<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">

<channel>
	<title>Web3.0log</title>
	
	<link>http://web3.0log.org</link>
	<description>web, technologies, seo, web2.0, web3.0 (why not?), etc.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 03:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Web30log" /><feedburner:info uri="web30log" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:browserFriendly></feedburner:browserFriendly><item>
		<title>I made update of tricks with saving traffic and SE-robots</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/20/i-made-update-of-tricks-with-saving-traffic-and-se-robots/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/20/i-made-update-of-tricks-with-saving-traffic-and-se-robots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[tutorial]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[update]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/20/i-made-update-of-tricks-with-saving-traffic-and-se-robots/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For long time I was going to update my tutorial &#8216;3 unusual tricks to not give SE-robots a chance to waste all your traffic&#8217;, finally done with this. Now it&#8217;s &#8216;4 unusual tricks to not give SE-robots a chance to waste all your traffic&#8216;.
Besides, thanks to Jonathan&#8217;s fair comment I added a note to trick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For long time I was going to update my tutorial &#8216;3 unusual tricks to not give SE-robots a chance to waste all your traffic&#8217;, finally done with this. Now it&#8217;s &#8216;<a href="http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/02/3-unusual-tricks-to-not-give-se-robots-a-chance-to-waste-all-your-traffic/">4 unusual tricks to not give SE-robots a chance to waste all your traffic</a>&#8216;.</p>
<p>Besides, thanks to <a href="http://jonathan.rawle.org/">Jonathan</a>&#8217;s fair <a href="http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/02/3-unusual-tricks-to-not-give-se-robots-a-chance-to-waste-all-your-traffic/#comment-110">comment</a> I added a note to trick #2.</p>
<p><a href="http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/02/3-unusual-tricks-to-not-give-se-robots-a-chance-to-waste-all-your-traffic/">Read updated tutorial</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/20/i-made-update-of-tricks-with-saving-traffic-and-se-robots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many backlinks to internal pages you have?</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/08/how-many-backlinks-to-internal-pages-you-have/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/08/how-many-backlinks-to-internal-pages-you-have/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2007 18:23:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[backlinks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[link building]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[supplemental results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tricks]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/08/how-many-backlinks-to-internal-pages-you-have/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now most of SEO advice to increase number of inbound links to site internal pages as way of preventing Google&#8217;s supplemental hell. For that end you need to know number of backlinks to internal pages of your website. I had found very simple Yahoo search trick, which helps to find this number and even see [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now most of SEO advice to increase number of inbound links to site internal pages as way of preventing Google&#8217;s supplemental hell. For that end you need to know number of backlinks to internal pages of your website. I had found very simple Yahoo search trick, which helps to find this number and even see this backlinks:</p>
<blockquote><p>linkdomain:domain.com -site:domain.com -link:http://domain.com/</p></blockquote>
<p>Check out <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0oGklDvLBlG21wBHQ5XNyoA?p=linkdomain%3Awww.google.com+-site%3Awww.google.com+-link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F&#038;ei=UTF-8&#038;n=10&#038;x=wrt">backlinks to internal pages of www.google.com</a> for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2007/04/08/how-many-backlinks-to-internal-pages-you-have/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Exclude Supplemental Results From Your Google Index Results</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/20/how-to-exclude-supplemental-results-from-your-google-index-results/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/20/how-to-exclude-supplemental-results-from-your-google-index-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[supplemental results]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tricks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/20/view-your-google-index-results-without-supplemental-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is described the interesting method many SEOs ask about: how to look over pages of an indexed site WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTAL results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Wall in his article &#8220;<a href="http://www.seobook.com/archives/002047.shtml">View All Your Google Supplemental Index Results</a>&#8221; writes how to see only supplemental results for indexed site.</p>
<p>My friend and colleague Oslix described the interesting method many SEOs ask about: how to look over pages of an indexed site WITHOUT SUPPLEMENTAL results:</p>
<blockquote><p>site:www.yoursite.com -allinurl:www.yoursite.com</p></blockquote>
<p>Enjoy it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/20/how-to-exclude-supplemental-results-from-your-google-index-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our web2.0 extension approved and added to addons.mozilla.org</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/07/our-web20-extension-approved-and-added-to-addonsmozillaorg/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/07/our-web20-extension-approved-and-added-to-addonsmozillaorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[del.icio.us]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[socialnetworking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tagclouds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/07/our-web20-extension-approved-and-added-to-addonsmozillaorg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice news: our extension approved by addons.mozilla.org catalogue editors.
