<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Jeff Richards&apos; Demand Insights</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6</id>
    <link rel="service.post" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6" title="Jeff Richards' Demand Insights" />
    <updated>2008-03-13T22:09:34Z</updated>
    <subtitle>New technologies and next-generation content services.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type 4.2-en</generator>
 

<entry>
    <title>Will the Widget Guy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/03/will_the_widget_guy.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=812" title="Will the Widget Guy" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.812</id>
    
    <published>2008-03-14T00:04:41Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-13T22:09:34Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Will Price, a friend and fellow fly fisherman, announced today that he&apos;s leaving Hummer Winblad to be CEO of WidgetBox, a venture-funded (by Hummer) startup to be the company&apos;s new CEO. Will was an operating guy before he was a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Venture/Startups" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/will-price">Will Price</a>, a friend and fellow fly fisherman, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/13/hummer-winblad-partner-will-price-resigns-to-head-widgetbox/">announced today that he's leaving Hummer Winblad</a> to be CEO of <a href="http://www.widgetbox.com/">WidgetBox</a>, a venture-funded (by Hummer) startup to be the company's new CEO.  Will was an operating guy before he was a vc, so this shouldn't shock anyone.  It is, however, a pretty cool move and a pretty cool company.  And, for those of you who don't know what a widget is (Dad), read <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/13/hummer-winblad-partner-will-price-resigns-to-head-widgetbox/">Will's letter on why he made the move on TechCrunch</a>.  Best of luck, Will!</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Upcoming Event: TV of Tomorrow 2008</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/upcoming_event_tv_of_tomorrow.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=771" title="Upcoming Event: TV of Tomorrow 2008" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.771</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-27T17:30:15Z</published>
    <updated>2008-03-03T23:36:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Tracy Swedlow and the folks at InteractiveTV always put on a terrific event, and I&apos;ll be speaking on a panel at this year&apos;s TV of Tomorrow show on March 11th @ 11:30 am (San Francisco, Yerba Buena Center). The...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="itvt.gif" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/itvt.gif" width="159" height="88" /></p>

<p>Tracy Swedlow and the folks at<a href="http://www.itvt.com/"> InteractiveTV</a> always put on a terrific event, and I'll be speaking on a panel at this year's <a href="http://www.itvt.com/tvoftomorrow/">TV of Tomorrow show</a> on March 11th @ 11:30 am (San Francisco, Yerba Buena Center).  The topic of our panel is "New Developments in Broadband Video: Can the Internet Keep Up?"  It is sure to be a lively discussion - my co-panelists are from <a href="http://www.bittorrent.com/">BitTorrent</a>, <a href="http://www.level3.com/">Level3</a>, <a href="http://www.brightcove.com/">Brightcove</a>, <a href="http://www.technicolor.com/Cultures/En-Us/Home/">Thompson</a>, <a href="http://www.narrowstep.com/">Narrowstep</a> and <a href="http://tandbergtv.com/">Tandberg</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Article Worth Reading on Wired Today</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/article_worth_reading_on_wired.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=765" title="Article Worth Reading on Wired Today" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.765</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-26T00:13:19Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-26T00:28:52Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Chris Anderson&apos;s (also wrote The Long Tail) got a great article posted on Wired today called &quot;Free! Why $0.00 is the Future of Business.&quot; Think about it - Google is one of the most profitable companies of our time, is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Chris Anderson's (also wrote <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Long-Tail-Future-Business-Selling/dp/1401302378/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1203985528&sr=8-1">The Long Tail</a>) got a great article posted on Wired today called <a href="http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free?currentPage=all">"Free!  Why $0.00 is the Future of Business."</a>  Think about it - Google is one of the most profitable companies of our time, is used every day by everyone you know, yet you'll never see a charge on your credit card bill that says "Google."  </p>

<p><a href="http://www.wired.com/print/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free">Head over to Wired and read the article.</a>  It'll make you think.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>P2P and Network Management: DCIA P4P Comment to FCC</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/p2p_and_network_management_dci.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=748" title="P2P and Network Management: DCIA P4P Comment to FCC" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.748</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-13T21:28:34Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-14T18:28:16Z</updated>
    
