Window To Islam

Can Thoughts and Preaching of Sufism Terminate the Present Global Terrorism?

2016-05-03T10:31:00.003-07:00

Of course there is no chance of terrorists to listen to Sufi voices. Why?

Before we take up the story of love and hate between human beings, we have to understand the concern of Sufis for intra-Muslim global terrorism; not for the other type of western terrorism against Islamic countries. Let us be more elaborate about these contrast groups of Muslims in the scene. The first Sufi group is the largest group famously called as Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat is fourteen hundred years old; while the second group known as Wahhabi/Salafi/Deobandi group, is two hundred and fifty years old.

To trace back the history of a Wahhabi’s psychology this is important to remember that after Allah ordered Iblis to prostrate before Adam, the psyche nafs of Iblis spontaneously overpowered him, he refused the order. This Quranic piece of history of Adam-Iblis emphasises that, to Allah the second next important thing after monotheism Tawheed was this exalt to Adam, the father of all the Prophets.

Monotheism is the nucleus of Islam. This is ancient and perpetual and is a vital ingredient of all sects, including Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat. But in the name of uncalled for protection of monotheism, the Wahhabi Movement’s lethal weapon is ‘Iblis-brand monotheism’, meaning thereby that they will worship only one Allah and will exalt only one Allah, not to anybody else. Even if Shariat demands exaltation to a non-God entity, they are quick to disregard and disrespect it. This is the hallmark feature of Wahhabism. Their favourite charm is to reduce a great Islamic personality to minor one, as per their psyche. To cover up their own mischief, they exhibit manoeuvres and display attractive postures.

To protect the satanic monotheism uniquely, the Wahhabi Movement has deliberately undone twelve Islamic exalt-seeking beliefs about Prophet Muhammad. They pretend to label them as ‘God-competitor-beliefs’ and tend to make Prophet’s position as controversial and weaker, so that they could take political advantages out of Muslim community.

The Movement’s prejudice with Muslim Sufi pirs, awliya-e-kamileen, is due to the fact that this pir group does not only believe and recognise the exalt-seeking elite beliefs about Prophet Muhammad, but it has huge support of Sufi disciples who hate Wahhabi Movement and pose threat to them politically and try to prevent Sufi world conversion to Wahhabi world.

The day when a seed of Iblis-brand Tawheed plant was sown in the field of earth, strong indication was that, one day, it will grow into a big tree and shall disperse its seeds across Islamic territories through the strong wind of change, shall vitiate and pollute the atmosphere. Colossal sum of Petro-Zakwat and Petro-gifts and huge efforts paved the way for the Movement to grow by mixing lie perfectly with the truth.

In Islamic religion, Prophet Muhammad is supreme judicial authority, as Quran, Hadith and practises of companions witness and Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat believe. Meaning, thereby that a situation demanding legal remedy has to be referred to Prophet’s judicial exercises and fique. But the founder of Wahhabism Muhammad bin Abdul Wahhab of Najd had rejected this fact and blamed this as an idolatry and God-competitor one. Through his fatwa and writings, Muhammad, the founder of Wahhabism made this special power of Prophet as generalised to every follower scholar, and made the Movement more dangerous and violent, as we see in newspaper report that appear in ‘Sunday Times of India Delhi/Agra December 27, 2015 edition:

“Washington. Islamic state has sanctioned the harvesting of human organs in a previously undisclosed ruling by the group’s Islamic scholars, raising concerns that the extremist group may be trafficking in body parts. The ruling contained in a January 31, 2015 document, says taking organ from a living captive to save a Muslim’s life, even if it is fatal for the captive, is permissible. “The apostate’s life and organ don’t Have to be respected and may be taken with impurity”, says the document, which is in the form of a fatwa, or religious ruling from the IS’s research and fatwa committee. “Organs that end the captive’s life if removed; the removal of that type is also not prohibited”, Fatwa Number 68 says, according to US government translation.”

Times Of India 20^th Jan 2016 under the news item 'IS brainwashing children to murder their own parents' reports : ”Nasir's ordeal was revealed as it emerged a notorious 20-year-old IS militant named Al Saqr al Qasem publicly executed his own mother after accusing her of apostasy. The activist group Raqqa is being slaughtered silently said 20-year-old jihadi Ali Saqra al Qaseem shot his mother Lena 45, in the head with assault rifle in front of a large crowd.”
The founder of Wahhabism was not less than an IS terrorist. He terrorised his father Mavlana Abdul Wahhab and brother Mavlana Sulaiman bin Abdul Wahhab on apostasy charges, making them fled away and brother writing a booklet 'Assawaequl Ilahiyah fi Radde Alal Wahhabiya' against Muhammad. Muhammad with his accomplices killed civilians levelling same charges.

Stephen Schwartz, the author of ‘The two faces of Islam The House of Saud from Tradition to Terror’, has implied in the book: ‘As we will see a wholesale purge of the Prophet’s personality from Islamic religion has been essential goal of the ‘end time’ cult of Wahhabism, which has made a serious attempt to reshape Islam in its intolerant image’ (page 9 published by Doubleday, New York).

As a Hadith says that after spending some time in hell, Iblis shall be told that Allah will forgive you if you can prostrate before Adam. Hearing this suggestion, he will start fuming and shall deny to do this. The Hadith suggests that Wahhabis/Salafis/Deobandis can never leave Iblis-brand of monotheism.

Of course there is no chance of terrorists to listen to Sufi voices.

Sufis and their disciples can terminate terrorism gradually by delivering thoughts and preaching of senior Sufis to the different segments of society. The exercise should be guarded and be ensured not be wasted on the persons who do not fit into the scene. This is likely to produce a good crop, after some time, to replace losses.

General principles of Sufism:

The great Sufi poet Mavlana Rumi writes:

As much as you will keep yourself busy with your works

So much so you will keep yourself away from spirituality

Until you will not remember him

So long as his door shall remain close for you

For the welfare of the society and individual, Allah has given two forms of orders: one for the body and frame; the other for the heart and soul. They are further subdivided into prohibitions and commands. Commands for the body are: prayer namaz, annual fast roza, religious tax zakwat and pilgrimage haj. Prohibitions for the body are killing, drinking, illicit physical relationship and theft.

Commands for the heart are: believing core Islamic beliefs and beliefs of Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat, sincerity, repentance, trust, thanksgiving to Allah, agreeing with Allah’s will; while prohibitions to heart are: indulgence in idolatry, apostasy, boasting, malice, grudge, selfishness and hypocrisy.

In order to get fruits of salvation, reformation and obedience of both body and heart is mandatory according to shariat laws. This is to be noted that commands and prohibitions related to heart are more scoring and have more chances of acceptance. Prophet Muhammad said: “Undoubtedly there is a part within human body, if this is correct, then the whole body is correct if it gets disordered then whole body is disordered. Beware this part is heart.” Within the body this part is the subject of Allah’s attention too. Prophet Muhammad said: “Allah does not pay his attention to your body or face; but he does pay at your heart.” This shows the importance of heart as an organ subjected to commands and prohibitions. Moreover, the significance of these heart related diseases is that, contrary to body disorders, the diseases of heart are small and subdued and hardly could be noticed. Therefore, purification of heart along with purification of manners can make one able to recognise the disorders of heart. Adopting this method, dangers and evil suggestions to heart could also be kept at bay, then commands related to heart are obeyed with good precision. The lord of the universe says in Quran: “The successful shall be one who purifies his psyche nafs” (Surah Shams-9). That is why this art of purification of human heart and manners is called Sufism tasawwuf. Sufism can serve an example to intern-Sufis and the Sufi disciples to make their future a success.

The definition of Sufism: Sufi Shaykh Abdul Qadir of Baghdad has given Sufism, a comprehensive definition: “To keep the heart away from all types of filth and to keep the heart away from the intervention of Allah’s enemy Iblis and decorating it with the traditions and manners of Allah’s friend Prophet Muhammad is called Sufism.”

The scholars know that the ingredients of Sufism are the same which Prophet Muhammad tutored gradually to his companions and like other departments of religion, the central figure for purification and Sufism-tutoring is also the Prophet. And finally Allah has declared Prophet Mohammad as the ‘chief purpose’ to send him on earth to tutor purification to human beings, as Allah says in Surah Aale Imran-164.

While teaching his companions, Prophet Muhammad once tutored them: “If you pray so much, that makes you bend like a bow; and keep on fasting so much that makes you as thin as a bow string, they will never serve you until you purify yourselves.” Once he said to his disciple companion Abu Hurayra: “Oh Abu Hurayra! Keep abstinence, you will be a big worshipper.”

Ingredients of Sufism: The ingredients are company (Prophet’s company to his disciple companions, pir’s company to disciple murids), oath taking bayet (companion’s oath taking with Prophet; disciple murid’s oath taking with Sufi pir), contention with Satan and own psyche nafs, remembrance to Allah, assembly (dhikra circle), repentance, checking self account, fear with Allah, optimism with Allah’s bounties, sincerity, intimacy with Allah, submission to the will of Allah, abstinence, continence and thanksgiving to Allah are the ingredients of the tutorials, Prophet Muhammad gave to his disciple companions Sehaba-e-Karam as evident from various Hadith books.

The same are the ingredients of Sufi pirs’ lessons to their disciple murids.

Sufis and Jihad: Sufis call jihad an Islamic duty, as what Prophet Muhammad himself really meant. Sufi Ghazali writes in his famous ‘Revelation of Heart Makashifat-ul-Qulub’: “Once Prophet Muhammad addressed his companions, who were returning from a military jihad:”Welcome! Now you have turned up from minor jihad to a major one.” They asked: “Oh Prophet of Allah, what is a major jihad?” Prophet answered: “Jihad with your inner selves is a major jihad.” ”

Great Sufi pir Shaykh Abdul Qadir of Baghdad in his book ‘Victory of God Alfatah ur Rabbani’ writes: “Oh slave! Make yourself busy with reform of inner self, when there is threat to integrity. You have no right to reform your family, neighbours, fellows of your city and country at this stage. When you have achieved this, first turn to reform up your family and then to other persons, but not until you put on armour of fear to Allah, put on helmet of faith on top of your heart, take the sword of monotheism in hand, pick up arrows of acceptance of prayer and put them in your quiver, ride on speeding horse with divine guidance, learn to achieve perfection with the usage of sword and spear and then take on the enemy of Allah. Then you will receive Allah’s help from six sides, you will get the humans released from the hands of Satan and send them to the doors of Allah’s court.”

Which is Sufi’s sect maslak?: Companion Abdullah Ibne Umar presents: Explaining to us the Quranic verse ‘youma tabyaddu wujuhu wa taswaddu wujuhun’ Prophet Muhammad described: “Tabyaddu wujuhun ahlus sunnate wa taswaddu wujuhun ahlul bida” On the day of judgement the faces of Ahle Sunnat will be shining and the faces of heretics shall be dark: (Tafsir Durre Mansur vol 1 part 2 page 63, Tafsir Qartabi vol 11 part 4 page 167). Another companion Abu Saeed Khudri says Prophet recited (above mentioned) Quranic verse and explained: “Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat faces will be shining and the faces of heretics and psyche nafs followers shall be dark.” (Durre Mansur vol 1 part 2 page 63). Companion Abdullah Ibne Abbas has described the meaning of the verse: “The faces of Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat will be white and shining and the faces of heretics and astrayed sects shall be dark” (Tafsir Durre Mansur vol 1 page 63, Tafsir Qartabi vol 11 page 167, Ibne Kasir vol 1 page 584).

Ibne Taymeyah describes in his book ‘Minhaj us Sunnah’ vol 1 page 206: “Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat is an ancient and well known sect. This sect is older than the birth of Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafei and Ahmad; this is school of thought of Prophet’s companions. They have taken this faith/belief mazhab from their Prophet. Any person going against this shall be held heretic according to Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat.” Therefore, the Sufi sect/maslak/school of thought is Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat.

Preventive Measures to Terminate Global Terrorism:

1. Sufi thoughts and preaching have always been endorsed by Muslim rulers, elites as well as masses across the world, since inception of Sufism, second century onwards. In India’s medieval and modern history background, there has been always a Sufi personality shadowing a Muslim king or emperor, right from Muhammad Ghauri till last Mughal king Bahadur Shah, supervising their policies, works and strategic feats. Sufis have always blessed them with a tongue always busy with Allah’s remembrance, and their hearts always filled with sincerity, fear, repentance, thanksgiving, trust and agreeing with Allah’s will. Moreover, Sufi mechanism was working because they loved Allah and Allah loved them. The current Sufi voices shall be accepted, only when they follow the footprints of their preceding generations and maintain their own study level high.

2. Sufis have always been a guiding force in making alike tatbiq between the verses of Quran with that of Hadith. Ghazali, Rumi, Sadi, Nizamuddin and Amir Khusru are the best examples who are still remembered for their wisdom and teachings.

3. Wholesale promotion of Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat beliefs with new face look to 12 exalt-seeking beliefs on Prophet Muhammad with clear distinction between rights of Allah and rights of Prophet Muhammad to every individual of all ages.

4. As opposed to traditional Islam, focus has shifted from Sufism tasawwuf to fiqh and jurisprudence. Islam needs rejuvenation where law is again reconciled with spirituality and justice tempered with compassion. Great Sufi Data Ganj Bukhsh Lahori wrote in Kashful Majub :"Shariat that does not go with tasawwuf is pretence; tasawwuf without discipline of shariat is hypocrisy."

5. Evils of Iblis brand monotheism should also be discussed at large.

6. Good finances and wide contacts with riches and distinguished personalities from all the fields will serve like a strong spinal column for Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat movement.

7. Influx of books and magazines among youths, specially, aimed to love Sufis, their influences and new researches on them. A newspaper owned by Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat should be started.

8. Formation of research organisations on selected Sufi work, Sufi poetry and current applications. Formation of Tablighi Jamaat type international organisation.

9. Sufis should encourage young disciples to take part in procession Julus-e-Nabvi on Prophet’s birthday.

10. Formation of legal body to protect and restore Ahle Sunnat wal Jamaat wakf properties and their mosques.

11. Formation of Imam Body to control Imam appointments, movements and redressal of their grievances.

12. All killings, sufferings, illnesses, mass exodus, malnourishment of children and loss of kith and kin in Syria and Iraq, must go on one shoulder i.e. satanic monotheism. This fact should be highlighted continuously through various means.

2012-02-22T09:42:00.001-08:00

A Road To Success

Companion Hazrat Abdullah Ibne Umar presents that explaining the Quranic verse ‘Youma Tab-yaddu wuju-hu-watas-waddu wuju-hun’, Prophet Muhammad described: ‘Tab-yaddu wuju-hun Ahlus-Sunnate wa-taswaddu wuju-hun Ahlul Bida-i’ on the day of judgement the faces of Ahle Sunnat will be shining and the faces of heretics shall be dark. (Tafseer Dur-rl-Mansur Vol I part 2 page 63, 2 Tafseer Qartabi Vol II part 4 page 167).

Another companion Hazrat Abu Saeed Khudri says the Prophet Muhammad recited the above mentioned Quranic verse and explained: ‘(On the day of judgement) Ahle Sunnat-o-Jamat faces will be shining and the faces of heretics and wish-followers shall be dark. (Durre Mansur Vol I part 2 page 63).

Hazrat Abdullah bin Abbas has described the exegesis of this verse in these words: ‘The faces of Ahle Sunnat-o-Jamat will be white and shining and the faces of heretics and astrayed sects shall be dark’ (Tafseer Dur-e-Mansur Vol I page 63, Tafsir-e-Qartab Vol II page 167 & Tafseer Ibn-e-Kaseer Vol I page 584).

Allama Ibn-e-Teymiyah describes in his book Minhaj-us-Sunnah Vol I page 206: ‘Ahle Sunnat-o-Jamat is an ancient and well known sect. This sect is older than the births of Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Shafe-i and Imam Ahmad and this is a school of thought of Prophet’s companion. They have taken this mazhab faith from their Prophet, any person going against this, shall be held heretic as per Ahle Sunnat-o-Jamat. (Sahaba-e-Kram aur Maslak-e-Ahle Sunnat, Allama Ghulam Murtiza Saqi Mujaddidi, page 64, 65, 66).

