were created as the result of an agreement to ignore segregation and the lynching of blacks.
Thousands of Democratic local officials, state legislators, state governors, U.S. congressmen, and U.S. senators were elected as supporters of slavery and then segregation between 1800 and 1965.
In return for election support, three post-Civil War Democratic presidents -- Grover Cleveland, Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt -- agreed to leave the issues of segregation and lynching unaddressed.
Three-fourths of the opposition to the 1964 Civil Rights Bill in the U.S. House of Representatives came from Democrats, as did four-fifths of the opposition in the Senate. That opposition included such figures as future Democratic Senate leader Robert Byrd of West Virginia (a former Klan member) and Tennessee Senator Albert Gore Sr., father of Al Gore.
The Birmingham, Alabama Public Safety Commissioner Bull Connor -- who infamously unleashed dogs and fire hoses on civil-rights protestors -- was a member of both the Democratic National Committee and the Ku Klux Klan.

Is it any wonder the Democrats yell against discrimination when they were the very ones that did a lot of discrimination themselves?

Take a look at this statement from six-time Socialist Party candidate for US President Norman Thomas and what he said about the Democratic Party in 1944.

"The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of 'liberalism,' they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.... I no longer need to run as a Presidential Candidate for the Socialist Party. The Democratic Party has adopted our platform."

Read it and look at it with clear eyes. In this, Thomas states that the Democrats had adopted the Socialist Party Platform. Today, this becomes clear that many people in the Democratic Party have direct links to the Socialist Party, the Communist Party or both. The Democrats may as well just come out and say what they are.

“The 1960s were the heyday of the radical, anti-American movement known as the New Left. (For a detailed discussion of the New Left and its worldview and activities, click here.) By the early 1970s, however, the New Left had spent its political capital and was a dying movement. But its adherents remained committed to the cause, altering their tactics so as to work within the political and social system in a manner the New Left had previously chosen not to do. These latter-day leftists incorporated the tactics of Saul Alinsky, seeking to change society by first infiltrating its major institutions – the schools, the media, the churches, the entertainment industry, the labor unions, and the three branches of government – and then implementing policies from those positions of power.”

Here we see the Democrats began their change into the realm of Saul Alinsky. Please read the above link to Saul Alinsky to find out just what the Democrats are doing today go directly back to what Communist Alinsky formatted for a Communist destruction of the United States! We should question all that the Democrats do as they are not for the Constitution, but are, in fact, against it and can only win by berating anyone they wish.

“Today's ruling Democratic Party faction, whose members include the so-called "Shadow Party" and its constituent elements, call themselves "progressive Democrats." These Democrats themselves have a leftwing faction in the House of Representatives which is formally organized into the Progressive Caucus.”

Democrats have sold the people out for Communists and Socialists. The people the Democrats want now are just plain old misdirection. Just look at the next part of this showing Democrats association to both the Socialists and Communists.

In April 2010, the official website of the Social Democrats USA (SDUSA) revealed that organization's ties to the Democratic Party. Describing itself as a "Party Within a Party," SDUSA stated the following:

The Social Democrats, USA kept the name Socialist Party for our political arm because we are the party of Eugene Debs, Mother Jones, Helen Keller, Carl Sandburg, Norman Thomas, A. Philip Randolph, Bayard Rustin, and thousands of people who worked to build the civil rights and trade union movements in this country. Many good folks gave their lives in these movements.

The Socialist Party, USA, in 1956, chose to stop running candidates of its own, except on rare occasion. During the 1960's, we began to work in the Democratic Party. This is where our allies in the civil rights and trade union movement worked and continue to work politically. We are proud of what we helped accomplish within the Democratic Party, particularly the civil rights legislation and anti-poverty programs of the 1960's. The struggle continues.

Our movement has been involved in the left wing of the Democratic Party since 1947. Socialist Party members helped found Americans for Democratic Action. ADA is this country's premiere "anti-Communist, liberal" organization. We are proud of our long relationships with Eleanor Roosevelt, Hubert Humphrey, and others. We look forward to forging a good working relationship with our fellow pro-labor, anti-totalitarian, left Democrats.

Late in 2010, Communist Party USA member C.J. Atkins called for his comrades to drop their "communist" label, so that they could work more effectively inside the Democratic Party. Soon thereafter, Joe Sims, co-editor of the CPUSA publication Peoples World, acknowledged not only that collaboration with the Democrats "will be an area of engagement for those wanting to make a difference," but also that communists might someday be able to "capture" the Democratic Party entirely. Sims warned, however, against dissolving the CPUSA entirely into the Democratic Party. Rather, he advised his organization to remain a separate entity, working both inside and outside the Democratic Party as circumstances required.

This makes it clear that the Democratic Party today is not what they lay claim to being. I have presented just the tip of the proverbial iceberg. But just like the iceberg, the Democrats are sure to make it hard to see what lies below the surface. The way the Democrats are acting today with Judge Kavanaugh, shows just how far they will go to maintain power and this freak show with all the bought and paid for women is nothing more than their hate to have a Supreme Court that would base their decisions on the written law and the Constitution.

We hope we have shown enough about the real Democratic Party, which today is much more like a Socialist/Communist Party than a party based upon the rule of law and the Constitution. You decide, because if the Democrats win, we all lose since then they will allow their Socialist/Communist friends such as George Soros to do as they please to destroy our nation by eliminating parts, if not all, of the entire Constitution.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Understatement Of The Year !

2018-09-06T07:19:00.000-04:00

Here's what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important......

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been empaneled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

Bet you can’t guess.

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?

Your friend and mine, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009......

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.

The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this time frame?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland?

None other than, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?

~145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

No other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server.

He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

Guess who secured 17 no bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer?

No other than James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.

Nope.... couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage.... pick a crime, any crime, chances are.... this group and a few others did it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton's.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey's brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation's taxes.

And,
See the person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillary R. Clinton.

WHO IS LISA BARSOOMIAN?

Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.

Lisa H. Barsoomian, a US Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protege of James Comey and Robert Mueller.

Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998.

Lawrence also represented:

Robert Mueller three times; James Comey five times; Barack Obama 45 times; Kathleen Sebelius 56 times; Bill Clinton 40 times; and Hillary Clinton 17 times.

Between 1998 and 2017, Barsoomian herself represented the FBI at least five times. You may be saying to yourself, OK, who cares? Who cares about the work history of this Barsoomian woman?

Apparently someone does, because someone out there cares so much that they’ve “purged” all Barsoomian court documents for her Clinton representation in Hamburg vs. Clinton in 1998 and its appeal in 1999 from the DC District and Appeals Court dockets (?). Someone out there cares so much that the internet has been “purged” of all information pertaining to Barsoomian.

Historically, this indicates that the individual is a protected CIA operative.

Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community.

And, although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney, her email address is Lisa Barsoomian at NIH gov. The NIH stands for National Institutes of Health.

This is a tactic routinely used by the CIA to protect an operative by using another government organization to shield their activities.

It’s a cover, so big deal right? I mean what does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?

It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians.

Why does Barsoomian, CIA operative, merit any mention?

BECAUSE….

She is Assistant Attorney General Rod Rosenstein’s WIFE….That’s why!!

God bless,
JohnnyD

Capitalist Comeback v. Socialist Supremacy

2018-08-23T12:27:00.001-04:00

From: Town Hall

by - Marina Medvin - Aug 22, 2018

If capitalism had a comeback in 2016, then why are we seeing a rise in socialist supremacy supporters in 2018?

Capitalism trumped socialism in our last presidential election. Donald Trump won the 2016 election in large part due to the American working class. Hardworking Americans wanted to keep what they earned (capitalism) as opposed to having to give it up, by force, and watch that money be given away to those who didn't earn it at all (socialism). Andy Puzder gave this victory a great name: The Capitalist Comeback.

The election of a president who supported capitalism became an issue of outrage for a small faction of angry socialists who believed in the destruction of private property rights—and destruction of property altogether. They claimed anyone who disagreed with them was a fascist and hence a capitalist (which is a significant logical error on their part, since fascists are in fact socialists, not capitalists). Antifa is what they called themselves, coming from the term anti-fascists. (They should more honestly call themselves Antica—because, in reality, they are just anti-capitalist.) They spent the past two years destroying private property and committing violent acts.

The most intriguing aspect of the Antifa movement is that they have been growing and gaining popularity on the left.

CNN's Chris Cuomo came out in support of Antifa and their violence on national television, calling them "right." Democrat National Committee deputy chair Keith Ellison also came out publicly in support of Antifa, taking a smiling selfie while holding the Antifa handbook. But why are the Democrats so supportive of violence?

Democrats, socialists, and leftists of all kind, have an ethical unity: they believe that the ends justify the means. And that ethical position justifies Antifa and the members' violent actions in entirety. So when Antifa attacks random police officers and media reporters, the left covers up for them.

But are these socialists really that different from the fascists that they hate? No, they're not. They're the same breed of idiot. Ayn Rand put it best when she said, “Fascism, Nazism, Communism and Socialism are only superficial variations of the same monstrous theme—collectivism.” In fact, watching the fascist white supremacists v. the Antifa socialist supremacists in Charlottesville and D.C. these past two years was like watching a fight between two sides of the same pancake.

Which brings me to the term that I have been using to describe Antifa, "socialist supremacists." If "white supremacist" is the correct term to describe someone who believes in his inherent superiority based on his pro-white beliefs, then "socialist supremacist" is the correct term to describe someone who believes in his inherent superiority based on his pro-socialist beliefs. Nazis and Antifa both believe in their inherent superiority. Both groups similarly believe in violence to achieve their goals, and both groups agree that the ends justify the means. In fact, Antifa has been learning from the Nazi side of the pancake that marching the streets while chanting idiocies in unison to Nazi rhymes is a great way to celebrate their inherent supremacy.

But didn't Capitalism win in 2016? American capitalist Puzder even wrote a book to prove it: The Capitalist Comeback. So what happened? Why are we experiencing a rise in socialism in our local elections, with openly socialist candidates like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez winning over moderate Democrats? Why are we seeing a rise in support for violent socialist supremacists who call themselves Antifa? And what does this have to do with hating the police and singing about it to Nazi tunes?

To find the answers, I went to go to the expert on the battle of capitalism v. socialism in America, Andy Puzder.

Here is Andy v. Antifa.

Didn't capitalism win in 2016? Why are we seeing a rise in support for socialist supremacists who call themselves Antifa?

"The capitalist candidate certainly did win the 2016 election. I don’t think there was any doubt in most peoples’ minds that the New York real estate developer and entrepreneur was a capitalist. For socialist supremacists, the result of President Trump’s victory was utter and irreconcilable frustration.

