<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Vale Inco Negotiations – Business News</title>
	
	<link>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com</link>
	<description>Vale Inco Negotiations – Business News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/ValeInco2009Negotiations" /><feedburner:info uri="valeinco2009negotiations" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>ValeInco2009Negotiations</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
		<title>Updates to www.valeinconegotiations.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/q3Imhd0nNhM/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-6</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-6#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More Q&#38;As on return to work, workforce balancing process, etc.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://valeinconegotiations.com/qa">More Q&amp;As on return to work, workforce balancing process, etc.</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/q3Imhd0nNhM" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-6/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-6</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Updates to www.valeinconegotiations.com</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/0vv4dzbz29U/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-5</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-5#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations Messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Q&#38;As on return to work, benefits reinstatement, vacation canvas, etc.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://valeinconegotiations.com/qa">Q&amp;As on return to work, benefits reinstatement, vacation canvas, etc.</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/0vv4dzbz29U" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-5/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/updates-to-www-valeinconegotiations-com-5</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Message to Employees – July 1, 2010</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/UVg8OCsJ3s8/message-to-employees-july-1-2010</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/message-to-employees-july-1-2010#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 18:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations Messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=904</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enough is enough.  And we&#8217;ve had enough.  Enough misrepresentation of Vale&#8217;s bargaining positions. 
We don&#8217;t understand why USW officials said in the last two days that Vale tried to change the deals that were reached on Tuesday, June 22 after a marathon bargaining session.  
Here&#8217;s what really happened.  We reached unconditional agreements for settlement for both Sudbury [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enough is enough.  And we&#8217;ve had enough.  Enough misrepresentation of Vale&#8217;s bargaining positions. </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t understand why USW officials said in the last two days that Vale tried to change the deals that were reached on Tuesday, June 22 after a marathon bargaining session.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what really happened.  We reached unconditional agreements for settlement for both Sudbury and Port Colborne around 8:00 a.m. on June 22 and a majority of both union bargaining committees said it would recommend these deals.  We were preparing the memorandums for signature, when we were told by mediator Kevin Burkett that there was a &#8220;problem&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Mr. Burkett told us that the USW needed us to say that the settlements would not be raised by the company to prevent the union from proceeding with its labour board case in connection with the nine discharged employees.  We said yes, we would not make the fact of the settlements a barrier.  In the week following the settlements, throughout discussions between company and union legal representatives, we have not changed our position on this issue. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s time to stop the misrepresentation, conclude the deals and get our employees back to work.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/UVg8OCsJ3s8" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/message-to-employees-july-1-2010/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/07/message-to-employees-july-1-2010</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A Message To All Ontario Operations Employees</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/nzQkNnoN_Yo/a-message-to-all-ontario-operations-employees</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/a-message-to-all-ontario-operations-employees#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations Messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hello everyone,
I am writing to provide you with the latest news regarding our efforts to negotiate new collective agreements with USW Locals 6500 and 6200 and end the strikes.
We recognize that employees are anxious for information and are anxious to return to normal operations. Until now, both the union and the company have operated under [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>Hello everyone,</p>
<p>I am writing to provide you with the latest news regarding our efforts to negotiate new collective agreements with USW Locals 6500 and 6200 and end the strikes.</p>
<p>We recognize that employees are anxious for information and are anxious to return to normal operations. Until now, both the union and the company have operated under a “communications blackout” imposed by independent mediator Kevin Burkett. As of moments ago, with Mr. Burkett terminating mediation, the blackout has now been lifted.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, the latest round of contract talks has failed to produce a tentative agreement – despite us having a deal at hand.</p>
<p>We had a deal on all issues early Tuesday morning (June 22), including submitting the matter of the discharged employees to the Ontario Labor Relations Board. Regrettably, in the days that followed, the parties could not agree on how this submission to the OLRB would take place. As far as we’re concerned, all other matters remain agreed.</p>
<p>At this time, there are no further talks scheduled.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>John Pollesel</p>
<p>Vice-President, Production Services &amp; Support – Canada/UK<br />
GM, Ontario Operations</p>
<p> </p></div>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/nzQkNnoN_Yo" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/a-message-to-all-ontario-operations-employees/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/a-message-to-all-ontario-operations-employees</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Vale response to Toronto Star story</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/0uH7vDHdhi4/vale-response-to-toronto-star-story</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/vale-response-to-toronto-star-story#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following Letter to the Editor was delivered to the Toronto Star by Jennifer Hooper, Vice President of Sustainability, Nickel, Vale Limited .