A human being can be divided into two types: Muslim and Kafir unbeliever. Again Kafir has two types: Kafir-e-Asli true unbeliever and Kafir-eMurtad Muslim-turned-unbeliever. Kafir-e-Asli is that which has no belief on Kalima-e-Islam since birth for example Da-hariya, Majusi Parsi, Jews, Christian and idolater etc. Kafir-e-Murtad again is divided into two types: Murtad-Mujahir and Murtad-Munafiq.

Murtad-Mujahir out-loud Murtad is that Kafir who was a Muslim earlier, then turned unbeliever out-loudly by disapproving Kalima La-Ilaha-Il-Lallaho and Murtad-Munafiq is that Kafir who still speaks Kalima La-Ilaha-Il-Lallaho and pronounces himself as Muslim but insults Allah, Prophet Muhammad, a messenger of Allah by shariat standard and rules, or if denies even one Zarurat-e-Deen Aqeeda Essential Islamic Belief (EIB). In all types of Kafirs, the worst one is this Murtad-Munafiq because he calls himself a Muslim while teaching Kufr.

Muslim is of two types: Sahih Musalman right Muslim and gumrah Musalman go heretic. The right Muslim is one who approves EIBS as well as Zaruriyat-e-Ahle Sunnat Essential Ahle Sunnat Beliefs (EASB). Heretical Muslim is that Bad-Mazhab who disapproves any Essential Ahle Sunnat Belief and is profoundly at odds what is generally accepted provided he has not touched the boundary of Kufr.

A few rare judgments of Prophet Muhammad given against heretics are being presented- (1.) Companion Hazrat Anas describes that Prophet Muhammad said: ‘If you meet a heretic, be rude to him, because Allah does animus with every heretic’ (Reference: Hadis Book: Ibne Asakir). (2.) Companion Hazrat Huzaifa refers to Prophet Muhammad that he said: ‘Allah rejects a fast observed by heretic, neither He accepts his prayer nor Ramzan charity, neither his Haj pligrimage nor Umrah, neither his jihad nor his Nafl (accessory) worship, or Farz (necessary) worship. A heretic is pulled out of Islamic religion like a hair is pulled out of kneaded dough’ (Ibn-e-Maja). (3.) Hazrat Abu Hurairah narrates that Prophet Muhammad ordered :’If heretics fall ill, do not visit them; if die, do not join their funeral prayer; if you see them do not salute; don’t join their company, don’t drink water or take food with them, don’t marry with them, don’t join their funeral prayer and don’t pray with them. (Muslim, Abu Daud & Ibn-e-Maja). (4.) ‘Heretics are like dogs of hell-dwellers’ (Dar-e-Qitni). (5.) Companion Hazrat Ibrahim-bin-Maisara narrates that Prophet Muhammad said: ‘If anybody has paid respect to heretic, he has tried to sabotage Islamic religion.’ (Mish-quat) (6.) Famous Hadis book Muslim refers to Prophet Muhammad alerting about heretics: ‘Do not befriend them and don’t accept their friendship, least they entangle you in heresy, least they entangle you in mischief.’

In his addresses, Prophet Muhammad has named Khawarij, Qadriya and Narjiya sects. He has referred Khawarij sect as ‘dogs of hell’ (Ibn-e-Maja) and told for Qadriya and Marjiya: ‘They have no participation in Islam’ (Tirmizi). The current international sect is reported to derive its heretical believes from Khawarij and Qadriya (read Motazila or rationalistic sect).

Now some Essential Ahle Sunnat Beliefs and their counter heretical opinions are given below for your perusal:

Essential Ahle Sunnat Belief is that Prophet Muhammad is very special human being in every respect while heretic’s opinion is that Prophet is a human like themselves. This belief is rather identical with that of ancient unbelievers who addressed their Prophets as being equal to themselves as revealed in various Quranic verses.
That Allah conferred on Prophet Muhammad the ilm-e-ghaib knowledge of unseen and ilm-e-makana-wa-ma-ya-koon the knowledge of unseen of past and in future as much as Allah desired, are Essential Ahle Sunnat Beliefs; On the other hand heretical opinion is that Prophet Muhammad does not possess them, only Allah does. In order to prove their heresy, heretics crossed the penal ordinances of Islam and wrote rude and disrespectful words for Prophet in their books and were held imposturous.
EASB is that Allah conferred on his deputy Prophet Muhammad the tashri-i akhtiyarat judicial authority as well as ghair tashri-i akhtiyarat powers to control affairs out of the purview of Islamic jurisprudence; while heretical belief is that Allah didn’t confer these powers to Prophet Muhammad, those are for Allah only.That is why Ahle Sunnat wal Jamat are determined to retain Prophet Muhammad as a central legislative authority for the solution of the Ummah Community problems being confronted today and in future as well. On the other hand, terrorists who are absolutely heretics tend to eliminate Prophet Muhammad altogether from Islam at least for legislative purposes and have replaced Prophet’s central and only one-person-legislative-position with their ‘Ulema council’ to direct and control the whole Muslim World, resulting in murders of Ahle Sunna Muslims and bombarding Darghah and Shrines after floating self-made decrees.
EASB is that Allah granted Prophet Muhammad the promised death just for a while, then bestowed him life in his sacred grave with perfect barzakhi hayat aliveness till doomsday. Deeds of every Muslim are submitted to him by angel, making him delighted and thankful to Allah if they are good or making him sad to seek forgiveness to Allah if our deeds are bad. On the other hand, a section of heretics believe that Prophet Muhammad is dead and mixed in soil and now useless for Muslims.

EASB is that Allah made Prophet Muhammad as witness and producer of testimony for every single Muslim. In Islamic Sharia (Hanafi, Maliki, Shafe-i and Hanbali jurisprudences) this belief is called as a belief of hazir-o-nazir present and beholder. For example to cover distance of hundreds of Kilometers within moments with the permission of Allah, to be present at many places at the same time with numerous duplicate bodies, to see from a remote place etc. While heretics don’t believe Prophet as to be hazir-o-nazir.
EASB is that seeking Shafa-at intercession from Prophet Muhammad is permissible act today. While heretical belief is that it is not permissible now, this shall be only possible on doomsday after Allah shall grant Prophet Muhammad a permission to do.
That Prophet Muhammad is the most learned among all created beings since Allah Himself taught him knowledge of everything through dual revelation of Quran and Hadis is Essential Ahle Sunnat Belief; on the other hand, heretics deny this and believe that Satan Iblees is the most learned created being and they described this in book Baraheen-e-Qatia.
EASB is that prophets are intermediary between ummah community and Allah so is Prophet Muhammad; but heretics contradicts this belief.
EASB is that Allah bestowed Prophet Muhammad power to hear a call away from a distant place; while a section of heretics believe he can listen a call from close to his grave but other heretics absolutely contradict both versions.
Calling Prophet Muhammad for help while in distress is permissible act, believe Ahle Sunnat-o-Jamat sect, while heretics don’t believe this and call this as ‘act of idolatry’.

Hope we can take on the right path of Ahle Sunnat, the only promised sect fit for a paradise as Prophet Muhammad himself described, of course along with performing good deeds and fulfilling faraiz-o-wajibat, what a safe and happy journey to aakhirat the next world.

A Brief Introduction to Ahle-Sunna Sect

2011-09-03T09:47:00.000-07:00

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

A serious perusal of the booklet titled ‘Ta’aruf-e-Ahle Sunnat’ compiled by Janab Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi convinced me that an English version of it will help the believers to analyse and visualize the truthfulness of their Sunni beliefs as against the evils of misleading preaching of the other factions.

So I thought it befitting to translate it into English for the benefit of readership through length and breadth of the country and outside it. The result of my effoert is in the form of ‘AN INTRODUCTION TO AHLE-SUNNA’ which is in your hands.

Apart from my own intentions Maulana Syed Anwer Mian Chishti Misbahi while visiting my residence asked me to translate it for the good of our brothers. This worked as catalyst and I prepared myself to do the job inspite of my drawbacks which I was aware of. I hope it will interest you too.

I am obliged indeed to Dr. Syed Mohammad Amin, Reader in Dept. of Urdu AMU Aligarh, who is also the Sajjada-Nasheen of the Qadri-Barkati Sufi order at Khanqah of Marehra(Etah) and Maulana Syed Mohammad Anwer Mian Chishti Misbahi of Phaphund Khanqah for their blessings and encouragement.

Whenever I found myself wanting in one way or the other Maulana Kamaluddin Sahib Ashrafi of Jaswant Nagar, Etawah came to my rescue every time and not only encouraged me but also gave full moral support and also rendered precious advice. I am really thankful to him without whose help and valuable advice this work would not have been possible. I am also grateful to my friend Professor Mohammad Ameer who spared his time whenever I required to help me in my translation work.

While concluding I must confess that it is my father’s effort that I have such a bent of mind and his blessings always came to my rescue. I am thankful to everyone who has helped me from time to time to complete this Project.

Let us pray to Almighty Allah for bestowing healthy vision to the ailing eyes of our beloved writer Maulana Yaseen Akhtar Misbahi. Ameen.

20^th August, 2000 Dr.Mohammad Afzal Barkati

19^th Jumadal Uoola 1421 A.H. 20, ArvindPul, RailwayRoad,Etawah

A BRIEF INTRODUCTION TO AHLE-SUNNA SECT

I was orally as well as in writing, invited to pen an introductory article regarding the school-of-thought of Ahle-sunna which is popularly known as Hanfi Bareilvi, and also about the thoughts and views of its distinguished scholars and erudite persons and important Institutions with the aim to publish it in special number of Jama’at-e-Islami’s organ ‘Dawat, Delhi’ (Oct 1999) on Indian Muslims, so as to introduce it in a positive manner to the Muslims. Accepting this invitation the understudy article is being presented. Although this subject demands a complete book and it it is very much possible that this article may become the preface of a complete book. At present evading details, I am presenting synoptical notes which I am sure, will add to the knowledge of the reader and will infuse interest in further study and research.

The Indian Muslims, from the beginning have been adhered to Sunni-Hanfi School of thought. There is a small population of Sunni-Shafei Muslims in the region of Konkan and Malabar, Shia Muslims are also found, spread in small number. Sectarianism and factionism started rearing its head amongst Muslims, in the first quarter of the nineteenth century. In this hot period of differences and disputes, the Chief aim was targeted towards the very act of conformation of four Imams of Islamic Jurisprudence, and in general, ‘Ta’sav’uf’ and ‘Ta’reeqat’ were aimed to be called as sinful acts and were severely criticized. Therefore, Islamic Jurisprudence, Ta’sav’uf and Ta’reeqat received severe and adverse criticism and were named as innovation (Bid’at) in religion. On these basis many new Schools-of-thoughts came into being, deviating from Ahle-Sunna path. To know this fact with historical continuity, I shall refer to the writings of Hakeem Abdul Hai, father of Maulana Abul Hasan Ali Nadvi and of Syed Sulaiman Nadvi, the disciple of Maulana Shibli Nomani.

To some people in the issue of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqah) the act of conformation of the Imam is unlawful and ‘Hara’m’ (forbidden). In their opinion one should follow the rules clearly described in Quran and Hadith and that in the cases of the Jurisprudence, presumption (Qias) and consensus (Ijma) are not excuses in Islamic Divine Law (Shariat). This new School-of-thought was laid by Maulana Fakhir Bin-Yahya of Allahabad, Sheikh Nazeer Husain Husaini Bin Jawwad Ali of Delhi, Nawab Syed Siddiq Hasan of Bhopal and their followers.

The other sect has an extreme opinion with regard to the act of conformation of an Imam. They are insistent on opposing the dignity of this act. They believe the conformists as being innovators and selfish. They have gone ahead away in their view to an extent that they insult the Imams especially Imam Abu Hanifa. This School-of-thought comprises of Sheikh Abdul Haque Benarsi Bin Fazalullah and Sheikh Abdullah Siddiqui Allahabadi etc.

They have authored books as well according to their views and School-of-thought for example ‘Dara satellabib’ of Sheikh Moenuddin Sindhi Bin Ameen, ‘Qur’rat-ul-Ain’ain’ of Sheikh Fakhir Allahabadi, ‘Tan’veer-ul-Ain’ain’ of Shah Ismail Dehalvi, ‘Mei’yar-ul-Haque’ of Mian Syed Nazeer Husain, ‘Ei’tisam-us-sunna’ of Sheikh Abdullah Allahabadi and ‘Al’jannat’o Fil-us’wat-el-Ha’sanate Bis’ sunnah’ of Nawab Siddiqui Hasan Bhopali. There are two groups amongst scholars belonging to Hanfi School-of-thought. One of which is following the path of research and justice, which includes Mullah Behrul-Uloom Abdul Ali Bin Mullah Nizamuddin, who has written ‘Ar’kane-Arbaa’ and Maulana Abdul Hai Firangi Mehali Bin Abdul Haleem is a writer of ‘At’taliq’ul-Mumajjad’.

The other faction comprises of those scholars who are strict followers of conformation and can compromise for nothing against their Imams. For example- Maulana Sheikh Fazal-e-Rasool Amvi Badayuni and his followers (Reference: Islami Uloom-o-Funoon Hindustan Mein by Hakeem Abdul Hai Rai Bareilvi; page 154; Publisher: Darul Musannifeen Azamgarh).

Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi and Maulana Qasim Nanotvi, the founder of Darul uloom Deoband are the distinguished pupils of Shah Abdul Ghani Mujaddidi and Maulana Sakhawat Ali Jaunpuri etc. are the pupils of Maulana Shah Ismail in the east. This category of scholars contained the colour of their conformation high, besides upholding their anti-innovation and pure-monotheism campaign.

Maulana Syed Nazeer Husain Bihari Dehalvi is another pupil of Maulana Shah Ishaque. This second category resorted to the direct references from the books of Hadith in order to gain understanding of the text to follow them, instead of conforming the Hanfi Islamic Jurisprudence, besides upholding their anti-innovation and pure-monotheism campaign and this very sect became popular as Ahl-e-Hadith.

The third sect was that which strictly remained undeviated from its old path and kept on proclaiming themselves calling Ahle-Sunna. The leading scholars of this were mostly from Bareilly and Badayun( Ref: Hayate Shibli by Syed Sulaiman Nadvi; page 46; Publisher: Darul Musannifeen Azamgarh).

According to Hakeem Abdul Hai Rai Bareilvi and Syed Sulaiman Nadvi, those who are strict conformist and strongly clinged to the old path calling themselves Ahle-Sunna are scholars of Badayun and Bareilly and their followers who are still not prepared to deviate from the old path.

Abdul Rahman Parwez Islahi and Professor Mohammad Ayyub Quadri of Karachi have elaborated this division of schools further in their own ways:

Of the pupils and followers of Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi, one group retained the preservance of Shah Abdul Azeez School-of-thought and did not like even the minor change in the rules of the Divine Law of Islam; but the other group enjoyed the act of non-conformation and exercised the interpretation of Islamic laws. So, gradually both factions started showing differences in various issues (Ref: Mufti Sardar Uddin Azurda by Abdul Rahman Parwez Islahi, Maktaba Jamia Ltd. New Delhi; Page 138).
Many great philosophers and logicians were born in Oudh and Maulana Fazal-e-Haque Khairabadi was like their Commander-in-Chief in the last period. He had the privilege of getting education from the family of scholars of Shah Waliullah besides being taught by his father Maulana Fazal-e-Imam himself. But he had serious differences with some thoughts and views of Shah Ismail and Shah Ishaque Dehalvi, and was firmly set on the old path. Maulana Mehboob Ali Dehalvi (pupil pf Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi) also shared with his views. Both of them strongly denounced the thoughts and views of Shah Ismail. In this connection, scholars of Badayun and Bareilly also helped them. (Ref: Urdu Mein Maz’habi A’dab. Page 55, Urdu Nama Karachi, December 1975).

It is necessary to go through the statements and observations of Mohammad Jafer Thenesri and Maulana Sanaullah if real results are to be achieved in understandable verbatim while keeping proximity with the truth:

During my presence in India (1864 AD/1280 AH) perhaps there were not even ten Muslims of Wahabi School-of-thought in the whole of Punjab. And now (1884 Ad/1302 AH) I see that Wahabi followers of Mohammad Ismail comprises at least one fourth of Muslim population in each village and town (Ref: Ta’waree’kh-e-Ajeeba by Mohammad Jafer Thenesri, page 81, Sang-e-Meil Publication Lahore).
In Amritsar both Muslims and Non-Muslims are equal in number. Eighty years ago, almost all Muslims had the same belief which is being observed by Hanfi Bareilvi Muslims now. (Ref: Shamm-a-Taheed by Sanaullah Amritsari, page 4, Publishers: Maktaba Sanaeya, Sargodha Punjab Pak).

