Voice Of Women and Families (VOW India) in India

Date of Birth Issue with General V K Singh (Indian Army Chief): The details

2012-01-24T07:34:00.000-08:00

GEN. V. K. SINGH, COAS: AGE CONTROVERSY;

SOME MYTHS AND HARD FACTS

Sr No. (a)	SEQUENCE OF EVENTS (b)	DATE (c)	REMARKS (d)
1.	Ancestral Village: BAPORA in Bhiwani Distt (Haryana)
2.	Father: Late Lt. Col Jagat of Rajput Regiment (14 Rajput)
3.	Date & Place of Birth	10 May 1951 at MH, Pune	Father’s record of service and 14 Rajput records refer.
4.	Schooling: Birla Public School, Pilani (Rajasthan) up to Class X	MARCH 1966
5.	Date of Birth Recorded in School Register and School Leaving Certificate	10 May, 1951
6.	Applied for written entrance exam for National Defence Academy (ND) Khargwasla as Air Force Entry Cadet for 36 NDA Course commencing 13 July 1966	1966 MARCH	DOB wrongly filled in the UPSC entrance form by BS Bhatnagar, erstwhile. English teacher at Birla Public School, Pilani as 10 May 1950 instead of 10 May 1951.
7.	Eligible age for entry for 36 NDA course as on 01 July 1966	15 Years to 17-1/2 years	Gen. VK Singh eligible for both the ages i.e. 10 May 1951 and 10 May 1950
8.	Matriculation Certificate or Certificate of Date of Birth from his father not attached with the application form pending receipt from Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan/Lt. Col. Jagat Singh (Father)		At the time of filling the UPSC application form, Gen. VK Singh was MINOR (14 years Plus) and had possibly signed the form without checking the details within the confidence that all details filled- in by his teacher would be correct.
9.	Before facing Service Selection Board and entry to NDA, a Certificate from his Father’s Unit (14 Rajput) and School Leaving Certificate giving correct Date of Birth (i.e. 10 May 1951) was forwarded to UPSC/appropriate authorities	03 AUG 1966

10.	UPSC, then, queried the Officer as to the anomaly between DOB filled in the UPSC application form and the two certificates subsequently forwarded as the serial 9 above.		The query was replied to with confirmation that correct Date of Birth is 10 May 1951, as recorded in School Leaving Certificate and his Father’s service records maintained by his unit (14 Rajput) – Receipt for above correspondence with UPSC available.
11.	Based on the facts mentioned at Serial 10 above and having convinced on the correct DOB (10 May 1051) the Officer was given a call for Service Selection Board (SSB) and allowed to join NDA as “PROVISIONAL” candidate pending receipt/submission of MATRICULATION CERTIFICATE. · The UPSC, thereafter, never queried on the issue of DOB confirming that issue has been laid to rest.		The Matric Certificate was not submitted at this time since though the results were declared on 13 June 1966, but the Certificate was not issued. However, school had issued Provisional School Leaving Certificate, which mentioned his passing X^th class and DOB as 10 May 1951. The Certificate was accordingly forwarded to appropriate authorities.
12.	The Officer filed a Record of Service particulars form while joining NDA which reflects his DOB as 10 May 1951.		Even his Medical Examination form as an Air Force Candidate reflects 10 May 1951 as his DOB.
13.	The Officer joined Indian Military Academy (IMA) Dehradun after passing out from NDA and was commissioned in Indian Army on 14 June 1970 in Infantry (2 RAJPUT)	14 June 1970	· All records maintained by NDA/IMA reflected DOB as 10 May 1951.
14.	Based on Service Records maintained at IMA, it issued officer Identity Card to the Officer reflecting this Date of Birth as 10 May 1951 (based on School Leaving Certificate) since Matric Certificate was not submitted by them.		This endorsement could not have been made if IMA records would not have had 10 May 1951 in the officer’s records of service particulars maintained by them.
15.	The officer on Commissioning joined 2 RAJPUT on 1970 and filled form No. IAFZ-2041 on joining the Unit, which is forwarded to Army HQ AG’s Branch (the official Record Holders of all Officers). Even IMA forwarded IAFZ-2041 to AG Branch (10 May 51)	14 June 1970	· Here, once again, at Para/Serial 6 of the Form the officer Officer fills-in his DOB as 10 MAY 1951.
16.	The Officer attends Infantry Young Officers Course(YO-COURCE-2) at Mhow and returns to the Unit (2 RAJPUT) on April 1971	Sep 1970 to March 1971
17.	Before reporting back to his Unit, he visits his village and finds the Matric Certificate there.		The Matric Certificate was issued by Rajasthan Secondary Board of Education on 13 June 1966 and forwarded to Birla Public School.
18.	Birla Public School forwarded the Matric Certificate at his father’s Unit address (14 RAJPUT)		But his father had been posted out of the Unit by then to :- · Branch Recruiting office REWA, then to · NCC Narnaul
19.	14 Rajput had accordingly dispatched the certificate to Rewa Rectg Office, who then dispatched to NCC Narnaul, who then forwarded to the Officers ancestral village since his father had moved out from there on retirement.		Obviously the Matric Certificate kept lying at his village unattended since no one was residing at his ancestral house since his father had moved out to Bhiwani where he expired in the year ____________
20.	The officer instantly submitted the Original matriculation certificate late to Army HQ (AG’s Branch) through his Unit (4 RAJPUT).	April 1971	The Unit had sent the certificate to Army HQ (AG’s Branch) who after due verification and updating their records returned the original certificate to the Officer and changed “Provisional” status to “Permanent”
21.	Meanwhile, without checking and confirming detailed record of service from Army HQ (AG’s Branch) who are the Official record holder and authority on all such matters) Military Secretary Branch (MS) got ARMY LIST published on ____________ reflecting wrong Date of Birth of the Officer as 10 MAY 1950, instead of 1951.		Though the Orders on the subject are very clear on the subject, MS Branch failed to verify the Date of Birth of the Officer from official record holder (AGs Branch) and the CGDA (the paying authority) and erroneously and carelessly endorsed 10 May 1950 as the officer’s DOB in the Army List.
22.	Even when Matric Certificate was received by AG’s Branch at Army HQ in April 1971 (within two years of Commissioning of the officer, no effort was made by MS Branch to either correct its records nor verify the same from AG’s Branch annually attached with Annual Confidential Report starting from 1971.		The seeds of MAIN controversy of DOB of Gen VK Singh was sworn by the careless attitude and erroneous actions by the MS Branch at this stage which was allowed to persist till 2006 when they first queried the officer on the anomaly in his DOB. (30 years after commissioning -?) · Why at this belated stage- ??
23.	The mistake was even never rectified till date by the MS Branch even when they were in receipt of the Record of Service annually attached with Annual Confidential Report starting from 1971
24.	The officer is required to endorse Form cechklist on completion of 20 years of service, para ________ of the Forms asks “have you ever asked for a change in DOB, if so what is your correct DOB?”.	30 Nov 1990	The officer has reflected “NO, my correct DOB is 10 MAY 1951”. · Even then no cognizance of this report was taken to correct records by MS Branch
25.	The FIRST ever query on the anomaly on the officer’s DOB as reflected by him in his Annual Record of Service as 10 May 1951 and in Army List as 10 May 1950, was made by, then, Military Secretary on 3rd May 2006.	3rd May 2006	· The officer has clearly replied that his correct DOB as endorsed in the AG’s Branch records and all other service records is 10 May 1951, which is maintained till date.
26.	The officer was issued with a certificate by AG MP (5&6) on 17 Oct, 2007 that his correct DOB as recorded with them was 10 May 1951.	17 Oct 2007	· The letter signed by AAG of concerned Branch refers
27.	Once again, Additional General (Manpower Planning and Personnel (MP&P) reflected entire details on record of service if the officer confirming DOB at each stage as 10 MAY 1951. · The ADG in his letter has concluded that all recorded endorsements in the documents stated above the DOB of Gen VK Singh is 10 MAY 1951.	January 2008	· - The letter clearly states that “Record of Service (IAFZ-2041) of every officer on commissioning is forwarded by IMA/OTA to AG Branch (MP-5/6) at Army HQ. It includes all occurrences during office service. · - Part-I (Personal Particular) of this documents is filled-up by IMA/OTA to the extent applicable at the time of commissioning. Para 5 of Part-I states “Date of Birth” (as recorded by UPSC or in Sheet Roll). · - Interestingly Date of Birth recorded in this Para 5 of Part I is 10 MAY 1951.
	Even DOB recorded in all Annual and other Medical Examination Boards is 10 MAY 1951.
28.	Once again DG (MP&PS) at Army HQ Lt. Gen. KR Rao in his Inter Office Note dt 30 Jan 2008 in reply to MS Branch service note dt 28 Jan 2008 mentions correct DOB of the Officer as 10 MAY 1951.	30 Jan 2008	Even then MS Branch failed to correct/reconcile its erroneous records of DOB.
29.	As per Para 136 of Defence Services Regulations (DSR), DOB recorded in Matric certificate is to be taken as correct DOB and the aberration if any in the Record of Service are to be corrected by the concerned record holding authority.		In the instant case the MS Branch failed to rectify their records.
30.	The officer replied to MS Branch query of 3rd May 2006 as at ser 24 above on 10th May 2006	10 May 2006	· Officer clarified that:- · - SSC certificate is the authority of his DOB (10MAY 1951) · - Had forwarded the SSC certificate to Org 3 (AGs Branch) in April 1971. · - Consequently his “Provisional” status of Commission was changed to “Permanent” · - Made efforts in 1985 to correct the Record of DOB in the Army List to MP-5 and was informed that needful would be done. · - Had made another effort in 2002 with MS Branch by sending a photocopy of Matric Certificate to MISO. However, no correction was made in the said DOB erroneously recorded at their end.
31.	MS Branch, vide their letter of 21 Aug 2006 replied that no change in the DOB is possible as the Rules only permit to do so with in first two years of Service.	21 Aug 2006	· MS Branch grossly erred here and misinterpreted the “Reconciliation DOB” in their Records to “Change in DOB”
32.	The whole controversy emanates from this misinterpretation of the Rules on the subject and has been allowed to willy nilly or otherwise continue till dates.	October 2007	· Even when AG’s Branch in October 2007 had clarified and confirmed to MS Branch on the correct DOB and 10 MAY 1951, no action was taken by the latter to rectify the mistake committed by them earlier.
33.	In Dec 2007 Min. of Defence asked MS Branch to indicate reasons of recording 10 MAY 1950 as been VK Singh’s DOB when he had himself indicated 10 MAY 1951 in his Annual Confidential Records.	14 Dec 2007	· MOD queries MS Branch for reasons of recording DOB as 10 May 1950 and asks for conduct of inquiry.
34.	MS Branch replied that they had relied upon UPSC application form in which the officer had filled 10 MAY 1950 as his DOB.They also claimed to rely on Army List which they had themselves endorsed with 10 MAY 1950 as his DOB without checking from AG’s Branch (Official Record Holder)	20 Dec 2007	· The MS Branch once again quoted GOI Office memorandum 21 April 1964 and MoD Memorandum 23 June 1954, under which no change in DOB is to be made after 2 years of commissioning of the officers. · Again misinterpretation of Orders since officer was not asking for “CHANGE” but “RECTIFICATION” of mistakes committed by them.
35.	Once again MS Branch asked officer to send all correspondence relating to his earlier requests for “CHANGE” of his DOB.	19 Dec 2007	· The officer once again replied that he had never asked for a “CHANGE” in DOB, but “CORRECTION” of erroneous records at their end based on Matric Certificate submitted to AG’s Branch and other related documents/reports (ACRs)
36.	Again AG Branch verified that Record of Service received by them from IMA at the time of Commissioning of the officer his DOB recorded is 10 MAY 1951.	Dec 2007
37.	Subsequently on 21 Jan 2008, MS Branch sticking to its previous stand replied that the DOB mentioned in Army List (10 May 1950) will remain to be correct and no change will be affected	21 Jan 2008	· Once again the Rule of 2 years restriction in change of DOB was quoted – continuous case of misinterpretation of the issue at Hand and Rules on the subject.
38.	The Officer was pressurized by Gen Deepak Kapoor, the then COAS, to admit 10 MAY 1950 as his DOB and accept it in the interest f Service and other officers whose promotion case files are pending in the Min. of Defence for clearance		Through telephonic conversation with COAS he was also assured that once the needful is done the fresh case for correcting his DOB could be effected later.
39.	The Officer accordingly gave this undertaking especially highlighting the same in the “Interest of Service”, hoping for due justice as the matter would be settled as promised.	24 Jan 2008	MS Branch later in their letter dt 28 Jan 2008 made reference of the officer letter saying doubts on the DOB still remain unanswered. It also referred MOD request to carry out detailed inquiry to find out correct DOB in consultation with AG’s Branch. HOWEVER, NO INQUIRY WAS CONDUCTED AND NOTING ON THE CASE WAS FOUND SAYING, “INQUIRY NOT TO BE CONDUCTED”.
40.	Subsequently the Officer in his letter dt 01 July 2008 addressed to COAS, Gen. Deepak Kapoor requesting for Justice to be done in his case and enquired as the constraints by MS Branch which compelled them to maintain his DOB as 10 MAY 1950 despite submitting SSC Certificate in 1974 which recorded 10 MAY 1951 as his DOB.	01 July 2008	It was mentioned in the officers letter that when he met Lt. Gen. Khare and Gen. Gangadharan of the MS Brnach in 2006 and 2007 respectively, he was assured that all necessary reconciliations with regard to the clarification his DOB would be carried out.
41.	The officer then issued letter dt Feb 2009 to MS Branch in response to their letter dt. 15 Jan 2009 to him which had quoted their letter ratified that verification process of DOB by MS Branch did not required Matriculation Certificate, while the same is an accepted authority for the same	Feb 2009 03 June 2009	The officer pointed out that whereas Matric Certificate was an authority, then what is the procedure for MS Branch to verify the DOB? -MS Branch asserted that it was not responsible to verify the age (DOB) as it was the duty of AG Branch - Why not reconciled?
42.	Subsequently the officer sent a letter to MS Branch that it was clear from the earlier letter of MS Branch (letter dt 15 Jan 2009)	06 May 2009 15 Jan 2009	To be made with regard to the Omission.
43.	On 25th May 2011 AG’s Branch, once again, certified the DOB of the officer as 10 MAY 1951.	25 May 11
46.	RTI dt 25 Oct 2010 filed by Dr. Kamal Tiwari in MOD for obtaining information on the subject.	25 Oct 2010 14 Feb 2011	Min. Of Law provided opinion on DOB confirming as 10 MAY 1951 (on 14 Feb 2011).
47.	Min. of Def vide their letter dt. 8 May 2011 informed the RTI Querist that DOB of the officer in High School Certificate and Records of AG Brach at Army HQ was same (10 MAY 1951)	08 May 2011	In the same reply Law Ministry informed that there was Omission in Core Branch (MS Branch) and the Ministry of Law & Justice had advised for the necessary corrections.
44.	But, surprisingly the matter was once again referred to Attorney General of India and the Law Ministry.		The News Media has since reported that now Attorney General and Law & Justice Minister have reversed their earlier opinion saying that now the DOB of Gen. VK Singh is 10 MAY 1950.
45.	The entire case smacks of a deeper plot to malign the image of Chief of Indian Army. In spite of solid and legal proof of his DOB the persons behind the scene are not permitting the corrections be made in his DOB that MS Branch had no system for verification of the DOB. He also intimated that he had given acceptance to the DOB (!0 MAY 1950) in good faith at the behest of COAS and not in agreement with the conclusion of the said MS Branch.		Surprisingly MS Branch responded vide their letter dt 03 June 2009 that “THEY WERE NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFICATION OF DOB AS THE SAME WAS CHARTERED AS THE DUTIES OF AG’s BRANCH”

