<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892</id><updated>2012-05-28T13:32:28.449+01:00</updated><title type="text">Varying thoughts - Fahad Burney</title><subtitle type="html">a place where I put my thoughts and ideas in to electronic form</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>12</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney" /><feedburner:info uri="varyingthoughts-fahadburney" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly>This is an XML content feed. It is intended to be viewed in a newsreader or syndicated to another site.</feedburner:browserFriendly><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110910263612280218</id><published>2005-02-22T20:01:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-02-22T20:03:56.126Z</updated><title type="text">Shopping for a web host</title><content type="html">&lt;img src="http://www.geocities.com/burney_fahad/webhosting.gif" align="right" /&gt; &lt;div align="justify"&gt;It is tiring, looking at the all the options available and than selecting which company to host with and this is not an easy job, but if you know hat you want it becomes slightly easy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have been busy window shopping for a web hosting for an ASP .Net and MS SQL Server hosting for the last one week and after spending plenty of time and numerous emails and reading reviews of the hosts I have finally picked one.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finding a good host is not difficult but finding one which is reliable and is in your budget is no mean task and finding one which has everything you need in one package is even tougher. Hosting companies are plentiful; offering PHP, MySQL combinations with plenty of disk space and database space, but finding a hosting company offering ASP .Net and MS SQL Server is not easy. As the ones that you like are the ones which are very expensive and the ones that fit your budget are those which offer only 25-50MB database space which is not much when you’re planning a portal. So one should spare sometime for selecting the right hosting company as you don’t want your web site going down due to one problem or another.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another thing which I noticed while looking for the web hosting was that there are a couple of companies who operate under different names and offer almost the same features, only customers who are aware can find this out. I found this out by simple doing a ‘trace route’ to there web sites and interestingly found the same results. Another thing which I saw was that there are some web site which offer features like you send in your request for proposal and they than send them off to there hosting companies and than they get back to you with the best quote, yes it seems to be a good idea BUT this web site is owned and operated by a the hosting company and you only get a response from them, as they are the one ones who get the RFP; cheeky!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the web hosting rankings and reviews that I have read are sponsored by the web hosting companies or are operated by there resellers who get a commission on there referral, so they are not of much use, as there rankings don’t change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let me know if you need any help with selecting a web host, may be you can gain something from my experience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110910263612280218?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110910263612280218/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110910263612280218" title="81 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110910263612280218" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110910263612280218" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/BcTlB7CIP_Q/shopping-for-web-host.html" title="Shopping for a web host" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>81</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/02/shopping-for-web-host.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110865557733075994</id><published>2005-02-17T15:47:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-02-17T15:52:57.333Z</updated><title type="text">Internet Explorer 7 to address security issues</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/images/experiences/hls_ie55.gif" align="right" /&gt;Microsoft announced the upcoming release of Internet Explorer 7 yesterday, which will be available in beta format sometime during this summer.The idea driving the update of Microsoft's browser is security. At the &lt;a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2005/feb05/02-15RSA05KeynotePR.asp" target="_blank"&gt;RSA Conference&lt;/a&gt; during his keynote speech, Bill Gates explained Internet Explorer 7.0 would provide a strong defense against phishing, malicious software and spyware. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;More on this story as it develops.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110865557733075994?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110865557733075994/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110865557733075994" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110865557733075994" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110865557733075994" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/dsPWJGiCv0M/internet-explorer-7-to-address.html" title="Internet Explorer 7 to address security issues" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/02/internet-explorer-7-to-address.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110728224433845972</id><published>2005-02-01T18:10:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-02-01T18:42:01.313Z</updated><title type="text">The new MSN Search</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;MSN started using it own search technology from today and leaving the Yahoo! technology which it had licensed sometime back. &lt;img src="http://www.geocities.com/burney_fahad/msns.gif" align="right" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;On the first look at the new full Microsoft search engine looks really chic with the UI having some great features which allow writing complex search queries really easy, especially for people who do not know much about them. One really cool feature is that you can specify the country and language of the web site you want to search and can adjust the settings by graphical equalizer bars! You can now also search content from Encarta which previously was through subscription.