<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>What's New - VC Experts, Inc.</title>
    <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/</link>
    <description>VC Experts is your resource for private equity &amp; venture capital data, education and legal best practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Copyright 2000 - 2005 VC Experts, Inc. All Rights Reserved.</copyright>
    <managingEditor>cory@vcexperts.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>cory@vcexperts.com</webMaster>
    <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc" type="application/rss+xml" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com" /><item>
      <title>13.3.2.l: Canada: New National Instrument 31-103 takes effect</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3269&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 11:01:01 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dealer and adviser registration categories and requirements throughout Canada are numerous, varied and complex. After several years of consultation, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) have published National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements and Exemptions (NI 31-103) containing amendments to securities legislation and local rules that are intended to harmonize, streamline and simplify dealer and adviser registration categories and requirements. NI 31-103 became effective in all provinces and territories of Canada on September 28, 2009 (the "Implementation Date")&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_llM0AqVbLTKk4MlUlb69GnJsCU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_llM0AqVbLTKk4MlUlb69GnJsCU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_llM0AqVbLTKk4MlUlb69GnJsCU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/_llM0AqVbLTKk4MlUlb69GnJsCU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=3V0YIeXHUFA:TT9f9LnGBxs:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=3V0YIeXHUFA:TT9f9LnGBxs:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=3V0YIeXHUFA:TT9f9LnGBxs:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>14.10: SEC Climate Change Disclosure: Is Your Company?s Carbon Footprint A "Material" Risk? </title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3268&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:59:26 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Securities law requires publicly-traded companies to report material risks. Does the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) currently stipulate that material climate risks be disclosed under existing law? No - at least not yet. Should publicly-traded companies evaluate whether climate change is reasonably likely to impact their future financial performance? Yes - especially as the Obama administration attempts to position the U.S. for a low-carbon future.&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/f1os5H-z9K33apQRQaafjAbx5tM/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/f1os5H-z9K33apQRQaafjAbx5tM/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/f1os5H-z9K33apQRQaafjAbx5tM/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/f1os5H-z9K33apQRQaafjAbx5tM/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=ygz_KQkM2W0:vADQzFv6J1A:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=ygz_KQkM2W0:vADQzFv6J1A:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=ygz_KQkM2W0:vADQzFv6J1A:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12.12.15: In a Leveraged Buyout With a Controlling Stockholder, Loyal Directors Must Actively Negotiate</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3267&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:37:38 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery reinforces the responsibility of a board of directors to assertively defend the interests of the noncontrolling stockholders when negotiating with a controlling stockholder in order to satisfy the board's duty of loyalty.  In Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System v. Fertitta, No. 4339-VCL, 2009 WL 2263406 (Del. Ch. July 28, 2009), the court refused to dismiss claims against the board and the CEO of Landry's Restaurants, Inc. alleging breach of their duty of loyalty and waste of corporate assets in connection with a failed leveraged buyout of the company by the CEO.&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wAkoZKn0PH2_2fcD9cQUN1LYS-4/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wAkoZKn0PH2_2fcD9cQUN1LYS-4/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wAkoZKn0PH2_2fcD9cQUN1LYS-4/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/wAkoZKn0PH2_2fcD9cQUN1LYS-4/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=eOMFoq_l0M0:LhLOMA7mmEY:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=eOMFoq_l0M0:LhLOMA7mmEY:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=eOMFoq_l0M0:LhLOMA7mmEY:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>15.13.19: Summary of Israeli High-Tech Company Capital Raising Q1-Q3/2009 Survey</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3265&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:10:42 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Tel Aviv, Israel, October 21, 2009. The following are the findings of the IVC Quarterly Survey conducted by the IVC Research Center, which for more than 12 years has been at the forefront of high-tech, venture capital and private equity research in Israel. This Survey reviews capital raised by private Israeli high-tech companies from Israeli venture capital funds, foreign investors and other investors. The Survey is based on reports from 81 investors of which 44 are Israeli management companies and 37 are other - mostly foreign - investment entities.&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jSVyF8cIsCwcfz1UqBsRVCuzg2M/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jSVyF8cIsCwcfz1UqBsRVCuzg2M/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jSVyF8cIsCwcfz1UqBsRVCuzg2M/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/jSVyF8cIsCwcfz1UqBsRVCuzg2M/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=olYJ1GsYdms:2kxIhc1Qk_w:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=olYJ1GsYdms:2kxIhc1Qk_w:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=olYJ1GsYdms:2kxIhc1Qk_w:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>7.3.5: Protecting Your Confidential Business Information While the Noncompete Debate Continues</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3264&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:19:37 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Certain recognized voices in the venture capital (VC) community have become increasingly vocal in their call for the abandonment of noncompete agreements in Massachusetts. Noncompetes are agreements that impose post-employment restrictions on a former employee's ability to compete with its prior employer. These VCs believe that noncompete agreements stifle an employee's mobility and innovation and, therefore, VC interest and investment. In support of their position, they point to the relative success of Silicon Valley's tech industry as compared with Boston's 128 high-tech corridor. &lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0d5vauijKWI80CdUpUOB0HZwiu8/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0d5vauijKWI80CdUpUOB0HZwiu8/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0d5vauijKWI80CdUpUOB0HZwiu8/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/0d5vauijKWI80CdUpUOB0HZwiu8/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=OizfIQ5SqTw:HSbQ1xXKRGE:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=OizfIQ5SqTw:HSbQ1xXKRGE:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=OizfIQ5SqTw:HSbQ1xXKRGE:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>8.2.1.e: New York State Enacts Changes Impacting the Creation and Potential Uses of Powers of Attorney</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3263&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 08:17:46 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;On September 1, 2009, broad changes to the laws governing powers of attorney became effective in the State of New York.