<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>WIKA Blog Pressuresensor Know How</title>
	
	<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com</link>
	<description />
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 07:38:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/WIKA-Pressuresensor-KnowHow" /><feedburner:info xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" uri="wika-pressuresensor-knowhow" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item>
		<title>Identification of absolute pressure and relative pressure measuring ranges for pressure sensors</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/05/03/identification-absolute-pressure-and-relative-pressure-measuring-ranges-pressure-sensors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/05/03/identification-absolute-pressure-and-relative-pressure-measuring-ranges-pressure-sensors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michèle Beyer, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absolute pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relative pressure]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How are absolute and relative pressure measuring ranges distinguished? There are considerable international differences. They can be explained in the following example: Europe: 0 … 10 bar / 0 … 10 bar abs America: 0 … 150 psig / 150 psia In Europe only the absolute measuring ranges are identified (by the abbreviation &#8220;abs&#8221; behind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/05/03/identification-absolute-pressure-and-relative-pressure-measuring-ranges-pressure-sensors/bar_psi/" rel="attachment wp-att-553"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-553" title="bar_psi" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/05/bar_psi-200x230.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="230" /></a>How are absolute and relative pressure measuring ranges distinguished?</p>
<p>There are considerable international differences. They can be explained in the following example:</p>
<ul>
<li>Europe: 0 … 10 bar / 0 … 10 bar abs</li>
<li>America: 0 … 150 psig / 150 psia</li>
</ul>
<p>In Europe only the absolute measuring ranges are identified (by the abbreviation &#8220;abs&#8221; behind the unit). In America, the pressure type is always indicated but using another naming system (g = gauge = relative pressure).</p>
<p>This is especially confusing if in America the pressure unit &#8220;bar&#8221; is required for an absolute measuring range or if in Europe a relative pressure device with the unit &#8220;psi&#8221; is required. How is then the correct nomenclature?</p>
<p>The WIKA group agreed upon the following procedure: if the unit psi is used, a &#8220;g&#8221; or an &#8220;a&#8221; is added according to the American system. For all other units, we observe the European standard and only the absolute measuring ranges are marked with a separate &#8220;abs&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/05/03/identification-absolute-pressure-and-relative-pressure-measuring-ranges-pressure-sensors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Electronic pressure sensor/pressure transmitter or mechanical pressure indicator?</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/26/electronic-pressure-sensor-or-mechanical-pressure-indicator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/26/electronic-pressure-sensor-or-mechanical-pressure-indicator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 07:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Heusel, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure gauge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure sensor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=529</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For some years now, it has been possible to increasingly automate production processes, and by doing to to achieve substantial cost reductions in some cases. This raises the question: does it still make sense to use mechanical pressure measuring instruments? The answer to this question is obvious and simple: yes. Both electronic pressure sensors and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/26/electronic-pressure-sensor-or-mechanical-pressure-indicator/pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor/" rel="attachment wp-att-532"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-532" title="pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/04/pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor-200x201.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="201" /></a>For some years now, it has been possible to increasingly automate production processes, and by doing to to achieve substantial cost reductions in some cases. This raises the question: does it still make sense to use mechanical pressure measuring instruments?</p>
<p>The answer to this question is obvious and simple: yes.</p>
<p>Both electronic pressure sensors and mechanical pressure gauges have properties that must be weighed against each other in each application. The table below summarises the individual benefits.</p>
<p><span id="more-529"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/26/electronic-pressure-sensor-or-mechanical-pressure-indicator/pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor/" rel="attachment wp-att-532"><img class="alignleft  wp-image-532" title="pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/04/pressure-gauge_or_pressure-sensor.jpg" alt="" width="314" height="317" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The biggest benefits of mechanical pressure gauges are the easy installation and good readability of the measured value. An electronic pressure transmitter can also be equipped with an on-site display, which is also easy to read even in darkness, but a pressure gauge offers better readability from a distance with a large scale and in daylight. Due to their robust mechanics mechanical pressure gaugesare mandatory in certain applications (e.g. hot-water tanks).</p>