48. May be it is an indirect effort to malign both the Government, Party in Power as well as to tarnish the image of this fine institution “INDIAN ARMY”. Ramifications of not taking the issue to rightful conclusion based on justified action are grave, especially when our enemies are eagerly waiting to dismantle and demoralize our Armed Forces.

49. The Print Media and Electronic Media, so far, have reflected the issue in bits and pieces without giving the complete picture, which has left the masses in doubt so serious that some of them have even raised eyebrows on the personal integrity of the Army Chief.

50. Instant effort, towards clearing all such misunderstandings and doubts and to let the people judge the case on the merits of the case and to know from the facts enumerated above that there are some vested Powers, who are hell bent to destroy the image of our Army Chief and promote some gullible and pliable personalities for the post, are required.

51. Important to Note:-

a) The aberration in DOB was first racked- up when Gen. J.J. Singh was COAS (2006). Interestingly planning for “TWO DOWN COAS” commences when a Maj. Gen. is approved for Lt. Gen. (So called “LINE OF SUCCESSION” after Gen. V.K. Singh drawn then, and has since been talked about and quoted today officially.

b) General Deepak Kapoor, the previous COAS followed the line for vested interests and vigorously pursued the issue at each stage and made allout efforts to malign and belittle Gen. V.K. Singh before his being considered as COAS, and now when so called “LINE OF SUCCESSION” is being firmed-in, the matter has hit the headlines.

c) Lt. Gen. Avdesh Prakash, the then, Military Secretary vehemently pursued the agenda of his Chief Gen. Deepak Kapoor. He is now involved in Sukhna Land Scam and found gilty and dismissed from service without any pension and benefits by a Court Martial.

Biological dads seek changes in child custody rights

2012-01-14T22:05:00.000-08:00

Biological dads seek changes in child custody rights
http://www.dnaindia.com/bangalore/report_biological-dads-seek-changes-in-child-custody-rights_1637734

In India, fathers are left out and are often misrepresented after separation
http://epaper.dnaindia.com/epapermain.aspx?edcode=860009&QuickEdition=yes
Children’s Rights Initiative for Shared Parenting (CRISP) foundation here on Saturday highlighted the problems faced by children from broken families and called for a re-look into the laws concerning child custody rights and a change in society’s mindset towards fathers.

At a news conference at press club, Dr Savio Pereira, the medical counsellor said the focus of this campaign was on the responsible biological fathers and not the irresponsible ones. According to him in India, fathers are left out and are often misrepresented after separation. There is a need to change the mindset of people and stop them from stereotyping fathers, he added.
“Do I really need a court order to see my own children? I am a responsible father and I should have the right to take care of my children and be a part in their upbringing,” said Sayyad Javed, a professor from Canada who wants the right to see his three young children who have been kept away from him due to family disputes.
Jayant TK, who was also going through a similar situation of being deprived from seeing his children, highlighted the United Nations Child Rights Convention 1989, to which India is a signatory, mentioning the right of a child to preserve his or her identity. “The state is duty-bound to ensure that a child is not separated from his or her parents against their will, unless it is in the best interests of child. But still some judicial apparatus is insensitive to it,” he said.
“I was not allowed to enter the school premises to see my own daughter. I am a responsible father and how can a school blatantly flout the rights of a father?” said Raju Reddy, who had to get a high court order to register his name as the father of his daughter.
CRISP president Kumar V Jahgirdar said that more than 5,000 members have joined the organisation. According to CRISP the practice of alienating and inter-parental child abduction is child abuse.
They demanded reforms in the child custody rights, separate guardian courts in all cities and addition of more such programmes to ensure meaningful and balanced participation of both the parents for emotional and psychological well- being of the children.
A CRISP study observes that children of separated parents show symptoms of psychological maladjustment, lower academic performance and often go through traumatic mental conflicts due to one parent’s influence over the other.
Dr Pereira stressed on the need to set the standards for engagement of parents in schools using the guidelines from standards of excellence programme created by US-based National PTA.
He said that he would present the document for raising such standards in educational institutions to National Accreditation Board for Education and Training, Quality Council of India and the Association of Schools.

PRESS CONFERENCE on “Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations”

2012-01-14T07:27:00.000-08:00

PRESS CONFERENCE on “Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations”

______________________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam.

Sub: Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations

Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW India), Global Counseling Centre and CRISP thank you for attending the press conference on Saturday 14^th January 2012 at Press club, Cubbon Park, Bangalore from 11.30 a.m to 12:00 Noon

CRISP is a Non Governmental Organization (NGO) founded recently by a group of citizens, who recognize the serious effects of "parental alienation" on children due to single parent families on account of divorce or separation. CRISP also focuses on furthering the rights of a child to remain connected with both parents.Our aims and objectives are based on research findings worldwide which indicate that children do best when both parents are actively involved in their lives, even after separation or divorce.

We will be making a presentation Sensitizing the Public and highlighting the following demands, in the interests of Biological Fathers who are being left out of Parent-Teacher/School roles during the Schooling of their Biological Children. Over 30 years' research has proven beyond dispute the positive connection between parent involvement and student success. Effectively engaging parents and families in the education of their children has the potential to be far more transformational than any other type of education reform. We are basing our “Standards” based on the US National Standards for Parent/Family Involvement Programs and their quality indicators which are research based and grounded in both sound philosophy and practical experience. The purpose for the standards is threefold:
• To promote meaningful parent and family participation

• To raise awareness regarding the components of effective programs
• To provide guidelines for schools that wish to improve their programs.

The program standards are guidelines for leaders of institutions with programs serving parents and families. Therefore, the intended audience includes Government of India and respective State Governments, principals, administrators, educators, and parents who are in positions to influence and improve parent involvement programs.

Building upon the six types of parent involvement identified by Joyce L. Epstein, US-based National PTA created program standards of excellence.

Standard I: Communicating—Communication between home and school is regular, two-way, and meaningful.
Standard II: Parenting—Parenting skills are promoted and supported.
Standard III: Student Learning—Parents play an integral role in assisting student learning.
Standard IV: Volunteering—Parents are welcome in the school, and their support and assistance are sought.
Standard V: School Decision Making and Advocacy—Parents are full partners in the decisions that affect children and families.
Standard VI: Collaborating with Community—Community resources are used to strengthen schools, families, and student learning.

We are submitting the detailed report to the relevant stake-holders which we are recommending as a Mandatory Quality standard for NABET (Quality council of India) and a Guideline for Appropriate engagement with Biological Parents of Children in India.

Roshni Mathan Pereira- Jayanth T K Christie S

Kumar Jahgirdar (President CRISP) Dr Savio Pereira Lokesh Reddy

PRESS CONFERENCE on “Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations”

2012-01-11T06:05:00.000-08:00

INVITATION FOR PRESS CONFERENCE on “Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations”

______________________________________________

Dear Sir/Madam.

Sub: Sensitization Campaign for Involvement of Responsible Biological Fathers in Parent-Teacher/School Associations

Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW India), Global Counseling Centre and CRISP invite you to a press conference on Saturday 14^th January 2012 at Press club, Cubbon Park, Bangalore from 11.30 a.m to 12:00 Noon

We will be making a presentation Sensitizing the Public and highlighting the following demands, in the interests of Biological Fathers who are being left out of Parent-Teacher/School roles during the Schooling of their Biological Children. Over 30 years' research has proven beyond dispute the positive connection between parent involvement and student success. Effectively engaging parents and families in the education of their children has the potential to be far more transformational than any other type of education reform. We are basing our “Standards” based on the US National Standards for Parent/Family Involvement Programs and their quality indicators which are research based and grounded in both sound philosophy and practical experience. The purpose for the standards is threefold: • To promote meaningful parent and family participation

• To raise awareness regarding the components of effective programs • To provide guidelines for schools that wish to improve their programs.

The program standards are guidelines for leaders of institutions with programs serving parents and families. Therefore, the intended audience includes Government of India & respective State Governments, principals, administrators, educators, and parents who are in positions to influence and improve parent involvement programs. Building upon the six types of parent involvement identified by Joyce L. Epstein, US-based National PTA created program standards of excellence.

Standard I: Communicating—Communication between home and school is regular, two-way, and meaningful.
Standard II: Parenting—Parenting skills are promoted and supported.
Standard III: Student Learning—Parents play an integral role in assisting student learning.
Standard IV: Volunteering—Parents are welcome in the school, and their support and assistance are sought.
Standard V: School Decision Making and Advocacy—Parents are full partners in the decisions that affect children and families.
Standard VI: Collaborating with Community—Community resources are used to strengthen schools, families, and student learning.

We appreciate your presence along with photographers at the press conference and help in building a better tomorrow for our children who are the future assets of our nation!

We are looking forward to your esteemed presence for the Press Conference and help us to educate and create awareness about the importance of Having Biological Fathers (and Mothers) in the Parent-Teacher Associations even when there is Break-up of the “First” Family.

Roshni Mathan Pereira- Jayanth T K Christie S

Kumar Jahgirdar (President CRISP) Dr Savio Pereira (9945104927) Lokesh Reddy

FIR against Anil Kumble soon for Impersonating Biological Father of Step-daughter

2012-01-10T07:05:00.000-08:00

FIR against Kumble soon
January 10, 2012
http://truthdive.com/2012/01/10/fir-against-kumble-soon.html
Bengaluru, Jan 10 : The Karnataka High Court on Friday served notice to the Bangalore police commissioner for not registering an FIR against former cricketer Anil Kumble in an impersonation and forgery case.

Serving the notice, Justice S. Abdul Naseer directed the police commissioner to explain by next week why a First Information Report (FIR) was not registered against Kumble, who had been accused of forging the signature of petitioner, Kumar V. Jahgirdar in an application for renewing the passport of the latter’s minor daughter Aaruni Kumar Jahgirdar in April 2011.

