Weed Breezes on Free Energy

Free energy antidote to $4-7/gallon gas; $200/barrel oil; dollar collapse

2011-03-18T09:59:00.000-07:00

Lindsey Williams said yesterday that his insider sources say U.S. gas prices will go up to $4 and $5 a gallon by the end of 2011, and up to $6 and $7 per gallon in 2012; and the U.S. Dollar will collapse completely by the end of 2012, wiping out the wealth of the Arab oil countries; and US will then open US oil fields in violation of secret agreements. Ramifications of free energy technology emerging as a stop gap.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

On Tuesday, Pastor Lindsey Williams appeared again on the Alex Jones radio program to give one of the most troubling reports yet from his insider sources from the top three oil companies.

Background on Lindsey Williams

I've been listening to his reports for a while, and have found his sources to be very accurate, though I don't care for his delivery. He could present in five minutes what he takes three hours to milk and hype, with a lot of repetition, urging the audience to take notes, setting the context that he already set 10 minutes ago. That aside, his information is valuable.

Back in the Fall of 1992 I had Lindsey Williams come speak to a large group of people at a junior high auditorium in Spanish Fork, Utah. It was the last formal event of the American Study Group that I founded, and which dissolved over concerns that the group was causing people to question the Church to which they belonged; urging people to stand independent rather than leaning on an organization in their standing with God.

Three decades ago, Williams served as Chaplain of the Alaska Pipeline Company, and bush pilot. In that capacity he struck up life-long friendships with several executives in the oil industry who have kept in touch with him over the years, feeding him key information about the plans of the global elite. Their disclosures to him are not so much along the lines of "whistle-blower" as they are holding true to an edict they conspirators live by that they will not do something before first letting people know what they're going to do (like a bully saying, "I know where you live."). And Lindsey Williams happens to be one of their methods of letting the public know their conniving plans.

Here's a video of Alex Jones announcing the upcoming interview, in which he summarizes William's credentials and what he would be talking about the next day. (Infowars.com)

Lindsey Williams on Alex Jones Show

You are here: PureEnergySystems.com > News > February 23, 2011
Free energy antidote to $4-7/gallon gas; $200/barrel oil; dollar collapse

Lindsey Williams said yesterday that his insider sources say U.S. gas prices will go up to $4 and $5 a gallon by the end of 2011, and up to $6 and $7 per gallon in 2012; and the U.S. Dollar will collapse completely by the end of 2012, wiping out the wealth of the Arab oil countries; and US will then open US oil fields in violation of secret agreements. Ramifications of free energy technology emerging as a stop gap.

by Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News

On Tuesday, Pastor Lindsey Williams appeared again on the Alex Jones radio program to give one of the most troubling reports yet from his insider sources from the top three oil companies.

Background on Lindsey Williams

I've been listening to his reports for a while, and have found his sources to be very accurate, though I don't care for his delivery. He could present in five minutes what he takes three hours to milk and hype, with a lot of repetition, urging the audience to take notes, setting the context that he already set 10 minutes ago. That aside, his information is valuable.

Back in the Fall of 1992 I had Lindsey Williams come speak to a large group of people at a junior high auditorium in Spanish Fork, Utah. It was the last formal event of the American Study Group that I founded, and which dissolved over concerns that the group was causing people to question the Church to which they belonged; urging people to stand independent rather than leaning on an organization in their standing with God.

Three decades ago, Williams served as Chaplain of the Alaska Pipeline Company, and bush pilot. In that capacity he struck up life-long friendships with several executives in the oil industry who have kept in touch with him over the years, feeding him key information about the plans of the global elite. Their disclosures to him are not so much along the lines of "whistle-blower" as they are holding true to an edict they conspirators live by that they will not do something before first letting people know what they're going to do (like a bully saying, "I know where you live."). And Lindsey Williams happens to be one of their methods of letting the public know their conniving plans.

Here's a video of Alex Jones announcing the upcoming interview, in which he summarizes William's credentials and what he would be talking about the next day. (Infowars.com)

Recent Track Record

Two years ago, when oil prices were at $140/barrel and rising, Williams came on Alex Jones' show and said that his sources had told him the price of oil would drop to $40/barrel. That was laughable then, but it turned out to be exactly what happened, actually dropping to slightly below $40/barrel.

Then, around the same period of time, Williams said the price of oil would gradually climb for the next two years but pretty much stay the same, which is what has happened.

More recently, before the Egyptian turmoil, he came on Jones' show and said that there would be a crisis in the Middle East that would drive up the price of oil significantly.

I remember hearing each of these predictions (they're available at YouTube), recalling how unusual they might seem to someone not familiar with the manipulative capabilities of the conspirators but just looking at the trends that had been in play at the time he gave the predictions based on his insider sources.

Yesterday's Predictions

In his interview yesterday, he said that U.S. gas prices will go up to $4 and $5 a gallon by the end of 2011, and up to $6 and $7 per gallon in 2012. He said that the (secretly caused and controlled) disturbances in the Middle East will push oil prices up to $200 a barrel in 2011/12. The rising oil prices will make it difficult for truckers, airlines, drive up food prices. And at that point the U.S. will begin opening its own oil fields to get oil domestically.

He said the U.S. Dollar will collapse completely by the end of 2012 and that will wipe out the wealth of the Arab oil countries, and the U.S. will stop buying from them and put them back in tents on the desert like they were 60 years ago before the U.S. discovered and drilled oil wells for them.

Williams and Jones talked about how in 1977, Nixon brokered deals with the Arabs that U.S. oil fields would not be harvested but that the U.S. would buy oil from the Middle East, under the condition that the Middle East would buy U.S. T-bill debt notes.

So once the dollar becomes worthless, not only will the Arabs loose out on their T-bill investment, but the U.S. will double cross by pulling from its own oil supplies. Neither of these things will ingratiate and already tense Arab world toward the U.S.

The collapse of the US dollar is engineered to be able to introduce a world currency to replace the dollar.

Williams and Jones also talked about how George Bush Sr. was the ambassador to China. Prior to that, China was a closed society who did not do business with the outside world. "We'll give you cheap labour; you give us your patents" was the deal. These actions made the US dependent on China and the Middle East so they could then leverage that against us. Bush Sr. was the one who announced at the U.N. that a "New World Order" is arising.

China "is the big one". They will not be effected by Middle East prices, because they get their oil from Russia. So these changes will further boost the strength of Communist China.

All of this is high treason, inimical to principles of freedom and the Constitution. It has been engineered to bring about the collapse of the United States with its freedoms and give rise to a world police state tyranny.

Does It Have to End This Way?

While these conspirators have been plotting the overthrow of the United States and its freedom, I'm convinced that ultimately their plans will fail, though not before bringing a profound extent of destruction, as is already set in motion. Destiny is on the side of freedom and goodness, and an enlightened society that will emerge in the end. Momentum is heading in both directions simultaneously: the mainstream worldwide is plummeting downward, both physically and spiritually; while an enlightened remnant is increasing in strength and spiritual fortitude.

Even as the American Revolution was won by a small portion of patriots (5% of the population), so also will goodness and freedom ultimately prevail in the the coming days, lead by a relatively small, enlightened remnant who will put on strength as independent emissaries of God or universal goodness.

Role of Free Energy as a Tool of Victory

Trends Researcher, Gerald Celente, says that one thing that can turn around the collapse of the US economy (and hence of the world) is the emergence of "productive capacity"; and in his 2011 trends forecast he specifically mentioned a breakthrough energy revolution -- "not wind, solar, geothermal, biofuel, but something much bigger." (Ref.)

Imagine a free energy technology that can be manufactured in simple shops around the world, both providing jobs and providing cheap, reliable energy that frees people from dependence on the grid. Imagine how personally empowering that will be.

Instead of electricity and cheap transportation becoming a thing of the past as the societal infrastructure collapses, leaving people to try and live off the land but not knowing how; electricity and transportation could be provided cheaply.

There isn't just one such technology offering such hope, but there are actually several, which we try and report on and help facilitate here in our news. And hopefully we can get at least one of these groups to open source their technology, which would make it easier to widely disseminate it in this manner, while still providing a substantial revenue flow for the inventor. We stand ready to facilitate this approach if someone wants to do it with a sufficient breakthrough technology that is relatively easy to understand and build inexpensively, while not being encumbered in its intellectual property claims.

In part three, Williams talks about how in 1977 Kissinger struck a deal with Middle East oil countries that the U.S. would not develop its own oil sources but would buy oil from them; if they in turn would buy U.S. T-bill debt notes.

Now what is going to happen is that the globalists, through their puppets, are going to double cross the Middle East, bringing down the dollar, making their T-bill investment worthless, and at the same time, they will start opening the U.S. oil fields, further enraging the Middle East, taking away their key customer; and introduce a world currency to replace the dollar. The rising oil prices will make it difficult for truckers, airlines, drive up food prices

China "is the big one". Will not be effected by Middle East prices, because they get their oil from Russia. So this will boost the strength of Communist China.

George Bush Sr. was the ambassador to China. Prior to that, China was a closed society who did not do business with the outside world. He announced that there will be a "New World Order." Made us dependent on China and Middle East so they could then leverage that against us. "We'll give you cheap labor; you give us your patents" was the deal.

Alex takes some calls, including a Muslim who says the protests were staged/fomented.

To order Lindsey William's material, call toll-free: 888-799-6111 or go to http://ProphecyClub.com

Resources at PESWiki.com

* Directory:Best_Exotic_Clean_Energy_Technologies
* Directory:Conspiracy
* Directory:Infowars_and_Prison_Planet_by_Alex_Jones
* Directory:Oil
* More Stories by Sterling D. Allan

* PESN (Pure Energy Systems News) - Feature stories on cutting-edge, clean energy technology.
* Free Energy News (.com) - Daily cutting-edge, clean energy technology news from around the world
* PESWiki Latest - Newest feature pages in the publicly-editable energy directory.
* This Week in Free Energy™ - Ten-minute recap each Sunday, 7:50 - 8:00 pm Mountain.
* Free Energy Now (.net) - in-depth interviews

Electromagnetic Mind control

2009-11-28T18:48:00.000-08:00

Main Page Bariumblues.com

Electromagnetic Mind control

Disclaimer: I have serious reservations about posting the article called "Total Population Control" found below.

The first reason is because Andrija Puharich is referred to, and he was an extremely questionable character. He is similar to other dubious types such as Dr. Steven Greer, Ingo Swann, Courtney Brown, Timothy Leary, and Thomas Bearden. You really can't trust these guys.

It seems that some of them are aware that they are spreading disinformation, while others are sincere but are being used as "assets". Or maybe they were really brilliant guys and going down the rabbit hole just screwed them up too much. Sometimes they are sort-of in-the-military, but also sort-of not in-the-military.

Sometimes they are actually being duped and used by nonhuman entities. Andrija Puharich was influenced by such entities. These beings have many names: aliens, spirits, Etherians, Extraterrestrials, etc. I refer to them as the Jinn. Modern humans tend to assume that these guys come from other planets because the entities sometimes pretend that this is the case and also because modern beliefs have been shaped by a philosophy of materialism (the view that everything that actually exists is material or physical) We expect to be able to see "everything real" with our own eyes and can't accept that some entities may exist outside the parameters or dimensions of human sight.

In the case of Andrija Puharich these jinn entities called themselves "The Nine".

The jinn which interact with humans are often shadowy trickster types, and the best approach is to avoid them and distrust any claims they make which can't be duplicated or proven.

The so-called "E.T.'s" mentioned in the article below were undoubtedly jinn and not from other planets. They fit a typical profile of a Jinn character type. For more on the true nature of these entities see thejinn.net .

The second reason is because there is no such thing as a "pendulum expert".

I have reservations about posting this article, but do so because many aspects of it are fascinating and may encourage further investigation. ~~Lydia

Total Population Control

An overview of the ELF, GWEN towers, and HAARP inter-connection.

By Nicholas Jones From http://educate-yourself.org/mc/mctotalcontrol12jul02.shtml

Earth is wrapped in a donut shaped magnetic field. Circular lines of magnetic flux continuously descend into the North Pole and emerge from the South Pole. The Ionosphere, an electromagnetic-wave conductor, 100 kilometers [62 miles] above the earth, consists of a layer of electrically charged particles acting as a shield from solar winds.

Earth Resonant Frequency
Natural waves are created which result from electrical activity in the atmosphere. They are thought to be caused by multiple lightning storms. Collectively, these waves are called 'The Schumann Resonance', with the strongest current registering at 7.8 Hz. These are quasi-standing [scalar], extremely low frequency (ELF) waves that naturally exist in the earth's electromagnetic cavity which is the space between ground and the Ionosphere. These 'earth brainwaves' are identical to the frequency spectrum of our human brainwaves.

[Frequency nomenclature: 1 hertz = 1 cycle per second, 1 Khz = 1000cps, 1 Mhz =1 million cps. Wavelength: A 1 Hertz wave has a wavelength that is 186,000 miles long, A 10 Hz wave is 18,600 miles long, etc. Radio-waves move at the speed of light (186,000 miles per second)]

HAARP
The Creator designed living beings to resonate to the11 natural Schumann Resonance frequency pulsation in order to evolve harmoniously. The Ionosphere is being manipulated by US government scientists using the Alaskan transmitter called HAARP, (High-Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) which sends focused radiated power to heat up sections of the Ionosphere, which bounces power down again. ELF waves produced from HAARP, when targeted on selected areas, can weather-engineer and create mood changes affecting millions of people. The intended wattage is 1,700 billion watts of power.

Geomagnetic Waves & GWEN
Sixty four elements in the ground modulate, with variation, the geomagnetic waves naturally coming from the ground. The earth's natural 'brain rhythm' above is balanced with these. These are the same minerals found in red blood corpuscles. There is a relation between the blood and geomagnetic waves. An imbalance between Schumann and geomagnetic waves disrupts these biorhythms. These natural geomagnetic waves are being replaced by artificially created low frequency (LF) ground waves coming from GWEN Towers.

GWEN (Ground Wave Emergency Network) transmitters placed 200 miles apart across the USA allow specific frequencies to be tailored to the geomagnetic-field strength in each area, allowing the magnetic field to be altered. They operate in the LF range, with transmissions between LF 150 and 175 KHz. They also emit waves from the upper VHF to the lower UHF range of 225 - 400 MHz. The LF signals travel by waves that hug the ground rather than radiating into the atmosphere. A GWEN station transmits in a 360 degree circle up to 300 miles, the signal dropping off sharply with distance. The entire GWEN system consists of, (depending on source of data), from 58 to an intended 300 transmitters spread across the USA, each with a tower 299-500 ft high. 300 ft copper wires in spoke-like fashion fan out from the base of the system underground, interacting with the earth, like a thin shelled conductor, radiating radio wave energy for very long distances through the ground.

The United States is bathed in this magnetic field which can rise from ground up to 500 ft, but goes down into basements, so everyone can be affected and mind-controlled. The entire artificial ground-wave spreads out over the whole of the USA like a web. It is easier to mind-control and hypnotize people who are bathed in an artificial electromagnetic-wave.

GWEN transmitters have many different functions including:

1. controlling the weather,
2. mind control,
3. behavior and mood control, and
4. sending synthetic-telepathy as infrasound to victims with US government mind-control implants.

GWEN works in conjunction with HAARP and the Russian Woodpecker transmitter, which is similar to HAARP. The Russians openly market a small version of their weather-engineering system called Elate, which can fine-tune weather patterns over a 200 mile area and have the same range as the GWEN unit. An Elate system operates at Moscow airport. The GWEN towers shoot enormous bursts of energy into the atmosphere in conjuction with HAARP. The website www.cuttingedge.org wrote an expose of how the major floods of the Mid-West USA occurred in 1993.

Atmospheric Vapor Rivers
Enormous, invisible rivers of water, consisting of vapors that flow, move towards the poles in the lower atmosphere. They rival the flow of the Amazon River and are 420 to 480 miles wide and up to 4,800 miles long. They are 1.9 miles above the earth and contain a volume of water equivalent to 340 lbs of water per second. There are 5 atmospheric rivers in each Hemisphere. A massive flood can be created by damming up one of these massive vapor rivers, causing huge amounts of rainfall to be dumped. The GWEN Towers positioned along the areas north of the Missouri and Mississippi Rivers were turned on for 40 days and 40 nights, probably mocking the Flood of Genesis. (This was in conjunction with HAARP, that creates a river of electricity flowing thousands of miles through the sky and down to the polar ice-cap, manipulating the jet-stream , like the Russian Woodpecker.) These rivers flooded, causing agricultural losses of $12-15 billion. HAARP produces earthquakes by focusing energy along fault lines. GWEN Towers are located on the fault lines and volcanic areas of the Pacific Northeast.

In 1963, Dr Robert Beck explored effects of external magnetic-fields on brainwaves showing a relationship between psychiatric admissions and solar magnetic storms. He exposed volunteers to pulsed magnetic-fields similar to magnetic-storms, and found a similar response. US 60 Hz electric power ELF waves vibrate at the same frequency as the human brain. UK 50 Hz electricity emissions depress the thyroid gland.

Human Vulnerability
Dr Andrija Puharich in the 50's/60's, found that clairvoyant's brainwaves became 8 Hz when their psychic powers were operative. He saw an Indian Yogi in 1956 controlling his brainwaves, deliberately shifting his consciousness from one level to another. Puharich trained people with bio-feedback to do this consciously, making 8 Hz waves. A healer made 8 Hz waves pass into a patient, healing their heart trouble, her brain emitting 8 Hz . One person emitting a certain frequency can make another also resonate to the same frequency. Our brains are extremely vulnerable to any technology which sends out ELF waves, because they immediately start resonating to the outside signal by a kind of tuning-fork effect. Puharich experimented discovering that

A) 7.83 Hz (earth's pulse rate) made a person feel good, producing an altered-state.
B) 10.80 Hz causes riotous behavior and
C) 6.6 Hz causes depression.

Puharich made ELF waves change RNA and DNA, breaking hydrogen bonds to make a person have a higher vibratory rate. He wanted to go beyond the psychic 8 Hz brainwave and attract psi phenomena. James Hurtak, who once worked for Puharich, also wrote in his book The Keys of Enoch that ultra-violet caused hydrogen bonds to break and this raised the vibratory rate.

Puharich presented the mental effects of ELF waves to military leaders, but they would not believe him. He gave this information to certain dignitaries of other Western nations. The US government burned down his home in New York to shut him up and he fled to Mexico. However, the Russians discovered which ELF frequencies did what to the human brain and began zapping the US Embassy in Moscow on 4 July 1976 with electromagnetic-waves, varying the signal, including focusing on 10 Hz. (10 Hz puts people into a hypnotic state. Russians and North Koreans use this in portable mind-control machines to extract confessions. A machine was even found in an American church to help the congregation believe!) The Russian "Woodpecker" signal was traveling across the world from a transmitter near Kiev. The US Air Force identified 5 different frequencies in this compound harmonic Woodpecker signal that was sending signals through the earth and the atmosphere.

Nikola Tesla revealed in 1901 power could be transmitted through the ground using ELF waves. Nothing stops or weakens these signals. The Russians retrieved Tesla's papers when they were finally returned to Yugoslavia after his death.

Puharich continued to monitor the Russian ELF wave signal while in Mexico and the higher harmonics produced in the MHz range (5.340 MHz). He met the CIA and started working for them. He and Dr. Robert Beck designed equipment to measure these waves and their effect on the human brain. Puharich started his work by putting dogs to sleep. By 1948/49 he graduated to monkeys, deliberately destroying their eardrums to enable them to pick up sounds without the eardrum intact. He discovered a nerve in the tongue could be used to facilitate hearing. He created the dental tooth implant which mind-control victims are now claiming was surreptitiously placed in their mouth by controlled dentists causing them to hear 'voices in their head.' The implant was placed under dental caps or lodged in the jaw.

Vaccine Implants
Implants are now smaller than a hair's width and are injected with vaccine and flu shots. Millions have had this done unknowingly. These 'biochips' circulate in the bloodstream and lodge in the brain, enabling the victims to hear 'voices' via the implant. There are many kinds of implants now and 1 in 40 are victims from 'alien abduction' statistics, though 1 in 20 has also been gauged. The fake alien abduction event, revealed to be actually the work of US military personnel using technology to make hologram spaceships outside, virtual reality scenarios of going onto a spaceship with humans in costumes, has been astutely perceived. Though real alien abductions do occur, the 'alien abduction' scenario has been useful to stop any further investigation or accountability of government authorities by poor victims who would face mockery and appear silly.

Are we being forced to respond to an artificially induced vibratory rate by global masters who want this planet to have a sudden leap in evolution, populated by the psychically aware and therefore a superior class of humans or is the agenda designed to eliminate billions of people who are 'useless eaters', deceptively being disposed by electro magnetically-induced cancers and diseases?

Electromagnetic Disease Transmission, ELF, & Chemtrails
The physics and engineering behind electromagnetic disease transmission are frightening. Diseases can be reproduced as 'disease signatures' in that the vibration of a disease can be manufactured and sent on to be induced. (The brainwave pattern of hallucinogenic drugs can also be copied and sent by ELF waves to induce 'visions'.) Once diseases are sprayed in the air, electromagnetic-waves attuned to the disease, using harmonics and subharmonics, will make them more lethal and infectious by sending particular disease frequency death-patterns.

Chemtrails are being sprayed daily all over USA (and other countries too) in a white crisscross pattern. They contain diseases and chemicals which affect our state of consciousness. They can produce apathy which works in conjuction with fluoridation of the water, as well as aspartame and drugs. Fluoride disables the willpower section of the brain, impairing the left occipital lobe.

Fluoride and selenium enable people to 'hear voices'. ELF waves create disturbances in the biological processes of the body and these can be activated in the population once the diseases are introduced into the body from the chemtrails.

Some chemtrails have been analyzed and shown to be creating cleavages in spacial perceptions, blocking the interaction of various amino-acids that relate to higher-consciousness and to increase dopamine in the brain producing a listless, spaced-out state of lower reactive mind.

Basically, the goal is to fog the difference between the real and unreal and some of this could be connected with the many UFO abductions occurring en-mass. Hundreds have been witnessed laid out on tables and implanted. Intelligence agencies are in league with each other behind this disablement of the masses to such a point that they can't even fight back. In order for the perpetrators to do what they want, they need the overall 'frequency' of each victim to function at a specific rate below the threshold of awareness.

Could this be part of a greater plan with mind-control transmitters covering the whole of USA and England, cleverly disguised as cell phone towers and trees? The power from microwave towers may be turned up to such a level that people can die.

A brain functioning at beta-level (above 13 Hz) is agitated and can't change its perceptions, if it is artificially maintained by technology to that frequency. This may increase body electricity in others, giving them psychic powers. Is this linked to the New-Agers claim of a rising 12-14 Hz Schumann Resonance, inching us towards the 4th dimension? Stimulants ingested globally from caffeine genetically-modified plants, may also produce an impact on the 'global-brain' in the ionosphere collecting our brainwaves. New-age channellers say we are going into 4th dimensional frequency. They 'heard' the voice of some 'ET' who told them.

However, some 'ETs' may be local boys. Voices in the head were produced in prisoners in Utah prisons using Tesla technology. Each of the prisoners received the same message from an 'ET'. Today, it seems, it's easy to produce 'voices in the head' without implants.

A prisoner called David Fratus in Draper Prison, Utah in 1988 wrote:

"I began to receive, or hear, high-frequency tones in my ears. When I plug my ears..the tones are still inside and become amplified. It's as if they had become electrified echo chambers with the sounds coming from the inside out..I began to hear voices..into my inner ears as vivid as though I were listening to a set of stereo headphones..with the end result being that I am now having my brain monitored by an omnipotent computerized mind reading or scanning machine of some sort "

Hundreds of inmates at the Gunnison Facility of the Utah State Prison, and the State Hospital were subject to this brand of mind-control in order to test it. In the early 1970s, this was brought out in the Utah U.S. District Court, because inmates who had been subjected to this Tesla-wave mind-control in prison had tried unsuccessfully to fight back in court. The University of Utah researched how Tesla-waves could be used to manipulate the mind into hearing voices, overriding and implanting thoughts into the mind, and reading the thoughts, as well as developing eye-implants.

Tracking
Cray computers, using artificial-intelligence, monitor the victims of government implants sending pre-recorded sound-bytes or occasional live messages. They are picked up by satellite and relayed to whatever large TV broadcasting antenna, GWEN tower or other microwave antenna is near the victim. It's believed that some type of body implants pick up the signal and broadcast the correct Tesla-wave pattern to create voices within the victim.

The tracking implant keeps the staff and the satellite system informed every few minutes as to exactly where to send the voice signals. The master computer and central HQ for this is reported to be in Boulder, CO. It is thought that transponders are being made there as well. The central cellular computer is in the Boulder, CO National Bureau of Standards building. AT&T is also cooperating in this project. Several government agencies work together on this.

Tim Rifat of UK wrote that

"this inter-cerebral hearing is used to drive the victim mad, as no one else can hear the voices transmitted into the brain of the target. Transmission of auditory data directly into the target's brains using microwave carrier beams is now common practice. Instead of using excitation potentials, one uses a transducer to modify the spoken word into ELF audiograms, that are then superimposed on a pulse modulated microwave beam."

The Sydney Morning Herald on 21 March 1983 published an article by Dr Nassim Abd El-Aziz Neweigy, Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Agriculture, Moshtohor Tukh-Kalubia, Egypt. It stated:

"Russian satellites, controlled by advanced computers, can send voices in one's own language interweaving into natural thoughts to the population of choice to form diffused artificial thought. The chemistry and electricity of the human brain can be manipulated by satellite and even suicide can be induced. Through ferocious anti-humanitarian means, the extremist groups are fabricated, the troubles and bloody disturbances are instigated by advanced tele-means via Russian satellites, in many countries in Asia, Africa, Europe and Latin America."

Another source says that these have been fed with the world's languages and synthetic telepathy will reach into people's heads making people believe God is speaking to them personally to enact the Second Coming, complete with holograms! The Russians broke the genetic code of the human brain. They worked out 23 EEG band-wave lengths, 11 of which were totally independent. So if you can manipulate those 11, you can do anything.

NSA Cray computers can remotely track people just knowing the specific EMF waves (evoked potentials from EEGs in the 30-50 Hz, 5 milliwatt range) of a person's bioelectric-field. Each person's emissions are unique and they can remotely track someone in public.

Maxwell's 'Hidden' Etheric Component
Evoked-potentials officially don't exist in physics, but in 1873 a Scotsman, James Clerk Maxwell, discovered electromagnetic waves have 3 components:

He discovered waveforms which exist at a certain number of right-angled rotations away from the electromagnetic-field. These are hyperspacial components, not subject to constraints of time and space. He claimed that electromagnetic-radiation waves were carried by the ether and the ether was disturbed by magnetic lines of force. The hidden component is called only 'potential' now and not normally used except for covert hyperdimensional physics and to manipulate consciousness itself via electromagnetic-waves covering vast areas of the planet.

Approx. one person in 3000 is naturally sensitive to this magnetic-waveform component, the telepathic types (according to a writer called "Majix"), but we are all capable of tuning into this magnetic component by tuning our subconscious to it. Maxwell's successors thought potentials were akin to mysticism, because they believed fields contain mass which cannot be created from apparently nothing, which is what potentials are, both literally and mathematically - they are an accumulation or reservoir of energy; but this hasn't been taught in mainstream physics.

Thought Control
Subliminal words in the correct electromagnetic-field that expresses human consciousness, attuned to the human brain, can enter our minds at a subconscious level. Our brain activity patterns can apparently be measured and stored on computer by super-computers. If a victim needs subliminal-thoughts implanted, all that is necessary is to capture, save on computer, and target the person's brainwave pattern to send them such low frequency subliminal-messages that they actually think it is their own thoughts [confirmed by Al Bielek and Preston Nichols with the Montauk Project in Long Island]. The researcher Majix says our brains are so sensitive that they are like liquid-crystal in response to the magnetic component of the earth.

We are sensitive to earth's magnetic changes, changes in the ionospheric cavity and re-resonate those frequencies ourselves. We are incredibly complex, beyond comprehension and a type of biocosmic transducer. He adds:

"Physicists in Russia correlate the mean annual magnetic-activity, electro-magnetic and electro-static fields on human behavior and medical indications.They are similar to biorhythms.These magnetic frequencies can be manipulated. Our brain waves can mimic magnetic frequencies from very simple equipment at extremely low power levels. From half a second to 4 seconds later, the neurons and brainwaves are driven exclusively by the device, with power levels almost nonexistent. All one needs is a circularly polarized antenna aimed up at the ionospheric cavity and they can manipulate the moods of everyone within a 75 sq. mile area. The body picks up these "new" manipulated waves and begins to correspond immediately. "Sleep" frequency will make everyone become tired and sleep."

In 1967, an "internationally renowned scientist" and Christopher Hills, a pendulum expert, communicated with some ETs. (It is not known who the scientist was, but at one time both Hills and Puharich were with the medium Eileen Garrett at a time when Puharich was communicating with ETs.)

In short, ETs communicated with us via modulated radio-waves, between 10,000 and 20,000 cycles below the known electromagnetic-spectrum. In the carrier-wave by amplitude modulation, mixed with frequency modulation. Single band energy, transmission power less than 25 watts. A naturally present wave on earth, the brain modulated - a wave that resonates between the earth and the ionosphere. All humans influence the ionosphere in this manner. A reflecting technique is involved. The brain modulation consisted of pulses, akin to those known from neuro pulses. Two humans can use this. It's related to something akin to low frequency radar and to ultrasonic techniques, but qualified. A mixed electro-acoustic wave function. The electromagnetic-wave induced an ultrasonic transduction in human tissue. The brain radiation has a sonic component to it as well as an electromagnetic component. Electromagnetic-radiation has a sonic component and it's dependent on the medium through which it travels.

The scientist cut through months of work. Now HAARP is slicing up the ionosphere, the world-brain, like a microwave knife, producing long tear incisions destroying the membrane which holds the reservoir of data accumulated by all earth's history. A healer called Mr. "A" claimed to receive "Ancient Wisdom" from this protective Magnetic-Ring of energy which stores within it all knowledge since time began. Ruth Mongomery wrote about him in Born To Heal.

He claimed that if our energy flow is cut off from this magnetic-field, the Universal-Supply is obstructed and we are no longer in tune and start to get sick. The Power from this travels in split-seconds around the world and is available to anyone who is capable of receiving it and handling it. The waves from The Ring automatically translated into words in his mind, as wisdom to diagnose and heal others, coming from the storehouse of knowledge here since the beginning of time. He produced instant miracles, knitting broken bones and removing arthritis. A photo caught forked lightning coming from his fingers.

In Let's Talk MONTAUK, Joyce Murphy shows that experiments on the 410-420 MHz cycle have been done which could affect the "window frequency to the human consciousness" as a whole:

"He (Preston Nichols) used his..radio equipment to learn that whenever a 410-420 MHz signal appeared on the air, the psychic's minds would be "jammed." Tracing the signal to Montauk Point and the red and white radar antenna on the Air Force Base.."

In Encounter in the Pleiades by Peter Moon and Preston Nichols, http://www.time-travel.com/skybooks/ Preston wrote that:

"Dr. Nicholas Begich has picked up 435 MHz signals connected to HAARP and that a mind control function is being employed. He says that 400-450 MHz is the window to human consciousness because it is our reality's background frequency."

Tim Rifat wrote in his Microwave Mind Control in the UK article http://www.brazilboycott.org/ that cellular phones use 435 MHz. UK police use 450 MHz exclusively. Dr. Ross Adey used this for CIA behavioral modification experiments. Police have a vast array of antennae to broadcast this frequency all over the UK. Adey used 0.75mW/cm2 intensity of pulse modulate microwave at a frequency of 450 MHz, with an ELF modulation to control all aspects of human behavior. 450 MHZ radar modulated at 60 Hz greatly reduced T-lymphocyte activity to kill cultured cancer cells. A study of USA 60 Hz power lines repeated this finding.

See:

the Jinn.net

The Nine

Dystopian visionary quotes from Brzezinski's book written back in 1970: "a system that would seriously impair the brain performance of very large populations"

More about Puharich:

from http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/council_of_nine_fortean.htm

Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the history of The Nine is its relationship to the career of Andrija Puharich. Recent research has revealed Puharich to have a distinctly sinister side. As an Army doctor in the 1950s, he was deeply involved with the CIA's notorious MKULTRA mind control project (see panel). He - together with the infamous Dr Sidney Gottlieb - experimented with a variety of techniques to change or induce actual thought processes. even to creating the impression of voices in the head. These techniques included the use of drugs, hypnosis and beaming radio signals directly into the subject's brain. And, significantly, he was engaged in this work at exactly the same time that The Nine made their first appearance at the Round Table Foundation. The Foundation itself is now known to have been largely funded by the Pentagon as a front for its medical and parapsychological research. Puharich was still working for the CIA in the early 1970s, when he brought Uri Geller out of Israel. Puharich's use of hypnosis is particularly interesting in The Nine circle. In the case of Uri Geller and Bobby Horne, he first hypnotised them and then suggested that they were in touch with The Nine - and lo, they were! Ira Einhorn - a close associate of Puharich's during the 1970s - confirmed to us that he believed that Puharich was "humanly directing" The Nine communications.

from http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:vu7Tv44XhP8J:www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/11/09/andrija-puharich-yeh-hoova/+puharich+extraterrestrial&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=5&gl=us

"To quickly summarize, Puharich was involved on the one hand with ELF (extremely low frequency) transmissions, and even supposedly invented a radio receiver which could be inserted into tooth fillings. And then on the other hand, he has this history of alleged UFO contact, and a series of channellers who claimed to be in communion with ancient Egyptian gods. Here are a couple pieces I’ve written about him, which you might want to explore:
He’s one of these malleable characters who flit in and out of other people’s life stories, such as Gene Roddenberry, creator Star Trek, and psychic Uri Geller, who in turn is connected to Michael Jackson, John Lennon, Dodi Fayed’s father and more. Further, Puharich seems to have been very much treading the line between working for the government and working against the government at various times, which perhaps indicates that there was some deeper hidden agenda at work. I’ve encountered fewer figures in the annals of conspiracy research who seem to have lead more interesting lives, nor left behind more twisted trails.

Main Page Bariumblues.com

.