<p>A pressure gauge is quite often combined with a separate electronic pressure sensor. This combines the benefits of both systems: pressure measurement with local display without power supply and availability of a measured value in the PLC. For users who have only one pressure connection available, <a href="http://en-co.wika.de/products_PV_en_co.WIKA?ActiveID=1085">pressure gauges with integrated electronic sensor</a> are also available.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/26/electronic-pressure-sensor-or-mechanical-pressure-indicator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analogue output signals of pressure sensors 2: DC 0 … 10 V, DC 1 … 5 V, DC 1 … 10 V</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/13/analogue-output-signals-pressure-sensors-dc-0-10-v/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/13/analogue-output-signals-pressure-sensors-dc-0-10-v/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 08:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Heusel, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[0 ... 10 V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[output signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voltage signal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apart from the current signals described in the article &#8220;Analogue output signals of pressure sensors 1&#8243;, the voltage signals 0 … 10 V, 1 … 5 V and 1 … 10 V are used in industrial automation for the transmission of measured values. As with the current signals, their advantage is the ease of use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/13/analogue-output-signals-pressure-sensors-dc-0-10-v/signal-curve-and-error-signalling-of-1-10-v-voltage-signals/" rel="attachment wp-att-513"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-513" title="Signal curve and error signalling of 1 … 10 V voltage signals" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/04/Signal-curve-and-error-signalling-of-1-…-10-V-voltage-signals-200x146.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="146" /></a>Apart from the current signals described in the article &#8220;Analogue output signals of pressure sensors 1&#8243;, the voltage signals 0 … 10 V, 1 … 5 V and 1 … 10 V are used in industrial automation for the transmission of measured values. As with the current signals, their advantage is the ease of use and the possibility to identify problems witha simple multimeter.</p>
<p>With voltage signals, electromagnetic interferences can easily lead to wrong readingsof the measured value or of the control signal, which is why shielded lines should be used for such signals. Very often, the voltage signals 0 … 10 V, 1 … 5 V and 1 … 10 V are used for setpoint signalsof motors, although temperature and pressure sensors are also available with these electrical outputs.</p>
<p>Similarly to the current signals, the actual pressure in the sensor is converted into a voltage value and transmitted via two (1 … 5 V, 1 … 10 V) or three (0 … 10 V) wires. The signals 1 … 5 V and 1 … 10 V have the advantage that by setting an active zero value of 1 V, short-circuits in the line can also be detected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/13/analogue-output-signals-pressure-sensors-dc-0-10-v/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analogue output signals of pressure sensors 1: 4 … 20 mA</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/02/analogue-output-signal-pressure-sensor-4-20-ma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/02/analogue-output-signal-pressure-sensor-4-20-ma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 09:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Heusel, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4-20 mA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analogue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current signal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAMUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NE 43]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[output signal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In industrial automation and in pressure sensors in particular, the current signal of 4 &#8230; 20 mA is the most frequently used signal for analogue transmission of values. The wide use of this signal is due to its ease of handling and especially its interference resistance. A current signal has a higher EMC interference immunity [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/02/analogue-output-signal-pressure-sensor-4-20-ma/signal-curve-and-error-signalling-of-4-20-ma-current-signals/" rel="attachment wp-att-502"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-502" title="Signal curve and error signalling of 4-20 mA current signals" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/04/Signal-curve-and-error-signalling-of-4-20-mA-current-signals-200x137.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="137" /></a>In industrial automation and in pressure sensors in particular, the current signal of 4 &#8230; 20 mA is the most frequently used signal for analogue transmission of values. The wide use of this signal is due to its ease of handling and especially its interference resistance. A current signal has a higher EMC interference immunity than a voltage signal, due to the fact that electromagnetic interferences are fed into the signal line as voltage signals and result in only very small changes in current at input resistance of the receiver.</p>