    <summary>VeriSign/Kontiki and other market leaders (including Verizon, Pando and others) in the P2P technology and ISP worlds are involved in a DCIA (Distributed Computing Industry Association) working group called P4P. With support and commentary from many involved in this group,...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>VeriSign/Kontiki and other market leaders (including Verizon, Pando and others) in the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-to-peer">P2P technology</a> and ISP worlds are involved in a <a href="http://www.dcia.info/index.php">DCIA</a> (Distributed Computing Industry Association) working group called <a href="http://www.dcia.info/documents/P4PWG_Mission_Statement.pdf">P4P</a>.  With support and commentary from many involved in this group, the DCIA today sent a letter to the <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/">FCC</a> with formal content on potential legislation (see my previous posts on Net Neutrality) surrounding network management guidelines for broadband operators.  With <a href="http://www.dcia.info/about/resources.php#CHIEF_EXECUTIVE">Marty Lafferty's</a> permission (Marty is the CEO of DCIA), I've pasted a copy of the letter into the extended portion of this blog entry.  To read the letter, skip below the jump.</p>

<p>The DCIA P4P perspective is notable because it represents the interests of technology providers, P2P providers, and ISP's.  It's stated mission, which appears below, is to work with each of these interest groups to deliver the best ultimate experience for end user consumers.  </p>

<p>2/14/08 ADDITION: <a href="http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/retrieve.cgi?native_or_pdf=pdf&id_document=6519841058">Click here to go to the letter as posted on the FCC web site</a></p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The DCIA P4P Mission Statement:</p>

<blockquote>"To work jointly and cooperatively with leading Internet service providers (ISPs), peer-to-peer (P2P) software distributors, and technology researchers to ascertain appropriate and voluntary best practices for the use of "P4P*" mechanisms to accelerate distribution of content and optimize utilization of ISP network resources in order to provide the best possible performance to end-user customers."</blockquote>

<p>The letter sent to the FCC on February 13th, 2008:</p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_1v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_1v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_2v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_2v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_3v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_3v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_4v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_4v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_5v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_5v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_6v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_6v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_7v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_7v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_8v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_8v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>

<p><img alt="2-13 DCIA FCC Comment_Page_9v2.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/2-13%20DCIA%20FCC%20Comment_Page_9v2.jpg" width="367" height="475" /></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Net Neutrality is (Officially) a Hot Topic Again</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/net_neutrality_is_a_hot_topic.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=747" title="Net Neutrality is (Officially) a Hot Topic Again" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.747</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-13T17:58:01Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-13T19:50:13Z</updated>
    
    <summary>As readers of this blog know, I have been saying for some time that Net Neutrality would be one of the hottest topics of 2008. Well, it&apos;s officially taken center stage again with a flurry of coverage this week (go...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>As readers of this blog know, <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/10/the_hottest_internet_video_top.php">I have been saying for some time</a> that Net Neutrality would be one of the hottest topics of 2008.  Well, it's officially taken center stage again with a flurry of coverage this week (go to <a href="http://news.google.com/nwshp?ned=us">Google News</a> and type in "net neutrality").  Yesterday, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080213/ap_on_hi_te/comcast_data_discrimination">representatives of Comcast appeared before the FCC</a> to discuss the company's practices around network management.  Today, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/12/AR2008021202778.html?hpid=moreheadlines">Washington Post reports</a> Representative Ed Markey (D-Mass.) is expected to introduce a bill calling for an Internet policy that would prohibit network operators from unreasonably interfering with consumers' right to access and use content over broadband networks (he must not be at the <a href="http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20080213&content_id=2371946&vkey=news_mlb&fext=.jsp&c_id=mlb">Roger Clemens Circus</a>).  This is a corporate blog, and thus my position is officially neutral on this subject (<a href="http://www.videonuze.com/blogs/details.php?id=250">as noted by Will Richmond back in November</a>) - but it is a topic I believe is worth following, even for the average consumer, for two primary reasons:</p>

<p>1) The ongoing dialogue, and any legislation tied to this subject, will have an impact on the ability of carriers, cable providers, Internet and media companies to compete for your dollars and mindshare, especially as it relates to rich media (music, video, movies, etc.).</p>

<p>2) The outcome will have a significant impact on what the Internet looks like in 5-10 years time.  As the Internet becomes more important to your daily life, you should care about this.  Kind of simple statement, but it's a pretty basic concept.</p>