Carrington event solar protons

2009-11-28T13:47:00.000-08:00

Wednesday, September 17, 2008
1
The atmospheric impact of the Carrington event solar protons 1
Craig J. Rodger 2
Department of Physics, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand 3
Pekka T. Verronen 4
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland 5
Mark A. Clilverd and Annika Seppälä 6
Physical Sciences Division, British Antarctic Survey (NERC), Cambridge, United Kingdom 7
Esa Turunen 8
Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, Finland 9
Abstract. The Carrington event of August/September 1859 was the most significant solar 10
proton event (SPE) of the last 450 years, about four times larger than the solar proton fluence of 11
the largest event from the "spacecraft era" (August 1972). Recently, much attention has focused 12
upon increasing our understanding of the Carrington event, in order to better quantify the 13
impact of extreme space weather events. In this study the Sodankylä Ion and Neutral Chemistry 14
(SIC) model is used to estimate the impact of the Carrington event to the neutral atmosphere 15
and the ionosphere, and the disruption to HF communication. We adopt a reported intensity- 16
time profile for the solar proton flux, and examine the relative atmospheric response to 17
different SPE-energy spectra, and in particular, the comparatively soft energy spectrum of the 18
August 1972 or March 1991 SPE which are believed to provide the best representation of the 19
Carrington event. Our calculations indicate that large changes in electron density and 20
atmospheric constituents occur during the period of SPE-forcing, depending upon the nature of 21
the spectrum and also on the hemisphere considered. However, the most important SPE-driven 22
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
2
atmospheric response is an unusually strong and long-lived Ox decrease in the upper 23
stratosphere (Ox levels drop by ~40%) primarily caused by the very large fluxes of >30 MeV 24
protons. This depletion is an indication of the extreme changes possible for the largest SPE. We 25
find that there are comparatively small long-term differences in the atmospheric and 26
ionospheric response between the 3 suggested SPE spectra. 27
28
1. Introduction 29
The Carrington event of August/September 1859 was the most significant solar proton event 30
(SPE) of the last 450 years, identified through impulsive nitrate events in polar ice [McCracken 31
et al., 2001]. The >30 MeV solar proton fluence determined from the ice cores indicate it was 32
twice as large as the next largest event (1895), and roughly four times larger than the solar 33
proton fluence of the largest event from the "spacecraft era" which occurred in August 1972. 34
The Carrington SPE was associated with the 1–2 September 1859 magnetic storm, the most 35
intense in recorded history [Tsurutani et al., 2003]. The space weather events of 36
August/September 1859 are now particularly famous due to Carrington's visual observation of 37
a white-light solar flare for the first time [Carrington, 1960]. The associated magnetic 38
disturbances produced widespread auroral displays and disruption to telegraph transmissions 39
which attracted much public attention and were widely reported in the newspapers and 40
scientific articles [see the review Boteler, 2006]. 41
Recently, much attention has focused upon increasing our understanding of the Carrington 42
event, in order to better quantify what extreme space weather events could do to our current 43
technological society. For example, estimates suggest a potential economic loss of billion due to lost revenue (~US$44 billion) and the cost of replacement of GEO satellites 45
(~US$24 billion) caused by a "once a century" single storm similar to the Carrington event 46
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
3
[Odenwald et al., 2006]. These authors estimate that 80 satellites in low-, medium, and 47
geostationary- Earth orbits might be disabled as a consequence of a superstorm event with 48
additional disruptions caused by the failure of many of the satellite navigation systems (e.g., 49
GPS). Ionising radiation doses from the SPE have been estimated to be as high as 54 krad (Si) 50
[Townsend et al., 2003], levels which are not only highly life-threatening for crews of manned 51
missions, but present a significant hazard to onboard electronics. 52
Solar proton events produce large ionization changes in the polar ionosphere which can drive 53
significant changes in atmospheric chemistry and communications disruption. Over the years 54
several studies of Solar Proton Event effects on the atmosphere have been published. The 55
earlier work of Crutzen and Solomon [1980], McPeters et al. [1981], and Solomon et al. [1983] 56
has been followed by several studies, notably the work of Jackman and coauthors [Jackman 57
and McPeters, 1985; Jackman and Meade, 1988; Jackman et al., 1990, 1993, 1995, 2000]. 58
SPEs result in enhancements of odd nitrogen (NOx) and odd hydrogen (HOx) in the upper 59
stratosphere and mesosphere [Crutzen et al.,1975; Solomon et al., 1981; Jackman et al., 1990, 60
2000]. NOx and HOx play a key role in the ozone balance of the middle atmosphere because 61
they destroy odd oxygen through catalytic reactions [e.g., Brasseur and Solomon, 1986, pp. 62
291-299]. Ionization changes produced by a 20 MeV proton will tend to peak at ~60 km 63
altitude [Turunen et al., Fig 3, 2008]. Ionization increases occurring at similar altitudes, caused 64
by solar proton events are known to lead to significant local perturbations in ozone levels 65
[Verronen et al., 2005], with polar ozone levels decreasing by >50% for large SPE. However, 66
the effect on annually averaged global total ozone is considered to be relatively small, of the 67
order of few tenths of a percent at the maximum [Jackman et al., 1996]. Changes in NOx and 68
O3 consistent with solar proton-driven modifications have been observed [Jackman et al. ,2001; 69
Seppälä et al., 2004; Verronen et al., 2005]. It is well-known that particle precipitation at high 70
latitudes produce additional ionization leading to increased HF absorption at high-latitudes 71
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
4
[MacNamara, 1985], in extreme cases producing a complete blackout of HF communications 72
in the polar regions. 73
In order to consider the impact of the Carrington event solar protons upon the Earth's 74
atmosphere, information on the fluence and energy spectrum of the SPE is required. An 75
estimate of the odd nitrogen increases and ozone decreases due to the Carrington SPE has been 76
undertaken [Thomas et al., 2007], using a Greenland ice core derived >30 MeV fluence of 77
2.7×1010 cm-2 and a spectrum taken from the very energetic and spectrally hard 19 October 78
1989 SPE. The total ionization was distributed over the 2 day duration uniformly (i.e. as a step 79
function), leading to a localized maximum column ozone depletion which was ~3.5 times 80
greater than that of the 1989 event. As noted in this study, the use of the 19 October 1989 81
spectrum to represent the 1859 Carrington SPE was a "best guess" approach, given the total 82
lack of direct proton spectral measurements in that era. 83
Limits on the Carrington event spectrum have been provided by measurements of the 84
cosmogenic isotope 10Be, also found in polar ice cores. Analysis of the 10Be concentrations 85
suggest that the spectral hardness of the Carrington event was significantly softer than those of 86
September-October 1989 SPE [Beer et al., 1990]; any increase in 10Be associated with the 87
Carrington event was found to be less than the 9% standard deviation of the annual data. It has 88
been suggested that the Carrington event may have had an energy spectrum very similar to 89
those measured for the August 1972 or March 1991 SPE [Smart et al., 2006]. The later study 90
also constructed an intensity-time profile of the solar particle flux, by assuming that the 91
Carrington solar event is part of the class of interplanetary shock-dominated events where the 92
maximum particle flux is observed as the shock passes the Earth. 93
In this study we make use of the new findings as to the nature of the Carrington event, 94
adopting both the Smart et al. [2006] intensity-time profile for the >30 MeV solar proton flux, 95
and the softer energy spectrum required to reproduce the cosmogenic isotope concentrations. 96
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
5
We make use of the Sodankylä Ion and Neutral Chemistry (SIC) model to estimate the impact 97
of the Carrington event to the neutral atmosphere and the ionosphere, and the disruption to HF 98
communication. We go on to consider the potential "worst case" significance of a Carrington- 99
level "superstorm". 100
2. Spectrum and intensity-time profile of the Carrington SPE 101
As noted above, cosmogenic isotope concentrations have indicated that the Carrington SPE 102
was significantly softer than those of September-October 1989 SPE. Smart et al. [2006] 103
concluded that either of the comparatively soft SPE energy spectra from August 1972 or March 104
1991 could be representative of that for the Carrington event, given the cosmogenic isotope 105
observations. In contrast, some previous studies into the potential doses to humans and 106
electronics, and the atmospheric impact, have used hard SPE energy spectra, particularly 29 107
September 1989 and 19 October 1989 [see the discussion in Townsend et al., 2006]. In this 108
study we model the SPE spectra using a Weibull distribution, which has been shown to provide 109
an accurate representation of the measured proton spectra for these events [Xapsos et al., Table 110
1, 2000]. The Weibull distribution fit for differential SPE fluxes are described through the 111
expression 112
( ) α α α kE E k
dE
d − Φ =
Φ − exp 1
0 (1) 113
where E is the energy in MeV and Φ
0 , k, and α are the Weibull fitting parameters. k and α are 114
taken from Xapsos et al. [2000], while Φ
0 is scaled to reproduce the >30 MeV proton fluence 115
for the Carrington event (1.9×1010 cm-2 [McCracken et al., 2001]). These values are given in 116
Table 1. The SPE fluxes are expressed with units of protons cm-2s-1sr-1MeV-1. Figure 1 shows a 117
comparison between the differential fluences which have been used to describe the Carrington 118
event, based on four different SPE. The differential fluences shown in Figure 1 have been 119
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
6
normalised to the Carrington-level >30 MeV fluence of 1.9×1010 protons cm-2. As noted by 120
Townsend et al. [2006], both of the SPEs which occurred in 1989 were spectrally hard, and 121
rather similar to one-another. In contrast, the SPEs which occurred in August 1972 and March 122
1991 were much softer, with the August 1972 SPE having an unusually soft spectrum. These 123
two soft-spectra SPEs provide two possibilities through which we can estimate the impact of 124
the Carrington event upon the neutral atmosphere, following the approach of Smart et al. 125
[2006] to treat these as "indicative spectra". The harder spectra from September-October 1989 126
provide an approach by which comparisons can be made with earlier studies, and also an 127
estimate of the possible "extreme" worst-case for a Carrington-level SPE with a hard spectra. 128
As the September and October 1989 SPE have very similar spectra, we arbitrarily select 129
October 1989. Note, however, that the differences between the normalised energy spectra for 130
the two hard SPEs and that of March 1991 are much smaller across the energy range 2- 131
40 MeV. Protons in this energy range deposit most of their energy in the altitude range ~50- 132
85 km [Turunen et al., Fig. 3, 2008], where SPE-induced changes to the neutral atmosphere are 133
largest [e. g., Verronen et al., 2005]. As such, it is instructive to contrast the atmospheric 134
impact of the differing spectra, as this may be less significant than Figure 1 suggests. 135
The upper panel of Figure 2 shows the intensity-time profile for >30 MeV solar proton fluxes 136
during the Carrington event [after Fig. 12, Smart et al., 2006]. This profile is combined with the 137
SPE energy spectra of Figure 1 to produce three different time-varying differential proton 138
fluxes for proton energies of 1-2000 MeV across the time period of the Carrington event, as 139
shown in the 3 lower panels of Figure 2. In those panels the time-varying differential proton 140
flux is shown with units of log10[protons cm-2s-1sr-1MeV-1]. The second and third panels of 141
Figure 2 represent differing possible differential fluxes for the Carrington SPE, while the lower 142
panel represents the "worst case" of a Carrington-level SPE with a hard spectrum. For time 143
periods outside the Smart et al. intensity-time profile, the proton fluxes are set to zero. A 144
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
7
widely accepted SPE definition requires the >10 MeV proton flux to be >10 cm-2s-1sr-1MeV-1. 145
The beginning and end of the time profile shown in Figure 2 are below this level, and thus we 146
have confidence that the fluxes shown in Figure 2 describe the entire SPE event. 147
3. Sodankylä Ion Chemistry Model 148
Using the Sodankylä Ion and Neutral Chemistry (SIC) model we consider the atmospheric 149
consequences of the Carrington SPE using the time-varying proton fluxes from Figure 2. SPE 150
produce ionization increases in the polar mesosphere and upper stratosphere, which in turn alters 151
atmospheric chemistry through changes in HOx and NOx. The SIC model is a 1-D chemical 152
model designed for ionospheric D-region studies, solving the concentrations of 65 ions at 153
altitudes across 20–150 km, of which 36 are positive and 29 negative, as well as 15 minor neutral 154
species. Our study made use of SIC version 6.9.0. The model has recently been discussed by 155
Verronen et al. [2005], building on original work by Turunen et al. [1996] with neutral species 156
modifications described by Verronen et al. [2002]. A detailed overview of the model was given 157
in Verronen et al. [2005], but we summarize the key characteristics of the model here to provide 158
background for this study. 159
In the SIC model several hundred reactions are implemented, plus additional external forcing 160
due to solar radiation (1–422.5 nm), electron and proton precipitation, and galactic cosmic 161
radiation. Solar flux is calculated with the SOLAR2000 model (version 2.27, now the Solar 162
Irradiance Platform, SIP) [Tobiska et al., 2000]. The scattered component of solar Lyman-α flux 163
is included using the empirical approximation given by Thomas and Bowman [1986]. The SIC 164
code includes vertical transport [Chabrillat et al., 2002] which takes into account molecular 165
[Banks and Kockarts, 1973] and eddy diffusion with a fixed eddy diffusion coefficient profile 166
which has a maximum of 1.2×106 cm2s-1 at 110 km. The background neutral atmosphere is 167
calculated using the MSISE-90 model [Hedin, 1991] and tables given by Shimazaki [1984]. The 168
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
8
SIC-models does not calculate temperature variations, leaving these fixed by MSIS. As such no 169
transport driven by adiabatic heating or cooling are included in the SIC results. Such changes in 170
vertical transport have been calculated for large SPE events [Jackman et al., 2007], but were 171
insignificant below 60 km altitudes. In the SIC model transport and chemistry are advanced in 172
intervals of 5 minutes. Within each 5 minute interval exponentially increasing time steps are 173
used because of the wide range of chemical time constants of the modeled species. 174
3.1 Control Run 175
In order to interpret the SPE-driven changes, a SIC modeling run has also been undertaken 176
without any SPE-forcing (i.e., zero proton fluxes), termed the "control" run. The SIC model is 177
run for the northern hemisphere location (70ºN, 0ºE) and southern hemisphere location (70ºS, 178
0ºE) starting on 27 August 1859 and continuing for 24 days. These locations were selected as the 179
geomagnetic cutoff energy is small for sufficiently high magnetic latitudes, such that the proton 180
flux spectra is essentially unaffected by the geomagnetic field, particularly for the mesospheric 181
altitudes of interest. Modeling of the 1850 geomagnetic field suggests there is little change in 182
cutoff rigidities for these locations relative to the modern field [Shea and Smart, Fig. 4, 2006], 183
and hence modern rigidity calculations can be applied [e.g., Rodger et al., 2006a]. In addition, 184
for these locations UT=LT, making interpretation easier. Finally, the northern location is the 185
same as has been used in some previous SIC-modeling studies into SPE-effects [e.g., Verronen 186
et al., 2005; Clilverd et al, 2006; Seppälä et al., 2006], allowing direct comparisons. 187
We assume active solar cycle phase for the SOLAR2000 output (F10.7 = 158.2×10-22 Wm-2Hz- 188
1, F10.7A = 167.7 ×10-22 Wm-2Hz-1), and drive the MSIS model with Ap = 138 based on the 189
mean storm value determined for the Carrington period [Nevanlinna, 2006]. Note that the 190
geomagnetic amplitude index C9 from the St. Petersburg observatory (Russia) reached peak 191
values of 8 and 9 for the times of the two peaks in the SPE fluxes [Nevanlinna, Fig 3., 2006], 192
which will also ensure that the cutoff rigidities are very low for our modeling locations. We 193
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
9
therefore assume that the geomagnetic cutoff energy is zero throughout the calculation for both 194
locations. 195
The results of this no-forcing control SIC-run, shown in Figure 3, represent the calculation of 196
"normal" conditions, and hence allow an indication of the significance of the SPE-driven 197
changes. The top panel of Figure 3 shows the normal diurnal variation in electron number 198
density, the second panel shows HOx number density (H + OH + HO2), the third panel NOx 199
number density (N + NO + NO2), and the lower panel shows Ox (O + O3). We use HOx, NOx and 200
Ox rather than NO and O3 as there are substantial diurnal variations in both the latter populations, 201
which would lead to distracting features in the relative change plots presented below. In all cases 202
these panels have units of log10[cm-3]. 203
The diurnal variation in the constituents is most clearly seen in the electron density and HOx 204
panels of Figure 3, but is much weaker for the NOx and Ox panels. This is because the chemical 205
lifetimes for the NOx and Ox species are relatively long, while the rapid changes taking place 206
during the diurnal cycle occur inside the family of species (i.e. NO2 and NO). There is a gradual 207
change present in the southern hemisphere HOx and NOx panels, due to increasing levels of 208
sunlight caused by the seasonal lengthening of the periods with daytime conditions as seen in the 209
electron density panels. 210
211
3.2 Proton Forcing 212
Ionization rates are calculated for the three possible representations of the Carrington SPE as 213
described in Verronen et al. [2005], and are shown in Figure 4 with units of log10[cm-3s-1]. As 214
the March 1991 spectrum leads to more high energy protons (>300 MeV) present in the SPE 215
than the August 1972 spectrum, the ionization rates are more significant at lower altitudes 216
(~20 km). However, the Weibull-fitted SPE spectrum for March 1991 also leads to additional 217
lower energy protons (<20 MeV) relative to August 1972, causing the ionization rates to be 218
larger than the August 1972 case for altitudes >~65 km. The hard spectra case (October 1989) 219
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
10
has significant ionization rates present for the lowest altitudes considered in our modeling (at 220
~20 km), where the rates are several orders of magnitude higher than for either of the other 221
spectra. In all cases the first ionization pulse is similar to the peak ionization rates seen for 222
other large SPE events [e.g., Verronen et al., Fig. 1, 2005, Seppälä et al., Fig. 1, 2006], while 223
the second pulse on 2 September 1859 is about one order of magnitude larger. 224
4. Modeling results 225
The ionization rates shown in Figure 4 are used to drive the SIC model. Hence we examine 226
the altitude and time variation in the electron number density and the neutral atmospheric 227
species (e.g., NOx (N + NO + NO2), HOx (H + OH + HO2), and Ox (O + O3)), during the 228
Carrington SPEs. The atmospheric changes modeled in our study mostly occur in the 229
mesosphere and upper stratosphere, as determined by energy spectra of the precipitating 230
protons. In the mesosphere changes in O3 (or Ox) are primarily caused by increases in HOx, 231
although NOx does play some role near 50 km and is important in Ox chemistry in the upper 232
stratosphere. Ionization-produced NOx and HOx leads to the Ox changes as shown in the 233
following figures. 234
4.1 Electron density variation 235
Figure 5 presents the Carrington SPE electron number density changes caused by the three 236
selected SPE-spectra, relative to the control runs shown in Figure 3, shown for the northern 237
hemisphere (left) and southern hemisphere (right) cases. The figure shows the ratio to represent 238
the very large changes which occur. The electron density plots show very large increases 239
during the period of direct SPE-forcing (i.e., 27 August-8 September 1859), with the two pulse 240
time-structure of the SPE clearly seen in the electron density relative changes. The peak 241
electron density changes in the 2nd pulse are roughly one order of magnitude larger than for the 242
1st pulse, as expected from the differences in the SPE forcing. The largest enhancements occur 243
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
11
in the southern hemisphere, which is dominated by night-time ionospheric conditions. The 244
three SPE spectra lead to rather similar electron density increases, of about 103-104 times in the 245
40-100 km altitude range. The primary difference between the 3 spectra considered is between 246
the August 1972 and October 1989 cases below 40 km altitude, to the relative hardness of the 247
spectra. Once the SPE forcing ends, the electron density rapidly returns to normal levels at 248
most altitudes. The exception to this is a long-lived factor of 3-9 increase which occurs at 249
~80 km altitude, caused by the Lyman-α ionization of increased NOx present after the SPE. 250
Note that this electron density enhancement feature does not completely disappear, and is still 251
present 10 days after the end of the SPE forcing. However, we are unable to determine the true 252
recovery time of this enhancement, as it lasts beyond the timescale over which our model runs 253
can be considered realistic. The length of the SIC-run needs to be limited due to the increasing 254
significance of horizontal transport, in addition to vertical transport from adiabatic heating, 255
neither of which are included in the 1D SIC model. In reality, the relatively small electron 256
density enhancement feature is likely to dissipate more rapidly than shown here, due to 257
transport mixing out the long-lived NOx increase. 258
4.2 HOx variation 259
Figure 6 presents the variation of HOx, in the same format as Figure 5. Increases in HOx are 260
only significant around the times of the SPE-forcing, as the lifetime of HOx is very short, and 261
the majority of the SPE-produced HOx rapidly decreases once forcing ends. As in the electron 262
case, the increases appear more significant in the southern hemisphere as the background level 263
of HOx is larger in the daytime than the night (Figure 3). All three spectra lead to peak HOx 264
increases of about one order of magnitude from ~20-85 km, with the two "hard" SPE spectra 265
causing significant HOx increases to the lowest altitudes considered. Order-of-magnitude HOx 266
increases have been seen also during smaller, more recent SPE, one example being the January 267
2005 event [Verronen et al., 2006; Seppälä et al., 2006]. However these high enhancements 268
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
12
have typically been restricted to mesospheric altitudes between 50-80 km. After the forcing, all 269
the SPE spectra produce a long-lived HOx increase of ~40% located around 60-80 km altitudes, 270
present during the nighttime periods. This persistent HOx increase is related to the increase of 271
NO. Larger amounts of NO lead to increased ionization in the D-region, even at night-time 272
because of Lyman-α radiation scattered from the geocorona being an important source of ions. 273
Increased ionization leads to more HOx production through ion chemistry during both day and 274
night. However, this occurs on a relatively low level so that this change is only seen at night 275
when the background production of HOx, which is dependent upon solar radiation, is low. The 276
persistent HOx increase will influence Ox destruction at these altitudes, leading to a long-lived 277
loss. 278
4.3 NOx variation 279
The SPE-produced NOx increases are shown in Figure 7, again in the same format as Figure 5. 280
In this case, the NOx increases are more significant in the northern hemisphere as the 281
background levels of NOx are significantly lower in the sunlight hemisphere (12 times less NOx 282
in the northern hemisphere), and hence the relative NOx increase in the northern hemisphere is 283
~5 times larger than the southern hemisphere. The production rate is the same in both 284
hemispheres, and while the loss rate is larger in the more sunlit northern hemisphere, the 285
relative peak increases are also larger. The faster decay rates in the northern hemisphere due to 286
additional levels of sunlight can be seen in this figure, such that the NOx increases at the end of 287
the SIC modeling period are larger in the southern hemisphere, even though the peak change is 288
larger in the northern. The most significant NOx increases occur from 40-85 km altitude, where 289
the background NOx levels are very low (Figure 3, panel 3). The SPE-produced increases are 290
roughly 100-1000 times the background levels, and thus are much like creating lower 291
thermospheric NOx concentrations at mesospheric altitudes where NOx concentrations are 292
normally very low. Again, there is very little difference between the NOx changes produced by 293
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
13
the March 1991 and October 1989 SPE spectra, while the softer August 1972 spectra leads to 294
11-14 times less NOx around 80 km altitude than for the harder spectra (depending on the 295
hemisphere considered). The NOx produced at altitudes below ~60 km altitudes is very long 296
lived in all conditions as NOx is normally destroyed by solar radiation, which has been largely 297
absorbed at higher altitudes causing very little photodissociation of low-altitude enhancements. 298
Once again, this is an area in which transport needs to be considered, and would be a 299
reasonable topic for a future study. 300
4.4 Ox variation 301
The effect of the HOx and NOx increases on Ox is shown in Figure 8. In this case the relative 302
changes (the ratio between the SPE run and the control run) are shown on a linear scale. During 303
the peak SPE-forcing periods, Ox concentrations drop by 80-90% across an altitude range of 304
50-80 km, with minimum values of 11-13% of the ambient Ox. The two hard spectra 305
representations produce unusually broad Ox decreases stretching over a wider altitude range 306
than seen for most large SPE. For example, the large SPEs which occurred in January 2005 307
produced Ox decreases of about 80% over 70-80 km altitude [Fig2.,Seppälä et al., 2004], while 308
the Carrington SPE is likely to have led to a ~90% decrease over the wider altitude range of 309
~60-80 km. These very large decreases in Ox which occur during the SPE-forcing are caused by 310
HOx. However, this quickly returns to near normal levels at most altitudes (Figure 6) once the 311
proton forcing has finished, after which the mesospheric Ox largely recovers. A long-lived but 312
relatively small nighttime Ox decrease of 5%, at 60-80 km altitude remains after the forcing, 313
caused by the previously identified HOx feature in Figure 6. However, after the SPE forcing 314
there is a significant long lived Ox decrease (Ox levels drop of ~40% when compared with 315
normal levels) at ~45 km altitude, i.e. in the upper stratosphere. This is an unusually large 316
decrease for a direct SPE effect upon these relatively low altitudes and is produced by the long- 317
lived NOx with an order of magnitude increase occurring at ~45 km altitude (Figure 7). The 318
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
14
first pulse in the SPE leads directly to a ~10-20% Ox decrease at these altitudes, which is more 319
typical for very large SPE [e.g. Seppälä et al., 2004]. All the three possible Carrington spectra 320
create this large low-altitude Ox decrease. Since protons of energy 30 MeV penetrate to ~50 km 321
and the three proton flux spectra are normalized to the same value for proton energies 322
>30 MeV, this was not unexpected. This is an indication of the extreme changes possible for 323
the largest SPE, and is a feature not seen in "normal" large SPE, even those with unusually hard 324
spectra [Seppälä et al., 2004, 2008], where the relative SPE-produced NOx increase are 325
insignificant due to the very large background NOx concentrations at these altitudes (Figure 3). 326
4.5 Synthesis 327
The three possible proton spectra representing the Carrington event lead to rather different 328
atmospheric ionization rates (Figure 4), which in turn produce somewhat different responses 329
for the electron number density profiles and neutral atmospheric constituents. There is also 330
some difference in the relative response between the northern and southern hemisphere due to 331
the relative levels of sunlight, either by pre-conditioning the background conditions (e.g., 332
electrons, HOx, NOx), or by driving the direct loss rates (e.g., NOx). In all cases the largest 333
changes occur during the two-pulse solar proton event itself, across the ~12 days in which there 334
is direct SPE forcing. During the period of direct SPE forcing the nature of the change depends 335
somewhat upon the SPE-spectra and hemisphere considered. The first pulse of the SPE leads to 336
changes which are similar to those produced by the largest SPE previously considered, while 337
the second pulse generally drives considerably larger changes. After the period of SPE-forcing 338
has finished there is much less difference in the calculated chemical effects between the 339
different SPE-spectra and hemisphere calculations than the period during the SPE forcing. This 340
is particularly the case for odd oxygen (Ox), likely the most important long-lived change driven 341
by large SPE. In all cases considered here the Carrington SPE produces a significant and 342
unusually strong long-lived Ox decrease (Ox levels drop by ~40%) at ~45 km altitude, i.e. in the 343
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
15
upper stratosphere due to NOx increases. As the nature of this NOx increase does not vary 344
significantly by SPE-spectra or hemisphere, there is relatively little variation in the long lived 345
Ox decrease. 346
Thomas et al. [2007] used ionization rates scaled from the October 1989 SPE to describe the 347
impact of the Carrington SPE upon long-lived ozone levels using a two dimensional 348
atmospheric model. Figure 9 shows the variation in the O3 column above 30 km altitude 349
determined from our calculations, for the three possible Carrington spectra and considering 350
both hemispheres. The maximum decrease in the >30 km O3 column is ~9% for both 351
hemispheres, with the somewhat softer spectra (March 1991) leading to maximum decrease of 352
~7%. As there is no immediate impact of the Carrington SPE upon O3 below 30 km altitude, 353
this 7-9% variation represents all the change in total column O3 which would be produced by 354
the SPE on short-time scales, before transport processes become significant. Transport 355
processes are likely to cause a decent in altitude of the SPE-produced NOx inside the winter 356
pole, leading to larger decreases in Ox and to more significant decreases in column O3. As the 357
one dimensional SIC model does not extend to low altitudes, and does include some significant 358
sources of vertical and horizontal transport, it is not possible to make a direct comparison with 359
the results of Thomas et al. [2007] from their two dimensional model. However, the small 360
differences between the calculated >30 km O3 column indicates the atmospheric response of 361
the Carrington SPE is not strongly dependent upon the spectra, suggesting that the calculations 362
of Thomas et al. [2007] are likely to be reasonable, at least within the overall uncertainties 363
associated with modeling this event. 364
The primary differences between the southern and northern hemispheric runs are due to the 365
very differing levels of sunlight. In order to further test this, and to consider the possible 366
"extreme" effect of the Carrington SPE, we have also undertaken a SIC-modeling run at the 367
southern hemisphere location (70ºS, 0ºE) starting from 15 July, and thus considering a period in 368
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
16
which there is almost no direct solar illumination. While it is complex to directly compare the 369
results of this run with the earlier calculations described above due to the very different 370
background conditions, there are no dramatic differences between the southern hemisphere 371
polar winter run starting 15 July and the run for the actual Carrington event times. The minor 372
differences (not shown) are dependent upon the levels of sunlight, as expected. For example, 373
the NOx loss at ~80 km is very low, such that almost all of the NOx produced by the SPE 374
remains to the end of the modeling run. In addition, the effect of the SPE during the forcing 375
period is more significant, with deeper longer-lived Ox losses from 60-80 km altitude that 376
recover more slowly (lasting 3-4 days more). However, the long-lived Ox decrease at 40-50 km 377
altitude is slightly less significant in the polar night run (decreases of ~40% rather than ~60%). 378
This is because the catalytic cycles of NOx require atomic oxygen to be present, which is only 379
released by photodissociation. While there are numerous minor differences between the polar 380
night runs and the existing southern hemisphere runs, they are small enough that we can 381
conclude the existing northern and southern hemisphere calculations provide a sufficiently 382
accurate indication of the significance of the Carrington-event of 1859. Additional 383
interhemispheric differences will also arise due to differences between the circulation patterns 384
in both hemispheres and their seasonal variability, which is not captured in the existing 1D 385
model used in our study. While this is likely to be significant when considering the long-time 386
scale response, it is unlikely to produce large changes in the calculations as presented. Over 387
time the relative importance of horizontal and vertical transport will increase, processes which 388
are not fully included in the one dimensional SIC model. However, the SIC modeling does 389
allow comparison between the immediate effects of the three different Carrington spectra in 390
either hemisphere. As such, these calculations should also provide a reasonable estimate of the 391
immediate impact of a future Carrington-like event striking the Earth's atmosphere. 392
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
17
5. Effect on HF communication 393
The additional ionospheric ionization caused by solar proton events lead to "polar blackouts", 394
also known as "polar cap absorption (PCA)" events, which are disruptions to HF/VHF 395
communications in high-latitude regions caused by attenuation in the ionospheric D-region 396
[Davies, 1990]. The additional attenuation can make HF communications impossible throughout 397
the polar regions, areas where HF communication is particularly important for the international 398
aviation industry; on some occasions major airlines have cancelled trans-polar flights due to such 399
space weather events [Jones et al., 2005], while the practice of changing the flightpaths to avoid 400
the poles leads to increased fuel consumption. 401
In order to characterize the ionospheric significance of the Carrington-SPE on HF attenuation 402
levels, we consider the variation with time of the Highest Affected Frequency (HAF) during the 403
SPE. The HAF is defined as the frequency which suffers a loss of 1 dB during vertical 404
propagation from the ground, through the ionosphere, and back to ground. Radio frequencies 405
lower than the HAF suffer an even greater loss. Here we determine the HAF by contrasting the 406
SPE-produced electron density changes with those expected from Solar Flares, following the 407
approach outlined in Rodger et al. [2006b]. As an example, an X20 flare, which has peak 0.1- 408
0.8 nm X-ray fluxes of 2.0 mW m-2, produces a HAF of 38 MHz. Flares of this magnitude lead 409
to "extreme" Radio Blackouts, with essentially no HF radio contact with mariners or en-route 410
aviators. NOAA has defined a Space Weather Scale for Radio Blackouts [Poppe, 2000], ranging 411
from R1 describing a minor disruption due to an M1 flare (10 µW m-2 peak 0.1-0.8 nm X-ray 412
flux) to R5 for the extreme blackout case described above. We will employ this scale to provide 413
an indication of the severity of the SPE-induced polar blackouts. 414
Figure 10 shows the HF blackout estimates for the Carrington SPE. The left panels shows the 415
blackouts estimated for the August 1972 spectra, while the right panels are for the March 1991 416
spectra, where the northern hemisphere results are in black and the southern hemisphere results 417
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
18
in red. The HF blackouts estimated for October 1989 are very similar to the March 1991 case, 418
due to the very similar electron density profiles (Figure 5), and hence are not shown in Figure 10. 419
The upper panels of Figure 10 show the equivalent peak X-ray flux in the 0.1-0.8 nm 420
wavelength range which would cause the same ionosphere electron density change during a solar 421
flare, represented using the H' parameter of Wait and Spies [1964]. For both the northern 422
hemisphere and southern hemisphere cases, and both spectra, the SPE-produced disruptions are 423
equivalent to very large equivalent peak X-ray fluxes. For context, there are about 175 solar 424
flares with peak X-ray fluxes of X1 or above per solar cycle (~16 per year), and 8 flares >X10 425
per cycle. The upper panel of Figure 10 also indicates the X45 threshold, representing the largest 426
solar flare peak X-ray flux measured since about 1976 [Thomson et al., 2004; 2005]. In both 427
cases the SPE-produced ionospheric disturbance peaks around the X45 threshold, and is larger 428
than the X10 threshold for ~15.5 hours. In contrast, the X45 flare of 4 November 2003 led to X- 429
ray fluxes which were >X10 for ~20 min [Thomson et al., Fig. 2, 2004]. 430
The lowest panels of Figure 10 presents the Highest Affected Frequency calculated from the 431
equivalent peak X-ray powers following the empirically derived relationship between HAF and 432
solar 0.1-0.8 nm X-ray flux provided by the Space Environmental Forecaster Operations 433
Manual (1997). The NOAA Radio Blackout Scale has been added for comparison. While the 434
peak HAF is smaller for the softer August 1972 spectra, in both cases and hemispheres the 435
Carrington SPE would have produced polar blackouts equivalent to the "Extreme" threshold of 436
the NOAA Radio Blackout Scale for a time period of ~15 hours, and led to some disturbances in 437
polar HF communications for ~11-12 days. While this is long in comparison to most SPE 438
disruptions, it is not wildly larger than the few days of disruption caused by most large SPE- 439
events. As such, the polar communications disruptions associated with the Carrington SPE would 440
not be severe, despite the exceptional nature of the SPE itself. 441
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
19
6. Discussion and Summary 442
The Carrington event of August/September 1859 was the most significant solar proton event 443
(SPE) of the last 450 years, with about four times larger solar proton fluence than the largest 444
event from the "spacecraft era" (August 1972). The space weather event which occurred at this 445
time produced the most intense geomagnetic storm in recorded history and the first visual 446
observation of a white-light solar flare. Recently, much attention has focused upon increasing 447
our understanding of the Carrington event, in order to better quantify the impact of extreme 448
space weather events. In this study we have used new findings as to the nature of the 449
Carrington event, adopting an intensity-time profile for the >30 MeV solar proton flux, and 450
examining the relative atmospheric response to three different SPE-energy spectra which have 451
previously been used to represent the Carrington SPE. Cosmogenic isotope concentrations have 452
indicated that the Carrington SPE likely had a comparatively soft energy spectrum, for example 453
similar to those measured for the August 1972 or March 1991 SPE, rather than the October 454
1989 SPE spectra sometimes used to model the impact of the Carrington SPE. The Sodankylä 455
Ion and Neutral Chemistry (SIC) model has been used to estimate the impact of the Carrington 456
event to the neutral atmosphere and the ionosphere, and the disruption to HF communication. 457
As seen in the SIC-output plots described in this paper, large changes in electron density and 458
atmospheric constituents occur during the period of SPE-forcing, which depend upon the nature 459
of the spectrum and also on the hemisphere considered. This is particularly significant for the 460
electron density increases. However, the most important SPE-driven atmospheric response is 461
the long-lived Ox decreases in the upper stratosphere (Ox levels drop by ~40% of the normal 462
level). This change does not significantly vary between the 3 spectra, or between the 2 463
hemispheres, due to the very small differences in the long-lived low-altitude NOx increases 464
which produce the Ox decreases. All the three possible Carrington spectra create this large low- 465
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
20
altitude Ox decrease due to the very large >30 MeV proton fluxes present in the normalized 466
spectra. This is an indication of the extreme changes possible for the very largest SPE, and is 467
not a feature seen previously for "normal" large SPE, even those with unusually hard spectra. 468
We have also characterized the ionospheric significance of the Carrington-SPE on HF 469
attenuation levels. Should a Carrington-level event occur in the current era, it would cause 470
disruptions to HF/VHF communications in high-latitude regions, making HF communications 471
impossible throughout the polar regions for some time. This could have a significant impact on 472
the routing of trans-polar aeroplane travel. The Carrington SPE would have produced polar 473
blackout equivalent to the "Extreme" threshold of the NOAA Radio Blackout Scale for a time 474
period of ~15 hours, and led to some disturbances in polar HF communications over a time 475
period of ~11-12 days, (i.e., during the period of direct SPE forcing). While this is long in 476
comparison to most SPE disruptions, it is not wildly larger than the few days of disruption 477
caused by most large SPE-events. As such, the polar communications disruptions associated 478
with the Carrington SPE would not be particularly severe, despite the exceptional nature of the 479
SPE itself. 480
In general, the atmospheric and ionospheric response is somewhat different between the 481
August 1972 or March 1991 SPE spectra, while the calculations using the March 1991 and 482
October 1989 SPE spectra are very similar to one another. Thus while cosmogenic isotope 483
concentrations from ice-cores indicate that the Carrington-SPE was comparatively soft, the 484
conclusions of previous modeling studies into the atmospheric response of the Carrington SPE 485
which have used rather hard spectra, and specifically the October 1989 SPE spectra, are likely 486
to be reasonable, at least within the overall uncertainties associated with modeling this event. 487
This is particularly important to the conclusions of Thomas et al. [2007], who used ionization 488
rates scaled from the October 1989 SPE to describe the impact of the Carrington SPE upon 489
long-lived ozone levels. These authors concluded that the globally averaged column-ozone 490
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
21
would decrease by as much as 4%, recovering slowly over several years. While this ozone 491
depletion is small in a global sense, it is accompanied by much larger decreases in the poles, 492
with long-lived polar ozone losses which are similar to those calculated in our study. As noted 493
by Thomas et al., even small increases in UVB can be harmful to many life forms. In addition, 494
changes in the chemical balance of the upper and middle stratosphere may be associated with 495
changes in polar winds and temperatures, and may even lead to few degree variations in sea- 496
level temperatures [Rozanov et al., 2005]. 497
498
Acknowledgments. CJR would like to thank Gillian Rodger of Manchester for her support. 499
PTV and AS are partly funded by the Academy of Finland through project 123275, 500
Thermosphere and Mesosphere affecting the Stratosphere. AS would also like to thank the 501
Academy of Finland for their support of her work through the EPPIC project. 502
References 503
Banks, P. M., and G. Kockarts (1973), Aeronomy, vol. B, chap. 15, Academic Press. 504
Beer, J., A. Blinov, G. Bonani, R. C. Finkel, H. J. Hofmann, B. Lehmann, H. Oeschger, A. Sigg, 505
J. Schwander, T. Staffelbach, B. Stauffer, M. Suter, and W. Wötfli (1990), Use of 10Be in 506
polar ice to trace the 11-year cycle of solar activity, Nature, 347, 164–166, 507
doi:10.1038/347164a0. 508
Boteler, D. H. (2006), The super storms of August/September 1859 and their effects on the 509
telegraph system, Advances Space Res., 38(2), 159-172. 510
Brasseur, G., and S. Solomon (1986), Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere, second ed., D. 511
Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht. 512
Carrington, R.C. (1860), Description of a singular appearance seen in the Sun on September 1, 513
1859. Monthly Not. R. Astron. Soc. 20, 13–15. 514
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
22
Clilverd, M. A., A. Seppälä, C. J. Rodger, N. R. Thomson, P. T. Verronen, E. Turunen, Th. 515
Ulich, J. Lichtenberger, and P. Steinbach, Modeling polar ionospheric effects during the 516
October-November 2003 solar proton events, Radio Sci., 41(2), doi: 10.1029/2005RS003290, 517
2006. 518
Chabrillat, S., G. Kockarts, D. Fonteyn, and G. Brasseur (2002), Impact of molecular diffusion 519
on the CO2 distribution and the temperature in the mesosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1-4. 520
Crutzen, P. J., I. S. A. Isaksen, and G. C. Reid (1975), Solar proton events: Stratospheric sources 521
of nitric oxide, Science, 189, 457–458. 522
Crutzen, P., and S. Solomon (1980), Response of mesospheric ozone to particle precipitation, 523
Planetary and Space Science, 28, 1147–1153. 524
Davies, K. (1990), Ionospheric radio, Peter Peregrinus, London. 525
Hedin, A. E. (1991), Extension of the MSIS Thermospheric model into the middle and lower 526
Atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1159-1172. 527
Jackman, C. H., and R. D. McPeters (1985), The responce of ozone to solar proton events during 528
solar cycle 21: A theoretical interpretation, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7955–7966. 529
Jackman, C. H., and P. E. Meade (1988), Effect of solar proton events in 1978 and 1979 on the 530
odd nitrogen abundance in the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 93, 7084–7090. 531
Jackman, C. H., A. R. Douglass, R. B. Rood, R. D. McPeters, and P. E. Meade (1990), Effect of 532
solar proton events on the middle atmosphere during the past two solar cycles as computed 533
using a two-dimensional model, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 7417–7428. 534
Jackman, C. H., J. E. Nielsen, D. J. Allen, M. C. Cerniglia, R. D. McPeters, A. R. Douglass, and 535
R. B. Rood (1993), The effects of the October 1989 solar proton events on the stratosphere as 536
computed using a three-dimensional model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 459–462. 537
Jackman, C. H., M. C. Cerniglia, J. E. Nielsen, D. J. Allen, J. M. Zawodny, R. D. McPeters, A. 538
R. Douglass, J. E. Rosenfield, and R. B. Hood (1995), Two-dimensional and three- 539
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
23
dimensional model simulations, measurements, and interpretation of the October 1989 solar 540
proton events on the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11,641–11,660. 541
Jackman, C. H., Fleming, E. L., Chandra, S., Considine, D. B., and Rosenfield, J. E., Past, 542
present, and future modeled ozone trends with comparisons to observed trends (1996), J. 543
Geophys. Res., 101 , 28 753–28 768. 544
Jackman, C. H., E. L. Fleming, and F. M. Vitt (2000), Influence of extremely large solar proton 545
events in a changing stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 11,659–11,670. 546
Jackman, C. H., R. D. McPeters, G. J. Labow, E. L. Fleming, C. J. Praderas, and J. M. Russel 547
(2001), Northern hemisphere atmospheric effects due to the July 2000 solar proton events, 548
Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2883–2886. 549
Jackman, C. H., R. G. Roble, and E. L. Fleming (2007), Mesospheric dynamical changes induced 550
by the solar proton events in October–November 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04812, 551
doi:10.1029/2006GL028328. 552
Jones, J. B. L., R.D. Bentley, R. Hunter, R.H.A. Iles, G.C. Taylor and D.J. Thomas (2006), 553
Space weather and commercial airlines, Advances Space Res., 36(12), 2258-2267. 554
MacNamara, L. F. (1985), High frequency radio propagation, in Handbook of Geophysics and 555
the Space Environment, edited by A. S. Jursa, Chapter 10, pp. 45-65, Air Force Geophys. 556
Lab., U. S. Air Force. 557
McCracken, K. G., G. A. M. Dreschhoff, E. J. Zeller, D. F. Smart, and M. A. Shea (2001a), Solar 558
cosmic ray events for the period 1561–1994. 1. Identification in polar ice, 1561–1950. J. 559
Geophys. Res. 106 (A10), 21585–21598. 560
McPeters, R. D., and C. H. Jackman (1985), The response of ozone to solar proton events during 561
solar cycle 21: the observations, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 7945–7954. 562
Nevanlinna, H. (2006), A study on the great geomagnetic storm of 1859: Comparisons with other 563
storms in the 19th century, Adv. in Space Res., 38 (2), 180-187. 564
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
24
Odenwald, S., J. Green, and W. Taylor (2006), Forecasting the impact of an 1859-calibre 565
superstorm on satellite resources, Advances Space Res., 38(2), 280-297. 566
Poppe, B. (2000), New scales help public, technicians understand space weather, Eos Trans., 567
Vol. 81 (29), 322, July 18. 568
Rodger, C. J., M. A. Clilverd, P. T. Verronen, Th. Ulich, M. J. Jarvis, and E. Turunen (2006a), 569
Dynamic geomagnetic rigidity cutoff variations during a solar proton event, J. Geophys. Res., 570
111, A04222, doi:10.1029/2005JA011395. 571
Rodger, C. J., M. A. Clilverd, Th. Ulich, P. T. Verronen, E. Turunen, and N. R. Thomson 572
(2006b), The atmospheric implications of Radiation Belt Remediation, Annales Geophys., 573
24(7), 2025 - 2041, SRef-ID: 1432-0576/ag/2006-24-2025. 574
Seppälä, A., P. T. Verronen, E. Kyrölä, S. Hassinen, L. Backman, A. Hauchecorne, J. L. Bertaux, 575
and D. Fussen (2004), Solar proton events of October-November 2003: Ozone depletion in 576
the Northern hemisphere polar winter as seen by GOMOS/Envisat, Geophys. Res. Lett., 577
31(19), L19,107, doi:10.1029/2004GL021042. 578
Seppälä, A., P. T. Verronen, V. F. Sofieva, J. Tamminen, E. Kyrölä, C. J. Rodger, and M. A. 579
Clilverd (2006), Destruction of the tertiary ozone maximum during a solar proton event, 580
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L07804, doi:10.1029/2005GL025571. 581
Seppälä, A., M. A. Clilverd, C. J. Rodger, P. T. Verronen, and E. Turunen (2008), The effects of 582
hard spectra solar proton events on the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., in press. 583
Shea, M. A., D. F. Smart, K. G. McCracken, G. A. M. Dreschoff, and H. E. Spence (2006), Solar 584
proton events for 450 years: The Carrington event in perspective, Adv. Space Res., 38 (2), 585
232-238. 586
Shea, M. A., and D. F. Smart (2006), Geomagnetic cutoff rigidities and geomagnetic coordinates 587
appropriate for the Carrington flare epoch, Adv. Space Res. 38 (2006), pp. 209–214. 588
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
25
Shimazaki, T. (1984), Minor Constituents in the Middle Atmosphere (Developments in Earth 589
and Planetary Physics, No 6), D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Netherlands. 590
Smart, D. F., M. A. Shea, and K. G. McCracken (2006), The Carrington event: Possible solar 591
proton intensity–time profile, Adv. Space Res., 38 (2), 215-225. 592
Solomon, S., D. W. Rusch, J.-C. Gérard, G. C. Reid, and P. J. Crutzen (1981), The effect of 593
particle precipitation events on the neutral and ion chemistry of the middle atmosphere: II. 594
Odd hydrogen, Planet. Space Sci., 8, 885–893. 595
Solomon, S., G. C. Reid, D. W. Rusch, and R. J. Thomas (1983), Mesospheric ozone depletion 596
during the solar proton event of July 13, 1982 Part II. Comparisons between theory and 597
measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 257–260. 598
Space Environmental Forecaster Operations Manual, page 4.3.1, 55th Space Weather Squadron, 599
Falcon AFB, USAF, 21 October 1997. As referenced by the NOAA Space Environment 600
Center at http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/dregion/dregionDoc.html 601
Rozanov, E., L. Callis, M. Schlesinger, F. Yang, N. Andronova, and V. Zubov (2005), 602
Atmospheric response to NOy source due to energetic electron precipitation, Geophys. Res. 603
Lett., 32, L14811, doi:10.1029/2005GL023041. 604
Thomas, B. C., C. H. Jackman, and A. L. Melott (2007), Modeling atmospheric effects of the 605
September 1859 solar flare, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L06810, doi:10.1029/ 2006GL029174. 606
Thomas, L., and M. R. Bowman (1986), A study of pre-sunrise changes in negative ions and 607
electrons in the D-region, Ann. Geophys., 4, 219-228. 608
Thomson, N. R., C. J. Rodger, and R. L. Dowden (2004), Ionosphere gives size of greatest solar 609
flare, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(6), L06803, 10.1029/2003GL019345. 610
Thomson, N. R., C. J. Rodger, and M. A. Clilverd (2005), Large solar flares and their 611
ionospheric D-region enhancements, J. Geophys. Res., 110, A06306, 612
doi:10.1029/2005JA011008. 613
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
26
Tobiska, W. K., T. Woods, F. Eparvier, R. Viereck, L. D. B. Floyd, G. Rottman, and O. R. White 614
(2000), The SOLAR2000 empirical solar irradiance model and forecast tool, J. Atmos. Terr. 615
Phys., 62, 1233-1250. 616
Townsend, L. W. (2003), Carrington flare of 1859 as a prototypical worst-case solar energetic 617
particle event, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 50(6), 2307-2309. 618
Tsurutani, B. T., W. D. Gonzalez, G. S. Lakhina, and S. Alex (2003), The extreme magnetic 619
storm of 1–2 September 1859, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A7), 1268, doi:10.1029/2002JA009504. 620
Turunen, E., H. Matveinen, J. Tolvanen, and H. Ranta (1996), D-region ion chemistry model, in 621
STEP Handbook of Ionospheric Models, edited by R. W. Schunk, pp. 1-25, SCOSTEP 622
Secretariat, Boulder, Colorado, USA. 623
Turunen, E., P. T. Verronen, A. Seppälä, C. J. Rodger, M. A. Clilverd, J. Tamminen, C. F. Enell 624
and Th. Ulich (2008), Impact of different precipitation energies on NOx generation during 625
geomagnetic storms, J. Atmos Sol.-Terr. Phys., in press. 626
Verronen, P. T., E. Turunen, Th. Ulich, and E. Kyrölä (2002), Modelling the effects of the 627
October 1989 solar proton event on mesospheric odd nitrogen using a detailed ion and neutral 628
chemistry model, Ann. Geophys., 20, 1967-1976. 629
Verronen, P. T., A. Seppälä, M. A. Clilverd, C. J. Rodger, E. Kyrölä, C-F. Enell, Th. Ulich, E. 630
and Turunen (2005), Diurnal variation of ozone depletion during the October-November 2003 631
solar proton event, J. Geophys. Res., 110(A9), doi:10.1029/2004JA010932. 632
Verronen, P. T., A. Seppälä, E. Kyrölä, J. Tamminen, H. M. Pickett, E. and Turunen, Production 633
of odd hydrogen in the mesosphere during the january 2005 solar proton event (2006), 634
Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L24811, doi:10.1029/2006GL028115. 635
Wait, J. R., and K. P. Spies (1964), Characteristics of the Earth-ionosphere waveguide for VLF 636
radio waves, NBS Tech. Note 300, Nat. Inst. of Stand. and Technol., Gaithersburg, Md.. 637
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
27
Xapsos, M. A., J. L. Barth, E. G. Stassinopoulos, S. R. Messenger, R. J. Walters, G. P. Summers, 638
and E. A. Burke (2000), Characterizing solar proton energy spectra for radiation effects 639
applications, IEEE Trans. Nuclear Sci., 47(6). 640
641
M. A. Clilverd and A. Seppälä, Physical Sciences Division, British Antarctic Survey 642
(NERC), High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, England, U.K. (e-mail: 643
macl@bas.ac.uk, annika.seppala@fmi.fi). 644
C. J. Rodger, Department of Physics, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New 645
Zealand. (email: crodger@physics.otago.ac.nz). 646
E. Turunen, Sodankylä Geophysical Observatory, University of Oulu, Sodankylä, Finland. 647
(email: esa@sgo.fi). 648
P. T. Verronen, Earth Observation, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503 (Erik 649
Palménin aukio 1), FI-00101 Helsinki, Finland. (email: pekka.verronen@fmi.fi). 650
651
RODGER ET AL.: ATMOSPHERIC IMPACT OF CARRINGTON SPE 652
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
28
653
Table 1. Weibull fitting parameters used in equation 1 to represent the differential SPE fluxes 654
of the Carrington event with the 4 different energy spectra as shown in Figure 1. 655
656
Date Φ
0 k α
4 August 1972 5.0033 × 1010 0.0236 1.108
29 September 1989 4.5751 × 1011 0.877 0.3841
19 October 1989 4.4280 × 1012 2.115 0.2815
23 March 1991 1.4039 × 1012 0.972 0.441
657
658
Figures 659
660
661
Figure 1. Comparison between the normalised differential fluences which have been used to 662
describe the Carrington event, based on four previous SPE. The values shown have been 663
normalised to the Carrington-level >30 MeV fluence of 1.9×1010 protons cm-2. [See the online 664
version for the color version of this figure]. 665
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
29
666
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
30
667
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
31
Figure 2. Proton fluxes used to describe the Carrington event SPE. The upper panel shows the 668
>30 MeV intensity-time proton profile [after Smart et al., Fig. 12, 2006]. The lower 3 panels 669
present the different time-varying differential proton fluxes used in this study to describe 670
Carrington-level SPE. [See the online version for the color version of this figure]. 671
672
673
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
32
Figure 3. The results of a SIC modeling run without any SPE-forcing (i.e., zero precipitating 674
proton fluxes), showing the calculated "normal" conditions for the northern (left) and southern 675
(right) hemispheres. Units are shown in log10[cm-3]. [See the online version for the color 676
version of this figure]. 677
678
679
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
33
680
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
34
Figure 4. Atmospheric ionization rates calculated from the SPE fluxes shown in the lower 3 681
panels of Figure 2, given in units of log10[cm-3s-1]. [See the online version for the color version 682
of this figure]. 683
684
685
Figure 5. SPE-driven changes in electron number density determined from the SIC model for 686
the varying SPE spectra, and show as the ratio to the control run (Figure 3). The left panels are 687
for the northern hemisphere, while the right are the southern hemisphere. [See the online 688
version for the color version of this figure]. 689
690
691
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
35
692
Figure 6. SPE-driven changes in odd hydrogen (HOx) determined from the SIC model for the 693
varying SPE spectra, and show as the ratio to the control run (Figure 3). The left panels are for 694
the northern hemisphere, while the right are the southern hemisphere. [See the online version 695
for the color version of this figure]. 696
697
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
36
698
Figure 7. SPE-driven changes in odd nitrogen (NOx) determined from the SIC model for the 699
varying SPE spectra, and show as the ratio to the control run (Figure 3). The left panels are for 700
the northern hemisphere, while the right are the southern hemisphere. [See the online version 701
for the color version of this figure]. 702
703
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
37
704
Figure 8. SPE-driven changes in odd oxygen (Ox) determined from the SIC model for the 705
varying SPE spectra, and show as the linear ratio to the control run (Figure 3). The left panels 706
are for the northern hemisphere, while the right are the southern hemisphere. [See the online 707
version for the color version of this figure]. 708
709
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
38
710
Figure 9. SPE-driven percentage changes in the >30 km altitude O3 total column for varying 711
Carrington SPE spectra. The upper panel shows the changes for the northern hemisphere (NH), 712
while the lower is for the southern hemisphere (SH). [See the online version for the color 713
version of this figure]. 714
715
Wednesday, September 17, 2008
39
716
717
Figure 10. Estimate of the severity of the Carrington-SPE forced HF polar blackout for the 718
August 1972 (left) and March 1991 (right) SPE-spectra. The upper panel shows the equivalent 719
peak X-ray fluxes in the 0.1-0.8 nm range which would cause the same ionospheric change 720
during a solar flare. The lower panel is the Highest Affected Frequency calculated from the 721
equivalent peak X-ray flux. The NOAA Radio Blackout Scale has been added for comparison. 722
[See the online version for the color version of this figure]. 723

1994: US Air Force Launches Top-Secret ‘Holographic Projector’ Research Program

2009-11-16T10:36:00.000-08:00

According to a 1999 Washington Post website report, the US Air Force starts a research program this year to develop a “holographic projector” as a psychological warfare weapon. Holograms are three-dimensional images created by laser technology. The US military explored the idea of using holograms during the 1991 Gulf War to deceive the Iraqis, but did not pursue it for technical reasons. One idea was to project a hologram of Allah several hundred feet in size over Baghdad, but this would take a mirror in space more than a mile square, plus huge projectors and power sources. Additionally, there are strict Islamic proscriptions on the depiction of Allah. However, the US military did not abandon the concept. “The Gulf War hologram story might be dismissed were it not the case that [the Post] has learned that a super secret program was established in 1994 to pursue the very technology for PSYOPS [psychological operations] application. The “Holographic Projector” is described in a classified Air Force document as a system to “project information power from space… for special operations deception missions.” A 1996 study commissioned by a US Air Force panel called “Air Force 2025” shows how a future “Airborne Holographic Projector” might look like. In this illustration, a virtual aircraft is created to deceive the enemy as to the size and location of attacking forces.

http://www.historycommons.org/timeline.jsp?us_military_general_topic_areas=us_military_weaponizationOfSpace&timeline=us_military_tmln

Free Energy Looks Like This

2009-06-24T18:00:00.001-07:00

Tesla Coil Artist Sparks Up for Christmas
By Asami Novak
12.12.07 | 12:00 AM
"WE WILL EX-TER-MI-NATE"
Want a face-to-face encounter with a Tesla spark? Try standing in this Faraday cage, which is shaped like a Dalek from the Doctor Who series. Just be sure to wear UV-protection glasses and high-efficiency earmuffs.
No doubt, sparks like these make some noise. But Terren lives in a fairly rural area (he says it's common to see kangaroos hopping by), so he doesn't have to worry about neighbors' complaints.
http://www.wired.com/culture/art/multimedia/2007/12/gallery_tesla_artist?slide=3&slideView=3
http://www.commutefaster.com/Energy2.html
http://biz.yahoo.com/iw/071203/0335081.html
SuperMag Update: SuperMag Surpasses All Expectations! Public Unveiling Soon! SuperVision Now Working on New Superheater; WPGL.TV Offers 1,000 Cruises and 1,000 Free Xmas Memberships
Monday December 3, 10:03 am ET
LOS ANGELES, CA--(MARKET WIRE)--Dec 3, 2007 -- SuperVision Entertainment Inc. (Other OTC:SVET.PK - News): The company is pleased to announce that the proprietary SuperMag 10kw commercial generator, powered by very powerful magnetic fields, has so far surpassed all expectations. The SuperMag is now undergoing the installation of the electronic control and management systems. Needless to say, the significance and ramifications of this system are enormous. Plans are now being made for the public unveiling of the SuperMag.
A spin off of this technology has led to a new product called SuperHeater. This product when commercially available will provide all heating requirements for homes, office buildings or manufacturing plants without reliance on electricity from a utility company or from fossil fuels.
The company's World Professional Video Gamers League (WPGL.TV) has secured 1,000 Caribbean cruises as prizes for its 'Early Bird' competition and in the spirit of Christmas is giving away 1,000 pro video gaming memberships worth $250.00 each on a first come first served basis. Check out the site at www.wpgl.tv and register for the Early Bird competition, over $500,000 in prizes available.
The company's Video On Demand business through its VOD subsidiary continues to be strong with a recent deal signed with Overstock.Com. This makes almost 90 major VOD deals that have been signed in the last two years.
Baron Storm's 'Christmas is for Lovers' CD is now catching up with Elvis Presley's most popular album 'Blue Christmas.' To check this out go to www.baronstorm.com
SuperVision will also be launching its spectacular web site next year where full information about the company and its exciting products and projects will be found.
For further info contact: superv0007@hotmail.com
Safe Harbor Statement
All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this press release are "forward-looking statements." The forward-looking statements, including statements about the Company's future, revenues and earnings, and all other forward-looking statements (i.e. future operational results and sales) are subject to assumptions and beliefs based on current information known to the Company and are factors that are subject to uncertainties, risks and other influences which are outside the Company's control, and which may yield results differing materially and substantially from those anticipated. Any reference to a private placement is not an offering or a solicitation of any kind and is to be considered a notice only. All information is subject to change.
Contact:
SuperVision Entertainment Inc.
Email: Email Contact
Email Contact
PowerPedia:Nikola Tesla
From PESWiki

For a listing of sites, see Directory:Nikola Tesla
Dr. Nikola Tesla

The man who invented the twentieth century.
Birthplace and date
9 July / 10 July, 1856
Smiljan, Croatia [then part of Austrian Empire]
Deathplace and date:
ca., January 7, 1943
New York City, New York, USA
Occupation:
inventor, physicist, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer
Ethnicity and nationality:
Serbian-American
Dr. Nikola Tesla was one of the most brilliant inventors of history and was of an unusual intellectual vision. He is affectionately refered to as the "Father of Free Energy". Tesla was a world-renowned Serbian-American inventor, physicist, mechanical engineer and electrical engineer, born in Smiljan, Austrian Empire (present day Croatia). Tesla is regarded as one of the most important inventors in history. He is also well known for his contributions to the discipline of electricity and magnetism in the late 19th and early 20th century. His patents and theoretical work form the basis of modern alternating current electric power (AC) systems, including the polyphase power distribution systems and the AC motor, with which he helped usher in the Second Industrial Revolution.
In the United States, Tesla's fame rivaled that of any other inventor or scientist in history or popular culture. After his demonstration of wireless communication in 1893 and after being the victor in the "War of Currents", he was widely respected as America's greatest electrical engineer. Much of his early work pioneered modern electrical engineering and many of his discoveries were of groundbreaking importance. In 1947, the United States Supreme Court credited him as being the inventor of the radio. Never putting much focus on his finances, Tesla died impoverished and forgotten at the age of 86.
Tesla's legacy can be seen across modern civilization wherever electricity is used. Aside from his work on electromagnetism and engineering, Tesla is said to have contributed in varying degrees to the fields of robotics, ballistics, computer science, nuclear physics, and theoretical physics. In his later years, Tesla was regarded as a mad scientist and became noted for making bizarre claims about possible scientific developments. Many of his achievements have been used, with some controversy, to support various pseudosciences, UFO theories, and New Age occultism. Many contemporary admirers of Tesla have deemed him the man who invented the twentieth century.

Table of contents [showhide]
1 Introduction
2 Early years
2.1 Coming to America
2.2 War of the Currents
2.3 Harnessing Niagara
3 Middle years
3.1 High Frequency High Voltage
3.2 Robots and Telautomatics
3.3 Colorado Springs, Colorado
3.4 Tower of Dreams
3.5 Who Invented Radio?
3.6 Turbines and pumps
4 Later years
4.1 World War I to World War II
4.2 Tesla's Pierce-Arrow
4.3 A Weapon to End War
4.4 Extraterrestrial Radio Transmitter
4.5 Dynamic Theory of Gravity
5 Death and afterwards
6 Personal views
6.1 Quotes
7 Relations and friendships
8 Recognition and honors
9 Further readings and films
9.1 Patents
9.2 Articles (pre-1900)
9.3 Books
9.4 Movies and Films
9.5 Magazines
10 Sources, resources, and references
11 Modern news articles
12 Directories
13 See Also

Introduction
Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night: God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light.
— B.A. Behrend, AIEE annual meeting, New York City, May 18, 1917.

Tesla writing and research, from his patents to his theoretical work, provide the
foundation to the basis for modern industrial systems. Tesla ushered in the
Second Industrial Revolution and his research continue to provide insights to
innovation yet to be exploited. (Image from the Nikola Tesla Museum (http://www.tesla-museum.org/))
Dr. Tesla was of unusual intellectual brilliance. He had a general mental capability that could reason, plan, and solve problems in his head. He could think abstractly and comprehend ideas without putting pen to paper. His patents (over 100 in the United States) and theoretical work still form the basis for modern alternating current electric power systems (including the polyphase power distribution system). Tesla helped usher in the Second Industrial Revolution. Yet he hardly gets a footnote in our public school textbooks
In his early years, he enjoy widespread fame, a person who was widely recognized in a high society, and in culture, large part of professional material of the publishing industries focues on Tesla's announcements. He was highly reguarded in the annuals of history. Tesla's name was a byword for innovation and practical achievement. His name was one of the most recognizable in the world, a magician who conjured up technical feats. Tesla's vision was to find a means to provide humanity the means for unlimited energy. He gave his life to make real these plans, while others made fortunes with his inventions.
Tesla is most famous for conceiving the rotating magnetic field principle (1882) and then using it to invent the induction motor together with the accompanying alternating current long-distance electrical transmission system (1888). His patents and theoretical work still form the basis for modern alternating current electric power(AC) systems including the polyphase power distribution system. He developed numerous other electrical and mechanical devices including the fundamental principles and machinery of wireless technology, the high frequency alternator, the "AND" logic gate and the Tesla coil, as well as other devices such as the bladeless turbine, devices for high voltage discharges, and the bifilar coil. He developed various devices that use rotating magnetic fields, the fundamental devices and systems of wireless communication (legal priority for the invention of radio), radio frequency oscillators, devices for voltage magnification by standing waves, robotics, devices for x-rays, and devices for ionized gases. Tesla later developed devices for high field emission, devices for charged particle beams, methods for providing extremely low level of resistance to the passage of electrical current, means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations, voltage multiplication circuitry, devices for lightning protection, and the VTOL aircraft.
Tesla toward the end of his life was regarded as a mad scientist. Tesla was mocked by his contemporaries and he wound up destitute and forgotten. Why is this? He wanted to distribute power freely to the entire globe, and he had the technology developed to do so. The problem with his proposal is that there would be no metering to make money off of each watt distributed -- no way to maintain control from the population. He was blacklisted from the mainstream. Although he was awarded hundred of patents worldwide, he died in poverty. A hundred years later, we are still playing catch-up. His legacy can been seen across modern civilization. Tesla was ahead of his time, many of Tesla's ideas and concepts are just only recently coming to fruition.
We think of his contribution much oftener than that of Ampere and Ohm [...] the induction motor and our power system are enduring monuments to Nikola Tesla.
— Dr. E. F. W. Alexanderson
Tesla was (and is) "the common man's Einstein". Real scientists mention him because his name is attached fundementally to much of the underpinning of our modern society, to the induction coil, and a SI physical unit. The latter seems to have been adopted because of his varied and wide contributions to science and engineering in general. He identified the basic idea for the rotary induction motor, which was missed by others (in devices such as the 19th-century Wheatstone patent), and the basic circuit for the 'Tesla coil' (an inprovement on more primative circuit that can be seen in the 9th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica (circa 1860)). The history of modern radio dates to Tesla's work, as he consolidated and put into practival usefulness previous research. Among the reasons for his fame is that he was good at conveying idea to the general public and businessmen who would then utilize this technology.

Early years

Nikola Tesla's home in Smiljan, Croatia.
Tesla was born "at the stroke of midnight" in 1856 with lightning striking during a summer storm (the first moment of July 10). The midwife commented, "He'll be a child of the storm," to which his mother replied, "No, of light." He was born in Smiljan near Gospić in Croatia, Lika, (the Military Frontier of the Austria-Hungary, now in Croatia). Smiljan is a village in the mountainous region of Lika, Croatia. It is located seven kilometers west of Gospić, and fifteen kilometers from the highway Zagreb-Split; its population is 446 (2001). Smiljan is known best for being the birthplace of Nikola Tesla on July 10, 1856. Nowdays, Tesla's birth house, together with the church and the surrounding area represents a memeorial complex with various exhibits of Tesla's inventions and a museum where the details of the discoverer's life are shown. There is also a congress hall in a nearby building.
Tesla's baptismal name was ?иколай (Nikola). His Baptism Certificate reports that he was born on June 28 (Julian calendar; July 10 in the Gregorian calendar) 1856. he was christened by the Serbian orthodox priest, Toma Oklobdžija. Tesla was baptised in the Old Slavonic Church rite.
His father was Rev. Milutin Tesla, a Serbian priest in the Orthodox Metropolitanate of Karlovci which gathered the Serbs of the "Greek-rite" as they were legally referred to in Habsburg Monarchy at the time (Vlach Orthodox; Metropolitanate of Karlovci). His father's church in Gospić was destroyed in the 1990s[1] (http://www.eparhija-gornjokarlovacka.hr/Images/Eparhija/Gospic/Gospic4.jpg). His mother was ?uka Mandić, a housewife talented in making home craft tools. Nikola was one of five children, having one brother and three sisters. His godfather, Jovan Drenovac, was a Captain in the Krajina army. His family moved to Gospić in 1862.
Dr. Tesla's education:

Elementary school
Gospić (Austria-Hungary, now Croatia)
Secondary school
Karlovac (Austria-Hungary, now Croatia)
Undergraduate studies
Baccalaureate of Physics
Austrian Polytechnic Institute (Graz)
Baccalaureate of Mathematics
Austrian Polytechnic Institute (Graz)
Baccalaureate of Mechanical Engineering
Austrian Polytechnic Institute (Graz)
Baccalaureate of Electrical Engineering
Austrian Polytechnic Institute (Graz)
Graduate studies
Physics
University of Prague (Prague)
Tesla went to school in Karlovac (then Austria-Hungary), then studied electrical engineering at the Austria Politechnic in Graz, Austria (1875). While there, he studied the uses of alternating current. In 1881 he moved to Budapest to work for the telegraph company, American Telephone Company. On the opening of the telephone exchange in Budapest, 1881, Tesla became the chief electrician to the company, later engineer to the Yugoslav government and the country's first telephone system. He also developed a telephone repeater (sometimes called an amplifier) [ed., this was one of the first wireless telephones]. The device could act as an audio speaker (not an audio transducer). Tesla was also fascinated by the Crookes radiometer, believeing that it was a most wonderful invention.

The device had its resonance tuned to a particular frequency of other repeaters to communicate between each. In 1916, Tesla described the prior developed audio transducers. According to Tesla, it was the:
"... simplest ways [to detect the radiant energy ...] the low frequency gave audible notes. [... in a field, there was] placed a conductor, a wire or a coil, and then Tesla would get a note [...] characteristics of the audible note".
The audible sounds were of the quality of the telephones diaphragms of that period of time. The invention was never patented nor released publicly (till years later by Tesla himself). The device also contained the characteristics of modern wireless telephones.
For a while he stayed in Maribor. He was employed at his first job as an assistant engineer. Tesla suffered a nervous breakdown during this time. In 1882 he moved to Paris to work as an engineer for the Continental Edison Company. He worked designing improvements to electric equipment. In the same year, Tesla conceived of the induction motor and began developing various devices that use rotating magnetic fields (for which he received patents in 1888). Tesla visualized the rotating fields and thereby designed the induction motor.
Tesla hastened from Paris to his mother's side as she lay dying, arriving hours before her death in 1882. Her last words to him were, "You've arrived, Nidzo, my pride." After her death, Tesla fell ill. He spent two to three weeks recuperating in Gospić and the village of Tomingaj near Gra�?, the birthplace of his mother. All his life, Tesla kept a home-spun embroidered travel bag from his mother. *[According to John J. O'Neill in his book "Prodigal Genius", Tesla's mother died in 1892. He rushed to her side not long after giving his famous lecture "Experiments with Alternating Currents of High Potential and High Frequency" delivered before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, February 1892. His father died sometime between 1878 and 1881.]

Coming to America
In 1884 Tesla moved to the United States of America to accept a job with the Edison Company in New York City. He arrived in the US with 4 cents to his name, a book of poetry, and a letter of recommendation from Charles Batchelor (his manager in his previous job) to Thomas Edison. The letter read simply "I know two great men, and you are one of them. This young man is the other". Tesla's work for Edison began with simple electrical engineering. Eventually Tesla earned the respect of Edison and offered to undertake a complete re-design of the Edison company's DC dynamos. After Tesla described the nature of the benefits from his proposed modifications, Edison offered him US$50,000 if they were successfully completed.
Tesla worked nearly a year to redesign them and gave the Edison company several enormously profitable new patents in the process. When Tesla inquired about the $50,000, Edison replied to him, "Tesla, you don't understand our American humor", and reneged on his agreement, offering a raise in Tesla's salary of $10 per week as a compromise - at which rate it would have taken almost 100 years to earn the money Edison had originally promised. Tesla resigned on the spot. In some accounts of the final confrontation, Tesla did not say a single word to Edison but simply turned his back on the inventor and walked off the premises. Edison would receive US patent 328572 for an improved commutator and, later, would gain US patent 373584 for a dynamo-electric machine (which includes an extra coil and utilizes a field of force) among other patents which Tesla may be responsible for.
In 1886, Tesla formed his own company, Tesla Electric Light & Manufacturing. The initial financial investors disagreed with Tesla on his plan for an alternating current motor and eventually relieved him of his duties at the company. Tesla worked in New York as a common laborer from 1886 to 1887 to feed himself and raise capital for his next project. In 1887, he constructed the initial brushless alternate-current induction motor, which he demonstrated to the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (now IEEE) in 1888. In the same year, he developed the principles of his Tesla coil and began working with George Westinghouse at Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company's Pittsburgh labs. Westinghouse listened to his ideas for polyphase systems which would allow transmission of alternating current electricity over large distances.