Though Kumble married Jahgirdar’s wife Chetana Ramtheertha in 1999 after they legally separated, the Supreme Court upheld the family court’s ruling granting joint custody of Aaruni to both, while maintaining the petitioner’s rights over the 17-year-old daughter as her natural father and legal guardian.

The court also served notice to Bharatinagar police station in the eastern suburb. “The Bharatinagar police station did not register the FIR and initiate criminal proceedings against Kumble for committing the cognizable offence even after its sub-inspector Pramod Kumar received my complaint Dec 26,” Jahgirdar told.

“I have also complained to the police commissioner (Jyotiprakash Mirji) Dec 29 against Kumar for not filing the FIR though they were bound to do so under section 154 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) but the latter too did not act,” Jahgirdar said.

Jaghirdar came to know that his ex-wife had applied for renewal of Aaruni’s passport, which expired in 2009 and had to be renewed from documents he obtained last month from the passport authority under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

“As per the rule, a declaration has to be made by the father in the case of a minor even for passport renewal. Chetana made a declaration without intimating me. In my daughter’s application, while my name was mentioned as her father, Kumble had impersonated me and signed it, which is a criminal offence,” Jahgirdar asserted.

The petitioner also claimed that the signature in his daughter’s renewal application resembled that of Kumble as it was similar to the signature in the latter’s passport.

“By impersonating me, Kumble affixed his signature fraudulently in Aaruni’s renewal application, which is a cognizable offence under various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC),” Jaghirdar reiterated.

Though Kumble declined to comment as the matter was sub-judice and personal, the police commissioner’s office said the high court notice had been referred to the legal department for opinion.

“He will reply to the notice appropriately after getting the legal opinion from the department concerned,” a police official said.

Anil Kumble in trouble: Accused of Forgery of Passport and Misrepresentation

2012-01-06T05:47:00.000-08:00

Anil Kumble lands in Jumbo Trouble: Allegations of Pretending to be Biological Father of Step-daughter

2012-01-06T05:45:00.000-08:00

Kumble accused of forgery:Wife’s ex-husband says cricketer pretended to be his daughter’s dad

2011-12-29T00:11:00.000-08:00

Kumble accused of forgery:Wife’s ex-husband says cricketer pretended to be his daughter’s dad
http://epaper.dnaindia.com/story.aspx?edorsup=Sup&wintype=popup&queryed=860009&querypage=12&boxid=30949544&id=713&eddate=2011-12-29&ed_date=2011-12-29

Kumar V Jagirdar, the ex-husband of cricketer Anil Kumble’s wife Chethana, has accused the duo of forging his signature to get the passport of his and Chethana’s daughter reissued.

Jagirdar, a stock broker, has filed a complaint with Bharathinagar police. He has stated that his daughter’s passport expired in 2009 and in April 2011, his ex-wife applied for passport renewal.

Jagirdar told DNA that he did not get a response from Chethana when he sought to know the developments regarding the passport’s renewal.

Jagirdar said he recently learnt that Chethana had applied for reissuing the child’s passport. Jagirdar said he was shocked upon learning this since as the biological father, his involvement is mandatory in the reissue of her passport. Hence, he filed an application under the Right to Information Act (RTI), seeking documents regarding his daughter’s passport-reissue application.

Jagirdar added that both the mandatory documents needed to issue passport to a minor require signatures of the biological father.

When he procured a copy of these documents, he discovered that somebody else had signed where his sign was required. He alleged that the signature is of Anil Kumble.

He added that he procured a copy of the cricketer’s passport, too, through RTI and noted that the signature on it resembles the signature on the application for their daughter’s passport. Further, Jagirdar said a copy of Kumble’s passport has been attached as the father’s passport.

Jagirdar alleged that Anil Kumble has pretended to be the biological father of his daughter and impersonated him by affixing his own signature where Jagirdar’s signature was required.

Further, Jagirdar said he had trusted his ex-wife to keep him informed about the developments regarding his daughter’s passport, in accordance with the court’s order.

Jagirdar said Kumble and Chethana have committed a serious offence, which amounts to forgery, misappropriation and impersonation, apart from other offences punishable under Indian Passport Act and various provisions of Indian Penal Code.

Bharathinagar police have registered a case and are investigating.

Kumar V Jagirdar (left) and Anil Kumble

Three quacks held in Torangal (Bellary district)

2011-12-15T07:23:00.000-08:00

Three quacks held in Torangal (Bellary district)
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2011050960580300.htm&date=2011/05/09/&prd=th&

Complaints lodged against three more suspected fake doctors

Raids conducted following several complaints of fake doctors practising in and around Torangal

Raids carried out in other parts of State as well

CRACKDOWN:Veerabhadrappa, Registrar of Karnataka Ayurveda, Unani, Yoga, Siddha and Naturopathy Practioners' Board, verifying the certificates of a medical practitioner at Torangal in Sandur taluk of Bellary district on Sunday.

BELLARY: In a crackdown on quacks led by Veerabhadrappa, Registrar of the Karnataka Ayurveda, Naturopathy, Siddha, Unani and Yoga Practitioners' Board, three medical practitioners at Torangal of Sandur taluk in the district, alleged to be possessing fake certificates, were caught and handed over to the local police on Saturday. Complaints have been lodged against three more suspected quacks in Torangal, who were alleged to be absconding.

Based on complaints of several persons indulging in medical practice with fake certificates, Dr. Veerabhadrappa, with the support of the police, raided several clinics near Toranagal Railway Station and in Torangal village.

According to official sources, one Sandip Kumar (27) from Jharkhand, who had opened a clinic on the busy Railway Station Road, was questioned by the authorities. He showed a certificate issued by the Alternative Medicine and Research Centre, New Delhi, affiliated to the Indian Board of Alternative Medicines, New Delhi, and International Open University of the U.S. Dr. Veerabhadrappa seized the certificate as he found it to be fake and asked the police to take him into custody.

S. Srinivasulu from Dhone in Kurnool district of Andhra Pradesh was another medical practitioner at Torangal to have held for possessing fake certificates.

One certificate produced by him stated that he was a member of the Grameena Vaidyula Sanskhema Sangham of Dhone in Andhra Pradesh. Another certificate produced by him had been issued by one K.V. Manidhar stating that Mr. Srinivasulu had worked as a doctor for six years. As the news about the raid spread, several such quacks in and around Torangal downed the shutters of their clinics and fled the place to avoid getting arrested.

Ajit Kumar, brother of Mr. Sandip Kumar, was also taken into custody on Saturday for allegedly practising medicine with fake certificates.

All the three were later handed over to the Toranagal police for further action.

Dr. Veerbhadrappa told The Hindu that following many complaints of several quacks practising all over the State, the Government had passed an order to put an end to such practices and protect the health of people. The order had empowered the Registrar of the Karnataka Ayurveda, Naturopathy, Siddha, Unani and Yoga Practitioners' Board, who has the jurisdiction over the entire State, the District Ayush Officers and District Health and Family Welfare Officers, to check medical practitioners within their respective jurisdictions and initiate action against fake doctors.

According to Dr. Veerbhadrappa, several raids have been conducted in Bangalore, Gangavati in Koppal district and Bagalkot among other places, and many quacks had been identified, handed over to respective police stations and complaints lodged against them.

The police would deal sternly with those found guilty of practising medicine with fake certificates.

The raids would continue, he said.

Federation of Chemists & Druggists in Karnataka urges state govt to act on quacks

2011-12-15T07:18:00.000-08:00

Federation of Chemists & Druggists in Karnataka urges state govt to act on quacks

Federation of Chemists and Druggists in Karnataka has sent in a proposal to the state government to take action on the quacks practising in the state and also look into the norms at the time of granting pharmacy outlets licenses across the state.

In a memorandum to the minister of health and family welfare, Ashokswamy Heroor, vice president of the Federation of Chemists and Druggists in Karnataka stated that there are 81,000 registered MBBS doctors, 12,000 ayurveda qualified practitioners and 4,500 homoeopathy specialists in Karnataka. But the number of quacks practising are more than qualified medical professionals. Therefore a serious action is mandated against those treating patients with non-medical qualifications.

The government should look at auditing the clinics even in the remote locations of the state to ascertain the number of doctors practising without medical degrees.

In order to curb the practice of quackery, the Supreme Court had passed a judgement on October 8, 1998, to identify the quack doctors. As per the order, Director of Health and Family Welfare department had issued a circular No. MDL, 14:2000-01 dated November 4, 2000. Karnataka government passed a notification No. HFW215/PIM-2007 dated December 13, 2007 to control the quack doctors to register Ayurveda Board, District Ayush officers and District Family welfare officers.

According to Heroor, despite these government orders to swoop down clinics and arrest the violators, not much could be achieved to control the practising of quacks.

He called upon the state government to increase the number of officers which would help empower committees in drugs control department covering designation of drugs inspectors assistant drug controller and deputy drug controllers.

Another issue is the proliferation of unsafe and ineffective medical devices in the market which are increasing the threat of infection transmission. Further, there is also inappropriate prescription and irrational use of drugs resulting in drug resistance and adverse drug reaction which the state government needs to address as these issues are impacting as a huge economic burden on the patient population, pointed out Heroor.

With reference to the pharmacy trade, he has proposed to the state drugs control department, there was need to ensure that permanent addresses of the registered pharmacists made available.

Even during the election process at the State Pharmacy Council, ballot papers were misused and addresses were not updated. Heroor stated that there needs to be a permanent residence proof records like voter ID or other government approved submissions for the same.

According to the vice president of the Federation of Chemists and Druggists in Karnataka, who is also the president of the Koppal District Chemists and Druggists Association and president Indian Pharmaceutical Association, Gangavati, stringent norms and constant surprise checks would help to keep quacks at bay. A regular vigil on hospital practices would help control unethical tasks, he added.
http://www.pharmabiz.com/PrintArticle.aspx?aid=64112&sid=1

Petition to the Chief Minister to take action Against Quacks (Fake Doctors) and Quackery

2011-12-14T17:34:00.000-08:00

People for Better Treatment (PBT)

Bangalore Chapter

and

Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW)

And

Chidrens’ Rights Initiative for Shared Parenting (CRISP)

Date : 13-12-2011

Hon’ble D V Sadananda Gowda

Hon’ble Chief Minister

Government of Karnataka.

Respected Sir,

Sub : Karnataka Health Service – Introduction of Anti Quackery Bill / Act

to save the lives of innocent public of Karnataka – Request

Warm greetings from CRISP, VOW India and Karnataka State Chapter of People for Better Treatment (PBT).

Allopathic system of Medicine is a Scientific Evidence based medicine being offered to the citizen of Karnataka by Qualified Medical practitioners of Medicine whose basic medical qualification in MBBS. In society there are many number of other system Doctors and unqualified persons misusing Allopathic system of Medicine to the sick leading to loss of precious lives, or multiple serious complications of stomach, liver, kidney etc. i.e. Serious Morbidity and Mortality.

This results in prolongation of illness and complicates the illness, so that subsequent treatment by qualified Doctors also may not yield the desired outcome. This is an unchecked menace in rural and urban of Karnataka. These “Quacks” exploit the ignorance of the under privileged and uneducated mass of our state.

More than 70% of Rural populations below the poverty line depends only on Primary Health Centres and Rural Allopathic Doctors for Health care. It is unfortunate that unqualified quacks – with some political and local influence have attracted the rural population with substandard treatment and. It is very difficult to do ethical practice competing with Quacks.

We are requesting the Government of Karnataka to eradicate quackery. But so for no mass action was taken against the quacks. It is mandatory to take mass action to eradicate quackery from Karnataka and to save the innocent people who are loosing their health and life’s due to quacks in the society.

The Government has specifically told earlier that the Government is considering bringing specific legislation to curb the quacks in medical profession. The police officers have to be directed to organize periodical raids along with Health Department Official. But no effective action is taken so far either for periodical raids or for to bring any specific legislation to curb quackery.

We submit that the punishment for practicing Quackery as per Medical Council Act 15(2) b and 15 (3) are only 1 year imprisonment and Rs.1000/- punishment, which is the lowest punishment. After one year punishment – the Quack will restart practice in some other areas. Hence in the proposed Anti Quackery Bill (similar to That functioning in Delhi and Tamil Nadu) – Quacks should be booked only in non-bailable section and minimum punishment should be not less than 10 years. If the same Quack started Allopathic practice again after punishment he should be give life time imprisonment.

By playing with the life of poor patients is more serious than causing physical injuries. At present Quacks can be punished under the following sections:

IPC 419 Attempt of Cheating

IPC 420 Cheating

IPC 338 Inject Drugs causing damage to the body

IPC 471 Keeping fake Documents.