"But why was Trump’s election so impactful for young Americans, who make up the majority of Antifa’s supporters? According to a recent Gallup poll young Americans are actually more positive about socialism (51%) than capitalism (45%). More disturbingly, the percentage of young Americans with a positive view of capitalism has declined 23 points since 2010 when 68% viewed capitalism positively.

"That’s not totally surprising, they just lived through 8 years of the Obama administration where the press touted President Obama’s economic accomplishments at every opportunity despite the fact that economic growth was anemic – the worst of any post WWII president – quality jobs were scarce, income inequality increased and the middle class was decimated. Coming out of a recession, economic growth should have been tremendous. It was not.

"However, most have been educated in a system controlled by socialist supremacists – and inundated with leftist ideology as entertainment. Rather than blaming Obama’s big government economic policies, young Americans have been conditioned to blame every economic problem on capitalism. They have been fed the lie that capitalism is based on greed while socialism is benevolent. This is a strange argument because, in a capitalist economy, the way you succeed is by meeting the needs of others. No matter what product or service you are providing, you will only succeed if meet the needs of a broad base of consumers who - in a form of economic democracy - vote with every dollar they spend on which businesses will succeed and which will fail. Capitalism takes the desire of every person to improve his or her life and directs it towards the needs of others. That may not be totally selfless conduct, but it isn’t greedy. Under socialism, on the other hand, you improve your life by getting more for yourself from a limited supply of goods or services the government makes available to the exclusion of others. Whether waiting in the inevitable bread line or the line for gasoline, your concern isn’t the needs of those in front or behind you. Its how to get the most for yourself. That’s a lot closer to greed than benevolence.

"We are now experiencing a tremendous economic surge because our capitalist president cut taxes, eviscerated Obama’s regulatory onslaught and incentivized the development of domestic energy, basically reversing every one of President Obama’s growth retarding Progressive economic policies. This Trump economic boom is benefitting people from every class and of every race. Hopefully, reality will help young Americans see through the lies of the Left. When that happens, groups like Antifa will have few supporters."

Based on your knowledge of socialist uprisings throughout US history, is the Antifa uprising something that we should be concerned with?

"We should always be concerned whenever socialism raises its head in America – or anywhere else. American capitalism has spread more wealth across broader demographics than any economic system in history. Socialism has been an abject failure in every nation in which it has been tried, but it appeals to elites who want to see themselves as the vanguard of the future. Those elites are desperately trying to maintain their illusions; they won’t be able to do it for long, but in the meantime, they cause a lot of damage. Unfortunately, younger Americans have been subjected to an education system and an entertainment industry more committed to leftist ideology that has been the case at any other time in our nation’s history.

"Many of us thought that the fall of the Soviet Union would have put the final nail in the coffin for American socialists. I had this to say in Chapter 5 of my book about the crisis of belief on the Left:"

'For over a century, many on the Left had invested their credibility in a utopian vision of socialism as the cure for capitalism’s supposed ills. . . . Think about the effort people with high IQs expended writing books and articles, organizing workers and activists, establishing careers and reputations, all in support of what turned out to be utter nonsense. . . . The Progressives were wrong about everything, completely and comprehensively wrong, and [with the fall of the Soviet Union] it was now so obvious that even herculean efforts at doublethink could no longer hide it.'

"For the Progressive Left, the collapse of the Soviet Union and the ascendancy of capitalism was a disaster. It put the lie too often repeated claims of a socialist workers’ paradise. The joke at the time was that the only place you could find a Marxist was in the faculty lounge at Harvard. Unfortunately, those faculty lounge Marxists have grown in number and taken over our institutions of higher education while leftists dominate the entertainment industry. They’ve created a bubble in which they indoctrinate young people. The result is a generation of Americans vulnerable to the lies and deceit of socialism. Some of them march in rallies for Antifa. Yes, it is something about which we should be very concerned."

Why does Antifa hate our police officers?

"Antifa is a domestic terrorist organization. As Politico reported in 2017, by early 2016, the Obama administration’s Department of Homeland Security formally classified Antifa’s activities as “domestic terrorist violence.” A 2016 joint intelligence assessment by DHS and the FBI, blamed Antifa “for attacks on the police, government and political institutions, along with symbols of ‘the capitalist system,’ racism, social injustice and fascism.”

"The police stand as the guardians of peace and order, preserving an environment in which different groups can express views under the First Amendment in a peaceful manner. This is one of the things that distinguishes the United States from the nations ruled by the very fascist governments Antifa claims to so vehemently oppose. The police are an impediment to terrorist violence, so they are a clear threat to Antifa’s efforts to subvert free expression and terrorize the American people."

Why did these socialist supremacists chant “all police are racist” in replacement of the Nazi words “you will not replace us,” but to the same Nazi tune, during Antifa's 2018 Charlottesville march?

"It’s an attempt to disparage the police and align them with the targets of Antifa’s terrorist activities. It feeds into anti-police sentiment on the Left.

"Keep in mind that Washington DC, where Antifa was also disparaging the police, has a total population that is 64.5% minority and the police department is 68.4% minorities. African Americans make up 48.7% of the DC population and 59.3% of the police force. These numbers are from 2013, which are the most recent I’ve seen. Although no one knows for sure, based on the videos I’ve seen, I suspect that the DC police department has better minority representation than Antifa."

Why is the media so concerned with protecting leftist violence from bad press? Why does the media value socialism above truth? Is this something that we have seen in American culture in the past?

"Yes, we have seen it before. Just look at the obsequious coverage that the New York Times gave to the Soviet Union in the 1930s. There is a long progressive media tradition that they have no enemies on the Left, and that is in full display in their coverage of Antifa.

"It’s also important to remember that the Left (including much of the press) is still convinced that the direction of history is in their favor. They are “progressive”, after all – they believe history is progressing towards the inevitable vindication of what they believe. They have a tremendous ego investment in that certainty. But it is increasingly difficult for them to sustain that investment against the weight of evidence of the last 100 years. So, every day they have to ignore the truth that is all around them to believe what they feel impelled to believe. After a while ignoring the truth becomes a habit, and we see that habit in action when they report (or don’t report) on Antifa.

"I think this fear of the truth is the cause of much of the media’s utter hatred for President Trump. The President doesn’t hide his contempt for their moral authority, their identity politics, their vision of the future, and their influence on the culture. The fact that Trump is president, and that he won’t back down, is for them an intolerable assault on things they hold sacred. They can’t even humanize Trump without threatening their own sense of identity."

What is your advice to a conservative on how to handle Antifa or socialist supremacists in a conversation, knowing that an appeal to reason does not work when communicating with them?

"That’s a tough one. If they truly are committed Antifa members, I doubt they’ll be willing to have a conversation with you. If they are just young people indoctrinated into socialism, I’d speak to them about the virtues of capitalism, keeping in mind that they will need to be deprogrammed. Ask them if they are willing to engage in a longer-term dialogue and make clear that you want to hear their opinions and respond to their points. Then I would try to interest them with a statement like: “I have good news for you. The economic system into which you were born is the best system ever devised for the poor and the marginalized. It gives them power and creates the opportunities that make them prosperous, and it’s the greatest engine for the redistribution of wealth in history. It’s called capitalism.”

"You’ll need to be prepared yourself if you are going to engage young people in a conversation like that. I’d get a copy of my book. That’s why I wrote it."

To summarize, Andy attributes the rise of socialist supremacists and Antifa to young people blaming all of society's economic ills on capitalism. I agree with him. I believe this is a perpetual, fundamental misunderstanding by our youth of why an economic problem exists in the first place. Instead of understanding the nature of personal responsibility, quality work, the marketplace, supply and demand, and market value, our youth just understands a superficial visual comparison: rich and poor. Failing to properly educate our children about capitalism and socialism is the greatest tragedy of our seemingly capitalist-wannabe nation.

To better educate our youth, go get a copy of Andy's book. He writes about the outrageous ways that socialists have been gaining power throughout America's history. He explains the history, development and the mindset the socialist left. The more you know and understand about what led to modern day Antifa, the more empowered you will be to educate your children, and the better prepared you will be to stand your ground if faced with an argument with or about socialist supremacy.

Reinvigorate and reinforce The Capitalist Comeback.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Explaining Trump Hatred

2018-08-16T07:47:00.002-04:00

From: Townhall

by - Marvin Folkertsma - Aug 15, 2018

On May 22, 1856, South Carolina Congressman Preston Brooks entered the Senate chamber and approached Charles Sumner, who was sitting at his desk applying a postal frank to copies of his “Crime Against Kansas” speech, in which he excoriated Senator Andrew Butler for embracing “the harlot, Slavery.” Brooks beat the unsuspecting Sumner senseless with a dog-whip cane, sending him into convalescence for the next three years and ending what remained of “reasoned discourse” in the Senate. A half-decade later, the nation plunged into the Civil War, settling disputes on the battlefield that could not be addressed by a civilized exchange of views, which had been crushed by passions of the time.

Today’s passions explode from elites embracing harlots of hatred and denunciation sufficient to shock the sensibilities of any ante-bellum orator: fake severed heads, assassination threats, enough F-bombs to obliterate America’s enemies, along with endless verbal assaults against President Trump, saturate Progressive bellowing. All of which is insane, of course: if only H. P. Lovecraft (Mountains of Madness) were around to help us cope. Absent that, we always have the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, though its entries apply to individual cases and not to entire categories of people losing their minds. What, then, can be said? What explains such unbridled hatred of President Trump? Here are a few suggestions.

1. Trump is an outsider. Trump is not a normal Republican, or a normal Democrat, or a normal anything. He burst into the political scene late in his life, with few political obligations to anyone, least of all to entrenched elites in both political parties. Progressives have been accustomed to milquetoast Republicans for many decades; even Ronald Reagan didn’t depart from the script in ways that threatened the established order. And both Bushes, regardless of their occasionally bellicose policies, were eminently manageable; Bush I reneged on his No New Taxes pledge in a heartbeat and Bush II even expanded Medicare. Of course, both were still vilified, but, hey, that’s the leftist script. Plus, like most Republicans, they didn’t complain too much. Heck, they’re almost one of us! Trump isn’t.

2. Trump fights back. The last thing leftist mudslingers expected was a Republican who would bring a cannon to a gunfight. In fact, President Trump’s loose Twitter lips have punctured enough egos among his opponents to prod battalions of leftist potty-mouths to sue for copyright infringement. Donald Trump’s intemperate (and often ill-advised) responses to filthy onslaughts against him has had the effect of tarnishing his opponents’ brand names—especially in the media—by triggering even more extreme attacks. Before Trump, ideological hemophiliacs on the left bled fashionable resentment with every minor cut, every perceived slight; now, here comes a guy who declares elite media as the “enemy of the people.” His denouncers are in full Keith Olbermann mode, now, competing for an award that celebrates obscenity-screeching madness. Would be entertaining if it were not so sickening, so pathetic. And dangerous.