June 9, 2010
Letter To The Editor – Toronto Star
 Re: Inside Sudbury’s bitter Vale strike, June 6
While the above article paints a stark picture of the pioneering spirit associated with early mining, it fails [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following Letter to the Editor was delivered to the Toronto Star by Jennifer Hooper, Vice President of Sustainability, Nickel, Vale Limited .</p>
<p>June 9, 2010</p>
<p>Letter To The Editor – Toronto Star</p>
<p> Re: Inside Sudbury’s bitter Vale strike, June 6</p>
<p>While the above article paints a stark picture of the pioneering spirit associated with early mining, it fails to acknowledge the modern, safe and high-tech mining industry Canadians enjoy today.</p>
<p>Suggesting that employees and companies willingly “trade-off” employee health and safety for generous pay and benefits does a disservice to every man and woman who has chosen mining as a career.</p>
<p>Safety in the mining industry is paramount.  At Vale, our goal is “zero harm” and we are making significant strides in reaching it.  For an unprecedented four consecutive years, Vale mines have captured the John T. Ryan trophy, emblematic of the safest metal mine in Canada.  It’s an honour earned precisely because employees and employer were unwilling to “trade-off” safety for anything.</p>
<p>The medical surveillance program, referenced somewhat ominously in the article, exists for the very reason of ensuring employee health and safety against risks inherent in any number of industrial settings.</p>
<p>On the environmental front, we have spent more than one billion dollars reducing emissions by more than 90 per cent – and millions more partnering with the community, the colleges and university, and our industrial colleagues in reclaiming the landscape, a process that has garnered Sudbury international recognition and acclaim.  Those efforts continue today with significant efforts underway on further emission reductions, environmental improvements and biodiversity recovery.</p>
<p>We are proud of our industry and of the Sudbury community where we operate.  Thank you for providing us an opportunity to set the record straight.</p>
<p>Jennifer Hooper</p>
<p>Vice-President,</p>
<p>Sustainability</p>
<p>Vale</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/0uH7vDHdhi4" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/vale-response-to-toronto-star-story/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/vale-response-to-toronto-star-story</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>A breakthrough in China, another blow for Sudbury</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/Ay1YJTvq_sc/nickel-pig-iron</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/nickel-pig-iron#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following article appeared in the Report on Business section of the Globe and Mail on Saturday, June 12.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>The following article appeared in the Report on Business section of the Globe and Mail on Saturday, June 12.</p>
<hr /><span>A</span>sk Li Guang about the prospects for  his business and a self-assured grin creeps across the young executive’s  face. It’s a smile that means trouble for Canada’s nickel-mining  capital of Sudbury, Ont., more than 11,000 kilometres away from Mr. Li’s  office in eastern China.</p>
<p>“Our production has quite a lot of advantages compared to refined  nickel,” says the budding metals titan, who is all of 30 years old and  dressed in a short-sleeve dress shirt and black jeans. “Now, in China,  many other enterprises are going to enter this market. Gradually they  will take over a lot of the share of refined nickel.”</p>
<p>Mr. Li and his company, Jiangsu Mingzhu, are among the many Chinese  manufacturers churning out a revolutionary product known as nickel pig  iron or NPI. Despite its prosaic name, the alloy has set the global  nickel industry on its ear by providing a low-cost alternative to the  refined nickel that has typically been used to make stainless steel.  Cheap NPI threatens to squelch demand for the refined metal, which is  produced in places like Sudbury, as well as in Russia and Australia.</p>