<p>For more on Net Neutrality, here are a few links (and different perspectives):</p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_neutrality">Wikipedia</a><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/help/netneutrality.html">Google</a><br />
<a href="http://www.videonuze.com/blogs/details.php?id=250">Will Richmond at VideoNuze</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Digital Media - The $ Continue to Flow (For Good Reason)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/digital_media_the_continue_to.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=746" title="Digital Media - The $ Continue to Flow (For Good Reason)" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.746</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-12T19:28:11Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-12T19:55:41Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Today&apos;s confirmation by Yahoo of its planned $160M acquisition of Maven continues what has been a banner 12-18 month period for digital / Internet media companies. Although the day to day battles in the trenches are brutally competitive (talk to...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today's <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/02/12/yahoo-confirms-maven-acquisition/">confirmation by Yahoo of its planned $160M acquisition of Maven</a> continues what has been a banner 12-18 month period for digital / Internet media companies.  Although the day to day battles in the trenches are brutally competitive (talk to anyone who's running a digital media startup), the classic Silicon Valley innovation cycle (entrepreneurs found startups, startups rapidly out-innovate big ones to take advantage of new opportunities, small companies get acquired by big ones, founders repeat process) and the <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/09/12_million_us_households_are_p.php">broader macro trends towards digital media distribution</a> via the Internet and mobile devices will continue to drive a huge amount of investment and M&A activity for years to come.  In addition to the <a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/02/12/yahoo-confirms-maven-acquisition/">note on Maven</a>, three relevant data points which provide context to this point:</p>

<p><a href="http://newsroom.parksassociates.com/article_display.cfm?article_id=5007&">Parks Associates new forecast for "new media" advertising is $12.2B by 2012</a></p>

<p><a href="http://alwayson.goingon.com/homepage">AlwaysOn</a> takes a look back at <a href="http://alwayson.goingon.com/permalink/post/23721">2007 financings, sales and M&A activity among the OnMedia 100</a></p>

<p>Media and Information Investment Bank <a href="http://www.jegi.com/">The Jordan Edmiston Group</a> has a great <a href="http://www.jegi.com/files/docs/Outsell%20Presentation%2011.07.07%20FINAL%20PRINTv3.pdf">presentation available on the firm's website which outlines "M&A Outlook and Valuations"</a> in the new media sector<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CDN Market Math</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/cdn_market_math.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=733" title="CDN Market Math" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.733</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-01T16:19:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-01T16:27:15Z</updated>
    
    <summary>I&apos;m often asked &quot;is market pricing for CDN services going down faster than distribution rates are going up?&quot; It&apos;s a good question, and while prices for basic content delivery have been going down, encode rates and volume are going up...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I'm often asked "is market pricing for CDN services going down faster than distribution rates are going up?"  It's a good question, and while prices for basic content delivery have been going down, encode rates and <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/01/new_stats_on_online_video_grow.php">volume are going up </a>(significantly).  In other words <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/09/12_million_us_households_are_p.php">more people are watching more high quality video online</a>.  <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/02/content-owners.html">Dan Rayburn has a very good post on his BusinessofVideo.com blog today on this topic</a>, along with the basic math required to answer this question.  <a href="http://blog.streamingmedia.com/the_business_of_online_vi/2008/02/content-owners.html">Click here</a> to go to his post.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Recently Read: Rigged</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/02/recently_read_rigged.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=721" title="Recently Read: Rigged" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.721</id>
    
    <published>2008-02-01T14:35:25Z</published>
    <updated>2008-02-01T15:29:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Ben Mezrich&apos;s book Rigged is a fast, moderately entertaining read from the same author who wrote Bringing Down the House - the story of the MIT Blackjack team (a great read). This is my second attempt to read a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Books" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="rigged.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/rigged.jpg" width="85" height="128" /></p>

<p>Ben Mezrich's book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Rigged-Story-League-Changed-Street/dp/0061252727/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201196108&sr=1-1">Rigged </a>is a fast, moderately entertaining read from the same author who wrote <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Bringing-Down-House-Students-Millions/dp/B00015PPM2/ref=pd_bbs_sr_3?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201196200&sr=1-3">Bringing Down the House</a> - the story of the MIT Blackjack team (a great read).  This is my second attempt to read a Mezrich book and get the same entertainment value I got out of House (the other was <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/04/recently_read_busting_vega.php">Busting Vegas</a>).   Unfortunately, neither Rigged nor Busting Vegas were as good as House.  In short - read Bringing Down the House again and skip Rigged.  For more, see below.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Rigged is the story of a young guy out of Harvard who gets a job working at the Merc Exchange, the Manhattan-based oil exchange.  To summarize the next 42 chapters, the main character then struggles with his new role, tries to maintain his relationship with his girlfriend while working long hours, partners with royalty in Dubai to set up an oil exchange in the booming country, and avoids getting beaten up by people who don't want to see the Dubai exchange succeed.  There you go - I've saved you 288 pages of reading.</p>

