I’d read a number of negative reviews prior to reading Black Swan Green. Many readers seemed unwilling to stray from Mitchell’s multi-narrative structure (as seen in Cloud Atlas and Ghostwritten) or couldn’t relate to Jason Taylor, the 13 year old stammering protagonist.

To those naysayers I say this: you are wrong.

Readers who really pay attention to Black Swan Green will recognize that it is a multi-narrative structure. Instead of stories from far flung reaches of the globe or throughout time they are simply stories from a year in the life of one person. Yet, what is packed into the year in the life of a 13 year old boy can be quite varied. They’re like the tracks on an eclectic CD compilation. Mitchell levels his unflinching prose on war, unemployment, acceptance, friendship, death and divorce.

In addition, Mitchell paints incredible stories through the lens of Jason Taylor. It’s not just about Jason’s coming of age story, it’s about all the adult issues swirling around him. You’ve missed substantial portions of Black Swan Green if you’re simply reading what is written on the page. Mitchell’s genius is in his ability to create stories that live off the page, that blossom out of a few simple sentences into the known spaces of understanding and feeling.

While reading I often turn the corner down on a page if I find a phrase or passage particularly interesting. Black Swan Green is filled with turned down corners! Here’s an example that is both evocative and intimately linked to the time period.

I crossed the flooded clinic car park leaping from dry bit to dry bit like James Bond froggering across the crocodiles’ backs.

Or this incredible observation in relation to how an alcoholic parent can be so different but the same person.

Green is made of yellow and blue, nothing else, but when you look at green, where’ve the yellow and the blue gone?

And then this supreme example of the inability to define beauty.

Beauty is immune to definition. When beauty is present, you know. Winter sunrise in dirty Toronto, one’s new lover in an old cafe, sinister magpies on a roof. But is the beauty of these made? No. Beauty is here, that is all. Beauty is.

Mitchell can also put down on paper and describe a feeling that I am certain many of you have experienced.

School corridors’re sort of sinister during classtime. The noisiest spaces’re now the silentest. Like a neutron bomb’s vaporized human life but left all the building standing. These drowned voices you hear aren’t coming from classrooms, but through the partitions between life and death.

In revisiting a elementary school Mitchell delivers another thought-provoking turn of phrase.

Primary school seemed so huge then. How can you be sure anything is ever its real size?

Finally, something that sums up much of what Black Swan Green is about.

The world won’t let things be. It’s always injecting endings into beginnings.

Many of these passages were jaw dropping, enough for me to stop reading and put the book down to marvel and think. Black Swan Green confirms and maintains Mitchell’s position as one of the best writers of this generation.

Going To See The Elephant follows Slater Brown, a budding writer who has traveled to San Francisco to launch his career. He winds up writing for a long-standing but third-rate newspaper, gaining scoops through a unique and strange method.

Brown becomes a local celebrity, incurring the ire of a colorful and voracious mayor. He also falls in love with a beautiful chess player, who is on a collision course with Milo Magnet a eccentric inventor.

Fishburne does an admirable job in creating interesting characters, from grumpy, gruff, grizzled newspapermen to an eager government entourage. He creates small worlds which resonate with the reader. The newspaper. City Hall. The mad scientist’s lab. Alone, they are actually quite good. Together they begin to lose focus.

Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like in Going To See The Elephant. The pacing is spot-on and you can’t help but be carried quickly through the story and enjoy the characters.

Yet, the theme of the book is about self-discovery and being true to your dreams. This subject matter deserves greater attention. It is in these instances where Fishburne seems to tell instead of show the reader how the characters deal with these internal conflicts.

In addition, the tone of the novel is uneven and is not cohesive. Is it supposed to be playful and humorous or is it supposed to be heartfelt and introspective? I’m not saying you can’t have both, but one should be consistent throughout, letting the other be the surprising and infrequent foil.

