<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/atom10full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:openSearch="http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearch/1.1/" xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gd="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" gd:etag="W/&quot;D08BRns8cCp7ImA9WhRRFE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293</id><updated>2011-11-27T15:17:37.578-08:00</updated><category term="POST" /><category term="pirates" /><category term="Twitter" /><category term="Copyright" /><category term="PUT" /><category term="popular trends" /><category term="Web services" /><category term="internet danger" /><category term="danger" /><category term="actionstream" /><category term="Ajax" /><category term="web security" /><category term="HTML 5" /><category term="ISP" /><category term="downloads" /><category term="emotions" /><category term="social networking" /><category term="danger to the internet" /><category term="frameworks and web security" /><category term="web 2.0" /><category term="NZ Government" /><category term="internet history" /><category term="ROA" /><category term="shutdown" /><category term="copyright law enforcement" /><category term="Web 3.0" /><category term="the future" /><category term="utility" /><title>Web Theory</title><subtitle type="html">the society of weblogs, twitter, social networks, Web 2.0 are a canvas, what we paint on it with structured thinking, object oriented systems, well thought out RESTful architectures and web services - and how we can use this or not depending upon economics, politics and intellectual capital.  
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</subtitle><link rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/" /><link rel="next" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25&amp;redirect=false&amp;v=2" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><generator version="7.00" uri="http://www.blogger.com">Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>30</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/WebTheory" /><feedburner:info uri="webtheory" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYNRno8eCp7ImA9WhZQF0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-7054371896886379837</id><published>2011-04-25T12:53:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2011-04-25T13:09:57.470-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2011-04-25T13:09:57.470-07:00</app:edited><title>Business intelligence</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/7054371896886379837/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=7054371896886379837" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7054371896886379837?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7054371896886379837?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/-gHAxZHF75w/business-intelligence.html" title="Business intelligence" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Programmers spend so much time configuring software to do utilitarian functions when the greatest advances yet to tap into our creativity have yet to be realised, (although photoshop was a good start).  Business intelligence goes beyond the size of the audience.  Mashups and mobile apps are a beginning not an end unto themselves. 

Some online games employ complex analytics on a simplistic model 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b67B-_QKFgLW0VrB80H7w_OVe6o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b67B-_QKFgLW0VrB80H7w_OVe6o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b67B-_QKFgLW0VrB80H7w_OVe6o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/b67B-_QKFgLW0VrB80H7w_OVe6o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/-gHAxZHF75w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2011/04/business-intelligence.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkACRXw8eip7ImA9WxFbF0o.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-370024833513438109</id><published>2010-07-10T07:06:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2010-07-10T07:06:04.272-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-07-10T07:06:04.272-07:00</app:edited><title>its interconnected process</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/370024833513438109/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=370024833513438109" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/370024833513438109?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/370024833513438109?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/Zhv9HfAnBfY/its-interconnected-process.html" title="its interconnected process" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">the medium is not merely communication, it is process

twitter for example is an extended work of art by a large number of people and the more that it casually represents the threads of reality, the less use it may be.  To make use of it in a traditionally advertising way seems logical, but is it?

