Vino cu o cola si un filtru...

Arde!

2010-06-09T10:14:00.002+03:00

Special

2010-05-08T04:07:00.000+03:00

La multi ani baby...

Video Bone Thugs N Harmony - Rebirth

2010-02-21T17:14:00.000+02:00

Bone Thugs'N'Harmony au lansat acum cateva zile video'ul la piesa Rebirth, primul single de pe noul album "Uni: 5 The World’s Enemy". Enjoy.

Google are buba la IQ

2010-02-07T20:46:00.001+02:00

Salut :)

Joaca de CopCHILL :)

2010-02-06T15:25:00.000+02:00

Magazine de vise, fise, fitze tzaca paca ce democratie ba?

2010-02-06T05:32:00.002+02:00

Da dragii mosului, blogul cu filtre si droguri are persoane care dezbat despre el. Un schimb destul de aprins de replici pe Zoss's blog (asa scrie pe tab'ul de Firefox :P).

Sunt amuzat la culme de comparatia pe care o face tovarasul cu blog intre DROGURI si fotbal. Dragul meu DROGURILE sunt un lucru rau. SPORTUL, este un lucru bun.

Mie imi place iarba. Eu sunt pentru legalizarea boschetului. Ce zici de o planta din care mamaie si stra'mamaie si stra'stra'mamaie faceau saci si tot felu de prostii? Ce zici de o planta din care se poate produce hartie? Ce zici de o planta care poate produce o cantitate de hartie la fel ca a unui copac, dar creste in cateva luni in loc de cateva zeci de ani? De ce trebuie sa fie ilegala treaba asta? Sa'ti spun eu...

A existat la un moment dat prin anii '30 un domn care se numea Harry J. Anslinger. Acest domn a condus o campanie anti marijuana si anti droguri(drugs) care creaza dependenta, asta din postura de membru important al Federal Bureau of Prohibition apoi ca lider al Federal Bureau of Narcotics. Ca arme impotriva plantei asteia, omul scria lucruri de genul:

"Not long ago the body of a young girl lay crushed on the sidewalk after a plunge from a Chicago apartment window. Everyone called it suicide, but actually it was murder. The killer was a narcotic known to America as marijuana, and to history as hashish.

Used in the form of cigarettes, it is comparatively new to the United States and as dangerous as a coiled rattlesnake. How many murders, suicides, and maniacal deeds it causes each year, especially among the young, can only be conjectured.

In numerous communities it thrives almost unmolested, largely because of official ignorance of its effects. Marijuana is the unknown quantity among narcotics. No one knows, when he smokes it, whether he will become a philosopher, a joyous reveler, a mad insensate, or a murderer.

The young girl's story is typical. She had heard the whisper which has gone the rounds of American youth about a new thrill, a cigarette with a "real kick" which gave wonderful reactions and no harmful after-effects.

With some friends she experimented at an evening smoking party. The results were weird. Some of the partiers went into paroxysms of laughter, others of mediocre musical ability became almost expert; the piano dinned constantly. Still others found themselves discussing weighty problems with remarkable clarity. The girl danced without fatigue throughout a night of inexplicable exhilaration.

Other parties followed, finally there came a gathering at a time when the girl was behind in her studies and greatly worried. Suddenly, as she was smoking, the thought of a solution to her school problems came. Without hesitancy she walked to a window and leaped to her death. Thus madly can marijuana "solve" one's difficulties.

It gives few warnings of what it intends to do to the human brain. Last year a young marijuana addict was hanged in Baltimore for criminal assault on a ten year old girl. In Chicago, two marijuana-smoking boys murdered a policeman.

In Florida, police found a youth staggering about in a human slaughterhouse. With an ax he had killed his father, mother, two brothers, and a sister. He had no recollection of having committed this multiple crime. Ordinarily a sane, rather quiet young man, he had become crazed from smoking marijuana.

In at least two dozen comparatively recent cases of murder or degenerate sex attacks, marijuana proved to be a contributing cause. In Ohio a gang of seven marijuana addicts, all less than 20, were caught after a series of 38 holdups. The boys' story was typical of conditions in many cities. One of them said they first learned about "reefers" in high school, buying the cigarettes at hamburger stands, and from peddlers who hung around the school. He told of "booth joints" where you could get a marijuana cigarette and a sandwich for a quarter, and of the shabby apartments of women who provided the cigarettes and rooms where boys and girls might smoke them together.

