USA Foreign Policy

Muhammad: The Prophet of the Almighty

2011-02-12T11:28:00.000-08:00

The Almighty is defined in Quran (Koraan) as follows:

One who never gave birth (meaning having no sons)

never been born (meaning unhuman, no father or mother)

has no relatives or preferred other (meaning unbiased and absolutely just)

Those were few concepts by which the holy prophet Muhammad was able to capture the souls and hearts of billions of followers over the last 1500 years. Muhammad simply explained what scientists have attempted to decipher. The matter is made of energy. Energy was made from unknown entity for which no human would ever find out. At the extremes of our horizon of knowledge, such unknown is addressed as the Almighty.

Muhammad's mission sits deep into the psyche of billions of Muslims. That is justice must be absolute and no one should be preferred based on favoritism.

Call it fundamentalism or extremism. At the end, absolute justice is the only safeguard against unpredictable upheavals.

Anwar Sadat denounced Muhammad's call for absolute justice only few days before he was assassinated in 1981. Sadat simply declared that "we are not prophets" when asked about his connection with people with shady wealth and the massive corruption of his administration. Mubarak's dull mind deprived him from understanding the basic believes of his own people. Mubarak claimed that his two sons work overseas and therefore, their wealth was gotten by moral and ethical means. As if the eighty million Egyptians were too naive to figure out that Mubarak was an unworthy thug. They called him: the coward, the agent of America, the ignorant thug, and every else that could describe Mubarak's true foolishness.

The Western approach to international conflicts is such in total conflict with the tenets of Islam. Obama started his presidency on the grounds of walking the middle line between the Israelis and the Arab despots which gave rise to the unstable Middle East where absolute justice is the underlying cause of upheaval. Of course the masses want Israel destroyed unless Israel explains its exclusive Jewish preference. America denounced its racist past and thus reconciled its differences with the melting pot of all races.

Israel has not yet done so.

Neither would Obams or Carter have the guts to adhere to the Constitutional values of the founding fathers of the USA of separating religion from government. Instead, the USA armed Israel and many Tyrants with military power that is mainly used to oppress and subjugate the governed.

Untrustworthy Leaders

2011-02-10T16:43:00.000-08:00

Riots chanting: Down, Down with the Coward, the America Agent, your day has come.

George Bush II: Promised the Palestinians with a state before the end of his term but never delivered. The invasion of Iraq and the demise of Saddam Hussein brought hope to millions that their fate will not always be sealed by the hands of their tormentors.

Jimmy Carter dared not call the Zionist movement in Palestine Apartheid till three decades after he left office. Carter even shied away from admitting the real truth by claiming that apartheid was only practiced in the part of the West Bank that was occupied by Israel. Carter's half hearted criticism of Israel's apartheid stemmed from observation that the Jews of Israel are both anti-Christean and anti-Muslims.

Saddam ordered millions of his people to fight and die, yet ran away and hid in ditch to evade capture. A coward dictator who disgraced his country for long time to come. Here, Saddam is whining about lack of access to clean clothes during his imprisonment.

Mad, angry tyrant.

Better that realistic fiction.

From one extreme, to the other.

Donald Rumsfeld pushed Saddam against Iraq, then pushed the USA against Saddam, then cried during TV interviews about his role in dragging the USA into two futile war.

Obama's confused presidency is attributed to his lack of understanding of International affairs. Here, Obama is chatting with Mubarak, whom he will soon betray.

Jon Corzine the most corrupt Governor of New Jersey, was supported by Obama, brought down by the voters.

Corzine, a greedy millionaire who capitalized on the immoral decay of Wall Street, massed enough money to buy a Senator seat and the governorship of New Jersey, was supported by the newly elected president. Not to long after, Corzine was booted from his office, returned to Wall Street to continue his dirty business.

Who is leading? Does it matter?

O'Reilly, a TV and Radio media hack jumped on Rush Limbaugh's right wing wagon in order to climb and stay at the top of a financially rewarding career.

Mubarak was known for his stupidity from the moment Sadat elected him as vice presdient. Mubarak terrified America with the Moslim Brothers and the Security of Israel and was able to stay in power 30 years. Mubarak's senility blinded him of the anger and despair of millions of government employees deprived from the very basic means of survival. Mubarak's stupidity haunted him in every utterance that came from his mouth. His latest was "the rioters crossed the line by breaking the emergency law which he enacted for thirty years" and that "his two sons work overseas such that people would not accuse them of stealing money".

Micheal Savage, a fanatic Zionist with epileptic racist agenda was banned from Britain. Savage's daily radio show coincides with another like host, Mark Levin, both host pouring their venomous rhetoric into the minds of Americans, for many years, non stop.

Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot [LARGE PRINT]

You could not tell the difference between Limbaugh's voice, agenda, and outlook from those of Hannity. The only difference is Limbaugh's embarrassing obesity that kept him away from the TV.

Ariel Sharon lived the life of criminals, consumed with hate and anger against anyone but Jews. Sharon was welcome by George Bush's White House till God picked him to his side. Sharon capitalized of the morbid hatred of Christians to Muslims and was able to advanced the Israeli's Apartheid over sixty years. It was Jimmy Carter who observed the anti-Christean hatred by the Israelis when he wrote his book "Peace Not Apartheid".