<p>It's a light, entertaining read.  I picked it up in an airport, where I seem to be a sucker, for light, entertaining reads.  This didn't feel like a total waste of time, but I'd go read Bringing Down the House again before I'd recommend Rigged.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>New Stats on Online Video Growth</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/01/new_stats_on_online_video_grow.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=724" title="New Stats on Online Video Growth" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.724</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-24T22:36:57Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-24T22:42:40Z</updated>
    
    <summary>One of the blogs I visit frequently is NewTeeVee. Liz Gannes put up a post on the site last week called &quot;Need to Know Video Stats.&quot; If you&apos;re tracking the growth of key sites and video online overall, see here...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>One of the blogs I visit frequently is <a href="http://newteevee.com/">NewTeeVee</a>.  Liz Gannes put up a<a href="http://newteevee.com/2008/01/17/need-to-know-web-video-stats-traffic-rentals-revenues-ugc/"> post on the site last week called "Need to Know Video Stats."</a>  If you're tracking the growth of key sites and video online overall, see here post for the latest data from ComScore, etc.  To summarize, they are all going up and to the right.  <blockquote>138 million Americans watched 9.5 billion videos online in November '07 (31% of them on Google sites like YouTube).</blockquote></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>iPlayer Update</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/01/iplayer_update.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=715" title="iPlayer Update" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.715</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-22T18:40:49Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-23T15:52:18Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Given Kontiki&apos;s role in digital media, and our role as the download platform for BBC&apos;s iPlayer, I&apos;m frequently asked &quot;how&apos;s it going?&quot; The short answer: very well. Ashley Highfield, Director Future Media and Technology at the BBC, put up...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="porridge_iplayer.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/porridge_iplayer.jpg" width="175" height="181" /></p>

<p>Given Kontiki's role in digital media, and our role as the<a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/07/bbc_iplayer_goes_live.php"> download platform for BBC's iPlayer</a>, I'm frequently asked "how's it going?"  The short answer: very well.  <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/biographies/biogs/executives/ashleyhighfield.shtml">Ashley Highfield</a>, Director Future Media and Technology at the BBC, put up a blog post last week called <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2008/01/iplayer_launch_first_indicatio.html">"iPlayer Launch: First Indications"</a> that provides some insight into the success of the iPlayer since it moved from beta to official launch on Christmas day.  To quote Highfield:</p>

<blockquote>"Demand for long-form video content over the web may be much higher than iTunes has witnessed before; It's too early to say, but I think we may be at the start of rewriting the rule book."</blockquote>

<p>For more on this topic, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/jan/03/bbc.television">see another good article on iPlayer by the Guardian's Mark Lawson from January 3rd.</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Recently Read: The Last Tycoons</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/01/recently_read_the_last_tycoons.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=720" title="Recently Read: The Last Tycoons" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.720</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-18T17:15:27Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-24T17:34:46Z</updated>
    
    <summary> The title of this post is a bit of a misnomer - I never actually finished The Last Tycoons by William Cohen. The author&apos;s 750 page account of the history of investment bank Lazard Freres is a reasonably good...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Books" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="lazard.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/lazard.jpg" width="84" height="128" /></p>

<p>The title of this post is a bit of a misnomer - I never actually finished <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Last-Tycoons-Secret-History-Lazard/dp/0385514514/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201194708&sr=1-1">The Last Tycoons by William Cohen</a>.  The author's 750 page account of the history of investment bank <a href="http://www.lazard.com/">Lazard Freres</a> is a reasonably good read - but no human should be forced to read 750 pages about an investment bank.  As a friend who works at Lazard put it to me: "Why would anyone want to read a 700 page book on Lazard?"  Putting that basic question aside, it is an interesting read - if you've got the time to work through 750 pages.  For more comments, see below.  </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed the early parts of the book, which focus on the early founding families of the bank, their struggles to keep it afloat, escape from Paris during Hitler's reign, and other interesting historical elements.  However, the last 75% of the book focuses primarily on Felix Rohatyn and the internal politics of the firm (battles with Wasserstein, etc.).  Interesting stories and an incredible level of detail (the author uses actual emails to walk through some accounts), but there's a bit too much rumor and gossip for my taste.  </p>