They must be booked Under IPC 307 (attempt to Murder). Hence we request the Government of Karnataka to come out with an ANTI-QUACKERY ACT. Even through the Medical Council Act, Indian Medical Degrees Act, Drugs and Cosmetics Act, various sections of IPC are there, we need a strong ANTI-QUACKERY LAW to be enforced in Karnataka so that effective action can be taken against the quacks.

Unless a separate act is passed like Anti Corruption wing, Civil Protection Act, etc., it will not be possible to eradicate Quackery.

We are also attaching a copy of Delhi Anti quackery bill for the plan of action.

Hence we request you Sir, as the custodian of Health of our state, to seriously consider out request and issue a Bill to Eradicate Quackery in Karnataka. This will safeguard innocent lives in Karnataka.

We are confident of yours speedy and justifiable action. We are willing to give our inputs for the Anti-Quackery Bill and/or Cell.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

Voice of Women and Families in India, CRISP (Children’s Rights Initiative for Better Treatment), PBT (People for Better Treatment)

References:

Chronology of Actions against Quackery in Karnataka

1. An anti-quackery cell set up in 1983 by the health and family welfare department

2. In order to curb the practice of quackery, the Supreme Court had passed a judgement on October 8, 1998, to identify the quack doctors.

3. As per the order, Director of Health and Family Welfare department had issued a circular No. MDL, 14: 2000-01 dated November 4, 2000.

4. HC order on March 7, 2001 directing the DGP to take action against unregistered medical practitioners.

5. Government circular dated November 28, 2001 to the district administration to take action against doctors practising any recognised system of medicine other than the one in which they are registered, is not being implemented.

6. HC order on March 1, 2002 that on any complaint filed against unqualified or fake practitioners, the government is competent to take action.

7. On August 17, 2002, Health and Family Welfare Minister Kagodu Thimmappa announced an ordinance would be promulgated to check the menace of quacks.

Awareness drive in Bangalore against quacks by PBT, VOW and CRISP India

2011-12-14T09:33:00.000-08:00

Awareness drive in Bangalore against quacks
http://expressbuzz.com/cities/bangalore/Awareness-drive-in-Bangalore-against-quacks/343297.html
14 Dec 2011
BANGALORE: In an effort to create awareness among the people on quacks, a drive against quacks will be conducted by Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW India), Children Right Initiative for Sharing Parents (CRISP) and People for Better Treatment (PBT).

Announcing this on Tuesday, Kumar Jagirdhar, president of CRISP said, “Anybody who impersonates as a doctor is a quack. It even includes a chemist who gives drugs without prescriptions. The issue of increase in the number of quacks in the country has led us to take up this initiative of creating awareness about the quacks.”

The associations said that there were more than 2.5 lakh quacks in India. They will be visiting many districts and taluks as a part of their awareness drive to look out for quacks.

“The number of quacks have increased to such a level that, out of one thousand patients nearly 800 end up getting treated from quacks. This has led to the violation of people’s rights to be treated by a qualified practitioner,” said Dr Savio Pereira.

The associations also urged the state government to set up a separate tribunal under the Karnataka Medical Council to curb quackery. They also wanted the government to strictly abide by the existing acts on quackery, and to impose the same punishment given to a murderer, to the quacks.

Press Release on “Drive against Quackery and Quacks (Fake Doctors) in Karnataka”

2011-12-13T09:37:00.000-08:00

CRISP (Children's Right Initiative for Shared Parenting), People For Better Treatment (PBT)

and

Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW)

Press Release on “Drive against Quackery and Quacks (Fake Doctors) in Karnataka”

Voice of Women and Families in India (VOW India), CRISP and PBT (People for Better Treatment) have conducting this press conference on Tuesday 13^th December 2011 at Press club, Cubbon Park, Bangalore from 3.30 to 4:00 PM

We have made a presentation highlighting the following issues, in the interests of patients who have been victimized due to the Fake Doctors who are practicing Scientific Medicine without having the Licence to Practice Medicine. We invite the IMA (Indian Medical Association) and other organizations to join us in this fight against Quackery.

The issues addressed are:

Serious issues in How Quacks show that they have Licence to Practice Modern Scientific Medicine. Harsh Punishment for Quacks who are involved in Misrepresentation and Murder.Liability of Quacks should be under KMC/MCI till a separate Tribunal is created to handle the Crimes by these Quacks
The Social impact of Fake RMP Certificates, and unscrupulous methods by Quacks to obtain RMP certificates including Forgery, Adultery and Blackmail
Specific complaint against Sunil Redson and Shantharaj Redson from Yadgir, who are QUACKS and are Suspects in the Murder of late Dr J A Mathan (to create a Fraudulent Certificate of Efficiency allegedly given by Dr J A Mathan)
Petition to the Chief Minister, Chief Secretary, Principal Health Secretary and other Law-enforcers to conduct the appropriate Investigations into General and Specific Complaints against Quacks.
Exposure of Quacks practicing in India using Website URL:

http://quacksfrauddoctorsindia.blogspot.com

Press Conference "Drive against Quackery"

We need your support to create awareness about the importance of Having Legally competent Doctors to treat Patients.

Roshni Mathan Pereira Pankaj Rai (People for Better Treatment)

Kumar Jahgirdar (President CRISP) Dr Savio Pereira (Eminent Doctor)

Chronology of Actions against Quackery in Karnataka

1. An anti-quackery cell set up in 1983 by the health and family welfare department
2. In order to curb the practice of quackery, the Supreme Court had passed a judgement on October 8, 1998, to identify the quack doctors.
3. As per the order, Director of Health and Family Welfare department had issued a circular No. MDL, 14: 2000-01 dated November 4, 2000.
4. HC order on March 7, 2001 directing the DGP to take action against unregistered medical practitioners.

5. Government circular dated November 28, 2001 to the district administration to take action against doctors practising any recognised system of medicine other than the one in which they are registered, is not being implemented.

6. HC order on March 1, 2002 that on any complaint filed against unqualified or fake practitioners, the government is competent to take action.

7. On August 17, 2002, Health and Family Welfare Minister Kagodu Thimmappa announced an ordinance would be promulgated to check the menace of quacks.

8. Karnataka government passed a notification No. HFW215/PIM-2007 dated December 13, 2007 to control the quack doctors to register Ayurveda Board, District Ayush officers and District Family welfare officers.

Coverage:
Television coverage: Doordarshan Kannada and Suvarna TV on 13 December 2011

Media Coverage:

Prajavani 15 December 2011


Indian Express 14 December 2011

Eenadu 14 December 2011

The Last day of Dr J A Mathan: The Players

2011-12-11T01:31:00.000-08:00

The Last day of Dr J A Mathan: The Players

Dr J A Mathan was a good man and a good doctor, remembered by many!

MBBS Dr J A Mathan

Dr J A Mathan studied in Bangalore Medical College, Bangalore, India. His religion declared while education was "Adi Dravida" Hindu.

J C Adimoolam (in a Good shepherd pose)

Dr J A Mathan's father was the leader of RPI in Karnataka named J C Adimoolam.

His Mother Jeevarathanam Loved Dr J A Mathan

He was posted in Kollur Primary Health Centre in 1973 to 1974. His colleagues in the Kollur Primary Health Centre (near Yadgir) included the Compounder Shantharaj Redson and his SIX Sons including Sunil Redson.

Kollur Government Primary Health Centre, Chittapur District, Gulbarga

They all stayed in the same Residential Compound. Shantharaj Redson was the Neighbour in the Residential Compound.

Residential Block of the Kollur Primary Health Centre, Chittapur Taluk, Gulbarga (Near Yadgir)

There were many Threats to his life in Yadgir/Gulbarga, following which he requested to be posted to Bangalore.
The adulterous wolves followed him to Bangalore.

18 October 1976 Chronology

Visitor 1: The Trap
The sister Saraswathi of Sworn enemy (Brother-in-law Sugumaran) made the last call to Dr J A Mathan to examine for a false complaint of Chest Pain (which she never had) for a Home Visit.

Sugumaran was Forced to Marry sister Rani (of Dr J A Mathan) in a Forced Shotgun Marriage in 1970 in KGF, after a public brawl with Dr J A Mathan in KGF.

Sugumaran

Visitor 2
Sunil Redson visited Dr J A Mathan in Directorate of Health Services, Anand Rao Circle, Bangalore in the morning of 18 October 1975. (and every day for the Last Few days of the Murder of late Dr J A Mathan)

"Dr" Sunil Redson
Sunil Redson is now a "Doctor" as well practicing in Yadgir, Karnataka (based on a forgery RMP Certificate issued in the name of Dr J A Mathan).

Dr J A Mathan was Murdered on 18 October 1975 in Austin Town

Dr J A Mathan

There are no records of F.I.R. (First Information Record), No Post-mortem records and No Death Certificate (before the Burial).

Marriage of late Dr J A Mathan (remains Adi Dravida HINDU)

Dr J A Mathan was professing as an Adi Dravida Hindu at the time of his death, and was the son of J C Adimoolam (who was THE Adi Dravida leader of Karnataka).

There is No ADDRESS written in the Burial Register of late Dr J A Mathan (only for Dr J A Mathan) in St Patrick's Church, Bangalore.

Death Register of Dr J A Mathan (No address)

The burial Certificate of late Dr J A Mathan

The burial Certificate of late Dr J A Mathan

The grave-stone of late Dr J A Mathan

They spit on my Grave!

Wife
Roshni-Sunil
???

The death Certificate saying Cause of Death "Accident" was produced by the brother of late Dr J A Mathan named J A Siddhu and J A Ambeth after the BURIAL of Dr J A Mathan.
Despite being a Professing "Adi Dravida Hindu" the two Adi Dravida brothers (J A Siddhu and J A Ambeth) declare that J A Mathan is a Christian (Ch) by Religion, produce NO Medical Cause of Death Certificate and provide no evidence of Cause of Death.

ORAL/VERBAL TESTIMONY by Two False Witnesses.

BBMP Death Certificate

No FIR or Post-mortem reports were submitted to the BBMP.

False Witness J A Siddhu

All the assets of late Dr J A Mathan (who died intestate) were misappropriated by Impostors.

Fast-Forward to the Future 2011

House of Quack Sunil Redson on 27 July 2011
(No Name Board outside House)
Opposite LIC Building, Station Road, Yadgir, Karnataka

Sunil Redson is a Quack practicing as a Doctor in Yadgir along with his Father Shantharaj Redson and his FIVE Brothers, since the Murder of late Dr J A Mathan since 1976 (without having Qualifications).Sunil Redson even displays his name in the Notice Board in the Yadgir Railway Station as having MD/BAMS qualification.

S.No	Hindi Name	Name of the Hospital	Distance	Mode of ransport	BSNL No	Mobail No
1		Health Unit, Raichur
2		Govt Hospital, Yadgir
3
4		Dr G Rajendra, MD
5		Dr Naganna K MBBS
6		Dr Sunil Kumar Redson MD/BAMS	By Walk			9886032367
7		Dr S Srinivas Reddy
8		Dr G Aparna Rajendra, MS, DGO, FIMS

Display of List of Hospitals outside Yadgir Railway Station

Dr Sunil Redson, BAMS/MD in List of Hospitals outsideYadgir Railway Station prior to November 2011

There is an ongoing investigation based on the Criminal Intimidation by Sunil Redson and his friend Threatening the Life and Limb of the Legitimate Daughter of Dr J A Mathan on 22 February 2011.

"Dr" Sunil Redson and yet another Son

This enquiry was done based on the Threat to Life by someone from the Past of late Dr J A Mathan.

Sunil Redson Working under cover of a BAMS student??? since October 2011

Working under cover of a BAMS student??

"Dr" Jagadeesh

Sunil Redson and his father Shantharaj Redson have been found not to be having the Licence to Practice by the "Karnataka Medical Council (KMC) and Medical Council of India (MCI).

KMC and MCI Conclude Sunil Redson and Shantharaj Redson are Quacks

The MCI and KMC Conclude the Enquiry

Sunil Redson Prescribes a Banned Drug Tab NISE (Nimulside): Prescribing a Drug Banned by the Government of India

Other Prescriptions by "Dr" Sunil Redson

Prescription by "Dr" Sunil Redson with Signature and Date

In November 2011, Sunil Redson meets the "Inspector of Works,Yadgir Railway Station, Yadgir" and informs the Person responsible for Painting that "He's not a Doctor" and to remove his name from the List of Doctors on the Notice Board in Yadgir Railway Station.

The Last day of Dr J A Mathan: The Players

2011-12-08T09:26:00.000-08:00

The Last day of Dr J A Mathan: The Players

Visitor 1: The Trap
The sister Saraswathi of Sworn enemy (Brother-in-law Sugumaran) made the last call to Dr J A Mathan to examine for a Chest Pain. Sugumaran was Forced to Marry sister Rani (of Dr J A Mathan) in a Forced Marriage in 1970 in KGF.