the medium is defined by the activity people engage in 

this appears self evident.  Between online
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KUJ0lK3l9TR5hdU6GIjc6vEJUlg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KUJ0lK3l9TR5hdU6GIjc6vEJUlg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KUJ0lK3l9TR5hdU6GIjc6vEJUlg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/KUJ0lK3l9TR5hdU6GIjc6vEJUlg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/Zhv9HfAnBfY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2010/07/its-interconnected-process.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;A0ECQHc8fyp7ImA9WxFUFUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-4744524995309854238</id><published>2010-06-26T15:01:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2010-06-26T15:01:01.977-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-06-26T15:01:01.977-07:00</app:edited><title>Blogger</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/4744524995309854238/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=4744524995309854238" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4744524995309854238?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4744524995309854238?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/G301OCX91Qg/blogger.html" title="Blogger" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Blogger has upgraded its templating systems.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xtc0Q0wujCleFa1IALRshbKFA4w/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xtc0Q0wujCleFa1IALRshbKFA4w/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xtc0Q0wujCleFa1IALRshbKFA4w/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/xtc0Q0wujCleFa1IALRshbKFA4w/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/G301OCX91Qg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2010/06/blogger.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkECQXs9fSp7ImA9WxBVFks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-2249961882303019088</id><published>2010-02-20T03:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2010-02-20T03:17:40.565-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2010-02-20T03:17:40.565-08:00</app:edited><title>Google BUZZ</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/2249961882303019088/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=2249961882303019088" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2249961882303019088?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2249961882303019088?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/bsJ-Eh817HI/google-buzz.html" title="Google BUZZ" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Google Buzz is the most exciting and interesting social networking idea even if it is pretty much the same as all the rest.  What is interesting is that the posts are objective, rather than personal (facebook) and relevant rather then random (twitter), and about the web rather than someone's music (myspace).
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aZYMup5_tdO4qM_caYAS2tdhwKg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aZYMup5_tdO4qM_caYAS2tdhwKg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aZYMup5_tdO4qM_caYAS2tdhwKg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/aZYMup5_tdO4qM_caYAS2tdhwKg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/bsJ-Eh817HI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2010/02/google-buzz.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DE8BSHc7eip7ImA9WxBTGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-1155404281990966976</id><published>2009-12-15T11:49:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-15T11:54:19.902-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-15T11:54:19.902-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="emotions" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="popular trends" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Twitter" /><title>Emotions</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/1155404281990966976/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=1155404281990966976" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1155404281990966976?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1155404281990966976?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/1TmTLOib2jU/emotions.html" title="Emotions" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">No!  Not those awful designed "emoticons" that were "popular" but seem to have become less so, at least on the services I choose to use.  

Services like Twitter, where 140 chars or less is supposed to support a "conversation" seems to support something else - and its name is the clue.  It is supposed to be a place where a meme can spread due to its inherent usefulness.  It is promoted as "a 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FFJNMMnkzqpVCHHA8TDGjmODVlE/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FFJNMMnkzqpVCHHA8TDGjmODVlE/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FFJNMMnkzqpVCHHA8TDGjmODVlE/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FFJNMMnkzqpVCHHA8TDGjmODVlE/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/1TmTLOib2jU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/12/emotions.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEcNRHY7cCp7ImA9WxBTFks.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-7306187416605488589</id><published>2009-12-12T15:47:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-12-12T15:54:55.808-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-12-12T15:54:55.808-08:00</app:edited><title>Knowledge</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/7306187416605488589/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=7306187416605488589" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7306187416605488589?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7306187416605488589?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/4DiInDXGi_M/knowledge.html" title="Knowledge" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">There are alternative models for thought storage and retrieval.

Knowledge is language based and can be stored as historic documents with providence, both electronically and physically.  What we know about specific objects is enhanced when viewed historically, the artifact and the digital study of the artifact, plus all the collected strands of human experience, thought and academic reasoning 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4Zsw5kUBktIaFChj6oSdweuNAiM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4Zsw5kUBktIaFChj6oSdweuNAiM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4Zsw5kUBktIaFChj6oSdweuNAiM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/4Zsw5kUBktIaFChj6oSdweuNAiM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/4DiInDXGi_M" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/12/knowledge.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEUBSHc-fyp7ImA9WxNaE0s.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-8032362736305137893</id><published>2009-11-27T14:43:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-27T14:50:59.957-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-27T14:50:59.957-08:00</app:edited><title>Shaken, not Stirred</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/8032362736305137893/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=8032362736305137893" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/8032362736305137893?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/8032362736305137893?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/o20he7urHE4/shaken-not-stirred.html" title="Shaken, not Stirred" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Programming is based on certainty.  You can only write code if the layers that connect together do so without any holes in the logic.  When you discover a method by which an infrastructure should produce a bunch of objects you do not need to be concerned that the infrastructure gets it wrong, that is why it is infrastructure.  
When the infrastructure does not respond in the most wholesome way, 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UvAqaSLu6sXOlFW17OXPVEp5I4g/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UvAqaSLu6sXOlFW17OXPVEp5I4g/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UvAqaSLu6sXOlFW17OXPVEp5I4g/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/UvAqaSLu6sXOlFW17OXPVEp5I4g/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/o20he7urHE4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/11/shaken-not-stirred.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0QGRHczeCp7ImA9WxNaEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-4623602734105812034</id><published>2009-11-25T12:35:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-25T12:35:25.980-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-25T12:35:25.980-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Copyright" /><title>A new copyright model</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/4623602734105812034/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=4623602734105812034" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4623602734105812034?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4623602734105812034?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/K6XSfbaWx_E/new-copyright-model.html" title="A new copyright model" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Should original works be protected by copyright? I think there is merit in rewarding writers and originators of new ideas with financial reward.  It encourages me to write more interesting and accessible articles, giving away years of experience and knowledge - there has to be a reason to do this.  