Maulana Sanaullah Amritsari, the editor of periodical Ahl-e-Hadith has presented the above mentioned analysis in 1937. According to which, about hundred and sixty years back, the Muslims in Amritsar had the same belief which is pronounced currently as Hanfi Bareilvi thoughts. And according to Mohammad Jafer Thenesri’s observation and research, two hundred years ago there was no existence of any Wahabi follower of Shah Ismail Dehalvi in Punjab.

The Muslim Congregation was shattered due to non-conformation and deviation of some of the believers of Sunni Hanfi sect, after Siraj ul Hind Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi.

The book ‘Taq’viyat-ul-Iman’ of Shah Ismail dehalvi, written in the name of protection to pure monotheism, came forward as an asylum to such persons, about which, according to Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, Shah Ismail Dehalvi himself had this opinion:

“I have written this book and I know that some harsh words have crept in at some places and there has become some severity too at times. For example, those affairs existed as Minor Shirk (non-perfect believing) have been written as Major Shirk (idolatry). I surely anticipate agitation from this publication. If I had stayed here, I would have brought out the text gradually in eight or ten years, but at present I intend to proceed on Haj pilgrimage and after my return, I have a firm intention to participate in Jehad. Therefore I find myself unable to fulfill this work. I see that no other person will shoulder this burden. Therefore, I have penned this book. Though there would be turbulence, but I am sure that things will be set right after some arguments (Ref: Hikayat-e-Auliya (Arvah-e-Salasa) Hikayat 59, by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi; page 98; Published at Kutub khana Naeemiya, Deoband). Harsh words and severity could be explained as to be a ‘style’; but how could the author of Taq’viyat-ul-Iman get the right to alter Minor Shirk (Non-Perfect Believing) to Major Shirk (Idolatry). The desire to make uproar and arguments is fulfilled; but still the deviation of Muslims could not be made corrected.Maulana Syed Ahmad Raza Bijnori Qasimi writes: “It is pity that due to this book (Taq’viyat-ul-Iman) the Indo-Pak Muslims who are more than Twenty Crores and Ninety percent of them belong to Hanfi School-of-thought have been divided into two groups (Maulana Syed Ahmad Raza Bijnori; ‘Anwar-ul-Bari’; Volume II; published by Nasir-ul-Uloom Bijnor; page 107).

Maulana Abul Kalam Azad writes: ‘Maulana Mohammad Ismail Shaheed took lessons together with Maulana Munawwar Uddin when after the death of Shah Abdul Azeez, he wrote Taq’viyat-ul-Iman and Jilal-ul-Ain’ain and his School-of-Thought gained popularity in the country, a strong debate was started among scholars. The strongest refutation against these came from Maulana Munawwar Uddin. He wrote various books and organized the famous 1240 A.H. debate (Manazirah) of Jama Masjid (Delhi). Also got Fatwa compiled from all the Indian scholars then procured Fatwa from Mecca and Medinah (Hara’mein).”

His writings reveal that initially he issued warning to Maulana Ismail and as well as his companion Shah sahib’s son-in-law Maulana Abdul Hai and tried to convince him every way; but when failed, indulged in active debate and rejections. He arranged the much famous debate (Manazirah) of Jama Masjid (Delhi) in which Maulana Ismail and Maulana Abdul Hai were on one side and on the other were Maulana Munawwar Uddin and all the other Delhi scholars. (Azad ki Kahani; compiled by Maulana Abdur Razzaq Malihabadi; page 48; Khalil Urdu Bazar, Lahore).

Maulana Makhsoos-Ullah, the son of Shah Rafiuddin Dehalvi, Maulana Mohammad Musa, the son of Shah Rafiuddin Dehalvi, Maulana Fazal-e-Haq Khairbadi, the pupil of Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi, Mufti Sadaruddin Azurda, the pupil of Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi, Maulana Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni, Maulana Ahmad Saeed Naqshbandi Dehalvi, Maulana Rasheeduddin Dehalvi, Maulana Khairuddin Dehalvi Hakeem Sadiq Ali Khan Dehalvi (Real Grand Father of Maseeh-ul-Mulk Hakim Ajmal Khan), Maulana Syed Ashraf Ali Gulshan Abadi, Maulana Mukhlis-ur-Rahman Chatgami, Maulana Qalandar Ali Zubairi Panipati etc. innumerable scholars of Ahle-Sunna rejected and refuted these new thoughts and views through their speeches and writings in every way and actively participated in the Jehad of protection and preservance of Ahle-Sunna School-of-thought with the help of their knowledge and practice.

The learned Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni asked seven questions to Hazrat Shah Makhsoos-Ullah, the son of Shah Rafiuddin, the son of Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehalvi, regarding Taq’viyat-ul-Iman and other related affairs which have published as questions and answers in ‘Risalah Teh’qiq-ul-Haqeeqah Bombay in 1267 A.H. Only three answers are being presented here; Hazrat Shah Makhsoos-Ullah Dehalvi pens down: “The answer of the first question is that Taq’viyat-ul-Iman which I have referred as ‘Taf’viyat-ul-Iman with ‘Fa’. The booklet which I have authored in the rejection of this has been named as ‘Mu’eid-ul-Iman’. The booklet of Ismail is not in accordance with the beliefs of our family but is even against the Monotheistic beliefs of all the Prophets and Messengers as well because the Messengers were sent down to educate Monotheism and to lead on their own path. In this booklet there is no trace of this Monotheism and practices of the Prophets. Some practices which he himself has segregated as to be ‘Polytheism’ or ‘Innovations’ have not been endorsed name by name either by a Prophet or his subordinate. If those are really there, wherever they are, please tell his followers to produce these before me also.

The answer of the fourth question is that the Wahabi’s (Mohammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi) booklet was the text and he (Ismail) has become like an annotator (of that book).

The answer of the fifth question is that the elder uncle (Shah Abdul Azeez) who had lost his sight and had become incompetent heard this and reacted: that had I not become incompetent due to indisposition, I would have answered this like ‘Tuhfa Asna Ashria’ and would present its rejection also.

Allah has helped me to endorse the rejection of the annotation. The purpose of the text has also been lost. Our honoured father (Shah Rafiuddin) had not seen it until disclosed by the order of elder Sir (Shah Abdul Azeez) than he believed him (Ismail) to be mislead and determined to present its rejection (Reference: Anwar Aftabe sadaqat compiled by Maulana Qazi Fazal Ahmad Ludhianvi, printed at Karimi Press Lahore, 1920 AD).

One more example of Shah Ismail Dehalvi’s styled innovation and self pride is being presented here for perusal.

Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi describes:

“Shah Ishaq Sahib reveals that when Maulvi Ismail started lifting of hands with post-preliminary ‘takbirs’ (Rafa-Yadein), then Maulvi Mohammad Ali and Maulvi Ahmad Ali who were disciples of Shah Abdul Azeez and his writer also, requested Shah Sahib that Sir! Maulvi Ismail has started rafa-yadein and it will lead to rioting, please make him stop it. Shah Sahib pacified them: I have become old. I will not be able to argue (Manazirah).”

When Shah Abdul Qadir came to him he suggested: Dear Abdul Qadir! Make Ismail to understand not to perform Rafa-Yadein. What is the advantage? Rioting will unnecessarily spread amongst people. Shah Abdul Qadir replied: Sir! I shall certainly convey this message but he would not agree to it and will refer to some Hadiths.

Shah Abdul Qadir sent a message to Maulvi Ismail through Maulvi Yaqub to quit Rafa-Yadein. This will create disturbance for no reason. When Maulvi Yaqub conveyed this message to Maulvi Ismail, he replied: How this Hadith will mean if public disturbance is kept in mind. “One who stays firm on just a single practice of Holy Prophet (Sunna) at the time of disturbance, shall be rewarded as equal to hundred martyrs,” because adopting the abandon practice (Sunna) shall surely create out cry in public. Maulvi Yaqub brought his answer to the knowledge of Shah Abdul Qadir. On hearing it said: Oh! Oh! I thought that Ismail had become a scholar; but he could not even understand the meaning of Hadith. This is correct for the time when there is a Non-Sunna against a Sunna, whereas in this case Sunna is not opposing a Non-Sunna; but there is another Sunna. Since adopting a Rafa-Yadein is Sunna; likewise abandoning this is also a Sunna.” (Reference: Hikayat 73, Arvahe Salasa, Imdadul Ghuraba, Saharanpur, 1370 AH).

The writings of Shah Ismail Dehalvi created differences pertaining to faith and juridical nature amongst scholars and public, amongst which issue of ‘Imkan-e-Kizb’ (A faith that Allah could utter a lie) and the issue of ‘Imkan-e-Nazeer’ (A faith that precedent of Holy Prophet was possible) are top listed. The scholars of Ahle-Sunna put forwarded their stand of ‘Imtina-e-Kizb’ (Providing prohibitions from Quran and Hadith against the faith of ‘Imkan-e-Kizb’) and ‘Imtina-e-Nazeer’ (Providing prohibitions against the faith of ‘Imkan-e-Nazeer’) with strong evidences and comprehensive annotations the controversial text is as follows:

“The Dignity of the Emperor is such that in a moment just with one order of ‘Be’ He could create crors of Prphets and pious persons and Jini and angels, Gabriel and Prophet Mohammad (Taq’viyat-ul-Iman by Shah Mohammad Ismail Dehalvi; page 37; Printed at Matbaa Siddiqui, Shah Jehanabad 1854 AD).

At this, the learned Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi, the pupil of Shah Abdul Azeez Dehalvi, nabbing him strongly under the Law of Sharia pleaded that under the absolute injunctions of Quran and Hadith Prophet Mohammad Sal’lallaho Alihi’ Wasallam is the Seal of Prophets. There can be no other Prophet after him. Now his precedent is not only impossible but is absurd according to Islamic Divine law. The belief of creating some another Mohammad similar to Holy Prophet Mohammad, shall necessitate Allah telling untrue of what He himself has described in Quran (about the Seal of Prophet) and lying is an imperfection (belief of) which is inappropriate for Allah. For further details please refer to (Tah’qeeq-ul-Fatwah Fi Ibta’lit’taghwa compiled by the learned Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi First Edition with Persian, Maktaba Qadria Lahore 1979/1399 AH, Translated in Urdu by Maulana Abdl Hakeem Sharaf Qadri) in which ample and strong evidences for ‘Imtina-e-Nazeer-e-Mohammadi’ and ‘Imtina-e-Kizb-e-Bari Taala’ have been presented. Shah Ismail Dehalvi penned down a booklet ‘Yak Roza’ in the same context. And one of his pupils Maulana Hyder Ali Tonki also tended to defend his teacher, by some answers. The learned Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi authored a research and scholary book in Persian with the name of ‘Imtina-Un-Nazeer’ as an answer to answer, which was published by the learned Syed Sulaiman Ashraf, Head of Department of Theology, Muslim University Aligarh in 1908 from Jaunpur. Maulana Ahmad Husain Kanpuri, pupil of Mufti Lutfullah Aligarhi and successor of Haji Imdad Ullah Muhajir the Meccan in the context of ‘Imtina-e-Kizb Bari Taala’ had (authored) ‘Tan’zeeh-ur-Rahman An Shaiba’til Kizb Wa’nuq’san. Maulana Hakeem Syed Barkat Ahmad Tonki had ‘As’sam’sam-ul-Qa’dib Li’rasil Muf’tari Al’lala’hil Ka’zib’ and Mufti Mohammad Abdullah Tonki had ‘Uja’lat-ur-Rakib Fi Im’tina-e-Kizbil Wajib’ authored to reject eloquently against the faith of ‘Imkan-e-Kizb-e-Bari Ta’ala.’

Now we move forward leaving behind the differences and their consequences of this era. In order to understand the gist of the issue, the famous Naqshbandi Mujaddidi scholar Maulana Abul Hasan Zaid Farroqi Dehalvi’s (demise 1993 AD) following piece of writing adequately serves a warning:

“From the era of Hazrat Mujaddid (Alf Sani Shaikh Ahmad Farooqi Sarhindi) until 1240 AH/1825 AD the Muslims in India remained divided in two sects, one Ahle-Sunna sect and the second as Shia (sect).”

Then Maulana Ismail Dehalvi came to prominence. He was the grandson of Shah Waliullah and nephew of Shah Abdul Qadir. He became attracted to Mohammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi (Najd is the province of Saudi Arabia) and he came across Najdi’s booklet ‘Rad’dul Ish’rak’ which he studied and authored ‘Taq’viyat-ul-Iman’ in Urdu. This book started the era of religious freedom of thoughts. Some people became Non-conformist; whereas the others became Wahabis, another group called itself Ahle-Hadith; while some chose to be called Salfi.

The dignity and regard for leading Jurists that was in the hearts had vanished, the persons of ordinary knowledge and writing were started to be recognised as leaders and the most deplorable thing is that in the name of protection to oneness of Allah, there started the succession of insult and disrespectfulness in the respected and honoured Court of Holy Prophet. All these harmful affairs have started appearing after the month of Rabi-ul-Akhir 1240 AH/1825 AD. (Reference: ‘Maulana Ismail Dehalvi Aur Taqviyat-ul-Iman’ by Maulana Abul Hasan Farooqi Dehalvi; page 9, published Shah Abul Khair Academy, Chitli Qabar Delhi-6).

There occurred dialectic between Munhib’be-Rasool. Taj’ul Fa’hool Allama Abdul Qadir Barkati Badayuni (demise 1319 AH/1901 AD) and Maulana Ameer Ahmad Bin Maulvi Ameer Hasan Sehaswani (D 1306 AH/1889 AD) on the issues of Imkan-e-Kizb and Imkan-e-Nazeer in 1871, in Sheikhu Pur Badayun. Maulana Nazeer Ahmad sehaswani (D 1299 AH/1881 AD) has given a vivid description of debate and dialectic in ‘Manazirah-e-Ahmadia’ printed in Shola-e-Tur, Kanpur, in the year 1289 AH/1872 AD. Maulana Ameer Ahmad and Maulana Nazeer Ahmad had enjoyed the company of Maulana Mohammad Ahsan nanotvi. Basing their arguments on a Hadith from Ibn-e-Abbas, these persons believed that Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus Christ Alihimus-Salam being in different grades on Earth, share equal status with Holy Prophet Mohammad. And this was to show that the precedent of the Holy Prophet Mohammad was not only possible but could also be proved.

Professor Mohammad Ayyub Qadri (Karachi) endorses “Here it is necessary to indicate towards the affair that in the issue of Hadith Ibn-e-Abbas, the scholars of Bareilly and Badayun have intensely opposed Maulana Mohammad Ahsan. Maulana Naqi Ali Khan was leading this front at Bareilly and Maulana Abdul Qadir, the son of Maulana Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni was the Chief of the body in Badayun. (Reference: Maulana Mohammad Ahsan Nanotvi, compiler: Prof Mohammad Ayyub Qadri page 94, Maktaba Usmania Karachi, 1966).

Maulana Abdul Haque Khairabadi, Maulana Syed Husain Shah Muhaddis Rampuri, Maulana Abdul Ali Rampuri, Mufti Noor-un-Nabi Rampuri and other scholars of Ahle-Sunna held the above mentioned belief as false one contending with the Definite verses of Quran. Hazrat Mufti Irshad Husain Rampuri wrote that having belief on it was against the sect of Ahle-Sunna. Kha’tim-un-Nabi’yeen possesses the meaning of the Seal of the Prophets. (Reference: Tan’bihul-Juhal compiled by Mufti Hafiz Bukhsh Anolvi, page 26).

The debate of the precedent of Prophet Mohammad, the Seal of the Prophethood and the Hadith of Ibn-e-Abbas continued gaining momentum. In reply to a question relating to the same subject Maulana Qasim Nanotvi authored a book named as Tah’zeer-un-Nas, in which he wrote that: “Thus belief held by the commoners for Holy Prophet as being the Final Prophet means that his era is after the era of the Prophets of past and he is the last of all the Prophets. But intelligent persons know that being early or last is indeed not an excellence.” (Reference: Tah’zeer-un-Nas, page 3, Ku’tub Khana Imdadia Deoband).