<p>Very widely used is the 4 &#8230; 20 mA signal in the transmission of values such as temperature and pressure. For example, the 0 &#8230; 10 bar pressure range of a pressure transmitter in a production process is converted by the electronics in the device into a 4..20 mA current signal. As two-wire signal, 4 &#8230; 20 mA has in the meantime been given preference over the three-wire version, due to its savings in wiring and its easier error detection. In this version, a cable break is detected by the current value falling below 3.8 mA and a short-circuit by the current value exceeding 20.5 mA (according to NAMUR NE 43). 4 &#8230; 20 mA in the three-conductor version is still being used, but only for devices with high supply power requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/04/02/analogue-output-signal-pressure-sensor-4-20-ma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is a pressure transmitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/26/what-is-a-pressure-transmitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/26/what-is-a-pressure-transmitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anna Gries, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure sensor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pressure transmitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The manufacturers of pressure sensors use many different terms for the various designs of measuring instruments,  such as pressure sensor, pressure transmitter, pressure transducer, etc. At WIKA, the term: “pressure transmitter” is commonly used to refer to a pressure sensor equipped with standardised electrical and mechanical interfaces and a standardised output signal. The working principle [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en-co.wika.de/A_10_en_co.WIKA?ActiveID=1071"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-493" title="pressure-transmitter_WIKA_A-10" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/03/pressure-transmitter_WIKA_A-101-200x317.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="317" /></a>The manufacturers of pressure sensors use many different terms for the various designs of measuring instruments,  such as pressure sensor, pressure transmitter, pressure transducer, etc.</p>
<p>At WIKA, the term: “pressure transmitter” is commonly used to refer to a pressure sensor equipped with standardised electrical and mechanical interfaces and a standardised output signal.</p>
<p>The working principle of a pressure transmitter is as follows:</p>
<p>The pressure of the medium to be measured is guided via a standard process connection thus affecting the internal pressure sensor element. The internal electronics converts the raw sensor signal into a filtered, amplified, temperature-compensated and standardised signal, such as the 4 &#8230; 20 mA signal. This output signal is delivered via a standardised connector or a cable to the subsequent unit for signal processing.</p>
<p>Would you like to have more information about the pressure transmitter A-10 for general industrial application? Then click <a href="http://en-co.wika.de/A_10_en_co.WIKA?ActiveID=1071">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/26/what-is-a-pressure-transmitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More efficient heating with WIKA sensors and heat pumps</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/09/efficient-heating-sensor-heat-pumps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/09/efficient-heating-sensor-heat-pumps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 09:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Sauerwein, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refrigeration technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The working principle of a heat pump is basically identical to that of an everyday appliance known to all of us: the refrigerator. However, while the refrigerator removes heat from its interior and gives it off to the environment, the heat pump removes heat from the exterior (air, soil, etc.) and gives it off to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_470" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/09/efficient-heating-sensor-heat-pumps/heatpump/" rel="attachment wp-att-470"><img class="size-medium wp-image-470" title="heatpump" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/03/heatpump-200x130.jpg" alt="Source: Bundesverband Wärmepumpe e. V." width="200" height="130" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: Bundesverband Wärmepumpe e. V.</p></div>
<p>The working principle of a heat pump is basically identical to that of an everyday appliance known to all of us: the refrigerator. However, while the refrigerator removes heat from its interior and gives it off to the environment, the heat pump removes heat from the exterior (air, soil, etc.) and gives it off to the house as heating energy. Thus, the system works exactly in reverse.</p>
<p>In order to do that the heat pump performs a compression of a gas (as in the refrigerator) and thus liberates the heat previously removed from the environment by evaporation. This process also consumes energy and must therefore be carefully controlled.</p>
<p>If the compression or evaporation temperature is controlled very accurately in a heat pump system via the pressure, this allows to save energy costs and thus also protect the environment.</p>
<p>WIKA offers products especially for application in heat pumps, the pressure transmitters <a href="http://en-co.wika.de/R_1_en_co.WIKA?ActiveID=1442">R-1</a> and <a href="http://en-co.wika.de/AC_1_en_co.WIKA">AC-1</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/03/09/efficient-heating-sensor-heat-pumps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ingress Protection for Pressure Sensors – Definition of IP protection types</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/02/01/ingress-protection-ip-rating/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/02/01/ingress-protection-ip-rating/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Lorenz, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ingress protection IP 65]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IP68]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A frequently recurring question is about the definition of the so-called IP protection types or sometimes referred to as “IP rating”. The IP ingress protection types provide a system that describes how the housing of electrical equipment is protected against the ingress of particles/ dust and water. Actually, the standard only describes &#8211; by means of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/02/01/ingress-protection-ip-rating/4-1-1/" rel="attachment wp-att-458"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-458" title="water" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/02/wassertropfen-200x200.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></a>A frequently recurring question is about the definition of the so-called IP protection types or sometimes referred to as “IP rating”.</p>