His recollection of the crimes he had committed was hazy. "When you get to floating", he explained, "it's hard to keep track of things. If I had killed somebody on one of those jobs, I'd never had known it. Sometimes it was over before I realized that I'd been out of my room."

It is the useless destruction of the youth which is so heartbreaking to all of us who labor in the field of narcotics suppression."

    Marijuana - Assassin of Youth
    by
    H. J. Anslinger
    U.S. Commissioner of Narcotics,
    (The American Magazine, July 1937)

Si Consiliul ONU a cazut de acord in ca trebuie trecuta in ilegalitate aceasta planta, folosita de cateva mii de ani, prin Conventia Unica ONU din 1961, adica...de curand :).

Pentru ca au fost cativa dementi care au emis chestii de genu Reefer Madness pe care vi'l recomand daca vreti sa va amuzati, chiar si cei mai "conservatori" dintre voi.

Eu nu sunt impotriva marijuana. Eu nu sunt nici pro marijuana. Eu spun doar ca mie imi place. Eu spun doar ca n'o sa ma arunc pe geam de la niste THC. Eu stiu ca nu este inregistrat nici un deces de pe urma consumului de marijuana. Eu stiu ca de la consumul de tutun mor multi baieti si fete in fiecare an. Eu stiu ca de la alcool mor multi baieti si fete in fiecare an. Eu stiu ca de la heroina mor destui baieti si fete in fiecare an. Eu cred ca marijuana nu este un drog mai mult decat un dublu cheese cu cartofi mari de la mac. Dar este numai punctul meu de vedere asupra problemei.

Dar dragul mosului, eu sunt impotriva unor lucruri care distrug societatea. Eu sunt impotriva unor substante care se vand la geam ca pe fornetti si care ii fac pe copii sa'si inghita creierii prin vreun WC de Colegiu National, ca e la moda. Ma omoara gandul ca peste cativa ani, exista posibilitatea(eu sper sa se trezeasca cineva sa intrezica imbecilitatea asta) ca fiul meu sa traga pe nas sau sa bage la vena Special Gold, sau Flower Magic Powder+. FLOWER MAGIC POWDER PLUS COAIE! CUM SA BAGI LA VENA ASA CEVA FUTUTI MORTII TEI DE COPIL CRETIN?!?!

Ce e cu Amoniac in Magic? Ce e cu Mephedrone in Special Gold? Cat de prost sa fii sa sustii ca treaba asta e bine si e democratic?

Vezi ca domnisoara cu http://blogpunct.blogspot.com nu a spus niciodata anti drog. A fost intotdeauna anti Spice si anti legal dream shop smoke shop pulamea shop.

O sa inchei cu un citat...." Astia suntem noi, ROMANII… lasati-ne sa traim…" Te'as lasa sa traiesti putin pe la dezintoxicare sa vezi ce se intampla pe'acolo si cam ce democratie vrei tu.

Si te rog io, vezi'ti de treaba ta, nu mai compara heroina cu marijuana si cu fotbalul si cu toate prostiile. Si schimba numele la blog ca esti slab. Incearca o modificare usoara a blogului lui...mircea badea spre exemplu. Macar sa radem :).

Somn usor, vise placute.

...Si imi promisesem la inceput ca nu o sa ma iau de blogul lui :(

Lansare B.R.G.

2010-01-29T21:42:00.001+02:00

Mare lansare mare!! B52, 21 februarie 2010.
Invitati: Vlad Dobrescu
Grigo
            Nosfi
Undoo
K-Gula
Dox
Ceilalti
            DJ Limun
            Carbon
            Coae
            Clever
            Blaziny
            Junky
            Al-X Ardelean
            Toata brigada 1Mai Caraiman

Ne vedem acolo. veniti cu rola ca o sa fie nevoie :)

Opreste-te!