<p>In less than five years, NPI has reshaped the world nickel industry,  marking a new stage in China’s capitalist evolution. Since it opened  itself to trade in the late 1970s, the Asian nation has become famous  for two things – lowering the price of manufactured products with its  cheap labour costs, and driving up the price of commodities with its  aggressive demand. Now it is altering the fundamentals of a vital  industrial sector with a homespun innovation.</p>
<p>NPI, a material produced in low-tech Chinese factories, already accounts  for as much as 10 per cent of the world’s $21-billion-a-year nickel  market, more than all the nickel that can be produced annually in  Sudbury. Some analysts expect China’s NPI producers to double their  output this year.</p>
<p>The booming supply of the new product hits hard at traditional nickel  miners. Until recently, the world’s largest mining firms believed that  surging Chinese demand for the metal would last for decades. As a  result, fevered takeover battles erupted in 2006 and 2007 for Canada’s  two nickel giants, Inco and Falconbridge.</p>
<p>But the days of $24 (U.S.) a pound nickel, last witnessed in 2007, are  unlikely to ever return. The average Chinese producer of NPI can now be  profitable at nickel prices of about $8.50 a pound – just about exactly  where prices stand right now. If nickel prices were to surge, China’s  NPI producers could quickly flood the market with their lower-cost  alternative.</p>
<p>“It does put a cap on world nickel prices. If not in practical terms, at  least in psychological terms,” concedes David Constable, vice-president  of investor relations at Quadra FNX Mining Ltd., a Canadian company  that began as a Sudbury nickel producer but has diversified its  production to focus primarily on copper.</p>
<p>BHP Billiton Ltd., the world’s largest mining firm, has already turned  bearish on nickel and sold some of its mines. The emergence of NPI was a  key factor in the decision, analysts say. They expect the Chinese  product’s impact to only get larger with time, as more producers enter  the fray.</p>
<p>In a worst-case scenario, NPI could usurp all of China’s demand for  traditional nickel, reducing the global market for the metal and  creating a nightmare for firms that paid top dollar for nickel assets at  the height of the market. Among the firms that invested heavily were  Vale SA, the Brazilian iron ore giant that paid $19.4-billion in 2006 to  win control of Inco’s Sudbury operations, and Xstrata PLC, the  Anglo-Swiss metals conglomerate that scooped up Falconbridge and its  Sudbury nickel assets at a price that valued the company at more than  $22-billion. (Both Vale and Xstrata declined comment for this story.)  Vale’s nickel production in Sudbury and Voisey’s Bay, Newfoundland, has  been crippled for nearly a year by a bitter strike over workers’ wages  and benefits. If and when production resumes, the company’s commitment  to exploration and expansion in Canada will have to be made with the  threat of NPI looming large.</p>
<p>How did a low-profile collection of Chinese manufacturers upset the  plans of the world’s mining giants? It’s a story about ingenuity born  out of necessity. It’s also a story about China’s emerging  entrepreneurial class and its growing impact on the global economy.</p>
<div><img src="http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00699/china-pig-iron12_699164artw.jpg" alt="Making nickel pig iron at a plant in in Huaibei, China." width="539" height="403" />The Globe and Mail</p>
<p>Making nickel pig iron at a plant in in  Huaibei, China.</p></div>
<p><strong>Cost advantage</strong>The heart of Mr. Li’s burgeoning metals empire is hardly a high-tech  showpiece. The plant where Jiangsu Mingzhu produces NPI in the city of  Huaibei in China’s Anhui province belches smoke. A stray dog picks at a  pile of rubbish, while a worker sits atop a hill of nickel ore, spraying  it down with a hose to keep it from turning to dust and blowing away in  the wind.</p>
<p>The NPI plant sits right beside its electricity source – a coal-fired  plant. “We spend 160,000 yuan [about $24,300 Canadian] on electricity  per day,” boasts Wu Jinduo, the plant’s sales and supply director.</p>