Sugumaran

"Dr" Sunil Redson

Dr J A Mathan was Murdered on 18 October 1975 in Austin Town

Dr J A Mathan

There are no records of F.I.R. (First Information Record), No Post-mortem records and No Death Certificate (before the Burial).

Dr J A Mathan was professing as an Adi Dravida Hindu at the time of his death, and was the son of J C Adimoolam (who was THE Adi Dravida leader of Karnataka).

There is No ADDRESS written in the Burial Register of late Dr J A Mathan (only for Dr J A Mathan).

Death Register of Dr J A Mathan (No address)

The grave-stone of late Dr J A Mathan

They spit on my Grave!

Wife
Roshni-Sunil
???

The death Certificate saying Cause of Death "Accident" was produced by the brother of late Dr J A Mathan named J A Siddhu after the BURIAL of Dr J A Mathan. No FIR or Post-mortem reports were submitted to the BBMP.

J A Siddhu

Dr J A Mathan was a good man and a good doctor, remembered by many!

Kollur Government Primary Health Centre, Chittapur District, Yadgir

They all stayed in the same Residential Compound. Shantharaj Redson was the Neighbour in the ResidentiaCompound.

Sunil Redson is now a "Doctor" as well practicing in Yadgir, Karnataka.

Dr J A Mathan: An unfinished life!

2011-12-08T08:26:00.000-08:00

Dr J A Mathan: An unfinished life!

Dr J A Mathan was a good man and a good doctor, remembered by many!

He was posted in Kollur Primary Health Centre in 1973 to 1974. His colleagues in the Kollur Primary Health Centre (near Yadgir) included the Compounder Shantharaj Redson and his SIX Sons including Sunil Redson.
They all stayed in the same Residential Compound. Shantharaj Redson was the Neighbour in the ResidentiaCompound.

Sunil Redson is now a "Doctor" as well practicing in Yadgir, Karnataka.

Converted Christian "J C Adimoolam" weds Christian "Jeevarathanam" on 12 July 1936 under Christian Marriage Rites and Baptises 4 Children

2011-12-06T08:57:00.001-08:00

Converted Christian "J C Adimoolam" weds Christian "Jeevarathanam" on 12 July 1936 under Christian Marriage Rites and Baptises at least 4 of the Eldest Children.

This Christian Marriage happened in Our Saviour Lutheran Church, Oorgaum, KGF, Kolar Gold Fields.

However, J C Adimoolam also converted to Buddhism under Dr B R Ambedkar in 1953 and became the Leader of Adi Dravidas in Karnataka.

He gave multiple "Adi Dravida" Scheduled Caste Certificates to all and sundry including to self and Children.

37 years on, boy Arun Dohle adopted by Germans meets mother: Does not want to know whether Sharad Pawar is Father!

2011-12-06T08:15:00.000-08:00

37 years on, boy adopted by Germans meets mother
November 18, 2010
http://www.ndtv.com/article/cities/37-years-on-boy-adopted-by-germans-meets-mother-67099
Mumbai: After 17 years of litigation, Arun Dohle, an India born-German national, was reunited with his biological mother in Pune on Wednesday.

Dohle, now 37, was adopted by a German couple when he was two months old. He was curious about his roots since he was 14 and suspected he was given away without his mother's consent.

Dohle's mother had surrendered him to Kusumbai Motichand Mahila Seva Gram as he was conceived before marriage. The Supreme Court in August allowed him access to records maintained by the organisation. This led to people, places and, finally, his mother.
When Arun Dohle, India-born German national, started on his mission to find his biological mother, it seemed an impossible task. But after 17 years of litigation and connecting several dots, thirty-seven-year-old Dohle was reunited with his mother in Pune on Wednesday.

"I don't know what to say," Dohle said, struggling to express his feelings. "I am very happy but I could not talk to her too much as I don't speak Marathi." Sitting face-to-face in a restaurant with his mother was emotional but a rather composed rendezvous.

Dohle was two months old when an unsuspecting German couple Michael and Gertrude Dohle adopted him in 1973. Dohle contested in court that he was given in adoption without his mother's consent. He alleged that his adoptive parents were friends of NCP leader Sharad Pawar's brother Pratap, who facilitated his adoption. Curious about his roots since the age of 14, he returned to India first at the age of 20.

After Wednesday's meeting, his apprehensions appear to have been put to rest. But his joy of seeing his mother is mixed with an underlying anger. "Since 1993, all that Arun asked for was to know who his mother was," Anjali Pawar-Kate of Against Child Trafficking, who was instrumental in locating Dohle's mother in Pune, said. "He was made to run from pillar to post and denied the information time and again. He is obviously angry about that."

With the Supreme Court's permission in August to access records maintained by Kusumbai Motichand Mahila Seva Gram (KMMSG), Dohle got in touch with several people and finally to his mother, now in her sixties.

"Some common contacts and a lot of running around led me to Arun's mother's brother," Pawar-Kate said. "I had to take him in confidence and explain the situation. The KMMSG records had only her name and the address of 1973."

"We did not speak too much," Dohle said. "She was holding her tears back and trying to stay calm. I did not feel like asking her any questions. Dohle is scheduled to fly back to Germany on Wednesday night.

"His aunt (mother's sister-in-law) was more emotional," Pawar-Kate said. "She caressed Arun's face and told him that she always told his mother that he would return one day."

Dohle's mother had surrendered him to the KMMSG because he was born out of wedlock. Over the years, the past has faded and she and her husband gave Dohle a warm welcome.

"His mother retired four years ago from a government job," Pawar-Kate said. "Her husband runs a motor driving school. They told Arun that he live with them when he is in India."

Dohle, however, is upset with the indifferent attitude of the adoption agency. "It took just three months to trace my mother after knowing her name but their non-cooperation took away 17 years of my life," he said. On his next visit to India, Dohle wants to bring his seven-year-old twins to visit their grandmother.

>>
'I am not interested in my biological father'
http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-08-18/mumbai/28303245_1_adoption-agency-inter-country-adoption-biological-parents
Aug 18, 2010
MUMBAI: A day after the Supreme Court allowed him to see the original adoption record which the Pune-based adoption agency was guarding fiercely, Arun Dohle was heading back home to Germany and to his own seven-year-old twin boys.

However, he made a quiet resolve to come back again "to find answers to the several questions that are still unanswered. It is not really my biological father that I am interested in,'' says the 37-year-old who was adopted as a month-old baby from Kusumbai Motichand Mahila Seva Gram (KMMSG) in Pune by the Belgium-based Michael and Gertrud Dohle, on recommendation by Pratap Pawar, brother of NCP chief Sharad Pawar.

His habeas corpus plea to have his biological mother produced in court was dismissed by the apex court. But 17 years of legal struggle after he first made the innocuous request to Mahila Seva Gram to be shown his adoption file, his wish was finally granted by the Supreme Court on Monday. He now knows that his mother was a 20-year-old Hindu Maratha, a Std X graduate who resided at the agency during her pregnancy after her "friend's brother'' refused to marry her.

The adoption file was slim, just a few handwritten pages, which the bench headed by Justice Markandey Katju handed over to Dohle's counsel and him in court to read without hurrying them up. According to the judges, it is not a national secret that will cause a `maha yudh', adding that "nothing is private here'' when the agency tried to prevent showing of the file citing "mother's privacy''.

Dohle is married and runs an NGO called Against Child Trafficking in Germany, which he says aims at "tackling a money-and-demand-driven market in adoption of children that should be labelled as child-trafficking.'' His battle may bring hope to many other children given up for inter-country adoption, who once they grow up, wish to find out the identity of their biological parents.

"The "child record'' that the adoption agency maintains may contain information about the biological parents if their identities are known,'' said advocate Jamshed Mistry, one of the counsels for Dohle in SC. He added that Monday's order will now ensure that adoption agencies will maintain authentic records as mandated by law in case of foreign adoption and by the landmark SC verdict of 1984, in the case of Laxmi Kant Pandey.

Dohle, hours before his flight out of Mumbai while speaking with TOI, recalled how he had first launched his quest to find his biological mother in 1993. "I first came to India in 1993 and asked Mahila Seva Gram to show me the file. They refused. The game being played is just cruel. Had they shown it then, so much time, trouble and trauma would have been saved on both sides,'' he said. "There are still details that need to be verified. The police did not investigate properly.'' Though he was born in Pune's Sassoon hospital, the police report said there is no record of the `relinquishment deed'. "The question is `why'?'' said the bespectacled Dohle who still wonders where and how his mother might be. His case was that the Pune agency asked his mother to leave and handed him to the German couple. The agency said as an "unwed mother'' she had relinquished her rights and abandoned him.

The case, took a controversial turn, when he said that former Maharashtra chief Minister Sharad Pawar's brother might be linked to his birth. The police report, however, categorically denied any links to the Pawar family. But as Dohle pointed out, Pratap Pawar in October 1973, while recommending the Dohles as adoptive parents had written: I am a member of Association of Friends of Germany and Mr & Mrs Dohle are friends...They stayed with us and selected Arun Swanand as their adopted son.''

Critical Analysis of the Law of Adultery in India: A Gender Biased Law.

2011-12-04T16:14:00.000-08:00

Critical Analysis of the Law of Adultery in India: A Gender Biased Law.
http://www.incubation360.com/knowledge-blogs/essays/315-critical-analysis-of-the-law-of-adultery-in-india
The law of adultery as it stands in India punishes only man, and assumes that in all cases ‘man is the seducer’ and the women, who is an equal participant is viewed as a victim. There have been numerous debates about the discriminatory stance of the provision, The insistence of the National commission for women and the report of the Madhav Menon committee & the 42nd Report of the Law Commission of India, have breathed a new lease of life in the dying controversy. The law relating to adultery as existing in the Indian penal code under section 497 has been criticized ever since it’s commencement. Its validity both on the constitutional grounds as well as philosophical grounds has been challenged time and again. But the law still stands as it is.

Law of Adultery as it stands in India.

In India the law of adultery is punishable under section 497 of the IPC, but originally the framers of the code did not make adultery an offence punishable under the Code, it was the Second law commission which after giving mature consideration to the subject, came to the conclusion that it was not advisable to exclude this offence from the Code.

Adultery figures in the penal law of many nations and some of the most celebrated English Lawyers have considered its omission from the English Law as a defect.
Section 497 provides : “Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he known or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting to the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years or with fine, or with both. In such a case the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor.

The law commissioners have limited the cognizance of this offence to adultery committed with a married woman, and the male offender alone has been made liable to punishment.

The Flaw

Prima facie unequal treatment is meted out by the law to men & women, there’s an inherent flaw, It makes the offence punishable for men but not the wife, to punish the man severely and to let the women who was an equal part to go scot free is unreasonable on the face of it, it is discriminatory that for the same act the man becomes the manifestation of evil but the woman still is considered to retain her virtues and is treated as a victim.

It is unexplainable that for the same wrongful act the man is presumed by the law to have a mens rea while no such presumption is attributed in reference to the woman.
The consent or the willingness of the woman is no impediment to the application of this section, and, as generally happens, she is quite aware of the purpose for which she is quitting her husband and is an assenting party to it.

Considering the present day situation and the vast transformation which the society has undergone, Blindly assuming that ‘man is the seducer and not the women’ would be a dangerous proposition, the boot is on the other leg these days, in a variety of cases. The law makes an irrational classification between man and woman, in restricting the class of offenders to men, where women or wife is an equal partner, it violates constitutional provisions enshrined in Articles 14,15 & 21.

The Justification taken by the Framers of the Code, and the retentionists lobby for this aberration is that owing to the atypical social conditions, it would not be just & proper to punish women equally, as they were a subjugated and exploited lot, and I am constrained to say that it was to a certain extent applicable in that era, now bygone.

The IPC, when in took form in 1860, was silent on the punishment for adultery with Lord Macaulay observing, “There are some peculiarities in the state of society in this country which may well lead a humane man to pause before he determines to punish the infidelity of wives.”

The Rationale & the circumstances he referred to included child marriage and polygamy. Macaulay, hence, advised that it would be enough to treat it as a civil injury.

The framers of the code believed that if the women did the deplorable act it was pressured by their social and private conditions in life. Hence they were actually not at fault and taking into account their already depleted station in life they should not have been held liable at least in the eyes of the law.

Supreme Court on the Law of Adultery: In 1951, one Yusuf Abdul Aziz challenged the constitutional validity of the provision. However, Bombay high court chief justice M C Chagla had upheld the provision saying the Constitution permitted such special legislation for women, it was held in this case that this section does not contravene any of the fundamental rights laid down in the Constitution of India, and therefore it is not bad or void under Articles 13.