War of the Currents
In the "War of Currents" era in the late 1880s, Nikola Tesla and Thomas Edison became adversaries due to Edison's promotion of direct current (DC) for electric power distribution over the more efficient alternating current (AC) advocated by Tesla. During the initial years of electricity distribution, Edison's direct current was the standard for the United States and Edison was not disposed to lose all his patent royalties. Direct current worked well for the incandescent lamps that were the principal load of the day. From his work with rotary magnetic fields, Tesla devised a system for generation, transmission, and use of AC power. He partnered with George Westinghouse to commercialize this system. Westinghouse had previously bought the rights to Tesla's polyphase system patents and other patents for AC transformers from Lucien Gaulard and John Dixon Gibbs.

Tesla's Patents provide a insight into his genius. This image is from U.S. Patent 390721 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=390721) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=390721); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=390721)).
Until Tesla invented the induction motor, AC's advantages for long distance high voltage transmission were counterbalanced by the inability to operate motors on AC. The direct current electric power transmission system had severe limitations that were solved by the use of alternating current. High loads of direct current could rarely be transmitted for distances of greater than one mile without introducing excessive voltage drops. The three-wire distribution system provided some improvement in voltage drop and conductor sizes, but did not eliminate the problem. Edison's response to the DC system limitations was to generate power close to where it was consumed (distributed generation) and install more wires to handle the growing demand for electricity, but this solution proved to be costly, impractical, and unmanageable.
Direct current could not easily be changed to higher or lower voltages. This meant that separate electrical lines had to be installed in order to supply power to appliances that use different voltages, for example, lighting and electric motors. This led to a greater number of wires to lay and maintain, wasting money and introducing unnecessary hazards. A number of deaths from the Great Blizzard of '88 were attributed to collapsing power lines that cluttered cities running DC power grids. High voltage AC could be transmitted over long distances with lower voltage drops (thus greater transmission efficiency), and then conveniently stepped down to low voltages for use in homes and factories. When Tesla introduced a system for alternating current generators, transformers, motors, wires, and lights in November and December of 1887, it became clear that AC was the future of electric power distribution.
Edison went on to carry out a campaign to discourage the use of alternating current. Edison personally presided over several executions of animals, primarily stray cats and dogs, to demonstrate to the press that his system of direct current was safer than that of alternating current. Edison's series of animal executions peaked with the electrocution of Topsy the Elephant. He also tried to popularize the term for being electrocuted as being "Westinghoused".
Edison opposed capital punishment, but his desire to disparage the system of alternating current led to the invention of the electric chair. Edison (or some of his employees) used AC to construct the first electric chair for the state of New York in order to promote the idea that alternating current was deadlier than DC. It is a popular belief, some would say misconception, that Edison alone invented the electric chair solely as a means of impressing the public that AC was more dangerous than DC, and would therefore be the logical choice for electrocutions. The chair was developed by a few of his employees, in particular Harold P. Brown, while working under Edison at Menlo Park.
When the chair was first used, the technicians on hand misjudged the voltage needed to kill the condemned prisoner, William Kemmler. The first jolt of electricity, delivered on August 6, 1890, was not enough to kill Kemmler, and left him only badly injured. The procedure had to be repeated and a reporter on hand described it as "an awful spectacle, far worse than hanging". George Westinghouse commented: "They would have done better using an axe." Low frequency (50 - 60 Hz) AC currents can be more dangerous than similar levels of DC current since the alternating fluctuations can cause the heart to lose coordination, inducing ventricular fibrillation, which then rapidly leads to death. However any practical distribution system will use voltage levels quite sufficient to ensure a dangerous amount of current will flow, whether it uses alternating or direct current. Since the precautions against electrocution are similar, ultimately, the advantages of AC power transmission outweighed this theoretical risk, and it was eventually adopted as the standard.

Harnessing Niagara
In 1883, the Niagara Falls Power Company, a descendant of Schoellkopf's firm, hired George Westinghouse to design a system to generate alternating current. When Tesla, for whom a memorial was later built at Niagara Falls, implemented the three-phase system of alternating current power transmission, distant transfer of electricity became possible. By 1896, with financing from moguls like J.P. Morgan, John Jacob Astor IV, and the Vanderbilts, they had constructed giant underground conduits leading to turbines generating upwards of 100,000 horsepower (75 MW), and were sending power as far as Buffalo, twenty miles (32 km) away. Private companies on the Canadian side also began to harness the energy of the Falls, employing both domestic and American firms in their efforts. The Government of Ontario eventually brought power transmission operations under public control in 1906, distributing Niagara's energy to various parts of that province. The water then passes through hydroelectric turbines that supply power to nearby areas of the United States and Canada before returning to the river well past the Falls. Some doubted that the system would generate enough electricity to power industry in Buffalo. Tesla was sure it would work, saying that Niagara Falls had the ability to power the entire eastern U.S. On November 16, 1896, electrical power was sent from Niagara Falls to industries in Buffalo from the hydroelectric generators at the Edward Dean Adams Station. The hydroelectric generators were built by Westinghouse Electric Corporation using Tesla's AC system patent. The nameplates on the generators bear Tesla's name. He also set the 60 hertz standard for North America. It took five years to complete the whole facility.

Middle years

High Frequency High Voltage

Tesla 1891 lecture.
In April of 1887, Tesla began investigating what would later be called X-rays using his own single node vacuum tubes (similar to his U.S. Patent 514170 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=514170) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=514170); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=514170))). This device differed from other early X-ray tubes in that they had no target electrode. The modern term for the phenomenon produced by this device is bremsstrahlung (or braking radiation). We now know that this device operated by emitting electrons from the single electrode through a combination of field emission and thermionic emission. Once liberated, electrons are strongly repelled by the high electric field near the electrode during negative voltage peaks from the oscillating HV output of the Tesla Coil, generating X-rays as they collide with the glass envelope. He also used Geissler tubes. By 1892, Tesla became aware of what Wilhelm Röntgen later identified as effects of X-rays.
Tesla commented on the hazards of working with single node X-ray producing devices, incorrectly attributing the skin damage to ozone rather than the radiation:
"As to the hurtful actions on the skin ... I note that they have been misinterpreted ... They are not due to the Röntgen rays, but merely to the ozone generated in contact with the skin. Nitrous acid may also be responsible, but to a small extent". (Tesla, in Electrical Review, 30 November 1895).
Tesla later observed an assistant severely "burnt" by X-rays in his lab. He performed several experiments (including photographing the bones of his hand; later, he sent these images to Röntgen) but didn't make his findings widely known; much of his research was lost in the 1895 Houston Street lab fire.

Tesla at East Houston Street lab (New York), with Roger Boskovich's book "Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis", in front of the spiral coil of his high-frequency transformer.
In the spring of 1891, Tesla gave demonstrations with various machines and coils before the American Institute of Electrical Engineers at Columbia College. Following the initial research of voltage and frequency by William Crookes, Tesla developed a series of coils that produced high-voltage, high-frequency currents. In the majority of Tesla's experiments, he used machinery of his own design to produce the Tesla effect. These early coils would use the "disruptive" action of a spark gap in their operation. The setup can be duplicated by a Ruhmkorff coil, two condensers (now called capacitors), and a second, specially constructed, disruptive coil.
In U.S. Patent 454622 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=454622) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=454622); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=454622)), System of Electric Lighting (1891 June 23), Tesla described this early disruptive coil. It was devised for the purpose of converting and supplying electrical energy in a form suited for the production of certain novel electrical phenomena, which require currents of higher frequency and potential. It also specified an energy storage capacitor and discharger mechanism on the primary side of a radio-frequency transformer. This is the first-ever disclosure of a practical RF power supply capable of exciting an antenna to emit powerful electromagnetic radiation.
On July 30, 1891, he became a naturalized citizen of the United States at the age of 35. Tesla established his 35 South Fifth Avenue laboratory in New York during this same year. Later, Tesla would establish his Houston Street laboratory in New York at 46 E. Houston Street. He lit vacuum tubes wirelessly at both of the New York locations, providing evidence for the potential of wireless power transmission. Some of Tesla's closest friends were artists. He befriended Century Magazine editor Robert Underwood Johnson, who adapted several Serbian poems of Jovan Jovanović Zmaj (which Tesla translated). Also during this time, Tesla was influenced by the Vedic philosophy teachings of the Swami Vivekananda.
At the 1893 World's Fair, the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago, Illinois, an international exposition was held which for the first time devoted a building to electrical exhibits. It was a historic event as Tesla and George Westinghouse introduced visitors to AC power by using it to illuminate the Exposition. In protest, Thomas Edison would not allow use of any of his lightbulbs for this event (Westinghouse sidestepped this by developing a double-stopper lamp). On display were Tesla's fluorescent lights and single node bulbs. As if lighting the Exposition was not enough, Tesla explained the principles of the rotating magnetic field and induction motor by demonstrating how to make an egg (made of copper) stand on end in his demonstration of the device he constructed known as the "Egg of Columbus". It was used to demonstrate and explain the model principles of a magnetic vortex field and the induction motor

The World's Columbian Exposition (also called The Chicago World's Fair), a World's fair, was held in the U.S. city of Chicago in 1893 to celebrate the 400th anniversary of Christopher Columbus' discovery of the New World. Chicago bested New York City, Washington, D.C., and St. Louis, Missouri, for the honor of hosting the fair. The fair had a profound effect on architecture, the arts, Chicago's self image, and American industrial optimism. The International Exposition was held in a building which for the first time was devoted to electrical exhibits. It was a historical moment and the beginning of a revolution, as Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse introduced the public to electrical power by providing alternating current to illuminate the Exposition. The general public observed firsthand the qualities and abilities of alternating current power. All the exhibits were from commercial enterprises. Thomas Edison, Brush, Western Electric, and Westinghouse had exhibits. General Electric Company (backed by Edison and J.P. Morgan) proposed to power the electric fair with direct current at the cost of one million dollars.
Westinghouse, armed with Tesla's alternating current system, proposed to illuminate the exposition for half that price. Tesla's high-frequency high-voltage lighting produced more efficient light with quantitatively less heat. A two-phase induction motor was driven by current from the main generators to power the system. Edison tried to prevent the use of his light bulbs in Tesla's works. Westinghouse's proposal was chosen over the less efficient (but safer) direct current system to power the fair. General Electric banned the use of Edison's lamps in Westinghouse's plan, in retaliation for losing the bid. Westinghouse's company quickly designed a double-stopper lightbulb (sidestepping Edison's patents) and was able to light the fair.
The Westinghouse Company displayed several polyphase systems. The exhibits included a switchboard, polyphase generators, step-up transformers, transmission line, step-down transformers, commercial size induction motors and synchronous motors, and rotary direct current converters (including an operational railway motor). The working scaled system allowed the public a view of a system of polyphase power which could be transmitted over long distances, and be utilized, including the supply of direct current. Meters and other auxiliary devices were also present. Tesla displayed his phosphorescent lighting, powered without wires by high-frequency fields. Tesla displayed the first practical phosphorescent lamps (a precursor to fluorescent lamps). Tesla's lighting inventions exposed to high-frequency currents would bring the gases to incandescence. Tesla also displayed the first neon lights. His innovations in this type of light emission were not regularly patented.

Also among the exhibits was Tesla's demonstration, most notably the "Egg of Columbus". This device explains the principles of the rotating magnetic field and his induction motor. The Egg of Columbus consisted of a polyphase field coil underneath a plate with a copper egg positioned over the top. When the sequence of coils were energized, the magnetic field arrangement inductively created a rotation on the egg and made it stand up on end (appearing to resist gravity). On August 25, Elisha Gray introduced Tesla for a delivery of a lecture on mechanical and electrical oscillators. Tesla explained his work for efficiently increasing the work at high frequency of reciprocation. As Electrical Congress members listened, Tesla delineated mechanisms which could produce oscillations of constant periods irrespective of the pressure applied and irrespective of frictional losses and loads. He continued to explain the working mean of the production of constant period electric currents (not resorting to spark gaps or breaks), and how to produce these with mechanisms which are reliable. The successful demonstration of alternating current lighting at the Exposition dispelled doubts about the usefulness of the polyphase alternating current system developed by Westinghouse and Tesla.
Tesla's AC replaced DC in many instances of generation and power distribution, enormously extending the range and improving the safety and efficiency of power distribution. Edison's inventions using DC ultimately lost to AC devices proposed by others: primarily Tesla's polyphase systems, and also other contributors, such as Charles Proteus Steinmetz (of General Electric). Tesla's Niagara Falls system marked the end of Edison's roadmap for electrical transmission and was a turning point in the acceptance of alternating current. Eventually, Edison's General Electric company converted to the AC system and began manufacture of AC machines. As a result of the "War of Currents," Edison and Westinghouse were almost bankrupt, so in 1897, Tesla released Westinghouse from contract, providing Westinghouse a break from Tesla's patent royalties. Also in 1897, Tesla researched radiation which led to setting up the basic formulation of cosmic rays.
When Tesla was 36 years old, the first patents concerning the polyphase power system were granted. He continued research of the system and rotating magnetic field principles. Tesla served as the vice president of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers (now part of the IEEE) from 1892 to 1894. From 1893 to 1895, he investigated high frequency alternating currents. He generated AC of one million volts using a conical Tesla coil and investigated the skin effect in conductors, designed tuned circuits, invented a machine for inducing sleep, cordless gas discharge lamps, and transmitted electromagnetic energy without wires, effectively building the first radio transmitter. In St. Louis, Missouri, Tesla made a demonstration related to radio communication in 1893. Addressing the Franklin Institute in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and the National Electric Light Association, he described and demonstrated in detail its principles. Tesla's demonstrations were written about widely through various media outlets.

Mark Twain participating in an experiment in Tesla's laboratory. Century Magazine, April 1895.
Another early Tesla coil was protected in 1897 by U.S. Patent 0593138 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=0593138) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=0593138); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=0593138)), "Electrical Transformer". This transformer developed (or converted) currents of high potential and was comprised of a primary and secondary coil (optionally, one terminal of the secondary could be electrically connected with the primary; similar to modern ignition coils). This Tesla coil had the secondary being inside of, and surrounded by, the convolutions of the primary coil. This Tesla coil comprised of a primary and secondary wound in the form of a flat spiral. One coil, the secondary in step up transformation, of the device consisted of a longer fine-wire. The apparatus was also connected to the Earth when the coil was in use.
Also when Tesla was 41 years old, he filed the first basic radio patent (U.S. Patent 645576 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=645576) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=645576); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=645576))). A year later, Tesla devised an "electric igniter" or spark plug for Internal combustion gasoline engines. He gained U.S. Patent 609250, "Electrical Igniter for Gas Engines", on this mechanical ignition system. Tesla lived in the former Gerlach Hotel, renamed The Radio Wave building, at 49 W 27th St.(between Broadway and Sixth Avenue), Lower Manhattan, before the end of the century where he conducted the radio wave experiments. A commemorative plaque was placed on the building in 1977 to honor his work.

Robots and Telautomatics
In 1897 , he demonstrated a radio controlled boat to the US military, believing that the military would want things such as radio controlled torpedoes. Tesla developed the "Art of Telautomatics", a form of robotics. In 1898, a radio-controlled boat was demonstrated to the public during an electrical exhibition at Madison Square Garden. These devices had an innovative coherer and a series of logic gates. Radio remote control remained a novelty until the 1960s.

Colorado Springs, Colorado
In 1899, Tesla decided to move and began research in Colorado Springs, Colorado, where he could have room for his high-voltage high-frequency experiments.He chose this location primarily because of the frequent thunderstorms, the high altitude (where the air, being at a lower pressure, had a lower dielectric breakdown strength, making it easier to ionize), and the dryness of the air (minimizing leakage of electric charge through insulators). Also, the property was free and electric power available from the El Paso Power Company. Today, magnetic intensity charts also show that the ground around his lab possesses a denser magnetic field than the surrounding area. Tesla reached Colorado Springs on May 17, 1899. Upon his arrival he told reporters that he was conducting experiments transmitting signals from Pikes Peak to Paris.
Tesla kept a diary of his experiments in the Colorado Springs lab where he spent nearly nine months. It consists of 500 pages of handwritten notes and nearly 200 drawings, recorded chronologically between June 1, 1899 and January 7, 1900, as the work occurred, containing explanations of his experiments. Tesla's diary contains explanations of his experiments concerning the ionosphere and the ground's telluric currents via transverse waves and longitudinal waves. He was developing a system for wireless telegraphy, telephony and the transmission of power, experimented with high-voltage electricity and the possibility of wireless transmitting and distributing large amounts of electrical energy over long distances. He also conceived a system for geophysical exploration--seismology--which he called telegeodynamics, based on his reciprocating mechanical oscillator patented in 1894, and explained that a long sequence of small explosions could be used to find ore and create earthquakes large enough to destroy the Earth. He did not experiment with this as he felt there would not be "a desirable outcome".

Colorado Springs photograph during an experiment (December 31, 1899). Several million volts of lightning cascade through a portion of the laboratory. Tesla is portaryed as deep into though on a book in the background. This is a double exposure to signify the extent of the discharge in the complex.
Tesla, a local contractor, and several assistants commenced the construction of the laboratory shortly after arriving in Colorado Springs. The lab was established on Knob Hill, east of the Colorado School for the Deaf and Blind and one mile (1.6 km) east of downtown. Its primary purposes were experiments with high frequency electricity and other phenomena and, secondarily, research into wireless transmission of electrical power. Tesla's design of the lab was a building fifty feet by sixty feet (15 by 18 m) with eighty-foot (24 m) ceilings. A one-hundred-forty-two foot (43 m) conducting aerial with a thirty-inch (76 cm) copper-foil covered wooden ball was erected on the roof. The roof was rolled back to prevent fire from sparks and other dangerous effects of the experiments. The laboratory had sensitive instruments and equipment.
The lab possessed the largest Tesla Coil ever built, fifty-two feet (16 m) in diameter, known as the Magnifying Transmitter. Not identical to a classic Tesla Coil, it was a three-coil magnifying system requiring different forms of analysis than lumped-constant coupled resonant coils presently described to most. It resonated at a natural quarter wavelength frequency and could work in a continuous-wave mode and in a partially damped-wave resonant mode. According to accounts, Tesla used it to transmit tens of thousands of watts of power wirelessly; it could generate millions of volts of electricity and produce lightning bolts more than one-hundred feet (30 m) long. At his lab, Tesla proved that the earth was a conductor, and he produced artificial lightning (with discharges consisting of millions of volts, and up to 135 feet long). Tesla posted a large fence around it with a sign "Keep Out - Great Danger".
Tesla became the first man to create electrical effects on the scale of lightning. The Magnifying Transmitter produced thunder which was heard as far away as Cripple Creek. People near the lab would observe sparks emitting from the ground to their feet and through their shoes. Some have observed electrical sparks from the fire hydrants (Tesla for a time grounded out to the plumbing of the city). The area around the laboratory would glow with a blue corona (similar to St. Elmo's Fire). One of Tesla's experiments with the Magnifying Transmitter destroyed Colorado Springs Electric Company's generator by backfeeding the city's power generators, and blacked out the city. The company denied Tesla further access to the backup generator's feed if he did not repair the primary generator at his own expense; it was working again in a few days.

See the PowerPedia Article: Magnifying Transmitter

Reproductions of Tesla's receivers and coherer circuits show an unpredicted level of complexity (e.g., distributed high-Q helical resonators, radio frequency feedback, crude heterodyne effects, and regeneration techniques). Tesla also constructed many smaller resonance transformers and discovered the concept of tuned electrical circuits. He also developed a number of coherers for separating and perceiving electromagnetic waves and designed rotating coherers which he used to detect the unique types of electromagnetic phenomenon he observed. They had a mechanism of geared wheels driven by a coiled spring-drive mechanism which rotated small glass cylinders. These experiments were the final stage of years of work on synchronized tuned electrical circuits.
These transceivers were constructed to demonstrate how signals could be "tuned in". Tesla logged in his diary on July 3, 1899 that a separate resonance transformer tuned to the same high frequency as a larger high-voltage resonance transformer would transceive energy from the larger coil, acting as a transmitter of wireless energy, which was used to confirm Tesla's patent for radio during later disputes in the courts. These air core high-frequency resonate coils were the predecessors of systems from radio to radar and medical magnetic resonance imaging devices.

Experimental proof of wireless transmission of electrical energy.
On July 3, 1899, Tesla discovered terrestrial stationary waves within the earth. He demonstrated that the Earth behaves as a smooth polished conductor and possesses electrical vibrations. He experimented with waves characterized by a lack of vibration at points, between which areas of maximum vibration occur periodically. These standing waves were produced by confining waves within constructed conductive boundaries. Tesla demonstrated that the Earth could respond at predescribed frequencies of electrical vibrations. At this time, Tesla realized that it was possible to transceive power around the globe.
The investigations of atmospheric electricity involved observing lightning signals via his receivers. Tesla stated that he observed stationary waves during this time. Tesla conducted experiments contributing to the understanding of electromagnetic propagation and the Earth's resonance. It is well documented (from various photos from the time) that he lit hundreds of lamps wirelessly at a distance of up to twenty-five miles (40 km). He transmitted signals several kilometres and lit neon tubes conducting through the ground. He researched ways to transmit energy wirelessly over long distances (utilizing the ionosphere and the ground's telluric currents via transverse waves, to a lesser extent, and, more readily, longitudinal waves). He transmitted extremely low frequencies through the ground as well as between the earth's surface and the Kennelly-Heaviside layer. He recieved patents on wireless that developed standing waves by this method. In his experiments, he made mathematical calculations and computations based on his experiments and discovered that the resonant frequency of the Earth was approximately 8 Hz (Hertz). In the 1950s, researchers confirmed resonant frequency was in this range (interesting to note, Theta brain waves also cycle in this range).
In the Colorado Springs lab, Tesla recorded what he concluded were extraterrestrial radio signals and announced his findings in some of the scientific journals of the time. [2] (http://www.teslasociety.com/mars2.htm) His announcements and data were rejected by the scientific community who did not believe him. He notes measurements of repetitive signals from his receiver which are substantially different from the signals he had noted from storms and earth noise. Specifically, he later recalled that the signals appeared in groups of clicks 1, 2, 3, and 4 clicks together. He stated in the article "A Giant Eye to See Round the World", of 25 February 1923, that:
"Twenty-two years ago, while experimenting in Colorado with a wireless power plant, I obtained extraordinary experimental evidence of the existence of life on Mars. I had perfected a wireless receiver of extraordinary sensitiveness, far beyond anything known, and I caught signals which I interpreted as meaning 1--2--3--4. I believe the Martians used numbers for communication because numbers are universal." Albany Telegram — 25 February 1923 [3] (http://www.tesla.hu/tesla/articles/19230225.doc)
Clearly, Tesla felt the signal groups originated on the planet Mars. In 1996 Corum and Corum published an analysis of Jovian plasma torus signals which indicate that there was a correspondence between the setting of Mars at Colorado Springs, and the cessation of signals from Jupiter in the summer of 1899 when Tesla was there. [4] (http://www.teslasociety.com/mars.pdf) Further, analysis by the Corums indicate that Tesla's transceiver was sensitive in the 18 kHz gap in the Kennelly-Heaviside layer which would have allowed that reception from Jupiter. Therefore, there is evidence the signals Tesla noticed came from Jupiter, among other possible sources. In 1996 Corum and Corum published an analysis of Jovian plasma torus signals which indicate that there was a correspondence between the setting of Mars at Colorado Springs, and the cessation of signals from Jupiter in the summer of 1899 when Tesla was there. Tesla spent the latter part of his life trying to signal Mars.
It is important to recognize that when he says he "recorded" these signals, it is meant that he wrote down the data and his impressions of what he had heard. He did release reports at the time. Tesla’s initial announcement of the existence of extraterrestrial radio signals was in 1899. [5] (http://www.teslasociety.com/cosmos.htm) In March of 1907, Tesla wrote about signaling to Mars in Harvard Magazine and how it was a problem of electrical engineering. [6] (http://www.teslasociety.com/signaltomars.htm) Additional descriptions come from remembrances twenty years later. All this was met with resistance and disbelief by his contemporaries.

Tower of Dreams
Tesla left Colorado Springs on January 7, 1900. The lab was torn down, broken up, and its contents sold to pay debts. The Colorado experiments prepared Tesla for his next project, the establishment of a wireless power transmission facility that would be known as Wardenclyffe. On March 21, 1900, Tesla was granted US685012 patent for the means for increasing the intensity of electrical oscillations. The United States Patent Office classification system currently assigns this patent to the primary Class 178/43 ("telegraphy/space induction"), although the other applicable classes include 505/825 ("low temperature superconductivity-related apparatus"). A few years later, George Westinghouse and J. P. Morgan stopped funding Tesla's research when Tesla showed him that he could offer free electricity to the whole world by simply "ramming a stick in the earth in your backyard". Westinghouse said he would go bankrupt if that happened.

Wardenclyffe tower and laboratory. The building was designed by Stanford White, famous architect and personal friend of Tesla. Tesla intended this to be a broadcasting system in the world and transmission systetm of electricity to the whole globe without wires.
Nikola Tesla began planning the Wardenclyffe Tower facility ca. 1898, and in 1901, construction began on the land near Long Island Sound. Architect Stanford White designed the Wardenclyffe facility main building. The tower was designed by W.D. Crow, an associate of White. Funding for Tesla's project was provided by influential industrialists and other venture capitalists. The project was initially backed by the wealthy J. P. Morgan (he had a substantial investment in the facility, initially investing $150,000).
In June 1902, Tesla moved his laboratory operations from his Houston Street laboratory to Wardenclyffe. However, in 1903, when the tower structure was near completion, it was still not yet functional due to last-minute design changes that introduced in an unintentional defect. When Morgan wanted to know "Where can I put the meter?", Tesla had no answer. Tesla's vision of free power did not agree with Morgan's worldview. Construction costs eventually exceeded the money provided by Morgan, and additional financiers were reluctant to come forth. By July 1904, Morgan (and the other investors) finally decided they would not provide any additional financing. Morgan also encouraged other investors to avoid the project. In 1904, the US Patent Office reversed its decision and awarded Guglielmo Marconi the patent for radio. Tesla began his fight to re-acquire his radio patent. Later in 1907, Marconi was awarded the Nobel Prize for radio. Tesla was deeply resentful. So in 1915, Tesla filed a lawsuit against Marconi. In May 1905, Tesla's patents on alternating current motors and other methods of power transmission expired, halting royalty payments and causing a severe reduction of funding to the Wardenclyffe Tower. In an attempt to find alternative funding, Tesla advertised the services of the Wardenclyffe facility, but he met with little success. By this time, Tesla had also designed the Tesla turbine at Wardenclyffe and produced Tesla coils for sale to various businesses.

See the PowerPedia Article: Wardenclyffe

Who Invented Radio?

Nikola Tesla (Sketch, 1893); 37 years old
Tesla always disputed the claim that Marconi invented radio and he gave a simple reason for this position. It was that radio is not an invention:
"It was evident to me in 1888 that wireless transmission of energy, if it could ever be accomplished, is not an invention; it is an art. Bell's telephone, Edison's phonograph, or my induction motor were inventions, but the wireless transmission of energy is an art that requires a great many inventions in combination.", (Nikola Tesla, 1916, in Ed. Anderson, Leland, 'Nikola Tesla On His Work With Alternating Currents And Their Application to Wireless Telegraphy, Telephony, and Transmission of Energy, Published 1992.
Seen in this context, some believe that it is Tesla's lecture and patent record from 1888 onwards that contains the fundamental information on the '... great many inventions ...' that form the basis for modern radio and wireless technology.
By 1905, since Tesla could not find any more backers, most of the site's activity had to be shut down. The main hall continued to be used for blackface minstrel shows until October of that year. Employees were laid off in 1906, but parts of the building remained in use until 1907. In 1908, the property was foreclosed for the first time. Tesla procured a new mortgage from the proprietor of the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, George C. Boldt. The facility was partially abandoned around 1911, the tower structure eventually becoming deteriorated. Between 1912 and 1915, Tesla's finances unraveled, and when the funders wanted to know how they were going to recapture their investments, Tesla was unable to give satisfactory answers. Newspaper headlines of the time labeled it "Tesla's million-dollar folly." The facility's main building was breached and vandalized around this time. Collapse of the Wardenclyffe project may have contributed to the mental breakdown Tesla experienced during this period. Coupled to the personal tragedy of Wardenclyffe was the earlier 1895 unexplained fire in Tesla's Houston Street laboratory. In this fire, he lost much of his equipment, notes and documents. This produced a state of severe depression for Tesla.
In 1915, legal ownership of the Wardenclyffe property was transferred to George Boldt for a $20,000 debt. Demolition (reportedly by the U.S. Govt.) and salvaging of the tower occurred in 1917. However, the main building remains standing to this day. Tesla was not in New York during the tower's destruction. George Boldt wished to make the property available for sale. New York papers reported that the tower had been destroyed by order of the government to prevent its use by foreign agents. In 1917, the United States government may have aided the destruction of the Wardenclyffe Tower, ostensibly because it was believed it could provide a navigational landmark for German submarines. Neither claim is known to have been substantiated. On April 20, 1922 Tesla lost an appeal of judgment versus his backers in the second foreclosure. This effectively locked Tesla out of any future development of the facility.
In 1915, Tesla filed a lawsuit against Marconi attempting, unsuccessfully, to obtain a court injunction against the claims of Marconi. Around 1916, Tesla filed for bankruptcy because he owed so much in back taxes. He was living in poverty. After Wardenclyffe, Tesla built the Telefunken Wireless Station in Sayville, Long Island. Some of what he wanted to achieve at Wardenclyffe was accomplished with the Telefunken Wireless. In 1917, the facility was seized and torn down by the Marines, because it was suspected that it could be used by German spies.
In the ongoing lawsuit regarding the patent battle was finally resolved in Tesla's favor in 1944, one year after his death. This decision was based on the facts of the prior work existing before the establishment of Marconi's patent. At the time, the United States Army was involved in a patent infringement lawsuit with Marconi regarding radio, leading some to posit that the government granted Tesla and others the formal recognition in order to nullify any claims Marconi would have to compensation (as the earlier award to Marconi nullified any claims Tesla would have had for compensation).
Since the Nobel Prize in Physics was awarded to Marconi for radio in 1909, Thomas Edison and Tesla were mentioned as potential laureates to share the Nobel Prize of 1915 in an press dispatch, leading to one of several Nobel Prize controversies. It was believed that due to their animosity toward each other neither was given the award, despite their enormous scientific contributions. There is some indication that each sought to minimize the other one's achievements and right to win the award, that both refused to ever accept the award if the other received it first, and that both rejected any possibility of sharing it, as was rumour in the press at the time. In the following events after the rumors, neither Tesla nor Edison won the prize (although Edison did receive one of 38 possible bids in 1915, and Tesla did receive one bid out of 38 in 1937). Earlier, Tesla alone was rumored to the Nobel Prize of 1912. The rumored nomination for the 1912 Nobel Prize was primarily for his experiments with tuned circuits using high-voltage high-frequency resonant transformers. It was possible that Tesla was told of the plans of the physics award committee and let it be known that he would not share the award with Edison.

Turbines and pumps
On his 50th birthday in 1906, Tesla demonstrated his 200 hp (150 kW) 16,000 rpm Bladeless Turbine. During 1910-1911 at the Waterside Power Station in New York, several of his bladeless turbine engines were tested at 100-5000 hp. The Tesla turbine's bladeless design patented by Tesla in 1913. It is referred to as a bladeless turbine because it utilizes the boundary layer effect and not by a fluid impacting the blades in a conventional turbine. The Tesla turbine is also known as the boundary layer turbine, cohesion-type turbine, bladeless turbine, and Prandtl layer turbine (after Ludwig Prandtl).

See the PowerPedia article: Tesla turbine

Later years

World War I to World War II
Prior to the First World War, Tesla looked overseas for investors to fund his research. When the war started, Tesla lost funding he was receiving from his European patents. Wardenclyffe Tower was also demolished towards the end of WWI. Tesla had predicted the relevant issues of the post-World War I environment (a war which theoretically ended) in a printed article (December 20, 1914). Tesla believed that the League of Nations was not a remedy for the times and issues. In 1915, Tesla filed a lawsuit against Marconi attempting, unsuccessfully, to obtain a court injunction against the claims of Marconi. Around 1916, Tesla filed for bankruptcy because he owed so much in back taxes. He was living in poverty.
Tesla started to exhibit pronounced symptoms of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the years following. He became obsessed with the number three. He often felt compelled to walk around a block three times before entering a building, demanded a stack of three folded cloth napkins beside his plate at every meal, etc. The nature of OCD was little understood at the time and no treatments were available, so his symptoms were considered by some to be evidence of partial insanity and this probably hurt what was left of his reputation. This obsessive-compulsive behavior may have originated from the observations over repeated polyphase systems in nature that Tesla researched. Referencing Tesla's developing obsessive-compulsive disorder, it has been concretely demonstrated that obsessive-compulsive disorder, once thought to be a mental illness, has conclusively been proven to be a physical illness. The origins may be viral in nature, perhaps related to a weakened immune system. Connecting his illness to his exposure to work may indeed be correct.

Tesla later worked on turbines among his other projects. Here he is in his lab in New York.
At this time, he was staying at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, renting in an arrangement for deferred payments. Eventually, the Wardenclyffe deed was turned over to George Boldt, proprietor of the Waldorf-Astoria to pay a $20,000 debt. In 1917, around the time that the Wardenclyffe Tower was demolished by Boldt to make the land a more viable real estate asset, Tesla received AIEE's highest honor, the Edison Medal. The irony of this honor was probably not lost on Tesla.
Tesla, in August 1917, first established principles regarding frequency and power level for the first primitive radar units in 1934. Emile Girardeau, working with the first French radar systems, stated he was building radar systems "conceived according to the principles stated by Tesla". By the twenties, Tesla was reportedly negotiating with the United Kingdom government under Prime Minister Chamberlain about a ray system. Tesla had also stated that efforts had been made to steal the "death ray" (though they had failed). The Chamberlain government was removed, though, before any final negotiations occurred. The incoming Baldwin government found no use for Tesla's suggestions and ended negotiations. In 1925, the property ownership of Wardenclyffe was transferred to Walter L. Johnson of Brooklyn.
On Tesla's seventy-fifth birthday in 1931, Time magazine put him on its cover. [7] (http://www.teslasociety.com/time.jpg) The cover caption noted his contribution to electrical power generation. In 1935, many of Marconi's patents relating to the radio were declared invalid by the United States Court of Claims. The Court of Claims decided that the prior work of Tesla (specifically U.S. Patent 645576 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=645576) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=645576); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=645576)) and U.S. Patent 649621 (http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?patentnumber=649621) (G.patent (http://www.google.com/patents?q=649621); PDF (http://www.pat2pdf.org/pat2pdf/foo.pl?number=649621))) had anticipated Marconi's later works. Tesla got his last patent in 1928 on January 3, an apparatus for aerial transportation which was the first instance of VTOL aircraft. In 1934, Tesla wrote to consul Janković of his homeland. The letter contained the message of gratitude to Mihajlo Pupin who initiated a donation scheme by which American companies could support Tesla. Tesla refused the assistance, and chose to live by a modest pension received from Kingdom of Yugoslavia and to continue researching.

Tesla's Pierce-Arrow
Of all the legends about Tesla, one of the most intriguing is that he ran a touring sedan on a little black box, extracting energy freely somehow from the wheelwork of nature, requiring no petrol. Tesla's 1931 Pierce-Arrow reportedly had a 80-horsepower alternating-current electric motor with no external power source. The driving circuit was composed of 12 vacuum tubes, some wires and assorted resistors. Tesla reportedly test drove the car for a week, with speed up to 90 mph. On March 6, 1939, Plantacres, Inc. purchased the facility's land and subsequently leased it to Peerless Photo Products, Inc. (which was subsequently bought out by AGFA Corporation, the current owner).

A Weapon to End War
Later in life, Tesla made some remarkable claims concerning a "teleforce" weapon. The press called it a "peace ray" or death ray. In total, the components and methods included:
An apparatus for producing manifestations of energy in free air instead of in a high vacuum as in the past. This, according to Tesla in 1934, was accomplished.
A mechanism for generating tremendous electrical force. This, according to Tesla, was also accomplished.
A means of intensifying and amplifying the force developed by the second mechanism.
A new method for producing a tremendous electrical repelling force. This would be the projector, or gun, of the invention.
Tesla worked on plans for a directed-energy weapon between the early 1900s till the time of his death. In 1937, Tesla composed a treatise entitled "The Art of Projecting Concentrated Non-dispersive Energy through the Natural Media" concerning charged particle beam. Tesla published the document in an attempt expound on the technical description of a "superweapon that would put an end to all war". This treatise of the particle beam is currently in the Nikola Tesla Museum archive in Belgrade. It described an open ended vacuum tube with a gas jet seal that allowed particles to exit, a method of charging particles to millions of volts, and a method of creating and directing nondispersive particle streams (through electrostatic repulsion). Records of his indicate that it was based on a narrow stream of atomic clusters of liquid mercury or tungsten accelerated via high voltage (by means akin to his magnifying transformer). Tesla gave the following description concerning the particle gun's operation:
[The nozzel would] "send concentrated beams of particles through the free air, of such tremendous energy that they will bring down a fleet of 10,000 enemy airplanes at a distance of 200 miles from a defending nation's border and will cause armies to drop dead in their tracks".
The weapon could be used against ground based infantry or for antiaircraft purposes. Tesla tried to interest the US War Department in the device. He also offered this invention to European countries. None of the governments purchased a contract to build the device. He was unable to act on his plans.

Extraterrestrial Radio Transmitter

See PESWiki article: Teslascope -- Extraterrestrial Radio Transmitter - Radio transmitter designed by Nikola Tesla and featured on his 75th birthday in Time Magazine, was intended to communicate with extraterrestrial life on other planets. Speak into one end, and the signal goes out the other end as a cosmic ray emitter, and vice versa.

Dynamic Theory of Gravity
When he was eighty-one, Tesla stated he had completed a Dynamic Theory of Gravity. At the time of his announcement, it was considered by the scientific establishment to exceed the bounds of reason. He stated that it was "worked out in all details" and hoped to give to the world the theory soon. [8] (http://www.tesla.hu/tesla/articles/19370710.doc) The theory was never published. Some believe that Tesla never fully developed the Unified Field Theory, nor that any physicist in the years since it was first postulated. While Tesla had "worked out a dynamic theory of gravity" that he soon hoped to give to the world, he died before he publicized any details. Few details were revealed by Tesla about his theory in the announcement. Tesla's critique in the announcement was the opening clash between him and modern experimental physics. Tesla may have viewed his principles in such a manner as to not be in conflict with other modern theories (besides Einstein's). Tesla's theory is ignored by some researchers (and mainly disregaurded by physicists).
The bulk of the theory was developed between 1892 and 1894, during the period that he was conducting experiments for with high frequency and high potential electromagnetism and patenting devices for thier ultilization. It was completed, according to Tesla, by the end of the 1930s. Tesla's theory explained gravity using electrodynamics consisting of transverse waves (to a lesser extent) and longitudinal waves (for the majority). Reminiscent of Mach's principle, Tesla stated in 1925 that,
There is no thing endowed with life - from man, who is enslaving the elements, to the nimblest creature - in all this world that does not sway in it's turn. Whenever action is born from force, though it be infinitesimal, the cosmic balance is upset and the universal motion results.
Tesla, concerning Albert Einstein's relativity theory, stated that:
"... the relativity theory, by the way, is much older than its present proponents. It was advanced over 200 years ago by my illustrious countryman Boskovic, the great philospher, who, not withstanding other and multifold obligations, wrote a thousand volumes of excellent literature on a vast variety of subjects. Boskovic dealt with relativity, including the so-called time-space continuum ...", (1936 unpublished interview, quoted in Anderson, L, ed. Nikola Tesla: Lecture Before the New York Academy of Sciences: The Streams of Lenard and Roentgen and Novel Apparatus for Their Production, 6 April 1897, reconstructed 1994).
Tesla was critical of Einstein's relativity work,
"...[a] magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying errors. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king ...., its exponents are brilliant men but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists ..., (New York Times, 11 July 1935, p23, c.8).
Tesla also stated that
I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. It might as well be said that God has properties. He has not, but only attributes and these are of our own making. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view. (New York Hearald Tribune, 11 September 1932)

See the PowerPedia article : Dynamic theory of gravity

Death and afterwards
The world, I think, will wait a long time for Nikola Tesla's equal in achievement and imagination.
— Edwin H. Armstrong

Tesla commemorative plaque on Hotel New Yorker erected July 10, 2001 by the Tesla Memorial
Society of New York and Hotel New Yorker. (Image from http://teslasociety.com)
Tesla died alone in the hotel New Yorker of heart failure, some time between the evening of January 5 and the morning of January 8, 1942. Despite selling his AC electricity patents, he was essentially destitute and died with significant debts. At the time of his death, Tesla had been working on some form of teleforce weapon, or death ray, the secrets of which he had offered to the United States War Department on the morning of 5 January. It appears that his proposed death ray was related to his research into ball lightning and plasma. He was found dead three days later and, after the FBI was contacted by the War Department, his papers were declared to be top secret.
Immediately after Tesla's death became known, the FBI instructed the Office of Alien Property to take possession of his papers and property, despite his US citizenship. All of his personal effects were seized on the advice of presidential advisors. J. Edgar Hoover declared the case "most secret", because of the nature of Tesla's inventions and patents. Tesla's Serbian-Orthodox family and the Yugoslav embassy struggled with American authorities to gain these items after his death due to the potential significance of some of his research. Eventually, his nephew, Sava Kosanovich, got possession of some of his personal effects (which are now housed in the wikipedia:Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade, Yugoslavia). Tesla's funeral took place on January 12, 1943 at the Cathedral of Saint John the Divine in Manhattan, New York City. Many went to New York City's Cathedral of St. John the Divine for his funeral services and a messages worldwide acknowledged the death of a genius. Addressing the crowd was three Nobel Prize recipients whos stated that Tesla was "one of the outstanding intellects of the world who paved the way for many of the technological developments of modern times."
On February 14, 1967, the nonprofit public benefit corporation Brookhaven Town Historical Trust was established. It selected the Wardenclyffe facility to be designated as a historic site and as the first site to be preserved by the Trust on March 3, 1967. In the month of July in 1976, a plaque from Tesla's birth country, Yugoslavia, was installed by the Brookhaven Town Historic trust near the entrance of the facility. The inscription of the plaque reads:
IN THIS BUILDING DESIGNED BY STANFORD WHITE, ARCHITECT
NIKOLA TESLA
BORN SMILJAN, YUGOSLAVIA 1856, DIED NEW YORK, U.S.A. 1943
CONSTRUCTED IN 1901-1905 WARDENCLYFFE, HUGE RADIO STATION WITH
ANTENNA TOWER 187 FT. HIGH (DESTROYED 1917), WHICH WAS TO SERVE
AS HIS FIRST WORLD COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
IN MEMORY OF 120TH ANNIVERSARY OF TESLA'S BIRTH AND 200TH
ANNIVERSARY OF U.S.A. INDEPENDENCE - July 10, 1976

Tesla Monument at Goat Island, Niagara Falls, New York. In 1976, Yugoslavia gifted this to the United States. The first hydro-electric power plant in Niagara Falls was of Tesla's design. This marked Tesla's Alternating Current victory over Edison's Direct Current. The Croatian sculptor Krsinic fashioned this monument.
In 1976, a bronze statue of Tesla was placed at Niagara Falls. A similar statue was also erected in the Tesla's hometown of Gospic in the 1981. The statue in Gospic was dynamited by the Croatian forces in 1991.
Perhaps because of Tesla's personal eccentricity and the dramatic nature of his demonstrations, conspiracy theories about applications of his work persist. The common Hollywood stereotype of the "mad scientist" mirrors Tesla's real-life persona, or at least a caricature of it—which may be no accident considering that many of the earliest such movies (including the first movie version of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein) were produced by Tesla's old rival, Thomas Edison. There are at least two films describing Tesla's life. In the first, arranged for TV, Tesla was portrayed by Rade Šerbedžija. In wikipedia:1980, Orson Welles produced a Yugoslavian film named Tajna Nikole Tesle (The Secret of Nikola Tesla), in which Welles himself played the part of Tesla's patron, George Westinghouse.
According to FBI documents [9] (http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/tesla.htm) acquired via FOIA request, the sum of Tesla's possessions ("consisting of about two truckloads of material... [and] approximately thirty barrels and bundles") were seized, upon his death in 1943, by agents of the (now defunct) Office of Alien Property Custodian. One document states that "[he] is reported to have some 80 trunks in different places containing transcripts and plans having to do with his experiments...".

Personal views
Tesla believed that war could not be avoided until the cause for its recurrence was removed, but was opposed to wars in general. He possessed a hatred of war, from his parents and homeland, and sought to end warfare scientifically by devising protective measures that would prevent wars. He found exceptions and some justifiable situations where conflict was necessary. He envisioned wars of machines, not of humans, and of more terrible weapons in the future. A system for "Projecting Concentrated Non-Dispersive Energy Through Natural Media" known as teleforce was reportedly developed later in his life. Teleforce was supposed to have been a type of defensive particle-beam weapon.
He sought to reduce distance, such as in communication for better understanding, transportation, and transmission of energy, as a means to ensure friendly international relations. Tesla predicted,
"One day man will connect his apparatus to the very wheelwork of the universe... and the very forces that motivate the planets in their orbits and cause them to rotate will rotate his own machinery."
Like many of his era, Tesla, a life-long bachelor, became a proponent of a self-imposed selective breeding version of eugenics. In a 1937 interview, he stated,
[...] man's new sense of pity began to interfere with the ruthless workings of nature. The only method compatible with our notions of civilization and the race is to prevent the breeding of the unfit by sterilization and the deliberate guidance of the mating instinct [...]. The trend of opinion among eugenists is that we must make marriage more difficult. Certainly no one who is not a desirable parent should be permitted to produce progeny. A century from now it will no more occur to a normal person to mate with a person eugenically unfit than to marry a habitual criminal.
In 1926, Tesla in an interview, commenting on the ills of the social subservience of women and the struggle of women toward gender equality, indicated that humanity's future would be run by "Queen Bees". He believed that women would become the dominant sex in the future.

Quotes
"My enemies have been so successful in portraying me as a poet and a visionary, that I must put out something commercial without delay." — Nikola Tesla
"War cannot be avoided until the physical cause for its recurrence is removed and this, in the last analysis, is the vast extent of the planet on which we live. Only through annihilation of distance in every respect, as the conveyance of intelligence, transport of passengers and supplies and transmission of energy will conditions be brought about some day, insuring permanency of friendly relations. What we now want is closer contact and better understanding between individuals and communities all over the earth, and the elimination of egoism and pride which is always prone to plunge the world into primeval barbarism and strife... Peace can only come as a natural consequence of universal enlightenment [...]" — Nikola Tesla, Electrical experimenter magazine, 1919.
"We are confronted with portentous problems which can not be solved just by providing for our material existence, however abundantly. On the contrary, progress in this direction is fraught with hazards and perils not less menacing than those born from want and suffering. If we were to release the energy of the atoms or discover some other way of developing cheap and unlimited power at any point of the globe this accomplishment, instead of being a blessing, might bring disaster to mankind[...] The greatest good will come from the technical improvements tending to unification and harmony, and my wireless transmitter is preeminently such. By its means the human voice and likeness will be reproduced everywhere and factories driven thousands of miles from waterfalls furnishing the power; aerial machines will be propelled around the earth without a stop and the sun's energy controlled to create lakes and rivers for motive purposes and transformation of arid deserts into fertile land [...]" — Nikola Tesla, Electrical experimenter magazine, 1919.
"As soon as [the Wardenclyffe facility is] completed, it will be possible for a business man in New York to dictate instructions, and have them instantly appear in type at his office in London or elsewhere. He will be able to call up, from his desk, and talk to any telephone subscriber on the globe, without any change whatever in the existing equipment. An inexpensive instrument, not bigger than a watch, will enable its bearer to hear anywhere, on sea or land, music or song, the speech of a political leader, the address of an eminent man of science, or the sermon of an eloquent clergyman, delivered in some other place, however distant. In the same manner any picture, character, drawing, or print can be transferred from one to another place ..." — Nikola Tesla, "The Future of the Wireless Art", Wireless Telegraphy and Telephony, 1908, pg. 67-71.
"It is not a dream, it is a simple feat of scientific electrical engineering, only expensive — blind, faint-hearted, doubting world! [...] Humanity is not yet sufficiently advanced to be willingly led by the discoverer's keen searching sense. But who knows? Perhaps it is better in this present world of ours that a revolutionary idea or invention instead of being helped and patted, be hampered and ill-treated in its adolescence — by want of means, by selfish interest, pedantry, stupidity and ignorance; that it be attacked and stifled; that it pass through bitter trials and tribulations, through the strife of commercial existence. So do we get our light. So all that was great in the past was ridiculed, condemned, combatted, suppressed — only to emerge all the more powerfully, all the more triumphantly from the struggle." — Nikola Tesla (at the end of his dream for Wardenclyffe) [Wardenclyffe — A Forfeited Dream]

Relations and friendships
In his middle life, Nikola Tesla became very close friends with Mark Twain. They spent a lot of time together in his lab and elsewhere. The following was stated by Tesla,
"I had hardly completed my course at the Real Gymnasium when I was prostrated with a dangerous illness or rather, a score of them, and my condition became so desperate that I was given up by physicians. During this period I was permitted to read constantly, obtaining books from the Public Library which had been neglected and entrusted to me for classification of the works and preparation of the catalogues. One day I was handed a few volumes of new literature unlike anything I had ever read before and so captivating as to make me utterly forget my hopeless state. They were the earlier works of Mark Twain and to them might have been due the miraculous recovery which followed. Twenty-five years later, when I met Mr. Clemens and we formed a friendship between us, I told him of the experience and was amazed to see that great man of laughter burst into tears." — Nikola Tesla, Electrical experimenter magazine, 1919.
Tesla was also friends with Robert Underwood Johnson. He had amicable relations with, among others, Francis Marion Crawford, Stanford White, Fritz Lowenstein, George Scherff, and Kenneth Swezey.
Tesla remained bitter in the aftermath of his incident with Edison. The day after Edison died the New York Times contained extensive coverage of Edison's life, with the only negative opinion coming from Tesla who was quoted as saying,
"He had no hobby, cared for no sort of amusement of any kind and lived in utter disregard of the most elementary rules of hygiene"
and that,
"His method was inefficient in the extreme, for an immense ground had to be covered to get anything at all unless blind chance intervened and, at first, I was almost a sorry witness of his doings, knowing that just a little theory and calculation would have saved him 90 per cent of the labor. But he had a veritable contempt for book learning and mathematical knowledge, trusting himself entirely to his inventor's instinct and practical American sense."