“Suppose if after the period of Holy Prophet a Prophet is born, none the less the finality of Prophet Mohammad shall not be changed, although his ‘contemporary’ be there on another earth or suppose, considered on this very same earth.” (Reference: Tah’zeer-un-Nas page 24).

In one of his epistles to Maulana Mohammad Fazil, Maulana Mohammad Qasim Nanotvi writes:

“The meaning of Khatim-un-Nabi’yeen for the persons looking at superficial things is the same that the era of Prophet is after the eras of Prophets of past and no other messenger shall come now, but you know, that this is a belief showing no excellence (for Holy Prophet).” (Reference: Qasim-ul-Uloom, Maktoob-e-Awwal, Page 55).

Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi endorses:

“At the time Maulana Nanotvi wrote Tah’zeer-un-Naas nobody supported Maulana across India except Maulana Abdul Hai” (Ref: Al Ifazat-ul-Yaumia, Volume IV, Malfooz 927, page 870, printed at Deoband).

Maulana Mohammad Shah Punjabi, Maulana Fazal-e-Majeed Badayuni, Maulana Hidayat Ali Bareilvi, Maulana Fasibuddin Badayuni and Sheikh Mohammad Thanvi and other scholars severely condemned the contents of Tah’zeer-un-Naas by writing books.

In reply to the famous book Anwar-e-Satia written by Hazrat Maulana Abdus-Sami Bedil Rampuri, successor of Haji Imdad-Ullah Muhajir, the Meccan, Maulana Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi Saharanpuri authored a book titled Bara’heen’-e-Qatia which bears an acknowledgement f Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi. The following heart-rending style has been adopted in order to compare the ‘Blessed Knowledge’ of Honoured Holy Prophet Sal’lalaho Alihiwasallam and that of ‘condemned’ Satan:

“Thus it should be considered that the ‘faith’ of proving the knowledge of the whole of earth for Holy Prophet is a false assumption without a proof and this is against the Absolute Statements of Quran and Hadith and this belief is not a right one but a Shirk (Polytheism), because this (belief) is only true for Satan and Angel of Death as proved by Quran and Hadith. Which absolute statement is there in Quran and Hadith to prove the knowledge of the whole of earth for Holy Prophet? Rejecting them all is like committing Shirk (Polytheism).”

(Reference: Bara’heen-e-Qatia; compiled by Maulana Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi; page 55; Kutub Khana Imdadia Deoband).

Authored in 1303 AH, there occurred uproar against Bara’heen-e-Qatia also. Scholars of Ahle-Sunna opposed this. Dialectic was organized in Bhavalpur (Punjab) in 1306 AH, under the supervision and control of Nawab Mohammad Sadiq Abbasi, the Nawab of Bhavalpur, where Maulana Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi was in service. Maulana Mahmood Hasan Deobandi and Maulana Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi defended the Bara’heen-e-Qatia in this dialectic (Manazirah). Honourable Maulana Ghulam Dastgir Qusoori was the dialectician (Manazir) on behalf of Ahle-Sunna. The illustrious Shah Ghulam Fareed was the Judge of this dialectic. The complete proceeding has been compiled and printed with the name of ‘Taqdees-ul-Vakil An Tauheen-ir-Rasheed-val-Khalil’. The dialectic (Manazirah) between Maulana Ghulam Dastgir Qusoori and Maulana Khalil Ahmad Ambethvi was documentary writing.

Maulana Dastgir has objected like this:

“The objection of Faqir (me) is that the broadness of knowledge of Sar’ver-e-Ka’enat (the Chief amongst Allah’s Creation) Aa’lam-e-Makh’looq’at (the most knowledgeable amongst the creatures) Sal’lalaho Ali’hiwasallam has been contradicted and his knowledge has been recorded as to be lower than that of Satan. This is an extreme insult.” (Taqdees-ul-Vakil;Page 93).

Haji Imdadullah Muhajir Mecci and the pillar of Hara’mein (Mecca and Medinah) Maulana Rahmat Ullah Keranvi have supported the stand of Scholars of Ahle-Sunna and while supporting Maulana Ghulam Dastgir Qusoori have certified Taqdees-ul-Vakil in writing. Maulana Khalil Ahmad Keranvi, while rejecting the recorded verification of Maula Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi’s stand endorsed on behalf of Maulana Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi, writes: “I considered Maulvi Rasheed Ahmad as truthful but he came out to be something else contrary to my understanding. (He) took great pain to prove that the knowledge of Holy Prophet is lesser than that of condemned Satan and held the opposite belief as Shirk (Polytheism)”. (Taqdees-ul-Vakil; Page 419).

Answering a question regarding Ilm-e-Ghaib (Fore Knowledge) Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi penned a booklet titled Hifzul-Iman in 1319 AH, in which defining the similarity or the measure and the quantity of the knowledge of Prophet Mohammad and has also further added that ‘such’ or ‘this much’ knowledge is also available with mad and infant, beast and cattles than what is the singularity of Holy Prophet. The real text is as follows: “If the decreeing of Fore-Knowledge on the Holy Prophet is correct according to Scholars, then point to be determined is that what does this Fore-Knowledge mean a part of the Fore-Knowledge or the whole of it? If this means the part of the Fore-Knowledge then what is the singularity for Holy Prophet? Such Fore-Knowledge is also available to every other man, infants or mad or even beasts and cattles.” (Hifz-ul-Iman by Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi; page 8; Kutubkhana Ejazia, Deoband).

Syed Nazeeruddin son of Syed Moinuddin and the grandson of Hazrat Syed Jeelani Qadri Hyderabadi, referring the harm and malice of the passage describes: “Some persons from Hyderabad brought the booklet ‘Hifz-ul-Iman’ of Maulvi Ashraf Ali to my Grandfather (Syed Mohammad Jeelani Qadri) and asked him about it. Having read the booklet, he said: “Maulvi Ashraf Ali has written very evil text about Ilm-e-Ghaib (Fore Knowledge)”.

A few days after it, Maulvi Ashraf Ali was sitting in Mecca Masjid (Hyderabad). My grandfather stood up and pointed out the evil of the text of Maulvi Ashraf Ali and said that the text smells Kufr.

Then after a few days a congregation of Scholars was convened at the residence of Maulana Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad (Son of Maulana Mohammad Qasim Nanotvi). Since Hafiz Sahib (Mohammad Ahmad) loved my grandfather, he invited him he visited him. There, the scholars exchanged opinions on the text of Hifz-ul-Iman. He described the objectionable text of this booklet and issued a judicial verdict (Fatwa) against it.

After a few days he saw Holy Prophet in dream expressing pleasure on rejecting the text of Hifz-ul-Iman proclaiming it as evil. The Holy Prophet told him that he was pleased with him andasked him if he wanted something. He (my grandfather) submitted: I have an earnest desire to pass on rest of my life in Medinah Munawwarah and be buried under the Holy soil of Medinah. His request was granted and thereafter he migrated to Medinah Munawwarah. He stayed there for ten years and passed away in 1364 AH. (Ref: Maqamat-e-Khair; page 616; Shah Abul Khair Academy Chitli Qabar; Delhi-6).

Once Hazrat Abul Khair Naqshbandi Mujaddidi Dehalvi was staying at Kothi Elahi Baksh in Meerut. On one occasion Hafiz Mohammad Ahmad, the son of Maulana Qasim Nanotvi and Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi were also present in his company. One elderly supporter of Hazrat Maulana Ghulam Dastgir Qusoori read the text of Hifzul-Iman there Hazrat Shah Abdul Khair Dehalvi strongly disapproved it and said to Maulvi Ashraf Ali: Is it the service to religion? Your ancestors were on our path, why did you do against this?

Maulvi (Ashraf Ali) Sahib answered: “I have clarified this text in my other booklet. He replied ‘After reading your booklet several people have gone astrayed. The clarification will not serve the purpose now.” (Bazm-e-Khair; By Zaid; Page 11; Shah Abul Khair Academy; Chitli Qabar, Delhi).

Both beginning and the end are before you. Mohammad Husain, the landlord of Nehtor, Distt. Bijnor writes that when Shah Ismail Dehalvi left Delhi for Lucknow alongwith his dependents and assistants and reached Lucknow and when he started preaching his beliefs “Maulana Abdur Rahman Vilayati alias Sufi was also present in Lucknow proper. His miracles (Kashf-o-Karamat) had gained extreme popularity. Maulvi Ismail visited him with the intention to debate. But it is said that Sufi Sahib’s mysticism remained dominating and abstained from participating in debate. At the time of departure, Maulvi Ismail said that the Scholars of Firangi Mahal (Lucknow) are badly misled. I have an intention to start Jehad against those misled Scholars after my return from Calcutta. Maulvi Abdur Rahman warned him: ‘Oh my son! Those who have such plans do never return.’ (Far’yad-ul-Muslimeen; Compiler Mohammad Husain; Printed Matbaa Riaz-e-Hind Amritsar; 1308 AH).

Pointing towards the consequences of deviation from ancestral School-of-thought and Waliullahi-beliefs in movement of Syed Ahmad Rae Bareilvi Sahib and in the writings of Shah Ismail Dehalvi Sahib, Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi expresses:

As the swerve which came its way after the historical deviation in Waliullahi Movement, it instead of taking shape of a national movement of Muslim masses changed into a separatist and sectarian movement. Although this movement attributed to Syed Ahmad Shaheed met its disastrous end but it had its impact on the other group belonging to the movement of Deoband. As a consequence even today the dominant majority in this sub-continent is that of Bareilvi Muslims who do not consider the two movements mentioned above, anything less than Infidelity (Kufr). (Ifadat-o-Malfuzat-e-Maulana Obaidullah Sindhi; Page 349; Compiler Professor Mohammad Suroor; Printed: Sindh Sagar Academy).

Our readers must have been acquainted with the knowledge of the brief history of the differences that have erupted within various Schools-of-thought and the causes of differences and the personalities and preceptors of differences after the year 1240 AH/1825 AD. Now a brief list of the leading personalities of Ahle Sunna School-of-thought is being presented before the readers: The thirteenth century after Hijrat:

Hazrat Allama Abdul Ali Firangi Mahli Lucknowi (Birth 1144 AH, demise 1235 AH). Hazrat Shah Mohammad Ajmal Allahabadi (Birth 1160 AH, demise 1236 AH); Hazrat Shah Anwar-ul-Haq Firangi Mahli (Birth 1167 AH, death 1236 AH); Hazrat Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi (1159 AH-1239 AH); Hazrat Shah Ghulam Ali Naqshbandi Dehalvi (1158 AH-1240 AH); Hazrat Shah Abu Saeed Mujaddidi Rampuri (1196 AH-1236 AH);Hazrat Shah Aale Ahmad Ach-che Mian Barkati Mareharvi (1160 AH-1262 AH); Hazrat Shah Abul Hasan Fard Phulvarvi (1191 AH-1265 AH); Hazrat Shah Ahmad Saeed Mujaddidi Rampuri (1217 AH-1277 AH); Hazrat Allama Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi (1212 AH-1278 AH); Hazrat Allama Abdul Haleem Firangi Mahali Lucknowi(1209 AH-1285 AH); Hazrat Allama Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni (1213 AH-1289 AH); Hazrat Syed Shah Aale Rasool Ahmadi Barkati Mareharvi (1209 AH-1296 AH); Hazrat Maulana Naqi Ali Bareilvi (1246 Ah-1297 AH) etc.

The Fourteenth Century after Hijrat:

Hazrat Abdul Hai Firangi Mahli Lucknowi (1264 AH-1304 AH); Hazrat Mufti Irshad Husain Rampuri (1248 AH-1311 AH); Hazrat Maulana Fazal-e-Rahman Ganj Moradabadi (1208 AH-1313 AH); Hazrat Maulana Ghulam Dastgir Qusoori Lahori (demise 1315 AH); Hazrat Maulana Abdul Qadir Badayuni (1253 AH-1319 AH); Hazrat Maulana Hidayat Ullah Rampuri (Jaunpuri) (Demise 1326 AH); Hazrat Maulana Khairuddin Dehalvi (demise 1326 AH); Hazrat Maulana Ahmad Raza Bareilvi (1272 AH-1340 AH); Hazrat Shah Abul Khair Naqshbandi Dehalvi (1272 AH-1341 AH); Hazrat Shah Ali Husain Ashrafi Kichochvi (1266 AH-1355 AH); Hazrat Shah Mehar Ali Gularvi Punjabi (1274 AH- 1356 AH) etc.

The preceding references on the earlier pages and some other texts which include misguidances and Blasphemies (In ‘Daawat-e-Fikr’ compiled by Maulana Mohammad Mansha Tabish Qusoori, printed in Pak and India, photos of nearly all the text like this could be seen) which directly strike at the Dignity of Allah and the honour of Prophet. In fact only these caused differences, divisions and confusions amongst the Indian Islamic community. And thus the Indian soil was changed into the battle field of different sects and School-of-thoughts whose sparks are flying even today from city to city and village to village and scorching the bodies and souls of Indian Islamic community.

In the chapter of the Movement of sanctity of the Prophethood (Tah’reek-e-Taq’dees-e-Risalat) and the defense of Ahle Sunna School-of-thought, Muhibb-e-Rasool Taj-ul-Fahool Maulana Abdul Qadir Barkati Badayuni (son of Allama Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni) disciple of Allama Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi, pupil of Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis Dehalvi and Imam-e-Ahle Sunna Maulana Ahmad Raza Fazil-e-Bareilvi (son of Allama Naqi Ali Bareilvi), the successor of Maulana Syed Shah Aale Rasool Mareharvi, the disciple of Shah Abdul Azeez Muhaddis Dehalvi played prominent roles during respective period. Both of these gentlemen had the permission and succession (Ijazat-o-Khilafat) after taking the oath of allegiance and devotion (Bait-o-Iradat) connected with the Historical chain of Lumanaries of ‘Qadri-Barkati Sufi Order’ from Marehrah district Etah (UP) and the centre of devotion for both of them was the same, Marehrah, the purifier.

For the distinctive quality of passion and love of Imam Ahmad Raza Fazil-e-Bareilvi with Holy Prophet, his real grandson Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Akhtar Raza Qadri Azhari Bareilvi, writes about the distinctive quality of his grandfather regarding his passion and love for the Holy Prophet: ‘ He (Honourable Fazil-e-Bareilvi) made the passion and love of the Holy Prophet as the axis of his life and these sentiments of love and passion has enveloped in such a way that if it is said that he was completely submerged in the love of Holy Prophet, it will reflect the true and vivid picture of his life. The love of the Holy Prophet was his life and was also his message.

It is worth considering here that his love was not insanity where there is a freedom from the fold of consciousness and wisdom but his love meant to perish in the pleasure of the beloved and it is that pinnacle of love where man’s own will does not exist and intentions disappear. Even like his movements come under the obedience of the wills of the beloved. And this is the position according to a Hadith when man’s will comes under the obedience of religion which was expressed by Holy Prophet Sal’alaho’ Alihi’Vasallam.

This was the essence of his entire religious and academic efforts and in order to learn this, it is advisable to study his book ‘Maqale Urafa Ba’Ezaze Sharaa-o-Ulema’ in which he has revealed the place and the honour of the Islamic Devine Path (Sharia) and has eloquently rejected the Sufis who have made themselves free from this Islamic Devine Path. And in many of his other books has strictly nabbed and criticized the customs against the Islamic Jurisprudence and has educated the Muslims to shun from them. For example to visit unreal graves and visit of tombs by women, the fair and shows at the occasion of ‘Urs’, respectful prostration, Muharram mourning etc. He has severely admonished to keep away and abstain from them (Reference: ‘Weekly Hujoom’ New Delhi, December 1988).