The Supreme Court observed that adultery is a wrong against the sanctity of the matrimonial home. Thus charges are pressed against the outsider who breaks the said sanctity. The woman, in cases of adultery, is considered the victim of a seducer. It appears that the court believes that the man has an unstoppable seductive charm and the woman is helpless against it. The evil that is punished by the law, in the mind of the court, is that of seduction of a woman by another man. According to the court the woman is considered to be the victim. Thus the court held that the law was non discriminatory and not violating the right to equality , thus the court upheld the constitutional validity of the section 497. The court also opined that by not allowing the spouses to prosecute each other the law offers a chance to the spouse to make-up, it was further held that “Section 497 is not violative of Articles 14, 15 & 21 of the Constitution.

It is humbly submitted that the court erred in its judgment,

We must keep in mind that these reasons and defenses were given decades ago. The most important reason for debate to get re-ignited is the drastic change in the social status of women. Gone are the days when Women were a suppressed or subjugated lot, The practices of sati, child marriage, polygamy, etc, have been done away with.

Today there are laws against these evils and also laws providing effective relief against heinous acts such as domestic violence, dowry and others. Almost all professional colleges has a quota for women. Thus women today are in no way inferior to men or suppressed, and are at par with the opposite sex. The effective implementation of these laws and other women friendly provisions in the constitution insures that women, today, have an edge in the society. All this has resulted in them gaining the power of choice. They can no longer be classified as victims in cases of adultery.

Solution: It is pertinent to note here that The 42nd Law Commission Report has suggested to substitute section 497 of the IPC, the substituting provision is “S. 497. Adultery – Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is, and whom he or she knows, or has reason to believe, to be the wife or husband, as the case may be, of another person, without the consent or connivance of that other person, such sexual intercourse by the man not amounting to the offence of rape commits adultery, and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to five years, or with fine, or with both”

The Malimath Committee on Criminal Justice Reforms has re-iterated more or less the same argument, that men and women being equally partners in the deplorable act, should be made to stand at the same footing, and equal treatment should be meted out to them both.

Conclusion: In light of the above critical analysis, it is very much apparent & beyond doubt, that the prevailing law is not in consonance with the changed times, the law is neither socially apt nor does it stand to the principles of equality, from absolute conservatism to absolute liberty, the social fabric of our country has undergone a drastic change. It is high time that Recommendations made by the Justice Malimath Committee and the 42nd Report of the Law Commission be taken into consideration religiously, and necessary amendments be made to Sec. 497 IPC, so as to do away with the irregularities, and in the interest of doctrine of equality.

BLOOD-AVENGER and The Angel of Death: The role of the next of kin of a Murdered Person : Bible Quotes

2011-12-03T19:27:00.000-08:00

BLOOD-AVENGER
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0003_0_03144.html

A person who is authorized by law, or who is duty-bound, to kill a murderer is called go'el ha-dam – usually translated as an avenger of blood, but more accurately to be rendered as a redeemer of blood (cf. Lev. 25:25; Ruth 3:12; I Kings 16:11).

By putting the murderer to death (Num. 35:19, 21), the avenger expiates the blood shed on the polluted land (Num. 35:33). Originally private revenge was legitimate in Israel, as in other ancient civilizations, not only for homicide but also for mayhem (cf. Gen. 4:23–24) and rape (Gen. 34:25–26); and the restrictions on the avenger's rights and their legal regulation marked the beginnings of a system of criminal law (see B. Cohen in bibl.). It was stipulated that only murder with malice aforethought (Num. 35:20–21; Deut. 19:11–13) or committed with a murderous instrument (Num. 35:16–18; for further examples, see Maim., Yad, Roze'ah u-Shemirat Nefesh 6:6–9) gave rise to the avenger's right (see Mak. 12a, Sanh. 45b); the unintentional manslayer was entitled to refuge from the avenger (Num. 35:12, 15; Deut. 19:4–6) and was liable to be killed by him only when he prematurely left the city of refuge (Num. 35:26–28). It may be considered a concession to human nature that avenging was not wholly prohibited, but only restricted and regulated: the natural "hot anger" (Deut. 19:6) of the victim's next of kin is left at least some legal outlet.

The avenger's rights were further restricted by being made subject to and dependent on the prior judicial conviction of the murderer – whether the murder was premeditated or not was a question not for the avenger but for the court to decide (Maim. loc. cit. 1:5, following Num. 35:12; "the manslayer may not die unless he has stood trial before the assembly"; but cf. Yad, loc. cit. 5:7–10). Opinions of later jurists were divided as to what the avenger's real function was; some held that he initiated the proceedings, searching for the murderer and bringing him to court for trial (Ramban; Nov.; Sanh. 45b; Beit ha-Beḥirah ad loc.); some thought he should appear before the court and participate in the proceedings as a prosecutor (Nissim Gerondi, basing himself on the Targum pseudo-Jonathan who renders go'el ha-dam as "claimant of blood"); others relegated the avenger to the role of an executioner, it being his right and privilege to execute the death penalty pronounced by the court (Yad, loc. cit. 1:2; Ritba, Nov., Mak. 10b). That the avenger had a locus standi in court appears probable from the scriptural injunction that the court "shall decide between the slayer and the blood-avenger" (Num. 35:24). While the slayer would protest his innocence or, alternatively, his lack of malice, the avenger would plead premeditation (cf. Malbim ad loc.); by finding a lack of malice, the court is said to "protect the manslayer from the blood-avenger" (Num. 35:25). When an alleged murderer stood trial but was not convicted (either because of lack of sufficient evidence or because the verdict had not yet been given) and the avenger killed him, most jurists held that while the killing was unlawful, the avenger was not guilty of murder (Beit ha-Beḥirah, Sanh. 45b) – the proffered reason being that the avenger had a better right to kill than even the unintentional manslayer (Yad, loc. cit. 6:5), or that Scripture itself recognized the avenger's "hot anger" (Deut. 19:6) as negating premeditation (Redak to II Sam. 14:7). However, if the avenger killed the murderer within the walls of the city of refuge, it was murder pure and simple (Tosef., Mak. 3:6).

Any next of kin entitled to inherit the deceased's estate qualified as an avenger (Yad, loc. cit. 1:2). Some later authorities even include maternal relatives although they are not in line for inheritance (Or Same'ah to Yad, loc. cit., against Maimonides). Women also qualify as avengers (Yad, loc. cit. 1:3). There are biblical instances of a father (II Sam. 13:31–38), a son (II Kings 14:5–6), brothers (Judg. 8:4–21; II Sam. 2:22–23), and also the king (I Kings 2:29–34) as avengers. It was later stipulated that when no next of kin was available or came forward, an avenger was to be appointed by the court (Sanh. 45b).

There is little doubt that legally the rights (and duties) of the blood-avenger became obsolete (Ḥavvat Ya'ir 146), though the killing by the avenger of a murderer is even today legally regarded by some scholars as no more than unintentional manslaughter (e.g. Keẓot ha-Ḥoshen ḤM 2). Apart from the law, the right and duty of avenging the blood of one's nearest relatives are still deeply imprinted on the mind and religious conviction of most Oriental (including many Jewish) communities; notwithstanding repeated efforts from various quarters, blood vengeance is not, however, recognized in Israeli law even in mitigating circumstances.

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

M. Duschak, Mosaisch-Talmudisches Strafrecht (1869), 19f.; S. Mayer, Rechte der Israeliten, Athener, und Roemer, 3 (1876), 36–47; E. Goitein, Vergeltungsprincip im biblischen und talmudischen Strafrecht (1891); G. Foerster, Das mosaische Strafrecht… (1900), 9ff.; J. Weismann, Talion und oeffentliche Strafe im mosaischen Rechte (1913); E. Merz, Blutrache bei den Israeliten (1916); ET, 5 (1953), 220–33; J.M. Ginzburg, Mishpatim le-Yisra'el (1956), 356–74; EM, 2 (1965), 392–4; B. Cohen, Jewish and Roman Law, 2 (1966), 624–7; addenda 793f.; I. Warhaftig, Goel ha-Dam, Tehumim, 11 (1990), 326-360.

Pre-meditated Bloodshed (MURDER) and Blood-Guilt of the Murderer: Bible Concordance

2011-12-03T19:01:00.000-08:00

BLOODGUILT
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/judaica/ejud_0002_0003_0_03145.html

“And for your lifeblood I will surely demand an accounting. I will demand an accounting from every animal. And from each human being, too, I will demand an accounting for the life of another human being.

“Whoever sheds human blood,
by human beings shall their blood be shed;
for in the image of God
has God made humankind.” (Gen 9:5-6)

BLOODGUILT, liability for punishment for shedding blood. The biblical concept of bloodguilt derives from the belief that deeds generate consequences and that sin, in particular, is a danger to the sinner.

The most vivid examples of this belief appear in connection with unlawful homicide, where innocent blood (dam naki (naqi); Jonah 1:14) cries out for vengeance (Gen. 4:10), is rejected by the earth (Isa. 26:21; Ezek. 24:7), and pollutes it (Num. 35:33–34).
Bloodguilt attaches to the slayer and his family (II Sam. 3:28ff.) for generations (II Kings 9:26), and even to his city (Jer. 26:5), nation (Deut. 21:8), and land (Deut. 24:4). The technical term for bearing bloodguilt damo bo, or damo bero'sho, meant originally "his blood [remains] in him/in his head" (Josh. 2:19; Ezek. 33:5), and the legal formula mot yumat damav bo (Lev. 20:9–16) means that in the case of lawful execution, the blood of the guilty victim remains on his own person and does not attach itself to his executioners.

The concept of bloodguilt in the Bible pervades all sources, legal, narrative, and cultic, and entails the following system of graded punishments for homicide.

Deliberate Homicide

The penalty is death by man (Gen. 9:6), or failing that, by God (Gen. 9:5; cf. Lev. 20:4–5). A man can be either the direct cause (Num. 35:16–21) or the indirect cause, e.g., a watchman (II Kings 10:24; Ezek. 33:6), priests (Num. 18:1, 3), homeowner (Deut. 22:8), or subordinate (I Kings 2:31–35). The punishment of the murderer is primarily the responsibility of the *blood-avenger (after court conviction, Num. 35:19; Deut. 19:12), but God is the final guarantor that homicide is ultimately punished.

His personal intervention is expressed by the verbs פקד (pakad (paqad), "attend to," Hos. 1:4); נקם (nakam (naqam), "avenge," II Kings 9:7); דרש (darash, "exact punishment," Ezek. 33:6); and שוב (השיב, heshiv, "return") in the idiom heshiv damim ʿal roʾsh (II Sam. 16:18; I Kings 2:33), which indicates that God will turn back to the head of the slayer the blood of the slain, the punishment the murderer believed he had averted. In the Bible, it should be noted, these idioms have become technical terms: the original phrase remains, but without the crudity of its more primitive implications in other ancient sources. God may postpone punishment to a later generation (II Sam. 12: 13–14; I Kings 21:21). Man, however, does not have this option (Deut. 24:16; II Kings 14:6) unless divinely authorized (II Kings 9:7, 26).

There is no commutation of the death penalty. The notion that deliberate homicide cannot be commuted is the foundation stone of criminal law in the Bible: human life is invaluable, hence incommutable.

Accidental Homicide

Since accidental homicide also results in bloodguilt, the killer may be slain by the goʾel with impunity (Num. 35:26–27; Deut. 19:4–10). However, as his act was unintentional, the natural death of the high priest is allowed to substitute for his own death (Num. 35:25, 28). In the interim, he is confined to a *city of refuge to protect him from the blood-avenger (Num. 35:9ff; Deut. 4:41–43; 19:1–13; Josh. 20:1ff.) In cases where the slayer is unknown, the community nearest the corpus delicti must disavow complicity and, by means of a ritual, symbolically wash away the blood of the slain (Deut. 21:1–9; see *Eglah Arufah).

Homicidal Beast

The penalty is death by stoning and the shunning of the carcass. The supreme value of human life in the Bible is best expressed in the law that a homicidal beast is also guilty and that not only must it be killed but its carcass, laden with bloodguilt, must be reviled (Ex. 21:28–29; cf. Gen. 9:5).

Unauthorized Slaughter of an Animal

The reverence for life that informs all biblical legislation reached its summit in the priestly law which sanctions the use of an animal for food on the condition that its blood, containing its life, be drained upon the authorized altar (and thereby be symbolically restored to God; Lev. 17:11). All other slaughter is unlawful bloodshed, punishable by death at the hand of God (Lev. 17:4).

Exceptions

No bloodguilt is incurred by homicide in self-defense (Ex. 22:1), judicial execution (Lev. 20:9–16), and war (I Kings 2:5–6). The priestly legislation may indicate some qualification of the view that war is justifiable homicide. For example, David was disqualified from building the Temple (I Chron. 22:8).