3. Trump loves America. He loves the country, that’s it. No apologies, no equivocations, no “on the other hands”—he stands up for America, for ordinary citizens, for every skin color, from sea to shining sea. He stiffs welfare-state besotted Euro-weenies, demands a level playing field in trade, and insists that government’s main concern should be for American citizens, and not foreign lawbreakers either in China or across the Rio Grande. Progressives have contempt for America. They spit on the flag, despise at least half of our citizens, trash our history, sneer at capitalism, denounce our founders, the Declaration, the Constitution, and dismiss most Americans with a blizzard of acronyms. And then they wonder why Trump won. Go figure.

4. Lib-Progs are spoiled rotten. They’ve had their way for the past half-century without serious interruption and still fully expect to transform the rest of the country to conform to the one-party systems they’ve clamped onto academia. A transformed America has no guns, no free speech, no boundaries, no conservatives, no Christians, a strictly controlled economic system, and a monstrous government in thrall to Lib-Progs’ lunatic weather cult and its grotesque commitment to infanticide. In short, totalitarianism. And then along came Trump.

5. Lib-Progs’ entitlement complex. Nothing in life is a matter of merit, achievement, or individual responsibility; everything is a matter of administratively determined entitlement, with an arc of history thrown in. Both ensure that the country rumbles along in a direction culminating in rule by an elite corps of Platonic guardians—liberal progressives controlling government, media, entertainment, academia, everything. In short, the country, history, owes them. And then along came Trump.

Although these suggestions offer hints to solving the Trump-hatred puzzle, one may still be left with a sense of incompletion, that something else still needs to be understood, an overlooked variable. Unfortunately, we may never understand such hatred completely, and even if we did, this knowledge may not thwart leftist plans for America. Normal cycles of politics will return liberals to government eventually; perhaps then, greater numbers of Americans besides the “deplorables” will more fully grasp what their self-described betters have in mind for them.

The only question is whether such a realization will arrive in time to save the country from those who despise Donald Trump and everything he stands for.

God bless,
JohnnyD

More Than a Man, Trump is a Personification of American Values and Beliefs

2018-08-03T09:09:00.000-04:00

The Left relentlessly attack Trump personally; his speech, hair, mannerisms, etc. They are oblivious to the reality that Trump is a symbol of the societal beliefs and values of millions of citizens

From: Canada Free Press

By Bill King —— Bio and Archives--August 3, 2018

Ever since his astonishing election win, Donald Trump has been assailed by the Left: Dems, RINOs, MSM, academia, the “deep state,” Silicon Valley elites, and globalists. Recently, the anti-Trump forces have become increasingly frustrated, and even enraged, from failed efforts to remove POTUS. The Left’s DNA is not coded for them to understand Trump, or why he remains, and will remain, impervious to their continual broadsides. The Left have gaping moral, social, and intellectual blind spots that render them incapable of separating Trump, the man, from the American values and beliefs he represents.

Heart and Soul of the American Spirit slowly dying under Obama

The political and ideological enemies aligned against Trump are tilting at windmills when they attack Trump personally. The reality is the Left’s mortal foe is not made of flesh & blood. Their archenemy is far more formidable than a mere man. Their foe is amorphous, intangible, i.e., a belief system conterminous with the American Spirit, diffused with foundational values and beliefs. These cherished values/beliefs had been ignored, demeaned, and actively suppressed during the Obama presidency. Millions upon millions of bewildered, hardworking citizens witnessed the debasement and refutation of traditional family values, American excellence, the rule of law, meritocracy, biological principles of male/female physiology, etc. Millions of other citizens experienced the eradication of livelihoods sacrificed before the altar of “climate change.”
With the heart and soul of the American Spirit slowly dying under Obama, “non-coastal” citizens began to abandon all hope, with the “certainty” of a Hillary presidency and the coup de grace to follow. Then, a phenomenon occurred during the GOP primaries. A tough-as-nails, street fighter emerged, a person who spoke from his heart and sincerely cherished and unabashedly expressed his love for America, the American Spirit, and American exceptionalism. Multitudes of desperate citizens flocked to, or watched the patriotic, perpetual Trump rallies. Despite his Queens accent and his odd-colored hair, citizens bonded with this main-street billionaire, whom they began to trust implicitly to champion the restoration and protection of their deeply held beliefs in God, country, and family. On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 these citizens voted en masse and Trump won in the early morning hours of Wednesday. Then, that very afternoon, the Left launched its all-out war on Trump.

The war against Trump continues unabated

The war against Trump continues unabated. Bereft of honesty and conscience, however, the Left now flounder on their incessant waves of opposition to Trump. The Left never did, never can, and never will understand Trump’s visceral connection with everyday citizens. They cannot fathom that Trump is the citizens’ champion who fights for their American values and beliefs. Trump has fashioned a broad shield to protect everyday citizens, one made from the patriotic sinew of the American Spirit, a shield, while intangible, that can never be splintered. Equally demoralizing for the Left is their continuing inability to parry the nationalistic “sword” Trump so skillfully deploys on the political battlefield. His myriad of enemies are clueless as to the strategies relied on by Trump as when to advance, thrust, feint, and disengage. They also are unaware that Trump’s sword has been tempered repeatedly, over decades, in the no-holds-barred arena of real estate development against well-lawyered cutthroat adversaries, street-savvy competitors, and the insidious power of regulatory tyrants and political gatekeepers. Now, as POTUS, Trump arises early each morning armed with shield and sword to engage in political battle for the sole benefit of American citizens.

The Left will continue to focus their hatred and venom on their faux mortal enemy, Trump, the “man.” They fatally misidentify their nemesis. For Trump is but the transparent symbol of the ideals that undergird American society. Ideals which flow from fundamental and natural rights embedded in the text and spirit of the U.S. Constitution. These American ideals resonate within the souls of citizens from all walks of life and age groups. Without reason or thought, the Left have unwittingly joined in battle against not a man, but an indomitable American Spirit personified by a man with blonde hair from Queens. The champion of “we the people.” In the coming skirmishes and battles with the Left, Trump knows in his heart he fights not alone, for Trump is “us.”

God bless,
JohnnyD

'Russian Collusion' by Saul Alinsky

2018-07-21T09:22:00.002-04:00

From: TownHall

by - Wayne Allyn Root - Jul 20, 2018

Do you know Saul Alinsky? He was the mentor of most of the leading liberal politicians of our time- including Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

Alinsky was a radical Marxist strategist and community organizer. His leading "weapons" were weapons of mass distraction: misinformation, radical protest and blaming the other guy for whatever you (the liberal politician or activist) are guilty of.

Alinsky actually counseled radical leftists to look in the mirror and whatever you see, blame the other guy for doing or being that exact same thing. So, if you’re a crook, blame the other guy for being a crook. If you’re a corrupt politician, call your opponent a corrupt politician. If you’ve ruined the economy, blame your opponent for ruining the economy. And of course, if you’re in bed with Russia, blame the other guy for being in “collusion” with Russia.

It’s all playing out in front of our very eyes.

First, of course, is the economy. Liberals insist Obama did a great job. They live by a combination of fake news, outright lies and delusion. Just today a liberal critic sent me “hate mail” claiming I’m a liar when I claim Trump’s economy is booming and better than Obama’s. He actually stated that Obama’s final year GDP hit 3.2%.

Fact: Obama is the only president in America’s history to never once in eight years reach 3% GDP (economic growth).

Fact: In Obama’s final year GDP was 1.6%. President Trump took over an economy in misery, malaise and despair.

Obama’s economy was a disaster. Trump has created a booming economy. Who says it? Not Wayne Root. Try the Federal Reserve.

The Fed announced on Tuesday that the Trump economy is booming and is expected to grow even faster. Fed Chairman Powell announced he is forced to raise interest rates to slow the booming Trump economy down!

Fact: In Obama’s final year GDP was 1.6%. President Trump took over an economy in misery, malaise and despair.

Powell added, “The unemployment rate is low and expected to fall further.”

Contrast that to the Obama years. In eight long years of Obama, as liberals claimed the economy was doing wonderful, the scared-to-death Fed raised interest rates ONCE by a ¼ point.

Under Trump the Fed has raised interest rates five times in 1 ½ years, with two more expected this year alone.

That’s one rate raise in eight years under Obama versus seven times in only two years for Trump.

Facts matter. With Trump in charge, the Fed is scared to death things are too good, jobs are too plentiful, the economy is growing too fast.

Enter “Russian Collusion."

The Deep State, DC Swamp and establishment of both parties are all in a panic. Trump is making America Great Again- just as he promised. Lots of jobs. Wage increases. A booming economy. He destroyed ISIS. He appears to have won a victory with North Korea. He just hounded NATO into contributing $33 billion more. And to top it off, Trump appears to have made friends with Putin and Russia. Trump’s critics are freaking out.

Now he’s “a traitor” for becoming too friendly with Russia.

They are desperate to distract you from the biggest takeaway of the Helinski Summit. Putin alleged a corrupt Russian business group gave Hillary’s campaign $400,000 of campaign contributions. Not only can foreigners not contribute to US campaigns…but Putin claims it was illegally obtained dirty money.

If true, Hillary is the one who colluded with Russians three times.

Once when selling 1/5 of America’s Uranium stock in return for $140 million in donations to the Clinton Foundation (plus a $500,000 speech for Bill Clinton). Second when she paid millions to Russians for a fake dossier to frame Trump. And again, when she colluded with corrupt Russians to help fund her presidential campaign.

Guess who else is in big trouble? Even if the Russians did try to help elect Trump, guess who was in charge at the time and did absolutely nothing? Obama.

Guess who was in charge while Hillary committed all these alleged crimes with Russia and Russian groups?Obama.

DC insiders report FBI lawyer Lisa Page has implicated a high profile insider in these Russian scandals, as well as the attempt by FBI insiders to fix the election for Hillary. Guess who? Obama.

And guess who Putin claims handled the illegal $400,000 campaign donation for Hillary? Obama's CIA.

Hillary and Obama looked in the mirror and saw their own criminal Russian Collusion. So, she made up a story and blamed Trump. The CIA, FBI, and DOJ were desperate to help, because they are all implicated in Hillary and Obama’s crimes.

Saul Alinsky would be so proud.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Flashback: Hillary Clinton Went on Russian Television and Said Obama Wanted to ‘Strengthen Russia’

2018-07-19T10:38:00.001-04:00

From: The Political Insider

By Rusty | Featured Contributor | July 19, 2018

Prominent members of the resistance didn’t always despise Russia.