<p>Workers begin the NPI process by mixing together three ingredients –  coking coal, nickel ore from Indonesia, and a mix of gravel and sand  known as aggregate or flux. The mix goes into one of the factory’s three  furnaces, where it’s blasted with high heat, reduced and concentrated.  The molten material is then poured into moulds to make bars of nickel  pig iron. Workers use long metal rakes to scrape the remnants of the  metal liquid from the container.</p>
<p>The process is dirty, dangerous and rudimentary. But it contains some  vital advantages.</p>
<p>Foremost among those advantages is the factory’s ability to capitalize  on several low-cost materials – cheap power, a small amount of coking  coal, and, most important, low-grade Indonesian ore.</p>
<p>The ore contains less than 2 per cent nickel, making it unsuitable for  traditional nickel production. But it is nearly half iron. Thanks to  that high iron content, the NPI that emerges from this plant contains a  generous amount of nickel – 10 to 12 per cent – mixed into a base that  is nearly all iron.</p>
<p>For China’s thousands of stainless steel producers, the combination of  nickel and iron is hugely attractive. They pay NPI producers the same  price (or slightly less) as they would pay traditional producers to get  the nickel content they need to make stainless steel. They get a bonus  of iron – another ingredient needed to make steel – for free.</p>
<p>Exactly who invented the NPI process is unknown. Industry executives say  Chinese producers took their first faltering steps with the product  around 2005. The early batches of NPI were prohibitively expensive and  low grade, containing only about 4 per cent nickel or less. The world’s  big nickel producers took little note.</p>
<p>Development went into fast forward when nickel prices spiked in 2007 and  China’s stainless steel producers were forced to look for alternatives.  As nickel soared to $24 (U.S.) a pound from $10, the economics of NPI  suddenly looked more attractive. Many Chinese smelters along the  country’s east coast switched from producing other metals to making NPI,  a shift that led to major improvements in smelting techniques.</p>
<p>In Xuzhou, Mr. Li’s company was among the most important innovators. Mr.  Li’s father had founded Jiangsu in the 1980s to produce metal alloys,  but by 2006, the company had moved into producing NPI. It soon figured  out a way to enhance the quality of the material. “We were the first  enterprise in China to smelt pig iron by electric furnace,” Mr. Li says.</p>
<p>By switching from blast furnaces to electric furnaces, Chinese NPI  producers can now make material containing between 8 and 15 per cent  nickel. Similar in quality to ferronickel produced by nickel giants such  as Vale, the Chinese NPI production can be used to make high-end “300  Series” stainless steel.</p>
<p>By 2009, the top NPI producers had reduced production costs to between  $7 and $8 a pound, according to analysts. By December of last year,  approximately 70 Chinese firms were producing NPI, says Celia Wang, an  analyst at Shanghai Metals Market, a unit of research firm CBI China,  and an expert in the NPI industry.</p>
<p>Ms. Wang estimates that NPI production hit 44,000 tonnes of nickel in  the first quarter and she expects output to break records this year,  reaching between 160,000 tonnes and 180,000 tonnes of nickel –  production that otherwise would have come from traditional refined  nickel miners.</p>
<p>China is expected to gobble even more NPI in the future. Until now,  demand has been driven by small private manufacturers of stainless  steel. The country’s largest steel producers, the state-owned  enterprises (SOEs), have yet to begin using NPI on a wide scale.</p>
<p>Mr. Li says it’s only a matter of time before the big producers, which  make about 40 per cent of China’s stainless steel, turn to NPI. “They  sell their products in the higher end of the market so they can afford  refined nickel, right now,” he says during an interview in his spacious  office in Xuzhou. He predicts that within two years the SOEs will  diversity their sources of supply. If so, that will take another big  bite out of global demand for refined nickel.</p>
<div><img src="http://beta.images.theglobeandmail.com/archive/00699/pig_iron_npi_699161a.jpg" alt="A metal gets hammered" width="565" height="595" />A metal gets hammered</div>
<p><strong>Environmental worries</strong></p>