Science. Politics. Media. Love. There’s a lot packed into Going To See The Elephant and I can’t help but think what might have been. Could Fishburne have held back some of the ideas and used them in a future novel? Perhaps fewer concepts would have made it easier to keep Going To See The Elephant focused? I could easily have read an entire novel about Milo Magnet and his experiments.

So I chalk this up to a writer finding his voice. Going To See The Elephant by Rodes Fishburne is an interesting novel. Flawed but enjoyable.

This is one of those instances where it’s probably best if you’ve read the other books in the series.

Woken Furies hits the ground running in a rich world of Morgan’s making. It’s a world where your essence is written to a ’stack’ - a microchip of sorts at the base of your skull. Should your body die, your stack can be retrieved and you can be ‘re-sleeved’ in a new body.

If that’s confusing … well, then you should read Altered Carbon and Broken Angels to get your bearings.

Like most Morgan novels the plot is a pursuit. In this case the pursuit seemed to be secondary and was a device for Morgan to explore the impact of the innovations he’s introduced into his world.

How would our relationships change if we were able to re-sleeve and live for centuries or longer? How would you approach the world if you could live in a virtual construct?

These are interesting topics because they actually relate to modern day issues. How are we dealing with our growing life span and the ability to hop-scotch around the globe. How does that effect our current family dynamic? I live 3000 miles away from most of my family. That’s not something that happened much even 100 years ago.

How will ‘life streaming’ on sites like Facebook and FriendFeed evolve? What about those MySpace and Facebook pages that continue long after the user has died. Is virtual sex cheating?

We’re putting more and more of ourselves online so couldn’t the endpoint be something like Morgan’s Renouncers, a religious group who have renounced the flesh, live in a virtual construct and are awaiting Upload.

And then there are the more blatantly obvious parallels Morgan draws with his political and religious themes. He explores revolution, dynamics of economic class and politics, and weaves a type of religious extremism into the heart of the story.

Yes, there’s a lot to think about in Woken Furies.

In between you get high doses of well crafted, bloody fight sequences and raunchy sex scenes. The dichotomy between the action and cerebral are more pronounced in Woken Furies. It feels more forced then in Morgan’s other novels and was distracting at times.

Despite this criticism, I enjoyed Woken Furies. I read it quickly and enjoyed both the sizzle and the steak. I recommend Woken Furies but be warned, Morgan is not for the timid.

I have a love hate relationship with history. In the wrong hands history can be unbelievably dull. Too many times a pious academic has reduced a truly interesting event into cut and dry facts that have as much life as a waterlogged tennis ball. But history is actually amazingly interesting in the right hands.

I had a professor in college who taught European Civilization. He made history come alive! He talked about the people who were part of the history, about their motivations, about the odd bits of lore that don’t make it into the textbooks. (It also helped that he had a dry sense of humor and was fond of throwing Monty Python quotes into his lectures.)

I don’t pick up non-fiction because too often it leaves me bored. Instead I find my history in fiction, blended into novels like English Passengers by Matthew Kneale or Carter Beats the Devil by Glen David Gould. These authors tell a story using history as a backdrop. Erik Larson, on the other hand, has a gift for telling history as it should, as a story.

The Devil in the White City chronicles the construction of the 1893 Chicago World’s Columbian Exposition by following the architects who pulled off the amazing feat. Larson makes it easy for the reader to understand the enormity of the undertaking. He educates and instructs on architecture and exposes city rivalry and political intrigue that isn’t much different from the present.

Larson also delivers a palpable sense of what it was like to live in Chicago in the 1890s. It was an age where the slow, dank, filth of cities began to diminish as buildings rose to the sky. You sense a transformation - a great leap forward for America and humanity in general. One foot in the dark past and the other in the bright future.

Maybe it was the time or the task, but the number of famous figures who pop up in the narrative is amazing. You get a glimpse of people like Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla, Clarence Darrow, Susan B. Anthony, Buffalo Bill and Frank Lloyd Wright among others.