BIBLIOGRAPHY:

M. Greenberg, in: Sefer Yovel Y. Kaufmann (1960), 5–28; idem, in: IDB, 1 (1962), S.V.; K. Koch, in: VT, 12 (1962), 396–416; J. Milgrom, Studies in Levitical Terminology, 1 (1970), 22–33, 56–69.
-------------------------------
Bloodguilt

Exodus 22:3 If the sun be risen upon him, there shall be bloodguiltiness for him--he shall make restitution; if he have nothing, then he shall be sold for his theft.

Exodus 22:4 If the stolen property is found in his hand alive, whether it is ox, donkey, or sheep, he shall pay double.

Leviticus 17:4 and hath not brought it unto the door of the tent of meeting, to present it as an offering unto the LORD before the tabernacle of the LORD, blood shall be imputed unto that man; he hath shed blood; and that man shall be cut off from among his people.

Deuteronomy 22:8 When thou buildest a new house, then thou shalt make a parapet for thy roof, that thou bring not blood upon thy house, if any man fall from thence.

1 Samuel 25:26 Now therefore, my lord, as the LORD liveth, and as thy soul liveth, seeing the LORD hath withholden thee from bloodguiltiness, and from finding redress for thyself with thine own hand, now therefore let thine enemies, and them that seek evil to my lord, be as Nabal.

1 Samuel 25:33 and blessed be thy discretion, and blessed be thou, that hast kept me this day from bloodguiltiness, and from finding redress for myself with mine own hand.

2 Samuel 21:1 And there was a famine in the days of David three years, year after year; and David sought the face of the LORD. And the LORD said: 'It is for Saul, and for his bloody house, because he put to death the Gibeonites.'

Psalms 51:14 Deliver me from bloodguiltiness, O God, the God of my salvation. My tongue shall sing aloud of your righteousness.

Hosea 12:14 Ephraim hath provoked most bitterly, And his blood on himself he leaveth, And his reproach turn back to him doth his Lord!
----
Save me from bloodguilt, O God,

God of my salvation;

My tongue will exult in your righteousness!”

(Psalm 51:16)
We must understand the concept of “bloodguilt” in the Old Testament. To begin with, blood represented life—it was seen as the life of a man and as the life of a beast (Genesis 9:4); hence the restriction against eating any flesh that still has the blood in it (Deuteronomy 12:23, Acts 15:20). You can commit many crimes against another person, but the shedding of his blood is the most destructive, for it is one he may never recover from.

Hence the idea of “bloodguilt.” If you are guilty of shedding the blood of another, you are guilty of his blood. To take this idea one step further, in ancient Jewish practice, there was a member of the family who was seen as the “avenger of blood” (Numbers 35:19). Were one of his relatives murdered, it was his role to put the murderer to death. Note that this is not meant as a means of revenge, but as a means of exacting justice. The blood avenger had rules and restrictions that he had to abide by, and this was simply one means by which capital punishment was carried forth in ancient Israel. At the same time, God established places in Israel called “Cities of Refuge” where the guilty could flee if the murder committed was not premeditated (Numbers 35:11). If you made it to the city of refuge before the avenger of blood could kill you, you were given sanctuary. In turn, you were required to stay in the city of refuge until the death of the high priest; when the high priest died, you would be free to return without fear of retribution.

And in this ancient practice, we have a wonderful picture of Christ. Beloved, our sin makes us guilty of blood—not just the blood of bulls and goats through the generation, but of the blood of one another, and most importantly, of the blood of Christ. It was Christ, whose sacrifice was planned and set since before the beginning of creation (1 Peter 1:20), who shed his own blood as atonement for our sins. The penalty for sin is death (Genesis 2:17)—thus sin cannot be forgiven without the shedding of blood (Hebrews 9:22). Our own blood, being tainted by sin, both inherited and actual, is tainted and ineffectual in atoning even for our own sins, let alone for the sins of another, and thus, the necessity for another to provide a sacrifice for us.

Yet, the picture does not end there in terms of the idea of bloodguilt, for it is in Christ that we have our city of refuge—it is in Christ and in Christ alone that we who bear the bloodguilt of sin can flee for refuge. And what is even more glorious is that is that Christ, the great High Priest, went to his death so that we might be forgiven, no longer convicted criminals hiding for their lives, but forgiven men and women forgiven and adopted as sons and daughters. Oh, beloved, what a picture of Christ we have in the Old Testament laws of bloodguilt, and here, King David is crying out to God in faith that he would be delivered from the bloodguilt that his sin has brought him—forgiveness that only comes from God through Christ. This is something that David understood well and looked forward in hopes for the day of seeing the Messiah come.

And as a result of the salvation that is given by God, David rejoices and exults in the righteousness of God. The verb that David uses to describe his praise is !n:r” (ranan), which means, “to sing,” yet the verb is in the Piel construct, which, in Hebrew, intensifies the verb and gives it a sense of ongoing repetition. Hence, the idea that David is conveying is of an exuberant, ongoing praise of God, rejoicing in song over and over again in praise. Oh, were this to describe the praise that we give to God in the salvation that he offers us!

Christ has provided both a city of refuge and a sacrifice for our sins.

O worship the King all glorious above,

O gratefully sing his power and his love;

Our shield and Defender, the Ancient of Days,

Pavilioned in splendor and girded with praise.

Adultery law biased against men, says Supreme Court

2011-12-02T18:50:00.001-08:00

Adultery law biased against men, says Supreme Court
Dec 3, 2011
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Adultery-law-biased-against-men-says-Supreme-Court/articleshow/10964790.cms
NEW DELHI: Taking up a matrimonial dispute, the Supreme Court on Thursday concurred with criticism of Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code which punishes a man alone for adultery for having consensual sex with a married woman.

The criticism of the bench of Justices Aftab Alam and R M Lodha was on two grounds - that the provision reduces a married woman to a property of the husband, and that punishment is meted out to the man though the woman with whom he had consensual sex was an equal partner in the alleged crime.

'Women immune to adultery charges'

Section 497 of IPC says, "Whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and whom he knows or has reason to believe to be the wife of another man, without the consent or connivance of that man, such sexual intercourse not amounting the offence of rape, is guilty of the offence of adultery and shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 5 years, or with fine, or with both. In such case, the wife shall not be punishable as an abettor."

The bench said, "The provision (Section 497) is currently under criticizm from certain quarters for showing a strong gender bias for it makes the position of a married woman almost as a property of her husband. But in terms of the law as it stands, it is evident from a plain reading of the section that only a man can be proceeded against and punished for the offence of adultery."

"Indeed, the section provides expressly that the wife cannot be punished even as an abettor. Thus, the mere fact that the appellant is a woman makes her completely immune to the charges of adultery and she cannot be proceeded against for that offence," the bench said.

49. Forbidden Fruit tastes sweeter: Cruella De-Vil Loved the Child of Her Lover, But Hated her Husband's Children!

2011-12-01T18:21:00.000-08:00

Chronicles of a Victim of Deceived Parentage. Chapter 49. Forbidden Fruit tastes sweeter: Cruella De-Vil Loved the Child of Her Lover, But Hated her Husband's Children!

List of Characters:

Maternal Great-Grandmother : Cruella De-Vil

Maternal Great-Grand-father: Major Bholanath (Cuckolded husband of Cruella De-Vil)

Maternal Great-Grand-uncle/??: Johny Rotten = brother/bother of Major Bholanath

Lover of Cruella Devil (and Potential Father of ex-Major Anil Peter Fritzl): Heart Swamy

Maternal Grandfather: ex-Major Anil Peter Fritzl

Maternal Grandmother: Mrs Fritzl

Mother: Paristha

Daughter: Orphan Nancy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exodus 22:22-24

22 Ye shall not afflict any (TRUE) widow, or fatherless child.

23 If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me,I will surely hear their cry;

24 And my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless.

Isa. 1:17

Uphold the rights of the orphan!

Romans 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who suppress the truth in unrighteousness!

Romans 13:4 For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.

Cruella De-Vil loved the Child of her Lover "Heart Swamy", but hated the Children of her Husband Bholanath!
Did they think that "Anil Peter Fritzl" was the Royal son of Poseidon, like Procrustes?

Cruella De-Vil envied her Step-Mother, who could keep her man and Orphan the Children of the First Wife! Cruella De-Vil survived the floods, famines and plagues. in Hassan

An orphanage

Why did the entire family in Coimbatore NOT acknowledge Peter Fritzl as the Legitimate son of Major Bholanath, and why did they communicate all issues with Captain Omission?

Major Bholanath rejected his wife's Cuckolded Child A-Nil Peter Fritzl, and had him sent to the Procrustes Boarding School in Coimbatore. The wife Cruella De-Vil ensured that the precocious teenager Johny Rotten was sent to look up A-nil Peter Fritzl in the Boarding School.

Fritzl was Stained in the Boarding School and there were many attempts of Bullying and Sodomy. The Sodomy attempt was so strong in Fritzl's mind that he wanted others to experience the same Trauma of rejection and abandonment that he did.

Procrustes Boarding School: One size fits all!

The Grand-father Mr Peter Fritzl was NOT acknowledged as the LEGITIMATE SON of his Mother's Husband, since the Army soldier Bholanath was busy at the War Front at the time of Conception of the baby in 1945 fighting the India-Pakistan War of Partition.

FATHER'S NAME IS "NIL" or BLANK

The Father's Name on the Birth Certificate read as "NIL"
and
The Mother's Name was "Cruella De-Vil"
and
The Name of the SON was "A-NIL"!

A-Nil the Son of "NIL"!
The Child grew up to be A-NIL Peter Fritzl!

Cruella De-Vil took many lovers, including the teenage brother Johny Rotten (who was only 13) and Heart Swamy, while the husband was busy fighting the Partition of India-Pakistan from the British Raj!

Who were the other suspects, who could be the potential Fathers of Fritzl?

Every lover thought that they were the Fathers of Fritzl including the precocious 13-year old Johny Rotten!

Sirach 23: 22-27 The unfaithful wife who bears the Child of Another Man!

Sirach 23:22 The same is true of a woman who is unfaithful to her husband and presents him with a child by another man.

Sirach 23:23 In the first place, she has broken the Law of the Most High.

In the second place, she has wronged her husband.

And in the third place, she has made a whore of herself by committing adultery and bearing the child of a man not her husband.

Sirach 23:24-25 The children will suffer for her sin. They will not be able to find a place in society or establish families. She herself will be brought before the assembly

Sirach 23:26 and permanently disgraced. There will be a curse on her memory. After she is gone,

Sirach 23:27 everyone will realize that nothing is better than fearing the Lord, nothing is sweeter than keeping his commands.

Deuteronomy 20:7

And what man is there that hath betrothed a wife, and hath not taken her? let him go and return unto his house, lest he die in the battle, and another man take her.

Deuteronomy 24:5
When a man hath taken a new wife, he shall not go out to war, neither shall he be charged with any business: but he shall be free at home one year, and shall cheer up his wife which he hath taken.

Indian Soldier fighting the War during Partition 1945, while Enemy Soldiers are busy at home, ravaging

Soldier in the Warfront: India-Pakistan War

Mrs Fritzl and Peter Fritzl (Father of his Daughter's Children)

There was a Hue and Cry, and the Husband of Cruella De-Vil Major Bholanath refused to acknowledge the Paternity of Peter Fritzl in Coimbatore.

The Cuckolded Boy-Child was born in Coimbatore, but was not baptized in the Church, due to a severe argument with the Parish Priest by 2 brothers of Major Bholanath including Johny Rotten.

Would Bholanath's message be the message given by the prophet Hosea (who married a fallen woman)?

Hosea Chapter 2

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hosea+2&version=NIV

2 "Rebuke your mother, rebuke her,

for she is not my wife,

and I am not her husband.

Let her remove the adulterous look from her face

and the unfaithfulness from between her breasts.

4 I will not show my love to her children,

because they are the children of adultery.

5 Their mother has been unfaithful

and has conceived them in disgrace.

She said, 'I will go after my lovers,

who give me my food and my water,

my wool and my linen, my oil and my drink.'

6 Therefore I will block her path with thornbushes;

I will wall her in so that she cannot find her way.

7 She will chase after her lovers but not catch them;

she will look for them but not find them.

Then she will say,

'I will go back to my husband as at first,

for then I was better off than now.'

Picture: The marriage of the prophet Hosea with his 'fallen' wife

8 She has not acknowledged that I was the one

who gave her the grain, the new wine and oil,

who lavished on her the silver and gold—

which they used for Baal.

The Husband Bholanath and his Eldest Daughter were however baptized in the Church.

As years went by, it was more and more clear that Peter Fritzl was not the Son of Major Bholanath, but of another man named Heart Swamy (among other contenders including Johny Rotten).

Everyone thought they were the Father of the Child.