Professor Mohammad Masud Ahmad (Karachi) the worthy son of Jurist Hazrat Mohammad Mazharullah Naqshbandi Mujaddidi, the Orator and Imam of Masjid Fatehpuri writes:

(Imam Ahmad Raza) Muhaddis Bareilvi considered the use of such words disrespectful for the dignity of Almighty Allah and that Holy Prophet insolent, which apparently are seemly but are also insolent. Such words are present in ‘Tahzeer-un-Naas’ of Maulvi Mohammad Qasim Nanotvi, in ‘Hifz-ul-Iman’ of Ashraf Ali Thanvi, in ‘Bara’heen-e-Qatia’ of Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi, in ‘Sirat-e-Mustaqeem’ and ‘Taq’viyat-ul-Iman’ of Maulvi Ismail and in ‘Al-Jihdul Muqil’ of Mahmudul-Hasan are found to be present according to Muhaddis Bareilvi. On the other hand these respected persons plead that their words do not mean that, which shows misbelieve because disrespect is also prohibited (Haraam) to them as well. But Muhaddis Bareilvi has the stand that since these texts are commonly understandable in Urdu, so whatever meaning the Urdu knowing persons take of this, shall be maintained as the ‘real meaning’ and therefore shall be subjected to judicial decree.
The second issue was that Muhaddis Bareilvi was convinced that all those especialities and distinctions of Holy Prophet which have been described in Quran and Hadith, should be exactly expressed so that his personality may emerged to the fore in full and his dignity and magnificence could establish in the hearts of Muslims. On the other hand, scholars of Deoband were convinced of restraint. They thought that this way Muslims could go out of hands.
Muhaddis Bareilvi believed the holding of Eid Meelad-un-Nabi as permitted and commendable; on the other hand scholars of Deoband opposed this and considered it as innovation in Islam.
Muhaddis Bareilvi believed ‘standing-erect’ during Meelad celebration as desirable; on the other hand scholars of Deoband thought it to be innovation in Islam.
Muhaddis Bareilvi believed ‘Urs’ (death anniversary of Saint) (provided it does not include acts against Islamic Jurisprudence) as lawful; whereas scholars of Deoband considered them to be unlawful.
Fatiha-Khu’ani (provided it does not have unlawful acts) was lawful to Muhaddis whereas it was held innovation in Islam by Deoband scholars.

Professor Mohammad Masud Ahmad writes after a few lines: Haji Imdad-Ullah Muhajir Mecci, the guide in mystics to the scholars of Deoband, almost agreed to all the concepts of Muhaddis Bareilvi and in order to bring unity between both the Schools-of-thoughts, he had compiled a booklet titled ‘Faisla Haft Mas’ala’. But the scholars of Deoband did not give consent to his views (Reference: Imam Ahmad Raza Muhaddis Bareilvi; compiler: Professor Mohammad Masud Ahmad; page 37, 38; printed at Qadri Kitab Ghar, Bareilly).

The belief of ancestors to successors based on consensus is that disrespect and insolence to the dignity of Holy Prophet is a heinous crime and open Blasphemy. The absolute orders regarding this (belief) are present in Quran and Hadith and in the percepts of the Companious and their Successors. The Sheikh-ul-Hadith of Darul Uloom Deoband Maulana Husain Ahmad Madni writes in this regard: “Defamation to Holy Prophet amounts to blasphemy. What to say of an insult if a person utters such words which are cause of disgrace, then they too will be the cause of blasphemy.”

(Reference: Maktubat-e-Sheikhul Islam, Volume 2, page 165).

Similarly disbelief and hypocrisy too are infidelity (Kufr) and after jurisprudential proof, it is obligatory to charge infidelity upon the person disapproving the necessities of religion.

Maulana Ameen Islahi, the Manager of Madarsa’tul-Islah, Sarae Meer, Distt Azamgarh (UP) writes in one of his epistles: “The Fatwa of Maulana Thanvi that Maulana shibli Nomani and Maulana Hameed-Ullah Farahi are infidels has been published. And since the Madarsa is a common Mission of both of these. The Madarsa’tul Islah is the Institution of blasphemy and hypocrisy. Even the Scholars who if participate in the (promotional) meetings of this Institution are also atheist and irreligious (Reference: ‘Hakeem-ul-Ummat’; Compiler: Abdul Majid Dariyabadi; page 475).

When Maulana Abdul Majid Dariyabadi the mystic disciple and spiritual successor of Maulana Ashraf Ali Thanvi, through a detailed epistle about the knowledge and excellence, devotion and obedience and their services to religion and learning of Maulana Shibli Nomani and Maulana Farahi, tried to present explanation to Maulana Thanvi. In response to it Maulana Thanvi wrote:

“All of these are practices and their reports, beliefs are something different. With the truthfulness of the beliefs, mischief of practices and conditions and with mischiefs of beliefs, truthfulness of practices and conditions can go collectively.” (Reference: Hakeem-ul-Ummat; page 476).

In order to get important information and further research on this subject apart from ‘Kitab-ush-Shifa’ written by Qazi Ayaz Maliki Undlasi (Born 476 AH-Demise 544 AH), please refer to the following other books ‘Ass’arim-ul-Mas’lool’ by Ibne Tae’mia; ‘Ifkar-ul-Mul’hideen’ by Anwer Shah Kashmiri Sheikhul Hadith Darul Uloom Deoband; ‘Ash’addul Azab’ by Murtiza Hasan of Dharbhanga, Administrator of Education Deoband.

The study of two recently published books ‘Na’mus-e-Rasool’ and ‘Qanoon-e-Risalat’ authored by Justice Mohammad Ismail Quraishi, printed at Al-Faseel Urdu Bazar Lahore, also ‘Gustakh-e-Rasool ki Shar’ai Haisiat’ compiled by Mufti Mohammad Gul-e-Rahman Qadri, printed at Razwi Kitab Ghar Delhi shall also prove to be useful.

The scholars of Ahle Sunna have on their own safeguarded and defended bravely against the attacks on the magnificence of Allah and the honour of Holy Prophet. Following their foot steps, Imam-e-Ahle Sunna Maulana Ahmad Raza Fazil-e-Bareilvi too has supported and defended the Ahle Sunna School-of-thought through his pen. Kan’zul Iman Fi Tarjamatil Quran; Al’atayan Nab’viyah Fil Fatawar Razwiya; Jid’dul Mum’tar Ala Rad’dil Muh’tar; Hada’iq-e-Baq’shish Al’dau’lat-ul-Meccia and other hundreds of books are true witness of justice on it. A strong addition to the same religious service is ‘Fatwa Har’mein Bar Jaf-e-Nad’vatul Mein’ (1317 AH) Al’mu’tamad-ul-Mus’tanad (1320 AH) and ‘Hu’sam-ul Har’mein’ (1324 AH) in which after delivering his own judicial verdict against the blasphemics already mentioned he has obtained confirmations from scholars of Mecca and Medinah. For details and research please refer to the book ‘Fazil-e-Bareilvi-Ulamae Hajaz ki Nazar Mein’ authored by Professor Mohammad Masud Ahmad printed in India and Pak.

He has given thousands of judicial verdicts as a jurist and Mufti and explained all sorts of intellectual and research concerned queries. Although such service has also been rendered by many of his contemporary scholars of Ahle Sunna, but he achieved a distinctive position as a representative and iterpretor of Scholars of Ahle Sunna. As in the field of repudiation of sinful thoughts and false beliefs, he was a severe fighter against enemy force in the rank and file. He participated actively in extirpation of Wahabism and its different branches. For this reason he also came under the attacks for various allegations and charges. He himself writes that:

“In order to misguide and instigate the helpless Muslim masses they play a ruse in broad day light how could the Fatwa of infidelity from Sunni scholars be trusted. They blurt out others as blasphemous even on negligible issues. The judicial verdicts of Kufr are always being printed in their machines.”

They called Ismail dehalvi an infidel and also to Maulvi Is-haq and Maulvi Abdul Hai. Then those who had little more immodesty added that they called Shah Abdul Azeez Sahib as Kafir, Allah forbid and call, and Hazrat Shah Waliullah and Haji Imdadullah were also called so, and Shah Fazle Rahman too was called so. Then those who have gone above the immodesty went ahead to call Hazrat Sheikh Mujaddid Alf Sani as Kafir.

In short, some one was called infidel in presence of his select devotee. It went to the extent that some of their elders tried to poison the ears of late Maulana Maulvi Shah Husain Sahib of Allahabad that Hazrat Saiyadna Sheikh Akbar Muhiuddin Bin Arabi has been called infidel, May Allah bestow heaven to Maulana. He practiced this verse of Holy Quran:

“If a sinner comes to you with any news, ascertain the truth, lest ye harm people unwittingly and afterwards become full of repentance for what ye have done” (Sura Al-Hujurat, Ayat VI).

He asked for the facts through a letter. Following which a booklet ‘An’ja’al Bari An Vis’vasal-Muftari’ was written and dispatched. And Maulana sent a gift of ‘Lahol Sharief’ upon the liar. (Reference: ‘Tam’heed-e-Iman’ by Imam Ahmad Raza Bareilvi; Page 45, 46; printed at Idarah Muarif Nomaniah Lahore).

A reliable and great scholar of Ahle-Sunna Maulana Syed Ahmad Saeed Kazmi Amrohi (Anwar-ul-Uloom Multan) writes:

“In a judicial matter of charging with ‘Kufr’, the stand of our School has remained unchanged that the person having uttered the blasphemous words or having practiced an act of infidelity, shall necessitate the act of Kufr upon himself, we will not hesitate to charge him with Kufr. May such person belong to Deoband or Bareilly, may he belong to League or to Congress be a Natury or Nadvi. It is not a manner of justice to differentiate between all and sundry in this context.

This does not ever mean that if an individual belonging to league utters profane words (of blasphemy) entire league has become infidel. If a Nadvi has committed blasphemy, May Allah forbid, does it mean that the entire Nadva has become infidel. We do not pronounce every native of Deoband as infidel due to infidel texts of a few scholars of Deoband.

We as well as our ancestors time and again have declared that we do not call any native of Deoband, or Lucknow as infidel. To us only those who have committed insults in the Court of The Most Dignified Allah and His Prophet and His Beloved persons and despite severe admonitions they did not renounce of their insolence who inspite of being aware of insolence and even after knowing the meaning of insolence accept insolents as true believers, righteous, their leader and their guide.

That is all! Apart from them, we have never charged with infidelity to a person claiming himself to be a Muslim. Such persons whom we have charged infidelity if are being investigated, they are very small in number. Besides them neither a resident of Deoband is infidel nor that of Bareilly, neither a man of League nor one from Nadva, we believe that all of them are Muslims. (Reference: Al-Haq’qul Mubeen; Allama Ahmad Saeed Kazmi; page 24, 25; printed at Multan).

The annotator of Bukhari Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Sharief-ul-Haq Amjadi, Head of the Department of Jurisprudence Jamia Ashrafia Mubarakpur Azamgarh writes:

“The meanings which are famous and familiar with the masses do not form a subject for a judicial decree, which is based on real meaning. Therefore such person who calls himself a Deobandi and is also called so by public. He recognizes these four scholars of Deoband as his guide and leader, he goes to the extent of calling Ahle Sunna as innovator, but he is not aware of the texts of infidelity of these four, already mentioned; then he is not of Deoband (School) indeed. The order shall not stand valid to call this person as infidelor performing funeral prayer is infidelity. (Reference: Muarif-e-Shariha; page 914, Raza Academy, Bombay).

According to the line of inheritance, those faiths and practices of the era of Holy Prophet, the era of Companions and their Subordinates as reported in ancient books of the commentaries of Quran and Hadith, Jurisprudence and mysticism biographies and history; the same faiths and practices are being followed by Ahle Sunna Sect. The Scholars of Firangi Mahal of Lucknow and Khairabad, Badayun and Bareilly have always invited for the same through their writings and speeches. They really are the caller and representative of Honourable Sheikh Abdul Haq Muhaddis of Delhi (demise 1052 AH). Honourable Shah Abdul Aziz Muhaddis of Delhi’s (demise 1239 AH) education and views, who are the heir and custodians of Islam, who are not prepared to accept or rather tolerate an influence of any ideology, modern view and un-Islamic thought hardly for a moment they continue to embrace their ancient heritage and believe the same to form the assets of intense happiness and the source of Salvation for themselves and for other Muslims on the globe as well.

Honourable Maulana Naeemuddin of Moradabad, the heir descendent of Imam Ahmad Raza Fazil-e-Bareilvi pens:

“Sunni is one who follows the footprints of Holy Prophet and his Companions. This shall form the persons who follow the School of four Chief Caliphs, the Imams, mystic saints and modern religious scholars such as Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Haq Muhaddis Dehalvi, Hazrat Maulana Abdul Ali Firangi Mahali, Hazrat Maulana Fazal-e-Haq Khairabadi, Hazrat Maulana Shah Fazal-e-Rasool Badayuni, Hazrat Mufti Irshad Husain Rampuri and Hazrat Maulana Mufti Shah Ahmad Raza Bareilvi. (Reference: Al-fiqih; Amritsar; page 9).

Imam Ahmad Raza Bareilvi like other scholars belonging to Sunni sect has emphasized everywhere for the reforms in beliefs and mode of life of Muslims, in his verdicts (Fatwa) which were printed in the form of small journals. If you go through them, you will come to know that the knowledge of real Islamic Jurisprudence and the Obedience to Islamic Jurisprudence is obligatory on Muslims. Shunning from innovations and disapprovals are necessary for Muslims. A mystic without knowledge and a spiritual guide not acting according to Islamic Jurisprudence are buffoons of devil, Resemblance to infidels, association with irreligios persons and participation in the fairs of Hindus is unlawful, prostration for someone except Allah is Shirk (Idolatry) and prostration of respect is forbidden (Haraam). The disdain of a Muslim while boasting one’s caste is unlawful. Muharram mourning (Tazia-Dari) is innovation and unlawful, Qawwali with music and musical instruments is unlawful. The journey of women to the pilgrimage of graves is unlawful. Writing ‘Sal’am etc. (An abbreviation for Sal’al’ahu Alihi’ Vasallam) is unlawful. Visiting false-graves is unlawful. Conveying rewards of virtuous deeds to a dead (Isale-Savab) and serving special meals to poor and meek’s for this purpose is lawful but to include everyone in the meals as feast is unlawful etc. etc. For further details please refer to the book written by me ‘Imam Ahmad Raza and Rejections of Innovations and Disapprovals’ printed in India and Pak as well.

Similar to the majority of Ahle Sunna the scholars of Badayun, Khairabad and Bareilly and Sufis of Marehrah and Kachocha etc. have faiths in the legality and interpretation of: The mediation of Prophets and pious personalities, devotional viewing of relics and remains, pilgrimage of holy tombs, prohibition-free Urs, Meelad, Qiyam, Fatiha and Isal-e-Savab etc. are convinced and practicing themselves which has always been customary with great ancestors and even today it is customary with the ninety percent population of the Islamic World. The details and verifications of these practices and customs of Ahle Sunna has been recorded in the latest Arabic book titled ‘Mafa’heem-e-Yajib An Tas’ahah’ compiled by Syed Mohammad Bin Alvi Maliki Mecci (First edition printed in 1985 AD), with the documented verifications of the scores of the contemporary Arab and African scholars which include a few special members of scholars of ‘Rabta-e-Alam-e-Islami’ Mecca Mukarrama. I have translated it with the title ‘Islah-e-Fikr-o-Aitiqad’ which has been published from both India and Pakistan and is readily available. Syed Mohammad Farooq-ul-Qadri, the Urdu translator of the marvelous book of Waliullahi order of mysticism ‘An’fas-ul-Arifeen’ while describing few aforesaid practices of Ahle Sunna writes in his preface: “Please think for a while! That Shah Waliullah Muhaddis Dehalvi, Shah Abdur Raheem, Sheikh Abur Raza, Sirajul Hind Maulana Shah Abdul Azeez, did all of them belonged to Bareilvi School-of-thought? There was no existence of Maulana Shah Ahmad Raza of Bareilly on the Indian soil when all such disputes got slanted.

The first thing which stirred the calm and peaceful atmosphere of the sub-continent was ‘Taq’vi-yatul Iman’ of Shah Mohammad Ismail who incidentally belonged to the same family. Whose ideas were unfamiliar, the calls were strange and the style of expression was aggressive. I have gone through a list of two hundred and fifty books came out in various languages from various regions to contradict ‘Taq’vi-yatul Iman’, one could very well gather from it, about spirit in which general Muslims, scholars and those belonging to Khanqah, look these books at that time.