Recognition and honors

Bust of Tesla by Croatian Ivan Meštrović, 1939, in Zagreb, Croatia. The Museum of Nikola Tesla in Belgrade possesses letters of correspondence between Tesla and Mestrovic, denoting thier their friendship and mutual admiration.
SI unit
The tesla (symbol T) is the SI derived unit of magnetic flux density (or magnetic induction). It is a unit to define the intensity (density) of a magnetic field. This SI unit is named after Nikola tesla. As for all SI units whose names are derived from the proper name of a person, the first letter of its symbol is uppercase (T). But when an SI unit is spelled out, it should always be written in lowercase (tesla), unless it begins a sentence or is the name "degree Celsius".
— Based on The International System of Units (http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter5/5-2.html), section 5.2.
The tesla was adopted in 1960, and named in honor of Tesla the genius. The tesla is the value of the total magnetic flux (a magnet's "power") divided by area. Hence, reducing the affected area will generally increase the magnetic flux density. This will continue to occur until the material becomes magnetically saturated and/or the magnetic field "leakage" increases so fast that no additional tesla gains are possible. 1 tesla is equivalent to: 10,000 gauss (G), used in CGS system; 109 gammas (γ), used in geophysics.
Scientific societies
As the result of his achievements in the development of electricity and radio, Nikola Tesla received many awards and accolades. He was selected as a fellow of the IEEE (at the time the AIEE) and was awarded its most prestigious prize, the Edison Medal. He was also made a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and accepted invitations to become a member of the American Philosophical Society, and the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts. Because of his research in electrotherapy and his invention of high frequency oscillators, he was also made a fellow of the American Electro-Therapeutic Association.
SI Unit
The scientific compound derived SI unit measuring magnetic flux density or magnetic induction (commonly known as the magnetic field ), the tesla, was named in his honor (at the Conférence Générale des Poids et Mesures, Paris, 1960).
IEEE Nikola Tesla Award
In 1975 the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) created a Nikola Tesla Award via an agreement between the IEEE Power Engineering Society and the IEEE Board of Directors. It is given to individuals or a team that has made outstanding contributions to the generation or utilization of electric power. The Tesla award is considered the most prestigious award in the area of electric power.
Airport
On July 10, 2006 in honor of his 150th birthday the biggest airport in Serbia (Belgrade) was renamed Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport.
Yugoslavian/Serbian currency
100 Serbian dinar banknote obverse. Nikola Tesla was featured on the currency of the former Yugoslavia. The 100 Serbian dinars banknote features a drawing of the electric motor and of Nikola Tesla. The current 100 Serbian dinar banknotes issued by the National Bank of Serbia have a picture of a handsome young Tesla on the obverse (front side). On the reverse side there is portion of drawing of an induction motor from his patent application and a photograph of Tesla holding a gas filled tube emitting light as a result of electric induction.
Cosmological objects
The Tesla crater on the far side of the moon and the minor planet 2244 Tesla are named after Tesla.
Belgrade airport Nikola Tesla
The Nikola Tesla Airport is situated 12 kilometers west of central Belgrade, in Belgrade's Municipality of Sur�?in, surrounded by Vojvodina's fertile lowlands. On July 10, 2006 to mark 150 years since the birth of Serbian-American scientist Nikola Tesla a monument has been erected near Terminal 1 of Belgrade Airport (now known as Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport). The monument is 3,10 metres high and 1,000 kilograms heavy.
Electric power stations
Two of the coal fired power stations run by Electric Power Industry of Serbia, TPP Nikola Tesla A and TPP Nikola Tesla B, are named in honor of Tesla.
Commerce
The Croatian subsidiary of Ericsson is named Ericsson Nikola Tesla d.d. (Nikola Tesla was a phone hardware company in Zagreb before Ericsson bought it in 1990s) in honour of Nikola Tesla's pioneering work in wireless communication.
Sports car
Tesla Motors states, "The namesake of our Tesla Roadster is the genius Nikola Tesla [...] We‘re confident that if he were alive today, Nikola Tesla would look over our car and nod his head with both understanding and approval."
Science fiction and computer games
Tesla technology is recurring in alternate history works like steampunk, or stories concerning secret pre WWII technology:
Tesla appears as a character in the 1995 novel The Prestige by Christopher Priest.
Tesla also makes a brief appearance as a character in the 1989 novel Moon Palace by Paul Auster.
Tesla is a continuing character in a series of novels by Spider Robinson concerned with Callahan's Crosstime Saloon.
In the ZBS series of audio plays The Adventures of Ruby, Tesla is considered to be the deity of technicians and engineers and can be summoned with a special chant near a reproduction of a Tesla Coil.
The superperson Nikola Tesla is a Japanese comic (manga).
Tesla is a character in the DC Comics Elseworlds story, JLA: Age of Wonder
In the White Wolf roleplaying game Mage: the Ascension, Nikola Tesla is mentioned as being one of the most respected members of the Sons of Ether Tradition.
The Tesla Gun in the computer game Return to Castle Wolfenstein is a weapon that projects lightning-like electrical arcs.
The Tesla Armor of the Fallout series of computer games provides excellent protection against laser and plasma/electrical attack types.
Two weapons in the Ratchet & Clank video game series, the Tesla Claw and Tesla Barrier (the upgraded version of the Shield Charger), use electricity to attack enemies
In the computer game Arcanum, two of the technological schematics available to Electrical Technologists are the Tesla Rod (a staff which fires bolts of electricity) and the Tesla Gun (a Tesla Rod combined with a Looking-Glass Rifle; effectively an energy rifle).
In the Command & Conquer Red Alert series of video games, "Tesla" is the name of the technology the Soviets use to generate power and for their lightning-based weapons. Perhaps the most widely known example is the Tesla Coil defense structure, capable of sending short eletrical bolts towards oncoming units.
In the massively multiplayer online game City of Heroes, there is an electricity-themed superpower named "Tesla Cage", and one class of enemy non-player character possessing that power are called "Tesla Knights".
Many other computer games feature devices with "Tesla" in the name.
A reference to Tesla's "Legendary Death Ray" is made in the film The Librarian: Quest for *The Spear (2004), in which the actual prototype is housed in the massive library of artifacts and books, which also includes such artifacts (fabled, or otherwise) as The Ark of the Covenant and Excalibur.
In Tomb Raider: Legend, Lara Croft has to investigate Tesla's (fictional) facility in Kazakhstan in order to uncover an ancient artifact which is powering the Tesla plant's main weapons array.
The Tesla inspired character Jonas Bartok, played by John de Lancie in the 1995 TV series Legend.
In Martian Dreams, Tesla has a minor role as the head of a rescue team sent to Mars.
In The Five Fists of Science Tesla teams up with Mark Twain to battle Thomas Edison.
In Clive Barker's novel The Great and Secret Show, one of the key-role characters is named Tesla.
In Dan Simmons' novel Hyperion, Tesla Trees (tall trees with a dome-shaped crown reminiscent of the tesla coil) form a flame forest which seasonally erupts into electric storm as the trees become active.
Arts
The rock band Tesla is named after him. They referenced his life and works a number of times, such as in the song "Edison's Medicine" (and accompanying music video) and the album The Great Radio Controversy.
The British pop group Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark released a single from their 1984 album Junk Culture called "Tesla Girls". The song included the lyrics: 'Tesla girls tesla girls/Testing out theories/Electric chairs and dynamos/Dressed to kill they’re killing me'.
The one-man synth pop force Joy Electric recorded a song titled Nikola Tesla on the 2004 album "Hello Mannequin." The song uses Tesla as an example to how some important figures in history are often overlooked and forgotten about.
Jack White of the rock band 'the White Stripes' has a keen interest in the life and works of Nikola Tesla. This is reflected in some aspects of his work, for example in the song 'Astro' (found on the band's eponymous debut) White sings "Maybe Tesla does the astro/Maybe Edison is AC/DC". The home page of the bands website is also adorned with a representation of Tesla's Wardenclyffe Tower. Furthermore, there are suggested parallels between White and Tesla as both have adopted a rather eccentric and somewhat avant-garde approach to their respective fields which is not (or was not) easily accepted by some. Additionally, Jack and ex-wife Meg White made an appearance with a Tesla Coil in a vignette in the independent film Coffee and Cigarettes
Australian Composer Constantine Koukias wrote his two-act opera TESLA - Lightning in his Hand about the life and times of Nikola Tesla. It premiered at the 10 Days on the Island Festival in Hobart, Tasmania in 2003. Tesla was a professor of electrical engineers and is a member of the I.S.A. (International Scientists Association).
The Handsome Family's 2006 album Last Days Of Wonder features a song called 'Tesla's Hotel Room'. The album takes its title from the lyrics of the song.
The America's Best Comics hero Tom Strong has a daughter named Tesla, who has had adventures with her father and on her own.
"Tesla Electric" is a play about Tesla's relationship with Edison and Twain written by Canadian David G. Fraser

Further readings and films

Patents
For a list of Tesla's patents, see Tesla's patent list
External patents
Pepe, "Pepe's Tesla Pages (http://www.tesla.hu/)", 2004-12-25.
Nikola's Page (http://www.tesla.hu/tesla/tesla.htm) (Hungarian - original images of text)
Fred Walters' hand-scanned Tesla patents (http://www.keelynet.com/tesla/) (PDFs)
Jim Bieberich's The Complete Nikola Tesla U.S. Patent Collection (http://web.mit.edu/most/Public/Tesla1/alpha_tesla.html)

Articles (pre-1900)
Selected Tesla Writings, Written by Tesla and others, 1888-1942.
Light Without Heat, The Manufacturer and Builder, January 1892, Vol. 24
Biography - Nikola Tesla, The Century Magazine, November 1893, Vol. 47
Tesla's Oscillator and Other Inventions, The Century Magazine, November 1894, Vol. 49
The New Telegraphy. Recent Experiments in Telegraphy wih Sparks, The Century Magazine, November 1897, Vol. 55
Nikola Tesla Museum, "Nikola Tesla 1856-1943: Lectures, Patents", 1956.
Nikola Tesla, "Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency", 1904.

Books
Anderson, Leland I., "Dr. Nikola Tesla (1856–1943)", 2d enl. ed., Minneapolis, Tesla Society. 1956. LCCN 56047430 /L
Cheney, Margaret, "Tesla: Man Out of Time", 1979. ISBN 0-13-906859-7
Childress, David H., "The Fantastic inventions of Nikola Tesla," 1993. ISBN 0-932813-19-4
Glenn, Jim, "The Complete Patents of Nikola Tesla," 1994. ISBN 1-566192-66-8
Inez Hunt and Wanetta W. Draper, "Lightning in His Hand: The Life Story of Nikola Tesla". 1964.
Jonnes, Jill "Empires of Light: Edison, Tesla, Westinghouse, and the Race to Electrify the World". New York: Random House, 2003. ISBN 0-375-50739-6
Martin, Thomas C., "The Inventions, Researches, and Writings of Nikola Tesla," 1894 . ISBN 0-880298-12-X
O'Neill, John H.,"Prodigal Genius," 1944. ISBN 0-914732-33-1
Seifer, Marc J., "Wizard, the Life and Times of Nikola Tesla," 1998. ISBN 1-559723-29-7 (HC), ISBN 0-806519-60-6 (SC)
Tesla, Nikola, "Colorado Springs Notes, 1899–1900", ISBN 0-899187-82-X
Tesla, Nikola, "My Inventions" Parts I through V published in the Electrical Experimenter monthly magazine from February through June, 1919. Part VI published October, 1919. Reprint edition with introductory notes by Ben Johnson, New York: Barnes and Noble,1982, ISBN 0-76070-085-0; also online at "My Inventions'", 1919. ISBN 1-599869-94-2
Valone, Thomas, "Harnessing the Wheelwork of Nature", 2002. ISBN 1-931882-04-5
Lindemann, Peter, "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity (http://www.scribd.com/doc/6771/Lindemann-Peter-Free-Energy-Secrets)", 2001. ISBN N/A

Movies and Films
Documentary film
"Tesla: Master of Lightning". 1999. ISBN 0760710058 (Book) ISBN 0793635497 (PBS Video)
"Nikola Tesla - The Genius that lit the world". 1994. Directed by Ljubo Vujovic ASIN 6304952899 (DVD/VHS) - Produced jointly by the Tesla Memorial Society and the Nikola Tesla Museum in Belgrade. - 40min
"Phenomena: Lost Archives: The Missing Secrets of Nikola Tesla"
Biopic
"The Secret of Nikola Tesla". 1h45min - Orson Welles, Petar Bozovic, Dennis Patrick, directed by Kristo Papic
Other
David Bowie as Tesla in the movie The PrestigeThere are at least two films describing Tesla's life. In the first, filmed in 1977, arranged for TV, Tesla was portrayed by Rade Šerbedžija. In 1980, Orson Welles produced a Yugoslavian film named Tajna Nikole Tesle (The Secret of Nikola Tesla), in which Welles himself played the part of Tesla's patron, J.P. Morgan. A 2006 Christopher Nolan film called The Prestige, based on the Christopher Priest novel of the same title mentioned above, will feature rock star and actor David Bowie playing the part of Nikola Tesla. Nikola Tesla is also referred to in the sketch "Jack Shows Meg His Tesla Coil" from Jim Jarmusch's film Coffee and Cigarettes Featuring Jack White and Meg White of The White Stripes. American film director Michael Almereyda was signed to a literary agency on the strength of a spec script on the life of Nikola Tesla. A reference to Tesla's "Legendary Death Ray" is made in the film The Librarian: Quest for The Spear (2004), in which the actual prototype is housed in the massive library of artifacts and books, which also includes such artifacts (fabled, or otherwise) as The Ark of the Covenant and Excalibur.

Magazines
Carlson, W. Bernard, "Inventor of dreams". Scientific American, March 2005 v292 i3 p78(7).
Jatras, Stella L., "The genius of Nikola Tesla". The New American, July 28, 2003 v19 i15 p9(1)
Rybak, James P., "Nikola Tesla: Scientific Savant". Popular Electronics, 1042170X, Nov99, Vol. 16, Issue 11.
Lawren, B., "Rediscovering Tesla". Omni, Mar88, Vol. 10 Issue 6.

Sources, resources, and references
G
Web
Sites on Nikola Tesla (http://www.google.com/search?svnum=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi&q=Nikola+Tesla)
via Google Search
G
groups
Newsgroups with Nikola Tesla (http://groups.google.com/groups?svnum=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi&q=Nikola+Tesla)
via Google Groups
G
Image
Images of Nikola Tesla (http://www.google.com/images?svnum=50&hl=en&lr=&safe=off&sa=N&tab=wi&q=Nikola+Tesla)
via Google Image
Y
Image
Images of Nikola Tesla (http://images.search.yahoo.com/search/images?p=Nikola+Tesla&fr=FP-tab-web-t&toggle=1)
via Yahoo! Images
You can find other information on Nikola Tesla by searching through the Wikimedia projects:
Encyclopedia entry from Wikpedia
Dictionary definitions from Wiktionary
Textbooks from Wikibooks
Quotations (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Special:Search/Nikola_Tesla) from Wikiquote
Source texts (http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Special:Search/Nikola_Tesla) from Wikisource
Images and media (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Search/Nikola_Tesla) from Commons
News stories (http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Special:Search/Nikola_Tesla) from Wikinews
General information Biographies
Cheney, Margaret & Uth, Robert, "Tesla, Master of Lightning", published by Barnes & Noble, 1999 ISBN 0-7607-1005-8
Germano, Frank, "Dr. Nikola Tesla (http://www.frank.germano.com/nikolatesla.htm)". Frank. Germano.com.
Lomas, Robert, "The Man who Invented the Twentieth Century (http://www.robertlomas.com/Tesla/presentation/index.htm)". Lecture to South Western Branch of Instititute of Physics.
Martin, Thomas Commerford, "The Inventions, Researches, and Writings of Nikola Tesla", New York: The Electrical Engineer, 1894 (3rd Ed); reprinted by Barnes & Noble, 1995 ISBN 0-88029-812-X
O'Neill, John J., "Prodigal Genius: The Life of Nikola (http://www.rastko.org.yu/istorija/tesla/oniell-tesla.html)", 1944. ISBN 0913022403 (Tesla reportedly said of this biographer "You understand me better than any man alive"; also the version at uncletaz.com (http://www.uncletaz.com/library/scimath/tesla/) with other items at uncletaz's site])
Penner, John R.H. The Strange Life of Nikola Tesla (http://www.tfcbooks.com/special/mi_link.htm), corrupted version of My Inventions.
Pratt, H., "Nikola Tesla 1856–1943", Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 44, September, 1956.
"Nikola Tesla (http://www.ieee-virtual-museum.org/collection/people.php?taid=&id=1234597&lid=1)". IEEE History Center, 2005.
Seifer, Marc J. "Wizard: The Life and Times of Nikola Tesla; Biography of a Genius", Secaucus, NJ:Carol Publishing Group, 1996. ISBN 1-55972-329-7
Weisstein, Eric W., "Tesla, Nikola (1856–1943) (http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Tesla.html)". Eric Weisstein's World of Science.
Wikipedia contributors (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Recentchanges), Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia. Wikimedia Foundation. .
Other Research
"Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature", Moon Nomenclature: Crater (http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/moon/mooncrat.html). USGS, Astrogeology Research Program.
Dimitrijevic, Milan S., "Belgrade Astronomical Observatory Historical Review". Publ. Astron. Obs. Belgrade, 60 (1998), 162–170. Also, "Srpski asteroidi, Tesla (http://www.astronomija.co.yu/suncsist/asteroidi/srbi.htm#Tesla)". Astronomski magazine.
Hoover, John Edgar, et al., FOIA FBI files (http://foia.fbi.gov/foiaindex/tesla.htm), 1943.
Pratt, H., "Nikola Tesla 1856–1943", Proceedings of the IRE, Vol. 44, September, 1956.
W.C. Wysock, J.F. Corum, J.M. Hardesty and K.L. Corum, "Who Was The Real Dr. Nikola Tesla (http://www.ttr.com/Who%20Was%20Dr%20Tesla.pdf)? (A Look At His Professional Credentials)". Antenna Measurement Techniques Association, posterpaper, October 22–25, 2001 (PDF)
Roguin, Ariel, "Historical Note: Nikola Tesla: The man behind the magnetic field unit". J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004;19:369–374. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Sellon, J. L., "The impact of Nikola Tesla on the cement industry". Behrent Eng. Co., Wheat Ridge, CO. Cement Industry Technical Conference. 1997. XXXIX Conference Record., 1997 IEEE/PC. Page(s) 125–133. ISBN 0-7803-3962-2
Valentinuzzi, M.E., "Nikola Tesla: why was he so much resisted and forgotten?" Inst. de Bioingenieria, Univ. Nacional de Tucuman; Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE. Jul/Aug 1998, 17:4, p 74–75. ISSN 0739-5175
Cosmic Rays
Waser, André, "Nikola Tesla’s Radiations and the Cosmic Rays (http://www.aw-verlag.ch/Documents/TeslasRadiationsAndCosmicRays01.PDF)". (PDF)
Views on War
Secor, H. Winfield, "Tesla's views on Electricity and the War", Electrical Experimenter, Volume 5, Number 4, August, 1917.
Florey, Glen, "Tesla and the Military". Engineering 24, December 5, 2000.
Stationary and scalar waves
Corum, K. L., J. F. Corum, "Nikola Tesla, Lightning Observations, and Stationary Waves". 1994.
Corum, K. L., J. F. Corum, and A. H. Aidinejad, "Atmospheric Fields, Tesla's Receivers and Regenerative Detectors". 1994.
Meyl, Konstantin, H. Weidner, E. Zentgraf, T. Senkel, T. Junker, and P. Winkels, "Experiments to proof the evidence of scalar waves Tests with a Tesla reproduction". Institut für Gravitationsforschung (IGF), Am Heerbach 5, D-63857 Waldaschaff.
Radio waves
Anderson, L. I., "John Stone Stone on Nikola Tesla’s Priority in Radio and Continuous Wave Radiofrequency Apparatus". The Antique Wireless Association Review, Vol. 1, 1986, pp. 18–41.
Anderson, L. I., "Priority in Invention of Radio, Tesla v. Marconi". Antique Wireless Association monograph, March 1980.
Marincic, A., and D. Budimir, "Tesla's contribution to radiowave propagation". Dept. of Electron. Eng., Belgrade Univ. (5th International Conference on Telecommunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Service, 2001. TELSIKS 2001. pg., 327–331 vol.1) ISBN 0-7803-7228-X
Page, R.M., "The Early History of Radar", Proceedings of the IRE, Volume 50, Number 5, May, 1962, (special 50th Anniversary Issue).
Induction motor
C Mackechnie Jarvis "Nikola Tesla and the induction motor". 1970 Phys. Educ. 5 280–287.
Other
"Giant Eye to See Round the World (http://www.tesla.hu/tesla/articles/19230225.doc)" (DOC)
Nichelson, Oliver, "Nikola Tesla's Latter Energy Generation Designs (http://tesla.nichelson.googlepages.com/home)", A description of Tesla's energy generator that "would not consume fuel." 26th IECEC Proceedings, 1991, Boston, MA (American Nuclear Society) Vol. 4, pp 433-438.
Nichelson, Oliver, "The Thermodynamics of Tesla's Fuelless Electrical generator (http://tesla.nichelson.googlepages.com/home)". A theory of the physics of Tesla's new energy generator. (American Chemical Society, 1993. 2722-5/93/0028-63)
Toby Grotz, "The Influence of Vedic Philosophy on Nikola Tesla's Understanding of Free Energy (http://arizonaenergy.org/CommunityEnergy/INFLUENCE%20OF%20VEDIC%20ON%20TESLA'S%20UNDERSTANDING%20OF%20FREE%20ENERGY.htm)".
History and family
The Nikola Tesla museum (http://www.tesla-museum.org/)
The Tesla Memorial Society (http://www.teslasociety.com/) - The Genius Who Lit the World "[10] (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2256433507046558974&q=Nikola+Tesla)".
World of Scientific Biography: Nikola Tesla (http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/biography/Tesla.html), by Wolfsram Research
Nikola Tesla Page, tesla coils (http://amasci.com/tesla/tesla.html), Plasma Sphere wo-glass, Plasma Sphere HV supplies, Coil plans, instructions, High voltage projects.
Tesla's great-grand niece Daniela Tesla lives in Serbia (http://arhiva.glas-javnosti.co.yu/arhiva/2006/07/10/srpski/D06070902.shtml) - Glas Javnosti interview with 16-year old Tesla's descendant, Serbian refugee from Croatia (in Serbian)
Tesla's relative Boško Budisavljević lives in Zagreb Croatia - about Tesla's Croatian homeland and Serbian parents (newspaper Jutarnji list) (http://www.jutarnji.hr/nedjeljni_jutarnji/clanak/art-2006,5,20,budisavljevic_tesla,27153.jl)- text is on Croatian language.
Wagner, John W., "Nikola Tesla, Forgotten American Scientist (http://www.ntesla.org/)".
Vujovic, Ljubo, "Tesla Memorial Society of New York (http://www.teslasociety.com/)", New York, USA.
"The Tesla Wardenclyffe Project (http://www.teslascience.org/)". Shoreham, New York. (Aims to reuse Wardenclyffe Tower.)
Bass, Robert W., "Self-Sustained Non-Hertzian Longitudal Wave Oscillations as a Rigorous Solution of Maxwell's Equations for Electromagnetic Radiation". Inventek Enterprises, Inc., Las Vegas, Nevada.
Tesla, Nikola, "On the Transmission of Electricity Without Wires". Electrical World and Engineer, March 5, 1904.
"Boundless Space: A Bus Bar". The Electrical World, Vol 32, No. 19.
Massie, Walter Wentworth, "Wireless telegraphy and telephony popularly explained ". New York, Van Nostrand. 1908.
Anderson, Leland, "Rare Notes from Tesla on Wardenclyffe", in Electric Spacecraft - A journal of Interactive Research, Issue 26, Sept 14, 1998. Contains copies of rare documents from the Tesla Museum in Belgrade including Tesla's notes and sketches from 1901
"Nikola Tesla's Father - Milutin Tesla (1819–1879) (http://www.serbnatlfed.org/Archives/Tesla/tesla-father.htm)". Serb National Federation.
Kosanovic, Bogdan R., "Serbian-American inventor, electrical engineer, and scientist (http://www.neuronet.pitt.edu/~bogdan/tesla/index.htm)". December 29, 2000.
Mrkich, D., "Tesla - The European Years (http://www.serbnatlfed.org/Archives/Tesla/TeslaBook.htm)", Serb National Federation.
Views of the wadenclyffe facility
Facility details :Interior view (a) (http://www.teslascience.org/archive/descriptions/WP005.htm) -- Interior view (b) (http://www.teslascience.org/archive/descriptions/WP004.htm) -- Interior view (c) (http://www.teslascience.org/archive/descriptions/WP014.htm) -- Facility front view (http://www.tfcbooks.com/images/articles/twp6a3.gif) --Facility side view (http://www.tfcbooks.com/images/articles/tower_sb.gif) -- Facility large front view (http://www.teslasociety.com/tower.jpg) -- Tower alone (http://www.teslasociety.com/tower2.jpg)
Radio shows
Science Friday, "Strange Scientists (http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/1998/Aug/hour2_080798.html)", August 7, 1998
Science Friday, "The Science of Radio (http://www.sciencefriday.com/pages/1995/Oct/hour2_101395.html)", October 13, 1995
Ockhams Razor, "Nikola Tesla -- The Unknown Inventor (http://www.abc.net.au/rn/science/ockham/stories/s690290.htm)"
Other
Online Archive of Many of Tesla's Writings, Articles and Published Papers (1.1 megs of text) (http://www.TeslaResearch.com)
Nikola Tesla Research Paper (http://home.earthlink.net/~dustin.wallace/id8.html)
Biography of Nikola Tesla (http://www.opendepth.com/ExperimentsAC_Nikola_Tesla_Biography), from Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency (http://www.opendepth.com/ExperimentswithAC).
Nikola Tesla Story (http://www.flyingmoose.org/truthfic/tesla.htm): Tells more about Tesla and Edison.
Seifer, Marc J., and Michael Behar, Electric Mind (http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.10/tesla.html), Wired Magazine, October 1998.
Palmer, Stephen E., "Wardenclyffe: Nikola Tesla's Dream For Free Energy And The Conspiracy Which Destroyed It (http://supernaturalminds.com/Wardenclyffe.html)".
Guntenberg's "Nikola Tesla's works" (http://www.gutenberg.org/browse/authors/t#a5067)
Requiem for Tesla (http://www.rudemechs.com/shows/history/requiem_03.htm): a play created by Rude Mechanicals in Austin, Texas 2001, 2003
Various writings and lectures (http://www.opendepth.com/node/46) by Nikola Tesla
Kenneth M. Swezey Papers (http://americanhistory.si.edu/archives/d8047.htm), 1891–1982, Archives Center, National Museum of American History, archival resources.
Nikola Tesla Special Event Amateur Radio Station 9A150NT (http://www.inet.hr/9a6aa/9a150nt) (celebrating Tesla's 150th birthday)
Nikola Tesla biography (http://www.elitesecurity.org/t18434-Biografija-Nikola-Tesla-Na-sezdesetu-godisnjicu-smrti-Nikole-Tesle) (Best collection of texts about Tesla on Serbian language)
Facilities assembled (http://www.tfcbooks.com/teslafaq/q&a_051.htm); Colorado Springs, Long Island, and Lac Edouard (near Sanford, Quebec).
PBS Tower of Dreams (http://www.pbs.org/tesla/ll/ll_todre.html)
The Tesla Wardenclyffe Project (http://www.teslascience.org/)
Tesla's vision of the wireless global communications (http://www.ensc.sfu.ca/people/grad/milan/cnl/presentations/ljilja/tesla/)
Creation of a Monument to Nikola Tesla (http://www.tfcbooks.com/articles/monument.htm)
The Real Science of "Non-Hertzian" Waves (http://205.243.100.155/frames/Non-Herzian_Waves.html) (ed. Reportedly focuses on Tesla's wireless energy transmission ideas; the main focus is on transverse wave, i.e. "Hertz waves". Plasma wave physics, longitudinal waves, and telluric currents not considered).
Cooper, John. F., "Magnifying Transmitter circuit diagram (http://www.tesla-coil.com/images/Magnifier%201.jpg); alternate circuit diagram (http://www.tesla-coil.com/images/Magnifier%202.jpg)". Tesla-Coil.com (http://www.Tesla-Coil.com).
Entry at Structurae (http://en.structurae.de/structures/data/index.cfm?ID=s0015668)
Entry at SkyscraperPage.com (http://www.skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?b41929)
Nikola Tesla and my thoughts (http://free-ri.htnet.hr/Branko/index.html); Tesla combustion engine, Energy of space, Flying machine ...

Modern news articles
News Coverage of Nikola Tesla's 150th Birthday (http://pesn.com/2006/07/12/9500291_Nikola_Tesla_150th_B-day/) - Stories from around the world by various news agencies, celebrating one of the most brilliant scientists who ever lived. Celebrated as the father of the 20th century, with his AC power and radio, he is also the father of free energy -- a probably foundation of the 21st century. (PESN; July 12, 2006)
Electricity 'war' victor given his due in L.A. (http://www.dailynews.com/news/ci_4115644) - Article in Daily News features Edson Andre Johnson, who has been championing Nikola Tesla, seeking for a global adoption of July 10, Tesla's B-day, as International Energy Independence Day. (Daily News; July 31, 2006)
After years of neglect, Nikola Tesla is "in" in Croatia (http://www.serbianna.com/news/2006/02018.shtml) - Serbianna.com is featuring a story about how Tesla is suddenly "in" again, thanks to Croatia's bid to join the European Union which has prodded it to make gestures of reconciliation. It's one of the bitter ironies of this war-battered Balkan nation. (Serbianna; Friday, July 07, 2006)

Directories
Nikola Tesla (http://www.energyplanet.info/Free_Energy/Nikola_Tesla/) - A visual directory of Nikola Tesla websites. (EnergyPlanet.info)

See Also
Directory:Nikola Tesla
- PowerPedia main index
- PESWiki home page
- PES Network, Inc. (http:pureenergysystems.com)
Retrieved from "http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Nikola_Tesla"
Categories: Nikola Tesla