Passing on knowledge makes it more valuable.  Copyright law should never prevent the passing on 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pShnpcm6VVLW-r-gMejZ2HbRZxo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pShnpcm6VVLW-r-gMejZ2HbRZxo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pShnpcm6VVLW-r-gMejZ2HbRZxo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/pShnpcm6VVLW-r-gMejZ2HbRZxo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/K6XSfbaWx_E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/11/new-copyright-model.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CkYNQXk6fSp7ImA9WxNaEE4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-7204997900415332397</id><published>2009-11-23T18:30:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-23T18:36:30.715-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-23T18:36:30.715-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="utility" /><title>Ways to use Twitter</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/7204997900415332397/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=7204997900415332397" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7204997900415332397?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7204997900415332397?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/H9VEPaL_OCQ/ways-to-use-twitter.html" title="Ways to use Twitter" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Here are some working phrases: 

"More than it appears to be"
"Deceptively Simple and Mad Enough to Work"
"More return than effort put in"

and some more

"Less than you expect"
"Elegant design fits so easily with other applications"
"Returns come when you put the effort in"

which set of statements (assumptions) are more true of Twitter?

The answer is dependent on how you want to use Twitter.


&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ce_A1HF1rpfP_IcOsL21ywZGqNs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ce_A1HF1rpfP_IcOsL21ywZGqNs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ce_A1HF1rpfP_IcOsL21ywZGqNs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/ce_A1HF1rpfP_IcOsL21ywZGqNs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/H9VEPaL_OCQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/11/ways-to-use-twitter.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEYMQnkyeyp7ImA9WxNUFk4.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-5474578874538437432</id><published>2009-11-07T14:11:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-11-07T14:16:23.793-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-11-07T14:16:23.793-08:00</app:edited><title>CMS page structure</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/5474578874538437432/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=5474578874538437432" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/5474578874538437432?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/5474578874538437432?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/DsMqKQXBbyc/cms-page-structure.html" title="CMS page structure" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Think of the page structure as three primary objects: 

either: 
[LEFT CONTENT RIGHT]
or: 
[HEADER BODY FOOTER] 

are defined as Primary, the other is contained by the middle element of the other.

i.e. [HEADER BODY FOOTER] defined inside CONTENT; or, [LEFT CONTENT RIGHT] defined inside BODY.