While they pull their hair out in feigned outrage over President Trump trying to establish diplomatic relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin today, there was once a time not all that long ago when Hillary Clinton admitted that Barack Obama was doing his best to help “strengthen Russia.”

During an interview – on Russian television no less – then-Secretary of State Clinton was asked by Vladimir Pozner, “What is being done to make it easier for Americans to come to Russia and for Russians to visit America?”

Clinton’s response seemed to be one of building relationships between Russia and America, something which is apparently frowned upon these days.

“Well, we want to encourage a lot more travel and a lot more exchanges,” she said. “As we move forward and we get more experience between our two countries and facilitating business travel, tourism travel, education travel, every kind of travel, I think it will become, at least I hope, easier and easier.”

Seems reasonable. Sure, had Trump said this there’d be a 24-hour news cycle claiming the apocalypse was on the horizon? But if you think that’s bad, wait until you hear what she said next.

“One of the fears that I hear from Russia is that somehow the United States wants Russia to be weak,” Clinton added. “That could not be farther from the truth. Our (the Obama administration) goal is to help strengthen Russia.”

In a 2010 interview on Russian television, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that the Obama administration wanted travel and business to increase between Russia and America and that the Obama administration wanted to “help strengthen Russia.” pic.twitter.com/Cnaa1HWaBJ
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) July 18, 2018

Wow, that’s crazy talk. In fact, by today’s standards, that would make Hillary and Obama “wholly in the pocket” of Russia and “nothing short of treasonous.”

Two years later, Clinton was again on television and announced that the administration viewed Russia as an ally.

“In many of the areas where we are working to solve problems, Russia has been an ally,” Clinton said. “So I think it’s somewhat dated to be looking backwards instead of being realistic about where we agree, where we don’t agree, but looking for ways to bridge the disagreements and then to maximize the cooperation.”

Maximize cooperation?

Those words would be blasphemy in the eyes of today’s Democrat party.

How did the Obama administration help strengthen Russia and maximize cooperation? By ignoring attempts to interfere in the 2016 election because they thought Hillary was going to win anyway.

Need proof? Here is a video of Obama’s chief cyber official Michael Daniel revealing to the Senate Intelligence Committee that Obama issued a “stand down” order against Russian cyber attacks in 2016.

“This is the Obama administration,” conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh analyzed. “They knew the Russians were hacking. They knew Russians were engaging in cyber warfare, and the Obama White House chief cyber official testified that he was told to stand down.”

Obama’s former National Security Advisor Susan Rice allegedly gave the “stand down” order.

HOLY GUACAMOLE: So the Russian attempts to meddle in the 2016 election? Turns out Obama admin. officially issued a “STAND DOWN” order on nat sec attempts to retaliate on Russia, per MOTHER JONES Yahoohttps://www.motherjones.com/politics/2018/03/why-the-hell-are-we-standing-down/ pic.twitter.com/ikVZ2UyvCC
— Christian Datoc (@TocRadio) March 9, 2018

“So Obama didn’t do anything about the Russians!” Limbaugh exclaimed. “Obama was telling everybody the Russians could not hack the presidential election. Obama was telling people that it was too massive and widespread and intricate, it couldn’t be done.”

Not only did he fail to do anything, he openly mocked Trump knowing full well he was allowing Russian interference.

“If whenever things are going badly for you and you lose, you start blaming somebody else, then you don’t have what it takes to be in this job,” Obama taunted in October of 2016.

“But the larger point that I want to emphasize here, is that there is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections,” he added. “And so I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go make his case to get votes.”

Obama allowed it, then scoffed at the notion.

He helped ‘strengthen Russia.’ He helped ‘maximize cooperation’ in meddling with the 2016 presidential election.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Man Explains why He’s Walking Away from the Left

2018-07-05T16:37:00.000-04:00

From: Constitution.com

By The Common Constitutionalist July 5, 2018

A rather remarkable thing has begun in America. It’s an awakening of sorts. Check that. It’s not “of sorts.” It is an absolute awakening. It’s been dubbed as #Walkaway.

As most know, I, the Common Constitutionalist, was not, am not, and will never be an “Ever-Trumper.” I wholeheartedly support the president when I believe he is right and constitutional on policy, and call him out when he strays. As the saying goes: “It’s not personal – it’s just business.” Being a Never-Trumper or Ever-Trumper is just silly and irrational.

But thank heavens for president Trump and the many things he has accomplished thus far. Most have been well publicized as good or evil, but known to most nonetheless. And most leftist campaigns against him have been equally well publicized.

However, one campaign may not – at least not yet. It’s called the #Walkaway movement, and I don’t think it would have begun without Trump being elected.

Up until this last presidential election, Ronald Reagan was the most hated Republican president. Reagan was labeled as the amiable dunce by the left, and to be sure, was hated by them. But as much as they disliked Reagan’s policies, the left didn’t suffer from Reagan Derangement Syndrome. Nor did they of either George Bush.

The reason was two fold. Despite his conservative bona fides, Reagan was a likeable guy. He was quick-witted and self-effacing, or as much as the leader of the free world can be. “W” was also likeable and developed a self-deprecating sense of humor. The other reason was that most liberals of that era weren’t full-on lunatics. And if they were, they were forced to remain in the closet, as it were.

But today, most on the left, and many on the right, see Trump as the opposite, and it grates on them. They hate his policies and don’t see him as even a likeable guy. This is how Trump derangement began. Even some on the right can’t separate the man from his policies. Admittedly, it does take some discipline – not a strong suit of the left.

But as the left becomes more unhinged, some liberals are waking up to the lunacy. Some are reaching the Red Line of “you’ve gone too far,” and refusing to cross.

You may have heard of the #Walkaway movement. I hadn’t, but I have now and it’s darned exciting. The movement was begun, just recently, by now former leftist, homosexual New York hair stylist, Brandon Straka. His only knock is that he is white. Can’t have everything I suppose.

He explains, clearly and concisely, why he has divorced himself from modern liberalism. No spin, no name-calling and no scripted talking points. And the movement is spreading fast.

n his wake have appeared dozens of other accounts from women, blacks – former liberals from all walks of life, all denouncing the fallacy of leftism. It’s a beautiful thing to see liberals have their eyes opened for the first time.

So what, you may ask, could this mean for the upcoming elections? Well, maybe nothing – maybe something. My first thought is really – how many people will actually be affected by this, to the point of leaving the democrat Party. Maybe not enough to affect this election cycle.

Most leftist phony virtue signally campaigns catch fire due to force-feeding by the media, burn bright for a short period and then flame-out. In other words, they have no staying power. It’s why they constantly have to uncover the next boogeymen to “stand” against. They do so because there is no underlying substance. There is nothing beyond the slogans and talking points.

But Brandon’s movement is different. It has what liberal movement’s lack – substance and thought. For a solid six minutes, Brandon uses logic and reason to explain, point by point, why he left the democrats and abandoned leftism. Because of this, he and many like him will likely never return to the left.

Enjoy the video. And don’t forget to like and subscribe. Someone as brave as Brandon needs all the support we can muster.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Is President Donald Trump God’s Olive Branch Extended To America?

2018-07-03T07:57:00.000-04:00

From: Eagle Rising

by Greg Holt - July 2, 2018

Amos 8:11 Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD

(The Olive) Amos 8:11 has never been more true than today – America has by and large become a godless nation. God has been thrown out of schools, kicked out of Christmas, removed from statehouses, and denigrated in every available medium. Even the Church itself plays fast and loose with the truth of the Gospel, denying the truth and making it up as they go along. Read approval of same-sex marriage, and ordaining homosexuals and lesbians as “pastors” here, this ought NOT to be.

Barack Obama downplayed the importance of God instead encouraging the edification of the people with regard to Islam. Obama effectively removed support for marriage as being between one man and one woman – this one move opened the floodgates wide for the advancement of the homosexual agenda, transgenders etc. Christians and Christianity were objects of scorn and derision, while the all-important fake god of Islam was venerated.

“Whatever we once were, we are no longer a Christian nation; at least not just. We are also a Jewish nation, a Muslim nation, and a Buddhist nation, and Hindu nation, and a nation of non-believers.”

Barack Obama – June 2007 speech

Lets not kid ourselves, the American culture and our personally held beliefs have been circling the toilet bowl for years now – then along came Obama, and he flushed the toilet. Under Obama’s reign of destruction, Islam was to be interwoven into the fabric of the Unites States as an important and critical tool used to bring down the U.S. while Christianity was attacked, maligned, marginalized, and destroyed – without outright admitting that this was exactly what was and IS going on.

Do your homework, see for yourself how many Muslim men were appointed to positions of power in the U.S. government by Obama – men that have ties to radical Islam – this was no accident.

Obama and his leftist, socialistic cronies, AKA the Deep State, did incalculable damage to this country – economically, socially, politically, spiritually, to our beliefs, our values, our foreign interests, and the military to name a few.

Then along came Donald Trump as a candidate for president. The Obama/Clinton crime machine went into super-overdrive. The leftist progressive socialists under the direct supervision of Obama and Hillary decided to be proactive – they decided to do everything possible to stop Trump from being elected as president. After Trump shockingly won the election, the left determined that Trump’s presidency must be undermined and destroyed by any means necessary. The left is still attempting to accomplish their most treasured goal; the complete and utter ruination and destruction of President Donald Trump – (as well as all Trump supporters), this is the ONLY purpose of the Mueller investigation.

The U.S. as a whole has fallen so far into the cesspool of evil one has to wonder if this country will ever regain a moral base again.

In ancient times prophets were sent to Israel to warn them of impending judgment – said warnings were usually ignored. Then proceeded the judgment of God against Israel.

Many including this writer have written of the judgment against America for our many sins and continuing slide ever further down into the cesspool of satanic filth that constitutes the greater portion of our society. This is of course not a popular position to take, but my writing is not based on popularity – but truth – truth is truth after all.

Lets look at the evidence before us:

Same-sex marriage is now the law of the land
Sex is ok and acceptable at anytime, anywhere, and between any number of persons regardless of gender
The U.S. is a HUGE distributor of porn
Millions of children have been murdered; their dismembered and butchered bodies being sold for profit
Men are trying to become what they cannot, women, and vice versa with the women.
Kindergarteners are taught about sex, homosexuality, transgenders etc.
Christianity which has its basis in love absolutely must not be taught and expounded on in schools – yet the so-called religion of peace that is built on murder and violence is now taught in many American schools.
Mass shootings are the new norm
Vaccinations are dangerous and are more about population control then medicine
Natural medicine (which actually works without the dangerous side affects) practitioners are being murdered in droves
Our food is actually engineered to kill us and cause disease and psychiatric problems – Yes REALLY. (GMOs)
Actors and other celebs openly make violent threats and death threats against Trump
Democrats advocate disarming the American people, (better known as gun control) why? Because a disarmed people are easily controlled people
Democratic policies are geared towards the collapse of the U.S. and loss of U.S. sovereignty to bring about the inclusion of the U.S. into a One World government and society. Can you say United Nations anyone?
Democrats and their backers are openly advocating violence as a tool to achieve their politically correct, socialistic goals
Democratic corruption and lawlessness has reached stunning levels never before seen

This writer believes that Barack Obama was a judgment against the U.S. from God. I also believe that Donald Trump is the olive branch if you will, sent by God. No I’m not saying Trump is to be equated with any of God’s prophets; that would be stupid. But I am saying that it strikes this writer that America has been offered another chance to change for the better by God, (just as Israel was) and Donald Trump is a big part of that.