Of course you also get a chilling look at Herman Mudgett or H.H. Holmes as he was better known. Larson paints a disturbing portrait of a personable killer who excels in gaining the confidence of his victims. It’s frightening how easily Holmes was able to con and cajole people, and how he was able to perform such treachery right under the noses of so many observers.

I was also left with the odd sense of similarity in the intense drive of lead architect Daniel Burnham and H.H. Holmes. Though the aims of each are diametrically opposed, the passion with which they both pursued their tasks are eerily the same. It is not the city of Chicago, or the World’s Columbian Exposition, but the zeal of each that truly binds the two narratives together.

I highly recommend The Devil in the White City if you have any interest in history or enjoy chilling murder mysteries. Erik Larson will convince you that history is far from dead.

This episode, “Ability”, led the characters to a rare book store where we witness a customer selling a copy of Jonathan Carroll’s Land of Laughs. The appearance of Land of Laughs was an illuminating look at the influence literary fiction is having on TV writers. There’s no question this wasn’t a coincidence as Carroll is well known for his amazingly surreal novels which dovetails nicely with the general theme of Fringe.

I’ve read a good deal of Carroll including Land of Laughs, Sleeping in Flame and The Wooden Sea among others. I read all of them before starting this blog so they aren’t currently reviewed. I am reminded that I should do a retro review to highlight the eerie, quirky genius that is Jonathan Carroll. Seriously, go out and read one of his many books. You will not be disappointed.

This is the second time I’ve noticed a J.J. Abrams show paying homage to and telegraphing plot and themes via literary works. The first time was on Lost, when I noticed Benjamin Linus reading a copy of VALIS by Philip K. Dick. Anyone who read VALIS immediately understood that there was an element of time travel involved on the island.

Literature is the fuel for our entertainment, regardless of the final medium and channel. So a big thank you to J.J. Abrams for putting these great writers in front of a mass audience.

What makes this initiative unique is that the books can be offered for sale before they are ever digitized, so there is no up-front printing, production or storage cost.

Indeed, that is interesting. Here’s how they say it works.

The desired book will be pulled from Penn’s shelves, digitized, processed by Kirtas for optimal reading and printing, and a newly-printed copy will be shipped to the initiator. Or, the customer can purchase access to an online-only version of the book. Once the book has been digitized, it is returned undamaged to the library shelf.

Google took some flak when people realized that the scanning of new books often entailed chopping the book apart (disbinding is the politically correct term) to aid in the digitizing process. Lets be clear though, Google doesn’t do this with the books that come from library collections.

The landscape for digitization is relatively small. Kirtas seemed to have the inside track when they partnered with Microsoft in their Live Search Books and Live Search Academic projects. However, both of the aforementioned projects were shuttered last year, leaving Kirtas in a David versus Goliath position with Google.

Mind you, there are other digitizing companies out there. Julian Ball, Manager of the BOPCRIS Digitisation Centre based within the Hartley Library at the University of Southampton, reviewed the four competing scanners at a public exhibition in Munich.

The wrinkle is that many digitizing experts seem to believe Google’s scanning technique, a proprietary process, is suboptimal. Some claim the scans are passable, while others believe rescanning might be necessary in some instances. This might not mean a lot to the everyman, but it’s a hot topic for historians and librarians.

Think of it this way, you’d have wanted the monks with the best penmanship to help preserve texts through the dark ages, right?

Here’s a look at the Kirtas 2400 Scanner.

For irony go watch the Kirtas Book Digitization Tour video.

I might give Kirtas Books a spin and you should too if you want an ‘analog’ book or a digital book that is in the public domain and available at the University of Pennsylvania Library.

Overall, I’m happy to see more momentum behind the digitization of books. I fully believe Google, or gBooks as I’ve come to call it, has the inside track on this business, and by a wide margin, over everyone else including Amazon via Kindle. More competition can only be good at this stage, leading to innovation and better products.