Over Unity

2009-06-24T17:20:00.000-07:00

This is the html version of the file http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Combine.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.
Page 1
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 1
Radiant Energy and Over-Unity
Version 6 – October 2006
Dan Combine
Document name: RE-OU-v6.1
Page 2
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 2
INDEX
1
Introduction............................... 3
2
Theory of RE phenomenon and OverUnity...... 4
2.1
Learning................................... 4
2.2
Researchers................................ 4
2.3
Theory of operation ....................... 5
2.4
Magnetic attraction........................10
2.5
About core coils and PM magnets ...........10
2.6
Levels of transformation...................12
2.7
Electron Spin .............................12
2.8
Load & battery circuits ...................13
2.9
Capturing or extracting....................14
2.10 The Cornu spiral (or Euler’s spiral)..18
2.11 Summary of RE manifest................18
3
Practical Applications.....................20
3.1
Rotoverter.................................20
Overview of Operation......................20
What you need..............................22
In practice ...............................22
The roll of impedance......................27
Efficiency and Torque .....................28
Hectors RV ests............................29
Hectors RV example with light bulbs........31
Next steps and trials......................33
Controlling................................35
Looping the RV ................. ..........35
RV with Permanent Magnet rotor Alternator .36
PM Multi-phase dynamotors .................38
Further reflection on PM-RV and PM-DC motors ..39
Gunning and overunity......................40
Micro-energetic cyclo-conversion...........41
Coil-Core-RF-DC repeat ....................42
Further considerations ....................43
Q& A of RV replication ....................45
3.2
Transverter................................47
Overview of Operation......................47
Example....................................49
Ferro-resonance ...........................50
Ferroresonant transformer .................51
TV REPLICATION.............................52
3.3
Homopolar transformer......................53
3.4
Reactor Core...............................54
3.5
Kone pulse motor...........................56
3.6
One-wire bulb - Brian Prater (Cavetronics Labs R&D)......................................59
3.7
JM Pulse Charger.........................62
3.8
Positive-bias inverter ....................63
3.9
Relation to Testatica, VTA, crystals, …....64
4
Summary ...................................66
Page 3
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 3
1 Introduction
This document describes the Radiant Energy as discovered by N. Tesla, and further used by researchers like E.
Gray. It covers the principles of generating RE, as well as several practical applications. In proper tuning
conditions, this energy can be tapped and overunity can be achieved.
The RE (Radiant Energy) phenomenon itself occurs when a RLC circuit has the appropriate impedance, is in
resonance and when a standing wave is created. Because of the L (inductor) and C (capacitor), there is a 90°
phase shift between V (voltage) and I (current in Ampere) vector.
Example: the picture to the right shows a 230V-1,000W
bulb lighted under pure resonance as ampere-load where the
filament runs within standing wave current node as a single
potential vector. The voltage drop being minimal, in this
case it was 19.8 VAC.
Free energy and overunity are a TRANSFORMATION. We
can learn its tricks and have all the free energy we want. But
first the art must be perfected. You can’t get free energy
from something that wastes 90% of it, like standard non-
loaded motors, prony-braking it to death (detuning) or low
impedance magnetically mismatched power generators
being 57% efficient. So the importance here is to create OU
states (Radiant Energy), "already done" in the RV
alternator. Then use this energy in applications and understanding its intricate effects and phenomena.
The RV mode of operation permits to quantify other devices such as the TURBINE development (Implosion
Turbines); once the turbine starts its endothermic energy transform.
This document is an interesting compilation of the principles, rules and mechanics involved. It gives also a
practical guideline for the serious researcher in this domain, as the results explained in this document have
already been achieved and demonstrated by several ‘replicators’.
For more information on AC, RLC circuits, resonance, Power Factor… please refer to the following websites:
http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/index.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/serres.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/standw.html
All information is public domain, copyright © by ARK Research, unless otherwise stated.
The following are references to the first RV system disclosures by ARK Research:
•
RV looping - Predates to 1983-84 period; one of the 16 methods is at Don Adsitt’s site;
http://www.theverylastpageoftheinternet.com/ElectromagneticDev/arkresearch/rotoverter.htm
•
RV -Ecklin-brown prime mover: Concept 1980; built 1983-84 SLC Utah US (looped);
•
1987 Macro electric open 100w to 1kw asynchronous mode generation;
•
1997 full disclosures on the internet;1999 reposting as sites were removed, blocked & cut down;
•
many internet postings done on magneto-transistor concepts, Recovery Diode concepts, transformation
postulate for OU; all predating MEG, Newman and Bedini ones;
Applying the RV effect does not constitute the right to patent as the Roto-Conversion RV effect is a free domain
application to such machine mode of operation in OU states. Any patent based on Roto-Conversion theory can
be challenged. For further and updated information, please refer to the EVGRAY Yahoo group and many of the
specific postings by Hector D Peres Torres of ARK Research.
The date of this document is only indicating when this document has been compiled, not when the information
has been publicly disclosed.
Page 4
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 4
2 Theory of RE phenomenon and OverUnity
2.1 Learning
Use the technologies described in this document, and in particular the RotoVerter (RV), as R&D tool first. As
you learn what ZPE is and the circuit meanings, you can convert any inverter to a ZPE device using pulse-length
& frequency tuning under a positive-bias modification.
I recommend you to study Power Factor theory, Magnetic amplification, Phasors, rotary angle power-voltage
relations, rotary capacitor power factor engines… The statements made in this document will become clear as
where the OU energy is. As you reach a point were there is a shift toward higher understanding on next level,
Hector will include more variable solutions to the problems you encounter as they are realized in vitro as real
tangible non deniable facts. What Hector revealed is tailored to be only understood by those doing the
experiments and having the spiritual right brain development.
The concepts explained here, like RotoVerter effect, Rotary Roto-Conversion and TransVerter (TV) plugs are
part of a mayor development. Firstly we give you the instrument and test tool (RV prime-mover) to be used to
quantify whatever loading you desire to test in its range, especially to design OU generators. Then we give you
the key of RESONANCE for radiant energy generation in RV alternator concept, using reverse induction,
including to attain those LOW LENZ PM-Coil energy pump generators live. Use RV alternator to generate R.E.
and learn its secrets to apply later in vitro. Transfer lab experience to standard hardware applications.
RV or TV, one complements the other, as reading about MEG, VTA, Newman & Bedini will open your eyes (
it’s a start) and experimenting with such things as Magnetic Interrupt concept "Magneto transistor" & others.
The right start is energy saving devices. As the art is improved, the result will be overunity (transformation). The
RV is based on off the shelve devices. Converting from standard frames to RV concept is easy, once you know
the theory and its application. As generator it is used to generate resonant power, “radiant energy” by means of
reverse induction (again using off the shelve devices).
Step By step the knowledge is acquired ... reason for the RV tool in first place. Learn to produce radiant energy
and how it manifest in the rotoconversion effect, impedance match in power engineering applications using 3rd
generation technology (energy saving) and EMA R&D.
2.2 Researchers
Nikola Tesla'sMagnifying Transmitter, T. Henry Moray'sRadiant Energy Device, Edwin Gray'sEMA Motor,
and Paul Baumann'sTestatika Machine all run on radiant energy. This natural energy form can be gathered
directly from the environment (mistakenly called "static" electricity) or extracted from ordinary electricity by the
method called "fractionation."
Since many years Hector D Peres Torres of ARK Research is doing practical research on systems demonstrating
OU and radiant energy, and extracting energy from the environment through various levels of transformation. He
released the information on the Rotoverter, Transverter, and the way to attain overunity.
Radiant energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity, at less than 1 percent of the cost. It does
not behave exactly like electricity, however, which has contributed to the scientific community's
misunderstanding of it.
Dr. Robert Adams of New Zealand has developed astounding designs of electric motors, generators, and heaters
that run on permanent magnets. One such device draws 100 watts of electricity from the source, generates 100
watts to recharge the source, and produces over 140 BTU'sof heat in two minutes!
Dr. Tom Bearden of the United States has two models of a permanent magnet-powered electrical transformer. It
uses a 6-Watt electrical input to control the path of a magnetic field coming out of a permanent magnet. By
channeling the magnetic field, LATCHING it from a central path side to side into 3PH transformer alike
configuration where the centre core is replaced by a PM (Permanent Magnet ) a pair of coils latch the field from
one core path to the other alternatively generating alternate pulsing power . The device can produce a 96-Watt
electrical output with no moving parts. Bearden calls his device a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, or
MEG.
Jean-Louis Naudin has duplicated Bearden'sdevice in France. The principles for this type of device were first
disclosed by Frank Richardson of the United States in 1978.
Page 5
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 5
Troy Reed, also of the United States, has working models of a special magnetized fan that heat up as it spins. It
takes exactly the same amount of energy to spin the fan whether it is generating heat or not.
Beyond these developments, multiple inventors have identified working mechanisms that produce motor torque
from permanent magnets alone. Magnetism is a flux, like any flux it can be tapped. The most promising are
magnetic latching and modulation.
2.3 Theory of operation
The RE (Radiant Energy) phenomenon itself occurs when a RLC circuit has the appropriate impedance, is in
resonance and when a standing wave is created. Because of the L (inductor) and C (capacitor), there is a 90°
phase shift between V (voltage) and I (current in Ampere) vector.
With theoretical ideal components, the signal decay is 0, and the resonance does not fade out. In reality no
component is ideal (all of them have some resistance), as such the impedance resistive will never be 0, but the
lower the better. As RE (Radiant Energy) is RF, we need a deep knowledge in RF practice, resonance Q, antenna
multiplication factors, dipole dynamics, standing wave theories, thermodynamic delta transform & others. It’s an
electrical equivalent of the acoustics (sound) laws.
RE manifests at V=0 node; I=max (current node) = pure resonance =
Radiant energy = RF, where the Power Factor PF = 0 at resonance. Such
loads are measured in Ampere Load TENSOR value, not voltage as there
is (nearly) none. Voltage "radiant" is measured in Elektron Volt,
‘elektron’ with K as its potential is a WAVE and not a mere particle. RF
is the ROOT of ZPE as you truly will use either 0 current states or 0
voltage states standing wave nodes within a standing wave in a LRC
circuit. We are talking about virtual power 4d tensor SCALAR standing
waves (created with a reverse inductor "rotor" within 3PH self oscillating
LC configured motor). At pure resonance PF is trashed and becomes
irevelant to the source.
So RF is determined by the angle of current and voltage, (0) power factor
90 deg angle relation. When the current = 0, the voltage is maximal; when voltage = 0, the current is maximal in
a perfectly resonant LC. In 3 phase this can manifest within 45 to 90 degrees angle, being differential the phasor
or angle of rotation relative as power factor figure (what differentiates it from powerline AC). Any signal with a
0 power factor figure is RF (radiant) energy. Use a scope to measure the current versus voltage angle.
See http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/AC_6.html.
You will see further that this POWER is in the alternator part of the RV. The Primemover is Broadbanded signal
NON RF potential that TENDS to RESONATE as LOADED while maintaining a 120° angle of rotation within
A,B,C phases being generated. The relation is SEMY resonant, if not full resonant as a variable within a set of
parameters.
The Standing wave, as per RF, results from pure resonance where a current AC node is separated from a
VOLTAGE radiating node being polarised as standing wave regions, where one is node & the other anti-node. In
one we have a 0 point region (electron Vacuum), in the other we have electron aether density accumulation as
compression tensor. It can also be defined as HOT ionizing and cold anti ion region.
In low impedance OU goes unnoticed, as it is lost to resistance and impedance mismatch, but at HI impedances
the amplification effect becomes evident. The SECRET to PURE magnetic amplification is the HI impedance
factor found in "Roto-conversion". This is one of the factors that create Over-unity. OU is in resonance; the
higher the Q the closer to self sustaining within proper elements. In RESONANCE power can be EXTRACTED,
even if theory says PF is 0 and power does not exist (but is there). COLD electricity is under RESONANT
conditions (Tensor) nodes. Add to it permanent magnet rotors and PF correction in hi impedance mode, it
becomes an EMA device.
Pure RE penetrates motor housing extending field outside it; it radiates from transformers and from Faraday cage
medium. Be also careful, because the ‘water is confused for the waves’ but the waves are not the water but only
a FORCE that gives them shape and movement. So is the energy to the electrons. Energy gives them POWER to
manifest in various forms but the electron themselves are not the power. Of 9 types of electricity humanity
knows only 2 and has only learned to use one in its more primitive forms.
NODE: A point defined within a
sine wave, be it voltage or current
where such potential manifests in a
physical object as antenna section,
dipole, LC, R or any circuit
component or structure. For further
details, look for Antenna design &
resonance.
STANDING WAVE: a wave
oscillating contained within a
predetermined space or structure
containing current node and
voltage node.
Page 6
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 6
Ever read the meaning of resistance and voltage drop in a basic LRC circuit? At resonance you have 0 voltage at
n amperes and x voltage at 0 amperes; L is in current node; C is in voltage node. Where is R then? According to
the standard theory, R as a lightbulb is in PHASE, but the reality is that R is at 90% REACTIVE state being at
CURRENT node, so the energy loading e.g. a 220 VAC 1,000W lightbulb might just have a voltage drop of 19V
and amperage of 4.5 A. Why does it light up at full potential then?
In RF a resistor R can become PURE L inductive & provide GAIN instead of loss. This is normal to microwave
circuits and to me is also normal in LOW frequency RF circuits down to standing wave DC vectors. You will be
able to eliminate the battery, as you do you will be using ANOTHER type of electric power were different
phenomena will manifest, gravity - time - pk related. Just remember everything you are dealing with is a form of
transformation.
Now you know why your voltage increased to OU, as you transferred power from the virtual rotary capacitor to
the smaller temporarily static one (magnetized coil) and back to the source "battery". The notes on RF explain
why L turns to C and C to L and R can be LC. The rotor field emulates, theoretically speaking, a capacitor. In
AC engineering practice this is explained as a ROTARY capacitor effect, the M field flux acting as a capacitor to
the coil, but in reality it is as explained above.
Take a coil and energize it with a given load, place a
reverse diode in the input; just discharge the circuit by
disconnecting the source, your bulb will BURN with
the CEMF pulse. That was the real discovery Newman
made, but never realized what it was. Hector did it in
the RV alternator, very related to the apparent ‘hoax’ of
the Genesis project, but formulation does work in
rotating negative INDUCTANCE (or we may say
NEGATIVE resistor), a resistance "LOAD" that
provides power (a squirrel cage rotor in RV case...).
A simple LC have a DECAY value in time; the only
energy you need to supply is the one lost to decay, as if
the system source were a negative inductor to LC (as in
the case of RV alternator). Normal entropy decay is
0.618 of 1.618 as logarithmic time receding signal
(search for Seike work in ultra-relativity concepts), so
the gain is also in atropic system of 1.618 where
frequency increase in octaves may increase amplification by a factor of 3.141592 where the spiral resonant
circular projection can be expressed in a 12,000 4d polygon structure (as simile to double helix DNA structure -
reason human system is OU by all definitions). Remember LOGARITHMIC SPIRALS ORBITAL DECAY
PATH IS RELATIVE to gravity as SIGNAL DECAY OR GAIN IS RELATIVE TO LC Q and parameters in a
working ZPE system.
It can be done either way, using a reactance to charge a cap, or discharge a cap in a reactive circuit; the resonant
condition creates a logarithmic path where VAR power is created and carries a magnetic amplification
component with it.
The AC in a LC circuit as a Tesla AC HV transformer and capacitor are OSCILLATING within a range of
voltage and current, where the spark gap determines discharges as a PULSE into the Tesla coil primary at
MAXIMAL capacitor potential. AC does have a FIXED period, but the DEVICE parameters where we feed that
power are variable: either we ADJUST device to source frequency or source frequency to device. TUNING and
PHEAKING is KEY to any OU device. The concept is simple but tuning is not ... requires lots of in vitro lab
experience, to tame the multiple inter-related variables.
In any coil an "N" potential is required to saturate a core, the thermal energy as the core atoms align
magnetically and are added to the alignment tensor. As the field collapses, the temperature drops and passes its
energy to the collapsing field E vector. As such overunity transformation occurs. This is for VTA type
transformation, applicable to EMA-RV.
N is the value as potential, that means a pulse or wave of specific duration (pulse length or frequency of
given voltage), with a given current capacity.
Having a source impedance A and a load impedance B, as to create a condition where energy from the
An electromagnets magnetic field strength is determined
solely (without changing the ferromagnetic core
material) by the number of turns in its winding times the
current measured in amps flowing thru it. With that in
mind consider the difference between serial resonance
and anti-resonance (below).
Series LC circuit: Resonance = input current is
maximum at resonance; Current thru drive coil windings
is maximum.
Parallel LC circuit: Parallel Resonance/Anti-resonance
= input current is minimum at anti-resonance; Current
thru drive coil windings is maximum.
Now, if you were a design engineer after the maximum
magnetic field strength for the least input power, which
circuit would you use?
Page 7
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 7
source is at optimal efficiency and imparts energy to the load where LOAD CORE in this case attains
maximal state of energy being the case of magnetic saturation.
The shifting of atomic components electron spin to magnetic alignment being so as to transfer energy from
thermal ambient background energy by means of magnetic LATCHING or stochastic linear amplification.
As such making possible the collapse of it to attain energy from the thermal region of such core & summing
it to the energy released in the collapse of the field into another load being a capacitor or recovery means,
electronic, mechanic or thermal, whatever.
C charge in X resistance determines power in N time, leading to saturation of Z core and LC in any given
circuit, opto trigger, non-coupled. It’s the Hypersignal modulation that extracts power from "ZP" (stochastic
resonance applies). It’s a very different ballgame, which requires a total rethinking of normal electric
concepts, seeking to do the reverse of what standard engineering does in many applications.
It is well known that, to get the maximum power transfer from a source to a load, the source impedance must
equal the complex conjugate of the load impedance, or: R
s
+ jX
s
= R
L
- jX
L
. In addition, for efficient power
transfer, this condition is required to avoid the reflection of energy from the load back to the source. This is
particularly true for high-frequency environments like video lines and RF and microwave networks (RF
engineering practice).
Hector is correct in saying that this is a resonant effect in the three phase rotory system and will demonstrate
O/U effects when fine tuned so that X
C
= X
L
with very low overall resistance (R) so as to produce a very sharp
resonant curve with very high "Q" (Q determines the time decay; Hi Q = low time decay per oscillation). When
operating at ultra high "Q", the circuit is "lossless" and operates as a magnetic amplifier. Find "Electrical
Engineering" by Terman, PhD, Dean of Engineering, Stanford University, 1955. This is one of the only text
books that go into detail regarding the resonance phenomenon. It is well worth your library search for you will
become highly enlightened and informed. The most important factor to consider is the circuit resistance, for this
is how resonant curves are flattened or widened to establish "band width". Lump resistance inserted into a
resonant circuit will reduce the "Q" and cause the resonant curve to loose the sharp tuned peak under which is
the "lossless" region of the curve.
The so called “cold” electricity E-Gray talked so much about, is more like a constant canned EMP. The first step
is vectoring this energy to a charge value within a capacitor where its JOULE potential exceeds the input by
gaining energy from the media. What is done electrically with RV alternator is to spin the rotor squirrel cage
(Reverse Inductor) inside a 3PH LC oscillator tank circuit where the effect is similar to the effect you can do by
stroking a wet finger in a fine grass cup. One wave mounts to the other with the acoustic simile being magnetic
multiplication factor.
Read here about Q figures and signal decay: http://home.freeuk.net/dunckx/wireless/sparktx/sparktx.html
At Q=34.6 the decay is .09 of the signal, then all you need to sustain a RADIANT energy signal is that .09. In a
system that contains multiple elements, decay becomes non- reflective upon loading as resonant states are
maintained. This results in magnetic amplification from the medium, stochastic amplification and thermo-
magnetic energy transfer, resulting in APPARENT overunity (in true sense is OVERUNITY due to transform).
In ferro-resonant metal cores, tend to LASE (laser) but electromagnetically EASER modes a lower power
pumping can result in a major transfer from other energy realm.
For now use Q12, is safe & cold, as Q15 overheats & melts frames. This is REASON E.Gray used PLASTIC
motor housing as his coils worked over Q15+ (Experimental)
If a low magnetic field attracts one of higher energy at a synchronous rotary angle, the stronger field ports
energy to the COIL that attracts it - leading M field. (Like connecting a LOW voltage battery to a HIGHER
voltage one, the one with higher voltage will charge the one with the lower one) As a magnet is attracted, its
STRONGER field LEADS the COIL FIELD inducing KVARS of power to it. What is happening is magnetic
amplification from the higher ROTOR M field component, all this under specific set of phasor conditions for
current and voltage relative to CORE mass, impedance and frequency. The same law applies to attraction and
repulsion, as energy can be gained in AMPERE flux or VOLTAGE flux (see section on magnetic attraction).
If M field poles are alike batteries, but the CONNECTION is INDUCTIVE, then the ROTARY capacitor
machine in RV mode of operation CONVERTS the MOTOR magnetic ROTOR into a VIRTUAL ROTARY
battery; KVARS being fed to the rotating field of stator cores (no diode needed) as long the M field is leading
the M stator rotating FIELD. Whatever switching method or commutation used it is the same (virtual battery).
Page 8
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 8
The strong M field will induce power in the smaller M field attracting it. That power can manifest in POWER
correction alike form or as a POWERFULL CEMF pulse (EASER) but definitively the WAY to transfer
magnetic energy is made by 5 basic means: mechanical movement, induction, modulation, radiation (RF),
(Electronic) transformation transformers.
Extracting the energy requires tuning of all the involved parameters from the machine, PM magnet intensity (not
more than required to saturate core), core mass and reluctance & remanance parameters as to work at the specific
frequency and speed you want with best performance figures, coil impedance or impedances also to match for
best condition to maximize the effect you desire.
From DC to RF (AC), law is the same! In DC this is seen as a TENSOR where the degree of phase can be
determined by hall-effect reading within a metal strip a copper cross shunt with 2 extra wires for measuring "hall
effect". If we were able to vary rotor magnetic intensity this reading will also vary along it.
The interesting thing is when DC is applied as & at reactive power, the current lags the voltage until it reaches
unity as field collapses in unity condition (co-Phased). Current reverses and becomes LEADING in OU in the
CEMF pulse, increasing the voltage back to the battery & GAINING ENERGY from PM Rotor magnetic field.
The back CEMF or EMP or time-reversed - E flow in a closed loop RESONANT TANK CIRUIT RLC or LRC
(Whatever 9 combinations you may choose) combined with the rotating energy field, to produce the Famous
POWER FACTOR SURGE. That applies to ANY Circuit even to the incremental time reversed oscillations in a
negative inductor.
In bifilar operation dual coil solenoid: One Coil is matched to saturate core at n potential as a pulse in T time. As
core collapses the other coil recovers voltage and current plus the ENERGY gained from core thermal add on
collapse (electrodynamic heat pump ) heat to electric conversion and drives it to the battery in a logarithmic
curve long sinewave within a given gain.
But for matters of simplification, use the synchronous attraction mode in a ‘common denominator’ called ‘PF
Correction’. Where do you think PF correction comes from? It’s a fancy term to hide OU transformation attained
from rotary synchronous magnetic induction. They are called rotary capacitor machines and can lower your
power bill by 40% if properly designed, in full RV mode even more. Power companies penalize you for power
factor. The “corrected” meter is a fallacy, its Amps-volts relation, the more amps the more you pay, the worst the
voltage line loss, the more $$$ you pay as your PF figure kills your motor performance and AMPS go up.
This justifies Bedini, Newman and MEG workings under unified "Rotoconversion effect". In Newman & Bedini
motors we have a coil attracting a rotating magnet. Hector had explained this for more than 5 years, but Newman
and Bedini stated he was wrong, insisting more on magic and far out unpractical aether theories rather than a
more down to earth electromagnetic dynamics to squeeze juice out of OU phenomena.
The POSITIVE aspect of Newman WORK is the EVIDENCE this energy can be recovered and recharge a prime
mover battery in a closed loop. The problems arising from this low-tech approach was the degradation of the
apparatus brushes and the destruction of the battery due to the subatomic degradation of the electron pair within
the battery chemistry (Related to reverse time tachion currents (Kapa)) or as normally referred to - energy or
"radiant energy".
Build the machine as Konzen did. Apply to PM rotor RV 3 PH motors; then we can work on were the magnet
energy is extracted from and how is transformed to M field that produces the KVARS, inducing OU transform in
the Stator Coils of RV PM motor/generator mode machines or in solid state Self inductor pulsed coils. As theory
states, such energy transfer must lower the coil and rotor thermal temperatures and contract the electron spin
orbit closer to atom nucleus "micro atomic K cooling". We have to go deeper into the solid-state class C
magnetic amp & magneto-transistor concepts also. And if paranormal & exotic anti gravity effects do occur, we
can solve those issues as they occur.
Radiant Energy as in a WAVE, passes a SOLID creating a CHARGE (Gray tube); the emitter must have the
same mass as the receiver, such wave is non reflective (related to RF, related to antenna resonant elements,
related to EASER modes). Electrons are the MEDIA, ball lightning is created when a WAVE pushes out
electrons from a metal conductor (see X-ray lasers) & relate to RF pumping and X-ray tubes.
The spark gap burst is a series of discharges at hi impedance; as a coil discharges across a gap its voltage drops
to 0, re-gausses again, then drops to 0 again in a fast speed linear RF burst where the coil acquires energy from
magneto-thermal regions. Such re-gaussing occurs as current NODE rolls into gap region, hi resistance & cut-off
occurs, then node rolls to voltage region where voltage re-ionizes gap in stepped discharges ... see B. Perrault
theory on ion tubes where stochastic resonance (= co-phasing and transforming energy) from radioactive
elements can add up to sustain an LC resonant mode porting energy to it.
Page 9
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 9
Remember aether energy is contained in the alignment of atoms creating the magnetic field flux that acts as
simile of electron flow emanating from opposed 2 high voltage sources.
In the atom we have horizontal electron spin. As they align magnetically, the spiral flux of the gravity aether
flow toward the centre of atom mass imparts its energy to the electron spin orbit and atom spin orbit "Electron
rotation" and maintain the Electron Orbit energy level. The internal spin of the NUCLEAR FORCE then
transfers the gravity tensor by means of transformation to the 4D VERTICAL tensor where it flows as N S pole
magnetic + - Delta Vectors AETHER flow. This can be seen as sub-particles, as VITRON & wavicles are
discovered by science in a near future where energy is seen as transformation phenomena in a wide gamma of
forms (9 to be specific). These concepts start to deal with Elektron transform which cover basic current
knowledge of electricity (first one - 8 more to go).
As there are 3 primary colors from basic white and 3 sub-color mixes there are 3 manifestation forms for every
form of energy and 3 mixed forms of them, every 2 interacting forces create a third; this third transforms the
initial 2 into a triad manifest x, y, z; this create 4d tensors delta, epsilon and gamma transferring projection from
vertical to horizontal trans-dimensional plane. The nautilus spiral "logarithmic" defines this very well as the dual
spiral projections of the sunflower form projecting from the centre of the flower (the answers are all written over
in nature).
Where is OU?
- Power factor rotary Condensers
- Synchronous motors
- Resonant transformers
- Rotophase Converters
- HI Q LC resonant Coil
- PM Motors
- How they are made non-OU? : Impedance Mismatching
- How they are made OU? : Hi impedance and hi Q modes looking for proper impedance matching and power
transformation relation.
The simple design is the barrier of the mind that OU is in a simple coil and in a simple capacitor blows the minds
of the experts. Upon experimenting the effect on switched LRC systems, you will find the simple truth. Help
keep it FREE and unbound for all. OU is there and has been in there unseen too much time, so let’s use it and
demonstrate its reality. In LC Resonant circuitry, C value is ALWAYS OU. Begin with Testatika "Capacitive
Interrupt Generator" and end with RV, OU is in RESONANCE, and the magnetic- thermal stochastic transforms
within the systems. (Hector July 20, 2003).
Hector always stated that there is magnetic amplification in PHASE CONVERSION and in POWER FACTOR
CORRECTION. This is Public Domain info from ARK Research. All patents & technology on rotary capacitors
converters had expired. Applying RV effect does not constitute right to patent, as Roto-Conversion RV effect is
a free domain application to such machine mode of operation in OU states. Any patent based in Roto-Conversion
theory can be challenged. In RV Hector tailored to use this phenomena in standard non modified hardware as to
keep RV as a COPYRIGHT intellectual property, as is an electrical effect, a phenomena that can be used to
obtain hi eff% from any properly modified electrical apparatus.
Patents based in erred theory are obsolete; rights are valid only as per their physical construct and design of such.
But RV theory Resonance & magnetic Amplification and all related applications are free domain. Re-patenting
devices under public domain RV concept can be challenged as copyright intellectual property theft punishable
with 25 years of mandatory jail sentence and or $250,000 fines.
A short at coil ends equals infinite capacity where inductance will charge at maximal amperage with a 0 volt
potential (current node).
As short is opened at max potential, that potential releases energy from its current node transferring it to a
voltage potential within a capacitor Volts with a farad potential that can be quantified as Joule-watt within an AC
system (voltage node).
In an AC transverter setup, RMA, VTA or EMA4, the same simple equation of RF applies as radiant energy
does not differ any from RF.
Wire mass must be equal in primary & secondary to balance the endothermal equation H=I²rT. Turn determine
impedance, impedance determines Q within a given set of parameters; can be broadband as unloaded RV and
narrowbanded as loaded RV in Tuned conditions. Loading is an impedance determining factor. Time, Frequency
and Pulselength well managed = ZPE OU.
Page 10
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 10
2.4 Magnetic attraction
A magnet is just a natural battery were the energy flux from atoms is POLARIZED and directed into N & S
poles, in fact like a battery. Its relation to a coil is that it requires VOLTAGE to create an M FIELD. Magnets
LOOK like batteries similes, but in reality they are transverters, "transponders", convert one energy transforming
it to another type from what is called "REALMS". In a PM magnet, the power is contained within the ALIGNED
atoms of the magnetic material, the ELECTRON SPIN being the POWER SOURCE (here the Magneto-thermal-
gravity-Aether theory comes in play - not before).
Note also a magnet is just a long lasting vitrionic energy source. Modulate it as class C linear amplifier, it
becomes a generator; modulate it in push-pull mode you have replicated a working MEG; loop it you got a VTA.
As a coil attracts a magnet, if the magnet is stronger than the force attracting, it will raise the VOLTAGE of the
source reversing the current in the coils as they are approached (as in one pair N-S poles circulating inside a 3
coil triangle in RV mode). The pole distance provide "attractive approach" to self induce creating VOLTAGE to
reverse back to battery source.
MAGNETIC amplification is the way to go using PM as energy source in pure ATRACTION modes. Put all the
coils to ATTRACT magnet toward them as they are switched. If done exactly, voltage will increase in the source
capacitor as magnet is attracted to the coil.
So stay with bifilar design and diode band-pass impedance configuration. Bifilar permits to prime move rotate in
one impedance (hi) and recover at a lower impedance to feed another battery. Bifilar coils are an answer to
impedance match, self inductors as time length pulse amplifier "Caduceus Coil".
In repulsion mode charge comes from OVERSHOOTING, receding field is more practical to have repulsion &
attraction at 90 deg, here is where 2 pole rotor & 3 coil in 3PH configuration becomes handy; tuning the device
impedance with capacitors makes the battery become a negative resistor within the rotary LC tank were
MAGNETIC field and thermo-magnetic mechanics provide the OU energy transform from ambient.
Note that you need to install a limiting circuit, if the battery voltage exceeds the output voltage, a circuit that
disconnects until the battery voltage drops (20%), than the circuit is reconnected to recharge them again. That
way you have a self recycled self-runner.
Speaker magnet metal caps make great low remanance DC pulse coil cores. 2 of them make a perfect coil spool.
Speakers can be obtained at TV and car radio repair shops. The magnet is separated from the faceplates wedging
a sharp knife and hitting it carefully with a piece of wood. Hard epoxied ones separate better by dipping them in
soapy water for a few days. The magnets can be used for PM Experiments if not broken.
2.5 About core coils and PM magnets
There is a relation to COIL impedance and CORE impedance & DRAG. Experiments with some permanent
magnet alternators (PMA), where the oversaturated coils become a source of drag due to room temperature
Meismer and Hall effect in the core internal composition, that tends to go electrically superconductive and
magneticaly resistive to induction.
In a car alternator a Ib or Cs magnet in the rotor resulted in oversaturation, while lower field intensity Ceramic 8,
5 gave better performance at Hi speed.
There is indeed the need to attain OU using METAL cores, also as in SOLID state this knowledge is essential.
Depending on the frequency, a set of variables have to be used as to attain degrees of performance. Remember a
7.5 HP US motor can be taken to 11 W in RV-mode. Prpermy “tuned", a 75KW transformer in hi impedance
mode uses 3W and we are dealing with over 500 pounds of steel-boron silica laminate there.
So the laminate can reduce the size and increase power. Note that the laminate itself is not the problem, but
rather its saturation that creates drag & loss, detuning, impedance mismatching of E and M field. The laminates
need to be closed circuits, so can’t be totally open as tuning becomes more under RF rules (like the ferrite plug
in small radios). Laminate OU parameters need to be defined as 99.9% of the motors & generators use them, so
we have to deal with it (until the coreless coaxial looped field generator is developed…).
Cores do in fact increase energy. If a normal energy saver motor is made of iron silicon core and its eff % is over
98%, then the information on coreloss is dis-info due to the FACT those 30 and 40 % loss material no longer
exist. Test any modern utility transformer for loss, it will strike you that modern core materials even have GAIN
at certain resonant conditions instead of loss. The old notion that Si cores cause loss is dis-info at this stage.
Page 11
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 11
The importance is the RESONANT condition at charging an LC capacitor to max level upon a magnet influence,
using a given coil and core mass combination. It’s in the Magnetic GAP and resonance.
Is this if done under collapse field interval, LOADING will not reflect to source ... and if C is discharged in a
load at BLANK interval it will not be reflective to the source.
The JM Pulse Charger (see further) does the same by transistor switching but dynamic is differently, there is a
"time factor" that evens out the OU tensor to Non-OU under averaging equation. The fact is the tuning will be
more difficult than RV to attain such average, also there is no PM magnet energy factor (the 2 must be compared
as there is light in this revelation).
You need to saturate the core, so it’s better to have a strong core bound field than an external purely inductive
one. If too external it will interact with other elements creating parasitic drag (loss) coil need to transfer a charge
to the capacitor avoiding SWR (reflected power) that results in detuning & OU transform loss. A capacitor is RF
element where the WAVE transfers to potential (charge) as Voltage Value aported to it
As such for magnets, it better to use strong Neos (which have strong fields close to it) rather than Sumarium
Cobalt magnets (which have flux fields which extend much further).
Bifilars & multi-filars are useful where impedance matching issues affect coil parameters, where elements need
to be isolated as not to interact negatively with each other (NULL) and where surface currents become an issue.
A fine stranded #0 cable works with less loss than a SOLID core #0 bar at hi frequency.
Core Coil and capacitance are critical variables in the OU transform. In order to obtain an EMA class C
amplifier, the magnetic component must correct the PF of the inductive and capacitive ones, at a given CORE
impedance where the ENERGY transform occurs. In AC is FULL resonance, in DC is half resonance states
where pulse becomes a logarithmic voltage gain from a discharging coil & or core into a capacitor where it
becomes a POWER vector (potential) extracted from the 0 point of resonant opposed curvature.
If voltage is maximal current is 0; if voltage is 0 current is maximal. These states create SPACE vacuum and
space tensor where energy compresses and relaxes. In theory 2 off phase identical LCs in common grounded
circuit must create potential differential relative to their space-vacuum states, being those captured such devices
extract energy from thermal and electron spin ones (transformation with possibility of self sustaining and
extraction of energy).
Regauging cores: the core inside a coil, once that coil is energized, will become polarized, either N or S
depending on how it was energized (two choices!). The core inside the motorcoil will NOT instantly return to its
"original" polarity after the power pulse (what most people don’t get - the coil field might collapse, but it doesn’t
take the core polarity with it is the whole thing - the core polarity "stays" like it was when the coil became most
powerful and energized and knocked the rotor....).
Assuming you have a motor with one coil and iron core, and 4 all - N magnets in a rotor. Assume you pulse the
motor 4 times a revolution, all N-N repulsive knocks for power. If that iron core remains N for example against a
N magnet, when the next rotor-magnet of the 4 in the rotor approaches the motor coil and its core, it will CLASH
and try and push backwards to the rotation (no good). As such you will have to input more juice to overcome
this. IF you REGAUGE (via the magnet next to iron motor coil core) the core (not so much coil) to be
ATTRACTIVE (South in this
case) now when the next rotor-
magnet approaches the motor
coil, instead of clashing, your get
a FREE power pulse (attractive).
You haven’t spent any extra
power-pulse, it is all free.
Here is simple drawing showing
how "regauging" a core works.
Regauging could also be called
reversing the polarity of the
CORE. This uses no extra power
and can double or triple the speed
of a DC pulse motor.
Look at the way that in the first
drawing #3 magnet in the rotor gets pushed clockwise with a power-pulse from the battery. Look at the way that
the approaching #2 magnet in the next drawing now will cause a repulsive clash against the rotor rotation, if
something isn’t done to that core. Look at the way the magnet underneath the core flips the polarity of the core,
making a once repulsive clash become a strong attractive pull in the direction of the rotor.
Page 12
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 12
The info on ROTARY condenser machine theory will help: http://www.pscpower.com/pages/series%20sc.htm.
If we see it from a perspective they "Regause" the utility lines making you save energy. In Hi impedance they
become EMAs Electro Magnetic Amplifier. It’s simple: a coil attracting a magnet of higher magnetic intensity
will get induced power from the stronger M field. In low impedance this effect is not noticed much, but at higher
ones it exhibits OU due to EMA effect.
See chapter 11 on Power Factor in http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/index.html. Calculate this
with hi impedance relative to M field in PM rotor synchronous machines.
2.6 Levels of transformation
OU is Transformation. If a magnetic flux is switched ON and OFF in any system with a MINOR force, you have
OU. The same happens with a static charge (ref Thestatika). The MEG is an example of a MagnetoTransistor,
requiring a perfect tuning, but with the disadvantage of loosing it at loading. The solution is to have a resonant
MEG with transverter diode plug and capacitor discharge system. Pulse length as to permit discharging the
accumulated Radiant Energy component in a totally non-reflecting way to the source.
Understanding the mechanics of how the power is transferred from the AMBIENT into the device, becomes
more analytically tangible as some BOOK rules can be applied to justify that TRANSFORMATION. In ZPE we
deal with variables interlaced with other variables, we start with 3 electric ones that subdivide into 3 more each
and so on to 48+1 levels of basic inter-related LAWS starting from basic Ohms law. Academia knowledge just
needs to be "restructured" as to define aether density and other yet to be known forces related to energy
transformation. OU is not magic, is the magic of transformation itself!
The energy is transferred from Thermal-magnetic regions. If FORCED more then it is transferred from
ELECTRON spin, electron DECAYS becomes VITRON emitting photon (be careful with the BLUE odic flame
= vitrons). Avoid contact; as anomaly fields are created like with the “USS Eldridge”, where time is beginning to
be distorted (transfers energy from time space tensor, degausses zone, as the Famous Philadelphia experiment
did). Energy transfer becomes awesome force.
If increased furthermore, the HELRAISER effect takes place, where reality is degaussed. Morphogenetic field is
disrupted matter (becomes ideo-plastic) and is turned to primal mind responsive paste. Aether transform occurs.
Nuclear elements can go critical with awesome force, silicon becomes Nuclear Photonic Explosive. The
Helraiser Field creates whatever your mind projects to it. Search info on Montauk project destruction, it was
achieved running amplitrons in looped phase mode, as full 4d state was attained a T-rex monster was projected
from the ID to destroy the base. RV is the BASE for ACTUAL secret government T.A.S.M.I.N project (time
travel).
ADVICE: stay thermal & low power with these devices. Use as R&D tool, use as energy saver device 90%+ idle
energy savings minimal in intermittent use, like grinders, pumps, drills whatever needs to be constantly running
but with intermittent loading (conveyors, lawnmowers & others).
On the Stochastic thermal transform that has been the issue all this time, atoms gravity flow is a type of energy
transformation were the gravity flux is transformed to MAGNETIC electron spin force within the atom. Thermal
energy plays a big part here also. Its energy is transferred to electrical realm.
And as I have stated before, the art of tapping OU energy is the art of transformation. For dominating that art you
have to dominate the current art to its top perfection 98%EFF and UP. Once you have reached the limit, then the
art of extracting the energy from the ambient "DIPOLE" can be attained.
2.7 Electron Spin
The internal structure of an electron consists of 4 Vitrons shaped like 3D 4 faces pyramid. One of them can shift
to a photon, and the electron lowers orbit-releasing energy (pro-photon).
If we look at real matter, all of it consists of “spherical standing waves”. In Einstein-Bose condensate experiment
when atoms are cooled to absolute 0, they appear like a condensed wave SOLITON (“flattened sphere”). This
creates WAVE pattern interference.
The Electron Spin frequency is 1.6 MHz. Thermal stochastic transfer works in this region quite well. The coil
cools and RF signal self sustains - 2 vitrons one pro-photon spinning within a spherical standing wave. Its
frequency is within the range of 1.5 to 1.8 MHz. It is perceived as background noise in multiple octaves, like
transformer random resonance recording, and LASER Ruby rod resonance.
Page 13
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 13
Electrons are transformers; as they need energy to self sustain they acquire energy, as this energy is transferred
to spherical standing wave strings they create gravity, M field and E field. Alter any, you alter the nature of the
electron "even transform it ". Phi is the only ratio in which waves can "add" and "multiply", expanding or
compressing, non-destructively and infinitly... tranform of circle to straight line and back again... a spiral in 3d.
This web site http://www.glafreniere.com/matter.htm explains that there is nothing else but aether, and that
matter is made solely of waves. They are catching up. A few more billion wavicles smaller and they got it! They
need to resolve the inner eleKtron triad in order to understand the 12,000 string wave structure that forms the
electron illusory spherical shape. Every particle has relative rotation; nothing is static not even at -273K; only
staticity can be found at 0 time and is also relative from viewers point ....WAVE Structures ? 3.141592742 for a
more accurate 12,000 poligon structure ... (as start).
See info on http://www.glafreniere.com/sa_electron.htm: the graphics are unidimensional compared to Electron
real Aether tensor transform interaction, the corroboration TIME contracts with gravity intensity trashed the red
shift theory cosmology as well as matter structure theoretics, the Black hole is just one single big electron
transform engine, as the infinitesimal electron itself ... And is only the tip of the Iceburg...
2.8 Load & battery circuits
A resistance (ampere load) must be provided for a capacitor as to emulate a battery compound character. That is
its LCR components as to prevent chronic rundown, where frequency increases as VOLTAGE drops, but CEMF
spikes go UP in voltage, but are not able to charge a capacitor as a capacitor turns relative to frequency-increase
into a solid conductor (ever tried to measure voltage drop in a capacitor? Can you pass 10 amps through a
capacitor having no voltage drop? Yes, as high frequency AC band pass circuit, the capacitor becomes a solid
conductor to hi frequency). Across a diode this represents a short circuit where the circuits drops under OU
energy level, farts and dies depleted.
Some of these concepts are still used in switching power supply systems as in PC computer power supplies. A
resistor (50 to 100 Ohm) and capacitor in an "LRC" in the HF hot section of the power step-down transformer is
regulating L reactance "tuning". If you take R off, the supply farts & goes dead or simply burns out. Same goes
for CR battery substitute.
Quoting Tesla: “tuning the Source to the Load needs”. Radiant Energy IS RF and every part of a circuit relates
to the next, unless is decoupled and isolated (Opto switch RV plug).
The battery has internal reactance and resistance differing from a litic or oil capacitor by quite a bit. A free
capacitor will change the circuit configuration as is it getting charged, like the VARACTOR tuner in a radio or
TV system. Voltage determines frequency as your capacitor charges, the impedance of the circuit is altered,
becoming regressive braking rotor instead of accelerating it. As this occurs VOLTAGE will drop detuning from
initial OU states, a 500 ohm resistance may help a bit to emulate battery resistance and provide a VOLTAGE
drop in circuit to TUNE, as the flyback type resistor and cap used in a PC power supply transformer circuit. A
25W light bulb will emulate this at 120V potential in series with a big litic caps reversed AMPERE load in the
back EMP recovery stepped plasma discharges. A bit complicated to tune but simple in construction.
With RV there is battery degradation within a looped state, as true voltage increase does occur, current is
required to maintain a charge, measured by hydrometer electrolytic density (acid % diluted in electrolytic) that
shows TRUE charge. In looped mode the tendency is to reach equilibrium where the battery will provide infinite
energy as long as it is provided with WATER as FUEL and does not atomically degrade by hydrate
transmutation (COLD fusion).
In any case batteries have to go unless current is added to looping. Here is where opto-circuits & diodes become
handy by transferring voltage tensor to current. This is the real bitchy issue to tame in tuned looped systems:
pulse-length, saturation, impedance matching - too much or too less, no OU. This is done in AC as most of
standard system works in AC (the universe is analogue, not digital), but it does not mean it cant pulse from time
to time.
The battery voltage can be defined by a resistor with x potential "voltage drop" at given amperage, so the
resistance is relative to the energy tensor and phase angle, in time relative to its extremely large wavelength. A
battery is just a large capacitor with specific resistive and inductive parameters.
Battery Power Factor correction: higher impedance, lower drain - higher CEMF discharge. A higher energy
attracted to a lower energy amplifies the lower energy one, adding its energetic component to it.
A way to simplify a battery set in OU condition (system running): a dpdt switch as to cut off battery from
capacitor and switch on R "ampere load" to it, the capacitor will have emulated internal reverse voltage drop that
becomes L to reverse EM flux from plasma & recovered VA from rotor.
Page 14
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 14
As any OU device they respond to aether flow changes, so don’t feel frustrated if some days they perform bad,
and others like heavens, the importance is to study and tame the phenomena. Later the problem is solved with
magnetic aether accumulators (orgon) to fuel the device "Spherical condensers" and tune to natures energy grid
matrix.
Notice that in Bedini and Newman motors, the "Battery conditioning" is increased resistance and voltage of
such, indicating a definitive voltage amplification being fed back to it (Power Factor corrected battery). In order
for this amplification factors to be understood I insist on the links to power factor phenomena, RV PM,
Newman, Meg…, as there is a need to demystify ZPE into current standard practice and demonstrate that the
magnetic field can provide amplification to a rotary system (OU) and also in a linear Solid state pump where we
have magnetic stacking of a signal providing amplification.
The statement on a Battery charge being a very long AC half wave signal is not far from the truth as it has a
Voltage and a corresponding current phase angle within this very long wave component. In Bedini motor this
voltage and current can attract a magnetized rotor toward it at a specific impedance L with a specific Magnetic
field value (m), the PM rotor being attracted has usually a MAYOR M component than the attractor L M
component.
Remember a battery is a big capacitor with a very long half sinewave discharge curve … and that Bedini was
power factor correcting his battery.
If we apply power factor correction formulas, the Major M component will alter the minor one, AMPLIFIYING
its ELECTRICAL POWER with a LEADING CURRENT reversing DC power to SOURCE. As this is done the
voltage in the source will increase with a virtual higher impedance gain in LC from the higher energy M
component, KVARS will flow to DC battery (reversed current) resulting in Battery being charged by magnetic
amplification, as magnet M field is just a natural battery yet to be understood.
The MAGNET energy comes from its electron spin. But since the electron energy in a free electron is 60,000
Horse Power, the drain we notice from the magnet is infinitesimal small in a Bedini motor (1/60 - 10x10 power
figure) with a corresponding thermal drop in magnet Kelvin ambient temperature (nearly imperceptible).
This can be attained in attraction as well as repulsion in PM rotary systems. (Kone managed to do that) at a
CERTAIN specific battery power level, internal resistance and LC values, but as battery charged up OU stops
until battery drops again to same condition in extremely long cycles as he used milliamps, in a hi amperage
circuit this cycling is much faster ...
2.9 Capturing or extracting
Here is where the fun starts, as we got RE in OU state. Now what do we do with it? Simply learn to extract it
after you learn what it is! E gray defined it as cold electricity. I agree, it knocks standard minds out cold, as it has
to be used differently than standard electricity, as load is defined only in amperes and not voltage. Voltage is at
90deg vectorial deviation of the current wave phasor, where current is maximal voltage is 0. Here tuning and RF
knowledge becomes a must, as the term “antenna matching the DIPOLE” is in fact true.
Most loads are variable, so we need a system that remains OU while load varies (non-reflective power switching
and transformation). The answer is a magnetic amplifier alike tuning (Old technology) or band-pass phase
bridge, but that is for Extra class Amateur or FCC 1rst class Engineer (RF engineering). We have Full Value if
we use as pulse AB type positive bias energy Pump (Switching) – see further.
The diode plug does that maintaining the OU condition but
transferring the POTENTIAL to a capacitor that is discharged to
transfer its POWER to a more standard co-phased PF=1 energy
mode. The basic circuit: 2x C transverter circuit; each half
equals basic LC at pure resonance, where the capacitor is
tailored to the load at a logarithmic path 1.618 over input power
raise. The circuit cycles as a constant turn on condition were OU
manifests as energy rise within a Node V state (ZPE) resonance.
Energy is extracted by driving the capacitor to a load at the dead
time (rest interval) where the other capacitor is being charged. As such we avoid LC field depletion. Discharged
into a 0 resistance, the energy becomes infinite (theoretic). And not far from the truth, if this PULSE is used to
SATURATE another LC as Electromagnetic Amplifier EASER pump (ON RV and LC Resonant circuits).
Related to Ferro-resonance, any Ferro-resonant transformer can be turned into a transverter diode PLUG,
dividing capacitance by 2 and using each HALVE as a + - DC vector source. If SHORTED it just goes
RESONANT, no burning in source.
Page 15
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 15
The load R is to acquire the feel of the meaning of AMPERE LOAD, as in the
current node the theoretical voltage = 0 as per ZERO POINT theory. C/2 =
resonance as R = 0 Ohms; that means the 2 capacitors must be the same voltage
but HALF the Farad value (C/2). In split C2X capacitor has the same value but
(r/2) I/2 =P in half wave C=1x2/T (T=time) where the signal as AC = 2/120
second length at 1/30s time interval interlaced + - half C tank in opto-electronic
trigger one half discharges non reflective to N load as the other logarithmically
charges in radiant state in a perpetual "Turn on" cycling state. The capacitor
energy is then defined in Joules Volt Ampere second discharge to N load C 2 x
T -->N in push pull circuit.
This is the same as in Phil’s circuit. Same dynamics as each capacitor is pulsed forward tendency is to remain
charged and electron coherence transfer e- x EV = E = Charge as Joule (VASD).
Adaptive electronics idea here is saturate at 0 Volts max amps node and release Ampere 0 point Node into C as a
voltage node as L current goes to 0.
Doesn'tputting a capacitor on the DC side of a full wave rectifier take it out
of the LC circuit? If you picture the diode plug it separates C component
from LC into 2 half tanks (LC) in full wave bridge. If you take the LC
relation from a 4
th
dimensional look you have a varactor circuit linear
driven LC at each cycle where R determines the value of impedance at
source driving it (Simple) capacitor size determines peak to peak value of
rectified potential as a charge in a capacitor, energy resultant is calculated
in joules (capacitor voltage and the energy it can deliver in watt seconds
(VA).
Does a rectifier take it out of the LC circuit? In a TV plug, discharging C in
blank interval does take it out of the circuit, as load is non entropically
reflective to source. The remanent charge is recovered by charge cycle in a
frequency determined shift within VARACTOR theory specifics
(broadband) hi impedance.
Blank interval: in a 60Hz period with 2 cap plug, you have 30 half wave
sinewave positive and 30 half waves negative. You are splitting the negative and the positive while Bedini only
splits the positive. We split the AC. While one HALF charges you discharge the OTHER halve before it charges
in its DIODE forward mode. This is used to discharge an LC in a PM generator or Tuned VTA latching device
MEG or Bedini motor. The essence is the timing, the discharge time must be shorter than the blank interval so
when CHARGING occurs CEMF adds up to overall capacity.
Loading/extracting non-reflecting to source: tune LC to resonance, let’s say 236V 4.3A; find a bulb that has this
same ampere load resistance and place in circuit. It will light up, compensate for radiant loss freq drift by adding
or taking capacitance off. Power drain increases to say .80 of output power, but system is still OU. The voltage
drop on a 1000w light bulb was read to be <19.8 v being able to submerge bulb underwater with no bang as EV
gray did. The bulb tensor is in current node at 1/10 the system voltage or lower.
You need to use a scope and read the coil collapse voltage ...across a diode then place your capacitor to be
charged, use a cap decade box as to find the capacitance value where COIL collapse will charge it to highest
voltage value, that Voltage value with your Capacitance in mF will give you your JOULE energy level at each
cap, that if discharged as a non reflective load will never affect input as the only energy required to charge it is
the one the MAGNET imparts to it as a resonant element from 0 point state (rest).
The method may vary as series parallel connection & diode configs, but the principle must be kept similar,
mitigating the Lenz component and isolate reflective power from source ... attaining true EMA performance (you
can use diode plug on each coil). Point is to get input down and output up.... VIOLATE Lenz law! Or I may say
bypass it using a better law (transformation) as here is no violation but mutual consent.
The size of the extraction plug is important! With no load is does nothing. It takes some cycles to become fully
charged. This goes unnoticed at RV with "normal" cap values. After them it just keeps the charges and does
nothing. But if you pulse-discharge the cap after every cycle, you will see the effect. The bigger the extraction
cap, the more the system detunes, as you have in principle 2 resonance frequencies, or in other words, charging
the cap takes a bit longer than discharging, as you have to charge 2 caps (higher capacitance->lower frequency)
and discharge just 1 cap (lower capacitance->higher frequency).
VARACTOR: also called varicap.
It is a semiconductor diode with
the properties of a voltage-
dependent capacitor, so it is
used as a voltage-controlled
capacitor, and its diode function
is secondary. Its capacitance is
inversely proportional to the
square root of applied voltage
The device has two primary
applications: frequency-tuning
of RF circuits and nonlinear
frequency conversion in
parametric oscillators.
Page 16
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 16
But the smaller the X-cap, the fewer energy you can extract per cycle, and the more Ohmic losses you will over
the time, as you have to pump the current more often through the wires. The trick is to find the "middle course",
tuning. A plug of big Farad DC litics at low voltage end passing the impedance relation as if trafos were RF
baluns. More clear can’t be... Simple but not easy.
ZPEM circuit: In the diagram to the right
(Schematic1x2xtalOU.jpg), the main LC (CLX) consists
of a hyper Q circuit in series with a thermo-piezoelectric
crystal (self oscillates at specific pressure and frequency -
self sustaining OU), where C1 is the MAIN component in
theoretic 1.618 gain circuit (in pure resonance). The
Circuit is not to explain specific OU transform elements
but to explain extraction method. It’s a key element for
OU extraction. Even being a coil, a crystal, 2 diodes and 2
caps, main C1 can also be virtual dielectric capacitor within same crystal (another "KEY").
To extract a percent of the energy in the OU region, avoid hypersignal broadbanding and degenerative entropy
by non-reflective means (signal does not decay under OU as energy is extracted). If such energy extracted is less
that the OU component required to sustain the system in above unity cutoff energetic level. In basic bandpass
filter a capacitor becomes a solid conductor (this is basic) and essential in OU energy transducer design
(transverters).
C1z and C2z is the isolation "split capacitance" where the total capacitance in joules is Cop (1.618 - 1) x .732 as
to extract excess OU non-reflective non-detuned of main ZPEM (Zero Point Energy module) using the blank AC
intervals of C1z and C2z to extract the OU energy (see Opto trigger circuits in early ZPE book compilation as
this schematic was explained in writing). This is simplification of the opto-trigger circuit applications.
This system is applicable to MEG, VTA and any universal OU LC Crystal powered transducer resonator tank.
Remember Cz charge capacitance value must be calculated from a relative 0 energy state as a solid conductor
"L" where it’s assumed it will parallel - logarithmically charge with main C1 contributing to main frequency Q
capacitance value as "Varactor - tune element alike".
This permits power extraction from systems like MRA and others self running hyper conductive or hyper Q
systems. The secret is Cz must NEVER extract power exceeding the OU self sustaining cut off (near 10%) of
main LCX power level at self sustaining transformation.
Well you just need some dilitium crystals now to power your chips. At Hi Q some crystals become endothermic,
transferring heat potential to electric one; the oscillations become self sustaining.
As for load, be careful with metal-halide bulbs, as you can get HALIDE Teleport Signal, which may give nasty
radiation burns (use shielding), as you are dealing with RF plasma & waviton Synchrotron alike radiation up to
100 times more powerful than a house microwave oven.
Let’s say we have 150% OU charge in a capacitor at x Volt and y uF. We calculate the extractable percentage of
say 200 uF, to be 25 uF with no oscillation decay. We use 175 uF in a main LC and use 25 uF in diode plug full
drained energy extraction circuit. This is applicable to NON PM alternator as true re-gaussing does not occur if
the capacitor is totally depleted, but does not apply to PM alternator where re-gaussing occurs as a first switch on
radiant energy effect at each cycle, energy provided by the PM field.
Timing and recovery capacity values need to be calculated, a series resistance to a capacitor can work as tuning
device (varactor tuning alike). As you reach OU, don’t worry,
leave it there as it will cycle up & down to OU non OU
regions as it tunes, charges, detunes goes under OU, discharge
to tuning OU states again in up & down long cycle waves.
That is normal. That is why tuning node must be at 10vdc OU
plus to the 12.7 OU cut off point for 12V battery & per battery
in series gang (e.g. 120VDC). Other factors also apply (like
speed regulation).
All devices work under the same basic formula H = I² Rt,
where basic gain from magneto-atomic amplification is a
predicted 1.618 within a logarithmic gain time-reversed spiral
with consequential thermal-ambient noise reduction and transform to the electrical power region. In transverter
mode, capture DC vectors within a capacitor diode plug recovery system. Inductance CHARGE is a current
Vectors are defined as forward force and
reflected force in AC. Such vectors can be
measured as phase angle relation be it
voltage or current "Phasors”. In DC they
become linear potential positive-negative
differential with N Joule force as capacity
and voltage discharged at x time within
entropic logarithmic decay until it reaches 0
"Valance".
Page 17
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 17
value at N voltage as it meet a capacitor this current is maximal but decays as coil reverse energy is fed to and
transferred to capacitor as a VOLTAGE energy vector until they equalize (across a diode).
So if the CEMF is recovered to a capacitor using a logarithmic path within a resonant LC configuration, the gain
will be a real 1.618 verifiable by charge the potential transferred to the capacitor (Joules). Added to it is the Q
multiplication factor attained in core & wire design. Sample hi latching VTA Ceramic magnets .... as a HI Q