2010-01-29T20:57:00.000+02:00

Te-ai gandit vreo-data sa te opresti? Da! Exact! Sa pui pauza la tot ce se intampla pe langa tine.
Te-ai gandit vreo-data sa pui pauza pur si simplu?
Sa ti-o arzi la modu':
"Buna bai!! Sunt eu asta din capu' tau!
Da! Te-ai hotarat in sfarsit sa-mi auzi strigatu'?
Sunt aici, inchis in mintea ta, si tu pur si simplu ma ignori..
De ce faci asta? De ce te pierzi tot timpul in detalii?
De ce te lasi influentat de preconceptii, de dogme, de reguli absurde?
De ce-ti faci asta?
De ce preferi sa fii atat de marunt? Atat de mic? Atat de prost uneori?
De ce-ti faci asta singur?
De ce complici tot timpul lucrurile?
Hai! Nu fii idiot! Stii prea bine cat esti de idiot.. si totusi continui sa iti traiesti aceiasi viata de rahat..
Te complaci! Asta e tot..
Te-ai obisnuit sa fi asa, e mai simplu pentru tine..
Tu esti singurul tau dusman, prietene.Ai atata putere asupra ta incat nici nu poti sa-ti imaginezi, pentru ca esti mic..
Te-ai gandit vreodata sa incerci macar si pentru o secunda sa traiesti ACUM? Sau ai fost prea ocupat cu ce s-a intamplat ori ce urmeaza sa se intample.. cum ar fi daca? cum ar fi fost daca?
De ce-ti creezi singur un univers atat de mic?"
Tie ce-ti spune vocea din capul tau?

DubseP DubseT gen astea

2010-01-29T16:18:00.002+02:00

De curand am hotarat ca trebuie promovat un prieten foarte bun, care a inceput sa butoneze. O sa postez un cantecel la cateva zile. astept comments :)

Here goes:

Eu pot sa spun..

2010-01-25T13:00:00.000+02:00

Mi-am inceput ziua savurand cu cui la cafeaua de dimineata alaturi de instructorul auto.
Nu stiu cati pot sa faca asta, dar daca eu tot pot, de ce sa nu profit?
Ma scoate din starea de rutina si nu mai lasa stresul sa ma'ncurce.. E tare.
Oricum ma tine de vorba si nu ma lasa sa ma pierd in senzatii, ma face sa focalizez..
As face greseala sa ma intreb daca e bine.. de ce? de ce as face asta? probabil as intra in primul stalp..
ce este greseala? din perspectiva cui?
am scris "cui"!!
ma intreb cine ar putea sa-mi spuna asta..for real!
Pan'atunci vor mai curge multe filtre..

Proud to be a stoner :)

2010-01-20T16:20:00.000+02:00

Un cantecel care imi place mult :)

Alcohol Vs. Herb

2010-01-19T17:50:00.004+02:00

1. Marijuana is far less addictive than alcohol.

Dependence: How difficult it is for the user to quit, the relapse rate, the percentage of people who eventually become dependent, the rating users give their own need for the substance and the degree to which the substance will be used in the face of evidence that it causes harm.

Withdrawal: Presence and severity of characteristic withdrawal symptoms.

Tolerance: How much of the substance is needed to satisfy increasing cravings for it, and the level of stable need that is eventually reached.

Reinforcement: A measure of the substance's ability, in human and animal tests, to get users to take it again and again, and in preference to other substances.

Intoxication: Though not usually counted as a measure of addiction in itself, the level of intoxication is associated with addiction and increases the personal and social damage a substance may do.

Source: Jack E. Henningfield, PhD for NIDA, Reported by Philip J. Hilts, New York Times, Aug. 2, 1994 "Is Nicotine Addictive? It Depends on Whose Criteria You Use." See, http://drugwarfacts.org/addictiv.htm

2. Deaths from the two substances. There are hundreds of alcohol overdose deaths each year, yet there has never been a marijuana overdose death in history. The consumption of alcohol is also the direct cause of tens of thousands of deaths in the U.S. each year.

In 2001, there were 331 alcohol overdose deaths and 0 marijuana overdose deaths. Source: U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5337a2.htm

Excessive alcohol consumption is the third leading preventable cause of death in the United States (1) and is associated with multiple adverse health consequences, including liver cirrhosis, various cancers, unintentional injuries, and violence.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported 20,687 “alcohol-induced deaths” (excluding accidents and homicides) in 2003. Source: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/alcohol.htm

The CDC has no reports of “marijuana-induced deaths.” (In reality, there may be 2-5 deaths each year attributed to marijuana, but this article -- http://bbsnews.net/bw2005-02-01.html -- describes how these are actually deaths attributable to other causes but “blamed” on marijuana due to the way the data is collected.)