On Thursday Google announced new mobile editions of 1.5 million public domain books. iPhone and Android users now have access to five times the number of titles currently available on Kindle.

While these books were already available on Google Book Search, these new mobile editions are optimized to be read on a small screen.

The timing of this announcement comes 4 days before the likely unveiling on the Kindle 2. Coincidence? I think not.

Of course, the titles currently available through Google Books are different from those on Kindle. We’re talking public domain versus the front list of bestsellers. But how long is that going to last?

Last month I wrote about the future of gBooks which is contingent on the blessing of the settlement agreement with the Authors Guild and Association of American Publishers.

Once this agreement has been approved, you’ll be able to purchase full online access to millions of books. This means you can read an entire book from any Internet-connected computer, simply by logging in to your Book Search account, and it will remain on your electronic bookshelf, so you can come back and access it whenever you want in the future.

Add it up. Sometime this year Google will have well over 3 million titles available and optimized for the small screen. In addition, authors and publishers have a clear and decent revenue share (63%) with the search giant.

What makes anyone think Google will stop with public domain and out-of-print books?

Authors and publishers would welcome an alternative to the increasingly combative Amazon. Last year Amazon put the squeeze to large publishers and Print On Demand (POD) publishers. Is it any wonder that Amazon couldn’t convince textbook publishers to play ball with a textbook Kindle.

Google will have public domain and out-of-print books available to deliver to a built-in base of customers. That’s right, there’s no new device to purchase! Particularly not a single-use device with a $359 price tag.

That larger base of customers is going to look very attractive to publishers. How long until they agree to sell front list bestsellers through Google?

Gadget fans will clearly swoon over Kindle 2 but the real story is the growing competition between Google and Amazon in the digital book arena. The timing of Google’s mobile version is a shot over Amazon’s bow. The industry should take notice and the Internati should be looking beyond the hype.

It’s right there on the tip of your tongue!

Try as you might you can’t remember it and Google has failed to turn up anything except odds and ends, many of which you may have preferred not to have discovered.

That’s a book stumper.

From time to time I get email from readers who have run into a book stumper. Just the other day I got one.

It was written in the 70s about a painter who lost his family in a car crash, met a new woman, then found he had a terminal disease. I think he was named Paul. Last line is “Black,” said the painter “is the purest of all colors.” It is in a dream of him looking into his grave. I thought it was “The Place He Made” But after looking at the author’s site I wasn’t so sure. I don’t know if I can read a book in 1979 that was printed in 1995! Please help, thank you.

I’ll do some poking around on my own to see if I can help, but most of the time I hand them off to the book stumper experts at Loganberry Books. Since 2003 they’ve been accepting book stumpers for the paltry sum of $2. The book stumper is then posted and literary crowdsourcing begins. Over 5,000 book stumpers have been submitted, with nearly 51% of them being solved.

Trust me, it’s more difficult than it seems. Sometimes the clues provided are scant at best.

I’m a fan of book stumpers for a number of reasons.

It is confirmation that what we read sticks with us for longer than we imagine. I find that both comforting and frightening. Comforting that some of my favorite books have influenced me and become part of who I am. Vonnegut’s Player Piano and Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land still surface as reference points today. It’s frightening in that some may not read at all or may read absolute drivel. The latter still being far superior to the former.

Book stumpers are also a testament to the inability of the almighty search engine to solve all our problems and answer all our questions. I make my living on the Internet (and I’m grateful for that), but at the same time I like that technology is still unable to interpret the clues locked in our heads and pinpoint the correct author and title. Where’s the fun in that?

There is still mystery in the world … and isn’t that what a good book can reveal.

Got a book stumper? Submit one to Loganberry today.

No, it doesn’t exist yet but the settlement agreement with the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers makes this a likely scenario.

Once this agreement has been approved, you’ll be able to purchase full online access to millions of books. This means you can read an entire book from any Internet-connected computer, simply by logging in to your Book Search account, and it will remain on your electronic bookshelf, so you can come back and access it whenever you want in the future.