<p>The question is whether NPI will become more than a Chinese phenomenon.  Because of steep duties, it’s not economical for Chinese NPI producers  to export their product to stainless steel producers outside of China.  However, Jiangsu Mingzhu is planning to build an NPI plant in the  Philippines; it is also looking at constructing another offshore plant  in Indonesia.</p>
<p>Jim Lennon, an analyst with Macquarie Group based in London, isn’t ready  to write off the traditional nickel industry just yet. He points out  that NPI requires not only cheap nickel ore, but also coking coal and  inexpensive electricity – a combination that is hard to find outside of  China. Still, Mr. Lennon expects that NPI production in China could  reach 200,000 tonnes of nickel this year, or about a third of Chinese  demand.</p>
<p>What could stop China’s NPI boom? One threat is growing environmental  concerns. China has already moved to shut scores of high-polluting coal  plants and could set its sights on smelters used to produce NPI. As  well, if China allows its currency to appreciate, NPI producers could  feel the pinch.</p>
<p>But Mr. Li, the young chief of Jiangsui Mingzhu, doesn’t seem to be  worried. With five plants in China, Jiangsu is now the country’s  second-largest NPI producer. Mr. Li plans to take his company public on  the Hong Kong Stock Exchange within the next two years. He has plenty of  reason to grin – and Sudbury has plenty of reason to worry.</p>
<p>______</p>
<p><strong>Everything you ever wanted to know about nickel pig iron but were  afraid to ask</strong></p>
<p><strong>What is it?</strong></p>
<p>Nickel pig iron (NPI) is a material produced in China that is used as a  substitute for traditional refined nickel in the production of stainless  steel. Nickel is the key ingredient that makes stainless steel shiny  and corrosion resistant.</p>
<p><strong>Is it new?</strong></p>
<p>Yes. NPI was first made in China in 2005 and only produced in large  quantities beginning in 2007.</p>
<p><strong>How is it made?</strong></p>
<p>The key ingredient in NPI is low-grade ore, usually imported from  Indonesia or the Philippines. The ore, which generally contains less  than 2 per cent nickel, is unsuitable for traditional nickel production.  NPI manufacturers mix the ore with coking coal and aggregate or gravel,  then transfer it to a furnace, which smelts it. NPI producers  originally used blast furnaces powered by coal, but a new generation of  producers rely upon electric furnaces, which produce NPI with a higher  nickel content.</p>
<p><strong>What does NPI consist of?</strong></p>
<p>NPI consists of 4 to 15 per cent nickel. The rest of the material is pig  iron – an important advantage since iron is also needed to produce  stainless steel.</p>
<p><strong>How is this different from traditional nickel from Sudbury?</strong></p>
<p>Traditional nickel begins with higher-grade ore, with a nickel content  typically above 2 per cent. The ore is crushed and smelted to remove  many impurities. The smelted material goes to a refinery where it is  processed into pure nickel.</p>
<p><strong>Is NPI cheaper to produce than refined nickel?</strong></p>
<p>It depends upon how you do your accounting. Innovation and improved  technologies have reduced the cost to between $7 (U.S.) and $8 a pound  of nickel. In comparison, the cost of producing a nickel in Sudbury is  thought to be about $5 a pound. However, the cost of building a  traditional nickel mine, smelter and refinery are massive compared to  the cost of building an NPI factory.</p>
<p><strong>Why do Chinese stainless steel producers use NPI?</strong></p>
<p>For two reasons. One, they can often buy the nickel content in NPI for  slightly less than buying the equivalent amount of pure nickel. Two,  they get the pig iron in NPI – which they need to produce stainless  steel anyway – for free.</p>
<p><strong>Why is NPI used only by Chinese stainless steel producers?</strong></p>
<p>China levies a steep export duty on NPI that makes it cost prohibitive  to ship the product outside of the country. To avoid the duty, some  Chinese companies are planning to build NPI plants in the Philippines or  Indonesia.</p>
<p><em>Andy Hoffman</em></div>