over-unity energy transform media ...
Constipation of energy law (Hector July 16 2003): Take a capacitor, make a resonant LC as to discharge first
capacitor to a coil or transformer choke (C discharged in L). As L reaches peak voltage and capacitor reaches
maximal current, cut off the connection. The power in L is 1.618 times the input if loaded into purely resistive
load by means of a REVERSE RECOVERY DIODE (started from the primary ferroTR.gif posted in JLN group
4 years ago).
Here http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EVGRAY/files/RECOVERY%20CIRCUITS/ are applications of diode
recovery. One of the most interesting is the positive bias one, where the coil is energized going into the negative
and as the transistor switches off the diode returns the CEMF pulse back to the positive.
The Phi curve is perfectly attained in a free floating capacitance as the coil L is discharged from its saturation
point into the equivalent capacitor value for a true resonant tank, where current decay is transformed into a
CAPACITIVE CHARGE of GREATER POTENTIAL. The diode permits a ONE way logarithmic transform as
node and anti-node of radio antenna dipole system. Once the capacitor has MAXIMAL energy, the component is
discharged in the second higher resonance harmonic in "load" (this maintains tuning as in transverter circuit).
These notes as very important, as they are the secret of Tesla amplifying transmitter...
So OU goes as follows: H = I² Rt (H=Heat; I=current; R=resistance; t=time) (Joules law)
where E
in
= E
out
x 1.618 x Q
where E
out
/ E
in
= Eff%
(in case of RV, Virtual Alternator power is 1000% + (Radiant RF mode), see picture 120200x.JPG)
P
in
= V.A.PF [W] (PF = 1 = ‘unity’)
P
out
= (V1+V2+V3)/3 x (A1+A2+A3)/3 x 1.732 x PF [W]
Here as PF=0, power becomes Virtual standing wave (Scalar) potential (RF)
A conversion back to normal phased power is multiplied by .8 for down conversion loss, but still is OU.
Above postulates are universal in nature and applicable to all systems.
System is OU by the book!!
Note that the value of 1.618 = PHI = Golden Mean. This is a universal constant in nature. It is the path energy
takes to OU in transformation from one state to the other as it goes from STATIC charge to Energy in Motion
(dynamic movement).
Most power mosfets and many Darlington transistors have a protection diode already built in (no smoke). That is
why the power must be switched AFTER the coil returned to the negative, as the TRANSISTOR OPENS CEMP
reverse across diode. Positive to positive, negative to negative. This was one of the FIRST feedback circuits
made public years ago. Another one is the “infinite loop diagram”: reactor core mutually inductive LC tank pair.
In summary all is needed, is to VECTOR potential to diode bridges, positive parallel to 12V battery and is
LOOPED With OU power. All loop testing have shown a factual 1.618 logarithmic gain with the .618 being
usable power. As to attain stable looping, you need to raise the conversion recovery figures to a PURE full load
of .618 (61.8%). This can be taken to hi Q factors but this is where time-space anomaly phenomena begin to
manifest… Anyway be carefull with looping as this creates singularity and anomalic fields. It’s signiture can be
detected instantly, even lightyears away…
You need an exact capacitor value to charge in the cornu spiral region .. resonant half wave top capacitance
charge ....
Disbalance creates differential. Once the energy flows (like a hurricane) it self sustains. OU is transformation
(from acustics to gamma rays is the same).
Looping is using a portion of the output energy to drive the input of the system. This is possible in OU states,
where the output is higher than the input requirements. As such a self-running system is achieved.
Be very carefull with looping as it transforms local time-space into a singularity, and creates a signature that can
be instantly detected lightyears away.
Page 18
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 18
2.10 The Cornu spiral (or Euler’s spiral)
If you charge a coil and the moment you disconnect it, the pulse of the magnetic
collapse speed is determined by initial voltage, core (if any), turns of wire and inter-
winding capacitance. Varying the frequency varies the parameters also. Look for its
natural resonant frequency. Voltage will raise and fall in a Cornu spiral (see
logarithmic dynamics of oscillatory decay in time).
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/CornuSpiral.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/cornu.html
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/LogarithmicSpiral.html
If you see the LC tank as a SLIT in time and space, it’s very easy to visualize the
discharge dynamics of a collapsing magnetic field, Radiant wave emission into space. An Optical slit is no other
thing than an equivalent of LC resonant pathway to light frequency. This is the reason why the insistence on
Radiant energy as being RF and RF being the Extraction and transformation method for extracting ZPE from the
Aether region.
Logarithmic spiral, Cornu spiral and RF rules definitely show you nature’s path
to OU. LC energy always decays gaining energy from the ambient (replicate
transverter system ...).
The CMPU secret (all over the net already)..... A multivibrator setup as to
trigger opposed charged capacitors in null zone (dead time state); this totally
isolates the LC HALF resonant tank from the load, it is discharged into higher Q
higher frequency mode as to discharge charged capacitor in HALF the time it
takes for the other to charge up. As is SCR switched it will disconnect cap as
potential goes near 0 (this avoids voltage detuning of LC) permitting enhancement of LC charge curve into
Cornu spiral "Radiant energy manifests" (same as optical counterpart). The energy level is awesome as Cornu
spiral defines vortex within Aether time space matrix compressing it (extracting energy from time tensor vector
itself).
It will become evident as how you can extract it....YOU WILL HAVE A MAGNETLESS VTA as Cornu spiral
effect on LC is the same as in Atomic structure of CONDITIONED magnets where Sweet so much talked about.
Another hint: Newman motor is the same stuff! Same RF rules but ELF waves; charge the pathway LC (SLIT),
the spiral is defined, let it collapse, the spiral collapses too, BUT gains energy from time tensor that is transferred
to RADIATING FIELD WAVE COMPONENT (Radiant Energy). Transverter is opposed alternate method. As
you will realize, power capture is linear to source but decouples totally at discharge cycle. Current value
becomes a voltage related Virtual tensor (Imaginary) as initially is "0" (Null). The secret of OU is in the tuning
of things, the energy source and its load ... (Nature provides the rest).
2.11 Summary of RE manifest
The core specific frequency must be matched with specific wire turns and also to specific capacitance, as to
match a given speed of rotor at a given magnetic field intensity, as to attain EMA (Electro Magnetic
Amplification) mode.
o Core: specific frequency and impedance
o Coil: must match core impedance and frequency from saturation to 0 field point.
o Capacitor: must be as to make LC resonant or semi-resonant in a given loading range ... vectored to DC
or as AC application.
The importance in applying the principle of RESONANCE is to attain unusual magnetic Amplification modes,
where the energy is transferred from the ambient to endo-electroinductive states in a system reflecting as OU, or
"extreme energy saving states".
Best results are Hi impedance Broadband low reflectivity to prime-mover (low power usage) resonant states.
Upon loading this states to LOW impedance (Lenz effect on LC component) going hi Q and narrow-banded in
specific frequency (Resonant)
In case of generator this is the AC frequency its magnetic POLES generate as they pass and induce alternate AC
n s poles or alternate pulse NN or SS poles, where rotating speed must be x2 times in case full resonant AC plug
is used to prevent coil (LC gunning) in NNNN or SSSS only operation.
Page 19
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 19
So of primary importance is to match your cores properly to your rotor and match rotor speed to best LC
frequency. (Kone matched to BEST capacitor voltage increase (resonant PEAK) at given load).
This is KEY to get OU from ANY kind of generator as they are universal in nature.
Remember the relation on impedance that is needed as to attain logarithmic resonant gain within an LC-
components induced from a magnetic field.
The natural core resonances summed to an optimal ampere turn wire relation for best Q at lowest impedance
(loaded) and highest impedance un-loaded at a very broadbanded state were the coil will assume highest voltage
potential.
Shorting a coil as a magnetic field induces a current in the coil equals having an infinite farad capacitor were its
virtual resistive component is 0 ohms (superconductive).
The coil by consequential relation becomes in virtual superconductive state, where the current tends to become
maximal relative to infinite Q in infinite farad capacitor, until the electron saturation charge becomes also near
infinite (superconductive condensate) in the L current node. As the virtual capacitor is disconnected the coil field
collapse causes the charge to be released from a current node to a voltage one, crossing 0 point barrier
transferring potential to a capacitor of a given lower resonant point than infinite one.
We got that e=MC²/T and H=I²rt of 16 basic transfer equations.
Cores do transfer thermal and magnetic ambient noise potential (aetheric) to electrical realm, OU being nothing
more than another manifest of stochastic resonance phenomena justified by standard formulations. A magnet
becomes an energizer battery as the electron spin energy is transferred to a magnetic field then to MARNETIC
modulated field, transferring thermal or noise component to the e-field by means of current pumping.
The point is that RE can be created in LOW voltage Hi Q modes of resonance using off the shelve components
and hardware and that OU states can be obtained in standard generators, motors and transformers.
Review the resonance theory (remember the statements we seek what engineers try to avoid - resonance &
natural harmonics) and that we have to turn things ON by turning them OFF short to saturate open to release the
potential into a logarithmic resonant charge into a specific capacitor value. The RV demonstrated that since the
beginning using reverse induction. It surpasses MEG by order of 5 in hyperwave modes. This taken to PM
generators RV / EMA /Muller combination is the key to REA: world ZPE applications.
Charge & Farads determine Joules second, so there is no crap way of determining JOULES - HP transfer in
potential (that finishes off with the debunker crap ) and buries it into a pure DC - volt ampere potential where
power factor issues are also terminated.
I hope this repetition enlightens a bit more on ZPE issues. Any efficient generator can be converted to a ZPE
machine, be it EM/PM/RIEM (Electro magnet) (permanent magnet) (reverse Induction electro magnet).
There is no way I can be more clear and simple about it. The RV demonstrates this state in AC reverse induction
radiant energy alternator mode.
OU is no longer in question, we have to seriously deal with the applications and that is transferring the lab toy
experience to standard frame technology. We have to face a truth that the technology is already existing and that
100% of its patent expired already and that the importance is the method (given public) and understanding how
to apply that to useful practical items, like a simple bench drill and other tools you can think off.
Looping may come easier and as a byproduct of energy saving technology as a move is made toward
RESONANT power on demand modes of power usage (transformation).
Page 20
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 20
3 Practical Applications
Most experiments explained further are based on the standard 50 or 60 Hz house power. However it is important
to note that every electrical component has its own OPTIMAL frequency where it is more efficient, and where
usually OU manifestation occurs. This frequency can be provided by a computer to a transistor inverter, which
drives a transformer as to provide RV with power. In a Tesla coil spark gaps are adjusted to tune it to best
performance.
In motors and transformers a combination of 4 factors can be used:
in case of AC: frequency and amplitude (voltage)
in case of PULSES: amplitude and pulse length
At a given voltage and pulselenght any coil will deliver OU as an EMP, as the magnetic field generated from the
pulse collapses within the coil.
Samples
A 10 HP motor uses 10 HP, loaded or not. In RV mode it uses 2 HP, as a Rotary condenser it is able to pull a 10
HP Magnetic field in the rotor toward the Prime mover 2 HP rotary field. The power in this field will increase 50
times returning to source as KVARS. (http://www.pscpower.com/pages/series%20sc.htm)
Term- Hyper-modulation, where a carrier wave is 1W but the overall capacity of power increase is 50W
amplification applied to FIELD dynamics, treating Magnetic field as Class C amplifier power source. The mass
"magneto-atomic resonance" is what makes class C magnetic amplification possible.
Call it a Rotary linear Amplitron Magnetic Amplifier in case of combined pulse motor RV PM motor generator,
(RLAMA).
Another example is to take apart a 3PH air conditioning motor, you can rewind the stator more easy (as it uses
no paint or epoxy) into a bifilar 3PH hi impedance. Built a PM rotor as to have at anytime a 90deg vector
attracting PM rotor POLES toward EM stator ones. As these are approached, the PM field being stronger will
add energy to the EM coil and CHARGE battery or capacitor supplying it.
Factor to attain OU are: firing 3 rotor coils in proper relation to attraction angle maintaining the PM induced
VOLTAGE leading battery current (reversing it) - 0 current goes to "0" = <0. Use 3-phase diode bridge for
recovery.
EASER (Electrical Amplification by Secondary Emission of Radiation) energy pump: to get OU transformation,
all you need is to find the specific natural EASER frequency for your particular core & wire combination.
On metering, digital will read as well as analogue if you use a voltage drop resistor (50k, 500k, 1M are OK; 1/2
W carbon type) parallel to input lines; hi V use 10Mohm. You can make your own shunts using copper strips,
width & length & gauge determines AC or DC MV output at desired "terminal" location.
http://www.uoguelph.ca/antoon/circ/circuits.htm
http://www.allaboutcircuits.com/vol_6/chpt_3/11.html (many metering Projects here)
3.1 Rotoverter
Overview of Operation
The RotoVerter (RV) is a combination of a prime mover and a generator, mechanically connected in a 1:1 link.
Normally standard 3-phase (a,b,c) asynchronous squirrel cage motors are used both for the prime-mover and the
generator (in so-called "induction generator" mode). The prime-mover is wired for the highest possible voltage
and fed from a single phase instead of using all 3 phases. The applied voltage should be around ¼ of the motor
wiring voltage, as the ratio 1 to 4 is key here.
A virtual third phase is created with the help of a capacitor, which creates a 90-degree phase-shift between the
applied voltage and the current. (Note that the RV is NOT an “ADD a phase” system). The advantage of this
virtual 3-phase powering scheme is, that the prime-mover will draw MUCH less power in idle mode. In idle
mode, only about 12-50W is consumed and when loaded about 900W consumed. Capacitor tuning needs to be
done to reach PF=1 (Cos =1) from the source (or differently said: in Anti-resonance - LC is a NULL filter).
The mechanical output power is about ¼ to 1/6 of the HP rating of the motor, but a higher efficiency is reached
(see further).
Page 21
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 21
The RV generator/alternator is wired for the lowest possible wiring voltage, to have lower impedance and higher
Q (is the reverse of prime mover higher impedance at no load, to lower semi resonant impedance at load hi Q).
In LC circulating power L, C and R parameters can be changed. In the alternator LOW voltage seems to give
best Q and highest resonance. The load R can be made an integral part of LC within a set of tuned parameters
and OU in nature. Else power remains within LC and radiation field range. Relative, imaginary and real power
can be integrated and used.
So in essence the RV is to have 2 motors connected, one as motor and the other as generator. A load will be
connected to generator (having it'sdual windings in parallel, thus low Q, motor part has it'sdual windings in
series => high Q, big inductivity) and only then the motor part'srun cap is TUNED to MINIMAL MOTOR
CURRENT WITH DESIRED LOAD. So as H also says, now we have a High Q narrowband motor part driving
low Q wideband alternator part with desired load. Motor part will be tuned to resonance and this resonance will
contribute a lot of mechanical power to the alternator part while consuming minimal power from the power
supply. The motor part should have U voltage driving 4*U rated windings, this gives some headroom for
resonant rise and resonant amplification effects without the irons saturating. If run without load with the same
run cap, the motor part will not have minimum current because C-run for loaded case is bigger than C-run for
idle case. So in idle mode the RV primary'sinput current will be actually capacitive instead of inductive as with
normal motors. But when loaded, the sweet point is attained where the PF=1 and resonant current amplification
occurs and motor torque will be much bigger than normally expected with this low input voltage.
The purpose is to create the maximum current and maximum voltage in the stator windings and all this without
causing too much drag to the prime mover. The power factor needs to be 0. Here again capacitors are
added/tuned, but to obtain PF=0. The highest Q factor, resonance and the highest circulating virtual power
(VAR) need to be obtained. In RV generator at RESONANCE the 50/60CPS turns into ELF RF RADIANT
energy sinewave (and can be used to generate any kind of Tesla wave using SCR triggered pulsing system).
Magnets vibrates strongly as its aproached to active LC wire while in RV primemover input wire is minimal.
Capacitors are not a LOAD, they are PART of TRIPLEFLUX resonant 3PH LC (frequency tank) on RV
alternator where a reverse inductor rotor (negative resistor alike) imparts energy (pumps) energy to 3PH stator
LC windings (OU in fact). Hector uses the name ‘flux capacitor, as you have Phase vectors flowing in 3
capacitors. In AC you get FLUX, not stored charge, as is a dynamic rotary engine; in some states a capacitor is
SOLID conductor to the signal.
Due to the cyclo-conversion effect, system gain is achieved, which comes from stochastic resonance. The RV
works under the basic formula H = I² Rt, where basic gain from magneto-atomic amplification is a predicted
1.618 within a logarithmic gain time-reversed spiral with consequential thermal-ambient noise reduction and
transformation to the electrical power region. As such overunity is achieved.
A diode plug is used to transfer 0.618 of the power to another capacitor, that is discharged to transfer its power to
a more standard co-phased PF=1 energy mode. The remaining 1.0 power is used to maintain the system in OU
resonant status.
RV is a Tool to improve on rotary machinery, and to acquire certain skills with lab practice (as solid-state
devices require much more Knowledge on Radiant energy issues).
Documentation about the mechanics involved: http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/AC_9.html. This
is one of the best to find, very helpful for RV & R&D stuff ... reversing some of the "equations" & applications
is the KEY to energy transform.
Relation: the M field becomes the energy provider for V-I, contributing its energy as VA to source as pole stator
pole becomes receptor of higher energy; as a rotary field is present on it the other pole may provide re-gaussing
to core in a mild repulsion mode but at same time attracted to opposed polarity pole sector at 90° angle.
Normal RV demonstrates OU virtual states (Radiant Energy). PM RV takes it to real transform mechanics
(Basic) from pure magnetic domain. RV demonstrates 3 principles in vitro. The intent is to give a tool of
learning where you can apply those 3 principles: 1) energy savings and R&D; 2) Radiant energy R&D;
3) overunity energy transform.
RV is an R&D tool seemly primitive, but is far more advanced than many university instruments now on use. It
will change the way we look at power in a very drastic way, to use RADIANT energy you need to create it! RV
alternator is the cheapest safest way I found you can create it with; no $5 million university prototype or Tesla
10 million volt coils. A safer 220 to 900VAC range using 3 PH motors as reverse inductor "amplitrons" - verify
you got RF with scope.
Nodes current and voltage related 0 to each other, 90 deg phase! That is "RADIANT ENERGY". It makes a
magnet dance in your hands, as many other still undisclosed things (partially revealed).
Page 22
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 22
What you need
The best RV performances are 3PH motors from 3 - 7.5 HP for 60Hz, or 5 - 10HP for 50Hz, minimal 84%
efficiency. (If available, use energy savings inverter-grade ones, up to 96% efficiency.) These have larger mass,
more impedance, less loss, more broadband loading range; that is why the RV efficiency range is better within
that range ... best impedance stator rotor relation. (Higher range is good for slow speed hi torque PM rotors). The
resonance figures are better, because bigger motors have much lower active resistance. 1-3 ohms-resistive is OK
for a phase. 25HP motor is hi current and lower impedance than normal 23 Ohm, a not so perfect RV mode (only
for PM rotor use). Old motor has core losses but the new motor cores are down to 3% loss or less, PM eliminates
squirrel cage 10% loss, run in RV mode it will provide KVAs to home correcting power factor.
For PM setups or EM synchronous, you can go to 1MW (tested) as can play with the impedance and drag issues.
10HP is OK for 50Hz as the higher mass ratio compensates for frequency (lower). 580VAC motors are OK.
Have a motor with external fan, which is easier to remove, as it is not needed and improves the efficiency. A
squirrel cage motor can function as an AC generator. You need a final LC network to transfer non-canceling
power to other inductive devices.
Best is to use dual winding motors. If not available, single winding motors can be used as well. For dual
winding motors, take 230/460, 9lines WYE or 12 lines DELTA/WYE configurable. The real universal would be
120/240/360/480 WYE DELTA 24 lines 3Phases, specified to as per RV design (EM / PM ).
Take any rpm, but alternator rpm must be equal or lower than primover rpm. Example primemover 2900rpm,
alternator 2900 or 1450rpm.
As reference, the most common utility grids in use are:
•
120/240 60Hz in US, Canada, Caribian area, …
•
230/400 50Hz in EU/ROW (some regions apply 220/380V or 240/415V, or even the older 127/220V)
The third phase is created by run capacitor(s) 1,2,4,8,16,32,64 µF. Those can be opto-SCR switched to make the
voltage equal in all phases (=semi-resonance).
So have a set of oil capacitors (no litics), ranging from 1uF to 50uF, not starting caps but running mode caps
being at least 370-400VAC. Take no litics as they overheat, degrade and explode in constant AC. Easiest in a lab
is to build a capacitor bank with switches to adjust the required capacitance value.
All you need is best starting capacitance from 100µF t0 175µF depending on your motor, and running
capacitance from 7.5µF to 24µF depending also on your motor.
In practice
Prime-mover: you need to wire the prime-mover correctly, to get to the correct
impedance where the RE effect occurs.
•
For single winding motors (typical for Europe): Use 2900rpm motor, wire it in
‘Y’ (so for 400V, but notice that in Y 2 windings are in series, so 460V rates),
and apply ¼ voltage single-phase to it. So feed 115V through variac (R&D) or
better through transformer (lower loss).
•
For 230/460V motors (typical for US): Use 3450rpm motor, wire it in
460V mode ‘Y’, and apply single-phase 110V. If dual winding motors are
available (230/460 dual winding, 9 lines WYE or 12 lines DELTA/WYE
configurable), use those, and connect the coils in series for the prime
mover. Up to date Baldor, US, GE motors are the best. (See wiring
diagram)
The prime-mover is connected in WYE. 2 terminals are connected to the input
voltage, where the current will lag behind due to the inductance. The third
terminal is fed through a capacitor, which compensates the lagging of current,
as such creating a rotating magnetic field in the stator windings, which will
induce the current in initially static squirrel cage rotor windings. The running cap becomes the phase-angle
vector generator. (this kind of driving a 3 PH motor is known as "Steinmetz"-circuit in Germany. But note again
that the RV is NOT an “ADD a phase” system, but special high eff energy saving mode). In RV primemover you
manage PHASEANGLE in broadbanded low loss HI impedance LC PHASING network (3-wire LC).
In RV you have 3 phases. At stand still, you need to generate 3 phases at 120deg using semi-resonant phasors
that requires high capacitance as your rotor is a short circuit at stand still, so has low impedance. The squirrel
cage is considered as a transformer secondary winding, which is in "shorted" state when the rotor is just starting
its rotation. Its primary virtual inductance (and thus the total impedance) is very low and high current is needed
Page 23
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 23
from the source. To maintain the rotating magnetic field in the stator when the rotor is just accelerating, we have
to supply a lot of current to ALL of the stator windings, as such needing a bigger starting capacity to lower the
impedance there as well.
When the rotor comes up to speed, the rotating magnetic field of the stator will cut less and less the squirrel-cage
windings and the virtual transformer shorting effect decreases and thus the needed current from the power source
also decreases. In order not to destroy the rotating field, the start cap needs to be disconnected. This is valid only
for the prime mover in UNLOADED case. If you leave the starting cap connected, it becomes out of resonance
with line tending to go lagging in one phase and leading in the other.
So the lower capacitance permits as rotor acquires rotation for the motor to be on resonance with line at high
impedance, such goes down with LOADING, and the
phasors or phases angles require adjustment to maintain
proper phase angles.
RV has a RANGE of parameters were its IMPEDANCE
varies for 23 Ohms to 800 Ohms and phase angles from
90 to 180 degrees of rotation. So taking as a base 60CPS,
you have to create a chart for each RV motor you make
on load and capacitive variables.
RV loaded it has 51.2 ohms reactance as OPTIMAL
value; as load varies it can shift from 23 to 800 ohms
impedance.
The winding'sX
L
will depend on the loading of the
motor; as such the Q (Q=X
L
/R or Q=X
C
/R) will change in
a wide range. When we are loading the RV primary with
some mechanical force (like loaded alternator for
example), we are reducing the rotors speed, the revolving
stator field will cut more of the squirrel cage windings,
the transformer-kind-of loading effect increases and stator
windings virtual resistance decreases. The run cap needs
to be adjusted so that the consumed power from source is
minimal. THIS IS WHAT HECTOR THINKS AS HIGH
Q SEMY RESONANT STATE: loaded motor is a bit
similar to a starting but unloaded motor - you need especially to tune the caps so, that the semi-resonance takes
place at LOADED STATE. Then according to the resonance laws and depending on the Q factor, the apparent
parallel LC circuit resistance can be many times bigger than the individual X
L
or X
C
(and so the consumed power
from the power supply is minimal). At the same time big circulating currents exist in the same parallel LC circuit
(motor windings).
So the effect will be such: when the RV prime mover is running idle, then it will consume some amount of
power and its total resistance is mainly determined by the X
L
of the windings. When loading the RV prime
mover, we will get closer to resonant state and the consumed power will NOT increase linearly with loading, but
may even DECREASE due to the fact that the overall system resistance might be several times bigger due to
high Q non-linear effect.
In RV under no loading it tends to be self power correcting to line, but relative to phase relation in rotary mode
tendency is to be as amplitron amplifier where phase elements tend to be resonant relative to rotation ... the load
becomes a reverse inductor were rotor at no mechanical resistance represents a hi impedance relative to stator
one. As loaded it becomes a low impedance relative to stator one correspondingly the current - voltage phase
angles change.
In resonance the current and voltage phases must be 90deg apart -
that is FULL LOAD lock. But as RV rotates it goes broadband as
toward infinite resistance as ROTOR impedance recedes from stator
rotary field in a Hyper broadband semi resonant state, as non
reflected power to source until it hits natural synchronous rotation
impedance limit were it can’t recede further (Acquired Rotation
stage).
One interesting thing is a running RV serves as Current flywheel to
any motor started on the same line ironing and spreading the
POWER surge. A big HP motor running as RV can serve as
DAMPER in HI surge power equipment, lowering brown outs and
If we take the single phase and make it resonate, it
will resonate differently in capacity then if all three
phases were resonated. The single phase alone will
defy the usual concepts of maximum energy transfer
also. It will not suffer a drop in voltage when the
demand is made on it, because the other phases will
contribute their voltage to its cause, and it can be
measured that the phase with no load on it actually
looses voltage with respect with the phase that has to
do work. Anyone with a converted AC car alternator,
playing around with driving resonant circuits to its
output freq on a single phase of three available should
find this out for themselves. We should not suppose
that phase exists entirely by itself, and truly a
common junction ties them all together because they
are tied in WYE. One cannot exactly act
independently of another. And if we take the
alternator outputs, and try to send them to a
transformer to increase the voltage, more illogical
things can happen. We cannot connect a WYE-to-
WYE transformation, imbalances occur. On the
ending WYE to DELTA secondary of the connected
transformer we might find voltage only on two of
three available outputs.
Page 24
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 24
surges on motor starting & other hi surge equipment
The values of the capacitors and components are specific to the motor size used. The starting cap is 100-200 F,
the running cap is from 7 to 40 F (370V oil caps). Starting cap is to give a boost from 0. Big motors require it to
acquire torque to move the rotor mass plus alternator mass to rotational RV effect speed. The run capacitor is
chosen as to maintain best 120-degree rotation within the 3PH windings under the intended target load.
Tune with the capacitor values to get PF=1 for input voltage and current. (see scope shot to the right). The
‘clean’ sine is the voltage, whereas the ‘dirty’ sine is the current, almost perfectly in phase.
Alternator: for alternator motor, use the corresponding motor voltage according to the grid of your region. You
can use a similar motor as your prime mover. But best is HI rpm prime mover and low rpm
alternator, in a 1:1 rigid link. So if you use a 1450rpm motor (1725rpm in US), you have a
100Hz (or 120Hz in US) output. An alternator with low core mass has less gain, but the
higher frequency compensates the loss. The higher frequencies at the alternator also allow you
later to achieve higher resonant Q values and allow the use of much smaller caps.
So wire your alternator for the lowest voltage (eg. 220VAC), as such they give the best
radiant energy output. They work OK in 415VAC but lower Q. In a 3PH alternator:
((V1+V2+V3)/3) x ((A1+A2+A3)/3) x 1.732 x PF (power factor being reversely applied
to RF radiant mode as power is maximal at 0 PF point).
Try various capacitor values in alternator. In one way or the other it will work, as long
you get within reverse induction LC parameters, remanent magnetism in core will
amplify until radiant energy switches to action.
So with the RV you need to tune 2 caps, the alternator cap and the run cap. First use a bit bigger run cap, get the
alternator to properly generate (by selecting/changing the value of alternator'svectoring cap) without bogging
down the prime mover. Also you need to do the tuning in the LOADED state, where some useful load is also
connected to the alternator. When the alternator works and the load is powered, then tune also the prime-mover's
run cap to the minimal value of consumed current from the power supply.
The voltage waveform across the run cap is 60° lagging the input waveform to the RV (not 90° as thought).
120/2 = 60. 3 phases are 120 degrees one from the other relative to line; in a phase converter it is 120/2. Relative
to the prime-mover, the alternator lags 30 deg max (critical).
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Page 25
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 25
In a 10x step-down in a RV alternator from hi voltage say 236VAC 8A circulation, means 23.6VAC at 80A.
Wire mass must be identical in primary and secondary impedance matching balun transformer or FR trafo; 10 to
one ratio must be a turn to circular mill ratio 10:1 within same weight ratio 1:1.
The schematic at Don’s page being "understood" within
standard technology ... being RV as sample 20A max at
inverter input, 200VAC 5A at alternator and split into a
pulsed diode 3x3 plug and 3 dual split 2x2 extracting
capacitors were joule time energy J/2 may equal 20VDC
at 25A potential versus the 20A 12.7 max input
expenditure fed back is a predictable 1.618 overunity as
predicted in theory or 1.33 as tested in VTA in real lab
testing.
Study MRA Dynamics apply to rotary motor ones
thinking in a reverse mode application where the LOAD
tunes system toward RF resonant OU states:
http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/1mra.htm and
http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/2mra.htm
In Hi Q tensor LC becomes energy transforming pump
& self sustains; a lowering of temperature indicates
transformation of energy from AMBIENT to electrical
one ... no magic , just a bit of advance plain science.
VTA, MEG, NEWMAN, Bedini, MRA, Konemotor,
RAIN motor.... is same phenomena.
HP is re-rated to 0.5 to 1.8 RV mode from (3 to 7.5 HP) motors. In solar energy applications it’s a big difference
using inverters; 10 solar cells less you need to run your devices. 40W at 12.7V with a 90% EFF inverter is 3.5
amperes max, compared to 1 HP 890W battery Killer constant 77.9 AMPERES at 12.7 VDC.
Hint: when the alternator part has demagnetized (this happens usually when alternator is allowed to run down
with load connected), do these steps in order to get it started again (of course the certain vector-capacitor is
always needed between two of the alternator output wires, unless you are using some triple-flux delta system):
1. RV is at standstill stopped and disconnected state (load disconnected from alternator)
2. Take 12V car battery and connect its leads to two of the alternator wires for about 1-2 seconds only. This
will restore the small remanent magnetism in alternator core that causes the alternator really to start
generate.
3. Fire up the RV as usual. Now it should start to generate easily again.
RV can give 1HP from 12W input in a well tuned system, and surprise in under-perfect tuned conditions it gives
1 HP for 548W not 746W as book rule. That condition is not easy to attain as it varies from motor to motor but is
there to be replicated by anyone wanting. In combination with reverse induction alternator in 3PH LC semi-
resonant tanks power levels of 12 times magnitude circulate within LC circuit. This power is RESONANT &
radiant in nature as described by TESLA & E Gray. The big difference is that using standard motors & parts, the
same power effects can be obtained as the Tesla Amplifying transmitter and Tesla coil, but on low voltage, and E
Gray COLD electricity can also be obtained as to FULLY light a 220V bulb under water with nearly no voltage
drop using the CURRENT NODE of the circulating standing wave within the RLC circuit. Voltage can be
regulated as a TUNING factor in OU circuit, look for a fast raise toward SATURATION and a slower energy
transform into a recovered DC vector. CORES will COOL down as predicted in GENESIS transform.
The force to maintain a HI Q radiant self exited oscillation within RV (RotoVerter) LC components is minimal
as system gains energy within itself, thermal and stochastic resonance waves add on to the rotating vector forces
not subtracting from it ... if induction becomes off phase then wave cancellation occurs and system shuts down
and degausses.
Resonance is maintained at higher energy levels than input. Using reverse induction, the rotor is becoming a sort
of negative resistor to the power within the Alternator LC circuit. The next path is to understand how to tune and
use this power with standard equipment and using standard parts.
The prime-mover acts as transformer. Tuned right it can hit 1.618 gain limited by LINE source parameters. It can
hit more with other higher-level technology…PMCUs. RV alternator is like a Tibetan crystal bell, similar you
can get in semi resonant states from COP 5 to COP 15 LC power circulation in 3 phases. The system can be
tailored for single phase also.
In PM mode (permanent magnet) the rotor unit
becomes ROTARY condenser Magnetic amplifier and
generates VARs to the line (KVARS if motor is big).
It’s NATURALY OU as there is no Impedance SWR
loss reflection resulting in TRUE Magnetic
amplification.
A lower powered HI inductance coil attracts a free
rotating magnetic pole the higher energy of the
ROTATING MAGNETIC FIELD will IMPART its
ENERGY to THE LOWER energy region, in this case
a stator sector of 3PH motor energized at a lower
energy level attracting a field with a higher energy one
... the attracted field will port leading energy factors to
it, with proper impedance pure rotary magnetic
amplitron alike amplification is obtained from magnets
energy.
Think on the microwave magnetron dynamics, only
instead of rotating an electron beam we rotate a magnet
at light speed that creates a synchronized amplified M
field to rotary LC electric RF components the M field
passes its energy to VA field of the source.
Page 26
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 26
The rotor top must rotate toward the rising sun (east) and bottom toward the west. It’s funny but you truly spare
a few extra watts doing that, and lower your bearing maintenance cost, stabilizing earth on the way. A rotor
spinning that way also will weight less in relativistic terms due to low virtual ballistic orbit and centrifugal
vectors relative to earth rotation and gravity flux. Anyway use RV for transformation, orient shaft N S (Poles)
rotate rotor top east bottom west, and tune to "nature" Harmonics, negative effects are eliminated
As an alternative you can use PC ATX power supply switched to 220VAC and vectored within the capacitor
potential. Output can then be diode paralleled to 12V 60A or more depending in ATX power 300W or 450W
used.
Summary
As RV starts, it is resonant; as it attains rotation its impedance becomes receding (running away from source); as
you load it tends to go back to semi resonant state, where the extra phase takes the power factor lag as a leading
angle in the extra phase, balancing input PF ‘unity’. As such the power is more efficiently used than in standard
all the time energy wasting motor. This can lead to RV LOW WASTE MOTOR design, eff 96% to 98% on
LOW power motors and 90% energy savings on basic iddling used like in tools and other intermittent or variable
load use.
•
PM start:
hi Q, low impedance, narrowband LC of resonant state
•
PM run no-load:
low Q, hi impedance, broadband LC of semi-resonant state
•
PM getting loaded:
becomes higher Q, lower impedance, narrowbanded LC of (semi-)resonant state
•
Alt
higher Q & resonance, lower impedance, higher capacitance, higher VARS
Primemover Input [a,b]: Watts = V x A x PF (line input)
3
rd
phase generation within ABC phase relation of that input, we have:
Primemover Motor: Watts = ((V1+V2+V3)/3) x ((A1+A2+A3)/3)) x 1.732 x PF (REAL a,b,c 3PH)
Just with this formula, OU is demostrated.
The extra virtual 120° phase is created by C (and relative to rotor vectors which are at 90° in 2 pole rotor being
best eff%), where the capacitor becomes a vectoring element generating the 3 phases within the rotary motor
component, that results in power factor correction and EMA effect (electromagnetic amplification) "virtual". In
the case of the RV under no load, it becomes broadband hi impedance semi resonant condition, resulting in
LOW power usage "energy savings" with one phase leading. Under loading the tendency is to go resonant
undergoing transition to low impedance and tendency (determined by tuning) to reflect Unity power factor to
line, but undergoing an also unity 120 deg phase shift (120x3=360 ) - relative also from semi resonant condition
states ...phases being synchronous and balanced (determined by tuning).
The rotor in RV becomes reverse induction VARIABLE element that determines IMPEDANCE relative to the
input frequency and amplitude. So here we take MECHANICAL LOAD as a variable, reflecting a CHANGE in
impedance rather than a PURE resistance to energy flow. In doing so, we reduce the thermal loss and increase
power gain eff% within the system.
That means the ROTATING element of squirrel cage rides the AC wave, becoming synchronous to it, resulting
in a very broadband impedance match to line, reducing loss as if it were a TRUE induction transformer; the
energy results in rotary mechanical movement reflecting minimal loss to the source. Results are 90% + minimal
savings in iddling motors with no loading.
You must understand the real meaning of rotoconversion. A 5HP-rated motor at RV mode at 60cps 1800RPM
will give out 1.5HP. When you double the frequency, you must double voltage to retain its mode. Power doubles
too. Why 1/4? Because higher voltages lead to magnetic saturation and there is "no room" for the energy
amplification. RV mode as well as high efficiency is maintained.
The point is that motor power is typically defined at 50 or 60Hz. If you increase it to 600cps the power is 10
fold. At the same time you must increase the voltage proportionally. All can be made to function automatically -
the pulse width to adjust voltage (example: 600V pulse at 20% = 120V) - if you increase the speed 5x - you will
have 100% pulse width.
The impedance varies during the load. You cannot easily measure it. Even if you know the inductance - it is
variable, no use.
RV-mode (driving at 1/4 V) is called higher impedance mode where OU transformation happens (or becomes
more visible). The reason to drive at 1/4V is to avoid at semi-resonance that the voltage goes towards/above the
rated motor voltage, which would bring it into the saturation region.
Page 27
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 27
In (semi)resonance you do not need very complicated equipment to measure the third phase. You can measure
current or voltage, if it is similar with all 3PH, it is in semi-resonance. There is no need for magic capacitor.
Without the load you can tune it to sharper area, with load, it is more flat. The point is that when the motor is not
saturated, there is an effect.
In resonance all phases are at 120°. Prime mover input power at PF=1 is V x A. The output power = average(V)
x average(A) x 1.732 x PF. At let’s say 80% down-conversion efficiency to co-phased power, this is still 138%
OU by the book (see section 2.9).
In our learning curve we are:
* RV principle as universal concept to drive motors
* PM RV, generators, Ecklin type generators, (brushless) excitable generators
* resonance power extraction
* solid state (TV), power generation and extraction
In a future, new motors can have RV concept, but they may turn at 60000RPM, having only some turns of wire,
high freq, low mass (use math: increase the RPM, you'll need less wire, less mass).
The roll of impedance
Standard motors usually have an impedance of 23 ohm or less. Resonance requires specific impedance where the
OU stochastic transform takes place from thermal-magnetic ambient noise. That usually is above 36 Ohms for
12V operation (48 Ohms might be optimal for Konehead type motor). For RV under LOAD is 52.1 ohms with
properly tuned capacitor. In a regressing rotating field resistance turns negative and becomes infinite, current
reverses back to source. Volts to Ohms ratio 1:4 (12.7VDC - 50.8 Ohms) to 1:5 (12.7VDC - 63.5 Ohms).
With no load, the impedance tends to go infinite assuming a PERFECT motor. As Loaded it goes to 50-Ohm
range. OU Energy is related to Q - you Broadband the signal it KILLS OU as energy is lost.
Relation of frequency core mass & winding impedance is KEY to alternate energy R&D -to find the OPTIMAL
frequency and voltage performance of MOTORS.
If you take the reverse stochastic thermal transform and multiply by .618, resistance will be 38.735Ohms within
an operable LC system in 1:5 ratio system. These RATIOS are MAGIC 1:5 (Voltage - Resistance) (impedance to
impedance) and 1:2 capacitor to capacitor stage one to stage two on Konzen type or solid state. This is also
applicable to MEG. Resonance is the key.
At semi resonant state HIGH IMPEDANCE, the Rotor becomes a Surfer - RIDER on the ROTARY field motor
a surfer puts no load on a sea wave as RV rotor assuming a perfect surfing puts no load to the WAVE it rides.
If you have a frequency, phase or impedance mismatch, you would waste energy (one part for increasing
oscillation, the other part for dampening). This is clear in RF power MATCHING.
The current, flowing through the coils, and the number of windings, determines intensity of a magnetic field. So
you can have the same strong magnetic field with fewer current and more windings (fewer energy needed for
same magnetic field). Over current only saturates cores creating drag (proven in Raivo’s "Oversaturated PM
generator cores").
One would think that it should be possible to get more torque connecting the motor in 220V instead of 120V.
BUT, the impedance changes to WASTE standard dynamics and RV effect is LOST, idea is to LET LOAD
RAISE impedance to more efficient power on demand conversion, in 220vac you have a half to 1/4 RV left,
other is WASTE ... (try to hit 12W in no load)
In order to RAISE Q you need to LOWER impedance, loading does that as your source frequency is fixed. Refer
to RF Transmitter final network tuning in Radio amateur books.
"Impossible" like building a Bedini motor with a 12V car motor Starter stator winding coil .00000013 Ohms we
are going back to already tested issues core and coil must be interrelated to their NATURAL resonance
frequency Kone TESTED the hi impedance effect and corroborated motors work best in HI impedance modes
(no need to go to EV Gray 5KV region) if we can do with 120V on existing hardware .. More practical to PM
them up (Permanent Magnet rotors).
And as TRUE UNIVERSAL motors PULSE THEM and AC run them TO OU modes ... the question is who
wants to make them? Or who wants to put serious money to manufacture them?
Page 28
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 28
Efficiency and Torque
Standard motors have an efficiency of about 84% (Watt to HP ratio), means 888.8W is required to run it at one
HP load. For a more efficient setup use energy saver type A motors and a 94% efficient inverter type. On some
motors HP increases over standard HP rating and exhibits OU in KVAR power factor correction in a line from
AC source. This applies to the compared load in original HP rating.
You may never see max power draw in newer energy saver types or hi impedance types, but standard plate
current for say Baldor motors from 1 HP to 250HP exceeds HP draw of 746W per HP as per plate reading, and
efficiency goes to .96 above 20HP frames but still under no load power draw exceeds HP rated draw. Under 20
HP I have not seen over 96% eff. yet and with 23 ohms or lower no motor uses less than rated HP power in watts
idling. Plate rated power is not same as rated HP.
Some standard motors don'tpull maximum power at idle. This is true for high impedance motors, say 52 Ohms,
but not for 23 ohms or lower. Baldor , Marathon and US motors list say otherwise, unless they go covertly into
high impedance without mentioning RV effect, as they else have to face that their motors were in fact designed
to waste energy. This is just like with the electronic energy savers lights; they gradually introduced non
modifiable circuits to put out 80% lumen increase with 20% of power use. Hector’s original design is tritium
mercury gas with 1W igniter for a 8 footer FL light at max lumen output. The problem was once lit it never goes
out, but only after 25 years when the tritium h3 is depleted.
Input when RV is idle: 12-50W on battery inverter side; with fully loaded RV: 890W on inverter side. In RV, HP
is re-rated to 0.5 to 1.8 RV mode from 3 to 7.5 HP motors. If the idle draw is 32W. Reported RV lab
performance efficiency is .97 -.94 range at max LOAD. In PM the 32W becomes 320W of VARS (PF correction
to source) being OU - PM RV primemover becomes 161.8% efficient (minimal).
If we take as a fact that a great percentage of industrial and commercial machinery uses power intermittently (as
a rotary punch, a lathe, a drill, a grinder, a rotary saw, a reciprocating pump, vacuum pumps and lots more), we
sum up the energy savings within the idle states and subtract this relative to standard full load motors, we can
conclude that the application of this system can save 36 to 40% of the power usage in the US alone.
1 HP RV
<40W idling
794W loaded
(1HP) 94% eff
1 HP Std Motor >888W idling
940W loaded
(1HP) 79% eff
constant 848W waste...
This demonstrates that the basic induction motor design can be enhanced using Hi impedance and capacitor
phase generation vectoring. This also can be applied to ROTARY condenser machines resulting in EMA where
energy can be gained from the medium by mean of transformation.
It has many immediate applications especially in low power AEOLIC, SOLAR co-generation projects, as RV
uses 1/5 to 1/10 the energy to co-generate from solar cells .. and that is only the start. The implication is massive,
as it permits the operation of otherwise wasteful high power implementations, using now low cost solar
alternatives leaving other wise wasted power as reserve, to be used on demand. It makes 1KW to 10KW home
cogeneration systems practical ... using PF correction is also OTHER issue as it can be taken to EMA ZPE
states. Applications from heat pumps to fans are many ... a bit of lab work prototype and manufacture it is all is
needed from off the shelve parts.
The rotoconversion effect applied to power factor correction cogeneration and generation will change forever the
way power engineering will be applied in the future, resulting in technologies never dreamed today. RV is
actually used as R&D tool, in fact it is the most advance and simplest development in alternate energy in the last
30 years, now slowly and painfully being made public piece by piece.
RV standard eff is 94 % minimal, 10% increase eff over same standard motor. 161.8 % in 3,6,9 sub-harmonic
internal superwave integration ... (that is why cone RV runs at faster RPM than normal). With 90%+ (up to 99%
in some motors) savings in non-loaded idle modes. That can give all motors in the US 90 % minimal power
savings in intermittent loading uses (shifting loads) variable.
PM goes OU providing KVARS to line when is connected synchronous to source power. If PM rotor is supplied,
then RV puts more power into Source than it requires to run. Standard EM Universal motor is 60% eff, with PM
is 80% eff; average power eff raise is 1.3333. So multiplying 94% x 1.33 = 125% … it’s OU…
See previous postings on POWER FACTOR & Bedini power Factor Correcting his batteries - Kone’s recovery
circuit experience and modification to use NS poles instead of all n poles in RV mode. Any 460VAC generator
powerplant can be made into RV Rotary magnetic - "condenser" amplifier.
So assuming a mass to field ratio, we have a range within witch motors have max gain, then we see a direct
relation of frequency mass and field strength in them. Entering into a design with PM rotors where in a near
mass limit we have a 91 to 99% eff. At an impedance from 100 to 51.1 ohms for a 10 HP motor we enter a
Page 29
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 29
lossless zone were PF becomes reciprocal AMPLIFICATION FACTOR as linear class C amplifier where EMI
(in) /EMR (rotor) = EMAF (Amplification factor). Other things apply, as this is oversimplified rule of thumb.
See power factor correction; frequency increase compensate mass, so we can have 30 to 100 HP motors that fit
in the palm of your hand.
There is an expected torque reduction running the motor at 120V but wired for 460V, which is between 46% to
80% depending on motor, PM 20% to none.
On Torque be careful, as there are many definitions for it from starting, to running torque, "variable" but on
rotation can be as hi as one HP full rated for 5HP motor. That is not low power especially at 94% eff.
Torque goes dramatically up as PM rotors are used and 3PH windings are switched to provide field rotation. 3 ph
frequency controlled AC inverters can be used for this adapted to 120V to drive hi impedance winding 460VAC
wired ones.
Hectors RV tests
He is using special dual-winding motors. In the prime mover he is connecting the windings in series (to 480V
mode), but driving the motor only from 110V grid (operating at ¼ of the voltage). This series-connection further
helps to reduce input current. The HI impedance and 3
rd
phase generation create a transformer alike operation
where 1/10 power usage can be attained at no load. In his alternator part (the second dual-winding motor) he has
connected the windings in parallel - this reduces losses and alternator (generator) internal resistance.
The second schematic is an RV looped system. There is one cross-phase cap to tune and keep the alt in semi-
resonant state, and there are three coupling caps where again RF and POWER transformer rules apply.
The reason why no fixed values are given, is because EACH motor character is different; even with the same
make and same model, the parameters deviate a bit as the % of accuracy in resistors and capacitors ... so to
encourage tuning no exact values are given.
In the next picture, a 12V car battery initiates the system, it provides power to a 12VDC - 120VAC 1200W AC
modified sine-wave inverter (EFF % 94%). This powers the RV main prime-mover (7.5 HP 3PH 230/460VAC
3465 rpm US motor - windings in WYE wired at 460VAC shown as L1, L2, L3). The alternator is an identical
(squirrel cage) motor but wired for 230VAC, linked face to face with a motor shaft coupling to prime mover. In
the alternator L1, L2, L3 are connected to 3 capacitors coupled to 3 transformers, an extra capacitor is placed in
any A, B, C phase as to provide rotor squirrel cage with inductive rotating field.
Page 30
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 30
A rotating magnetic field is created loaded by the battery resistance and the Inverter load; the system is tuned to
resonance providing a standing wave current node input to the battery ("negative resistor"), which exceeds the
LOAD demand of the inverter recharging the system. At 0 volts a negative current is created as to maintain a
reverse flow (charge) to battery exceeding the forward drain of the inverter demand, detuning system with a
forward charge at 10 amperes with a voltage rise of approximately .83333 V over the battery voltage charge
produces OU transform from the 0 point standing wave component. System gains energy from stochastic
resonance within the LC tank components draining energy from "thermal" signature of the ZPE and K
thermodynamic-thermoelectric ambient heat. The System Energy is maintained by the energy of the rotating
squirrel cage in regressive reverse induction, requiring energy only to regain a percentage of the energy loss
component from the resonant system acting as negative resistor.
Apply bandpass filter to achieve a more suitable impedance match between the alt and the trifos. Idea is to
valance the phase angle of current and voltage to vectorize properly the radiant energy across transformer
phases; see the battery as a varactor diode that must be compensed at hi Q.
In testing, battery changes resistance as recharging occurs this provokes system to detune from resonant to non-
resonant mode drifting from OU to non-OU transform modes. Tendency is to dry out battery, as these are not
designed to work in cross current vectors variations. Therefore use separated alternating battery banks and
increase inverter input operation
voltage (design it for 120VDC input)
eliminating the transformers.
System Gain comes from stochastic
resonance and ZPE as the magnetic
latching occurs within the core-wire
LCR components of the motor and its
Capacitor driven rotary 3PH fields, in
resonance, the time-energy decay is
the only energy you require to
replenish at to maintain it. A resonant
hi Q circuit tends to have a fixed
decay, this being as rule of thumb
.372 (37.2 %) per full wave
oscillation. A spiral is manifested as
logarithmic gain of 1.618 within sine-
wave gain curve occurs were Voltage
“Electrons” are accelerated within
virtual oscillatory wall (Stochastic
Page 31
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 31
resonance).
To measure the current relation in a RV, use 3 current shunts (can be resistors) 0.1 ohm in WYE. One leg goes to
the source battery, one to return (generator to be tested, DC output), and the third to the load (inverter). A
common ground is used for all devices (G).
The inverter current must be the sum of return and battery current. As the return equals inverter current and
battery current is 0 that is UNITY. When the battery voltage equals Return voltage = unity. As current reverses
into battery and battery voltage becomes lower than Return voltage, that signals you got overunity.
RV>BV=OU COP = RV/BV condition under full load.
That is DC Y bridge to measure overunity; an undeniable tool as it measures pure DC. Since 3PHASE DC
outputs phases overlap, is very low ripple, hi rectification adding to DC purity, so no ripple artifacts can be
attributed as to be cause of error in dc readings.
Hectors RV example with light bulbs
(see picture on Introduction page) First tune the RV to minimal loading (free wheeling - no mechanical load). In
the alternator side seek 3 LCs max energy near resonance with less power input. Normal ratio of power in to
Virtual LC power is 10:1 compared to input "minimal '.Then READ the ampere load: that means the amperage
of EACH LC, you seek a LOAD as filament lightbulb of SAME amperage (e.g.: 220 VAC 4.545A - 1000W -
in series you put a 1000W lightbulb to that LC). Do not exceed R ampere rating as it can burn or explode the
lightbulb. In case needed, put several bulbs in series and/or parallel to match the voltage and current.
The secret is the STANDARD AMPERES rating in the lightbulb MUST match the LC amperage at resonance.
Call it Ampere Load, as in resonance the antinode condition is the only VALID reference measure, retune to
compensate for R thermal ambient drift. In RV alternator you can SHORT a 1000W bulb to 0 resistance, and
have circulating currents of 1700W with a minimal input. But as short is removed and bulb lights, 500W are
immediately required by entropy transform within the voltage drop of bulb ... LC detunes.
Note: Radiant energy at low frequency cannot be used in mercury lamps as it teleports UV radiation within E
fields, burning biological entity and causing cancer.
Put the bulb(s) parallel to a switch in “ON” position. Once the current node is attained, put the switch to “OFF
(open it), and the current node will be over the bulb. In RF you have to turn things OFF to turn things ON. Tip:
in LCR as R ampere load is put in LC, the added impedance Value R aport must be capacitor compensated to
maintain target resonant state.
The coil is shorted by a (reed) switch, it goes to resonance impedance "max saturation less Lenz component, as
short is cut OFF it dumps its collapsed field as a charge into capacitor. Where M Field is C and coil is L within a
given core wire-turn relation that is
resonant relative to the magnetic field
acting as a reversed rotary condenser
(reversed current angle). Importance to
short at the proper rotary angle and cut
off at saturation peak, where this energy
will dump into capacitor as a charge as
the switch opens.
Turning things ON by turning them
off, like simil of holding on spring until
it stretches and releasing it as the mass
pulling it becomes near null ... release
and pull becomes push. The result is a
power factor virtual logarithmic power
increase relative to the Impedance
increase where current I transfers to
voltage V potential as field collapses &
coil regausses to major greater
impedance.
First experiment with one leg, then go 3
phase. The reasoning here is you are
dealing with RESONANCE and your
loading relation is in Phase differences
and frequency shifting parameters.
Page 32
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 32
The MASS relative resonance in NODAL segment is revealed here; a single filament matching the AMPERE
load of a resonant LC will light at current node Under a MINIMAL voltage drop but giving Same POWER
output than a conventional lighbulb (this is what EV GRAY called COLD electricity).
Note: be careful with a combination of smaller bulbs (parallel and/or series) as there is a mass radiation
parameter that must be taken in consideration using series/parallel connection, some filaments being partially
magnetic will not glow at all even having same ampere loading character (resistance ). Ohms law does not cover
this nor other book data. Material damping of resonance does occur in some lightbulbs containing nicrome alloy
(magnetic) in filament
Where I am getting the HV is shorting the coil with the switch, not
turning it on-off...which is something new.
Entropic in logarithmic decay, its true radiated power becomes 1.618
in comparison to input "1" (ratio 1:1.618). A corresponding phase
shift is reversed as entropy to primemover, but is usually .618:1 in
reverse relation (in VTA and MEG this number was closer to
1:1.313 relation) 461.028W being 1HP not 746W. That is 1000W
must be run with 618W at input at unity PF; same luminance as
lightbulb directly connected 220VAC. These experiments were done using 60CPS; as frequency increases so
does efficiency. The idea is to series resonate LCR as to make virtual power becoming real manifest within
physical entity of bulb to create a pure current node were voltage drop of bulb is less than 19.8 VAC being able
to operate underwater (220VAC lightbulb as EV Gray demonstrated
http://www.rexresearch.com/evgray/1gray.htm). Don’t try water stuff unless you got 19.8VAC tip to tip in
filament, else BANG!
If your alternator provides high voltage (e.g. 790VAC – obtained with 1500rpm motor running at 3000rpm…),
you can make tests with FL tubes. You set LC at 790VAC, connect a lot of FL tubes across a parallel switch and
as resonance is attained you turn FLs on by turning switch off. (This is for intermittent experimental use, as ELF
resonant wave carries the Mercuric UV signal.)
When Hector disclosed the resonant FLs tubes in SLC "1984" and demonstrated the 12W (75W simile) Luminic
output, no one paid heed. But now you have 20W lamps giving 100W luminal output. Hectors goal was 8 footers
resonating in HF at 1W, but they kept burning out. So lower frequency and less Q was used.
This is WAY over
regular power
engineering
concepts but
REQUIRED as
basic for alternate
energy R&D as this
BOOK rules are the
only ones properly
justifying theory of
TRANSFORMATI
ON to support were
OU truly comes
from.
Tesla’s words are
so easy to
understand as he
tells to tune the
POWER source to
the LOADS needs
(he was using
RADIANT
energy). That means his circuit was perfectly tuned in resonance at maximal energy wile supplying the loads
power needs (simple).
Please see the pictures posted on RV and Zeus lamps. In resonance circulating power is 10 to 15 times the input
of witch 1.618 is true logarithmic stochastic energy gain transformation.
Page 33
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 33
Next steps and trials
•
Change the 3000 (3600) rpm alternator with a 5.5 kW 1500 (1800) rpm one, still connected in a 1:1 link, to
have 100 (120) Hz at higher voltage and to attain higher Q. Add in addition diode plug system, and a proper
transformer or variac for 165 volt input (EU). Note that the primemover rpm must be same or higher than
alternator rpm.
•
Variac or Reactive compensated dimmer (Triac) gives you 220 to 0 volts adjustment giving you a range of
greater experimentation with different voltages (full range adjustment).
•
Automate the switch on & off of the start caps with a current relay. You can buy this or make yourself.
Raivo did this by wrapping 2 turns of (thick) wire around a toroid transformer. This wire forms the
‘primary’ is goes to the start caps. To the transformer’s secondary of 14VAC, add a full-wave bridge and a
cap (1000uF), and connect this to the coil of a 12V 40A relay. If the current exceeds about 5A, the relay is
turned on and starting capacitor is connected. After the required RPM has reached, the current decreases
below the threshold and starting capacitor is disconnected.
•
Look for screws crossing rotor core, acting as short windings. Insulate those at one end eliminating short.
•
When energy is extracted from caps of the primemover, the input power goes 2 to 3 times higher that output.
So let the prime mover act as PM; no power extraction from it. Attach alternator or generator to PM.
•
In the primemover, you can extract power by putting a resistive load (light) in series with the caps, matching
light amperes to capacitor amperes, at the current node. Its very interesting what you can get with VA phase
relation and valanced phase relation, try 3 lightbulb delta compensate rotation. Try to light the bulbs at same
intensity (use safety eye lens in case a bulb explodes).
•
If you have a primemover with strong permanent magents, you can get OU from the primemover alone...but
you might as well turning a generator if looking for maximum OU and perhaps a selfrunner. Going high
impedance, rotary condenser becomes EMA (Electro Magnetic Amplification). As a M field atracts another
M field of mayor intensity, the second apports energy to the first. Any EM rotor in any generator run in RV-
mode becomes a free energy device, first correcting PF and second pure EMA rotary effect (rotary
condenser to rotrary Magnetic Amplifier). That is the secret of EVGray, Bedini, Newman,MEG, VTA …
universal laws.
•
If the alternator is run with no load, any loss will reflect to the source as drag & power use increase.
•
Shunt winding (reversed opposing wire turns): rewire alternator to eliminate those. Test the core in an empty
non wired run to test core magnetic drag, too much loss, use motor standard motor core with PM rotor and
forget alternator if you cant find good ones with low loss cores
•
It’s easier to get an standard motor to work in PM pulse motor modes than to redesign in Newman, Bedini
or axial mode ones.
•
An EM rotor RV can be used for the power factor correction and KVAR OU tests and experiments.
•
Take a modern motor with a modern PM rotor. Make sure it’s not oversaturated to magnetic drag like wind
PM alternators are, and you have something interesting. See further.
•
Uses: cyclo-converters, power factor RC correction, asynchronous generation (Solar, aeolic, Hydro
applications) Motive power (prime mover) tools, cars, airplanes, lawnmowers and infinite applications on
other products all in low power energy savings modes.. (green compliant) products.
•
RE-WIRE a common 120vac motor to 460V and use 120 VAC. The 90 deg STARTING WINDING being
tuned for best angle phase shading using OIL capacitors you get RV EFFECT. Also if you run 120V motor
at 24VAC using right values of capacitors for starting and running you get RV effect.
•
RV mode can be made small using 1Khz motors and inverters but requires high expertise, the smaller the
more expensive it becomes to create.
•
A 230/460VAC 3PH motor wired for 460V equipped with N S poles rotor as to work on ATTRACTION by
means of PULSE management (120V pulsed) may be the easy way to make OU motor, as ATTRACTIVE
force does not degauss rotor magnets. The CEMF can be collected by reverse diodes in IGTB or transistor
switching array for a full 3 Phase "modified" sine wave operation (having the advantage of Bedini like PM
magner operation and the Johnson wave effect).
http://freeenergynews.com/directory/howard_johnson_motor/blueprints/hard_replicate/
Page 34
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 34
For a generator the best design is the MAGNETIC DISTRIBUTOR GENERATOR CONCEPT made with
care to avoid shorting the flux path of AC magnetics.
•
Try paralleling some capacitance with R (lightbulb load ) to correct the LR POWER FACTOR loss (basic
start). Or use NN or SS unipole induction and load the CEMF EMP non reflective to primemover coil
charges in forward discharges at collapse.
Idea is to learn the basics to "bend" LENZ law, and lab tested RV is the best tool to do it. The LOAD as
integral part must be tuned to source and source to load NEEDS.
•