It is a column arrangement (not all columns need be used) that can be used to slice the site into "
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FfNlpEw37C2CCvdGeVteUTAXCQ0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FfNlpEw37C2CCvdGeVteUTAXCQ0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FfNlpEw37C2CCvdGeVteUTAXCQ0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/FfNlpEw37C2CCvdGeVteUTAXCQ0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/DsMqKQXBbyc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/11/cms-page-structure.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkUMQnwzcCp7ImA9WxNXGUk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-7378472139716905617</id><published>2009-10-07T13:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T13:44:43.288-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-10-07T13:44:43.288-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="frameworks and web security" /><title>Frameworks</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/7378472139716905617/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=7378472139716905617" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7378472139716905617?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7378472139716905617?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/vhk9QnuHJOs/frameworks.html" title="Frameworks" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Everyone loves Frameworks but there are good software stacks that follow design patterns and there are ones that labour away in your browser.  The whole idea of RESTful design is that the client has an independent life.  But RESTful design coupled with intelligent clients that are now possible to write with Javascript frameworks (so we now have two separate software stacks talking through the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2wJx7uxvqUDMn7cnaKPRCdDFyfI/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2wJx7uxvqUDMn7cnaKPRCdDFyfI/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2wJx7uxvqUDMn7cnaKPRCdDFyfI/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/2wJx7uxvqUDMn7cnaKPRCdDFyfI/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/vhk9QnuHJOs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/10/frameworks.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C08EQ3g-fip7ImA9WxNXGUg.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-1211653530311410794</id><published>2009-10-07T13:02:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-10-07T14:43:22.656-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-10-07T14:43:22.656-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="the future" /><title>Innovation and Capital</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/1211653530311410794/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=1211653530311410794" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1211653530311410794?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1211653530311410794?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/ugONbTZsZag/innovation-and-capital.html" title="Innovation and Capital" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Over seven years ago I created a website that published academic articles of a leading professional and put in links that allowed you to generate links for your own site to link to the article, or get a link to email to your friend.  I also provided lots of expensive looking paper backgrounds with multiple style sheets.  It was all innovation and if things had gone better, could have gone 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJNRpB31Tgde3_I9o_8EAndcfUs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJNRpB31Tgde3_I9o_8EAndcfUs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJNRpB31Tgde3_I9o_8EAndcfUs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VJNRpB31Tgde3_I9o_8EAndcfUs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/ugONbTZsZag" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/10/innovation-and-capital.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEMGSXY-cCp7ImA9WxNRFEQ.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-6746425503160839364</id><published>2009-09-09T03:32:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-09T03:33:48.858-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-09T03:33:48.858-07:00</app:edited><title>Follow this blog</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/6746425503160839364/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=6746425503160839364" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/6746425503160839364?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/6746425503160839364?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/-UTEy7-iZO4/follow-this-blog.html" title="Follow this blog" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">From somewhere this blog found a follower. I maintain about 30 blogs.  The ones with followers get updated more often.  If you want to read more "Web Theory" follow this blog using your google account.Free advertising for a giant.  A very big giant.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q64JMwIPLNEU3zv1rv_fipcCrGg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q64JMwIPLNEU3zv1rv_fipcCrGg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q64JMwIPLNEU3zv1rv_fipcCrGg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/q64JMwIPLNEU3zv1rv_fipcCrGg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/-UTEy7-iZO4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/09/follow-this-blog.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkIARnk9cSp7ImA9WxNRFEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-8002421158057887883</id><published>2009-09-09T01:14:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-09-09T01:22:27.769-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-09-09T01:22:27.769-07:00</app:edited><title>Social Security and Networking</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/8002421158057887883/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=8002421158057887883" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/8002421158057887883?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/8002421158057887883?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/gmJDm2WGT1w/social-security-and-networking.html" title="Social Security and Networking" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">A recent case of a woman who's password was hacked and her account cracked, meant she had to shut her Facebook account down as the hackers then harvested pity from her close friends and actually extracted $1000 via Western Union from one of them within 24 hours.  She found the "report" link on Facebook and after 12 hours, Facebook closed her hacked account.  