<hr /><a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/industry-news/energy-and-resources/a-breakthrough-in-china-branother-blow-for-sudbury/article1601530/" target="_blank">Source</a></p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/Ay1YJTvq_sc" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/nickel-pig-iron/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/nickel-pig-iron</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Response from Mayor Rodriguez to The Toronto Star</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/87Sm_dZ3orA/response-from-mayor-rodriguez-to-the-toronto-star</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/response-from-mayor-rodriguez-to-the-toronto-star#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strike just a temporary setback for Sudbury; Inside Sudbury&#8217;s bitter Vale strike, June 6
07 June 2010
Provided by: The Toronto Star
Factiva News Search 
Inside Sudbury&#8217;s bitter
Vale strike, June 6 
Calling Greater Sudbury a &#8220;company town&#8221; does a disservice to the people of this community who have spent the past 30 years engaged in a successful effort [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strike just a temporary setback for Sudbury; Inside Sudbury&#8217;s bitter Vale strike, June 6<br />
07 June 2010<br />
Provided by: The Toronto Star<br />
Factiva News Search </p>
<p>Inside Sudbury&#8217;s bitter<br />
Vale strike, June 6 </p>
<p>Calling Greater Sudbury a &#8220;company town&#8221; does a disservice to the people of this community who have spent the past 30 years engaged in a successful effort to diversify our economy. Not surprisingly, it was a strike by the then 12,000 strong workforce at Inco in 1978-79 that galvanized citizens into action.</p>
<p>Now, as northern Ontario&#8217;s largest centre, the City of Greater Sudbury boasts significant employment in health and education, retail and tourism, and in the mining supply and services sector that sends goods and expertise globally.</p>
<p>No one would dispute the importance of a strike of 3,000 workers in any community, or argue that the loss of up to $4 million per week in payroll does not impact local business. But the reality is that today&#8217;s Greater Sudbury is significantly more diversified than in earlier times and is weathering this strike better than most would predict.</p>
<p>Last month, this city produced jobs at a faster per-capita rate than any other urban centre in Canada. The 1,800 new jobs in May dropped our unemployment rate by almost a full percentage point to 8.9 per cent, the same as the provincial average.</p>
<p>The current labour dispute is contentious and divisive. Continued production and the use of replacement workers has brought new tensions, as has the ability of the union to work internationally to bring pressure on the company in the U.S., Europe and Brazil. There is no one in this city that does not want to see both sides reach an agreement and return to normal operations.</p>
<p>Mining and mineral processing remain critical components of Greater Sudbury&#8217;s future and we need all of our mining companies to be active and productive in order for us to reach our full economic potential.</p>
<p>This strike will end, and we will rebuild bridges and move forward. I encourage the Star to come back and see how the citizens of this former company town do so.</p>
<p>John Rodriguez, Mayor, City of Greater Sudbury<br />
Copyright (c) 2010 The Toronto Star<br />
The Toronto Star </p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/87Sm_dZ3orA" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/response-from-mayor-rodriguez-to-the-toronto-star/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/06/response-from-mayor-rodriguez-to-the-toronto-star</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>VALE INCO ANNOUNCES NAME CHANGE TO VALE</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/1lA4VhznBOI/vale-inco-announces-name-change-to-vale</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/vale-inco-announces-name-change-to-vale#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 13:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=845</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TORONTO, Ontario, May 27, 2010 – Vale Inco announced the natural next step in the company’s
evolution today by changing its name to Vale – a milestone that aligns it more fully with other Vale
operations worldwide and reflects its position as part of the world’s second largest mining company.