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img style="WIDTH: 297px; HEIGHT: 84px" height="103" src="http://www.geocities.com/burney_fahad/msns2.gif" width="328" align="right" /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;On the indexing side Microsoft claims that the new search indexes more than 5 billion pages and that it is updated every 2 days as compared to the industry average of 2 weeks.&lt;img src="http://www.geocities.com/burney_fahad/msns1.gif" align="right" /&gt; The new MSN search has been given a new and much improved place on the man MSN page and you can also adjust the theme of the page, I found the white theme pretty good, possibly something other portals will follow.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The speed of MSN search is good too, but time will tell when more and more users start using MSN Search how the MS clusters responds and whether it maintains the speed or not.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;These were all the good things, but the main thing which matters is the quality of results and that is really bad. I know I have said in the previous posts that the quality is improving but than MSNS was using technology which was a mixture of its own and from Yahoo! but now that it is using its very own, the results are not good. I searched my name on &lt;a href="http://search.msn.co.uk/results.aspx?q=Fahad+Burney&amp;FORM=QBHP" target="_blank"&gt;MSNS&lt;/a&gt; and found some strange results will if I do the same on &lt;a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Fahad+Burney&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;fr=FP-tab-web-t&amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8" target="_blank"&gt;Yahoo!&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;q=Fahad+Burney&amp;amp;meta=" target="_blank"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; I get different results and ones that I expect to make it to the top.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;So as far as the usability and interface is concerned MSNS is good but on quality of the results more is desired.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Check out the MSN Search &lt;a href="http://search.msn.com"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110728224433845972?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110728224433845972/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110728224433845972" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110728224433845972" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110728224433845972" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/_fm8ROEjhmY/new-msn-search.html" title="The new MSN Search" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/02/new-msn-search.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110575568266301159</id><published>2005-01-15T02:05:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-15T02:40:03.090Z</updated><title type="text">Why have I started hating Google?</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;If &lt;img src="http://www.google.com/intl/en/logos/Logo_40wht.gif" align="right" /&gt; punishments were to be awarded on writing negative comments about companies that people on the internet simply adore, than I would get a life term for this heading. But I have a very valid reason for writing this.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;I have been trying to get a web site, which I maintain [&lt;a href="http://www.RIBT.org" target="_blank"&gt;RIBT&lt;/a&gt;] on the first page of Google for sometime, but with little success. I have tried all sorts of things from robots.txt to link sharing, page renaming to getting my web site listed in some major directories. But all this has not paid off much; as I was only focusing on getting my web site on Google, being the one that most people refer to. After this run with not much success I tried out the other search engines which I had almost stopped using, Yahoo!, Ask Jeeves and MSN Search.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;When I tried searching for my web site on Yahoo! I got great results, so while I was focusing on getting my site on top at Google, which hasn’t happened as yet but it comes on top at Yahoo! Thus my interest in finding results from other search engines grew. I tried MSN Search which is a lot better than when I last used it. Ask Jeeves is not bad either, and is giving good results. Lycos although I do not like the look of its main page but none the less its result are good.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;After I checked these search engines I had a look at my website log files. Since I use web site log analyzing software which makes it easy to track the bots and crawlers which last crawled the web site and what amount of information they actually crawled. An analysis of the logs reveals that the Yahoo/Inktomi Slurp visits the web site 4 times more than the GoogleBot and crawls more data per visit than the GoogleBot. I checked my robots.txt file again to verify if I was making any mistakes in it that made the GoogleBot go away from some directories but there seems to be no problem. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;I am very impressed by the results that Yahoo! and other search engines are giving, not that Google is very bad but it seems to me that it is loosing the edge that it had. Although Google has been instrumental in improving the search market and forcing the other search engines to improve, which I think they are doing now. I checked on the internet to see if there were more people like me who are getting frustrated with Google. So my search took me to ‘&lt;a href="http://keynote.com/news_events/releases_2005/05jan13.html" target="_blank"&gt;Yahoo! Search and MSN Search Close the Gap with Google&lt;/a&gt;’. A very interesting read and would also second my views when it comes to the quality of search for what Google is known for, I guess they are just focusing too much on Desktop Search, Gmail and other stuff, which Yahoo! and Microsoft already have and are catching up on the web search! &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;The team at Google has some work cut-out as according to a report by &lt;a href="http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessnews/wpn-45-20050114GoogleMaybetheFavoredToolofHackersin2005.html" target="_blank"&gt;ZDNet Google May be the Favoured Tool of Hackers in 2005&lt;/a&gt;, so I guess popularity has its price! Now they would know whets it like being the big guy as criticism pours in as it does at Microsoft.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;So how do I get my life term waived, oh Yes! I will right something bad about Microsoft next time. :-)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Worth reading:&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-5537328.html?tag=zdfd.newsfeed" target="_blank"&gt;MSN's Web search picks up steam&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5500341.html" target="_blank"&gt;Google's search for security&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110575568266301159?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110575568266301159/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110575568266301159" title="8 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110575568266301159" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110575568266301159" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/kXS5uLPkGwI/why-have-i-started-hating-google.html" title="Why have I started hating Google?" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>8</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/why-have-i-started-hating-google.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110566454362610610</id><published>2005-01-14T01:37:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-14T13:05:00.396Z</updated><title type="text">Apple Unveils No Frills Computer, iPod</title><content type="html">&lt;img src="http://www.geocities.com/burney_fahad/macmini.jpg" align="right" /&gt; &lt;div align="justify"&gt;The Mac Mini lacks a monitor, mouse and keyboard. The 40 gigabyte version will cost $499, an 80-gigabyte model $599. They ship with Apple's new operating system, OS X Panther, as well as the newest version of iLife.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Full story: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Apple-Unveils-No-Frills-Computer-iPod-39676.html"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Apple-Unveils-No-Frills-Computer-iPod-39676.html&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;FB: Although I have never been a fan of &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com"&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt;, nor have I been a fanatic of the iPod, but the way things are going I may end up buying the new &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/macmini/"&gt;Mac Mini&lt;/a&gt; just to try it out. And this 'trying out' thing may be the factor that lures many PC users to the new Mac, but I guess it would be just to have fun and be the kid on the block who also has a Mac! The success of the &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/"&gt;iPod&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/itunes/"&gt;iTunes&lt;/a&gt; has played a major part in Apple's revival, Apple which was valued last January at $4-5Billion is now valued at $27Billion and the sales of iPod last year has passed industry estimates, and if these figure look good than have a look at the companies &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2005/jan/12results.html"&gt;1st quater report&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;From what I have read from the newspapers there is even talk of Steve Jobs getting into the Hollywood scene with the same iTunes concept, which would mean we may possibly be buying/downloading movies over the internet 'legally'. Although the Mac Mini is a very big risk for Apple and it is not only taking on &lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com"&gt;Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; but also &lt;a href="http://www.intel.com"&gt;Intel&lt;/a&gt; in this PC v Mac price drop war and only time will tell if Apple can lure the PC users to the Mac. As for me I would probably end up using the Mac to play movies :-)&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;On the subject of price drop wars have a look at Wal-Marts sub $500 PCs &lt;a href="http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_query=computers&amp;search_constraint=0&amp;amp;ics=20&amp;ico=0&amp;amp;ref=+500000.500592"&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110566454362610610?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://www.technewsworld.com/story/Apple-Unveils-No-Frills-Computer-iPod-39676.html" title="Apple Unveils No Frills Computer, iPod" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110566454362610610/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110566454362610610" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110566454362610610" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110566454362610610" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/D9-U3MOfTs4/apple-unveils-no-frills-computer-ipod.html" title="Apple Unveils No Frills Computer, iPod" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/apple-unveils-no-frills-computer-ipod.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110503212900114507</id><published>2005-01-06T17:01:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-06T17:23:41.816Z</updated><title type="text">Search Looks at the Big Picture</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;Searching the internet for images or videos often leads down a blind alley or worse -- to deceitful advertisers or unsuitable content. Researchers are developing visualization technologies that can "see" inside images, reducing search engines' reliance on text-based image tags that are easily manipulated. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Search companies testing the waters of image retrieval see it as a lucrative method of connecting advertisers with customers, according to Chris Sherman, editor of the &lt;a href="http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday"&gt;SearchDay&lt;/a&gt; newsletter. &lt;a href="http://video.search.yahoo.com/"&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/imghp?hl=en&amp;amp;tab=wi"&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://beta.search.msn.com/images"&gt;MSN&lt;/a&gt;, as well as AOL's &lt;a href="http://www.singingfish.com/"&gt;Singingfish&lt;/a&gt; have launched websites for searching static images and video.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Read full storry at: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66185,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66185,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FB:&lt;/strong&gt; I recently had a search engine bot crawl my web site which I did not know off, so I back tracked it to from where it came from and what was it that it wanted since it just crawled the robot.txt file on the root and went back. After tracking it down I found out it was an image crawler, part of a new search engine which is still in testing and processes images. Since my 'robot.txt' file had
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Disallow: /image/
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Thus the bot just went back to where it came form with out actually crawling the web site. What this new technology means is that we would have image processing search engines which would not rely on the meta data of the web site but on the content of the image itself, thus big shift towards some positives. This way search engines can cut down on pornography and other obscene material of graphic nature which previously could not be controlled, the online e-tailers would have a field day with there products getting higher recognition in the search results. But this new technology is yet to mature but is growing fast!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;I will be posting more on this as I come across more material&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110503212900114507?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,66185,00.html?tw=wn_tophead_2" title="Search Looks at the Big Picture" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110503212900114507/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110503212900114507" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110503212900114507" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110503212900114507" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/ubG8ClASflQ/search-looks-at-big-picture.html" title="Search Looks at the Big Picture" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/search-looks-at-big-picture.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110495506805226045</id><published>2005-01-05T19:45:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-05T20:36:42.376Z</updated><title type="text">Mobile players look beyond 3G</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;Twenty-six of the biggest players in the mobile phone industry have signed an accord that could lead to newer, faster wireless technology. The companies behind the initiative include Vodafone, NTT DoCoMo, NEC, Siemens, Alcatel and about 20 others. The aim of the consortium is to develop a new standard for the transmission of data over mobile networks - a standard that will be up to 10 times faster than 3G (UMTS), which is still in its infancy.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The as-yet-undeveloped standard is to be called "Super 3G", according to early media reports, which also say that development of the technology could conclude by 2007, with commercial launches after 2009. It is thought that the new standard could allow for services not available over 3G, including continuous video broadcasting and full movie downloads.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Read full storry at: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/05/super_3g/"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/05/super_3g/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FB:&lt;/strong&gt; With mobile companies paying billions of pounds for 3G licenses and not getting exactly what they had expected; so I guess this means they would have to join hands to make sure that in order to beat competition they would have to join hands when it comes to standards. We have already seen with 3G especially in the UK market only '&lt;a href="http://www.three.co.uk/"&gt;3&lt;/a&gt;' is getting open acceptance with the consumers, not because of the services or any added facilities but only because of the prices plans on offer, while 3’s main rival in the UK market 'Vodafone' is targeting the high end of the market with the premium content. I cannot comment on &lt;a href="http://www.vodafone.co.uk/cgi-bin/COUK/portal/ep/browse.do?channelPath=%2FVodafone+Portal%2FVodafone+live!%2F3G+Experience+it"&gt;Vodafone’s ‘3G live’&lt;/a&gt; since the service was only launched about a month back, lets see what sort of feedback it gets. There are news that '&lt;a href="http://www.orange.co.uk/"&gt;Orange&lt;/a&gt;' and '&lt;a href="http://www.t-mobile.co.uk/"&gt;T Mobile&lt;/a&gt;' are also about to launch there 3G services, will this mean a war of pricing with '3' already offering plans as low as £5 per month. Go consumers!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110495506805226045?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/01/05/super_3g/" title="Mobile players look beyond 3G" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110495506805226045/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110495506805226045" title="2 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110495506805226045" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110495506805226045" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/Ci8PIuqFK-U/mobile-players-look-beyond-3g.html" title="Mobile players look beyond 3G" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>2</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/mobile-players-look-beyond-3g.