Run your prime-mover from an inverter. For RV experiments, best use is >90% eff , least idle draw (<1A),
with modified sine wave (no compound sine waves). For the required power, calculate the required Watts
based on the motor size used. Keep in mind the starting peak power demand. For example, a 5HP motor
might need 2000-2500W for 10 seconds to start, after which 1000W is OK for running load conditions.
Consider also a safe margin, so a 1200-1500W inverter, with 2500-3000W peak is good. A microwave
transformer can be used as inverter with a single transistor using 12VDC as input; to light FL 8 footers and
as HI voltage source.
Variable pulse-width is essential to ring LC to OU states in hi Q modes. The pulse is tailored to get coil to
saturation, as M field collapses it takes energy from thermal and magnetic ambient transferring it to the
CEMP being OU in nature. See also “coil banger” and poor man thyratron circuits using disposable camera
flash circuit and party strobe lights.
On HV-side pulselenght adjust the AC output to optimal impedance load relation , hit that 98% to 161.8 %
efficiency areas .
RV is not friendly to frequency harmonics as it brakes at over-speed in high frequency, as VOLTAGE tends
to go infinite. It tends to shoot to next octave, it de-phases third phase angle and brakes down as capacitor
generates over-voltage at lower frequency than input line, becoming a solid conductor in an instant to hi
frequency signal from input, equaling to a self induced short. Pulse-length control might mitigate over
speed, LOADING at specific load also. Variable speed inverter permits to find best performance figures.
The RV may be reflecting power back reactively across inverter TR diodes maintaining switch on and
shorting it to overload. Try a 5uF capacitor parallel to input line to take input load at start as more "resistive"
surge disconnect as rotation is attained. Some inverters simply can’t take reactive loads too well especially
cheap imports, so use higher power version.
As RV starts there is a hi Q resonant vectoring creating the initial narrow-banded hi power starting rotary
currents within the 3PH vectors. As the motor accelerates, the impedance relation to a receding impedance
equivalent to a 0 Ohm short in rotor is transformed to impedance traveling toward infinite resistance (600+
ohms) as rotor attains synchronous speed and locks to rotary field in a LONGER very broad-banded region
of resonant crest in apparent on resonant condition with a resulting very low power consumption.
In any case the impedance of the circuit will be changing if you run from an inverter. Now you must
optimize as to permit MATCHING in START capacitance to INVERTER and run capacitance. If the motor
can’t start on the lower power curve adjusted to inverter, switch to the inverter when the prime-mover is
already running from household power, and then adjust running capacitor for best rotation performance.
Some inverters permit pulse-length time adjust. Find if yours can be adjusted using scope. On power, use
DC shunt to battery DC readings for total power use. Your AC is a localized loop in a second stage, PF can
give you higher readings not related to real input if by sample you get 10 to 30 amps in inverter that is a
more real reliable reading as is a no meter lie DC parameter. The target <15 amps 12.7VDC or lower.
If the inverter transistors are H reverse diode protected from the DC high V, in semi-resonant synchronous
condition power factor feeds back to DC capacitors in the inverter, as RV goes leading. This condition is
OU within what I describe as producing a HYPERWAVE.
In past postings I mentioned an alternative to feed RV alternator hi output directly to the inverter HI Voltage
capacitors itself, and downstep the power to a battery using parallel AC trafo from AC end to low 12.7
VDC conversion to attain battery feedback. This testing must be done with battery charged to optimal 12.7
to 13.8 VDC, as you may be getting low-V inverter shutdown and may not be a hyperwave.
•
VFD (variable frequency drives): customize a 3PH modified sine (square) wave inverter, by
downconversion from 220VAC to 120VAC, and pulselenght adjustable with 3 phase IGBT bridge with 6
reverse diodes in 3PH diode recovery bridge configuration. Specify as 20 to 470Hz and 1 to 90%
pulselenght adjust, and drive a generator to the "sweet spot" and get instant OU....
Page 35
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 35
•
PF correction: If you take a 10KW generator, 120/230/460 VAC 60CPS 1600rpm (4 pole) ring exited rotor
(brush). Replace the regulator with manual or current regulated adjust EM excitation power. When the
system is wired to 460 VAC, a pony RV starts is to synchronous speed with the grid. Once is synchronous,
connect to line where excitation voltage and current magnetizes rotor creating RV power factor correction
synchronous dynamotor. This connected to your house reduces power factor loss to 0 with adaptive sensing
and adjusting. That is 40% energy savings average. Use PM rotor this feeds EMA OU power to home, use
series variac to regulate KVARS or Magnetic current regulated amplifier to control PM KVAR output. In
places far away from grid power source this can save 60% on power bills correcting PF line loss.
Controlling
A governor can be used to regulate speed with a hi speed disconnect low speed reconnect cycle. The excess
charge can be passed to any 127V UPS or inverter system (off the shelve) and monitor its battery charging
capability. Then next step is to increase to RV type KVAR 1 to 10kilowatt range, without having to build a
Newman motor alike monster. A 3HP PM motor operating at 15,000 RPM can transform 30 HP of energy
(22.38KW); if 0.382 of that is OU definitely we have a practical device 8.5 usable KW. The solution for
extracting this energy without destroying the effect producing it, is where the resonant diode plug and optical
switching become useful, as PARTIAL extraction and NON-reflective vectoring can be attained (schematics &
pictures in PDF files).
Same can be done in Solid state Modulating caduceus like class C linear amplifier after you find the proper EM
relation, the battery just becomes reversed in time, causing ATOMIC mass increment in lead atoms PB206
reintegrates to radium and so on. Nice stuff to manufacture cheap plutonium if you use pure lead plates and
heavy water in your battery system. Normal batteries contain bismuth (neutron moderator) that sulphates in
Fusion modes (burns) destroying the battery.
Looping the RV
For direct looping the RV system, you need integral wave Cyclo-conversion. If not then you need a battery for
power conversion, because asynchronous motors without permanent magnet have a slip, as such creating a lower
frequency. Also the prime-mover frequency must be higher than the desired alternator one, due to the slip (speed
must be compensated in AC). In DC it’s just having more volts and current, than at the input to inverter.
There is vectoring that comes to play, to convert those radiant states "OU" to a real vector potential Q, resonance
and phase angles are the key; with proper tuning stable looping is achieved within a charge-discharge cycle
operation (OU – under-OU – OU – under-OU cycles like Kone did) in a wide shallow cycle.
It’s good to have a broadband quantity of capacitor values to play with the tuning set-ups ... can be tripleflux
delta - wye combos with transformers, diode bridges and diode plugs.
In Hector’s RV looped schematic, the Radiant Energy can be coupled through the trifos like standard electricity
by applying the RF and power transform rules.
See http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/AC_8.html . Radiant energy must be Rephased in order to be
transformed properly in standard transformers or use RF homopolar transformers.
Tip: you got Alternator VOLTAGE relative to IMPEDANCE and capacity; Hi voltage lower capacitance ...
LOW VOLTAGE HI CAPACITANCE (sample 200V-100uF; 20V-1000uF; 10V-2000uF). Interesting to note
that the CORE density is relative to L1 HV to L2 LV, where CORE defines L1,L2 Q relation whe²re null zone is
within CORE itself (reread info re ferroresonance recording commentary).
Being alternator PM, then C can be in a value to aquire charge in logarithmic resonant half waves (DIODE
PLUG) wherever on reverse induction we need to maintain pressure wall reflective to source to maintain the core
self exitation. Values need to be rotary standing wave within a given voltage value determining the broadbanding
of signal (in this case Hypersignal).
The swing of particles within matter from + electron values to negative POSITRON ones in hyperdimensional
fabric where electron becomes elektron (with K) charging energy from timereversal hypesignal, is what makes
looping self subtaining, but at same time DEGAUSSES and transforms LOCAL time-space into a singularity.
On RF the trick is feeding a HI Q 60CPS LC with the battery being a plug capacitor load on it. Compensate for
VARACTOR detuning effect. It’s no Mystery but a matching and in vitro application issue.
(http://www.nuenergy.org/alt/energy_amplification.htm) The need to keep to the BASIC essential where the OU
transform manifest is the key.
Page 36
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 36
Remember R represents a series L to L and series C to C, and reflects as such a purely resistive load were RA
and RV are theoretically in phase at a 0 angle or POINT in SPACE, like the centre of a balance in an
equilibrium. So the REAL value is a virtual Ampere load as seen by the pure LC where Voltage is not reflecting
the reality of that point but shifted to other point within the circuit ... node, anti-node. In ZPE and magnetic
amplification this is the difficulty the experts stumble, the reality every part parameter reflects in the other.
A battery by sample, its L its R and its C, has an intrinsic resonant value as a unit or its parts, it’s a self tuning on
state device with those R, C, L values being VARIABLES within a working unit. The reason Kone-motor was
working in OU - non OU cycles and the reason Engineers failed to analyze properly. ED also met the wave
within the Wave oscillations in a partial loop.
The battery as seen by L from a rising AC half sinewave is C "capacitance", when CL frequency equals the
WAVE frequency, the POWER multiplies by 1.618 in LOGARITHMIC EMA; this multiplied also by Q EMA
factor ... gives OU gain over Isotropic virtual dipole. (a need to know in deep Bedini and Kone design and the
term Hector used that BEDINI just POWER FACTOR corrected his battery…).
Increase C in LRC to compensate R broadbanding loss . If mathematically we have sine & cosine, it is obvious
in energy we got same manifest that represent energy transform. The famous “negentrophy” Bearden mentioned
so much, but failed to demonstrate others.
If the diode plug recovery circuit/impedance match test with the 10:1 trifos is successful, then try to find out how
one can connect three trifos & plugs to a single battery.
Similar or identical motors, identical will be interesting as the radiant readings on the alternator side and
temperature versus impedance issues can be compared, also as is, motor alternator gives flexibility to use to
"primemove" any other machine "2 RVs ".
RV with Permanent Magnet rotor Alternator
With PM-RV, first you win the slip and rotor energy losses, and second you have the PM magnet amplification
effect (which must be well designed).
RV with PM (Permanent Magnet) rotor can be used. PM force must be calculated as not to over-saturate the
core. Konzen motor type experiments and Raivo & Rain Electric Turbine modeling. 15,000RPM and 11k of
centrifugal energy spinning rotor. These motors in PM version can be operated in Pulse mode, where the
magnetic phenomena Amplification does occur (Kone had attained in vitro in his advanced pulse motor
conversion). Secret is Frequency and pulse-length & voltage intensity adjustment to attain overunity (Magnetic
rotary amplification).
Reasons to build PM RV from 3PH motor:
•
optimal size (10HP), advanced "toy"
•
relatively easy, standard (it helps us to advance more quickly using standard methods)
•
BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY: I recommend production - as would probably find many (10+) people in
the EVGRAY group willing to buy (synchro-motors are far too expensive to buy).
•
wide area of use: you can use these as 3PH motor, PM RV, PM alternator, wind gen, PF correction
•
it is OU
A continuous RESONANT wave surfing PM rotor makes the RV superior to ANY other motor ever made. Such
state can be obtained in HI impedance RV effect using modified sine wave inverters. That’s the advantage of
3PH 90 deg force vector and oval shaped rotary
Phasor fields.
A PM RV pulse motor is the best mix of the 2, and
there is a lot more as this is only the tip of the iceberg
(ref. to Hector’s 111 phases Electric Axial coreless
turbine). If you convert RV to PM you can pulse it
with 6 reed switches or Opto-Transistors and 6
recovery diodes in 3PH bridge.
Metal for half moons & centre body parts
recommended is speaker end plates, Mu metal alloy
low remanance hi conductivity HF harmonic tolerant.
Or for the Half Moon, use ceramics 5 & 8.
The half-moons on the picture to the right (© Raivo)
Page 37
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 37
are made of magnet conductive steel, as is the central part (2-pole diagram in picture). The rotor must be highly
conductive. The red “sleeve” or “jacket” is made of dur-aluminium (or stainless steel, but expensive to do) in
order not to short out magnets and to make the structure strong (the drawing is for 2 x 1 x .5 ''strong NEO
magnets). Depending on the motor power rating you may need a version with maybe 5 magnets in a row (total
2x5 = 10). The magnets are oriented such that one half moon is North and the other South, so 2 poles N-S. The
magnets must be separated from each other, then the field distribution M force lines choose the iron core path
instead of themselves, so to help localize the field to metal core.
Flow: stator <-air-> (half moon ( N-magnet-S (CENTRE (O) STEEL) N-magnet-S) half moon) <-air> )stator.
The most important part is that it must be well designed so the <-air->gap must be minimum. The power will
depend reversely on this air cap.
If the magnets are too powerful, it over-saturates the core (laminations) under room temperature (Meismer effect
- partial superconductivity). This creates a high drag at magneto-atomic level; separate from core, loss decreases
as field drag decreases. Also distance influences impedance of coil so it affects timing circuit effectivity,
shortening or narrowing pulse CEMF. Find its magnetic saturation point at given frequency voltage and current
potential If you cant move it with a finger at no loading ,the engineering is no good and generator is no good for
ZPE and or RS (Rotoverter System work). The importance of the meaning LOW lenz component is a LOW
reflection of mechanical POWER to the primemover, so it’s ovious by now that if a mechanical system is loaded
by the generator it drives way over the energy it produces its not OU.
A car alternator is 37% eff average, but electronics needed to regulate the voltage. With a PM rotor non-
saturating, the eff is 75%. Using proper core 98% to 161.8% eff (resonant) hi Q. Right now 99.999% of all
generators commercialy available are unfit for Alternate energy and ZPE R&D use.
The iron or steel in the stator cores in existing 3ph motors is good and fine if you have constructed a homemade
or modified PM rotor, ONLY if the magnets are fairly weak ones (like maybe grade 10 neo for instance).
However if you use the strongest neodymium magnets in those rotors, the LATCH against the iron/steel (even if
laminate) will ruin any sort of advantage of using strong magnets. So this means AIR-cores, or black sand cores
or metglass stator cores.
If you use grade 45 neodymium magnets, there is not going to be any resonation in those cores, just a lot of
latch, "pulling" everything "one way". Perhaps with lots of power input, you could balance-out the force of the
neos whirling inside the iron stator cores, BUT then you get HEAT PROBLEMS with iron or steel cores. If
building or modifying your own motor, you should use the strongest magnets possible. Then against these super
strong magnets, the coil'scores should be/have to be: air, black sand, or metglas (no heat build-up when lots of
power from low hysteresis).
This will be near impossible to do with the stators in existing 3ph motors - some will be better, (laminates) but
they all have too much latch against strong neos. Everything that happens mechanically and dynamically with a
3ph motor can be done "axially" as well as the existing standard "radial" design in 3ph motors; this by side-
saddle stator banks, and Muller-like imbedded-magnet rotor in between. It’s simple to make motors like this,
probably much easier than just machining a PM rotor to fit inside existing 3ph rotor.
In order to determine the magnetic strength needed (how many magnets and how strong), have Gauss readings of
the CORE metal subjected to M field & let that field collapse under controlled conditions to get highest CEMF
level at minimal gauss. This can be determined by pulse discharge and other methods, conductance, remanance,
reluctance are important to ROTOR -stator relation parameters. Excessive powerful magnets will create DRAG
& heat from a given point further; intensity creates undesirable eddy current effects. If the magnet is too strong,
the laminate becomes a shorted conductor turn to it creating drag, so core magnetization, core material, speed,
ampere turn, intended load, impedance and a lot of detailing must be done to acquire ART perfection necessary
for improving current technology to standards required for OU transformation.
First, obtain good motor 3-7HP that takes normally let’s say 60W max (good bearings, no fan) driven in RV
mode. Take it into pieces and measure, print out this schematic, calculate new dimensions and let specialist to
make PM motor for you. Also old compressor motor cores can be used to make PM generators if good
(compressors usually fail due to valve problems). Cut sealed compressors along the weld line, 3/8 deep.
Advantage of compressor stators is that they are not painted or epoxied. They can be rewired more easily.
The target in a generator is no load near 0 mechanical load. Coreless PM gen 0 load must be no higher than
.003%. The target in a motor "Primemover-driver" is no load 0 power demand.
In PM (permanent magnet) RS (rotoconversion system) motor synchronized to line is SYNCHRONOUS
CONDENSER MACHINE and provides KVARS to system in OU EMA modes at HI impedance.
Page 38
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 38
That is MAGNETIC ROTOR field intensity determines KVARS injected in supply system ... an EM (Electro-
magnet) driven system makes it possible to control PF and Electromagnetic Amplification EMA level, also
adjusting Rotation angles (phasors) of electric signal (Power).
Suming it up perfect generator minimal drag at no load; maximal power output with low loading to source.
Perfect motor minimal Power use at no load max eff at loading in HP output (lowest power usage per HP).
Using Permanent Magnet rotor all HP ranges can be used by frequency and speed being determinant of
performance to EACH motor, PM must never exceed the saturation of cores; this MUST cool down but never
HEAT up under semy resonant power. Generating or working as a motor (Prime Mover) same factors apply.
Every motor and generator has an OPTIMAL speed & frequency and Loading factors, where it is more efficient
and performs the best.(Lab proven & tested ). Within a certain RANGE, most of them can exibit overunity
phenomena due to natural magnetic amplification EMA effects.
If someone has real interest, the path to follow is to buy existing MOTOR manufacturer and convert part of a
production line to built PM RVs, and contract Hector for re-educating the engineers in a lab.
IMPORTANT: PM rotor motors MUST be synchronized to AC field rotation and turned on.
PM Multi-phase dynamotors
On generator design using PM DC motors: DC motors do not make good generators "as is". If you disassemble
one you can see the brushes and the area of commutators they touch. In the case of a Baldor DC motor if you
have 40 commutators in 40 windings delta connected and the brushes touch only 2 commutator segments, you
are using only 1/10 of your rotor winding, plus the others become shunts drawing power from the first, an
independent star configuration prevents self shunting.
This is the same as the generator diode bridging in 40 Phases Bridge, which uses full potential of windings in
overlapping phases in a continuous DC stream in magnetic PM top N-S field crest within the structure.
Good test is to create PM end bell from PM DC motor and rotate it with RV in a full phased Wye rewired DC
motor rotor (now stator) and quantify energy generated in pure DC. That is raw 4 times over the full load
capacity of motor at 10 times more efficient, depending on the quality of motor and rotor laminates. Some really
suck! RV permits you to see were they are poor and where quality and design influences performance.
In repulsion mode charge comes from overshooting the receding field and is more practical to have repulsion &
attraction at 90 deg. Here is where 2 pole rotor & 3 coil in 3PH configuration becomes handy. Tuning the device
impedance with capacitors makes the battery become a negative resistor within the rotary LC tank where the
magnetic field and thermo magnetic mechanics provide the OU energy transform from ambient. All you need is
to install a limiting circuit as 10 batteries exceed 127VDC charge circuit disconnects until battery drops 100
volts then circuit is reconnected to recharge them again that way you have a self recycled self runner.
Then you can build a PM RV and do the same with a standard frame motor. The switching can be connected
where the fan used to be, be it commutators, magnetic reed or optical switch.
So as an advanced search to lower the cost in making super E PM motor-generators, you can make a multi-phase
alternator from a PM DC brush motor. Prepare its stator to be used as a rotor, and its rotor to be used as stator
wired for 3 phases or more (Hector took a Baldor
CDP3455 motor). If we see in a DC motor, only
a segment of its rotor contacts the brushes 1/5 to
1/20, so if we fix the rotor and as a delta 40
phases (example) winding place diodes on each
segment, our 1 HP DC motor becomes a 10KW
AC to DC 40 phases generator.
The diodes must be placed as follows: 2 diodes
(one positive one negative) to each segment, all
negatives to common negative, all positives to
common positive, all wires same length. 40
phases, rectified 9° each apart from the other =
super low ripple DC double voltage 5 amp per
segment; that is 360V at 200A max (72KW)
surge max (hi speed) ...7.2KW constant rating
low speed. Interesting to concentrate such power
in under 20Kg.
Each commutator segment is a phase - they
Page 39
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 39
overlap at 360/P where P is number of commutator segments wired in DELTA. (Read Tesla 3rd brush
regulation: "he was telling something BIG there", but no one noticed). Divide P by 360 and you get the phase
angles. Calculate the peak of each phase in time to get the ripple factor (e.g. 44 segments = 8.18° phase angle =
ripple of 1/4%). So the ripple is near 0, except for the edge modulation caused in the rpm x number of phases x 2
(poles) harmonics. These will be also rectified and filtered into DC component but complement strongly at slow
speeds.
See picture to the right of a disassembled PM DC motor with 44 segments. This motor goes up to 15000 rpm.
You can use H steel beam to hold stator as end bell in long shaft, and prepare the rotor as stator with the
commutator segments tapped to use as pulsemotor, generator and dynoconverter; or just drive it with RV to
address the PM drag issues and design. Preliminary experiments can be done with PM fan motors, air
conditioner FANS, wiper motors, blower motors or any PM stator brush DC motor.
The PM ones Outer Stator is placed in cup at end of shaft ....the rotor is fixed to a plate as to fit like original
inside but is fixed to it non rotating , the commutator is then diode bridged as a multy phase alternator , if
laminate is good quality.
Since rotor magnets are inside, centrifugal force maintains them in place inside cylinder. It can also be micro
valanced for hi speed 24K RPM; that increases power to 50KW, using hot fast switching hi voltage diodes. But
this thing can generate power by moving it with the hand.
Any PM car motor can be converted to multi-phase alternator, like the fan, wiper, air conditioner fan. Just
disassemble a toy motor (3 phases) or car wiper motor (12 to 24 phases depending on make).
In starter motors, the PM stator made into rotors are OK for hi current hi speed low voltage DC generation. 10
diode rectifiers from standard alternators work the 33 phases (Delta) 10.90909°. You can fire 3 phases segments
in pulsemode to get not 15 but 100HP at 30,000 rpm (depends in laminate quality). You can pulse 1 segment
each 4 steps and “pulsemotor” it to hi speed super HP RV dynamotor Turbine. The diodes will recover every
CEMF you can create there; also you can run in 3PH and generate in 12, 24, 40 phases or whatever phases your
DC commutator segments may have.
Further reflection on PM-RV and PM-DC motors
The DC-PM-RV rotor is a superior efficient running motor design. The PM RV rotor eliminates the motor’s slip
loss in the RV generator side, therefore increases the efficiency to 100%. A slip is a poor design that squirrel
cage motors (currently used as RV `hosts')are designed with. Doug Konzen has already modified a 5hp 3PH
motor and eliminated the loss of the slip via this modification. Important core drag issues are still on the R and D
table with this method, but it is workable. What is needed is a PM rotor designed as to be magnetized to near
saturation point but not exceeding the CORE saturation as to have minimal on NO saturation drag effect. It is
also a R&D method to quantify the issues in the reverse dynamometer capability of RV.
Using a PM RV and 3PH pulsing & recovery is the way to go, and the reason why synchronous motors are
getting eliminated is to get rid of OU manufacturing devices.
(http://www.tpub.com/content/neets/14177/css/14177_101.htm).
DC/AC Rotor conversion: http://www.tecowestinghouse.com/Products/Custom_Engineered/synchronous.html.
Read and wake up as a great truth is being repeated here that if you attract a greater force with smaller one, the
greater will amplify the smaller one. The word leading implies power production ,OU due to magnetic
amplification the so called power factor correction is the answer to OU transform "KVARS".
You supply a greater magnetic field to a synchronous motor rotor and it will produce more power than it
consumes leading PF (Secret OU terminology).
The PM-RV is related to the concepts of resonance hyper Q states, logarithmic and the magnetic amplification
factor in LCs. Easy transferable to RV in a low voltage hi impedance rotary pulsed machine. With a PM-RV
design, pulse driven with logarithmic power and CEMF recovery in a full phases diode bridge; 3x3 configured or
(n X n) - n being the number of phases used as in a multiphase PM generator-motor concept.
All that is required is a standard 230/460 3 phase motor with a PM rotor designed as to be magnetized to near
saturation point but not exceeding the core saturation as to have minimal or NO saturation drag effect. Secret is
tuning into the resonant states and optimizing use of the power attained without killing the OU LC effect.
As in a stator the PM rotor within a given impedance makes this resistor negative as the voltage drop in the line
is minor than the voltage drop in virtual LC resistor, as the generator works in synchronous HI impedance
rotary condenser mode. This results in Electro Magnetic Amplification were H = I
2
Rt EMA, where apparent
Page 40
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 40
power contributes to source power on other mode of resonance taken to a PF corrected Nul, Zero Point energy
state VAR production in HI virtual OU impedance value. (Ref. formulas http://www.nepsi.com/formulas.htm).
The M field is your power source when you create a self amplifying amplitron RV-PM alternator. The fact is that
any high efficiency generator wired to 460VAC and run synchronous in 120VAC can be used to make and
demonstrate this principle. Once understood a PM generator is wired as to create these effects.
In this configuration the LC is seen as a resistor and as such you read amperage and multiply by the voltage
source and get its voltage drop value (basic Ohms law). As the voltage drop in the line is less than voltage drop
in the virtual LC resistor, means that the virtual resistor possesses energy transferred from attracted M field to
attracting M field.
In impedance matching its current must be equal. Even if the resistance is unequal, Voltage and Resistance are
the determining variables to match virtual resistors and reverse energy to source where then current reverses
being of a larger magnitude than the source.
As the LC voltage is induced, it attracts the rotor magnet so M1 attracting magnetic field attracts M2 summing
and exceeding M1 turning the virtual unity resistor to a negative over unity resistor, as its energy level is more
than the one supplying it (source). That means the current at a given point reverses to the source supporting
energy to it, usually in VARS as PF and cogeneration laws apply.
Rotary condenser machine (http://www.pscpower.com/pages/series%20sc.htm): if we see it from a perspective
they "re-gauss" the utility lines making you save energy. In high impedance they become EMA (Electro
Magnetic Amplifier). It'ssimple: a coil attracting a magnet of higher magnetic intensity will get induced power
from the stronger M field. In low impedance this effect is not noticed much, but at higher ones it exhibits OU
due to EMA effect. Calculate this with hi impedance relative to M field in PM rotor synchronous machines.
This theory is also clear in PF correction using PM rotors to attain over unity in hi impedance modes as an EMA.
Any motor generator can be modified to attain these modes as is off the shelf, properly designed PM rotors and
stator cores can do marvels to already existing devices (modifications) to increase efficiency and performance.
Drag issues must be settled where you must find core fundamental frequency (natural resonance) then test by
building a coil and capacitor tank to use this frequency in resonance and spin your magnet at this frequency and
measure the circulating Watts.
The voltage used is determined by the LC needs to attain saturation & mechanical rotation within the EMA
operation mode. ED GRAY operated on pulse. The RV demonstrates that such a system can be operated in
continuous low voltage hi impedance AC feed and amplification mode. It takes a bit to understand Rotary
condenser theory and W-VAR relation, all it takes is to study PF correction and RV to build a self sustaining OU
machine.
Gunning and overunity
Gunning is the term used as you reverse polarity in a running DC motor as to reverse rotation instantly without
stopping the motor completely. AC gunning creates extreme lagging power factor figures resulting in creation of
extreme KVAR energy pulse EMP .. in case of switching BOUNCE small gap resulted in instant evaporation of
hundred ampere rated switches or relays (due to ARC discharge of extreme EMP potential).
In case of VECTORING, gunning can be transferred from a negative KVAR region to a multiplied and
amplified charge in a capacitor within plugged LC configuration where this CHARGE can be non reflectively
discharged and isolated from main magnetically driven LC component.
Applying this to asynchronous coil induction and using Capacitor collected EMP vector potential as paralleled
DC stream will add the EMP as class C magnetic amplification signature resulting in overunity ... as
asynchronity will tend to charge some coils in REPULSIVE mode against MAGNET path certain degrees of
Lenz effect neutralization will take effect within the alternator.
You will have coils being repulsed and others in attraction lowering rotor magnetic drag as one wave over-
imposes over the other circulating clockwise and counter-clockwise within a virtual torus, were these rotating
components meet the amplification effect occurs being of REPULSINE electric nature (ZPE), the EMA effect is
taken from magnetic field modulation and alternation at same time adding as vectors as contrary to entropic
standard system where they result in loss subtracting potential from each other ...
This explains some Kones postings about Muller generator making Muller a bit more RV alternator alike but
with the big difference of its asynchronous and PM character advantage.
Page 41
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 41
Micro-energetic cyclo-conversion
As mentioned before, the importance is to saturate the core and let it decay with its added ambient energy
component into the power recovery circuit (Ringing); OU energy “one shot” Cycloconverter. Review phasing,
once a coil is taken to saturation, there is no need to discharge the whole capacitor into it (ping it to saturation cut
off). In a cycloconverter, one frequency excites it, another extracts the energy (the "short" excites the “long”).
In order for looping any resonant OU system, the Hyper modulated signal from Super signal must be tapped
from the natural Universal SINE integral energy component, which is 3Hz. It’s taped using 1.618 frequency
incremental step up and relative Q from 8 transformation elements, the first FEEDBACK Q relation is based in
this ratio. (.215 .021 .002 values in octaves can range from 1 to 81). 3,6,9 (the MICRO relates to the MACRO)
remember a lower signal can arise to a sequential creation of higher energy ones; like the Transformer ferro-
resonance experiment recording showed.
In another way, I am telling that RV can be directly looped by dividing one alternator frequency segment in 2
(60/2 =30), and mix that f to obtain 90 (90CPS/ 3=30 -- 30/10=3) from other segments using filter mixer array.
The sub-harmonic of sine integral looping SINEWAVE superwave component is 3 cycles per second; unit loops
and de-loops OU non-OU in this frequency. In a Universal Inverse Reactive Motor-Generator such a signal is
fed BACK to primemover at .621 ratio of alternator voltage level (in this case 215VAC x.621 = 133.515VAC) at
90CPS were slip of squirrel cage reduces to 73 CPS maintaining a TENSOR of RESISTANCE against
ACCELERATION (negative reverse energy and POSITIVE forward induction Valance - opposed pairs).
Unvalanced phases create the hyperwave. The unit tunes & detunes as a low CPS signal, hypermodulating the
first from 0 to max. Average your capacitor values across all phases to lower this effect. In LOOPING this effect
is NORMAL, because once your source is charged system goes under OU, it discharges then goes OU again in a
slow long sine wave. This is what happened in Kone looped motor OU – non-OU – OU – non-OU. In any
incremental tuned amplifier there is this tendency to detune and die as it overdrives and cuts off, its one of the
priority listed bitch thing to understand in tuning in a looped system you have this cycling and its normal. If you
maintain LOADING, you can regulate TUNE to any sweet spot you want. Best sample is to put DIODE bridge
in LC and hook output to a car starter motor. As system starts motor is seen as a short, as motor accelerates
resistance & impedance increases, LC power will die motor will stop, as it stops again is seen as a short and it
will power on again. But if you PRONY break it you can maintain LOAD at a GIVEN standing wave were
POWER will be sustained. In extracting power from ANY OU system this is VITAL to understand as HOW
power loading can tune or detune a system. The In vitro experimentation is the TEXT book needed to understand
this, else theory will take 300 years to learn. I don’t think any of us here have that much time to waste.
The typical slip of a squirrel cage motor in STANDARD use is between 1 and 4% depending of the load. But in
RV looping, time becomes relative as f = V (frequency = velocity). Time (t) becomes a variable within RF rotary
field. This is way advanced, but as more experiments are done to apply radiant energy this will be understood.
The capacitors will cut off over-acceleration if tailored to stress non-OU to over OU. In PM just be careful with
direct looping, as it will ping in incremental upper harmonics and pieces will fly up in the air and end as a
burning piece of crap in floor (remember pulleys (low drag ones) can substitute cycloconversion).
Tuning definitely at this stage is "ultra bitchy", but with 18 basic ways to do it can’t be missed. Just remember
load determines LC tuning in alternator, acceleration detunes LC, so its self-regulating angle of ROTATION
frequency "LOADED". Primemover PF must be near unity 1, but alternator needs to be ‘wasted’ (PF=0), leading
far over primemover rotation.
Try to resonate at HI Q your coils at 27, 30, 33 cycles per second in triangle 3x3 (star of David) one half pulse
feeds each one other half pulse feeds other 3. The relation is to create a wave within a wave to tap 3Hz Universal
Sinewave integral. Base frequency is 90Hz that means HALF pulse at HALF the time. Superwave WAVITON
integration to fundamental frequency input within 3 phases ... (natural Cyclo-conversion and frequency
integration) Stochastic frequency mixing..
On a scope you see a semi-rectified feedback with an overlapping mother lode at 3 CPS that will take your motor
way OU. It will be difficult to tune each COIL, but the frequency relation (n-constant) is what is important in
this case for 90/3 base = 30, where (n) is 3. Even if the frequency changes, (n) is .6666 x (base). A frequency
creates another of stronger magnitude than the first, but is as it were a HOLOGRAM within the rotary engine.
ABC triangle (3) with ABC second inverted triangle (3) and sequence as explained in any octave from 1 to 81.
It’s high-level order technology. Don’t expect to understand it if you don’t do the lab. It’s Energy Hologram
forming. 3 basic colours, interrelate to form 6; 6 + 3 = 9; 1,4,8,8,5,7
1.42857 .142857 The micro relates to
the macro and the macro relates to the micro.
Page 42
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 42
RV is the Star of David in your hands you need the BASE or the ARK of the covenant to unleash it power upon
the world. Study the solar rays as they pass a triangular prism: 3 rods at its tips, run it in 3 phases at the
frequency of light. What do you get? Up-convert and down-convert to it ... the universal "hologram".
Since all power is interrelated, you can use the system as wireless Internet by pumping a broadbanded
superimposed signal in a triangular crystal lattice and use a NEUTRON frequency signal as super-modulation to
3 CPS one (Atomic stochastic amplification). 100,000 times more powerful than nuclear energy as used
standard.
Harmonics are created within non-linear components, where in the RV/TV we 'only'have Ls & Cs? But
harmonics can be natural fundamental in FORCED electrical fundamental within a transformer or device. The
Forced Fundamental, say 50 CPS, does not necessarily needs to be the NATURAL fundamental of a
transformer. A transformer frequency range can be in a set of natural frequency fundamental to its own
construction, say 47 to 570CPS.
Reverse induction creates BASIC 3 phase in fundamental frequency region and tends to be table as is
determined by speed the LC bandwidth determines the Range of Q within a speed variable in reverse
induction the ROTOR is a NEGATIVE RESISTOR providing ENERGY to LC, as to keep oscillations at hi
energy level. In solid state the highest Q the lower the energy required in input to sustain it. The same applies to
rotary engine.
Indian secret "Lingam power" unveiled. Now you all know even if its "encrypted" is symbolically designed to
activate "hidden knowledge" already contained in HUMAN GENETIC code for this work; idea will pop to mind
like a shotgun blast " just retain it " and apply.
To run 3 brains in 3 phases (red for heart chakra, blue for right lung upper chakra and yellow for pineal gland).
R L & central NS will run in 3 phases rotation upon vectorizing mindwaves in 3CPS. Blue cachina stargate
opens, and I reveal my face…
Coil-Core-RF-DC repeat
Pure "L": idea is to charge coil and core (if any) to saturation, being the collapse discharge the OU producing
element.
Pure "LC": idea is to charge a capacitor to max potential within a resonant circuit with the lowest power usage to
primemover. The RV alternator does already OU, using reverse resonant induction. L being impedance matched
to C as to attain EMA gain from M field.
PM induction RV & Muller RV: here power factor & resonance intermix, where PM "M field" saturates a COIL
& core as to cause a charge resulting in OU potential, as it gains power from M field "EMA" and ZPE "C"
components. JM charger, RV & transverter play big issue here ... (LC).
The current problem is attaining the PM induced OU states and understanding how to transfer this power as a
vector to a battery. Check looped RV schematic.
If by sample 200V at 10A, this is the same as 20V at 100A at alternator end, capacitance and impedance
responding to same proportion but increasing Q to the hilt x10 Q extreme "OU" states ... battery and its charge
becomes a VARACTOR diode in series with this LC, battery power is determined by amperes-in amperes-out
within a virtual load, inverter becomes R in parallel with source that becomes added to series LC vector source
the RV output becomes a current vector within the R component where the battery becomes a varactor in a
negative resistor state where such becomes C and L as reverse induction is attained, RV output becomes virtual
higher VOLTAGE battery to LOAD where current transfers from lower state in a current reversal to higher state
one, voltage differential causes reversed voltage to reverse current to lower power region into battery.. R
becomes a virtual shunt regulator, in this case the inverter.
In the RV schematic the symbol of transformers and diodes from the RV alternator represent the down-
conversion of voltage and increase of current and this is done using RF engineering rules. Those rules are
simpler if using a Muller generator, but issues are the same the sum of vectored DC must relate to battery
parameter and your inverter specifics and within a range of 10 to 15 volts DC as to play safe, current & volt
ampere is were the magic is, the battery is a VARACTOR LOAD relative to the SOURCE impedance. To
maintain OU transform from ZERO point, the RESONANCE TENSOR must be maintained within all circuit
elements, so it’s time to get an inverter, power up the RV from a DC battery and start vectoring your generator
output into the battery and load stream.
Page 43
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 43
As a simple shunt it’s all that is needed to demonstrate OU (current charging battery) and a voltmeter to monitor
voltage 12.7 optimal ... a series of loads must be provided to prevent overcharge and create the hyperwave OU-
non-OU HI-LOW wave cycles - normal to a well tuned system. Regulating load can be at any stage. The
principle is quite well demonstrated, however the issue is to transfer it to a working physical model within closed
loop and mitigate the impedance mismatch problems.
Tips: coil voltage as DC must be greater than battery ...real load must be battery not a resistor. The real POWER
then becomes voltage differential of source relative to battery multiplied by the amperage ...(charge) "OU". The
re-circulating power is imaginary "virtual" power within a local singularity created by the device as a whole.
Tesla spoke of tuning the load and source. A shorted out coil trashes whatever impedance matching relation it
has with the M field. M field, coil and capacitor tuned at a given speed and a given frequency with a properly
designed core, coil, capacitor, relation ... are key to OU. Shorting is OK to test Lenz drag. RV idea is to optimize
energy output, not prony brake it to death.
The real design challenge is to drive current back to a battery and in DC its POWER factor is measured in
REVERSE voltage relation. Say battery 12.7 VDC, source 13.7 VDC, differential is 1VDC. In a charge relation
the reverse resistance is the power determining aspect, say as a sample 1 Ohm, then the power charging the
battery is 1V x 1Ohm x 1V = 1W true relative power transfer ratio.
So we have as a tensor (DC) equivalent of Phasor (AC) (power factor) relative rotation angle to co-phased
element "synchronous".
So as we may equate battery resistance + load resistance in amps at a given VOLTAGE drop, lets say 12.7VDC
At 10A that required to BALANCE a tensor of 10A, so we must calculate voltage required to valance such
where generator Source voltage power must be higher than battery as to reduce draw and reverse charge to it.
The impedance must then be lower than the battery one as to transfer current to load and reverse to battery (same
formula above) where the generator overcomes power requirements feeding a reversed power factor vector to the
battery. DC is nothing more than an extremely long sinewave and RF rules also apply to it but as pure standing
waves. Understand that and looping is within grasp.
Something very interesting that everyone should understand is that you can’t just do resonance formulas only to
find the right resistance and capacitor size for the particular inductance of a particular coil - the factor that can
only be seen by actual bench-testing, is what the motor goes up in draw as the coil is loaded. As example, if I
brought the cap size from 47uf down to 22uf, now I get more power-out, but this change also makes the AC
motor draw increase.
The load acts as a VARACTOR diode & only a few are qualified to deal with those theoretic aspects. In a pulse
generator, that means using ONE pole, idea is to charge the coil with the PM and using the M field collapse as
power source being non reflective to mechanical power source. R load will a variable determining the time T and
current level discharge of L, L will be affected by C internal interwinding capacitance and OTHER also self
changing parameters. The 4rt dimension is the PROJECTION of all the parameters to an unified set of final
values determined by all the components. The MODEL testing is the only WAY now possible to perceive this
aspects until the proper formulations can be included in electrical computer simulations .
Now anyone can be able to SEE where OU is lost and why alternators and generator designs are flawed and the
need to change engineering concepts into a more broadbanded region were RF knowledge becomes vital to be
able to integrate and interlace the INTERRELATED parameters affecting the way generators and motors work.
RV is a Toy to discover interesting new things.
Further considerations
The concept of RV alternator is not new, as to use any motor as a generator putting a capacitor in any ABC
phases, but using RESONANCE LRC concept in series is new and is Hector’s public domain copyright. RV was
meant as a power source for the now free domain Ecklin-Brown generator (1978 patent expired).
Before building a RV, one could think of it as just a motor configured to run more efficiently with capacitors.
But there is more here than just that. It is impedance matching (the famous dipole theory taken to practical
application, semi-resonant principles are interacting here with the virtual creation of extra phases. All Seike’s
Ultra-relativity formulations apply here on rotating magnetic fields.
RV is not important on its own, but what is important is that you learn how to make it WORK and use it as a tool
(as the recovery circuits). Integrating RV knowledge to it is what will permit you to use these motors connected
to an AC line & at higher intermediate POWER to attain replication of E-Gray concept & overunity.
As RV is taking solid ground, lets put the facts on the table:
Page 44
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 44
•
Standard motor stators in motors are more efficient as HP goes up: 50% low power, to 98%+ hi power
HP (http://www.reliance.com/prodserv/motgen/b2838.htm); Eff goes up as rotor mass goes up.
•
Baldor high eff motors: 100% eff at 10 HP; In RV mode and with PM rotors, they are OU.
•
The primemover is demonstrated: RV effect (rotoconversion)
•
The alternator is demonstrated: RF RADIANT ENERGY (Tesla, E.Gray, Keely, Hendershot, Bedini,
Bearden, Newman, Wootan systems).
•
The RESONANCE is in OU RADIANT ENERGY levels within rotoverter alternator. Idea is to extract
RADIANT ENERGY WITH NO LOADING to SOURCE.
Any motor can be run at RV mode, even single phase ones, but the reason this has not been discussed is that you
cannot find 460VAC motors in single phase. A single-phase motor with start winding can be converted to RV,
but requires much more capacitance making it more expensive. Its starting winding is at 45 , shading the main
winding, which gives much less torque than the 3 phase one. The capacitor and phase angle create a “wedge”
wave effect more acute than in 3PH, but requires greater control (step-down transformer or variac). Tesla bi-
phase motors are better to use in one phase but no one manufactures them.
The RV equates TESLA COIL primary without the spark and massive hi voltages but with same RF "capacity"
for pulse operation, RV reverse induction is similar to the finger in the wet glass cup trick except is done by
electrically augmenting the signal instead of mechanical acoustic mean.
This link http://pirt.asu.edu/detail_3.asp?ID=811&offset=200 takes you to a series of acoustic resonance
experiments that explain well what takes place in RV alternator insides. It’s an ELECTRICAL equivalent as
acoustics LAWS apply to electric ones.
There is a big difference in standard ADD a phase and RV modes. RV modes can be attained in a one phase
operation, but there are NO motors WIRED for 460Volts in single-phase mode. That is why I used 3 phase and
at the same time attain more gain by the Capacitor extra phase generation. There is also a more convenient phase
angle than in the standard starting winding of a single-phase motor.
In testing made way back using a 120/230/460 3ph generator, we replaced the exciter unit with a variable power
supply feeding the ROTOR to magnetize it "no slip". We found the device lowered the power usage of the lab
devices 40% as it corrected the POWER factor.
In RV mode, current in RV lines increased as we magnetized rotor but current decreased to utility lines…PF
correction, magic word to hide OU & free energy so leave it there is PF. It is interesting to note it also corrects
the PF of a battery, as if pulsed in gives pulsed back more power than what it used to move itself! Konzen is
correcting the Power factor of his battery. Bedini and Newman is the same. MEG corrected the core PF… (Keep
this as is another containing revealing answers - slightly encrypted but evident for smart eyes). Note that a
Rotophase (http://home.earthlink.net/ojmsmith/indexd.html) differs from RV mode in IMPEDANCE, voltage,
current, operation & transformation theory.
Its energy savings potential can’t be overlooked for long, its a matter of time the engineering community starts
looking to Rotoconversion modes and its applications, the magic words are cost effective, viable, durable,
redundant, standard base design (off the shelve hardware) simple construct.
Best alternators you can built is taking DC pm motors and using the commutator as phases into - + diode multi-
phase bridge, mounting stator magnets into same ID pipe coupled to RV shaft as External gen rotor and using
rotor fixed to shaft support as stator .... from each commutator segment same wire length is used into diode
bridge .... Much more efficient than car alternator (more phases). Adds up as 15 phases uses 4 for brush contact
means 375% more power performance as a generator if you diode rectify each one into outside PM rotor with
internal brushless stator ...
I had no other choice than to give this the way I had done and without the dedication of people efforts to
replicate the experiments it might just still be an useless paper posted as a curio in an internet page, so Humanity
owns a debt of gratitude to those taking the first step, without you the RV potential might have remained
unknown and I might already be dead. Sooner or later a motor manufacturer will take an eye on these systems
and call us as to how to manufacture it to please the alternate energy community and industry.
On the other hand there is the tendency to over-engineer and prevent secondary use. All motors will be replaced
by things you can never use. It is called “second use mitigation” and is currently on NSA priority R&D agenda.
They started it with CAR alternators, engine and electronics, in computers with the ATX power supply
configuration to prevent its use as a NORMAL bench power supply. Trace what happened to Synchronous
Motor history, why they were removed from the market? The EV GRAY motor was constructible from any
normal EM motor-generator, but it was OVER-engineered to a non-replicable piece of junk. 3PH motors had
raised price 50% since RV disclosure; they are using HIGHER impedance in newer motors and lower Q cores to
suppress RV effect. My advice buy all surplus you can as 5 HP motor now is $1300 USD
Page 45
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 45
If a normal generator can be purchased with a 300% duty and 2KV high voltage certification, then there is no
single reason why it can’t work with RADIANT energy pulsing as a MOTOR! The RV alternator replaces the
EV Gray Dynamotor alternator and any EM or PM alternator can be used as EV GRAY PULSEMOTOR. Hector
is linking the relation of RV to EV Gray work (Radiant Energy). The RV and Gray phenomena are the same
thing. You built an RV; you can build EV GRAYS motor-generators also.
Converting Bedini to 3PH RV Mode: for RV Bedini mix, you require (sample) 3 coils in the stator per every 2 in
the rotor, spaced at equal angle intervals (sample 120deg for 3 stator poles, for 6=60 deg for rotor, 2 poles 180
deg, 4 poles 90deg) then you can configure your coils either in delta or WYE. Pulse to emulate 3PH timing at
A,B,C intervals, recover CEMP using simpler 3PH DIODE bridge … 3X the power out. Your cores may heat up
so watch for burn outs (use transformer laminate if they do overheat). This will prove RV and Bedini are
working under the same phenomena.
A motor operating under Smith patent will use the stated plate current all the time. The difference is that RV uses
nearly no power as long as is not loaded, and acts as a transformer with de-rated HP (standard mode). Any
MOTOR with core loses of down to 1% can work better than any Bedini coil. Any 3 PH motor in Hi impedance
with a PM rotor can exceed Bedini motor power a hundredfold. A 3PH 230/460VAC 12 lead 10HP motor with
PM rotor can exceed Newman motor (7,500 pound) tenfold, and cost 1/20 $$ to built.
Q& A of RV replication
Q: I am currently building a RV unit. I have 2 nearly identical motors, mechanically linked, both 3PH 5.5KW
2800 rpm. Motor unit is wired for 660 V, driven with 220 VAC.
A: Prime-mover must be driven with 165V for proper 52.1 Ohms impedance (minimal)
Q: Generator unit is wired for 380 V.
A: Q here is too low to attain hi gain, wire for 220 if possible & raise capacitance. Higher Q more gain less
energy required from prime-mover to attain radiant energy at a given frequency and mass.
Q: Un-tuned, motor needs 600 watt for driving generator, while 4200 watt virtual power is generated in
generator, single phase (not yet extracted, un-tuned).
A: You attained near resonance in Alternator "amplitron alike" very near RADIANT energy. Get a magnet near
motors and compare different hand vive feeling; energy passes as RF and radiates out of housing in alternator
while in prime mover this effect is minimal. Also approach the magnet to the wire lines in prime-mover and
alternator. E-Gray tube uses this energy, requires use of "homopolar transformer" rods or grids for E Gray. Next
step is to VECTOR this energy into different LOADS & experiment with it until the tuning and energy transform
are understood. Applications from solar co-generation, dynamometer, dynamotor are easy attained for lab work
and household use.
Q: How small is the window for correct cap values for creating an exact standing wave within 2x500W bulb?
A: That is why I specified KNOWN AMPERE LOAD were the USE of EXACT amperage is required, else
thermal overrun will blast the bulb to bits or melt filament. If LC is 8A 263 V, use 2000W light bulb for 230
VAC then adjust cap for drift.
Q: I think, a big problem is the shift of filament resistance due to different lightning.
A: Yes, but can’t be exceeded given LC current if load is same or higher. This experiment demonstrates COLD
electricity, as if done right filament will fall in current node of dipole resonance and voltage drop will be 24 to
19.8 VAC (easy operated underwater as Grey did). Do that with a normal 220 flashbulb and it will blast away
with a big bang.
Q: I saw z.e.u.s. lamps and the simple negative inductor. Why and how does the teleportation take place in line
to the inductor? It reminds me on Joe-cell principle. Are you able to explain this?
A: Aether flows in coil meridian toward centre "gravity flow". M field flows out from coil ENDS, this flow can
carry phase dimensionally atoms from core into an energy loop, the higher the energy the more danger there is.
There is an immediate metal taste in mouth when this happens as body WATER tends to trap dimensionally
phase-shifted atoms. Gold, silver, titanium must be used in genesis type coils, or pure biologically compatible
iron. In USDOE experiments they used titanium cores.
Back to RV, instant application is to run RV using frequency and pulse-length controlled inverter to synchronize
asynchronous generators to lines in overspeed mode to supplement utility power. The advantage is if load is
reduced RV demand in prime mover also reduces.
Page 46
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 46
In solar energy this is a stumbling block under 5KW regions, but with RV mode run motors, Solar to
asynchronous conversion can be attained under 1KW exceeding 75% eff. Using NORMAL state of art method
that is impossible (under 30% eff) as in LOW impedance motors waste 90% to 98% of its energy with no
loading!! In HI impedance motors use 1/10 to 1/20 the rated max load HP rating for RV operation
Using PM RV motor that can be taken to PF correction figures well in OU transform regions. 461W per HP over
the standard 746W figure, being the rotor M field relation to line input M field impedance x 1.618 x Q core
factor x PF.
Squirrel cage is a loss factor; any properly designed PM RV connected to a house will provide KVARS to it
lowering utility power usage. You can call that "free energy" with an EM (variable) electrically exited rotor you
can regulate power correction and amplification figures.
You definitely have a very useful tool in your hands now. Just be careful with the "looping" as it will take you to
other realms of science. Energy savings applications are much safer for life & health. If you loop perfect, Cayce
predicted cosmic energy may be used first in Europe unstopped by American suppression & greed.
Q: The magnetic field from bifilar coils is 0 in 3D-Space. What happens with atoms under this condition?
A: Light is measured as speed. But what happens if measured as frequency standing wave Reverse were M =
MC²/(T/T). Matter reverses in time state to Light.
Q: And where is the connection between mind and the field, generated by RV?
A: As the frequency is increased toward LIGHT speed, matter becomes degaussed to the square and PK energy
is amplified to the SQUARE also. That is why persons with no CENTER of gravity cannot travel in time space
or exceed C to 4D or 5D states. Personally I resist 5D transposition, a normal person simply banishes into NON-
existence due to lack of gravity centre.
Q: How do you know if the best run cap brings the motor coil to resonance at 60 Hz, 120 Hz, or 180 Hz? In
other words, how can you be sure you are in resonance on the fundamental and not harmonic?
If you resonate on a harmonic, it will bog down and amperage will surge. If in 3 phases lower harmonic, it will
slow RPM at basic coil harmonic frequency. If high harmonic, it will double the speed.
But in 3 phase motors it’s a NO as it acts as a filter as what you do is alter phase relation under semi-resonant
condition. Harmonics require a shitload of Q, something RV only gets in very loaded conditions, but it acts like a
filtered amplitron device, so harmonics again are a NO as they only exhibit as a phase shift modulation, nothing
more. RV is quite stable in that sense.
Norman Wootan (Mon, 25 Feb 2002 – on Keelynet-rotoverter)
I built Hectors phase rotoverter with the following results: Motor is 3HP, 3 Phase, 60HZ, 1725 RPM, wired for
operation on 480V. Motor free running, tuned to minimum current draw from 120V line input required 20mfd
370V oil filled cap resulting with a current draw of .66 amps @ 120VAC input. Motor loaded with belt drive
step-up 6:1 ratio to drive a PMI disk PM, DC motor acting as a generator. (generator unloaded) required 30 mfd,
370V oil filled cap with a resulting current draw of .50 amps @ 120VAC input.
Now I loaded the DC generator with 160-watt incandescent lamp load. Since I have two independent systems
here, one being driven with 120VAC line input and the other system a belt driven DC generator being loaded
with pure resistive load. Here are the numbers: Motor was retuned for minimum current draw which required 45
mfd, 370V oil filled cap with a resulting current draw of .15 amps @ 120VAC input. The independent
generator put out .75 amps @ 74 VDC into a resistive load. The only thing that needs to be looked at on the
input side of the equation is the power factor of the AC input.
I need to to look at the current/ voltage phase relationship. I'm satisfied with the figures that I calculate which
shows roughly 18 watts AC input with a DC output of 55.5 watts. What I find most interesting is the fact that the
more load you put on the 3-phase motor the lower the input current draw and the motor gets colder. The belt
driven DC generator gets quite hot after about 30 minutes of running time. Go figure it out. I believe there is a
lot to be learned about revolving magnetic fields in 3 phase motors and tuning the output via capacitors. This
experiment is so easy to do everyone should seriously look at this phenomenon. My next step is to document
PF on input and improve the DC side of the circuit to provide more loading.
Go to this URL and carefully read how the RV really works: http://home.earthlink.net/ojmsmith/indexd.html
Hector: You Forgot Otto does not use Hi impedance mode, Otto device loads standard currents on line (constant
rated demand) load on no load to motor shaft. OU is lost as the free wheeling is lost to synchronous hysteresis
Rotor cannot exceed synchronous speed unless compound winded to do so.
Page 47
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 47
3.2 Transverter
Overview of Operation
Standard AC transformers can be pulsed to OU transform states by taking them to resonance. The power within
the LC ("radiant in nature") provides a source of imaginary potential within the shift of power factor non-linear
reflected to the source. In pure LC the AMPERAGE reading is the important factor as in Radiant Energy this is
measured in AMPERE LOAD, as in RESONANCE the "R" is antinode where the voltage value (in a perfect
theoretical system) must be near 0 and amperage maximal.
Why is this system OU? Simple LC have a DECAY value in time, so the ONLY energy you need to supply is
the one lost to DECAY as if system source where a negative inductor to LC (as is the case of RV alternator
rotor; similar to a wet finger on a glass cup - cup decibel energy output exceeds finger input as glass molecules
transform energy from their RESONANT STATE adding to input). Normal entropy decay is .618 of 1.618 as
logarithmic time receding signal, so gain is also in atropic system of 1.618 where frequency increase in octaves
may increase amplification by a factor of 3.141592 where the spiral resonant circular projection can be expressed
in a 12,000 4d polygon structure (similar to double helix DNA structure – the reason the human system is OU by
all definitions).
Remember logarithmic spirals orbital decay path is relative to gravity as signal decay or gain is relative to LC Q
and parameters in a working ZPE system.
Surplus 3 PH transformers are good for these experiments, WYE-delta combinable 480/230/120VAC I/Os.
Normal Universal transformers 480/360/240/120 I/O isolation 3KW 47-450-CPS are ok, but TUNING and a lot
of work in vitro lab experience is needed to GET the idea WERE OU is and WHAT RADIANT ENERGY is all
about. There is a lot that can be done with 3 phase transformers. A MAGNETOTRANSISTOR is just one of
them. The transformer is superior to MEG as it does not need magnets to attain OU radiant energy states.
Try rotating it first, to enclose the field within the transformer core. Resonate the side coils, vectoring DC plug to
the center coil, drive in 3PH rotation (A,B,C) to create "MEMA" magnet-less Electro Magnetic Amplifier.
Splitting the transformer’s center-tap, feeding POSITIVE across winding and SWITCHING the negative using a
reverse DIODE in the transistor to capture and feed back counter EMP as the transistor switches off. See
schematic in PDF; just find the right frequency and pulse-length to make the ferroxplana sing a song! As in
NEWMAN coil, BIG CORES have nice CEMF EMP.
The Side lodes: R/2 Ix2 where centre amperage B phase x 2 times. A,C phases current and A,B voltage is V =
V/2 as A,B phases are 90° from centre C phase instead of 120 deg required in 3 phase relation; so being in phase
relation is (V1+V2+V3/3)x 1.732 = VT in relation to V input (same applies to current-power relation). You
need Q 12 to 15 to sustain rotation with near 0 field loss. Impedance is projected to infinity as fields open and
goes widebanded with a projected M field out of the transformer (exteriorized field).
The solution is to co-phase A,B,C relation properly to create SELF impedance regulation within HI Q modes.
Outside of the transformer this can become a POWER source as a SOLID EM AC EMF source if placed inside
a coil ... short the coil, impedance decreases, and Q increases. Just we need to see the 4rth dimensional picture in
3Phases of the whole construct in a given space .. phasors field projections interactions, all the works ! going
inside and out within that transformer.... Contain the rotation, increase the "Q" Resonance gain eff. goes up.
(this gives also more ideas on the postings related to Sweet VTA Magnetic latching and Resonance; revisit also
the MEG).
Loading the sides of 3PH transformers A,C phase exteriorizes and projects FIELD outside transformer. If
another LOOP is used it becomes a magneto-transistor. Experimentation is the key to obtain these effects. 3PH
transformers can be used as Scalar WAVE EW EMP weapon. Work also harmonics. One frequency rotates in
one direction the other counter rotates within; this is little known in power dynamics but is key to many OU
states related to Magneto-atomic resonance.
Maintain rotation, else EM field will leak out forming exterior projected field. This leaking is useful in other
applications: put a coil outside the transformer and it will generate quite a good AC signal, as test to verify
condition, this Broadbands LC as IMPEDANCE increases so Q goes down.
The trick is to Obtain HI Q at a given frequency, such resonance occurs. In your transformer case
"ferroresonance", as in any circuit you must look for losses that reflect in lower Q and limit accumulative
incremental resonance. Every transformer is Unique, not 2 are equal, as also no 2 capacitors are equal.
Once attained a given Resonant Frequency, the Exiting Pulse can be shortened; at a given point where ringback
OU effect is noticed, core magnetics porting energy to system, the requirements become minimal as per 1 Watt
Page 48
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 48
being able to maintain a HI Q kilowatt range resonance. The problem even a Clamp on Meter impedance detunes
the LC, your BODY field changes the frequency as you get near it, MOON gravity Tidal force also detunes it.
These aspects being very interesting to test in vitro as gravity influence is noticed under these conditions, Mass
concentration becomes a Parameter in the operation of device.
For certain 3PH applications, 3 independent transformers are better as they are magnetically decoupled. The
phase becomes more "malleable" to capacitor value influence. A triad Ultra looped system can be developed
using SEIKE rotary transform theory (under resonance) self-inductive modes.
Bifilar inter-winding capacitance tends to correct power factor de-phasing from resonance, but the SCALAR
TENSOR providing the STANDING wave is removed. Gray used AC homopolar principle to do such transform,
as long Radiant state TENSOR is maintained such tensor will manifest OU with a corresponding thermal pump
effect. Quantifiable by Delta t transform (Thermopile effect), it’s in reality simple but is LOST in the attempt to
leave the Dual 0 states of resonance. POWER is not a "Unisex" force. The FORCES of the Universe are always
manifested to fullest force when FEMALE & MALE forces interact "bipolar".
Good toy to play with is a 2x 75 KW 3PH used for MEMA experiments. We took it to resonance using a pulse
driver driven with an AA 1.5 VDC volt battery where the 3W pulser developed a 10KW ringing within the core.
Hector used Seike configuration Wye/Delta modes using pulses to maintain system rotary field ... 480/500VAC
for Hi 208VAC delta low using 3x3 600VAC 22µF capacitor array, in a 75 KW 3PH hi efficiency ISO
transformer (FCC grade). The ringing varied in decay, frequency voltage increase from 1 cycle 1/10 sec pulse to