A world leader in nickel, the former Inco [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TORONTO, Ontario, May 27, 2010 – Vale Inco announced the natural next step in the company’s<br />
evolution today by changing its name to Vale – a milestone that aligns it more fully with other Vale<br />
operations worldwide and reflects its position as part of the world’s second largest mining company.<br />
A world leader in nickel, the former Inco Limited was acquired by the former CVRD in late 2006. It<br />
has operated around the world as Vale Inco since 2007 when CVRD rebranded itself as Vale.<br />
“Our global nickel business will continue to be headquartered in Toronto, Canada,” said Tito<br />
Martins, President and CEO of Vale’s nickel operations. “We have a very strong team in place and<br />
are building a long-term future for our operations around the world in Canada, Indonesia, New<br />
Caledonia, the United Kingdom, China, Japan and Brazil. Our nickel business today is larger than it<br />
was in 2006, when we first invested in Inco and we are building on that investment every day.<br />
“We are positioning our company to meet the challenges of an increasingly competitive global<br />
marketplace,” he continued. “Our objective is to ensure a sustainable, successful future for the<br />
business and the people and communities who rely on it.”</p>
<p>Vale’s nickel business has more than 11,000 employees worldwide and net sales in 2009 of<br />
US$3.26 billion, accounting for 13.6% of Vale’s overall global revenue. The management team in<br />
Toronto oversees a global business committed to significant production upgrades, capital<br />
investments and new projects that hold forth the potential for further growth in Canada and<br />
internationally.</p>
<p>When Vale acquired Inco in 2006, it was the largest-ever acquisition by a Latin American company.<br />
“It was a defining moment in our history,” remarked Roger Agnelli, President and CEO, Vale. “We<br />
stepped boldly onto the global stage and since that time our growth has continued, with our nickel<br />
operations playing a vital role in achieving our international ambitions.</p>
<p>“We have overcome many challenges and today stand poised to complete significant investments in<br />
new nickel operations at Goro in New Caledonia and Onça Puma in Brazil, said Mr. Agnelli. “In<br />
Canada, we are opening the first new mine in our Ontario Operations in close to 40 years, at Totten,<br />
and are constructing a new state-of-the-art hydromet processing facility at Long Harbour in<br />
Newfoundland. All of this is building towards positioning Vale as the leading, safest and most<br />
profitable nickel company in the world – which is our ultimate objective.”</p>
<p>“While our name is changing, we are still the very recognizable company our employees and<br />
communities have come to know,” continued Mr. Martins. “We are proud of our Inco heritage and<br />
its rich 107-year history – the record of accomplishments and the employees who made them<br />
possible were a large part of what attracted Vale in the first place. That experience and that<br />
commitment to excellence will continue to drive us going forward. Today’s announcement builds on<br />
the achievements of our past to help create an exciting and prosperous future.”</p>
<p>The roll-out of the Company’s new name will occur across its Canadian and global operations over<br />
the coming weeks and months.</p>
<h3>About Vale</h3>
<p>Vale is the second largest diversified metals and mining company in the world, the world’s largest<br />
producer of iron ore, and the world’s second largest producer of nickel. Vale also produces<br />
manganese, ferroalloys, thermal and coking coal, bauxite, alumina, aluminum, copper, cobalt,<br />
platinum group metals, potash and kaolin. Vale is the largest private sector company in Latin<br />
America with a market capitalization of around US$ 150 billion and more than 500,000 shareholders<br />
on all continents.</p>
<h3>Contact</h3>
<p>Cory McPhee<br />
Vice-President, Corporate Affairs<br />
Nickel Business<br />
Vale<br />
416.361.7669</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/1lA4VhznBOI" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/vale-inco-announces-name-change-to-vale/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/vale-inco-announces-name-change-to-vale</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting the record straight</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/AKhrG8GD2U0/setting-the-record-straight</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/setting-the-record-straight#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 12:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In yesterday&#8217;s edition of the Northern Life, USW Local 6500 President John Fera says he &#8220;doesn&#8217;t understand why Vale Inco hasn&#8217;t yet agreed to negotiate with the union.