To all the naysayers I know are out there chomping at the bit to refute this statement – this writer would remind you of King Nebuchadnezzar, one the most evil men there ever was in the ancient world, and yet God used him mightily.

Nor am I here saying that Trump is even a Christian, I do not know that and neither does anyone else. That in no way precludes God from using Trump to move America in the right direction.

Under the Trump administration Christians and Christianity are respected and protected. Donald Trump may not always say all the right things, or tweet the right things etc., but he IS trying to do what is best for America. Why else do you think the political left hates him and we his supporters so much?

Under Trump America is slowly growing again and prospering. The U.S. is again respected on the international stage after years of being laughed at under Obama’s wimpy leadership. Trump has the moral courage to stand up to nations like Iran and North Korea. ISIS was defeated in a year; Trump does not play games and handcuff the military like Obama did. The military will be rebuilt after Trump’s predecessor weakened and gutted it.

So yes, this writer firmly believes Donald Trump is being used of God for the good of this country, God’s olive branch to America – another chance for America to turn and repent of her sin and wrongdoing. We can, under Trump’s leadership seek to root out the evil in America and combat it, in government and society, or we can sit back and do nothing and watch America die – if we as a nation choose to do nothing, America WILL die.

2 Chronicles 7:14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

God bless,
JohnnyD

The Liberal Meltdown Is the Greatest Show on Earth

2018-06-28T07:12:00.002-04:00

From: Western Journalism

By Angela Box - June 26, 2018

Do you smell that, patriots?

Kick aside the dirty needles and piles of human feces you find on the quaint streets of Seattle and San Francisco. Make your way past the tattooed and body-pierced non-binary, genderqueers of Berkeley and Brooklyn. Hold your nose as you step over an able-bodied millennial who is choosing homelessness #BecauseAntifa.

You’ll find that littered among the fetid armpits and unwashed hair of liberals, there is an underlying and deeper scent: the scent of desperation and fear.

The full liberal meltdown is now on full display.

Every week there’s another reason for these exceedingly unhappy lumps of flesh to lose what’s left of their minds.

An elected official like Rep. Maxine Waters (whose wig glue seems to be seeping into her scalp) is calling for violence and aggressive harassment of Trump administration officials. Sen. Cory Booker and others Second That Emotion.

To wit:

Stephen Miller, Trump’s most trusted aide on immigration, had his personal phone number released into the sewer of Twitter by a liberal group.

Occupy Wall Street has told fellow cockroaches how to murder ICE agents — and the Twitter post still exists.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was attacked in a Mexican restaurant by leftist thugs — including an Obama holdover from the Department of Justice.

Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi was chased out of a Mister Rogers documentary.

Press Secretary Sarah Sanders and her family were kicked out of a Virginia restaurant because the owner took a poll of her idiot workers and they all agreed to make Sanders leave (and then proceeded to harass her family at another restaurant).

Never-relevant Peter Fonda publicly called for Barron Trump to be kidnapped from his mother, the first lady, and thrown into a cage with pedophiles.

Kathy Griffin — she of the Trump severed head skit — has excoriated comedian Kevin Hart for not bashing Trump.

Bill Maher wants a recession, so Trump’s (and Normal America’s) policies will be proven wrong.

The examples of the collective left’s serious mental breakdown are endless. (I didn’t even mention how insane the media is!)

Imagine the hatred they must feel every day for their fellow Americans. That is what the left is: Pure and unbridled hate — from the arbiters of “peace,” “love,” and “tolerance.”

Their philosophy is unworkable, and their policies are not supported by the majority — so they resort to fascist tactics (and the leftist judiciary) to get their way. That’s enough to put anyone in a bad mood!

And what has caused the latest liberal meltdown?

The leftists’ latest tantrum is caused by President Trump enforcing current immigration law, and then using an executive order to keep illegal alien families together — as they await deportation.

Leftists are even using fake photos of crying little girls and children in cages taken during the Obama administration to gin up outrage! (Side note: if Trump is so awful, why does the corrupt media have to invent illegal alien sob stories?)

The Democrat Party, which supposedly used to be the party of working-class Americans, wants to import uneducated and illegal foreign nationals and elevate them over American citizens.

They think Normal America is the enemy – not foreign invaders.

They think Trump’s tweets that illegals should be immediately sent back from whence they came – a sentiment which is shared by a vast majority of Americans – is a sign that he is Adolf Hitler.

Naturally, calling any Republican Hitler is nothing new, but the frothing of the mouth these psychotics are engaging in over Trump is really something to behold.

They are completely melting down.

When the media lament the lack of civility in America right now, who else are we to blame but them?

After all, they are the ones who have insisted on 90 percent negative media coverage for the Trump administration — and refuse to highlight anything positive at all.

Even with all of these cards stacked against him — in addition to the Obama administration and his FBI, DOJ, and CIA minions trying to fix an election for Hillary Clinton and allow her to get away with numerous crimes while trying to destroy her opponent — Donald Trump is winning.

He is winning because his policies are commonsense solutions supported by a growing majority of the American people.

Trump’s stance on immigration reflects what the American people want.

We have been screaming from the rooftops for 20 years to build a border wall and fix the system that allows illegals and their progeny to be placed above American citizens. We’ve begged our leaders stop the practice of funding sanctuary cities, welfare to illegals, or sending aid to nations that send their poorest and most uneducated illegally over our border.

Leftist elites don’t care about these people streaming over our border – the invaders who expect American taxpayers to take care of them and their children.

Elites want to make sure they are stocked with nannies and gardeners in Santa Monica, San Francisco, Silicon Valley, Manhattan, East Hampton, Martha’s Vineyard, and Loudoun County — and anywhere else they gather.

Elites never have to deal with the actual ramifications of illegal immigration.

Ramifications like the American children who can’t get an education because the teacher’s time is spent remediating and teaching English as a Second Language.

The American construction worker who can’t find a job because business owners hire illegal workers on the cheap.

The American mothers and fathers who have lost children because an illegal alien decided to drive drunk, murder, rape, assault, or traffic their beloved child.

The American taxpayer who is on the hook for all of it.

No, elites don’t care about any of that. They are perfectly fine with importing more invaders and amassing more power among the true one percent.

Donald Trump and his supporters have upended all of that. Trump did not come into this job as a textbook conservative or ideologue — but he is governing as one.

We’ve had one Civil War already in our history. The next Civil War seems to be quickly approaching.

But considering liberals would rather go to feminist marches and scream at the Twitter CEO for eating a chicken sandwich at Chick-fil-A, I’m not too worried about our chances.

And for the record, it will be leftists who fire the first shot – either figuratively or literally.

Normal America will be there to answer them.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Progressive Ethics

2018-06-27T08:18:00.001-04:00

From: TownHall

by - John P. Warren - June 23, 2018

One of Charles Krauthammers’ precepts is to speak bluntly about Things that Matter. As the 2018 election season begins, one that’s bedeviled the American voter for nearly a hundred years is the notion of Progressive Ethics.

Like the phrases, honest politician, genuine imitation, and perfect child—each of which is joined by words with mutually exclusive meanings—evidence suggests that Progressive Ethics has a place all its own in the Hall of Oxymorons.

Progressives may be devoid of ethical constructs because they are political amnesiacs. They promise one thing, then disavow their words when it becomes convenient to forget their inconvenient truths. Here are just a few examples:

1. In the early 1930s, Democrats made a play for Black voters, who until WWI and shortly thereafter, had usually voted Republican in memory of their putative savior, Abraham Lincoln. What happened next? FDR’s massive government projects denied work to Black laborers and mechanics because they were not members of craft unions as required by the Davis-Bacon Act. FDR’s rejection of anti-lynching legislation permitted ongoing, unspeakable brutalities toward Blacks for another three decades. FDR’s refusal to integrate the armed services kept Black men in mostly menial positions until Truman remembered his courage.

Blacks were forgotten until needed for the Great Society welfare experiments which dismantled millions of Black families and made them welfare dependent. Except for throwing billions more into the stewpot of bureaucratic incompetence, Progressives have walked away from it all.

2. In the 1970s, with Roe v. Wade, Progressives made their play for women voters under cover of a woman’s right to terminate another life on demand—forgetting their decades of opposition to abortion, given the religiosity of their ethnic constituents. Their true assertion of a woman’s place in the world occurred in the Clinton Administration when the president and his wife monstrously decried women who outed Bill’s ongoing predatory behavior. That Clinton has become the poster boy for #MeToo is no surprise.

3. Progressives’ amnesia continued when the LGBTQ community garnered enough support to push the Clinton’s into abandoning the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) right after President Obama did the same. They were all for it until they were against it.

4. In 2008, Obama promised to solve the immigration problem once in office. Except for record numbers of deportations during his eight years, he did no such thing. Instead, he promptly trashed his promises to Latinos, squandering his House-Senate, two-year majority to force The Affordable Care Act down the throats of all Americans (say, “Aahh!”). Not least, he forgot his promise to “keep your doctor.”

5. Didn’t Obama promise a new, high level of respect amongst nations, then gave us a feckless foreign policy in Russia, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and Israel, just to name a few—all anchored by the humiliation of Benghazi, a low point in modern American diplomacy?

6. Isn’t it now becoming clear that Obama broadly manipulated DOJ/FBI investigative actions to help assure a Clinton victory in 2016—forgetting the elegant words about his presidency being emblematic of integrity?

7. Progressives’ behavior toward CIA Director nominee Gina Haspel underscores their courage to forget. When Obama nominated John Brennan for that position in 2013, Democrats had no problem confirming him by a wide margin, despite a 2007 CBS interview in which he stated that waterboarding gleaned useful intelligence information and “saved lives.” With near total amnesia, only six Democrats could vote for Haspel’s confirmation in May 2018, despite her repeatedly declared disavowal of the use of torture.