We do not have any proof and propriety in order to say with one stroke of pen that all the scholars, mystics saints and masses of the sub-continent May Allah forbid, all are involved in Polytheism and innovations (Shirk and Bidat) and for the first time Shah Mohammad Ismail was acquainting them to the real Monotheism (oneness of Allah). What the time gap is between Shah Waliullah, Shah Abdul Azeez and Shah Mohammad Ismail? Did the entire sub-continent get involved in infidelity and idolatry during this period? And if it was already so, then why Hakeem-ul-Ummat Shah Waliullah and Shah Abdul Azeez themselves did not use such a severity and such a tone? The truth is that it was the first voice with deviation from the School-of-thought of the majority sect which resounded in the sub-continent which can indeed be termed as the echo of the movement of Sheikh Mohammad Bin Abdul Wahab Najdi but it can never be termed as an interpretation of the thoughts and practices of Waliullah.” ( Reference: An’fasul-Arifeen; page 18, 19; Mak’taba’tul Fa’lah; Deoband).

The movement of the Sunni scholars of Khairabad, Badayun and Bareilly the preservation of the honour of Holy Prophet came into existence as a reaction to the wahabism. The leader of the Sunni sect at that time, Maulana Ahmad Raza Fazil-e-Bareilvi (D 1340 AH/1921 AD) while enthusiastically leading (this movement) supported and defended the (Sunni) School-of-thought, of ancestors and masses and the following great scholars, in particular co-operated with him: Hazrat Maulana Wasi Ahmad Muhaddis Surti, Hazrat Maulana Mohammad Amjad Ali Azmi, Hazrat Maulana Naeemuddin Moradabadi, Hazrat Syed Jamaat Ali Shah Muhaddis Alipuri, Hazrat Shah Deedar Ali Alwari, Hazrat Maulana Hamid Raza Qadri, Hazrat Maulana Mustafa Raza Noori, Hazrat Maulana Abdul Muqtadir Badayuni, Hazrat Maulana Abdul Qadeer Badayuni, Hazrat Maulana Abdul Aleem Siddiqui Meeriti, Hazrat Syed Mohammad Ashrafi Kachochvi, Hazrat Zafaruddin Qadri Bihari, Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Abdul Baqi, Burhan-ul-Haq Jabalpuri, Hazrat Maulana Hashmat Ali Lucknowi, Hazrat Maulana Karamat Ullah Dehalvi, Hazrat Hasnain Raza Bareilvi etc.

A few present outstanding names of this class are the following:

Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Akhtar Raza Qadri Azhari, Hazrat Shah Ahmad Noorani, Maulana Tehseen Raza Bareilvi, Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Sharief-ul-Haq Amjadi, Hazrat Arshad-ul-Qadri, Hazrat Mufti Abdul Mannan Mubarakpuri, Hazrat Mufti Ghulam Mohammad Razvi, Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Abdul Qayyum Hazarvi, Hazrat Professor Mohammad Masud Ahmad Mazhari, Hazrat Mufti Zafar Ali Nomani, Hazrat Mufti Jalaluddin Ahmad Amjadi, V Syed Mohammad Madani Ashrafi Kachochvi, Hazrat Mufti Mohammad Ashfaq Husain Naeemi, Hazrat Ziaul Mustafa Qadri, Hazrat Khuwaja Muzaffar Husain Razvi, Hazrat Maulana Mujeeb Ashraf Razvi, Hazrat Maulana Abdul Hakeem Sharf Qadri, Hazrat Shah Turabul Haq Qadri, Hazrat Syed Hamid Ashraf Kachochvi, Hazrat Maulana Qamar-uz-Zaman Azamgarhi etc.

These are the names of some of the distinguished Institutions (Madarsas) of Ahle Sunna:

Manzar-e-Islam Bareilly, Mazhar-e-Islam Bareilly, Jamia Ashrafia Mubarakpur, Jamia Naeemia Moradabad, Darul Uloom Amjadia Karachi, Jamia Nizamia Rizviyya Lahore, Darul Uloom Is-haqia Jodhpur, Markaz-us-Saqafat-issunnia Calicut Kerala, Jamia Sadia KasarKode kerala, Jamia Hazrat Nizamuddin Aulia New Delhi, Darul-Uloom Amjadia Nagpur, Darul-Uloom Faizur Rasool Baraun Sharief, Jamia Hameedia Rizviyya Benaras, Jamia Naeemia Lahore, Jamia Naeemia Karachi, Jamia Islamia Runahi Faizabad, Darul-Uloom Aleemia Jamda Shahi Basti, Darul-Uloom Mohammadia Bombay, Faiz-ul-Uloom Jamshedpur, Zia-ul-Islam Howrah Bengal, Anwar-ul-Quran Balrampur, Darul-Uloom Ghareeb Nawaz Allahabad, Ehsan-ul-Madaris Kanpur, Daul-Uloom Warsiyya Lucknow etc. A few Organisations working for broadcasting and publication are as follows:

Sunni Dar-ul-Ishaat Mubarakpur, Al Majma-ul-Islami Mubarakpur, Markazi Majlis-e-Raza Lahore, Raza Academy Lahore, Raza Academy Bombay, Idarah-e-Tehqeeqat-e-Imam Ahmad Raza Karachi, Idarah Muarif-e-Nomania Lahore, Darul-Qalam Delhi, Idarah-e-Afkar-e-Haq Baisy Purnia, Maktaba-jam-e-Noor Delhi, Farooqia Book Depot Delhi, Rizvi Kitab Ghar Delhi and Bhevandi, Maktaba Naeemia Delhi, Qadri Kitab Ghar Bareilly, Qadri Book Depot Bareilly, Maktaba Rahmania Rizviyya Bareilly etc.

Monthly ‘Kanzul Iman’ Delhi, Monthly Ashrafia Mubarakpur, Monthly ‘Jehane-Raza’ Lahore, Monthly Sunni Duniya Bareilly, Monthly ‘Aala-Hazrat’ Bareilly, Monthly ‘Taeba’ Ahmadabad, Monthly ‘Yaseen’ Kota Rajasthan, Monthly ‘Sirat-e-Mustaqeem’ Udaipur Rajasthan, Monthly ‘Mehe Taeba’ Jodhpur Rajasthan, Trimonthly ‘Al-Kausar’ Sehsram, Yearly ‘Muarif-e-Raza’ Karachi, Monthly ‘Zia-e-Haram’ Lahore etc. are also links of the same chain.

The Centre and axis of propagation of faith and call of all of them is:

“Show us the straight path:

The path of those whom thou hast favoured:

Not the path of those who earn thine anger:

Not of those who go astray.”

(Surat: Al-Fatiha)

Blessed and reverend personalities and noble ancestors of the sub-continent mentioned below are those following whose footprints may win rewards from Allah for the present day Muslims:

Hazrat Daata Ganj Bukhsh Hijveri of Lahore, Hazrat Khwaja Moeenuddin Chishti Ajmeri, Hazrat Sheikh Bahauddin Zakaria of Multan, Hazrat Khwaja Fareed Uddin Ganj Shakar, Hazrat Khwaja Qutubuddin Bakhtiyar Kahki, Hazrat Makhdoom Alauddin Sabir Kalyari, Hazrat Mehboob-e-Ilahi Nizamuddin Aulia, Hazrat Sharfuddin Yahya Muneeri, Hazrat Makhdoom Jahanian Jehan Gasht, Ameer Kabir Syed Ali Hamdani, Hazrat Makhdoom Ashraf Jehangir Simnani, Hazrat Sheikh Abdul Haq Muhaddis Dehalvi, Hazrat Mujaddis Alf Sani Sarhindi etc.

These holy persons are those who after enriching the sub-continent with the wealth of Islam and Iman, have turned the sky into brilliance.

Verse:

Their shadow was refulgence and footprints were lamps.

The brilliance spread from where they passed.

(Hindustani Mussalman Part II; Biweekly Dawat, New Delhi; October 1999 Edition and the Monthly ‘Kanzul Iman’ Delhi December 1999 Edition).

********************************

Peace And The Last Prophet

2011-03-12T08:51:00.000-08:00

When Prophet Muhammad started propagating Islam, staying at Mecca for Muslims was difficult. He suggested them to migrate to Ethopia then later to Medina to avert fellow Arab’s cruelties and to save their lives and religion. He also joined them later. Prophet made an accord with Medina Jews, fought defensive wars with Meccans and Jews, made a historical Hudaibiya compromise deed with his Meccan enemies and gained exemplary bloodless entry into Mecca in 8^th Hegira year.

Addressing the largest public gathering in his last historic Haj pilgrimage, Prophet Muhammad said: ‘I can imagine that I shall see you all gathered here, never again.’ He gave many important orders and told them to quit evils and bad customs of past illiteracy era. He said: ‘Oh my people! I trample every bad thing of past illiteracy era under my foot. Likewise he ordered to abandon self-made bad practices, family pride, economic and racial discriminations. He spoke: ‘Oh listeners! Undoubtedly your creator is one and your father is one, of course, listen to me! No Arabic upon any non-Arabic, no red on any black and no black upon any red bears any supremacy but for restraint and good deeds.

In Islamic history books, one is unable to find a single piece of evidence, Prophet permitting anybody to kill a Muslim in war or in piece.

Abusing Muslim is a sin and killing him is infidelity Kufr for someone who believes it is permitted in Islam.

Inviting Bani Jazima tribe for Islam during war, what Khalid bin Walid, a companion of Prophet spoke or did with them, is enough to take a lesion: When Khalid got close with the tribe he asked them: Who are you, a Muslim or disbeliever? They answered: we are Muslims, perform prayers, testify Prophet Mohammad, have Mosques, where we give a call for prayer.

But they failed to project what they really meant, they failed to explain that they had accepted Islam instead they said that they had changes their religion. Khalid asked back: Why are you taking arms with you? They replied that they had enmity with some Arab tribals. They sensed a danger assuming them to belong to the same, that is why they were armed. Khalid ordered them to disarm, they obeyed him. He ordered his men to take them into custody and to kill them the next morning. This was a decision taken in hurry. When this news broke to Prophet, he prayed twice addressing Allah: Oh Allah! I express my acquittal in Thy court for what Khalid had done.

An other companion of The Prophet, Osama bin Zaid has been reported to describe in famous Hadis book Bukhari: ‘Prophet of Allah ordered us to march for Harqa, we reached there in morning and defeated them all. I and another companion followed an enemy, when we overpowered him he uttered: ‘There is no God but Allah’. The companion stopped but I killed him with a spear. On reporting back to Prophet, he reacted painfully: Oh Osama! Why did you kill him after he testified that there is no God but Allah? I answered ‘Oh Prophet of Allah! He was uttering so for reason to save his life’. The Prophet kept on repeating this. I wished I would not accept Islam until this moment passed away’.

Another report says that the Prophet of Allah told: ‘Why did not you open his heart to know he was truthful or lying?’ Osama bin Zaid concluded: ‘I shall never kill a person who testifies there is no God but Allah.’

Killing disbeliever Kafir, except in war, is condemnable act, and is put in class of ‘worst forbidden acts’ and the killer if be a Muslim shall have to give full compensation asked by the next of the kin of the murdered person.

A great fourth century Arabian Sufi Ghazali writes in his famous book ‘Revelation of Heart Makashifat-ul-Qulub’: ‘once Prophet Mohammad addressed his companions, who were returning from a military jihad: ‘Welcome! Now you have turned up from minor jihad to a major one’. They asked: ‘Oh prophet of Allah! What is a major jihad?’ The Prophet answered back: ‘Jihad with your inner-selves is a major jihad.’- what a strong answer to Al-Qaida and Taliban.

Sufis Vs Militants

2010-12-17T23:23:00.000-08:00

Q. Do Sufis have belief-link with Prophet Mohammad?

Sufis are special persons among the community of Traditionist Muslims i.e. the largest sect of Muslims worldwide. They are always historically well connected with their predecessors and successors through proper records of will documents, tracing Sufis back to finally connect with Caliph Abu Bakr Siddique or Caliph Ali, the two spiritual successors of Prophet Mohammad.

As per Islamic belief and practice, Prophet Mohammad is the final spiritual and legislative authority connecting humans to God. Therefore, every Sufi has a mandatory oath of allegiance to Prophet at the occasion of taking charge of his office. Furthermore, Quran says that one night, Allah called upon His dearest Prophet in His court, met him and sent him back to his house, the same night. Therefore, Prophet Mohammad is the one and the only person amongst all created-beings including great angels, to ‘see Allah through his own eyes’, as he himself has described.

Among the present day Sufis of India, Quadri order Sufi Professor Syed Mohammad Amin Mian of Marehra is 45^th in succession after Caliph Ali and Chishti order Sufi Syed Babar Ashraf of Kichocha ranks 40^th.

Q. What is the chief source of guidance for militant organizations?

Before sending to the military training, Al-Qaida and Taliban militants are first educated with neo-Islamic beliefs by the scholar’s wing, for example, by the Scholars of Salafi or Deobandi scholars, respectively.

Q. What is the difference between Sufi and militants beliefs?

Islam, Christianity and Judaism are belief bound religions, based on their heavenly books. Islamic (Sufi) beliefs are like cool and soothing breeze while current neo-Islamic (militants) beliefs end up in New York twin-tower horror or self blowing off terror blast reported on Sufi shrines or packed market. Barring Essential Islamic Beliefs (EIB), Islamic Beliefs (IB) were actually established through consensus is post-Prophetic era, called the era of goodness Khair-ul-Quroon. IB were derived from the holy verses of Quran and Hadis (Prophet’s speech) by the companions of Prophet Mohammad themselves. Therefore, the companion’s original and pure beliefs were copied down in books passing century to century manifested as pan geographical faiths to finally reach to the community of the Traditionist Ahle-Sunnat wal-jamat Muslims, today. On the other hand, neo-Islamic doctrines of militant organizations are not heavenly revelation based, but attractive manipulations suiting to their ideology.

Q. Whom militants make their choice target object and why?

Sufis, their Muslim followers and all non-Muslims are militant’s targets, as they call them as idolater or polytheist Mushrik. They anticipate actual threat from ‘Sufi-idolaters’ against spreading and legitimizing Wahhabi brand of Islam in a non-Muslim or a Muslim country. Shia Muslims are also subjected to militant’s wrath.

Q. What is the meaning of Jihad for Sufis?

Sufis call a jihad an Islamic duty, as what Prophet Mohammad himself really meant.

The greatest ever Sufi and scholar jurist Syed Abdul Qadir Geelani of Baghdad writes in Victory of God Alfatah-ur-Rabbani: ‘Oh slave! Make yourself busy with reform of inner self when there is threat to integrity. You have no right to reform your family, neighbours, fellows of your city and the country at this stage. When you achieve this, first turn to reform up your family and then to other persons, but not until you put on armour of fear of Allah, helmet of faith on the head of your heart, the sword of monotheism in hands and pick up the arrows of acceptance of prayer in your quiver and ride on speeding horse with a divine guidance and learn to get perfections with the usage of sword and spear and take on the enemy of Allah. Then you will receive Allah’s help from six sides and you will get the men released from the hands of Satan and send them to the doors of the court of Allah.’

Q. Why Sufis are the biggest hurdle for terrorists worldwide?

Sufis have large following. The faiths and practices of Sufism have always been endorsed worldwide by Islamic scholars; while these are now being targeted by terrorists and their guru Wahhabi scholars under the false charges of polytheism. Sufi faiths for Prophet Mohammad are the original faiths and Sufi practices are good Islamic innovations prevalent worldwide for more than thousand years. Visiting Sufi shrines and tombs are visible signs of connectivity with past Islamic eras.

Sufis are determined to retain Prophet Mohammad as a central legislative authority for the solution of their problems being confronted today and in future as well; On the other hand, terrorists tend to eliminate him altogether from Islam for legislative purposes and want to replace Prophet Mohammad’s central and the only one-person-legislative-position (as the deputy of Allah) with their Shura-council to direct and control the whole Muslim world.

In order to exercise and enforce this, they have developed some neo-Islamic beliefs as anchor-support, which have absolutely been rejected and resisted by Sufi community throughout the Islamic world.

Q. Does an Indian Salafi or Deobandi student love Al-Qaida or Taliban?

Yes, if you are a friend of him and ask him this question, he will answer: ‘Oh yes! They are protecting Islam, I love them.’ We have thousands of young boys in every city of India who love terrorists because their parents are following Salafi or Deobandi School. The famous proverb ‘terrorists bear no religion’ is now beaten by the new one ‘terrorists have Wahhabi religion.’