10KC 800V PP cut off end signal. A Ping with incremental voltage and frequency decay within a rotary LC
triple-flux array. Even in a valance capacity-impedance array, the system tendency is to rotate clockwise under 1
phase pulsing A,B,C selected inputs. A 1.5VDC battery can power a 3W LC Driver, a Pulser can drive Joules
into a big transformer; Exiting core to GIVE energy from thermal region (OU).
Hidden somewhere Hector has the NASA rotary resonant transformer formulations, and they are nifty OU. All
RF resonant coils are OU ... Stochastic resonance is the FIRST demonstration of OU.
If you listen to a Ferro-resonant transformer the core rings to the AC frequency at RESONANCE as electrical
manifest into the mechanical ring frequency of the element being used as a core. This relation is considered
UNWANTED noise, but for OU production like in VTA type latching you must put the Metglass to scream in
agony on electron spin erotic delirium in order to attain certain energetic transfers from magneto atomic thermal
regions to the electrical circuit ones (OU). If inverters TR cores were made to scream, they go OU but transistors
& Fets usually fry as they are not designed for it (nor the circuits they are on).
You may need frequency and pulselenght adjusments in normal DC to DC H network inverters. The
upconversion to Hi voltage is adjusted as to EXCITE the ferroxplana to OU states charging the capacitors under
sinusoidal logaritmic standing wave. The H network fires the capacitor charge as also frequency and pulselenght
adjust.
It goes “TUNG”. That "Tung" is not 50 or 60CPS, but 10 harmonics up 0.5-0.6KCPS. As 50 or 60CPS feed the
transformer, the power line frequency echoes of the fundamental & harmonics interact forming WAVITONS
within the core by core natural "cycloconversion" effect. Use an Equalizer Chart and see the so-called resonant
PULSES are NOT in the fundamental frequency but in a multi octave broadbanded in hypermodulated Waves
across equalizer frequency range.
As the transformer is in Extreme LOW Q and its fundamental RESONANCE is WAY up from the power line
one. This is what must be compressed into a rotating Hi Q phased COHERENT signal to attain EASER modes in
the core. If you compare such a chart to one from a PUMPED laser rod you will see the simile, they ENHANCE
this effect to Amplify light. Why not enhance it to amplify electric current, and let it acquire energy from
ambient by stochastic amplification.
In resonance capacitor charge becomes maximal discharging this POTENTIAL non-coupled to (not loading and
detuning source is key. Idea is that M field logarithmically charges C upon influencing inductance and core (if
any); logarithmic gain is 1.618 as defined, so its a 4 D projection 72° offset into "other plane" or I may say phase
and virtual relative energy state. It must be tailored to occur in PM driven alternator .... to get a logarithmic gain
into a given capacitor value from a 0 charge state (optimal) to make CEMF a linear forward vector (+ power
factor) force. Verifiable easy with the postulated line of experiments being performed with RV-Muller Gen
setup.
We have talked within the lines on this subject related to Easer modes: "seek the acoustic signature within LC
resonance". "Ringing" as RV works is this state, it hums like a turbine (gravity and magnetism are not far apart).
Page 49
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 49
If a pulse of strong a magnitude is created countering a RELAXING iron mass, it can create an instant black hole
(mass implosion) (used in X ray NSA-DOE lasers). That is what is called creating Wavitons within the core, like
a LASER these electro-acoustic signals can be taken to atomic fusion intensity; solid titanium as a resonator can
help to deepen more into this phenomena (but is government restricted and expensive). So laminates and speaker
metal end plates have to do it.
The fight has always been that if people want OU they must seek Hi perfection in the energy transformation
mechanics. Resonant circuits are just tools to acquire states of Hi eff energy transformation. OU becomes a by-
product of such effort. Every time you experiment with resonance and Q aspects you can seek for the Sweet
point, that Special condition where the combination of Reactive and capacitive components create the best Q,
lowest loss condition.
MASS core materials make nice differences. Some commercial hi eff utility transformers go off the roof
energetically speaking when resonated. Single-phase utility transformers have some magic in them also. Some
give very HI Q transform as taken to Hi voltage resonance. I recommend resonating whatever you can find,
some transformers will really suck, but others will sing to the tune of pure OU resonance.
Relation: Core mass, coil turns, capacitance. Look for its Natural best resonating point, which is usually where
the best Q is. Try harmonics; usually some transformers can resonate in harmonics this being ten fold in intensity
to basic exiting frequency. In standard practice this is seen as loss, but if done intentional can be a source of
energy multiplication.
The importance in OU design is CORE mass (its natural resonance), wire size and turn ratio as capacitor tensor
relation across a diode as it charges it "logaritmmic semy resonant curve". This is where HI gain & efficiency are
leading to OU states.
If capacitor potential is 0, the charging takes a hi Q lower impedance logarithmic C charge within a CORNU
spiral (as optical slit) charge path resulting in true magnetic amplification from the 4D zero point tensor , this
under "resonant" conditions. The diode does not isolate L from C just converts it to half tank rectifying half
wave ... 30cps case of house AC Pulses into C. A diode bridge does the same but doubles half wave pulses
60CPS AC.
If a second LC tuned at 120CPS is placed at bridge pulsed DC output you have an AC cyclo-converter frequency
doubling circuit. If the diodes are set as FREQUENCY MIXER bridge using LC and diodes, you can convert
any signal, say Shuman resonance 11 CPS into useful 66 to 72CPS .... and get free energy from the EARTH
resonance. It needs extreme expertise in AC-RF even if it seems so simple.
Example
Take a DEC 10 power supply Ferro-resonant transformer (DEC 16-1491 rev D); use 1200v 22.5 uF capacitor in
the resonant coil. AC primary input of 444.6W (117V 3.8A) with 3151.5W (573V 5.5A) circulating power in
resonant coil. If diode plug is used as in plan with x2 capacity, each capacitor will become a half resonant Tank
circuit becoming in a sense a VECTOR accumulator one negative and one positive "half" in "resonant" mode. If
discharged in sequential pulse mode the power is awesome compared to the input. The ratio in this transformer
circulating power was over 7:1. All this time we were forced to assume this was a POWER FACTOR
phenomena and that this power was not EXTRACTABLE in any way. Well not any more with proper tuning and
pulsing circuits or simple "Spartan" resonant direct connections it can be used.
I hope you can find FR transformers or
get a standard one 120/240/480V
primary 120/240/480V sec. Turn the
secondary into a resonant tank; the
transformer will hum and if tuned right,
will "drift" with input frequency
"TUNE". In this case no shunt needed
since no core secondary current
"regulation" is going to be used.
Try getting a ferro-resonant
transformer. Old voltage stabilizers are
resonant transformers.
After this first step try diode plug use
x2 capacity. Note the circuit will not hum it will do a “punk” and input current will be a NO LOAD VALUE.
But be very careful: x2 voltages and x2 currents will be present at plug +- terminals. Pulse-extract the power into
resistor bank until the system goes resonant (hum), max "Q" if possible.
Page 50
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 50
In a PM rotor the magnet translates as inductive VA-energy going into a capacitor (transform to VAR); the
relation of L and C being RESONANT radiant ONE in half LC diode vectored tank the OPTO isolation circuit
and BLANK energy firing non-reflective to source Stage is SECRET to EXTRACT ZPE energy.
So the transverter circuit recovery
approach is a 2-gunned device where
there is no excuse for whatever
energy resides within it or the core
used to be converted into DC +-
vectors (poles). "Radiant" energy
contributes to charge capacitor within
Resonant circuit. Unit can be called
in a sense a theoretical "Vovine
feces" eliminator. If there is any (OU)
this basic circuit will extract it from a
coil at proper tuning parameters (RF
tuning practices are the standard).
Try to replicate the FR RC effect and
use the diode plug system; this simple device make many obsolete by all terms. This is simpler and cheaper than
the rotoverter 3PH systems.
Suppose we take a trafo 480V to 220V and feed it with 120VAC and resonate the secondary (pure LC, not diode
plug). You need to raise Q, loss decreases to a point it self sustains like VTA configuration, as "reactor core" it
self amplifies. In order to get the losses become negative to reach "self sustain”, the Stochastic resonance comes
to play, transfer of H Heat to Electrical current. As Einstein-bose condensate is created: certain resonance
conditions create hyper-conductivity, cooling at magneto-atomic resonance level where natural
superconductivity exist, like GENESIS device (UFO engine) it freezes to absolute 0 as it works to max potential.
This at extremes as condition can be exothermic were the Burn out occurs (usually were BROADBANDING and
signal annihilation occurs) as the Ferro-resonance papers stated. (To make the Genesis device working, the core
material Natural resonance must be determined as to determine C and L values. An ACUSTIC physical NOISE
like the TRANSFORMER Ferro-resonance is heard
when such state is attained.)
LC needs to be Optimized (No loss) no welds, no shorts,
no sinks (Like RV alternator taken to highest Level, but
with difference it stays on and does not shut down).
Resonance can make an ELEMENT a SUPERconductor
(why you think they call it COLD electricity?)
(Note that Metglass magic is in kilohertz -megahertz
range)
About resonant Electrolysis, the Sonofusion water
frequency is 23 to 24.5 Khz and its harmonics up to
WATER boiling 2.45GHZ (microwave oven magnetron)
and down to 2.45 Hz where the gas action separation is
increased ten fold
You can experiment with the transverter as vectored
resonant electrolyser. In the first picture above, the R
load can be the electrolytic cells. The coils cores and
capacitor need to be tailored to a specific frequency,
where they match the best gas production of the
electrodes or plates in the gas chamber (requires lab
work). The small diodes across C1 and C2 are power
reversal blocking diodes.
Ferro-resonance
Ferro resonance is a complex electrical phenomenon, which is characterized by the sudden onset of
very high sustained overvoltages concurrent with high levels of harmonic distortion. The system can
take a sudden non-linear jump from its normal steady state response to a steady state condition of severe
harmonic distortion. Ferro-resonance is distinguished from linear resonance (which is predictable) in
that there exist several stable steady state responses to any given change of parameters, the response is
very dependent on the initial condition, the resonance at a given frequency can occur over a wide range
Page 51
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 51
of parameter values, and the resonant frequency can be different for each stable response. It accrues in
iron cores when a frequency of a coil hits a sub-harmonic of the iron'snatural resonance frequency.
This resonance frequency is dependent on the structure of the molecular lattice of the material. Because
of this, the resonant frequency varies with different metals.
There are two additional properties of ferromagnetic materials that are important in understanding the
phenomenon: ferromagnetic materials can saturate and they exhibit hysteresis. For saturation, as the current in a
ferromagnetic coil increases beyond the saturation point, the inductance of the coil changes suddenly. As for
hysteresis, the magnitude of the current that causes the iron to go into saturation is not the same as the one at
which the iron come out of it. The boundary between linear operation and saturated operation is not a fixed value
of current, but is dependent on the previous values of that current. The hysteresis is due to the residual flux
density stored in the iron, which must be overcome when the current changes direction.
As such the inductance is not fixed. It changes due to saturation, and this changes the inductive reactance, so that
the resonant frequency is a moving target. This change in inductance can sometimes tune a system into
resonance. As the iron goes into saturation, the sudden change in inductance brings about a sudden change the
frequency at which resonance will occur. Sudden and unpredictable changes in inductance will mean that a wide
range of capacitances can potentially lead to resonance at a given frequency. Once the ferromagnetic inductance
"pops" into saturation, it remains saturated until the current magnitude decreases. If the inductance when
saturated causes a resonance (i.e. results in an inductive reactance that matches the capacitive reactance in the
circuit), the current magnitude can increase dramatically, further driving the iron into saturation, and thus
making the resonant point stable. See also a paper on ferroresonance on www.cadickcorp.com.
When an iron core is in super-saturated (magnetically) state and suddenly relaxed, there is a very unusual
amount of energy that comes out of the grounded iron core material, which is the "radiant energy" that many
have been trying to generate.
See the following link: http://www.rexresearch.com/mra/1mra.htm. You take any low-loss transformer to ultra hi
Q. Upon ferro-resonance it acquires self cooling; oscillations and superconductivity being LOSSLESS and OU.
We try to enhance what the (destructive) power utilities try to avoid.
Ferroresonant transformer
In normal transformers, you wind the secondary on top of the primary. In FRs, you wind the primary on bottom
half of trafo, and secondary on the top half, with a magnetic shunt in between. This magnetic shunt is nothing
else than simply the same laminate really shortcutting the magnetic path of the secondary. The thickness of this
shunt is less than half of the transformer core thickness, else all flux would be 'shunted'.
So you could see this trafo as containing 2 separate magnetic paths with a limited coupling between them.
The conventional reason of using a FR is because any change in the primary voltage will not translate into
changes in the saturated secondary voltage, and voltage regulation results.
Normally, core saturation in a transformer results in distortion of the sinewave shape, and the FR is no
exception. To combat this side effect, FRs have an auxiliary secondary winding paralleled with one or more
capacitors, forming a resonant circuit tuned to the power supply frequency. This "tank circuit" serves as a filter
to reject harmonics created by the core saturation, and provides the added benefit of storing energy in the form of
AC oscillations, which is available for sustaining output winding voltage for brief periods of input voltage loss
(milliseconds'worth of time, but certainly better than nothing).
In addition to blocking harmonics created by the saturated core, this resonant circuit also "filters out" harmonic
frequencies generated by nonlinear (switching) loads in the secondary winding circuit and any harmonics present
in the source voltage, providing "clean" power to the load.
When a FR is fully loaded, meaning that it is having maximum current drawn from it, the output voltage wave
form approaches that of a sine wave. On the other hand, when the load is light, the wave form takes on more of a
quasi square wave. This is a result of the transformer'seffort to keep the output voltage as constant as possible,
which is the very essence of the ferro-resonant design.
So far a conventional FR use... end of “classic” education…
Now the interesting thing... We DON'T use FRs for voltage regulation nor with the auxiliary winding (just with
the primary and main secondary), but purely for resonance creation (with high Q) without impact to primary.
You can resonate the secondary (so creating high current and voltage). In a normal trafo, this will impact the
total flux and as such also the primary. In an FR, because of the shunt, this resonance and as a consequence the
saturation remains within the secondary magnetic loop (because of the laminate shunt). So you can get the ferro-
resonance effect in the secondary without impacting the primary.
Page 52
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 52
In fact you can see the primary winding as RV primemover and the secondary winding as alternator, but all in
1PH.
So the FR is a solid state versus the RV primemover+alt (simpler & no rotating parts), but the drawback is the
single phase only.
To the right is a picture of a FR. The
bottom is the primary of 230V
(connection 1-2). The top is the
secondary of 50V with connection 3-6
(there are also some other connections
to the same winding with lower
voltage). This secondary has very thick
wire, so good for high resonant current.
There is an auxiliary winding (white
small wires at the back), but not needed
for our purposes. See the magnetic
shunt between the windings.
FRs tends to correct its own PF making
up for input variations; can be lagging
or leading depending on input voltage
& loads. 1.618 winding ratio to primary
in normal trafo, then resonate;
amplification factor is x10, voltage
doubled, amperage x phi. You need the
metal laminate shunt. Some
manufactures use 2xPhi and hi voltage
capacitors under resonance to lower
cost.
TV REPLICATION
Jinis started a replication: http://www.m-primus.com/www/de/data/tv/tv.html
The optimal input voltage for primary is the minimal self sustaining resonant constant; the energy required to
overcome time energy decay e-(H/2L)T. This is the cut-off amplitude, below which resonance becomes entropic
and shuts down. That potential will reflect back to line as power factor correction (VAR). This is typical ¼ of the
rated voltage at the nominal frequency. The constant determines the impedance match required (ratio) as is
variable on aspects as Q, ampere turn, core parameter, wire size, capacitor voltage & electret dielectric constant
& others you will find as you go.
Due to the ferro-resonance effect, the voltage tendency is to go up as input goes down, and the acoustic physical
noise increasing in the transformer (predictable) until it cuts off a certain point (resonance shuts down) as null
wave is created.
Note that you can’t start resonance with this constant level of energy. That resonance needs to exist in the first
place in order to go down in power to find this constant, so first start with higher level. So don’t use a resonant
pulse to first start a circuit, as if there is no resonance you can never try to sustain a positive constant feedback as
there is nothing being acquired to sustain it.
Once the constant is found, try to find the optimal C value for LC resonance. In ferro-resonance the idea is to hit
the core fundamental frequency where the electron spin energy transfers to the core magnetic oscillation in
where energy heat transfers from current flow as H=(IxI)Rt as crude simple equation to justify genesis transform
(hi Q) resonant mode. You must find a capacitor value where at a natural frequency the core becomes in a hyper-
saturated state and squeals like a pig. So again, find the core fundamentals and make a hyper-Q LC
configuration, and work on time compression and energy JOULE potentials. The transformer core in itself
becomes a "crystal" with a basic audible acoustic manifest in its fundamental Hyper Q resonance. Calculate the
best coil-capacitor relation to acquire hyper-saturated states in transformer cores, determining the best optimal
frequency to acquire OU transformation states (RE at low voltage – compared to Tesla coil high voltage), where
a node constant is provided to correct time decay drift and maintain a loop (... using 2 resonant jin-jang systems).
For your natural Q, you will find a decay constant relative to your system Q. The lower the decay constant the
higher the OU potential on your transformer core natural resonance regions. Ampere turn, core and capacitor are
determining factors in design. Read MRA papers as everything there applies to TV.
Page 53
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 53
Make sure you are not hitting the harmonics, as this means you are exiting within the sideband and not exactly in
the fundamental, so the beat creates harmonics in the upper regions. You may require a variable frequency
source as to tune in exact fundamental (natural LC) frequency. Once you attain the transformer natural frequency
you will need to find the cut off resonant sustaining point, watching for frequency drift compensation as you
lower input voltage. Remember input voltage acts as virtual varactor tuning diode affecting the frequency
fundamental; as the voltage is reduced the fundamental frequency drifts from centre. The tendency of the voltage
is to self increase as the frequency increases also, in self driven oscillator (inverter).
Note that looping requires a positive regeneration constant within sharing circuits in multi vibrator mode.
You can extend this to solid state 3PH transformer, MEMA (Magnet-less Electro Magnetic Amplifier) concepts.
The TV is essential to create the B phase EM required for operating any 3PH transformer in MEMA Mode.
The diode plug is for extracting usable potential using non reflecting power, splitting capacitance bridging the
2x2, and 4x4 designs. To get OU power extracted, its total C capacity in joules Cj/1.618 /1.618, then have main
C and 2 diode plugged capacitors in parallel C to get a resonant power split without killing the resonance effect.
This diode plug can self trigger using a resistor and switching diode with small cap .005 and 6.8 K variable
adjust neon trigger. You can use a lamp dimmer SCR circuit alike, but tailored to switch on at C rest charge (self
triggering).
Every engineer from classic physic school would say the power with PF=0 is not usable, but here’s how it gets.
In RF at C node capacitor charge is maximal, so you have JOULE potential as pure DC in this capacitor.
Recapitulate on past postings: PM generator magnet saturates shorted coil, where V = 0 and I = maximal at 0
point energy current node. At the peak the coil is OPENED and this POTENTIAL dumps into C were C is
tailored to equal in pure resonance hyper Q value to get the full charge from L across a diode until I = 0 and C
equals maximal Joule stored potential at 0 point energy transfer. The M field charging a coil in optimal core
ampere turn to core mass relation hyper Q half shorted tank where pure L is taken to saturation in PURE
current node to hyper Q state, where OU transform occurs, at field collapse and energy transfer to a capacitor
the coil cools down transferring its magneto-thermal energy to C. All the RV and TV experiments are tailored to
get the experimenter face to face with the REAL 0 point energy.
Let’s say you prepare a transformer where you can wind the turns you want with the wire you want, say multi
stranded hi frequency RF wire 12, 8, 6 AWG and wire your core to a point the highest Q at a frequency where
the natural core metal resonates "fundamental ferro-resonance in this case". Taking this to extreme Q and
elevated resonant states with proper matching network and feedback, such a reactor becomes self sustaining,
transferring Electron energy to the system core and coils becoming cold and superconductive if system becomes
self incremental to a given point of maximal energy saturation and resonance balance.
That is the secret of MEG, VTA and Hendershot. The basic gain is 1.618 over isotropic (virtual dipole) X the
core Q multiplication factor that is the ability to latch magnetically and gain energy from its Electro-atomic
components. Like Tesla stated hundred years ago, all you need to create is a SINK were the energy flows and is
transformed.
When feeding the primary with let’s say 50Hz and you notice that your secondary LC is resonating at 150Hz,
then it resonates at the 3rd harmonic. So get variable frequency
inverter and feed it the 150CPS it needs.
3.3 Homopolar transformer
The Radiant energy can be transformed using special homopolar
AC transformers, related to Gray Tubes. Homopolar
transformers are no other thing than a cylinder inside a cylinder
(long pipes of same mass coaxially placed one inside the other
with no electrical contact as to use the Radiation RF, aka
"Radiant Energy", to induce in the second external pipe an exact
field of the first provided is matched to within a gamma, beta or
delta RF matching to the secondary radiant energy circuit. More
formulations needed for the AC Homopolar transformer, as
distance is also critical proportional with the relative density
match. At this point without a firm lab experience, they are
useless until concepts are demonstrated in vitro adjusted to
physical realm.
You could extract up to 20% of the radiant energy without
Page 54
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 54
killing the action. The size guidelines for a homopolar transformer are that the inner pipe must equal the outer
pipe mass (exact weight), the length must match the wavelength (acoustic sub-harmonic of 50/60CPS or any of
its higher harmonics – do this by hitting them softly at the end, hanging as pipe bells; just cut piece but until you
hit a basic or harmonic), aluminum is OK. The inner pipe must be the emitter, the outer pipe collector. This is the
same as E-Gray tube but no spark gap outside pipe is tapped at ends to get power the pipes are isolated, inner
pipe forms part of motor LC tapped at ends.
This is related to GENESIS files (A1 Genesis.zip) and Genesis coaxial coil (bifilar); use it in your charger or
built coaxial caduceus. Correct and compensate time-energy component. It’s the only way to attain looping.
Tuning is 10 times more bitchy than RV so I modified to hollow coaxial transformer ... it reduces Newman coil
1000 times with same effect "4KV hipot capable iso is needed" my reference is SEIKE from gravity R&D lab
Japan. I got his book from WASS delta group in Seattle WS 1983 US R&D period. Use audio speaker alloy
metal for the cores; flat Tesla LC coil sandwich in speaker end plates will do fine; watch for that METAL taste
in mouth (field teleport of metal on EM field Aether stream).
In the pictures to the right you’ll find a Homopolar transformer: a pipe within a pipe of same weight; inside
"tuned" pipe is source, external is receptor. EV Gray tube = Homopolar AC transformer. This is KEY to free
energy, gives the basic TOOL to start - true R&D in HI power Radiant energy systems.
If we Delta match a series of phased LCs using homopolar
AC transformers creating STAR loop, once initiated in Hi
Q, the system never turns off, taking the self feeding power
loop into a self destruct hypersaturation state creating
energy singularity within the rotary elements. That was the
thing missing from Seike formulations and his reverse
atomic reactor design and theory. This is aplicable to
Norman MRA as well to any hyper Q system.
The TV plug is used to EXTRACT partial energy from rotating STAR reactor using parralleling parasite LCs
combined with the Homopolar RF transformers.
You can test this theory using AM and FM comercial radio final stages matching networks as well as Amateur
Radio equipment.
Another kind of special transformer, seen often in radio-frequency circuits, is the air core trans-former. True to
its name, an air core transformer has its windings wrapped around a non-magnetic form, usually a hollow tube of
some material. The degree of coupling (mutual inductance) between windings in such a transformer is many
times less than that of an equivalent iron-core transformer, but the undesirable characteristics of a ferromagnetic
core (eddy current losses, hysteresis, saturation, etc.) are completely eliminated. It is in high-frequency
applications that these effects of iron cores are most problematic.
3.4 Reactor Core
Take the following:
2x 120v/24v transformers
C2/C4 twice as big as C1/C3
Top square between C3/T2 is a test point
Bottom squares under C3 is the output
Permanent magnet in the big square box
T1 T2 must be co-phased as to 24V coil be reverse inductor of the other, T1 excites T2, T2 excites T1. Jin-Yang
circuit at resonance, one excites the other to OU saturation. As for the values I let to the user as the BASIC
diagram explains all. Ferroxplana is best material Hi frequency gives the optimal gain.
Magnet is fixed at a distance to provide "Latching fuel" to any of the 2 transformers. This distance is determined
by unit power level as magnet distance "TUNES" the circuit. Magnetic field feeds energy to the system, distance
TUNES & Matches Magnetic field resonance to Unit resonance by proximity.
It can be made in solid state LCs (tuned transformers). You start with 3 cycles per second resonance in LC, split
it to 1.5 Cycles using the 1.618 factor where you have a mass core delay of .181 CPS, so end product is 1.5CPS.
This is MIXED to drive another core at 3 + 1.5 = 4.5CPS, where divided by 2 becomes 2.5 CPS at x 2 times
interval, that is for every 6 cycles you inject back a LEADING 4.5 half cycle to rotary LC engine.
Page 55
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 55
The system will self-loop with a feedback requirement of .002 the total power within the circuit. If done within 1
of the 81 universal octaves you have infinite energy to draw from universal waviton component (sinewave
integral) – see cyclo-conversion.
When you touch a wire, you get frozen fingers, especially at 1.6 MHz operating frequency ... and yes this is
same Original Hendershot principle, all you need is to get proper ratios, zap it, and it starts to generate self
oscillation. Hendershot hid secret in a bunch of unnecessary crap, like the disclosure on the Buzzer and magnet
was crap and dis-info. Hector decided to post it as the basics to generate RE are OUT.
In another variation, capacitors are eliminated from low L side but you need to calculate the LOOPBACK Q gain
multiplication factor. Think of this as a self-fed looped stochastic gain dielectric element AMPLITRON.
This will switch the brains of many to "ON" states, just pass it on, you can use CAR Audio Amplifier toroids to
do this. Finding the music that makes them sing. The magnet feeds power to the system as looped dual Class C
linear amplifier.
As before Energy transfer comes from H=I²Rt within system cores. System cools down, can also overrun and
BURN out in a GREEN flash as ferroxplana goes critical, atomically speaking (disintegrate) into hyperspace 4D.
Usually unit levitates before this so DONT try to grab it as you can disintegrate with it, or loose body parts. In
Hectors case, he shifts from dimension to dimension, glad they are parallel. So be careful what you do with this
toy.
Unit creates extremely hi vitron Static charge great care recommended at looping (Use Fuses in LC loops).
Vitrons result from electron decay to D4 states. Remember as C is attained mass becomes relativistic infinite, so
electron seems like a LIGHT wave from a to b tensor in space, but as is static its state is as Vitron (Liquid light)
The link to Ectoplasmic manifest.. of spirit world.. (Good place to keep your Stuff after you create it).
This unit uses 2 magnets with counter-balancing polarities, but first is to get device to work, building resonant
stuff helps a lot. RV is a basic principle as power is amplified virtually. Same is done in the cores where one
induces in the other. This is ELECTROMAGNUM, the power of the Gods, the secret of Atlantis. One coil can
PUMP the other in rotating machinery. Think Resonance & OU, as KVARS fed into REACTOR by the
MAGNETS … rotation self sustains. RV is an essential step to understand "Reactor Core" dynamics. The
Generation of VIRTUAL ENERGY STATES is the key to the LOOPED REACTOR CORE, as is LC tendency
to self regulate at saturation. Tuning is critical ... as in RV or TV PLUG.
In pure resonance a & c phases become self latching; compensate the BROADBANDING at latch and the
system can also be looped. The solution is partial non-reflective non-entropic extraction;.that permits field
regeneration and self sustaining
Data from 1999 series of Experiments - Transverter Secrets Revealed
480/220VAC Universal transformer design.
The circuit consists of 2 half LC tanks. A know the Radiant Energy flashover occurs at TURN ON, one capacitor
charges to maximal resonant value then the cycle goes in opposed sinewave; as the other charges in resonant
condition the first one is discharged in the second transformer with a nominal gain of 1.618 if properly tuned,
this second circuit deplete C Voltage value as near to 0 Volts as SCR switches off at a minimal remanent voltage
(minimal) before primary tank reverses sinewave to reload half LC and discharge the other loaded capacitor.
The discharge does not affect input tuning as it’s at opposed non-coupled relation this permits the full vector of
the power components to be decoupled from the source (totally non-reflective) as to permit a PERFECT resonant
tune of LC as to charge capacitor in RF radiant operation mode.
Now you have the BASIC and simple design of the looped TV circuit, just be very careful with it; use at minimal
power and follow safety common sense.
For basic triggering you can use multi-vibrator opto-isolated mode a simple switching diode set up to trigger the
opposed capacitor when charged, input AC regulates the timing, LOAD regulates the discharge time so overall
time must be shorter (lower impedance) to increase frequency (shorter pulse) (shorter discharge time) as to
reduce capacitor Voltage value to near 0.
Page 56
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 56
3.5
Kone pulse motor
Doug Konzen has built several axial pulse motors with various numbers of stator coils, and magnets in the
rotors. The picture to the right is a simple "axial RV" with 2 n-s magnets in rotor, and 3 stator coils on each side
(© Doug Konzen).
PM motors pulsed 3 Phase are OU at specific frequencies and rotation speeds.
In AXIAL motors there is always a 90° approach to the pole, call it "sidewinder approach" (like the snake), its
just perspective relative as how you see the 3d construct and the way M field interacts, but the same LAWS
apply to all types of rotary machines. It’s just some are more efficient using force vectors and fields than others.
One good advice when dealing with pulse
motors: forget all kinds of screws and bolts. You
will see the difference in recovered back-EMF
when you will use proper laminated core. So go
to auto-junkyard and get some old ignition coils.
From these you can get good impulse-cores and
even some fat windings and HV windings too.
When tests were done with an old Bedini-motor
and bifilar coil, with 8mm bolt as a core, the
back-emf had to be collected both from the drive
coil and from the pickup coil and add them up to
get the same charge in the same cap during the
same time interval. But when using proper
laminated core, one could tap the back-emf from
only the recovery winding or from the drive
winding and even better power level was reached in the storage cap during the same time interval. So the
laminated core helps a lot. Also in plain bolt or screw there will be induced eddy currents by the collapsing
magnetic field and you will lose energy anyway (eddy current loss).
Doug (aka Kone) build a big motor-gen, called the 363 since it has 3 coils on each side of a rotor of 6 coil
positions (alternating N-S). There are actually 12 magnets total, with the 6 on each side separated by black
plastic plate in between; this way the magnets hold themselves together strongly and wont pull out from the rotor
since they would have to rip apart the black plate between them to get them out. He is firing repulsive-only 3
coils of the 6, 2 on one side, and just one on the other, and then firing the remaining 3 coils, (also two on one
side, one on the other), rather than firing just two facing coils (normal) or all three at once on one side. "Splitting
up" the coils being fired like this gives more power it seems to me testing it out right now...
It is found that most power from a single pulse comes form the stator coil being IN BETWEEN the N-S
magnets, so that the coil reacts to BOTH magnets, both pushing and pulling the rotor in the same direction, since
they are N and S...(let the magnets do the work Bill Muller would say). It is advised to try to resonate at HI Q
your coils at 27, 30, 33 cycles per second in triangle 3 X 3 one half pulse feeds each one other half pulse feeds
other 3 (see section on cyclo-conversion).
Kone also wired up a motor in attractive mode instead of repulsive mode, which had the best results with the
FWBR AC legs across the "switch only". Now testing in attractive mode (more shaft power this way too it
seems), the FWBR AC legs worked the very best with them across BOTH the motor coils and switch for some
reason, so knowing this, he came up with this new "split" recovery scheme, the purpose is to add extra power via
an extra power stroke that is supplied with its juice through the recovery circuit of the backemf/recoil, with
minimal or no extra draw happening when the extra coils fire and make for more "free" (recycled at least) speed
and power.
Kone’s idea is simple but great: at HI impedance the coil is attractor to MAJOR force, minor force takes energy
from MAYOR one (MAGNET) as VOLTAGE is greater in coil, amperage reverses to battery charging it.
Proportion tuning it is the secret (1.618 ratio), energy is obtained from the Magnetic field, the field captures what
it needs from K ambient electron & thermal heat, Rotor nnn magnets becomes a 400 year long tripleflux
monopolar energizer battery. Electric Wankel engine in mechanical terms (runs and runs and runs!).
Another thing is that the "vectoring" (diodes/fwbr) should/could be done at the SWITCHING (especially if this
is what blows up like NW was saying)
Put the AC legs of your FWBR across the switch - the DC side into capacitor, and switch during OFF-time of
primary this capacitor with DPDT switch into resistance to control it (your pre determined load)- 2nd switch at
AC leg flips ON about halfway or 3/4 through primary pulse (now won’t lug extra current draw) and then stays
ON while primary turns off (catching recoil power which blows everything up usually) this 2nd switch then
Page 57
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 57
stays ON for a bit more, now catching the back emf....then turns off - cycle starts again with primary pulses only
ON at first, then 3
rd
AC leg switch ON, then only 2nd switch ON etc…
Here is the scheme explained of a 2 vs 3 motor
(see picture to the right). Motorcoils A and B are
in parallel, and the 3 rotor magnets slide between
these two...on the opposite side of the motor are
two more facing-coils, C and D, (look at picture)
which also the 3 rotor magnets slide through
too...so the experiment now is that these two
coils (C and D) are getting fed with the
backemf/recoil collected from coils A and B
when A and B together fire in parallel for the
"main" (primary) motor-pulse...
So here is the best recovery scheme he could
come up with to add extra power stroke with
back emf/recoil collected with FWBRs on this
particular 2vs3 axial (4 coil) motor:
Motorcoils A and B are in parallel and switched on-off to run motor.
AClegs over SwitchFWBR#1 DC out goes into Cap#1
AClegs over MotorcoilFWBR#2 DC out goes into Cap#2
Cap#1 fires single coil C via switch for motor effect at proper timing
Cap#2 fires single coil D via same switch at same time for more motor effect...
The advantage of this split-idea is that the impedance of a single coil is 1/2 less than two of those same
"primary" motorcoils in parallel, and so the backemf-recoil energy collected and then discharged from the cap
gets to travel through a coil of 1/2 resistance as the two main motor coils in parallel have...so the motor doesn’t
bog down with extra amps at all or just slightly when the "secondary" coils (C an D) fire and give extra speed
and power..next step is to loop the backemf/recoil from C and D coils back to the original A and B coils and pull
the plug and see if it will selfrun....
Definitely it will work well Synchronized, will do also as a rectifier, like the old type Synchronous X ray
machine rectifiers an "H" cross switch HV non contact commutator switching the alternations into ++ -- poles.
(Good for diode substitute in case of Nuclear EMP attack; those having the Know how will have a chance to
survive the IC and transistor & diode fry out. Have a good stock of transformers & tubes. RV alternator can
stand to nuclear EMP and survive it (not so 99% of standard generators which will burn and fry). As things go,
point of no return is getting near, just try to prepare.).
For the axial RV in AC, the magnets ride a rotating wave like the OVAL (alike vector phasors of a Wankel
engine), the magnets being pushed pulled along the wave. If a resonant condition is attained where the magnet
can correct VOLTAGE loss as a POWER FACTOR figure, the device will run itself with pure magnetic wave
modulation as a ROTARY MEG. A smaller series coil can offset feed the other forward coil in an endless loop
(see reactor core for reference). Check MEG design; not like MEG forward reverse side to side swing, but like a
wave circling inside a circle. A true rotary self amplification 3x3 rotary magnetic amplifier RMAMEG where the
ROTARY wave self amplifies with the rotating magnet effect within the cores. Call it "Magnetic power factor
correction".
The system will try to detune as rotor recedes in negative time, but the next coil will acquire the field in
attraction mode, where the FIELD from the magnet regausses it porting energy to core & coils.
Theoretically the system will generate negative "G" as it acquires energy from time curve. Relative to us time
will slow down inside the field as it acquires energy. To do this great insight and knowledge is required. Glad the
Gravity-time corroboration came out in scientific circles, as now it can explain better where the energy comes
from in such looped systems and how the anomaly is created. As soon as a relation to gravitic spiral flux toward
equator will be related to POLAR (Magnetic) FLUX & the Jets flowing from BLACK HOLE poles AETHER,
existence can no longer be denied and its role in universal energy transform, ALL MATTER is transformed to
AETHER flux that is EJECTED at POLE ENDS toward LOCAL ovoid thorus in space time galactic string.
Page 58
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 58
Here is another circuit diagram of a pulsemotor. It describes how the switching sends in current one way through
the motor and in the other way (info
between brackets).
This circuit works the same as the
TRANSVERTER circuit. As the capacitor
is charged in the NO LOAD condition it can RESPOND TO THE BEST resonant Q curve (in plain English: a
specific FARAD value will give you maximal POWER from the coil discharge). As the switches maintain this
capacitor independent from the battery, LOADING DOES NOT DETUNE the recovery circuit (transverter
design). You go a step further using an INDEPENDENT battery as to get a blank spacing to permit the
CAPACITOR to be discharged in an UNLOADED battery using otherwise loss return as an advantage.
To simplify it, use 2 transistors positively biased to fire into each other battery on the blanking space, or to
charge capacitors and fire it on opposed + LOAD as assistive current boost. If you keep the meters above 0 +
you have OU and your battery will never run out (quite the same as Gray did but at a MUCH lower voltage).
Definitely you need a 3 phase 230/460V motor with a Nb permanent magnet rotor N-S "2 poles" for a 3600
RPM motor (1800RPM motor requires 4 pole rotor - more expensive and complex). The recovery can be done
with dual triplefluxed 6 bridged recovery plug system. A synchronous motor can be used for your preliminary
experiments (PM ROTOR), as is it simpler to built a rotor for a 3PH motor than to built current pulse motor
design from scratch (over 3HP).
You can use a disk to fire optical switches to control 6 independent SSR relays and use up to 127VDC dual bank
batteries.
Kone'smotor is showing OU, partly because of the spacing of the magnets and the coils are such to have
overlapping magnetic fields which is partly canceling the Lenz effect. This is similar to the 3PH oval shaped
field rotating the 2 rotor poles at 120 the 3 to 2 ratio rotor stator coil relation.
The Lenz cancelling effect largely depends on spacing and
field intensity. The worst sin is to over-saturate, it creates
drag.
Here is Kone’s the ultimate BEMF recovery circuit for a
pulsing motor coil. If you want AC, double this circuit up
and make it go both ways.
If you have a 120V inverter firing alternating-polarity 120V
DC pulses (now AC) then do that same recovery "over" the
120V switches and recover the BEMF those inverter-
switches create, and pop it into cap, and knock cap into
battery, BETWEEN the times those 120V switches fire.
This way whenever the battery gets charged with a pulse, it
doesn’t reflect back as additional draw to system, and so
battery charging becomes "free".
Simultaneous timed switches S1-S2 (S3-
S4) send current into motor through side
B (A).
FWBR with AC legs across both
switches S1-S2 (S3-S4) collects BEMF
and fills cap through simultaneous
switches S5-S6 (S9-S10).
Simultaneous switches S7-S8 (S11-S12)
discharge cap into battery A (B) to
charge.
Switches S5-S6 (S9-S10) fill the cap
between the motor pulses.
Switches S7-S8 (S11-S12) discharge the
cap between switches S5-S6 (S9-S10)
and also between the motor pulses.
Page 59
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 59
3.6 One-wire bulb -
Brian Prater (Cavetronics Labs R&D)
The one wire bulb works on the concept of magnetic reconnection.
Magnetic reconnection is the process whereby magnetic field lines from different magnetic domains are spliced
to one another, changing the overall topology of a magnetic field. It is a violation of an approximate
conservation law in plasma physics, and can concentrate mechanical or magnetic energy in both space and time.
Solar flares, the largest explosions in the solar system, are caused by reconnection of large systems of magnetic
flux on the Sun, releasing in minutes energy that is stored in the magnetic field over a period of weeks to years.
Magnetic reconnection in Earth'smagnetosphere is responsible for the aurora, and it is important to the science
of controlled nuclear fusion because it is one mechanism preventing magnetic confinement of the fusion fuel.
In an electrically conductive fluid or plasma, magnetic field lines are grouped into 'domains'- bundles of field
lines that connect from a particular place to another particular place, and that are topologically distinct from
other field lines nearby. This topology is approximately preserved even when the magnetic field itself is strongly
distorted by the presence of variable currents or motion of magnetic sources, because effects that might
otherwise change the magnetic topology instead induce eddy currents in the plasma; the eddy currents have the
effect of canceling out the topological change.
See http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node84.html for an explanation on magnetic energy.
The diagram to the right gives an overview of concept and
wiring.
The system uses 64 W from the line input, running the motor
and light, the light being 58 W. The motor running at 1725
RPM without a light uses 58 W, where the light uses the 58 W
that the motor has past off to the light bulb, matching the
current. So we get 116W out version 64W in, as such there is
about 52 W free.
The input is about 118 VAC single phase. At that voltage the
light will use about 58 W (same as the motor). Now when
looking at the voltage coming off the motor without a light as a
load, it reads 92 V no load. Now when the motor output is
loaded, it rises to 109 V and the light is lit up. So a rise of
about 17 V.on the output of the motor.
Specific: 63.67 W-in - 42.45 W-out = 21.22 x 2 = 42.45
42.45 - 63.67 = -21.22 (+- 42.45 bandwidth)
106.12 W-out (63.67+42.45) - 42.45 = 63.67 W-used
= 106.12 total W-out / 63.675 total W-in = 1.667:1 gain
This motor is started with a smaller motor, as there are currently no run or start caps on the system.
The remarkable fact is that the light once lit, stays lit after you switch open one of its input lines, as to be lit by
"one wire", costing just 5.8W for the 58W of energy used (not to account the other 58W running the motor). So
the light burns on 58 watts one wire, and in fact uses the same amount of energy, switched on or off… "one wire
or both wires" cost the same energy. (the light resistance is around 174-280 Ohms while lit). Node-anti-node,
wherever you are at it you get it with one wire.
You can run some DC caps (e.g. 8900µF 250VDC) off where the light is hooked up, through a FWBR. You can
then get 89 V at 0.5 A for free while running the light and motor.
Total input = 64 W; total output = 158+ W; 158/64= 2.46875 gain
Page 60
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 60
Harmonic Series Expansion for Prediction of Over-unity Systems (drafted by Jason Owens)
Theoretical Max Efficiency
System Efficiency
ε = (P
f
/ P
i
) x 100
Excess energy
= P
f
- P
i
Loss factor calculation γ = 100 / (100 - %loss)
OU applet http://www.cco.caltech.edu/phys1/java/phys1/lrc/index.html
This Java applet is intended to show you how a system of a R, C and L react with one another in a system. Use
this to see the scope shot.
Use an Angular frequency of 23 radians/second, Voltage = 65V, L = 58µH, R = 4 Ohm, C = 7µF. This will show
you the waveform a lot better on the motors and you will see how it reads "over current", but still matches the
wave form. Brian knows from his 1/6 HP motor that the "over current" is 3.6-4.2 V
(over current = OU V !).
So let’s say we have this volts over; and add it back to the system, let’s say it’s about 26 to 32 volt (average
29V): 65 - 29 = 36 volts less input.
Let’s see how close it is if we do the 65V - 46.08% = 35.048V – 29V we get back = 6.048V x 2 (input
line)=12.096 "tensor volts" or 120.96 line volts.
Now 120.96 line volts - 12.096 = 108.864V; see how close this is to Brian’s 109V on the one-wire bulb setup.
Say we have 108.864 / 2=54.432 W or V input from the motor and from the line-in power, and add the 54.432
plus the extra 4.2V, and we have about 58.632V or W; if we add both up 58.632W + 54.432W = 113.064V.
113.064V - 4.2 = 108.864V - right on the money...
Hector: Take in account Time, phase relation & phasor – within the following formulas:
((V1+V2+V3)/3) x ((I1+I2+I3)/3) x 1.732 x PF = Watts (circulation 3PH)
A, B, C phases
Where AC input 1PH is (V x I) x PF = Watts
=> System is OU as is!
Phasors A=0 (line), B=120, C = 240, where A=0=360 (virtual relative).
So B must lead A by 120°, where the relative self induction sets B & C 120° 240° apart by means of C that
provides the leading VAR power to the rotary 3PH engine. VARs runs the EMA effect. The 3PH polar field is
rotary triangle ‘egg’ shape, where relative max torque to the rotor 2 poles is at 90° angle (relative).
The rest is resonance and its transformation engine potential using the ZPE on this engine type nodes.
Electron resonance
The nodes are points of concentration of electrons and vacuum of electrons; they can be made as resonant on
multi harmonics along a conductor alike the light bright and dark spots that form along 8 ft long FL tubes.
Like in TV setup, first is to attain resonance then lower the circuit power or open the series circuit to attain linear
open loop one. If one attains magneto-nuclear resonance from the ambient heat, you can get looped OU from
even a resonating kitchen sink!
By resonating the electron field, you can get permanent wireless fixtures. Get Shuman frequency as a sample to
resonate to it, then feed on one of the 1.3 to 1.8 MHz electron harmonics within the Shuman Hyperwave and you
get all the free energy you want.
This is like resonating electrons in a light bulb filament within an OPEN dipole; ideal will be to place other open
bulbs with independent switches and close and open each independently to see if they remain atomically
resonant within the RV LC influence. If they do, you got something bigger going than you may think.
Pure electron resonance of the filament with a low frequency exciter radiant energy field. This is like a wet
finger stroking a grass cup and generating ultrasonic waves. RV RF AC excites the bulb atoms to oscillate at
f
s
n
n
i
s
P
P
Lim
=
ƒ
=
∞
→
1
γ
ƒ
=
=
s
n
n
i
f
P
P
1
γ
s = # of collectors
P
i
= power input
P
f
= power output
γ = loss factor
Page 61
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 61
higher frequency in open resonant dipole emitting heat and light in the process at a higher frequency. (That lab
test may finish iron out the issue that RV truly generates radiant energy and that Newman, Bearden and Bedini
were wrong in the analysis of its nature).
Tesla neither grasped the true scope or did not have the tools to disclose such knowledge due to the limited
scientific understanding at the time.
Mass and ampere load
Wherever you resonate the linear nodes, there is a NEW aspect of amperage you must know:
Mass or ampere load, where amperage in unit of mass = concentration of electrons per cm
2
of unit mass that
equals a virtual linear impedance to the linear flow of RF signal as a VECTOR signal across a medium (mass)
"conductor". The R light-bulb is the cross node where as the law of resonance voltage must be 0 but within the
cut-off region of MAX current (standing wave) (search RF antenna dipole electrical properties).
This current is capacitive in nature and has NO voltage component. It is an ELECRON DENSITY linear wave.
"Elektron" with K defines it, as a PART of RF Radiant energy components.
Where R takes the LOAD and flux increases speed, the energy is released as HEAT due to the lesser mass
junction (filament) that restricts the electron waviton flow. So the free wire end is REVELANT to tuning a
radiant one-light-bulb system
See also Tesla single wire energy transmission (Colorado lab notes). How many miles he lit a light-bulb away?
600? And in the PROPER NATURAL frequency standing wave, the light-bulb lit perpetually. So in the end, his
transmitter was useless and not necessary to get free power from the "medium" (he ran his car on it).
But he took the secret to his grave. Hector gave it away now. “They” might try to erase him now, like they did
with Tesla, but not if people fight for this and keep it free domain. People will built ELF wave Radios detecting
and tapping the ZPE natural energy fields.
Multiplication & cross-field currents
Think about how a load (looped back into its self ) (bootstrapped) - and + feed back ...works as an amplifier that
lets you use what it takes to run - multiplying wave packets of compressions under the same amount of time.
Thus = higher frequency and or amplitude -> more energy!
For a 60Hz system, one complete cycle (360 degrees) takes 16.67 milliseconds to complete. Note on a 50-60hz
line one can yield about 17 volts free at around 117 volts.
When 2 sine waves of the same frequency are multiplied together the frequency doubles. That 60Hz hum you
hear from a motor, transformer or lighting ballast is really 120Hz.
If the load is something like a resistor, note using a 3ph RV system the complete cycle (360 degrees) will yield
more "because of more transformers in the whole system; that will rise the Hz with higher volts and less load; or
it lower the current "Hz" under a load.
So on the input as the load is applied the input goes down when loaded; so as when it is in tune with the load,
input/output you get 60hz in and 120 or more out - just because you loaded the system and looped part of the Hz
back in to its self or you use it in a load for that statement is both one of the same.
'Spintronics'could enable a new generation of electronic devices.
Small electronic devices are plagued by energy loss or dissipation, as signals pass from one transistor to the next.
Theoretical physicists think they've found a way to solve the dissipation problem by manipulating a neglected
property of the electron - its ''spin,''or orientation, typically described by its quantum state as ''up''or ''down.''
Electronics relies on Ohm'sLaw, which says application of a voltage to many materials results in the creation of
a current. That'sbecause electrons transmit their charge through the materials. But Ohm'sLaw also describes the
inevitable conversion of electric energy into heat when electrons encounter resistance as they pass through
materials.
The equivalent of a new 'Ohm'sLaw'for spintronics is the emerging science of manipulating the spin of
electrons for useful purposes 'Unlike the Ohm'sLaw for electronics, the new 'Ohm'sLaw'says that the spin of
the electron can be transported without any loss of energy, or dissipation. Furthermore, this effect occurs at room
temperature in materials already widely used in the semiconductor industry, such as gallium arsenide.
Page 62
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 62
Below is an example of a more detailed calculation: (ref Brian for more details)
Take 100W of energy, drive it from 2 lines going in; loop it back to itself, so as 1/2 of the line of 50W = 25W,
leaving 25W. Now flip the phase angles and we have a difference of 25W
(like 50(25a+25b) okay now 50c / 25a= 25b)
now 50c / 25b= 25a now 25a=25b=50c "cross field" currents"
100/23 = 4.347826 (23 comes from the max OU on the motor per volt (in the OU23.475 file)
= .0434782 per S "system tap"
For the 5.1304276 W-in extra watts used (about) what it light cost per heat and photons)= 118V 50.68862W-out
= 2.3279386 (2.3 move over the point to (23)
here’s the (23) OU PF or 118 V / 4.6558772 ohms= 25.344311 W x 2 = 50.688622 W-out for 118 V-in
= 118 - 50.688622 W = 67.31138 W max ( input )
118volts at 1.18% OU gain; 118% / %100 = 1.18% per 100% (1.18% x 100%) = 118%
so at 21003.988 watts at hand, of the incoming electric (wall plug )/ 100 % = 210.0398 % per 100% =
210.0398% / 210% =100.00003%
so 100.00003 % / 210.0398% = .4761003% per 1% = 1.4761003 %
per 1, or 1:1.4761003 = .6774607 x 1 = 118/.6774607=174.17984 W max per 120 volt 20 amp braker ( wall plug
)
174.17984 W – 118 W = 56.17984 W-in for an output of 118 watts = 118 - 56.17984 W = 61.82016 W total
input for output of 118 W-out or for (61.82016 - 56.17984) 118 W of energy it cost 5.64032 W-in for 56.17984
W-out = 9.9603994 Times more energy
or 118 / 9.9603993= 11.846914 : 118 = 9.9603998
1.18 x 118. = 139.24 - 118 = 21.24 OU for 118 volt or watts
21.24 x 2 phases = 42.48 volts or watts (mixed because phases)
139.24 - 42.48 = 96.76 W
139.24 - 96.76 = 42.48 W
118 / 42.48 = 2.7777777
= 118 / 2.7777777 = 42.480001
42.480001% of 118% = 277.77777 ohms
http://www.astro.psu.edu/users/mce/A1/lect02.html
3.7 JM Pulse Charger
This is the undressed original JM battery charger circuit and it is Solid state similar to magneto-resonance
amplification, in fact same as HALF diode plug, but positive coil biased switched to ground we encounter a self
fed gun diode mix with a varactor tuned effect; L turns from a resistive source to C to a grounded reactive
accumulator being discharged into C being in series with the source as the time controlled pulse-length
grounding to attain SATURATION is cut off (confusing, but trace naked schematic ).
Field collapse is series fed
from source in semi resonant
state to C at a longer
wavelength rate until
OVERCHARGE equilibrium
is attained (coil discharge peak
power is passed to C, C then is
discharged in blanking interval
to Battery also switched at the
negative being the energy in
this capacitor Joule average +
to input. Compare with DEC
patents pulsed reactor voltage
inverters (OU) at a given C
Page 63
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 63
value where L discharges logarithmically to C in pure resonant mode, if C is partially charged and relative pulse
is floating in series, the source as well as the load receive energy from L at a given point altering the circuit
relative polarity.
Diode plug is same principle, but C can be totally depleted and disconnected from L as C value drops to 0V
making possible transfer of L power to a given R load. See ZPE PDF docs.
The answer as how to attain looping is the reactor core Reactor (Core .gif) in ARK file section; configuration
with the MAGNET to feed the KVARS needed to sustain the REACTION you already share in different
HARDWARE modes but IDENTICAL theoretical construct.
The problem is not demonstrating OU; it’s the applications, Magneto Resonant Amplification. I don’t think there
is a problem on integrating core dynamics to charger & magnetically "Power factor corrected"* solid-state OU
system cores. (* = VIP Hint ... see naked charger diagram).
The JMPulseCharge is Copyright © from Jean-Michel Cour, France.
3.8 Positive-bias inverter
Inverter & amplifier modification: in transformer inverters,
the center is split and sides are common to positive, negative
is switched in dual push pull CEMF. This is called a
POSITIVE BIAS circuit, were the LOAD is always in the
LIVE positive and is switched by grounding. A ground is
open (transistor opens) the field collapses and REVERSE
diode passes the negative CEMP to negative and the
Positive CEMP to the battery positive.
Check if the transistors (FET) used, have build in reverse
diodes. If so use those in a Positive Bias recovery method,
by using the internal reverse diode, else add an external
diode (see picture).
The picture to the right is an example used for a pulse
motor, which is discussed further.
Inverter & amplifier modification: in TRANSFORMER
inverters, the center is split and sides are common to positive, negative is switched in dual push pull CEMF. In a
standard class AB push pull with no load, the circuit uses 10 Amperes. As case of non modified PC 1000
inverters some computer UPS units can be modified to work this way, as it requires to split the center
transformer tap and feed the common positive to the sides. This is called a POSITIVE BIAS circuit, were the
LOAD is always in the LIVE positive and is switched by grounding. A ground is open (transistor opens) the
field collapses and REVERSE diode passes the negative CEMP to negative and the Positive CEMP to the battery
positive. In EASER resonant modes energy transform from thermal component will be transferred to Electrical
energy resulting in OU (core & wire temperature will drop), where H = I² Rt as stated in Genesis Transform
Theories.
It is applicable to the production of electret & permanent charge materials with Electron tunneling capacity using
either voltage and or current potential vectors.
Total value = 1.618 OU; from that discharge the .618 and leave the ORIGINAL CHARGE; use whatever is over
for whatever you want. Other permutations are possible. Remember, joules energy is defined, Time, Amperes,
Voltage, but importance is to saturate the core and let it decay with its added ambient energy component into the
power recovery circuit (Ringing) OU.
Using the circuit below, you can convert 12V DC into 220V AC. By modifying the transformer ratio, you could
have 24VDC input and/or 110VAC output, depending on the requirements of your region.
This circuit is specifically modified to have a “+ biasing” conversion, as the spikes & CEMF go back to the
battery for transformer operated inverters. Hector got +.02 amps goin back to battery from transformer "idling".
Ignoring the driver board power requirements, this is WAY OU at resonant modes.
Page 64
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 64
This circuit is generating a square wave of 50Hz through the 4047 IC, where the tansistors are amplifying the
current. The transistors can be replaced by FETs to have lower power dissipation and faster switching. The
driver circuit can be changed to have a modified sine-wave, as square wave is not good for many electric
appliances.
In a trafo inverter, the voltage will rise in the trafo. With modified sinewave IGBTs bridge, a recovery resulting
in OU can be attained at specific frequency and pulselenght , no need for other exotic electronics other than
regulating frequency and pulselenght of inverter. Pulse it at 100V, it bangs back 400V at 240CPS ... average.
Again Pulselenght -recovery -- frequency.
Any inverter can be made OU, by driving it properly using H configuration in the HV stage and + bias in push
pull or H dual coil first stage 2x2 configuration.
3.9 Relation to Testatica, VTA, crystals, …
The Testatica is a type of Moray generator. As other
inventions use mountain crystals to generate power to
light bulb, the testatica will reveal pieces crystalline of
material surrounded by metal mesh. Combining this
information with accounts of Moray'searly experiments
with artificial Quartz compounds yields to this. The only
electricity needed from the disks is that amount to
stimulate the electron cascade effect in the crystalline
material.
Betatronic EASER mode is done by PUMPING crystal capacitively. You may do this using ultrasonic transducer
crystals in place of electret (have this nasty habit of detonating themselves on resonance)
Testatika has a single disk with alternating charged plates. As disc with opposed polarity butterflies 2 are OK (4
pole) for testing concept, then go multiple, 60 (120 pole)
The basic design does not really need this crystals Testatica wheel at 50 Hz if it has 100 elements in wheel, it
will spin at 50 RPM and generate 50Hz (calculate rotation in testatica movie, each plate syncs with 50Hz strobe)
at step down secondary. That means an RV can drive such a wheel at 12 to 40W power with a step-down speed
and POWER gain of 2760W (3.69 HP).
Page 65
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 65
It is no other thing than a ROTARY reactance L, the inverse of ROTARY condenser C. In one the energy is in
M field in the other is a fixed charge. Like in a transistor we use a small quantity of energy to CONTROL a large
ONE, battery = Charged Capacitor = PM NS poles. Those are the 3 basic forces of Elektron Dynamics.
Proportional downconversion, the charge of Electrons must be down converted from linear EV potential to AC
HV to AC LV. TESTATIKA uses 2 such transformers. I redesigned to 1and AC generating DC charged rotor ..
this is TRUE ZPE ..... "Charge differential Vacuum"
The power comes from the charge cohesion of multiple capacitor disc acrylic tendency to hold a charge. It takes
advantage of dielectric electron tunneling (one of many parameters).
The Methernitha community in Switzerland currently has five or six working models of fuel-less, self-running
devices that tap this energy.
2
nd
explanation as CIG (Capacitive Interrupt Generator):
The Testatica consist of a plastic or dielectric disc were alternate charged capacitors (plates) are integrated as to
rotate inside 2 isolated plates leading to a HI voltage transformer were 2 wires take the ac charge and rectify it to
make system self Exited ...
A comon HI voltage transformer may be used, as an Acrylic plastic rotor made of NON-Anty static plastic (the
ones you peel the protective paper coating and hits you with electric sparks). Aluminum Tape or FOIL can be
used to make the capacitor rotor plates that are alternated as if it were the magnetic poles of a generator.
This Rotor is charged to 10 KVDC at it rotates near transformer RESONANT frequency thansformer will
generate 16.18KV minimal part of that is rectified to feed rotor charge (161.8 AC VOLTS output if built with
standard 120VAC-10KV Transformer). OU comes from ROTOR tendency to RETAIN a charge and lower
CEMF. LOW volt AC is your output power is determined by your design.
The magnets, wires and all that fancy stuff were EGO generated by the inventor to keep the thing secret and
complicated. Now it is simple. See file section for A1 Testatica.gif.
If the Testatica is not a CIG, then you can name it an original design from ARK RESEARCH Capacitive
Interrupt Generator.
The Testatica can also run from 47-450cps and from 90 to 400VAC using computer drive & software for driving
disk motor (RV). The CIG can be driven from an RV and its output transformed & rectified to 12.7VDC to drive
RV inverter into a loop….
Testatika = wimhurst + OU transformation + toys & whistles
Page 66
Radiant Energy and OverUnity
Page 66
4 Summary
Hector has stated that RV principle is universal to all devices, and that the secret of OU lays in Magnetic
amplification and the so-called power factor correction phenomena as a key element. For basic building
everything basic is told, it’s up to the experimenter to tune and play the instrument. A list to remember:
Rotoconversion RV effect: Way to operate a motor at hi impedances with a lower reflective power loss at idle
mode, working similar to a POWER transformer but on Electrical to mechanical conversion, resulting in hi eff
performance and under some conditions (OU) due to reso-magnetic amplification and other quantifiable
phenomena related to ENERGY transformation from the ambient.
Radiant Energy: = AC in RF mode
OU (Overunity): Condition where a system gains energy from other source than the input and adds it to the
output to exceed input power be it Magnetic, thermal, Aetheric, radiant, Stochastic, magneto-atomic, vitrionic,
orgonic, odic, PK in any dimension or geometric plane.
PO/PI = EFF% (COP)
OU = PO>PI
Other references and links:
•
See consolidated knowledge file (ZPEV2.pdf) in EVGRAY group file section. Important!
•
For more information on AC, RLC circuits, resonance, Power Factor, Q, signal decay… please refer to
the following websites:
http://www.ibiblio.org/obp/electricCircuits/AC/index.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/serres.html
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/standw.html
http://home.freeuk.net/dunckx/wireless/sparktx/sparktx.html
http://www.pscpower.com/pages/series%20sc.htm (Synchronous condenser)
http://www.mullerpower.com/index2.php