8. We come full circle to 2018, a damning memory for Progressives, given their intransigence in solving the immigration issue once and for all, despite showings a strong majority of Americans are willing to support a DACA solution and a defined, non-amnesty path to citizenship for many illegals, in trade for strong border security and merit-based immigration. Their banal cruelty creeps into sunlight when decrying the separation of children from their families at the border while furthering the number of American family units torn asunder by poverty, drugs, and illiteracy with their policies of big government, welfare dependency, and free stuff.

For a group that has done much to further one-parent households all across America, to rob our culture of unifying behaviors (standing for the anthem?), to make religious freedom its own oxymoron, Progressive promises for our future are as empty as their memories. With them, we can count on one thing: They will run from one constituency to another, promising everything, all the while dividing us and stripping us of our rights.

With Progressives, it’s nothing new. In The Benedict Option (p89), author Rod Dreher reminds us of de Tocqueville’s belief that democracy in America “could not survive the loss” of its religious faith, that “self-government required shared convictions about moral truths,” or else, the nation, “falls prey to inordinate individualism, materialism, and democratic despotism,” all precursors “for servitude.” No thanks.

Americans should know what to do about Progressives. From now on, forget them.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Liberalism is a Mental Disorder – the Solution Has Been Found

2018-06-25T07:47:00.002-04:00

From: Eagle Rising

Written by Greg Holt

Yes folks the solution for the incurable disease known as liberalism has been found. It has actually been right under our noses the entire time.

California.

You read that right; California is the solution to the liberal problem. First however, we need to make a few simple changes:

1. California will immediately be renamed Libfornia.

2. Libfornia will immediately become a U.S. territory. No voting rights that way you see. The former state of California’s Senators and Representatives will be removed from Washington and sent home.

3. All liberals will be rounded up and sent to Libfornia effective immediately. What liberal would want to miss the opportunity to live in the land of their own making?

4. All illegal border crossers will henceforth be sent to Libfornia, after all, liberals want open borders.

5. MS-13 gang members that are caught crossing the border or are in police custody will be sent to Libfornia – liberals seem to think that their daughters should date MS-13 members rather then Republicans and think that MS-13 members are only misguided so they will be Libfornia’s problem from now on.

6. As liberals hate America, America will not be responsible for Libfornia’s problems.

7. Libfornia’s new capitol will be poop central, San Francisco. After all, what liberal could resist the city destroyed by their own stupidity. Covered in human feces, dirty drug needles, and a huge homeless population – all brought on by liberal Democrat policies.

Analysis:

Libfornia will likely become the Mecca of political correctness and the world bastion of liberal thought. It is also anticipated that medical care will be free for everyone, and a college education will cost zero. Residents of Libfornia will almost assuredly be able to apply for and receive a Universal Basic Income in the very near future.

The fallout from these decisions will be swift and sure. Libfornia will very likely collapse in the near future. Free college, free medical care, and free money – who will pay for this, where does the money come from? Maybe Google, Facebook, and Elon Musk will chip in. Rational thought is not part of the liberal platform.

Conclusion:

After Libfornia implodes completely – the U.S. can reenter the territory taking control, and reestablish the sane rule of law. Maybe a few liberals will even abandon liberalism…

God bless,
JohnnyD

Dear America, The LEFT Has Declared War On You

2018-06-25T07:43:00.001-04:00

From: TownHall

by -Kevin McCullough | June 24, 2018

While you’ve been busy enjoying your new jobs, improved wages, lower taxes, and less government interference in your life the left has decided that all of those things are immoral. They must be undone. And those who enjoy them must be made to understand that they are not good American citizens, but some sort of participant to hurt others. They would love to say it makes you a racist, except that African Americans and Hispanics are enjoying the best economy they’ve ever known in American history. They would love to say your lack of desire to give government more and more of what you earn makes you an elitist, except that you aren’t. You’re creating new companies, hiring more people, and taking control back of your personal choices. This leaves less capital for them to make choices for you and run your life with. Therefore when all options have been exhausted their desperation leaves them with only two options—conform to the new energy transforming life, business and people in America, or destroy it.

In the past week public mobs—always organized by leftist groups—have taken to public harassment of women who merely work for the current administration. Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen was literally shouted at until she left a dinner at an eatery near the White House. Press Secretary Sarah Sanders just Friday evening was told she would not be served (nor her family) at the Red Hen eatery of the Shenandoah Valley in Lexington, Virginia. She was told she was refused service was because she works for the President. Secretary Nielsen has had additional groups camped outside her house playing loud speakers, disturbing the peace of she and her neighbors. Entitled leftist celebrities like Robert De Niro bogart awards shows encouraging viewers to sexually violate the President. Washed up former TV stars like Tom Arnold claim they will harass the First Lady at her son’s school. And true Hollywood losers like Peter Fonda claim that Sarah Sanders’ as well as Melania Trump’s children should literally be raped by pedophiles and sex traffickers.

There is an obvious purpose in the illegitimate behavior that they are engaging in. Taking the primary methods of the losers from the “Occupy” movement they believe there is no moral barrier stopping them from doing any thing at all (in their way of thinking) “necessary” to take back power. They believed they had finally launched America onto its great socialist enlightenment under dear leader Obama, and they all but believed they had eight more years with the Hillary Clinton presidency. The only problem turned out to be that she was a horrible candidate, and Trump understood the people of this country better than she did. That’s why he routed her. In a contest of states 33 to 17 is a spanking by any measure.

That they had control of extended reach into law enforcement, justice, the judiciary, and all of the media and entertainment elite allies they enjoy, the left never believed that they would ever see the tornado of activity that has occurred in the first eighteen months of the Trump administration. A Supreme Court Justice who will reliably remove power from the hands of government, twenty-four appellate court judges, and seventy-one additional judicial appointments that all reflect that same judicial temperament add up to a limited window of time before much of the anti-constitutional hackery that has taken place over the last few decades is toast. But they are content to undo as much of what is true just and good as they can on any level. This week Gubernatorial candidate for New York—Cynthia Nixon—openly advocated for the elimination of Immigration & Customs Enforcement. She claimed they had gone adrift from their mission. Yet their mission is to do nothing but enforce immigration and customs law.

Their activist agents in the FBI (at least five of them identified in the report released by Inspector General Horowitz) demonstrated that their was no filter governing their approach to investigation. Agent Strzok volunteering in texts to sympathizers they he/they had the power to stop a lawfully executed election and that they would. The slimy behavior of Comey, Lynch, McCabe and Dr. Rice, their willingness to countenance, cover the backside for, and go the extra mile to mislead everyone only demonstrates this idea that they have no responsibility to respect the process of our republic. They feel entitled not only to disagree with us, but to rig the system against us in an attempt to force our conformity.

That they were willing to threaten the children of the First Lady, the Press Secretary and joking or otherwise suggest molestation as a way to even the score against their opponents, is sick. That they literally seem unmoved by the fact that smugglers and human traffickers will thrive if we re-adopt their catch & release procedures is even worse. Yet even in the debate over such policy they lied in using pictures from 2013-14 to justify their rage They were just fine with TIME magazine lying through its teeth on this week’s cover, and they have no perception of the danger endless catch & release has on our neighborhoods, hospitals, and schools. All of which indicates their unwillingness to literally care for America as opposed to many others who wish to come here without a commitment to “be” American.

Follow any number of left leaning celebrities, pundits, politicians, public figures & elected officials on Twitter (as I do) and you will easily see that everything I have argued here is already happening. The desperation at the loss of power, the open & undeniable hostility towards traditional America, their mockery making of our elections, laws, and public servants, their use of any and all tactics to fight back regardless of how gutter-prone they may be all pale in comparison to what they believe about their own beliefs. No longer interested in a pluralistic society with many different world-views competing in generations’ long struggle over ideas. They have had enough. They are not interested in hearing opposing viewpoints, much less allowing them to prosper. This is why they want no church to teach that abortion is taking a human life, many sexual behaviors are literally unhealthy, or that people should choose to do good vis-a-vie their earnings vs. being forced to at the government’s point of a gun.

Every one of these points was illustrated on some level. They have declared a war on America. What America is. What she stands for. What she believes. They are angry. They are fueled by hate for everyone who disagrees with them—though many may describe it as piously as a law professor claiming to see a court case from all sides. They are bitter. And they are ticked that America is prospering, making more money, doing more good, and getting better sleep than they do.

War has been declared, and we can only hope that America responds in the best way she knows how—under God, with Liberty & Justice for all.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Dick Morris: Winning the Trade War with China

2018-06-20T12:19:00.003-04:00

From: The Western Journal

By Dick Morris - June 19, 2018

The current stock market selloff is a key part of a test of wills between Beijing and Washington that President Donald Trump must win. And we must support him while he battles.

The fact is that the U.S. sells the Chinese only $130 billion of goods and services and buys $505 billion from them (2017 data).

The trade deficit of $375 billion with one country (China) accounts for three-quarters of the total U.S. trade deficit of $515 billion. Most of the rest is for oil.

We cannot let this subsidy of China stand.

To do so would be to agree to the creation of a rival economic — and eventually military — power subsidized by our consumers.

Getting off dependence on Chinese low-cost imports is a bit like kicking a drug habit: tough but necessary.

Doing so will cause short-term pain as stocks drop, partly because certain sectors are especially vulnerable and partly because the Chinese are trying to deter Trump by selling stocks on Wall Street.

But the U.S. can, must and will win a trade war.

With over $500 billion in imports we can punish and only $130 billion in exports they can limit, the math works strongly in our favor.

We need to back Trump and remain patient while the market reacts.

This trade war is a battle for our economic independence. It is the cold turkey we must undergo to end our addiction to Chinese imports.

The political risks Trump incurs by angering the Midwestern farmers and other exporters will be slight in comparison with the incredible economic and political harm he can inflict on China.

The Chinese political structure is predicated on its wealth. If China falters economically, it falters politically.

Beijing maintains a huge state sector in its economy that is totally unproductive and exists only because of government subsidies. Its purpose is political — to give tens of millions of people jobs doing stuff they can deceive themselves into believing is real work for real wages.

This chimera will collapse quickly in the face of a trade war.

China is totally dependent on exports and cannot survive politically without it.

In reaching a settlement after the dust has settled, we must be mindful of China’s bottom line. It needs its exports and it requires its trade surplus to survive politically.

But it doesn’t need to be a $375 billion annual surplus. It can be a third of that and still satisfy Beijing’s political needs.

God bless,
JohnnyD

President Trump Considering Executive Action to End Family Breakup of Illegal Immigrants

2018-06-20T12:09:00.001-04:00

From: The Political Insider

By Jim E | June 20, 2018

President Trump has had enough of the media’s onslaught of critical coverage of his immigration policies. The “zero tolerance” approach to illegal immigrants, which is seeing all adults arrested who attempt to illegally enter the country, and forced separation from minors who accompany them, has brought explosive attention to the Administration.