3. Alcohol is one of the most toxic drugs, and using just 10 times what one would use to get the desired effect can lead to death. Marijuana is one of – if not the – least toxic drugs, requiring thousands times the dose one would use to get the desired effect to lead to death. This “thousands times” is actually theoretical, since there has never been a recorded case of marijuana overdose.

The most toxic recreational drugs, such as GHB (gamma-hydroxybutyrate) and heroin, have a lethal dose less than 10 times their typical effective dose. The largest cluster of substances has a lethal dose that is 10 to 20 times the effective dose: These include cocaine, MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine, often called "ecstasy") and alcohol. A less toxic group of substances, requiring 20 to 80 times the effective dose to cause death, include Rohypnol (flunitrazepam or "roofies") and mescaline (peyote cactus). The least physiologically toxic substances, those requiring 100 to 1,000 times the effective dose to cause death, include psilocybin mushrooms and marijuana, when ingested. I've found no published cases in the English language that document deaths from smoked marijuana, so the actual lethal dose is a mystery. My surmise is that smoking marijuana is more risky than eating it but still safer than getting drunk.

Despite the health risks and social costs, consciousness-altering chemicals have been used for centuries in almost all cultures. So it would be unrealistic to expect that all types of recreational drug use will suddenly cease. Self-management of these substances is extremely difficult, yet modern Western societies have not, in general, developed positive, socially sanctioned rituals as a means of regulating the use of some of the less hazardous recreational drugs. I would argue that we need to do that.

Source: The American Scientist, the Magazine of Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society. http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/50773?&print=y

4. Long-term marijuana use is far less harmful than long-term alcohol use.

There is little evidence, however, that long-term cannabis use causes permanent cognitive impairment, nor is there is any clear cause and effect relationship to explain the psychosocial associations.

There are some physical health risks, particularly the possibility of damage to the airways in cannabis smokers. Overall, by comparison with other drugs used mainly for ‘recreational’ purposes, cannabis could be rated to be a relatively safe drug.

Source: Iversen, Leslie. Current Opinion in Pharmacology. Volume 5, Issue 1, February 2005, Pages 69-72. Long-term effects of exposure to cannabis. University of Oxford, Department of Pharmacology.

5. The United Kingdom's Science and Technology Select Committee considers alcohol far more harmful than marijuana.

The committee commissioned an assessment of 20 legal and illegal stimulants in order to bring some logic to the country’s drug classification. Based on this study, they made recommendations to the government, including a recommendation that alcohol be considered among the most harmful drugs. Cannabis was considered significantly less harmful. (See chart below.) As you can see in the chart below, cannabis was recently rescheduled in the UK and is now a Class C substance (with A being the most harmful).

Source: New Scientist Magazine. Issue 2563. August 2006, page 5. Drug-danger 'league table' revealed.

6. There has never been a documented case of lung cancer in a marijuana-only smoker, and recent studies find that marijuana use is not associated with any type of cancer. The same cannot be said for alcohol, which has been found to contribute to a variety of long-term negative health effects, including cancers and cirrhosis of the liver.

It could be interesting to note in the chart the difference between what people usually consider the most likely serious harms associated with marijuana and alcohol. While there has never been a documented case of lung cancer in a marijuana-only smoker, there are clearly thousands of deaths by liver disease directly associated with alcohol – 12,360 in 2003, to be exact. [See, http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/alcohol.htm . Note also on this page that “alcoholic liver disease” is a separate category from “alcohol-induced deaths, excluding accidents and homicides.” Thus the 20,687 cited in #2 (as “deaths from alcohol consumption” could easily be 33,047.]

Study Finds No Cancer-Marijuana Connection

By Marc Kaufman, Washington Post Staff Writer, Friday, May 26, 2006; Page A03

The largest study of its kind has unexpectedly concluded that smoking marijuana, even regularly and heavily, does not lead to lung cancer.

The new findings "were against our expectations," said Donald Tashkin of the University of California at Los Angeles, a pulmonologist who has studied marijuana for 30 years.