The first line of defense is your 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_NbOiMRAPWBjGiU2uRntfg-xPC4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_NbOiMRAPWBjGiU2uRntfg-xPC4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_NbOiMRAPWBjGiU2uRntfg-xPC4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_NbOiMRAPWBjGiU2uRntfg-xPC4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/gmJDm2WGT1w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/09/social-security-and-networking.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMDRXgycSp7ImA9WxNTFko.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-4219438568012901804</id><published>2009-08-18T23:01:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-19T02:34:34.699-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-19T02:34:34.699-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="PUT" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="POST" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Ajax" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Web services" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="web security" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="HTML 5" /><title>Web 2.0 interactivity</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/4219438568012901804/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=4219438568012901804" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4219438568012901804?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4219438568012901804?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/8O2Q8Ej6zuc/web-20-interactivity.html" title="Web 2.0 interactivity" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">When a field selector is used to load values or a web interface wants to interact with a back end process, a useful design pattern to use is Ajax MVC.This works very well with jQuery, PHP and a database.MVCModelThe model is a map of how data is stored.  The model may also provide object structures that inform the view how to use data.ViewThe view is a form with active fields that talk to the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x8lFA6i_Qr6Nyz75oZ6xg_ME5Ew/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x8lFA6i_Qr6Nyz75oZ6xg_ME5Ew/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x8lFA6i_Qr6Nyz75oZ6xg_ME5Ew/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/x8lFA6i_Qr6Nyz75oZ6xg_ME5Ew/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/8O2Q8Ej6zuc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/08/web-20-interactivity.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CEcAR388cSp7ImA9WxNTFkk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-1552925457619757981</id><published>2009-08-18T17:31:00.000-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-18T17:34:06.179-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-18T17:34:06.179-07:00</app:edited><title>The Web is distracting</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/1552925457619757981/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=1552925457619757981" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1552925457619757981?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1552925457619757981?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/WbTe03vEcaU/web-is-distracting.html" title="The Web is distracting" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The internet is distracting humanity from the humdrum pointless paper pushing inanity that used to rule us. Now we can share without authority, now we can make things and see them without institutions dictating, but it helps academia prepare our minds.Compare TED.com with Sarah Palin.  One shares ecology and values, educating humanity.  The other exposes the mind of a greedy person.Now, back to 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rwf2vR8TbnxJnCMWl-jKCU_FFY0/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rwf2vR8TbnxJnCMWl-jKCU_FFY0/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rwf2vR8TbnxJnCMWl-jKCU_FFY0/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Rwf2vR8TbnxJnCMWl-jKCU_FFY0/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/WbTe03vEcaU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/08/web-is-distracting.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUQNRnc5cSp7ImA9WxNTFUs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-6146653953033269179</id><published>2009-08-17T19:42:00.001-07:00</published><updated>2009-08-17T19:43:17.929-07:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-08-17T19:43:17.929-07:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="internet history" /><title>The very first Web page</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/6146653953033269179/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=6146653953033269179" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/6146653953033269179?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/6146653953033269179?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/zWg3Ak5QZjI/very-first-web-page.html" title="The very first Web page" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Here it is, a piece of Internet HistoryThe WWW Project
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m55rIY3plOtHwECD8wJZ2v4kk0o/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m55rIY3plOtHwECD8wJZ2v4kk0o/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m55rIY3plOtHwECD8wJZ2v4kk0o/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/m55rIY3plOtHwECD8wJZ2v4kk0o/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/zWg3Ak5QZjI" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/08/very-first-web-page.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DkMGQXw7eyp7ImA9WxVVEEs.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-3335084409340171840</id><published>2009-03-02T23:12:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-03-02T23:13:40.203-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-03-02T23:13:40.203-08:00</app:edited><title>myspace</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/3335084409340171840/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=3335084409340171840" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/3335084409340171840?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/3335084409340171840?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/L9uowDf7pjo/myspace.html" title="myspace" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">I put TOP FRIENDS into random order for entirely selfish reasons - for instance - whom I rate or do not rate is something that seems entirely private.  Although it is thrilling finding ones' mug on someone else's page is not just an honour but a risk.  I hate that kind of thing - so I randomised the friendset on myspace.  It results in this being more of a performance space and less of a personal