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110476425583559942</id><published>2005-01-03T14:45:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-03T15:11:51.863Z</updated><title type="text">Blog Readership Surged 58 Percent in 2004</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;If 2004 was, among other things, the Year of the Blog, that development occurred in terra incognita for most online Americans, according to a new report from the &lt;a href="http://www.pewinternet.org/" target="_blank"&gt;Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Pew found blog readership increased sharply, up 58 percent, between February and November 2004. This, despite the fact 62 percent of adult American Internet users still have no clear idea what a blog actually is. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;"The story is, blogs are catching on," said Lee Rainie, director of the Pew Internet &amp; Amercian Life Project, "Not just on the creator side, but also on the demand side. Blog readership took off in 2004." &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div align="left"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Read full story at: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/traffic_patterns/article.php/3453431"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/traffic_patterns/article.php/3453431&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;FB: &lt;strong&gt;Blogging&lt;/strong&gt; one of the major online phenomenas of the internet and adding a democratic dimension by a being the mouth piece to the millions of people online. Blogging has added a personal touch to the internet which previously only had business concerns vying for a place in the league but now as internet becomes a vital part of everyday life people are beginning to adopt it; thus now you can read personal view points of the online population which was absent before, thus adding a more human dimension to the internet.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;p.s I had to add the word '&lt;strong&gt;Blogging&lt;/strong&gt;' to my MS Word doctionary&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110476425583559942?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="related" href="http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/traffic_patterns/article.php/3453431" title="Blog Readership Surged 58 Percent in 2004" /><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110476425583559942/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110476425583559942" title="43 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110476425583559942" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110476425583559942" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/DaltqRkwK5A/blog-readership-surged-58-percent-in.html" title="Blog Readership Surged 58 Percent in 2004" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>43</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/blog-readership-surged-58-percent-in.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110460053456007847</id><published>2005-01-01T17:12:00.000Z</published><updated>2005-01-14T01:03:32.890Z</updated><title type="text">Microsoft ends Passport push</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;Microsoft is abandoning one of its most contentious attempts to dominate the internet &lt;img src="http://www.passportimages.com/1033/PassportLogo140x44.gif" align="right" /&gt; after rivalimg technology companies banded together in opposition and consumers failed to embrace it. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The world's biggest software company said it would stop trying to persuade websites to use its Passport service, which stores consumers' credit card and other information as they surf from place to place. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;Read full story at: &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/d7a8f600-5ad0-11d9-aa6e-00000e2511c8.html"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;http://news.ft.com/cms/s/d7a8f600-5ad0-11d9-aa6e-00000e2511c8.html&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;span style="font-size:78%;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;FB:&lt;/strong&gt; One of the very few times MS has to step back; that too from one of its toughest and contentious attempts to dominate the internet security market. I found using 'passport' rather weird, one of the main reasons being if this system went down that meant that everything goes down, although a single password for all access sounds enticing but when you take in to account the risk involved, I would rather prefer to have a couple of passwords and not share my info with all companies involved, only provide info which is relevant, why provide something which is not required by the web giants.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110460053456007847?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110460053456007847/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110460053456007847" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110460053456007847" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110460053456007847" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/TfFThVmLO0U/microsoft-ends-passport-push.html" title="Microsoft ends Passport push" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2005/01/microsoft-ends-passport-push.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110435226258485193</id><published>2004-12-29T21:26:00.000Z</published><updated>2004-12-29T20:31:02.583Z</updated><title type="text">Oracle takes control of PeopleSoft</title><content type="html">&lt;div align="justify"&gt;DECEMBER 29, 2004 &lt;a href="http://www.idg.net/" target="NEW"&gt;(IDG NEWS SERVICE)&lt;/a&gt; - Oracle Corp. has taken over control of PeopleSoft Inc. by buying 75% of the PeopleSoft's outstanding shares from its stockholders, Oracle announced today.