"We hypothesized that there would be a positive association between marijuana use and lung cancer, and that the association would be more positive with heavier use," he said. "What we found instead was no association at all, and even a suggestion of some protective effect."

Federal health and drug enforcement officials have widely used Tashkin's previous work on marijuana to make the case that the drug is dangerous. Tashkin said that while he still believes marijuana is potentially harmful, its cancer-causing effects appear to be of less concern than previously thought.

Earlier work established that marijuana does contain cancer-causing chemicals as potentially harmful as those in tobacco, he said. However, marijuana also contains the chemical THC, which he said may kill aging cells and keep them from becoming cancerous.

Tashkin's study, funded by the National Institutes of Health's National Institute on Drug Abuse, involved 1,200 people in Los Angeles who had lung, neck or head cancer and an additional 1,040 people without cancer matched by age, sex and neighborhood.

They were all asked about their lifetime use of marijuana, tobacco and alcohol. The heaviest marijuana smokers had lighted up more than 22,000 times, while moderately heavy usage was defined as smoking 11,000 to 22,000 marijuana cigarettes. Tashkin found that even the very heavy marijuana smokers showed no increased incidence of the three cancers studied.

"This is the largest case-control study ever done, and everyone had to fill out a very extensive questionnaire about marijuana use," he said. "Bias can creep into any research, but we controlled for as many confounding factors as we could, and so I believe these results have real meaning."

Tashkin's group at the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA had hypothesized that marijuana would raise the risk of cancer on the basis of earlier small human studies, lab studies of animals, and the fact that marijuana users inhale more deeply and generally hold smoke in their lungs longer than tobacco smokers -- exposing them to the dangerous chemicals for a longer time. In addition, Tashkin said, previous studies found that marijuana tar has 50 percent higher concentrations of chemicals linked to cancer than tobacco cigarette tar.

While no association between marijuana smoking and cancer was found, the study findings, presented to the American Thoracic Society International Conference this week, did find a 20-fold increase in lung cancer among people who smoked two or more packs of cigarettes a day.

The study was limited to people younger than 60 because those older than that were generally not exposed to marijuana in their youth, when it is most often tried.

Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729.html

7. Studies find alcohol use contributes to the likelihood of domestic violence and sexual assault and marijuana use does not.

Of the psychoactive substances examined, among individuals who were chronic partner abusers, the use of alcohol and cocaine was associated with significant increases in the daily likelihood of male-to-female physical aggression; cannabis and opiates were not significantly associated with an increased likelihood of male partner violence.

…the odds of any male-to-female physical aggression were more than 8 times (11 times) higher on days when men drank than on days of no alcohol consumption. The odds of severe male-to-female physical aggression were more than 11 times (11 times) higher on days of men’s drinking than on days of no drinking. Moreover, in both samples, over 60% of all episodes occurred within 2 hours of drinking by the male partner. (page 1557)

Source: Fals-Stewart , William, James Golden, Julie A. Schumacher. Journal of Addictive Behaviors. 28, pages 1555-1574. Intimate partner violence and substance use: A longitudinal day-to-day examination. Research Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo, State University of New York

8. Studies find alcohol use contributes to aggressive behavior and acts of violence, whereas marijuana use reduces the likelihood of violent behavior.

Alcohol is clearly the drug with the most evidence to support a direct intoxication-violence relationship.

Cannabis reduces likelihood of violence during intoxication…

Source: Hoaken, Peter N.S., Sherry H. Stewart. Journal of Addictive Behaviors. 28, pages 1533-1554. Drugs of abuse and the elicitation of human aggressive behavior. Dept. of Psychology, University of Western Ontario. Dept. of of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University.

9. Alcohol use is highly associated with violent crime, whereas marijuana use is not.

About 3 million violent crimes occur each year in which victims perceive the offender to have been drinking at the time of the offense.

Two-thirds of victims who suffered violence by an intimate (a current or former spouse, boyfriend, or girlfriend) reported that alcohol had been a factor.

Among spouse victims, 3 out of 4 incidents were reported to have involved an offender who had been drinking.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice. Bureau of Justice Statistics. National Crime Victimization Survey 2002.