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oaYXeis_2lfH4aOp-QIgeNPcG7A/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oaYXeis_2lfH4aOp-QIgeNPcG7A/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oaYXeis_2lfH4aOp-QIgeNPcG7A/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oaYXeis_2lfH4aOp-QIgeNPcG7A/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/L9uowDf7pjo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/03/myspace.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DU8BQXsycCp7ImA9WxVWEUU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-1224499578064628372</id><published>2009-02-20T15:13:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-20T19:44:10.598-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-20T19:44:10.598-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="Web 3.0" /><title>Defining Web 3.0</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/1224499578064628372/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=1224499578064628372" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1224499578064628372?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1224499578064628372?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/F_imkx6UEXE/wanted-web-30.html" title="Defining Web 3.0" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Web 2.0What Web 2.0 delivers is audience.  It leverages our own social network as a model for promotional activities and audience gathering.  But like most of the user initiated movies on youtube the engagement factor is missing.  MySpace/FacebookBoth are inventions of the same thing, but with very different orientations.  One is designed to majestically implode upon the interaction of the me-too
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oe6mRR9CXY2xgf1GqH8tJ0kzv5Q/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oe6mRR9CXY2xgf1GqH8tJ0kzv5Q/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oe6mRR9CXY2xgf1GqH8tJ0kzv5Q/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/oe6mRR9CXY2xgf1GqH8tJ0kzv5Q/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/F_imkx6UEXE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/02/wanted-web-30.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;CUIHQnk7cCp7ImA9WxVWEEU.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-1675351958484657806</id><published>2009-02-19T14:44:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-19T14:45:33.708-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-19T14:45:33.708-08:00</app:edited><title>Parliament: Don't screw up copyright</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/1675351958484657806/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=1675351958484657806" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1675351958484657806?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/1675351958484657806?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/DN8Ntq8HLc8/parliament-dont-screw-up-copyright.html" title="Parliament: Don't screw up copyright" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Media will take an angle on anything.  But so will ISPs and in their tricky negotiations with various parties about copyrights without making blunders they will be sued for, and passing on unnecessary legal expenses?  A good law would pave a path to economic prosperity.  This hampers economic progress and cements a stupid set of relationships into fact.  There is no reason to incriminate the 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Trqtsi_p7yz64r3ZFja8WBwnQxo/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Trqtsi_p7yz64r3ZFja8WBwnQxo/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Trqtsi_p7yz64r3ZFja8WBwnQxo/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/Trqtsi_p7yz64r3ZFja8WBwnQxo/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/DN8Ntq8HLc8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/02/parliament-dont-screw-up-copyright.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;AkADQX47fyp7ImA9WxVXGU8.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-4251606241826269013</id><published>2009-02-17T18:31:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-17T19:46:10.007-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-17T19:46:10.007-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="NZ Government" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="danger" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="internet danger" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="danger to the internet" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="copyright law enforcement" /><title>NZ Government experiments with ISPs</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/4251606241826269013/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=4251606241826269013" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4251606241826269013?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/4251606241826269013?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/MGkUeNkd_M4/nz-government-experiments-with-isps.html" title="NZ Government experiments with ISPs" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">The New Zealand Government overlooked an opportunity to dissect a contentious law that seeks to enforce copyright by giving ISPs the responsibility to cut off any user not complying with three warnings.This is the bull headed socialism that the Labour Government enacted defensively and very unwisely in the last year of it's 9 years firmly holding the reigns of government.  Most likely, hoping to 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VCfiwDpBRCxaKExiLgtClMiCK1M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VCfiwDpBRCxaKExiLgtClMiCK1M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VCfiwDpBRCxaKExiLgtClMiCK1M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/VCfiwDpBRCxaKExiLgtClMiCK1M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/MGkUeNkd_M4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/02/nz-government-experiments-with-isps.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0EDRXk4fip7ImA9WxVXGUw.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-9187320161044375844</id><published>2009-02-17T15:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-02-17T15:01:14.736-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-02-17T15:01:14.736-08:00</app:edited><title>Letter to NZ Minister of Arts and Culture</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/9187320161044375844/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=9187320161044375844" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/9187320161044375844?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/9187320161044375844?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/PXwk9MiT83E/letter-to-nz-minister-of-arts-and.html" title="Letter to NZ Minister of Arts and Culture" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">Dear MinisterThere are grave concerns about a very destructive law which comes into effect at the end of February this year, passed by the previous Government.As an artist and publisher, I support copyright as a means to return value to artists.This law is well intentioned, but destructive to NZ's image.  