Those who was afraid of some spyware or adware can install it from https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4196/ .
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice news: our extension approved by addons.mozilla.org catalogue editors.<br />
Those who was afraid of some spyware or adware can install it from <a href="Nice news: our extension approved by addons.mozilla.org catalogue editors.  Those who was afraid of some spyware or adware can install it from  https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4196/">https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/4196/</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2007/02/07/our-web20-extension-approved-and-added-to-addonsmozillaorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tags Everywhere Firefox Extension</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2007/01/07/tags-everywhere-firefox-extension/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2007/01/07/tags-everywhere-firefox-extension/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jan 2007 17:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[ajax]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[del.icio.us]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[digg]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[msn]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[reddit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[socialnetworking]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tagclouds]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tagging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2007/01/07/tags-everywhere-firefox-extension/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had released very interesting innovative Firefox extension - true web 2.0 spirit!
Extension shows related Del.icio.us tags on top of plain sites:

And in some cases extension shows related tags clouds below every item of sites list of some popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN-Live.com) and web2.0 news (Digg and Reddit):



Check out official site of Tags [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had released <a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/">very interesting innovative Firefox extension</a> - true web 2.0 spirit!</p>
<p>Extension shows related Del.icio.us tags on top of plain sites:<br />
<a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/tags-on-plain_sites.png"><img src="http://tagseverywhere.info/tn-tags-on-plain_sites.png" border="0" alt=""/></a></p>
<p>And in some cases extension shows related tags clouds below every item of sites list of some popular search engines (Google, Yahoo, MSN-Live.com) and web2.0 news (Digg and Reddit):<br />
<a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/tags-on-digg.png"><img src="http://tagseverywhere.info/tn-tags-on-digg.png" border="0" alt=""/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/tags-on-reddit.png"><img src="http://tagseverywhere.info/tn-tags-on-reddit.png" border="0" alt=""/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/tags-on-google.png"><img src="http://tagseverywhere.info/tn-tags-on-google.png" border="0" alt=""/></a></p>
<p><a href="http://tagseverywhere.info/">Check out official site of Tags Everywhere Firefox Extension!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2007/01/07/tags-everywhere-firefox-extension/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editors of Firefox Add-ons directory thinks spyware is not shit</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/14/editors-of-firefox-add-ons-directory-thinks-spyware-is-not-shit/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/14/editors-of-firefox-add-ons-directory-thinks-spyware-is-not-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2006 12:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[adware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[badware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bullshit]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stupidity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/14/editors-of-firefox-add-ons-directory-thinks-spyware-is-not-shit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Few days ago I decided to add my tiny security extension to Firefox
Add-ons directory and got funny answer:
Subject: [Check page for shit! 1.0] Approval Denied
Check page for shit! 1.0 - Approval Denied
Your item, Check page for shit! 1.0, has been reviewed by a Mozilla Update
editor who took the following action:
Approval Denied
Your item was tested by [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few days ago I decided to add my <a href="http://checkpageforshit.com/">tiny security extension</a> to Firefox<br />
Add-ons directory and got funny answer:</p>
<blockquote><p>Subject: [Check page for shit! 1.0] Approval Denied</p>
<p>Check page for shit! 1.0 - Approval Denied<br />
Your item, Check page for shit! 1.0, has been reviewed by a Mozilla Update<br />
editor who took the following action:<br />
Approval Denied</p>
<p>Your item was tested by Justin Scott using n/a on n/a.<br />
Editor&#8217;s Comments:<br />
<strong>Please choose a more appropriate name</strong>. Thanks.</p></blockquote>
<p>Do editors of directory really beleives that spyware and adware is not web shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/14/editors-of-firefox-add-ons-directory-thinks-spyware-is-not-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don’t want to post to your blog everyday? Use automation!</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/03/dont-want-to-post-to-your-blog-everyday-use-automation/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/03/dont-want-to-post-to-your-blog-everyday-use-automation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 03:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[automation]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[cms]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tuning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/03/dont-want-to-post-to-your-blog-everyday-use-automation/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s suprising few people know that this possibility is built into Wordpress engine primordially. I was looking for the plugin when I stumbled on the discussion on WordPress Support board.