&#8221;  Perhaps he isn&#8217;t listening closely enough. Vale Inco&#8217;s position is very clear &#8212; we are willing to go back to the table, but only when we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In yesterday&#8217;s edition of the Northern Life, USW Local 6500 President John Fera says he &#8220;doesn&#8217;t understand why Vale Inco hasn&#8217;t yet agreed to negotiate with the union.&#8221;  Perhaps he isn&#8217;t listening closely enough. Vale Inco&#8217;s position is very clear &#8212; <strong>we are willing to go back to the table, but only when we see the union is serious about achieving a deal!</strong>  The union knows this. We&#8217;ve told them this as plainly as we&#8217;ve written it here.</p>
<p>Also in yesterday&#8217;s Sudbury Star, USW District 6 Director Wayne Fraser is quoted as saying &#8220;we can&#8217;t negotiate alone&#8221;. The fact is that over the course of the last 10 months the company has demonstrated significant flexibility in putting forward a series of offers to resolve the strike &#8212; the last was presented during talks which were adjourned earlier this month. Remarkably, <strong>we have received no formal counter-proposal whatsoever from the USW since the strike began</strong>. We have a very good offer on the table today that includes wage increases, pension increases and cost-of-living adjustments. Still, we have received nothing from the union. Mr. Fraser should recognize that you cannot be negotiating alone if you are not negotiating to begin with. The union knows this.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/AKhrG8GD2U0" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/setting-the-record-straight/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/setting-the-record-straight</feedburner:origLink></item>
		<item>
		<title>Ontario Operations resumes production</title>
		<link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~3/GCbRzlwwIJQ/ontario-operations-resumes-production</link>
		<comments>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/ontario-operations-resumes-production#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 20:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Negotiations Messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://valeinconegotiations.com/?p=826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The safe and dedicated work of repair teams is being credited with a return to production at the Copper Cliff Smelter this week following an incident in which an extension of the Fluid Bed Drier stack at the complex fell to the ground earlier this month. The single furnace was back on-line and in production [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The safe and dedicated work of repair teams is being credited with a return to production at the Copper Cliff Smelter this week following an incident in which an extension of the Fluid Bed Drier stack at the complex fell to the ground earlier this month. The single furnace was back on-line and in production on May 16.</p>
<p>This work was completed several days ahead of schedule.</p>
<p>While the exact cause of the stack extension failure is still under investigation, the restart of smelting activities allows the company to continue with plans to increase feed from the mines as it moves towards resuming full production.</p>
<p>Elsewhere, mill recoveries are improving and are showing excellent product quality. In the mines, the first ore production is now coming out of Creighton Deep with ongoing significant contributions from Coleman and Stobie Mines.</p>
<p>All efforts are being completed with the same excellent safety performance that has been demonstrated since the restart of production in the second half of 2009.</p>
<p><strong>Court update: Contempt of court allegations</strong></p>
<p>On Monday, May 17 Vale Inco was in Superior Court in Sudbury with the USW and six employees – all of whom were cited with contempt of court following the illegal blockades at Coleman Mine and Clarabelle Mill that began on May 4.  The purpose of the hearing was to ask the courts to find all in contempt of the injunction in effect that prohibits blockades at our plants.</p>
<p>After one day of arguments, the hearing was adjourned until Friday May 21. At that time it is expected there will be further procedural matters which will lead to future court dates.</p>
<img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/ValeInco2009Negotiations/~4/GCbRzlwwIJQ" height="1" width="1"/>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/ontario-operations-resumes-production/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<feedburner:origLink>http://www.valeontarionegotiations.com/2010/05/ontario-operations-resumes-production</feedburner:origLink></item>
	</channel>
</rss>