If our Government allows laws that enforce the presumption of guilt and enforces punitive 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qmLfU_g2xEcpbRtM3cT6pK9fpoU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qmLfU_g2xEcpbRtM3cT6pK9fpoU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qmLfU_g2xEcpbRtM3cT6pK9fpoU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qmLfU_g2xEcpbRtM3cT6pK9fpoU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/PXwk9MiT83E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/02/letter-to-nz-minister-of-arts-and.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0MFRHY_cCp7ImA9WxVQFEk.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-2159091560209630603</id><published>2009-01-29T03:00:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-31T14:36:55.848-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-01-31T14:36:55.848-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ROA" /><title>ROA and PHP</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/2159091560209630603/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=2159091560209630603" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2159091560209630603?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2159091560209630603?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/PoLi-SLfeaM/roa-and-php.html" title="ROA and PHP" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">According to the PHP Manual HTTP PUT is implemented as a sort of file upload emulation as though that was useful.The whole subject of HTTP PUT was very murky until I read the RESTful Architecture O'Reilly book.  What you need to know is that in a ROA (a Resource Orientated Architecture) uses HTTP PUT to create a resource.Think social networking paths to individual resources requires a different 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vh_v5TQdkGDpGMKrUcQtlnHmqws/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vh_v5TQdkGDpGMKrUcQtlnHmqws/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vh_v5TQdkGDpGMKrUcQtlnHmqws/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/vh_v5TQdkGDpGMKrUcQtlnHmqws/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/PoLi-SLfeaM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/01/roa-and-php.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;C0cMRXs8eyp7ImA9WxVSGU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-2244888050486495271</id><published>2009-01-13T18:17:00.000-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-13T18:44:44.573-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-01-13T18:44:44.573-08:00</app:edited><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="pirates" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="ISP" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="shutdown" /><category scheme="http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#" term="downloads" /><title>NZ ISPs to be pirate police</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/2244888050486495271/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=2244888050486495271" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2244888050486495271?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/2244888050486495271?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/1IhBme3EmnE/nz-isps-to-be-pirate-police.html" title="NZ ISPs to be pirate police" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">NZ Herald discussion pageA new law in New Zealand makes ISPs responsible for cutting off copyright pirates.  This is all a bit silly.For a start, define "pirate".  A pirate is not the same thing as a thief.  A pirate is someone who steals contraband.  What is contraband?  Goods in transit that have not yet been destination cleared.  So, how is a "downloader" a "pirate"?When a downloader also 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qiKQnQoLnVgniykMupxEtIeCWao/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qiKQnQoLnVgniykMupxEtIeCWao/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qiKQnQoLnVgniykMupxEtIeCWao/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/qiKQnQoLnVgniykMupxEtIeCWao/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/1IhBme3EmnE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/01/nz-isps-to-be-pirate-police.html</feedburner:origLink></entry><entry gd:etag="W/&quot;DUcFSXszeip7ImA9WxVSEU0.&quot;"><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9158602313305296293.post-7625094815554472534</id><published>2009-01-04T13:53:00.001-08:00</published><updated>2009-01-04T14:10:18.582-08:00</updated><app:edited xmlns:app="http://www.w3.org/2007/app">2009-01-04T14:10:18.582-08:00</app:edited><title>A model of a business</title><link rel="replies" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/feeds/7625094815554472534/comments/default" title="Post Comments" /><link rel="replies" type="text/html" href="http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=9158602313305296293&amp;postID=7625094815554472534" title="0 Comments" /><link rel="edit" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7625094815554472534?v=2" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.blogger.com/feeds/9158602313305296293/posts/default/7625094815554472534?v=2" /><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTheory/~3/3pZh59Ic4wY/model-of-business.html" title="A model of a business" /><author><name>Nicholas</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/17113426316236474278</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image rel="http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail" width="17" height="32" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_UtBCSfrskT4/SbcoW9cc0qI/AAAAAAAAA6U/dJSD6XKdj6I/S220/n2.jpg" /></author><thr:total>0</thr:total><content type="html">RESTful Business models seem to proceed presently as follows:/business/address/street/street_number/business/contact/email/business/staff/executive/managerand so forth.  Nouns are nice as they relate to tangibles, that in turn have attributes, actions resulting in changes in their state.This subject-noun centralisation appears to make sense but is that Resource Orientated?  Probably not, unless 
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/H2siOQnc9KQeDmO7DyKKiC9X3G4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/H2siOQnc9KQeDmO7DyKKiC9X3G4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/H2siOQnc9KQeDmO7DyKKiC9X3G4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/H2siOQnc9KQeDmO7DyKKiC9X3G4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/WebTheory/~4/3pZh59Ic4wY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</content><feedburner:origLink>http://weblogtheory.blogspot.com/2009/01/model-of-business.html</feedburner:origLink></entry></feed>