So, write messages for required period, say, for a week, set date of publication for each message - and have a good time! Messages would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s suprising few people know that this possibility is built into Wordpress engine primordially. I was looking for the plugin when I stumbled on <a href="http://wordpress.org/support/topic/40442?replies=6">the discussion on WordPress Support board</a>.<br />
So, write messages for required period, say, for a week, set date of publication for each message - and have a good time! Messages would be published automatically, according to dates you set.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2006/12/03/dont-want-to-post-to-your-blog-everyday-use-automation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2 useful tricks with html frames</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2006/11/23/2-useful-tricks-with-html-frames/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2006/11/23/2-useful-tricks-with-html-frames/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2006 13:07:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[blackhat]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[frames]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[iframe]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[javascript]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2006/11/23/2-useful-tricks-with-html-frames/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Couples of days ago I had to make few tricks with frame and iframe tags. I suggest this can be useful for many webmasters, especially for those who work with ads.
Trick 1: Page is built in frame on another site without your previous agreement. Remove this stupid frame.
Many don&#8217;t fancy frames because of bad usability. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couples of days ago I had to make few tricks with frame and iframe tags. I suggest this can be useful for many webmasters, especially for those who work with ads.</p>
<p><b>Trick 1: Page is built in frame on another site without your previous agreement. Remove this stupid frame.</b><br />
Many don&#8217;t fancy frames because of bad usability. But I give you the decent reason to don&#8217;t like them: some smart guy can make a frameset in one frame of which your pages would be opened and his content would be shown in other frames, like his ads. Not bad for him, is it? No need content anymore! </p>
<p>The decision I chose:<br />
<code><br />
&lt;script LANGUAGE=&quot;JavaScript&quot;&gt;<br />
&lt;!&#45;-<br />
if (self.parent.frames.length != 0) self.parent.location=document.location<br />
// &#45;-&gt;<br />
&lt;/script&gt;<br />
</code><br />
And other variants are listed in articles &#8220;<a href="http://budugllydesign.com/frame9806/f-java.htm">Frame Breaking JavaScript Code</a>&#8221; and <a href="http://evolt.org/node/249">Breaking out of frames</a>.<br />
You&#8217;ll find curious ones, that tells you how to stop loading alien site and open your own in new window!</p>
<p>Hint: you can use this trick to remove frames from image searches of Google, Yahoo and Live.com (MSN).</p>
<p><b>Trick 2: How to open iframe as full parent page like there is no iframe at all.</b><br />
If you just use iframe with width=100% &#038; height=100%, two scrollers will be hard not to notice - iframe&#8217;s scroller, and disabled main page scroller. It&#8217;s too plain and, moreover, sometimes it&#8217;s necessary to open your pages from another site and make it unnoticeable for surfer.<br />
The decision (taken on <a href="http://zvonko.biz/2006/11/21/msie-iframe-vo-vse-okno/">zvonko.biz</a>):<br />
<code><br />
&lt;html&gt;<br />
&lt;title&gt; zvonko.biz - full window iframe example&lt;/title&gt; <br />
&lt;body style=&quot;overflow:hidden;margin:0px;&quot;&gt; <br />
&lt;iframe style=&quot;width:100%;height:100%;border:0px;overflow:auto;&quot; src=&quot; http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;safe=off&amp;q=test&amp;btnG=Search &quot;&gt; <br />
&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;/body&gt; <br />
&lt;/html&gt; <br />
</code></p>
<p>Working example: <a href="http://zvonko.biz/files/no-scroll-ie.html">http://zvonko.biz/files/no-scroll-ie.html</a></p>