The coverage has been so critical that Administration officials are actually being accosted in public by violent, loathsome liberals.

Trump has been asking Congress to pass a permanent fix to the border crisis and reunite the families. But lawmakers have been dragging their feet. Now, we’ve just gotten word that Trump may enact a quick fix to the situation via executive action. The news comes via John Roberts of Fox News:

EXCLUSIVE: @realDonaldTrump considering some sort of executive action today to allow children to stay with detained parents through immigration adjudication process. Sources say Admin believes it is likely to draw a court challenge on the basis of Flores v Reno
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) June 20, 2018

The order is reportedly being drafted:

BREAKING: AP Sources: Homeland Security secretary drafting order to end family separation at border; unclear if Trump will sign it.
— The Associated Press (@AP) June 20, 2018

Oddly enough, this is exactly the kind of fix congressional Democrats have been urging. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer has called on Trump to fix the immigration issue via executive action:

Democrats Turn Down GOP Proposal to Address Border Crisis: Mr. President, Use That ‘God**** Pen of Yours’ https://t.co/3M5QvLPrB9
— Free Beacon (@FreeBeacon) June 19, 2018

This is a short-sighted move that doesn’t actually fix the crisis at the border. The problem with what’s going on at the border stems from a series of court decisions, executive actions, federal statutes, and a Congress too cowardly to actually pass a comprehensive solution.

Whatever action Trump takes will be challenged in court. It will be a Band-Aid – not an antibiotic, which Congress needs to pass.

If Trump takes unilateral action, that will take the pressure off Congress to pass an actual solution to the ongoing situation.

What’s happening at the southern border is hard for all Americans to watch. But we need a real fix to the heartbreaking circumstances. An executive order won’t cut it.

UPDATE – John Roberts reports that Trump is also being lobbied by Homeland Security Secretary Kristjen Nielsen to accept an expedited bill to end family separation from Congress:

EXCLUSIVE: And now another potential track – sources tell @FoxNews that @SecNielsen is encouraging @realDonaldTrump to support a stand-alone “loopholes” bill in Congress and do the broader immigration/border security measures in another bill.
— John Roberts (@johnrobertsFox) June 20, 2018

God bless,
JohnnyD

The Media Lies Against Trump’s ‘Child Separation’ Policy Keep Coming

2018-06-20T08:04:00.000-04:00

From: Constitution

By Warner Todd Huston June 19, 2018

The nation has seen two full days, now, of the left-wing media disgorging one bald-faced lie after another while pretending to “report” on the Trump administration’s policies for minors brought illegally over the border. The lies are so thick and the “reporting” so shrill that if you had any doubt that the media is not for “news” but is solely an adjunct to the Democrat party, you can retire any such doubts.

Firstly, the policy of separating children from criminal illegal adults is not a new policy. It has been around at least since the 1990s. So, when the lying liberal media keeps saying “Trump’s policy” this and that, you know they are lying. Trump did nothing other than enforce the rule. But it is one that Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama all enforced to one degree or another.

Indeed, one of the rules for holding children who came here with illegal criminals was written in 1997. It is called the Flores Consent Decree, a rule from 1997 which says that unaccompanied immigrant children can be held for 20 days. But a later Ninth Circuit ruling extended the 20-day period to children who come as part of illegal alien family groups, too. So, as you see, this is a matter of law, not any sort of “new” Trump policy.

Indeed, what we are generally dealing with is illegals bringing kids who are not their own across the border with the expectation that these kids will afford them a free pass to get into the U.S.A.

Take the case of the illegal woman recently caught trying to get into the U.S. with a handful of kids. When border patrol agents in the Del Rio Sector detained her they found that three of the children she was traveling with were not her own children.

It is cases like this that has the U.S. Department of Homeland Security insisting that it has done nothing extra-legal or immoral with its policies.

“We will not apologize for the job we do or for the job law enforcement does, for doing the job that the American people expect us to do,” Secretary of Homeland Security Kirstjen Nielsen said before the National Sheriffs’ Association in New Orleans. “Illegal actions have and must have consequences. No more free passes, no more get-out-of-jail-free cards.”

National Review added:

Nielsen went on to decry inaccurate media portrayals of the Trump administration’s enforcement policy, which requires the detention and prosecution of all individuals caught crossing the border illegally. The policy has resulted in the separation of roughly 2,000 children from their parents, who are in detention awaiting trial.

The separations have been attacked as immoral by congressional Democrats and a handful of Republicans, who advocate a return to the previous policy of releasing individuals awaiting trial for trying to immigrate illegally with their children. But Nielsen placed blame for family separations squarely on lawmakers, citing legislative inaction on immigration reform as the central obstacle to changing the system. She also suggested that previous administrations are partly to blame for incentivizing child trafficking by providing “free passes” to adults who try to cross the border with children.

“From October 2017 to this February, we have seen a staggering 315 percent increase in illegal aliens fraudulently using children to pose as family units to gain entry into this country,” she said. “This must stop. All this does is put the children at risk. To address these issues we’ve asked Congress to change the law to allow for the expeditious return of unaccompanied children, regardless of their country of origin. We are also asking Congress to allow us to keep families together while they are detained.”

The fact is, we have only two choices where it concerns our border policy. One, we continue with the Obama-styled policy of essentially having no border at all and enticing millions of people to chance the extremely dangerous conditions in the attempt to get here, or, two, we can enforce our rules and prevent people from wanting to chance those dangerous conditions.

The truth is, the presidential culprit is Obama. It is Obama’s dangerous polices that created the perilous situation. It’s time we put an end to it all. If anyone is at fault for separating kids at the border, it’s Obama’s fault.

But what happens? We get liars in the media pretending that they care about these migrant kids and literally crying about our policies.

Take CBS’ Gayle King who falsely invoked the Statue of Liberty. As Breitbart reported:

Monday at a border patrol facility in McAllen, TX on “CBS This Morning,” co-host Gayle King said the Statue of Liberty is “weeping right now” over the separating of immigrant children from their families.

King said “We arrived yesterday afternoon. We went straight to the facility, the location where kids and their parents were reunited. All I can say after talking to the people, watching the people, listening to the people, that the Statue of Liberty I think is weeping right now. It’s unbelievable the stories we’ve heard.”

She added, “We’re standing in front of a converted warehouse. This is the first stop for many undocumented families caught at the southern border. It’s where federal officials are trying to weed out criminals. An executive officer at the center told us a 55,000-square-foot facility can hold about 1,500 people. This is a very nondescript building. It’s not marked. And it is deliberately not marked. Yesterday, more than 1,000 people were being processed here. That includes more than 500 families and 197 unaccompanied children.”

It is clear King is trying act as if the poem on the famed statue — “give us your tired, your poor, your illegals sneaking in with fake children” — is somehow both an American first principle and our immigration policy.

The fact is, Emma Lazarus’ airy poem was not even part of the Statue of Liberty until 1903, 17 years after the statue was erected. Furthermore, her socialist-inspired poem (Lazarus was an avowed socialist) never formed any part of our national immigration policy. The truth is, we have always blocked some group or another from coming here.

Then there was the left-wing outburst from Kasie Hunt, a supposed “reporter” from NBC. She jumped to her overheated Twitter account to make this proclamation:

Congress did not create this problem.
Congress did NOT create this problem.
CONGRESS DID NOT CREATE THIS PROBLEM.
The Trump administration created this problem.
THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION CREATED THIS PROBLEM.
— Kasie Hunt (@kasie) June 18, 2018

Kaise Hunt is a liar and she is advocating for policy, here, not “reporting” on it.

The airwaves are filled with liars and shills like King and Hunt.

But, in the end, Breitbart’s Brandon Darby had the best retort to the left-wingers lying about these immigration policies. Darby has been creating first-hand reporting from the border for years, now, and no one alive today knows more about what is really going on down there than Darby.

Darby had a fantastic Twitter thread that you just have to see. Darby showed us dozens of photos taken during the Obama era of the same holding facilities the media is suddenly all concerned about.

Thanks to Twitchy:

Re: “Cages” —- The chainlink partitions in the holding facilities at border are the exact same ones we showed you during the Obama Admin. Why didn’t you care then? Cc @joelpollak

— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #1 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/GHYfs4a7sO
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #2 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/5s31QgL9sH
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #3 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/m2Pjy59FR4
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #4 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/NHoQiRL4fP
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #5 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/dakVvUY31E
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #6 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/NcCklvdcbq
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #7 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/MwmCvx8ZCL
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #8 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/N7c9IYpcqW
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #9 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/t4yfGnFA2z
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #10 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/UymvqBoy3o
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #11 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/yUXq5zS5zm
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #12 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/mmbHdj1zHt
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #13 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/H6wF2xFowo
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #14 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/joPgPKRS3J
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #15 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/8Te1RcNq60
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #16 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/4tiVctXrTK
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #17 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/IZZN1LGZaO
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #18 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/ZFxLGrZfCP
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #19 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/7pU7MBEuY4
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Image #20 we showed you in 2014 pic.twitter.com/1YsbbcsxyK
— Brandon Darby (@brandondarby) June 18, 2018

Well, you get the picture. There are DOZENS more of Brandon’s photos from the Obama era on his Twitter feed. Dozens.

What we are seeing is the left’s lies written in photos because not a single so-called mainstream news outlet published Mr. Darby’s photos during the Obama era. Indeed, not a single “news” outlet talked about Obama’s warehousing of kids brought here by illegals. So, what is different between today and those few years ago? Well, today the media can use the story as a weapon to destroy President Donald Trump.

When the media claims they care about the kids, know that they are liars.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Dangerous People Are Teaching Your Kids

2018-06-13T11:19:00.003-04:00

God bless,
JohnnyD

We Swore We Would Never Forget 9/11. But We Did.

2018-06-13T10:53:00.000-04:00

From: Brittany Hughes - mrctv

Sixteen years ago, 2,606 people were killed when two planes slammed into the World Trade Center in New York City.

Another 125 died when a third plane hit the Pentagon. Forty more were killed when hijacked flight United 93 crashed in a Pennsylvania field.

We all sat there glued to our box TVs, watching the whole nightmare, most of us completely helpless to do a thing.

Do you remember our reaction 16 years ago today? In the months after 9/11, there was barely a car on the road that didn't have an American flag bumper sticker.

Today, we can't even fly Old Glory at a baseball game without someone getting offended.

Sixteen years ago we watched proudly as a group of New York City firefighters raised a American flag over the rubble at Ground Zero.

Today, left-wing rioters burn American flags in the streets.

Sixteen years ago, millions of Americans were introduced to Islamic extremism for the very first time.