Peter Fritzl with Statue in School

Major Bholanath put the Child in the Boarding School, and Johny Rotten stayed back to look after Peter Fritzl, and married a Woman for a short period of time.

Major Bholanath had the male pattern of Baldness shared with another son Captain Omission.

Pattern of Baldness: Like Father, Like Son

Peter Fritzl had the Hair Pattern inherited from main suspect Heart Swamy.

Peter Fritzl with different pattern of Balding

Do you know who your Father is?

Maternity is a certainty, Paternity is a Matter of Dispute???
>>

And they say: "You are a "Pain to your Mother since your birth!".

>>
The child minor Fritzl was NOT acknowledged as the SON of father's Blood.

There was a fight between Johny Rotten and the Parish Priest, and the Parish Priest refused to Baptise the Child thus born. The end-result was that the CHILD was NOT ACKNOWLEDGED as the Father's Child during the Wedlock (out of wedlock and yet during wedlock).

Picture: St Anthony's Church Puliakulam

The Paternity Fraud was repeated 30 years and 60 years later in Two More Generations. And, there was one Murder to cover up the Paternity Fraud.

1. In the First Generation, the Church Baptism for baby Minor Peter Fritzl was NOT done after the Birth because of the Paternity Dispute. Bholanath's two brothers Johny Rotten and Frank took up the cause of the Adulerous wife and Cuckolded Child born.

2. In the Second Generation of Paternity Fraud, the Church Baptism was done for the Illegitimate Child without the husband's presence for the sister of Peter Fritzl named Rosemary Fritzl, but the Presence of Major Peter Fritzl as God-Father and Fat-ma as God-mother! The Cuckolded Husband was murdered within 1 year of the birth of the Cuckolded Child. The cause of the Adulterous wife and Cuckolded Child was taken up by two sisters of Dr Madhusudan named Poorkodi and Reena (whose husband Koomaran was an adulterous lover).

3. In the Third Generation of Paternity Fraud, the Church Baptism was done for the Illegitimate Child born, and ex-Major Peter Fritzl figured as the Father of his own Daughter's Child on the Certificatesof Birth and Baptism!

Second Chance, Second Life, Second Avatar!

By Hook or By Crook!

One From Gin, One from Sin and One in the Dust-bin!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer: For reasons of confidentiality, please don't assume the identity of the 'narrator'. The entire story has been placed in custody of certain well-wishers. Names and identities of characters have been masked and changed to protect their identities. Let us call the name of the Child (deceived about Parentage in this generation) as 'Orphan Nancy' .

Images used are only representative of the story.

Strong Legal action will be taken in Bangalore jurisdiction, against all those who claim to resemble or know the identity of any characters mentioned in this Chronicles. If you think that you relate to any Character in the Chronicles, it will remain a FIGMENT OF YOUR IMAGINATION. And, the purpose of a true CLASSIC in Developmental Psychology will be achieved.

Events are true and character sketches are disguised to protect their identity.

Literary agents and International publishers can contact me for further details.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Copyright © 2011 Roshni Mathan Pereira and 'Orphan Nancy'
>>

1. At an individual level children may be separated from their family members, families or communities because of:
Divorce or separation - the cases of the marriages of different nationals can mean children are pawns in access battles and find themselves living in a different country through no choice of their own. This may be sometimes because a parent abducts their child or children and the laws of each country interpret parental rights differently

Domestic violence - the refuges for women who have fled violent husbands are testimony to crisis-driven situations that lead women and often their children to search for a new life in safe surroundings. Research in recent years has begun to address the trauma and its effects such events have on the children involved.

Familial abuse and abandonment - children who are subject to serious risk or harm in their home will be subject to legal proceedings in which the province or state takes responsibility for decisions regarding their safety. In many situations this will mean being removed to live with in foster care or residential setting with obvious destabilisation of their domestic situation and often much wider effects on their peer and social networks as well as the personal consequences of the abuse

Running away - many children may not wait for external intervention in their chaotic and/or abusive lives. For some the only way out they may be able to see is to run away and leave everything including their name behind them. The Missing Children Society of Canada states (1999):

There were over 48,000 reported runaway cases in Canada in 1998. Although runaway children have left home voluntarily, studies have shown that children who repeatedly run are often running from a home life that is physically, mentally or sexually abusive. While the majority of runaways return home within a short period of time, many others do not.

http://www.sws.soton.ac.uk/cwab/Session6/ICWs62.htm
Boarding school - the examples of the Doukhobor children (reported in session 5) and indigenous people's of Canada and Australia are stark reminders of the way in which compulsory residential schooling has been used as a means of destabilising families and communities, distancing children from their cultural and religious identities and isolating them from individual and collective parenting.

Boarding school can also be used by parents themselves through access to wealth as a means of shedding some parental responsibility and under the guise of the child's best interest can be used to permanently unsettle and displace the child from their family or community. For some sections of society boarding school can, of course, can be part of the ritualised entry into a particular social strata, for children as young as five years old.

The use of boarding school for special needs children who may have physical, emotional and or learning difficulties has also been a part of the history of all four countries involved in this course. Isolating and separating these children from mainstream society has in the past has been disguised by a number of theories in which access to 'expert' and specialist is key. Moves to community-based 'people first' approaches for policy and practice undermined dominance of this residential model but the legacy of decades of institutionalisation from childhood to adulthood has been seen in the often painful dismantling of the system for both service users and providers.
>>

If anyone will not welcome you or listen to your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town. I tell you the truth, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town. --Matthew 10:14-15

Matthew 11:20-24 "And you, Caper'na-um, will you be exalted to heaven? You shall be brought down to Hades. For if the mighty works done in you had been done in Sodom, it would have remained until this day. But I tell you that it shall be more tolerable on the day of judgment for the land of Sodom than for you."

A rabbinic tradition,postulates that the sin of Sodom was related to property: Sodomites believed that "what is mine is mine, and what is yours is yours", which is interpreted as a lack of compassion. These two wealthy cities treated visitors in a sadistic fashion. One major crime done to strangers was almost identical to that of Procrustes in Greek mythology. This would be the story of the "bed" that guests to Sodom were forced to sleep in: if they were too short they were stretched to fit it, and if they were too tall, they were cut up (indeed, in Hebrew and Yiddish, the corresponding term for a Procrustean bed is a "Sodom bed").

In another incident, Eliezer, Abraham's servant, went to visit Lot in Sodom and got in a dispute with a Sodomite over a beggar, and was hit in the forehead with a stone, making him bleed. The Sodomite demanded Eliezer pay him for the service of bloodletting, and a Sodomite judge sided with the Sodomite. Eliezer then struck the judge in the forehead with a stone and asked the judge to pay the Sodomite.

Genesis 19:4-5 But before they lay down, the men of the city, the men of Sodom, both young and old, all the people to the last man, surrounded the house; and they called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us, that we may know them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procrustes
In Greek mythology Procrustes (Προκρούστης) or "the stretcher [who hammers out the metal]", also known as Prokoptas or Damastes (Δαμαστής) "subduer", was a rogue smith and bandit from Attica who physically attacked people by stretching them or cutting off their legs, so as to force them to fit the size of an iron bed.

The last adventure of Theseus occurred at the Sacred Way (near today's Dafni), where Damastes, the so-called Procrustes had a house, inviting the people to rest. Inside the house he had two beds, one big and one small.
At the big bed, he would put the short in height travelers and with a hammer he would beat them, to become longer.
The tall ones, he would put them at the small bed and he would chop their legs, to fit the bed.
Theseus pushed Procrustes on his short bed and cut his feet and head off.

48. Cruella De-Vil Orphaned and Abandoned by Father after Death of Mother; and remarriage to Step-Mother!

2011-12-01T09:39:00.000-08:00

Chronicles of a Victim of Deceived Parentage. Chapter 48. Cruella De-Vil Orphaned Abandoned by Father after Death of Mother; and remarriage to Step-Mother!

List of Characters:

Maternal Great-Grandmother : Cruella De-Vil

Maternal Great-Grand-father: Major Bholanath (Cuckolded husband of Cruella De-Vil)

Maternal Great-Grand-uncle/??: Johny Rotten = brother/bother of Major Bholanath

Lover and Potential Father of ex-Major Anil Peter Fritzl: Heart Swamy

Maternal Grandfather: ex-Major Anil Peter Fritzl

Maternal Grandmother: Mrs Fritzl

Mother: Paristha

Daughter: Orphan Nancy

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exodus 22:22-24

22 Ye shall not afflict any (TRUE) widow, or fatherless child.

23 If thou afflict them in any wise, and they cry at all unto me,I will surely hear their cry;

24 And my wrath shall wax hot, and I will kill you with the sword; and your wives shall be widows, and your children fatherless.

Isa. 1:17

Uphold the rights of the orphan!

Cruella De-Vil's Mother died when she was a Child. Her Father Rau, a Marathi Christian, re-married a Christian Brahmin and the Children of the late First wife were placed in the Church Orphanage, after the outbreak.

Cruella De-Vil's early experience with Childhood Abandonment and Rejection by Father and Step-Mother made her the Cruel Step-Mother to be remembered for posterity!

Cruella De-Vil envied her Step-Mother, who could keep her man and Orphan the Children of the First Wife!

An orphanage

Why did the entire family in Coimbatore NOT acknowledge Peter Fritzl as the Legitimate son of Major Bholanath, and why did they communicate all issues with Captain Omission?

Procrustes Boarding School: One size fits all!

FATHER'S NAME IS "NIL" or BLANK

Every lover thought that they were the Fathers of Fritzl including the precocious 13-year old Johny Rotten!

Sirach 23: 22-27 The unfaithful wife who bears the Child of Another Man!

Sirach 23:22 The same is true of a woman who is unfaithful to her husband and presents him with a child by another man.

Sirach 23:23 In the first place, she has broken the Law of the Most High.

In the second place, she has wronged her husband.

And in the third place, she has made a whore of herself by committing adultery and bearing the child of a man not her husband.

Sirach 23:24-25 The children will suffer for her sin. They will not be able to find a place in society or establish families. She herself will be brought before the assembly

Sirach 23:26 and permanently disgraced. There will be a curse on her memory. After she is gone,

Sirach 23:27 everyone will realize that nothing is better than fearing the Lord, nothing is sweeter than keeping his commands.

Deuteronomy 20:7

Indian Soldier fighting the War during Partition 1945, while Enemy Soldiers are busy at home, ravaging

Soldier in the Warfront: India-Pakistan War

Mrs Fritzl and Peter Fritzl (Father of his Daughter's Children)

There was a Hue and Cry, and the Husband of Cruella De-Vil Major Bholanath refused to acknowledge the Paternity of Peter Fritzl in Coimbatore.

Hosea Chapter 2

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Hosea+2&version=NIV

2 "Rebuke your mother, rebuke her,

for she is not my wife,

and I am not her husband.

Let her remove the adulterous look from her face

and the unfaithfulness from between her breasts.

4 I will not show my love to her children,

because they are the children of adultery.

5 Their mother has been unfaithful

and has conceived them in disgrace.

She said, 'I will go after my lovers,

who give me my food and my water,

my wool and my linen, my oil and my drink.'

6 Therefore I will block her path with thornbushes;

I will wall her in so that she cannot find her way.

7 She will chase after her lovers but not catch them;

she will look for them but not find them.

Then she will say,

'I will go back to my husband as at first,

for then I was better off than now.'

Picture: The marriage of the prophet Hosea with his 'fallen' wife

8 She has not acknowledged that I was the one

who gave her the grain, the new wine and oil,

who lavished on her the silver and gold—

which they used for Baal.

The Husband Bholanath and his Eldest Daughter were however baptized in the Church.

As years went by, it was more and more clear that Peter Fritzl was not the Son of Major Bholanath, but of another man named Heart Swamy (among other contenders including Johny Rotten).

Everyone thought they were the Father of the Child.

Peter Fritzl with Statue in School

Major Bholanath put the Child in the Boarding School, and Johny Rotten stayed back to look after Peter Fritzl, and married a Woman for a short period of time.

Major Bholanath had the male pattern of Baldness shared with another son Captain Omission.

Pattern of Baldness: Like Father, Like Son

Peter Fritzl had the Hair Pattern inherited from main suspect Heart Swamy.

Peter Fritzl with different pattern of Balding

Do you know who your Father is?

Maternity is a certainty, Paternity is a Matter of Dispute???
>>

And they say: "You are a "Pain to your Mother since your birth!".

>>
The child minor Fritzl was NOT acknowledged as the SON of father's Blood.

Second Chance, Second Life, Second Avatar!

By Hook or By Crook!

One From Gin, One from Sin and One in the Dust-bin!

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Images used are only representative of the story.

Events are true and character sketches are disguised to protect their identity.

Literary agents and International publishers can contact me for further details.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------