<p>If you want to read a more interesting (shorter) book with tales of Wall Street, read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Goldman-Sachs-Culture-Lisa-Endlich/dp/0684869683/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201195155&sr=1-1">Goldman Sachs</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Accidental-Investment-Banker-Inside-Transformed/dp/0812978048/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201195314&sr=1-1">The Accidental Investment Banker</a>, or some of the classics like <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Liars-Poker-Rising-Through-Wreckage/dp/0140143459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201195992&sr=8-1">Liars Poker</a> or <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Den-Thieves-James-B-Stewart/dp/067179227X/ref=pd_bbs_5?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1201195992&sr=8-5">Den of Thieves</a>.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Favorite New Toys</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2008/01/favorite_new_technology_toys.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=713" title="Favorite New Toys" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2008:/demandinsights//6.713</id>
    
    <published>2008-01-14T16:54:09Z</published>
    <updated>2008-01-14T17:44:49Z</updated>
    
    <summary> Coming out of the Holidays, I&apos;ve got two new favorite toys. They&apos;re new to my arsenal, but not new on the market (in both cases, I&apos;m not exactly an early adopter). #1 is a Toyota Prius, and #2 is...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Random" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="Jawbone.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/Jawbone.jpg" width="183" height="128" /></p>

<p>Coming out of the Holidays, I've got two new favorite toys.  They're new to my arsenal, but not new on the market (in both cases, I'm not exactly an early adopter).  #1 is a Toyota Prius, and #2 is my new Jawbone bluetooth headset.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="Prius.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/Prius.jpg" width="205" height="102" /></p>

<p>The first: a <a href="http://www.toyota.com/prius/">Toyota Prius</a>.  I bought mine to start <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Prius">saving on gas, as well as to start driving in the carpool lane</a>.  For California residents who don't know, if you have a Prius (or other certified hybrid or electric vehicle), and you applied for and received the special stickers before they ran out (in early '07), you can drive in the carpool lane with only one passenger.  California's effort to reduce gas consumption has done two things: 1) drive up sales of the cars in CA (estimates I saw peg about 50% of US Prius sales to California buyers), and 2) drive up the price of pre-owned cars that have the stickers (mine is an '04 with about 50K miles on it, and I paid about what it costs to buy a brand new one - without the stickers).  Even at a premium price, getting 45 MPG and driving in the carpool lane are worth it - and it's actually entertaining to watch the little meter that tells you how much energy is being recycled through the battery.</p>

<p><img alt="Jawbone.jpg" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/Jawbone.jpg" width="183" height="128" /></p>

<p>The second is my new <a href="http://www.jawbone.com/">Jawbone</a> bluetooth headset from Aliph.  Santa brought them for my wife and myself for Christmas.  I've used a million headsets over time, and never been happy with any of them - too much background noise, and the person on the other end can always tell I'm on a headset.  The Jawbone uses a set of <a href="http://www.jawbone.com/technology.php">new technologies</a> to both enhance the sound quality and virtually eliminate background noise.  Even if you don't buy one, you have to <a href="http://www.jawbone.com/demo.php">check out the demo video on the Jawbone site</a> - a guy using a Jawbone while standing next to a leaf blower - with near-pristine sound quality.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>In Today&apos;s WSJ: Marrying the TV and Internet</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/12/in_todays_wsj_marrying_the_tv.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=681" title="In Today's WSJ: Marrying the TV and Internet" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2007:/demandinsights//6.681</id>
    
    <published>2007-12-11T16:19:57Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-11T16:37:24Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Interesting article today in the WSJ by Nick Wingfield on the blurring line between Internet and TV. He breaks down what he sees as the five primary barriers to consumers merging their Internet connections and their tv&apos;s to - voila!...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119706406734417529.html">Interesting article today in the WSJ by Nick Wingfield</a> on the blurring line between Internet and TV.  He breaks down what he sees as the five primary barriers to consumers merging their Internet connections and their tv's to - voila! - watch video from the Internet on their tv.  It's worth <a href="http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB119706406734417529.html">reading the article</a>, but I am curious why he uses a data point (see graphic in middle of print article) from Forrester Research dated 3Q of 2006 (80% of consumers aren't interested in Internet video on their tv) - it sure seems like video on the Net has come a long way over the last year, and all of the most recent statistics and surveys point to rapidly rising demand (see <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/09/12_million_us_households_are_p.php">my post on the Parks Associates report in September</a>). </p>

<p>I'd agree with a lot of Nick's points, but I think the groundswell of demand is perhaps higher than you might take away from the article.  One data point from the article - <a href="http://www.nbc.com/">NBC</a> alone streamed more than 50 million shows from its web site in October.</p>