Hosni Mubarak left red faced over doctored red carpet photo

Embarrassment as Egyptian paper alters image to put president at head of procession

Al-Ahram's Photoshopped image of President Hosni Mubarak and other leaders at the Middle East peace talks. Photograph: Al-Ahram There are those who lead and those who follow, and the Egyptian newspaper Al-Ahram clearly feels that President Hosni Mubarak fits into the former category. When he was pictured with the Israeli and Palestinian leaders, Binyamin Netanyahu and Mahmoud Abbas, trailing behind Barack Obama on the red carpet at the White House recently, it was nothing Photoshop could not fix. So, on Tuesday, the state-run daily Al-Ahram published the photo, taken at the launch of the latest Middle East peace talks – but with Mubarak switched to the front of the procession.

The original photograph of the five leaders. Photograph: Alex Wong/Getty Images The doctored picture was exposed by the Egyptian blogger Wael Khalil and quickly struck a chord with Egypt's vibrant network of online opposition activists. Spoof versions have since appeared depicting the 82-year-old Mubarak landing on the moon, breaking the 100m world record and hoisting aloft the World Cup. The controversy comes as the government gears up for parliamentary elections and amid rumours the authoritarian leader, who has ruled Egypt for nearly three decades, is seriously ill. "I think what's significant is that Al-Ahram, the regime's mouthpiece, is clearly very sensitive about the way Mubarak appears to the general public in the current climate," Khalil said. "People have picked up on the photo because it's such a good insight into the way the government operates in Egypt; whenever there are problems or failings they simply try and gloss over them – you can see that in this photo, and you can see it in the way they run the country." Al-Ahram is the most widely circulated Arabic newspaper in the Middle East and is known for its largely fawning coverage of the Egyptian government. Its market share has been challenged in recent years by an increasingly bold crop of independent newspapers willing to adopt a more critical tone towards the ruling NDP party, a stance which has landed many independent editors in court. By contrast Al-Ahram and other state-run publications have a track record of subtly "improving" pictures of Egypt's political elite, although usually in a less obvious manner than this week's example. The scandal will come as a blow to Al-Ahram's director, Abdel Moneim Said, a former Egyptian senator who was thought to have presided over a slight revival of the 135-year-old newspaper's fortunes since taking the helm last year, following decades of mismanagement. Al-Ahram has so far failed to issue any response or apology for its actions, although the offending photo has been removed from the paper's website. Although the incident has caused plenty of mirth at the president's expense, some are not amused. The anti-government 6 April Youth Movement said: "This is what the corrupt regime's media has been reduced to." It added that the newspaper had "crossed the line from being balanced and honest," and accused it of unprofessionalism. The publication of the photograph coincided with the arrival of Abbas and Netanyahu at the Egyptian resort of Sharm El-Sheikh for the second round of talks under the current peace process.

Minds In Revolt

2011-02-08T15:18:00.000-08:00

Almost There!!

2011-02-06T21:58:00.000-08:00

State vs. Person

2011-02-06T11:02:00.000-08:00

The Middle East's crisis has been central to the American Foreign policy soon after Great Britain ceased to its imperialistic dominance after WWII. Gradually, the USA merged its interests with the Arab monarchs and dictators based solely on the influence of separate American governments. From 1945, the Saudis realized the untrustworthy alliance with president Truman after the creation of Israel. That was followed by the American conspiracy to bring the Shah of Iran to power and to topple Nasser in Egypt. Along half a century, the American Foreign Policy in the Middle East operated through the CIA clandestine operations, which spared the American blood to crises like Vietnam, North Korea, and other hot spots.

The creation of Israel and the support of the Shah by the United States governments led to the Khomenian Islamic revolution in Iran and the counter revolution of the Suni Islamic Brotherhood of Bin Laden. Both revolutions scared the hell of Saddam Hussein, Sadat, Mubarak, Israel, the Saudis, and the USA governments. For the first time since the creation of the USA, George Bush gathered enough courage to remove the Arabian Stalin, which started an new dawn in the Middle East. Now, people sensed the possibility of defeating immortal dictators. However, Hosni Mubarak was truly defeated by his own senility and inability to manage the overwhelmingly growing poverty. As such, the Egyptian uprising was more or less an opportunist upheaval against overly rich but senile Mubarak, overly poor and voluminous police, and unprecedented cell networking and Internet linking of emotions and feelings.

Could it be that the American Constitutional values are permeating through the porous borders, through the electronic highways, through the global trade agreements?

The toppling of Saddam Hussein and Slobodan Milošević, before him, by the American treasure and blood, was preceded by the collapse of Communism in the Soviet Union and Apartheid in South Africa. Those four global signal the unrelenting trend that globalized the civil rights movements which led to the present crisis in Egypt.

The theater of international human civil rights revolution is expanding with the meeting of minds at the speed of light for the first time in history.

Could states and officials ignore the voices of the justice and equality?

The voices of the masses have grown beyond return. The true meaning of a republic; government of the people, by the people, and for the people, may be the only alternative to chaos and anarchy.

Ironically, Israel was founded by individuals who persuaded president Truman to shift the American Foreign Policy against the Palestinians and Arabs. That led to other extremists like Bin Laden and Khomeini who were able to drag the USA into two wars in Iraq and another in Afghanistan.

In every personal pursuit, the ideologies of the biblical age were the underlying drive to change. Of those, the Muslim's ideology was fueled by the enormous poverty, population growth, and fear of moral decay. The Jewish ideology was oddly fictitious in the form of grabbing land amidst the most volatile part of the world, with the delusion of nuclear protection beyond return.