10. Alcohol use is a catalyst for domestic violence in Denver.

Alcohol is involved in nearly 50 percent of all domestic violence cases in Denver, and the use of alcohol by the perpetrator is a predominant factor in fatal cases of domestic violence.

Marijuana is not mentioned as a correlating or causal factor in cases of domestic violence in Denver.

Source: Abrams, Margaret L., Joanne Belknap, Heather C. Melton. When Domestic Violence Kills: The Formation and Findings of the Denver Metro Domestic Violence Fatality Review Committee. March 2001.

11. Alcohol use is prevalent in cases of sexual assault and date rape on college campuses. Marijuana use is not considered a contributing factor in cases of sexual assault and date rape, as judged by the lack of discussion of marijuana in sexual assault and date rape educational materials.

A Harvard School of Public Heath study found that 72 percent of college rapes occurred when the female was too intoxicated by alcohol to resist/consent. Source: http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/cas/Documents/rapeintox-pressRelease/

Comparisons between alcohol and marijuana with respect to sexual assault are very difficult. This is because it does not appear as if marijuana is a significant contributing factor. The best way to "prove" this is through observation that many organizations dedicated to studying and educating about sexual assault do not list marijuana as a substance associated with incidents. Here is a good example from the Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network: http://www.rainn.org/types-of-assault/sexual-assault/drug-facilitated-assault.html

Note their description of alcohol: "Alcohol is the most commonly used chemical in drug facilitated sexual assault. In large part this is due to the fact that alcohol is easily accessible and a chemical that many people use in social interactions." Given the fact that marijuana is also "easily accessible" and used widely in "social interactions," it is quite telling that marijuana is not even listed at all on this "Drug Facilitated Assault" page.

Another example: A Web site sponsored by the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services lists alcohol, but not marijuana, as putting a person at risk for unwanted or risky sexual activity: http://www.4woman.gov/faq/rohypnol.htm#5

Sursa: saferchoice.org

in juru' cozii

2010-01-18T16:12:00.000+02:00

se pare ca este mai greu decat am crezut sa sar peste trac si sa trec direct la fapte.
nu ar trebui sa intampin atata lipsa de inspiratie, dar se pare ca e una din perioadele alea..
este o provocare sa vorbesti despre niste lucruri la care altii se uita cu jin, sau despre care altii au pareri fixe si idioate.
nu vreau sa-mi fac prozeliti, nu vreau sa conving pe nimeni ca e bine ce fac, oricum nu ma intereseaza.. vor fi insemnari din viata mea, ca pana acum, insemnari pe care nu am avut indrazneala sa le scriu pe blogul meu din mai multe motive.
n-o sa spun decat ca: "Drogurile nu sunt bune, dar e bine ca le avem!" asa ca scoate o cola si un filtru..

Rupe'ti creierii cu Magic!

2010-01-13T03:41:00.001+02:00

Flower MAGIC powder 1g - ingrasamant

UTILIZARE: se utilizeaza pentru cresterea plantelor

CONTINUT: amoniac!!, acid nitric, aminoacizi, sodiu, apa

CANTITATE: aprox. 1g

ATENTIONARE: NU ESTE PENTRU CONSUM UMAN. Nu este produs herbal high.

Baga Magic prietene, poate'ti creste vreo garoafa pe creier, mortii tei de prost!

Vorbe Mari part 2

2010-01-12T14:50:00.001+02:00

Despre pictat: Sa iei culori si sa le smecleiesti pe panza e foarte tare.
....Arata ca un englezoi d'ala britanic...

Vorbe mari

2009-12-05T23:03:00.000+02:00

"Pentru fiecare putin pe care il dai iti iei multe puli..."
"Ba nu mai fii asa animal pe strada, inchide gura cand mergi!" :))
"I'm a fish from Bucharest, I want to sell you ladies"
"Media de viata a unui om e 60 de ani, adica familia ta o sa'mi suga pula urmatorii 6000 de ani."

geN!

CadO

2009-07-16T15:42:00.000+03:00

...Ti'am facut prea multe cadouri in ultima perioada Profetule! GATA!

Blogging miez?

2009-07-10T18:33:00.000+03:00

Da miez, nu conteaza. ai un pachet de tzigari gol? Ok, fa un filtru!