<p>The IP ingress protection types provide a system that describes how the housing of electrical equipment is protected against the ingress of particles/ dust and water.</p>
<p>Actually, the standard <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">only</span></strong> describes &#8211; by means of a code of max. 4 digits - whether the instrument is protected against the penetration of water and foreign particles/dust but does not indicate if the instrument is suitable for special operating conditions.</p>
<p>The abbreviation IP stands for &#8220;International Protection&#8221; but in the English speaking countries it is often translated by &#8220;Ingress Protection&#8221; .<br />
This designation is factually correct since only a description is made whether water or particles may &#8220;ingress&#8221; into the housing.</p>
<p>There are two different standards for the classification of the IP codes:</p>
<ul>
<li>DIN EN 60529 à <em>Degrees of protection provided by housings (IP code)<br />
<strong>Often used in the industrial area.<br />
</strong></em></li>
<li>DIN 40 050 part 9 à <em>Road vehicles; IP protection types; protection against foreign bodies, water and contact;<br />
electrical equipment<br />
<strong>Is used if the requirements exceed the normal immersion of the instruments, e.g. high-pressure cleaning</strong></em></li>
</ul>
<p>Both standards are applicable and there are slight differences in some details. It is therefore useful to refer to the respective standard for each individual case.</p>
<p><strong>Additional information regarding the &#8220;Ingress of water&#8221;:<br />
</strong>NB: Only the behaviour of the equipment when coming into contact with pure water is described here. As soon as additives have been added, these protection types are no longer valid or apply only to a limited extent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/02/01/ingress-protection-ip-rating/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC PED – Pressure limits 0.5 bar and 200 bar for pressure sensors and pressure transmitters</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/24/pressure-equipment-directive-ped-pressure-limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/24/pressure-equipment-directive-ped-pressure-limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 08:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Lorenz, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[FAQs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[declaration of conformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In connection with the pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC (PED), a pressure limit of 200 bar is often mentioned. But what does this limit mean for manufacturers and/or companies that place pressure sensors, pressure transmitters and pressure equipment on the market? Generally it can be said that, depending on the type of medium to be measured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/24/pressure-equipment-directive-ped-pressure-limits/200bar/" rel="attachment wp-att-450"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-450" title="200bar" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/01/200bar-200x180.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="180" /></a>In connection with the pressure equipment directive 97/23/EC (PED), a pressure limit of 200 bar is often mentioned. But what does this limit mean for manufacturers and/or companies that place pressure sensors, pressure transmitters and pressure equipment on the market?</p>
<p>Generally it can be said that, depending on the type of medium to be measured (gaseous, liquid, harmful substance), pressure measuring instruments are subject to different requirements, depending on the pressure range and volume. If the medium is not known, it is best to design pressure measuring instruments conservatively, that is, also for harmful gaseous and liquid media, with a pressure channel and an internal volume of &lt; 0.1 l.</p>
<p>Whereas it is sufficient that pressure equipment for up to 200 bar is generally designed and manufactured following the rules of &#8220;Good Engineering Practice&#8221; (GEP), for pressures from 200 bar, a conformity assessment procedure must be used, which in the simplest case can be an &#8220;internal production control&#8221;.</p>
<p>For pressures from 200 bar, it is also required to meet the basic safety requirements of the PED Appendix I, which, among other things, requires a pressure test as proof of the pressure strength. An EC Declaration of Conformity must be prepared, and the instrument will be marked with CE.</p>
<p>In any case, details should be looked up in the original text of the PED, while information on the interpretation of this directive can be found in the PED guidelines.</p>
<p>Here are the most important key points:</p>
<ol>
<li>Pressure equipment for more than 0.5 bar is subject to the PED.</li>
<li>Between 0.5 and 200 bar, &#8220;Good Engineering Practice&#8221; must be applied. No CE marking and Declaration of conformity possible according to the PED.</li>