&lt;br /&gt;Oracle has appointed four members to the PeopleSoft board to replace members who resigned after the board agreed on Dec. 13 to sell the company to Oracle for $10.3 billion. The move gives Oracle majority control of the PeopleSoft board; two previous PeopleSoft board members will remain until the merger is completed.
&lt;br /&gt;The Oracle announcement comes a day after news broke that PeopleSoft CEO David Duffield resigned on Dec. 21 &lt;a href="http://www.computerworld.com/managementtopics/management/story/0,10801,98585,00.html"&gt;(see story)&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;br /&gt;With today's announcement, an 18-month struggle, during which PeopleSoft repeatedly turned down Oracle's offers, has effectively ended.
&lt;br /&gt;Despite gaining control of three quarters of the outstanding stock, Oracle didn't reach its goal of acquiring 90% of PeopleSoft stock. After Oracle's first tender offer expired yesterday, the company announced a second tender offer that expires Jan. 4. Stockholders who tender shares during the second offer will be paid the same $26.50 per share paid during the initial offering period.
&lt;br /&gt;If Oracle gains control of 90% of PeopleSoft shares, it expects to complete the merger shortly after the second offering period, the company said in a press release. "We're very confident we'll get the 90%," said Bob Wynne, an Oracle spokesman.
&lt;br /&gt;If Oracle should fail to acquire 90% of PeopleSoft's stock, the merger would require a vote of the shareholders, with Oracle already controlling a majority. That vote could delay the merger four to six weeks. &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt; &lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div align="justify"&gt;&lt;em&gt;FB: Peoplesoft eaten up by a bigger fish!&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110435226258485193?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110435226258485193/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110435226258485193" title="6 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110435226258485193" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110435226258485193" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/kHA6rE-zP7o/oracle-takes-control-of-peoplesoft.html" title="Oracle takes control of PeopleSoft" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>6</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2004/12/oracle-takes-control-of-peoplesoft.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110433972230286481</id><published>2004-12-29T17:02:00.000Z</published><updated>2004-12-29T17:04:08.623Z</updated><title type="text">The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami</title><content type="html">&lt;a href="http://tsunamihelp.blogspot.com/"&gt;The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Please visit the SEA-EAT blog for short, News and information about resources, aid, donations and volunteer efforts.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110433972230286481?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110433972230286481/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110433972230286481" title="1 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110433972230286481" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110433972230286481" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/mVUaBikn6Fk/south-east-asia-earthquake-and-tsunami.html" title="The South-East Asia Earthquake and Tsunami" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>1</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2004/12/south-east-asia-earthquake-and-tsunami.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9837892.post-110433521376913640</id><published>2004-12-29T15:45:00.000Z</published><updated>2004-12-29T20:21:11.980Z</updated><title type="text">Blogging!</title><content type="html">I am a blogger from today, lets see how long I can stick to this.
&lt;br /&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/9837892-110433521376913640?l=fahadburney.blogspot.com' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/feeds/110433521376913640/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9837892&amp;postID=110433521376913640" title="3 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110433521376913640" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9837892/posts/default/110433521376913640" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/VaryingThoughts-FahadBurney/~3/_YXIlUQshhs/blogging.html" title="Blogging!" /><author><name>Fahad</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/11056210765416700132</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="16" height="16" src="http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif" /></author><thr:total>3</thr:total><feedburner:origLink>http://fahadburney.blogspot.com/2004/12/blogging.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