Q. Did Prophet Mohammad permit anybody to kill Muslim in war or piece? Ordered to kill a disbeliever not engaged in war?

In Islamic history books, one is unable to find a single piece of evidence, Prophet permitting anybody to kill a Muslim in war or in piece.

Abusing Muslim is a sin and killing him is infidelity Kufr for someone who believes it is permitted in Islam.

Q. Who is the role model for terrorists?

Every Muslim has a deep desire to follow ‘true’ Islam. A few of them have a privilege to get it from books themselves, but still millions stay away from the books to learn by listening. An estranged Islamic scholar Mohammad bin Abdul Wahhab (1699-1792) of Najd province of Arab was first to misuse the situation. He picked up some texts of Quran and speeches of Prophet to blend and churn them to his own meanings and interpretations and serve them to common Muslims in the name of pure Islamic rules and faiths. Initially he did this in Najd province, which is far away from Mecca and Medina. When followers swelled to great number, he legitimized and imposed Wahhabi beliefs on every citizen, where disobeying resulted in tortures and murders. For this he made an accord with a local ruler Mohammad bin Saud with a dream to lay foundation of a new Arab country based on Wahhabi-Islamic constitution which finally came into full existence, after series of wins and defeats in 1934 to be renamed after the ruler as Saudi Arabia.

Mohammad bin Abdul Wahhab was just an ordinary scholar like thousands of contemporary fellows, if he would not dare to form and introduce new rules and beliefs in the name of Islam, who knew who he was.

After two centuries, he has become a role model for Al-Qaida and Taliban fighters to bring belief-changes in Sufi-beliefs-dominating-countries like Afghanistan and Pakistan with the help of methods as Mohammad bin Abdul Wahhab and Mohammad bin Saud’s duo adopted.

Q. What are the sources of money for militant organizations?

According to WikiLeaks, main militant organizations Lashkar, Taliban, Al-Qaida and Hamas main financial source is Saudi Arabia. Besides this, Qatar, Kuwait and U.A.E. Sheikhs also assist in providing money to militant organizations.

Taliban’s other financial sources are cultivation of Opium, drug-smuggling and kidnapping also.

Q. Do militants have social organizations?

Yes, Tablighi Jamat is a huge social organization sharing Taliban’s Deoband school of thought, likewise Jamiat-ul Ahle Hadis is another big social organization sharing Al-Qaida’s Salafi School, with their key books Fatawa Rashidiya and Taqviat-ul-Iman respectively. Both subscribe to faiths and ideology of the estranged scholar Mohammad bin Abdul Wahhab Najdi, recognize and recommend his militancy manual The book of Monothiesm Kitab-ul Tauheed. So they tend to be natural sympathizer and partners in rousting out Sufism from the global map, since both of these social organizations have strong International network and clout. In India and Pakistan they have their political parties and MPs in Parliament.
Q. Can Shura council overrule Prophet Muhammad?

In Islamic constitution prophet Muhammad wields a top and solo-judicial status encompassing every situation in war or peace, in every tense. But wahabi Islam denies this in some situations and now tends to overrule the prophet’s orders by their shura council for example killing non-Muslims except in war and legitimizing suicides are strictly forbidden as per prophet’s order but terrorists have been trained to do these acts. As the 18^th Century wahabi bible Taqviyat-ul-Iman fortifying faiths describes it: ‘Muhammad and Ali (Shias next) don’t possess any judicial status.’ This book enjoys religious status next to holy Quran for every devout wahabi and Deobandi after a fatwa issued by Darul-Uloom Deoband’s co-founder Maulana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi in his book Fatawa Rashidia Kamil published from Delhi. This depicts that Wahabis and Deobandis are hand-in-hand position right from the beginning.

Q. If Deoband has sufi followance?

Maulana Rashid Ahmad Gangohi was among a few greats who established Deoband. In his Fatwa book Fatawa Rashidia, for a question whether to follow the founder of wahabism, Abdul wahab Najdi or not, answered that everybody should follow him because only wahabi Islam is the correct one.

Conclusion and Humble Request:

Will the government of India, opposition in Parliament, political parties, judiciary and press come forward to save India and Sufis from impending perils of this typically faith-linked terrorism furtively loved by every Salafi and Deobandi citizen of India for they label every Indian as polytheist except themselves--what a tricky ruse to rule the countries in the name of Islam.

Inter Islamic Sect Relationship

2009-10-10T10:04:00.000-07:00

Difference between main-sect Muslims and other sects:Islam is a religion based on fixed believes on (1)Allah, His divine (2)books (Tohra, Bible and Qur’an), His (3)angels, His (4)messengers (David, Moses, Jesus Christ and last Prophet Muhammad etc), (5)destiny of men and universe, (6)doomsday and the day of (7)judgement, as reported from the teachings of Prophet Muhammad. Believe details are available in Islamic jurisprudence books. From first Hijri Century till the current date, these believes bear striking similarity among the main sect (Ahle Sunnat wal Jama’t) worldwide.

● According to centuries old consensus among Islamic scholars, anybody tempering with the Islamic believes wholly or partially shall be treated as heretic. The group of similar heretics shall be known as bad-sect. Current example: Wahhabi and Deobandi sects with global presence, which have tempered with some believes about Prophet Muhammad.

●As per Prophet Muhammad foretells, there shall be only one main sect out of seventy two bad-sects. Scores of bad-sects have emerged in past with different names assigned to them in jurisprudence books.

Commands of Prophet Muhammad to main sect Muslims on their relationship with other sect Muslims:1- ‘Don’t visit to heretics to inquire their well-being if they fell ill, don’t join their funeral procession if they die, don’t salute them when you meet, don’t join their company, don’t share with them while dining and drinking water, don’t make marital relationship with them, don’t join the funeral prayer for a dead heretic and don’t join daily prayer with them.’

(Refer to Hadith books:Muslim, Abu Daud, Ibn-e-Maja)

2- ‘If you meet a heretic, don’t show love, because Allah takes every heretic as his enemy.’

(Ref: Ibn-e-Asakir)

Commands of Abdul Wahhab Najadi, the father-originator of Wahhabi sect to his followers:
‘As all of you understand very clearly that their (main sect’s) monotheistic belief on Allah does not entertain them as Muslim, since their (polytheistic) act of seeking mediation (an Islamic faith-act, prevalent worldwide) has lawfully justified (for us) to move to their murder and loot.’
(Ref: Kashf-ush-shub-hat, Muhammad Bin Abd-al-wahhab Najadi, page 21, Riadh print)

Amir Ajmal Kasab on ‘father’ of wahhabi-sect footing-
Q: Sketch artist: ‘Kasab! Why did you do all this’?
A: ‘Because I hate (1)worshippers of idol standing erect as well as (2)worshippers of idol lying horizontal.’

1- Hindus.
2- Main sect Muslims seeking mediation on dead sufi grave.

Making a cross sign between finger and pencil, this is what Kasab told to a Muslim artist, assigned for his pencil sketch in Mumbai jail.

Source: A pir of Chishti-Ashrafi order, the artist’s spiritual guru.

Wahhabi Islam and International Terrorism

2009-06-25T02:34:00.000-07:00

The roots of Al-Qaida network are not to be found in the poverty and oppression of Arab regimes, nor in America’s global economic dominance nor in our support for the state of Israel. Instead, Osama Bin Laden and his followers come from and belong to a puritanical variant of Islam known as Wahhabism.
Stephen Schwartz- "The Two Faces of Islam”.

Q1. What are the terms wahhabi and wahhabism?
A. As Oxford Dictionary’s tenth edition defines: Wahhabi is a member of a strictly orthodox Sunni Muslim sect, the predominant religious force in Saudi Arabia, named after the founder, Muhammad Ibn Abd al-wahhab(1703-92). Stephen Schwartz, an U.S. author and Journalist in his internationally famous book ‘The two faces of Islam’ has defined the wahhabism as a fascistic cult and a puritanical variant of Islam.

Q2. Do wahhabbi host the ‘original’ Islamic beliefs?
A. Sects in Islam are recognized by beliefs; not by practices. Islamic faiths are evolved from two divine sources: Qur’an and Hadith. The differentness of beliefs depend on sect’s own meanings and interpretations of the Qur’an and Hadiths texts. Now the chief question arises: Which beliefs are the original ones? The answer is that a belief should meet two basic conditions: First, the origin of the belief should be within Prophet’s life period or within his Caliphates’ period, and second, that belief’s original size of spread should also be looked in. Since we know that Prophet’s companions came to him from various countries and returned back to their native places after taking the ‘purest’ Islamic beliefs from Prophet’s Muhammad himself. These beliefs were preserved in the books of Hadith, history, biography and various books on variety of Islamic subjects written in that period, and were available in Islamic cities and countries encompassing east to west. In this fashion Islamic beliefs continued to be propagated and preserved from century to century and have reached to us, and shall continue to go further and further through the books. The hallmark feature in preserving history of Islamic faiths is that self-made un-Islamic beliefs have always been subject of strong refutations by the majority, as the Prophet himself said: ‘Majority of my followers can’t go astray’. Facing these parameters, wahhabism is only as old as the originator of this religion itself. If wahhabi interpretations and faiths are traced back, absolutely they end up in eighteenth century and the original size of wahhabi religion was restricted to a part of Najd province only. On the other hand, the mentioned two basic conditions along with the reception of beliefs from century to century are exclusively exhibited in the community of traditional Muslims Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at and to marginal extent in secluded sect Shi’a as well, who came into existence after the end of the companion era; in late first century.
Therefore community of traditional Muslim Sect’s components Hanafi, Maliki, Sha’fay-i and Hanbal-i have always been in numerical dominance worldwide. Name any famous book on any Islamic subject written any time in Islamic history, one always finds an author who only belongs to community of traditional Muslims. Name the oldest Islamic University and find again University of Al-Azhar Cairo, name a famous sufi; one always finds him in Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at.Sixth century Islamic revivalist and greatest ever Sufi scholar Shayekh Abdul Qadir Gilani Hanbali of Baghdad has defined the community of traditional Muslim Sunnat wal-Jama’at as: The word ‘community’ is referred to the community of the companions of Prophet who established consensus upon Islamic faiths in early thirties after the demise of the Prophet, and the word ‘traditionist’is defined as the ‘followers’ of Prophet’s traditions. This concludes that throughout the course of Islamic history, traditional Muslim famous personalities have called themselves as followers of community of traditionists Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at and not just traditionist Sunni.

Q3. When and how wahhabism was founded?
A. The founder of wahhabi religion was an evil Islamic scholar Muhammad Ibn Abd al-wahhab of Najd. Najd is a desert province of Saudi Arabia. Hempher, as one of the hundreds of British missioners, was assigned the task of carrying on espionage activities in Islamic countries, befriended Muhammad Ibn Abd al-wahhab. Hempher maintained a secret work book, which was found by German secret service agent and later printed as ‘Confession of a British Spy’. Turkey’s Hakikat Kitabevi print represents this story: 'A couple of years later the Ministry of the Commonwealth managed to cajole Muhammad bin Saud, the Amir of Der’iyya in to join our lines. They sent me a messenger to inform me about this and to establish a mutual affection and cooperation between the two Muhammads. For earning Muslim hearts and trusts, we exploited our Muhammad of Najd religiously, and Muhammad bin Saud politically. It is a historical fact that states based on religion have lived longer and have been more powerful and more imposing.
Thus we continuously became more and more powerful. We made Der’iyya city our capital and we named our new religion the wahhabi religion. The Ministry supported and reinforced the wahhabi government in an underhanded way. The new government brought eleven British officers, very well learned in the Arabic language and desert warfare, under the name of slaves. Schwartz adds: ‘Der’iyya was a lawless place ruled by the whims of Al Sa’ud until 1747, when Ibn Abd al-wahhab and Al Sa’ud established a crude government based on a unique power-sharing agreement, with the former as religious authority and the later as political ruler. They contracted marriage between their families- a typical means of cementing alliances in tribal and clan-based societies- and agreed that power should be inherited exclusively by their descendents, as if their lineage carried greater authority than that of Prophet Muhammad, who neither imposed his successor nor made any attempt to establish a dynasty.’

Q4. How did newborn wahhabism was propagated?
A. After giving a thorough microscopic finish; wahhabism was floated as ‘pure Islam’, manufactured by messrs Ibn Abd al-wahhab and the British spy Hempher Company. Hempher a fluent Arabic speaker projected himself as an Islamic scholar. Muhammad Ibn al-Saud was directed to join agreement with Ibn Abd al-wahhab by the local British missionary to take charge of administration and governance, while the latter for judiciary and education, upon the territory captured by joint forces. Two centuries on, both sides are holding it in the same spirit. Since it’s inception, terrorism is the hallmark of wahhabi Islam propagation and spread.
The agreement fell disastrous on the region. His brother Suleyman Ibn Abd al-wahhab accused him of trying to add a ‘sixth pillar’ to Islam, the infallibility of Ibn Abd al-wahhab. Brother Suleyman was not spared from the torment to migrate away to safer place to pen down a book: ‘Devine thunderbolt upon wahhabi’s religion’, as dozens of books were written against this new cult from many cities based on arguments. But Ishiq Hilmi, a noted Turkey historian’s book ‘Endless Bliss’ serves the reader interest: ‘In those years, Ottoman army had been warring against exterior enemies. There was a chaos in the interior too. Though we had been at peace with France for many years, Napoleon Bonaparte had attacked Egypt with five thousand soldiers in 1213 A.H. In fight on the sea and on the land the enemy was replied from Egypt.’ ‘Further, he focuses on wahhabi terrorists: ‘In 1218 A.H., they besieged the blessed city of Mecca for three months. The Meccan ate cats, dogs, grass and leaves. At last not finding these either, they had to surrender. The wahhabis insulted and tormented the inhabitants and said: ‘Those who died after the year 500, became disbelievers. We will bring you round to Iman(renewal of beliefs). They martyred those Ahle Sunnat Muslims who would not admit wahhabism.’
They were harsher on Medina: ‘In 1220, they attacked the blessed city of Medina and raped women of Medina. They demolished all the sacred tombs and subjected the inhabitants to very bitter torture and loathsome treatment. Their chief Sa’ud gathered the people in Masjid-e-Seadat and said: ‘Oh you inhabitants of Medina! Today your religion has been completed. You have become Muslim and pleased Allah. Don’t esteem your father’s and grandfather’s superstitious religion any more. Do not remember them with mercy. All of them died as polytheists and disbelievers. Our book, explain how you will worship. Be it known that possessions and properties, the children, the wives of those who will not obey our servants are free for my soldiers. They will put you all in chains and torment you. You will no longer stand in front of the Prophet Mausoleum and say ‘Assala-mo Alaika ya Rasool Allah’(Oh Prophet of Allah! Please accept blessings). He uttered many more loathsome terms which we can’t write here.’

Q5.When and how did India receive dispensation of wahhabism?
A. It was 1212 A.H., when great Islamic scholar Shah Abd al-Aziz of Delhi, received a booklet ‘Rejecting Idolatory’ from Najd, sent by Ibn Abd al-wahhab’s son. And accidently one of his nephews Maulvi Ismail Dehalvi found it, and finished to receive a sea-change in his beliefs and thoughts, as he was altogether a different personality now to be named as the first wahhabi of India. He was strongly rebuked and denounced by all of his family members comprised of distinguished Islamic scholars but he continued propagating wahhabi beliefs in Delhi and elsewhere in the country. Finally he translated Ibn Abd al-wahhab booklet in Urdu as Fortifying Faiths Taqviyat-ul-Iman.It was first printed from Calcutta by East India Co. The founder members of Deoband seminary became admirer of Maulvi Ismail and inclined and started defending his new wahhabi ideology and beliefs through legal verdicts Fatwa.They defended Ibn Abd al-wahhab as well through their verdict book ‘Fatawa Rashidiyah’. Delhi served as India’s gateway for wahhabism, Deoband seminary as the nursery and Tabligh-i-Jamaat, an agency to dispense the cult.