<li>At pressures greater than 200 bar, the &#8220;Basic Safety Requirements&#8221; of the PED Appendix I must be met, CE marking is required, and an EC Declaration of conformity according to the PED must be prepared.<strong></strong></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/24/pressure-equipment-directive-ped-pressure-limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Active and passive temperature compensation of pressure sensors</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/10/active-and-passive-temperature-compensation-of-pressure-sensors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/10/active-and-passive-temperature-compensation-of-pressure-sensors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 08:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dominik Lorenz, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Knowledge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature compensation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does an active or passive temperature compensation of pressure transmitters  actually work? High-quality pressure transmitters, especially those used in precision critical applications, are almost always provided with an individual temperature compensation. But what is actually the difference between  an  active and a passive temperature compensation of these sensors? Passive temperature compensation: Sections of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?attachment_id=445"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-445" title="Temperature-error-band" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2012/01/Temperature-error-band1-200x120.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="120" /></a>How does an active or passive temperature compensation of pressure transmitters  actually work? High-quality pressure transmitters, especially those used in precision critical applications, are almost always provided with an individual temperature compensation. But what is actually the difference between  an  active and a passive temperature compensation of these sensors?</p>
<p>Passive temperature compensation:</p>
<p>Sections of the characteristic accuracy curve of the pressure sensor are measured at different temperatures during the manufacturing process. Then, the previously determined temperature errors are compensated by passive elements (resistors) within the electronics of the sensor or by corrections of specifically  designed resistance structures directly on the sensor  element itself (e.g. by laser-trimming). The (passive) resistor elements used have an almost linear temperature behaviour, it is, however, only possible to compensate 1st order errors. Temperature errors of higher order, i.e. strong bending of the characteristic curve under temperature, can not be compensated.</p>
<p><span id="more-434"></span></p>
<p>Active temperature compensation:</p>
<p>Here too, the characteristic curve of the pressure transmitters is measured at different temperatures during the manufacturing process. However, the pressure transmitter has an additional integrated temperature sensor which constantly measures the temperature of the sensor and transfers it to the pressure transmitter&#8217;s signal processing. In practice, two methods of active temperature compensation are common: the first method compensates by means of a limited number of samples, , i.e. discrete correction values, between which interpolation takes place. The second method uses the electronics of the transmitter and a higher-order equation resulting from the regression of the acquired measurement values in order to compensate then the expected error.</p>
<p>During operation, this signal processing makes it possible to automatically, i.e. &#8220;actively&#8221;, compensate the pressure transmitter ‘s temperature error using the calculated correction factors within a specified temperature range (e.g. 10-60°C).</p>
<p>The most commonly used method to minimise temperature errors of pressure sensors is a passive temperature compensation. This is the traditional method which is widely used. However, active temperature compensation is the top class of possible compensation methods. WIKA has constantly improved and refined this technology in recent years.</p>
<p>The pressure transmitters of WIKA using active temperature  compensation therefore feature a temperature error which is almost zero in their specified temperature range.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2012/01/10/active-and-passive-temperature-compensation-of-pressure-sensors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there an intrinsically safe pressure sensor / pressure tranmsitter with SIL2 classification?</title>
		<link>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2011/12/12/intrinsically-safe-pressure-sensor-sil2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2011/12/12/intrinsically-safe-pressure-sensor-sil2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ms. Sauerwein, Product Management</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SIL2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/?p=426</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the pressure transmitter IS-20 with the ignition protection type ia (intrinsically safe) and ATEX approval, the safety-relevant data for SIL applications have been determined and summarised in the additional instructions &#8220;safety-related data&#8221;. These include the Average Probability of Failure on Demand (PFDa), the Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT) and the Safe Failure Fraction (SFF). Process [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2011/12/12/intrinsically-safe-pressure-sensor-sil2/wika_sil_logo/" rel="attachment wp-att-429"><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-429" title="WIKA_SIL_Logo" src="http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/files/2011/12/WIKA_SIL_Logo-200x169.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="169" /></a>For the pressure transmitter <a href="http://en-co.wika.de/IS_20_S__IS_21_S__IS_20_F__IS_21_F_en_co.WIKA?ActiveID=1073">IS-20</a> with the ignition protection type ia (intrinsically safe) and ATEX approval, the safety-relevant data for SIL applications have been determined and summarised in the <a href="http://de-de.wika.de/upload/OI_11522977_IS_2X_SIL_GB_D_F_E_19135.pdf">additional instructions &#8220;safety-related data&#8221;</a>. These include the Average Probability of Failure on Demand (PFD<sub>a</sub>), the Hardware Fault Tolerance (HFT) and the Safe Failure Fraction (SFF).</p>
<p>Process industry users need this information for a SIL evaluation of the complete application.</p>
<p>For the requirements of the machine building industry, MTTF<sub>d</sub> (Mean Time To Dangerous Failure) values are provided in order to be able to determine the relevant Performance Level (PL).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.pressuresensor-knowhow.com/blog/2011/12/12/intrinsically-safe-pressure-sensor-sil2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