Millions of books. That’s right. In one fell swoop Google will have five to ten times the titles currently available on Kindle.

Out-of-print books aren’t actively being published or sold, so the only way to procure one is to track it down in a library or used bookstore. When this agreement is approved, every out-of-print book that we digitize will become available online for preview and purchase, unless its author or publisher chooses to “turn off” that title. We believe it will be a tremendous boon to the publishing industry to enable authors and publishers to earn money from volumes they might have thought were gone forever from the marketplace.

Out-of-print books is the long-tail of the book industry and it makes perfect sense for Google to enable this part of the market. Google has been scanning books for years through the Google Library Project. In 2008, Microsoft finally ceded this space, shuttering its own Live Search Books and Live Search Academic projects. The only real competitor that remains is Amazon.

Some of you may be wondering why I’m writing about this now. It’s not breaking news, right? Here’s the thing. In the last year Google has finally determined that they need to focus and find new revenue streams, particularly with a maturing search market. Here’s a quick listing of Google projects or properties that have recently been closed.

• Lively
• Google Video Uploads
• Google Notebook
• Jaiku
• Dodgeball
• Google Catalog Search

The latter might make you think that Google is abandoning books. But a quick look at the farewell post shows the exact opposite.

It was a great experiment. Nonetheless, in recent years, Catalog Search hasn’t been as popular as some of our other products. So tomorrow, we’re bidding it a fond farewell and focusing our efforts to bring more and more types of offline information such as magazines, newspapers and of course, books, online.

And of course, books.

That’s right, Google is very keen on books and not just because it is part of their mission to help organize information. It’s about revenue. The revenue share on consumer sales under the agreement will be 37% for Google and 63% for the publishers and/or authors. Frankly, this seems like a win for both sides.

Unlike Amazon, I doubt Google is going to restrict how and where these books are read. It could be on your desktop or downloaded to your phone. You might read it on Stanza or perhaps on the new G1.

Google sees dollars in books and has been developing book related projects for five or more years. Here’s a prime example. Anyone poking at Google Base will see that it was built with specific book related fields. I happened to have a front row seat for the transition from Froogle to Google Base and it was obvious that books was a top priority.

Now, what do you think happens when publishers begin to see more dollars from their backlist titles via gBooks versus their frontlist titles via Kindle?

gBooks might not be as sexy as Kindle. It’s not a gadget that can be endlessly debated. Instead gBooks is the quiet tropical depression off the coast of Florida that could quickly turn into a hurricane.

The San Francisco area has seen a number of independent bookstores close in the last few years. Stacey’s follows Cody’s Books and Black Oak Books in particular. Both were excellent stores and Cody’s in particular was another long-time fixture. In my own neighborhood both Diablo Books and Bonanza Street Books closed their doors in the last few years. (Readers, please use the comments section to detail any other Bay Area bookstore closings in the last 3 to 5 years.)

I try to think about how books may find a wider audience through the Internet and through new social reading sites that allow exploration and discovery as you might find in a physical bookstore. It’s still unsettling to see these stores disappear from the landscape. It feels like a society that doesn’t value literature.

The continuing difficulties for Barnes & Noble and the prospect of Borders Books going out of business perpetuate the impression that books are not as valued as they once were in America. The new booksellers extraordinaire are Costco, Target and Walmart. And while I am happy to have books and literature of any sort survive, these retailers are not stocking a broad range or diverse selection of titles.

It’s at times like these that I’m proud to have worked at Alibris for 3 years, helping independent booksellers survive, and more importantly, keeping the long-tail of books in circulation.  Aggregators like Alibris, Abebooks and Biblio, online store providers like Bibliopolis, as well as social reading sites like LibraryThing, Goodreads and Shelfari should be looked upon as the ‘keepers of the flame’ so to speak.

Because the homogenization of books is a scary prospect.