<p>Tags: Google tricks, Adwords tricks, Yahoo tricks, MSN tricks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2006/11/23/2-useful-tricks-with-html-frames/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our new Firefox security-extension uses Google for spyware check</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/12/our-new-firefox-security-extension-uses-google-for-spyware-search/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/12/our-new-firefox-security-extension-uses-google-for-spyware-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 18:00:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[adware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[badware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[browsers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[extensions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[tuning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[vulnerabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web2.0]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[worms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/12/our-new-firefox-security-extension-uses-google-for-spyware-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
We released the Firefox security extension &#8216;Check Page for Shit&#8216; that uses Google to detect spyware, adware and other malware. No need spyware removal software, because the extension checks if a webpage contains spyware before loading. If spyware was found, you&#8217;ll get a link to Google&#8217;s warning page instead of one to the dangerous page.
Attention, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="display:block;float:left;padding:5px 15px 5px 5px;"><img src="http://checkpageforshit.com/logo.png" border="0" alt=""/></div>
<p>We released the Firefox security extension &#8216;<a href="http://checkpageforshit.com/">Check Page for Shit</a>&#8216; that uses Google to detect spyware, adware and other malware. No need spyware removal software, because the extension checks if a webpage contains spyware before loading. If spyware was found, you&#8217;ll get a link to Google&#8217;s warning page instead of one to the dangerous page.<br />
Attention, I don&#8217;t recommend doing it, but if you still want to surf the dangerous site, click an appropriate link on Google&#8217;s warning page. Yyou won&#8217;t see warnings for some time. Besides, you can switch on/off the extension anytime by clicking its&#8217; icon in status bar.<br />
In most cases you won&#8217;t need a spyware remover - Google protects you from loading dangerous sites with spyware and adware!<br />
Feature requests and bug fixes send to <a href="mailto:webmaster@checkpageforshit.com">webmaster@checkpageforshit.com</a> or comment me in this entry.</p>
<h3><a href="http://checkpageforshit.com/">Check out our extension!</a></h3>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/12/our-new-firefox-security-extension-uses-google-for-spyware-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google doesn’t show domain info anymore</title>
		<link>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/04/google-doesnt-show-domain-info-anymore/</link>
		<comments>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/04/google-doesnt-show-domain-info-anymore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 10:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>samlowry</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[domains]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/04/google-doesnt-show-domain-info-anymore/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not long time ago Google added new operator info: that represented links to cash, backlinks, index and etc on given domain name query. For some time, domain name query by itself and query with this operator worked the same way, and that was strange - what this operator needed for, then? Now, domain name in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long time ago Google added new operator <em>info:</em> that represented links to cash, backlinks, index and etc on given domain name query. For some time, domain name query by itself and query with this operator worked the same way, and that was strange - what this operator needed for, then? Now, domain name in query interpreted as ordinary keyword (before we had to inquote it).<br />
Demo-queries:<br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;q=google.com&#038;btnG=Search">google.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;lr=&#038;q=info%3Agoogle.com&#038;btnG=Search">info:google.com</a></p>
<p>In view of the aforesaid a question raises - <em>what else was changed in Google</em>?</p>
<p>P. S. Don&#8217;t ask me about why Google doesn&#8217;t show backlinks - it&#8217;s very old story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://web3.0log.org/2006/09/04/google-doesnt-show-domain-info-anymore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