<p>At the end of the day, a significant percentage of consumers just don't - and won't - move quickly on new technologies.  Witness the adoption of DVR's.  I don't know anyone who doesn't have one, but I live in the Bay Area, and <a href="http://www.bizofshowbiz.com/2007/04/neilsen_releases_first_officia.html">DVR penetration across the US still stands at around 17%</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Recap from NewTeeVee and Dinner with a Ninja</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/11/recap_from_newteevee_and_dinne.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=651" title="Recap from NewTeeVee and Dinner with a Ninja" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2007:/demandinsights//6.651</id>
    
    <published>2007-11-16T15:58:37Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-16T16:52:44Z</updated>
    
    <summary> On Wednesday I was at the NewTeeVee event in San Francisco. I have to say it was one of the better digital media conferences of the year. I can&apos;t really pinpoint why (it still seemed to focus on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p><img alt="NTV.png" src="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/images/NTV.png" width="312" height="78" /></p>

<p>On Wednesday I was at the <a href="http://live.newteevee.com/">NewTeeVee event</a> in San Francisco.  I have to say it was one of the better digital media conferences of the year.  I can't really pinpoint why (it still seemed to focus on the same subjects we've heard at conferences throughout the year: a) "advertising will be big," b) "social networking is really important for video," c) "consumers want HD, and d) "let's hear from YouTube or MySpace..."), but quite a few people I talked to thought it was a great event.  </p>

<p>For two anecdotes from the event, click to the rest of the post.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>I had a lot of fun on Wednesday night at a dinner hosted by <a href="http://gigaom.com/author/om/">Om Malik</a> and <a href="http://www.accenture.com/home/default.htm">Accenture</a>.  I randomly sat next to Mark Trout of Accenture (Mark runs the West Coast Tech practice) and <a href="http://askaninja.com/faq">Kent Nichols</a> of <a href="http://www.askaninja.com/">AskANinja.com</a>.  You couldn't get two more opposite ends of the spectrum - Accenture is a $20B global corporation, while AskANinja is "two guys and a ninja."</p>

<p>I do think what the Ninja guys are doing is pretty interesting, though, as we look forward for the future of digital media.  Kent and his partner created and run the site on a shoestring, but get more than 700,000 monthly visitors and are making real money (sounded like it was in the hundreds of thousands of $) through advertising.  There are weak shows on broadcast tv that don't reach those numbers.  <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/chi-1116internet_onlinenov16,1,5650264.story">I'm not the first to ponder this,</a> but with the writers' strike, don't you think more of the creative types in LA will look to the Internet as a low-cost way to distribute their ideas - and get paid directly, without studios and others taking a giant cut?  If nothing else, <a href="http://www.askaninja.com/">go to Kent's site</a> and watch a few videos - they're hilarious.</p>

<p>One of the more poignant insights at the conference was made by <a href="http://newteevee.com/2007/11/14/ntv-live-keynote-quincy-smith-cbs-interactive/">Quincy Smith</a> of CBS, who said "Old media executives have made more of an effort to learn new media than new media has bothered to learn old media."  There's some strong advice in there for technology vendors...</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Net Neutrality v2 on Will Richmond&apos;s Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/11/net_neutrality_v2_on_will_rich.php" />
    <link rel="service.edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.verisign.com/cgi/mt/mt-atom.cgi/weblog/blog_id=6/entry_id=644" title="Net Neutrality v2 on Will Richmond's Blog" />
    <id>tag:blogs.verisign.com,2007:/demandinsights//6.644</id>
    
    <published>2007-11-09T21:21:16Z</published>
    <updated>2007-11-09T21:33:22Z</updated>
    
    <summary>Today on Will Richmond&apos;s blog VideoNuze he goes into more depth on the Net Neutrality topic (see my previous post on October 19th) - will can take a much more aggressive stance - he&apos;s a journalist, I&apos;m not). Will&apos;s post...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Jeff Richards</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Digital Content" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Today on <a href="http://www.videonuze.com/blogs/details.php?id=250">Will Richmond's blog VideoNuze he goes into more depth on the Net Neutrality topic</a> (see my <a href="http://blogs.verisign.com/demandinsights/2007/10/the_hottest_internet_video_top.php">previous post on October 19th)</a> - will can take a much more aggressive stance - he's a journalist, I'm not).  Will's post came out of a long and involved dialogue we had on Wednesday night over a few drinks at our Kontiki User Conference in Atlanta.  As will points out, my OFFICIAL position is neutral on this subject, but I will point out that a few of the folks who posted comments on Will's blog make some good points :).</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed> 