Today, you can't even say the words Islamic extremism without being accused of bigotry and hate.

Sixteen years ago, our nation was attacked by 19 al-Qaeda terrorists, all of whom were foreign and at least three of which were here illegally.

Now at the time, we were outraged. But today, if you dare to say that immigrants should be thoroughly vetted, that foreign visitors must obey our visa laws, and that illegal aliens should be removed, you're a hateful xenophobic Nazi.

Sixteen years ago, we as a nation promised that we would never forget 9/11. But we did. We forgot.

Every time some bleeding heart liberal apologizes for Islamic violence, every time a sanctuary city leaves us open to foreign threats by deliberately ignoring our immigration laws, every time some attention-whoring athlete or overpaid celebrity gets famous off insulting a nation that has given them so mush, we forget.

Sixteen years ago , 2,977 innocent people died in a terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and we forgot.

And it is high time we started remembering.

May God bless those who lost loved ones on 9/11, whose hearts still ache every year on this day.

And may God, in His mercy, bless the United States of America.

God bless,

JohnnyD

The Salty Sailor

2018-05-30T07:47:00.001-04:00

In the U.S. Navy, the term "Salty Sailor" is in common use to describe a sailor of good ability and little or no social graces. Some would call a salty sailor "rude, crude and unattractive."

TRUMP: The Salty Sailor

The views this mother has about Donald Trump are much like many others.

Her characterization of Trump as the "Salty Sailor" or as "The Fireman" paint an excellent picture!!.

She has written many great books about her son and family.

Comment from KAREN VAUGHN Mother of Aaron Vaughn, Navy Seal, killed during operation enduring freedom in Afghanistan on Aug. 6, 2011 when the CH-47 Chinook helicopter in which he was riding was shot down.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Salty Sailor

" Sometimes we need the no-nonsense, salty sailor to get the job done.

Appreciating what the man is doing doesn't mean we worship the salty sailor or even desire to be like the salty sailor. It doesn't even mean we admire the salty sailor. Maybe we just know that he's necessary for such a time as this.

I believe with all my heart that we need the salty sailor in the White House and he gave this nation one more chance in November 2016

Donald Trump is what he is. He is still the man that he was before the election. And without guilt, I very much admire what that salty sailor is accomplishing.

He's not like me. That's okay with me. I don't want to be like him. I will never behave like him. I know we've NEVER had a man like him lead our nation. It's crazy and a little mind blowing at times. But I can't help admire the ability he has to act with his heart rather than a calculated, PC, think tank-screened, carefully edited script.

I still believe that is WHY he became our President and WHY he's been able to handle a landslide of adversity and STILL pass unprecedented amounts of good legislation for our country AND do great works for MANY other nations, including Israel.

I'm THRILLED with what he's doing for my nation, and for the concept of rebuilding America and putting her FIRST. I will not be ashamed of my position because others don't see him through the same lens.

Should it matter to me if a Fireman drops an f-bomb while he's pulling me from a burning building? Would I really care about what came out of his mouth in those moments? Heck no! I'd CARE about what he was DOING.

He wasn't sent there to save my soul and I'm not looking to him for spiritual guidance. All I'm thinking in those moments is, "Thanks, that I have the Salty Sailor for a Fireman."

This man is crass. Okay. He's not careful with what he says Okay. You feel offended that he's not a typical statesman. Okay. But he is rebuilding the nation my son died for...the nation I feared was on a fast track to becoming a hopeless cause. Forgive me if I'm smiling."

KAREN VAUGHN

God bless,

JohnnyD

Kanye and Democrats

2018-05-16T10:37:00.004-04:00

From: TownHall

Walter E. Williams - May 16, 2018

In the aftermath of the Kanye West dust-up, my heart goes out to the white people who control the Democratic Party. My pity stems from the hip-hop megastar's November announcement to his packed concert audience that he did not vote in the presidential election but if he had, he would have voted for Donald Trump. Then, on April 21, West took to his Twitter account, which has 28 million followers, to announce, "I love the way Candace Owens thinks." Owens is Turning Point USA's director of urban engagement and has said that former President Barack Obama caused "damage" to race relations in the United States during his two terms in office.

West's support for Trump, along with his criticism of the "plantation" mentality of the Democratic Party, has been met with vicious backlash from the left. In one song, West raps, "See, that's the problem with this damn nation. All blacks gotta be Democrats. Man, we ain't made it off the plantation." Rep. Maxine Waters said West "talks out of turn" and advised, "He should think twice about politics -- and maybe not have so much to say." The bottom-line sin that West has committed is questioning the hegemony of the Democratic Party among black Americans. The backlash has been so bad that West had to hire personal security to protect him against threats made against his life. Fortunately, the police are investigating those threats.

Kanye West is not saying anything different from what Dr. Thomas Sowell, Larry Elder, Jason Riley, I and other black libertarians/conservatives have been saying for decades. In fact, West has tweeted quotations from Sowell, such as "Socialism in general has a record of failure so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it" and "The most basic question is not what is best but who shall decide what is best." Tweeting those Sowell quotations represents the highest order of blasphemy in the eyes of leftists.

The big difference between black libertarians/conservatives and West is that he has 28 million Twitter followers and a huge audience of listeners whereas few blacks have even heard of libertarian/conservative blacks outside of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. (I might add in passing that Dr. Thomas Sowell is one of the nation's most distinguished and accomplished scholars alive today.)

The Kanye problem for the Democratic Party is that if the party doesn't keep blacks in line and it loses even 20 to 25 percent of the black vote, it can kiss any hope of winning any presidential and many congressional elections goodbye. Democrats may have already seen that threat. That's why they support illegal immigration and voting rights for noncitizens. Immigrants from south of the border who are here illegally may be seen as either a replacement for or a guarantee against the disaster of losing the black vote.

Keeping blacks blind to the folly of unquestioned support for the Democratic Party by keeping blacks fearful, angry and resentful and painting the Republican Party as racist is vital. Democrats never want blacks to seriously ask questions about what the party has done for them. Here are some facts. The nation's most troublesome and dangerous cities -- Indianapolis, Stockton, Oakland, Milwaukee, Cleveland, Kansas City, Baltimore, Memphis, St. Louis and Detroit -- have been run by Democrats, often black Democrats, for nearly a half-century. These and other Democratic-run cities are where blacks suffer the highest murder rates and their youngsters attend the poorest-performing and most unsafe schools.

Democrats could never afford for a large number of black people to observe, "We've been putting you in charge of our cities for decades. We even put a black Democrat in the White House. And what has it meant for us? Plus, the president you told us to hate has our unemployment rate near a record low." It turns out that it's black votes that count more to black and white politicians than black well-being, black academic excellence and black lives. As for black politicians and civil rights leaders, if they're going to sell their people down the river to keep Democrats in power, they ought to demand a higher price.

God bless,
JohnnyD

Why Hasn’t John Kerry Been Arrested? He Has Leftist Privilege

2018-05-10T11:52:00.000-04:00

From: PJ Media

By Robert Spencer May 7, 2018

Like Hillary Clinton, former Secretary of State John Kerry apparently enjoys the immunity from prosecution that being a powerful Leftist brings you today.

The Boston Globe revealed Friday that Kerry is working hard to sabotage President Trump’s foreign policy regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran. Kerry reportedly “sat down at the United Nations with Foreign Minister Javad Zarif to discuss ways of preserving the pact limiting Iran’s nuclear weapons program.”

This was not, apparently, a one-off meeting between Kerry and the foreign minister of the regime that orders its citizens to chant “Death to America” in mosques every Friday: “It was the second time in about two months that the two had met to strategize over salvaging a deal they spent years negotiating during the Obama administration, according to a person briefed on the meetings.”

Further, the Globe reported that Kerry has not limited his shadow diplomacy to Zarif: “[Kerry] also met last month with German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, and he’s been on the phone with top European Union official Federica Mogherini … Kerry has also met with French President Emmanuel Macron in both Paris and New York, conversing over the details of sanctions and regional nuclear threats in both French and English.”

Today, Kerry’s spokesperson confirmed the meetings -- but danced around admitting his behavior:

NEW: spokesman for @JohnKerry on “shadow diplomacy,” response to @realDonaldTrump tweet: pic.twitter.com/dVwVcsjM4f
— Brooke Singman (@brookefoxnews) May 7, 2018

Why? Because John Kerry must know he has put himself in violation of a never-prosecuted federal law that only seems to be mentioned when a conservative is involved -- for example, see what former Acting Attorney General Sally Yates said about Michael Flynn.

The Logan Act forbids unauthorized people from engaging in negotiations with foreign governments that are involved in disputes with the United States. The Logan Act’s intention is to prevent those unauthorized negotiations from undermining the position of the U.S. government.

Isn’t that exactly what Kerry is doing? Shouldn’t he be arrested and prosecuted?

He will not be. Kerry’s deep state peers think he is right, are hoping for his success, and couldn’t care less about the Logan Act. Just like they couldn’t care less about the security of classified State Department documents when they showed up on Anthony Wiener’s laptop next to his naughty selfies.

Kerry’s friends who are still employed in the U.S. government won’t be roused to care about the Logan Act unless one of their own is back in the White House, and, say, former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo goes around the world drumming up support for the Trumpian foreign policy that the neo-Obama in the Oval Office is busy dismantling.

Pompeo is unlikely to do that, of course, because he, unlike Kerry and others on the Left, actually respects the law. But were he or some other member of the Trump administration to do what Kerry is doing now, the media outcry would be immediate and insistent, calling for the immediate arrest and prosecution of the perpetrator -- and that arrest would likely soon follow.

The law in the United States is for the little people, and for conservatives.

Popular culture is obsessed these days with a “white privilege” that extends even to the shampoo bottles in hotels (who knew?). But the most heinous example of privilege in today’s society is one that no one talks about: Leftist privilege.

If you’re a Leftist and want to start a not-for-profit organization, no problem. Only conservative organizations got buried in mountains of red tape and hobbled by unexplained delays by the IRS.

If you’re a Leftist and start a news website, you’ll have loads of readers referred to your site from Facebook, Twitter and the rest. Only conservative sites are being systematically blocked.

If you’re a Leftist president, you can oversee a corrupt and lawless administration for eight years and then brag about how your presidency was “scandal-free.” You won’t hear a murmur of dissent from an establishment media that worked hard throughout those years to make sure that as few people as possible knew about your scandals.

And if you’re John Kerry, you can traverse the globe doing everything you can to undermine the foreign policy of the United States government, secure in the confidence that you will not face any consequences at all. You’re John Kerry. You’re a made man in the Leftist political elite. You could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue, and awaken the next morning to adoring headlines in the New York Times and the Washington Post.

God bless,

JohnnyD