Q6. What makes a wahhabi shun traditional Islam and convert to wahhabi Islam?
A. There are verses in Qur’an and Hadith which testify their emergence. Their key difference with all time numerically dominant Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at is based on insisting their own interpretation of a Qur’anic verse with covered meaning Aayat-e-Mutashabah about the human status of Prophet Muhammad to suit their heretical beliefs. Wahhabi insist that the Prophet Muhammad shares equality of human status with his followers through this verse; while traditional Muslims absolutely contradict this and present numerous verses supporting ‘Special status’ gifted by God to him, through His own verdicts, thereby enabling him to share a few selected specialties with God within limited purviews as His deputy on earth.

Q7. What differentiates wahhabi, Taliban from traditional Muslims?
A. As per Islamic jurisprudence, the supreme law making authority is Allah; He has passed this power of authority within limited purviews to His beloved and deputy Prophet Muhammad, as evident through the texts of Qur’an and Hadith. Wahhabi, Taliban outrightly disconfirm this gifted authority power of Prophet and rebuke traditional Muslim for this belief. Consequently they have sidelined the Prophet as the law maker. To meet their selfish gains, they have made their ‘self-made shariat’ laws dealing with Jihad on Muslims, insurgencies capital punishments, harsh punitive penalties and rape on Shi’a women which stand distinctly opposite to existing laws of Islamic jurisprudence. Prophet Muhammad is reported to have said: “My followers ummah will split in seventy three sects, the most mischievous them all shall be one who will deliver the judgement legitimizing the prohibited actions; and prohibiting the legitimate sanctions.” Besides, wahhabi denounce many other Qur’anic recognitions of Prophet. After 1950s, they have also destroyed many historic things, birth place, mosques and relics of Prophet Muhammad deeply loved by traditional Muslims, sending shock waves all over the Muslim world and India-Pak, as well.

Q.8 Does Islam preaches violence?
A. Schwartz writes:‘I do not believe anything in Islam led intrinsically or inevitably to September 11. If Islam had been an unrelievedly violent and aggressive religion, it would have disappeared long ago, like numerous pagan cults. I base this view on my own experience as a journalist and writer on the Balkan wars of the 1990s, during which I encountered the other face of Islam- pluralist, spiritual and committed to coexistence with the earlier Abrahamic revelations, Judaism and Christianity.

Q9. How to identify a non-traditional Muslim like wahhabi, Taliban, Mawdudi, Deobandi, Salafi or Tabligi?A. ‘The lack of central religious authority in Islam contributes to problem; for outsider it is difficult to distinguish between the margin and the mainstream, questions, Stephen Schwartz. The answer is that outward appearance does not help; but some routine questions could be helpful to extract their self made beliefs about Prophet Muhammad. Wahhabis consider the gifted and shared specialties of Prophet as idolatery and sanction traditional sufi Muslims as idolater of the Prophet through hundred of legal verdicts fatwas. So essentially they do not subscribe to traditional acts symbolizing the Prophet’s supremacy next to Allah. For example calling him Oh Prophet of God! Help me.Ya Rasul Allah al-madad, commemorating birth of Prophet Mawlud-e-Nabvi and salute him standing and chanting loudly in group or single: Oh Prophet of God! Oh friend of God! Please accept regards, as God also sends blessing upon you, are the branded acts of Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at or traditional Muslims rooted to multilayered Islamic beliefs. Seeking intercession and mediation of the Prophet, and belief of gifted life to Prophet after death, providing spiritual link to his followers are also hallmarks of traditional Muslims, which have been fired as polytheism by Saudi and Deobandi jurist scholars. Likewise other leading questions could also be asked as visiting tombs of famous soofis or joining birthday celebrations ‘Urs’ of great Sufis or participating soofi music Mahfil-e-Sim’a, which can distinguish between traditional Muslim and wahhabi. Schwartz concludes: ‘Islamic extremists seek to remove Muhammad from Islam altogether. To westerners, this seems impossible. But it is true: Islamic fundamentalists ignore the personality of the Prophet and oppose traditional Muslim’s love and admiration of his quest for compassion. As we will see, a wholesale purge of the Prophet’s personality from Islamic religion has been an essential goal of the’end time’ cult of wahhabism, which has made a serious attempt to reshape Islam in its intolerant image.’

Q10. Is Mawdudi a role-model for International terrorists?
A. Stephen Schwartz, an authority on wahhabi terrorism, now takes up the the Deobandi think tank: ‘A central figure in this process was Sayyid Abul-Ala Mawdudi(1903-1979), an Indian Muslim radical who greatly influenced the course of Arab nationalism, becoming one of the most controversial figures in recent Islamic history. Like the wahhabis, he idolized Ibn Taymiyyah and declared that the entire Ummah was characterized by unbelief. For him, traditional Muslims were living in a second period of superstition and ignorance comparable to that of the pre-Islamic Arabs of Mecca. He also condemned the mixing of diverse religious populations, blaming Muslims who lived among Hindus, or who permitted the latter to live among them, for the weakness of Indian Islam in modern. Mawdudi’s first book, Jihad in Islam appeared in 1927. In it Mawdudi argued for curtailment of the rights of non-Muslims residing under Islamic rule and the destruction of existing governments, Muslim as well secular. With more forthrightness than his wahhabi counterparts, he declared, “Islam is a revolutionary doctrine and system that overturns governments. It seeks to overturn the whole universal social order… and establish its structure anew… Islam seeks the world. It is not satisfied by a piece of land but demands the whole universe… Jihad is at the same time offensive and defensive…the Islamic party does not hesitate to utilize the means of war to implement its goal.” Based on these ideas, in 1941 Mawdudi founded a militant movement in India, the community for Islam or Jama’at-i-Islami, and his anti-Hindu doctrines and incitement to violence have been blamed for continuing conflict in Kashmir. When the Muslim world league was established by the Saudis, he was among its leading figures… Mawdudi was richly honoured by the Saudi regime and enjoys immense prestige among Muslim fundamentalists today… his obsession with political revolution was deemed un-Islamic, since traditional Islam based it guidance on knowledge and ethics rather than violence and subversion. His Muslim critics have grouped him with later figures like Hassan al-Banna and Syed Qutb (1906-1966) as seditionists whose seductive effect on young Muslims has been wholly evil.’

Q11. Does Tabligh-i-Jama’at contribute in terrorism?
A. Stephen Schwartz, a Washington bureau chief for the Jewish Forward and on editorial writer for the Voice of America, an interfaith activist in Bosnia- Herzegovina and Kosovo was a Jew- and - now a Muslim, writes: ‘Rashid acknowledges the historical continuity between wahhabism and the supporters of Mawdudi, the Muslim Brotherhood that inspired Sayyid Qutb, Saudi controlled Afghans and Hezb-ut-Tahrir. While one should not confuse the distinction between wahhabism and less extreme forms of Islamism, one should also not exaggerate the differences between the wahhabis and similar phenomena, including the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Deobandism, the Taliban and Hezb-ut-Tahrir, that may be described as wahhabized….How did Lindh find his way to Harkatul-Mujahidin? The intermediary was a secretive International Islamic group that both Lindh and Reid joined Tabligh-i-Jama’at or call to the community.
Tabligh-i-Jama’at was founded in India in the 1920s at the time of aggravated conflict between Muslims and Hindus, which has always been a pretext for the spread of wahhabism in the subcontinent. In the past Tabligh-i-Jama’at rejected the wahhabi label while claiming to stay out of politics. But in recent years it has undergone a transformation. It infiltrated the Pakistani government and was left off President Musharraf’s recent list of banned extremist organizations. However, Indian sources claim that it was a major supplier of recruits for the terrorist groups Musharraf has suppressed- groups that also supported Harkat-ul-Mujahidin, which planned to send Lindh to Kashmir. American Muslim sources say Tabligh-i-Jama’at indoctrinated its followers to fight for the Taliban and al-Qaida as well.
According to Bay Area media, John Walker Lindh attended a small mosque in San Francisco run by Tabligh-i-Jama’at presents itself as nothing more than a prayer and study circle. Published accounts of Lindh’s involvement with Tabligh-i-Jama’at quoted University of California specialist Barbara D.Metcalf, who recycles the movement’s claim that its obsessive rhetoric about Jihad refers only to ‘the Jihad of personal improvement’. Yet Metcalf herself acknowledged having heard the group was also committed to military action”, concludes Schwartz.

Q12. What measures India could adopt to prevent terrorism on Her land?
A. Saudi Arabia is determined to promote and protect wahhabi Islam at the cost of its colossal hydrocarbon energy reserves, whenever and wherever it is possible. Stephen Schwartz gives a few glimpses: In the aftermath of September 11, the Saudi authorities were asked, as allies of the United States in the anti-terror war to investigate, freeze and seize the bank accounts of participants in and contributors to terrorist activities. In addition, like other foreign carriers Saudi airlines were asked to provide advance passenger lists for flights to the United States. These requests were not specifically prompted by the discovery that 15 out of 19 terrorists involved in the attacks on New York and Washington were Saudi citizens and the long-standing awareness that most of Osama bin Laden’s funds also came from the Kingdom. Rather, they were viewed as almost perfunctory measures necessary for a coordinated response to bin Laden terrorism. But in both cases, the Saudi refused compliance.
Schwartz confirms Saudis official training to suicide bombers: ‘While Yasir Arafat condemned suicide terrorism as an impediment to the Palestinian cause, Saudi television beamed how-to instructions to potential bombers among Israeli Arabs. Nor did the Saudis cease their support for bin Laden and his network.’
Besides, man money and arm-ammunation power, ‘Cyberjihad’ and ‘Literature infiltration’ are also included in Saudi agenda: ‘Grand Mufti Shaykh Abd al-Aziz al-Alshaikh issued a fatwa authorizing a ‘Cyberjihad’ that encouraged wahhabi fanatics to hack into and disable Shi’a and non-wahhabi websites. On the other hand, the regime encourages the establishment of websites promoting hatred of non-wahhabi Islam’, adds Schwartz.
Therefore consignments of Saudi wahhabi literature reaching Delhi for free distribution should be banned because they are mistaken by simpleminded traditional Muslims as sample of ‘pure Islam’ from the holy land. Saudi money is also reliably learnt to be regularly distributed in Meerut should also be stopped to flow in. Effects of Darul-ulum Deoband and Nadva-tul-Ulema Lucknow should be diluted and national press should stop printing their fatwas, as they gain popularity through the prints in national newspapers. Their main propagational vehicle, call to community Tabligh-i-Jama’at should be banned at Aligarh Muslim University, Jamia Millia Islamia University Delhi and other government aided Muslim institutions because today’s young non-violent wahhabi mind requires only a trigger to turn violent. Mawdudi’s Jama’at-e-Islami should also be discouraged and requires press non-cooperation. On the other hand, government and national press should highlight and help Ahle Sunnat wal-Jama’at institutions like Jamia Naeemiyah of Moradabad and Al-Ja’miatul Ashrafia Mubarakpur Azamgarh. Central ministers and Chief Ministers should remove wahhabi- Deobandi assistants, secretaries and consultants from their close circles as they are the potential factors to protect their sect’s interests. State and Central Waqf board Deobandi heads should be purged and keys of affairs should reach in traditional Muslim hands. Another strong means to propagate wahhabism in India is in the hands of Imams and manager muta’wallis of mosques. Mosques built before 1960 exclusively belong to traditional Muslims therefore they should be restored back. There should be effective legal cell for traditional Muslims in cities to redress their grievances against wahhabi-Deobandi counterparts. Worth-considering point for our Hindu brothers and national leadership is that only traditional Muslims Ahle Sunnat wal Jama’at could serve as counter-terrorism force against wahhabi-Deobandi-Mawdudi terrorism. The living example could be seen in Pakistan where a Mufti of a renowned institution of Ahle-Sunnat in Lahore was assacinated by a Taliban bomber in a crowded mosque in June 2009, in a retaliatory bid for issuing fatwa forbidding suicide terrorism in Islam, as traditional Muslims have risen up against Taliban occupation of NWF province boarding Afghanistan, assisting military operations there, successfully.
India as a progressive nation of 21st century, shall have to opt one of the two faces of Islam: a face of moderation, equanimity, patience and fairness of 1400 years old traditional Ahle Sunnat-wal-Jama’at Muslims versus separation, supremacism, frenzy and aggression- the other face of Wahhabi-Taliban Muslims, just 250 years old.

"Waqf Board supporting Wahhabism":High CourtCourt No. 24
Writ Petition No. 7893 of 2009(MB)
Syed Hammad Ashraf and others ……Petitioners
Versus
State of U.P. and others ……Opposite Parties

********
Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J.
Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.
Heard Sri Umesh Chandra, Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Vikas Singh, Advocate, on behalf of the petitioners, Standing Counsel for the opposite parties nos. 1 to 4 and 6 and Sri Mohd.Arif Khan, who has put in appearance on behalf of private respondent.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that on 20.9.1991, late Ghaus Mohammad executed a power of attorney in favour of Maulana Syed Izhar Ashraf to supervise, control and construct incomplete Mosque [Masjid-e-Ghausia] and to manage it with Sunni Barelivi sect rituals. Since then the petitioners and other Muslims are offering Namaz. On account of an attempt made by Wahhabis, on 12.12.2007, to take forceful possession, the district administration intervened and consequently the Muslims following the Wahhabi Sect started prayer on the 1st floor of the Mosque whereas the Muslims of Sunni Barelvi sect offered Namaz at ground floor behind their own Imam.
It is further submitted that with a view to usurp the Sunni Waqf property, the Chief Executive Officer of the Waqf Board, who also supports the Wahhabism, passed an order dated 5.5.2009 appointing opposite party no.5 as Mutawalli. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, the Additional Superintendent of Police [Trans Gomti] passed the order dated 9.6.2009 and in the garb of the said order and in collusion with the opposite party no.5, the Station House Officer, PS Hasanganj, Lucknow, restrained the Sunni Muslims and the petitioners from offering Namaz on the ground floor of the Mosque and also evicted the ‘Imam’ [Religious Cleric] arbitrarily.
It is urged on behalf of the petitioners that the holy month of ‘Ramzan’ is going to commence from 22nd August, 2009 and every Muslim has to perform ‘Tarabih Namaz’ and other mandatory prayers like ‘Albida’ but on account of restraint, the Sunni Muslims at large and the petitioners would be denied their fundamental right to perform Namaz and other prayers.
Counsel for the petitioners has vehemently argued that the function of Muttawali [Administrator] is to manage the affairs of Mosque but he cannot restrained the petitioners and other Muslim from offering Namaz or the change the status.
Article 25 of the Constitution deals with the right to freedom of religion. The emphasis in this article is on the practice of religious freedom by individuals. The freedom guaranteed by Article 25 is to ‘profess, practice and propagate’ religion. The act of ‘practice’ is concerned primarily with religious worship, ritual and observations. The Apex Court has held that each person, whatever be his religion, must get an assurance from the State that he has the protection of law freely to profess, practice and propogate his religion and freedom of conscience, otherwise, the rule of law will become replaced by individual perceptions of one’s own presumptions of good social order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has also argued that Additional Superintendent of Police, Trans Gomti has no authority to pass the impugned order directing the Station House Officer to execute the order unless and until the order is passed by the Court of law. Therefore, the same is without jurisdiction.
Prima-facie a case for interim relief is made out.
Considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as also the fact that Ramzan is going to start very soon, the further operation and implementation of the impugned order dated 9.6.2009 passed by Additional Superintendent of Police [Trans Gomti] shall remain stayed and the opposite parties especially the district administration shall ensure that followers of Sunni Barelvi sect are allowed to perform daily Namaz behind their own Imam on the ground floor of the Mosque without any interference.
As prayed the opposite parties are allowed time to file counter affidavit within a week.
List this case on 21.8.2009 before the appropriate bench as fresh.
13.8.2009
Ajit/-

SignatureHon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J.
Hon’ble Anil Kumar, J.
13/8/09

TRUE COPY
Sig.
Section Officer
Copying Department
(Pending)
High Court Lucknow Bench
Lucknow

Note: Two Ahle-Sunnat youths protecting this Mosque from Wahhabi’s possession were murdered by Wahhabi goons. And stones fixed in interior Mosque wall inscribed with Islamic signs like ‘Ya Rasul-Allah’, ‘Ya Mohammad’ and ‘Durud’ were disfigured with sharp metal object, by Wahhabis, according to the family source Syed Babar Ashraf.