[1] These changes impact both the creation and potential uses of powers of attorney and apply not only to New York residents, but also to individuals who execute powers of attorney while conducting business in New York.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The revised law has wide implications. The revised law does not provide for an exclusion for commercial transactions; thus, it appears to govern all powers of attorney that are executed by individuals in New York, including those that may be incorporated into other documents such as limited partnership agreements and limited liability company operating agreements, or granted in connection with registration statements and other filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). &lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iMBvoJqaL6Wj0PMwkcPMknDPnWg/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iMBvoJqaL6Wj0PMwkcPMknDPnWg/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iMBvoJqaL6Wj0PMwkcPMknDPnWg/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/iMBvoJqaL6Wj0PMwkcPMknDPnWg/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=AxW6ufnUSWY:fChRjgeSWGM:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=AxW6ufnUSWY:fChRjgeSWGM:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=AxW6ufnUSWY:fChRjgeSWGM:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2.1.1.d: Tax Opportunities and Pitfalls in Operating an S Corporation</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3261&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 09:33:46 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An S corporation is a special creation of the tax law. To qualify as an S corporation, a number of very specific statutory requirements must be satisfied, and the corporation must elect, with the unanimous consent of its shareholders, to be taxed as provided in Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code.&lt;/P&gt;

&lt;P&gt;The principal benefit of an S election is that, except in limited circumstances, income of the corporation passes through to its shareholders without corporate taxation. Thus, an S corporation has some tax characteristics of a partnership, but it is a corporation for all other purposes, including liability protection.&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bURo9RIsLrwmdd0VQWblgZnKgpA/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bURo9RIsLrwmdd0VQWblgZnKgpA/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bURo9RIsLrwmdd0VQWblgZnKgpA/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/bURo9RIsLrwmdd0VQWblgZnKgpA/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=b_zjw-HW9e0:PqH4zjIYGIw:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=b_zjw-HW9e0:PqH4zjIYGIw:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=b_zjw-HW9e0:PqH4zjIYGIw:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12.3.1.a: The MAC - MAE Checklist</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3259&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 08:36:28 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Herewith some thoughts prompted by David Marcus' excellent piece on the now-notorious material adverse effect clause (the "walk right") in buyout transactions, in The Deal, "In Praise of Ambiguity." The landscape for Marcus' note is the extraordinary frequency of litigation involving conflicting interpretations of the material adverse change or effect clause in agreements between public companies (targets or the "sell side") being taken private by a buyout fund (the "buy side"). &lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/di_-TVopRUyfVotgoKYY3aZogPs/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/di_-TVopRUyfVotgoKYY3aZogPs/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/di_-TVopRUyfVotgoKYY3aZogPs/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/di_-TVopRUyfVotgoKYY3aZogPs/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=sjqEiHWMIDY:fJyqt_CMdms:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=sjqEiHWMIDY:fJyqt_CMdms:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=sjqEiHWMIDY:fJyqt_CMdms:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>12.12.14: Courts Signal that Financial Advisors Issue Fairness Opinions, Not Insurance Policies</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3258&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 10:22:10 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In recent years the role of financial advisors in M&amp;A transactions has garnered increased attention. Traditionally viewed as a sort of insurance policy for disappointed buyers, financial advisors are now more commonly viewed as service providers responsible for specified duties. The courts have reinforced this position with a string of opinions which both narrowly tailor the role of financial advisors in such transactions and appear to limit their duties of disclosure in connection with financial analyses and the issuance of fairness opinions.&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DBn2v_8_90tI2fwayq6Fj80otnw/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DBn2v_8_90tI2fwayq6Fj80otnw/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DBn2v_8_90tI2fwayq6Fj80otnw/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/DBn2v_8_90tI2fwayq6Fj80otnw/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=XIOklmQdvVc:W_yjcKlcF0c:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=XIOklmQdvVc:W_yjcKlcF0c:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=XIOklmQdvVc:W_yjcKlcF0c:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10.2.6.c.ii: Updated IPEV Private Equity Valuation Guidelines</title>
      <link>http://vcexperts.com/vce/library/encyclopedia/documents_view.asp?document_id=3257&amp;referrer=rss</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:42:35 -0700</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The International
Private Equity and Venture Capital Valuation
Guidelines were developed by the Association Fran?aise des
Investisseurs en Capital (AFIC), the British Venture Capital
Association (BVCA) and the European Private Equity and Venture Capital
Association (EVCA) and were launched in March 2005 to reflect the need
for greater comparability across the industry and for consistency with
IFRS and US GAAP accounting principles.
&lt;/P&gt;...
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sL8eJa4Jz4nSgV5GeBWuk5flSHU/0/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sL8eJa4Jz4nSgV5GeBWuk5flSHU/0/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sL8eJa4Jz4nSgV5GeBWuk5flSHU/1/da"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedads.g.doubleclick.net/~a/sL8eJa4Jz4nSgV5GeBWuk5flSHU/1/di" border="0" ismap="true"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div class="feedflare"&gt;
&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=3Pwq0VMjbSw:IgspdzngM1A:yIl2AUoC8zA"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?a=3Pwq0VMjbSw:IgspdzngM1A:V_sGLiPBpWU"&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/WhatsNew-VcExpertsInc?i=3Pwq0VMjbSw:IgspdzngM1A:V_sGLiPBpWU" border="0"&gt;&lt;/img&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
